text stringlengths 89 3.77k ⌀ | category stringclasses 4
values | saul-7b_perplexity float64 1.76 124 ⌀ | llama2-7b_perplexity float64 1.8 127 ⌀ | mistral-7b_perplexity float64 1.76 157 ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
E) The calculation of interest 567. The Tribunal has established that the compensation due by Respondent for its violations of the Treaty amounts to USD 4,880,609 + 38,709,481 = USD 43,590,090, plus interest, to be added to this sum on the basis of the principle of full reparation. | Legal Decisions | 9.913409 | 9.564906 | 10.235126 |
Browning, 165 S.W.3d at 346. The bankruptcy court’s order is not void, and therefore, the Lawyers may not collaterally attack it here. | Party Submissions | 8.534686 | 9.525539 | 11.725756 |
ETMC Athens contends Respondent abused his discretion when it granted Dunn's motion to strike the designation of Woolverton and ETMC EMS as responsible third parties. Applicable Law HN4 [ ] Texas law allows a tort [*5] defendant to designate a person as a "responsible third party." Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 33... | Party Submissions | 5.557865 | 5.925109 | 5.701336 |
Footnotes 1 The Hon. Michael J. O'Neill, Justice, Court of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas at Dallas, Retired, sitting by assignment. 2 The elements of a legal malpractice claim are not in dispute. Under Texas law, a plaintiff alleging legal malpractice must establish four elements: (1) that the defendant attorney owe... | Party Submissions | 3.876339 | 3.794261 | 4.018766 |
The requested document, referred on page 14 of the 2013 DRP, includes, among other things, an analysis of traffic frequency considered as one of the parameters for deciding on optimal location of a bus loop. The requested document is relevant and material to assess whether the decision to place the bus loop at Obnova’s... | Legal Decisions | 18.055132 | 19.29225 | 18.230309 |
Any and all lease agreements, agreements on use of warehousing space, land and/or buildings, including all of their annexes, concluded between Serbia or Luka Beograd on one side and Obnova on other side between 1948 and 26 April 2012 related to Dunavska 17-19, Dunavska 23 and/or the Surrounding Area, including, but not... | Legal Decisions | 11.263277 | 9.402955 | 11.009397 |
If Samson had taken these positions during its opening argument, Respondents could have hit them head-on from the podium. Because Samson saved them for rebuttal, an answer to each is appropriate. First, the U.S. Supreme Court has never sat to overrule this Court’s pronouncements of Texas law. Second, unpaid Late Charge... | Party Submissions | 24.056889 | 24.791752 | 26.250385 |
Nor can Respondent argue that unilateral mistake makes the Agreement voidable. “Two separate unilateral mistakes in the minds of the grantors and grantees do not create a factual issue for a mutual mistake cause of action.” Holley v. Grigg, 65 S.W.3d 289, 295 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2001, no pet.). A unilateral mistake does... | Party Submissions | 4.609995 | 4.726165 | 4.822322 |
Similarly, as above, a notice evaluation is unnecessary to conclude jurisdiction is lacking for Weatherford’s SWDA suit against Midland; however, the provision of reasonable notice is yet another threshold requirement that Weatherford has failed to satisfy. Notice under the SWDA requires: (1) notice “of the existence o... | Party Submissions | 6.828818 | 7.472113 | 7.479733 |
To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to fund the information clearinghouse through fiscal year 2031, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 6.522564 | 5.550296 | 6.407922 |
None of these documents were provided by the Respondent to the Claimant at the time of his arrest or thereafter. The requested information is internal governmental documentation, which Qatar is in a position to access without undue burden. | Legal Decisions | 14.367309 | 17.40334 | 14.598733 |
On March 11, 2021, the trial court signed the order denying MVP’s plea in abatement. MVP filed a motion for clarification and reconsideration. MVP asked the trial court to dismiss the Texas case based on RLB’s and McCarthy’s waiver of the right to object to the forum-selection clause, or alternatively abate the Texas c... | Party Submissions | 4.022007 | 4.444209 | 4.440453 |
