text
stringlengths
0
1.99k
+ download an executable
+ perhaps decrypt the executable
+ execute the executable
Frankly I see nothing wrong with this, but apparently Microsoft disagrees!
A funny quirk about behavioral analysis, though, is that it relies on
identifying the behavior of a given execution context, not the sum of its
executions. In order for behavioral analysis to succeed, the bad behaviors
which happen in combination need to happen within the same execution
context. If we split the three tasks above into three separate execution
contexts-- download, decrypt and execute-- will this be sufficient to
bypass the behavioral detection?
Yes! While I did not reverse-engineer NisSrv.exe to see the why's of why I
evaded, the theory of splitting up tasks across execution contexts
succeeded in bypassing Defender. The payload thus evolved into an
interesting multistage payload. The user would have to run the infected
executable multiple times before a sheep would appear. This would have
the added benefit of confusing stealth. Where is the sheep coming from?
Why does it keep happening when I run this program? Baffling! But
adorable. In this way, Broodsac lives up to the name of the multi-staged
worm it was named after, the green-banded broodsac.[9]
Our zen garden is tended, and ready to be shared, for others to meditate
upon and ponder for their own gardens. For that meditation, the various
code objects contained in the tarball attached to this article have been
annotated with comments to explain the individual code areas and what
they're doing. Naturally, the complexity of the dinosaur that is the PE
format comes with annoying, disgusting tricks and habits that make one
ashamed of their code in the first place. I apologize on Mark Zbikowski's
behalf.
--[ 6. Conclusions
It is without a doubt that the strange developmental anomalies you see
within wild samples of malware are the byproduct of some sort of build
system. SmokeLoader's use of encrypted functions is certainly not a
feature of the MSVC compiler[10]. But even a nasty rewrite of a C-file
being dumped into a directory for an IDE to compile, while quick and dirty
as we hackers love to do, would technically count as a build system. After
all, the Visual Studio IDE is merely a shell for the build system that is
MSVC. But as virus writers, we are still technically engineers at the end
of the day. We long for the beautiful solution to the problem.
We ultimately want our own little zen garden to tend to.
The beauty of CMake in particular is in the fact that it's cross-platform.
So if you have code-- for example, an obfuscation engine-- that is capable
of being used on multiple platforms, CMake can be used to make building
the project on each platform relatively painless. Just like how CMake
wrangles MSVC, it can also wrangle the complex build environment that is
GNU Make. Many other build targets are supported-- but some not as fully
as MSVC and GNU. Exotic targets may have some difficulty.
I hope I have made a good argument for incorporating build systems into
your payload development. While we can certainly get by with surface shell
scripts, wouldn't it be wonderful to get into the guts of the machine at
the linker level? Linux developers have that privilege, why not liberate
that access on Windows? After all, we're all effectively the demons of our
target operating systems-- we lurk at the lowest level of the machine, and
we love it here.
--[ 7. Shouts
0x6d6e647a for editing, dc949 for being family, slop pit for memes and
hardchats.
--[ 8. References
[1]: 40Hex #8: An Introduction to Nonoverwriting Virii, Part II: EXE
Infectors,
ERROR: type should be string, got " https://amethyst.systems/zines/40hex8/40HEX-8.007.txt"
[2]: 29A #6: W32.Shrug, by roy g biv,
ERROR: type should be string, got " https://amethyst.systems/zines/29a6/29A-6.615.txt"
[3]: 29A #2: PE infection under Win32,
ERROR: type should be string, got " https://amethyst.systems/zines/29a2/29A-2.3_1.txt"
[4]: https://github.com/Adrianotiger/desktopPet
[5]: https://github.com/commial/experiments/tree/master/windows-defender
/VDM
[6]: https://github.com/matterpreter/DefenderCheck
[7]: https://github.com/rasta-mouse/ThreatCheck
[8]: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5
/security-compliance-and-identity
/enhancements-to-behavior-monitoring-and-network-inspection
/ba-p/247706
[9]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leucochloridium_paradoxum
[10]: https://www.sentinelone.com/blog
/going-deep-a-guide-to-reversing-smoke-loader-malware/,
see "Decoding the Buffer"
--[ 9. Artifacts
begin 644 broodsac.tar.gz
M'XL(`````````^P]:W?;-K+][%^!9KNI9$N.93O>['7L<V1)KG6O+/E(<K*]
MV5P>2H0L-A2I)2D[WC;__<[@10"D'G;<;;MK?6@L<#`8S`SF";&C.(J\Q!V_
M:ERZGVC'3])D-_V<?O.4GSWX'!T>XK^UO[S>T__%3^WUT>MO:H>O_[)_N'^X
M]_KH&QC9.]C_ANP]*15+/HLD=6-"OIDOXGE`E\.M>_X'_8QG('9GYH?^;#%S
M8OJ/A1]3K_2NU1^T>UURL%M[7=[:FL?13W2<ED9"6TB#U`>73A?^4]Y*:%IJ