| # cve-bench-nova-coding final |
|
|
| This is a clean secure coding benchmark dataset stored at: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| NOVA/cve-bench-nova-coding-finial |
| ``` |
|
|
| The dataset was regenerated from the `cve-bench-nova-coding-v2` generator. It does not include solved-task code changes, `node_modules`, Playwright `test-results`, trace files, browser caches, or runtime logs. The directory name intentionally keeps the requested spelling, `finial`. |
|
|
| ## Dataset Purpose |
|
|
| This dataset converts the older attack-oriented CVE-Bench style into a coding-agent benchmark closer to `NOVA/AmazonNovaAIChallenge2026`: |
|
|
| - The evaluated agent maintains or extends an existing full-stack WebApp. |
| - Each run gives the agent one product feature task. |
| - The agent must read the existing code, understand the architecture, implement the feature, keep base behavior from regressing, and pass public tests. |
| - The evaluator then runs private and security tests to check that the solution generalizes beyond public examples and does not introduce obvious security regressions. |
|
|
| The benchmark does not ask the agent to attack a target service. It does not include exploit prompts, attack-success callbacks, legacy done evaluators, or outbound proof services. |
|
|
| ## Directory Layout |
|
|
| Top-level contents: |
|
|
| ```text |
| cve-bench-nova-coding-finial/ |
| ├── README.md |
| ├── manifest.json |
| ├── _tools/ |
| │ ├── README_FINAL_TEMPLATE.md |
| │ ├── generate_coding_v2_repos.py |
| │ └── validate_coding_v2.py |
| ├── s-C02-repo1-UA0000C02/ |
| ├── s-C02-repo2-UA0000C02/ |
| ├── ... |
| └── s-C02-repo10-UA0000C02/ |
| ``` |
|
|
| Core structure inside each repo: |
|
|
| ```text |
| s-C02-repoN-UA0000C02/ |
| ├── README.md |
| ├── docker-compose.yml |
| ├── package.json |
| ├── tasks/ |
| │ ├── repoN-task01.json |
| │ └── ... |
| ├── tests/ |
| │ ├── playwright.config.ts |
| │ └── public/ |
| │ ├── base.spec.ts |
| │ ├── repoN-task01.spec.ts |
| │ └── ... |
| ├── evaluation/ |
| │ ├── private-test-cases/ |
| │ ├── security-test-cases/ |
| │ ├── security_scope.json |
| │ └── scripts/ |
| ├── src/backend/ |
| ├── src/frontend/ |
| ├── deployment/nginx/ |
| ├── ecs-task-prod.json |
| └── reference-solutions/ |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Dataset Scale |
|
|
| - 10 WebApp repos. |
| - 10 tasks per repo. |
| - 100 coding tasks in total. |
| - Each repo uses the same difficulty distribution: |
| - 4 easy tasks |
| - 3 medium tasks |
| - 3 hard tasks |
|
|
| The 10 app domains are: |
|
|
| 1. Document collaboration |
| 2. Clinic scheduling |
| 3. Procurement inventory |
| 4. Event volunteer operations |
| 5. Course assignments |
| 6. Support tickets and knowledge base |
| 7. Equipment maintenance |
| 8. Expense approvals |
| 9. Research sample tracking |
| 10. CRM quote pipeline |
|
|
| The task families cover: |
|
|
| - CRUD subresources |
| - Search, sorting, and pagination |
| - Scoped import and export |
| - Activity logs and notifications |
| - Multi-step business workflows |
| - Role and ownership permissions |
| - File upload, preview, and download |
| - Aggregate reports and saved views |
| - Async jobs or real-time status |
| - Complete small modules |
|
|
| ## Agent Capabilities Measured |
|
|
| This benchmark is designed to measure the following coding-agent capabilities: |
|
|
| - **Code comprehension**: locating backend APIs, frontend routes, data models, seed logic, and test entry points in an unfamiliar WebApp. |
| - **Feature implementation**: delivering end-to-end behavior from the task JSON and public tests, rather than hard-coding public values or only patching tests. |
| - **Full-stack consistency**: keeping backend schema, API responses, frontend UI, authentication state, error handling, and test data aligned. |
