text stringlengths 1 10.7k | label sequencelengths 1 3 | class sequencelengths 1 3 | CoT stringlengths 0 1.44k |
|---|---|---|---|
Where does the pressure come from when people ask questions the status quo doesn't like? Who profits by limiting the window of appropriate topics? I wish some people would focus on investigating these two questions on this sub. I think a lot of progress could be made and a lot of eyes opened if we started answering ... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it does not target or attack any specific individual or group based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it questions the status quo and the motivations of those who limit the discussion of... |
It is illegal to download the New Zealand mosque shooting. The phrasing was really sketchy, they said "download to your screen" or something like that, possibly implying just watching the video is a crime. I'm also really disappointed r/watchpeopledie was banned. I get it from a PR perspective, but I can't help but fee... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've described is not hate speech because it is a statement about a legal matter, specifically the illegality of downloading the New Zealand mosque shooting video. The phrasing may be unclear, but it does not contain any language that targets or discriminates against a specific group of people based on th... |
We could always go back to Web 1.0/2.0
Peer 2 Peer, RSS early chat programs. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message does not contain any explicit or implicit expressions of hatred, discrimination, or violence towards any specific group of people. It is a statement about a technological evolution, comparing the early stages of the internet (Web 1.0/2.0) to later stages, and mentioning specific features such as Peer-to-Pee... |
Zoomers are aware of this and becoming increasingly conservative compared to millennials. Sometimes I think, even as a millennial myself (97), maybe millennials are the problem. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not necessarily constitute hate speech for several reasons:
1. It does not incite violence or hatred towards a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity.
2. It expresses an opinion, albeit a c... |
You're acting like there's no difference between porn and this... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "You're acting like there's no difference between porn and this..." is not hate speech because it does not target a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a statement expressing a disagreement or criticism abo... |
Your opinion of what is dangerous is not sufficient justification for removing another person's ability to view direct sources. Direct sources are by nature a fact of reality. Erasing them is akin to an attempt to remove reality. Only dictators and propagandists 'need' to remove reality. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it does not target or attack a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a statement about the importance of access to information and the dangers of censorship. It does not advocate fo... |
It all starts with 911 | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "It all starts with 911" is not necessarily hate speech. This phrase is often used in reference to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States. The attacks are a significant historical event that had profound impacts on the world, particularly in terms of foreign policy, security measures... |
I've been using for over a year and my you can not tell me it's "just as good " because it's not but I do recommend switching and what you can't find use google but I agree otherwise | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech. Hate speech is typically characterized by expressions of hatred, prejudice, or intolerance towards individuals or groups based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or other personal characteristics.
In this case, the message is a... |
Yeah let's censor everything and pretend the world is Disneyland instead of having people just be responsible parents that monitor what their children view online. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided is not hate speech because it does not target or incite harm against a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it expresses a critical opinion about the idea of censorship and the responsibility of pa... |
It's because society would rather just blame Islamophobia/gun laws/video games/the right than admit that the problem is society itself.
We'll never stop this kind of thing if we don't face up to the grievances of these people, if we just keep writing them off as lunatics.
Obviously they are lunatics but they did... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it does not target or attack a specific group of people based on their race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a critique of society as a whole, suggesting that it has a role in creating the conditio... |
What's interesting to me is when these shooters fit a certain profile we never see enough of them. When they don't support a preconceived narrative all the information is scrubbed from existence. Compare say Sandy Hook or Aurora vs Las Vegas, Scalise, and New Zealand. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is expressing a critical observation about the media's handling of certain events, specifically mass shootings. The speaker is pointing out a perceived inconsistency in the way certain shootings are covered, suggesting that some shootings receive less attention or scrutiny if t... |
It's called a Thought Crime | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "It's called a Thought Crime" is not considered hate speech because it does not directly incite violence, discrimination, or harassment against a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics. Instead, it is a statement that refers to ... |
Swatrz was a hero - He'd be turning in his grave now your right. Theres a great doco on him called Killswitch. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is not intended to incite violence, discrimination, or hatred against a particular group or individual. Instead, it is a statement of opinion about a historical figure, Swartz, and his actions. The message also refers to a documentary about Swartz, which suggests that the speak... |
Not just this.
