a
stringlengths
138
8.15k
b
stringlengths
138
8.15k
label
int64
1
1
Many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continue to experience exacerbations despite receiving standard-of-care treatments.,Novel approaches to COPD treatment focus on understanding and targeting molecular mechanisms of airway inflammation, airway obstruction, remodeling and lung destruction.,Several identified phenotypes and endotypes of COPD will pave the future path for a more personalized approach to therapy.,Although well known to be associated with neutrophilic inflammation, COPD may also be driven by eosinophilic inflammation both at stable states and during exacerbation.,Targeting eosinophilic inflammation has been successful in managing severe eosinophilic asthma and may hold promise in certain phenotypes of COPD.,The most promising biologic treatments at an advanced stage of development are agents blocking interleukin (IL)-5 or its receptor.,This review examines our current understanding of the eosinophilic inflammation in COPD and the rationale for IL-5 targeting agents.
COPD is characterized by progressive airflow obstruction which does not fully reverse to inhaled or oral pharmacotherapy.,The management of patients with COPD has taken a totally new direction over the past 20 years, thank to the use of novel therapies aimed to improve and modify the natural history of COPD.,Long-acting bronchodilators, including long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs), were introduced several years ago in order to enhance improvements in lung function, health status related quality of life, and reduce the rate of exacerbations.,These effects can be boosted by the combination of LABAs with long-acting anticholinergic, and/or with inhaled corticosteroids.,Inhaled LABAs are commonly well tolerated although adverse effects such as tremor and palpitations are occasionally troublesome.
1
The gold standard for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is spirometry, but there are barriers to its use in primary care.,To externally validate the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) as a diagnostic tool in patients at increased risk in Australian general practice and to compare its performance with other CDQ validation studies.,Patients were recruited from 36 general practices in Sydney, Australia.,Former or current smokers aged 40-85 years with no prior COPD diagnosis were invited to a case-finding appointment with the practice nurse.,The CDQ was collected and pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry was performed.,Cases for whom complete CDQ data were present and the spirometry met quality standards were analysed.,Of 1,631 patients who attended case-finding recruitment, 1,054 (65%) could be analysed.,Spirometry showed 13% had COPD.,The ability of the CDQ to discriminate between patients with and without COPD was fair, represented by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.713.,With a CDQ cut-off point value of 16.5 the sensitivity was 80% and specificity 47% and, at a cut-off point value of 19.5, the sensitivity was 63% and specificity 70%.,The CDQ did not discriminate between patients with and without COPD accurately enough to use as a diagnostic tool in patients at increased risk of COPD in Australian general practice.,Further research is needed on the value of the CDQ as a tool for selecting patients for spirometry.
The use of a simple screening questionnaire to detect persistent airflow obstruction (AO) in COPD may facilitate the early, accurate diagnosis of COPD in general practice settings.,This study developed an original persistent AO questionnaire for screening individuals with COPD in a general Japanese population.,A working group was established to generate initial draft questionnaire items about COPD.,Eligible subjects aged 40 and older living in Japan were solicited to participate in a health checkup from 2014 to 2015.,In study I, 2,338 subjects who fully completed the initial draft questionnaire and who had valid spirometry measurements were statistically analyzed to determine the final questionnaire items as a COPD screening questionnaire (COPD-Q).,Persistent AO was defined as a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.70.,In study II, the working group analyzed the weighted scores for individual items and established a cutoff point for the COPD-Q based on the data of 2,066 subjects in the Hisayama study.,Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the ability of the COPD-Q to discriminate between subjects with and without AO.,The five-item COPD-Q was established based on 19 initial draft items in study I and the weighted scores of individual items.,The overall area under the ROC curve for the COPD-Q was 0.796 (95% confidence interval, 0.707-0.788).,A cutoff of 4 points resulted in a sensitivity of 71.0% and a specificity of 70.1%.,The positive predictive value was 10.8%, and the negative predictive value was 97.9%.,The crude odds ratio of the COPD-Q for AO was 5.8.,The five-item COPD-Q is a useful questionnaire for diagnosing persistent AO in a general Japanese population and is expected to be an effective first-stage screening tool for detecting COPD.
1
Nighttime symptoms can negatively impact the quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The Nighttime Symptoms of COPD Instrument (NiSCI) was designed to measure the occurrence and severity of nighttime symptoms in patients with COPD, the impact of symptoms on nighttime awakenings, and rescue medication use.,The objective of this study was to explore item reduction, inform scoring recommendations, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the NiSCI.,COPD patients participating in a Phase III clinical trial completed the NiSCI daily.,Item analyses were conducted using weekly mean and single day scores.,Descriptive statistics (including percentage of respondents at floor/ceiling and inter-item correlations), factor analyses, and Rasch model analyses were conducted to examine item performance and scoring.,Test-retest reliability was assessed for the final instrument using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).,Correlations with assessments conducted during study visits were used to evaluate convergent and known-groups validity.,Data from 1,663 COPD patients aged 40-93 years were analyzed.,Item analyses supported the generation of four scores.,A one-factor structure was confirmed with factor analysis and Rasch analysis for the symptom severity score.,Test-retest reliability was confirmed for the six-item symptom severity (ICC, 0.85), number of nighttime awakenings (ICC, 0.82), and rescue medication (ICC, 0.68) scores.,Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations between the NiSCI, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, and Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Tool-Respiratory Symptoms scores.,The results suggest that the NiSCI can be used to determine the severity of nighttime COPD symptoms, the number of nighttime awakenings due to COPD symptoms, and the nighttime use of rescue medication.,The NiSCI is a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate these concepts in COPD patients in clinical trials and clinical practice.,Scoring recommendations and steps for further research are discussed.
Few studies have investigated the 24-hour symptom profile in patients with COPD or how symptoms during the 24-hour day are inter-related.,This observational study assessed the prevalence, severity and relationship between night-time, early morning and daytime COPD symptoms and explored the relationship between 24-hour symptoms and other patient-reported outcomes.,The study enrolled patients with stable COPD in clinical practice.,Baseline night-time, early morning and daytime symptoms (symptom questionnaire), severity of airflow obstruction (FEV1), dyspnoea (modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale), health status (COPD Assessment Test), anxiety and depression levels (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), sleep quality (COPD and Asthma Sleep Impact Scale) and physical activity level (sedentary, moderately active or active) were recorded.,The full analysis set included 727 patients: 65.8% male, mean ± standard deviation age 67.2 ± 8.8 years, % predicted FEV1 52.8 ± 20.5%.,In each part of the 24-hour day, >60% of patients reported experiencing ≥1 symptom in the week before baseline.,Symptoms were more common in the early morning and daytime versus night-time (81.4%, 82.7% and 63.0%, respectively).,Symptom severity was comparable for each period assessed.,Overall, in the week before baseline, 56.7% of patients had symptoms throughout the whole 24-hour day (3 parts of the day); 79.9% had symptoms in ≥2 parts of the 24-hour day.,Symptoms during each part of the day were inter-related, irrespective of disease severity (all p < 0.001).,Early morning and daytime symptoms were associated with the severity of airflow obstruction (p < 0.05 for both).,Night-time, early morning and daytime symptoms were all associated with worse dyspnoea, health status and sleep quality, and higher anxiety and depression levels (all p < 0.001 versus patients without symptoms in each corresponding period).,In each part of the 24-hour day, there was also an association between symptoms and a patient’s physical activity level (p < 0.05 for each period).,More than half of patients experienced COPD symptoms throughout the whole 24-hour day.,There was a significant relationship between night-time, early morning and daytime symptoms.,In each period, symptoms were associated with worse patient-reported outcomes, suggesting that improving 24-hour symptoms should be an important consideration in the management of COPD.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0122-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Increasing evidence suggests that human antigen R (HuR) is involved in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process of several diseases.,However, the role of HuR in EMT in the airway epithelial cells of patients with COPD remains unclear.,BEAS-2B cells were cultured and treated with 3%CSE.,Western blotting, RT-PCR and immunofluoresence were used to detect the expression of HuR, ZEB-1.,RNAi was used to suppress HuR expression.,Then knockdown of HuR, RT-PCR and Western blotting showed that with siHuR-1 and siHuR-3, clear suppression of HuR expression was confirmed.,We chose siHuR-3, the most effective one, to proceed with subsequent experiments.,Immunofluorescence analysis, western blotting were used to detect the expression of E-cadherin, vimentin, ZEB-1 and HuR.,We show that more HuR expression is enhanced in the airways epithelium of smokers with or without COPD than controls (nonsmoker non-COPD patients).,However, there was no definite correlation between HuR expression and FEV1%.,Further study reveals that knockdown of HuR significantly increases the apoptosis of BEAS-2B cells and down-regulates ZEB-1 expression.,EMT is partially enhanced through the HuR-binding proteins and its post-transcriptional regulation role in airway epithelium in COPD.
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have critical regulatory roles in protein-coding gene expression.,Aberrant expression profiles of lncRNAs have been observed in various human diseases.,In this study, we investigated transcriptome profiles in lung tissues of chronic cigarette smoke (CS)-induced COPD mouse model.,We found that 109 lncRNAs and 260 mRNAs were significantly differential expressed in lungs of chronic CS-induced COPD mouse model compared with control animals.,GO and KEGG analyses indicated that differentially expressed lncRNAs associated protein-coding genes were mainly involved in protein processing of endoplasmic reticulum pathway, and taurine and hypotaurine metabolism pathway.,The combination of high throughput data analysis and the results of qRT-PCR validation in lungs of chronic CS-induced COPD mouse model, 16HBE cells with CSE treatment and PBMC from patients with COPD revealed that NR_102714 and its associated protein-coding gene UCHL1 might be involved in the development of COPD both in mouse and human.,In conclusion, our study demonstrated that aberrant expression profiles of lncRNAs and mRNAs existed in lungs of chronic CS-induced COPD mouse model.,From animal models perspective, these results might provide further clues to investigate biological functions of lncRNAs and their potential target protein-coding genes in the pathogenesis of COPD.
1
Comorbidities are frequent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and significantly impact on patients’ quality of life, exacerbation frequency, and survival.,There is increasing evidence that certain diseases occur in greater frequency amongst patients with COPD than in the general population, and that these comorbidities significantly impact on patient outcomes.,Although the mechanisms are yet to be defined, many comorbidities likely result from the chronic inflammatory state that is present in COPD.,Common problems in the clinical management of COPD include recognizing new comorbidities, determining the impact of comorbidities on patient symptoms, the concurrent treatment of COPD and comorbidities, and accurate prognostication.,The majority of comorbidities in COPD should be treated according to usual practice, and specific COPD management is infrequently altered by the presence of comorbidities.,Unfortunately, comorbidities are often under-recognized and under-treated.,This review focuses on the epidemiology of ten major comorbidities in patients with COPD.,Further, we emphasize the clinical impact upon prognosis and management considerations.,This review will highlight the importance of comorbidity identification and management in the practice of caring for patients with COPD.
Objective To examine the effect of β blockers in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), assessing their effect on mortality, hospital admissions, and exacerbations of COPD when added to established treatment for COPD.,Design Retrospective cohort study using a disease specific database of COPD patients (TARDIS) linked to the Scottish morbidity records of acute hospital admissions, the Tayside community pharmacy prescription records, and the General Register Office for Scotland death registry.,Setting Tayside, Scotland (2001-2010),Population 5977 patients aged >50 years with a diagnosis of COPD.,Main outcome measures Hazard ratios for all cause mortality, emergency oral corticosteroid use, and respiratory related hospital admissions calculated through Cox proportional hazard regression after correction for influential covariates.,Results Mean follow-up was 4.35 years, mean age at diagnosis was 69.1 years, and 88% of β blockers used were cardioselective.,There was a 22% overall reduction in all cause mortality with β blocker use.,Furthermore, there were additive benefits of β blockers on all cause mortality at all treatment steps for COPD.,Compared with controls (given only inhaled therapy with either short acting β agonists or short acting antimuscarinics), the adjusted hazard ratio for all cause mortality was 0.28 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.39) for treatment with inhaled corticosteroid, long acting β agonist, and long acting antimuscarinic plus β blocker versus 0.43 (0.38 to 0.48) without β blocker.,There were similar trends showing additive benefits of β blockers in reducing oral corticosteroid use and hospital admissions due to respiratory disease. β blockers had no deleterious impact on lung function at all treatment steps when given in conjunction with either a long acting β agonist or antimuscarinic agent,Conclusions β blockers may reduce mortality and COPD exacerbations when added to established inhaled stepwise therapy for COPD, independently of overt cardiovascular disease and cardiac drugs, and without adverse effects on pulmonary function.
1
This study evaluated the efficacy of tiotropium/olodaterol vs tiotropium on lung function, exercise capacity, and physical activity in patients with COPD.,A total of 184 patients aged ≥40 years with COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage II-IV) received tiotropium/olodaterol for 6 weeks, then tiotropium for 6 weeks, or vice versa.,The primary endpoint was inspiratory capacity (IC) at peak post-dose.,Adjusted mean IC after 6-week treatment was 1.990 L with tiotropium/olodaterol vs 1.875 L with tiotropium (difference: 115 mL; 95% CI: 77, 153; p<0.0001).,Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (difference: 105 mL; 95% CI: 88, 123), forced vital capacity (difference: 163 mL; 95% CI: 130, 197), and slow vital capacity (difference: 134 mL; 95% CI: 91, 176) improved with tiotropium/olodaterol (all p<0.0001).,Adjusted mean 6-min walk distance was similar between treatments in the overall population but was significantly increased with tiotropium/olodaterol in the subgroup with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage III/IV at baseline (difference: 18.1 m; 95% CI: 2.3, 33.9; p=0.0254).,In a post hoc analysis, tiotropium/olodaterol improved the values for ≥2.0 metabolic equivalents (difference: 5.0 min; 95% CI: 0.4, 9.7; p=0.0337).,Tiotropium/olodaterol significantly improved IC compared with tiotropium and potentially enhanced the exercise capacity in COPD patients.,A slight improvement in physical activity of relatively more than moderate intensity was also seen with tiotropium/olodaterol.
Lung hyperinflation and exercise intolerance are hallmarks of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, their relationship remains uncertain.,A combined analysis of two placebo-controlled, randomized studies examined the effects of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC) and long-acting β2-agonist vilanterol (VI) separately and in combination on static hyperinflation, exercise endurance time (EET), and their relationship in patients with COPD.,Patients with moderate-to-severe stable COPD and resting functional residual capacity >120% predicted were randomized to UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, UMEC 62.5 μg, VI 25 μg, or placebo for 12 weeks.,Inspiratory capacity (IC), residual volume (RV), total lung capacity (TLC), and EET in an endurance shuttle-walk test were measured.,In this post hoc analysis, IC/TLC, RV/TLC, and IC were used as hyperinflation markers.,After 12 weeks, UMEC/VI and UMEC and VI showed significant improvements in hyperinflation versus placebo when measured by absolute change from baseline in IC/TLC (trough and 3 hours postdose [P≤0.011]).,UMEC/VI showed significant improvements versus UMEC and VI in absolute changes in IC/TLC (trough and 3 hours postdose [P≤0.001]).,Statistical significance for comparisons with placebo and between treatments for absolute changes in IC and percentage changes in RV/TLC followed similar patterns to those for absolute changes in IC/TLC.,UMEC/VI showed significant improvements in EET versus placebo at day 2 and week 12, measured as change from baseline in seconds (P≤0.002) and as a percentage from baseline (P≤0.005).,There was a lack of evidence to suggest a correlation between improvements in static hyperinflation and EET at any time point.,Although the dual bronchodilator UMEC/VI demonstrated greater improvements in static hyperinflation markers than UMEC or VI and significant improvements in exercise endurance, no direct relationship was observed between static hyperinflation and exercise endurance.
1
Thoracoabdominal asynchrony is the nonparallel motion of the ribcage and abdomen.,It is estimated by using respiratory inductive plethysmography and, recently, using optoelectronic plethysmography; however the agreement of measurements between these 2 techniques is unknown.,Therefore, the present study compared respiratory inductive plethysmography with optoelectronic plethysmography for measuring thoracoabdominal asynchrony to see if the measurements were similar or different.,27 individuals (9 healthy subjects, 9 patients with interstitial lung disease, and 9 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease performed 2 cycle ergometer tests with respiratory inductive plethysmography or optoelectronic plethysmography in a random order.,Thoracoabdominal asynchrony was evaluated at rest, and at 50% and 75% of maximal workload between the superior ribcage and abdomen using a phase angle.,Thoracoabdominal asynchrony values were very similar in both approaches not only at rest but also with exercise, with no statistical difference.,There was a good correlation between the methods and the Phase angle values were within the limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis.,Thoracoabdominal asynchrony measured by optoelectronic plethysmography and respiratory inductive plethysmography results in similar values and has a satisfactory agreement at rest and even for different exercise intensities in these groups.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory disease that results in airflow limitation and respiratory distress, also having many nonrespiratory manifestations that affect both function and mobility.,Preliminary evidence suggests that balance deficits constitute an important secondary impairment in individuals with COPD.,Our objective was to investigate balance performance in two groups of COPD patients with different body compositions and to observe which of these groups are more likely to experience falls in the future.,We included 27 stable COPD patients and 17 healthy individuals who performed a series of balance tests.,The COPD patients were divided in two groups: emphysematous and bronchitic.,Patients completed the activities balance confidence scale and the COPD assessment test questionnaire and afterward performed the Berg Balance Scale, timed up and go, single leg stance and 6-minute walking distance test.,We analyzed the differences in the balance tests between the studied groups.,Bronchitic COPD was associated with a decreased value when compared to emphysematous COPD for the following variables: single leg stance (8.7 vs 15.6; P<0.001) and activities balance confidence (53.2 vs 74.2; P=0.001).,Bronchitic COPD patients had a significantly higher value of timed up and go test compared to patients with emphysematous COPD (14.7 vs 12.8; P=0.001).,Patients with COPD have a higher balance impairment than their healthy peers.,Moreover, we observed that the bronchitic COPD phenotype is more likely to experience falls compared to the emphysematous phenotype.
1
Limited information is available regarding medication use in COPD patients from Latin America.,This study evaluated the type of medication used and the adherence to different inhaled treatments in stable COPD patients from the Latin American region.,This was an observational, cross-sectional, multinational, and multicenter study in COPD patients attended by specialist doctors from seven Latin American countries.,Adherence to inhaled therapy was assessed using the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) questionnaire.,The type of medication was assessed as: short-acting β-agonist (SABA) or short-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA) only, long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long-acting β-agonist (LABA), LABA/LAMA, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), ICS/LABA, ICS/LAMA/LABA, or other.,In total, 795 patients were included (59.6% male), with a mean age of 69.5±8.7 years and post-bronchodilator FEV1 of 50.0%±18.6%.,The ICS/LAMA/LABA (32.9%) and ICS/LABA (27.7%) combinations were the most common medications used, followed by LABA/LAMA (11.3%), SABA or SAMA (7.9%), LABA (6.4%), LAMA (5.8%), and ICS (4.3%).,The types of medication most commonly used in each Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2013 category were ICS/LABA (A: 32.7%; B: 19.8%; C: 25.7%; D: 28.2%) and ICS/LAMA/LABA (A: 17.3%; B: 30.2%; C: 33%; D: 41.1%).,The use of long-acting bronchodilators showed the highest adherence (good or high adherence >50%) according to the TAI questionnaire.,COPD management in specialist practice in Latin America does not follow the current guideline recommendations and there is an overuse of ICSs in patients with COPD from this region.,Treatment regimens including the use of long-acting bronchodilators are associated with the highest adherence.
Long-acting bronchodilators are the cornerstone of pharmacologic treatment of COPD.,The new combination of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium (TIO) and long acting beta-agonists (LABA) olodaterol (OLO) has been introduced as fist line therapy for COPD.,This article analyses the evidence of efficacy and safety of the TIO/OLO combination.,A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) with a period of treatment of at least 6 weeks, in patients with COPD confirmed by spirometry, comparing combined treatment with TIO/OLO (approved doses only), with any of the mono-components or any other active comparator administered as an inhalator.,A total of 10 Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were identified (N = 10,918).,TIO/OLO significantly improved trough FEV1 from baseline to week 12 versus TIO, OLO and LABA/ICS (0.06 L, 0.09 L and between 0.04 and 0.05 L, respectively).,TIO/OLO improved transitional dyspnea index (TDI) and St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) compared with mono-components, with patients more likely to achieve clinically important improvements in TDI (risk ratio [RR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.07, 1.28] versus TIO and RR: 1.14, 95%CI: [1.01, 1.28] versus OLO) and in SGRQ (RR: 1.21, 95%CI: [1.12, 1.30] versus TIO and RR: 1.28, 95%CI: [1.18, 1.40] versus OLO).,Patients treated with TIO/OLO showed a significant reduction in the use of rescue medication and no significant differences in frequency of general and serious adverse events were observed between TIO/OLO and mono-components.,Treatment with TIO/OLO provided significant improvements in lung function versus mono-components and LABA/ICS with more patients achieving significant improvements in dyspnea and health status.,No differences in adverse events were observed compared with other active treatments.,PROSPERO register of systematic reviews (CRD42016040162).,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-017-0683-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Purpose: Assess the clinical and economic consequences associated with an early versus late diagnosis in patients with COPD.,Patients and methods: In a retrospective, observational cohort study, electronic medical record data (2000-2014) were collected from Swedish primary care patients with COPD.,COPD indicators (pneumonia, other respiratory diseases, oral corticosteroids, antibiotics for respiratory infections, prescribed drugs for respiratory symptoms, lung function measurement) registered prior to diagnosis were applied to categorize patients into those receiving early (2 or less indicators) or late diagnosis (3 or more indicators registered >90 days preceding a COPD diagnosis).,Outcome measures included annual rate of and time to first exacerbation, mortality risk, prevalence of comorbidities and health care utilization.,Results: More patients with late diagnosis (n=8827) than with early diagnosis (n=3870) had a recent comorbid diagnosis of asthma (22.0% vs 3.9%; P<0.0001).,Compared with early diagnosis, patients with late diagnosis had a higher exacerbation rate (hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83-1.96; P<0.0001) and shorter time to first exacerbation (HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.54-1.69; P<0.0001).,Mortality was not different between groups overall but higher for late versus early diagnosis, after excluding patients with past asthma diagnosis (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.18; P=0.0095).,Late diagnosis was also associated with higher direct costs than early diagnosis.,Conclusion: Late COPD diagnosis is associated with higher exacerbation rate and increased comorbidities and costs compared with early diagnosis.,The study highlights the need for accurate diagnosis of COPD in primary care in order to reduce exacerbations and the economic burden of COPD.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has traditionally been considered an inexorably progressive disease, associated with a constant increase of symptoms that occur as the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) worsens, only intermittently interrupted by exacerbations.,However, this paradigm has been challenged in recent decades by the available evidence.,Recent studies have pointed out that COPD-related symptoms are not consistently perceived by patients in the same way, showing not only seasonal variation, but also changes in symptom perception during a week or even within a single day.,According to the available data, patients experience the biggest increase in respiratory symptoms during the first hours of the early morning, followed by the nighttime.,This variation over time is of considerable importance, since it impacts on daily life activities and health-related quality of life, as measured by a recently developed ad hoc questionnaire.,Additionally, recent clinical trials have suggested that the use of rapid-onset long-acting bronchodilators may have an impact on morning symptoms, despite their current use as maintenance treatment for a determined period.,Although this hypothesis is to be validated in future long-term clinical trials comparing fast-onset versus slow-onset inhaled drugs in COPD, it may bring forward a new concept of long-term bronchodilator therapy.,At the present time, the two available long-acting, fast-onset bronchodilators used in the treatment of COPD are formoterol and the recently marketed indacaterol.,Newer drugs have also been shown to have a rapid onset of action in preclinical studies.,Health care professionals caring for COPD patients should consider this variation in the perception of symptoms during their clinical interview as a potential new target in the long-term treatment plan.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common causes of mortality and a major contributor to morbidity.,Longitudinal clinical practice data yielding information on the characteristics of the disease, its natural course, and management are limited.,To investigate and describe the COPD population from a nationwide perspective during an 11-year period (1999-2009) with a focus on management, co-morbidity, and mortality.,This observational retrospective epidemiological study linked electronic medical records data from patients with COPD in primary care to mandatory Swedish hospital, drug and Cause of Death registry data from 1999 to 2009 (PATHOS).,A total of 21,361 patients with a COPD diagnosis were included (mean age 68.0 years, 53% females).,The proportion of patients diagnosed in primary care increased from 59% in 1999 to 81% in 2009 and the mean age at diagnosis decreased from 73 to 66 years.,The number of exacerbations decreased from 3.0 to 1.3 and COPD-related hospitalisations decreased from 1.02 to 0.20 per patient per year.,Prescriptions of long-acting muscarinic antagonists and fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist inhalers increased from 0% to 36% and 37%, respectively.,The most common co-morbidities were hypertension, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, and diabetes.,Overall life expectancy was 8.3±6.8 years shorter in patients with COPD than in the general population, and all-cause mortality was 3.5 times higher.,Management of COPD in Sweden has improved during the 11-year study period.,Despite this, patients with COPD have a substantially reduced life expectancy than the general population.
Exacerbation-associated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with severe and very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is ill-defined.,This study describes patterns, HRQoL, and the work productivity impact of COPD-related moderate and SEV exacerbations in patients with SEV/VSEV COPD, focusing on the chronic bronchitis subtype.,A US sample of SEV and VSEV COPD patients with recent moderate or SEV exacerbation was recruited.,Along with the demographic and clinical data collected from medical records, patients reported on exacerbation frequency, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (using the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD [SGRQ-C] and the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D]™ index), and work productivity and activity impairment (using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Specific Health Problem [WPAI-SHP]).,The HRQoL-related impacts of exacerbation frequency, time since exacerbation, and last exacerbation severity were evaluated via linear regressions.,A total of 314 patients (190 SEV/124 VSEV, mean age =68.0 years, 51% male, 28% current smokers) were included.,In the previous 12 months, patients reported an average of 1.8 moderate exacerbations and 0.9 SEV exacerbations.,Overall, 16% of patients were employed and reported a high percentage of overall work impairment (42.4% ± 31.1%).,Activity impairment was positively associated with recent exacerbation severity (SEV 64.6% ± 26.8% versus moderate 55.6% ± 28.2%) (P=0.006).,The HRQoL was significantly worse for SEV versus VSEV COPD (EQ-5D: 0.62 ± 0.23 versus 0.70 ± 0.17, respectively, and SGRQ-C: 70.1 ± 21.3 versus 61.1 ± 19.0, respectively) (P<0.001).,Worse current HRQoL was reported by patients with a SEV versus moderate recent exacerbation (EQ-5D: 0.63 ± 0.21 versus 0.70 ± 0.20, respectively) (P=0.003); SGRQ-C: 70.3 ± 19.9 versus 61.7 ± 20.1, respectively (P<0.001).,One additional exacerbation in the previous 12 months was associated with a 2.4-point SGRQ-C increase and a 0.02-point EQ-5D index decrease.,The severity and frequency of COPD-related moderate/SEV exacerbations in SEV and VSEV COPD patients were positively associated with poor HRQoL and work productivity and activity impairment.
1
Tiotropium + olodaterol has demonstrated improvements beyond lung function benefits in a large Phase III clinical program as a once-daily maintenance treatment for COPD and may be a potential option for the initiation of maintenance treatment in COPD.,Despite guideline recommendations that combined long-acting β2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids should only be used in individuals at high risk of exacerbation, there is substantial use in individuals at lower risk.,This raises the question of the comparative effectiveness of this combination as maintenance treatment in this group compared to other combination regimens.,The study aimed to assess the effect on lung function of once-daily tiotropium + olodaterol versus twice-daily salmeterol + fluticasone propionate in all participants with Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2 or 3 (moderate to severe) COPD.,This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, four-treatment, complete crossover study in which participants received once-daily tiotropium + olodaterol (5/5 µg and 2.5/5 µg) via Respimat® and twice-daily salmeterol + fluticasone propionate (50/500 µg and 50/250 µg) via Accuhaler® for 6 weeks.,The primary end point was change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 hour to 12 hours (AUC0-12) relative to the baseline after 6 weeks.,Tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 µg and 2.5/5 µg demonstrated statistically significant improvements in FEV1 AUC0-12 compared to salmeterol + fluticasone propionate (improvements from baseline were 317 mL and 295 mL with tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 µg and 2.5/5 µg, and 188 mL and 192 mL with salmeterol + fluticasone propionate 50/500 µg and 50/250 µg, respectively).,Tiotropium + olodaterol was superior to salmeterol + fluticasone propionate in lung function secondary end points, including FEV1 area under the curve from 0 hour to 24 hours (AUC0-24).,Once-daily tiotropium + olodaterol in participants with moderate-to-severe COPD provided superior lung function improvements to twice-daily salmeterol + fluticasone propionate.,Dual bronchodilation can be considered to optimize lung function in individuals requiring maintenance treatment for COPD.
The association of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is still controversial.,From the National Health Insurance Database of Taiwan, COPD cases with history of acute exacerbation (AE) were identified (COPD cohort).,Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was applied to investigate the risk factors for pneumonia with COPD severity controlled by surrogate variables.,Among the COPD cohort, those who continuously used ICS for more than 360 days without interruption were selected (ICS cohort).,The incidence rate of pneumonia during ICS use was compared with those before ICS use and after ICS discontinuation by using pair t test.,A total of 6034 and 842 cases were identified as the COPD and ICS cohorts, respectively.,In the COPD cohort, recent ICS use was independently associated with pneumonia (hazard ratio: 1.06 [1.02-1.11] for per 80 mg of budesonide).,Other independent risk factors included age, male, diabetes mellitus, malignancy, low income, baseline pneumonia event, and recent use of oral corticosteroids and aminophylline.,In the ICS cohort, while AE rate gradually decreased, the incidence rate of pneumonia significantly increased after ICS use (from 0.10 to 0.21 event/person-year, P = 0.001).,This study demonstrates the association between ICS use and pneumonia in patients with COPD and history of AE.,ICS should be judiciously used in indicated COPD patients.
1
Blood biomarkers are increasingly used to stratify high risk chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients; however, there are fewer studies that have investigated multiple biomarkers and replicated in multiple large well-characterized cohorts of susceptible current and former smokers.,We used two MSD multiplex panels to measure 9 cytokines and chemokines in 2123 subjects from COPDGene and 1117 subjects from SPIROMICS.,These biomarkers included: interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, eotaxin/CCL-11, eotaxin-3/CCL-26, and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC)/CCL-17.,Regression models adjusted for clinical covariates were used to determine which biomarkers were associated with the following COPD phenotypes: airflow obstruction (forced expiratory flow at 1 s (FEV1%) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), chronic bronchitis, COPD exacerbations, and emphysema.,Biomarker-genotype associations were assessed by genome-wide association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).,Eotaxin and IL-6 were strongly associated with airflow obstruction and accounted for 3-5% of the measurement variance on top of clinical variables.,IL-6 was associated with progressive airflow obstruction over 5 years and both IL-6 and IL-8 were associated with progressive emphysema over 5 years.,None of the biomarkers were consistently associated with chronic bronchitis or COPD exacerbations.,We identified one novel SNP (rs9302690 SNP) that was associated with CCL17 plasma measurements.,When assessing smoking related pulmonary disease, biomarkers of inflammation such as IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and eotaxin may add additional modest predictive value on top of clinical variables alone.,COPDGene (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02445183).,Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcomes Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT 01969344).,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-017-0662-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Current treatment strategies to stratify exacerbation risk rely on history of ≥2 events in the previous year.,To understand year-to-year variability and factors associated with consistent exacerbations over time, we present a prospective analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort.,We analyzed SPIROMICS participants with COPD and three years of prospective data (n=1,105).,We classified participants according to yearly exacerbation frequency.,Stepwise logistic regression compared factors associated with individuals experiencing ≥1 AECOPD in every year for three years versus none.,During three years follow-up, 48·7% of participants experienced at least one AECOPD, while the majority (51·3%) experienced none.,Only 2·1% had ≥2 AECOPD in each year.,An inconsistent pattern (both years with and years without AECOPD) was common (41·3% of the group), particularly among GOLD stages 3 and 4 subjects (56·1%).,In logistic regression, consistent AECOPD (≥1 event per year for three years) as compared to no AECOPD were associated with higher baseline symptom burden assessed with the COPD Assessment Test, previous exacerbations, greater evidence of small airway abnormality by computed tomography, lower Interleukin-15 (IL-15) and elevated Interleukin-8 (IL-8).,Although AECOPD are common, the exacerbation status of most individuals varies markedly from year to year.,Among participants who experienced any AECOPD over three years, very few repeatedly experienced ≥2 events/year.,In addition to symptoms and history of exacerbations in the prior year, we identified several novel biomarkers associated with consistent exacerbations, including CT-defined small airway abnormality, IL-15 and IL-8.
1
Small airways disease (SAD) is a cardinal feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) first recognized in the nineteenth century.,The diverse histopathological features associated with SAD underpin the heterogeneous nature of COPD.,Our understanding of the key molecular mechanisms which drive the pathological changes are not complete.,In this article we will provide a historical overview of key histopathological studies which have helped shape our understanding of SAD and discuss the hallmark features of airway remodelling, mucous plugging and inflammation.,We focus on the relationship between SAD and emphysema, SAD in the early stages of COPD, and the mechanisms which cause SAD progression, including bacterial colonization and exacerbations.,We discuss the need to specifically target SAD to attenuate the progression of COPD.
Exacerbations of COPD are defined clinically by worsening of chronic respiratory symptoms.,Chronic respiratory symptoms are common in the general population.,There are no data on the frequency of exacerbation-like events in individuals without spirometric evidence of COPD.,To determine the occurrence of ‘exacerbation-like’ events in individuals without airflow limitation, their associated risk factors, healthcare utilisation and social impacts.,We analysed the cross-sectional data from 5176 people aged 40 years and older who participated in a multisite, population-based study on lung health.,The study cohort was stratified into spirometrically defined COPD (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7) and non-COPD (post bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7 and without self-reported doctor diagnosis of airway diseases) subgroups and then into those with and without respiratory ‘exacerbation-like’ events in the past year.,Individuals without COPD had half the frequency of ‘exacerbation-like’ events compared with those with COPD.,In the non-COPD group, the independent associations with ‘exacerbations’ included female gender, presence of wheezing, the use of respiratory medications and self-perceived poor health.,In the non-COPD group, those with exacerbations were more likely than those without exacerbations to have poorer health-related quality of life (12-item Short-Form Health Survey), miss social activities (58.5% vs 18.8%), miss work for income (41.5% vs 17.3%) and miss housework (55.6% vs 16.5%), p<0.01 to <0.0001.,Events similar to exacerbations of COPD can occur in individuals without COPD or asthma and are associated with significant health and socioeconomic outcomes.,They increase the respiratory burden in the community and may contribute to the false-positive diagnosis of asthma or COPD.