The majority cannot justify why it treats these “easily severable” matters as intertwined in an arbitrability appeal. “[T]he question on appeal,” as the majority opinion correctly identifies, is “whether the case belongs in arbitration.” Ante, at 1919. But the questions remaining before the district court are different... | Party Submissions | 8.303374 | 9.18259 | 9.470598 |
Defendant Alvarez was not assigned to the “Bill Greehey” refinery when he struck and injured Mann, and therefore his actions were not within the scope of people protected from suits at common law under the umbrella of Valero's ROCIP. Had Alvarez been assigned to Valero's “Bill Greehey” refinery at the time he struck an... | Party Submissions | 13.788339 | 14.346685 | 15.574409 |
Tribunal may draw the inferences it deems appropriate in relation to the documents not produced, taking into consideration all relevant circumstances. | Legal Decisions | 12.040475 | 17.599371 | 20.045103 |
Respondent argues that Claimants' investment does not deserve protection as it was not made in good faith, in particular because the investment dispute was foreseeable at the time of the alleged investment of the Cypriot Claimants in April 2012. Claimants' allegations also concern multiple circumstances concerning Obno... | Legal Decisions | 8.919703 | 8.062669 | 9.022766 |
The City of Liberty (“Liberty”) contends that “Liberty provided a service for which Ames has not fully paid.” Respondent’s Response to Petition for Review (“Liberty’s Response”) at 16. The City of Ames (“Ames”) has paid all amounts owed for the services that Liberty was contractually required to provide under the Liber... | Party Submissions | 9.601339 | 7.549007 | 9.209737 |
Again, Terry was acutely aware of the Flaven problem. But in Terry’s view, designating Flaven — who Terry believed to be a fraudster — as an RTP before he had any idea what Flaven would say, was a greater risk to his clients than waiting to designate him. He believed Flaven’s testimony was likely to make his clients lo... | Party Submissions | 19.639711 | 18.475147 | 21.816309 |
Arbitration Rule 38 19.1. All the rules set forth in Section 18 above shall apply by analogy to experts unless they are inconsistent with this Section. | Legal Decisions | 13.236451 | 13.577684 | 15.444221 |
G. Without limiting the other provisions of this Article XVII, it is further specifically acknowledged and agreed by the parties hereto that the term “market value” as used herein shall be defined in accordance with the above Paragraph III.H. and not. in accordance with the provisions of Subsection 91.402 (i) of the Te... | Party Submissions | 10.083426 | 9.554863 | 10.868688 |
Manager, Superintendent and necessary assistants. The Project Manager or Superintendent and necessary assistants shall be in attendance at the Project site during the progress of the Work. These personnel shall be satisfactory to McCarthy and shall not be changed except with the consent of McCarthy, unless such personn... | Party Submissions | 5.147041 | 5.909238 | 5.476637 |
Without specific explanations factually connecting Dr. Castillo’s claimed negligence to H.W.’s injuries, Dr. Tappan’s causation opinions left readers to do exactly what this Court has held they cannot: speculate, infer, or fill in gaps in his report. Wright, 79 S.W.3d at 52; see also Tiscareno, 495 S.W.3d at 607. | Party Submissions | 11.554825 | 12.750317 | 13.288685 |
The seminal case in this area is Green Tree Fin. Corp. v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79 (2000). In Grenn Tree, the United States Supreme Court noted that “[i]t may well be that the existence of large arbitration costs could preclude a litigant. .. from effectively vindicating [her] rights in the arbitral forum.” Id. at 90. How... | Party Submissions | 4.032652 | 4.100512 | 4.375628 |
Division of Debt: Wife’s Attorney’s Fees In Wife’s nal issue, she argues the trial court abused its discretionby failing to consider the $140,000 she incurred in attomey’s fees as debt when dividing the marital estate. She asserts this resulted in a. grossly disproportionate division in favor‘ of Husband. Husband respo... | Party Submissions | 10.598802 | 11.400715 | 11.346743 |
