Datasets:
The dataset viewer is not available for this split.
Error code: TooBigContentError
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
- 📝 Summary Representation
- Sources
- 📊 CanadaFireSat Dataset Statistics (Without Test Hard):
- 📍 Samples Localisation:
- 🛰️ Example of S2 time series:
- Dataset Structure
- 📊 Performance Analysis: In this table, we describe the models' performances across data settings and architectures.
- Citation
- Contacts & Information
Dataset Card for CanadaFireSat 🔥🛰️
In this benchmark, we investigate the potential of deep learning with multiple modalities for high-resolution wildfire forecasting. Leveraging different data settings across two types of model architectures: CNN-based and ViT-based.
- 📝 Published paper from ISPRS (ArXiv Version)
- 💿 Dataset repository on GitHub
- 🤖 Model repository on GitHub & Weights on Hugging Face
- 🟰 Another "Raw" version of the data with NPY files organized in different folders per-modality types can be found at CanadaFireSat-Raw
Disclaimer: [23/06/2026] CanadaFireSat does not contain yet the ignition proxy predictors used in Appendix E.
📝 Summary Representation
The main use of this dataset is to push for the development of algorithms towards high-resolution wildfire forecasting via multi-modal learning. Indeed, we show the potential through our experiments of models trained on satellite image time series (Sentinel-2) and with environmental predictors (ERA5, MODIS, FWI). We hope to emulate the community to benchmark their EO and climate foundation models on CanadaFireSat to investigate their downstream fine-tuning capabilities on this complex extreme event forecasting task.
Sources
We describe below the different sources necessary to build the CanadaFireSat benchmark.
🔥📍 Fire Polygons Source
- 💻 National Burned Area Composite (NBAC 🇨🇦): Polygons Shapefile downloaded from CWFIS Datamart
- 📅 Filter fires since 2015 aligning with Sentinel-2 imagery availability
- 🛑 No restrictions are applied on ignition source or other metadata
- ➕ Spatial aggregation: Fires are mapped to a 2.8 km × 2.8 km grid | Temporal aggregation into 8-day windows
🛰️🗺️ Satellite Image Time Series Source
- 🛰️ Sentinel-2 (S2) Level-1C Satellite Imagery (2015–2023) from Google Earth Engine
- 🗺️ For each grid cell (2.8 km × 2.8 km): Collect cloud-free S2 images (≤ 40% cloud cover) over a 64-day period before prediction
- ⚠️ We discard samples with: Fewer than 3 valid images | Less than 40 days of coverage
🌦️🌲 Environmental Predictors
- 🌡️ Hydrometeorological Drivers: Key variables like temperature, precipitation, soil moisture, and humidity from ERA5-Land (11 km, available on Google Earth Engine) and MODIS11 (1 km, available on Google Earth Engine), aggregated over 8-day windows using mean, max, and min values.
- 🌿 Vegetation Indices (MODIS13 and MODIS15): NDVI, EVI, LAI, and FPAR (500 m) captured in 8 or 16-day composites, informing on vegetation state.
- 🔥 Fire Danger Metrics (CEMS previously on CDS): Fire Weather Index and Drought Code from the Canadian FWI system (0.25° resolution).
- 🕒 For each sample, we gather predictor data from 64 days prior to reflect pre-fire conditions.
🏞️ Land Cover
- ⛔️ Exclusively used for adversarial sampling and post-training analysis.
- 💾 Data extracted is the 2020 North American Land Cover 30-meter dataset, produced as part of the North American Land Change Monitoring System (NALCMS) (available on Google Earth Engine)
📊 CanadaFireSat Dataset Statistics (Without Test Hard):
| Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Samples | 177,801 |
| Target Spatial Resolution | 100 m |
| Region Coverage | Canada |
| Temporal Coverage | 2016 - 2023 |
| Sample Area Size | 2.64 km × 2.64 km |
| Fire Occurrence Rate | 39% of samples |
| Total Fire Patches | 16% of patches |
| Training Set (2016–2021) | 78,030 samples |
| Validation Set (2022) | 14,329 samples |
| Test Set (2023) | 85,442 samples |
| Sentinel-2 Temporal Median Coverage | 55 days (8 images) |
| Number of Environmental Predictors | 58 |
| Data Sources | ERA5, MODIS, CEMS |
📍 Samples Localisation:
Figure 1: Spatial distribution of positive (left) and negative (right) wildfire samples.
🛰️ Example of S2 time series:
Figure 2: Row 1-3: Samples of Sentinel-2 input time series for 4 locations in Canada, with only the RGB bands with rescaled intensity. Row 4: Sentinel-2 images after the fire occurred. Row 5: Fire polygons used as labels with the Sentinel-2 images post-fire.