1
Despite the availability of treatment guidelines and inhaled medications for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), much remains to be done to lessen the burden of these respiratory diseases for patients.,The challenge of selecting effective and efficacious drugs for patients is a key focus area for healthcare professionals.,Here we discuss the concept of “drivers of effectiveness”- features of a medicine which may increase or decrease its effectiveness in the presence of real-world factors - and highlight the importance of considering these drivers in the early stages of drug development, and exploring their impact in carefully designed pragmatic trials.,Using the Salford Lung Studies (SLS) in asthma and COPD as an illustrative example, we discuss various features of the inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination, fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI), as potential drivers of effectiveness that may have contributed to the improved patient outcomes observed with initiation of FF/VI versus continuation of usual care in the UK primary care setting.
Adherence to inhalation therapy is a critical determinant of the success of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management.,However, in practice, nonadherence to inhalation therapy is very common in COPD patients.,The effects of adherence to inhalation therapy in COPD have not been fully studied, and less is known about the relationship between medication adherence and quality of life in COPD.,Our aim is to assess the factors that contribute to adherence to inhalation therapy and examine their correlation with quality of life.,A cross-sectional analysis of 88 COPD patients was performed using a self-reported adherence questionnaire with responses on a 5-point Likert scale.,Of the 88 patients who were potential participants, 55 (63%) responded with usable information.,The only significant factor associated with the overall mean adherence score was receiving repeated instruction about inhalation techniques (P = 0.032).,Of the 55 respondents, 22 (40.0%) were given repeated verbal instruction and/or demonstrations of inhalation technique by a respiratory physician.,Significant correlations were found between the overall mean adherence score and the health-related quality of life score (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire: total, r = −0.35, P = 0.023; symptoms, r = −0.43, P = 0.002; impacts, r = −0.35, P = 0.011).,Furthermore, patients with repeated instruction showed better quality of life scores than those who did not receive instruction (total, P = 0.030; symptoms, P = 0.038; impacts, P = 0.019).,Repeated instruction for inhalation techniques may contribute to adherence to therapeutic regimens, which relates to better health status in COPD.
1
The efficacy of inhaled salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate (SFC) in patients with severe or very severe COPD is well documented.,However, there are only limited data about the influence of GOLD severity staging on the effectiveness of SFC, particularly in patients with milder disease.,TORCH was a 3-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6112 patients with moderate/severe COPD with pre-bronchodilator FEV1 < 60% predicted (mean age 65 years, 76% male, mean 44% predicted FEV1, 43% current smokers).,To understand the relative efficacy of SFC and its components by GOLD stages, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of the TORCH dataset using baseline post-bronchodilator FEV1 to segment patients into three groups: moderate COPD (GOLD stage II and above: ≥ 50%; n = 2156), severe COPD (GOLD stage III: 30% to < 50%; n = 3019) and very severe COPD (GOLD stage IV: < 30%; n = 937).,Compared with placebo, SFC improved post-bronchodilator FEV1: 101 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71, 132) in GOLD stage II, 82 ml (95% CI: 60, 104) in GOLD stage III and 96 ml (95% CI: 54, 138) in GOLD stage IV patients, and reduced the rate of exacerbations: 31% (95% CI: 19, 40) in GOLD stage II, 26% (95% CI: 17, 34) in GOLD stage III and 14% (95% CI: -4, 29) in GOLD stage IV.,SFC improved health status to a greater extent than other treatments regardless of baseline GOLD stage.,Similarly, SFC reduced the risk of death by 33% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.98) for GOLD stage II, 5% (HR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.24) for GOLD stage III, and 30% (HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.05) for GOLD stage IV.,The rates of adverse events were similar across treatment arms and increased with disease severity.,Overall, there was a higher incidence of pneumonia in the fluticasone propionate and SFC arms, compared with other treatments in all GOLD stages.,In the TORCH study, SFC reduced moderate-to-severe exacerbations and improved health status and FEV1 across GOLD stages.,Treatment with SFC may be associated with reduced mortality compared with placebo in patients with GOLD stage II disease.,The effects were similar to those reported for the study as a whole.,Thus, SFC is an effective treatment option for patients with GOLD stage II COPD.,Clinicaltrial.gov registration NCT00268216; Study number: SCO30003
COPD has a profound impact on daily life, yet remains underdiagnosed and undertreated.,We set out to develop a brief, reliable, self-scored questionnaire to identify individuals likely to have COPD.,COPD-PS™ development began with a list of concepts identified for inclusion using expert opinion from a clinician working group comprised of pulmonologists (n = 5) and primary care clinicians (n = 5).,A national survey of 697 patients was conducted at 12 practitioner sites.,Logistic regression identified items discriminating between patients with and without fixed airflow obstruction (AO, postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 70%).,ROC analyses evaluated screening accuracy, compared scoring options, and assessed concurrent validity.,Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed via COPD-PS and SF-12v2 score correlations.,For known-groups validation, COPD-PS differences between clinical groups were tested.,Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a 20% sample.,Of 697 patients surveyed, 295 patients met expert review criteria for spirometry performance; 38% of these (n = 113) had results indicating AO.,Five items positively predicted AO (p < 0.0001): breathlessness, productive cough, activity limitation, smoking history, and age.,COPD-PS scores accurately classified AO status (area under ROC curve = 0.81) and reliable (r = 0.91).,Patients with spirometry indicative of AO scored significantly higher (6.8, SD = 1.9; p < 0.0001) than patients without AO (4.0, SD = 2.3).,Higher scores were associated with more severe AO, bronchodilator use, and overnight hospitalization for breathing problems.,With the prevalence of COPD in the studied cohort, a score on the COPD-PS of greater than five was associated with a positive predictive value of 56.8% and negative predictive value of 86.4%.,The COPD-PS accurately classified physician-reported COPD (AUC = 0.89).,The COPD-PS is a brief, accurate questionnaire that can identify individuals likely to have COPD.
1
Previous attempts to characterise the burden of chronic respiratory diseases have focused only on specific disease conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma.,In this study, we aimed to characterise the burden of chronic respiratory diseases globally, providing a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis on geographical and time trends from 1990 to 2017.,Using data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017, we estimated the prevalence, morbidity, and mortality attributable to chronic respiratory diseases through an analysis of deaths, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and years of life lost (YLL) by GBD super-region, from 1990 to 2017, stratified by age and sex.,Specific diseases analysed included asthma, COPD, interstitial lung disease and pulmonary sarcoidosis, pneumoconiosis, and other chronic respiratory diseases.,We also assessed the contribution of risk factors (smoking, second-hand smoke, ambient particulate matter and ozone pollution, household air pollution from solid fuels, and occupational risks) to chronic respiratory disease-attributable DALYs.,In 2017, 544·9 million people (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 506·9-584·8) worldwide had a chronic respiratory disease, representing an increase of 39·8% compared with 1990.,Chronic respiratory disease prevalence showed wide variability across GBD super-regions, with the highest prevalence among both males and females in high-income regions, and the lowest prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia.,The age-sex-specific prevalence of each chronic respiratory disease in 2017 was also highly variable geographically.,Chronic respiratory diseases were the third leading cause of death in 2017 (7·0% [95% UI 6·8-7·2] of all deaths), behind cardiovascular diseases and neoplasms.,Deaths due to chronic respiratory diseases numbered 3 914 196 (95% UI 3 790 578-4 044 819) in 2017, an increase of 18·0% since 1990, while total DALYs increased by 13·3%.,However, when accounting for ageing and population growth, declines were observed in age-standardised prevalence (14·3% decrease), age-standardised death rates (42·6%), and age-standardised DALY rates (38·2%).,In males and females, most chronic respiratory disease-attributable deaths and DALYs were due to COPD.,In regional analyses, mortality rates from chronic respiratory diseases were greatest in south Asia and lowest in sub-Saharan Africa, also across both sexes.,Notably, although absolute prevalence was lower in south Asia than in most other super-regions, YLLs due to chronic respiratory diseases across the subcontinent were the highest in the world.,Death rates due to interstitial lung disease and pulmonary sarcoidosis were greater than those due to pneumoconiosis in all super-regions.,Smoking was the leading risk factor for chronic respiratory disease-related disability across all regions for men.,Among women, household air pollution from solid fuels was the predominant risk factor for chronic respiratory diseases in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, while ambient particulate matter represented the leading risk factor in southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania, and in the Middle East and north Africa super-region.,Our study shows that chronic respiratory diseases remain a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, with growth in absolute numbers but sharp declines in several age-standardised estimators since 1990.,Premature mortality from chronic respiratory diseases seems to be highest in regions with less-resourced health systems on a per-capita basis.,Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Early identification of patients with a prolonged stay due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may reduce risk of adverse event and treatment costs.,This study aimed to identify predictors of prolonged stay after acute exacerbation of COPD based on variables on admission; the study also looked to establish a prediction model for length of stay (LOS).,We extracted demographic and clinical data from the medical records of 599 patients discharged after an acute exacerbation of COPD between March 2006 and December 2008 at Oslo University Hospital, Aker.,We used logistic regression analyses to assess predictors of a length of stay above the 75th percentile and assessed the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve to evaluate the model’s performance.,We included 590 patients (54% women) aged 73.2±10.8 years (mean ± standard deviation) in the analyses.,Median LOS was 6.0 days (interquartile range [IQR] 3.5-11.0).,In multivariate analysis, admission between Thursday and Saturday (odds ratio [OR] 2.24 [95% CI 1.60-3.51], P<0.001), heart failure (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.34-3.80), diabetes (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.07-3.37), stroke (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.04-3.21), high arterial PCO2 (OR 1.26 [95% CI 1.13-1.41], P<0.001), and low serum albumin level (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.87-0.97], P=0.001) were associated with a LOS >11 days.,The statistical model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.73.,Admission between Thursday and Saturday, heart failure, diabetes, stroke, high arterial PCO2, and low serum albumin level were associated with a prolonged LOS.,These findings may help physicians to identify patients that will need a prolonged LOS in the early stages of admission.,However, the predictive model exhibited suboptimal performance and hence is not ready for clinical use.
1
While a subgroup of patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) clearly benefit from antibiotics, their identification remains challenging.,We hypothesised that selective assessment of the balance between the two dominant bacterial groups (Gammaproteobacteria (G) and Firmicutes (F)) in COPD sputum samples might reveal a subgroup with a bacterial community structure change at exacerbation that was restored to baseline on recovery and potentially reflects effective antibiotic treatment.,Phylogenetically specific 16S rRNA genes were determined by quantitative real time PCR to derive a G:F ratio in serial sputum samples from 66 extensively-phenotyped COPD exacerbation episodes.,Cluster analysis based on Euclidean distance measures, generated across the 4 visit times (stable and exacerbation day: 0,14 and 42) for the 66 exacerbation episodes, revealed three subgroups designated HG, HF, and GF reflecting predominance or equivalence of the two target bacterial groups.,While the other subgroups showed no change at exacerbation, the HG cluster (n = 20) was characterized by G:F ratios that increased significantly at exacerbation and returned to baseline on recovery (p<0.00001); ratios in the HG group also correlated positively with inflammatory markers and negatively with FEV1.,At exacerbation G:F showed a significant receiver-operator-characteristic curve to identify the HG subgroup (AUC 0.90, p<0.0001).,The G:F ratio at exacerbation can be determined on a timescale compatible with decisions regarding clinical management.,We propose that the G:F ratio has potential for use as a biomarker enabling selective use of antibiotics in COPD exacerbations and hence warrants further clinical evaluation.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic inflammatory diseases of mucosal tissues that affect the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts, respectively.,They share many similarities in epidemiological and clinical characteristics as well as inflammatory pathologies.,Importantly, both conditions are accompanied by systemic co-morbidities that are largely overlooked in both basic and clinical research.,Therefore, consideration of these complications may maximise the efficacy of prevention and treatment approaches.,Here, we examine both the intestinal involvement in COPD and the pulmonary manifestations of IBD.,We also review the evidence for inflammatory organ cross-talk that may drive these associations, and discuss the current frontiers of research into these issues.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a multicomponent condition that is characterised by airflow obstruction that is not fully reversible and is a major global cause of morbidity and mortality.,The most widely used marker of disease severity and progression is FEV1.,However, FEV1 correlates poorly with both symptoms and other measures of disease progression and thus there is an urgent need for other biological markers to better characterise individuals with COPD.,Fibrinogen is an acute phase plasma protein that has emerged as a promising biomarker in COPD.,Here we review the current clinical evidence linking fibrinogen with COPD and its associated co-morbidities and discuss its potential utility as a biomarker.,Searches for appropriate studies were undertaken on PubMed using search terms fibrinogen, COPD, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, FEV1, cardiovascular disease, exacerbation and mortality.,There is strong evidence of an association between fibrinogen and the presence of COPD, the presence and frequency of exacerbations and with mortality.,Fibrinogen is associated with disease severity but does not predict lung function decline, a measure used as a surrogate for disease activity.,The role of fibrinogen in identifying inflammatory co morbidities, particularly cardiovascular disease, remains unclear.,Fibrinogen is reduced by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors in individuals with stable disease and by oral corticosteroids during exacerbations.,Fibrinogen is likely to be a useful biomarker to stratify individuals with COPD into those with a high or low risk of future exacerbations and may identify those with a higher risk of mortality.
Because chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous condition, the identification of specific clinical phenotypes is key to developing more effective therapies.,To explore if the persistence of systemic inflammation is associated with poor clinical outcomes in COPD we assessed patients recruited to the well-characterized ECLIPSE cohort (NCT00292552).,Six inflammatory biomarkers in peripheral blood (white blood cells (WBC) count and CRP, IL-6, IL-8, fibrinogen and TNF-α levels) were quantified in 1,755 COPD patients, 297 smokers with normal spirometry and 202 non-smoker controls that were followed-up for three years.,We found that, at baseline, 30% of COPD patients did not show evidence of systemic inflammation whereas 16% had persistent systemic inflammation.,Even though pulmonary abnormalities were similar in these two groups, persistently inflamed patients during follow-up had significantly increased all-cause mortality (13% vs. 2%, p<0.001) and exacerbation frequency (1.5 (1.5) vs.,0.9 (1.1) per year, p<0.001) compared to non-inflamed ones.,As a descriptive study our results show associations but do not prove causality.,Besides this, the inflammatory response is complex and we studied only a limited panel of biomarkers, albeit they are those investigated by the majority of previous studies and are often and easily measured in clinical practice.,Overall, these results identify a novel systemic inflammatory COPD phenotype that may be the target of specific research and treatment.
1
Aclidinium/formoterol is a twice-daily (BID) fixed-dose combination (FDC) in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The efficacy and safety of aclidinium/formoterol versus monotherapy and placebo in patients with COPD was assessed.,In this 24-week double-blind, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled, multicentre Phase III study, patients (≥40 years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]/forced vital capacity <70% and FEV1 ≥30% but <80% predicted normal) were randomised 2:2:2:2:1 to aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg (n = 385) or 400/6 μg (n = 381), aclidinium 400 μg (n = 385), formoterol 12 μg (n = 384) or placebo (n = 194) BID via Genuair®/Pressair®a.,At Week 24, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg and 400/6 μg lead to significant improvements from baseline in 1-hour post-dose FEV1 versus aclidinium (125 mL [95% CI: 90, 160; p < 0 · 001] and 69 mL [95% CI: 34, 105; p < 0.001], respectively) and trough FEV1 versus formoterol (85 mL [95% CI: 51, 119; p < 0.001] and 53 mL [95% CI: 19, 87; p < 0.01], respectively; co-primary endpoints).,Additionally, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg and 400/6 μg provided significant improvements in Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score versus placebo (1.29 units [95% CI: 0.73, 1.86; p < 0.001] and 1.16 units [95% CI: 0.59, 1.73; p < 0.001], respectively; secondary endpoint).,All treatments were well tolerated, with safety profiles of the FDCs similar to those of placebo and monotherapy.,Both aclidinium/formoterol BID doses significantly improved bronchodilation versus monotherapy, and dyspnoea versus placebo, with no increase in safety risk.,Aclidinium/formoterol may be an effective treatment for patients with COPD.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01462942.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-178) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Interactions between spirometry and patient-reported outcomes in COPD are not well understood.,This systematic review and study-level analysis investigated the relationship between changes in FEV1 and changes in health status with bronchodilator therapy.,Six databases (to October 2009) were searched to identify studies with long-acting bronchodilator therapy reporting FEV1 and health status, dyspnoea or exacerbations.,Mean and standard deviations of treatment effects were extracted for each arm of each study.,Relationships between changes in trough FEV1 and outcomes were assessed using correlations and random-effects regression modelling.,The primary outcome was St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score.,Thirty-six studies (≥3 months) were included.,Twenty-two studies (23,654 patients) with 49 treatment arms each contributing one data point provided SGRQ data.,Change in trough FEV1 and change in SGRQ total score were negatively correlated (r = -0.46, p < 0.001); greater increases in FEV1 were associated with greater reductions (improvements) in SGRQ.,The correlation strengthened with increasing study duration from 3 to 12 months.,Regression modelling indicated that 100 mL increase in FEV1 (change at which patients are more likely to report improvement) was associated with a statistically significant reduction in SGRQ of 2.5 (95% CI 1.9, 3.1), while a clinically relevant SGRQ change (4.0) was associated with 160.6 (95% CI 129.0, 211.6) mL increase in FEV1.,The association between change in FEV1 and other patient-reported outcomes was generally weak.,Our analyses indicate, at a study level, that improvement in mean trough FEV1 is associated with proportional improvements in health status.
1
Events of the past decade have stimulated development of new drug formulations and delivery devices that have improved the efficiency, ease of use, and environmental impact of inhaled drug therapy.,Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler is a novel, multidose, propellant-free, hand-held, liquid inhaler that represents a new category of inhaler devices.,The aerosol cloud generated by Respimat contains a higher fraction of fine particles than most pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and the aerosol spray exits the inhaler more slowly and for a longer duration than with pMDIs.,This translates into higher lung drug deposition and lower oropharyngeal deposition, making it possible to give lower nominal doses of delivered drugs without lowering efficacy.,In clinical trials in patients with COPD, bronchodilator drugs delivered from Respimat were equally effective at half of the dose delivered from a pMDI.,In one study of inhaler preference, Respimat was preferred over the pMDI by patients with COPD and other obstructive lung diseases.,Respimat is a valuable addition to the range of inhaler devices available to the patient with COPD.
COPD is prevalent in Western society and its incidence is rising in the developing world.,Acute exacerbations of COPD, about 50% of which are unreported, lead to deterioration in quality of life and contribute significantly to disease burden.,Quality of life deteriorates with time; thus, most of the health burden occurs in more severe disease.,COPD severity and frequent and more severe exacerbations are all related to an increased risk of mortality.,Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have similar effects on quality of life but ICS/long-acting bronchodilator combinations and the long-acting antimuscarinic tiotropium all improve health status and exacerbation rates and are likely to have an effect on mortality but perhaps only with prolonged use.,Erythromycin has been shown to decrease the rate of COPD exacerbations.,Pulmonary rehabilitation and regular physical activity are indicated in all severities of COPD and improve quality of life.,Noninvasive ventilation is associated with improved quality of life.,Long-term oxygen therapy improves mortality but only in hypoxic COPD patients.,The choice of an inhaler device is a key component of COPD therapy and this requires more attention from physicians than perhaps we are aware of.,Disease management programs, characterized as they are by patient centeredness, improve quality of life and decrease hospitalization rates.,Most outcomes in COPD can be modified by interventions and these are well tolerated and have acceptable safety profiles.
1
The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) is a validated simple instrument to assess health status, and it correlates well with the severity of airway obstruction in COPD patients.,However, little is known about the relationships between CAT scores and quantitative computed tomography (CT) measurements of emphysema and airway wall thickness in COPD patients in the People’s Republic of China.,One hundred and twelve participants including 63 COPD patients and 49 normal control subjects were recruited.,All participants were examined with high-resolution CT to get the measurements of emphysema (percentage of pixels below −950 HU [%LAA-950]) and airway wall thickness (wall area percentage and the ratio of airway wall thickness to total diameter).,Meanwhile, they completed the CAT and modified Medical Research Council questionnaire independently.,Significantly higher CAT scores and CT measurements were found in COPD patients compared with normal control subjects (P<0.05), and there was a tendency of higher CAT scores and CT measurements with increasing disease severity measured by GOLD staging system.,Positive correlations were found between CAT scores and CT measurements (P<0.01).,Using multiple linear stepwise regression, CAT score =−46.38+0.778× (wall area percentage) +0.203× (%LAA-950) (P<0.001).,Meanwhile, CAT scores and CT measurements in COPD patients all positively correlated with the modified Medical Research Council grades and negatively correlated with FEV1% (P<0.01).,CAT scores correlate well with the quantitative CT measurements in COPD patients, which may provide an imaging evidence that the structural changes of the lungs in this disease are associated with the health status measured by CAT.
The COPD Assessment Test (CAT™) is a new short health status measure for routine use.,New questionnaires require reference points so that users can understand the scores; descriptive scenarios are one way of doing this.,A novel method of creating scenarios is described.,A Bland and Altman plot showed a consistent relationship between CAT scores and scores obtained with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD (SGRQ-C) permitting a direct mapping process between CAT and SGRQ items.,The severity associated with each CAT item was calculated using a probabilistic model and expressed in logits (log odds of a patient of given severity affirming that item 50% of the time).,Severity estimates for SGRQ-C items in logits were also available, allowing direct comparisons with CAT items.,CAT scores were categorised into Low, Medium, High and Very High Impact.,SGRQ items of corresponding severity were used to create scenarios associated with each category.,Each CAT category was associated with a scenario comprising 12 to 16 SGRQ-C items.,A severity 'ladder' associating CAT scores with exemplar health status effects was also created.,Items associated with 'Low' and 'Medium' Impact appeared to be subjectively quite severe in terms of their effect on daily life.,These scenarios provide users of the CAT with a good sense of the health impact associated with different scores.,More generally they provide a surprising insight into the severity of the effects of COPD, even in patients with apparently mild-moderate health status impact.
1
Epigenetics changes have been shown to be affected by cigarette smoking.,Cigarette smoke (CS)-mediated DNA methylation can potentially affect several cellular and pathophysiological processes, acute exacerbations, and comorbidity in the lungs of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We sought to determine whether genome-wide lung DNA methylation profiles of smokers and patients with COPD were significantly different from non-smokers.,We isolated DNA from parenchymal lung tissues of patients including eight lifelong non-smokers, eight current smokers, and eight patients with COPD and analyzed the samples using Illumina’s Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip.,Our data revealed that the differentially methylated genes were related to top canonical pathways (e.g., G beta gamma signaling, mechanisms of cancer, and nNOS signaling in neurons), disease and disorders (organismal injury and abnormalities, cancer, and respiratory disease), and molecular and cellular functions (cell death and survival, cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance) in patients with COPD.,The genome-wide DNA methylation analysis identified suggestive genes, such as NOS1AP, TNFAIP2, BID, GABRB1, ATXN7, and THOC7 with DNA methylation changes in COPD lung tissues that were further validated by pyrosequencing.,Pyrosequencing validation confirmed hyper-methylation in smokers and patients with COPD as compared to non-smokers.,However, we did not detect significant differences in DNA methylation for TNFAIP2, ATXN7, and THOC7 genes in smokers and COPD groups despite the changes observed in the genome-wide analysis.,Our study suggests that DNA methylation in suggestive genes, such as NOS1AP, BID, and GABRB1 may be used as epigenetic signatures in smokers and patients with COPD if the same is validated in a larger cohort.,Future studies are required to correlate DNA methylation status with transcriptomics of selective genes identified in this study and elucidate their role and involvement in the progression of COPD and its exacerbations.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-017-0335-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Epidemiological studies show that approximately 20-30% of chronic smokers develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) while 10-15% develop lung cancer.,COPD pre-exists lung cancer in 50-90% of cases and has a heritability of 40-77%, much greater than for lung cancer with heritability of 15-25%.,These data suggest that smokers susceptible to COPD may also be susceptible to lung cancer.,This study examines the association of several overlapping chromosomal loci, recently implicated by GWA studies in COPD, lung function and lung cancer, in (n = 1400) subjects sub-phenotyped for the presence of COPD and matched for smoking exposure.,Using this approach we show; the 15q25 locus confers susceptibility to lung cancer and COPD, the 4q31 and 4q22 loci both confer a reduced risk to both COPD and lung cancer, the 6p21 locus confers susceptibility to lung cancer in smokers with pre-existing COPD, the 5p15 and 1q23 loci both confer susceptibility to lung cancer in those with no pre-existing COPD.,We also show the 5q33 locus, previously associated with reduced FEV1, appears to confer susceptibility to both COPD and lung cancer.,The 6p21 locus previously linked to reduced FEV1 is associated with COPD only.,Larger studies will be needed to distinguish whether these COPD-related effects may reflect, in part, associations specific to different lung cancer histology.,We demonstrate that when the “risk genotypes” derived from the univariate analysis are incorporated into an algorithm with clinical variables, independently associated with lung cancer in multivariate analysis, modest discrimination is possible on receiver operator curve analysis (AUC = 0.70).,We suggest that genetic susceptibility to lung cancer includes genes conferring susceptibility to COPD and that sub-phenotyping with spirometry is critical to identifying genes underlying the development of lung cancer.
1
A combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting beta agonist (LABA) is recommended in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients experiencing frequent exacerbations.,Currently, there are five ICS/LABA combination products available on the market.,The purpose of this study was to systematically review the efficacy of various ICS/LABA combinations with a network meta-analysis.,Several databases and manufacturer’s websites were searched for relevant clinical trials.,Randomized control trials, at least 12 weeks duration, comparing an ICS/LABA combination with active control or placebo were included.,Moderate and severe exacerbations were chosen as the outcome assessment criteria.,The primary analyses were conducted with a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method.,Most of the ICS/LABA combinations reduced moderate-to-severe exacerbations as compared with placebo and LABA, but none of them reduced severe exacerbations.,However, many studies excluded patients receiving long-term oxygen therapy.,Moderate-dose ICS was as effective as high-dose ICS in reducing exacerbations when combined with LABA.,ICS/LABA combinations had a class effect with regard to the prevention of COPD exacerbations.,Moderate-dose ICS/LABA combination therapy would be sufficient for COPD patients when indicated.,The efficacy of ICS/LABA combination therapy appeared modest and had no impact in reducing severe exacerbations.,Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of ICS/LABA combination therapy in severely affected COPD patients requiring long-term oxygen therapy.
COPD is characterized by variability in exercise capacity and physical activity (PA), and acute exacerbations (AEs).,Little is known about the relationship between daily step count, a direct measure of PA, and the risk of AEs, including hospitalizations.,In an observational cohort study of 169 persons with COPD, we directly assessed PA with the StepWatch Activity Monitor, an ankle-worn accelerometer that measures daily step count.,We also assessed exercise capacity with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and patient-reported PA with the St.,George's Respiratory Questionnaire Activity Score (SGRQ-AS).,AEs and COPD-related hospitalizations were assessed and validated prospectively over a median of 16 months.,Mean daily step count was 5804±3141 steps.,Over 209 person-years of observation, there were 263 AEs (incidence rate 1.3±1.6 per person-year) and 116 COPD-related hospitalizations (incidence rate 0.56±1.09 per person-year).,Adjusting for FEV1 % predicted and prednisone use for AE in previous year, for each 1000 fewer steps per day walked at baseline, there was an increased rate of AEs (rate ratio 1.07; 95%CI = 1.003-1.15) and COPD-related hospitalizations (rate ratio 1.24; 95%CI = 1.08-1.42).,There was a significant linear trend of decreasing daily step count by quartiles and increasing rate ratios for AEs (P = 0.008) and COPD-related hospitalizations (P = 0.003).,Each 30-meter decrease in 6MWT distance was associated with an increased rate ratio of 1.07 (95%CI = 1.01-1.14) for AEs and 1.18 (95%CI = 1.07-1.30) for COPD-related hospitalizations.,Worsening of SGRQ-AS by 4 points was associated with an increased rate ratio of 1.05 (95%CI = 1.01-1.09) for AEs and 1.10 (95%CI = 1.02-1.17) for COPD-related hospitalizations.,Lower daily step count, lower 6MWT distance, and worse SGRQ-AS predict future AEs and COPD-related hospitalizations, independent of pulmonary function and previous AE history.,These results support the importance of assessing PA in patients with COPD, and provide the rationale to promote PA as part of exacerbation-prevention strategies.
1
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), delivered as a supervised multidisciplinary program including exercise training, is one of the cornerstones in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management.,We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect on mortality of a supervised early PR program, initiated during or within 4 weeks after hospitalization with an acute exacerbation of COPD compared with usual post-exacerbation care or no PR program.,Secondary outcomes were days in hospital, COPD related readmissions, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), exercise capacity (walking distance), activities of daily living (ADL), fall risk and drop-out rate.,We identified randomized trials through a systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cocharne Library and other sources through October 2017.,Risk of bias was assessed regarding randomization, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other biases using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.,We included 13 randomized trials (801 participants).,Our meta-analyses showed a clinically relevant reduction in mortality after early PR (4 trials, 319 patients; RR = 0.58 (95% CI: [0.35 to 0.98])) and at the longest follow-up (3 trials, 127 patients; RR = 0.55 (95% CI: [0.12 to 2.57])).,Early PR reduced number of days in hospital by 4.27 days (1 trial, 180 patients; 95% CI: [− 6.85 to − 1.69]) and hospital readmissions (6 trials, 319 patients; RR = 0.47 (95% CI: [0.29 to 0.75])).,Moreover, early PR improved HRQoL and walking distance, and did not affect drop-out rate.,Several of the trials had unclear risk of bias in regard to the randomization and blinding, for some outcome there was also a lack of power.,Moderate quality of evidence showed reductions in mortality, number of days in hospital and number of readmissions after early PR in patients hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation.,Long-term effects on mortality were not statistically significant, but improvements in HRQoL and exercise capacity appeared to be maintained for at least 12 months.,Therefore, we recommend early supervised PR to patients with COPD-related exacerbations.,PR should be initiated during hospital admission or within 4 weeks after hospital discharge.,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-018-0718-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
In addition to their respiratory symptoms, patients with COPD experience multiple, co-occurring symptoms.,The aims of this study were to identify subgroups of COPD patients based on their distinct experiences with 14 symptoms and to determine how these subgroups differed in demographic and clinical characteristics and disease-specific quality of life.,Patients with moderate, severe, and very severe COPD (n=267) completed a number of self-report questionnaires.,Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct symptom experiences based on the occurrence of self-reported symptoms using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale.,Based on the probability of occurrence of a number of physical and psychological symptoms, three subgroups of patients (ie, latent classes) were identified and named “high”, “intermediate”, and “low”.,Across the three latent classes, the pairwise comparisons for the classification of airflow limitation in COPD were not significantly different, which suggests that measurements of respiratory function are not associated with COPD patients’ symptom burden and their specific needs for symptom management.,While patients in both the “high” and “intermediate” classes had high occurrence rates for respiratory symptoms, patients in the “high” class had the highest occurrence rates for psychological symptoms.,Compared with the “intermediate” class, patients in the “high” class were younger, more likely to be women, had significantly more acute exacerbations in the past year, and reported significantly worse disease-specific quality of life scores.,These findings suggest that subgroups of COPD patients with distinct symptom experiences can be identified.,Patients with a higher symptom burden warrant more detailed assessments and may have therapeutic needs that would not be identified using current classifications based only on respiratory function.
1
There is still limited information on systemic inflammation in alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficient (AATD) COPD patients and what effect alpha-1-antitrypsin augmentation therapy and/or exercise might have on circulating inflammatory cytokines.,We hypothesized that AATD COPD patients on augmentation therapy (AATD + AUG) would have lower circulating and skeletal muscle inflammatory cytokines compared to AATD COPD patients not receiving augmentation therapy (AATD-AUG) and/or the typical non-AATD (COPD) patient.,We also hypothesized that cytokine response to exercise would be lower in AATD + AUG compared to AATD-AUG or COPD subjects.,Arterial and femoral venous concentration and skeletal muscle expression of TNFα, IL-6, IL-1β and CRP were measured at rest, during and up to 4-hours after 50% maximal 1-hour knee extensor exercise in all COPD patient groups, including 2 additional groups (i.e.,AATD with normal lung function, and healthy age-/activity-matched controls).,Circulating CRP was higher in AATD + AUG (4.7 ± 1.6 mg/dL) and AATD-AUG (3.3 ± 1.2 mg/dL) compared to healthy controls (1.5 ± 0.3 mg/dL, p < 0.05), but lower in AATD compared to non-AATD-COPD patients (6.1 ± 2.6 mg/dL, p < 0.05).,TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1β were significantly increased by 1.7-, 1.7-, and 4.7-fold, respectively, in non-AATD COPD compared to AATD COPD (p < 0.05), and 1.3-, 1.7-, and 2.2-fold, respectively, compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.05).,Skeletal muscle TNFα was on average 3-4 fold greater in AATD-AUG compared to the other groups (p < 0.05).,Exercise showed no effect on these cytokines in any of our patient groups.,These data show that AATD COPD patients do not experience the same chronic systemic inflammation and exhibit reduced inflammation compared to non-AATD COPD patients.,Augmentation therapy may help to improve muscle efflux of TNFα and reduce muscle TNFα concentration, but showed no effect on IL-6, IL-1β or CRP.
Despite the status of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as a major global health problem, no currently available therapies can limit COPD progression.,Therefore, an urgent need exists for the development of new and effective treatments for COPD.,An improved understanding in the molecular pathogenesis of COPD can potentially identify molecular targets to facilitate the development of new therapeutic modalities.,Among the best approaches for understanding the molecular basis of COPD include gene expression profiling techniques, such as serial analysis of gene expression or microarrays.,Using these methods, recent studies have mapped comparative gene expression profiles of lung tissues from patients with different stages of COPD relative to healthy smokers or non-smokers.,Such studies have revealed a number of differentially-regulated genes associated with COPD progression, which include genes involved in the regulation of inflammation, extracellular matrix, cytokines, chemokines, apoptosis, and stress responses.,These studies have shed new light on the molecular mechanisms of COPD, and suggest novel targets for clinical treatments.