Ensure Your DNS is not 8.8.8.8 or 4.4.4.4, otherwise you are sending all your web destinations to google.
Delete chrome
Ditch Android, or use a de-googled version. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is providing advice and warnings about potential privacy issues related to the use of certain services (Google DNS, Chrome, and Android) and suggesting alternatives (using a different DNS, deleting Chrome, and using a de-googled version of Android). It does not attack or discri... |
They've always acted this way of course, but the far left has really gotten out of hand lately. Much like the radical right most people just left of center increasingly seem to live inside their own dogma and the blinders are permanently up. The radical right is going to be emboldened by the left's behavior and I'm con... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message does not explicitly target or dehumanize any specific group of people based on their race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics. Instead, it expresses a critical view of political ideologies, specifically the "far left" and the "radical right," and the percei... |
The issue is censorship, and no, most of the people that want to see that video can't find it.
Because it's been censored. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is expressing a viewpoint about censorship, which is a topic of public interest and debate. The message is critical of censorship, and it is stating a fact that the video in question is not accessible to many people due to censorship. The message does not target or attack any s... |
This is how it should play out but it's not looking good. The space reserved for philosophy and satire is currently gripped by the dead fingers of the past, it's a machine that won't allow opposing thought. Our only hope is free platforms on the internet, and the machine is already present there. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message expresses a critical opinion about the current state of philosophy and satire, specifically pointing out that it is dominated by outdated ideas and lacks openness to new or opposing thoughts. It also suggests that the only hope for change lies in free platforms on the internet. While the message may be crit... |
Please point me towards more info on this, or give me a hint at what you're referring to. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not qualify as hate speech for several reasons:
1. It does not contain any content that targets, threatens, or insults a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability.
2. The message is a request for informatio... |
I found it in about one minute after following a Google auto complete suggestion. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not contain any content that is typically considered hate speech. Hate speech is generally defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender, or disability. The message you've provided is simply a statem... |
I agree, but be aware that in nature these changes are not ever what you expect or in any way pretty, even if the outcome is beautiful. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided is not hate speech because it does not target a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a statement about the natural world and the changes that occur within it, which may not always ... |
I get what you are saying, but "There exists a problem" is just as factual as "There exists 25,009 of a thing". It's verifiable. It's even verifiable if you include the word serious. People are concerned about it nationwide, no one has a solution, the costs are high, it's in the national discourse. These are all object... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it does not contain any language that is intended to harm, threaten, or incite violence against a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, the message is discussing a political is... |
Has it become a literal crime? An actual criminal offense?
Not being sarcastic, I don't know and it seems possible? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech for several reasons:
1. It does not target a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics.
2. It does not use derogatory or offensive language.
3. It does not incite violence or hatre... |
It's annudah shoah!! | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "It's annudah shoah!!!" is not necessarily hate speech, although it can be interpreted as such depending on the context in which it is used. The term "Shoah" is a Hebrew word that means catastrophe or holocaust, and it is commonly used to refer to the genocide of six million Jews during World War II. Howeve... |
They put out a documentary about him called "Anonymous" which is a complete fraud starting with the title. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is expressing an opinion about a documentary, specifically that it is a "fraud" and the title is misleading. The message does not target or attack a specific individual or group based on their race, religion, nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, or any other prot... |
What's weird is there's tons of real gore that isn't censored. I don't get off on watching it, it makes me sick to my stomach. But, if I get a whiff of people saying its a hoax, psyop, or false flag you can watch it and it looks fake literally every time, even when people are saying OMG Extremely graphic!! | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message does not contain any explicit or implicit expressions of hatred towards a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it expresses a personal opinion about the depiction of violence in media, specifically in t... |
> This is 1984. The new internet will be only MSM viewpoints. In the next few years it will be IMPOSSIBLE to find non-MSM viewpoints.