Both this Court and the United States Supreme Court have recognized that the Republican Party of Texas enjoys a robust First Amendment right to select the candidates that shall bear its nomination. Brady v. Fourteenth Court of Appeals, 795 S.W.2d 712, 715 (Tex. 1990); Eu v. S.F. Cnty. Dem. Ctrl. Comm., 489 U.S. 214, 22... | Party Submissions | 4.957036 | 5.198624 | 5.215004 |
Sequentially, assuming arguendo that Bay can meet these monumental burdens, and only after those two issues are established, does the court then reach what Bay chooses to argue as the dispositive issue: whether Bay has conclusively established “course and scope” as a matter of law. Mann contends course and scope cannot... | Party Submissions | 11.567887 | 11.845984 | 12.923403 |
No amendment or modification of any provision of this Agreement, the Note or any instrument delivered under this Agreement or the Note is effective unless the same is in writing and signed by the Lender and the Borrower. | Contract | 4.743184 | 4.642446 | 6.13675 |
Weatherford insists that Midland must prove that a leak occurred after mixture with residential sources in order to show that the domestic sewage exclusion applies. R.R. Street never required the cost-recovery defendant to prove such a finding, nor did it affirmatively decide whether the exclusion applied. In R.R. Stre... | Party Submissions | 8.600166 | 8.630495 | 9.006969 |
The arbitration agreement has a “delegation provision,” which “is an agreement to arbitrate threshold issues concerning the arbitration agreement.” Rent-A-Ctr., W., Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63, 68 (2010). The delegation provision required “issues of formation, validity or enforceability of [the arbitration agreement i... | Party Submissions | 4.631235 | 4.894023 | 4.896246 |
On cross-examination, Thomas testified as required by A.S.’s plan of service, A.S. completed her: (1) parenting class; (2) psychological; (3) psychosocial; and (5) may have completed her ETCADA/Sabine Valley Assessment with another case worker. 4 RR 144-46. Thomas also testified that A.S. did not miss appointments with... | Party Submissions | 9.66694 | 11.045461 | 10.76768 |
This payment-for-services Contract is a textbook contract for goods and services for which the Legislature has expressly waived governmental immunity. TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE § 271.152. The Contract obligates Liberty to provide wastewater treatment services to Ames in exchange for Ames’s payments, including payments for t... | Party Submissions | 7.32728 | 7.220494 | 7.365608 |
To amend the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 to require the timely appointment of agency transition officials, to ensure adequate performance and oversight of required transition-related preparation, to require new guidance for agencies and possible transition teams, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 9.632676 | 9.264915 | 9.375476 |
Acting as the factfinder, the trial court had the right to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight that it wished to give to their testimony. | Party Submissions | 5.407103 | 6.786561 | 7.156967 |
The lower court also noted the reports’ lack of explanation of why it mattered that Dr. Castillo left the unit or what would have been different had she not. There was no explanation of what the BSA nurses could have done about Dr. Castillo’s leaving that would have made a difference in the outcome. Baptist St. Anthony... | Party Submissions | 8.635675 | 8.523587 | 9.041807 |
On October 9, 2023, this document was served on Douglas W. Alexander, lead counsel for Petitioner, via DAlexander@adjtlaw.com; and on Jane M. N. Webre, lead counsel for Respondent EOG Resources, Inc., via JWebre@scottdoug.com. | Party Submissions | 14.710983 | 15.873144 | 19.60995 |
We propose to uphold COES’s proposal regarding a joint optimization program/secondary reserve (Unit Commitment) since it would be difficult for a model of specific allocations of a Unit Commitment based on costs to coexist, such as the current daily programming in Perú, with a separate market model for the secondary b... | Legal Decisions | 48.34918 | 42.30041 | 45.515003 |