1
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibit poor sleep quality and consider morning as the worst time of day for their symptoms.,While work has been done to characterize nighttime (NT) and early morning (EM) symptoms in various populations, the impact and factors associated with NT/EM symptoms among patients with COPD in the United States is not well understood.,Commercially insured patients aged ≥40 years with one or more medical claim for COPD and one or more pharmacy claim for COPD maintenance medication were identified from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database between September 1, 2010 and August 31, 2011.,Consenting respondents were asked whether they had COPD symptoms on at least three nights or at least three mornings during the past week.,Respondents were then either assigned to one of three symptom groups to complete the survey or excluded if their predefined group quota limit had been met.,Survey completers completed the survey with questions about COPD symptoms and other commonly used patient-reported outcome measures.,Respondents with NT/EM symptoms were asked about the frequency, severity, and impact of the symptoms on sleep, morning activities, and anxiety levels.,Among respondents with symptoms, 73.1% of respondents with NT symptoms (N=376) and 83% of respondents with EM symptoms (N=506) experienced at least three distinct types of symptoms over the past week, with cough being the most frequently reported symptom.,Approximately half of respondents with NT or EM symptoms perceived their symptoms as moderate to very severe, with a majority reporting their symptoms affected their NT sleep and morning activities, and more than half felt anxious due to their symptoms.,Multinomial logistic regression showed COPD patients with both or either NT/EM symptoms were associated with poorer health status compared to those without.,Improved disease management may reduce NT/EM symptoms and improve health status in patients with COPD.
To assess the treatment progression during the 24 months following a formal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the UK primary care setting.,A retrospective cohort of newly diagnosed COPD patients was identified in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) from 1/1/2008 until 31/12/2009.,Maintenance therapy prescribed within the first 3 months of diagnosis and in the subsequent 3-month intervals for 24 months were analyzed.,Treatment classes included long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), and respective combinations.,At each 3-month interval, discontinuation, switching, addition, and stepping down patterns were analyzed cumulatively for the first 12 months and over the 24-month of follow-up.,A total of 3199 patients with at least one prescription of a maintenance therapy at baseline and during 4th-6th month interval were included in the analysis.,At diagnosis (0-3 months), the most frequently prescribed maintenance therapy was LABA+ICS (43%), followed by LAMA (24%) and LABA+LAMA+ICS (23%).,Nearly half the patients (LABA-50%, LAMA-43%) starting on a monobronchodilator had additions to their treatment in 24 months.,Compared to other medications, patients starting on a LAMA were most likely to escalate to triple therapy in 24 months.,Nearly one-fourth of the patients prescribed triple therapy at baseline stepped down to LABA+ICS (25%) or LAMA (31%) within 24 months.,Disease progression is evident over the 24 months after COPD diagnosis, as more patients were prescribed additional maintenance therapy in the 24-month period compared to baseline.,The changes in therapy suggest that it is difficult to achieve a consistently improved COPD disease state.
1
This systematic review evaluated the effects of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) plus routine pharmacotherapy (RP) on the objective outcome measures BODE index, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in individuals with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Searches were conducted of six English and Chinese databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, CNKI and CQVIP) from their inceptions until 18th November 2013 for randomized controlled trials involving oral administration of CHM plus RP compared to the same RP, with BODE Index and/or 6MWT/D as outcomes.,Twenty-five studies were identified.,BODE Index was used in nine studies and 6MWT/D was used in 22 studies.,Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.,Weaknesses were identified in most studies.,Six studies were judged as ‘low’ risk of bias for randomisation sequence generation.,Twenty-two studies involving 1,834 participants were included in the meta-analyses.,The main meta-analysis results showed relative benefits for BODE Index in nine studies (mean difference [MD] −0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.94, −0.47) and 6MWT/D in 17 studies (MD 54.61 meters, 95%CI 33.30, 75.92) in favour of the CHM plus RP groups.,The principal plants used were Astragalus membranaceus, Panax ginseng and Cordyceps sinensis.,A. membranaceus was used in combination with other herbs in 18 formulae in 16 studies.,Detailed sub-group and sensitivity analyses were conducted.,Clinically meaningful benefits for BODE Index and 6MWT were found in multiple studies.,These therapeutic effects were promising but need to be interpreted with caution due to variations in the CHMs and RPs used and methodological weakness in the studies.,These issues should be addressed in future trials.
Pulmonary inflammation, oxidants-antioxidants imbalance, as well as innate and adaptive immunity have been proposed as playing a key role in the development of COPD.,The role of vitamins, as assessed either by food frequency questionnaires or measured in serum levels, have been reported to improve pulmonary function, reduce exacerbations and improve symptoms.,Vitamin supplements have therefore been proposed to be a potentially useful additive to COPD therapy.,A systematic literature review was performed on the association of vitamins and COPD.,The role of vitamin supplements in COPD was then evaluated.,The results of this review showed that various vitamins (vitamin C, D, E, A, beta and alpha carotene) are associated with improvement in features of COPD such as symptoms, exacerbations and pulmonary function.,High vitamin intake would probably reduce the annual decline of FEV1.,There were no studies that showed benefit from vitamin supplementation in improved symptoms, decreased hospitalization or pulmonary function.
1
The combination of aclidinium bromide, a long-acting anticholinergic, and formoterol fumarate, a long-acting beta2-agonist (400/12 μg twice daily) achieves improvements in lung function greater than either monotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is approved in the European Union as a maintenance treatment.,The effect of this combination on symptoms of COPD and exacerbations is less well established.,We examined these outcomes in a pre-specified analysis of pooled data from two 24-week, double-blind, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled, multicentre, randomised Phase III studies (ACLIFORM and AUGMENT).,Patients ≥40 years with moderate to severe COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]/forced vital capacity <70 % and FEV1 ≥30 % but <80 % predicted normal) were randomised (ACLIFORM: 2:2:2:2:1; AUGMENT: 1:1:1:1:1) to twice-daily aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg or 400/6 μg, aclidinium 400 μg, formoterol 12 μg or placebo via Genuair™/Pressair®.,Dyspnoea (Transition Dyspnoea Index; TDI), daily symptoms (EXAcerbations of Chronic pulmonary disease Tool [EXACT]-Respiratory Symptoms [E-RS] questionnaire), night-time and early-morning symptoms, exacerbations (Healthcare Resource Utilisation [HCRU] and EXACT definitions) and relief-medication use were assessed.,The pooled intent-to-treat population included 3394 patients.,Aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg significantly improved TDI focal score versus placebo and both monotherapies at Week 24 (all p < 0.05).,Over 24 weeks, significant improvements in E-RS total score, overall night-time and early-morning symptom severity and limitation of early-morning activities were observed with aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg versus placebo and both monotherapies (all p < 0.05).,The rate of moderate or severe HCRU exacerbations was significantly reduced with aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg compared with placebo (p < 0.05) but not monotherapies; the rate of EXACT-defined exacerbations was significantly reduced with aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg versus placebo (p < 0.01) and aclidinium (p < 0.05).,Time to first HCRU or EXACT exacerbation was longer with aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg compared with placebo (all p < 0.05) but not the monotherapies.,Relief-medication use was reduced with aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg versus placebo and aclidinium (p < 0.01).,Aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg significantly improves 24-hour symptom control compared with placebo, aclidinium and formoterol in patients with moderate to severe COPD.,Furthermore, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg reduces the frequency of exacerbations compared with placebo.,NCT01462942 and NCT01437397 (ClinicalTrials.gov),The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-015-0250-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represent a major burden for patients and health care systems.,Respiratory rehabilitation may improve prognosis in these patients by addressing relevant risk factors for exacerbations such as low exercise capacity.,To study whether respiratory rehabilitation after acute exacerbation improves prognosis and health status compared to usual care, we quantified its effects using meta-analyses.,Systematic review of randomized controlled trials identified by searches in six electronic databases, contacts with experts, hand-searches of bibliographies of included studies and conference proceedings.,We included randomized trials comparing the effect of respiratory rehabilitation and usual care on hospital admissions, health-related quality of life (HRQL), exercise capacity and mortality in COPD patients after acute exacerbation.,Two reviewers independently selected relevant studies, extracted the data and evaluated the study quality.,We pooled the results using fixed effects models where statistically significant heterogeneity (p ≤ 0.1) was absent.,We identified six trials including 230 patients.,Respiratory rehabilitation reduced the risk for hospital admissions (pooled relative risk 0.26 [0.12-0.54]) and mortality (0.45 [0.22-0.91]).,Weighted mean differences on the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire were 1.37 (95% CI 1.13-1.61) for the fatigue domain, 1.36 (0.94-1.77) for emotional function and 1.88 (1.67-2.09) for mastery.,Weighted mean differences for the St.,Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score, impacts and activities domains were -11.1 (95% CI -17.1 to -5.2), -17.1 (95% CI -23.6 to -10.7) and -9.9 (95% CI -18.0 to -1.7).,In all trials, rehabilitation improved exercise capacity (64-215 meters in six-minute walk tests and weighted mean difference for shuttle walk test 81 meter, 95% CI 48-115).,Evidence from six trials suggests that respiratory rehabilitation is effective in COPD patients after acute exacerbation.,Larger trials, however, are needed to further investigate the role of respiratory rehabilitation after acute exacerbation and its potential to reduce costs caused by COPD.
1
Previous studies have investigated the effects of air pollution on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients using either fixed-site measurements or a limited number of personal measurements, usually for one pollutant and a short time period.,These limitations may introduce bias and distort the epidemiological associations as they do not account for all the potential sources or the temporal variability of pollution.,We used detailed information on individuals’ exposure to various pollutants measured at fine spatiotemporal scale to obtain more reliable effect estimates.,A panel of 115 patients was followed up for an average continuous period of 128 days carrying a personal monitor specifically designed for this project that measured temperature, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), nitric oxide (NO), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5 and <10 μm at 1-min time resolution.,Each patient recorded daily information on respiratory symptoms and measured peak expiratory flow (PEF).,A pulmonologist combined related data to define a binary variable denoting an “exacerbation”.,The exposure-response associations were assessed with mixed effects models.,We found that gaseous pollutants were associated with a deterioration in patients’ health.,We observed an increase of 16.4% (95% CI 8.6-24.6%), 9.4% (95% CI 5.4-13.6%) and 7.6% (95% CI 3.0-12.4%) in the odds of exacerbation for an interquartile range increase in NO2, NO and CO, respectively.,Similar results were obtained for cough and sputum.,O3 was found to have adverse associations with PEF and breathlessness.,No association was observed between particulate matter and any outcome.,Our findings suggest that, when considering total personal exposure to air pollutants, mainly the gaseous pollutants affect COPD patients’ health.,Significant adverse associations were found between the respiratory health of COPD patients and their personal exposure to gaseous pollutants measured using portable sensors over 6 months.,No significant associations were found for particulate pollutants.https://bit.ly/3aqMT6O
Comorbidities are frequent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and significantly impact on patients’ quality of life, exacerbation frequency, and survival.,There is increasing evidence that certain diseases occur in greater frequency amongst patients with COPD than in the general population, and that these comorbidities significantly impact on patient outcomes.,Although the mechanisms are yet to be defined, many comorbidities likely result from the chronic inflammatory state that is present in COPD.,Common problems in the clinical management of COPD include recognizing new comorbidities, determining the impact of comorbidities on patient symptoms, the concurrent treatment of COPD and comorbidities, and accurate prognostication.,The majority of comorbidities in COPD should be treated according to usual practice, and specific COPD management is infrequently altered by the presence of comorbidities.,Unfortunately, comorbidities are often under-recognized and under-treated.,This review focuses on the epidemiology of ten major comorbidities in patients with COPD.,Further, we emphasize the clinical impact upon prognosis and management considerations.,This review will highlight the importance of comorbidity identification and management in the practice of caring for patients with COPD.
1
Inhaled medication is central to the treatment of COPD.,Various types of inhaler devices, which directly deliver medication to the lung, have been developed.,However, patients often exhibit incorrect techniques of inhaler usage.,Effectiveness of therapy may be affected by the ease of device usage, size, convenience of use, durability, clarity of instructions and device preferences of patients.,This study compares the satisfaction and preference, as well as error occurrence, with the use of Genuair®, Ellipta™ and Breezhaler™ by healthy subjects in Hong Kong.,One hundred and thirty healthy Hong Kong Chinese subjects aged ≥40 years without a previous diagnosis of COPD and asthma and with no experience of using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) were recruited.,Subjects learned to use the three DPIs by initially reading the instructions and then observing a demonstration with verbal explanation.,The number of errors committed was evaluated.,Subjects also completed a questionnaire to indicate their satisfaction and preference.,The satisfaction score of comfort for Breezhaler was significantly higher than that for Ellipta (p≤0.05), while the satisfaction score on confidence to have inhaled the entire dose was highest for Genuair compared with Ellipta (p≤0.0001) or Breezhaler (p≤0.05).,The overall satisfaction score was significantly higher for Genuair than Ellipta (p≤0.05) or Breezhaler (p≤0.01).,After reading the instructions, the highest number of subjects committing one or more critical errors was with Breezhaler (97) followed by Genuair (70) and then Ellipta (33).,Demonstration reduced the number of critical errors made by subjects for each DPI to one third or lower.,Breezhaler seemed to be more comfortable and easy to carry, but users made less critical errors when using Ellipta after reading the instructions only.,Genuair provided the clearest indication of correct dose preparation and inhalation.
Inhaled drug delivery is the cornerstone treatment for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, use of inhaler devices can be challenging, potentially leading to critical errors in handling that can significantly reduce drug delivery to the lungs and effectiveness of treatment.,A systematic review was conducted to define ‘critical’ errors and their impact on health outcomes and resource use between 2004 and 2016, using key search terms for inhaler errors in asthma and COPD (Search-1) and associated health-economic and patient burden (Search-2).,Search-1 identified 62 manuscripts, 47 abstracts, and 5 conference proceedings (n = 114 total).,Search-2 identified 9 studies.,We observed 299 descriptions of critical error.,Age, education status, previous inhaler instruction, comorbidities and socioeconomic status were associated with worse handling error frequency.,A significant association was found between inhaler errors and poor disease outcomes (exacerbations), and greater health-economic burden.,We have shown wide variations in how critical errors are defined, and the evidence shows an important association between inhaler errors and worsened health outcomes.,Given the negative impact diminished disease outcomes impose on resource use, our findings highlight the importance of achieving optimal inhaler technique, and a need for a consensus on defining critical and non-critical errors.,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-017-0710-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Current pharmacological treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are mostly limited to inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids.,Azithromycin can contribute to exacerbation prevention.,Roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase (PDE) 4 inhibitor administered orally, also prevents exacerbations in selected patients with chronic bronchitis, recurrent exacerbations, severe airflow limitation and concomitant therapy with long-acting inhaled bronchodilators.,This outcome likely results from anti-inflammatory effects since PDE4 is expressed by all inflammatory cell types involved in COPD.,The use of this agent is, however, limited by side-effects, particularly nausea and diarrhea.,To address remaining unmet needs and enrich therapeutic options for patients with COPD, inhaled dual PDE3/4 inhibitors have been developed, with the aim of enhancing bronchodilation through PDE3 inhibition and modulating inflammation and mucus production though PDE4 inhibition, thus producing a potentially synergistic effect on airway calibre.,Experimental preclinical data confirmed these effects in vitro and in animal models.,At present, RPL554/ensifentrine is the only agent of this family in clinical development.,It decreases sputum markers of both neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation in patients with COPD.,Clinical Phase II trials confirmed its bronchodilator effect and demonstrated clinically meaningful symptom relief and quality of life improvements in these patients.,The safety profile appears satisfactory, with less effects on heart rate and blood pressure than salbutamol and no other side effect.,Altogether, these data suggest that ensifentrine could have a role in COPD management, especially in addition to inhaled long-acting bronchodilators with or without corticosteroids since experimental studies suggest potentiation of ensifentrine effects by these agents.,However, results from ongoing and future Phase III studies are needed to confirm both beneficial effects and favourable safety profile on a larger scale and assess other outcomes including exacerbations, lung function decline, comorbidities and mortality.
We investigated the short-term bronchodilator effects of RPL554 (an inhaled dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor) combined with other bronchodilators in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with reversibility (>150 mL to short-acting bronchodilators).,Study 1 was a six-way, placebo-controlled crossover study (n=36) with single doses of RPL554 (6 mg), salbutamol (200 µg), ipratropium (40 µg), RPL554 (6 mg)+salbutamol (200 µg), RPL554 (6 mg)+ipratropium (40 µg) or placebo.,Study 2 was a three-way crossover study (n=30) of tiotropium (18 µg) combined with RPL554 (1.5 or 6 mg) or placebo for 3 days.,Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), lung volumes and specific airway conductance (sGaw) were measured.,In study 1, peak FEV1 change compared with placebo was similar with RPL554, ipratropium and salbutamol (mean 223, 199 and 187 mL, respectively).,The peak FEV1 was higher for RPL554+ipratropium versus ipratropium (mean difference 94 mL; p<0.0001) and RPL554+salbutamol versus salbutamol (mean difference 108 mL; p<0.0001).,In study 2 (day 3), both RPL554 doses caused greater peak FEV1 effects than placebo.,The average FEV1(0-12 h) increase was greater with RPL554 6 mg only versus placebo (mean difference 65 mL; p=0.0009).,In both studies, lung volumes and sGaw showed greater RPL554 combination treatment effects versus monotherapy.,RPL554 combined with standard bronchodilators caused additional bronchodilation and hyperinflation reduction.,The dual PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitor RPL554 causes additional bronchodilation when combined with commonly used short- or long-acting bronchodilatorshttp://ow.ly/CUYi30lDcYW
1
Symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and low exacerbation risk still have disease instability, which can be improved with better bronchodilation.,We evaluated two long-acting bronchodilators individually and in combination on reducing exacerbation risk and the potential impact of concurrent medication in these patients.,Integrated post hoc intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of data from two large 24-week, randomized placebo (PBO)-controlled trials (NCT01313637, NCT01313650).,Symptomatic patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD with/without an exacerbation history were randomized (2:3:3:3) to once-daily: PBO, umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg [NCT01313650] or 125/25 μg [NCT01313637]), UMEC (62.5 [NCT01313650] or 125 μg [NCT01313637]) or VI (25 μg) via the ELLIPTA inhaler.,Medication subgroups were segmented by treatment status at screening: a) maintenance-naïve or on maintenance medications, b) inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]-free or ICS-treated, c) low or high albuterol use based on median run-in use (< 3.6 or ≥ 3.6 puffs/day).,Time to first moderate/severe exacerbation (Cox proportional hazard model) and change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1; mixed model repeated measures) were analyzed.,Safety was also assessed.,Of 3021 patients (ITT population; UMEC/VI: n = 816; UMEC: n = 825; VI: n = 825; PBO: n = 555), 36% had a recent exacerbation history, 33% were maintenance-naïve, 51% were ICS-free.,Mean baseline albuterol use was 5.1 puffs/day.,In the ITT population, UMEC/VI, UMEC, and VI reduced the risk of a first exacerbation versus PBO by 58, 44, and 39%, respectively (all p < 0.05).,UMEC/VI provided significant risk reductions versus PBO in all subgroups.,VI had no benefit versus PBO in maintenance-naïve, ICS-free, and low rescue use patients and was significantly less effective than UMEC/VI in these subgroups.,UMEC had no significant benefit versus PBO in maintenance-naïve and ICS-free patients.,All bronchodilators improved FEV1 versus PBO, and UMEC/VI significantly improved FEV1 versus both monotherapies across all populations studied (p < 0.05).,All bronchodilators were similarly well tolerated.,Results suggest that UMEC/VI reduces exacerbation risk versus PBO more consistently across medication subgroups than UMEC or VI, particularly in patients with no/low concurrent medication use.,Confirmed prospectively, these findings may support first-line use of dual bronchodilation therapy in symptomatic low-risk patients.,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-019-1027-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) symptoms in the morning, including dyspnea and sputum production, affect patients’ quality of life and limit their ability to carry out even simple morning activities.,It is now emerging that these symptoms are associated with increased risk of exacerbations and work absenteeism, suggesting that they have a more profound impact on patients than previously thought.,The development of validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires to capture patients’ experience of COPD symptoms in the morning is, therefore, vital for establishing effective and comprehensive management strategies.,Although it is well established that long-acting bronchodilators are effective in improving COPD symptoms, the limited available data on their impact on morning symptoms and activities have been obtained with non-validated PRO questionnaires.,In this review, we discuss the impact of COPD symptoms in the morning and available tools used to evaluate them, and highlight specific gaps that need to be addressed to develop standardized instruments able to meet regulatory requirement.,We also present available evidence on the effect of pharmacological therapies on morning symptoms.
1
Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are episodes of worsening of symptoms, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality.,COPD exacerbations are associated with increased airway and systemic inflammation and physiological changes, especially the development of hyperinflation.,They are triggered mainly by respiratory viruses and bacteria, which infect the lower airway and increase airway inflammation.,Some patients are particularly susceptible to exacerbations, and show worse health status and faster disease progression than those who have infrequent exacerbations.,Several pharmacological interventions are effective for the reduction of exacerbation frequency and severity in COPD such as inhaled steroids, long-acting bronchodilators, and their combinations.,Non-pharmacological therapies such as pulmonary rehabilitation, self-management, and home ventilatory support are becoming increasingly important, but still need to be studied in controlled trials.,The future of exacerbation prevention is in assessment of optimum combinations of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies that will result in improvement of health status, and reduction of hospital admission and mortality associated with COPD.
Comorbidities are frequent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and significantly impact on patients’ quality of life, exacerbation frequency, and survival.,There is increasing evidence that certain diseases occur in greater frequency amongst patients with COPD than in the general population, and that these comorbidities significantly impact on patient outcomes.,Although the mechanisms are yet to be defined, many comorbidities likely result from the chronic inflammatory state that is present in COPD.,Common problems in the clinical management of COPD include recognizing new comorbidities, determining the impact of comorbidities on patient symptoms, the concurrent treatment of COPD and comorbidities, and accurate prognostication.,The majority of comorbidities in COPD should be treated according to usual practice, and specific COPD management is infrequently altered by the presence of comorbidities.,Unfortunately, comorbidities are often under-recognized and under-treated.,This review focuses on the epidemiology of ten major comorbidities in patients with COPD.,Further, we emphasize the clinical impact upon prognosis and management considerations.,This review will highlight the importance of comorbidity identification and management in the practice of caring for patients with COPD.
1
The aim of this study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to discuss the different tools available for its assessment.,The most widely used assessments are the St.,George respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and the COPD assessment test (CAT) questionnaire.,Both have a different difficulty in exam completion, calculation, and scoring.,No studies exist that analyze the validity and internal consistency of using both questionnaires on patients admitted to the hospital for a COPD exacerbation.,A multicenter, cross-sectional analytic observational study of patients admitted to the hospital due to a COPD exacerbation (CIE 491.2).,During their hospital stay, they were administered the SGRQ and the CAT questionnaire within the framework of a therapeutic education program (APRENDEPOC).,Descriptive and comparative analysis, correlations between the scales (Pearson’s correlation index), consistency and reliability calculations (Cronbach’s α), and a forward stepwise multiple linear regression were performed, with significant correlations in both questionnaires considered p < 0.01 with the total scores.,A statistical significance of p < 0.05 was assumed.,Altogether, 231 patients were admitted for a COPD exacerbation (n = 77) at Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (HCB) and (n = 154) at Hospital Universitario General of Castellón (HUGC).,The sample profile was not homogeneous between both centers, with significant differences in HRQL between hospitals.,Correlation were noted between both scales (p < 0.01), along with high levels of internal consistency and reliability (CAT 0.836 vs.,SGRQ 0.827).,The HRQL is related to dyspnea, wheezing, daytime drowsiness, and edema, as well as to the need to sleep in a sitting position, anxiety, depression, and dependence on others in the execution of daily activities.,Our regression analysis showed that the SGRQ questionnaire could predict more changes in HRQL with a higher number of variables.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are common diseases with a heterogeneous distribution worldwide.,Here, we present methods and disease and risk estimates for COPD and asthma from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) 2015 study.,The GBD study provides annual updates on estimates of deaths, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), a summary measure of fatal and non-fatal disease outcomes, for over 300 diseases and injuries, for 188 countries from 1990 to the most recent year.,We estimated numbers of deaths due to COPD and asthma using the GBD Cause of Death Ensemble modelling (CODEm) tool.,First, we analysed data from vital registration and verbal autopsy for the aggregate category of all chronic respiratory diseases.,Subsequently, models were run for asthma and COPD relying on covariates to predict rates in countries that have incomplete or no vital registration data.,Disease estimates for COPD and asthma were based on systematic reviews of published papers, unpublished reports, surveys, and health service encounter data from the USA.,We used the Global Initiative of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease spirometry-based definition as the reference for COPD and a reported diagnosis of asthma with current wheeze as the definition of asthma.,We used a Bayesian meta-regression tool, DisMod-MR 2.1, to derive estimates of prevalence and incidence.,We estimated population-attributable fractions for risk factors for COPD and asthma from exposure data, relative risks, and a theoretical minimum exposure level.,Results were stratified by Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a composite measure of income per capita, mean years of education over the age of 15 years, and total fertility rate.,In 2015, 3·2 million people (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 3·1 million to 3·3 million) died from COPD worldwide, an increase of 11·6% (95% UI 5·3 to 19·8) compared with 1990.,There was a decrease in age-standardised death rate of 41·9% (37·7 to 45·1) but this was counteracted by population growth and ageing of the global population.,From 1990 to 2015, the prevalence of COPD increased by 44·2% (41·7 to 46·6), whereas age-standardised prevalence decreased by 14·7% (13·5 to 15·9).,In 2015, 0·40 million people (0·36 million to 0·44 million) died from asthma, a decrease of 26·7% (−7·2 to 43·7) from 1990, and the age-standardised death rate decreased by 58·8% (39·0 to 69·0).,The prevalence of asthma increased by 12·6% (9·0 to 16·4), whereas the age-standardised prevalence decreased by 17·7% (15·1 to 19·9).,Age-standardised DALY rates due to COPD increased until the middle range of the SDI before reducing sharply.,Age-standardised DALY rates due to asthma in both sexes decreased monotonically with rising SDI.,The relation between with SDI and DALY rates due to asthma was attributed to variation in years of life lost (YLLs), whereas DALY rates due to COPD varied similarly for YLLs and years lived with disability across the SDI continuum.,Smoking and ambient particulate matter were the main risk factors for COPD followed by household air pollution, occupational particulates, ozone, and secondhand smoke.,Together, these risks explained 73·3% (95% UI 65·8 to 80·1) of DALYs due to COPD.,Smoking and occupational asthmagens were the only risks quantified for asthma in GBD, accounting for 16·5% (14·6 to 18·7) of DALYs due to asthma.,Asthma was the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease worldwide in 2015, with twice the number of cases of COPD.,Deaths from COPD were eight times more common than deaths from asthma.,In 2015, COPD caused 2·6% of global DALYs and asthma 1·1% of global DALYs.,Although there are laudable international collaborative efforts to make surveys of asthma and COPD more comparable, no consensus exists on case definitions and how to measure disease severity for population health measurements like GBD.,Comparisons between countries and over time are important, as much of the chronic respiratory burden is either preventable or treatable with affordable interventions.,Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
1
Acupuncture has been suggested to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in China.,However, current evidence is insufficient to draw a firm conclusion regarding the effectiveness of acupuncture in COPD.,Therefore, this multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture for treating patients with COPD.,This is a two-arm, parallel group, multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial with concealed allocation, and participants, assessor, and analyst blinding.,Seventy-two participants with COPD were recruited and randomly divided into 2 groups (real acupuncture group and sham acupuncture group) in a 1:1 ratio.,Patients received either real or sham needling at the same acupoints 3 times weekly for 8 weeks.,The primary outcome was dyspnea on exertion evaluated using the 6-minute walk test.,In addition, health-related quality of life was also evaluated.,Measurements were obtained at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment.,Six-minute walking distance measurements and health-related quality of life were significantly better in the real acupuncture group than that in the sham acupuncture group.,The findings suggest that acupuncture can be used as an adjunctive therapy to reduce dyspnea in patients with COPD.
The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) across many world regions is high.,We aim to estimate COPD prevalence and number of disease cases for the years 1990 and 2010 across world regions based on the best available evidence in publicly accessible scientific databases.,We conducted a systematic search of Medline, EMBASE and Global Health for original, population-based studies providing spirometry-based prevalence rates of COPD across the world from January 1990 to December 2014.,Random effects meta-analysis was conducted on extracted crude prevalence rates of COPD, with overall summaries of the meta-estimates (and confidence intervals) reported separately for World Health Organization (WHO) regions, the World Bank's income categories and settings (urban and rural).,We developed a meta-regression epidemiological model that we used to estimate the prevalence of COPD in people aged 30 years or more.,Our search returned 37 472 publications.,A total of 123 studies based on a spirometry-defined prevalence were retained for the review.,From the meta-regression epidemiological model, we estimated about 227.3 million COPD cases in the year 1990 among people aged 30 years or more, corresponding to a global prevalence of 10.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3%-14.0%) in this age group.,The number of COPD cases increased to 384 million in 2010, with a global prevalence of 11.7% (8.4%-15.0%).,This increase of 68.9% was mainly driven by global demographic changes.,Across WHO regions, the highest prevalence was estimated in the Americas (13.3% in 1990 and 15.2% in 2010), and the lowest in South East Asia (7.9% in 1990 and 9.7% in 2010).,The percentage increase in COPD cases between 1990 and 2010 was the highest in the Eastern Mediterranean region (118.7%), followed by the African region (102.1%), while the European region recorded the lowest increase (22.5%).,In 1990, we estimated about 120.9 million COPD cases among urban dwellers (prevalence of 13.2%) and 106.3 million cases among rural dwellers (prevalence of 8.8%).,In 2010, there were more than 230 million COPD cases among urban dwellers (prevalence of 13.6%) and 153.7 million among rural dwellers (prevalence of 9.7%).,The overall prevalence in men aged 30 years or more was 14.3% (95% CI 13.3%-15.3%) compared to 7.6% (95% CI 7.0%-8.2%) in women.,Our findings suggest a high and growing prevalence of COPD, both globally and regionally.,There is a paucity of studies in Africa, South East Asia and the Eastern Mediterranean region.,There is a need for governments, policy makers and international organizations to consider strengthening collaborations to address COPD globally.
1
Background: This document provides clinical recommendations for the pharmacologic treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,It represents a collaborative effort on the part of a panel of expert COPD clinicians and researchers along with a team of methodologists under the guidance of the American Thoracic Society.,Methods: Comprehensive evidence syntheses were performed on all relevant studies that addressed the clinical questions and critical patient-centered outcomes agreed upon by the panel of experts.,The evidence was appraised, rated, and graded, and recommendations were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.,Results: After weighing the quality of evidence and balancing the desirable and undesirable effects, the guideline panel made the following recommendations: 1) a strong recommendation for the use of long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) combination therapy over LABA or LAMA monotherapy in patients with COPD and dyspnea or exercise intolerance; 2) a conditional recommendation for the use of triple therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/LABA/LAMA over dual therapy with LABA/LAMA in patients with COPD and dyspnea or exercise intolerance who have experienced one or more exacerbations in the past year; 3) a conditional recommendation for ICS withdrawal for patients with COPD receiving triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) if the patient has had no exacerbations in the past year; 4) no recommendation for or against ICS as an additive therapy to long-acting bronchodilators in patients with COPD and blood eosinophilia, except for those patients with a history of one or more exacerbations in the past year requiring antibiotics or oral steroids or hospitalization, for whom ICS is conditionally recommended as an additive therapy; 5) a conditional recommendation against the use of maintenance oral corticosteroids in patients with COPD and a history of severe and frequent exacerbations; and 6) a conditional recommendation for opioid-based therapy in patients with COPD who experience advanced refractory dyspnea despite otherwise optimal therapy.,Conclusions: The task force made recommendations regarding the pharmacologic treatment of COPD based on currently available evidence.,Additional research in populations that are underrepresented in clinical trials is needed, including studies in patients with COPD 80 years of age and older, those with multiple chronic health conditions, and those with a codiagnosis of COPD and asthma.
Severe exacerbations of COPD, ie, those leading to hospitalization, have profound clinical implications for patients and significant economic consequences for society.,The prevalence and burden of severe COPD exacerbations remain high, despite recognition of the importance of exacerbation prevention and the availability of new treatment options.,Severe COPD exacerbations are associated with high mortality, have negative impact on quality of life, are linked to cardiovascular complications, and are a significant burden on the health-care system.,This review identified risk factors that contribute to the development of severe exacerbations, treatment options (bronchodilators, antibiotics, corticosteroids [CSs], oxygen therapy, and ventilator support) to manage severe exacerbations, and strategies to prevent readmission to hospital.,Risk factors that are amenable to change have been highlighted.,A number of bronchodilators have demonstrated successful reduction in risk of severe exacerbations, including long-acting muscarinic antagonist or long-acting β2-agonist mono- or combination therapies, in addition to vaccination, mucolytic and antibiotic therapy, and nonpharmacological interventions, such as pulmonary rehabilitation.,Recognition of the importance of severe exacerbations is an essential step in improving outcomes for patients with COPD.,Evidence-based approaches to prevent and manage severe exacerbations should be implemented as part of targeted strategies for disease management.
1
Thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans are widely performed in clinical practice, often leading to detection of airway or parenchymal abnormalities in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic individuals.,However, clinical relevance of CT abnormalities is uncertain in the general population.,We evaluated data from 1361 participants aged ≥40 years from a Canadian prospective cohort comprising 408 healthy never-smokers, 502 healthy ever-smokers, and 451 individuals with spirometric evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who had thoracic CT scans.,CT images of subjects were visually scored for respiratory bronchiolitis(RB), emphysema(E), bronchial-wall thickening(BWT), expiratory air-trapping(AT), and bronchiectasis(B).,Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations of CT features with respiratory symptoms, dyspnea, health status as determined by COPD assessment test, and risk of clinically significant exacerbations during 12 months follow-up.,About 11% of life-time never-smokers demonstrated emphysema on CT scans.,Prevalence increased to 30% among smokers with normal lung function and 36%, 50%, and 57% among individuals with mild, moderate or severe/very severe COPD, respectively.,Presence of emphysema on CT was associated with chronic cough (OR,2.11; 95%CI,1.4-3.18); chronic phlegm production (OR,1.87; 95% CI,1.27-2.76); wheeze (OR,1.61; 95% CI,1.05-2.48); dyspnoea (OR,2.90; 95% CI,1.41-5.98); CAT score≥10(OR,2.17; 95%CI,1.42-3.30) and risk of ≥2 exacerbations over 12 months (OR,2.17; 95% CI, 1.42-3.0).,Burden of thoracic CT abnormalities is high among Canadians ≥40 years of age, including never-smokers and smokers with normal lung function.,Detection of emphysema on CT scans is associated with pulmonary symptoms and increased risk of exacerbations, independent of smoking or lung function.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex condition with pulmonary and extra-pulmonary manifestations.,This study describes the heterogeneity of COPD in a large and well characterised and controlled COPD cohort (ECLIPSE).,We studied 2164 clinically stable COPD patients, 337 smokers with normal lung function and 245 never smokers.,In these individuals, we measured clinical parameters, nutritional status, spirometry, exercise tolerance, and amount of emphysema by computed tomography.,COPD patients were slightly older than controls and had more pack years of smoking than smokers with normal lung function.,Co-morbidities were more prevalent in COPD patients than in controls, and occurred to the same extent irrespective of the GOLD stage.,The severity of airflow limitation in COPD patients was poorly related to the degree of breathlessness, health status, presence of co-morbidity, exercise capacity and number of exacerbations reported in the year before the study.,The distribution of these variables within each GOLD stage was wide.,Even in subjects with severe airflow obstruction, a substantial proportion did not report symptoms, exacerbations or exercise limitation.,The amount of emphysema increased with GOLD severity.,The prevalence of bronchiectasis was low (4%) but also increased with GOLD stage.,Some gender differences were also identified.,The clinical manifestations of COPD are highly variable and the degree of airflow limitation does not capture the heterogeneity of the disease.
