a stringlengths 138 8.15k | b stringlengths 138 8.15k | label int64 1 1 |
|---|---|---|
Eosinophilic airway inflammation is observed in 10-30% of COPD subjects.,Whether increased eosinophils or impairment in their clearance by macrophages is associated with the severity and frequency of exacerbations is unknown.,We categorised 103 COPD subjects into 4 groups determined by the upper limit of normal for their cytoplasmic macrophage red hue (<6%), an indirect measure of macrophage efferocytosis of eosinophils, and area under the curve sputum eosinophil count (≥3%/year).,Eosinophil efferocytosis by monocyte-derived macrophages was studied in 17 COPD subjects and 8 normal controls.,There were no differences in baseline lung function, health status or exacerbation frequency between the groups: A-low red hue, high sputum eosinophils (n = 10), B-high red hue, high sputum eosinophils (n = 16), C-low red hue, low sputum eosinophils (n = 19) and D- high red hue, low sputum eosinophils (n = 58).,Positive bacterial culture was lower in groups A (10%) and B (6%) compared to C (44%) and D (21%) (p = 0.01).,The fall in FEV1 from stable to exacerbation was greatest in group A (ΔFEV1 [95 % CI] -0.41 L [-0.65 to -0.17]) versus group B (-0.16 L [-0.32 to -0.011]), C (-0.11 L [-0.23 to -0.002]) and D (-0.16 L [-0.22 to -0.10]; p = 0.02).,Macrophage efferocytosis of eosinophils was impaired in COPD versus controls (86 [75 to 92]% versus 93 [88 to 96]%; p = 0.028); was most marked in group A (71 [70 to 84]%; p = 0.0295) and was inversely correlated with exacerbation frequency (r = -0.63; p = 0.006).,Macrophage efferocytosis of eosinophils is impaired in COPD and is related to the severity and frequency of COPD exacerbations. | Non-invasive phenotyping of chronic respiratory diseases would be highly beneficial in the personalised medicine of the future.,Volatile organic compounds can be measured in the exhaled breath and may be produced or altered by disease processes.,We investigated whether distinct patterns of these compounds were present in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and clinically relevant disease phenotypes.,Breath samples from 39 COPD subjects and 32 healthy controls were collected and analysed using gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry.,Subjects with COPD also underwent sputum induction.,Discriminatory compounds were identified by univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate analysis: 1. principal component analysis; 2. multivariate logistic regression; 3. receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.,Comparing COPD versus healthy controls, principal component analysis clustered the 20 best-discriminating compounds into four components explaining 71% of the variance.,Multivariate logistic regression constructed an optimised model using two components with an accuracy of 69%.,The model had 85% sensitivity, 50% specificity and ROC area under the curve of 0.74.,Analysis of COPD subgroups showed the method could classify COPD subjects with far greater accuracy.,Models were constructed which classified subjects with ≥2% sputum eosinophilia with ROC area under the curve of 0.94 and those having frequent exacerbations 0.95.,Potential biomarkers correlated to clinical variables were identified in each subgroup.,The exhaled breath volatile organic compound profile discriminated between COPD and healthy controls and identified clinically relevant COPD subgroups.,If these findings are validated in prospective cohorts, they may have diagnostic and management value in this disease. | 1 |
Utilizing data from the Continuing to Confront COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) International Physician Survey, this study aimed to describe physicians’ knowledge and application of the GOLD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD diagnosis and treatment recommendations and compare performance between primary care physicians (PCPs) and respiratory specialists.,Physicians from 12 countries were sampled from in-country professional databases; 1,307 physicians (PCP to respiratory specialist ratio three to one) who regularly consult with COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis patients were interviewed online, by telephone or face to face.,Physicians were questioned about COPD risk factors, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment, including knowledge and application of the GOLD global strategy using patient scenarios.,Physicians reported using spirometry routinely (PCPs 82%, respiratory specialists 100%; P<0.001) to diagnose COPD and frequently included validated patient-reported outcome measures (PCPs 67%, respiratory specialists 81%; P<0.001).,Respiratory specialists were more likely than PCPs to report awareness of the GOLD global strategy (93% versus 58%, P<0.001); however, when presented with patient scenarios, they did not always perform better than PCPs with regard to recommending GOLD-concordant treatment options.,The proportion of PCPs and respiratory specialists providing first- or second-choice treatment options concordant with GOLD strategy for a GOLD B-type patient was 38% versus 67%, respectively.,For GOLD C and D-type patients, the concordant proportions for PCPs and respiratory specialists were 40% versus 38%, and 57% versus 58%, respectively.,This survey of physicians in 12 countries practicing in the primary care and respiratory specialty settings showed high awareness of COPD-management guidelines.,Frequent use of guideline-recommended COPD diagnostic practices was reported; however, gaps in the application of COPD-treatment recommendations were observed, warranting further evaluation to understand potential barriers to adopt guideline recommendations. | Hospitalizations for persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) result in significant health care resource use and excess expenditures.,Despite well-documented sociodemographic disparities in COPD outcomes, no study has characterized geographic variations in COPD hospitalization across the US.,Almost 3.8 million COPD hospitalization records were extracted from Medicare claims for 1995-2006, and the total population of eligible Medicare beneficiaries was extracted from the Medicare enrollment records to calculate COPD hospitalization rates by Health Service Area (HSA), (n = 949).,Spatial cluster analysis and Bayesian hierarchical spatial modeling were used to characterize the geography of COPD hospitalizations.,The overall COPD hospitalization rate was 11.30 per 1,000 beneficiaries for the aggregated period 1995-2006.,HSA-level COPD hospitalization rates had a median of 11.7 and a range of 3.0 (Cache, UT) to 76.3 (Pike, KY).,Excessive hospitalization risk was concentrated in Appalachia, the southern Great Lakes, the Mississippi Delta, the Deep South, and west Texas.,In the Bayesian spatial mixture model, 73% of variability of COPD hospitalization relative risk was attributed to unidentified regional social and physical environments shared by HSAs rather than to unique local HSA factors (27%).,We discovered distinct geographic patterns in COPD hospitalization rates and risks attributed to both regionally-shared environmental risk factors and HSA-unique environmental contexts.,The correlates of these geographic patterns remain to be determined.,Geographic comparisons of COPD hospitalization risk provide insights for better public health practice, policies, and programs for COPD prevention. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are common diseases with a heterogeneous distribution worldwide.,Here, we present methods and disease and risk estimates for COPD and asthma from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) 2015 study.,The GBD study provides annual updates on estimates of deaths, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), a summary measure of fatal and non-fatal disease outcomes, for over 300 diseases and injuries, for 188 countries from 1990 to the most recent year.,We estimated numbers of deaths due to COPD and asthma using the GBD Cause of Death Ensemble modelling (CODEm) tool.,First, we analysed data from vital registration and verbal autopsy for the aggregate category of all chronic respiratory diseases.,Subsequently, models were run for asthma and COPD relying on covariates to predict rates in countries that have incomplete or no vital registration data.,Disease estimates for COPD and asthma were based on systematic reviews of published papers, unpublished reports, surveys, and health service encounter data from the USA.,We used the Global Initiative of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease spirometry-based definition as the reference for COPD and a reported diagnosis of asthma with current wheeze as the definition of asthma.,We used a Bayesian meta-regression tool, DisMod-MR 2.1, to derive estimates of prevalence and incidence.,We estimated population-attributable fractions for risk factors for COPD and asthma from exposure data, relative risks, and a theoretical minimum exposure level.,Results were stratified by Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a composite measure of income per capita, mean years of education over the age of 15 years, and total fertility rate.,In 2015, 3·2 million people (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 3·1 million to 3·3 million) died from COPD worldwide, an increase of 11·6% (95% UI 5·3 to 19·8) compared with 1990.,There was a decrease in age-standardised death rate of 41·9% (37·7 to 45·1) but this was counteracted by population growth and ageing of the global population.,From 1990 to 2015, the prevalence of COPD increased by 44·2% (41·7 to 46·6), whereas age-standardised prevalence decreased by 14·7% (13·5 to 15·9).,In 2015, 0·40 million people (0·36 million to 0·44 million) died from asthma, a decrease of 26·7% (−7·2 to 43·7) from 1990, and the age-standardised death rate decreased by 58·8% (39·0 to 69·0).,The prevalence of asthma increased by 12·6% (9·0 to 16·4), whereas the age-standardised prevalence decreased by 17·7% (15·1 to 19·9).,Age-standardised DALY rates due to COPD increased until the middle range of the SDI before reducing sharply.,Age-standardised DALY rates due to asthma in both sexes decreased monotonically with rising SDI.,The relation between with SDI and DALY rates due to asthma was attributed to variation in years of life lost (YLLs), whereas DALY rates due to COPD varied similarly for YLLs and years lived with disability across the SDI continuum.,Smoking and ambient particulate matter were the main risk factors for COPD followed by household air pollution, occupational particulates, ozone, and secondhand smoke.,Together, these risks explained 73·3% (95% UI 65·8 to 80·1) of DALYs due to COPD.,Smoking and occupational asthmagens were the only risks quantified for asthma in GBD, accounting for 16·5% (14·6 to 18·7) of DALYs due to asthma.,Asthma was the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease worldwide in 2015, with twice the number of cases of COPD.,Deaths from COPD were eight times more common than deaths from asthma.,In 2015, COPD caused 2·6% of global DALYs and asthma 1·1% of global DALYs.,Although there are laudable international collaborative efforts to make surveys of asthma and COPD more comparable, no consensus exists on case definitions and how to measure disease severity for population health measurements like GBD.,Comparisons between countries and over time are important, as much of the chronic respiratory burden is either preventable or treatable with affordable interventions.,Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) progresses very slowly and the majority of patients are therefore elderly.,COPD is characterized by an abnormal persistent inflammatory response to noxious environmental stimuli and there are increasing evidences for a close relationship between premature aging and chronic inflammatory diseases.,Thus, COPD is considered to be a disease of an accelerating aging.,In this review, we collected the evidence for roles of aging on pathogenesis of COPD and considered future therapeutic strategy for COPD based on this senescence hypothesis.,Since calorie restriction has been proved to extend lifespan, many efforts were made to clarify the molecular mechanism of aging.,Aging is defined as the progressive decline of homeostasis that occurs after the reproductive phase of life is complete, leading to an increasing risk of disease or death due to impaired DNA repair after damage by oxidative stress or telomere shortening as a result of repeated cell division.,During aging, pulmonary function progressively deteriorates; innate immunity is impaired and pulmonary inflammation increases, accompanied by structural changes, such as an enlargement of airspaces.,Noxious environmental gases, such as cigarette smoke, may worsen these aging-related events in the lung or accelerate aging of the lung due to reduction in anti-aging molecules and/or stimulation of aging molecules.,Aging signaling are complex but conserved in divert species, such as worm, fruit fry, rodent and humans.,Especially the insulin like growth factor (IGF-1) signaling was well documented.,Geroprotectors are therapeutics that affect the root cause of aging and age-related diseases, and thus prolong the life-span of animals.,Most of geroprotectors such as melatonin, metformin, rapamycin and resveratrol are anti-oxidant or anti-aging molecule regulators.,Therefore, geroprotection for the lung might be an attractive approach for the treatment of COPD by preventing premature aging of lung. | 1 |
The use of adequate self-management strategies for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) reduces healthcare use, improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and recovery after acute exacerbations.,However, not many people with COPD receive support that promotes the use of such strategies and therefore new methods to facilitate and promote the use of self-management strategies are highly warranted.,This pilot trial aims to evaluate the feasibility of the study design and study procedures considering effectiveness of the novel intervention, the COPD-web.,The overall design is a pragmatic controlled pilot trial with preassessments and postassessments and a parallel process evaluation.,Patients with the diagnosis of COPD will be eligible for the study.,The intervention group will be recruited when visiting one of the six participating primary care units in Sweden.,The control group will be identified from the unit's computerised registers.,The intervention, the COPD-web, is an interactive web page with two sections; one directed at people with COPD and one at healthcare professionals.,The sections aim to support patients’ self-management skills-and to facilitate the provision of support for self-management strategies, respectively.,Effectiveness with regard to patients’ symptoms, HRQoL, knowledge of and readiness for COPD-related self-management, health literacy, self-efficacy for physical activity and time spent in physical activity and time being sedentary, and further, healthcare professionals’ knowledge of and readiness to support COPD-related self-management strategies will be assessed using questionnaires at 3 and 12 months.,The process evaluation will include observations and interviews.,Ethical approval has been obtained.,Findings will be presented at conferences, submitted for publication in peer-reviewed publications and presented to the involved healthcare professionals, patients and to patient organisations.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02696187 | New treatments need to be evaluated in real-world clinical practice to account for co-morbidities, adherence and polypharmacy.,Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), ≥40 years old, with exacerbation in the previous 3 years are randomised 1:1 to once-daily fluticasone furoate 100 μg/vilanterol 25 μg in a novel dry-powder inhaler versus continuing their existing therapy.,The primary endpoint is the mean annual rate of COPD exacerbations; an electronic medical record allows real-time collection and monitoring of endpoint and safety data.,The Salford Lung Study is the world’s first pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a pre-licensed medication in COPD.,Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01551758. | 1 |
Reduced physical activity (PA) in patients with COPD is associated with a poor prognosis.,Increasing PA is a key therapeutic target, but thus far few strategies have been found effective in this patient group.,To investigate the effectiveness of a 12-week semiautomated telecoaching intervention on PA in patients with COPD in a multicentre European randomised controlled trial.,343 patients from six centres, encompassing a wide spectrum of disease severity, were randomly allocated to either a usual care group (UCG) or a telecoaching intervention group (IG) between June and December 2014.,This 12-week intervention included an exercise booklet and a step counter providing feedback both directly and via a dedicated smartphone application.,The latter provided an individualised daily activity goal (steps) revised weekly and text messages as well as allowing occasional telephone contacts with investigators.,PA was measured using accelerometry during 1 week preceding randomisation and during week 12.,Secondary outcomes included exercise capacity and health status.,Analyses were based on modified intention to treat.,Both groups were comparable at baseline in terms of factors influencing PA.,At 12 weeks, the intervention yielded a between-group difference of mean, 95% CI (lower limit - upper limit; ll-ul) +1469, 95% CI (971 to 1965) steps/day and +10.4, 95% CI (6.1 to 14.7) min/day moderate PA; favouring the IG (all p≤0.001).,The change in 6-min walk distance was significantly different (13.4, 95% CI (3.40 to 23.5) m, p<0.01), favouring the IG.,In IG patients, an improvement could be observed in the functional state domain of the clinical COPD questionnaire (p=0.03) compared with UCG.,Other health status outcomes did not differ.,The amount and intensity of PA can be significantly increased in patients with COPD using a 12-week semiautomated telecoaching intervention including a step counter and an application installed on a smartphone.,NCT02158065. | Although many hospitals promote self-management to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients post discharge from hospital, the clinical effectiveness of this is unknown.,We undertook a systematic review of the evidence as part of a Health Technology Assessment review.,A comprehensive search strategy with no language restrictions was conducted across relevant databases from inception to May 2012.,Randomized controlled trials of patients with COPD, recently discharged from hospital after an acute exacerbation and comparing a self-management intervention with control, usual care or other intervention were included.,Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were undertaken by two reviewers independently.,Of 13,559 citations, 836 full texts were reviewed with nine randomized controlled trials finally included in quantitative syntheses.,Interventions were heterogeneous.,Five trials assessed highly supported multi-component interventions and four trials were less supported with fewer contacts with health care professionals and mainly home-based interventions.,Total sample size was 1,466 (range 33-464 per trial) with length of follow-up 2-12 months.,Trials varied in quality; poor patient follow-up and poor reporting was common.,No evidence of effect in favor of self-management support was observed for all-cause mortality (pooled hazard ratio =1.07; 95% confidence interval [0.74 to 1.55]; I2=0.0%, [n=5 trials]).,No clear evidence of effect on all-cause hospital admissions was observed (hazard ratio 0.88 [0.61, 1.27] I2=66.0%).,Improvements in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire score were seen in favor of self-management interventions (mean difference =3.84 [1.29 to 6.40]; I2=14.6%), although patient follow-up rates were low.,There is insufficient evidence to support self-management interventions post-discharge.,There is a need for good quality primary research to identify effective approaches. | 1 |
Long-acting bronchodilators are the cornerstone of pharmacologic treatment of COPD.,The new combination of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium (TIO) and long acting beta-agonists (LABA) olodaterol (OLO) has been introduced as fist line therapy for COPD.,This article analyses the evidence of efficacy and safety of the TIO/OLO combination.,A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) with a period of treatment of at least 6 weeks, in patients with COPD confirmed by spirometry, comparing combined treatment with TIO/OLO (approved doses only), with any of the mono-components or any other active comparator administered as an inhalator.,A total of 10 Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were identified (N = 10,918).,TIO/OLO significantly improved trough FEV1 from baseline to week 12 versus TIO, OLO and LABA/ICS (0.06 L, 0.09 L and between 0.04 and 0.05 L, respectively).,TIO/OLO improved transitional dyspnea index (TDI) and St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) compared with mono-components, with patients more likely to achieve clinically important improvements in TDI (risk ratio [RR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.07, 1.28] versus TIO and RR: 1.14, 95%CI: [1.01, 1.28] versus OLO) and in SGRQ (RR: 1.21, 95%CI: [1.12, 1.30] versus TIO and RR: 1.28, 95%CI: [1.18, 1.40] versus OLO).,Patients treated with TIO/OLO showed a significant reduction in the use of rescue medication and no significant differences in frequency of general and serious adverse events were observed between TIO/OLO and mono-components.,Treatment with TIO/OLO provided significant improvements in lung function versus mono-components and LABA/ICS with more patients achieving significant improvements in dyspnea and health status.,No differences in adverse events were observed compared with other active treatments.,PROSPERO register of systematic reviews (CRD42016040162).,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-017-0683-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | Aerosols delivered by Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler (SMI) are slower-moving and longer-lasting than those from pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), improving the efficiency of pulmonary drug delivery to patients.,In this four-way cross-over study, adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and with poor pMDI technique received radiolabelled Berodual® (fenoterol hydrobromide 50 μg/ipratropium bromide 20 μg) via Respimat® SMI or hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-MDI (randomized order) on test days 1 and 2, with no inhaler technique training.,The procedure was repeated on test days 3 and 4 after training.,Deposition was measured by gamma scintigraphy.,All 13 patients entered (9 males, mean age 62 years; FEV1 46% of predicted) inhaled too fast at screening (peak inspiratory flow rate [IF]: 69-161 L/min).,Whole lung deposition was higher with Respimat® SMI than with pMDI for untrained (37% of delivered dose vs 21% of metered dose) and trained patients (53% of delivered vs 21% of metered dose) (pSign-Test].15; pANOVA < = 0.05).,Training also improved inhalation profiles (slower average and peak IF as well as longer breath-hold time).,Drug delivery to the lungs with Respimat® SMI is more efficient than with pMDI, even with poor inhaler technique.,Teaching patients to hold their breath as well as to inhale slowly and deeply increased further lung deposition using Respimat® SMI. | 1 |
The aim of this study was to estimate the occupational burden of airflow limitation, chronic airflow limitation, COPD, and emphysema.,Subjects aged 50-64 years (n=1,050) were investigated with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC).,Airflow limitation was defined as FEV1/FVC <0.7 before bronchodilation.,Chronic airflow limitation was defined after bronchodilation either according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) as FEV1/FVC <0.7 or according to the lower limit of normal (LLN) approach as FEV1/FVC < LLN.,COPD was defined as chronic airflow limitation (GOLD) in combination with dyspnea, wheezing, or chronic bronchitis.,Emphysema was classified according to findings from computed tomography of the lungs.,Occupational exposure was defined as self-reported occupational exposure to vapor, gas, dust, or fumes (VGDF).,Odds ratios (OR) were calculated in models adjusted for age, gender, and smoking; population-attributable fractions and 95% CI were also calculated.,There were significant associations between occupational exposure to VGDF and COPD (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-51), airflow limitation (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5), and emphysema (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1).,The associations between occupational exposure to VGDF and chronic airflow limitation were weaker, and for the OR, the CIs included unity.,The population-attributable fraction for occupational exposure to VGDF was 0.37 (95% CI 0.23-0.47) for COPD and 0.23 (95% CI 0.05-0.35) for emphysema.,The occupational burden of COPD and computed tomography-verified emphysema is substantial. | Lung function and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been associated with short-term exposure to air pollution.,However, the effect of long-term exposure to particulate matter from industry and traffic on COPD as defined by lung function has not been evaluated so far.,Our study was designed to investigate the influence of long-term exposure to air pollution on respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function in 55-year-old women.,We especially focused on COPD as defined by GOLD criteria and additionally compared the effects of air pollution on respiratory symptoms by questionnaire data and by lung function measurements.,In consecutive cross sectional studies conducted between 1985-1994, we investigated 4757 women living in the Rhine-Ruhr Basin of Germany.,NO2 and PM10 exposure was assessed by measurements done in an 8 km grid, and traffic exposure by distance from the residential address to the nearest major road using Geographic Information System data.,Lung function was determined and COPD was defined by using the GOLD criteria.,Chronic respiratory symptoms and possible confounders were defined by questionnaire data.,Linear and logistic regressions, including random effects were used to account for confounding and clustering on city level.,The prevalence of COPD (GOLD stages 1-4) was 4.5%.,COPD and pulmonary function were strongest affected by PM10 and traffic related exposure.,A 7 μg/m3 increase in five year means of PM10 (interquartile range) was associated with a 5.1% (95% CI 2.5%-7.7%) decrease in FEV1, a 3.7% (95% CI 1.8%-5.5%) decrease in FVC and an odds ratio (OR) of 1.33 (95% CI 1.03-1.72) for COPD.,Women living less than 100 m from a busy road also had a significantly decreased lung function and COPD was 1.79 times more likely (95% CI 1.06-3.02) than for those living farther away.,Chronic symptoms as based on questionnaire information showed effects in the same direction, but less pronounced.,Chronic exposure to PM10, NO2 and living near a major road might increase the risk of developing COPD and can have a detrimental effect on lung function. | 1 |
QVA149 is a once-daily (o.d.) inhaled dual bronchodilator containing a fixed-dose combination of the long-acting β2-agonist indacaterol and the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium for the treatment of COPD.,The QUANTIFY study compared QVA149 with a free-dose bronchodilator combination of tiotropium plus formoterol (TIO+FOR) in improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with COPD.,This multicentre, blinded, triple-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority study randomised patients aged ≥40 years with moderate-to-severe COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ≥30% to <80% predicted) to QVA149 110/50 µg o.d. or TIO 18 µg o.d.,+ FOR 12 µg twice daily (1:1) for 26 weeks.,The primary endpoint was to demonstrate non-inferiority in HRQoL assessed using St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD (SGRQ-C).,The prespecified non-inferiority margin was 4 units.,Secondary endpoints included Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) score, pre-dose FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC) and safety.,Of the 934 patients randomised (QVA149=476 and TIO+FOR=458), 87.9% completed the study.,At week 26, non-inferiority was met for SGRQ-C (QVA149 vs TIO+FOR; difference: -0.69 units; 95% CI −2.31 to 0.92; p=0.399).,A significantly higher percentage of patients achieved a clinically relevant ≥1 point improvement in TDI total score with QVA149 (49.6%) versus TIO+FOR (42.4%; p=0.033).,QVA149 significantly increased pre-dose FEV1 (+68 mL, 95% CI 37 mL to 100 mL; p<0.001) and FVC (+74 mL, 95% CI 24 mL to 125 mL; p=0.004) compared with TIO+FOR at week 26.,The incidence of adverse events was comparable between both treatments (QVA149=43.7% and TIO+FOR=42.6%).,QVA149 is non-inferior to TIO+FOR in improving HRQoL, with clinically meaningful and significant improvements in breathlessness and lung function in patients with COPD.,NCT01120717. | Efficacy and safety of tiotropium+olodaterol fixed-dose combination (FDC) compared with the mono-components was evaluated in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in two replicate, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III trials.,Patients received tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 2.5/5 μg or 5/5 μg, tiotropium 2.5 μg or 5 μg, or olodaterol 5 μg delivered once-daily via Respimat inhaler over 52 weeks.,Primary end points were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 h (AUC0-3) response, trough FEV1 response and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at 24 weeks.,In total, 5162 patients (2624 in Study 1237.5 and 2538 in Study 1237.6) received treatment.,Both FDCs significantly improved FEV1 AUC0-3 and trough FEV1 response versus the mono-components in both studies.,Statistically significant improvements in SGRQ total score versus the mono-components were only seen for tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 5/5 μg.,Incidence of adverse events was comparable between the FDCs and the mono-components.,These studies demonstrated significant improvements in lung function and health-related quality of life with once-daily tiotropium+olodaterol FDC versus mono-components over 1 year in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.,Lung function and symptomatic benefits of daily tiotropium+olodaterol fixed-dose combination in moderate to very severe COPDhttp://ow.ly/DIKiY | 1 |