It should be clear at this point that for information to continue spreading on the internet, we have to go back to the old days and start hosting BBSs and setting up webrings of relat... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is expressing a concern about the potential for censorship and homogenization of viewpoints on the internet, and suggesting a solution to this problem by advocating for the creation of decentralized platforms for information sharing, such as BBSs and webrings. It does not targe... |
It's called being sensitive. 50 people are dead and you are whining about not being able to talk about their deaths. You know how entitled you sound right now? Those people are DEAD. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not necessarily constitute hate speech, but it does contain elements that could be perceived as insensitive or disrespectful. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender, o... |
How do i get a degoogled version or a better phone path? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not contain hate speech. It is a question asking for information about obtaining a "degoogled" version of a phone or a better phone path. The term "degoogled" refers to a device that has had Google services removed, often for privacy reasons. The question is not directed at any specific... |
I think AI driven planes and public transit will be introduced in our children's future, and our children's Children's futures will have them be more commonplace.
You look at a computer like Watson that can diagnose medical cases with high accuracy and yet doctors still have jobs. Just because the technology exists... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message does not contain any explicit or implicit expressions of hatred, discrimination, or violence towards any specific group of people. It is a statement about the potential future development and acceptance of AI-driven technology in various industries, particularly transportation. The message does not target o... |
Sounds a lot like Skynet to me! Judgement Day may very well still be upon us gentlemen. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you provided appears to be a reference to the fictional artificial intelligence system, Skynet, from the Terminator movie franchise. In these films, Skynet is portrayed as a self-aware, autonomous AI system that becomes a threat to humanity, leading to a series of events known as "Judgement Day."
The speak... |
What if I have google WiFi : / | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "What if I have Google WiFi : /" is not hate speech because it does not contain any content that targets, threatens, or insults a group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it appears to be a statemen... |
Duck doesn't use targeted results. Google does. It cannot provide the same specificity and accuracy.
The difference is marginal for many day to day searches. Google still exists when you need it. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message does not contain any explicit or implicit expressions of hatred, discrimination, or violence towards any specific group or individual. It is a comparison between two search engines, DuckDuckGo and Google, in terms of their search results accuracy and specificity. The message does not demean, threaten, or in... |
Thats the whole idea.
How will TPTB control the narrative if everyone is challenging and questioning. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message does not contain any explicit threats, slurs, or expressions of violence, and it does not target any specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics. Instead, it appears to be a commentary on a political or social issue, expressing a con... |
Google is pretty damn close. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "Google is pretty damn close." is not considered hate speech because it does not contain any content that targets, threatens, or insults a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. Instead, it appears to be a casual express... |
I use yandex.ru.
It's like the internet before censorshit. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "I use yandex.ru. It's like the internet before censorship." is not hate speech because it does not target or attack a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a statement about the u... |
You see the problem with this is that google DNS is much better than the DNS provided with ISP's in Australia - heaps of shit is DNS blocked here, and we use google DNS to access a lot of stuff. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is expressing an opinion about a service provided by Google and ISPs in Australia. The message does not target or attack any specific individual or group based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a statement... |
Does anyone know what is flashing out of his rifle while he is in the car & getting out of the car?
It's not firing but it looks exactly like it is firing.