1
This study aimed to determine the associations of various sociodemographic factors with the level of disease-specific knowledge among Hong Kong Chinese patients with COPD.,A cross-sectional survey of 100 Chinese adults with COPD recruited from outpatient clinics was conducted from September 2009 to September 2010.,Data on the knowledge specific to COPD and patients’ sociodemographics were collected from face-to-face interviews.,Primary outcome of disease-specific knowledge was measured using 65-item Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire (BCKQ), summing up the 65 items as the BCKQ overall score.,Associations of sociodemographic factors with the BCKQ overall score were evaluated using the linear regression model.,The mean BCKQ overall score of our patients was 41.01 (SD: 10.64).,The knowledge in topics of “Smoking” and “Phlegm” achieved the first (3.97, SD: 0.82) and second (3.91, SD: 1.17) highest mean scores, respectively, while the topic of “Oral steroids” returned the lowest mean score of 1.89 (SD: 1.64).,The BCKQ overall score progressively declined (P<0.001) with increase in education level, with the highest BCKQ overall score of 46.71 at no formal education among all subgroups.,Compared to nondrinkers, current drinkers were associated with lower total BCKQ score.,We found that among COPD patients in outpatient clinics, impairments in the level of COPD knowledge were evident in patients who were current drinkers or had higher level of education.
Introduction.,Awareness of the healthcare providers on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in our country and all over the world, and on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) which plays an important role in its nonpharmacological treatment will provide effectiveness in diagnosis and treatment of COPD.,The present study aimed at determining knowledge level of the healthcare providers about COPD and PR.,Materials and Methods.,In this cross-sectional study, family practitioners and staff of home-care in central county of Manisa City were applied a questionnaire in order to determine their knowledge level on COPD and pulmonary rehabilitation during the in-service training on “pulmonary rehabilitation, home-care services for the pulmonary diseases, and respiratory exercises.”,Results.,65.5% of the healthcare providers responded to the survey.,Rate of those correctly knowing at least one of four items was 97.2%.,No responder knew all items correctly.,Average value for correct answers was 5.30 ± 2.1 (range: 1-10).,The physicians, men, and those working in family health centers had higher level of knowledge on COPD compared to nonphysician healthcare providers (p = 0.006), women (p = 0.002), and those working in other practices (p = 0.019), respectively.,Conclusion.,Knowledge level of the primary healthcare providers on COPD and PR remains inadequate.,Dynamic postgraduate training on this topic will be useful in referring the patients to centers giving service for this condition.
1
Efficient management of COPD represents an international challenge.,Effective management strategies within the means of limited health care budgets are urgently required.,This analysis aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a home-based disease management (DM) intervention vs usual management (UM) in patients from the COPD Patient Management European Trial (COMET).,Cost-effectiveness was evaluated in 319 intention-to-treat patients over 12 months in COMET.,The analysis captured unplanned all-cause hospitalization days, mortality, and quality-adjusted life expectancy.,Costs were evaluated from a National Health Service perspective for France, Germany, and Spain, and in a pooled analysis, and were expressed in 2015 Euros (EUR).,Quality of life was assessed using the 15D health-related quality-of-life instrument and mapped to utility scores.,Home-based DM was associated with improved mortality and quality-adjusted life expectancy.,DM and UM were associated with equivalent direct costs (DM reduced costs by EUR −37 per patient per year) in the pooled analysis.,DM was associated with lower costs in France (EUR −806 per patient per year) and Spain (EUR −51 per patient per year), but higher costs in Germany (EUR 391 per patient per year).,Evaluation of cost per death avoided and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained showed that DM was dominant (more QALYs and cost saving) in France and Spain, and cost-effective in Germany vs UM.,Nonparametric bootstrapping analysis, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR 20,000 per QALY gained, indicated that the probability of home-based DM being cost-effective vs UM was 87.7% in France, 81.5% in Spain, and 75.9% in Germany.,Home-based DM improved clinical outcomes at equivalent cost vs UM in France and Spain, and in the pooled analysis.,DM was cost-effective in Germany with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 2,541 per QALY gained.,The COMET home-based DM intervention could represent an attractive alternative to UM for European health care payers.
COPD is a disease associated with significant economic burden.,It was reported that Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guideline-oriented pharmacotherapy improves airflow limitation and reduces health care costs.,However, several studies showed a significant dissociation between international recommendations and clinicians’ practices.,The consequent reduced diagnostic and therapeutic inappropriateness has proved to be associated with an increase in costs and a waste of economic resources in the health sector.,The aim of the study was to evaluate COPD management in the Puglia region.,The study was performed in collaboration with the pulmonology centers and the Regional Health Agency (AReS Puglia).,An IT platform allowed the pulmonologists to enter data via the Internet.,All COPD patients who visited a pneumological outpatient clinic for the first time or for regular follow-ups or were admitted to a pneumological department for an exacerbation were considered eligible for the study.,COPD’s diagnosis was confirmed by a pulmonologist at the moment of the visit.,The project lasted 18 months and involved 17 centers located in the Puglia region.,Six hundred ninety-three patients were enrolled, evenly distributed throughout the region.,The mean age was 71±9 years, and 85% of them were males.,Approximately 23% were current smokers, 63% former smokers and 13.5% never smokers.,The mean post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 59%±20% predicted.,The platform allowed the classification of patients according to the GOLD guidelines (Group A: 20.6%, Group B: 32.3%, Group C: 5.9% and Group D: 39.2%), assessed the presence and severity of exacerbations (20% of the patients had an exacerbation defined as mild [13%], moderate [37%] and severe [49%]) and evaluated the appropriateness of inhalation therapy at the time of the visit.,Forty-nine percent of Group A patients were following inappropriate therapy; in Group B, 45.8% were following a therapy in contrast with the guidelines.,Among Group C patients, 41.46% resulted in triple combination therapy, whilê14% of Group D patients did not have a therapy or were following an inappropriate therapy.,In conclusion, 30% of all patients evaluated had been following an inadequate therapy.,Subsequently, an online survey was developed to inquire about the reasons for the results obtained.,In particular, we investigated the reasons why 30% of our population did not follow the therapy suggested by the GOLD guidelines: 1) why was there an excessive use of inhaled corticosteroids, 2) why a significantly high percentage was inappropriately treated with triple therapy and 3) why a consistent percentage (11%) of Group D patients were not treated at all.,The data provides an overview on the management of COPD in the region of Puglia (Italy) and represents a resource in order to improve appropriateness and reduce the waste of health resources.
1
Previous studies have reported that anemia increased mortality in patients with COPD.,However, it is unclear whether anemia is associated with increased COPD mortality in the general population.,The purpose of our study is to identify whether anemia is related to long-term mortality in COPD using a large population-based database.,Using the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort, we identified COPD patients with available hemoglobin level.,We analyzed mortality among patients with COPD from 2003 to 2013 according to hemoglobin level.,A total of 7,114 patients with COPD were identified.,Mean age was 65.0±9.3 years, and 62.9% were male.,Anemia was present in 469 patients (6.6%).,The overall mortality rate was 46.5% in anemia and 32.1% in non-anemia groups (p<0.001).,The hazard ratio of anemia for mortality was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.11-1.54).,Among patients with anemia, the hemoglobin level correlated well with mortality.,Anemia was associated with increased long-term mortality of COPD, and even mild anemia was related to a significantly increased risk.
Comorbidities are common in COPD, but quantifying their burden is difficult.,Currently there is a COPD-specific comorbidity index to predict mortality and another to predict general quality of life.,We sought to develop and validate a COPD-specific comorbidity score that reflects comorbidity burden on patient-centered outcomes.,Using the COPDGene study (GOLD II-IV COPD), we developed comorbidity scores to describe patient-centered outcomes employing three techniques: 1) simple count, 2) weighted score, and 3) weighted score based upon statistical selection procedure.,We tested associations, area under the Curve (AUC) and calibration statistics to validate scores internally with outcomes of respiratory disease-specific quality of life (St.,George's Respiratory Questionnaire, SGRQ), six minute walk distance (6MWD), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score and exacerbation risk, ultimately choosing one score for external validation in SPIROMICS.,Associations between comorbidities and all outcomes were comparable across the three scores.,All scores added predictive ability to models including age, gender, race, current smoking status, pack-years smoked and FEV1 (p<0.001 for all comparisons).,Area under the curve (AUC) was similar between all three scores across outcomes: SGRQ (range 0·7624-0·7676), MMRC (0·7590-0·7644), 6MWD (0·7531-0·7560) and exacerbation risk (0·6831-0·6919).,Because of similar performance, the comorbidity count was used for external validation.,In the SPIROMICS cohort, the comorbidity count performed well to predict SGRQ (AUC 0·7891), MMRC (AUC 0·7611), 6MWD (AUC 0·7086), and exacerbation risk (AUC 0·7341).,Quantifying comorbidity provides a more thorough understanding of the risk for patient-centered outcomes in COPD.,A comorbidity count performs well to quantify comorbidity in a diverse population with COPD.
1
The chronic and progressive nature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires self-administration of inhaled medication.,Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are increasingly being used for inhalation therapy in COPD.,Important considerations when selecting DPIs include inhalation effort required and flow rates achieved by patients.,Here, we present the comparison of the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIF) values achieved by COPD patients, with moderate to very severe airflow limitation, through the Breezhaler®, the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers.,The effects of disease severity, age and gender on PIF rate were also evaluated.,This randomized, open-label, multicenter, cross-over, Phase IV study recruited patients with moderate to very severe airflow limitation (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease 2014 strategy), aged ≥40 years and having a smoking history of ≥10 pack years.,No active drug or placebo was administered during the study.,The inhalation profiles were recorded using inhalers fitted with a pressure tap and transducer at the wall of the mouthpiece.,For each patient, the inhalation with the highest PIF value, out of three replicate inhalations per device, was selected for analysis.,A paired t-test was performed to compare mean PIFs between each combination of devices.,In total, 97 COPD patients were enrolled and completed the study.,The highest mean PIF value (L/min ± SE) was observed with the Breezhaler® (108 ± 23), followed by the Ellipta® (78 ± 15) and the HandiHaler® (49 ± 9) inhalers and the lowest mean pressure drop values were recorded with the Breezhaler® inhaler, followed by the Ellipta® inhaler and the HandiHaler® inhaler, in the overall patient population.,A similar trend was consistently observed in patients across all subgroups of COPD severity, within all age groups and for both genders.,Patients with COPD were able to inhale with the least inspiratory effort and generate the highest mean PIF value through the Breezhaler® inhaler when compared with the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers.,These results were similar irrespective of patients’ COPD severity, age or gender.,The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02596009 on 4 November 2015.,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-018-0662-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
For optimal efficacy, an inhaler should deliver doses consistently and be easy for patients to use with minimal instruction.,The delivery characteristics, patients’ correct use, and preference of two single-dose dry powder inhalers (Breezhaler and HandiHaler) were evaluated in two complementary studies.,The first study examined aerodynamic particle size distribution, using inhalation profiles of seven patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The second was an open-label, two-period, 7-day crossover study, evaluating use of the inhalers with placebo capsules by 82 patients with mild to severe COPD.,Patients’ correct use of the inhalers was assessed after reading written instructions on Day 1, and after training and 7 days of daily use.,Patients’ preference was assessed after completion of both study periods.,Patient inhalation profiles showed average peak inspiratory flows of 72 L/minute through Breezhaler and 36 L/minute through HandiHaler.,For Breezhaler and HandiHaler, fine particle fractions were 27% and 10%, respectively.,In the second study, correct use of Breezhaler and HandiHaler was achieved by >77% of patients for any step after 7 days; 61% of patients showed an overall preference for Breezhaler and 31% for HandiHaler (P = 0.01).,Breezhaler is a low-resistance inhaler suitable for use by patients with a range of disease severities.,Most patients used both inhalers correctly after 7 days, but more patients showed an overall preference for the Breezhaler compared with the HandiHaler.,These are important factors for optimum dose delivery and successful COPD management.
1
NVA237 (glycopyrronium bromide) is a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The GLycopyrronium bromide in COPD airWays clinical Study 2 (GLOW2) evaluated the efficacy and safety of NVA237 in moderate-to-severe COPD over 52 weeks.,Patients were randomised 2:1:1 to NVA237 50 μg, placebo or open-label tiotropium 18 μg for 52 weeks.,Primary end-point was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at 12 weeks.,1,066 patients were randomised, 810 completed the study.,At week 12, trough FEV1 increased significantly by 97 mL with NVA237 (95% CI 64.6-130.2; p<0.001) and 83 mL with tiotropium (95% CI 45.6-121.4; p<0.001).,Compared with placebo, NVA237 produced significant improvements in dyspnoea (Transition Dyspnoea Index at week 26; p=0.002) and health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire at week 52; p<0.001).,NVA237 significantly reduced the risk of moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations by 34% (p=0.001) and the use of rescue medication (p=0.039), versus placebo.,NVA237-placebo and tiotropium-placebo differences were comparable for all outcomes.,Safety profiles were similar across groups.,NVA237 50 μg provided significant improvements in lung function, dyspnoea, health status, exacerbations and rescue medication use, versus placebo, and was comparable to tiotropium.,NVA237 can potentially be an alternative choice of LAMA for COPD patients.
Two 1-year studies evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of tiotropium 5 or 10 μg versus placebo, inhaled via the Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler (SMI).,The two studies were combined and had 4 co-primary endpoints (trough FEV1 response, Mahler Transition Dyspnea Index [TDI] and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire scores all at week 48, and COPD exacerbations per patient-year).,A total of 1990 patients with COPD participated (mean FEV1: 1.09 L).,The mean trough FEV1 response of tiotropium 5 or 10 μg relative to placebo was 127 or 150 mL, respectively (both P < 0.0001).,The COPD exacerbation rate was significantly lower with tiotropium 5 μg (RR = 0.78; P = 0.002) and tiotropium 10 μg (RR = 0.73; P = 0.0008); the health-related quality of life and Mahler TDI co-primary endpoints were significantly improved with both doses (both P < 0.0001).,Adverse events were generally balanced except anticholinergic class effects, which were more frequent with active treatment.,Fatal events occurred in 2.4% (5 μg), 2.7% (10 μg), and 1.6% (placebo) of patients; these differences were not significant.,Tiotropium Respimat® SMI 5 μg demonstrated sustained improvements in patients with COPD relative to placebo and similar to the 10 μg dose but with a lower frequency of anticholinergic adverse events.
1
BackgroundThe clinical features and incidence of human coronavirus (HCoV) infections in chronically ill older adults need better definition,MethodsHCoV infection was determined on the basis of a 4-fold increase in serum antibody and the detection of HCoV by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.,Laboratory-documented influenza (LDI) was detected by serologic assay and culture.,HCoV illnesses were compared with other acute respiratory illnesses identified by active surveillance, during the 1998-99 winter respiratory-virus season, of 2215 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who were ⩾50 years old and who received influenza vaccines,ResultsHCoV-229E and HCoV-OC43 were associated with 90 (14%) of 665 illnesses (HCoV-229E in 22, HCoV-OC43 in 67, and both in 1), LDI with 107 (16%) of 678 illnesses.,In multivariate logistic regression analysis, myalgia was less likely with HCoV infection than with LDI (OR, 0.27 [95% confidence limit, 0.13-0.58]).,A majority of these HCoV and LDI illnesses exhibited each of 11 symptoms and signs of acute respiratory illness.,Spirometric results worsened most often with LDI, and many acute respiratory illnesses, regardless of etiology, were associated with hospitalization.,A total of 8 illnesses were associated with HCoV-NL63, 1 with HCoV-HKU1,ConclusionsThe frequencies of HCoV and LDI illnesses were similar.,HCoV illness was less severe than LDI illness, was accompanied by multiple respiratory and systemic symptoms, and was associated with hospitalization
Development of adult respiratory disease is influenced by events in childhood.,The impact of childhood pneumonia on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not well defined.,We hypothesize that childhood pneumonia is a risk factor for reduced lung function and COPD in adult smokers.,COPD cases and control smokers between 45-80 years old from the United States COPDGene Study were included.,Childhood pneumonia was defined by self-report of pneumonia at <16 years.,Subjects with lung disease other than COPD or asthma were excluded.,Smokers with and without childhood pneumonia were compared on measures of respiratory disease, lung function, and quantitative analysis of chest CT scans.,Of 10,192 adult smokers, 854 (8.4 %) reported pneumonia in childhood.,Childhood pneumonia was associated with COPD (OR 1.40; 95 % CI 1.17-1.66), chronic bronchitis, increased COPD exacerbations, and lower lung function: post-bronchodilator FEV1 (69.1 vs.,77.1 % predicted), FVC (82.7 vs.,87.4 % predicted), FEV1/FVC ratio (0.63 vs.,0.67; p < 0.001 for all comparisons).,Childhood pneumonia was associated with increased airway wall thickness on CT, without significant difference in emphysema.,Having both pneumonia and asthma in childhood further increased the risk of developing COPD (OR 1.85; 95 % CI 1.10-3.18).,Children with pneumonia are at increased risk for future smoking-related lung disease including COPD and decreased lung function.,This association is supported by airway changes on chest CT scans.,Childhood pneumonia may be an important factor in the early origins of COPD, and the combination of pneumonia and asthma in childhood may pose the greatest risk.,ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00608764 (Active since January 28, 2008).,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-015-0273-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Alpha-1-Antitrypsin Deficiency (AATD) is an economically unexplored genetic disease.,Direct and indirect costs (based on self-reported information on healthcare utilization) and health-related quality of life (HRQL, as assessed by SGRQ, CAT, and EQ-5D-3 L) were compared between 131 AATD patients (106 with, 25 without augmentation therapy (AT)) and 2,049 COPD patients without AATD participating in the COSYCONET COPD cohort.,The medication costs of AT were excluded from all analyses to reveal differences associated with morbidity profiles.,The association of AATD (with/without AT) with costs or HRQL was examined using generalized linear regression modelling (GLM) adjusting for age, sex, GOLD grade, BMI, smoking status, education and comorbidities.,Adjusted mean direct annual costs were €6,099 in AATD patients without AT, €7,117 in AATD patients with AT (excluding costs for AT), and €7,460 in COPD patients without AATD.,AATD with AT was significantly associated with higher outpatient (+273%) but lower inpatient (−35%) and medication costs (−10%, disregarding AT) compared with COPD patients without AATD.,There were no significant differences between groups regarding indirect costs and HRQL.,Apart from AT costs, AATD patients tended to have lower, though not significant, overall costs and similar HRQL compared to COPD patients without AATD.,AT was not associated with lower costs or higher HRQL.,NCT01245933,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-017-0543-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is an important patient-reported outcome measure used to describe the burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which is often accompanied by comorbid conditions.,Data from 2275 participants in the COPD cohort COSYCONET and from 4505 lung-healthy control subjects from the population-based KORA and SHIP studies were pooled.,Main outcomes were the five dimensions of the generic EQ-5D-3 L questionnaire and two EQ-5D index scores using a tariff based on valuations from the general population and an experience-based tariff.,The association of COPD in GOLD grades 1-4 and of several comorbid conditions with the EQ-5D index scores was quantified by multiple linear regression models while adjusting for age, sex, education, body mass index (BMI), and smoking status.,For all dimensions of the EQ-5D, the proportion of participants reporting problems was higher in the COPD group than in control subjects.,COPD was associated with significant reductions in the EQ-5D index scores (-0.05 points for COPD grades 1/2, -0.09 for COPD grade 3, -0.18 for COPD grade 4 according to the preference-based utility tariff, all p < 0.0001).,Adjusted mean index scores were 0.89 in control subjects and 0.85, 0.84, 0.81, and 0.72 in COPD grades 1-4 according to the preference-based utility tariff and 0.76, 0.71, 0.68, 0.64, and 0.58 for control subjects and COPD grades 1-4 for the experience-based tariff respectively.,Comorbidities had additive negative effects on the index scores; the effect sizes for comorbidities were comparable to or smaller than the effects of COPD grade 3.,No statistically significant interactions between COPD and comorbidities were observed.,Score differences between COPD patients and control subjects were most pronounced in younger age groups.,Compared with control subjects, the considerable reduction of HRQL in patients with COPD was mainly due to respiratory limitations, but observed comorbidities added linearly to this effect.,Younger COPD patients showed a greater loss of HRQL and may therefore be in specific need of comprehensive disease management.,NCT01245933
1
To evaluate the impact of lung function, measured as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) % predicted, on health care resource utilization and costs among patients with COPD in a real-world US managed-care population.,This observational retrospective cohort study utilized administrative claim data augmented with medical record data.,The study population consisted of patients with one or more medical claims for pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry during the intake period (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013).,The index date was the date of the earliest medical claim for pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry.,Spirometry results were abstracted from patients’ medical records.,Patients were divided into two groups (low FEV1% predicted [,50%] and high FEV1% predicted [≥50%]) based on the 2014 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease report.,Health care resource utilization and costs were based on the prevalence and number of discrete encounters during the 12-month postindex follow-up period.,Costs were adjusted to 2014 US dollars.,A total of 754 patients were included (n=297 low FEV1% predicted group, n=457 high FEV1% predicted group).,COPD exacerbations were more prevalent in the low FEV1% predicted group compared with the high group during the 12-month pre- (52.5% vs 39.6%) and postindex periods (49.8% vs 36.8%).,Mean (standard deviation) follow-up all-cause and COPD-related costs were $27,380 ($38,199) and $15,873 ($29,609) for patients in the low FEV1% predicted group, and $22,075 ($28,108) and $10,174 ($18,521) for patients in the high group.,In the multivariable analyses, patients in the low FEV1% predicted group were more likely to have COPD exacerbations and tended to have higher COPD-related costs when compared with patients in the high group.,Real-world data demonstrate that patients with COPD who have low FEV1% predicted levels use more COPD medications, have more COPD exacerbations, and incur higher COPD-related health care costs than those with high FEV1% predicted levels.
A variety of large randomized controlled trials (RCT’s) evaluating pharmacotherapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients does exist.,One of the drugs that has been tested is the new long-acting anticholinergic glycopyrronium bromide.,As the generalizability of results from RCT’s is questionable we designed a longitudinal, prospective non-interventional study (DACCORD) of two years duration plus two years extension with at least 6000 participants in approximately 500 primary and secondary care practices in Germany (within the new established COPD National Prospective Registry), to assess patient reported outcomes (PRO’s), lung function, adherence and drug safety.,To circumvent the hurdle of inappropriate COPD diagnosis in a non-interventional trial, patients have to fulfill the inclusion criteria of the COPD disease management program (DMP) of the German statutory health insurances.,Patient management should follow the German national COPD guidelines, which are based on Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2007 (GOLD) report.,Labels of prescribed drugs should also be taken into account.,Patients received treatment as part of their standard care: at the discretion of the investigator patients were included in one of two arms.,A: standard care with glycopyrronium containing regimen, and arm B: standard care without glycopyrronium.,For 2016 we expect important results regarding longitudinal development of PRO’s including exacerbations, lung function, adherence and side effects.,We also investigate applicability of the new GOLD staging system in usual care.,Data on diagnostic and treatment modalities in current German primary and secondary care, as well as pharmaco-economic data will be generated.,1.,German Register for non-interventional studies: http://www.vfa.de/de/arzneimittel-forschung/datenbanken-zu-arzneimitteln/nisdb.,2.,EMA EnCePP http://www.encepp.eu/.
1
The diagnostic criteria of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) are controversial.,Emphysema is characteristic of COPD and usually does not exist in typical asthma patients.,Emphysema in patients with asthma suggests the coexistence of COPD.,Quantitative computed tomography (CT) allows repeated evaluation of emphysema noninvasively.,We investigated the value of quantitative CT measurements of emphysema in the diagnosis of ACOS.,This study included 404 participants; 151 asthma patients, 125 COPD patients, and 128 normal control subjects.,All the participants underwent pulmonary function tests and a high-resolution CT scan.,Emphysema measurements were taken with an Airway Inspector software.,The asthma patients were divided into high and low emphysema index (EI) groups based on the percentage of low attenuation areas less than −950 Hounsfield units.,The characteristics of asthma patients with high EI were compared with those having low EI or COPD.,The normal value of percentage of low attenuation areas less than −950 Hounsfield units in Chinese aged >40 years was 2.79%±2.37%.,COPD patients indicated more severe emphysema and more upper-zone-predominant distribution of emphysema than asthma patients or controls.,Thirty-two (21.2%) of the 151 asthma patients had high EI.,Compared with asthma patients with low EI, those with high EI were significantly older, more likely to be male, had more pack-years of smoking, had more upper-zone-predominant distribution of emphysema, and had greater airflow limitation.,There were no significant differences in sex ratios, pack-years of smoking, airflow limitation, or emphysema distribution between asthma patients with high EI and COPD patients.,A greater number of acute exacerbations were seen in asthma patients with high EI compared with those with low EI or COPD.,Asthma patients with high EI fulfill the features of ACOS, as described in the Global Initiative for Asthma and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines.,Quantitative CT measurements of emphysema may help in diagnosing ACOS.
Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap syndrome (ACOS) was proposed by the science committees of both Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD).,However, the definition of ACOS has remained unclear all over the world, and the prevalence rate of ACOS is basically dependent on the patient’s symptoms or the physician’s opinion, based on questionnaire testing.,In the current case report, we investigated the prevalence rate of COPD patients with high levels of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) or immunoglobulin E (IgE) as candidate markers of ACOS in COPD, as a multicenter, cross-sectional study.,Outpatients with COPD were enrolled from Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan, and five hospitals (Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan; NTT East Tohoku Hospital, Sendai, Japan; Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Kimiidera, Japan; Hiraka General Hospital, Yokote, Japan; Iwate Prefectural Isawa Hospital, Oshu, Japan) with pulmonary physicians from March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2014.,When they were estimated using 35 ppb as the cutoff value of FENO, the prevalence rate of ACOS was 16.3% in COPD.,When estimated by both FENO and IgE, the high-FENO/high-IgE group was 7.8% in COPD.,To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to detect the prevalence rate of ACOS in COPD populations by using objective biomarkers.,The results from the current study should be useful to identify the subgroup requiring early intervention by inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta agonist combination in COPD in order to improve the long-term management for ACOS.
1
COPD is a chronic airway inflammatory disease characterized mainly by neutrophil airway infiltrations.,Interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-17 are the key mediators of neutrophilic airway inflammation in COPD.,This study was undertaken to evaluate the serum IL-1β and IL-17 levels and associations between these two key mediators with clinical parameters in COPD patients.,Serum samples were collected from 60 COPD subjects during the acute exacerbation of COPD, 60 subjects with stable COPD and 40 healthy control subjects.,Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits were used to measure the serum IL-1β and IL-17 concentrations.,The association between serum IL-1β and IL-17 with FEV1% predicted, C-reactive protein, neutrophil percentage and smoking status (pack-years) was assessed in the COPD patients.,We found that serum IL-1β and IL-17 levels in acute exacerbation of COPD subjects were significantly higher than that in stable COPD or control subjects and were positively correlated to serum C-reactive protein levels, neutrophil % and smoking status (pack-years) but negatively correlated with FEV1% predicted in COPD patients.,More importantly, serum IL-1β levels were markedly positively associated with serum IL-17 levels in patients with COPD (P=0.741, P<0.001).,In conclusion, elevated serum IL-1β and IL-17 levels may be used as a biomarker for indicating persistent neutrophilic airway inflammation and potential ongoing exacerbation of COPD.
The landmark study of Fletcher and Peto on the natural history of tobacco smoke-related chronic airflow obstruction suggested that decline in the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is slow at the beginning, becoming faster with more advanced disease.,The present authors reviewed spirometric data of COPD patients included in the placebo arms of recent clinical trials to assess the lung function decline of each stage, defined according to the severity of airflow obstruction as proposed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines.,In large COPD populations the mean rate of FEV1 decline in GOLD stages II and III is between 47 and 79 mL/year and 56 and 59 mL/year, respectively, and lower than 35 mL/year in GOLD stage IV.,Few data on FEV1 decline are available for GOLD stage I.,Hence, the loss of lung function, assessed as expiratory airflow reduction, seems more accelerated and therefore more relevant in the initial phases of COPD.,To have an impact on the natural history of COPD, it is logical to look at the effects of treatment in the earlier stages.
1
The chronic bronchitis (CB) phenotype has been associated with poor quality of life and an increased risk of disease in patients with COPD.,However, little information exists regarding the relationship between the CB phenotype and the COPD assessment test (CAT) score.,The goal of this study was to reveal the different pattern of CAT scores between CB and non-CB patients.,Moreover, we aimed to investigate whether the CB phenotype is an independently associated factor for more symptom and high-risk groups.,Data were obtained from the Korea COPD Subgroup Study cohort recruited from 46 centers in South Korea since April 2012.,CB patients were defined as having a chronic cough and sputum for 3 months per year, for a period of 2 consecutive years.,We investigated the pattern of CAT and subquestionnaire scores between CB and non-CB patients.,We also analyzed the proportion of CB phenotypes in each Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage.,Finally, we performed a logistic regression analysis to identify whether the CB phenotype was an independently associated factor for more symptom and high-risk groups.,Of the 1,106 study patients, 11.5% of patients were found to have a CB phenotype.,CB phenotypes were most common in GOLD III (GOLD 2006) and GOLD D (GOLD 2015) stages.,CAT scores were significantly higher in CB patients not only in terms of the total score but also for each subquestionnaire.,Logistic regression revealed that the CB phenotype is an independently associated factor for more symptom and high-risk groups.,The present study revealed that CB patients have higher CAT scores and subquestionnaire results compared to non-CB patients.,Additionally, we demonstrated that the CB phenotype is an independently associated factor for both more symptom and high-risk groups.
The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) across many world regions is high.,We aim to estimate COPD prevalence and number of disease cases for the years 1990 and 2010 across world regions based on the best available evidence in publicly accessible scientific databases.,We conducted a systematic search of Medline, EMBASE and Global Health for original, population-based studies providing spirometry-based prevalence rates of COPD across the world from January 1990 to December 2014.,Random effects meta-analysis was conducted on extracted crude prevalence rates of COPD, with overall summaries of the meta-estimates (and confidence intervals) reported separately for World Health Organization (WHO) regions, the World Bank's income categories and settings (urban and rural).,We developed a meta-regression epidemiological model that we used to estimate the prevalence of COPD in people aged 30 years or more.,Our search returned 37 472 publications.,A total of 123 studies based on a spirometry-defined prevalence were retained for the review.,From the meta-regression epidemiological model, we estimated about 227.3 million COPD cases in the year 1990 among people aged 30 years or more, corresponding to a global prevalence of 10.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3%-14.0%) in this age group.,The number of COPD cases increased to 384 million in 2010, with a global prevalence of 11.7% (8.4%-15.0%).,This increase of 68.9% was mainly driven by global demographic changes.,Across WHO regions, the highest prevalence was estimated in the Americas (13.3% in 1990 and 15.2% in 2010), and the lowest in South East Asia (7.9% in 1990 and 9.7% in 2010).,The percentage increase in COPD cases between 1990 and 2010 was the highest in the Eastern Mediterranean region (118.7%), followed by the African region (102.1%), while the European region recorded the lowest increase (22.5%).,In 1990, we estimated about 120.9 million COPD cases among urban dwellers (prevalence of 13.2%) and 106.3 million cases among rural dwellers (prevalence of 8.8%).,In 2010, there were more than 230 million COPD cases among urban dwellers (prevalence of 13.6%) and 153.7 million among rural dwellers (prevalence of 9.7%).,The overall prevalence in men aged 30 years or more was 14.3% (95% CI 13.3%-15.3%) compared to 7.6% (95% CI 7.0%-8.2%) in women.,Our findings suggest a high and growing prevalence of COPD, both globally and regionally.,There is a paucity of studies in Africa, South East Asia and the Eastern Mediterranean region.,There is a need for governments, policy makers and international organizations to consider strengthening collaborations to address COPD globally.
1
A low body mass index (BMI) is associated with increased mortality and low health-related quality of life in patients with COPD.,The Asia-Pacific classification of BMI has a lower cutoff for overweight and obese categories compared to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification.,The present study assessed patients with COPD among different BMI categories according to two BMI classification systems: WHO and Asia-Pacific.,Patients with COPD aged 40 years or older from the Korean COPD Subtype Study cohort were selected for evaluation.,We enrolled 1,462 patients.,Medical history including age, sex, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C), the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were evaluated.,Patients were categorized into different BMI groups according to the two BMI classification systems.,FEV1 and the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) percentage revealed an inverse “U”-shaped pattern as the BMI groups changed from underweight to obese when WHO cutoffs were applied.,When Asia-Pacific cutoffs were applied, FEV1 and DLCO (%) exhibited a linearly ascending relationship as the BMI increased, and the percentage of patients in the overweight and obese groups linearly decreased with increasing severity of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria.,From the underweight to the overweight groups, SGRQ-C and mMRC had a decreasing relationship in both the WHO and Asia-Pacific classifications.,The prevalence of comorbidities in the different BMI groups showed similar trends in both BMI classifications systems.,The present study demonstrated that patients with COPD who have a high BMI have better pulmonary function and health-related quality of life and reduced dyspnea symptoms.,Furthermore, the Asia-Pacific BMI classification more appropriately reflects the correlation of obesity and disease manifestation in Asian COPD patients than the WHO classification.
Never smokers comprise a substantial proportion of patients with COPD.,Their characteristics and possible risk factors in this population are not yet well defined.,We analyzed data from 14 countries that participated in the international, population-based Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study.,Participants were aged ≥ 40 years and completed postbronchodilator spirometry testing plus questionnaires about respiratory symptoms, health status, and exposure to COPD risk factors.,A diagnosis of COPD was based on the postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio, according to current GOLD (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease) guidelines.,In addition to this, the lower limit of normal (LLN) was evaluated as an alternative threshold for the FEV1/FVC ratio.,Among 4,291 never smokers, 6.6% met criteria for mild (GOLD stage I) COPD, and 5.6% met criteria for moderate to very severe (GOLD stage II+) COPD.,Although never smokers were less likely to have COPD and had less severe COPD than ever smokers, never smokers nonetheless comprised 23.3% (240/1,031) of those classified with GOLD stage II+ COPD.,This proportion was similar, 20.5% (171/832), even when the LLN was used as a threshold for the FEV1/FVC ratio.,Predictors of COPD in never smokers include age, education, occupational exposure, childhood respiratory diseases, and BMI alterations.,This multicenter international study confirms previous evidence that never smokers comprise a substantial proportion of individuals with COPD.,Our data suggest that, in addition to increased age, a prior diagnosis of asthma and, among women, lower education levels are associated with an increased risk for COPD among never smokers.