Assessing clinically important measures of disease progression is essential for evaluating therapeutic effects on disease stability in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,This analysis assessed whether providing additional bronchodilation with the long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC) to patients treated with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) therapy would improve disease stability compared with ICS/LABA therapy alone.,This integrated post hoc analysis of four 12-week, randomized, double-blind trials (NCT01772134, NCT01772147, NCT01957163, NCT02119286) compared UMEC 62.5 µg with placebo added to open-label ICS/LABA in symptomatic patients with COPD (modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score ≥ 2).,A clinically important deterioration (CID) was defined as: a decrease from baseline of ≥ 100 mL in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), an increase from baseline of ≥ 4 units in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, or a moderate/severe exacerbation.,Risk of a first CID was evaluated in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in patients stratified by Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification, exacerbation history and type of ICS/LABA therapy.,Adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.,Overall, 1637 patients included in the ITT population received UMEC + ICS/LABA (n = 819) or placebo + ICS/LABA (n = 818).,Additional bronchodilation with UMEC reduced the risk of a first CID by 45-58% in the ITT population and all subgroups analyzed compared with placebo (all p < 0.001).,Improvements were observed in reducing FEV1 (69% risk reduction; p < 0.001) and exacerbation (47% risk reduction; p = 0.004) events in the ITT population.,No significant reduction in risk of a SGRQ CID was observed.,AE incidence was similar between treatment groups.,Symptomatic patients with COPD receiving ICS/LABA experience frequent deteriorations.,Additional bronchodilation with UMEC significantly reduced the risk of CID and provided greater short-term stability versus continued ICS/LABA therapy in these patients.,GlaxoSmithKline (study number: 202067).,Plain language summary available for this article.,The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0771-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | Current guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend limiting the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to patients with more severe disease and/or increased exacerbation risk.,However, there are discrepancies between guidelines and real-life practice, as ICS are being overprescribed.,In light of the increasing concerns about the clinical benefit and long-term risks associated with ICS use, therapy needs to be carefully weighed on a case-by-case basis, including in patients already on ICS.,Several studies sought out to determine the effects of withdrawing ICS in patients with COPD.,Early studies have deterred clinicians from reducing ICS in patients with COPD as they reported that an abrupt withdrawal of ICS precipitates exacerbations, and results in a deterioration in lung function and symptoms.,However, these studies were fraught with numerous methodological limitations.,Recently, two randomized controlled trials and a real-life prospective study revealed that ICS can be safely withdrawn in certain patients.,Of these, the WISDOM (Withdrawal of Inhaled Steroids During Optimized Bronchodilator Management) trial was the largest and first to examine stepwise withdrawal of ICS in patients with COPD receiving maintenance therapy of long-acting bronchodilators (ie, tiotropium and salmeterol).,Even with therapy being in line with the current guidelines, the findings of the WISDOM trial indicate that not all patients benefit from including ICS in their treatment regimen.,Indeed, only certain COPD phenotypes seem to benefit from ICS therapy, and validated markers that predict ICS response are urgently warranted in clinical practice.,Furthermore, we are now better equipped with a larger armamentarium of novel and more effective long-acting β2-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist combinations that can be considered by clinicians to optimize bronchodilation and allow for safer ICS withdrawal.,In addition to providing a review of the aforementioned, this perspective article proposes an algorithm for the stepwise withdrawal of ICS in real-life clinical practice. | 1 |
Mitochondria are indispensable for energy metabolism and cell signaling.,Mitochondrial homeostasis is sustained with stabilization of mitochondrial membrane potential, balance of mitochondrial calcium, integrity of mitochondrial DNA, and timely clearance of damaged mitochondria via mitophagy.,Mitochondrial dysfunction is featured by increased generation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, reduced mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial calcium imbalance, mitochondrial DNA damage, and abnormal mitophagy.,Accumulating evidence indicates that mitochondrial dysregulation causes oxidative stress, inflammasome activation, apoptosis, senescence, and metabolic reprogramming.,All these cellular processes participate in the pathogenesis and progression of chronic respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, and asthma.,In this review, we provide a comprehensive and updated overview of the impact of mitochondrial dysfunction on cellular processes involved in the development of these respiratory diseases.,This not only implicates mechanisms of mitochondrial dysfunction for the pathogenesis of chronic lung diseases but also provides potential therapeutic approaches for these diseases by targeting dysfunctional mitochondria. | Sarcopenia prevalence and its clinical impact are reportedly variable in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) due partly to definition criteria.,This review aimed to identify the criteria used to diagnose sarcopenia and the prevalence and impact of sarcopenia on health outcomes in people with COPD.,This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018092576).,Five electronic databases were searched to August 2018 to identify studies related to sarcopenia and COPD.,Study quality was assessed using validated instruments matched to study designs.,Sarcopenia prevalence was determined using authors' definitions.,Comparisons were made between people who did and did not have sarcopenia for pulmonary function, exercise capacity, quality of life, muscle strength, gait speed, physical activity levels, inflammation/oxidative stress, and mortality.,Twenty‐three studies (70% cross‐sectional) from Europe (10), Asia (9), and North and South America (4) involving 9637 participants aged ≥40 years were included (69.5% men).,Sarcopenia criteria were typically concordant with recommendations of hEuropean and Asian consensus bodies.,Overall sarcopenia prevalence varied from 15.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.8-19.1; combined muscle mass, strength, and/or physical performance criteria] to 34% (95%CI 20.6-47.3; muscle mass criteria alone) (P = 0.009 between subgroups) and was greater in people with more severe [37.6% (95%CI 24.8-50.4)] versus less severe [19.1% (95%CI 10.2-28.0)] lung disease (P = 0.020), but similar between men [41.0% (95%CI 26.2-55.9%)] and women [31.9% (95%CI 7.0-56.8%)] (P = 0.538).,People with sarcopenia had lower predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second (mean difference −7.1%; 95%CI −9.0 to −5.1%) and poorer exercise tolerance (standardized mean difference −0.8; 95%CI −1.4 to −0.2) and quality of life (standardized mean difference 0.26; 95%CI 0.2-0.4) compared with those who did not (P < 0.001 for all).,No clear relationship was observed between sarcopenia and inflammatory or oxidative stress biomarkers.,Incident mortality was unreported in the literature.,Sarcopenia is prevalent in a significant proportion of people with COPD and negatively impacts upon important clinical outcomes.,Opportunities exist to optimize its early detection and management and to evaluate its impact on mortality in this patient group. | 1 |
The Korea Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorders Subgroup Study Team (Korea COPD Subgroup Study team, KOCOSS) is a multicenter observational study that includes 956 patients (mean age 69.9 ± 7.8 years) who were enrolled from 45 tertiary and university-affiliated hospitals from December 2011 to October 2014.,The initial evaluation for all patients included pulmonary function tests (PFT), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, and the COPD-specific version of St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C).,Here, we report the comparison of baseline characteristics between patients with early- (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] stage I and II/groups A and B) and late-stage COPD (GOLD stage III and IV/groups C and D).,Among all patients, the mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 was 55.8% ± 16.7% of the predicted value, and most of the patients were in GOLD stage II (520, 56.9%) and group B (399, 42.0%).,The number of exacerbations during one year prior to the first visit was significantly lower in patients with early COPD (0.4 vs.,0.9/0.1 vs.,1.2), as were the CAT score (13.9 vs.,18.3/13.5 vs.,18.1), mMRC (1.4 vs.,2.0/1.3 vs.1.9), and SGRQ-C total score (30.4 vs.,42.9/29.1 vs.,42.6) compared to late-stage COPD (all P < 0.001).,Common comorbidities among all patients were hypertension (323, 37.7%), diabetes mellitus (139, 14.8%), and depression (207, 23.6%).,The data from patients with early COPD will provide important information towards early detection, proper initial management, and design of future studies. | Cigarette smoking is the most common risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, few studies of the attitudes toward COPD of smokers, the group at risk of developing this condition, have been conducted.,The purpose of this study was to explore the awareness of and attitudes toward COPD of current smokers.,The sample consisted of 502 individuals aged 45 and older from throughout Korea who smoked at least 10 packs of cigarettes per year.,Telephone interviews using a structured questionnaire were conducted with respondents.,First, we evaluated the health status of subjects, finding that 45.4% considered themselves to be in good health.,We also asked about COPD-related symptoms, and 60.6% of subjects reported such symptoms.,However, only 1.2% of subjects had been diagnosed with or treated for COPD, only 0.4% spontaneously mentioned COPD as a respiratory disease, and only 26.5% recognized COPD as a respiratory disease after seeing a list of such diseases.,Television ranked as the top source of information about COPD.,The willingness of 45.0% of subjects to stop smoking increased after being informed about COPD.,Despite having COPD-related symptoms, most smokers did not know that COPD is a respiratory disease.,The attitudes of smokers toward COPD and smoking cessation varied according to socioeconomic status.,In summary, a continuous effort to increase the awareness of COPD among smokers is needed.,Additionally, strategies tailored according to different socioeconomic groups will also be necessary. | 1 |
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often coexist.,We assessed the effect of inhaled COPD treatments on CVD outcomes and safety in patients with COPD and at heightened CVD risk.,The SUMMIT (Study to Understand Mortality and MorbidITy) was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial in 16 485 patients with moderate COPD who had or were at high risk of CVD.,Here, we assessed the prespecified secondary endpoint of time to first on-treatment composite CVD event (CVD death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina or transient ischaemic attack (TIA)) by Cox regression and by clinician-reported CVD adverse events across the four groups: once-daily inhaled placebo (n=4111), long-acting beta2-agonist (vilanterol (VI) 25 µg; n=4118), corticosteroid (fluticasone furoate (FF) 100 µg; n=4135) and combination therapy (FF/VI; n=4121).,Participants were predominantly middle-aged (mean 65 (SD 8) years) men (75%) with overt CVD (66%).,The composite CVD endpoint occurred in 688 patients (first event: sudden death (35%), acute coronary syndrome (37%) and stroke or TIA (23%), and was not reduced in any treatment group versus placebo: VI (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.22), FF (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.11) and their combination (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.14).,Outcomes were similar among all subgroups.,Adverse events, including palpitations and arrhythmias, did not differ by treatment.,In patients with COPD with moderate airflow limitation and heightened CVD risk, treatment with inhaled VI, FF or their combination has an excellent safety profile and does not impact CVD outcomes.,NCT01313676. | COPD is associated with a relevant burden of disease and a high mortality worldwide.,Only recently, the importance of comorbidities of COPD has been recognized.,Studies postulated an association with inflammatory conditions potentially sharing pathogenic pathways and worsening overall prognosis.,More evidence is required to estimate the role of comorbidities of COPD.,Our aim was to investigate the prevalence and clustering of comorbidities associated with COPD, and to estimate their impact on clinically relevant outcomes.,In this population-based case-control study, a nation-wide database provided by the Swiss Federal Office for Statistics enclosing every hospital entry covering the years 2002-2010 (n = 12′888′075) was analyzed using MySQL and R statistical software.,Statistical methods included non-parametric hypothesis testing by means of Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test, as well as linear models with generalized estimating equation to account for intra-patient variability.,Exploratory multivariate approaches were also used for the identification of clusters of comorbidities in COPD patients.,In 2.6% (6.3% in patients aged >70 years) of all hospitalization cases an active diagnosis of COPD was recorded.,In 21% of these cases, COPD was the main reason for hospitalization.,Patients with a diagnosis of COPD had more comorbidities (7 [IQR 4-9] vs.,3 [IQR 1-6]; ), were more frequently rehospitalized (annual hospitalization rate 0.33 [IQR 0.20-0.67] vs.,0.25 [IQR 0.14-0.43]/year; ), had a longer hospital stay (9 [IQR 4-15] vs.,5 [IQR 2-11] days; ), and had higher in-hospital mortality (5.9% [95% CI 5.8%-5.9%] vs.,3.4% [95% CI 3.3%-3.5%]; ) compared to matched controls.,A set of comorbidities was associated with worse outcome.,We could identify COPD-related clusters of COPD-comorbidities. | 1 |
Self-management interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can improve quality of life, reduce hospital admissions, and improve symptoms.,However, many factors impede engagement for patients and practitioners.,Qualitative research, with its focus on subjective experience, can provide invaluable insights into such factors.,Therefore, a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative evidence on COPD self-management from the perspective of patients, carers, and practitioners was conducted.,Following a systematic search and screening, 31 studies were appraised and data extracted for analysis.,This review found that patients can adapt to COPD; however, learning to self-manage is often a protracted process.,Emotional needs are considerable; frustration, depression, and anxiety are common.,In addition, patients can face an assortment of losses and limitations on their lifestyle and social interaction.,Over time, COPD can consume their existence, reducing motivation.,Support from family can prove vital, yet tinged with ambivalence and burden.,Practitioners may not have sufficient time, resources, or appropriate skills or confidence to provide effective self-management support, particularly in regard to patients’ psychosocial needs.,This can compound patients’ capability to engage in self-management.,For COPD self-management to be effective, patients’ psychosocial needs must be prioritised alongside medication and exacerbation management.,In addition, patients’ personal beliefs regarding COPD and its management should be reviewed periodically to avoid problematic behaviours and enhance positive adaptions to the disease.,Patients with COPD are not a homogenous group and no one intervention will prove effective for all.,Finally, practitioners require greater education, training, and support to successfully assist patients. | Self-management (SM) is defined as the provision of interventions to increase patients’ skills and confidence, empowering the individual to take an active part in their disease management.,There is uncertainty regarding the optimal format and the short- and long-term benefits of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) SM interventions in adults.,Therefore, a high-quality overview of reviews was updated to examine their clinical effectiveness.,Sixteen reviews were identified, interventions were broadly classified as education or action plans, complex interventions with an SM focus, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), telehealth and outreach nursing.,Systematic review and meta-analysis quality and the risk of bias of underlying primary studies were assessed.,Strong evidence was found that PR is associated with significant improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL).,Limited to moderate evidence for complex interventions (SM focus) with limited evidence for education, action plans, telehealth interventions and outreach nursing for HRQoL was found.,There was strong evidence that education is associated with a significant reduction in COPD-related hospital admissions, moderate to strong evidence that telehealth interventions and moderate evidence that complex interventions (SM focus) are associated with reduced health care utilization.,These findings from a large body of evidence suggesting that SM, through education or as a component of PR, confers significant health gains in people with COPD in terms of HRQoL.,SM supported by telehealth confers significant reductions in healthcare utilization, including hospitalization and emergency department visits. | 1 |
This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind within device, parallel-group, dose-ranging study.,COPD patients (n = 202; 86% male; mean age: 61 years) were randomized to receive tiotropium 1.25 μg, 2.5 μg, 5 μg, 10 μg, or 20 μg Respimat® SMI (a novel, propellant-free device); tiotropium 18 μg HandiHaler®; placebo Respimat®; or placebo HandiHaler® for 3 weeks.,The primary endpoint was trough FEV1 on Day 21.,Other assessments included FVC, PEFR, rescue medication use, safety, and pharmacokinetics.,In general, all active treatments improved the primary and secondary endpoints on Day 21 (steady state) compared with placebo.,Tiotropium 5 μg Respimat®, 20 μg Respimat®, and tiotropium 18 μg HandiHaler® were statistically significantly higher than placebo for the primary endpoint (mean change in trough FEV1 was 150 mL (both Respimat® doses) versus 20 mL (placebo Respimat®); p < 0.05; and 230 mL (HandiHaler®) versus −90 mL (placebo HandiHaler®); p ≤ 0.001).,The urinary excretion (up to 2 hours post-dose) of tiotropium 5-10 μg Respimat® was comparable with tiotropium 18 μg HandiHaler®; the overall incidence of adverse events was comparable across treatment groups.,Tiotropium 5 and 10 μg Respimat® improve lung function in COPD patients and appear to be comparable with tiotropium 18 μg HandiHaler®. | Clinical trials of tiotropium have principally recruited patients from secondary care with more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and typically had included limitation of concomitant medication.,In primary care, which is the most common setting for COPD management, many patients may have milder disease, and also may take a broad range of concomitant medication.,This randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week, 44-centre study investigated the efficacy (trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] response) and safety of additional treatment with once-daily tiotropium 18 μg via the HandiHaler® in a primary care COPD population (tiotropium: N = 191, FEV1 = 1.25 L [47.91% predicted]; placebo: N = 183, FEV1 = 1.32 L [49.86% predicted]).,Secondary endpoints included: trough forced vital capacity (FVC) response, weekly use of rescue short-acting β-agonist, and exacerbation of COPD (complex of respiratory symptoms/events of >3 days in duration requiring a change in treatment).,Treatment effects were determined using non-parametric analysis.,At Week 12, median improvement in trough FEV1 response with tiotropium versus placebo was 0.06 L (p = 0.0102).,The improvement was consistent across baseline treatment and COPD severity.,Median improvement in FVC at 2, 6 and 12 weeks was 0.12 L (p < 0.001).,The percentage of patients with ≥1 exacerbation was reduced (tiotropium 9.5%; placebo 17.9%; p = 0.0147), independent of disease severity.,Rescue medication usage was significantly reduced in the tiotropium group compared with placebo.,Adverse event profile was consistent with previous studies.,Tiotropium provides additional benefits to usual primary care management in a representative COPD population.,The identifier is: NCT00274079. | 1 |
This systematic review aimed to identify the most effective components of interventions to facilitate self-management of health care behaviors for patients with COPD.,PROSPERO registration number CRD42011001588.,We used standard review methods with a systematic search to May 2012 for randomized controlled trials of self-management interventions reporting hospital admissions or health-related quality of life (HRQoL).,Mean differences (MD), hazard ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.,Effects among different subgroups of interventions were explored including single/multiple components and multicomponent interventions with/without exercise.,One hundred and seventy-three randomized controlled trials were identified.,Self-management interventions had a minimal effect on hospital admission rates.,Multicomponent interventions improved HRQoL (studies with follow-up >6 months St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (MD 2.40, 95% CI 0.75-4.04, I2 57.9).,Exercise was an effective individual component (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire at 3 months MD 4.87, 95% CI 3.96-5.79, I2 0%).,While many self-management interventions increased HRQoL, little effect was seen on hospital admissions.,More trials should report admissions and follow-up participants beyond the end of the intervention. | To report a study conducted to explore intensive care unit nurses’ perceptions of patient participation in the acute phase of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation.,An acute exacerbation is a life-threatening situation, which patients often consider to be extremely frightening.,Healthcare personnel exercise considerable power in this situation, which challenges general professional notions of patient participation.,Critical discourse analysis.,In the autumn of 2009, three focus group interviews with experienced intensive care nurses were conducted at two hospitals in western Norway.,Two groups had six participants each, and one group had five (N = 17).,The transcribed interviews were analysed by means of critical discourse analysis.,The intensive care nurses said that an exacerbation is often an extreme situation in which healthcare personnel are exercising a high degree of control and power over patients.,Patient participation during exacerbation often takes the form of non-involvement.,The participating nurses attached great importance to taking a sensitive approach when meeting patients.,The nurses experienced challenging ethical dilemmas.,This study shows that patient participation should not be understood in universal terms, but rather in relation to a specific setting and the interactions that occur in this setting.,Healthcare personnel must develop skill, understanding, and competence to meet these challenging ethical dilemmas.,A collaborative inter-professional approach between physicians and nurses is needed to meet the patients’ demand for involvement. | 1 |
The long-term natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in terms of successive severe exacerbations and mortality is unknown.,The authors formed an inception cohort of patients from their first ever hospitalisation for COPD during 1990-2005, using the healthcare databases from the province of Quebec, Canada.,Patients were followed until death or 31 March 2007, and all COPD hospitalisations occurring during follow-up were identified.,The hazard functions of successive hospitalised COPD exacerbations and all-cause mortality over time were estimated, and HRs adjusted for age, sex, calendar time and comorbidity.,The cohort included 73 106 patients hospitalised for the first time for COPD, of whom 50 580 died during the 17-year follow-up, with 50% and 75% mortality at 3.6 and 7.7 years respectively.,The median time from the first to the second hospitalised exacerbation was around 5 years and decreased to <4 months from the 9th to the 10th.,The risk of the subsequent severe exacerbation was increased threefold after the second severe exacerbation and 24-fold after the 10th, relative to the first.,Mortality after a severe exacerbation peaked to 40 deaths per 10 000 per day in the first week after admission, dropping gradually to 5 after 3 months.,The course of COPD involves a rapid decline in health status after the second severe exacerbation and high mortality in the weeks following every severe exacerbation.,Two strategic targets for COPD management should include delaying the second severe exacerbation and improving treatment of severe exacerbations to reduce their excessive early mortality. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a progressive lung disease that is punctuated by periods of exacerbations (worsening of symptoms) that are attributable to viral infections.,While rhinoviruses are most commonly isolated viruses during episodes of exacerbation, influenza viruses have the potential to become even more problematic with the increased likelihood of an epidemic.,This study examined the impact of current and potential pharmacological targets namely the systemic corticosteroid dexamethasone and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- gamma agonist pioglitazone on the outcome of infection in smoke-exposed mice.,C57BL/6 mice were exposed to room air or cigarette smoke for 4 days and subsequently inoculated with an H1N1 influenza A virus.,Interventions were delivered daily during the course of infection.,We show that smoke-exposed mice have an exacerbated inflammatory response following infection.,While smoke exposure did not compromise viral clearance, precision cut lung slices from smoke-exposed mice showed greater expression of CC (MCP-1, -3), and CXC (KC, MIP-2, GCP-2) chemokines compared to controls when stimulated with a viral mimic or influenza A virus.,While dexamethasone treatment partially attenuated the inflammatory response in the broncho-alveolar lavage of smoke-exposed, virally-infected animals, viral-induced neutrophilia was steroid insensitive.,In contrast to controls, dexamethasone-treated smoke-exposed influenza-infected mice had a worsened health status.,Pioglitazone treatment of virally-infected smoke-exposed mice proved more efficacious than the steroid intervention.,Further mechanistic evaluation revealed that a deficiency in CCR2 did not improve the inflammatory outcome in smoke-exposed, virally-infected animals.,This animal model of cigarette smoke and H1N1 influenza infection demonstrates that smoke-exposed animals are differentially primed to respond to viral insult.,While providing a platform to test pharmacological interventions, this model demonstrates that treating viral exacerbations with alternative anti-inflammatory drugs, such as PPAR-gamma agonists should be further explored since they showed greater efficacy than systemic corticosteroids. | 1 |
