text stringlengths 89 3.77k ⌀ | category stringclasses 4
values | saul-7b_perplexity float64 1.76 124 ⌀ | llama2-7b_perplexity float64 1.8 127 ⌀ | mistral-7b_perplexity float64 1.76 157 ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Customers do not own the claims is erroneous. See Pet. at 20, 23-25. In the 2008 assignment, Best Buy assigned its tax refund claims to the individual Customers. Id . | Party Submissions | 18.103987 | 22.607157 | 24.406454 |
To provide that an individual who uses marijuana in compliance with State law may not be denied occupancy of federally assisted housing, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 7.043193 | 6.024899 | 7.621117 |
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS This petition for review complies with the typeface requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(e) because it has been prepared in a conventional typeface no smaller than 14-point for text and 12-point for footnotes. This petition also complies with the word-court limitations of Rule 9... | Party Submissions | 4.538315 | 5.153582 | 6.030106 |
And in March 2020, the City of Frisco likewise issued its Declaration of Local Disaster for Public Health Emergency. Frisco passed an ordinance stating, “ In accordance with the Guidelines from the President, the Governor and the CDC, people shall avoid eating or drinking at bars [and] restaurants .” Ordinance No. 2020... | Party Submissions | 6.933353 | 7.258455 | 7.685024 |
Quinn, joined by Justices Parker and Doss, unanimously concluded that the Walkers’ experts’ reports were insufficient to comply with section 74.351. | Party Submissions | 20.443045 | 22.400541 | 26.502293 |
In its Motion for Rehearing, Petitioners ask the Court to reverse its holding that there was no evidence to legally support a finding of proximate cause needed for the yield sign claim. On this point, the motion should be denied as the Court correctly held that no evidence on proximate cause existed make the claim lega... | Party Submissions | 9.144487 | 10.168868 | 9.745978 |
First Franklin made a special indorsement on the Note directing payment to First Franklin Financial Corporation. CR2:53. First Franklin Financial Corporation made a special indorsement on the Note directing payment to Dreambuilder Investments, LLC. CR2:53. Dreambuilder Investments, LLC executed an Allonge directing pay... | Party Submissions | 6.26755 | 6.260788 | 7.190885 |
Enacted by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269 (H.B. 752), § 1, effective September 1, 1993; am. Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1426 (H.B. 2510), § 11, effective September 1, 1999; am. Acts 2005, 79th Leg., ch. 265 (H.B. 7), § 3.104, effective September 1, 2005; am. Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., ch. 1153 (H.B. 2089), § 1, effective Septe... | Party Submissions | 2.100206 | 2.115378 | 2.146222 |
Change in Control. A Participant will receive his or her entire unpaid vested Account Balance in a single lump sum payment if Separation from Service occurs within twenty-four (24) months following a Change in Control. Payment will be made at the time set forth in Section 6.1(a). | Contract | 4.677625 | 4.747571 | 5.486487 |
Fleming Defendants made their second Absolute Anti-Collateral Estoppel Agreement with the court after they lost the Kinney trial. Wilson Plaintiffs sought offensive collateral estoppel on the Kinney judgment, and Fleming Defendants responded with an aggressive absolute anti-collateral estoppel position as follows: In K... | Party Submissions | 7.797826 | 6.949313 | 8.113153 |
This document is current through the 2023 Regular Session; the 1st C.S.; the 2nd C.S.; the 3rd C.S. and the 4th C.S. of the 88th Legislature; and the November 7, 2023 election results. | Party Submissions | 4.423625 | 3.996976 | 5.107457 |
S EC. 2. Upon adoption of House Resolution 863— (a) House Resolution 995 is hereby adopted; and • HRES 996 EH (b) no other resolution incidental to impeachment relating to House Resolution 863 shall be privileged during the remainder of the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. | Legislation | 13.138287 | 13.735745 | 15.150468 |
The Party invoking confidentiality and/or privilege may respond to these objections no later than 24 November 2023. Both the objections and replies must be set out in the privilege log. | Legal Decisions | 18.091553 | 15.530838 | 21.243576 |
Arbitration Rule 30 15.1. The arbitration shall proceed in accordance with the Procedural Calendar attached hereto as Annex B, except if the Tribunal, upon a showing of good cause by either Party, on the Tribunal’s own initiative, or by mutual agreement of the Parties, decides that this Procedural Timetable requires am... | Legal Decisions | 7.037377 | 7.100563 | 6.925854 |
