scar-eval / README.md
Farseen0's picture
Add HuggingFace Collection link to Related section
231e939 verified
metadata
license: apache-2.0
task_categories:
  - text-retrieval
language:
  - en
tags:
  - smart-contracts
  - solidity
  - security
  - evaluation
  - benchmark
size_categories:
  - n<1K

SCAR Evaluation Set

838 held-out contrastive pairs for evaluating smart contract vulnerability retrieval models. Constructed as a 10% stratified holdout from training sources plus the 91 original FORGE-Curated pairs (temporal holdout).

The split is performed at the report level — not the finding level — to prevent information leakage. Hash-based verification (SHA-256 on normalized source) confirms zero code overlap with scar-pairs.

Source Breakdown

Source Pairs
Solodit 228
msc-audits-with-reasons 178
msc-smart-contract-auditing 131
FORGE-Curated (original) 91
DeFiHackLabs 67
FORGE-Artifacts 59
FORGE-Curated-v2 36
EVuLLM 32
SmartBugs-Curated 14
GitmateAI 2
Total 838

Headline Results on this Eval Set

Method R@1 R@10 nDCG@10 MRR
BM25 0.504 0.689 0.591 0.566
E5-base-v2 0.456 0.656 0.554 0.530
SPLADE (Qwen) 0.809 0.963 0.892 0.869
SCAR (25 epochs) 0.894 0.977 0.939 0.927
SCAR + BM25 hybrid 0.825 0.983 0.908 0.884

Improvement over BM25 statistically significant at p < 0.0001 (paired bootstrap, n = 10,000).

Usage

from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("Farseen0/scar-eval", split="train")

Related

Paper

This dataset accompanies SCAR: Sparse Code Audit Retriever via SAE-LoRA Adaptation (Farseen Shaikh, 2026).

Citation

@inproceedings{shaikh2026scar,
  title  = {SCAR: Sparse Code Audit Retriever via SAE-LoRA Adaptation},
  author = {Shaikh, Farseen},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Under review at EMNLP 2026 (ACL ARR March cycle)},
  url    = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=moD8Hxq9hN}
}

License

Apache 2.0 — free for research and commercial use with attribution.