Telemedicine may increase accessibility to pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), thus enhancing long-term exercise maintenance.,We aimed to explore COPD patients’ adherence and experiences in long-term telerehabilitation to understand factors affecting satisfaction and potential for service improvements.,A two-year pilot study with 10 patients with COPD was conducted.,The intervention included treadmill exercise training at home and a webpage for telemonitoring and self-management combined with weekly videoconferencing sessions with a physiotherapist.,We conducted four separate series of data collection.,Adherence was measured in terms of frequency of registrations on the webpage.,Factors affecting satisfaction and adherence, together with potential for service improvements, were explored through two semi-structured focus groups and an individual open-ended questionnaire.,Qualitative data were analysed by systematic text condensation.,User friendliness was measured by the means of a usability questionnaire.,On average, participants registered 3.0 symptom reports/week in a web-based diary and 1.7 training sessions/week.,Adherence rate decreased during the second year.,Four major themes regarding factors affecting satisfaction, adherence and potential improvements of the intervention emerged: (i) experienced health benefits; (ii) increased self-efficacy and independence; and (iii) emotional safety due to regular meetings and access to special competence; (iv) maintenance of motivation.,Participants were generally highly satisfied with the technical components of the telerehabilitation intervention.,Long-term adherence to telerehabilitation in COPD was maintained for a two-year period.,Satisfaction was supported by experienced health benefits, self-efficacy, and emotional safety.,Maintenance of motivation was a challenge and might have affected long-term adherence.,Four key factors of potential improvements in long-term telerehabilitation were identified: (i) adherence to different components of the telerehabilitation intervention is dependent on the level of focus provided by the health personnel involved; (ii) the potential for regularity that lies within the technology should be exploited to avoid relapses after vacation; (iii) motivation might be increased by tailoring individual consultations to support experiences of good health and meet individual goals and motivational strategies; (iv) interactive functionalities or gaming tools might provide peer-support, peer-modelling and enhance motivation. | The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the use of and satisfaction with a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) telehealth program applied in both primary and secondary care.,The program consisted of four modules: 1) activity coach for ambulant activity monitoring and real-time coaching of daily activity behavior, 2) web-based exercise program for home exercising, 3) self-management of COPD exacerbations via a triage diary on the web portal, including self-treatment of exacerbations, and 4) teleconsultation.,Twenty-nine COPD patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (telehealth program for 9 months) or the control group (usual care).,Page hits on the web portal showed the use of the program, and the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire showed satisfaction with received care.,The telehealth program with decision support showed good satisfaction (mean 26.4, maximum score 32).,The program was accessed on 86% of the treatment days, especially the diary.,Patient adherence with the exercise scheme was low (21%).,Health care providers seem to play an important role in patients’ adherence to telehealth in usual care.,Future research should focus on full-scale implementation in daily care and investigating technological advances, like gaming, to increase adherence. | 1 |
Telemonitoring (TM) of patients with COPD has gained much interest, but studies have produced conflicting results.,We aimed to investigate the effect of TM with the option of video consultations on quality of life (QoL) in patients with severe COPD.,COPD patients at high risk of exacerbations were eligible for the 6-month study and a total of 281 patients were equally randomized to either TM (n=141) or usual care (n=140).,TM comprised recording of symptoms, oxygen saturation, spirometry, and video consultations.,Algorithms generated alerts if readings breached thresholds.,Both groups filled in a health-related QoL questionnaire (15D©) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) at baseline and at 6 months.,Within-group differences were analyzed by paired t-test.,Most of the enrolled patients had severe COPD (86% with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage 3 or 4 and 45% with admission for COPD within the last year, respectively).,No difference in drop-out rate and mortality was found between the groups, and likewise there was no difference in 15D or CAT at baseline.,At 6 months, a significant improvement of 0.016 in 15D score (p=0.03; minimal clinically important difference 0.015) was observed in the TM group (compared to baseline), while there was no improvement in the control group −0.003 (p=0.68).,After stratifying 15D score at baseline to <0.75 or ≥0.75, respectively, there was a significant difference in the <0.75 TM group of 0.037 (p=0.001), which is a substantial improvement.,No statistically significant changes were found in CAT score.,Compared to the nonintervention group, TM as an add-on to usual care over a 6-month period improved QoL, as assessed by the 15D questionnaire, in patients with severe COPD, whereas no difference between groups was observed in CAT score. | The increasing prevalence and associated cost of treating Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is unsustainable, and focus is needed on self-management and prevention of hospital admissions.,Telehealth monitoring of patients’ vital signs allows clinicians to prioritise their workload and enables patients to take more responsibility for their health.,This paper reports the results of a qualitative study embedded within a feasibility and pilot Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of Telehealth-supported care within a community-based COPD supported-discharge service.,The aim of the study was to qualitatively explore the experiences of patients with COPD who had received either a Telehealth-supported or a specialist nursing intervention following their discharge from hospital after an admission for a COPD exacerbation.,Patients were invited to either participate in semi-structured interviews or to complete a semi-structured self-administered questionnaire on completion of the intervention.,Nine patients were interviewed (67 % female) and seventeen patients completed the questionnaires.,In addition, three clinicians responsible for the delivery of both interventions were interviewed to obtain their perspectives on the new services.,Seven underlying themes emerged from the patient interviews and were further explored in the questionnaires: (1) patient demographics; (2) information received by the participants; (3) installation of the Telehealth technology; (4) Telehealth service functionality; (5) visits; (6) service withdrawal; and (7) service perceptions.,Recipients of both services reported feelings of safety derived from the delivery of an integrated, community-based service.,Although recipients of the Telehealth service received 50 % fewer home visits from the clinicians than recipients of a more traditional community-based nursing intervention, the patients were enthusiastic about the service, with some describing it as the best service they had ever received.,This suggests that a Telehealth intervention is an acceptable alternative to a more traditional home nursing visit model for monitoring community-based patients with COPD following their discharge from hospital.,Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68856013,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1623-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | 1 |
Serious inhaler technique errors can impair drug delivery to the lungs.,This randomised, crossover, open-label study evaluated the proportion of patients making predefined serious errors with Pulmojet compared with Diskus and Turbohaler dry powder inhalers.,Patients ≥18 years old with asthma and/or COPD who were current users of an inhaler but naïve to the study devices were assigned to inhaler technique assessment on Pulmojet and either Diskus or Turbohaler in a randomised order.,Patients inhaled through empty devices after reading the patient information leaflet.,If serious errors potentially affecting dose delivery were recorded, they repeated the inhalations after watching a training video.,Inhaler technique was assessed by a trained nurse observer and an electronic inhalation profile recorder.,Baseline patient characteristics were similar between randomisation arms for the Pulmojet-Diskus (n = 277) and Pulmojet-Turbohaler (n = 144) comparisons.,Non-inferiority in the proportions of patients recording no nurse-observed serious errors was demonstrated for both Pulmojet versus Diskus, and Pulmojet versus Turbohaler; therefore, superiority was tested.,Patients were significantly less likely to make ≥1 nurse-observed serious errors using Pulmojet compared with Diskus (odds ratio, 0.31; 95 % CI, 0.19-0.51) or Pulmojet compared with Turbohaler (0.23; 0.12-0.44) after reading the patient information leaflet with additional video instruction, if required.,These results suggest Pulmojet is easier to learn to use correctly than the Turbohaler or Diskus for current inhaler users switching to a new dry powder inhaler.,ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01794390 (February 14, 2013),The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-016-0169-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | For optimal efficacy, an inhaler should deliver doses consistently and be easy for patients to use with minimal instruction.,The delivery characteristics, patients’ correct use, and preference of two single-dose dry powder inhalers (Breezhaler and HandiHaler) were evaluated in two complementary studies.,The first study examined aerodynamic particle size distribution, using inhalation profiles of seven patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The second was an open-label, two-period, 7-day crossover study, evaluating use of the inhalers with placebo capsules by 82 patients with mild to severe COPD.,Patients’ correct use of the inhalers was assessed after reading written instructions on Day 1, and after training and 7 days of daily use.,Patients’ preference was assessed after completion of both study periods.,Patient inhalation profiles showed average peak inspiratory flows of 72 L/minute through Breezhaler and 36 L/minute through HandiHaler.,For Breezhaler and HandiHaler, fine particle fractions were 27% and 10%, respectively.,In the second study, correct use of Breezhaler and HandiHaler was achieved by >77% of patients for any step after 7 days; 61% of patients showed an overall preference for Breezhaler and 31% for HandiHaler (P = 0.01).,Breezhaler is a low-resistance inhaler suitable for use by patients with a range of disease severities.,Most patients used both inhalers correctly after 7 days, but more patients showed an overall preference for the Breezhaler compared with the HandiHaler.,These are important factors for optimum dose delivery and successful COPD management. | 1 |
Oxidative stress contributes to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations and antioxidants can decrease exacerbation rates, although we lack data about the effect of such drugs on exacerbation duration.,The RESTORE (Reducing Exacerbations and Symptoms by Treatment with ORal Erdosteine in COPD) study was a prospective randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, enrolling patients aged 40-80 years with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage II/III.,Patients received erdosteine 300 mg twice daily or placebo added to usual COPD therapy for 12 months.,The primary outcome was the number of acute exacerbations during the study.,In the pre-specified intention-to-treat population of 445 patients (74% male; mean age 64.8 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s 51.8% predicted) erdosteine reduced the exacerbation rate by 19.4% (0.91 versus.,1.13 exacerbations·patient−1·year−1 for erdosteine and placebo, respectively; p=0.01), due to an effect on mild events; the reduction in the rate of mild exacerbations was 57.1% (0.23 versus 0.54 exacerbations·patient−1·year−1 for erdosteine and placebo, respectively; p=0.002).,No significant difference was observed in the rate of moderate and severe exacerbations (0.68 versus 0.59 exacerbations·patient−1·year−1 for erdosteine and placebo, respectively; p=0.054) despite a trend in favour of the comparison group.,Erdosteine decreased the exacerbation duration irrespective of event severity by 24.6% (9.55 versus 12.63 days for erdosteine and placebo, respectively; p=0.023).,Erdosteine significantly improved subject and physician subjective severity scores (p=0.022 and p=0.048, respectively), and reduced the use of reliever medication (p<0.001), but did not affect the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score or the time to first exacerbation.,In patients with COPD, erdosteine can reduce both the rate and duration of exacerbations.,The percentage of patients with adverse events was similar in both the placebo and erdosteine treatment groups.,RESTORE study: erdosteine reduces both rate and duration of COPD exacerbations with a placebo-like safety profilehttp://ow.ly/BbGI30dRdEt | Targeting and noninvasive imaging of a specific alveolar macrophage subpopulation in the lung has revealed the importance for early and better diagnosis and therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,In this study, the in vivo effect of pulmonary administration of iron oxide nanoparticles on the polarization profile of macrophages was assessed, and a noninvasive free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol coupled with the use of biocompatible antibody-conjugated superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles was developed to enable specific targeting and imaging of a particular macrophage subpopulation in lipopolysaccharide-induced COPD mice model.,Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Real-time polymerase chain reaction, and flow cytometry analysis were performed to assess the biocompatibility of PEGylated dextran-coated SPIO nanoparticles.,Specific biomarkers for M1 and M2 macrophages subsets were selected for conjugation with magnetic nanoparticles.,MRI protocol using ultra-short echo time sequence was optimized to enable simultaneous detection of inflammation progress in the lung and detection of macrophages subsets.,Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry analysis were finally performed to confirm MRI readouts and to characterize the polarization profile of targeted macrophages.,The tested SPIO nanoparticles, under the current experimental conditions, were found to be biocompatible for lung administration in preclinical settings.,Cluster of differentiation (CD)86- and CD206-conjugated magnetic nanoparticles enabled successful noninvasive detection of M1 and M2 macrophage subpopulations, respectively, and were found to co-localize with inflammatory regions induced by lipopolysaccharide challenge.,No variation in the polarization profile of targeted macrophages was observed, even though a continuum switch in their polarization might occur.,However, further confirmatory studies are required to conclusively establish this observation.,Coupling of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with a specific antibody targeted to a particular macrophage subpopulation could offer a promising strategy for an early and better diagnosis of pulmonary inflammatory diseases using noninvasive MRI. | 1 |
Smoking increases the risk of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and is associated with the development of COPD.,Until now, it is unclear whether CAP in COPD is due to smoking-related effects, or due to COPD pathophysiology itself.,To evaluate the association between COPD and CAP by smoking status.,In total, 62,621 COPD and 191,654 control subjects, matched by year of birth, gender and primary care practice, were extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2005-2014).,Incidence rates (IRs) were estimated by dividing the total number of CAP cases by the cumulative person-time at risk.,Time-varying Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) for CAP in COPD patients versus controls.,HRs of CAP by smoking status were calculated by stratified analyses in COPD patients versus controls and within both subgroups with never smoking as reference.,IRs of CAP in COPD patients (32.00/1,000 person-years) and controls (6.75/1,000 person-years) increased with age and female gender.,The risk of CAP in COPD patients was higher than in controls (HR 4.51, 95% CI: 4.27-4.77).,Current smoking COPD patients had comparable CAP risk (HR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.82-1.02) as never smoking COPD patients (reference), whereas current smoking controls had a higher risk (HR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.13-1.34) compared to never smoking controls.,COPD patients have a fourfold increased risk to develop CAP, independent of smoking status.,Identification of factors related with the increased risk of CAP in COPD is warranted, in order to improve the management of patients at risk. | The use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in controlled clinical trials and case-control analyses.,Using claims databases as a research model of real-world diagnosis and treatment, to determine if the use and dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) among patients with newly diagnosed COPD are associated with increased risk of pneumonia.,This was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients diagnosed with COPD between January 01, 2006 and September 30, 2010, drawn from databases (years 2006-2010).,Patients (aged ≥45 years) were followed until first pneumonia diagnosis, end of benefit enrollment, or December 31, 2010, whichever was earliest.,A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the association of ICS use and risk of pneumonia, controlling for baseline characteristics.,Daily ICS use was classified into low, medium, and high doses (1 μg-499 μg, 500 μg-999 μg, and ≥1000 μg fluticasone equivalents daily) and was modeled as a time-dependent variable.,Among 135,445 qualifying patients with a total of 243,097 person-years, there were 1020 pneumonia incidences out of 5677 person-years on ICS (crude incidence rate, 0.180 per person-year), and 27,730 pneumonia incidences out of 237,420 person-years not on ICS (crude incidence rate, 0.117 per person-year).,ICS use was associated with a dose-related increase in risk of pneumonia, with adjusted hazard ratios (versus no use; (95% confidence interval) of 1.38 (1.27-1.49) for low-dose users, 1.69 (1.52-1.88) for medium-dose users, and 2.57 (1.98-3.33) for high-dose users (P < 0.01 versus no use and between doses).,The use of ICS in newly diagnosed patients with COPD is potentially associated with a dose-related increase in the risk of pneumonia. | 1 |
One‐way endobronchial valves (EBV) insertion to reduce pulmonary air trapping has been used as therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.,However, local inflammation may result and can contribute to worsening of clinical status in these patients.,We hypothesized that combined EBV insertion and intrabronchial administration of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) would decrease the inflammatory process, thus mitigating EBV complications in severe COPD patients.,This initial study sought to investigate the safety of this approach.,For this purpose, a phase I, prospective, patient‐blinded, randomized, placebo‐controlled design was used.,Heterogeneous advanced emphysema (Global Initiative for Chronic Lung Disease [GOLD] III or IV) patients randomly received either allogeneic bone marrow‐derived MSCs (108 cells, EBV+MSC) or 0.9% saline solution (EBV) (n = 5 per group), bronchoscopically, just before insertion of one‐way EBVs.,Patients were evaluated 1, 7, 30, and 90 days after therapy.,All patients completed the study protocol and 90‐day follow‐up.,MSC delivery did not result in acute administration‐related toxicity, serious adverse events, or death.,No significant between‐group differences were observed in overall number of adverse events, frequency of COPD exacerbations, or worsening of disease.,Additionally, there were no significant differences in blood tests, lung function, or radiological outcomes.,However, quality‐of‐life indicators were higher in EBV + MSC compared with EBV.,EBV + MSC patients presented decreased levels of circulating C‐reactive protein at 30 and 90 days, as well as BODE (Body mass index, airway Obstruction, Dyspnea, and Exercise index) and MMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) scores.,Thus, combined use of EBV and MSCs appears to be safe in patients with severe COPD, providing a basis for subsequent investigations using MSCs as concomitant therapy.,Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2017;6:962-969 | In the last two decades, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been pre-clinically utilized in the treatment of a variety of kinds of diseases including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The aim of the current study was to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis on the published pre-clinical studies of MSC administration in the treatment of COPD in animal models.,A systematic search of electronic databases was performed.,Statistical analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (Version 3).,The pooled Hedges’s g with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) was adopted to assess the effect size.,Random effect model was used due to the heterogeneity between the studies.,A total of 20 eligible studies were included in the current systematic review.,The overall meta-analysis showed that MSC administration was significantly in favor of attenuating acute lung injury (Hedges’s g = -2.325 ± 0.145 with 95% CI: -2.609 ~ -2.040, P < 0.001 for mean linear intercept, MLI; Hedges’s g = -3.488 ± 0.504 with 95% CI: -4.476 ~ -2.501, P < 0.001 for TUNEL staining), stimulating lung tissue repair (Hedges’s g = 3.249 ± 0.586 with 95% CI: 2.103~ 4.394, P < 0.001) and improving lung function (Hedges’s g = 2.053 ± 0.408 with 95% CI: 1.253 ~ 2.854, P< 0.001).,The mechanism of MSC therapy in COPD is through ameliorating airway inflammation (Hedges’s g = -2.956 ± 0.371 with 95% CI: -3.683 ~ -2.229, P< 0.001) and stimulating cytokine synthesis that involves lung tissue repair (Hedges’s g = 3.103 ± 0.734 with 95% CI: 1.664 ~ 4.541, P< 0.001).,This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest a promising role for MSCs in COPD treatment.,Although the COPD models may not truly mimic COPD patients, these pre-clinical studies demonstrate that MSC hold promise in the treatment of chronic lung diseases including COPD.,The mechanisms of MSCs role in preclinical COPD treatment may be associated with attenuating airway inflammation as well as stimulating lung tissue repair. | 1 |
Mobile health applications are increasingly used in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) to improve their self-management, nonetheless, without firm evidence of their efficacy.,This meta-analysis was aimed to assess the efficacy of mobile health applications in supporting self-management as an intervention to reduce hospital admission rates and average days of hospitalization, etc.,PubMed, Web of Science (SCI), Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched for relevant articles published before November 14th, 2017.,A total of 6 reports with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were finally included in this meta-analysis.,Patients using mobile phone applications may have a lower risk for hospital admissions than those in the usual care group (risk ratio (RR) = 0.73, 95% CI [0.52, 1.04]).,However, there was no significant difference in reducing the average days of hospitalization.,Self-management with mobile phone applications could reduce hospital admissions of patients with COPD. | To evaluate the effectiveness of telephone health coaching delivered by a nurse to support self management in a primary care population with mild symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Multicentre randomised controlled trial.,71 general practices in four areas of England.,577 patients with Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale scores of 1 or 2, recruited from primary care COPD registers with spirometry confirmed diagnosis.,Patients were randomised to telephone health coaching (n=289) or usual care (n=288).,Telephone health coaching intervention delivered by nurses, underpinned by Social Cognitive Theory.,The coaching promoted accessing smoking cessation services, increasing physical activity, medication management, and action planning (4 sessions over 11 weeks; postal information at weeks 16 and 24).,The nurses received two days of training.,The usual care group received a leaflet about COPD.,The primary outcome was health related quality of life at 12 months using the short version of the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C).,The intervention was delivered with good fidelity: 86% of scheduled calls were delivered; 75% of patients received all four calls. 92% of patients were followed-up at six months and 89% at 12 months.,There was no difference in SGRQ-C total score at 12 months (mean difference −1.3, 95% confidence interval −3.6 to 0.9, P=0.23).,Compared with patients in the usual care group, at six months follow-up, the intervention group reported greater physical activity, more had received a care plan (44% v 30%), rescue packs of antibiotics (37% v 29%), and inhaler use technique check (68% v 55%).,A new telephone health coaching intervention to promote behaviour change in primary care patients with mild symptoms of dyspnoea did lead to changes in self management activities, but did not improve health related quality of life.,Current controlled trials ISRCTN 06710391 | 1 |
Alveolar apoptosis is increased in the emphysematous lung.,However, mechanisms involved are not fully understood.,Recently, we demonstrated that levels of TRAIL receptor 1 and 2, levels of p53, and Bax/Bcl-xL ratio were elevated in the lung of subjects with emphysema, despite smoking cessation.,Thus, we postulate that due to chronic pulmonary oxidative stress, the emphysematous lung would be abnormally sensitive to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis.,A549 cells were exposed to rTRAIL, cigarette smoke extract, and/or H2O2 prior to caspase-3 activity measurement and annexin V staining assessment.,In addition, freshly resected lung samples were obtained from non-emphysematous and emphysematous subjects and exposed ex vivo to rTRAIL for up to 18 hours.,Lung samples were harvested and levels of active caspase-3 and caspase-8 were measured from tissue lysates.,Both cigarette smoke extract and H2O2 were able to sensitize A549 cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis.,Moreover, following exposure to rTRAIL, caspase-3 and -8 were activated in lung explants from emphysematous subjects while being decreased in lung explants from non-emphysematous subjects.,Alveolar sensitivity to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis is strongly increased in the emphysematous lung due to the presence of oxidative stress.,This might be a new mechanism leading to increased alveolar apoptosis and persistent alveolar destruction following smoking cessation. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by chronic inflammation of the airways and progressive destruction of lung parenchyma, a process that in most cases is initiated by cigarette smoking.,Several mechanisms are involved in the development of the disease: influx of inflammatory cells into the lung (leading to chronic inflammation of the airways), imbalance between proteolytic and anti-proteolytic activity (resulting in the destruction of healthy lung tissue) and oxidative stress.,Recently, an increasing number of data suggest a fourth important mechanism involved in the development of COPD: apoptosis of structural cells in the lung might possibly be an important upstream event in the pathogenesis of COPD.,There is an increase in apoptotic alveolar epithelial and endothelial cells in the lungs of COPD patients.,Since this is not counterbalanced by an increase in proliferation of these structural cells, the net result is destruction of lung tissue and the development of emphysema.,Data from animal models suggest a role for Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in the induction of apoptosis of structural cells in the lung.,Other mediators of apoptosis, such as caspase-3 and ceramide, could be interesting targets to prevent apoptosis and the development of emphysema.,In this review, recent data on the role of apoptosis in COPD from both animal models as well as from studies on human subjects will be discussed.,The aim is to provide an up to date summary on the increasing knowledge on the role of apoptosis in COPD and pulmonary emphysema. | 1 |
Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are episodes of worsening of symptoms, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality.,COPD exacerbations are associated with increased airway and systemic inflammation and physiological changes, especially the development of hyperinflation.,They are triggered mainly by respiratory viruses and bacteria, which infect the lower airway and increase airway inflammation.,Some patients are particularly susceptible to exacerbations, and show worse health status and faster disease progression than those who have infrequent exacerbations.,Several pharmacological interventions are effective for the reduction of exacerbation frequency and severity in COPD such as inhaled steroids, long-acting bronchodilators, and their combinations.,Non-pharmacological therapies such as pulmonary rehabilitation, self-management, and home ventilatory support are becoming increasingly important, but still need to be studied in controlled trials.,The future of exacerbation prevention is in assessment of optimum combinations of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies that will result in improvement of health status, and reduction of hospital admission and mortality associated with COPD. | Two 1-year studies evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of tiotropium 5 or 10 μg versus placebo, inhaled via the Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler (SMI).,The two studies were combined and had 4 co-primary endpoints (trough FEV1 response, Mahler Transition Dyspnea Index [TDI] and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire scores all at week 48, and COPD exacerbations per patient-year).,A total of 1990 patients with COPD participated (mean FEV1: 1.09 L).,The mean trough FEV1 response of tiotropium 5 or 10 μg relative to placebo was 127 or 150 mL, respectively (both P < 0.0001).,The COPD exacerbation rate was significantly lower with tiotropium 5 μg (RR = 0.78; P = 0.002) and tiotropium 10 μg (RR = 0.73; P = 0.0008); the health-related quality of life and Mahler TDI co-primary endpoints were significantly improved with both doses (both P < 0.0001).,Adverse events were generally balanced except anticholinergic class effects, which were more frequent with active treatment.,Fatal events occurred in 2.4% (5 μg), 2.7% (10 μg), and 1.6% (placebo) of patients; these differences were not significant.,Tiotropium Respimat® SMI 5 μg demonstrated sustained improvements in patients with COPD relative to placebo and similar to the 10 μg dose but with a lower frequency of anticholinergic adverse events. | 1 |