Cabe señalar además que la propia Demandante atribuye lo cual contradice abiertamente el argumento de que el valor de CALICA es equivalente a la de la Red CALICA.204 182. El otro defecto que tiene la estrategia empleada por la Demandante es que no se puede aislar el valor de CALICA del valor de la Red CALICA. Como no... | Party Submissions | 8.061308 | 12.160991 | 9.573071 |
If the Lawyers had filed a motion for leave to designate Flaven as an RTP more than 60 days before trial and if the trial court had granted that motion over the BNC Sellers’ objections, the next step would be surviving a motion to strike. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 33.004(l). As explained in the Lawyers’ brief, ... | Party Submissions | 9.769455 | 9.368576 | 10.38714 |
Serbia does not seem to dispute that the requested documents indeed are material and relevant. Serbia merely asserts that the requested documents are “ not sufficiently ” relevant and material. However, Serbia does not propose any test nor refers to any authority that would establish when documents requested in a docum... | Legal Decisions | 6.826924 | 7.022669 | 6.869382 |
This is the ninth of nine requests for documents which the Claimant contends was seized during the criminal proceedings in Qatar. | Legal Decisions | 29.448599 | 30.19039 | 36.398533 |
Court concluded the appellate court erred in upholding the denial of a party’s motion to compel arbitration on a ground not presented in the trial court. MVP’s Brief at 30-31 (citing 392 S.W.3d 633 (Tex. 2013)). This Court noted that the party opposing arbitration never denied the existence of a valid agreement to arbi... | Party Submissions | 5.469626 | 5.748039 | 5.908939 |
The United States objects to Request No. 1.h for the same reasons stated above with respect to Request No. 1.a. | Legal Decisions | 9.014922 | 13.688306 | 14.657824 |
To restore the ability of the people of American Samoa to approve amend- ments to the territorial constitution based on majority rule in a democratic act of self-determination, as authorized pursuant to an Act of Congress delegating administration of Federal territorial law in the territory to the President, and to the... | Legislation | 8.112366 | 7.684755 | 7.805746 |
Galovelho also relies on mootness cases that express a concern when charged conduct is voluntarily ceased by the defendant without an admission that the action – 20– was wrongful. The concern is that “ defendants could control the jurisdiction of courts with protestations of repentance and reform, while remaining free ... | Party Submissions | 10.617626 | 11.381156 | 11.24304 |
A breach of a contract by itself is not a negligent act or omission. B. HSMiller’s claim that the phrase “that violates a legal HSMiller argues Flaven was a proper RTP based on the concluding phrase defining an RTP as someone who has engaged in “other conduct or activity that violates an applicable legal standard.” (Cr... | Party Submissions | 9.754736 | 8.997509 | 10.268232 |
If the Court agrees with the Lawyers’ arguments on the assignment or negligence issues, gross negligence and exemplary damages should be set aside as a matter of law. E.g., U-Haul Int’l, Inc. v. Waldrip, 380 S.W.3d 118, 137 (Tex. 2012). But, if the Court does decide that remand on any issue is appropriate (which the La... | Party Submissions | 6.098117 | 5.832069 | 6.798981 |
Finally, Mann will address Bay's creative attempt to collaterally establish standing at the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation (“the Division”). This issue was not addressed in the trial courts order granting permission to file this permissive appeal and is not necessary to the determinati... | Party Submissions | 16.340322 | 16.392134 | 17.481657 |
Worse still, relief here would greatly disserve the public interest. Signature requirements, like other laws that “require candidates to make a preliminary showing of substantial support in order to qualify for a place on the ballot,” serve the public interest by keeping “frivolous candidates” off the ballot. Anderson ... | Party Submissions | 6.151798 | 7.060765 | 7.39217 |
Even with the Texas Workers' Compensation Act's waiver of defenses, an employee must still prove all elements of a negligence claim to prevail against nonsubscribing employers. | Party Submissions | 5.952728 | 7.574644 | 8.032341 |
