Datasets:
File size: 8,201 Bytes
79e67e6 f367b1e 79e67e6 f367b1e 79e67e6 f367b1e 79e67e6 f367b1e 79e67e6 f367b1e 79e67e6 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 | ---
language:
- en
license: mit
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
task_categories:
- time-series-forecasting
- tabular-classification
- tabular-regression
tags:
- time-series
- foundation-models
- probing
- benchmark
- evaluation
- synthetic
- baseline-controlled
- neurips-2026
pretty_name: TSFMI-Synthetic
configs:
- config_name: trend
data_files:
- split: train
path: trend/train.parquet
- split: validation
path: trend/val.parquet
- split: test
path: trend/test.parquet
- config_name: seasonality
data_files:
- split: train
path: seasonality/train.parquet
- split: validation
path: seasonality/val.parquet
- split: test
path: seasonality/test.parquet
- config_name: frequency
data_files:
- split: train
path: frequency/train.parquet
- split: validation
path: frequency/val.parquet
- split: test
path: frequency/test.parquet
- config_name: stationarity
data_files:
- split: train
path: stationarity/train.parquet
- split: validation
path: stationarity/val.parquet
- split: test
path: stationarity/test.parquet
- config_name: anomaly
data_files:
- split: train
path: anomaly/train.parquet
- split: validation
path: anomaly/val.parquet
- split: test
path: anomaly/test.parquet
- config_name: change_point
data_files:
- split: train
path: change_point/train.parquet
- split: validation
path: change_point/val.parquet
- split: test
path: change_point/test.parquet
- config_name: trend_hard
data_files:
- split: train
path: trend_hard/train.parquet
- split: validation
path: trend_hard/val.parquet
- split: test
path: trend_hard/test.parquet
- config_name: frequency_hard
data_files:
- split: train
path: frequency_hard/train.parquet
- split: validation
path: frequency_hard/val.parquet
- split: test
path: frequency_hard/test.parquet
- config_name: stationarity_hard
data_files:
- split: train
path: stationarity_hard/train.parquet
- split: validation
path: stationarity_hard/val.parquet
- split: test
path: stationarity_hard/test.parquet
- config_name: anomaly_hard
data_files:
- split: train
path: anomaly_hard/train.parquet
- split: validation
path: anomaly_hard/val.parquet
- split: test
path: anomaly_hard/test.parquet
- config_name: change_point_hard
data_files:
- split: train
path: change_point_hard/train.parquet
- split: validation
path: change_point_hard/val.parquet
- split: test
path: change_point_hard/test.parquet
---
# TSFMI-Synthetic
Synthetic time-series datasets with **mathematically exact ground-truth labels**
for the TSFMI baseline-controlled probing protocol.
> Companion data for the NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations & Datasets Track submission
> *"TSFMI: A Baseline-Controlled Evaluation Protocol for Time-Series Foundation
> Model Representations."* The code (anonymous) lives at
> https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TSFMI.
## Why this dataset exists
Probing time-series foundation models (TSFMs) is hard because high probe
accuracy may reflect probe capacity rather than encoded knowledge. TSFMI
addresses this with **explicit non-model controls** (hand-crafted features,
raw signal, random projection, ROCKET) evaluated under the same canonical
60/20/20 split, the same sklearn estimator, the same 5 seeds, and the same
bootstrap CI as the model probe. The synthetic datasets in this repository
provide six standard temporal properties **plus five hard variants** under
which TSFM representation claims can be evaluated against the controls.