Dataset Structure
| Name | Type | Shape | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
date |
timestamp[s] |
- | Fire Date |
doy |
sequence<int64> |
- | Sentinel-2 Tiles Day of the Year |
10x |
sequence<array3_d> |
(4, 264, 264) | Sentinel-2 10m bands, Order: ["B4", "B3", "B2", "B8"] |
20x |
sequence<array3_d> |
(6, 132, 132) | Sentinel-2 20m bands, Order: ["B5", "B6", "B7", "B8A", "B11", "B12"] |
60x |
sequence<array3_d> |
(3, 44, 44) | Sentinel-2 60m bands, Order: ["B1", "B9", "B10"] |
loc |
array3_d<float32> |
(2, 264, 264) | Latitude and Longitude grid |
labels |
array2_d<uint8> |
(264, 264) | Fire binary label mask |
tab_cds |
array2_d<float32> |
(8, 6) | Tabular CDS variables |
tab_era5 |
array2_d<float32> |
(8, 45) | Tabular ERA5 variables |
tab_modis |
array2_d<float32> |
(8, 7) | Tabular MODIS products |
env_cds |
array4_d<float32> |
(8, 6, 13, 13) | Spatial CDS variables |
env_cds_loc |
array3_d<float32> |
(13, 13, 2) | Grid coordinates for CDS |
env_era5 |
array4_d<float32> |
(8, 45, 32, 32) | Spatial ERA5 variables |
env_era5_loc |
array3_d<float32> |
(32, 32, 2) | Grid coordinates for ERA5 |
env_modis11 |
array4_d<float32> |
(8, 3, 16, 16) | Spatial MODIS11 variables |
env_modis11_loc |
array3_d<float32> |
(16, 16, 2) | Grid coordinates for MODIS11 |
env_modis13_15 |
array4_d<float32> |
(8, 4, 32, 32) | Spatial MODIS13/15 variables |
env_modis13_15_loc |
array3_d<float32> |
(32, 32, 2) | Grid coordinates for MODIS13/15) |
env_doy |
sequence<int64> |
- | Environment Variables Day of the Year |
region |
string |
- | Canadian Province or Territory |
tile_id |
int32 |
- | Tile identifier |
file_id |
string |
- | Unique file identifier |
fwi |
float32 |
- | Tile Fire Weather Index |
📊 Performance Analysis: In this table, we describe the models' performances across data settings and architectures.
| Encoder | Modality | Params (M) | Val PRAUC | Val F1 | Test PRAUC | Test F1 | Test Hard PRAUC | Test Hard F1 | Avg PRAUC | Avg F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔷 ResNet-50 | ||||||||||
| SITS Only | 52.2 | 45.9 | 49.4 | 54.0 | 59.9 | 26.2 | 36.7 | 42.0 | 48.7 | |
| ENV Only | 97.5 | 41.6 | 46.7 | 50.8 | 55.2 | 24.5 | 33.1 | 39.0 | 45.0 | |
| Multi-Modal | 52.2 | 46.1 | 51.2 | 57.0 | 60.3 | 27.1 | 37.4 | 43.4 | 49.6 | |
| 🔶 ViT_S | ||||||||||
| SITS Only | 36.5 | 45.2 | 50.6 | 51.2 | 51.9 | 25.7 | 33.8 | 40.7 | 45.2 | |
| ENV Only | 54.8 | 34.8 | 45.7 | 49.2 | 59.9 | 21.2 | 35.1 | 35.1 | 46.9 | |
| Multi-Modal | 37.7 | 43.9 | 50.0 | 56.2 | 59.2 | 24.7 | 35.6 | 41.6 | 48.3 | |
| ⚫ Baselines | ||||||||||
| Baseline (FWI) | ENV Only | - | 20.0 | 32.7 | 43.1 | 50.3 | 21.1 | 32.7 | 28.1 | 38.6 |
| Baseline (UNet) ¹ | ENV Only | 9.1 | 33.6 | 43.2 | 51.4 | 58.4 | 25.1 | 34.2 | 36.7 | 45.3 |
| Baseline (UTAE) ² | ENV Only | 1.1 | 32.9 | 43.8 | 47.2 | 52.5 | 22.0 | 31.7 | 34.0 | 42.7 |
| Baseline (ConvLSTM) ³ | SITS Only | 1.2 | 41.4 | 46.0 | 50.2 | 58.9 | 23.1 | 35.0 | 38.2 | 46.6 |
¹ Prapas et al., 2023 ² Michail et al., 2025 ³ Yang et al., 2021
Citation
The paper has been published in the ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
@article{porta2026canadafiresat,
title={CanadaFireSat: Towards high-resolution wildfire forecasting with multiple modalities},
author={Porta, Hugo and Dalsasso, Emanuele and McCarty, Jessica L and Tuia, Devis},
journal={ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},
volume={239},
pages={555--572},
year={2026},
publisher={Elsevier}
}
Contacts & Information
- Curated by: Hugo Porta
- Contact Email: hugo.porta@epfl.ch
- Shared by: ECEO Lab
- License: MiT License
- Downloads last month
- 3,305