1
Comorbidities are frequent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and significantly impact on patients’ quality of life, exacerbation frequency, and survival.,There is increasing evidence that certain diseases occur in greater frequency amongst patients with COPD than in the general population, and that these comorbidities significantly impact on patient outcomes.,Although the mechanisms are yet to be defined, many comorbidities likely result from the chronic inflammatory state that is present in COPD.,Common problems in the clinical management of COPD include recognizing new comorbidities, determining the impact of comorbidities on patient symptoms, the concurrent treatment of COPD and comorbidities, and accurate prognostication.,The majority of comorbidities in COPD should be treated according to usual practice, and specific COPD management is infrequently altered by the presence of comorbidities.,Unfortunately, comorbidities are often under-recognized and under-treated.,This review focuses on the epidemiology of ten major comorbidities in patients with COPD.,Further, we emphasize the clinical impact upon prognosis and management considerations.,This review will highlight the importance of comorbidity identification and management in the practice of caring for patients with COPD.
Diabetes damages major organ systems through disrupted glycemic control and increased inflammation.,The effects of diabetes on the lung have been of interest for decades, but the modest reduction in pulmonary function and its nonprogressive nature have limited its investigation.,A recent systematic review found that diabetes was associated with reductions in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide of the lung and increased FEV1/FVC.,They reported pooled results including few smokers.,This study will examine measures of pulmonary function in participants with extensive smoking exposure.,We examined pulmonary function in participants with a >10-pack-year history of smoking with and without diabetes with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We measured pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and pulmonary-related quality of life in 10,129 participants in the Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPDGene) Study.,Participants with diabetes were observed to have reduced pulmonary function after controlling for known risk factors and also significant reductions in exercise capacity and quality of life across functional stages of COPD.,Pulmonary function in patients with ≥10 pack-years of smoking and diabetes is reduced, and this decrease is associated with significant reductions in activity-related quality of life and exercise capacity.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a risk factor that increases the incidence of postoperative cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality after lung resection.,Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenoreceptor agonist, has been reported previously to attenuate intrapulmonary shunt during one-lung ventilation (OLV) and to alleviate bronchoconstriction.,The objective is to determine whether dexmedetomidine improves oxygenation and lung mechanics in patients with moderate COPD during lung cancer surgery.,A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.,Single university hospital.,Fifty patients scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery who had moderate COPD.,Patients were randomly allocated to a control group or a Dex group (n = 25 each).,In the Dex group, dexmedetomidine was given as an initial loading dose of 1.0 μg kg−1 over 10 min followed by a maintenance dose of 0.5 μg kg−1 h−1 during OLV while the control group was administered a comparable volume of 0.9% saline.,Data were measured at 30 min (DEX-30) and 60 min (DEX-60) after dexmedetomidine or saline administration during OLV.,The primary outcome was the effect of dexmedetomidine on oxygenation.,The secondary outcome was the effect of dexmedetomidine administration on postoperative pulmonary complications.,Patients in the Dex group had a significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio (27.9 ± 5.8 vs.,22.5 ± 8.4 and 28.6 ± 5.9 vs.,21.0 ± 9.9 kPa, P < 0.05), significantly lower dead space ventilation (19.2 ± 8.5 vs.,24.1 ± 8.1 and 19.6 ± 6.7 vs.,25.3 ± 7.8%, P < 0.05) and higher dynamic compliance at DEX-30 and DEX-60 (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0184) compared with the control group.,In the Dex group, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the postoperative period was significantly higher (P = 0.022) and the incidence of ICU admission was lower than in the control group.,Dexmedetomidine administration may provide clinically relevant benefits by improving oxygenation and lung mechanics in patients with moderate COPD undergoing lung cancer surgery.,ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT 02185430.
In 2011, the traditional Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) COPD spirometry-based severity classification system was revised to also include exacerbation history and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) scores.,This study examined how COPD patients treated in primary care are reclassified by the new GOLD system compared to the traditional system, and each system’s level of agreement with patient’s or physician’s severity assessments.,In this US multicenter cross-sectional study, COPD patients were recruited by 83 primary care practitioners (PCPs) to complete spirometry testing and a survey.,Patients were classified by the traditional spirometry-based system (stages 1-4) and under the new system (grades A, B, C, D) using spirometry, exacerbation history, mMRC, and/or CAT results.,Concordance between physician and patient-reported severity, spirometry stage, and ABCD grade based on either mMRC or CAT scores was examined.,Data from 445 patients with spirometry-confirmed COPD were used.,As compared to the traditional system, the GOLD mMRC system reclassifies 47% of patients, and GOLD CAT system reclassifies 41%, but the distributions are very different.,The GOLD mMRC system resulted in relatively equal distributions by ABCD grade (33%, 22%, 19%, 26%, respectively), but the GOLD CAT system put most into either B or D groups (9%, 45%, 4%, and 42%).,The addition of exacerbation history reclassified only 19 additional patients.,Agreement between PCPs’ severity rating or their patients’ self-assessment and the new ABCD grade was very poor (κ=0.17 or less).,As compared to the traditional system, the GOLD 2011 multidimensional system reclassified nearly half of patients, but how they were reclassified varied greatly by whether the mMRC or CAT questionnaire was chosen.,Either way, the new system had little correlation with the PCPs or their patients’ impressions about the COPD severity.
1
The changes in grading of disease severity and treatment recommendations for patients with COPD in the 2017 GOLD strategy may present an opportunity for reducing treatment burden for the patients and costs to the health care system.,The aim of this study was to assess the implications of the GOLD 2017 grading system in terms of change in distribution across GOLD groups A-D for existing patients in UK primary care and estimate the potential cost savings of implementing GOLD 2017 treatment recommendations in UK primary care.,Using electronic health record data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), patients aged ≥35 years with spirometry-confirmed COPD, receiving care during 2016, were included.,The cohort was graded according to the GOLD 2017 groups (A-D), and treatment costs were calculated, according to corresponding recommendations, to observe the difference in actual vs predicted costs.,When applying GOLD 2013 criteria, less than half of the cohort (46%) was assigned to GOLD A or B, as compared to 86% when applying the GOLD 2017 grading.,The actual mean annual maintenance treatment cost was £542 per patient vs a predicted £389 for treatment according to the 2017 GOLD strategy.,There is a potential to make significant cost savings by implementing the grading and treatment recommendations from the 2017 GOLD strategy.
Respiratory virus infections are commonly associated with COPD exacerbations, but little is known about the mechanisms linking virus infection to exacerbations.,Pathogenic mechanisms in stable COPD include oxidative and nitrosative stress and reduced activity of histone deacetylase-2 (HDAC2), but their roles in COPD exacerbations is unknown.,We investigated oxidative and nitrosative stress (O&NS) and HDAC2 in COPD exacerbations using experimental rhinovirus infection.,Nine subjects with COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage II), 10 smokers, and 11 nonsmokers were successfully infected with rhinovirus.,Markers of O&NS-associated cellular damage, and inflammatory mediators and proteases were measured in sputum, and HDAC2 activity was measured in sputum and bronchoalveolar macrophages.,In an in vitro model, monocyte-derived THP-1 cells were infected with rhinovirus and nitrosylation and activity of HDAC2 was measured.,Rhinovirus infection induced significant increases in airways inflammation and markers of O&NS in subjects with COPD.,O&NS markers correlated with virus load and inflammatory markers.,Macrophage HDAC2 activity was reduced during exacerbation and correlated inversely with virus load, inflammatory markers, and nitrosative stress.,Sputum macrophage HDAC2 activity pre-infection was inversely associated with sputum virus load and inflammatory markers during exacerbation.,Rhinovirus infection of monocytes induced nitrosylation of HDAC2 and reduced HDAC2 activity; inhibition of O&NS inhibited rhinovirus-induced inflammatory cytokines.,O&NS, airways inflammation, and impaired HDAC2 may be important mechanisms of virus-induced COPD exacerbations.,Therapies targeting these mechanisms offer potential new treatments for COPD exacerbations.
1
Inhaled long-acting beta2 agonists used alone and in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid reduce the risk of exacerbations in patients with stable COPD.,However, the relative efficacy of these agents in preventing recurrent exacerbations in those recovering from an initial episode is not known.,This study compared the rate of COPD exacerbations over the 26 weeks after an initial exacerbation in patients receiving the combination of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol (FP/SAL) or SAL alone.,Patients (n = 639) aged ≥40 years were randomized to either twice-daily inhaled FP/SAL 250/50 μg or SAL 50 μg.,Primary, and secondary, endpoints were rates of recurrent severe, and moderate/severe, exacerbations of COPD.,Lung function, health outcomes and levels of biomarkers of systemic inflammation were also assessed.,There was no statistically significant treatment difference in rates of recurrent severe exacerbations (treatment ratio 0.92 [95% CI: 0.58, 1.45]) and moderate/severe exacerbations (0.82 [0.64, 1.06]) between FP/SAL and SAL in the intent-to-treat population.,Pre-dose morning FEV1 change from baseline was greater (0.10 L [0.04, 0.16]) with FP/SAL than SAL.,No treatment difference was seen for other endpoints including patient-reported health outcomes and biomarker levels for the full cohort.,No significant treatment difference between FP/SAL and SAL was seen in COPD exacerbation recurrence for the complete cohort.,Treatment benefit with FP/SAL over SAL (treatment ratio 0.68 [0.47, 0.97]) was seen in patients having FEV1 ≥ 30% and prior exposure to ICS.,No unexpected safety issues were identified with either treatment.,Patients with the most severe COPD may be more refractory to treatment.,ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01110200).,This study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline (study number ADC113874).,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0105-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Despite the availability of national and international guidelines, evidence suggests that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment is not always prescribed according to recommendations.,This study evaluated the current management of patients with COPD using a large UK primary-care database.,This analysis used electronic patient records and patient-completed questionnaires from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database.,Data on current management were analyzed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group and presence or absence of a concomitant asthma diagnosis, in patients with a COPD diagnosis at ≥35 years of age and with spirometry results supportive of the COPD diagnosis.,A total of 24,957 patients were analyzed, of whom 13,557 (54.3%) had moderate airflow limitation (GOLD Stage 2 COPD).,The proportion of patients not receiving pharmacologic treatment for COPD was 17.0% in the total COPD population and 17.7% in the GOLD Stage 2 subset.,Approximately 50% of patients in both cohorts were receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA; 26.7% for both cohorts) or a LABA and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA; 23.2% and 19.9%, respectively).,ICS + LABA and ICS + LABA + LAMA were the most frequently used treatments in GOLD Groups A and B.,Of patients without concomitant asthma, 53.7% of the total COPD population and 50.2% of the GOLD Stage 2 subset were receiving ICS.,Of patients with GOLD Stage 2 COPD and no exacerbations in the previous year, 49% were prescribed ICS.,A high proportion of GOLD Stage 2 COPD patients were symptomatic on their current management (36.6% with modified Medical Research Council score ≥2; 76.4% with COPD Assessment Test score ≥10).,COPD is not treated according to GOLD and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations in the UK primary-care setting.,Some patients receive no treatment despite experiencing symptoms.,Among those on treatment, most receive ICS irrespective of severity of airflow limitation, asthma diagnosis, and exacerbation history.,Many patients on treatment continue to have symptoms.
1
Clinical guidelines recommend long-acting bronchodilators as first maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reserved for patients with more severe disease and exacerbations.,The aim of this analysis was to examine real-life prescribing of first maintenance therapy for COPD in the UK.,Data were extracted from the UK Optimum Patient Care Research Database for patients with a first prescription for COPD maintenance therapy between 2009 and 2012 and a diagnosis of COPD at or before the date of the first prescription for COPD maintenance therapy.,Routine clinical data including demographics, disease history and symptoms, comorbidities, therapy, hospitalisation rate and exacerbation rate were collected and used to characterise patients stratified by disease severity and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group (A-D).,The analysis population included 2,217 individuals (55.4% male, 45.2% smokers).,Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) as monotherapy were prescribed as first maintenance therapy for 40.2% of patients.,ICS were prescribed as ICS/long-acting beta-agonists combination for 29.1% of patients or as monotherapy for 15.5%.,ICS (alone or in combination) were prescribed to >40% of patients in each GOLD group.,ICS-containing regimens were prescribed to patients with a history of pneumonia and comorbid conditions for whom the risks of ICS therapy may outweigh the benefits.,The clinical reality of prescribing indicates that ICS are often prescribed outside current guideline recommendations for many patients newly diagnosed with COPD in the UK.,Encouragingly, LAMAs are increasingly being prescribed as first maintenance therapy for these patients.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a serious, yet preventable and treatable, disease.,The success of its treatment relies largely on the proper implementation of recommendations, such as the recently released Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD (GOLD 2011, of late December 2011).,The primary objective of this study was to examine the extent to which GOLD 2011 is being used correctly among Czech respiratory specialists, in particular with regard to the correct classification of patients.,The secondary objective was to explore what effect an erroneous classification has on inadequate use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).,In order to achieve these goals, a multi-center, cross-sectional study was conducted, consisting of a general questionnaire and patient-specific forms.,A subjective classification into the GOLD 2011 categories was examined, and then compared with the objectively computed one.,Based on 1,355 patient forms, a discrepancy between the subjective and objective classifications was found in 32.8% of cases.,The most common reason for incorrect classification was an error in the assessment of symptoms, which resulted in underestimation in 23.9% of cases, and overestimation in 8.9% of the patients' records examined.,The specialists seeing more than 120 patients per month were most likely to misclassify their condition, and were found to have done so in 36.7% of all patients seen.,While examining the subjectively driven ICS prescription, it was found that 19.5% of patients received ICS not according to guideline recommendations, while in 12.2% of cases the ICS were omitted, contrary to guideline recommendations.,Furthermore, with consideration to the objectively-computed classification, it was discovered that 15.4% of patients received ICS unnecessarily, whereas in 15.8% of cases, ICS were erroneously omitted.,It was therefore concluded that Czech specialists tend either to under-prescribe or overuse inhaled corticosteroids.
1
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is commonly used to combine with pharmacotherapy for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in China and other Asian countries such as South Korea and Japan.,The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tonifying kidney therapy (Bushen, TK) for stable COPD.,Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TK for stable COPD were searched from 4 databases including Pubmed, the Cochrane library, CBM (China Biology Medicine disc, CBMdisc), CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from inception to December 2017.,Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias in included studies.,RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.,The primary outcomes analyzed in this meta-analysis were effectiveness, TCM Syndrome Score, dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council questionnaire [mMRC]), COPD health status (COPD Assessment Test [CAT]), exercise capacity (6-min walk distance in meters [6mWD]), and respiratory-specific quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]).,Second outcomes analyzed for this meta-analysis were lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], FEV1%, forced vital capacity [FVC], FEV1/FVC), the frequency of acute exacerbation, T-lymphocyte subsets (CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8), and immunoglobulin (IgA, IgG, and IgM).,The summary results will be pooled using the random-effects model or fixed-effects model according to the heterogeneity of the included studies.,This systematic review will provide an evidence of TK for stable COPD, and will submit to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.,The conclusion of this systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether TK is an effective intervention for stable COPD patients.,PROSPERO CRD 42018090328.
The integrated therapy of Bufei Yishen granule and acupoint sticking has been used in the treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) clinically, with remarkable benefits.,This study was initiated to observe the effects of the combination of Bufei Yishen granule and acupoint sticking on pulmonary function and morphormetry in a COPD rat model.,Rats were randomized into Control, Model, Bufei Yishen (BY), Acupoint sticking (AS), Bufei Yishen + Acupoint sticking (BY + AS) and aminophyline (APL) groups.,COPD rats were duplicated by repeated cigarette smoke and bacterial exposures.,The rats were treated with normal saline, Bufei Yishen granule, acupoint sticking, Bufei Yishen + Acupoint sticking and aminophylline, respectively, from week 9 through 20.,Pulmonary function was measured by using a whole body plethysmograph every 4 weeks.,The rats were sacrificed at the end of week 20, and lung tissue histology and ultrastructure was observed under light and electron microscopes.,The pulmonary function, including tidal volume (VT), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and expiratory flow at 50 % tidal volume (EF50), was markedly decreased from week 8 in COPD rats (P < 0.05).,At week 20, VT, PEF and EF50 were significantly lower in Model group (P < 0.05).,Compared with Model group, VT, PEF and EF50 were higher in BY and BY + AS groups (P < 0.05), and EF50 was higher in AS group, while VT was higher in APL group (P < 0.05).,Markedly histological and ultrastructural changes, including respiratory membrane thickening, volume density of lamellar corpuscle decreasing, mitochondria reducing in type II alveolar cell, were found in COPD rats and were alleviated in the treated groups, especially in BY and BY + AS groups.,Bufei Yishen granule and acupoint sticking can improve pulmonary function and lung pathological impairment in COPD rats, the curative effect of the combination is better than acupoint sticking or aminophylline only.
1
The aim of this paper was to propose key steps for community pharmacist integration into a patient care pathway for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management.,A literature search was conducted to identify publications focusing on the role of the community pharmacist in identification and management of COPD.,The literature search highlighted evidence supporting an important role for pharmacists at each of the four key steps in the patient care pathway for COPD management.,Step 1 (primary prevention): pharmacists are ideally placed to provide information on disease awareness and risk prevention campaigns, and to encourage lifestyle interventions, including smoking cessation.,Step 2 (early detection/case finding): pharmacists are often the first point of contact between the patient and the healthcare system and can therefore play an important role in the early identification of patients with COPD.,Step 3 (management and ongoing support): pharmacists can assist patients by providing advice and education on dosage, inhaler technique, treatment expectations and the importance of adherence, and by supporting self‐management, including recognition and treatment of COPD exacerbations.,Step 4 (review and follow‐up): pharmacists can play an important role in monitoring adherence and ongoing inhaler technique in patients with COPD.,In summary, pharmacists are ideally positioned to play a vital role in all key stages of an integrated COPD patient care pathway from early disease detection to the support of management plans, including advice and counselling regarding medications, inhaler technique and treatment adherence.,Areas requiring additional consideration include pharmacist training, increasing awareness of the pharmacist role, administration and reimbursement, and increasing physician-pharmacist collaboration.
To identify factors that hinder discussions regarding chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) between primary care physicians (PCPs) and their patients in Sweden.,Primary health care centres (PHCCs) in Stockholm, Sweden.,A total of 59 PCPs.,Semi-structured individual and focus-group interviews between 2012 and 2014.,Data were analysed inspired by grounded theory methods (GTM).,Time-pressured patient-doctor consultations lead to deprioritization of COPD.,During unscheduled visits, deprioritization resulted from focusing only on acute health concerns, while during routine care visits, COPD was deprioritized in multi-morbid patients.,The reasons PCPs gave for deprioritizing COPD are: “Not becoming aware of COPD”, “Not becoming concerned due to clinical features”, “Insufficient local routines for COPD care”, “Negative personal attitudes and views about COPD”, “Managing diagnoses one at a time”, and “Perceiving a patient’s motivation as low’’.,De-prioritization of COPD was discovered during PCP consultations and several factors were identified associated with time constraints and multi-morbidity.,A holistic consultation approach is suggested, plus extended consultation time for multi-morbid patients, and better documentation and local routines.,Key pointsUnder-diagnosis and insufficient management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common in primary health care.,A patient-doctor consultation offers a key opportunity to identify and provide COPD care.,Time pressure, due to either high number of patients or multi-morbidity, leads to omission or deprioritization of COPD during consultation.Deprioritization occurs due to lack of awareness, concern, and local routines, negative personal views, non-holistic consultation approach, and low patient motivation.Better local routines, extended consultation time, and a holistic approach are needed when managing multi-morbid patients with COPD.,Under-diagnosis and insufficient management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common in primary health care.,A patient-doctor consultation offers a key opportunity to identify and provide COPD care.,Time pressure, due to either high number of patients or multi-morbidity, leads to omission or deprioritization of COPD during consultation.Deprioritization occurs due to lack of awareness, concern, and local routines, negative personal views, non-holistic consultation approach, and low patient motivation.Better local routines, extended consultation time, and a holistic approach are needed when managing multi-morbid patients with COPD.,Time pressure, due to either high number of patients or multi-morbidity, leads to omission or deprioritization of COPD during consultation.,Deprioritization occurs due to lack of awareness, concern, and local routines, negative personal views, non-holistic consultation approach, and low patient motivation.,Better local routines, extended consultation time, and a holistic approach are needed when managing multi-morbid patients with COPD.
1
The latest chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) epidemiology survey in China estimated that there were 99 million potential COPD patients in the country, the majority of whom are undiagnosed.,Screening for COPD in primary care settings is of vital importance for China, but it is not known which strategy would be the most suitable for adoption in primary care.,Studies have been conducted to test the accuracy of questionnaires, expiratory peak flow meters and microspirometers to screen for COPD, but no study has directly evaluated and compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these methods in the Chinese setting.,We present the protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study, to be conducted in eight community hospitals from four cities among Chinese adults aged 40 years or older to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different case-finding methods for COPD, and determine the test performance of individual and combinations of screening tests and strategies in comparison with quality diagnostic spirometry.,Index tests are screening questionnaires (COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ), COPD Assessment in Primary Care To Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk Questionnaire (CAPTURE), symptom-based questionnaire, COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ)), microspirometer and peak flow.,Each participant will complete all of these tests in one assessment.,The primary analysis will compare the performance of a screening questionnaire with a handheld device.,Secondary analyses will include the comparative performance of each index test, as well as a comparison of strategies where we use a screening questionnaire and a handheld device.,Approximately 2000 participants will be recruited over 9 to 12 months.,The study has been approved by Peking University Hospital and University of Birmingham.,All study participants will provide written informed consent.,Study results will be published in appropriate journal and presented at national and international conferences, as well as relevant social media and various community/stakeholder engagement activities.,ISRCTN13357135.
Microspirometry may be useful as the second stage of a screening pathway among patients reporting respiratory symptoms.,We assessed sensitivity and specificity of the Vitalograph® lung monitor compared with post-bronchodilator confirmatory spirometry (ndd Easy on-PC) among primary care chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients within the Birmingham COPD cohort.,We report a case-control analysis within 71 general practices in the UK.,Eligible patients were aged ≥40 years who were either on a clinical COPD register or reported chronic respiratory symptoms on a questionnaire.,Participants performed pre- and post-bronchodilator microspirometry, prior to confirmatory spirometry.,Out of the 544 participants, COPD was confirmed in 337 according to post-bronchodilator confirmatory spirometry.,Pre-bronchodilator, using the LLN as a cut-point, the lung monitor had a sensitivity of 50.5% (95% CI 45.0%, 55.9%) and a specificity of 99.0% (95% CI 96.6%, 99.9%) in our sample.,Using a fixed ratio of FEV1/FEV6 < 0.7 to define obstruction in the lung monitor, sensitivity increased (58.8%; 95% CI 53.0, 63.8) while specificity was virtually identical (98.6%; 95% CI 95.8, 99.7).,Within our sample, the optimal cut-point for the lung monitor was FEV1/FEV6 < 0.78, with sensitivity of 82.8% (95% CI 78.3%, 86.7%) and specificity of 85.0% (95% CI 79.4%, 89.6%).,Test performance of the lung monitor was unaffected by bronchodilation.,The lung monitor could be used in primary care without a bronchodilator using a simple ratio of FEV1/FEV6 as part of a screening pathway for COPD among patients reporting respiratory symptoms.
1
Chronic cough can be a dominant symptom of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although its clinical impact remains unclear.,The aim of our study was to identify phenotypic differences according to the presence of chronic cough or sputum and evaluate the impact of chronic cough on the risk of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).,In a nationwide COPD cohort including 1,613 COPD patients, patients with chronic cough only, those with sputum only, those with chronic bronchitis (CB), and those without cough and sputum were compared with regard to dyspnea, lung function, quality of life (QoL), and risk of AECOPD.,The rates of chronic cough, chronic sputum, and both were 23.4%, 32.4%, and 18.2%, respectively.,Compared with patients without chronic cough, those with chronic cough exhibited a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% predicted) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (% predicted), more frequent AECOPD, more severe dyspnea, and worse QoL.,Pulmonary function, dyspnea severity, and QoL worsened in the following order: without cough or sputum, with sputum only, with cough only, and with CB.,Multivariate analyses revealed chronic cough as an independent risk factor for a lower lung function, more severe dyspnea, and a poor QoL.,Moreover, the risk of future AECOPD was significantly associated with chronic cough (odds ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.08-2.24), but not with chronic sputum.,Our results suggest that chronic cough should be considered as an important phenotype during the determination of high-risk groups of COPD patients.
The coexistence of upper airways disease with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not well documented.,The aim of this research was to assess sino-nasal inflammation in COPD by various tools, and look for the impact on quality of life, relation to smoking, disease severity and systemic inflammation.,Current and ex-smokers with COPD (n = 42) and healthy never-smokers (n = 21) were included in this study.,COPD severity was assessed by GOLD criteria and BODE index.,Markers of systemic inflammation were measured.,Nasal symptoms and general quality of life were assessed using the questionnaires; sino-nasal questionnaire (SNAQ-11) and St.,George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).,Nasal endoscopy and saccharine test were performed.,Nasal lavages were collected for cytological examination and eicosanoids (cysteinyl leukotrienes, leukotriene B4, 8-isoprostane).,Symptoms and endoscopic scores were higher in COPD (P ≤ 0.0001).,Only SGRQ symptoms subscore correlated with SNAQ-11 (r = 0.34, P = 0.035).,Mucociliary clearance was impaired only in current smokers (9.91 ± 0.49 versus 13.12 ± 0.68 minutes, P ≤ 0.001). 8-isoprostane was higher in COPD smokers compared to the controls (0.17 ± 0.04 versus 0.34 ± 0.09 pg/g protein, P < 0.05).,Endoscopic score and mucociliary of impairment patients who currently smoked cigarettes correlated with concentrations of 8-isoprostane.,None of the parameters correlated with disease severity and markers of systemic inflammation.,We provide evidence of upper airways disease in COPD, which appears to be related more to patients who currently smoke than to disease severity.
1
Airway epithelium integrity is essential to maintain its role of mechanical and functional barrier.,Recurrent epithelial injuries require a complex mechanism of repair to restore its integrity.,In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), an abnormal airway epithelial repair may participate in airway remodeling.,The objective was to determine if airway epithelial wound repair of airway epithelium is abnormal in COPD.,Patients scheduled for lung resection were prospectively recruited.,Demographic, clinical data and pulmonary function tests results were recorded.,Emphysema was visually scored and histological remodeling features were noted.,Primary bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) were extracted and cultured for wound closure assay.,We determined the mean speed of wound closure (MSWC) and cell proliferation index, matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-2, MMP-9 and cytokines levels in supernatants of BEC 18 hours after cell wounding.,In a subset of patients, bronchiolar epithelial cells were also cultured for wound closure assay for MSWC analyze.,13 COPD and 7 non COPD patients were included.,The severity of airflow obstruction and the severity of emphysema were associated with a lower MSWC in BEC (p = 0.01, 95% CI [0.15-0.80]; p = 0.04, 95% CI [−0.77;-0.03] respectively).,Cell proliferation index was decreased in COPD patients (19 ± 6% in COPD vs 27 ± 3% in non COPD, p = 0.04).,The severity of COPD was associated with a lower level of MMP-2 (7.8 ± 2 105 AU in COPD GOLD D vs 12.8 ± 0.13 105 AU in COPD GOLD A, p = 0.04) and a lower level of IL-4 (p = 0.03, 95% CI [0.09;0.87]).,Moreover, higher levels of IL-4 and IL-2 were associated with a higher MSWC (p = 0.01, 95% CI [0.17;0.89] and p = 0.02, 95% CI [0.09;0.87] respectively).,Clinical characteristics and smoking history were not associated with MSWC, cell proliferation index or MMP and cytokines levels.,Finally, we showed an association of the MSWC of bronchial and corresponding bronchiolar epithelial cells obtained from the same patients (p = 0.02, 95% CI [0.12;0.89]).,Our results showed an abnormal bronchial epithelial wound closure process in severe COPD.,Further studies are needed to elucidate the contribution and the regulation of this mechanism in the complex pathophysiology of COPD.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0151-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Abnormal immune responses are believed to be highly relevant in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Dendritic cells provide a critical checkpoint for immunity by their capacity to both induce and suppress immunity.,Although evident that cigarette smoke, the primary cause of COPD, significantly influences dendritic cell functions, little is known about the roles of dendritic cells in the pathogenesis of COPD.,The extent of dendritic cell infiltration in COPD tissue specimens was determined using immunohistochemical localization of CD83+ cells (marker of matured myeloid dendritic cells), and CD1a+ cells (Langerhans cells).,The extent of tissue infiltration with Langerhans cells was also determined by the relative expression of the CD207 gene in COPD versus control tissues.,To determine mechanisms by which dendritic cells accumulate in COPD, complimentary studies were conducted using monocyte-derived human dendritic cells exposed to cigarette smoke extract (CSE), and dendritic cells extracted from mice chronically exposed to cigarette smoke.,In human COPD lung tissue, we detected a significant increase in the total number of CD83+ cells, and significantly higher amounts of CD207 mRNA when compared with control tissue.,Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells exposed to CSE (0.1-2%) exhibited enhanced survival in vitro when compared with control dendritic cells.,Murine dendritic cells extracted from mice exposed to cigarette smoke for 4 weeks, also demonstrated enhanced survival compared to dendritic cells extracted from control mice.,Acute exposure of human dendritic cells to CSE induced the cellular pro-survival proteins heme-oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and B cell lymphoma leukemia-x(L) (Bcl-xL), predominantly through oxidative stress.,Although activated human dendritic cells conditioned with CSE expressed diminished migratory CCR7 expression, their migration towards the CCR7 ligand CCL21 was not impaired.,These data indicate that COPD is associated with increased numbers of cells bearing markers associated with Langerhans cells and mature dendritic cells, and that cigarette smoke promotes survival signals and augments survival of dendritic cells.,Although CSE suppressed dendritic cell CCR7 expression, migration towards a CCR7 ligand was not diminished, suggesting that reduced CCR7-dependent migration is unlikely to be an important mechanism for dendritic cell retention in the lungs of smokers with COPD.
1
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) share common risk factors.,However, there is limited information about COPD and CKD.,This is case-cohort study was carried out using the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database to evaluate the correlation between COPD and CKD.,We identified cases aged older than 40 years who had an inpatient hospitalization with a first-time COPD diagnosis between 1998 and 2008.,Control were selected from hospitalized patients without COPD or CKD and were matched according to age, gender, and year of admission at a 2:1 ratio.,Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of CKD and COPD.,The overall incidence of CKD was higher in the COPD group (470.9 per 104 person-years) than in the non-COPD group (287.52 per 104 person-years).,The adjusted hazard ratio of case was 1.61 (P < 0.0001) times that of control.,COPD was found to be associated with kidney disease from our follow-up.,To detect CKD early, early diagnosis of CKD in patients with COPD and prompt initiation of monitoring and treatment are imperative.
Neurodegenerative disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was observed.,We aim to clarify the risk of dementia in patients with COPD.,The study used claims data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.,Subjects were those who received a discharge diagnosis of COPD between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2011.,Only the first hospitalization was enrolled, and the index date was the first day of admission.,Patients younger than 40 years or those with a history of Alzheimer disease (AD) or Parkinson disease (PD) before the index date were excluded.,The patients with COPD were then followed until receiving a diagnosis of AD or PD, death, or the end of the study.,Control subjects were selected from hospitalized patients without a history of COPD, AD, or PD and were matched according to age (±3 years), gender, and the year of admission at a 2:1 ratio.,The comorbidities were measured from 1 year before the index date based on the ICD-9-CM codes.,The study included 8640 patients with COPD and a mean age of 68.76 (±10.74) years.,The adjusted hazard ratio of developing dementia (AD or PD) was 1.74 (95% confidence interval = 1.55-1.96) in patients with COPD compared with patients without COPD after adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidities.,This nationwide cohort study demonstrates that the risk of dementia, including AD and PD, is significantly increased in patients with COPD compared with individuals in the general population.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a multicomponent disorder that leads to substantial disability, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality.,Although the majority of COPD patients are first diagnosed and treated in primary care practices, there is comparatively little information on the management of COPD patients in primary care.,A web-based pilot survey was conducted to evaluate the primary care physician’s, or general practitioner’s (GP’s), knowledge, understanding, and management of COPD in twelve territories across the Asia-Pacific region, Africa, eastern Europe, and Latin America, using a 10-minute questionnaire comprising 20 questions and translated into the native language of each participating territory.,The questionnaire was administered to a total of 600 GPs (50 from each territory) involved in the management of COPD patients and all data were collated and analyzed by an independent health care research consultant.,This survey demonstrated that the GPs’ understanding of COPD was variable across the territories, with large numbers of GPs having very limited knowledge of COPD and its management.,A consistent finding across all territories was the underutilization of spirometry (median 26%; range 10%-48%) and reliance on X-rays (median 14%; range 5%-22%) for COPD diagnosis, whereas overuse of blood tests (unspecified) was particularly high in Russia and South Africa.,Similarly, there was considerable underrecognition of the importance of exacerbation history as an important factor of COPD and its initial management in most territories (median 4%; range 0%-22%).,Management of COPD was well below guideline-recommended levels in most of the regions investigated.,The findings of this survey suggest there is a need for more ongoing education and information, specifically directed towards GPs outside of Europe and North America, and that global COPD guidelines appear to have limited reach and application in most of the areas studied.
Lung function and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been associated with short-term exposure to air pollution.,However, the effect of long-term exposure to particulate matter from industry and traffic on COPD as defined by lung function has not been evaluated so far.,Our study was designed to investigate the influence of long-term exposure to air pollution on respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function in 55-year-old women.,We especially focused on COPD as defined by GOLD criteria and additionally compared the effects of air pollution on respiratory symptoms by questionnaire data and by lung function measurements.,In consecutive cross sectional studies conducted between 1985-1994, we investigated 4757 women living in the Rhine-Ruhr Basin of Germany.,NO2 and PM10 exposure was assessed by measurements done in an 8 km grid, and traffic exposure by distance from the residential address to the nearest major road using Geographic Information System data.,Lung function was determined and COPD was defined by using the GOLD criteria.,Chronic respiratory symptoms and possible confounders were defined by questionnaire data.,Linear and logistic regressions, including random effects were used to account for confounding and clustering on city level.,The prevalence of COPD (GOLD stages 1-4) was 4.5%.,COPD and pulmonary function were strongest affected by PM10 and traffic related exposure.,A 7 μg/m3 increase in five year means of PM10 (interquartile range) was associated with a 5.1% (95% CI 2.5%-7.7%) decrease in FEV1, a 3.7% (95% CI 1.8%-5.5%) decrease in FVC and an odds ratio (OR) of 1.33 (95% CI 1.03-1.72) for COPD.,Women living less than 100 m from a busy road also had a significantly decreased lung function and COPD was 1.79 times more likely (95% CI 1.06-3.02) than for those living farther away.,Chronic symptoms as based on questionnaire information showed effects in the same direction, but less pronounced.,Chronic exposure to PM10, NO2 and living near a major road might increase the risk of developing COPD and can have a detrimental effect on lung function.