Around 5:00mins to 6:10. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is a question asking for information about an observation made by the person posting the message. The question does not contain any language that is intended to incite violence, hatred, or discrimination against any specific group of people. It is simply a request for clarifica... |
You don't have to use Google, I'd actually recommend against it. The same trick works on most any web search platform. I was just making the point that even though YouTube is owned by Google, using this kind of workaround will still get better results than the native search function. Even with Google filtering web sear... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it does not express hatred or discrimination towards a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is offering an alternative to using Google for web searches and suggesting that ... |
Looks like an LED light similar to car lights where the camera captures the strobe effect. We can't see it normally though. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you provided does not contain hate speech. Hate speech is defined as speech or expression that incites violence, discrimination, or hatred against a particular group based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other personal characteristics. The message you prov... |
No it isn't by a long way. And he's not. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "No it isn't by a long way. And he's not" does not qualify as hate speech for several reasons:
1. Lack of personal attacks: The message does not contain any personal attacks, slurs, or derogatory language directed towards an individual or a group based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, g... |
Money is free speech in the good ole US of A... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "Money is free speech in the good ole US of A..." is not considered hate speech because it does not incite violence, discrimination, or hatred against a specific group of people based on their race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics. The statement is a... |
But free-speech is just an excuse too say hateful and bigoted things!!! /s | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided is a sarcastic comment, indicated by the "/s" at the end, which stands for "sarcasm." Sarcasm is a form of irony that uses words in a way that suggests the opposite of their literal meaning to convey contempt, scorn, or ridicule. In this case, the speaker is mocking the idea that free speech... |
I checked the sites that are hosting it and most users are toxic. We as the human race are so fucked. There is so much hate. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message expresses a personal opinion about the behavior of a group of people (users of certain sites) and the state of humanity as a whole. It does not advocate for violence, discrimination, or the harm of any specific group of people, and it does not incite others to do so. Therefore, it is not hate speech.
Hate ... |
You can talk about it. Why do you want to see the video though? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not qualify as hate speech for several reasons:
1. It does not incite violence or hatred towards a specific group of people based on their race, religion, nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, or any other characteristic.
2. It does not use derogatory or offensive langua... |
Listen and believe. That's all you need to do to be a good boi. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "Listen and believe. That's all you need to do to be a good boi." is not hate speech because it does not advocate for violence, discrimination, or the harassment of any specific group of people. Instead, it appears to be a humorous and playful statement, using the term "boi" as a colloquial term for a good ... |
I hate the "but it's a private company so x and x laws don't apply" argument. Just because it's legal to do something doesn't mean it's the smart or moral thing to do. For example, I'm fully within my legal rights to sell all my possessions and gamble it away in Vegas, but it doesn't mean it's smart or that I should do... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided is not hate speech because it does not target or attack a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a general statement about the ethical implications of legal actions, using a hypothet... |
That is why you should use Duckduckgo. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "That is why you should use Duckduckgo" is not hate speech because it does not contain any content that targets, threatens, or insults a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it i... |
Welcome to the non-independent social media.
No matter how you look at it, a commercially owned entity will not give you a free platform.
So relax. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message does not contain any explicit threats, slurs, or incitement to violence, which are common characteristics of hate speech. Instead, it is a statement of fact about the nature of social media platforms, which are typically owned by commercial entities and funded through advertising revenue. The message also d... |
-5 social credit points for you | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "-5 social credit points for you" is not considered hate speech because it does not contain any content that promotes violence, discrimination, or hatred towards a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics.
The message ... |
Or use givero.com \- directs advertising revenue to charities. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "Or use givero.com - directs advertising revenue to charities" is not hate speech for several reasons:
1. It does not contain any content that promotes hatred or violence towards a group or individual based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or disability.
2.... |
That's not true at all | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "That's not true at all" is not considered hate speech because it does not target a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics. Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks, threatens, incites violence against, or discriminates aga... |
No | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message 'No' is not hate speech because it is a simple, single-word response that does not express any malicious intent or discrimination towards a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic. Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks, threaten... |
swartz was instrumental but joined later after his own "origami" startup did not grow quickly enough. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you provided is a statement about a person's role in a project, specifically Aaron Swartz, and the timing of his involvement. It does not contain any derogatory or discriminatory language based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, ethnicity, or any other protected characteristic. ... |
for simple technical questions in english ducky is actually better | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you provided does not appear to be hate speech. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender, or disability.
In this case, the message is comparing two technical support ser... |
Let adults come to their own decisions on whether or not they want they want to view this video, do you always ask daddy government permission before you do things? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided is not hate speech because it does not advocate for violence, discrimination, or hatred towards a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a commentary on the role of government in regulating per... |
expect the novel tort of facecrime soon. if you got a resting dickface we'll probably meet at the re-education camp.