Injunctive Relief Galovelho sought injunctive relief in the trial court based on its claims that appellees’ actions violated its rights to equal protection and due process under the Texas constitution. See TEX. CONST. art I, §§ 3, 19. In its third appellate issue, – 18– Galovelho argues that these equitable claims are ... | Party Submissions | 8.424552 | 10.559953 | 10.051931 |
Having considered the above documents and the Parties’ views, the Tribunal now issues the present Order: Pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rules 27 and 29, this Procedural Order sets out the Procedural Rules that govern this arbitration. The timetable is attached as Annex B . | Legal Decisions | 8.485363 | 9.561317 | 9.708775 |
As to the RTP issue, HSMiller has not and cannot point to any legally sufficient evidence that in the underlying trial Flaven would have been submitted in the apportionment question, that Flaven would have been apportioned 100% of the responsibility, or that any failure to timely designate Flaven was the cause-in-fact ... | Party Submissions | 14.967164 | 18.801987 | 20.474873 |
See Tex. Lab. Code § 410.021 (emphasis added). The Section refers to the "claim" three times, including to "the respective parties to a workers' compensation claim," apparently contemplating the existence of a pending claim as a predicate to the conference. The section is silent as to the question before us—whether DWC... | Party Submissions | 4.707472 | 5.175277 | 4.97011 |
Any and all documents included in the files maintained by the Planning Commission of the Assembly of the City of Belgrade’s with respect to its work on the 2015 DRP. RELEVANCE Claimants hereby incorporate the explanation provided at Request No. 52 above. | Legal Decisions | 29.476807 | 34.74383 | 36.15494 |
In this case, had the court not exercised or retained its jurisdiction, the court would have dismissed R.L.S.'s petition for expunction. It did not. Rather, the trial court ruled on the merits of the petition and denied it. | Party Submissions | 7.769316 | 9.56017 | 9.983601 |
Convention Article 48(1); Arbitration Rules 10, 11(4), 12, 27 and 35 5.1. Decisions of the Tribunal shall be taken by a majority of the Members of the Tribunal. | Legal Decisions | 6.6559 | 6.534712 | 7.424344 |
Just a few years later, the Austin Court of Appeals considered the characterization of an employment bonus paid to husband shortly after divorce. | Party Submissions | 29.875221 | 31.606842 | 39.599133 |
To require the review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States of greenfield investments by the People’s Republic of China. | Legislation | 9.757529 | 5.405306 | 7.67507 |
The Amarillo Court correctly concluded the reports failed to state any causal link between the nurses’ alleged failures and the harm. Baptist St. Anthony’s Hosp. v. Walker, No. 07-22-00032-CV, 2022 WL 17324338 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Nov. 29, 2022). Because the reports omitted the causation element, they were deficient and... | Party Submissions | 6.357648 | 6.263497 | 6.456084 |
Here, as set forth above, there was at least some evidence by Husband as to the lack of donative intent regarding the real property refinance and deed. Likewise, as set forth above, there was at least some evidence a to the mixed character value of husband’s retirement funds. Even if the evidence presented in either in... | Party Submissions | 11.354743 | 11.895185 | 12.263207 |
None of these documents were provided by the Respondent to the Claimant or are in the possession of the Claimant. The requested information is internal governmental documentation, which Qatar is in a position to access without undue burden. | Legal Decisions | 12.488874 | 16.023962 | 13.31581 |
The determination of whether any type of claim is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Texas Workers' Compensation Commission depends on whether the claim is based on a claimant's entitlement to benefits. The issue is not whether a particular type of claim, such as a tort or statutory claim, is within the exclusive... | Party Submissions | 3.972559 | 3.709529 | 4.178559 |
Also in 2017, Stonehenge had investors that needed state tax credits to be issued in 2017. To do so, TX 1111 obtained an advisory determination from NPS that allowed it to prepare a state Part C for QREs incurred in the rehabilitation of the Texaco building through December 31, 2016. This had the effect of dividing the... | Party Submissions | 8.592151 | 7.998089 | 8.254432 |
