Datasets:
Scoring
DocuBench scores schema-guided extraction output against hand-verified JSON labels. The scorer is intentionally small and inspectable; the canonical implementation is scorer.py.
Inputs
Each scoring call takes:
result: the system output JSON object, usually from the top-leveldatakey inresults/<system>/<doc_id>.jsonschema: the JSON Schema inschemas/<doc_id>.jsonlabel: the hand-verified target JSON inlabels/<doc_id>.json
The schema determines which fields are scored.
Normalization
Before comparison:
- numeric values are cast to floats and rounded to six decimal places
- strings are lowercased
- whitespace is removed from strings
- punctuation and non-word separators are removed from strings
- empty strings, empty arrays, and empty objects are stripped
nullis preserved because it can represent an intentional labeled value
This normalization is meant to avoid penalizing harmless formatting differences. It is not semantic matching.
Non-Array Fields
Non-array leaves are scored as binary exact matches after normalization.
- matching leaf:
1 - mismatching leaf:
0 - both sides empty: skipped
- one side empty: mismatch
The non-array score is correct / total over scored leaf fields.
Array Fields
Arrays are scored order-independently.
- Each labeled item is compared with each predicted item.
- Item similarity is computed as binary leaf-field accuracy over the union of leaves present in either item.
- The scorer greedily assigns the highest-scoring label/result item pairs without reusing either side.
- Unmatched label or result items count against the score through the denominator.
Array scores are weighted by the average non-empty leaf count in labeled array items. This keeps the final score approximately leaf-weighted rather than array-count-weighted.
Aggregate Metric
For one document, the final score is a weighted average across array and non-array components.
For a system, the headline benchmark score is the macro average of per-document final scores. Each document contributes equally to the headline aggregate.
Known Tradeoffs
- Array matching is greedy, not globally optimal.
- String matching is normalized exact matching, not semantic equivalence.
- Extra fields outside the schema are ignored for non-array objects.
- Extra fields inside array items can affect item-level similarity because array item comparison uses the union of leaves.
- Field-specific tolerances are not yet expressed in schema metadata.
These tradeoffs are documented so scores are interpretable and reproducible. Changes to scoring behavior should be treated as benchmark-version changes.