[LINK]
The chinese are automating that: [LINK] | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is a satirical commentary on a hypothetical future legal concept, "facecrime," which is a playful reference to George Orwell's novel "1984." The message also references a hypothetical re-education camp, which is another reference to the novel. The message is not intended to inc... |
Use duckduckgo | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "Use DuckDuckGo" is not hate speech because it does not contain any content that targets, threatens, or insults a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a recommendation to use a specific search eng... |
If your intolerant and you know it clap your hands
You: | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "If you're intolerant and you know it, clap your hands" is not considered hate speech because it does not incite violence, discrimination, or hatred against a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, the message is a ... |
Vegas? Or Sandy Hook? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message 'Vegas? Or Sandy Hook?' is not hate speech because it does not directly target or incite violence against a specific group of people based on their race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. Instead, it is a rhetorical question that compares two tragic events, the Las Vegas ... |
Apparently Beto has wild hand movements when he talks...but I wouldn't know. I couldn't find a single video illustrating it | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech. It is a statement about a political figure's public speaking style, specifically mentioning his hand movements. The speaker acknowledges that they have not personally observed this trait, which suggests an honest attempt to share an observation rather than ... |
like the JFK assassination film youtube does not mind that video | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech for several reasons:
1. It does not contain any direct threats, slurs, or insults towards a specific group or individual based on their race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic.
2. It does not incite vi... |
Use a complete different browser. Possibly Mozilla Firefox or Brave. I recommend either those two. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you provided is not hate speech for several reasons:
1. It does not target a specific group of people based on their race, religion, nationality, ethnicity, or any other protected characteristic.
2. It does not use derogatory or offensive language.
3. It does not incite violence or harm against any indiv... |
Have you a link to that specific line in the YouTube TOS? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "Have you a link to that specific line in the YouTube TOS?" is not hate speech for several reasons:
1. It is a question seeking information, not an expression of hatred or discrimination.
2. It does not target or attack a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, o... |
I'm sorry to say, ddg just doesn't deliver the same results that Geevil does. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided is a comparison between two search engines, DuckDuckGo (ddg) and Geevil. It expresses a personal opinion that the user finds Geevil to be more effective than DuckDuckGo. This statement does not contain any elements of hate speech, as it does not target or attack any individual or group based... |
I really wonder how organic or real those who were cheering the Mosque event live online are? It would be a simple matter to concoct such a scene. Yes many of these users at these sites are ignorant and juvenile- but I don't believe that that many are quite that evil. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message in question does not meet the criteria for hate speech as it does not incite violence, discrimination, or hatred against a specific group of people based on their race, religion, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. The message expresses skepticism about the authenti... |
What's funny is good science fiction writers( Orwell, Issamov) follow almost the exact same process as the military threat assessment and planning divisions. They look at situations and think of likely outcomes based on evidence, logic and projective thinking. Every version of those assesments comes to the same conclu... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is expressing a critical opinion about the development and use of autonomous AI with military capabilities, and the comparison it makes to George Orwell and Issamov, two well-known science fiction writers, is not based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual... |
The companies that control the media today would never allow libraries if they could prevent them. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The statement "The companies that control the media today would never allow libraries if they could prevent them" is not hate speech because it is an expression of opinion about the potential actions of certain corporations, not an attack on a specific group of people based on their race, religion, national origin, sex... |
What should my DNS be then? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "What should my DNS be then?" is not hate speech because it does not contain any content that promotes hatred, violence, or discrimination against a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic.
The message is a questio... |
Maybe for what you're using it for. I just used it to teach, and for my own Univ. learning. Also normal life.