1
Telemedicine may increase accessibility to pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), thus enhancing long-term exercise maintenance.,We aimed to explore COPD patients’ adherence and experiences in long-term telerehabilitation to understand factors affecting satisfaction and potential for service improvements.,A two-year pilot study with 10 patients with COPD was conducted.,The intervention included treadmill exercise training at home and a webpage for telemonitoring and self-management combined with weekly videoconferencing sessions with a physiotherapist.,We conducted four separate series of data collection.,Adherence was measured in terms of frequency of registrations on the webpage.,Factors affecting satisfaction and adherence, together with potential for service improvements, were explored through two semi-structured focus groups and an individual open-ended questionnaire.,Qualitative data were analysed by systematic text condensation.,User friendliness was measured by the means of a usability questionnaire.,On average, participants registered 3.0 symptom reports/week in a web-based diary and 1.7 training sessions/week.,Adherence rate decreased during the second year.,Four major themes regarding factors affecting satisfaction, adherence and potential improvements of the intervention emerged: (i) experienced health benefits; (ii) increased self-efficacy and independence; and (iii) emotional safety due to regular meetings and access to special competence; (iv) maintenance of motivation.,Participants were generally highly satisfied with the technical components of the telerehabilitation intervention.,Long-term adherence to telerehabilitation in COPD was maintained for a two-year period.,Satisfaction was supported by experienced health benefits, self-efficacy, and emotional safety.,Maintenance of motivation was a challenge and might have affected long-term adherence.,Four key factors of potential improvements in long-term telerehabilitation were identified: (i) adherence to different components of the telerehabilitation intervention is dependent on the level of focus provided by the health personnel involved; (ii) the potential for regularity that lies within the technology should be exploited to avoid relapses after vacation; (iii) motivation might be increased by tailoring individual consultations to support experiences of good health and meet individual goals and motivational strategies; (iv) interactive functionalities or gaming tools might provide peer-support, peer-modelling and enhance motivation.
Disease management programmes have been developed for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to facilitate the integration of care across healthcare settings.,The purpose of the present study was to examine the experiences of COPD patients and their relatives of integrated care after implementation of a COPD disease management programme.,Seven focus groups and five individual interviews were held with 34 patients with severe or very severe COPD and two focus groups were held with eight of their relatives.,Data were analysed using inductive content analysis.,Four main categories of experiences of integrated care emerged: 1) a flexible system that provides access to appropriate healthcare and social services and furthers patient involvement; 2) the responsibility of health professionals to both take the initiative and follow up; 3) communication and providing information to patients and relatives; 4) coordination and professional cooperation.,Most patients were satisfied with their care and raised few criticisms.,However, patients with more unstable and severe disease tended to experience more problems.,Participant suggestions for optimizing the integration of healthcare included assigning patients a care coordinator, telehealth solutions for housebound patients and better information technology to support interprofessional cooperation.,Further studies are needed to explore these and other possible solutions to problems with integrated care among COPD patients.,A future effort in this field should be informed by detailed knowledge of the extent and relative importance of the identified problems.,It should also be designed to address variable levels of severity of COPD and relevant comorbidities and to deliver care in ways appropriate to the respective healthcare setting.,Future studies should also take health professionals’ views into account so that interventions may be planned in the light of the experiences of all those involved in the treatment of COPD patients.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-471) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
To systematically investigate the prevalence of pain, factors related with pain and pain management interventions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Systematic review and meta-analysis.,PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychINFO from 1966 to December 2013.,Studies were included if they presented clinical data on pain or symptom burden in patients with COPD, or pain as a domain of quality of life (QoL).,All types of study designs were included.,Of the 1571 articles that were identified, 39 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review.,Fourteen studies focused on pain and symptom burden (including pain) in patients with COPD and 25 studies focused on QoL using a questionnaire that included a separate pain domain.,Reported pain prevalence in high-quality studies ranged from 32 to 60%.,Included studies report that pain is more prevalent in patients with COPD compared to participants from the general population.,Comorbidity, nutritional status, QoL and several symptoms were related to pain.,None of the included studies reported a significant relationship between lung function and pain prevalence or severity.,However, studies investigating pain in patients with moderate COPD reported higher pain prevalence compared to studies in patients with severe of very severe COPD.,Although literature on this topic is limited and shows substantial heterogeneity, pain seems to be a significant problem in patients with COPD and is related to several other symptoms, comorbidity and QoL.,Data synthesis suggests that pain is more prevalent in patients with moderate COPD compared to patients with severe or very severe COPD.,Further research is needed and should focus on determining a more accurate pain prevalence, investigating the relationship between pain prevalence, disease severity and comorbidity and explore implementation and efficacy of pain management interventions in patients with COPD.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients present a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease.,This excess of comorbidity could be related to a common pathogenic mechanism, but it could also be explained by the existence of common risk factors.,The objective of this study was to determine whether COPD patients present greater cardiovascular comorbidity than control subjects and whether COPD can be considered a risk factor per se.,1200 COPD patients and 300 control subjects were recruited for this multicenter, cross-sectional, case-control study.,Compared with the control group, the COPD group showed a significantly higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease (12.5% versus 4.7%; P < 0.0001), cerebrovascular disease (10% versus 2%; P < 0.0001), and peripheral vascular disease (16.4% versus 4.1%; P < 0.001).,In the univariate risk analysis, COPD, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia were risk factors for ischemic heart disease.,In the multivariate analysis adjusted for the remaining factors, COPD was still an independent risk factor (odds ratio: 2.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.18-4.24; P = 0.014).,COPD patients show a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease, higher than expected given their age and the coexistence of classic cardiovascular risk factors.
1
This study aims to (i) evaluate the association between anxiety and depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL); and (ii) identify the effect modifiers of this relationship in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,A total of 337 clinically stable COPD patients answered the St.,George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (assessing HRQoL) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).,Socio-demographic information, lung function, and other clinical data were collected.,Most patients (93%) were male; they had a mean (SD) age of 68 (9) years and mild to very severe COPD (post-bronchodilator FEV1 52 (16)% predicted).,Multivariate analyses showed that anxiety, depression, or both conditions were associated with poor HRQoL (for all SGRQ domains).,The association between anxiety and total HRQoL score was 6.7 points higher (indicating a worse HRQoL) in current workers than in retired individuals.,Estimates for patients with "both anxiety and depression" were 5.8 points lower in stage I-II than in stage III-IV COPD, and 10.2 points higher in patients with other comorbidities than in those with only COPD.,This study shows a significant association between anxiety, depression, or both conditions and impaired HRQoL.,Clinically relevant factors affecting the magnitude of this association include work status, COPD severity, and the presence of comorbidities.
In the current study, the prevalence of the most common psychological disorders in COPD patients and their spouses was assessed cross-sectionally.,The influence of COPD patients’ and their spouses’ psychopathology on patient health-related quality of life was also examined.,The following measurements were employed: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second expressed in percentage predicted (FEV1%), Shuttle-Walking-Test (SWT), International Diagnostic Checklists for ICD-10 (IDCL), questionnaires on generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life (St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), European Quality of Life Questionnaire (EuroQol), a modified version of a Disability-Index (CDI)), and a screening questionnaire for a broad range of psychological problems and symptoms of psychopathology (Symptom-Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R)).,One hundred and forty-three stable COPD outpatients with a severity grade between 2 and 4 (according to the GOLD criteria) as well as 105 spouses took part in the study.,The prevalence of anxiety and depression diagnoses was increased both in COPD patients and their spouses.,In contrast, substance-related disorders were explicitly more frequent in COPD patients.,Multiple linear regression analyses indicated that depression (SCL-90-R), walking distance (SWT), somatization (SCL-90-R), male gender, FEV1%, and heart disease were independent predictors of COPD patients’ health-related quality of life.,After including anxiousness of the spouses in the regression, medical variables (FEV1% and heart disease) no longer explained disability, thus highlighting the relevance of spouses’ well-being.,The results underline the importance of depression and anxiousness for health-related quality of life in COPD patients and their spouses.,Of special interest is the fact that the relation between emotional distress and quality of life is interactive within a couple.
1
Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) are leading causes of morbidity worldwide.,However, the spatial and temporal trends in prevalence and incidence of CRDs have not been estimated.,Based on data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2017, we analyzed the prevalence and incidence trends of CRDs from 1990 to 2017 according to age, sex, region and disease pattern.,Furthermore, the correlations between the incidence and the World Bank income levels, sociodemographic index (SDI), and human development index (HDI) levels were analyzed to assess the factors affecting incidence.,The total number of CRD cases increased by 39.5% from 1990 to 2017, nevertheless, the age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR) and age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) showed decreasing trends.,The ASIRs of CRD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumoconiosis, and asthma decreased, whereas the ASIR of interstitial lung disease and pulmonary sarcoidosis increased during the past 27 years.,Significant differences between males and females in the incidence rates of pneumoconiosis, interstitial lung disease and pulmonary sarcoidosis were observed.,Elderly people especially suffered from CRDs, except for asthma.,For COPD, the ASIR decreased from low-SDI regions to high-SDI regions.,The ASIR of interstitial lung disease and pulmonary sarcoidosis in the high-SDI region was highest and have increased mostly.,The ASIRs for pneumoconiosis and asthma were inversely related to the HDI.,In 2017, CRDs were still the leading causes of morbidity worldwide.,A large proportion of the disease burden was attributed to asthma and COPD.,The incidence rates of all four types of CRDs varied greatly across the world.,Statistically significant correlation was found between the ASIR and SDI/HDI.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of death in smokers, particularly in those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) are required for endothelial homeostasis, and their dysfunction contributes to CVD.,To investigate EPC dysfunction in smokers, we isolated and expanded blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOEC) from peripheral blood samples from healthy nonsmokers, healthy smokers, and COPD patients.,BOEC from smokers and COPD patients showed increased DNA double-strand breaks and senescence compared to nonsmokers.,Senescence negatively correlated with the expression and activity of sirtuin-1 (SIRT1), a protein deacetylase that protects against DNA damage and cellular senescence.,Inhibition of DNA damage response by silencing of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase resulted in upregulation of SIRT1 expression and decreased senescence.,Treatment of BOEC from COPD patients with the SIRT1 activator resveratrol or an ATM inhibitor (KU-55933) also rescued the senescent phenotype.,Using an in vivo mouse model of angiogenesis, we demonstrated that senescent BOEC from COPD patients are dysfunctional, displaying impaired angiogenic ability and increased apoptosis compared to cells from healthy nonsmokers.,Therefore, this study identifies epigenetic regulation of DNA damage and senescence as pathogenetic mechanisms linked to endothelial progenitors' dysfunction in smokers and COPD patients.,These defects may contribute to vascular disease and cardiovascular events in smokers and could therefore constitute therapeutic targets for intervention.
1
Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important events that carry significant consequences for patients.,Some patients experience frequent exacerbations, and are now recognized as a distinct clinical subgroup, the ‘frequent exacerbator’ phenotype.,This is relatively stable over time, occurs across disease severity, and is associated with poorer health outcomes.,These patients are therefore a priority for research and treatment.,The pathophysiology underlying the frequent exacerbator phenotype is complex, with increased airway and systemic inflammation, dynamic lung hyperinflation, changes in lower airway bacterial colonization and a possible increased susceptibility to viral infection.,Frequent exacerbators are also at increased risk from comorbid extrapulmonary diseases including cardiovascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux, depression, osteoporosis and cognitive impairment.,Overall these patients have poorer health status, accelerated forced expiratory volume over 1 s (FEV1) decline, worsened quality of life, and increased hospital admissions and mortality, contributing to increased exacerbation susceptibility and perpetuation of the frequent exacerbator phenotype.,This review article sets out the definition and importance of the frequent exacerbator phenotype, with a detailed examination of its pathophysiology, impact and interaction with other comorbidities.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-181) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Acute exacerbations of COPD can complicate the course of the disease in patients with severe airway obstruction.,Reduction of exacerbations is an important clinical outcome in evaluating new therapies in COPD.,Combination therapies with long-acting β-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids have now been approved for use.,Three 1-year randomized clinical trials, which studied the effect of combining a long-acting β2-agonist with an inhaled corticosteroid in COPD, documented that exacerbation frequency was lower with therapy than placebo.,Combination therapy had a similar effect to its monocomponents in the trial evaluating salmeterol/fluticasone combination.,However, when patients with more severe COPD were studied using a combination of budesonide and formoterol, a clear improvement was seen in the overall exacerbation rates compared with the use of a long-acting β2-agonist alone.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) imposes a substantial burden on individuals with the disease, which can include a range of symptoms (breathlessness, cough, sputum production, wheeze, chest tightness) of varying severities.,We present an overview of the biomedical literature describing reported relationships between COPD symptoms and disease burden in terms of quality of life, health status, daily activities, physical activity, sleep, comorbid anxiety, and depression, as well as risk of exacerbations and disease prognosis.,In addition, the substantial variability of COPD symptoms encountered (morning, daytime, and nighttime) is addressed and their implications for disease burden considered.,The findings from this narrative review, which mainly focuses on real-world and observational studies, demonstrate the impact of COPD symptoms on the burden of disease and that improved recognition and understanding of their impact is central to alleviating this burden.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has traditionally been considered an inexorably progressive disease, associated with a constant increase of symptoms that occur as the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) worsens, only intermittently interrupted by exacerbations.,However, this paradigm has been challenged in recent decades by the available evidence.,Recent studies have pointed out that COPD-related symptoms are not consistently perceived by patients in the same way, showing not only seasonal variation, but also changes in symptom perception during a week or even within a single day.,According to the available data, patients experience the biggest increase in respiratory symptoms during the first hours of the early morning, followed by the nighttime.,This variation over time is of considerable importance, since it impacts on daily life activities and health-related quality of life, as measured by a recently developed ad hoc questionnaire.,Additionally, recent clinical trials have suggested that the use of rapid-onset long-acting bronchodilators may have an impact on morning symptoms, despite their current use as maintenance treatment for a determined period.,Although this hypothesis is to be validated in future long-term clinical trials comparing fast-onset versus slow-onset inhaled drugs in COPD, it may bring forward a new concept of long-term bronchodilator therapy.,At the present time, the two available long-acting, fast-onset bronchodilators used in the treatment of COPD are formoterol and the recently marketed indacaterol.,Newer drugs have also been shown to have a rapid onset of action in preclinical studies.,Health care professionals caring for COPD patients should consider this variation in the perception of symptoms during their clinical interview as a potential new target in the long-term treatment plan.
1
The airway smooth muscle (ASM) plays an indispensable role in airway structure and function.,Dysfunction in ASM plays a central role in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and contributes to alterations of contractility, inflammatory response, immunoreaction, phenotype, quantity, and size of airways.,ASM makes a key contribution in COPD by various mechanisms including altered contractility and relaxation induce by [Ca2+]i, cell proliferation and hypertrophy, production and modulation of extracellular cytokines, and release of pro-and-anti-inflammatory mediators.,Multiple dysfunctions of ASM contribute to modulating airway responses to stimuli, remodeling, and fibrosis, as well as influence the compliance of lungs.,The present review highlights regulatory roles of multiple factors in the development of ASM dysfunction in COPD, aims to understand the regulatory mechanism by which ASM dysfunctions are initiated, and explores the clinical significance of ASM on alterations of airway structure and function in COPD and development of novel therapeutic strategies for COPD.
Small airway fibrosis is the main contributor to physiological airway dysfunction in COPD.,One potential mechanism contributing to small airway fibrosis is epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT).,When associated with angiogenesis (so called EMT-Type-3) it may well also be the link with the development of airway epithelial cancer, which is closely associated with COPD and predominantly in large airways.,In a recent study published in Respiratory Research, Reimann and colleagues, showed increased expression of S100A4 in vasculature of human COPD and murine lungs.,It is quite possible that the process of endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndMT) is active in COPD lungs which we wish to comment on.
1
In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the extent of physical activity (PA) is correlated with disease severity and prognosis.,However, factors associated with low-level PA in elderly COPD patients are not known.,We assessed the levels of PA and clinical factors associated with low-level of PA in elderly COPD patients.,This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective study of 245 patients with COPD.,Among them, 160 patients with 65 years or more were included.,Three PA groups were defined with respect to daily activity time (low, moderate, and high).,Health related quality of life (HRQL) was measured using St.,George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and 36-item short-form health survey.,Anxiety and depression status were assessed employing the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS).,Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of low-level PA in elderly COPD patients.,Of all the 160 patients, 103 (64.4%) engaged in low-level PA.,Upon univariate analysis, a decreased exercise capacity (6-minute walk test < 250 m), an increased dyspnea (the modified medical research council [MMRC] dyspnea scale ≥ 2), a decreased HRQL (total SGRQ score), and a presence of depression (HADS-D ≥ 8) were significantly associated with low-level PA.,Upon multivariate analysis, an MMRC grade ≥ 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.550; p = 0.034), and HADS-D ≥ 8 (HR, 2.076; p = 0.045) were independently associated with low-level PA in elderly COPD patients.,Two-thirds of elderly patients with COPD reported low-level of PA.,More severe dyspnea and a presence of depression were independently associated with low-level PA in elderly COPD patients.
Mortality rate is high in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Our aim was to investigate long-term mortality and associated risk factors in COPD patients previously hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation.,A total of 256 patients from the Nordic countries were followed for 8.7 ± 0.4 years after the index hospitalization in 2000-2001.,Prior to discharge, the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire was administered and data on therapy and comorbidities were obtained.,Information on long-term mortality was obtained from national registries in each of the Nordic countries.,In total, 202 patients (79%) died during the follow up period, whereas 54 (21%) were still alive.,Primary cause of death was respiratory (n = 116), cardiovascular (n = 43), malignancy (n = 28), other (n = 10), or unknown (n = 5).,Mortality was related to older age, with a hazard risk ratio (HRR) of 1.75 per 10 years, lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (HRR 0.80), body mass index (BMI) <20 kg/m2 (HRR 3.21), and diabetes (HRR 3.02).,Older age, lower BMI, and diabetes were related to both respiratory and cardiovascular mortality.,An association was also found between lower FEV1 and respiratory mortality, whereas mortality was not significantly associated with therapy, anxiety, or depression.,Almost four out of five patients died within 9 years following an admission for COPD exacerbation.,Increased mortality was associated with older age, lower lung function, low BMI, and diabetes, and these factors should be taken into account when making clinical decisions about patients who have been admitted to hospital for a COPD exacerbation.
1
Randomized interventional trials generally recruit highly selected patients.,In contrast, long-term, noninterventional studies can reflect standard of care of real-life populations.,DACCORD (Die ambulante Versorgung mit langwirksamen Bronchodilatatoren: COPD-Register in Deutschland [Outpatient Care With Long-Acting Bronchodilators: COPD Registry in Germany]) is an ongoing observational study, conducted in primary and secondary care in Germany, aiming to describe the impact of disease and treatments on real-life patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Patients had a clinical and spirometry diagnosis of COPD, were aged ≥40 years, and were initiating or changing COPD maintenance medication.,The only exclusion criteria were asthma and participation in a randomized clinical trial.,Exacerbation data were collected every 3 months.,COPD medication, COPD Assessment Test, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were recorded at the end of the 1 year period.,In the 6 months prior to baseline, 26.5% of the 3,974 patients experienced ≥1 exacerbation, compared with 26.1% over the 1-year follow-up (annualized rate 0.384).,Importantly, only previous exacerbations and not poor lung function alone predicted an increased exacerbation risk.,There was a general shift to lower disease severity from baseline to 1 year, predominantly as a consequence of a lower proportion of patients considered at high risk due to exacerbations.,COPD Assessment Test mean change from baseline was −1.9, with 48.9% of patients reporting a clinically relevant improvement.,Overall persistence to medication was high, with 77.2% of patients still receiving the same class of medication at 1 year.,DACCORD suggests that in clinical practice, the large majority of COPD patients are symptomatic but seldom exacerbate and that widely used tools and treatment recommendations do not reflect this fully.
Despite the availability of national and international guidelines, evidence suggests that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment is not always prescribed according to recommendations.,This study evaluated the current management of patients with COPD using a large UK primary-care database.,This analysis used electronic patient records and patient-completed questionnaires from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database.,Data on current management were analyzed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group and presence or absence of a concomitant asthma diagnosis, in patients with a COPD diagnosis at ≥35 years of age and with spirometry results supportive of the COPD diagnosis.,A total of 24,957 patients were analyzed, of whom 13,557 (54.3%) had moderate airflow limitation (GOLD Stage 2 COPD).,The proportion of patients not receiving pharmacologic treatment for COPD was 17.0% in the total COPD population and 17.7% in the GOLD Stage 2 subset.,Approximately 50% of patients in both cohorts were receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA; 26.7% for both cohorts) or a LABA and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA; 23.2% and 19.9%, respectively).,ICS + LABA and ICS + LABA + LAMA were the most frequently used treatments in GOLD Groups A and B.,Of patients without concomitant asthma, 53.7% of the total COPD population and 50.2% of the GOLD Stage 2 subset were receiving ICS.,Of patients with GOLD Stage 2 COPD and no exacerbations in the previous year, 49% were prescribed ICS.,A high proportion of GOLD Stage 2 COPD patients were symptomatic on their current management (36.6% with modified Medical Research Council score ≥2; 76.4% with COPD Assessment Test score ≥10).,COPD is not treated according to GOLD and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations in the UK primary-care setting.,Some patients receive no treatment despite experiencing symptoms.,Among those on treatment, most receive ICS irrespective of severity of airflow limitation, asthma diagnosis, and exacerbation history.,Many patients on treatment continue to have symptoms.
1
We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a digital health system supporting clinical care through monitoring and self-management support in community-based patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of a fully automated Internet-linked, tablet computer-based system of monitoring and self-management support (EDGE‚ sElf-management anD support proGrammE) in improving quality of life and clinical outcomes.,We compared daily use of EDGE with usual care for 12 months.,The primary outcome was COPD-specific health status measured with the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD (SGRQ-C).,A total of 166 patients were randomized (110 EDGE, 56 usual care).,All patients were included in an intention to treat analysis.,The estimated difference in SGRQ-C at 12 months (EDGE−usual care) was −1.7 with a 95% CI of −6.6 to 3.2 (P=.49).,The relative risk of hospital admission for EDGE was 0.83 (0.56-1.24, P=.37) compared with usual care.,Generic health status (EQ-5D, EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire) between the groups differed significantly with better health status for the EDGE group (0.076, 95% CI 0.008-0.14, P=.03).,The median number of visits to general practitioners for EDGE versus usual care were 4 versus 5.5 (P=.06) and to practice nurses were 1.5 versus 2.5 (P=.03), respectively.,The EDGE clinical trial does not provide evidence for an effect on COPD-specific health status in comparison with usual care, despite uptake of the intervention.,However, there appears to be an overall benefit in generic health status; and the effect sizes for improved depression score, reductions in hospital admissions, and general practice visits warrants further evaluation and could make an important contribution to supporting people with COPD.,International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 40367841; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN40367841 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6pmfIJ9KK)
Debate exists regarding which endpoints most sensitively reflect day-to-day variation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) symptoms and are most useful in clinical practice to predict COPD exacerbations.,We hypothesized that short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) reliever use would predict short- and long-term exacerbation risk in COPD patients.,We performed a retrospective analysis of data from a study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT00419744) comparing budesonide/formoterol 320/9 μg with formoterol 9 μg (both twice daily) in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD; reliever salbutamol 90 μg was provided.,First occurrence of reliever use >4 (low), >10 (medium), and >20 (high) inhalations/day was assessed as a predictor of short-term (3-week) exacerbation risk.,Mean daily reliever use in the week preceding the 2-month visit was investigated as a predictor of the long-term (10-month) exacerbation risk, using intervals of 2-5, 6-9, and ≥10 inhalations/day.,Overall, 810 patients were included (61 % male; mean age 63.2 years; post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s 37.7 % of predicted).,First occurrence of low, medium, or high reliever use was predictive of an exacerbation within the following 3 weeks; exacerbation risk increased significantly with increasing reliever use.,Mean reliever use over 1 week was predictive of long-term exacerbation risk.,Patients with mean use of 2-5, 6-9, and ≥10 inhalations/day exhibited 21 %, 67 %, and 135 % higher exacerbation rates, respectively, in the following 10 months, compared with <2 inhalations/day.,Budesonide/formoterol was associated with lower short- and long-term exacerbation risk than formoterol in all reliever-use groups.,SABA reliever use is a predictor of short- and long-term exacerbation risk in moderate-to-very-severe COPD patients with a history of exacerbations receiving budesonide/formoterol or formoterol.
1
The 2017 GOLD ABCD classification shifts patients from groups C-D to A-B.,Group A was the most widely distributed group in several studies.,It would be useful to understand the characteristics for group A patients, but little has been reported concerning these issues.,This was a multicenter cross-sectional study using the COPD Assessment in Practice study database from 15 primary or secondary care facilities in Japan.,We investigated the clinical characteristics of group A by stratification according to a mMRC grade 0 or 1.,In 1,168 COPD patients, group A patients accounted for approximately half of the patients.,Compared with the groups B-D, group A was younger and had a higher proportion of males, higher pulmonary function, and higher proportion of monotherapy with long-acting muscarinic antagonist or long-acting β-agonist.,The prevalence of mMRC grade 1 patients was about two-thirds of group A.,Compared with the mMRC 0 patients, mMRC 1 patients showed a tendency to have a higher proportion of exacerbations (P=0.054) and had a significantly lower pulmonary function.,Regardless of the mMRC grade, 60% of group A patients were treated with monotherapy of long-acting muscarinic antagonist or long-acting β-agonist.,Group A patients accounted for approximately half of the patients, and they were younger, had higher pulmonary function, and had lower pharmacotherapy intensity compared with groups B-D.,By stratifying according to the mMRC grade 0 or 1 in group A patients, there were differences in the exacerbation risk and airflow limitation.
Exposure to noxious gases and particles contained in both tobacco smoking (TS) and biomass smoke (BS) are well recognized environmental risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,COPD is characterized by an abnormal inflammatory response, both in the pulmonary and systemic compartments.,The differential effects of TS, BS or their combined exposure have not been well characterized yet.,This study sought to compare the lung function characteristics and systemic inflammatory response in COPD patients exposed to TS, BS or their combination.,Sociodemographic, clinical and lung functional parameters were compared across 49 COPD patients with a history of smoking and no BS exposure (TS COPD), 31 never-smoker COPD patients with BS exposure (BS COPD), 46 COPD patients with a combined exposure (TS + BS COPD) and 52 healthy controls (HC) who have never been exposed neither to TS or BS.,Blood cell counts, C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen and immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were quantified in all four groups.,TS + BS COPD patients exhibited significantly lower oxygen saturation than the rest of groups (p < 0.01).,Spirometry and diffusing capacity were significantly higher in BS than in TS or TS + BS patients.,CRP levels were significantly higher in TS COPD patients than in BS COPD group (p < 0.05), whereas fibrinogen was raised in COPD patients with a history of smoking (TS and TS + BS) when compared to control subjects (p < 0.01).,Finally, COPD patients with BS exposure (BS and BS + TS groups) showed higher IgE levels than TS and HC (p < 0.05).,There are significant physiological and inflammatory differences between COPD patients with TS, BS and TS + BS exposures.,The latter had worse blood oxygenation, whereas the raised levels of IgE in BS exposed patients suggests a differential Th2 systemic inflammatory pattern triggered by this pollutant.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent airflow limitation and abnormal inflammatory response.,Wnt/β‐catenin and AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK) have been shown to modulate lung inflammatory responses and injury.,However, it remains elusive whether Wnt/β‐catenin and AMPK modulate nuclear factor erythroid‐2 related factor‐2 (Nrf2)‐mediated protective responses during the development of emphysema.,Here we showed that treatment with a Wnt pathway activator (LiCl) reduced elastase‐induced airspace enlargement and cigarette smoke extract (CSE)‐induced lung inflammatory responses in WT mice, which was associated with increased activation of Nrf2 pathway.,Interestingly, these effects of LiCl were not observed in Nrf2−/− mice exposed to elastase.,In normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells, Wnt3a overexpression up‐regulated, whereas Wnt3a knockdown further down‐regulated the levels of Nrf2 and its target proteins heme oxygenase‐1 (HO‐1) and NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) by CSE treatment.,In contrast, Nrf2 deficiency did not have any effects on Wnt/β‐catenin pathway in mouse lungs and NHBE cells.,Both elastase and CSE exposures reduced AMPK phosphorylation.,A specific AMPK activator metformin increased Wnt3a, β‐catenin, Nrf2 phosphorylation and activation but reduced the levels of IL‐6 and IL‐8 in NHBE cells and mouse lungs exposed to CSE.,Furthermore, Nrf2 deficiency abolished the protection of metformin against CSE‐induced increase in IL‐6 and IL‐8 in NHBE cells.,In conclusion, Nrf2 mediates the protective effects of both Wnt3a/β‐catenin and AMPK on lung inflammatory responses during the development of COPD/emphysema.,These findings provide potential therapeutic targets for the intervention of COPD/emphysema.
Inflammation and oxidative stress play critical roles in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Mitochondrial oxidative stress might be involved in driving the oxidative stress-induced pathology.,We sought to determine the effects of oxidative stress on mitochondrial function in the pathophysiology of airway inflammation in ozone-exposed mice and human airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells.,Mice were exposed to ozone, and lung inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and mitochondrial function were determined.,Human ASM cells were isolated from bronchial biopsy specimens from healthy subjects, smokers, and patients with COPD.,Inflammation and mitochondrial function in mice and human ASM cells were measured with and without the presence of the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ.,Mice exposed to ozone, a source of oxidative stress, had lung inflammation and AHR associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and reflected by decreased mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), increased mitochondrial oxidative stress, and reduced mitochondrial complex I, III, and V expression.,Reversal of mitochondrial dysfunction by the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ reduced inflammation and AHR.,ASM cells from patients with COPD have reduced ΔΨm, adenosine triphosphate content, complex expression, basal and maximum respiration levels, and respiratory reserve capacity compared with those from healthy control subjects, whereas mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels were increased.,Healthy smokers were intermediate between healthy nonsmokers and patients with COPD.,Hydrogen peroxide induced mitochondrial dysfunction in ASM cells from healthy subjects.,MitoQ and Tiron inhibited TGF-β-induced ASM cell proliferation and CXCL8 release.,Mitochondrial dysfunction in patients with COPD is associated with excessive mitochondrial ROS levels, which contribute to enhanced inflammation and cell hyperproliferation.,Targeting mitochondrial ROS represents a promising therapeutic approach in patients with COPD.
1
Since the discovery of alpha-1 antitrypsin in the early 1960s, several new genes have been suggested to play a role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) pathogenesis.,Yet, in spite of those advances, much about the genetic basis of COPD still remains to be discovered.,Unbiased approaches, such as genome-wide association (GWA) studies, are critical to identify genes and pathways and to verify suggested genetic variants.,Indeed, most of our current understanding about COPD candidate genes originates from GWA studies.,Experiments in form of cross-study replications and advanced meta-analyses have propelled the field towards unravelling details about COPD's pathogenesis.,Here, we review the discovery of genetic variants in association with COPD phenotypes by discussing the available approaches and current findings.,Limitations of current studies are considered and future directions provided.
Human respiratory epithelia function in airway mucociliary clearance and barrier function and have recently been implicated in sensory functions.,We investigated a link between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms underlying Ca2+ influx into human airway epithelia elicited by diesel exhaust particles (DEP).,Using primary cultures of human respiratory epithelial (HRE) cells, we determined that these cells possess proteolytic signaling machinery, whereby proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) activates Ca2+-permeable TRPV4, which leads to activation of human respiratory disease-enhancing matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), a signaling cascade initiated by diesel exhaust particles (DEP), a globally relevant air pollutant.,Moreover, we observed ciliary expression of PAR-2, TRPV4, and phospholipase-Cβ3 in human airway epithelia and their DEP-enhanced protein-protein complex formation.,We also found that the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-predisposing TRPV4P19S variant enhances Ca2+ influx and MMP 1 activation, providing mechanistic linkage between man-made air pollution and human airway disease.,DEP evoked protracted Ca2+ influx via TRPV4, enhanced by the COPD-predisposing human genetic polymorphism TRPV4P19S.,This mechanism reprograms maladaptive inflammatory and extracellular-matrix-remodeling responses in human airways.,The novel concept of air pollution-responsive ciliary signal transduction from PAR-2 to TRPV4 in human respiratory epithelia will accelerate rationally targeted therapies, possibly via the inhalatory route.
1
One in three patients hospitalised due to acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is readmitted within 90 days.,No tool has been developed specifically in this population to predict readmission or death.,Clinicians are unable to identify patients at particular risk, yet resources to prevent readmission are allocated based on clinical judgement.,In participating hospitals, consecutive admissions of patients with AECOPD were identified by screening wards and reviewing coding records.,A tool to predict 90-day readmission or death without readmission was developed in two hospitals (the derivation cohort) and validated in: (a) the same hospitals at a later timeframe (internal validation cohort) and (b) four further UK hospitals (external validation cohort).,Performance was compared with ADO, BODEX, CODEX, DOSE and LACE scores.,Of 2417 patients, 936 were readmitted or died within 90 days of discharge.,The five independent variables in the final model were: Previous admissions, eMRCD score, Age, Right-sided heart failure and Left-sided heart failure (PEARL).,The PEARL score was consistently discriminative and accurate with a c-statistic of 0.73, 0.68 and 0.70 in the derivation, internal validation and external validation cohorts.,Higher PEARL scores were associated with a shorter time to readmission.,The PEARL score is a simple tool that can effectively stratify patients' risk of 90-day readmission or death, which could help guide readmission avoidance strategies within the clinical and research setting.,It is superior to other scores that have been used in this population.,UKCRN ID 14214.
