| --- |
| id: task_007_comprehensive_decision_hard_hard001 |
| name: comprehensive_decision-hard-hard001 |
| category: comprehensive_decision |
| grading_type: llm_judge |
| timeout_seconds: 1200 |
| gold_file: qa_gold/comprehensive_decision/hard001.json |
| workspace_files: [ |
| { |
| "source": "database/bilingual_translation_english_chinese.json", |
| "dest": "database/bilingual_translation_english_chinese.json" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/enterprise/company_core.csv", |
| "dest": "database/enterprise/company_core.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/enterprise/company_operation_status.csv", |
| "dest": "database/enterprise/company_operation_status.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/enterprise/company_operation_status_detail.csv", |
| "dest": "database/enterprise/company_operation_status_detail.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/enterprise/company_operation_yearly_status.csv", |
| "dest": "database/enterprise/company_operation_yearly_status.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/enterprise/company_profile.csv", |
| "dest": "database/enterprise/company_profile.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/enterprise/company_profile_as.csv", |
| "dest": "database/enterprise/company_profile_as.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/enterprise/company_profile_eu.csv", |
| "dest": "database/enterprise/company_profile_eu.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/enterprise/company_profile_na.csv", |
| "dest": "database/enterprise/company_profile_na.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/enterprise/company_profile_oc.csv", |
| "dest": "database/enterprise/company_profile_oc.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/industry/national_industry_status.csv", |
| "dest": "database/industry/national_industry_status.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/industry/national_industry_status_detail.csv", |
| "dest": "database/industry/national_industry_status_detail.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/industry/national_industry_yearly_status.csv", |
| "dest": "database/industry/national_industry_yearly_status.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/industry/regional_industry_status.csv", |
| "dest": "database/industry/regional_industry_status.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/industry/regional_industry_status_detail.csv", |
| "dest": "database/industry/regional_industry_status_detail.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/industry/regional_industry_yearly_status.csv", |
| "dest": "database/industry/regional_industry_yearly_status.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/internal_metrics.csv", |
| "dest": "database/internal_metrics.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/policy/policy_release_status.csv", |
| "dest": "database/policy/policy_release_status.csv" |
| }, |
| { |
| "source": "database/policy/policy_resource.csv", |
| "dest": "database/policy/policy_resource.csv" |
| } |
| ] |
| --- |
| |
| ## Prompt |
|
|
| In 2022, a strategic consulting firm was commissioned by a provincial government to quantitatively rank the comprehensive attractiveness of pharmaceutical manufacturing across provinces, in order to identify priority target regions for attracting leading enterprises. The company designed a four-dimensional weighted scoring system: four original indicators—enterprise agglomeration level (weight 30%), R&D expenditure as a share of revenue (weight 30%), regional policy coverage intensity (weight 20%), and R&D human resource penetration rate (weight 20%)—were normalized (min-max) and then weighted to produce a composite score. Among these, agglomeration level is measured by the proportion of enterprises in each province to the national total in pharmaceutical manufacturing; policy intensity is measured by the ratio of relevant policy items in each province to the total number of relevant policies nationwide; and human resource penetration rate is the total number of R&D personnel in each province divided by total employees. What is the specific composite score value of the province with the highest weighted composite score after normalization across provinces? |
|
|
| Output guidelines: |
| The answer should be a numerical value with 2 decimal places. Output only the number, without units or text. If relevant data cannot be found, please answer "No relevant data found" |
|
|
| Only use files under `./database/`. |
|
|
| ## Expected Behavior |
|
|
| Agent should read the provided `database/` files, compute the result, and return the final answer. The final answer must follow the required output format. |
|
|
| ## Grading Criteria |
|
|
| - [ ] Final answer semantically matches the gold `answer`. |
| - [ ] Output format follows `guidelines`. |
|
|
| ## LLM Judge Rubric |
|
|
| ### Criterion 1: Single-answer Correctness (Weight: 100%) |
|
|
| Gold answer JSON: |
| `0.92` |
|
|
| Scoring rules: |
| - Judge semantic equivalence between the model final answer and the gold answer. |
| - Return `scores` with one key `match` as 1 or 0. |
| - Return `total` as 1.0 if equivalent, otherwise 0.0. |
|
|
|
|