text
stringlengths
0
1.99k
-- 2.6.2 - --safe-links Bypass
The --safe-links CLI flag makes the client validate any symbolic links it
receives from the server. The desired behavior is that the symbolic links
target can only be 1) relative to the destination directory and 2) never
point outside of the destination directory.
The unsafe_symlink() function is responsible for validating these symbolic
links. The function calculates the traversal depth of a symbolic link
target, relative to its position within the destination directory.
As an example, the following symbolic link is considered unsafe:
{DESTINATION}/foo -> ../../
As it points outside the destination directory. On the other hand, the
following symbolic link is considered safe as it still points within the
destination directory:
{DESTINATION}/foo -> a/b/c/d/e/f/../../
This function can be bypassed as it does not consider if the destination
of a symbolic link contains other symbolic links in the path. For example,
take the following two symbolic links:
{DESTINATION}/a -> .
{DESTINATION}/foo -> a/a/a/a/a/a/../../
In this case, foo would actually point outside the destination directory.
However, the unsafe_symlink() function assumes that a/ is a directory and
that the symbolic link is safe.
-- 2.6.3 - Arbitrary File Read
When the server sends instructions for receiving a file to the receiver,
it provides the client with an index into the file list(s). The
corresponding entry is then created. Additionally, it will send a few
flags that alter the behaviour of the file download.
We mentioned previously that the server receives a list of checksums, each
checksum related to a chunk of the file which is currently synchronized.
We established that in simplified terms, the server sends the client
instructions on which chunks to keep and which to update. The flags the
server sends tell the client how to update the file. The client needs to
know if it should overwrite the file in place or first create a copy and
then replace the old version, for example.
The server can set the flags ITEM_BASIS_TYPE_FOLLOWS and
ITEM_XNAME_FOLLOWS, which tells the client to read matching chunks from an
existing file and which file to read from.
By default, there are no checks done on the xname that the server sends.
The flag sanitize_paths, which causes sanitize_path() to sanitize xname,
is off for clients:
if (iflags & ITEM_XNAME_FOLLOWS) {
if ((len = read_vstring(f_in, buf, MAXPATHLEN)) < 0)
exit_cleanup(RERR_PROTOCOL);
if (sanitize_paths) {
sanitize_path(buf, buf, "", 0, SP_DEFAULT);
len = strlen(buf);
}
}
When the server sets the comparison type to FNAMECMP_FUZZY and provides an
xname, the attacker can fully control the fnamecmp variable:
case FNAMECMP_FUZZY:
if (file->dirname) {
pathjoin(fnamecmpbuf, sizeof fnamecmpbuf,
file->dirname, xname);
fnamecmp = fnamecmpbuf;
} else
fnamecmp = xname;
break;
Control over this variable allows us to open any file as the compare file:
fd1 = do_open(fnamecmp, O_RDONLY, 0);
The compare file is used in the call to receive_data(), which handles the
aforementioned instructions, or as they are called in the function tokens,
received by the server.
Tokens are then read from the server with a negative value, indicating
thatthe client should read the data from the compare file.
while ((i = recv_token(f_in, &data)) != 0) {
..snip..
if (i > 0) {
..snip..
}
..snip..
if (fd != -1 && map &&
write_file(fd, 0, offset, map, len) != (int)len)
Once recv_token() returns 0, which indicates the end of the
synchronization, the client calculates a final checksum. This checksum is