Id. Second, the Court noted that the Division’s exclusive jurisdiction does not extend to all cases that touch on workers’ compensation issues. Id. (quoting AMS Constr. Co., Inc. v. K.H.K. | Party Submissions | 11.396755 | 12.231123 | 12.66534 |
The United States objects to Request No. 3.f for the same reasons stated above with respect to Request No. 3.a. | Legal Decisions | 8.448828 | 13.670918 | 15.115705 |
Memorial, paras 90-96 Counter-Memorial, paras 357-359, 492-495 Kalemegdan was registered in the Cypriot corporate register on 23 March 2012. According to Claimants, on 26 April 2012, Mr Obradović, acting upon Mr Rand's instruction, contributed his shares in Obnova and in four other Serbian companies to Kalemegdan, of ... | Legal Decisions | 8.046474 | 8.44871 | 8.471875 |
Weatherford claims that limitations are an issue that cannot be reached if the Trial Court lacked jurisdiction because Midland enjoyed immunity from suit. However, a time-barred suit is yet another threshold requirement for a valid SWDA claim that Weatherford failed to meet. City of Madisonville v. Sims, 620 S.W.3d 375... | Party Submissions | 9.167688 | 8.834765 | 9.744241 |
In a self-dealing case involving two principals, the demand-futility arguments advanced by the Response have no legitimate place. As the Delaware Chancery Court explains, it makes “little sense to find that demand is required in an evenly divided situation.... Rather, it is enough for a plaintiff to show that there is ... | Party Submissions | 12.828844 | 13.412421 | 13.688375 |
C) Damages related to Claimant’s shares in Lajun 549. The Tribunal considers that, in view of Respondent’s breaches of the Treaty, the value of Claimant’s shares in Lajun has been materially impaired. As a consequence, Claimant is entitled to full reparation for the loss of his ownership interest, which is 90% of Lajun... | Legal Decisions | 8.175908 | 7.833742 | 7.783941 |
But assuming the filing fee for a $1 million claim applies, the initial filing fee for such a claim under the flexible schedule is $3,500. Further, the payment of the initial fee can be deferred upon request in cases of extreme hardship. See AAAA Construction Industry Arbitration Rule 55. Dissent, p. 7. | Party Submissions | 15.994551 | 15.265891 | 18.1717 |
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Relator, Hon. Brian Walker, prays that the Court grant his Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus and issue a writ of mandamus compelling Respondent, Hon. Matt Rinaldi, to review and reject the application of Hon. John Devine for a place on the 2024 Republican General Primary ballot for... | Party Submissions | 5.208718 | 5.032641 | 5.983452 |
To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to remove barriers to agricul- tural producers in accessing funds to carry out emergency measures under the emergency conservation program, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 7.971618 | 6.274549 | 8.345556 |
The United States objects to Request No. 2.i for the same reasons stated above with respect to Request No. 2.a. | Legal Decisions | 8.912113 | 13.559953 | 15.544323 |
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify when the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to prohibit the specification of a defined area, or deny or restrict the use of a defined area for specification, as a disposal site under section 404 of such Act, and for other pu... | Legislation | 4.760233 | 4.269073 | 4.391833 |
This point can be illustrated by an analogy to the law of intestate succession. Suppose a person dies without a will. In such a case, a statutory scheme provides a set of default rules about who inherits what. Anyone who wishes to opt out of the statutory default scheme may do so by executing a will. And if someone cho... | Party Submissions | 7.427786 | 9.205104 | 8.01945 |
NAFTA Articles 1127, 1128 and 1129 28.1. Non-Disputing NAFTA Parties may make submissions to the Tribunal within the meaning of NAFTA Article 1128 by the date indicated in Annex B . | Legal Decisions | 6.655997 | 8.342679 | 8.333483 |
