License clarifications
#3
by stefanistrate - opened
Hello!
I have found some inconsistencies between what the README says about data licensing, and what the individual recordings say.
For the XCL train split I'm seeing this distribution:
License Clips
-------------------------------------------------------
nan 122531
//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ 8439
//creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ 74
//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 47
//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ 13
//creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 10
//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ 7
TOTAL 131121
For all cumulated test_5s splits I'm seeing this distribution:
License Clips
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License 101685
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal 4414
None 62
TOTAL 106161
- Can you clarify where the
nanand missing licenses (=None) are coming from? - The README says:
The lack of a license (i.e.Each recording in the training datasets has a unique recordist and the corresponding license from XC. We omit all recordings from XC that are CC-ND.
nanorNone) is a stronger restriction than CC-ND. Can you confirm that all training recordings can be used in a non-commercial way? - The README says:
I'm still seeing recordings with CC-BY-SA and CC-BY-NC-SA. Is this an inconsistency, and those recordings were supposed to be filtered out in the first place?We exclude all recordings with a SA licenses. Every recording is NC.
- The README says:
Please clarify the missing licenses (=Each test dataset is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
None) from thetest_5ssplit.
Thanks,
Ștefan
mwirth7 changed discussion status to closed