## Configurations (11 tasks)
| Config | Type | Classes / Range | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| `trend` | classification | 3 (up / down / flat) | linear slope ± noise |
| `seasonality` | regression | period ∈ {8, 16, 32, 64} | sinusoid + noise; label = period |
| `frequency` | classification | 8 frequency bins | discrete sinusoidal frequency bands |
| `stationarity` | classification | 2 (stationary / non-stationary) | Gaussian noise vs. random walk |
| `anomaly` | classification | 2 (normal / anomaly) | single ±5σ point spike — **kurtosis is a sufficient statistic** |
| `change_point` | classification | 2 (none / has-CP) | mean+variance shift at midpoint |
| `*_hard` (5) | classification | varies | structured background + subtle anomalies / weak slopes / overlapping harmonics / variance drift / mild CP |
Each config has 1000 sequences of length 512, partitioned 60/20/20
(train/val/test = 600/200/200). All data is generated deterministically with
`seed=42` (data) and `split_seed=0` (partition), matching the canonical
artefacts in the paper.
## Quick start
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("EvalData/TSFMI", "anomaly")
print(ds)
# DatasetDict({
# train: 600, validation: 200, test: 200
# })
print(ds["train"][0]["sequence"][:8], ds["train"][0]["label"])
```
Each row contains:
- `sequence`: list[float] of length 512 (the time-series window)
- `label`: int (classification) or float (seasonality regression)
- `seed`: int (data-generation seed; always 42 here)
- `split_seed`: int (split seed used to partition this row; 0 for the canonical artefacts)
## Reproduction recipe
The same 60/20/20 + 5-seed + bootstrap protocol used in the paper is
implemented in [the GitHub repository](https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TSFMI):
```bash
curl -L -o TSFMI.zip "https://anonymous.4open.science/api/repo/TSFMI/zip"
unzip TSFMI.zip && cd TSFMI
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt && pip install -e ".[dev]"
# CPU smoke test (<10 min) — reproduces the headline HC anomaly = 0.858 cell
make smoke
# Full canonical pipeline (~48 A100-hours)
make extract-representations
make reproduce-all
```
## Headline result reproducible from this dataset
Under the canonical 60/20/20 protocol with sklearn `LogisticRegression` and a
bootstrap 95% CI over 5 seeds:
- An 8-D **hand-crafted feature vector** reaches **0.858** test accuracy on
the canonical `anomaly` configuration.
- A **single kurtosis feature** alone reaches **0.859**.
- A **single max-absolute-magnitude feature** alone reaches **0.907**.
- The best of seven pre-trained TSFMs reaches **0.753** (TimesFM); all other
TSFMs (MOMENT, Chronos, PatchTST, GPT4TS, Timer, Moirai) score 0.50–0.73.
This **inversion** is what motivates the baseline-controlled discipline of
TSFMI and is documented in §3.3 and Appendix A.8 of the paper.
## License
MIT. The synthetic data is fully procedurally generated; there is no
human-derived or scraped content. Real-world datasets used elsewhere by the
TSFMI evaluation pipeline (ETTh1, Weather, Electricity, Traffic, Exchange
Rate, UCR) are **not redistributed here** and remain under their respective
original licenses; see the GitHub `LICENSE` file for details.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{tsfmi2026,
title = {{TSFMI}: A Baseline-Controlled Evaluation Protocol for Time-Series Foundation Model Representations},
author = {Anonymous Authors},
howpublished = {Anonymous submission to the NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations \& Datasets Track},
year = {2026},
url = {https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TSFMI}
}
```
## Responsible AI notes
- **Data collection**: synthetic procedural generation, no human subjects, no scraping.
- **Limitations**: each generator instantiates one statistically simple test bed; the canonical anomaly task is kurtosis-trivial by design (`realistic_anomaly` variant in the GitHub repo bounds this).
- **Biases**: none — purely synthetic with no demographic content.
- **Personal/sensitive info**: none.
- **Use cases**: probing TSFM internal representations, calibrating new probing protocols against simple non-model baselines.
- **Misuse cases**: not intended as a production anomaly detector; do not interpret the canonical anomaly task as evidence that any model "detects anomalies" in any operational sense.
- **Synthetic data indicator**: 100% synthetic.
The full Croissant 1.0 + RAI metadata is provided as `CROISSANT.json` in this
repository.
|