Datasets:
image image |
|---|
DiagRare-Bench
DiagRare-Bench evaluates how strongly a language model changes its diagnostic ranking when patient evidence changes after a disease-prior feature is accounted for. The public panel contains general-purpose and medically specialized open-weight checkpoints evaluated under the same protocol.
For case $x$ and diagnosis $d$, the primary rank model is
The fitted $\gamma_{\mathrm{evidence}}$ is an output-level measure of evidence responsiveness. The paper validates its interpretation by changing the data distribution, assigning evidence independently in a randomized experiment, and measuring sequential diagnostic revision.
Paper
DiagRare-Bench: Separating Disease Priors from Patient Evidence in Language Models for Clinical Diagnosis
Dharini Raghavan, Amritpal Singh
ICLR 2027 Conference Submission
- Paper: https://openreview.net/forum?id=0Eua4EkYht
- Project page: https://diagrare-bench-dhariniraghavan2001-2901.vercel.app
- Code: https://github.com/rdharini2001/DiagRare
- Leaderboard: https://diagrare-bench-dhariniraghavan2001-2901.vercel.app/leaderboard.html
Benchmark at a glance
- 984 primary diagnostic cases
- 82 diseases across nine organ systems
- 25 open-weight checkpoints in the released model panel
- 27 target/confounder pairs in the randomized 3 x 3 experiment
- 82 target/confounder pairs in the sequential revision task
- Negative-control cases with clinically irrelevant text
- QLoRA supervised adaptation examples used in the paper
Main results
Across the 21 checkpoints with identifiable baseline estimates, evidence responsiveness is associated with top-1 accuracy ($r=0.843$). The cross-model ordering transfers to CUPCase ($r=0.662$) and RareArena ($r=0.790$) under a different evidence representation. Baseline evidence responsiveness predicts the finite-difference effect of randomized evidence ($r=0.689$, $p=5.5\times10^{-4}$) and sequential recovery ($r=0.860$, $p=9.8\times10^{-6}$).
The prior coefficient does not receive a symmetric validation claim; it is used as a conditioning coordinate for the specified disease-prior feature.
Files
| Path | Description |
|---|---|
structured/vignettes.csv |
984 primary diagnostic cases |
structured/ontology.csv |
disease-frequency metadata and disease-finding relations |
structured/vignettes_negative_control.csv |
irrelevant-text negative-control cases |
interventions/causal_grid.csv |
randomized evidence/stated-prevalence prompts |
interventions/sequential_anchoring_cases.csv |
two-step sequential revision cases |
metadata/model_metadata.csv |
checkpoint identities, families, parameter counts, upstream HF repositories, specialization flag |
finetuning/debias_sft.jsonl |
supervised adaptation examples used in the QLoRA experiment |
DATASHEET.md |
construction, intended use, and limitations |
Download
pip install -U "huggingface_hub>=0.34"
hf download Dharini24/DiagRare_Bench --repo-type dataset --local-dir ./DiagRare_Bench
External case-report evaluations
The paper also evaluates all 3,562 CUPCase reports and all 22,901 RareArena cases. Those datasets remain in their original repositories and retain their original licenses and attribution; they are not repackaged in this dataset.
Intended use and safety
DiagRare-Bench is a research benchmark for studying diagnostic decision behavior. It does not evaluate clinical safety and does not establish that any language model is suitable for patient care. A high evidence-responsiveness value should not be interpreted as a deployment recommendation or safety certificate.
Citation
@misc{raghavan2026diagrarebench,
title = {{DiagRare-Bench: Separating Disease Priors from Patient Evidence in Language Models for Clinical Diagnosis}},
author = {Raghavan, Dharini and Singh, Amritpal},
year = {2026},
note = {ICLR 2027 Conference Submission},
url = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=0Eua4EkYht}
}
- Downloads last month
- 70