Could you give examples of where duckgo failed you & Gggle came through? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message does not contain any explicit threats, slurs, or insults that are typically associated with hate speech. Instead, it appears to be a personal opinion or experience shared by the sender about their use of DuckDuckGo and Google search engines. The sender is expressing their own experiences and preferences, an... |
That's getting deep for me. But I can delete Chrome. Thanks. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message does not contain any explicit or implicit expressions of hatred, discrimination, or violence towards a specific group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it appears to be a personal statement about the recipient'... |
I think this is why sites like 4chan thrive because they can't really be censored like all the mainstream ones. Then the media can basically label any user that uses those sites or any information from those sites as 'conspiracy theories' so the dumb people who don't ever actually research anything think any news from ... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is expressing a critical view of mainstream media and the way it handles news, particularly in relation to the political climate in the United States. The author argues that mainstream media often labels information from certain sources, such as 4chan, as "conspiracy theories" and "fake news," which can lea... |
Have to admit I sometimes think twice before posting my opinions on conspiracies, not sure if it's just paranoia but sometimes I wonder just who else might be reading it, how it might be interpreted etc. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message expresses a personal concern about the potential consequences of sharing opinions on conspiracies, particularly regarding the potential audience and interpretation of the opinions. It does not advocate for violence, discrimination, or hatred towards any specific group of people, nor does it incite others to... |
The military is always very ahead of what the public is allowed to know, the fact that this is now public information essentially means it's already being used. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech. Hate speech is typically characterized by expressions of hatred, bias, or discrimination towards a particular group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other personal characteristics.
The message you've provid... |
Only in shithole countries like NZ.
But Josh Moon, Our Saviour will put an end to that for good. Not even Rob Ford PBUH could do that. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is a satirical commentary that uses hyperbole and sarcasm to criticize the perceived state of New Zealand and the perceived inability of its leaders to address certain issues. The message is not intended to incite hatred or violence against any specific group of people, but rat... |
Hasn't been free since they killed Arron | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "Hasn't been free since they killed Arron" is not necessarily hate speech, as it does not explicitly incite violence, discrimination, or hatred against a specific group of people based on their race, religion, nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, or any other protected characteristic.
The me... |
9/11 is the gateway pill | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "9/11 is the gateway pill" is not necessarily hate speech, as it does not explicitly target or incite harm against a specific group of people based on their race, religion, nationality, ethnicity, or other protected characteristics.
The phrase "9/11" refers to the terrorist attacks that occurred on Septemb... |
Exciting times, eh? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on certain characteristics, such as race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin. The message "Exciting times, eh?" does not explicitly attack or intimidate anyone based on any of these characteristics. It is a ge... |
Make a new platform. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "Make a new platform" is not considered hate speech because it does not contain any content that targets, threatens, or insults a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. Instead, it seems to be a suggestion or instruction... |
Yeah I dig that, I'm just saying it's not common knowledge. It will become common knowledge when it's normalized over the course of decades. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not qualify as hate speech for several reasons:
1. It does not incite violence, harassment, or discrimination against any specific group or individual.
2. It does not use derogatory or offensive language towards any group or individual.
3. It does not promote hatred or intolerance base... |
Yep. Can't talk about it. Can't speculate. Only the official narrative (which often changes) is allowed.
It's how they went after Alex Jones and it was their excuse for de-platforming him.
I was listening to his show all week when Sandy Hook happened. He did a lot of speculating. At first he said it he thou... | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message does not contain any language that is intended to incite hatred or violence towards a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. It is a commentary on the censorship of free speech, specifically in relation to the Alex Jones cas... |
The link is on piratebay. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "The link is on piratebay" is not considered hate speech because it does not target or attack a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics. Instead, it is a statement about the location of a link, which is a neutral piece... |
In your opinion, what's the *value* of allowing the public to view people being mass executed, then? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided is not necessarily hate speech, but it could be perceived as insensitive or provocative. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation.