After a hearing, the trial court granted the motion to dismiss, finding Berrelez had not exhausted her administrative remedies under the Act and her claims were barred by the Act's exclusive remedy provision. Thereafter, the trial court severed Berrelez's claim against Mascorro, creating a final, appealable judgment wi... | Party Submissions | 6.789678 | 8.760198 | 8.365277 |
As explained above, the requested documents will show the basis for the inscription of Selfnest doo as the owner of a part of the former land plot 39/1, on which a part of Obnova’s premises at Dunavska 23 is located. Clarification of Selfnest’s alleged ownership, its extent and its validity is relevant and material to ... | Legal Decisions | 14.947229 | 15.775936 | 16.190834 |
COMPLIANCE WITH OBLIGATIONS Each Party shall comply with its commitments regarding investment and shall, in no way, impair, through the adoption of arbitrary and discriminatory measures, the management, development, maintenance, utilisation, usufruct, acquisition, expansion or transfer of said investments. | Legal Decisions | 13.970463 | 8.681651 | 12.872716 |
All contributions Husband made to his 401(k) during the marriage are part of the community estate. The trial court found that $62,042.77 of Husband’s 401(k) was community property and $311,778.24 was his separate property. (CR 596–597). The evidence showed that Husband contributed to his 401(k) each year of the marriag... | Party Submissions | 4.445754 | 4.775254 | 4.594351 |
Liberty ignores the clear language of the Contract and argues that the Additional Service Charge is part of an agreed upon rate structure. The Contract did not contain volumetric rate brackets, as Liberty claims, where Liberty agreed to accept all of Ames’s wastewater and Ames agreed to pay a certain rate up to the “To... | Party Submissions | 8.947651 | 7.545019 | 9.46593 |
A case where litigants were found to NOT be in privity with each other despite being in the same case together during pre-trial was Saqui v. Pride Intern., Inc., No. 14-10-00540-CV, 2011 WL 5056162, at *1 (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 25, 2011, no pet.). In Saqui, the Saqui Plaintiffs and the Spinoso Plaintiff... | Party Submissions | 4.526579 | 4.427909 | 4.528583 |
Galovelho pleaded: “The economic impact of the regulations was total and failed to allow any economic or beneficial use of the property as a full-service restaurant. ” But the Lucas requirement of a “complete elimination of value” or a “total loss” is not tied to an owner’s preferred economic use of the property. Galov... | Party Submissions | 12.181211 | 12.888098 | 13.822303 |
NATURE OF THE CASE: Financial retribution and explicit bias obstruction in the expose of extrajudicial misconduct in the theft of Uniformed Partition of Heirs Property Act (UPHPA) protected land, active mineral leases, and producing mineral estate protected. | Party Submissions | 50.49768 | 56.38293 | 52.146057 |
Sonic acknowledges that abatement orders are ordinarily incidental rulings of the court not subject to mandamus review. But Sonic argues that when extraordinary circumstances exist, this general rule may not apply. Sonic claims extraordinary circumstances are present here because continued abatement prevents it from pu... | Party Submissions | 6.579323 | 8.016594 | 7.907159 |
If Lessee is not producing any quantities of gas from leased premises but is receiving payments under the “pay” portion of such “take or pay” gas purchase contract provision, such payments shall not relieve Lessee of the duty to make shut-in royalty payments if Lessee desires to continue this Lease, but such “take or p... | Party Submissions | 9.792779 | 10.325642 | 10.326344 |
Not only is the franchise more than the OEM’s agreement, Texas also defines it to include a written communication in which a duty is imposed from an OEM to a franchisee. A franchise also includes the recognition that a dealer relies upon its OEM for a continued supply of motor vehicles. A franchise is also defined to e... | Party Submissions | 15.076391 | 12.27348 | 17.049398 |
As a result, we find th at the trial court’s aw ard of attorney fees to Osprin did not result in a double recovery and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the fees under the UDJA. We overrule Backes ’s sole iss ue. VI. Conclusion For the reasons stated, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. | Party Submissions | 9.802067 | 9.953559 | 13.293678 |