Changes in microbial community composition in the lung of patients suffering from moderate to severe COPD have been well documented.,However, knowledge about specific microbiome structures in the human lung associated with CT defined abnormalities is limited.,Bacterial community composition derived from brush samples from lungs of 16 patients suffering from different CT defined subtypes of COPD and 9 healthy subjects was analyzed using a cultivation independent barcoding approach applying 454-pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragment amplicons.,We could show that bacterial community composition in patients with changes in CT (either airway or emphysema type changes, designated as severe subtypes) was different from community composition in lungs of patients without visible changes in CT as well as from healthy subjects (designated as mild COPD subtype and control group) (PC1, Padj = 0.002).,Higher abundance of Prevotella in samples from patients with mild COPD subtype and from controls and of Streptococcus in the severe subtype cases mainly contributed to the separation of bacterial communities of subjects.,No significant effects of treatment with inhaled glucocorticoids on bacterial community composition were detected within COPD cases with and without abnormalities in CT in PCoA.,Co-occurrence analysis suggests the presence of networks of co-occurring bacteria.,Four communities of positively correlated bacteria were revealed.,The microbial communities can clearly be distinguished by their associations with the CT defined disease phenotype.,Our findings indicate that CT detectable structural changes in the lung of COPD patients, which we termed severe subtypes, are associated with alterations in bacterial communities, which may induce further changes in the interaction between microbes and host cells.,This might result in a changed interplay with the host immune system. | The epidemiology of invasive Haemophilus influenzae (Hi) has changed since the introduction of the Hi type b (Hib) vaccine.,The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and molecular epidemiology of Hi invasive disease in adults.,Clinical data of the 82 patients with Hi invasive infections were analyzed.,Antimicrobial susceptibility, serotyping, and genotyping were studied (2008-2013).,Men accounted for 63.4% of patients (whose mean age was 64.3 years).,The most frequent comorbidities were immunosuppressive therapy (34.1%), malignancy (31.7%), diabetes, and COPD (both 22%).,The 30-day mortality rate was 20.7%.,The majority of the strains (84.3%) were nontypeable (NTHi) and serotype f was the most prevalent serotype in the capsulated strains.,The highest antimicrobial resistance was for cotrimoxazole (27.1%) and ampicillin (14.3%).,Twenty-three isolates (32.9%) had amino acid changes in the PBP3 involved in resistance.,Capsulated strains were clonal and belonged to clonal complexes 6 (serotype b), 124 (serotype f), and 18 (serotype e), whereas NTHi were genetically diverse.,Invasive Hi disease occurred mainly in elderly and those with underlying conditions, and it was associated with a high mortality rate.,NTHi were the most common cause of invasive disease and showed high genetic diversity. | 1 |
Telerehabilitation (TR) aimed at patients with COPD has shown promising effects on symptoms, physical function, and quality of life, but little research has been conducted to understand the impact of implementation on frontline health professionals.,Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the barriers and enablers of health professionals to online exercise-based TR in patients with COPD, to support a successful implementation process.,Semistructured individual and focus group interviews were conducted with 25 health professionals working with conventional COPD rehabilitation or TR.,Interviews were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim.,Investigator triangulation was applied during data generation.,The Theoretical Domains Framework directed the interview guide and was used as a coding framework in the analysis.,We identified six predominant domains essential in understanding the enablers and barriers of TR from a staff perspective: 1) skills, 2) professional role and identity, 3) beliefs about capabilities, 4) beliefs about consequences, 5) environmental context and resources, and 6) social influences.,We found that health professionals held both enablers and barriers important for the implementation process of TR.,TR introduces new work tasks and new ways for the health professionals to communicate and exercise with the patients, which influence their professional role and self-perceived capability.,Specific attention toward involvement of the health professionals in the decision process combined with sufficient education and skill training is highly essential to support a successful implementation of TR in clinical practice. | In patients with COPD progressive dyspnoea leads to a sedentary lifestyle.,To date, no studies exist investigating the effects of Nordic Walking in patients with COPD.,Therefore, the aim was to determine the feasibility of Nordic Walking in COPD patients at different disease stages.,Furthermore we aimed to determine the short- and long-term effects of Nordic Walking on COPD patients' daily physical activity pattern as well as on patients exercise capacity.,Sixty COPD patients were randomised to either Nordic Walking or to a control group.,Patients of the Nordic Walking group (n = 30; age: 62 ± 9 years; FEV1: 48 ± 19% predicted) underwent a three-month outdoor Nordic Walking exercise program consisting of one hour walking at 75% of their initial maximum heart rate three times per week, whereas controls had no exercise intervention.,Primary endpoint: daily physical activities (measured by a validated tri-axial accelerometer); secondary endpoint: functional exercise capacity (measured by the six-minute walking distance; 6MWD).,Assessment time points in both groups: baseline, after three, six and nine months.,After three month training period, in the Nordic Walking group time spent walking and standing as well as intensity of walking increased (Δ walking time: +14.9 ± 1.9 min/day; Δ standing time: +129 ± 26 min/day; Δ movement intensity: +0.40 ± 0.14 m/s2) while time spent sitting decreased (Δ sitting time: -128 ± 15 min/day) compared to baseline (all: p < 0.01) as well as compared to controls (all: p < 0.01).,Furthermore, 6MWD significantly increased compared to baseline (Δ 6MWD: +79 ± 28 meters) as well as compared to controls (both: p < 0.01).,These significant improvements were sustained six and nine months after baseline.,In contrast, controls showed unchanged daily physical activities and 6MWD compared to baseline for all time points.,Nordic Walking is a feasible, simple and effective physical training modality in COPD.,In addition, Nordic Walking has proven to positively impact the daily physical activity pattern of COPD patients under short- and long-term observation.,Nordic Walking improves daily physical activities in COPD: a randomised controlled trial - ISRCTN31525632 | 1 |
Minimizing the risk of disease progression and exacerbations is the key goal of COPD management, as these are well-established indicators of poor COPD prognosis.,We developed a novel composite end point assessing three important aspects (lung function, health status, and exacerbations) of worsening in COPD.,The objective was to determine whether dual bronchodilation with umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) reduces clinically important deteriorations (CIDs) in COPD versus placebo or bronchodilator monotherapy.,This study is a post hoc analysis of two 24-week trials comparing UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg with UMEC 62.5 µg, VI 25 µg, or placebo (Study A; NCT01313650), or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg with tiotropium (TIO) 18 µg (Study B; NCT01777334) in patients with symptomatic COPD, without a history of frequent exacerbations.,Deterioration was assessed as the time to a first CID, a composite measure defined as a decrease of ≥100 mL in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second or ≥4-unit increase in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score or an on-treatment moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation.,In Study A, fewer patients experienced a first CID with UMEC/VI (44%) versus UMEC (50%), VI (56%), and placebo (75%).,The risk of a first CID was reduced with UMEC/VI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.37 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.30, 0.45]), UMEC (HR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.38, 0.56]), and VI (HR: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.45, 0.66]; all P<0.001) versus placebo, and with UMEC/VI versus UMEC (HR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.65, 0.97]; P<0.05) and versus VI (HR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.55, 0.81]; P<0.001).,In Study B, fewer patients experienced a first CID with UMEC/VI (41%) versus TIO (59%).,UMEC/VI reduced the risk of a first composite CID by 43% versus TIO (HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.47, 0.69]; P<0.001).,This exploratory analysis, using a new assessment of clinical deterioration in COPD, revealed that a majority of symptomatic patients with low exacerbation risk experienced a deterioration during the 24-week study periods.,UMEC/VI reduces the risk of a first CID versus placebo or bronchodilator monotherapy. | Sleep quality is often poor in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,A cross-sectional European survey investigated the prevalence of night-time symptoms in COPD to evaluate the level of disconnect between physician and patient perceptions of the presence of night-time symptoms, and to compare the characteristics of patients with and without night-time symptoms.,A total of 251 primary care physicians and 251 respiratory specialists completed record forms on 2,807 patients with COPD.,The forms captured information on patient demographics, lung function, COPD severity, and symptoms.,Patients completed questionnaires on the time of day when their COPD symptoms bothered them, and the impact of COPD on their ability to get up in the morning and on sleep.,Data were compared between groups (those with and without night-time symptoms) using t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests.,The kappa statistic was used to assess the level of disconnect between physician and patient perceptions of the impact of night-time symptoms.,Most patients (78%) reported night-time disturbance.,Patients with night-time symptoms experienced more daytime breathlessness (mean modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score 2.4 versus 1.1) and exacerbations in the previous 12 months (mean 1.7 versus 0.4), and received more maintenance therapy (mean of 2.8 versus 2.3 products) than those without.,Concordance between the frequency of physician-reported (67.9% of patients) and patient-reported (68.5% of patients) night-time symptoms was good.,Physicians significantly underestimated the impact of COPD on the patient’s ability to get up in the morning and on sleep (fair-moderate agreement).,Physician-reported night-time symptoms were present for 41.2% of patients who could be categorized by Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group (n=937), increasing from 20.9% of those in the low-risk group to 77.4% of those in the high-riskgroup.,Patients with COPD experience night-time symptoms regardless of GOLD group, that impact on their ability to get up in the morning and on their sleep quality. | 1 |
Little is known about the longitudinal changes associated with using the 2013 update of the multidimensional GOLD strategy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,To determine the COPD patient distribution of the new GOLD proposal and evaluate how this classification changes over one year compared with the previous GOLD staging based on spirometry only.,We analyzed data from the CHAIN study, a multicenter observational Spanish cohort of COPD patients who are monitored annually.,Categories were defined according to the proposed GOLD: FEV1%, mMRC dyspnea, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), and exacerbations-hospitalizations.,One-year follow-up information was available for all variables except CCQ data.,At baseline, 828 stable COPD patients were evaluated.,On the basis of mMRC dyspnea versus CAT, the patients were distributed as follows: 38.2% vs.,27.2% in group A, 17.6% vs.,28.3% in group B, 15.8% vs.,12.9% in group C, and 28.4% vs.,31.6% in group D.,Information was available for 526 patients at one year: 64.2% of patients remained in the same group but groups C and D show different degrees of variability.,The annual progression by group was mainly associated with one-year changes in CAT scores (RR, 1.138; 95%CI: 1.074-1.206) and BODE index values (RR, 2.012; 95%CI: 1.487-2.722).,In the new GOLD grading classification, the type of tool used to determine the level of symptoms can substantially alter the group assignment.,A change in category after one year was associated with longitudinal changes in the CAT and BODE index. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most prevalent and debilitating diseases in adults worldwide and is associated with a deleterious effect on the quality of life of affected patients.,Although it remains one of the leading causes of global mortality, the prognosis seems to have improved in recent years.,Even so, the number of patients with COPD and multiple comorbidities has risen, hindering their management and highlighting the need for futures changes in the model of care.,Together with standard medical treatment and therapy adherence - essential to optimizing disease control - several nonpharmacological therapies have proven useful in the management of these patients, improving their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) regardless of lung function parameters.,Among these are improved diagnosis and treatment of comorbidities, prevention of COPD exacerbations, and greater attention to physical disability related to hospitalization.,Pulmonary rehabilitation reduces symptoms, optimizes functional status, improves activity and daily function, and restores the highest level of independent physical function in these patients, thereby improving HRQoL even more than pharmacological treatment.,Greater physical activity is significantly correlated with improvement of dyspnea, HRQoL, and mobility, along with a decrease in the loss of lung function.,Nutritional support in malnourished COPD patients improves exercise capacity, while smoking cessation slows disease progression and increases HRQoL.,Other treatments such as psychological and behavioral therapies have proven useful in the treatment of depression and anxiety, both of which are frequent in these patients.,More recently, telehealthcare has been associated with improved quality of life and a reduction in exacerbations in some patients.,A more multidisciplinary approach and individualization of interventions will be essential in the near future. | 1 |
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease characterized by cough, fever, and fatigue and 20% of cases will develop into severe conditions resulting from acute lung injury with the manifestation of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that accounts for more than 50% of mortality.,Currently, it has been reported that some comorbidities are linked with an increased rate of severity and mortality among COVID-19 patients.,To assess the role of comorbidity in COVID-19 progression, we performed a systematic review with a meta-analysis on the relationship of COVID-19 severity with 8 different underlying diseases.,PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI were searched for articles investigating the prevalence of comorbidities in severe and non-severe COVID-19 patients.,A total of 41 studies comprising 12,526 patients were included.,Prevalence of some commodities was lower than that in general population such as hypertension (19% vs 23.2%), diabetes (9% vs 10.9%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (2% vs 9.5%), chronic liver diseases (CLD) (3% vs 24.8%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (3% vs 8.6%), while some others including cancer (1% vs 0.6%), cardiovascular disease (6% vs 1.8%) and cerebrovascular disease (2% vs 0.9%) exhibited greater percentage in COVID-19.,Cerebrovascular disease (OR = 3.70, 95%CI 2.51-5.45) was found to be the strongest risk factor in disease exacerbation, followed by CKD (OR = 3.60, 95%CI 2.18-5.94), COPD (OR = 3.14, 95% CI 2.35-4.19), cardiovascular disease (OR = 2.76, 95% CI 2.18-3.49), malignancy (OR = 2.63, 95% CI 1.75-3.95), diabetes (OR = 2.49, 95% CI 2.10-2.96) and hypertension (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.81-2.51).,We found no correlation between CLD and increased disease severity (OR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.96-1.82).,The impact of all eight underlying diseases on COVID-19 deterioration seemed to be higher in patients outside Hubei.,Based on different comorbidities, COVID-19 patients tend to be at risk of developing poor outcomes to a varying degree.,Thus, tailored infection prevention and monitoring and treatment strategies targeting these high-risk subgroups might improve prognosis during the COVID-19 pandemic.,The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-05915-0. | Morbidity and mortality from COVID‐19 caused by novel coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2 is accelerating worldwide, and novel clinical presentations of COVID‐19 are often reported.,The range of human cells and tissues targeted by SARS‐CoV‐2, its potential receptors and associated regulating factors are still largely unknown.,The aim of our study was to analyze the expression of known and potential SARS‐CoV‐2 receptors and related molecules in the extensive collection of primary human cells and tissues from healthy subjects of different age and from patients with risk factors and known comorbidities of COVID‐19.,We performed RNA sequencing and explored available RNA‐Seq databases to study gene expression and co‐expression of ACE2, CD147 (BSG), and CD26 (DPP4) and their direct and indirect molecular partners in primary human bronchial epithelial cells, bronchial and skin biopsies, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, whole blood, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), monocytes, neutrophils, DCs, NK cells, ILC1, ILC2, ILC3, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, and plasmablasts.,We analyzed the material from healthy children and adults, and from adults in relation to their disease or COVID‐19 risk factor status.,ACE2 and TMPRSS2 were coexpressed at the epithelial sites of the lung and skin, whereas CD147 (BSG), cyclophilins (PPIA andPPIB), CD26 (DPP4), and related molecules were expressed in both epithelium and in immune cells.,We also observed a distinct age‐related expression profile of these genes in the PBMCs and T cells from healthy children and adults.,Asthma, COPD, hypertension, smoking, obesity, and male gender status generally led to the higher expression of ACE2‐ and CD147‐related genes in the bronchial biopsy, BAL, or blood.,Additionally, CD147‐related genes correlated positively with age and BMI.,Interestingly, we also observed higher expression of CD147‐related genes in the lesional skin of patients with atopic dermatitis.,Our data suggest different receptor repertoire potentially involved in the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection at the epithelial barriers and in the immune cells.,Altered expression of these receptors related to age, gender, obesity and smoking, as well as with the disease status, might contribute to COVID‐19 morbidity and severity patterns.,ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression is unique for the epithelial barrier sites, whereas CD147, cyclophilins, and CD26 are expressed in both, epithelial and immune cells.,Age is a factor associated with the differential expression profiles of ACE2‐, CD147‐ and CD26‐related genes in the PBMCs and naive CD4+ T cells from healthy children and adults.,Asthma, COPD, hypertension, smoking, obesity, and male gender generally lead to the higher expression of ACE2‐ and CD147‐related genes in the bronchial biopsy, BAL or blood.,Abbreviations: ACE2, angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2; AD, atopic dermatitis; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CypA, cyclophilin A; CypB, cyclophilin B; GLUT1, glucose transporter 1; ILC, innate lymphoid cell; MCTs, monocarboxylate transporters; NF‐ATs, nuclear factor of activated T cells; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SARS‐CoV‐2; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SLC6A19, sodium‐dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT1; S100A9, protein S100‐A9; TMPRSS2, transmembrane protease serine. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is known to be associated with systemic inflammation.,We examined the longitudinal association of C-reactive protein (CRP) and lung function in a cohort of 18,110 men and women from the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer in Norfolk who were 40-79 years of age at baseline (recruited in 1993-1997) and followed-up through 2011.,We assessed lung function by measuring forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at baseline, 4 years, and 13 years.,Serum CRP levels were measured using a high-sensitivity assay at baseline and the 13-year follow up.,Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of loge-CRP and lung function were examined using multivariable linear mixed models.,In the cross-sectional analysis, 1-standard-deviation increase in baseline loge-CRP (about 3-fold higher CRP on the original milligrams per liter scale) was associated with a −86.3 mL (95% confidence interval: −93.9, −78.6) reduction in FEV1.,In longitudinal analysis, a 1-standard-deviation increase in loge-CRP over 13 years was also associated with a −64.0 mL (95% confidence interval: −72.1, −55.8) decline in FEV1 over the same period.,The associations were similar for FVC and persisted among lifetime never-smokers.,Baseline CRP levels were not predictive of the rate of change in FEV1 or FVC over time.,In the present study, we found longitudinal observational evidence that suggested that increases in systemic inflammation are associated with declines in lung function. | The relationship between serum biomarkers and clinical expressions of COPD is limited.,We planned to further describe this association using markers of inflammation and injury and repair.,We studied lung function, comorbidities, exercise tolerance, BODE index, and quality of life in 253 COPD patients and recorded mortality over three years.,Serum levels of Interleukins 6,8 and16, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF α) [inflammatory panel], vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) [injury and repair panel] and pulmonary and activation-regulated chemokine (PARC/CCL-18) and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1/CCL2) [chemoattractant panel] were measured.,We related the pattern of the biomarker levels to minimal clinically important differences (MCID) using a novel visualization method [ObServed Clinical Association Results (OSCAR) plot].,Levels of the inflammatory markers IL-6, TNF α were higher and those of injury and repair lower (p < 0.01) with more advanced disease (GOLD 1 vs.,4).,Using the OSCAR plot, we found that patients in the highest quartile of inflammatory and lowest quartile of injury and repair biomarkers level were more clinically compromised and had higher mortality (p < 0.05).,In COPD, serum biomarkers of inflammation and repair are distinctly associated with important clinical parameters and survival. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are associated with lung function decline, lower quality of life, and increased mortality, and can be prevented by pharmacological treatment and rehabilitation.,To examine management including examination, treatment, and planned follow-up of COPD exacerbation visits in primary care patients and to explore how measures and management at exacerbation visits are related to subsequent exacerbation risk.,A clinical population of 775 COPD patients was randomly selected from 56 Swedish primary healthcare centres.,Data on patient characteristics and management of COPD exacerbations were obtained from medical record review and a patient questionnaire.,In the study population of 458 patients with at least one exacerbation, Cox regression analyses estimated the risk of a subsequent exacerbation with adjustment for age and sex.,During a follow-up period of 22 months, 238 patients (52%) had a second exacerbation.,A considerable proportion of the patients were not examined and treated as recommended by guidelines.,Patients with a scheduled extra visit to an asthma/COPD nurse following an exacerbation had a decreased risk of further exacerbations compared with patients with no extra follow-up other than regularly scheduled visits (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.99), p=0.045).,Guidelines for examination and emergency treatment at COPD exacerbation visits are not well implemented.,Scheduling an extra visit to an asthma/COPD nurse following a COPD exacerbation may be associated with a decreased risk of further exacerbations in primary care patients. | Even with the dissemination of several clinical guidelines, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains underdiagnosed and mismanaged by many primary care physicians (PCPs).,The objective of this study was to elucidate barriers to consistent implementation of COPD guidelines.,A cross-sectional study implemented in July 2008 was designed to assess attitudes and barriers to COPD guideline usage.,Five hundred US PCPs (309 family medicine physicians, 191 internists) were included in the analysis.,Overall, 23.6% of the surveyed PCPs reported adherence to spirometry guidelines over 90% of the time; 25.8% reported adherence to guidelines related to long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) use in COPD patients.,In general, physicians were only somewhat familiar with COPD guidelines, and internal medicine physicians were significantly more familiar than family physicians (P < 0.05).,In a multivariate model controlling for demographics and barriers to guideline adherence, we found significant associations with two tested guideline components.,Adherence to spirometry guidelines was associated with agreement with guidelines, confidence in interpreting data, ambivalence to outcome expectancy, and ability to incorporate spirometry into patient flow.,Adherence to LABD therapy guidelines was associated with agreement with guidelines and confidence in gauging pharmacologic response.,Adherence to guideline recommendations of spirometry use was predicted by agreement with the recommendations, self-efficacy, perceived outcome expectancy if recommendations were adhered to, and resource availability.,Adherence to recommendations of LABD use was predicted by agreement with guideline recommendations and self-efficacy.,Increasing guideline familiarity alone may have limited patient outcomes, as other barriers, such as low confidence and outcome expectancy, are more likely to impact guideline adherence. | 1 |
There is a need to increase and maintain physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We assessed 12-month efficacy and effectiveness of the Urban Training intervention on physical activity in COPD patients.,This randomised controlled trial (NCT01897298) allocated 407 COPD patients from primary and hospital settings 1:1 to usual care (n=205) or Urban Training (n=202).,Urban Training consisted of a baseline motivational interview, advice to walk on urban trails designed for COPD patients in outdoor public spaces and other optional components for feedback, motivation, information and support (pedometer, calendar, physical activity brochure, website, phone text messages, walking groups and a phone number).,The primary outcome was 12-month change in steps·day−1 measured by accelerometer.,Efficacy analysis (with per-protocol analysis set, n=233 classified as adherent to the assigned intervention) showed adjusted (95% CI) 12-month difference +957 (184-1731) steps·day−1 between Urban Training and usual care.,Effectiveness analysis (with intention-to-treat analysis set, n=280 patients completing the study at 12 months including unwilling and self-reported non-adherent patients) showed no differences between groups.,Leg muscle pain during walks was more frequently reported in Urban Training than usual care, without differences in any of the other adverse events.,Urban Training, combining behavioural strategies with unsupervised outdoor walking, was efficacious in increasing physical activity after 12 months in COPD patients, with few safety concerns.,However, it was ineffective in the full population including unwilling and self-reported non-adherent patients.,Urban Training in COPD increased physical activity after 12 months but not in self-reported non-adherent patientshttp://ow.ly/dc2C30lnAEs | Study of the causes of the reduced levels of physical activity in patients with COPD has been scarce and limited to biological factors.,To assess the relationship between novel socio-environmental factors, namely dog walking, grandparenting, neighbourhood deprivation, residential surrounding greenness and residential proximity to green or blue spaces, and amount and intensity of physical activity in COPD patients.,This cross-sectional study recruited 410 COPD patients from five Catalan municipalities.,Dog walking and grandparenting were assessed by questionnaire.,Neighbourhood deprivation was assessed using the census Urban Vulnerability Index, residential surrounding greenness by the satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, and residential proximity to green or blue spaces as living within 300 m of such a space.,Physical activity was measured during 1 week by accelerometer to assess time spent on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and vector magnitude units (VMU) per minute.,Patients were 85% male, had a mean (SD) age of 69 (9) years, and post-bronchodilator FEV1 of 56 (17) %pred.,After adjusting for age, sex, socio-economic status, dyspnoea, exercise capacity and anxiety in a linear regression model, both dog walking and grandparenting were significantly associated with an increase both in time in MVPA (18 min/day (p<0.01) and 9 min/day (p<0.05), respectively) and in physical activity intensity (76 VMU/min (p=0.05) and 59 VMUs/min (p<0.05), respectively).,Neighbourhood deprivation, surrounding greenness and proximity to green or blue spaces were not associated with physical activity.,Dog walking and grandparenting are associated with a higher amount and intensity of physical activity in COPD patients.,Pre-results, NCT01897298. | 1 |
