|
|
---
|
|
|
dataset_info:
|
|
|
features:
|
|
|
- name: timestamp
|
|
|
dtype: large_string
|
|
|
- name: tweet
|
|
|
dtype: large_string
|
|
|
- name: language
|
|
|
dtype: string
|
|
|
- name: total_tokens
|
|
|
dtype: int64
|
|
|
- name: sentiment_class
|
|
|
list:
|
|
|
- name: label
|
|
|
dtype: string
|
|
|
- name: score
|
|
|
dtype: float64
|
|
|
- name: sentiment_label
|
|
|
dtype: string
|
|
|
- name: sentiment_score
|
|
|
dtype: float64
|
|
|
- name: confidence_level
|
|
|
dtype: string
|
|
|
- name: year
|
|
|
dtype: string
|
|
|
splits:
|
|
|
- name: train
|
|
|
num_bytes: 6772592588.26901
|
|
|
num_examples: 22033090
|
|
|
download_size: 3584763878
|
|
|
dataset_size: 6772592588.26901
|
|
|
configs:
|
|
|
- config_name: default
|
|
|
data_files:
|
|
|
- split: train
|
|
|
path: data/train-*
|
|
|
language:
|
|
|
- en
|
|
|
tags:
|
|
|
- Blockchain,
|
|
|
- DLT
|
|
|
- Cryptocurrencies
|
|
|
- Bitcoin
|
|
|
- Ethereum
|
|
|
- Crypto
|
|
|
pretty_name: Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) / Blockchain Tweets
|
|
|
size_categories:
|
|
|
- 10M<n<100M
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
# DLT-Tweets |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Description |
|
|
|
|
|
### Dataset Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
DLT-Tweets is a large-scale corpus of social media posts related to Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT). This dataset is part of the larger DLT-Corpus collection, designed to support NLP research, social computing studies, and public discourse analysis in the DLT domain. |
|
|
|
|
|
The dataset contains **22.03 million social media documents** with **1,120 million tokens** (1.12 billion tokens), spanning posts from **2013 to mid-2023**. All documents are in English and have been processed to protect user privacy. |
|
|
|
|
|
This dataset is part of the DLT-Corpus collection. For the complete corpus including scientific literature and patent data, see: https://huggingface.co/collections/ExponentialScience/dlt-corpus-68e44e40d4e7a3bd7a224402 |
|
|
|
|
|
### Languages |
|
|
|
|
|
English (en) |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Structure |
|
|
|
|
|
### Data Fields |
|
|
|
|
|
Each post in the dataset contains the following fields: |
|
|
|
|
|
- **tweet**: Full text content of the social media post |
|
|
- **timestamp**: Date and time when the post was created |
|
|
- **year**: Year the post was created |
|
|
- **language**: Language code (all entries are 'en' for English) |
|
|
- **total_tokens**: Total number of tokens in the tweet |
|
|
- **sentiment_class**: Classified sentiment category (e.g., positive, negative, neutral) |
|
|
- **sentiment_label**: Detailed sentiment label |
|
|
- **sentiment_score**: Numerical sentiment score |
|
|
- **confidence_level**: Confidence level of the sentiment classification |
|
|
|
|
|
**Privacy Protection:** All usernames have been removed from the tweet text to protect user privacy. |
|
|
|
|
|
### Data Splits |
|
|
|
|
|
This is a single corpus without predefined splits. Users should create their own train/validation/test splits based on their specific research needs. Consider temporal splits for time-series analyses or studying how discourse evolves over time. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Creation |
|
|
|
|
|
### Curation Rationale |
|
|
|
|
|
DLT-Tweets was created to address the lack of large-scale social media corpora for studying public discourse, sentiment, and information diffusion in the Distributed Ledger Technology domain. Social media data provides unique insights into: |
|
|
|
|
|
- Public perception and sentiment toward DLT technologies |
|
|
- Real-time reactions to DLT events (market movements, hacks, regulations) |
|
|
- Information spreading patterns and viral content |
|
|
- Community dynamics and influencer networks |
|
|
- The gap between technical development and public understanding |
|
|
|
|
|
### Source Data |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Data Collection |
|
|
|
|
|
Social media posts were aggregated from: |
|
|
1. **Previously published academic datasets** focused on cryptocurrency and blockchain topics |
|
|
2. **Publicly available industry sources** that collected DLT-related social media data |
|
|
|
|
|
All data was collected **before Twitter/X's 2023 API restrictions** that limited academic research access. The collection complies with platform Terms of Service that were in effect at the time of collection, which explicitly permitted academic research use. |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Data Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
The collection process involved: |
|
|
|
|
|
1. **Aggregation**: Combining multiple sources while tracking provenance |
|
|
2. **Username removal**: Removing all @username mentions to protect privacy |
|
|
3. **Duplicate detection**: Identifying and removing duplicate posts |