Taylor v. Sturgell does not indicate the Wilson and Harpst plaintiffs were in privity. Taylor describes six paths to privity, and Fleming Defendants focused almost exclusively on the first one (“Taylor Privity Path 1”) as being allegedly applicable in this case. Taylor Privity Path 1 states the following: First, “[a] p... | Party Submissions | 10.307878 | 10.742392 | 11.385245 |
Also, the history of this litigation demonstrates that guidance is needed from this Court now—to avoid the inevitable need for yet another appeal in the near future. For example, in an unusual procedural ruling, the court of appeals did not determine the Naths actually raised a fact issue on attorney’s fees: instead it... | Party Submissions | 8.140108 | 8.620691 | 8.670583 |
Word 2019, which indicated that the total word count (exclusive of those items listed in Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i) (1)) is 4,116 words. | Party Submissions | 9.251889 | 17.932446 | 17.461824 |
First, Relator’s cursory assertion “explain[s]” nothing “with precision.” Khanoyan, 637 S.W.3d at 764. Relator contends that the time to print the ballots “would typically be ten days.” Pet.2. But he does not address whether this allegedly “typical” number applies to each of Texas’s 254 counties. Nor does he defend the... | Party Submissions | 7.031207 | 8.036115 | 7.298515 |
Petitioner essentially argues that an optional acceleration clause must be considered mandatory after some certain, undefined length of time. How the parties or the courts are to determine where this line in the sand should be drawn is not an ambiguity that the law should favor. | Party Submissions | 23.496956 | 27.366581 | 26.520578 |
The Court of Appeals, below, held that the “gist” of “Guardians, Inc.” was defamatory and not substantially true because it omitted certain facts. Op. at 4–5. | Party Submissions | 19.323622 | 15.486933 | 18.494556 |
In their petition, appellants Berry Contracting, L.P., d/b/a Bay Ltd. and Juan Tomas Hernandez Alvarez (Bay) fail to meet their burden entitling them to a permissive appeal. Berry asserts that the requirement that there is substantial ground for difference of opinion on the controlling question of law is “obvious from ... | Party Submissions | 14.583927 | 15.472176 | 15.550757 |
ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by East Texas Medical Center Athens; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12-23-00263-CV and a defendant in trial court cause number 68714, pending on the docket of the County Court at Law of Smith County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mand... | Party Submissions | 5.032466 | 6.917882 | 6.690397 |
Declaratory Judgment both by failing to join a proper party Defendant, and on the ground of governmental immunity. VII. WILLACY v SEBASTIAN DOES NOT SUPORT RESPONDENT’S Throughout these proceedings, Respondent has relied heavily—and almost exclusively—on Willacy County. Appraisal Dist. v. Sebastian Cotton & Grain, Ltd ... | Party Submissions | 10.732131 | 10.994104 | 10.417805 |
Eligible Employee. Eligible Employee means a member of a “select group of management or highly compensated employees” of a Participating Employer within the meaning of Sections 201(2), 301(a)(3) and 401(a)(1) of ERISA, as determined by the Committee from time to time in its sole discretion. | Contract | 2.448609 | 2.491581 | 2.955609 |
Oncor’s argument that the agreement did not purport to resolve the possibility of a clerical error existing is specious. The agreement resolved value. If Oncor’s sole concern were for the accuracy of Wilbarger CAD’s records, records not apparent on the face of the appraisal roll, but that it was not seeking to alter va... | Party Submissions | 8.865804 | 9.759109 | 9.465923 |
Relator, Justice Brian Walker of the Second Court of Appeals, seeks mandamus relief originally in this Court—bypassing both the appropriate district court and court of appeals—to address a putative emergency of his own creation. Walker al-leges, though no court has ever found, that Justice John Devine’s application to ... | Party Submissions | 8.571188 | 8.339155 | 9.267507 |