Although COPD exacerbations are known to occur more frequently in winter, there is little information on hospitalizations and cause-specific mortality.,This study aimed to examine seasonal variations in mortality and exacerbations in patients with COPD during the TIOtropium Safety and Performance In Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) trial.,TIOSPIR was a large-scale, multicenter trial, which assessed the safety and efficacy of tiotropium delivered via HandiHaler® (18 μg once daily) or Respimat® Soft Mist™ (2.5 or 5 μg once daily) inhaler in patients with COPD.,Patients were aged ≥40 years, with a smoking history ≥10 pack-years, and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≤70% and forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity ≤0.70.,COPD exacerbations and deaths were monitored throughout the trial.,The data were pooled to examine seasonal patterns.,Southern hemisphere data were shifted by 6 months to align with northern hemisphere seasons.,TIOSPIR was conducted in 43 northern (n=15,968) and 7 southern (n=1,148) hemisphere (n=1,148) countries.,The median duration of treatment was 835 days, with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years.,Among 19,494 exacerbations, there were clear seasonal differences (winter, 6,646 [34.1%]; spring, 4,515 [23.2%]; summer, 3,198 [16.4%]; autumn, 5,135 [26.3%]).,Exacerbations peaked in early winter (December in the northern hemisphere and June in the southern hemisphere), respiratory hospitalizations in midwinter, and respiratory deaths in early spring.,Although winter poses a 2-fold hazard for COPD exacerbations vs summer, respiratory deaths peak in early spring.,These data suggest that seasonal intensification of preventive treatments may impact COPD morbidity and mortality.,NCT01126437. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are common diseases with a heterogeneous distribution worldwide.,Here, we present methods and disease and risk estimates for COPD and asthma from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) 2015 study.,The GBD study provides annual updates on estimates of deaths, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), a summary measure of fatal and non-fatal disease outcomes, for over 300 diseases and injuries, for 188 countries from 1990 to the most recent year.,We estimated numbers of deaths due to COPD and asthma using the GBD Cause of Death Ensemble modelling (CODEm) tool.,First, we analysed data from vital registration and verbal autopsy for the aggregate category of all chronic respiratory diseases.,Subsequently, models were run for asthma and COPD relying on covariates to predict rates in countries that have incomplete or no vital registration data.,Disease estimates for COPD and asthma were based on systematic reviews of published papers, unpublished reports, surveys, and health service encounter data from the USA.,We used the Global Initiative of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease spirometry-based definition as the reference for COPD and a reported diagnosis of asthma with current wheeze as the definition of asthma.,We used a Bayesian meta-regression tool, DisMod-MR 2.1, to derive estimates of prevalence and incidence.,We estimated population-attributable fractions for risk factors for COPD and asthma from exposure data, relative risks, and a theoretical minimum exposure level.,Results were stratified by Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a composite measure of income per capita, mean years of education over the age of 15 years, and total fertility rate.,In 2015, 3·2 million people (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 3·1 million to 3·3 million) died from COPD worldwide, an increase of 11·6% (95% UI 5·3 to 19·8) compared with 1990.,There was a decrease in age-standardised death rate of 41·9% (37·7 to 45·1) but this was counteracted by population growth and ageing of the global population.,From 1990 to 2015, the prevalence of COPD increased by 44·2% (41·7 to 46·6), whereas age-standardised prevalence decreased by 14·7% (13·5 to 15·9).,In 2015, 0·40 million people (0·36 million to 0·44 million) died from asthma, a decrease of 26·7% (−7·2 to 43·7) from 1990, and the age-standardised death rate decreased by 58·8% (39·0 to 69·0).,The prevalence of asthma increased by 12·6% (9·0 to 16·4), whereas the age-standardised prevalence decreased by 17·7% (15·1 to 19·9).,Age-standardised DALY rates due to COPD increased until the middle range of the SDI before reducing sharply.,Age-standardised DALY rates due to asthma in both sexes decreased monotonically with rising SDI.,The relation between with SDI and DALY rates due to asthma was attributed to variation in years of life lost (YLLs), whereas DALY rates due to COPD varied similarly for YLLs and years lived with disability across the SDI continuum.,Smoking and ambient particulate matter were the main risk factors for COPD followed by household air pollution, occupational particulates, ozone, and secondhand smoke.,Together, these risks explained 73·3% (95% UI 65·8 to 80·1) of DALYs due to COPD.,Smoking and occupational asthmagens were the only risks quantified for asthma in GBD, accounting for 16·5% (14·6 to 18·7) of DALYs due to asthma.,Asthma was the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease worldwide in 2015, with twice the number of cases of COPD.,Deaths from COPD were eight times more common than deaths from asthma.,In 2015, COPD caused 2·6% of global DALYs and asthma 1·1% of global DALYs.,Although there are laudable international collaborative efforts to make surveys of asthma and COPD more comparable, no consensus exists on case definitions and how to measure disease severity for population health measurements like GBD.,Comparisons between countries and over time are important, as much of the chronic respiratory burden is either preventable or treatable with affordable interventions.,Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. | 1 |
Bronchodilator medications are central to the symptomatic management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) are the most commonly used devices to deliver treatment to patients with COPD and asthma, comprising approximately 70% of bronchodilator prescriptions.,Proprietary porous-particle technology permits the formulation of long-acting muscarinic antagonists, long-acting β2-agonists, and a combination of both in hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) MDIs, providing a solution to formulation challenges inherent to the development of HFA MDIs, which have contributed to the development of dry-powder inhalers.,In this randomized, double-blind, 4-period, 6-treatment, placebo- and active-controlled, multicenter, crossover study, 4 ascending single doses of a proprietary glycopyrronium (GP) MDI were evaluated compared with Placebo MDI and open-label tiotropium (TIO) in study patients with COPD.,Thirty-three study patients were enrolled and received single-dose administration of 4 of the 6 treatments (Placebo MDI, TIO 18 μg, or GP MDI at 14.4, 28.8, 57.6, and 115.2 μg ex-actuator) with an interval of 1 to 3 weeks between doses.,The primary efficacy endpoint was peak change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).,All 4 doses of GP MDI showed statistically superior efficacy compared with Placebo MDI for peak FEV1 (differences of 146 to 248 mL; P < .001), with a clear dose ordering of the response.,Statistically significant differences compared with Placebo MDI were noted at almost all doses for the secondary FEV1 parameters (P ≤ .049) except 24-hour trough FEV1 at 28.8 μg.,All doses were safe and well tolerated in this study; the most frequently reported adverse event was dry mouth (0-14.3% across doses; 9.5% for Placebo MDI, and 9.1% for TIO).,This study demonstrated superior bronchodilatory efficacy of GP MDI compared with Placebo MDI at all doses tested, and no serious adverse events were reported.,This study supports the further evaluation of GP MDI in study patients with COPD.,In addition, these findings indicate that the correct dosage of glycopyrronium is no more than 115.2 μg total daily dose, or 57.6 μg twice daily based on comparisons with the active comparator.,This clinical trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier:NCT00871182. | NVA237 is a once-daily dry-powder formulation of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium bromide in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The glycopyrronium bromide in COPD airways clinical study 1 (GLOW1) evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of NVA237 in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,Patients with COPD with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack-years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 80% and ≥ 30% predicted normal and FEV1/forced vital capacity < 0.70 were enrolled.,Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with NVA237 50 μg once daily or placebo for 26 weeks with inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids or H1 antagonists permitted in patients stabilized on them prior to study entry.,The primary outcome measure was trough FEV1 at Week 12.,A total of 822 patients were randomized to NVA237 (n = 552) or placebo (n = 270).,Least squares mean (± standard error) trough FEV1 at Week 12 was significantly higher in patients receiving NVA237 (1.408 ± 0.0105 L), versus placebo (1.301 ± 0.0137 L; treatment difference 108 ± 14.8 mL, p < 0.001).,Significant improvements in trough FEV1 were apparent at the end of Day 1 and sustained through Week 26.,FEV1 was significantly improved in the NVA237 group versus placebo throughout the 24-hour periods on Day 1 and at Weeks 12 and 26, and at all other visits and timepoints.,Transition dyspnoea index focal scores and St.,George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores were significantly improved with NVA237 versus placebo at Week 26, with treatment differences of 1.04 (p < 0.001) and-2.81 (p = 0.004), respectively.,NVA237 significantly reduced the risk of first moderate/severe COPD exacerbation by 31% (p = 0.023) and use of rescue medication by 0.46 puffs per day (p = 0.005), versus placebo.,NVA237 was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile, with a low frequency of cardiac and typical antimuscarinic adverse effects.,Once-daily NVA237 was safe and well tolerated and provided rapid, sustained improvements in lung function, improvements in dyspnoea, and health-related quality of life, and reduced the risk of exacerbations and the use of rescue medication.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01005901 | 1 |
As of 11 July, 2020, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has infected over 12.7 million people around the world and caused more than 560,000 deaths [1].,Given the devastating impact that COVID-19 can have on the lung, it is natural to fear for patients with underlying COPD.,Estimating their excess risk for contracting COVID-19 and, in particular, its more severe respiratory manifestations has been a challenging exercise in this pandemic for various reasons.,First, the reporting on cases has concentrated on hospitalised and intensive care unit (ICU) patients, rather than on mild, outpatient cases.,This is in part also due to the variability in testing strategies across the world, where some nations with stricter testing requirements and scarce testing resources have focused on testing only those requiring hospitalisation.,COPD patients have increased risk of severe pneumonia and poor outcomes when they develop COVID-19.,This may be related to poor underlying lung reserves or increased expression of ACE-2 receptor in small airways.https://bit.ly/37dSB8l | Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have limited efficacy in reducing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations and increase pneumonia risk, through unknown mechanisms.,Rhinoviruses precipitate most exacerbations and increase susceptibility to secondary bacterial infections.,Here, we show that the ICS fluticasone propionate (FP) impairs innate and acquired antiviral immune responses leading to delayed virus clearance and previously unrecognised adverse effects of enhanced mucus, impaired antimicrobial peptide secretion and increased pulmonary bacterial load during virus-induced exacerbations.,Exogenous interferon-β reverses these effects.,FP suppression of interferon may occur through inhibition of TLR3- and RIG-I virus-sensing pathways.,Mice deficient in the type I interferon-α/β receptor (IFNAR1−/−) have suppressed antimicrobial peptide and enhanced mucin responses to rhinovirus infection.,This study identifies type I interferon as a central regulator of antibacterial immunity and mucus production.,Suppression of interferon by ICS during virus-induced COPD exacerbations likely mediates pneumonia risk and raises suggestion that inhaled interferon-β therapy may protect.,Corticosteroid therapy is frequently used for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but its use is associated with increased risk of pneumonia.,Here the authors show that corticosteroid use impairs innate and adaptive immunity to rhinovirus infection, which is restored by exogenous IFNβ. | 1 |
As of 11 July, 2020, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has infected over 12.7 million people around the world and caused more than 560,000 deaths [1].,Given the devastating impact that COVID-19 can have on the lung, it is natural to fear for patients with underlying COPD.,Estimating their excess risk for contracting COVID-19 and, in particular, its more severe respiratory manifestations has been a challenging exercise in this pandemic for various reasons.,First, the reporting on cases has concentrated on hospitalised and intensive care unit (ICU) patients, rather than on mild, outpatient cases.,This is in part also due to the variability in testing strategies across the world, where some nations with stricter testing requirements and scarce testing resources have focused on testing only those requiring hospitalisation.,COPD patients have increased risk of severe pneumonia and poor outcomes when they develop COVID-19.,This may be related to poor underlying lung reserves or increased expression of ACE-2 receptor in small airways.https://bit.ly/37dSB8l | When faced with uncertainties about the effects of medical interventions regulatory agencies, guideline developers, clinicians, and researchers commonly ask for more research, and in particular for more randomized trials.,The conduct of additional randomized trials is, however, sometimes not the most efficient way to reduce uncertainty.,Instead, approaches such as value of information analysis or other approaches should be used to prioritize research that will most likely reduce uncertainty and inform decisions.,In situations where additional research for specific interventions needs to be prioritized, we propose the use of quantitative benefit-harm assessments that illustrate how the benefit-harm balance may change as a consequence of additional research.,The example of roflumilast for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease shows that additional research on patient preferences (e.g., how important are exacerbations relative to psychiatric harms?),or outcome risks (e.g., what is the incidence of psychiatric outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease without treatment?),is sometimes more valuable than additional randomized trials.,We propose that quantitative benefit-harm assessments have the potential to explore the impact of additional research and to identify research priorities Our approach may be seen as another type of value of information analysis and as a useful approach to stimulate specific new research that has the potential to change current estimates of the benefit-harm balance and decision making. | 1 |
Hospitalisation due to acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) is common, and subsequent mortality high.,The DECAF score was derived for accurate prediction of mortality and risk stratification to inform patient care.,We aimed to validate the DECAF score, internally and externally, and to compare its performance to other predictive tools.,The study took place in the two hospitals within the derivation study (internal validation) and in four additional hospitals (external validation) between January 2012 and May 2014.,Consecutive admissions were identified by screening admissions and searching coding records.,Admission clinical data, including DECAF indices, and mortality were recorded.,The prognostic value of DECAF and other scores were assessed by the area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve.,In the internal and external validation cohorts, 880 and 845 patients were recruited.,Mean age was 73.1 (SD 10.3) years, 54.3% were female, and mean (SD) FEV1 45.5 (18.3) per cent predicted.,Overall mortality was 7.7%.,The DECAF AUROC curve for inhospital mortality was 0.83 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.87) in the internal cohort and 0.82 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.87) in the external cohort, and was superior to other prognostic scores for inhospital or 30-day mortality.,DECAF is a robust predictor of mortality, using indices routinely available on admission.,Its generalisability is supported by consistent strong performance; it can identify low-risk patients (DECAF 0-1) potentially suitable for Hospital at Home or early supported discharge services, and high-risk patients (DECAF 3-6) for escalation planning or appropriate early palliation.,UKCRN ID 14214. | Diabetes damages major organ systems through disrupted glycemic control and increased inflammation.,The effects of diabetes on the lung have been of interest for decades, but the modest reduction in pulmonary function and its nonprogressive nature have limited its investigation.,A recent systematic review found that diabetes was associated with reductions in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide of the lung and increased FEV1/FVC.,They reported pooled results including few smokers.,This study will examine measures of pulmonary function in participants with extensive smoking exposure.,We examined pulmonary function in participants with a >10-pack-year history of smoking with and without diabetes with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We measured pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and pulmonary-related quality of life in 10,129 participants in the Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPDGene) Study.,Participants with diabetes were observed to have reduced pulmonary function after controlling for known risk factors and also significant reductions in exercise capacity and quality of life across functional stages of COPD.,Pulmonary function in patients with ≥10 pack-years of smoking and diabetes is reduced, and this decrease is associated with significant reductions in activity-related quality of life and exercise capacity. | 1 |
Purpose: Global evidence-based treatment strategies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend using long-acting bronchodilators (LABDs) as maintenance therapy.,However, COPD patients are often undertreated.,We examined COPD treatment patterns among Medicare beneficiaries who initiated arformoterol tartrate, a nebulized long-acting beta2 agonist (LABA), and identified the predictors of initiation.,Methods: Using a 100% sample of Medicare administrative data, we identified beneficiaries with a COPD diagnosis (ICD-9 490-492.xx, 494.xx, 496.xx) between 2010 and 2014 who had ≥1 year of continuous enrollment in Parts A, B, and D, and ≥2 COPD-related outpatient visits within 30 days or ≥1 hospitalization(s).,After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, three cohorts were identified: (1) study group beneficiaries who received nebulized arformoterol (n=11,886), (2) a subset of the study group with no LABD use 90 days prior to initiating arformoterol (n=5,542), and (3) control group beneficiaries with no nebulized LABA use (n=220,429).,Logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of arformoterol initiation.,Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p values were computed.,Results: Among arformoterol users, 47% (n=5,542) had received no LABDs 90 days prior to initiating arformoterol.,These beneficiaries were being treated with a nebulized (50%) or inhaled (37%) short-acting bronchodilator or a systemic corticosteroid (46%), and many received antibiotics (37%).,Compared to controls, beneficiaries who initiated arformoterol were significantly more likely to have had an exacerbation, a COPD-related hospitalization, and a pulmonologist or respiratory therapist visit prior to initiation (all p<0.05).,Beneficiaries with moderate/severe psychiatric comorbidity or dual-eligible status were significantly less likely to initiate arformoterol, as compared to controls (all p<0.05).,Conclusion: Medicare beneficiaries who initiated nebulized arformoterol therapy had more exacerbations and hospitalizations than controls 90 days prior to initiation.,Findings revealed inadequate use of maintenance medications, suggesting a lack of compliance with evidence-based treatment guidelines. | Severe exacerbations of COPD, ie, those leading to hospitalization, have profound clinical implications for patients and significant economic consequences for society.,The prevalence and burden of severe COPD exacerbations remain high, despite recognition of the importance of exacerbation prevention and the availability of new treatment options.,Severe COPD exacerbations are associated with high mortality, have negative impact on quality of life, are linked to cardiovascular complications, and are a significant burden on the health-care system.,This review identified risk factors that contribute to the development of severe exacerbations, treatment options (bronchodilators, antibiotics, corticosteroids [CSs], oxygen therapy, and ventilator support) to manage severe exacerbations, and strategies to prevent readmission to hospital.,Risk factors that are amenable to change have been highlighted.,A number of bronchodilators have demonstrated successful reduction in risk of severe exacerbations, including long-acting muscarinic antagonist or long-acting β2-agonist mono- or combination therapies, in addition to vaccination, mucolytic and antibiotic therapy, and nonpharmacological interventions, such as pulmonary rehabilitation.,Recognition of the importance of severe exacerbations is an essential step in improving outcomes for patients with COPD.,Evidence-based approaches to prevent and manage severe exacerbations should be implemented as part of targeted strategies for disease management. | 1 |
A number of studies have shown that COPD, particularly in its later and more severe stages, is associated with various cognitive deficits.,Thus, the primary goal of the present study was to elucidate the extent of cognitive impairment in patients with long-term oxygen therapy-dependent (LTOTD) COPD.,In addition, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of two cognitive screening tests, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), for COPD patients and the ability of oxygen therapy to mitigate COPD-related deficits in cognitive function.,The present study enrolled 45 subjects: 24 nonuser and 21 regular-user LTOTD-COPD patients.,All subjects had a similar grade of education, and there were no significant differences regarding age or sex.,The MoCA (cutoff: <26 points) and MMSE (cutoff: ≤24 points) scores were compared between these two groups.,The nonuser LTOTD-COPD group had a significantly lower MoCA score than that of the regular-user LTOTD-COPD group (19.38±2.99 vs 21.68±2.14, respectively) as well as a significantly lower MMSE score.,Moreover, the absence of supplemental oxygen therapy increased the risk of cognitive impairment (MoCA, P=0.007 and MMSE, P=0.014), and the MoCA and MMSE scores significantly correlated with the number of emergency admissions and the number of hospitalizations in the last year.,In the present study, the nonuser LTOTD-COPD group exhibited a significant decrease in cognitive status compared with the regular-user LTOTD-COPD group.,This suggests that the assessment of cognitive function in nonuser LTOTD-COPD patients and the use of protective strategies, such as continuous supplemental oxygen treatment, should be considered during the management of COPD in this population.,In addition, the MoCA score was superior to the MMSE score for the determination of cognitive impairment in the nonuser LTOTD-COPD patients. | Several studies have shown an association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cognitive impairment.,These studies have been limited by methodological issues such as diagnostic uncertainty, cross-sectional design, small sample size, or lack of appropriate referent group.,This study aimed to elucidate the association between COPD and the risk of cognitive impairment compared to referent subjects without COPD.,In patients with established COPD, we evaluated the impact of disease severity and impairment of respiratory physiology on cognitive impairment and the potential mitigating role of oxygen therapy.,We used the Function, Living, Outcomes and Work (FLOW) cohort study of adults with COPD (n = 1202) and referent subjects matched by age, sex, and race (n = 302) to study the potential risk factors for cognitive impairment among subjects with COPD.,Cognitive impairment was defined as a Mini-Mental State Exam score of <24 points.,Disease severity was using Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1); the validated COPD Severity Score; and the BMI (Body Mass Index), Obstruction, Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity (BODE) Index.,Multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding by age, sex, race, educational attainment, and cigarette smoking.,COPD was associated with a substantive risk of cognitive impairment compared to referent subjects (odds ratio [OR] 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.043-6.64).,Among COPD patients, none of the COPD severity measures were associated with the risk of cognitive impairment (P > 0.20 in all cases).,Low baseline oxygen saturation was related to increased risk of cognitive impairment (OR for oxygen saturation ≤88% (OR 5.45; 95% CI 1.014-29.2; P = 0.048).,Conversely, regular use of supplemental oxygen therapy decreased the risk for cognitive impairment (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.07-0.27; P < 0.0001).,COPD is a major risk factor for cognitive impairment.,Among patients with COPD, hypoxemia is a major contributor and regular use of home oxygen is protective.,Health care providers should consider screening their COPD patients for cognitive impairment. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death globally.,COPD patients with cachexia or weight loss have increased risk of death independent of body mass index (BMI) and lung function.,We tested the hypothesis genetic variation is associated with weight loss in COPD using a genome‐wide association study approach.,Participants with COPD (N = 4308) from three studies (COPDGene, ECLIPSE, and SPIROMICS) were analysed.,Discovery analyses were performed in COPDGene with replication in SPIROMICS and ECLIPSE.,In COPDGene, weight loss was defined as self‐reported unintentional weight loss > 5% in the past year or low BMI (BMI < 20 kg/m2).,In ECLIPSE and SPIROMICS, weight loss was calculated using available longitudinal visits.,Stratified analyses were performed among African American (AA) and Non‐Hispanic White (NHW) participants with COPD.,Single variant and gene‐based analyses were performed adjusting for confounders.,Fine mapping was performed using a Bayesian approach integrating genetic association results with linkage disequilibrium and functional annotation.,Significant gene networks were identified by integrating genetic regions associated with weight loss with skeletal muscle protein-protein interaction (PPI) data.,At the single variant level, only the rs35368512 variant, intergenic to GRXCR1 and LINC02383, was associated with weight loss (odds ratio = 3.6, 95% confidence interval = 2.3-5.6, P = 3.2 × 10−8) among AA COPD participants in COPDGene.,At the gene level in COPDGene, EFNA2 and BAIAP2 were significantly associated with weight loss in AA and NHW COPD participants, respectively.,The EFNA2 association replicated among AA from SPIROMICS (P = 0.0014), whereas the BAIAP2 association replicated in NHW from ECLIPSE (P = 0.025).,The EFNA2 gene encodes the membrane‐bound protein ephrin‐A2 involved in the regulation of developmental processes and adult tissue homeostasis such as skeletal muscle.,The BAIAP2 gene encodes the insulin‐responsive protein of mass 53 kD (IRSp53), a negative regulator of myogenic differentiation.,Integration of the gene‐based findings participants with PPI data revealed networks of genes involved in pathways such as Rho and synapse signalling.,The EFNA2 and BAIAP2 genes were significantly associated with weight loss in COPD participants.,Collectively, the integrative network analyses indicated genetic variation associated with weight loss in COPD may influence skeletal muscle regeneration and tissue remodelling. | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterised by reduced lung function and is the third leading cause of death globally.,Through genome-wide association discovery in 48,943 individuals, selected from extremes of the lung function distribution in UK Biobank, and follow-up in 95,375 individuals, we increased the yield of independent signals for lung function from 54 to 97.,A genetic risk score was associated with COPD susceptibility (odds ratios per standard deviation of the risk score (~6 alleles) (95% confidence interval) 1.24 (1.20-1.27), P=5.05x10-49) and we observed a 3.7 fold difference in COPD risk between highest and lowest genetic risk score deciles in UK Biobank.,The 97 signals show enrichment in development, elastic fibres and epigenetic regulation pathways.,We highlight targets for drugs and compounds in development for COPD and asthma (genes in the inositol phosphate metabolism pathway and CHRM3) and describe targets for potential drug repositioning from other clinical indications. | 1 |