To estimate patient- and episode-level direct costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among commercially insured patients in the US.,In this retrospective claims-based analysis, commercial enrollees with evidence of COPD were grouped into five mutually exclusive cohorts based on the most intensive level of COPD-related care they received in 2006, ie, outpatient, urgent outpatient (outpatient care in addition to a claim for an oral corticosteroid or antibiotic within seven days), emergency department (ED), standard inpatient admission, and intensive care unit (ICU) cohorts.,Patient- level COPD-related annual health care costs, including patient- and payer-paid costs, were compared among the cohorts.,Adjusted episode-level costs were calculated.,Of the 37,089 COPD patients included in the study, 53% were in the outpatient cohort, 37% were in the urgent outpatient cohort, 3% were in the ED cohort, and the standard admission and ICU cohorts together comprised 6%.,Mean (standard deviation, SD) annual COPD-related health care costs (2008 US$) increased across the cohorts (P < 0.001), ranging from $2003 ($3238) to $43,461 ($76,159) per patient.,Medical costs comprised 96% of health care costs for the ICU cohort.,Adjusted mean (SD) episode-level costs were $305 ($310) for an outpatient visit, $274 ($336) for an urgent outpatient visit, $327 ($65) for an ED visit, $9745 ($2968) for a standard admission, and $33,440 for an ICU stay.,Direct costs of COPD-related care for commercially insured patients are driven by hospital stays with or without ICU care.,Exacerbation prevention resulting in reduced need for inpatient care could lower costs.
1
Never smokers comprise a substantial proportion of patients with COPD.,Their characteristics and possible risk factors in this population are not yet well defined.,We analyzed data from 14 countries that participated in the international, population-based Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study.,Participants were aged ≥ 40 years and completed postbronchodilator spirometry testing plus questionnaires about respiratory symptoms, health status, and exposure to COPD risk factors.,A diagnosis of COPD was based on the postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio, according to current GOLD (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease) guidelines.,In addition to this, the lower limit of normal (LLN) was evaluated as an alternative threshold for the FEV1/FVC ratio.,Among 4,291 never smokers, 6.6% met criteria for mild (GOLD stage I) COPD, and 5.6% met criteria for moderate to very severe (GOLD stage II+) COPD.,Although never smokers were less likely to have COPD and had less severe COPD than ever smokers, never smokers nonetheless comprised 23.3% (240/1,031) of those classified with GOLD stage II+ COPD.,This proportion was similar, 20.5% (171/832), even when the LLN was used as a threshold for the FEV1/FVC ratio.,Predictors of COPD in never smokers include age, education, occupational exposure, childhood respiratory diseases, and BMI alterations.,This multicenter international study confirms previous evidence that never smokers comprise a substantial proportion of individuals with COPD.,Our data suggest that, in addition to increased age, a prior diagnosis of asthma and, among women, lower education levels are associated with an increased risk for COPD among never smokers.
The Wnt pathway mediates differentiation of epithelial tissues; depending on the tissue types, Wnt can either drive or inhibit the differentiation process.,We hypothesized that key genes in the Wnt pathway are suppressed in the human airway epithelium under the stress of cigarette smoking, a stress associated with dysregulation of the epithelial differentiated state.,Microarrays were used to assess the expression of Wnt-related genes in the small airway epithelium (SAE) obtained via bronchoscopy and brushing of healthy nonsmokers, healthy smokers, and smokers with COPD.,Thirty-three of 56 known Wnt-related genes were expressed in the SAE.,Wnt pathway downstream mediators β-catenin and the transcription factor 7-like 1 were down-regulated in healthy smokers and smokers with COPD, as were many Wnt target genes.,Among the extracellular regulators that suppress the Wnt pathway, secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (SFRP2), was up-regulated 4.3-fold in healthy smokers and 4.9-fold in COPD smokers, an observation confirmed by TaqMan Real-time PCR, Western analysis and immunohistochemistry.,Finally, cigarette smoke extract mediated up-regulation of SFRP2 and down-regulation of Wnt target genes in airway epithelial cells in vitro.,Smoking down-regulates the Wnt pathway in the human airway epithelium.,In the context that Wnt pathway plays an important role in differentiation of epithelial tissues, the down-regulation of Wnt pathway may contribute to the dysregulation of airway epithelium differentiation observed in smoking-related airway disorders.
1
Poor sleep quality is common in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,It is associated with poor quality of life.,Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves quality of life, exercise capacity, and anxiety and depression.,Its effect on sleep quality is uncertain.,To determine whether PR improves sleep quality in COPD.,A prospective controlled ‘before and after’ study of sleep quality in COPD patients attending a community PR programme was conducted.,Sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).,Lung function, disease-specific quality of life (COPD assessment test-CAT), exercise capacity (incremental shuttle walk test-ISWT), and anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-HADS) were measured.,Change in sleep quality was compared with a COPD control group.,Twenty-eight participants completed PR.,The control group comprised 24 patients.,Prevalence of poor sleep quality (PSQI ⩾5) was 78%.,There were no differences between observation and control groups in sleep quality, age or severity.,Quality of life was strongly correlated with quality of sleep (r=0.64, P<0.001).,PR improved the quality of life (CAT change 3.0; 95% CI, 0.7-5.3), exercise capacity (ISWT change (metres) 81.0; 15.3-146.6), anxiety (HADS score ⩾8: change 2.33; 0.45-4.22), and depression (HADS score ⩾8: change 2.90; 1.92-3.88).,PR did not improve sleep quality (PSQI mean change 0.79; −0.35 to 1.93).,PR did not improve sleep quality in COPD despite improving quality of life, exercise capacity, anxiety and depression.,New strategies, independent of PR, are required to improve sleep quality in COPD.
“Physical inactivity” and “sedentary lifestyles” are phrases often used when describing lifestyles of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Evidence suggests activity types, independent of energy expenditure, influence health outcomes, so understanding patterns of time use is important, particularly in chronic disease.,We aimed to identify reports of time use in people with COPD.,Predefined search strategies were used with six electronic databases to identify individual activity reports (including frequencies and/or durations) in which community-dwelling people with COPD engaged.,Eligible studies were assessed independently against predefined criteria and data were extracted by two reviewers.,Data synthesis was achieved by aggregating activity reports into activity domains (sports/exercise, screen time, transport, quiet time, self-care, sociocultural, work/study, chores, and sleep).,Twenty-six publications reported 37 specific daily activities.,People with COPD were found to spend extended periods in sedentary behaviors (eg, standing [194 min/day]; sitting [359 min/day]; lying [88 min/day]), have limited engagement in physical activity (eg, walking [51 min/day]; exercising [1.2 episodes per week {ep/w}, 13 min/day]), have high health care needs (medical appointments [1.0 ep/w]), and experience difficulties associated with activities of daily living (eg, showering [2.5 ep/w, 60 minutes per episode]; preparing meals [4.7 ep/w]).,Little data could be found describing how people with COPD use their time, and data synthesis was problematic because of variations in methodologies, population differences, and research emphases.,Identified data largely referred to posture and were skewed according to country, assessment methods, and disease severity.,Comparisons with age-matched population data showed people with COPD spent less time engaged in personal-care activities (self-care and sleeping) and chores than people in similar age groups.,The incorporation of time-use outcomes in future research designs should be encouraged.,Ideally, these tools should use consistent frameworks and comparable outcome measures in order to provide clearer descriptions of time use in chronic disease.
1
Little is known about the composition and clinical implications of lung microbiome in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and community-acquired pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit admission.,Therefore, this study aimed to explore the longitudinal changes in microbial airway composition and its variations between COPD patients with different weaning outcomes.,Fifty-one endotracheal aspirate samples from 21 participants and 5 saline samples were collected as the patient and control group, respectively.,Sequence analysis revealed significant increases and upward trends in the relative abundance of the Acinetobacter genus and Acinetobacter baumannii complex species in paired comparisons of sampling points and over time, respectively, in patients with failed weaning (p for trend = 0.012 and 0.012, respectively) but not in those with successful weaning (p for trend = 0.335 and 0.426, respectively).,Furthermore, significant changes in the composition of the bacterial community were observed in paired comparisons of sampling points in patients with failed weaning compared with those with successful weaning.,The alpha diversity did not differ between the patients with different weaning outcomes.,These results further the understanding of longitudinal airway microbiome structure analysis and its clinical implications when managing critically ill patients with and without COPD.
Respiratory infection is a major cause of exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Infectious contributions to exacerbations remain incompletely described.,We therefore analyzed respiratory tract samples by comprehensive real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in combination with conventional methods.,We evaluated multiple risk factors for prolonged hospitalization to manage COPD exacerbations, including infectious agents.,Over 19 months, we prospectively studied 46 patients with 50 COPD exacerbations, collecting nasopharyngeal swab and sputum samples from each.,We carried out real-time PCR designed to detect six bacterial species and eleven viruses, together with conventional procedures, including sputum culture.,Infectious etiologies of COPD exacerbations were identified in 44 of 50 exacerbations (88%).,Infections were viral in 17 of 50 exacerbations (34%).,COPD exacerbations caused by Gram-negative bacilli, including enteric and nonfermenting organisms, were significantly associated with prolonged hospitalization for COPD exacerbations.,Our results support the use of a combination of real-time PCR and conventional methods for determining both infectious etiologies and risk of extended hospitalization.
1
A combination of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2 agonist (ICS/LABA) is used frequently to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.,The aim of the study was to determine whether prescribing ICS/LABA to COPD patients in primary care in 2009/10 was within the GOLD guidelines and whether and to what degree patient characteristics were associated with prescription of these drugs by GPs.,This was a cross-sectional study in seven Norwegian GP practices.,Patients registered with a diagnosis of asthma or COPD in the previous five years were included.,Among the 376 patients included in the analysis, 149 patients had COPD, defined as a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7 and 55.6% of these patients were treated with ICS/LABA.,The rate of prescribing was significantly higher in the COPD patients also diagnosed with asthma than in those with COPD as the only diagnosis, 66.7%, and 39.0%, respectively (P = 0.001).,The prescribing rate in the latter subgroup would have been 18.6% if the 2007 GOLD guidelines had been followed.,One or more exacerbations in the previous year was the strongest predictor of ICS/LABA prescribing in the COPD patients who were not registered with a concomitant diagnosis of asthma (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.0-10.0) but this association was limited to the patients with severe disease (FEV1% predicted <50) (OR 13.5, 95% CI 1.8-101.1).,Cardiovascular disease was associated with decreased ICS/LABA prescribing (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8) in the COPD group.,A Kappa coefficient of 0.32 was found between the actual prescribing rate and that recommended in the 2007 GOLD guidelines.,Overprescribing of ICS/LABA for the COPD patients was shown.,Previous exacerbation was a strong predictor of ICS/LABA prescribing only in patients with severe COPD.,Because of the low emphasis on previous exacerbation when prescribing for COPD patients with mild to moderate disease, the actual prescribing rate agreed more closely with the GOLD guidelines from 2007 than with those published in 2011.,Cardiovascular disease was associated with decreased prescribing, indicating that GPs adjust the treatment in cases with multimorbidity.
To quantify the relationship between severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as expressed by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage and the annual exacerbation frequency in patients with COPD.,We performed a systematic literature review to identify randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reporting the exacerbation frequency in COPD patients receiving usual care or placebo.,Annual frequencies were determined for total exacerbations defined by an increased use of health care (event-based), total exacerbations defined by an increase of symptoms, and severe exacerbations defined by a hospitalization.,The association between the mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)% predicted of study populations and the exacerbation frequencies was estimated using weighted log linear regression with random effects.,The regression equations were applied to the mean FEV1% predicted for each GOLD stage to estimate the frequency per stage.,Thirty-seven relevant studies were found, with 43 reports of total exacerbation frequency (event-based, n = 19; symptom-based, n = 24) and 14 reports of frequency of severe exacerbations.,Annual event-based exacerbation frequencies per GOLD stage were estimated at 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.49) for mild, 1.17 (0.93-1.50) for moderate, 1.61 (1.51-1.74) for severe, and 2.10 (1.51-2.94) for very severe COPD.,Annual symptom-based frequencies were 1.15 (95% confidence interval 0.67-2.07), 1.44 (1.14-1.87), 1.76 (1.70-1.88), and 2.09 (1.57-2.82), respectively.,For severe exacerbations, annual frequencies were 0.11 (95% confidence interval 0.02-0.56), 0.16 (0.07-0.33), 0.22 (0.20-0.23), and 0.28 (0.14-0.63), respectively.,Study duration or type of study (cohort versus trial) did not significantly affect the outcomes.,This study provides an estimate of the exacerbation frequency per GOLD stage, which can be used for health economic and modeling purposes.
1
Rationale: The IMPACT (Informing the Pathway of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment) trial demonstrated a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (ACM) risk with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus UMEC/VI in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at risk of future exacerbations.,Five hundred seventy-four patients were censored in the original analysis owing to incomplete vital status information.,Objectives: Report ACM and impact of stepping down therapy, following collection of additional vital status data.,Methods: Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 μg, FF/VI 100/25 μg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg following a run-in on their COPD therapies.,Time to ACM was prespecified.,Additional vital status data collection and subsequent analyses were performed post hoc.,Measurements and Main Results: We report vital status data for 99.6% of the intention-to-treat population (n = 10,355), documenting 98 (2.36%) deaths on FF/UMEC/VI, 109 (2.64%) on FF/VI, and 66 (3.19%) on UMEC/VI.,For FF/UMEC/VI, the hazard ratio for death was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.99; P = 0.042) versus UMEC/VI and 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.16; P = 0.387) versus FF/VI.,Independent adjudication confirmed lower rates of cardiovascular and respiratory death and death associated with the patient’s COPD.,Conclusions: In this secondary analysis of an efficacy outcome from the IMPACT trial, once-daily single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI triple therapy reduced the risk of ACM versus UMEC/VI in patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations.
While single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) devices were not available when the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease strategy and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines were developed, two devices are now available in the UK.,This paper offers practical, patient-focused advice to optimize placement of SITT in the management of COPD.,A survey of UK health care professionals (HCPs) identified issues around, and attitudes toward, SITT, which informed a multidisciplinary expert panel’s discussions.,The survey confirmed the need to clarify the place of SITT in COPD management.,The panel suggested three criteria, any one of which identifies a high-risk patient where escalation to triple therapy from monotherapy or double combination treatment is appropriate: 1) at least two exacerbations treated with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics, or both in the previous year; 2) at least one severe exacerbation that required hospital admission in the previous year; 3) one exacerbation a year on a repeated basis for 2 consecutive years.,Appropriate non-pharmacological management is essential for all patients and should be considered before stepping up treatment.,Regular review is essential.,During each review, HCPs should consider stepping treatment up or down.,If patients exacerbate despite adhering to triple therapy, an individualized approach should be considered if the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) confers benefit or causes side effects.,In this situation, the blood eosinophil count could aid decision making.,ICSs should be continued when the history suggests that asthma overlaps with COPD.,Training, counseling, and education should be individualized.,HCPs should consider referral: 1) when there is limited response to treatment and persistent exacerbations; 2) where there is diagnostic uncertainty or suspected comorbidity; 3) whenever they feel “out of their depth.”,Overall, the panel concurred that when used correctly, SITT has the potential to improve adherence, symptom control, and quality of life, and reduce exacerbations.,Studies using real-world evidence need to confirm these benefits.
1
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that long-acting bronchodilator combinations, such as β2-agonist (LABA)/muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), have favorable efficacy compared with commonly used COPD treatments.,The objective of this analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of LABA/LAMA with LAMA or LABA/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in adults with stable moderate-to-very-severe COPD.,This systematic review and meta-analysis (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinical trial/manufacturer databases) included RCTs comparing ≥12 weeks’ LABA/LAMA treatment with LAMA and/or LABA/ICS (approved doses only).,Eligible studies were independently selected by two authors using predefined data fields; the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.,Eighteen studies (23 trials) were eligible (N=20,185).,LABA/LAMA significantly improved trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to week 12 versus both LAMA and LABA/ICS (0.07 L and 0.08 L, P<0.0001), with patients more likely to achieve clinically important improvements in FEV1 of >100 mL (risk ratio [RR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.20, 1.46] and RR: 1.44, 95% CI: [1.33, 1.56], respectively, the number needed to treat being eight and six, respectively).,LABA/LAMA improved transitional dyspnea index and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire scores at week 12 versus LAMA (both P<0.0001), but not versus LABA/ICS, and reduced rescue medication use versus both (P<0.0001 and P=0.001, respectively).,LABA/LAMA significantly reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rate compared with LABA/ICS (RR 0.82, 95% CI: [0.75, 0.91]).,Adverse event (AE) incidence was no different for LABA/LAMA versus LAMA treatment, but it was lower versus LABA/ICS (RR 0.94, 95% CI: [0.89, 0.99]), including a lower pneumonia risk (RR 0.59, 95% CI: [0.43, 0.81]).,LABA/LAMA presented a lower risk for withdrawals due to lack of efficacy versus LAMA (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.51, 0.87]) and due to AEs versus LABA/ICS (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: [0.69, 0.99]).,The greater efficacy and comparable safety profiles observed with LABA/LAMA combinations versus LAMA or LABA/ICS support their potential role as first-line treatment options in COPD.,These findings are of direct relevance to clinical practice because we included all currently available LABA/LAMAs and comparators, only at doses approved for clinical use.
Tiotropium-olodaterol, formulated in the Respimat soft-mist inhaler, is an inhaled fixed-dose combination (FDC) of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), commercialized under the name of Spiolto or Stiolto.,The efficacy of tiotropium-olodaterol 5-5 μg once daily in adult patients with COPD was documented in eleven large, multicenter trials of up to 52 weeks duration.,Tiotropium-olodaterol 5-5 μg not only improved spirometric values to a significantly greater extent than placebo but also resulted in statistically significant beneficial effects on dyspnea, markers of hyperinflation, use of rescue medication, health-related quality of life, and exercise endurance.,Improvements exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), dyspnea, and quality of life.,Differences between tiotropium-olodaterol 5-5 μg and the respective monocomponents were statistically significant for FEV1, dyspnea, markers of hyperinflation, use of rescue medication, and health-related quality of life, but did not reach the MCID.,However, dual bronchodilatation significantly increased the number of patients who exceeded the MCID for dyspnea and quality of life.,Moreover, tiotropium-olodaterol 5-5 μg was significantly more effective than salmeterol-fluticasone (FDC) twice daily at improving pulmonary function.,Differences between tiotropium-olodaterol and other LAMA/LABA FDCs were not observed for FEV1 or other efficacy markers.,Therefore, tiotropium-olodaterol is a valuable option in the treatment of COPD patients who remain symptomatic under monotherapy.
1
Previous attempts to characterise the burden of chronic respiratory diseases have focused only on specific disease conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma.,In this study, we aimed to characterise the burden of chronic respiratory diseases globally, providing a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis on geographical and time trends from 1990 to 2017.,Using data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017, we estimated the prevalence, morbidity, and mortality attributable to chronic respiratory diseases through an analysis of deaths, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and years of life lost (YLL) by GBD super-region, from 1990 to 2017, stratified by age and sex.,Specific diseases analysed included asthma, COPD, interstitial lung disease and pulmonary sarcoidosis, pneumoconiosis, and other chronic respiratory diseases.,We also assessed the contribution of risk factors (smoking, second-hand smoke, ambient particulate matter and ozone pollution, household air pollution from solid fuels, and occupational risks) to chronic respiratory disease-attributable DALYs.,In 2017, 544·9 million people (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 506·9-584·8) worldwide had a chronic respiratory disease, representing an increase of 39·8% compared with 1990.,Chronic respiratory disease prevalence showed wide variability across GBD super-regions, with the highest prevalence among both males and females in high-income regions, and the lowest prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia.,The age-sex-specific prevalence of each chronic respiratory disease in 2017 was also highly variable geographically.,Chronic respiratory diseases were the third leading cause of death in 2017 (7·0% [95% UI 6·8-7·2] of all deaths), behind cardiovascular diseases and neoplasms.,Deaths due to chronic respiratory diseases numbered 3 914 196 (95% UI 3 790 578-4 044 819) in 2017, an increase of 18·0% since 1990, while total DALYs increased by 13·3%.,However, when accounting for ageing and population growth, declines were observed in age-standardised prevalence (14·3% decrease), age-standardised death rates (42·6%), and age-standardised DALY rates (38·2%).,In males and females, most chronic respiratory disease-attributable deaths and DALYs were due to COPD.,In regional analyses, mortality rates from chronic respiratory diseases were greatest in south Asia and lowest in sub-Saharan Africa, also across both sexes.,Notably, although absolute prevalence was lower in south Asia than in most other super-regions, YLLs due to chronic respiratory diseases across the subcontinent were the highest in the world.,Death rates due to interstitial lung disease and pulmonary sarcoidosis were greater than those due to pneumoconiosis in all super-regions.,Smoking was the leading risk factor for chronic respiratory disease-related disability across all regions for men.,Among women, household air pollution from solid fuels was the predominant risk factor for chronic respiratory diseases in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, while ambient particulate matter represented the leading risk factor in southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania, and in the Middle East and north Africa super-region.,Our study shows that chronic respiratory diseases remain a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, with growth in absolute numbers but sharp declines in several age-standardised estimators since 1990.,Premature mortality from chronic respiratory diseases seems to be highest in regions with less-resourced health systems on a per-capita basis.,Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Although it is well accepted that air pollution exposure exacerbates preexisting airway disease, it has not been firmly established that long-term pollution exposure increases the risk of new-onset asthma or chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD).,This Workshop brought together experts on mechanistic, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of airway disease to review current knowledge regarding whether air pollution is a causal factor in the development of asthma and/or COPD.,Speakers presented recent evidence in their respective areas of expertise related to air pollution and new airway disease incidence, followed by interactive discussions.,A writing committee summarized their collective findings.,The Epidemiology Group found that long-term exposure to air pollution, especially metrics of traffic-related air pollution such as nitrogen dioxide and black carbon, is associated with onset of childhood asthma.,However, the evidence for a causal role in adult-onset asthma or COPD remains insufficient.,The Mechanistic Group concluded that air pollution exposure can cause airway remodeling, which can lead to asthma or COPD, as well as asthma-like phenotypes that worsen with long-term exposure to air pollution, especially fine particulate matter and ozone.,The Clinical Group concluded that air pollution is a plausible contributor to the onset of both asthma and COPD.,Available evidence indicates that long-term exposure to air pollution is a cause of childhood asthma, but the evidence for a similar determination for adult asthma or COPD remains insufficient.,Further research is needed to elucidate the exact biological mechanism underlying incident childhood asthma, and the specific air pollutant that causes it.
1
Inhaled bronchodilator medications are central to the management of COPD and are frequently given on a regular basis to prevent or reduce symptoms.,While short-acting bronchodilators are a treatment option for people with relatively few COPD symptoms and at low risk of exacerbations, for the majority of patients with significant breathlessness at the time of diagnosis, long-acting bronchodilators may be required.,Dual bronchodilation with a long-acting β2-agonist and long-acting muscarinic antagonist may be more effective treatment for some of these patients, with the aim of improving symptoms.,This combination may also reduce the rate of exacerbations compared with a bronchodilator-inhaled corticosteroid combination in those with a history of exacerbations.,However, there is currently a lack of guidance on clinical indicators suggesting which patients should step up from mono- to dual bronchodilation.,In this article, we discuss a number of clinical indicators that could prompt a patient and physician to consider treatment escalation, while being mindful of the need to avoid unnecessary polypharmacy.,These indicators include insufficient symptomatic response, a sustained increased requirement for rescue medication, suboptimal 24-hour symptom control, deteriorating symptoms, the occurrence of exacerbations, COPD-related hospitalization, and reductions in lung function.,Future research is required to provide a better understanding of the optimal timing and benefits of treatment escalation and to identify the appropriate tools to inform this decision.
The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines.,Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them.,This was an evaluation of COPD treatment guidelines published in Europe and Russia in the past 7 years.,Each guideline was reviewed in detail and information about the most important aspects of patient diagnosis, risk stratification and pharmacotherapy was extracted following a standardised process.,Guidelines were available from the Czech Republic, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden.,The treatment goals, criteria for COPD diagnosis, consideration of comorbidities in treatment selection and support for use of long-acting bronchodilators, were similar across treatment guidelines.,There were differences in measures used for stratification of disease severity, consideration of patient phenotypes, criteria for the use of inhaled corticosteroids and recommendations for other medications (e.g. theophylline and mucolytics) in addition to bronchodilators.,There is generally good agreement on treatment goals, criteria for diagnosis of COPD and use of long-acting bronchodilators as the cornerstone of treatment among guidelines for COPD management in Europe and Russia.,However, there are differences in the definitions of patient subgroups and other recommended treatments.,There are important differences between European national COPD guidelineshttp://ow.ly/U2P4y
1
Conventional cigarette smoking is known to result in significant COPD morbidity and mortality.,Strategies to reduce and/or stop smoking in this highly vulnerable patient group are key public health priorities to reduce COPD morbidity and mortality.,Unfortunately, smoking cessation efforts in patients with COPD are poor and there is a compelling need for more efficient approaches to cessation for patients with COPD.,Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are devices that use batteries to vaporize nicotine.,They may facilitate quit attempts and cessation in many smokers.,Although they are not risk free, ECs are much less harmful than tobacco smoking.,Hence, the use of ECs in vulnerable groups and in patients with challenges to abstain or multiple relapses to this habit may be promising.,To date, little is known about health consequences of EC use among COPD smokers and whether their regular use has any effects on subjective and objective COPD outcomes.,In the current review, we discuss the current perspectives and literature on the role of ECs in abstaining from conventional smoking and the effects of ECs on the respiratory tract in patients with COPD.
Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are battery-operated devices designed to vaporise nicotine, which may help smokers quitting or reducing their tobacco consumption.,There is a lack of data on the health effects of EC use among smokers with COPD and whether regular use results in improvement in subjective and objective COPD outcomes.,We investigated long-term changes in objective and subjective respiratory outcomes in smokers with a diagnosis of COPD who quit or reduced substantially their tobacco consumption by supplementing with or converting only to ECs use.,We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with COPD to identify those reporting regular daily use of ECs on at least two follow-up visits at 12- (F/up1) and 24-months (F/up2).,Regularly smoking COPD patients were included as a reference group.,A marked reduction in cigarette consumption was observed in ECs users.,A significant reduction in COPD exacerbations was reported in the COPD EC user group, their mean (±SD) decreasing from 2.3 (±1) at baseline to 1.8 (±1; p = 0.002) and 1.4 (±0.9; p < 0.001) at F/up1 and F/up2 respectively.,A significant reduction in COPD exacerbations was also observed in ECs users who also smoked conventional cigarettes (i.e. ‘dual users’).,COPD symptoms and ability to perform physical activities improved statistically in the EC group at both visits, with no change in the control group.,These findings suggest that ECs use may aid smokers with COPD reduce their cigarette consumption or remain abstinent, which results in marked improvements in annual exacerbation rate as well as subjective and objective COPD outcomes.
1
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an effective, key standard treatment for people with COPD.,Nevertheless, low participant uptake, insufficient attendance and high drop-out rates are reported.,Investigation is warranted of the benefits achieved through alternative approaches, such as pulmonary tele-rehabilitation (PTR).,To investigate whether PTR is superior to conventional PR on 6 min walk distance (6MWD) and secondarily on respiratory symptoms, quality of life, physical activity and lower limb muscle function in patients with COPD and FEV1 <50% eligible for routine hospital-based, outpatient PR.,In this single-blinded, multicentre, superiority randomised controlled trial, patients were assigned 1:1 to 10 weeks of groups-based PTR (60 min, three times weekly) or conventional PR (90 min, two times weekly).,Assessments were performed by blinded assessors at baseline, end of intervention and at 22 weeks’ follow-up from baseline.,The primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle.,The primary outcome was change in 6MWD from baseline to 10 weeks; 134 participants (74 females, mean±SD age 68±9 years, FEV1 33%±9% predicted, 6MWD 327±103 metres) were included and randomised.,The analysis showed no between-group differences for changes in 6MWD after intervention (9.2 metres (95% CI: −6.6 to 24.9)) or at 22 weeks’ follow-up (−5.3 metres (95% CI: −28.9 to 18.3)).,More participants completed the PTR intervention (n=57) than conventional PR (n=43) (χ2 test p<0.01).,PTR was not superior to conventional PR on the 6MWD and we found no differences between groups.,As more participants completed PTR, supervised PTR would be relevant to compare with conventional PR in a non-inferiority design.,Trial registration number,ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02667171), 28 January 2016.
Telemedicine may increase accessibility to pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), thus enhancing long-term exercise maintenance.,We aimed to explore COPD patients’ adherence and experiences in long-term telerehabilitation to understand factors affecting satisfaction and potential for service improvements.,A two-year pilot study with 10 patients with COPD was conducted.,The intervention included treadmill exercise training at home and a webpage for telemonitoring and self-management combined with weekly videoconferencing sessions with a physiotherapist.,We conducted four separate series of data collection.,Adherence was measured in terms of frequency of registrations on the webpage.,Factors affecting satisfaction and adherence, together with potential for service improvements, were explored through two semi-structured focus groups and an individual open-ended questionnaire.,Qualitative data were analysed by systematic text condensation.,User friendliness was measured by the means of a usability questionnaire.,On average, participants registered 3.0 symptom reports/week in a web-based diary and 1.7 training sessions/week.,Adherence rate decreased during the second year.,Four major themes regarding factors affecting satisfaction, adherence and potential improvements of the intervention emerged: (i) experienced health benefits; (ii) increased self-efficacy and independence; and (iii) emotional safety due to regular meetings and access to special competence; (iv) maintenance of motivation.,Participants were generally highly satisfied with the technical components of the telerehabilitation intervention.,Long-term adherence to telerehabilitation in COPD was maintained for a two-year period.,Satisfaction was supported by experienced health benefits, self-efficacy, and emotional safety.,Maintenance of motivation was a challenge and might have affected long-term adherence.,Four key factors of potential improvements in long-term telerehabilitation were identified: (i) adherence to different components of the telerehabilitation intervention is dependent on the level of focus provided by the health personnel involved; (ii) the potential for regularity that lies within the technology should be exploited to avoid relapses after vacation; (iii) motivation might be increased by tailoring individual consultations to support experiences of good health and meet individual goals and motivational strategies; (iv) interactive functionalities or gaming tools might provide peer-support, peer-modelling and enhance motivation.
1
Our starting point is that relatively new findings into the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of airway disease in smokers that lead to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) need to be reassessed as a whole and integrated into “mainstream” thinking along with traditional concepts which have stood the test of time.,Such a refining of the accepted disease paradigm is urgently needed as thinking on therapeutic targets is currently under active reconsideration.,We feel that generalised airway wall “inflammation” is unduly over-emphasised, and highlight the patchy and variable nature of the pathology (with the core being airway remodelling).,In addition, we present evidence for airway wall disease in smokers/COPD as including a hypocellular, hypovascular, destructive, fibrotic pathology, with a likely spectrum of epithelial-mesenchymal transition states as significant drivers of this remodelling.,Furthermore, we present data from a number of research modalities and integrate this with the aetiology of lung cancer, the role of chronic airway luminal colonisation/infection by a specific group of “respiratory” bacteria in smokers (which results in luminal inflammation) and the central role for oxidative stress on the epithelium.,We suggest translation of these insights into more focus on asymptomatic smokers and early COPD, with the potential for fresh preventive and therapeutic approaches.,We discuss the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of COPD, emphasising their need to be reassessed as a whole and integrated with traditional concepts to refine the disease paradigm.,This is urgently needed to open-up thinking about therapeutic targets.https://bit.ly/3pTyrsi
We have explored whether assessing the degree of concavity in the descending limb of the maximum expiratory flow-volume curve enhanced spirometric detection of early small airway disease.,We used spirometry records from 890 individuals aged ≥40 years (mean 59 years), recruited for the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Australia study.,Central and peripheral concavity indices were developed from forced expired flows at 50% and 75% of the forced vital capacity, respectively, using an ideal line joining peak flow to zero flow.,From the 268 subjects classified as normal never smokers, mean values for post-bronchodilator central concavity were 18.6% in males and 9.1% in females and those for peripheral concavity were 50.5% in males and 52.4% in females.,There were moderately strong correlations between concavity and forced expired ratio (forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity) and mid-flow rate (forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the FVC [FEF25%-75%]; r=−0.70 to −0.79).,The additional number of individuals detected as abnormal using the concavity indices was substantial, especially compared with FEF25%-75%, where it was approximately doubled.,Concavity was more specific for symptoms.,The inclusion of these concavity measures in the routine reports of spirometry would add information on small airway obstruction at no extra cost, time, or effort.
1
Recent evidence indicates that AZD8999 (LAS190792), a novel muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist and β2-adrenoceptor agonist (MABA) in development for chronic respiratory diseases, induces potent and sustained relaxant effects in human bronchi by adressing both muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and β2-adrenoceptor.,However, the anti-inflammatory effects of the AZD8999 monotherapy or in combination with corticosteroids are unknown.,This study investigates the anti-inflammatory effects of AZD8999 in monotherapy and combined with fluticasone propionate in neutrophils from healthy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.,Peripheral blood neutrophils from healthy and COPD patients were incubated with AZD8999 and fluticasone propionate, individually or in combination, for 1h followed by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation for 6h.,The IL-8, MMP9, IL-1β, and GM-CSF release was measured in cell culture supernatants.,AZD8999 shows ~ 50% maximum inhibitory effect and similar potency inhibiting the released cytokines in neutrophils from healthy and COPD patients.,However, while fluticasone propionate suppresses mediator release in neutrophils from healthy patients, COPD neutrophils are less sensitive.,The combination of non-effective concentrations of AZD8999 (0.01nM) with non-effective concentrations of fluticasone propionate (0.1nM) shows synergistic anti-inflammatory effects.,The studied mechanisms that may be involved in the synergistic anti-inflammatory effects of this combination include the increase of glucocorticoid receptor (GR)α and MKP1 expression, the induction of glucocorticoid response element (GRE) activation and the decrease of ERK1/2, P38 and GR-Ser226 phosphorylations compared with monotherapies.,In summary, AZD8999 shows anti-inflammatory effects in neutrophils from COPD patients and induces synergistic anti-inflammatory effects when combined with fluticasone propionate, supporting the use of MABA/ICS combination therapy in COPD.
COPD patients have high pulmonary and systemic oxidative stress that correlates with severity of disease.,Sulforaphane has been shown to induce expression of antioxidant genes via activation of a transcription factor, nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 (Nrf2).,This parallel, placebo-controlled, phase 2, randomized trial was conducted at three US academic medical centers.,Patients who met GOLD criteria for COPD and were able to tolerate bronchoscopies were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive placebo, 25 μmoles, or 150 μmoles sulforaphane daily by mouth for four weeks.,The primary outcomes were changes in Nrf2 target gene expression (NQ01, HO1, AKR1C1 and AKR1C3) in alveolar macrophages and bronchial epithelial cells.,Secondary outcomes included measures of oxidative stress and airway inflammation, and pulmonary function tests.,Between July 2011 and May 2013, 89 patients were enrolled and randomized.,Sulforaphane was absorbed in the patients as evident from their plasma metabolite levels.,Changes in Nrf2 target gene expression relative to baseline ranged from 0.79 to 1.45 and there was no consistent pattern among the three groups; the changes were not statistically significantly different from baseline.,Changes in measures of inflammation and pulmonary function tests were not different among the groups.,Sulforaphane was well tolerated at both dose levels.,Sulforaphane administered for four weeks at doses of 25 μmoles and 150 μmoles to patients with COPD did not stimulate the expression of Nrf2 target genes or have an effect on levels of other anti-oxidants or markers of inflammation.,Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01335971.