In addition, Claimants have not established that the requested documents are relevant to the U.S. preliminary objection or material to its outcome. | Legal Decisions | 20.385302 | 18.134775 | 22.138533 |
This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Knott Knott, 128 S.W.3d 211, 215 (Tex. 2003). When both sides move for summary judgment and the trial court grants one motion and denies the other, the court reviews the summary judgment evidence presented by both sides, deter... | Party Submissions | 3.147865 | 4.231894 | 4.029581 |
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Patricia A. Grant, acting pro se, appeals from a final judgment partitioning real property in Fayette County and from an order requiring payment of court costs. 1 We affirm both decisions. | Party Submissions | 7.343418 | 8.217943 | 9.555355 |
First, the cases are not distinguishable because there is not, fundamentally, a dispute about which contract is at issue in this matter. | Party Submissions | 18.18615 | 19.840641 | 27.52691 |
Any and all minutes and recordings from all meetings of the Urban Planning Institute of Belgrade related to the preparation of the 2015 DRP. RELEVANCE The Urban Planning Institute of Belgrade was the holder of the plan development ( in Serbian: nosilac izrade plana ) for the 2015 DRP with responsibilities described at ... | Legal Decisions | 19.202368 | 14.422627 | 19.069511 |
The Motion claims the appellate court failed to address whether direct-benefits estoppel applied to Respondents’ claims under the de novo standard. | Party Submissions | 19.45255 | 22.964588 | 21.847488 |
Investment Disputes (“ ICSID ” or the “Centre”) on the basis of the Agreement Between the Government of the Kingdom of Norway and the Government of the Republic of Latvia on the Mutual Promotion and Protection of Investments, which entered into force on 1 December 1992 (the “BIT” or “Treaty”), and the Convention on the... | Legal Decisions | 2.879286 | 2.987506 | 3.096771 |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date. | Contract | 2.093611 | 2.443819 | 3.083943 |
The Court of Appeals’ decision in this case cannot be reconciled with the holdings in Tyler and Hellas, as the factual and procedural differences the court highlighted as “distinguishing” factors simply have no bearing on the jurisdictional analysis. This Court should grant review to clarify the scope of the DWC’s excl... | Party Submissions | 8.404494 | 8.31779 | 9.58728 |
On appeal, Grant asserts that the order should be reversed because the trial court ignored her, failed to consider evidence, allowed judicial misconduct, and violated her due process and equal protection rights. We review the trial court’s order requiring payment of costs for an abuse of discretion. In re R.J., No. 02-... | Party Submissions | 3.828843 | 4.363794 | 4.381625 |
By focusing on Thompson, the Seventh Court also erred by failing to read the expert reports together and credit all of the experts’ opinions. Miller, 536 S.W.3d at 517; Van Ness, 461 S.W.3d at 144. | Party Submissions | 9.625717 | 9.438447 | 11.482796 |
Rusk at San Jacinto Building Investors, LP, entity formed by PRA (which was founded by Leon J. Backes) and owner of the Texaco building. Stonehenge Stonehenge Capital Co., the tax credit investor to which TX 1111 sold the state tax credits through Rusk Investor, LLC. | Party Submissions | 43.742016 | 34.967915 | 45.49756 |
On the calculation of damages 518. The Tribunal has found that Respondent has engaged in several violations of the Treaty. Specifically, Respondent has executed an indirect creeping expropriation of Claimant’s investment and has violated the both the FET and the umbrella clauses. The Tribunal has concluded that there h... | Legal Decisions | 7.71137 | 8.273689 | 7.729132 |
Arbitral Tribunal considers that the documents sought under this request are included in Request 3.a and no decision is therefore made. | Legal Decisions | 31.192448 | 45.665344 | 56.72801 |
Texas Bar No. 10476000 donjackson@warejackson.com Ware, Jackson, Lee, O’Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP 2929 Allen Parkway, 39th Floor Houston, Texas 77019 (713) 659-6400 (713) 659-6262 (fax) I certify that Rule 9.4(i)(1) portion of this petition contains 2868 words. | Party Submissions | 5.882101 | 6.972879 | 7.503247 |
To facilitate Serbia’s search for responsive documents, Claimants agree to limit their request to: “ Any and all minutes and recordings from Beoland’s meetings related to the preparation of the 2015 DRP discussing the rezoning of the land plot located across the street from Dunavska 17-19 and 23 for residential purpose... | Legal Decisions | 11.90665 | 11.275858 | 13.464645 |