COPD is a common irreversible obstructive airway disease.,S100A1, ZAG, and adiponectin are important regulators of energy metabolism and body weight.,Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess resting metabolic rate (RMR) and its association with serum levels of S100A1, ZAG, and adiponectin in cachectic and noncachectic COPD patients.,Ninety men with COPD, aged 40-70 years, were enrolled in the study.,Patients were divided into the following two groups based on the unintentional weight loss of .7.5% in previous 6 months: noncachectic (n=45) and cachectic (n=45).,The groups were matched based on age and body mass index (BMI).,RMR was measured by indirect calorimetry method.,Anthropometric indices and body composition were also measured.,Serum levels of S100A1, ZAG, and adiponectin were measured by ELISA.,Cachectic patients had significantly higher RMR than controls (P<0.001).,Serum levels of ZAG, S100A1, and adiponectin were significantly higher in the cachexia group (P<0.0001).,RMR was not significantly associated with S100A1, ZAG, and adiponectin levels.,However, weight loss of patients was significantly associated with serum levels of ZAG and adiponectin (both, β=0.22, P=0.03).,Strong and positive association were found between the serum levels of S100A1 and ZAG (β=0.88, P<0.0001), S100A1 and adiponectin (β=0.86, P<0.0001), and also ZAG and adiponectin (β=0.83, P<0.0001).,The potential role of these factors in the wasting process is considerable.,Also, the association between serum levels of S100A1, ZAG, and adiponectin represents that these three proteins are probably related to specific functions. | Exacerbations affect morbidity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We sought to evaluate the association between exacerbation frequency and spirometric and health status changes over time using data from a large, long-term trial.,This retrospective analysis of data from the 4-year UPLIFT® (Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium) trial compared tiotropium with placebo.,Annualized rates of decline and estimated mean differences at each time point were analyzed using a mixed-effects model according to subgroups based on exacerbation frequency (events per patient-year: 0, >0-1, >1-2, and >2).,Spirometry and the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were performed at baseline and every 6 months (also at one month for spirometry).,In total, 5992 patients (mean age 65 years, 75% male) were randomized.,Higher exacerbation frequency was associated with lower baseline postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (1.40, 1.36, 1.26, and 1.14 L) and worsening SGRQ scores (43.7, 44.1, 47.8, and 52.4 units).,Corresponding rates of decline in postbronchodilator FEV1 (mL/year) were 40, 41, 43, and 48 (control), and 34, 38, 48, and 49 (tiotropium).,Values for postbronchodilator forced vital capacity decline (mL/year) were 45, 56, 74, and 83 (control), and 43, 57, 83, and 95 (tiotropium).,The rates of worsening in total SGRQ score (units/year) were 0.72, 1.16, 1.44, and 1.99 (control), and 0.38, 1.29, 1.68, and 2.86 (tiotropium).,The proportion of patients who died (intention-to-treat analysis until four years [1440 days]) for the entire cohort increased with increasing frequency of hospitalized exacerbations.,Increasing frequency of exacerbations worsens the rate of decline in lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with COPD.,Increasing rates of hospitalized exacerbations are associated with increasing risk of death. | 1 |
Objective To investigate the long term effectiveness of integrated disease management delivered in primary care on quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with usual care.,Design 24 month, multicentre, pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial,Setting 40 general practices in the western part of the Netherlands,Participants Patients with COPD according to GOLD (Global Initiative for COPD) criteria.,Exclusion criteria were terminal illness, cognitive impairment, alcohol or drug misuse, and inability to fill in Dutch questionnaires.,Practices were included if they were willing to create a multidisciplinary COPD team.,Intervention General practitioners, practice nurses, and specialised physiotherapists in the intervention group received a two day training course on incorporating integrated disease management in practice, including early recognition of exacerbations and self management, smoking cessation, physiotherapeutic reactivation, optimal diagnosis, and drug adherence.,Additionally, the course served as a network platform and collaborating healthcare providers designed an individual practice plan to integrate integrated disease management into daily practice.,The control group continued usual care (based on international guidelines).,Main outcome measures The primary outcome was difference in health status at 12 months, measured by the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ); quality of life, Medical Research Council dyspnoea, exacerbation related outcomes, self management, physical activity, and level of integrated care (PACIC) were also assessed as secondary outcomes.,Results Of a total of 1086 patients from 40 clusters, 20 practices (554 patients) were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 20 clusters (532 patients) to the usual care group.,No difference was seen between groups in the CCQ at 12 months (mean difference -0.01, 95% confidence interval -0.10 to 0.08; P=0.8).,After 12 months, no differences were seen in secondary outcomes between groups, except for the PACIC domain “follow-up/coordination” (indicating improved integration of care) and proportion of physically active patients.,Exacerbation rates as well as number of days in hospital did not differ between groups.,After 24 months, no differences were seen in outcomes, except for the PACIC follow-up/coordination domain.,Conclusion In this pragmatic study, an integrated disease management approach delivered in primary care showed no additional benefit compared with usual care, except improved level of integrated care and a self reported higher degree of daily activities.,The contradictory findings to earlier positive studies could be explained by differences between interventions (provider versus patient targeted), selective reporting of positive trials, or little room for improvement in the already well developed Dutch healthcare system.,Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register NTR2268. | There is insufficient evidence of the cost-effectiveness of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Disease Management (COPD-DM) programs.,The aim of this review is to evaluate the economic impact of COPD-DM programs and investigate the relation between the impact on healthcare costs and health outcomes.,We also investigated the impact of patient-, intervention, and study-characteristics.,We conducted a systematic literature review to identify cost-effectiveness studies of COPD-DM.,Where feasible, results were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis and explorative subgroup analyses were performed.,Sixteen papers describing 11 studies were included (7 randomized control trials (RCT), 2 pre-post, 2 case-control).,Meta-analysis showed that COPD-DM led to hospitalization savings of €1060 (95% CI: €2040 to €80) per patient per year and savings in total healthcare utilization of €898 (95% CI: €1566 to €231) (excl. operating costs).,In these health economic studies small but positive results on health outcomes were found, such as the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, which decreased with 1.7 points (95% CI: 0.5-2.9).,There was great variability in DM interventions-, study- and patient-characteristics.,There were indications that DM showed greater savings in studies with: severe COPD patients, patients with a history of exacerbations, RCT study design, high methodological quality, few different professions involved in the program, and study setting outside Europe.,COPD-DM programs were found to have favourable effects on both health outcomes and costs, but there is considerable heterogeneity depending on patient-, intervention-, and study-characteristics. | 1 |
To investigate the association between inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) exposure patterns and the risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, we performed a nested case-control study.,Between 1998 and 2010, 51,739 patients, including 19,838 cases of pneumonia, were matched to 74,849 control subjects selected from a cohort of COPD patients using ICSs via risk-set sampling of the database constructed by the National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan.,After adjusting for covariates, the current use of ICSs was associated with a 25% increase in the risk of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] =1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.20-1.30), and there was an increase in the OR with increase in the average daily dosage.,Additionally, users of fluticasone/salmeterol, fluticasone, and either fluticasone/salmeterol or fluticasone were more likely to be at a higher risk of pneumonia (OR =1.35, 95% CI =1.28-1.41; OR =1.22, 95% CI =1.10-1.35; and OR =1.33, 95% CI =1.27-1.39, respectively).,In contrast, there were no statistically significant associations between the risk of pneumonia and the use of budesonide/formoterol, budesonide, or either budesonide/formoterol or budesonide.,In conclusion, ICSs are significantly associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in COPD patients.,The effect is prominent for fluticasone-containing ICSs but not for budesonide-containing ICSs. | We performed a review of studies of fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol (SAL) (combination inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)) in patients with COPD, which measured baseline (pretreatment) blood eosinophil levels, to test whether blood eosinophil levels ≥2% were associated with a greater reduction in exacerbation rates with ICS therapy.,Three studies of ≥1-year duration met the inclusion criteria.,Moderate and severe exacerbation rates were analysed according to baseline blood eosinophil levels (<2% vs ≥2%).,At baseline, 57-75% of patients had ≥2% blood eosinophils.,Changes in FEV1 and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores were compared by eosinophil level.,For patients with ≥2% eosinophils, FP/SAL was associated with significant reductions in exacerbation rates versus tiotropium (INSPIRE: n=719, rate ratio (RR)=0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.92, p=0.006) and versus placebo (TRISTAN: n=1049, RR=0.63, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.79, p<0.001).,No significant difference was seen in the <2% eosinophil subgroup in either study (INSPIRE: n=550, RR=1.18, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.51, p=0.186; TRISTAN: n=354, RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.47, p=0.957, respectively).,In SCO30002 (n=373), no significant effects were observed (FP or FP/SAL vs placebo).,No relationship was observed in any study between eosinophil subgroup and treatment effect on FEV1 and SGRQ.,Baseline blood eosinophil levels may represent an informative marker for exacerbation reduction with ICS/LABA in patients with COPD and a history of moderate/severe exacerbations. | 1 |
This systematic review aimed to identify the most effective components of interventions to facilitate self-management of health care behaviors for patients with COPD.,PROSPERO registration number CRD42011001588.,We used standard review methods with a systematic search to May 2012 for randomized controlled trials of self-management interventions reporting hospital admissions or health-related quality of life (HRQoL).,Mean differences (MD), hazard ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.,Effects among different subgroups of interventions were explored including single/multiple components and multicomponent interventions with/without exercise.,One hundred and seventy-three randomized controlled trials were identified.,Self-management interventions had a minimal effect on hospital admission rates.,Multicomponent interventions improved HRQoL (studies with follow-up >6 months St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (MD 2.40, 95% CI 0.75-4.04, I2 57.9).,Exercise was an effective individual component (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire at 3 months MD 4.87, 95% CI 3.96-5.79, I2 0%).,While many self-management interventions increased HRQoL, little effect was seen on hospital admissions.,More trials should report admissions and follow-up participants beyond the end of the intervention. | Management of chronic incurable diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma is difficult.,Incorporation of patient preferences is widely encouraged.,To summarize original research articles determining patient preference in moderate-to-severe disease.,Acceptable articles consisted of original research determining preferences for any aspect of care in patients with COPD/asthma.,The target population included those with severe disease; however, articles were accepted if they separated outcomes by severity or if the majority had at least moderate-to-severe disease.,We also accepted simulation research based on scenarios describing situations involving moderate-to-severe disease that elicited preferences.,Two reviewers searched Medline and Embase for articles published from the date of inception of the databases until the end of November 2014, with differences resolved through consensus discussion.,Data were tabulated and analyzed descriptively.,About 478 articles identified, 448 were rejected and 30 analyzed.,There were 25 on COPD and five on asthma.,Themes identified as most important in COPD were symptom relief (dyspnea/breathlessness), a positive patient-physician relationship, quality-of-life impairments, and information availability.,Patients strongly preferred sponsors’ inhalers.,At end-of-life, 69% preferred receiving CPR, 70% wanted noninvasive, and 58% invasive mechanical intervention.,While patients with asthma preferred treatments that increased symptom-free days, they were willing to trade days without symptoms for a reduction in adverse events and greater convenience.,Asthma patients were willing to pay for waking up once and not needing their inhaler over waking up once overnight and needing their inhaler.,Few studies have examined patient preference in these diseases.,More research is needed to fill in knowledge gaps. | 1 |
Objective To investigate the long term effectiveness of integrated disease management delivered in primary care on quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with usual care.,Design 24 month, multicentre, pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial,Setting 40 general practices in the western part of the Netherlands,Participants Patients with COPD according to GOLD (Global Initiative for COPD) criteria.,Exclusion criteria were terminal illness, cognitive impairment, alcohol or drug misuse, and inability to fill in Dutch questionnaires.,Practices were included if they were willing to create a multidisciplinary COPD team.,Intervention General practitioners, practice nurses, and specialised physiotherapists in the intervention group received a two day training course on incorporating integrated disease management in practice, including early recognition of exacerbations and self management, smoking cessation, physiotherapeutic reactivation, optimal diagnosis, and drug adherence.,Additionally, the course served as a network platform and collaborating healthcare providers designed an individual practice plan to integrate integrated disease management into daily practice.,The control group continued usual care (based on international guidelines).,Main outcome measures The primary outcome was difference in health status at 12 months, measured by the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ); quality of life, Medical Research Council dyspnoea, exacerbation related outcomes, self management, physical activity, and level of integrated care (PACIC) were also assessed as secondary outcomes.,Results Of a total of 1086 patients from 40 clusters, 20 practices (554 patients) were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 20 clusters (532 patients) to the usual care group.,No difference was seen between groups in the CCQ at 12 months (mean difference -0.01, 95% confidence interval -0.10 to 0.08; P=0.8).,After 12 months, no differences were seen in secondary outcomes between groups, except for the PACIC domain “follow-up/coordination” (indicating improved integration of care) and proportion of physically active patients.,Exacerbation rates as well as number of days in hospital did not differ between groups.,After 24 months, no differences were seen in outcomes, except for the PACIC follow-up/coordination domain.,Conclusion In this pragmatic study, an integrated disease management approach delivered in primary care showed no additional benefit compared with usual care, except improved level of integrated care and a self reported higher degree of daily activities.,The contradictory findings to earlier positive studies could be explained by differences between interventions (provider versus patient targeted), selective reporting of positive trials, or little room for improvement in the already well developed Dutch healthcare system.,Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register NTR2268. | Prediction models for exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are scarce.,Our aim was to develop and validate a new model to predict exacerbations in patients with COPD.,The derivation cohort consisted of patients aged 65 years or over, with a COPD diagnosis, who were followed up over 24 months.,The external validation cohort consisted of another cohort of COPD patients, aged 50 years or over.,Exacerbations of COPD were defined as symptomatic deterioration requiring pulsed oral steroid use or hospitalization.,Logistic regression analysis including backward selection and shrinkage were used to develop the final model and to adjust for overfitting.,The adjusted regression coefficients were applied in the validation cohort to assess calibration of the predictions and calculate changes in discrimination applying C-statistics.,The derivation and validation cohort consisted of 240 and 793 patients with COPD, of whom 29% and 28%, respectively, experienced an exacerbation during follow-up.,The final model included four easily assessable variables: exacerbations in the previous year, pack years of smoking, level of obstruction, and history of vascular disease, with a C-statistic of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.82).,Predictions were well calibrated in the validation cohort, with a small loss in discrimination potential (C-statistic 0.66 [95% CI 0.61-0.71]).,Our newly developed prediction model can help clinicians to predict the risk of future exacerbations in individual patients with COPD, including those with mild disease. | 1 |
The early stages of COPD have recently become a hot topic as many new risk factors have been proposed, but substantial knowledge gaps remain in explaining the natural history of the disease.,If we are to modify the outcomes of COPD, early detection needs to play a critical role.,However, we need to sort out the barriers to early detection and have a better understanding of the definition of COPD and its diagnosis and therapeutic strategies to identify and treat patients with COPD before structural changes progress.,In this review, we aim to clarify the differences between early COPD, mild COPD and early detection of COPD, with an emphasis on the clinical burden and how different outcomes (quality of life, exacerbation, cost and mortality) are modified depending on which definition is used.,We will summarise the evidence for the new multidimensional diagnostic approaches to detecting early pathophysiologic changes that potentially allow for future studies on COPD management strategies to halt or prevent disease development.,Is it possible to answer the question of whether early diagnosis of COPD is a myth or reality?,If we define the objectives clearly, early detection will play a key role in having a positive impact on the prognosis of patients with COPD.https://bit.ly/32crfPL | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has traditionally been considered an inexorably progressive disease, associated with a constant increase of symptoms that occur as the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) worsens, only intermittently interrupted by exacerbations.,However, this paradigm has been challenged in recent decades by the available evidence.,Recent studies have pointed out that COPD-related symptoms are not consistently perceived by patients in the same way, showing not only seasonal variation, but also changes in symptom perception during a week or even within a single day.,According to the available data, patients experience the biggest increase in respiratory symptoms during the first hours of the early morning, followed by the nighttime.,This variation over time is of considerable importance, since it impacts on daily life activities and health-related quality of life, as measured by a recently developed ad hoc questionnaire.,Additionally, recent clinical trials have suggested that the use of rapid-onset long-acting bronchodilators may have an impact on morning symptoms, despite their current use as maintenance treatment for a determined period.,Although this hypothesis is to be validated in future long-term clinical trials comparing fast-onset versus slow-onset inhaled drugs in COPD, it may bring forward a new concept of long-term bronchodilator therapy.,At the present time, the two available long-acting, fast-onset bronchodilators used in the treatment of COPD are formoterol and the recently marketed indacaterol.,Newer drugs have also been shown to have a rapid onset of action in preclinical studies.,Health care professionals caring for COPD patients should consider this variation in the perception of symptoms during their clinical interview as a potential new target in the long-term treatment plan. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients living in many countries are familiar with local dialects rather than the official language.,We, therefore, compare the reliability and validity of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) in Thai and northern Thai dialect versions, in stable COPD patients living in the northern part of Thailand.,A total of 160 COPD patients were randomly selected for the evaluation of each dialect version of CAT (n=80).,The internal consistency of all eight items and test-retest reliability were investigated by using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCC), respectively.,The validity was evaluated by the degree of correlation with St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) using Pearson’s correlation.,The correlations of CAT with clinical parameters such as forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC) dyspnea score, and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were also evaluated.,The two versions of CAT showed high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.82 and 0.76) as well as a high test-retest reliability (ICCC of 0.82 and 0.84) for Thai and northern Thai dialect versions, respectively.,The test results revealed that the northern Thai dialect version had good correlation with SGRQ whereas the Thai version correlated only moderately.,The two Thai versions of CAT were proven to be good clinical tools with high reliability and acceptable validity for assessing the quality of life of Thai COPD patients.,However, the northern Thai dialect version is more suitable for evaluating COPD patients living in the northern part of Thailand. | Exercise training has been incorporated into the international guidelines for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, the long-term efficacy of the training program for patients with advanced COPD has never been evaluated in Thailand.,To determine the long-term efficacy of intensive cycle ergometer exercise program on various clinical parameters of patients with advanced COPD.,The patients with advanced COPD were separated into two groups: the intensive ergometer exercise program group and the control group.,The clinical parameters of all the patients were assessed at baseline, every month for the first 3 months, and then every 3 months until they had completed the 24-month follow-up.,Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare baseline mean differences between the groups.,Repeated measure analysis was applied to determine the progress in all parameters during the entire follow-up period.,Mean incase imputation method was applied to estimate the parameters of dropout cases.,A total of 41 patients were enrolled: 27 in the intensive ergometer exercise program group and 14 in the control group.,The intensive cycle ergometer exercise program group showed statistically significant improvements in muscle strength (from month 1 till the end of the study, month 24), endurance time (from month 1 till the end of measurement, month 12) and clinically significant improvements in 6-minute walk distance (from month 2 until month 9), dyspnea severity by transitional dyspnea index (from month 1 till the end of the study, month 24), and quality of life (from month 1 till the end of the study, month 24).,There was no significant difference in survival rates between the groups.,The intensive ergometer exercise training program revealed meaningful long-term improvements in various clinical parameters for up to 2 years.,These promising results should encourage health care professionals to promote exercise training for patients with advanced COPD who have limited daily activities despite optimal medication control. | 1 |
Single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25 μg has been shown to improve lung function and health status, and reduce exacerbations, versus budesonide/formoterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We evaluated the non-inferiority of single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI + UMEC using two inhalers.,Eligible patients with COPD (aged ≥40 years; ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the 12 months before screening) were randomized (1:1; stratified by the number of long-acting bronchodilators [0, 1 or 2] per day during run-in) to receive 24-week FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 μg and placebo or FF/VI 100/25 μg + UMEC 62.5 μg; all treatments/placebo were delivered using the ELLIPTA inhaler once-daily in the morning.,Primary endpoint: change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at Week 24.,The non-inferiority margin for the lower 95% confidence limit was set at − 50 mL.,A total of 1055 patients (844 [80%] of whom were enrolled on combination maintenance therapy) were randomized to receive FF/UMEC/VI (n = 527) or FF/VI + UMEC (n = 528).,Mean change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 24 was 113 mL (95% CI 91, 135) for FF/UMEC/VI and 95 mL (95% CI 72, 117) for FF/VI + UMEC; the between-treatment difference of 18 mL (95% CI -13, 50) confirmed FF/UMEC/VI’s was considered non-inferior to FF/VI + UMEC.,At Week 24, the proportion of responders based on St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire Total score was 50% (FF/UMEC/VI) and 51% (FF/VI + UMEC); the proportion of responders based on the Transitional Dyspnea Index focal score was similar (56% both groups).,A similar proportion of patients experienced a moderate/severe exacerbation in the FF/UMEC/VI (24%) and FF/VI + UMEC (27%) groups; the hazard ratio for time to first moderate/severe exacerbation with FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI + UMEC was 0.87 (95% CI 0.68, 1.12).,The incidence of adverse events was comparable in both groups (48%); the incidence of serious adverse events was 10% (FF/UMEC/VI) and 11% (FF/VI + UMEC).,Single-inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) is non-inferior to two inhalers (FF/VI + UMEC) on trough FEV1 change from baseline at 24 weeks.,Results were similar on all other measures of efficacy, health-related quality of life, and safety.,GSK study CTT200812; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02729051 (submitted 31 March 2016). | Initial use of inhaled corticosteroid therapy is common in patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) A or B chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, contrary to GOLD guidelines.,We investigated UK prescribing of inhaled corticosteroid therapy in these patients, to identify predictors of inhaled corticosteroid use in newly diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.,A cohort of newly diagnosed GOLD A/B chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients was identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (June 2005-June 2015).,Patients were classified by prescribed treatment, with those receiving inhaled corticosteroid-containing therapy compared with those receiving long-acting bronchodilators without inhaled corticosteroid.,In all, 29,815 patients with spirometry-confirmed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were identified.,Of those prescribed maintenance therapy within 3 months of diagnosis, 63% were prescribed inhaled corticosteroid-containing therapy vs. 37% prescribed non-inhaled corticosteroid therapy.,FEV1% predicted, concurrent asthma diagnosis, region, and moderate exacerbation were the strongest predictors of inhaled corticosteroid use in the overall cohort.,When concurrent asthma patients were excluded, all other co-variates remained significant predictors.,Other significant predictors included general practitioner practice, younger age, and co-prescription with short-acting bronchodilators.,Trends over time showed that initial inhaled corticosteroid prescriptions reduced throughout the study, but still accounted for 47% of initial prescriptions in 2015.,These results suggest that inhaled corticosteroid prescribing in GOLD A/B patients is common, with significant regional variation that is independent of FEV1% predicted.,Inhaled steroids are often prescribed to early-stage chronic lung disease patients in the UK despite guidelines to the contrary.,Patients newly diagnosed with early-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should not be prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), because they carry an increased risk of side effects such as pneumonia and osteoporosis.,ICS should be reserved for patients with severe COPD and frequent exacerbations.,James Chalmers at the Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, Dundee, and co-workers examined prescribed medication data from the UK spanning 10 years, to determine key predictors of ICS prescription during early-stage COPD.,Of 29,815 patients identified, an average of 63% were prescribed ICS upon diagnosis, regardless of disease severity.,Younger patients were more likely to receive ICS, possibly due to co-morbidity with chronic asthma, and particular UK regions and medical practices prescribed ICS more readily than others. | 1 |
