| # Component testing | |
| [Unit testing your Redux actions and reducers](unit-testing.md) is nice, but you | |
| can do even more to make sure nothing breaks your application. Since React is | |
| the _view_ layer of your app, let's see how to test Components too! | |
| <!-- TOC depthFrom:2 depthTo:6 withLinks:1 updateOnSave:1 orderedList:0 --> | |
| - [Shallow rendering](#shallow-rendering) | |
| - [react-testing-library](#react-testing-library) | |
| - [Snapshot testing](#snapshot-testing) | |
| - [Behavior testing](#behavior-testing) | |
| <!-- /TOC --> | |
| ## Shallow rendering | |
| React provides us with a nice add-on called the Shallow Renderer. This renderer | |
| will render a React component **one level deep**. Lets take a look at what that | |
| means with a simple `<Button>` component. | |
| This component renders a `<button>` element containing a checkmark icon and some | |
| text: | |
| ```javascript | |
| // Button.js | |
| import React from 'react'; | |
| import CheckmarkIcon from './CheckmarkIcon'; | |
| function Button(props) { | |
| return ( | |
| <button className="btn" onClick={props.onClick}> | |
| <CheckmarkIcon /> | |
| {React.Children.only(props.children)} | |
| </button> | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| export default Button; | |
| ``` | |
| _Note: This is a [state**less** ("dumb") component](../js/README.md#architecture-components-and-containers)_ | |
| It might be used in another component like this: | |
| ```javascript | |
| // HomePage.js | |
| import Button from './Button'; | |
| function HomePage() { | |
| return <Button onClick={this.doSomething}>Click me!</Button>; | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| _Note: This is a [state**ful** ("smart") component](../js/README.md#architecture-components-and-containers)!_ | |
| When rendered normally with the standard `ReactDOM.render` function, this will | |
| be the HTML output | |
| (_Comments added in parallel to compare structures in HTML from JSX source_): | |
| ```html | |
| <button> <!-- <Button> --> | |
| <i class="fa fa-checkmark"></i> <!-- <CheckmarkIcon /> --> | |
| Click Me! <!-- { props.children } --> | |
| </button> <!-- </Button> --> | |
| ``` | |
| Conversely, when rendered with the shallow renderer, we'll get a String | |
| containing this "HTML": | |
| ```html | |
| <button> <!-- <Button> --> | |
| <CheckmarkIcon /> <!-- NOT RENDERED! --> | |
| Click Me! <!-- { props.children } --> | |
| </button> <!-- </Button> --> | |
| ``` | |
| If we test our `Button` with the normal renderer and there's a problem | |
| with the `CheckmarkIcon` then the test for the `Button` will fail as well. | |
| This makes it harder to find the culprit. Using the _shallow_ renderer, we isolate | |
| the problem's cause since we don't render any other components other than the | |
| one we're testing! | |
| The problem with the shallow renderer is that all assertions have to be done | |
| manually, and you cannot do anything that needs the DOM. | |
| ## react-testing-library | |
| In order to write more maintainable tests which also resemble more closely the way | |
| our component is used in real life, we have included [react-testing-library](https://github.com/kentcdodds/react-testing-library). | |
| This library renders our component within an actual DOM and provides utilities for querying it. | |
| Let's give it a go with our `<Button />` component, shall we? First, let's check that it renders our component with its | |
| children, if any, and second that it handles clicks. | |
| This is our test setup: | |
| ```javascript | |
| import React from 'react'; | |
| import { render, fireEvent } from 'react-testing-library'; | |
| import Button from '../Button'; | |
| describe('<Button />', () => { | |
| it('renders and matches the snapshot', () => {}); | |
| it('handles clicks', () => {}); | |
| }); | |
| ``` | |
| ### Snapshot testing | |
| Let's start by ensuring that it renders our component and no changes happened to it since the last time it was | |
| successfully tested. | |
| We will do so by rendering it and creating a _[snapshot](https://jestjs.io/docs/en/snapshot-testing)_ | |
| which can be compared with a previously committed snapshot. If no snapshot exists, a new one is created. | |
| For this, we first call `render`. This will render our `<Button />` component into a _container_, by default a | |
| `<div>`, which is appended to `document.body`. We then create a snapshot and `expect` that this snapshot is the same as | |
| the existing snapshot, taken in a previous run of this test and committed to the repository. | |
| ```javascript | |
| it('renders and matches the snapshot', () => { | |
| const text = 'Click me!'; | |
| const { container } = render(<Button>{text}</Button>); | |
| expect(container.firstChild).toMatchSnapshot(); | |
| }); | |
| ``` | |
| `render` returns an object that has a property `container` and yes, this is the container our | |
| `<Button />` component has been rendered in. | |
| As this is rendered within a _normal_ DOM we can query our | |
| component with `container.firstChild`. This will be our subject for a snapshot. | |
| Snapshots are placed in the `__snapshots__` folder within our `tests` folder. Make sure you commit | |
| these snapshots to your repository. | |
| Great! So, now if anyone makes any change to our `<Button />` component the test will fail and we get notified of what | |
| changed. | |
| ### Behavior testing | |
| Onwards to our last and most advanced test: checking that our `<Button />` handles clicks correctly. | |
| We'll use a [mock function](https://jestjs.io/docs/en/mock-functions) for this. A mock function is a function that | |
| keeps track of _if_, _how often_, and _with what arguments_ it has been called. We pass this function as the `onClick` handler to our component, | |
| simulate a click and, lastly, check that our mock function was called: | |
| ```javascript | |
| it('handles clicks', () => { | |
| const onClickMock = jest.fn(); | |
| const text = 'Click me!'; | |
| const { getByText } = render(<Button onClick={onClickMock}>{text}</Button>); | |
| fireEvent.click(getByText(text)); | |
| expect(onClickSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | |
| }); | |
| ``` | |
| Our finished test file looks like this: | |
| ```javascript | |
| import React from 'react'; | |
| import { render, fireEvent } from 'react-testing-library'; | |
| import Button from '../Button'; | |
| describe('<Button />', () => { | |
| it('renders and matches the snapshot', () => { | |
| const text = 'Click me!'; | |
| const { container } = render(<Button>{text}</Button>); | |
| expect(container.firstChild).toMatchSnapshot(); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles clicks', () => { | |
| const onClickMock = jest.fn(); | |
| const text = 'Click me!'; | |
| const { getByText } = render(<Button onClick={onClickMock}>{text}</Button>); | |
| fireEvent.click(getByText(text)); | |
| expect(onClickSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| ``` | |
| And that's how you unit test your components and make sure they work correctly! | |
| Also have a look at our example application. It deliberately shows some variations of implementing tests with | |
| react-testing-library. | |
| _Continue to learn how to test your components [remotely](remote-testing.md)!_ | |