This Court has already recognized that removing an individual from the ballot based on technical defects poses serious and difficult “constitutional problems.” In re Francis, 186 S.W.3d at 542. That is reason enough not to construe Section 172.0222(i) as abrogating this Court’s equitable authority to permit candidates ... | Party Submissions | 8.152986 | 7.464752 | 8.046346 |
Texas action in favor of the first-filed Oklahoma case is therefore consistent with principles of comity and conservation of judicial resources. See generally Wyatt v. | Party Submissions | 16.893312 | 24.074566 | 33.57863 |
Further, the trial court's action would deprive Tyler of its right to claim the exclusive remedy provision of the Act. See TEX. LAB.CODE ANN. § 408.001. There is currently a binding appeals panel decision that Reynaldo's death occurred in the course and scope of his employment, and the Gaonas are entitled to death bene... | Party Submissions | 5.523408 | 6.556421 | 6.089772 |
Lennar respectfully requests that the Court grant its petition for review, reverse the court of appeals’ judgment, and render judgment ordering the case into arbitration. | Party Submissions | 9.875594 | 16.930246 | 11.456581 |
Alternatively, Petitioners ask the Court to rewrite the Opinion so as to not follow Casteel or rather provide "guidance" on Casteel so that the Court may presume that the jury's negligence finding was based on the humped crossing theory and not the yield sign theory. This result, of course, directly conflicts with Cast... | Party Submissions | 9.4231 | 11.022336 | 11.006998 |
First NBC was closed by the Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation was appointed receiver and took possession of First NBC’s assets on April 28, 2017. The bridge loan matured on August 28, 2017, and the principal balance of $30,000,000.00 became due and owing. Both TX ... | Party Submissions | 6.852844 | 6.847508 | 7.34807 |
Ross, and reports by the court-appointed attorney/investigators concluding that the accusations by Laura and Ross against Tonya were untrue. | Party Submissions | 27.444342 | 30.913506 | 35.8209 |
The Opinion does not open door for "granulating a simple negligence question into multiple special issues" as Amici speculate.31 Rule 277 merely directs the use of broad-form submissions "whenever feasible." As the Opinion notes, "Rule 277 30 As discussed in KCSR's Motion for Rehearing, the charge as to the humped cros... | Party Submissions | 9.021107 | 10.069393 | 9.85821 |
The only reason that the finality of a § 1.111(e) agreement will likely ever be before a court is that one party to it latently believes that the agreement was ill advised and probably entered into without requisite or accurate knowledge. If every contract theory of avoidance is available to the party wishing to void t... | Party Submissions | 10.57144 | 11.969609 | 10.751901 |
According to Respondents, Oncor just seeks to change an erroneous “value,” and the Tax Code excludes “a mistake in judgment or reasoning” from the definition of a “clerical error.” See Respondents’ Brief at 19. But Oncor does not seek a substantive reevaluation of market value.3 Oncor seeks to correct an objective erro... | Party Submissions | 9.371038 | 10.564297 | 9.92642 |
The Program disclosed the following undisputed facts about Barina, all of which establish as true that she exploited Thrash’s estate, but the court of appeals notably—and erroneously—never engaged with them. | Party Submissions | 36.053635 | 35.16772 | 36.96405 |
To the contrary, there are at least two courts of appeals that have held that mutual mistake will not work to set aside an agreement filed under TEX. TAX CODE § 1.111(e). In a case in which Valerus, the owner, tried to set aside an agreement under § 1.111(e) on the basis of mutual mistake, the Thirteenth Court of Appea... | Party Submissions | 5.078503 | 5.199644 | 5.116845 |
On December 27, 2023—more than six weeks after Justice Devine filed his application—Relator sent a letter to Chairman Rinaldi challenging Justice Devine’s application. Ex.A. This letter argued that signatures on Justice Devine’s petition were invalid. Ex.A. Chairman Rinaldi did not respond to the challenge. Ex.D. Relat... | Party Submissions | 6.790307 | 7.350258 | 7.694951 |
However, contrary to the Claimant’s submissions, the first page of the report does not say that it was issued “in response to [the Respondent’s] request”. Rather, the report provides that it was issued further to “records of [payments], processed through [the MOPC], supposedly ready and awaiting [the Comptroller Genera... | Legal Decisions | 8.616547 | 8.647827 | 8.772159 |
