Science-Last-Exam / LEADERBOARD.md
ShuhanXue's picture
Clarify current scoring and development status without changing evaluation data
9652134 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
6.11 kB

Native Hub leaderboard definitions

This specification describes the website results synchronized on 5 November 2026. It records published model-and-harness results, not a reaggregation of later attempts. The complete table is in the dataset card and on the website leaderboard.

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra have not yet been evaluated. Their biological safeguards can restrict biology research workflows. We are applying for research access and will add results once access is approved and evaluation is complete. Official explanations: Anthropic · OpenAI.

Task scope and metrics

SLE covers six scientific capabilities and one end-to-end research assessment, with 113 tasks in v1. Wet-lab Execution is In construction and is not scored. End-to-end research is To be expanded. The default configuration / v1 split indexes 113 task cards: Hypothesis Discovery 5, Protocol Planning 40, Scientific Computing 23, Scientific Software Operation 14, Experiment Observation 30 and End-to-end research 1. Wet-lab Execution has no released task. All scored metrics use a 0–100 scale and higher is better.

Hub task ID Definition
composite-score Equal-weight mean of the scored assessments below, at 1/6 each.
hypothesis-discovery-inspire-rate Percentage of hypothesis versions that anticipate research published after the model's knowledge cutoff; reported with positives / hypothesis versions.
protocol-planning-mean-score Mean task score for 40 Protocol Planning tasks, on a 0–100 scale.
scientific-computing-full-credit-rate Percentage of 23 tasks passing every scientific check; not mean repair gain.
scientific-software-operation-full-credit-rate Percentage of 14 tasks receiving full credit; not mean partial-credit reward.
experiment-observation-pass-rate Percentage of 30 tasks with every requested field correct.
end-to-end-research-score End-to-end research score; 0 for all currently listed models, included in the composite.

The composite equally weights Hypothesis Discovery, Protocol Planning, Scientific Computing, Scientific Software Operation, Experiment Observation and End-to-end research on a 0–100 scale, at 1/6 each. End-to-end research scores 0 for all currently listed models; this is a published result, not a fixed scoring rule. Wet-lab Execution is In construction and is not scored. Cost and time equally average the per-task means for Protocol Planning, Scientific Computing, Scientific Software Operation and Experiment Observation; Hypothesis Discovery and End-to-end research report neither.

The composite is not an overall task pass rate. The runner's raw capability-balanced mean and the end-to-end progress rubric are diagnostic outputs, not replacements for the official leaderboard metrics.

Frozen values and provenance

leaderboard-results-20261105.json contains the current published rows, all scored assessment metrics, the source website commit and the Hub model mappings. Earlier dated snapshots are retained unchanged for provenance; they record the scope and aggregation in use at the time. Missing infrastructure outcomes are not converted to zero.

Evaluations use model API endpoints with task-specific agent runtimes. Native result notes identify the harness and reasoning setting. These are API endpoint measurements, not measurements of locally served or quantized Hub checkpoints. No cryptographic verification badge is claimed.

Model repository mapping

Native submissions target these official repositories:

Website model Official Hub repository Harness (task-based / Hypothesis Discovery) Reported effort
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 Claude Code / DiscoveryRSI High
GLM-5.3 Flash zai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash Claude Code / DiscoveryRSI High
MiniMax-M3 MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3 Claude Code / DiscoveryRSI High
Qwen3.8 Max API Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B Claude Code / DiscoveryRSI Not reported
MiMo-V2.6-Pro API (MOPD update) XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-MOPD Claude Code / DiscoveryRSI Not reported

The Qwen model card identifies Qwen3.8-Max as the official API version based on Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B, with additional API features. The submission is explicitly labeled as an API-version measurement; it does not claim identical behavior from locally served weights.

Xiaomi's update notice states that the MOPD update reached its API on 25 September 2026 without changing mimo-v2.6-pro. The recorded SLE MiMo attempts are dated 29–30 October 2026. This is the evidence used to map the measured API version to MiMo-V2.6-Pro-MOPD; the MOPD model card also lists API and OpenRouter availability.

As checked on 3 November 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K3.1 Pro do not have an established matching official Hub model repository. They remain in the complete eight-model dataset-card table. Kimi K3 is a different model and is not substituted for K3.1 Pro.

Hub integration

The root eval.yaml declares the composite and its scored assessment metrics with the Harbor evaluation framework. Result records belong in .eval_results/*.yaml in each matching model repository, not in this dataset repository. Each record links to this dataset, its task ID, a pinned dataset revision and the published result source.

Hugging Face controls Benchmark allow-list activation. Configuration and submitted result files alone are not a claim of Official Benchmark status. The three SLE data repositories remain in private preview unless their maintainers explicitly change access.