In this... |
Way to go to extremes. I don't recall saying that. This whole "if we censor *anything*, pretty soon *everything* will be censored argument is horseshit. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message in question does not meet the criteria for hate speech. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation. The message does not target any of these protected charac... |
It's not a crime, it's just banned. People said okay to censorship so now this is what we have. Censorship hurts people on all sides. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided is a commentary on censorship, not hate speech. It expresses concern about the impact of censorship on society, stating that it can harm people on all sides. It does not target or incite hatred towards any specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or... |
Germany (the people living here) has found the holocaust to be a historical fact. Therefore Germany (its constitution) values the right of the victims to never be forgotten and the exhortation to the world to never letting such a crime happen again higher than anyones right to deny history. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it is a statement of historical fact and a expression of values, rather than an attack or expression of hatred towards a specific group of people. The message is about the Holocaust, a historical event, and the importance of remembering it and preventing such atrocities from happe... |
You're referring to freedom of religion? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "You're referring to freedom of religion?" is not hate speech because it is a question that is asking for clarification or understanding about the topic being discussed. Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on certain characteristics, such as race, religio... |
beautiful | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks, threatens, incites violence, or discriminates against a person or group based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation. The message "beautiful" does not meet any of these criteria. It is a positive, non-discriminatory s... |
No, I'm referring to freedom to talk shit about a religion; or group of people. | [
"Identity Directed Abuse"
] | [
1
] | The message "No, I'm referring to freedom to talk shit about a religion; or group of people" can be considered as identity-directed abuse because it targets a specific group of people, in this case, a religion or a group of people, with derogatory language. The phrase "talk shit" is disrespectful and offensive, and the... |
Just like the Chinese and shit like Tienanmen square. You're not supposed to know about things the government doesn't want you to know about! | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not meet the criteria for hate speech. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation. The message you've provided does not directly target ... |
I think an IRA Bombing Tour of Britain would go well with it. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not necessarily constitute hate speech, but it comes very close. Hate speech is generally defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation.
In this case, the message ... |
Kick the Mick. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "Kick the Mick" is not considered hate speech in a legal or general sense because it does not meet the criteria for hate speech. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, sexual orientat... |
Submission statement
It's a documentary about a popular (way more popular than I would have ever guessed) conspiracy theory | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message does not contain any explicit or implicit threats, slurs, or derogatory language towards any specific group of people. It is simply a statement about a topic, a documentary, and the popularity of a conspiracy theory. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for hate speech, which is speech that attacks, thr... |
I'm Australian and I approve of this. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "I'm Australian and I approve of this." is not considered hate speech because it does not contain any content that targets, threatens, or insults a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic. Instead, it is a simple statement of... |
Fucking lol | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message 'Fucking lol' is not typically considered hate speech for several reasons:
1. Context: The phrase is often used casually in online communication, especially in informal settings, to express amusement or laughter. It's important to consider the context in which the phrase is used.
2. Lack of targeting: Hat... |
Thank you. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on certain characteristics, such as race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin. The message "Thank you." is not hate speech because it does not attack or intimidate anyone based on their characteristics. Instead... |
All according to plan my dude. I'm moving into the woods as soon as I can | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech. Hate speech is typically characterized by expressions of hatred, bias, or discrimination towards a particular group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other personal characteristics.
In this case, the message... |
Thank you for the feedback
Definitely want to improve for the next project I do | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message is not hate speech because it does not contain any language that is intended to harm, threaten, or incite violence against a specific group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, the message is a polite and respectf... |
Way too early I had to unsubscribe | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "Way too early I had to unsubscribe" is not hate speech because it does not contain any content that targets a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic with the intention to harm, intimidate, or incite violence. Inst... |
Y stop using google?? | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message "Y stop using google??" is not considered hate speech because it does not contain any content that targets, threatens, or insults a group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. Instead, it appears to be a question or statement about a ... |
They are becoming Orwellian. Trying to control & manipulate information according to their globalist, anti-American, regressive agenda. They have gone evil. | [
"Neutral"
] | [
0
] | The message you've provided expresses a strong opinion about a group of people, suggesting they are acting in a malicious and manipulative manner. However, it is important to note that the term "Orwellian" is a well-known reference to George Orwell's novel "1984," where totalitarian control and manipulation of informat... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 4