The evidence supports Justice Jewell’s conclusion that “Rafiei has several options to seek a reduced or deferred filing fee, and he has not shown that he has explored any of them.” Dissent, p. 7. Additionally, “Rafiei does not explain why the $7,000 initial filing fee for his $1 million claim will apply to an arbitral ... | Party Submissions | 14.545101 | 15.23638 | 15.024179 |
What this Court actually held in the context of a settlement agreement was: In the first instance, it is up to a local appraisal board to decide whether there has been more than one protest relating to the same property. While a board has no authority to change a settlement reached by a taxpayer and the chief appraiser... | Party Submissions | 10.039286 | 11.418312 | 11.69017 |
R, M : Claimants failed to demonstrate how requested documents are relevant to its case and material for the outcome of the proceedings. In particular, Claimants failed to explain how the documentation relating to the Environmental Impact Assessment Report is relevant to the question of Obnova's alleged rights or mater... | Legal Decisions | 11.079899 | 10.329768 | 11.745482 |
A Participant shall specify an investment allocation for each of his Accounts in accordance with procedures established by the Committee. Allocation among the investment options must be designated in increments of one percent (1%). The Participant’s investment allocation will become effective on the same Business Day o... | Contract | 6.62776 | 7.076271 | 8.536901 |
Convention Article 48(1); Arbitration Rules 10, 11(4), 12, 27 and 35 5.1. Decisions of the Tribunal shall be taken by a majority of the Members of the Tribunal. | Legal Decisions | 6.6559 | 6.534712 | 7.424344 |
The heart of the prohibitive arbitration costs analysis resides in the penultimate paragraph and its accompanying footnote. There, the Court elucidates that “ If AutoNation insists on some payment from Shattenkirk, and Shattenkirk resists arbitration on that ground, only then will the court have to address the legal ba... | Party Submissions | 12.316971 | 11.278889 | 13.493501 |
Jaguar ? And if the next case goes to the forthcoming Fifteenth Court of Appeals, how should it treat these authorities? This resulting confusion, too, merits review. | Party Submissions | 55.993397 | 70.50861 | 77.175186 |
A governmental defendant may challenge the existence of jurisdictional facts and support its argument with evidence. Alamo Heights Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Clark, 544 S.W.3d 755, 770 (Tex. 2018). In such instances, the analysis “mirrors that of a traditional summary judgment.” Tex. Dep’t of Transp. v. Lara, 625 S.W.3d 46, ... | Party Submissions | 3.091019 | 3.114798 | 3.313456 |
ATE .—The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to overpayments of special financial assistance under section 4262 of the Em-ployment Retirement Income Security Act (29 U.S.C. 1104) occurring before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act. | Legislation | 5.519043 | 6.664343 | 7.117274 |
Compensation Deferral Agreements. A Participant may elect to defer Compensation by submitting a Compensation Deferral Agreement during the enrollment periods established by the Committee and in the manner specified by the Committee, but in any event, in accordance with Section 4.2. A Compensation Deferral Agreement tha... | Contract | 4.747348 | 4.56456 | 5.165794 |
It is unclear what Serbia is actually arguing on this issue. To begin with, Serbia argues that searching for responsive documents would put Serbia “ in the difficult position of searching both physical archives and 160 Article 5(2) of the Law on Free Access to the Information of Public Importance states that everyone h... | Legal Decisions | 8.548787 | 9.586636 | 9.39858 |
Christus Spohn Health System Corp. v. High and Rector , 658 S.W.3d 375 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi-Edinburg 2022, pet. denied). | Party Submissions | 6.022725 | 10.305033 | 6.255786 |
While Dr. Castillo and BSA raised many objections in the trial court, on appeal they challenged only the trial court ’s ruling on their causation and causation-related qualifications objections. Yet rather than limiting its review to the specific objections raised, the Seventh Court reviewed the causation objection de ... | Party Submissions | 12.961496 | 16.314413 | 16.003565 |
The obligation to provide full protection and security requires each Party to provide the level of police protection required under customary international law. | Legal Decisions | 10.023672 | 20.13379 | 13.543587 |