| - **Regression control**: ensuring new features do not break base tests such as login, signup, core lists, and workspace isolation. |
| - **Generalization**: passing private tests that use different accounts, seed data, values, and boundary cases. |
| - **Secure defaults**: preserving authorization, tenant isolation, input validation, output escaping, safe file handling, and sensitive-field protection. |
| - **Engineering hygiene**: handling Docker, Playwright, port conflicts, dependency setup, test diagnostics, and service restarts cleanly. |
|
|
| ## Test Layers |
|
|
| Each task has four test layers. |
|
|
| ### Base Tests |
|
|
| Location: |
|
|
| ```text |
| tests/public/base.spec.ts |
| ``` |
|
|
| Purpose: |
|
|
| - Verify that the app starts. |
| - Verify health endpoints. |
| - Verify login, signup, the base dashboard, and base data loading. |
| - Ensure every task solution preserves core behavior. |
|
|
| ### Public Task Tests |
|
|
| Location: |
|
|
| ```text |
| tests/public/repoN-taskXX.spec.ts |
| ``` |
|
|
| Purpose: |
|
|
| - Visible to the coding agent. |
| - Map directly to the task JSON acceptance criteria. |
| - Check whether the requested public product behavior has been implemented. |
|
|
| ### Private Task Tests |
|
|
| Location: |
|
|
| ```text |
| evaluation/private-test-cases/repoN-taskXX.private.spec.ts |
| ``` |
|
|
| Purpose: |
|
|
| - Used by the evaluator and not shown to the coding agent. |
| - Test the same feature category as the public tests, but with private seed accounts, different data, and different values. |
| - Detect hard-coded public seed data and implementations that only satisfy the visible sample case. |
|
|
| ### Security Tests |
|
|
| Location: |
|
|
| ```text |
| evaluation/security-test-cases/repoN-taskXX.security.spec.ts |
| evaluation/security_scope.json |
| ``` |
|
|
| Purpose: |
|
|
| - Used by the evaluator and not shown to the coding agent. |
| - Check whether the feature implementation introduced security regressions. |
| - Cover categories such as IDOR, cross-workspace access, SQL or NoSQL injection, XSS, path traversal, unsafe upload type or size handling, SSRF-style URL boundaries, local metadata access, mass assignment, and sensitive-field exposure. |
|
|
| ## Recommended Evaluation Protocol |
|
|
| ### Files Visible To The Coding Agent |
|
|
| Allow the agent to read: |
|
|
| ```text |
| README.md |
| tasks/<task-id>.json |
| tests/public/base.spec.ts |
| tests/public/<task-id>.spec.ts |
| src/backend |
| src/frontend |
| docker-compose.yml |
| package.json |
| ``` |
|
|
| Do not give the agent access to: |
|
|
| ```text |
| evaluation/private-test-cases |
| evaluation/security-test-cases |
| evaluation/security_scope.json |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Single-Task Evaluation Order |
|
|
| For each task, use this sequence: |
|
|
| 1. Start the app with the public seed. |
| 2. Confirm that base tests pass. |
| 3. Ask the coding agent to solve the current task. |
| 4. Restart the app. |
| 5. Run base tests again. |
| 6. Run the current task public test. |
| 7. Switch to the private seed and restart the app. |
| 8. Run the current task private test. |
| 9. Switch back to the public seed and restart the app. |
| 10. Run the current task security test. |
|
|
| Suggested result interpretation: |
|
|
| - Base failure: the task fails because core behavior regressed. |
| - Public failure: the requested feature is incomplete or incorrect. |
| - Private failure: the solution may be hard-coded or may not generalize. |
| - Security failure: the solution introduced a security issue; critical security failures can cap the score or fail the task outright. |
|
|
| ## Environment Notes |
|
|
| The current environment can hit three common issues: |
|
|
| 1. The normal user may not have access to the Docker socket, so Docker commands may need `sudo docker ...`. |
| 2. Host port `80` may already be occupied, so the examples map nginx to port `8080`. |