H.B. A No. A 59 AN ACT relating to child water safety requirements for certain organizations; authorizing disciplinary action, including an administrative penalty. | Party Submissions | 39.19506 | 33.98355 | 45.453007 |
But no such “attribution” rule exists. The statute is clear—media defendants cannot be held liable for “accurate reporting of allegations made by a third party regarding a matter of public concern.” CPRC § 73.005(b). The statute does not, in any way, mention or imply an attribution requirement, just as it includes no e... | Party Submissions | 6.027546 | 6.736502 | 6.859769 |
TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 3.003(a). Only community property is subject to the trial court ’ s just and right division. Barnard v. Barnard, 133 S.W.3d 782, 789 (Tex. | Party Submissions | 4.887651 | 6.649094 | 5.724226 |
The Arbitral Tribunal considers that the documents sought under this request are included in Request 3.a and no decision is therefore made. | Legal Decisions | 26.068045 | 30.948666 | 38.062782 |
Husband responds the evidence was sufficient to support the trial court’s characterization of the marital residence such that there was no abuse of discretion. | Party Submissions | 10.922565 | 13.829384 | 14.764082 |
This RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made as of the Date of Grant set forth above by and between UNITED RENTALS, INC., a Delaware corporation, having an office at 100 First Stamford Place, Suite 700 Stamford, CT 06902 (the “Company”), and Awardee (together with the Company, the “Parties”), current... | Contract | 2.963199 | 3.0404 | 3.011105 |
When the episode introduces Tonya, it cuts to a photo of her scowling in the courtroom as foreboding music plays in the background. | Party Submissions | 16.085625 | 16.156557 | 16.987001 |
The name-change issue that Respondents did brief is entirely meritless. That issue relates solely to the damages that Westwood would be entitled to recover under the jury’s verdict if the court of appeals’ ju dgment is reversed. And while Respondents insist that Westwood’s name change creates “intractable problems” for... | Party Submissions | 15.421136 | 15.605821 | 16.792084 |
Relator’s petition should be denied because it would disrupt the ongoing election process. Relief at this late hour would be incredibly destabilizing, as the Secretary of State has advised counties across Texas to “complet[e] [thei]r ballots not later than the 60th day before election day, which is Friday, January 5, 2... | Party Submissions | 7.935659 | 9.106448 | 8.375385 |
In the first instance, it is up to a local appraisal board to decide whether there has been more than one protest relating to the same property. While a board has no authority to change a settlement reached by a taxpayer and the chief appraiser, it certainly has the authority to take note of what property was included. | Party Submissions | 10.018972 | 12.088733 | 11.882392 |
One Lease Ended Up in Both the Hooks and this Bordages Case The severance also put a single lease into both the Hooks case and Bordages cases. One Bordages owner under that lease is also in privity with the Hooks, who own the executive rights under that lease. | Party Submissions | 38.532383 | 44.14165 | 49.602325 |
Orders confirming Chapter 11 reorganization plans become final judgments when not challenged for fraud in accordance with 11 U.S.C. | Party Submissions | 10.1776 | 11.361624 | 11.074043 |
Synopsis Employer petitioned for writ of mandamus, compelling the 189th District Court, Harris County, Carolyn Marks Johnson, J., to abate employee's negligence action against employer until Workers' Compensation Commission made final decision on employee's claim. The Court of Appeals, Bill Cannon, J. (Assigned), held ... | Party Submissions | 6.544973 | 6.480578 | 6.64504 |
The Texarkana court held that the Raymond exclusion only applies where the deed is from one spouse as the grantor to the other spouse as grantee. Id. at 710. In Moncey, the sisters were the grantors under the deed, so it was not a conveyance from one spouse to the other spouse to exclude parol evidence. Id. | Party Submissions | 10.758111 | 10.503847 | 13.138333 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.