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE This motion complies with the length limitations of TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2)(D) because it has 4,498 words, excluding the parts exempted by TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(1). | Party Submissions | 3.425274 | 4.964233 | 5.639733 |
MVP’s filings alone were enough to obtain dismissal of the Texas action. No joinder by McCarthy and Travelers to “request dismissal” was required. | Party Submissions | 37.153755 | 49.093674 | 50.205055 |
T he tenant’s claim in Kemp did not fail because of anything that occurred in the forcible entry and retainer action itself. Thus, there is no conflict between the result in Kemp and Texas law on the division of authority between the district courts and the justice of the peace courts, or the proper dividing line betwe... | Party Submissions | 9.903068 | 11.377197 | 10.272077 |
The United States objects to Request No. 2.b for the same reasons stated above with respect to Request No. 2.a. | Legal Decisions | 7.55244 | 12.123148 | 12.931706 |
In its mandamus petition, Sonic seeks relief from the trial court's October 23, 2003 orders of abatement. See generally TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3. Sonic argues that the trial court's continued abatement of its contract claims is an abuse of discretion because there is no authority under the law to support continued abatemen... | Party Submissions | 5.203844 | 6.497932 | 5.896205 |
Aside from Oncor’s imaginative recasting of the facts in this matter making the error in question seem like entirely the mistake of Wilbarger CAD’s appraisal firm, Oncor suggests again the that agreement in question was really an agreement on total mileage across the state and that “a simple scrivener’s error in a sing... | Party Submissions | 10.015041 | 10.798358 | 10.308767 |
Neither side has conclusively proved its case with regard to the exclusive-remedy defense. The defense remains a question of fact to be decided by the jury. | Party Submissions | 10.041157 | 12.854323 | 13.781443 |
Respondent disputes that Obnova had property rights over the Dunavska Plots and argues that Obnova merely had a right to use the Dunavska Plots pursuant to several lease agreements. Respondent located a number of lease agreements concluded by Obnova and the City of Belgrade and Luka Beograd. However, Respondent was not... | Legal Decisions | 7.699575 | 7.182027 | 7.81854 |
Claimants note that Serbia’s objections relate to the lack of a specific time period and the fact that the request was not limited to documents related to the rezoning for residential purposes of the land plot located directly across the street from Obnova’s premises at Dunavska 17-19 and Dunavska 23. Claimants have li... | Legal Decisions | 9.187655 | 9.066597 | 9.264204 |
To determine characterization of marital property, it is necessary to follow the flow of the presumptions at play: First, property possessed by either spouse during or upon dissolution of marriage is presumed to be community property. TEX. FAM. CODE §3.003(a). This is a rebuttable presumption and the party asserting se... | Party Submissions | 4.609492 | 5.348602 | 4.728341 |
A unanimous court of appeals reversed, holding the reports lacked the fundamental explanation of how and why any actions or inactions of the BSA nurses caused H.W.’s injury. Baptist St. Anthony’s Hosp., 2022 WL 17324338, at *5. The court also held the reports were insufficient as to Dr. Castillo. Id. The court did not ... | Party Submissions | 9.471805 | 10.339344 | 10.852271 |
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to improve the calculation and reduce the taxpayer cost of payment errors under the supplemental nutrition assistance program, and for other purposes. | Legislation | 4.813775 | 4.032531 | 4.93228 |
In Texas family law, the characterization of an asset as either community or separate property is determined by the character at the moment the party first has the right of claim to property. Welder v. Lambert, 91 Tex. 510, 44 S.W. 281 (1898). In determining whether the property is separate or community, the important ... | Party Submissions | 7.207574 | 9.054636 | 7.396808 |
The same analysis applies with equal force to the Program, a quintessential example of the issue-driven, advocacy-oriented journalism that is a standard part of the contemporary media diet in Texas and beyond. See Pet. Br. at 35 n.9 (noting that such reporting has been awarded for over 30 years). Even if the Program’s ... | Party Submissions | 12.236168 | 13.523847 | 13.388394 |