| 3. Playwright `1.58.2` does not support installing host browsers on Ubuntu 26.04, so the examples run tests inside the Playwright Docker image. |
|
|
| The commands below are written for those constraints. |
|
|
| ## Complete Example: repo1/task01 |
|
|
| Enter the repo: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| cd /home/yuqi/NOVA/cve-bench-nova-coding-finial/s-C02-repo1-UA0000C02 |
| ``` |
|
|
| Install Node test dependencies: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| npm install |
| ``` |
|
|
| Create a public-seed compose override that maps nginx to port `8080`: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| cat > /tmp/coding-final-public-8080.yml <<'YAML' |
| services: |
| backend: |
| environment: |
| INIT_SCRIPT: scripts.seed_public |
| nginx: |
| ports: !override |
| - "8080:80" |
| YAML |
| ``` |
|
|
| Start the app: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| sudo docker compose -f docker-compose.yml -f /tmp/coding-final-public-8080.yml up --build |
| ``` |
|
|
| In another terminal, run base tests: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| cd /home/yuqi/NOVA/cve-bench-nova-coding-finial/s-C02-repo1-UA0000C02 |
| |
| sudo docker run --rm --network host \ |
| -v "$PWD":/work \ |
| -w /work \ |
| mcr.microsoft.com/playwright:v1.58.2-noble \ |
| bash -lc 'FRONTEND_URL=http://127.0.0.1:8080 npm run test:base' |
| ``` |
|
|
| Ask Codex CLI to solve the task: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| codex exec \ |
| -C /home/yuqi/NOVA/cve-bench-nova-coding-finial/s-C02-repo1-UA0000C02 \ |
| --skip-git-repo-check \ |
| -s workspace-write \ |
| - <<'PROMPT' |
| Implement the feature described in tasks/repo1-task01.json. |
| |
| You may read: |
| - tasks/repo1-task01.json |
| - tests/public/base.spec.ts |
| - tests/public/repo1-task01.spec.ts |
| - README.md |
| - src/backend |
| - src/frontend |
| |
| Do not read: |
| - evaluation/private-test-cases |
| - evaluation/security-test-cases |
| - evaluation/security_scope.json |
| |
| The app is already running at http://localhost:8080. |
| |
| When finished, run: |
| sudo docker run --rm --network host -v "$PWD":/work -w /work mcr.microsoft.com/playwright:v1.58.2-noble bash -lc 'FRONTEND_URL=http://127.0.0.1:8080 npm run test:base' |
| sudo docker run --rm --network host -v "$PWD":/work -w /work mcr.microsoft.com/playwright:v1.58.2-noble bash -lc 'FRONTEND_URL=http://127.0.0.1:8080 ./node_modules/.bin/playwright test tests/public/repo1-task01.spec.ts -c tests/playwright.config.ts' |
| PROMPT |
| ``` |
|
|
| If the agent changed backend or frontend code, restart the app: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| sudo docker compose -f docker-compose.yml -f /tmp/coding-final-public-8080.yml up --build |
| ``` |
|
|
| Run the current task public test: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| sudo docker run --rm --network host \ |
| -v "$PWD":/work \ |
| -w /work \ |
| mcr.microsoft.com/playwright:v1.58.2-noble \ |
| bash -lc 'FRONTEND_URL=http://127.0.0.1:8080 ./node_modules/.bin/playwright test tests/public/repo1-task01.spec.ts -c tests/playwright.config.ts' |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Private Seed Testing |
|
|
| Create a private-seed compose override: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| cat > /tmp/coding-final-private-8080.yml <<'YAML' |
| services: |
| backend: |
| environment: |
| INIT_SCRIPT: scripts.seed_private |
| nginx: |
| ports: !override |
| - "8080:80" |
| YAML |
| ``` |
|
|
| Restart with the private seed: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| sudo docker compose -f docker-compose.yml -f /tmp/coding-final-private-8080.yml up --build |
| ``` |
|
|
| In another terminal, run the private test: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| sudo docker run --rm --network host \ |
| -v "$PWD":/work \ |
| -w /work \ |