1
Smoking is considered as the major causal factor of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Nevertheless, a minority of chronic heavy cigarette smokers develops COPD.,This suggests important contribution of other factors such as genetic predisposing.,Our objective was to investigate combined role of EPHX1, GSTP1, M1 and T1 gene polymorphisms in COPD risk, its phenotypes and lung function impairment.,Prevalence of EPHX1, GSTP1, M1 and T1 gene polymorphisms were assessed in 234 COPD patients and 182 healthy controls from Tunisia.,Genotypes of EPHX1 (Tyr113His; His139Arg) and GSTP1 (Ile105Val; Ala114Val) polymorphisms were performed by PCR-RFLP, while the deletion in GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes was determined using multiplex PCR.,Analysis of combinations showed a significant association of 113His/His EPHX1/null-GSTM1 (OR = 4.07) and null-GSTM1/105Val/Val GSTP1 (OR = 3.56) genotypes with increased risk of COPD (respectively P=0.0094 and P=0.0153).,The null-GSTM1/ null-GSTT1, 105Val/Val GSTP1/null GSTT1, 113His/His EPHX1/null-GSTM1 and null-GSTM1/105Val/Val GSTP1 genotypes were related to emphysema (respectively P = 0.01; P = 0.009; P = 0.008 and P = 0.001).,Combination of 113His/His EPHX1/null-GSTM1 genotypes showed a significant association with the decrease of ΔFEV1 in patients (P = 0.028).,In conclusion, our results suggest combined EPHX1, GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms may play a significant role in the development of COPD, emphysema and decline of the lung function.
TNF-α mediated inflammation is thought to play a key role in the respiratory and systemic features of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.,The aim of the present study was to replicate and extend recent findings in Taiwanese and Caucasian populations of associations between COPD susceptibility and variants of the TNFA gene in a Spanish cohort.,The 3 reported SNPs were complemented with nine tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of the TNFA and LTA genes and genotyped in 724 individuals (202 COPD patients, 90 smokers without COPD and 432 healthy controls).,Pulmonary function parameters and serum inflammatory markers were also measured in COPD patients.,The TNFA rs1800630 (-863C/A) SNP was associated with a lower COPD susceptibility (ORadj = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.33-0.77, p = 0.001).,The -863A allele was also associated with less severe forms of the disease (GOLD stages I and II) (ORadj = 0.303, 95%CI = 0.14-0.65, p = 0.014) and with lower scores of the BODE index (< 2) (ORadj = 0.40, 95%CI = 0.17-0.94, p = 0.037).,Moreover, the -863A carrier genotype was associated with a better FEV1 percent predicted (p = 0.004) and a lower BODE index (p = 0.003) over a 2 yrs follow-up period.,None of the TNFA or LTA gene variants correlated with the serum inflammatory markers in COPD patients (p > 0.05).,We replicated the previously reported association between the TNFA -863 SNP and COPD.,TNFA -863A allele may confer a protective effect to the susceptibility to the disease in the Spanish population.
1
Bronchodilators are central in the symptomatic management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) are the main classes of long-acting bronchodilators.,To date, tiotropium is the only once-daily LAMA available for the treatment of COPD.,Glycopyrronium is a novel LAMA, currently in development for COPD.,Phase II studies have shown that glycopyrronium 50 μg once daily provides clinically significant 24-hour bronchodilation with a rapid onset of action, which is faster than that of tiotropium, and a favorable safety and tolerability profile.,The Phase III GLycopyrronium bromide in COPD airWays (GLOW) program has now confirmed the long-term efficacy and tolerability of glycopyrronium 50 μg once daily.,The three studies included in this program have further shown that the effect of glycopyrronium versus placebo is similar to that of tiotropium in reducing dyspnea and the risk of exacerbations, as well as improving lung function, exercise tolerance, and health status in patients with COPD.,The safety profile of glycopyrronium is also similar to that of tiotropium in terms of overall incidence of adverse events and muscarinic side effects.,Glycopyrronium could be an alternative choice to tiotropium, and like tiotropium, has the potential to be used as a monotherapy or combination therapy.,Phase II studies have shown that a fixed-dose combination of glycopyrronium and the 24-hour LABA indacaterol, produces rapid and sustained bronchodilation compared with indacaterol monotherapy in patients with COPD.,Phase III studies are currently ongoing to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of this combination.
Long-acting bronchodilators have been shown to improve multiple clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) including lung function, symptoms, dyspnea, quality of life, and exacerbations.,Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, long-acting β2-agonist providing 24-hour bronchodilation with once-daily dosing.,It is currently approved for the maintenance treatment of COPD to be administered as 150 or 300 μg once-daily doses as licensed in many countries and 75 μg as licensed in the US by means of a single-dose dry powder inhaler.,The data from clinical development support a favorable safety and tolerability profile within the β2-agonist drug class, with no relevant issues identified.,Current evidence indicates that indacaterol is suitable for use as first-line monotherapy in COPD patients with moderate disease (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] stage II) and beyond that do not require an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as per GOLD guidelines, or in combination with an ICS in severe or very severe patients with repeated exacerbations.,Data from trials with the novel once-daily β2-agonist, indacaterol, indicate superior bronchodilation and clinical efficacy over twice-daily long-acting β2-agonists and at least equipotent bronchodilation as once-daily tiotropium.,Bronchodilators are central in the symptomatic management of COPD.,It is likely that once-daily dosing of a bronchodilator would be a significant convenience and probably a compliance-enhancing advantage, leading to improved overall clinical outcomes in patients with COPD.
1
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a useful and noninvasive biomarker for eosinophilic airway inflammation, particularly in asthma.,However, its utility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial.,In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate FENO levels in COPD.,A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registry was conducted from inception to January 2018.,Studies were included if they reported FENO levels in patients with COPD and healthy controls.,We then extracted relevant information and analyzed data.,Standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied in this meta-analysis.,A total of 2,073 studies were reviewed for eligibility, with 24 studies pooled for analysis.,The FENO levels in patients with COPD were elevated mildly compared with healthy controls (SMD 1.28, 95% CI 0.60-1.96).,A similar result was also observed in stable COPD, with an SMD of 1.21 (95% CI 0.47-1.96).,On the other hand, we found no association between FENO levels and exacerbated COPD.,Additionally, for patients with COPD, ex-smokers had higher levels of FENO than current smokers (SMD 2.05, 95% CI 1.13-2.97).,Our studies demonstrated a mild elevation of FENO in COPD, and the association between exacerbated COPD and FENO levels needs to be further explored.,The potential mechanism is still unknown and conflicting.
Waste management, namely, collection, transport, sorting and processing, and disposal, is an issue of social concern owing to its environmental impact and effects on public health.,In fact, waste management activities are carried out according to procedures that can have various negative effects on the environment and, potentially, on human health.,The aim of our study was to assess the potential effects on respiratory health of this exposure in workers in the waste management and disposal field, as compared with a group of workers with no occupational exposure to outdoor pollutants.,The sample consisted of a total of 124 subjects, 63 waste collectors, and 61 office clerks.,Informed consent was obtained from all subjects before inclusion in the study.,The entire study population underwent pulmonary function assessments with spirometry and completed two validated questionnaires for the diagnosis of rhinitis and chronic bronchitis.,Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 13.,Spirometry showed a statistically significant reduction in the mean Tiffenau Index values in the exposed workers, as compared with the controls, after adjusting for the confounding factors of age, BMI, and smoking habit.,Similarly, the mean FEV1 values were lower in the exposed workers than in the controls, this difference being again statistically significant.,The FVC differences measured in the two groups were not found to be statistically significant.,We ran a cross-sectional study to investigate the respiratory health of a group of workers in the solid waste collection and disposal field as compared with a group of office workers.,In agreement with most of the data in the literature, our findings support the existence of a prevalence of respiratory deficits in waste disposal workers.,Our data suggest the importance of adopting preventive measures, such as wearing specific individual protection devices, to protect this particular category of workers from adverse effects on respiratory health.
1
Severe exacerbations of COPD, ie, those leading to hospitalization, have profound clinical implications for patients and significant economic consequences for society.,The prevalence and burden of severe COPD exacerbations remain high, despite recognition of the importance of exacerbation prevention and the availability of new treatment options.,Severe COPD exacerbations are associated with high mortality, have negative impact on quality of life, are linked to cardiovascular complications, and are a significant burden on the health-care system.,This review identified risk factors that contribute to the development of severe exacerbations, treatment options (bronchodilators, antibiotics, corticosteroids [CSs], oxygen therapy, and ventilator support) to manage severe exacerbations, and strategies to prevent readmission to hospital.,Risk factors that are amenable to change have been highlighted.,A number of bronchodilators have demonstrated successful reduction in risk of severe exacerbations, including long-acting muscarinic antagonist or long-acting β2-agonist mono- or combination therapies, in addition to vaccination, mucolytic and antibiotic therapy, and nonpharmacological interventions, such as pulmonary rehabilitation.,Recognition of the importance of severe exacerbations is an essential step in improving outcomes for patients with COPD.,Evidence-based approaches to prevent and manage severe exacerbations should be implemented as part of targeted strategies for disease management.
To analyze the role of the capsular type in pneumococci causing relapse and reinfection episodes of acute exacerbation in COPD patients.,A total of 79 patients with 116 recurrent episodes of acute exacerbations caused by S. pneumoniae were included into this study (1995-2010).,A relapse episode was considered when two consecutive episodes were caused by the same strain (identical serotype and genotype); otherwise it was considered reinfection.,Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (microdilution), serotyping (PCR, Quellung) and molecular typing (PFGE/MLST) were performed.,Among 116 recurrent episodes, 81 (69.8%) were reinfections, caused by the acquisition of a new pneumococcus, and 35 (30.2%) were relapses, caused by a pre-existing strain.,Four serotypes (9V, 19F, 15A and 11A) caused the majority (60.0%) of relapses.,When serotypes causing relapses and reinfection were compared, only two serotypes were associated with relapses: 9V (OR 8.0; 95% CI, 1.34-85.59) and 19F (OR 16.1; 95% CI, 1.84-767.20).,Pneumococci isolated from relapses were more resistant to antimicrobials than those isolated from the reinfection episodes: penicillin (74.3% vs.,34.6%, p<0.001), ciprofloxacin (25.7% vs.,9.9%, p<0.027), levofloxacin (22.9% vs.,7.4%, p = 0.029), and co-trimoxazole (54.3% vs.,25.9%, p<0.001).,Although the acquisition of a new S. pneumoniae strain was the most frequent cause of recurrences, a third of the recurrent episodes were caused by a pre-existing strain.,These relapse episodes were mainly caused by serotypes 9V and 19F, suggesting an important role for capsular type.
1
Approximately 210 million people are estimated to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] worldwide.,The burden of disease is known to be high, though less is known about those of a younger age.,The aim of this study was to investigate the wider personal, economic and societal burden of COPD on a cross country working-age cohort.,A cross-country [Brazil, China, Germany, Turkey, US, UK] cross-sectional survey methodology was utilised to answer the research questions. 2426 participants aged 45-67 recruited via a number of recruitment methods specific to each country completed the full survey.,Inclusion criteria were a recalled physician diagnosis of COPD, a smoking history of > 10 pack years and the use of COPD medications in the previous 3 months prior to questioning.,The survey included items from the validated Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI] scale and the EuroQoL 5 Dimension [EQ-5D] scale.,Disease severity was measured using the 5-point MRC [Medical Research Council] dyspnoea scale as a surrogate measure.,64% had either moderate [n = 1012] or severe [n = 521] COPD, although this varied by country. 75% of the cohort reported at least one comorbid condition.,Quality of life declined with severity of illness [mild, mean EQ-5D score = 0.84; moderate 0.58; severe 0.41].,The annual cost of healthcare utilisation [excluding treatment costs and diagnostic tests] per individual was estimated to be $2,364 [£1,500].,For those remaining in active employment [n: 677]: lost time from work cost the individual an average of $880 [£556] per annum and lifetime losses of $7,365 [£4,661] amounting to $596,000 [£377,000] for the cohort. 447 [~40%] of the working population had retired prematurely because of COPD incurring individual estimated lifetime income losses of $316,000 [£200,000] or a combined total of $141 m [£89.6 m].,As the mean age of retirees was 58.3 and average time since retirement was 4 years, this suggests the average age of retirement is around 54.,This would mean a high societal and economic impact in all study countries, particularly where typical state retirement ages are higher, for example in Brazil, Germany and the UK [65] and the US [65,66,67], compared to Turkey [58 for women, 60 for men] and China [60].,Although generalisation across a broader COPD population is limited due to the varied participant recruitment methods, these data nevertheless suggest that COPD has significant personal, economic and societal burden on working age people.,Further efforts to improve COPD diagnosis and management are required.
The efficacy of inhaled salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate (SFC) in patients with severe or very severe COPD is well documented.,However, there are only limited data about the influence of GOLD severity staging on the effectiveness of SFC, particularly in patients with milder disease.,TORCH was a 3-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6112 patients with moderate/severe COPD with pre-bronchodilator FEV1 < 60% predicted (mean age 65 years, 76% male, mean 44% predicted FEV1, 43% current smokers).,To understand the relative efficacy of SFC and its components by GOLD stages, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of the TORCH dataset using baseline post-bronchodilator FEV1 to segment patients into three groups: moderate COPD (GOLD stage II and above: ≥ 50%; n = 2156), severe COPD (GOLD stage III: 30% to < 50%; n = 3019) and very severe COPD (GOLD stage IV: < 30%; n = 937).,Compared with placebo, SFC improved post-bronchodilator FEV1: 101 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71, 132) in GOLD stage II, 82 ml (95% CI: 60, 104) in GOLD stage III and 96 ml (95% CI: 54, 138) in GOLD stage IV patients, and reduced the rate of exacerbations: 31% (95% CI: 19, 40) in GOLD stage II, 26% (95% CI: 17, 34) in GOLD stage III and 14% (95% CI: -4, 29) in GOLD stage IV.,SFC improved health status to a greater extent than other treatments regardless of baseline GOLD stage.,Similarly, SFC reduced the risk of death by 33% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.98) for GOLD stage II, 5% (HR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.24) for GOLD stage III, and 30% (HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.05) for GOLD stage IV.,The rates of adverse events were similar across treatment arms and increased with disease severity.,Overall, there was a higher incidence of pneumonia in the fluticasone propionate and SFC arms, compared with other treatments in all GOLD stages.,In the TORCH study, SFC reduced moderate-to-severe exacerbations and improved health status and FEV1 across GOLD stages.,Treatment with SFC may be associated with reduced mortality compared with placebo in patients with GOLD stage II disease.,The effects were similar to those reported for the study as a whole.,Thus, SFC is an effective treatment option for patients with GOLD stage II COPD.,Clinicaltrial.gov registration NCT00268216; Study number: SCO30003
1
Oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) caused by cigarette smoke and characterized by chronic inflammation, alveolar destruction (emphysema) and bronchiolar obstruction.,Ozone is a gaseous constituent of urban air pollution resulting from photochemical interaction of air pollutants such as nitrogen oxide and organic compounds.,While acute exposure to ozone induces airway hyperreactivity and neutrophilic inflammation, chronic ozone exposure in mice causes activation of oxidative pathways resulting in cell death and a chronic bronchial inflammation with emphysema, mimicking cigarette smoke-induced COPD.,Therefore, the chronic exposure to ozone has become a model for studying COPD.,We review recent data on mechanisms of ozone induced lung disease focusing on pathways causing chronic respiratory epithelial cell injury, cell death, alveolar destruction, and tissue remodeling associated with the development of chronic inflammation and AHR.,The initial oxidant insult may result from direct effects on the integrity of membranes and organelles of exposed epithelial cells in the airways causing a stress response with the release of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA, and proteases.,Mitochondrial ROS and mitochondrial DNA activate NLRP3 inflammasome and the DNA sensors cGAS and STING accelerating cell death pathways including caspases with inflammation enhancing alveolar septa destruction, remodeling, and fibrosis.,Inhibitors of mitochondrial ROS, NLRP3 inflammasome, DNA sensor, cell death pathways, and IL-1 represent novel therapeutic targets for chronic airways diseases underlined by oxidative stress.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease that severely threatens human health.,Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is a major cause of disease progression and death, and causes huge medical expenditures.,This consensus statement represents a description of clinical features of AECOPD in the People’s Republic of China and a set of recommendations.,It is intended to provide clinical guidelines for community physicians, pulmonologists and other health care providers for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of AECOPD.
1
Sarcopenia is characterized by a progressive and generalized decrease of strength and muscle mass.,Muscle mass loss is prevalent in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as a result of both the disease and aging.,Some methods have been proposed to assess body composition (and therefore identify muscle mass loss) in this population.,Despite the high accuracy of some methods, they require sophisticated and costly equipment.,The purpose of this study was to infer the occurrence of muscle mass loss measured by a sophisticated method (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry [DEXA]) using a more simple and affordable equipment (dynamometer).,Fifty-seven stable subjects with COPD were evaluated for anthropometric characteristics, lung function, functional exercise capacity, body composition, and peripheral muscle strength.,A binary logistic regression model verified whether knee-extension strength (measured by dynamometry) could infer muscle mass loss (from DEXA).,Patients with decreased knee-extension strength were 5.93 times more likely to have muscle mass loss, regardless of sex, disease stage, and functional exercise capacity (P=0.045).,Knee-extension dynamometry was able to infer muscle mass loss in patients with COPD.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of death and disability internationally.,Alveolar hypoxia and consequent hypoxemia increase in prevalence as disease severity increases.,Ventilation/perfusion mismatch resulting from progressive airflow limitation and emphysema is the key driver of this hypoxia, which may be exacerbated by sleep and exercise.,Uncorrected chronic hypoxemia is associated with the development of adverse sequelae of COPD, including pulmonary hypertension, secondary polycythemia, systemic inflammation, and skeletal muscle dysfunction.,A combination of these factors leads to diminished quality of life, reduced exercise tolerance, increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity, and greater risk of death.,Concomitant sleep-disordered breathing may place a small but significant subset of COPD patients at increased risk of these complications.,Long-term oxygen therapy has been shown to improve pulmonary hemodynamics, reduce erythrocytosis, and improve survival in selected patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure.,However, the optimal treatment for patients with exertional oxyhemoglobin desaturation, isolated nocturnal hypoxemia, or mild-to-moderate resting daytime hypoxemia remains uncertain.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major public health problem, associated with considerable morbidity and health care costs.,The global burden of COPD morbidity is predicted to rise substantially in the coming decade, but could be moderated by better use of existing management strategies.,Smoking cessation, medication therapy, and pulmonary rehabilitation have all been shown to diminish morbidity and improve patient outcomes.,But each of these strategies requires adherence.,Adherence is crucial for optimizing clinical outcomes in COPD, with nonadherence resulting in a significant health and economic burden.,Suboptimal medication adherence is common among COPD patients, due to a number of factors that involve the medication, the delivery device, the patient, and the health professionals caring for the patient.,Lack of medication adherence needs to be identified and addressed by using simplified treatment regimens, increasing patient knowledge about self-management, and enhancing provider skills in patient education, communication, and adherence counseling.,This article reports some of the challenges of medication nonadherence faced by the clinician in the management of COPD, and suggests ways to evaluate and improve adherence effectively in primary care.
None of the drugs currently available for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are able to reduce the progressive decline in lung function which is the hallmark of this disease.,Smoking cessation is the only intervention that has proved effective.,The current pharmacological treatment of COPD is symptomatic and is mainly based on bronchodilators, such as selective β2-adrenergic agonists (short- and long-acting), anticholinergics, theophylline, or a combination of these drugs.,Glucocorticoids are not generally recommended for patients with stable mild to moderate COPD due to their lack of efficacy, side effects, and high costs.,However, glucocorticoids are recommended for severe COPD and frequent exacerbations of COPD.,New pharmacological strategies for COPD need to be developed because the current treatment is inadequate.
1
COPD is associated with a relevant burden of disease and a high mortality worldwide.,Only recently, the importance of comorbidities of COPD has been recognized.,Studies postulated an association with inflammatory conditions potentially sharing pathogenic pathways and worsening overall prognosis.,More evidence is required to estimate the role of comorbidities of COPD.,Our aim was to investigate the prevalence and clustering of comorbidities associated with COPD, and to estimate their impact on clinically relevant outcomes.,In this population-based case-control study, a nation-wide database provided by the Swiss Federal Office for Statistics enclosing every hospital entry covering the years 2002-2010 (n = 12′888′075) was analyzed using MySQL and R statistical software.,Statistical methods included non-parametric hypothesis testing by means of Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test, as well as linear models with generalized estimating equation to account for intra-patient variability.,Exploratory multivariate approaches were also used for the identification of clusters of comorbidities in COPD patients.,In 2.6% (6.3% in patients aged >70 years) of all hospitalization cases an active diagnosis of COPD was recorded.,In 21% of these cases, COPD was the main reason for hospitalization.,Patients with a diagnosis of COPD had more comorbidities (7 [IQR 4-9] vs.,3 [IQR 1-6]; ), were more frequently rehospitalized (annual hospitalization rate 0.33 [IQR 0.20-0.67] vs.,0.25 [IQR 0.14-0.43]/year; ), had a longer hospital stay (9 [IQR 4-15] vs.,5 [IQR 2-11] days; ), and had higher in-hospital mortality (5.9% [95% CI 5.8%-5.9%] vs.,3.4% [95% CI 3.3%-3.5%]; ) compared to matched controls.,A set of comorbidities was associated with worse outcome.,We could identify COPD-related clusters of COPD-comorbidities.
Guidelines traditionally focus on the diagnosis and treatment of single diseases.,As almost half of the patients with a chronic disease have more than one disease, the applicability of guidelines may be limited.,The aim of this study was to assess the extent that guidelines address comorbidity and to assess the supporting evidence of recommendations related to comorbidity.,We conducted a systematic analysis of evidence-based guidelines focusing on four highly prevalent chronic conditions with a high impact on quality of life: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus type 2, and osteoarthritis.,Data were abstracted from each guideline on the extent that comorbidity was addressed (general comments, specific recommendations), the type of comorbidity discussed (concordant, discordant), and the supporting evidence of the comorbidity-related recommendations (level of evidence, translation of evidence).,Of the 20 guidelines, 17 (85%) addressed the issue of comorbidity and 14 (70%) provided specific recommendations on comorbidity.,In general, the guidelines included few recommendations on patients with comorbidity (mean 3 recommendations per guideline, range 0 to 26).,Of the 59 comorbidity-related recommendations provided, 46 (78%) addressed concordant comorbidities, 8 (14%) discordant comorbidities, and for 5 (8%) the type of comorbidity was not specified.,The strength of the supporting evidence was moderate for 25% (15/59) and low for 37% (22/59) of the recommendations.,In addition, for 73% (43/59) of the recommendations the evidence was not adequately translated into the guidelines.,Our study showed that the applicability of current evidence-based guidelines to patients with comorbid conditions is limited.,Most guidelines do not provide explicit guidance on treatment of patients with comorbidity, particularly for discordant combinations.,Guidelines should be more explicit about the applicability of their recommendations to patients with comorbidity.,Future clinical trials should also include patients with the most prevalent combinations of chronic conditions.
1
Symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and low exacerbation risk still have disease instability, which can be improved with better bronchodilation.,We evaluated two long-acting bronchodilators individually and in combination on reducing exacerbation risk and the potential impact of concurrent medication in these patients.,Integrated post hoc intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of data from two large 24-week, randomized placebo (PBO)-controlled trials (NCT01313637, NCT01313650).,Symptomatic patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD with/without an exacerbation history were randomized (2:3:3:3) to once-daily: PBO, umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg [NCT01313650] or 125/25 μg [NCT01313637]), UMEC (62.5 [NCT01313650] or 125 μg [NCT01313637]) or VI (25 μg) via the ELLIPTA inhaler.,Medication subgroups were segmented by treatment status at screening: a) maintenance-naïve or on maintenance medications, b) inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]-free or ICS-treated, c) low or high albuterol use based on median run-in use (< 3.6 or ≥ 3.6 puffs/day).,Time to first moderate/severe exacerbation (Cox proportional hazard model) and change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1; mixed model repeated measures) were analyzed.,Safety was also assessed.,Of 3021 patients (ITT population; UMEC/VI: n = 816; UMEC: n = 825; VI: n = 825; PBO: n = 555), 36% had a recent exacerbation history, 33% were maintenance-naïve, 51% were ICS-free.,Mean baseline albuterol use was 5.1 puffs/day.,In the ITT population, UMEC/VI, UMEC, and VI reduced the risk of a first exacerbation versus PBO by 58, 44, and 39%, respectively (all p < 0.05).,UMEC/VI provided significant risk reductions versus PBO in all subgroups.,VI had no benefit versus PBO in maintenance-naïve, ICS-free, and low rescue use patients and was significantly less effective than UMEC/VI in these subgroups.,UMEC had no significant benefit versus PBO in maintenance-naïve and ICS-free patients.,All bronchodilators improved FEV1 versus PBO, and UMEC/VI significantly improved FEV1 versus both monotherapies across all populations studied (p < 0.05).,All bronchodilators were similarly well tolerated.,Results suggest that UMEC/VI reduces exacerbation risk versus PBO more consistently across medication subgroups than UMEC or VI, particularly in patients with no/low concurrent medication use.,Confirmed prospectively, these findings may support first-line use of dual bronchodilation therapy in symptomatic low-risk patients.,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-019-1027-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
COPD is characterized by persistent airflow limitation, progressive breathlessness, cough, and sputum production.,Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are one of the recommended first-choice therapeutic options for patients with COPD, and several new agents have been developed in recent years.,A literature search identified 14 published randomized, placebo-controlled studies of the efficacy and safety of LAMAs in patients with COPD, with improvements seen in lung function, exacerbations, breathlessness, and health status.,A greater weight of evidence currently exists for glycopyrronium (GLY) and tiotropium than for umeclidinium and aclidinium, especially in terms of exacerbation reductions.,To date, there have been few head-to-head clinical studies of the different LAMAs.,Available data indicate that GLY and aclidinium have similar efficacy to tiotropium in terms of improving lung function, dyspnea, exacerbations, and health status.,Overall, evidence demonstrates that currently available LAMAs provide effective and generally well-tolerated therapy for patients with COPD.,Delivery devices for the different LAMAs vary, which may affect individual patient’s adherence to and preference for treatment.,Subtle differences between individual therapeutic options may be important to individual patients and the final treatment choice should involve physician’s and patient’s experiences and preferences.
1
Dyspnea, exercise intolerance, and activity restriction are already apparent in mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, patients may not seek medical help until their symptoms become troublesome and persistent and significant respiratory impairment is already present; as a consequence, further sustained physical inactivity may contribute to disease progression.,Ventilatory and gas exchange impairment, cardiac dysfunction, and skeletal muscle dysfunction are present to a variable degree in patients with mild COPD, and collectively may contribute to exercise intolerance.,As such, there is increasing interest in evaluating exercise tolerance and physical activity in symptomatic patients with COPD who have mild airway obstruction, as defined by spirometry.,Simple questionnaires, eg, the modified British Medical Research Council dyspnea scale and the COPD Assessment Test, or exercise tests, eg, the 6-minute or incremental and endurance exercise tests can be used to assess exercise performance and functional status.,Pedometers and accelerometers are used to evaluate physical activity, and endurance tests (cycle or treadmill) using constant work rate protocols are used to assess the effects of interventions such as pulmonary rehabilitation.,In addition, alternative outcome measurements, such as tests of small airway dysfunction and laboratory-based exercise tests, are used to measure the extent of physiological impairment in individuals with persistent dyspnea.,This review describes the mechanisms of exercise limitation in patients with mild COPD and the interventions that can potentially improve exercise tolerance.,Also discussed are the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation and the potential role of pharmacologic treatment in symptomatic patients with mild COPD.
Because chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous condition, the identification of specific clinical phenotypes is key to developing more effective therapies.,To explore if the persistence of systemic inflammation is associated with poor clinical outcomes in COPD we assessed patients recruited to the well-characterized ECLIPSE cohort (NCT00292552).,Six inflammatory biomarkers in peripheral blood (white blood cells (WBC) count and CRP, IL-6, IL-8, fibrinogen and TNF-α levels) were quantified in 1,755 COPD patients, 297 smokers with normal spirometry and 202 non-smoker controls that were followed-up for three years.,We found that, at baseline, 30% of COPD patients did not show evidence of systemic inflammation whereas 16% had persistent systemic inflammation.,Even though pulmonary abnormalities were similar in these two groups, persistently inflamed patients during follow-up had significantly increased all-cause mortality (13% vs. 2%, p<0.001) and exacerbation frequency (1.5 (1.5) vs.,0.9 (1.1) per year, p<0.001) compared to non-inflamed ones.,As a descriptive study our results show associations but do not prove causality.,Besides this, the inflammatory response is complex and we studied only a limited panel of biomarkers, albeit they are those investigated by the majority of previous studies and are often and easily measured in clinical practice.,Overall, these results identify a novel systemic inflammatory COPD phenotype that may be the target of specific research and treatment.
1
Few studies have evaluated the contribution of multiple virus and bacterial infections in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.,This study estimated the burden of multiple viral and bacterial respiratory infections in moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients that were prospectively followed‐up during a 12‐month pilot study.,Clinical data were collected monthly and sputum was collected at the time of each acute exacerbation event.,Classical culture techniques for bacteria and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and microarray detection assays were performed to identify viral and atypical bacterial pathogens in the sputum.,Overall, 51 patients were included and 45 acute exacerbation events were investigated clinically and microbiologically.,Among the 45 acute exacerbation events, 44% had evidence of viral infection involving human rhinovirus (HRV) and metapneumovirus (hMPV) in 20% and 18%, respectively.,Intracellular bacteria were not found in sputum by PCR.,Common bacterial pathogens were identified in 42% of acute exacerbation patients, most frequently Branhamella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.,Viral or virus and bacteria co‐infections were detected in 27% of acute exacerbation events (n = 12) with HRV and hMPV involved in 92% of cases.,Patients with co‐infections did not present greater clinical severity scores at exacerbation and more recurrence of acute exacerbation events at 3 and 6 months than those with single infections (P > 0.4).,These results suggest that HRV and hMPV may be contributors or cofactors of AECOPD.,These findings indicate that viral or virus and bacterial co‐infections do not impact significantly on the clinical severity of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and recurrence at 3 and 6 months.,J.,Med.,Virol.,85:866-873, 2013.,© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Influenza is a frequent cause of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Exacerbations are associated with worsening of the airflow obstruction, hospitalisation, reduced quality of life, disease progression, death, and ultimately, substantial healthcare-related costs.,Despite longstanding recommendations to vaccinate vulnerable high-risk groups against seasonal influenza, including patients with COPD, vaccination rates remain sub-optimal in this population.,We conducted a systematic review to summarise current evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on the immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with COPD.,The selection of relevant articles was based on a three-step selection procedure according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.,The search yielded 650 unique hits of which 48 eligible articles were screened in full-text.,Seventeen articles describing 13 different studies were found to be pertinent to this review.,Results of four RCTs and one observational study demonstrate that seasonal influenza vaccination is immunogenic in patients with COPD.,Two studies assessed the occurrence of COPD exacerbations 14 days after influenza vaccination and found no evidence of an increased risk of exacerbation.,Three RCTs showed no significant difference in the occurrence of systemic effects between groups receiving influenza vaccine or placebo.,Six out of seven studies on vaccine efficacy or effectiveness indicated long-term benefits of seasonal influenza vaccination, such as reduced number of exacerbations, reduced hospitalisations and outpatient visits, and decreased all-cause and respiratory mortality.,Additional large and well-designed observational studies would contribute to understanding the impact of disease severity and patient characteristics on the response to influenza vaccination.,Overall, the evidence supports a positive benefit-risk ratio for seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with COPD, and supports current vaccination recommendations in this population.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-017-0420-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Sleep quality is often poor in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,A cross-sectional European survey investigated the prevalence of night-time symptoms in COPD to evaluate the level of disconnect between physician and patient perceptions of the presence of night-time symptoms, and to compare the characteristics of patients with and without night-time symptoms.,A total of 251 primary care physicians and 251 respiratory specialists completed record forms on 2,807 patients with COPD.,The forms captured information on patient demographics, lung function, COPD severity, and symptoms.,Patients completed questionnaires on the time of day when their COPD symptoms bothered them, and the impact of COPD on their ability to get up in the morning and on sleep.,Data were compared between groups (those with and without night-time symptoms) using t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests.,The kappa statistic was used to assess the level of disconnect between physician and patient perceptions of the impact of night-time symptoms.,Most patients (78%) reported night-time disturbance.,Patients with night-time symptoms experienced more daytime breathlessness (mean modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score 2.4 versus 1.1) and exacerbations in the previous 12 months (mean 1.7 versus 0.4), and received more maintenance therapy (mean of 2.8 versus 2.3 products) than those without.,Concordance between the frequency of physician-reported (67.9% of patients) and patient-reported (68.5% of patients) night-time symptoms was good.,Physicians significantly underestimated the impact of COPD on the patient’s ability to get up in the morning and on sleep (fair-moderate agreement).,Physician-reported night-time symptoms were present for 41.2% of patients who could be categorized by Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group (n=937), increasing from 20.9% of those in the low-risk group to 77.4% of those in the high-riskgroup.,Patients with COPD experience night-time symptoms regardless of GOLD group, that impact on their ability to get up in the morning and on their sleep quality.
We examined the influence of overweight and obesity on pulmonary function, exercise tolerance, quality of life and response to pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD.,261 patients with COPD were divided into three groups: normal body mass index (BMI), overweight and obese.,Baseline and post rehabilitation pulmonary function, 6-min walking test (6MWT), endurance time during a constant workrate exercise test (CET) and St.,George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores were compared between all three classes of BMI.,At baseline, obese and overweight patients had less severe airflow obstruction compared to normal BMI patients.,There was no baseline difference in CET performance or SGRQ scores across BMI classes and 6MWT was reduced in the presence of obesity (p < 0.01).,Compared to baseline, post-rehabilitation 6MWT, CET performance and SGRQ scores improved significantly in each group (p < 0.01), but 6MWT was still significantly lower in the presence of obesity.,Walking, but not cycling performance was worse in obese patients.,This difference was maintained post rehabilitation despite significant improvements.,Weight excess may counterbalance the effect of a better preserved respiratory function in the performance of daily activities such as walking.,However, obesity and overweight did not influence the magnitude of improvement after pulmonary rehabilitation.
1