In January, Texas Mutual answered the petition with a one-page general denial and prayed that "upon final hearing hereof, the Court enter judgment denying all relief requested by [the Martinez Family] and affirming the Decision & Order. .. rendered on October 13, 2020, finding that Pedro Jovany 'Bruno' Martinez sustain... | Party Submissions | 5.920423 | 6.679228 | 6.66695 |
Affected Territory is. Bellpas’s lack of care in defining the Affected Territory was obvious to anyone that cared to look. LISD cared to look and CCISD did not. | Party Submissions | 52.3426 | 43.980347 | 61.113216 |
To prevent anticompetitive conduct through the use of pricing algorithms by prohibiting the use of pricing algorithms that can facilitate collusion through the use of nonpublic competitor data, creating an antitrust law enforcement audit tool, increasing transparency, and enforcing violations through the Sherman Act an... | Legislation | 10.62951 | 9.364967 | 11.107366 |
As of this date, Respondent has not fulfilled his duty to reject Devine’s application as required by law, forcing Relator to file this Petition. Exhibit D. | Party Submissions | 22.737307 | 22.42758 | 24.977766 |
Dunavska 17-19 and 23 were not part the land over which Luka Beograd was granted the right of use under the agreement submitted as R-060. These determinations are, in turn, dire ctly relevant and material to show that Serbia’s assertion that Obnova did not have any permanent rights to its premises at Dunavska 17-19 and... | Legal Decisions | 11.592744 | 10.514335 | 11.730752 |
Further, the Plan did not really give HSMiller much incentive to prosecute after the initial $6 million settlement with Diamond State: (i) HSMiller had to fund up front the fees, costs, and expenses related 24 to the litigation; and (ii) HSMiller would not receive any funds from the first $5 million recovered, it would... | Party Submissions | 8.843505 | 8.418051 | 8.961015 |
In ¶ 150 of Procedural Order No. 7, the majority of the Tribunal considered the ancillary claim to be “within the scope of consent of the Parties and within the jurisdiction of ICSID”. In ¶ 157 of the same Order, the majority also confirmed that the “consideration of the ancillary claim [would] be carried out respectin... | Party Submissions | 8.85959 | 9.738926 | 8.409583 |
During the meeting on 3 March 2006, the Assembly adopted Decision No. 350-5/06-c, which constitutes the basis for the later adoption of the 2013 DRP.107 The requested documents are relevant and material to assess the factors that the City of Belgrade took into consideration when it decided to prepare a detailed regulat... | Legal Decisions | 11.152655 | 11.507807 | 12.479559 |
Id., at 535; Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 74.001(a)(10). This Court held that the claims related to professional or administrative services directly related to the healthcare of some patient and thus fell under the TMLA. | Party Submissions | 10.144421 | 11.662151 | 12.820369 |
In addition to the illegal assignment, another reason requires the Court to reverse and render: legally insufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict on malpractice liability. HSMiller attempts to rebut two of the Lawyers’ no-evidence arguments — the timing of moving to designate Flaven as a responsible third party... | Party Submissions | 17.316805 | 15.484652 | 18.999575 |
Respondent notes that in principle Claimants do not object to this request, “ with the exception of any documents created in preparation for and/or in connection with the conduct of the present arbitration”. However, Claimants' willingness to produce the documents is made uncertain and is overshadowed by the fact that ... | Legal Decisions | 16.659096 | 17.38488 | 16.590742 |
Dr. Tappan also described how the BSA nurses caring for Ms. Walker — Sarah Beukelman, R.N., Kristen Yoder, R.N., and Kendra Smith, R.N. — breached the standard of care when they failed to apply a fetal scalp electrode early in the delivery (as required by BSA’s protocols and authorized by Dr. Castillo), failed to recor... | Party Submissions | 13.522876 | 13.821426 | 15.146014 |
Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 840. The relator must also show that it has no other adequate remedy. Id. A remedy by appeal is not inadequate merely because the party may incur more expense and delay than in obtaining the writ. Id. at 842. | Party Submissions | 5.406082 | 6.160585 | 7.239087 |
R. App. P. 9.4(e) because it was prepared with Microsoft Word 365 software, using a proportionally spaced 12-point Times New Roman typeface. | Party Submissions | 9.057385 | 14.761822 | 17.3874 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.