|
|
4. **Language filtering**: Filtering for English-language posts using language detection |
|
|
5. **Sentiment analysis**: Adding sentiment labels using automated classification |
|
|
6. **Quality filtering**: Removing extremely short posts |
|
|
7. **Privacy protection**: Ensuring no identifying information remains |
|
|
|
|
|
### Annotations |
|
|
|
|
|
The dataset includes automated sentiment annotations generated using sentiment analysis models. These provide: |
|
|
- Sentiment class (positive, negative, neutral) |
|
|
- Sentiment scores and confidence levels |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Annotation Process |
|
|
|
|
|
Sentiment was determined using automated sentiment analysis models trained on social media text. |
|
|
|
|
|
### Personal and Sensitive Information |
|
|
|
|
|
**Privacy Measures:** |
|
|
|
|
|
- **All usernames have been removed** from the text content |
|
|
- No profile information, user IDs, or biographical data is included |
|
|
- Only the text content and basic engagement metrics are retained |
|
|
- Posts are not linkable back to specific individuals |
|
|
|
|
|
**Residual Considerations:** |
|
|
|
|
|
- Some posts may contain self-disclosed information in the text itself |
|
|
- Famous individuals or organizations might be identifiable through context |
|
|
- Users should not attempt to re-identify individuals from this dataset |
|
|
|
|
|
## Considerations for Using the Data |
|
|
|
|
|
### Social Impact of Dataset |
|
|
|
|
|
This dataset can enable: |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Positive impacts**: Understanding public discourse, detecting misinformation, studying information diffusion, analyzing sentiment trends, improving public communication about DLT |
|
|
- **Potential negative impacts**: Could be misused for market manipulation, creating targeted misinformation campaigns, or developing manipulative trading systems |
|
|
|
|
|
**Researchers should implement appropriate safeguards when working with this data.** |
|
|
|
|
|
### Discussion of Biases |
|
|
|
|
|
Potential biases include: |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Platform bias**: Only Twitter/X data is included; other social platforms are not represented |
|
|
- **User bias**: Social media users are not representative of the general population |
|
|
- **Language bias**: Only English-language posts are included |
|
|
- **Temporal bias**: More recent years have more posts due to platform growth and increased DLT interest |
|
|
- **Topic bias**: Certain events (market crashes, hacks) may generate disproportionate discussion |
|
|
- **Bot bias**: Despite filtering, some bot-generated content may remain |
|
|
- **Geographic bias**: English-speaking regions are over-represented |
|
|
|
|
|
### Other Known Limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Temporal gap**: No posts after mid-2023 due to platform API restrictions |
|
|
- **Context loss**: Username removal eliminates ability to analyze user behavior or influence |
|
|
- **Incomplete threads**: Some conversation threads may be incomplete due to filtering |
|
|
- **Sarcasm and irony**: Social media posts often use language that is difficult for NLP models to interpret |
|
|
- **Misinformation**: Dataset may contain false or misleading claims about DLT |
|
|
- **Market sensitivity**: Discussions may reflect market manipulation or coordinated campaigns |
|
|
- **Evolving terminology**: DLT terminology evolves rapidly; older posts may use outdated terms |
|
|
|
|
|
## Additional Information |
|
|
|
|
|
### Dataset Curators |
|
|
|
|
|
Walter Hernandez Cruz, Peter Devine, Nikhil Vadgama, Paolo Tasca, Jiahua Xu |
|
|
|
|
|
### Licensing Information |
|
|
|
|
|
**CC-BY-NC 4.0** (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International) |
|
|
|
|
|
This dataset is released under CC-BY-NC 4.0 for **research purposes only**. |
|
|
|
|
|
**Key terms:** |
|
|
- **Attribution required**: You must give appropriate credit to the dataset creators |
|
|
- **Non-commercial use**: Commercial use is not permitted under this license |
|
|
- **Academic research**: The dataset is intended for academic and non-profit research |
|
|
|
|
|
**Legal basis:** Data was collected before changes in Twitter/X's Terms of Service in 2023, under terms that explicitly permitted academic research use. See: |
|
|
- https://x.com/en/tos/previous/version_18 |
|
|
- https://x.com/en/tos/previous/version_17 |
|
|
|
|
|
For more information on CC-BY-NC 4.0, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
|
|
|
|
|
### Citation Information |
|
|
|
|
|
```bibtex |
|
|
@article{hernandez2025dlt-corpus, |
|
|
title={DLT-Corpus: A Large-Scale Text Collection for the Distributed Ledger Technology Domain}, |
|
|
author={Hernandez Cruz, Walter and Devine, Peter and Vadgama, Nikhil and Tasca, Paolo and Xu, Jiahua}, |
|
|
year={2025} |
|
|
} |
|
|
``` |