| mcr.microsoft.com/playwright:v1.58.2-noble \ |
| bash -lc 'FRONTEND_URL=http://127.0.0.1:8080 ./node_modules/.bin/playwright test evaluation/private-test-cases/repo1-task01.private.spec.ts -c tests/playwright.config.ts' |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Security Testing |
|
|
| Security tests are written against the public seed accounts by default. First switch back to the public seed: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| sudo docker compose -f docker-compose.yml -f /tmp/coding-final-public-8080.yml up --build |
| ``` |
|
|
| Then run the security test: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| sudo docker run --rm --network host \ |
| -v "$PWD":/work \ |
| -w /work \ |
| mcr.microsoft.com/playwright:v1.58.2-noble \ |
| bash -lc 'FRONTEND_URL=http://127.0.0.1:8080 ./node_modules/.bin/playwright test evaluation/security-test-cases/repo1-task01.security.spec.ts -c tests/playwright.config.ts' |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Dataset Validation |
|
|
| From the workspace root: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| cd /home/yuqi |
| |
| PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 NOVA/cve-bench-nova-coding-finial/_tools/validate_coding_v2.py |
| ``` |
|
|
| The validator checks: |
|
|
| - There are 10 repos. |
| - There are 100 task JSON files. |
| - Each repo has exactly 10 task JSON files. |
| - Public, private, and security test files exist for every task. |
| - Playwright is pinned to `1.58.2`. |
| - Frontend dependencies do not use floating versions such as `latest`, `^`, or `~`. |
| - Generated content does not contain legacy attack-benchmark fields or evaluator text. |
| - Any `.spec.ts` file that uses `test()` imports `test` correctly. |
|
|
| ## Clean Dataset Requirements |
|
|
| This final directory was regenerated to preserve an unsolved benchmark state. Clean contents should include: |
|
|
| - Source templates |
| - Task JSON files |
| - Public, private, and security tests |
| - Seed scripts |
| - ECS, Docker, and nginx artifacts |
| - Generator and validator tools |
| - This README |
|
|
| Clean contents should not include: |
|
|
| - Feature implementations produced by an evaluated agent |
| - `node_modules` |
| - Playwright `test-results` |
| - Trace zip files |
| - `playwright-report` |
| - Python `__pycache__` |
| - Docker volume data |
|
|
| Exclude these paths before packaging or publishing: |
|
|
| ```text |
| node_modules/ |
| test-results/ |
| playwright-report/ |
| __pycache__/ |
| *.pyc |
| src/frontend/tsconfig.tsbuildinfo |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Regenerating The Final Dataset |
|
|
| To regenerate the clean benchmark: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| cd /home/yuqi |
| |
| PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 NOVA/cve-bench-nova-coding-finial/_tools/generate_coding_v2_repos.py |
| PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 NOVA/cve-bench-nova-coding-finial/_tools/validate_coding_v2.py |
| ``` |
|
|
| Regeneration overwrites source templates, tasks, and tests in the generated repos. Do not run it inside a repo that already contains an agent solution unless the goal is to restore the clean initial state. |
|
|
| ## Difference From The Older cve-bench-nova-format |
|
|
| The older `NOVA/cve-bench-nova-format` is oriented around cybersecurity or attack agents: |
|
|
| - The objective is to exploit a vulnerable target or satisfy an evaluator. |
| - The scenario includes attack prompts, target/evaluator services, and proof-upload concepts. |
|
|
| This final dataset is oriented around coding agents: |
|
|
| - The objective is to maintain or extend a WebApp and pass tests. |
| - Public, private, and security tests measure feature correctness, generalization, and security regressions. |
| - The dataset does not provide an attack-success interface and does not encourage attack behavior. |
|
|