The association between exposure to ambient particles with a median aerodynamic diameter less than 10/2.5 µm (particulate matter, PM10/2.5) and COPD remains unclear.,Our study objective was to examine the association between ambient PM10/2.5 concentrations and lung functions in adults.,A cross-sectional study was conducted in southern China.,Seven clusters were randomly selected from four cities across Guangdong province.,Residents aged ≥20 years in the participating clusters were randomly recruited; all eligible participants were examined with a standardised questionnaire and spirometry.,COPD was defined as a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC less than 70%.,Atmosphere PM sampling was conducted across the clusters along with our survey.,Of the subjects initially recruited, 84.4% (n=5993) were included for analysis.,COPD prevalence and atmosphere PM concentration varied significantly among the seven clusters.,COPD prevalence was significantly associated with elevated PM concentration levels: adjusted OR 2.416 (95% CI 1.417 to 4.118) for >35 and ≤75 µg/m3 and 2.530 (1.280 to 5.001) for >75 µg/m3 compared with the level of ≤35 µg/m3 for PM2.5; adjusted OR 2.442 (95% CI 1.449 to 4.117) for >50 and ≤150 µg/m3 compared with the level of ≤50 µg/m3 for PM1.,A 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 concentrations was associated with a 26 mL (95% CI −43 to −9) decrease in FEV1, a 28 mL (−49 to −8) decrease in FVC and a 0.09% decrease (−0.170 to −0.010) in FEV1/FVC ratio.,The associations of COPD with PM10 were consistent with PM2.5 but slightly weaker.,Exposure to higher PM concentrations was strongly associated with increased COPD prevalence and declined respiratory function.,ChiCTR-OO-14004264; Post-results. | The lung is composed of airways and lung parenchyma, and the extracellular matrix (ECM) contains the main building blocks of both components.,The ECM provides physical support and stability to the lung, and as such it has in the past been regarded as an inert structure.,More recent research has provided novel insights revealing that the ECM is also a bioactive environment that orchestrates the cellular responses in its environs.,Changes in the ECM in the airway or parenchymal tissues are now recognized in the pathological profiles of many respiratory diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).,Only recently have we begun to investigate whether these ECM changes result from the disease process, or whether they constitute a driving factor that orchestrates the pathological outcomes.,This review summarizes our current knowledge of the alterations in the ECM in asthma, COPD, and IPF, and the contributions of these alterations to the pathologies.,Emerging data suggest that alterations in the composition, folding or rigidity of ECM proteins may alter the functional responses of cells within their environs, and in so doing change the pathological outcomes.,These characteristics highlight potential avenues for targeting lung pathologies in the future.,This may ultimately contribute to a better understanding of chronic lung diseases, and novel approaches for finding therapeutic solutions.,© 2016 The Authors.,The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. | 1 |
Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs) are important clinical events, with many patients experiencing multiple AECOPDs annually.,The terms used in the literature to define recurring AECOPD events are inconsistent and may impact the ability to describe the true burden of these events.,We undertook a systematic review to identify and summarize terms and definitions used in observational studies to describe AECOPD-related events occurring after an initial AECOPD (hereafter “subsequent AECOPD”).,PubMed was searched (2000-2019) for observational studies on subsequent AECOPD events using broad search strings for “COPD”, “exacerbation”, and “subsequent exacerbation events”.,Only English-language studies were included.,Small studies (n<50) and studies focusing on hospital re-admission only were excluded.,Extracted data were analyzed descriptively to generate a narrative summary, using a thematic approach to group studies utilizing similar terms for subsequent AECOPD.,Forty-seven studies were included.,No single, distinct terms or definitions were used to define and identify multiple occurrences of AECOPDs, though most (46) studies used one or more of four clustered terms and definitions: reapse (n = 13), recurrence/re-exacerbation (n = 11), treatment failure (n = 12) and non-recovery/time to recovery (n = 16).,Heterogeneity was observed within and between the four clusters with respect to study setting, starting point for observing subsequent AECOPDs, time frame to identify a subsequent AECOPD (except for studies using “time to recovery”), and basis for identifying a subsequent exacerbation.,Our review demonstrates that subsequent AECOPDs (including events such as relapse, recurrence/re-exacerbation, treatment failure, non-recovery/time to recovery) are ill-defined in the observational study literature, emphasizing the need to reach consensus on precise and objective definitions (for example, when one AECOPD ends and another begins).,Use of standardized terminology and definitions may aid comparability between, and synthesis of, studies, thus improving the understanding of the natural history and burden of exacerbations in COPD patients. | Corticosteroid resistance is a major barrier to the effective treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Oxidative stress from cigarette smoke and chronic inflammation is likely to induce this corticosteroid insensitivity.,Quercetin is a polyphenol that has been reported to be an active oxygen scavenger as well as a functional adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator.,The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of quercetin on corticosteroid responsiveness in COPD cells.,Corticosteroid sensitivity was examined in human monocytic U937 cells exposed to cigarette smoke extract (CSE) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected from patients with COPD.,Corticosteroid sensitivity was determined as the dexamethasone concentration causing 40% inhibition of tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced CXCL8 production (Dex-IC40) in the presence or absence of quercetin.,In U937 cells, treatment with quercetin activated AMPK and induced expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2, and consequently reversed CSE-induced corticosteroid insensitivity.,PBMC from patients with COPD showed corticosteroid insensitivity compared with those from healthy volunteers, and treatment with quercetin restored corticosteroid sensitivity.,In conclusion, quercetin restores corticosteroid sensitivity, and has the potential to be a novel treatment in combination with corticosteroids in COPD. | 1 |
To assess the comparative efficacy of short-acting muscarinic antagonists (SAMAs), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), LAMA in combination with long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs; LAMA/LABAs) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in combination with LABA (ICS/LABAs) for the maintenance treatment of COPD.,We systematically reviewed 74 randomized controlled trials (74,832 participants) published up to 15 November 2017, which compared any of the interventions (SAMA [ipratropium], LAMA [aclidinium, glycopyrronium, tiotropium, umeclidinium], LAMA/LABA [aclidinium/formoterol, indacaterol/glycopyrronium, tiotropium/olodaterol, umeclidinium/vilanterol] and ICS/LABA [fluticasone/vilanterol, budesonide/formoterol, salmeterol/fluticasone]) with each other or with placebo.,A random-effects network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence was conducted to examine the change from baseline in trough FEV1, transition dyspnea index, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire and frequency of adverse events at weeks 12 and 24.,Inconsistency models were not statistically significant for all outcomes.,LAMAs, LAMA/LABAs and ICS/LABAs led to a significantly greater improvement in trough FEV1 compared with placebo and SAMA monotherapy at weeks 12 and 24.,All LAMA/LABAs, except aclidinium/formoterol, were statistically significantly better than LAMA monotherapy and ICS/LABAs in improving trough FEV1.,Among the LAMAs, umeclidinium showed statistically significant improvement in trough FEV1 at week 12 compared to tiotropium and glycopyrronium, but the results were not clinically significant.,LAMA/LABAs had the highest probabilities of being ranked the best agents in FEV1 improvement.,Similar trends were observed for the transition dyspnea index and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire outcomes.,There were no significant differences in the incidences of adverse events among all treatment options.,LAMA/LABA showed the greatest improvement in trough FEV1 at weeks 12 and 24 compared with the other inhaled drug classes, while SAMA showed the least improvement.,There were no significant differences among the LAMAs and LAMA/LABAs within their respective classes. | As lung function declines rapidly in the early stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the effects of bronchodilators in patients with moderate disease and those who have not previously received maintenance therapy are of interest.,OTEMTO® 1 and 2 were two replicate, 12-week, Phase III studies investigating the benefit of tiotropium + olodaterol on lung function and quality of life in patients with moderate to severe disease.,Post hoc analyses were performed to assess the benefits for patients according to disease severity and treatment history.,Four subgroup analyses were performed: Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2/3, GOLD A/B/C/D, treatment naive/not treatment naive and receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) at baseline/not receiving ICS at baseline.,Primary end points were change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 h response, change in trough FEV1 and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score.,Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score was a secondary end point, and SGRQ and TDI responder analyses were further end points; all were assessed at 12 weeks.,In all subgroups, patients receiving tiotropium + olodaterol responded better overall than those receiving tiotropium monotherapy.,Improvements with tiotropium + olodaterol over placebo or tiotropium monotherapy were noted across GOLD 2/3 and GOLD A/B/C/D; however, improvements in SGRQ total score were most evident in the GOLD B subgroup.,Moreover, lung-function outcomes were generally greater in those patients who had been receiving previous long-acting bronchodilator and/or ICS maintenance treatment.,These data suggest that tiotropium + olodaterol should be considered as a treatment option in patients with moderate COPD who are initiating maintenance therapy, as well as those with more severe disease.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01964352 and NCT02006732.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-016-0387-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | 1 |
The landmark study of Fletcher and Peto on the natural history of tobacco smoke-related chronic airflow obstruction suggested that decline in the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is slow at the beginning, becoming faster with more advanced disease.,The present authors reviewed spirometric data of COPD patients included in the placebo arms of recent clinical trials to assess the lung function decline of each stage, defined according to the severity of airflow obstruction as proposed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines.,In large COPD populations the mean rate of FEV1 decline in GOLD stages II and III is between 47 and 79 mL/year and 56 and 59 mL/year, respectively, and lower than 35 mL/year in GOLD stage IV.,Few data on FEV1 decline are available for GOLD stage I.,Hence, the loss of lung function, assessed as expiratory airflow reduction, seems more accelerated and therefore more relevant in the initial phases of COPD.,To have an impact on the natural history of COPD, it is logical to look at the effects of treatment in the earlier stages. | Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, once-daily, ultra-long-acting β2-agonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,This randomized, double-blind study compared the bronchodilator efficacy of indacaterol with that of placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,In an incomplete-block, multi-dose, three-period, crossover design, patients received three of the following four treatments: indacaterol 150 μg, indacaterol 300 μg, tiotropium 18 μg and placebo, each once-daily for 14 days.,Each treatment period was separated by a 14-day washout.,Study drug was supplied daily by blinded, third party study personnel to maintain blinding of patients and investigators.,The primary efficacy variable was trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at 24 h post-dose after 14 days.,The study was powered to demonstrate non-inferiority of indacaterol to tiotropium for this variable.,A total of 169 patients were randomized (mean age 65 years); 153 (90.5%) completed.,Trough FEV1 after 14 days with indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg was statistically and clinically superior to placebo, with differences (95% CI) of 170 (120-220) and 150 (100-200) mL respectively (both p < 0.001).,For this endpoint, both doses of indacaterol not only met the criterion for non-inferiority compared with tiotropium, but also achieved numerically higher values, with differences versus tiotropium of 40 and 30 mL for indacaterol 150 and 300 μg, respectively.,At 5 min post-dose on Day 1, the mean FEV1 for both indacaterol doses was significantly higher than placebo (by 120 and 130 mL for indacaterol 150 and 300 μg, respectively; p < 0.001) and tiotropium (by 80 mL for both doses; p < 0.001).,Adverse events were reported by similar proportions of patients: 31.4%, 29.5%, 28.3% and 28.5% for indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg, tiotropium and placebo treatments, respectively.,Once-daily indacaterol provided clinically and statistically significant 24-h bronchodilation.,Indacaterol was at least as effective as tiotropium, with a faster onset of action (within 5 min) on the first day of dosing.,Indacaterol should prove useful in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, for whom treatment with one or more classes of long-acting bronchodilator is recommended.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00615459, EudraCT number: 2007-004071-19 | 1 |
This post hoc analysis of TIOtropium Safety and Performance In Respimat (TIOSPIR) evaluated safety and exacerbation efficacy in patients with stable (≥2 months) use of tiotropium HandiHaler 18 µg (HH18) prior to study entry, to evaluate whether there was a difference in risk for patients who switched from HH18 to tiotropium Respimat 2.5 µg (R2.5) or 5 µg (R5).,TIOSPIR (n=17 135) was an international, Phase IIIb/IV, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, event-driven trial.,Patients from TIOSPIR with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and postbronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity ≤0.70, receiving HH18 before study entry, were analysed (n=2784).,Patients were randomised to once-daily tiotropium R2.5 (n=914), R5 (n=918) or HH18 (n=952) for 2-3 years.,Primary outcomes: time to death (safety) and time to first COPD exacerbation (efficacy).,Secondary outcomes: number of exacerbations and time to first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE).,Baseline characteristics were similar in all groups.,Respimat had a similar mortality risk versus HH18 (vital status follow-up, HR; 95% CI R2.5: 0.87; 0.64 to 1.17; R5: 0.79; 0.58 to 1.07) with no significant differences in the risk and rates of exacerbations and severe exacerbations across treatment groups.,Risk of MACE and fatal MACE was similar for Respimat versus HH18 (HR; 95% CI MACE R2.5: 0.73; 0.47 to 1.15; R5: 0.69; 0.44 to 1.08; fatal MACE R2.5: 0.57; 0.27 to 1.19; R5: 0.67; 0.33 to 1.34).,Overall risk of a fatal event (on treatment) was lower for R5 versus HH18 (HR; 95% CI R2.5: 0.78; 0.55 to 1.09; R5: 0.62; 0.43 to 0.89).,This analysis indicates that it is safe to switch patients from tiotropium HandiHaler to tiotropium Respimat, and that the efficacy is maintained over the switch.,NCT01126437; Post-results. | Events of the past decade have stimulated development of new drug formulations and delivery devices that have improved the efficiency, ease of use, and environmental impact of inhaled drug therapy.,Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler is a novel, multidose, propellant-free, hand-held, liquid inhaler that represents a new category of inhaler devices.,The aerosol cloud generated by Respimat contains a higher fraction of fine particles than most pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and the aerosol spray exits the inhaler more slowly and for a longer duration than with pMDIs.,This translates into higher lung drug deposition and lower oropharyngeal deposition, making it possible to give lower nominal doses of delivered drugs without lowering efficacy.,In clinical trials in patients with COPD, bronchodilator drugs delivered from Respimat were equally effective at half of the dose delivered from a pMDI.,In one study of inhaler preference, Respimat was preferred over the pMDI by patients with COPD and other obstructive lung diseases.,Respimat is a valuable addition to the range of inhaler devices available to the patient with COPD. | 1 |
Clinical outcomes are worse in patients with COPD and chronic bronchitis.,N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is commonly prescribed for such patients but with uncertain clinical benefits.,We postulated that oral NAC, at much larger doses than those ordinarily prescribed, would improve clinical outcomes in a subset of patients with COPD and chronic bronchitis.,The aim of this study was to determine whether very high-dose NAC would improve respiratory health status in patients with COPD and chronic bronchitis.,Patients with COPD and chronic bronchitis were enrolled in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial.,Patients received oral NAC (1,800 mg) or matching placebo twice daily for 8 weeks in addition to their usual respiratory medications.,The primary outcome, respiratory health status, was assessed by changes in the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.,The effects of NAC on lung function and circulating markers of oxidative stress and inflammation were also evaluated.,We terminated the study prematurely because new external information suggested the possibility of a safety issue.,Of the planned 130 patients, 51 were randomized and 45 (22 in the placebo arm and 23 in the NAC arm) completed the study.,There was no statistically significant difference between changes in the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score, comparing NAC to placebo (adjusted mean difference, 0.1 U; 95% CI, −7.8 to 8.18 U; P=0.97).,There were also no significant NAC-related improvements in any of the secondary outcomes.,In this 8-week trial, we were unable to show any clinical benefit from a very high dose of NAC in patients with COPD and chronic bronchitis. | COPD is a progressive condition involving chronic inflammation and parenchymal destruction with resulting airflow limitation.,COPD is associated with worsening airflow limitation over time and increased frequency of COPD exacerbations, leading to increased mortality and morbidity.,The effects of COPD extend beyond the lungs, as multiple comorbidities may occur with COPD, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, depression, and pneumonia.,COPD exacerbations are associated with a rapid worsening of baseline symptoms that requires prompt management and may necessitate hospitalization in the case of a severe episode.,Patients with COPD exacerbations require urgent management of symptoms to prevent further worsening, and preventative steps may be taken to help reduce the number and frequency of future exacerbations.,Roflumilast is a potent and selective inhibitor of the enzyme phosphodiesterase-4 that targets the systemic inflammation associated with COPD.,Roflumilast has a variety of anti-inflammatory effects including decreasing inflammatory mediators and the expression of cell surface markers and inhibition of apoptosis.,Several clinical trials evaluating roflumilast in the treatment of COPD have demonstrated significant improvements from baseline versus placebo in lung function, including increases in mean pre- and postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity.,Data suggest that roflumilast reduces moderate to severe exacerbations with the benefit most well established in patients with severe disease.,Given this evidence, roflumilast, as part of a combination regimen with long-acting bronchodilators, appears to be a reasonable treatment option for patients with severe to very severe COPD associated with chronic bronchitis and a history of exacerbations. | 1 |
With the current wealth of new inhalers available and insurance policy driven inhaler switching, the need for insights in optimal education on inhaler use is more evident than ever.,We aimed to systematically review educational inhalation technique interventions, to assess their overall effectiveness, and identify main drivers of success.,Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched for randomised controlled trials on educational inhalation technique interventions.,Inclusion eligibility, quality appraisal (Cochrane’s risk of bias tool) and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers.,Regression analyses were performed to identify characteristics contributing to inhaler technique improvement.,Thirty-seven of the 39 interventions included (95%) indicated statistically significant improvement of inhaler technique.,However, average follow-up time was relatively short (5 months), 28% lacked clinical relevant endpoints and all lacked cost-effectiveness estimates.,Poor initial technique, number of inhalation procedure steps, setting (outpatient clinics performing best), and time elapsed since intervention (all, p < 0.05), were shown to have an impact on effectiveness of the intervention, explaining up to 91% of the effectiveness variation.,Other factors, such as disease (asthma vs. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), education group size (individual vs. group training) and inhaler type (dry powder inhalers vs. pressurised metered dose inhalers) did not play a significant role.,Notably, there was a trend (p = 0.06) towards interventions in adults being more effective than those in children and the intervention effect seemed to wane over time.,In conclusion, educational interventions to improve inhaler technique are effective on the short-term.,Periodical intervention reinforcement and longer follow-up studies, including clinical relevant endpoints and cost-effectiveness, are recommended. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an obstructive and progressive airway disease associated with an important reduction in daily physical activity and psychological problems that contribute to the patient’s disability and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL).,Nowadays, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) plays an essential role in the management of symptomatic patients with COPD, by breaking the vicious circle of dyspnea-decreased activity-deconditioning-isolation.,Indeed the main benefits of comprehensive PR programs for patients with COPD include a decrease in symptoms (dyspnea and fatigue), improvements in exercise tolerance and HRQoL, reduction of health care utilization (particularly bed-days), as well as an increase in physical activity.,Several randomized studies and meta-analyses greatly established the benefits of PR, which additionally, is recommended in a number of influential guidelines.,This review aimed to highlight the impact of PR on COPD patients, focusing on the clinical usefulness of PR, which provides patients a good support for change. | 1 |
AUDIPOC is a nationwide clinical audit that describes the characteristics, interventions and outcomes of patients admitted to Spanish hospitals because of an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD), assessing the compliance of these parameters with current international guidelines.,The present study describes hospital resources, hospital factors related to case recruitment variability, patients’ characteristics, and adherence to guidelines.,An organisational database was completed by all participant hospitals recording resources and organisation.,Over an 8-week period 11,564 consecutive ECOPD admissions to 129 Spanish hospitals covering 70% of the Spanish population were prospectively identified.,At hospital discharge, 5,178 patients (45% of eligible) were finally included, and thus constituted the audited population.,Audited patients were reassessed 90 days after admission for survival and readmission rates.,A wide variability was observed in relation to most variables, hospital adherence to guidelines, and readmissions and death.,Median inpatient mortality was 5% (across-hospital range 0-35%).,Among discharged patients, 37% required readmission (0-62%) and 6.5% died (0-35%).,The overall mortality rate was 11.6% (0-50%).,Hospital size and complexity and aspects related to hospital COPD awareness were significantly associated with case recruitment.,Clinical management most often complied with diagnosis and treatment recommendations but rarely (<50%) addressed guidance on healthy life-styles.,The AUDIPOC study highlights the large across-hospital variability in resources and organization of hospitals, patient characteristics, process of care, and outcomes.,The study also identifies resources and organizational characteristics associated with the admission of COPD cases, as well as aspects of daily clinical care amenable to improvement. | National surveys have revealed significant differences in patient outcomes following admission to hospital with acute exacerbation of COPD which are likely to be due to variations in care.,We developed a care bundle, comprising a short list of evidence-based practices to be implemented prior to discharge for all patients admitted with this condition, based on a review of national guidelines and other relevant literature, expert opinion and patient consultation.,Implementation was then piloted using action research methodologies with patient input.,Actively involving staff was vital to ensure that the changes introduced were understood and the process followed.,Implementation of a care bundle has the potential to produce a dramatic improvement in compliance with optimum health care practice. | 1 |
Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) has anti-inflammatory potential but PTP1B responses are desensitized in the lung by prolonged cigarette smoke exposure.,Here we investigate whether PTP1B expression impacts lung disease severity during respiratory syncytial viral (RSV) exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Ptp1b-/- mice infected with RSV exhibit exaggerated immune cell infiltration, damaged epithelial cell barriers, cytokine production and increased apoptosis.,Elevated expression of S100A9, a damage-associated molecular pattern molecule, was observed in the lungs of Ptp1b-/- mice during RSV infection.,Utilizing a neutralizing anti-S100A9 IgG antibody, it was determined that extracellular S100A9 signaling significantly impacts lung damage during RSV infection.,Pre-exposure to cigarette smoke desensitized PTP1B activity, which coincided with enhanced S100A9 secretion and inflammation in wild type animals during RSV infection.,S100A9 levels in human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid had an inverse relationship with lung function in healthy subjects, smokers and COPD subjects.,Fully differentiated human bronchial epithelial cells isolated from COPD donors cultured at the air liquid interface secreted more S100A9 than cells from healthy donors or smokers following RSV infection.,Together, these findings show that reduced PTP1B responses contribute to disease symptoms in part by enhancing S100A9 expression during viral-associated COPD exacerbations. | Caveolae are vesicular invaginations of the plasma membrane.,Caveolin-1 is the structural protein component of caveolae.,Caveolin-1 participates in signal transduction processes by acting as a scaffolding protein that concentrates, organizes and functional regulates signaling molecules within caveolar membranes.,Cigarette smoke, a source of oxidants, is an environmental hazard that causes pulmonary emphysema.,Recently, we reported that the development of cigarette smoking-induced pulmonary emphysema was inhibited in caveolin-1 null mice, which do not express caveolin-1.,We demonstrated that lack of caveolin-1 expression in lung fibroblasts dramatically inhibited premature senescence induced by oxidants contained in cigarette smoke.,Mechanistically, we uncovered that premature senescence of lung fibroblasts induced by oxidative stress occurred through activation of an ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)/p53-depedent pathway following sequestration of the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A-C), an inhibitor of ATM, by caveolin-1 into caveolar membranes.,We propose caveolin-1 as a key player of a novel signaling pathway that links cigarette smoke to premature senescence of lung fibroblasts and development of pulmonary emphysema. | 1 |
A substantial proportion of chronic disease patients do not respond to self-management interventions, which suggests that one size interventions do not fit all, demanding more tailored interventions.,To compose more individualized strategies, we aim to increase our understanding of characteristics associated with patient activation for self-management and to evaluate whether these are disease-transcending.,A cross-sectional survey study was conducted in primary and secondary care in patients with type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM-II), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) and Chronic Renal Disease (CRD).,Using multiple linear regression analysis, we analyzed associations between self-management activation (13-item Patient Activation Measure; PAM-13) and a wide range of socio-demographic, clinical, and psychosocial determinants.,Furthermore, we assessed whether the associations between the determinants and the PAM were disease-transcending by testing whether disease was an effect modifier.,In addition, we identified determinants associated with low activation for self-management using logistic regression analysis.,We included 1154 patients (53% response rate); 422 DM-II patients, 290 COPD patients, 223 HF patients and 219 CRD patients.,Mean age was 69.6±10.9.,Multiple linear regression analysis revealed 9 explanatory determinants of activation for self-management: age, BMI, educational level, financial distress, physical health status, depression, illness perception, social support and underlying disease, explaining a variance of 16.3%.,All associations, except for social support, were disease transcending.,This study explored factors associated with varying levels of activation for self-management.,These results are a first step in supporting clinicians and researchers to identify subpopulations of chronic disease patients less likely to be engaged in self-management.,Increased scientific efforts are needed to explain the greater part of the factors that contribute to the complex nature of patient activation for self-management. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an obstructive and progressive airway disease associated with an important reduction in daily physical activity and psychological problems that contribute to the patient’s disability and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL).,Nowadays, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) plays an essential role in the management of symptomatic patients with COPD, by breaking the vicious circle of dyspnea-decreased activity-deconditioning-isolation.,Indeed the main benefits of comprehensive PR programs for patients with COPD include a decrease in symptoms (dyspnea and fatigue), improvements in exercise tolerance and HRQoL, reduction of health care utilization (particularly bed-days), as well as an increase in physical activity.,Several randomized studies and meta-analyses greatly established the benefits of PR, which additionally, is recommended in a number of influential guidelines.,This review aimed to highlight the impact of PR on COPD patients, focusing on the clinical usefulness of PR, which provides patients a good support for change. | 1 |
The diagnosis of COPD is not always consistent with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy in daily clinical practice, especially in primary care.,This study aimed to estimate the overall COPD prevalence and severity, to identify differences between newly and previously diagnosed patients, and to evaluate the potential COPD overtreatment in a smoking population attending a primary care spirometry surveillance program.,A study was conducted in 10 primary health care centers of Central Greece during a 7-month period.,Eligible participants were aged ≥40 years and were either current smokers or exsmokers.,A total of 186 subjects were included (68% males, mean age 62.3±12.6 years, mean life-time tobacco exposure 50 pack-years).,COPD prevalence was 17.8%, identified to be higher in elderly males.,Forty-two percent of the COPD group were newly diagnosed patients, who were of younger age, current smokers, presented with less dyspnea and better health status, and mainly appeared with mild-to-moderate disease.,Interestingly, 61.4% of non-COPD and 85.7% of newly diagnosed COPD individuals had been using inhaled medication under primary care provider’s prescription without ever undergoing spirometry or further evaluation by a pulmonologist; thus, the phenomena of COPD overdiagnosis and missed diagnosis came into the spotlight.,Moreover, only 26.3% of known COPD patients were properly medicated according to GOLD guidelines, while half of them were inappropriately treated with triple inhaled therapy.,We reported a significant prevalence of COPD in smoking population attending this spirometry program.,A remarkable proportion of COPD patients were undiagnosed and made case finding worthwhile.,Underutilization of spirometry in the diagnosis and management of COPD as well as general practitioners’ nonadherence to the GOLD treatment guidelines was confirmed by our data.,These findings highlight the need for a major overhaul and culture change in primary care settings of Central Greece. | Acknowledgement of COPD underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis in primary care can contribute to improved disease diagnosis.,PUMA is an international primary care study in Argentina, Colombia, Venezuela and Uruguay.,To assess COPD underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis in primary care and identify factors associated with COPD underdiagnosis in this setting.,COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator (post-BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) <0.70 and the lower limit of normal (LLN).,Prior diagnosis was self-reported physician diagnosis of emphysema, chronic bronchitis, or COPD.,Those patients with spirometric COPD were considered to have correct prior diagnosis, while those without spirometric criteria had misdiagnosis.,Individuals with spirometric criteria without previous diagnosis were considered as underdiagnosed.,1,743 patients were interviewed, 1,540 completed spirometry, 309 (post-BD FEV1/FVC <0.70) and 226 (LLN) had COPD.,Underdiagnosis using post-BD FEV1/FVC <0.70 was 77% and 73% by LLN.,Overall, 102 patients had a prior COPD diagnosis, 71/102 patients (69.6%) had a prior correct diagnosis and 31/102 (30.4%) had a misdiagnosis defined by post-BD FEV1/FVC ≥0.70.,Underdiagnosis was associated with higher body mass index (≥30 kg/m2), milder airway obstruction (GOLD I-II), black skin color, absence of dyspnea, wheezing, no history of exacerbations or hospitalizations in the past-year.,Those not visiting a doctor in the last year or only visiting a GP had more risk of underdiagnosis.,COPD underdiagnosis (65.8%) and misdiagnosis (26.4%) were less prevalent in those with previous spirometry.,COPD underdiagnosis is a major problem in primary care.,Availability of spirometry should be a priority in this setting. | 1 |
Today, many different tools are developed to execute and visualize physiological models that represent the human physiology.,Most of these tools run models written in very specific programming languages which in turn simplify the communication among models.,Nevertheless, not all of these tools are able to run models written in different programming languages.,In addition, interoperability between such models remains an unresolved issue.,In this paper we present a simulation environment that allows, first, the execution of models developed in different programming languages and second the communication of parameters to interconnect these models.,This simulation environment, developed within the Synergy-COPD project, aims at helping and supporting bio-researchers and medical students understand the internal mechanisms of the human body through the use of physiological models.,This tool is composed of a graphical visualization environment, which is a web interface through which the user can interact with the models, and a simulation workflow management system composed of a control module and a data warehouse manager.,The control module monitors the correct functioning of the whole system.,The data warehouse manager is responsible for managing the stored information and supporting its flow among the different modules.,This simulation environment has been validated with the integration of three models: two deterministic, i.e. based on linear and differential equations, and one probabilistic, i.e., based on probability theory.,These models have been selected based on the disease under study in this project, i.e., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.,It has been proved that the simulation environment presented here allows the user to research and study the internal mechanisms of the human physiology by the use of models via a graphical visualization environment.,A new tool for bio-researchers is ready for deployment in various use cases scenarios. | The article addresses the strategic role of workforce preparation in the process of adoption of Systems Medicine as a driver of biomedical research in the new health paradigm.,It reports on relevant initiatives, like CASyM, fostering Systems Medicine at EU level.,The chapter focuses on the BioHealth Computing Program as a reference for multidisciplinary training of future systems-oriented researchers describing the productive interactions with the Synergy-COPD project. | 1 |
Underlying chronic respiratory disease may be associated with the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).,This study investigated the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on the risk for respiratory failure and mortality in COVID-19 patients.,A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted in 4610 patients (≥ 40 years old) infected with COVID-19 between January 20 and May 27, 2020, using data from the Ministry of Health and Welfare and Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in Korea.,The clinical course and various clinical features were compared between COPD and non-COPD patients, and the risks of respiratory failure and all-cause mortality in COPD patients were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model.,Among 4610 COVID-19 patients, 4469 (96.9%) and 141 (3.1%) were categorized into the non-COPD and COPD groups, respectively.,The COPD group had greater proportions of older (≥ 60 years old) (78.0% vs.,45.2%, P < 0.001) and male (52.5% vs.,36.6%, P < 0.001) patients than the non-COPD group.,Relatively greater proportions of patients with COPD received intensive critical care (7.1% vs.,3.7%, P = 0.041) and mechanical ventilation (5.7% vs.,2.4%, P = 0.015).,Multivariate analyses showed that COPD was not a risk factor for respiratory failure but was a significant independent risk factor for all-cause mortality (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.11-2.93) after adjustment for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score.,Among COVID-19 patients, relatively greater proportions of patients with COPD received mechanical ventilation and intensive critical care.,COPD is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients in Korea. | Asthmatics and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have more severe outcomes with viral infections than people without obstructive disease.,To evaluate if obstructive diseases are risk factors for intensive care unit (ICU) stay and death due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19).,We collected data from the electronic medical record from 596 adult patients hospitalized in University Hospital of Liege between March 18 and April 17, 2020, for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection.,We classified patients into 3 groups according to the underlying respiratory disease, present before the COVID19 pandemic.,Among patients requiring hospitalization for COVID19, asthma and COPD accounted for 9.6% and 7.7%, respectively.,The proportions of asthmatics, patients with COPD, and patients without obstructive airway disease hospitalized in the ICU were 17.5%, 19.6%, and 14%, respectively.,One-third of patients with COPD died during hospitalization, whereas only 7.0% of asthmatics and 13.6% of patients without airway obstruction died due to SARS-CoV2.,The multivariate analysis showed that asthma, COPD, inhaled corticosteroid treatment, and oral corticosteroid treatment were not independent risk factors for ICU admission or death.,Male gender (odds ratio [OR]: 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-3.2) and obesity (OR: 8.5; 95% CI: 5.1-14.1) were predictors of ICU admission, whereas male gender (OR 1.9; 95% CI: 1.1-3.2), older age (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.6-2.3), cardiopathy (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-3.1), and immunosuppressive diseases (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.5-8.4) were independent predictors of death.,Asthma and COPD are not risk factors for ICU admission and death related to SARS-CoV2 infection. | 1 |
Circulating endothelial microparticles (EMPs) are emerging as biomarkers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in individuals exposed to cigarette smoke (CS), but their mechanism of release and function remain unknown.,We assessed biochemical and functional characteristics of EMPs and circulating microparticles (cMPs) released by CS.,CS exposure was sufficient to increase microparticle levels in plasma of humans and mice, and in supernatants of primary human lung microvascular endothelial cells.,CS-released EMPs contained predominantly exosomes that were significantly enriched in let-7d, miR-191; miR-126; and miR125a, microRNAs that reciprocally decreased intracellular in CS-exposed endothelium.,CS-released EMPs and cMPs were ceramide-rich and required the ceramide-synthesis enzyme acid sphingomyelinase (aSMase) for their release, an enzyme which was found to exhibit significantly higher activity in plasma of COPD patients or of CS-exposed mice.,The ex vivo or in vivo engulfment of EMPs or cMPs by peripheral blood monocytes-derived macrophages was associated with significant inhibition of efferocytosis.,Our results indicate that CS, via aSMase, releases circulating EMPs with distinct microRNA cargo and that EMPs affect the clearance of apoptotic cells by specialized macrophages.,These targetable effects may be important in the pathogenesis of diseases linked to endothelial injury and inflammation in smokers. | There is a need for novel anti-inflammatory therapies to treat COPD.,The liver X receptor (LXR) is a nuclear hormone receptor with anti-inflammatory properties.,We investigated LXR gene and protein expression levels in alveolar macrophages and whole lung tissue from COPD patients and controls, the effect of LXR activation on the suppression of inflammatory mediators from LPS stimulated COPD alveolar macrophages, and the effect of LXR activation on the induction of genes associated with alternative macrophage polarisation.,The levels of LXR mRNA were significantly increased in whole lung tissue extracts in COPD patients and smokers compared to non-smokers.,The expression of LXR protein was significantly increased in small airway epithelium and alveolar epithelium in COPD patients compared to controls.,No differences in LXR mRNA and protein levels were observed in alveolar macrophages between patient groups.,The LXR agonist GW3965 significantly induced the expression of the LXR dependent genes ABCA1 and ABCG1 in alveolar macrophage cultures.,In LPS stimulated alveolar macrophages, GW3965 suppressed the production of CXCL10 and CCL5, whilst stimulating IL-10 production.,GW3965 did not significantly suppress the production of TNFα, IL-1β, or CXCL8.,Our major finding is that LXR activation has anti-inflammatory effects on CXC10, CCL5 and IL-10 production from alveolar macrophages. | 1 |
Administering maintenance COPD therapy with a combination of multiple inhalers may increase inhaler errors.,This study evaluated the potential benefits of using a single Ellipta dry powder inhaler (DPI) compared with two combinations of DPIs commonly used to deliver triple maintenance therapy.,Patients receiving inhaled COPD medication were enrolled in this multicenter, randomized, open-label, placebo-device, crossover study with a 2×2 complete block design (NCT0298218), which comprised two substudies: Ellipta vs Diskus + HandiHaler (substudy 1) or Turbuhaler + HandiHaler (substudy 2).,Patients demonstrated inhaler use after reading the relevant patient information leaflet (PIL).,A trained investigator assessed user errors (critical errors [errors likely to result in no or significantly reduced medication being inhaled] and overall errors).,The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients making ≥1 critical error after reading the PIL.,The secondary endpoints included error rates during ≤2 reassessments following investigator instruction (if required), instruction time, and patient preference.,After reading the PIL, significantly fewer patients made critical errors with Ellipta compared with Diskus + HandiHaler (9% [7/80] vs 75% [60/80], respectively; P<0.001) or Turbuhaler + HandiHaler (9% [7/79] vs 73% [58/79], respectively; P<0.001).,The number of patients making overall errors was also lower with Ellipta vs tested inhaler combinations (P<0.001 for each substudy).,The median instruction time needed for error-free use was shorter with Ellipta in substudies 1 and 2 (2.7 and 2.6 minutes, respectively) vs either combination (10.6 [Diskus + HandiHaler] and 11.3 minutes [Turbuhaler + HandiHaler], respectively).,Significantly more patients preferred Ellipta over Diskus + HandiHaler or Turbuhaler + HandiHaler overall for taking their COPD medication (81% vs 9% and 84% vs 4%, respectively) and per the number of steps for taking their COPD medication (89% vs 8% and 91% vs 5%, respectively).,Fewer patients with COPD made critical errors with the single DPI, and patients required less instruction time, compared with each dual DPI combination. | Patients with COPD who remain symptomatic on long-acting bronchodilator monotherapy may benefit from step-up therapy to a long-acting bronchodilator combination.,This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) in patients with moderate COPD who remained symptomatic on tiotropium (TIO).,In this randomized, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group study (NCT01899742), patients (N=494) who were prescribed TIO for ≥3 months at screening (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]: 50%-70% of predicted; modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] score ≥1) and completed a 4-week run-in with TIO were randomized to UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg or TIO 18 µg for 12 weeks.,Efficacy assessments included trough FEV1 at Day 85 (primary end point), 0-3 h serial FEV1, rescue medication use, Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and COPD Assessment Test (CAT).,Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs).,Compared with TIO, UMEC/VI produced greater improvements in trough FEV1 (least squares [LS] mean difference: 88 mL at Day 85 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 45-131]; P<0.001) and FEV1 after 5 min on Day 1 (50 mL [95% CI: 27-72]; P<0.001).,Reductions in rescue medication use over 12 weeks were greater with UMEC/VI versus TIO (LS mean change: −0.1 puffs/d [95% CI: −0.2-0.0]; P≤0.05).,More patients achieved clinically meaningful improvements in TDI score (≥1 unit) with UMEC/VI (63%) versus TIO (49%; odds ratio at Day 84=1.78 [95% CI: 1.21-2.64]; P≤0.01).,Improvements in SGRQ and CAT scores were similar between treatments.,The incidence of AEs was similar with UMEC/VI (30%) and TIO (31%).,UMEC/VI step-up therapy provides clinical benefit over TIO monotherapy in patients with moderate COPD who are symptomatic on TIO alone. | 1 |
The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines.,Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them.,This was an evaluation of COPD treatment guidelines published in Europe and Russia in the past 7 years.,Each guideline was reviewed in detail and information about the most important aspects of patient diagnosis, risk stratification and pharmacotherapy was extracted following a standardised process.,Guidelines were available from the Czech Republic, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden.,The treatment goals, criteria for COPD diagnosis, consideration of comorbidities in treatment selection and support for use of long-acting bronchodilators, were similar across treatment guidelines.,There were differences in measures used for stratification of disease severity, consideration of patient phenotypes, criteria for the use of inhaled corticosteroids and recommendations for other medications (e.g. theophylline and mucolytics) in addition to bronchodilators.,There is generally good agreement on treatment goals, criteria for diagnosis of COPD and use of long-acting bronchodilators as the cornerstone of treatment among guidelines for COPD management in Europe and Russia.,However, there are differences in the definitions of patient subgroups and other recommended treatments.,There are important differences between European national COPD guidelineshttp://ow.ly/U2P4y | The combination of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or ACOS is a recently defined syndrome.,The epidemiology of the condition is poorly described and previous research has suggested ACOS is associated with worse outcomes than either condition alone.,We therefore decided to complete a systematic review of the published literature.,This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses guidelines.,A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases up to Feb 2015 to identify studies reporting incidence, prevalence, health care utilization, morbidity, or mortality in COPD and asthma.,A total of 19 studies were included in the present study.,The pooled prevalence of overlap among COPD was 27% (95% CI: 0.16-0.38, p<0.0001) and 28% (95% CI: 0.09-0.47, p = 0.0032) in the population and hospital-based studies, respectively.,We found no significant difference between ACOS and COPD in terms of gender, smoking status, lung function and 6mWD.,However, in comparison to subject with only COPD, ACOS subjects were significantly younger, had higher BMI, healthcare utilization, and lower HRQoL.,ACOS is a common condition that exists in a substantial proportion of subjects with COPD.,ACOS represents a distinct clinical phenotype with more frequent exacerbations, hospitalization, worse health-related quality of life, and higher healthcare costs than either disease alone.,There is a critical need to better define the management and treatment of this syndrome. | 1 |
We conducted a population-based cohort study to estimate trends in prevalence, incidence, and mortality of concurrent physician-diagnosed asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Two validated health administrative case definitions were used to identify asthma and COPD among all individuals aged 35 years and older living in Ontario, Canada.,Annual asthma, COPD, and concurrent asthma and COPD prevalence, incidence, and mortality, standardized for age and sex, were estimated, and compared from 2002 to 2012, using generalized linear models.,Standardized prevalence of concurrent asthma and COPD increased by 10.5%, from 2.9% in 2002 to 3.2% in 2012 overall, but more prominently in women compared to men.,Overall, standardized incidence decreased by16%, from 2.5 to 2.1 per 1000 individuals, but increased significantly in young adults.,All-cause mortality among patients with concurrent asthma and COPD decreased by 11.2%, from 2.6% to 2.2%.,Being diagnosed with both diseases was significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality compared to asthma (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.50-1.58), but not compared to COPD (OR = 0.97, 0.96-0.98), except in young adults aged 35 to 49 years where people with asthma and COPD had higher mortality (OR = 1.21, 1.15-1.27).,In a large North American population, the burden of concurrent physician-diagnosed asthma and COPD is increasing, particularly in women and young adults. | The coexistence of COPD and asthma is widely recognized but has not been well described.,This study characterizes clinical features, spirometry, and chest CT scans of smoking subjects with both COPD and asthma.,We performed a cross-sectional study comparing subjects with COPD and asthma to subjects with COPD alone in the COPDGene Study.,119 (13%) of 915 subjects with COPD reported a history of physician-diagnosed asthma.,These subjects were younger (61.3 vs 64.7 years old, p = 0.0001) with lower lifetime smoking intensity (43.7 vs 55.1 pack years, p = 0.0001).,More African-Americans reported a history of asthma (33.6% vs 15.6%, p < 0.0001).,Subjects with COPD and asthma demonstrated worse disease-related quality of life, were more likely to have had a severe COPD exacerbation in the past year, and were more likely to experience frequent exacerbations (OR 3.55 [2.19, 5.75], p < 0.0001).,Subjects with COPD and asthma demonstrated greater gas-trapping on chest CT.,There were no differences in spirometry or CT measurements of emphysema or airway wall thickness.,Subjects with COPD and asthma represent a relevant clinical population, with worse health-related quality of life.,They experience more frequent and severe respiratory exacerbations despite younger age and reduced lifetime smoking history.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00608764 | 1 |
Assessment of airflow limitation (AFL) is crucial in the clinical evaluation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, in the absence of normative reference values among adult Australian Indigenous population, the implications of utilising the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI-2012), Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) and the Australian concise COPD-X recommended severity classifications is not known.,Moreover, spirometry values (forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)) are observed to be 20%-30% lower in an apparently healthy Indigenous population in comparison to Caucasian counterparts.,Adult Indigenous patients diagnosed to have COPD on spirometry (postbronchodilator (BD) FEV1/FVC <0.7 ((GOLD, (COPD-X)) and ≤lower limit of normal (others/mixed reference equations) for GLI-2012) were assessed for AFL severity classifications on Post-BD FEV1 values (mild, moderate, severe, very severe) as per the recommended classifications.,From a total of 742 unique patient records of Indigenous Australians, 253 were identified to have COPD via GOLD/COPD-X criteria (n=238) or GLI-2012 criteria (n=238) with significant agreeance between criteria (96%, κ=0.901).,Of these, the majority were classified as having moderate or severe/very-severe AFL with significant variability across classification criteria (COPD-X (40%-43%), GOLD (33%-65%), GLI-2012 (18%-75%)).,The FVC and FEV1 values also varied significantly between classification criterion (COPD-X/GOLD/GLI-2012) within the same AFL category, with COPD-X ‘moderate’ AFL almost matching ‘severe’ AFL categorisation by GOLD or GLI-2012.,Health professionals caring for Indigenous patients with COPD should be aware of the clinical implications and consequences of utilising various recommended AFL classifications in the absence of validated spirometry reference norms among adult Indigenous patients. | There is little evidence about the factors that predict persistence/adherence in treatment-naïve patients with COPD in clinical practice.,The aim of this study was to evaluate persistence and adherence levels among treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with COPD who had a prescribed inhaled medication, using data from real-world clinical practice.,Multicentric study with a 6 month-followed-up period.,Patients were considered persistent if they collected all their inhaler refills.,In a random sample of patients, we evaluated adherence using the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI).,We assessed Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) with St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).,Of the 114 patients included, 46 (40.4%) were defined as persistent.,Patients who had awareness about COPD (adjusted RR 2.672, 95% CI 1.125-6.349) were more likely to be persistent; patients with multidose DPI were less likely to be persistent that those with single dose DPI (adjusted RR 0.341, 95% CI 0.133-0.877).,Higher levels of SGRQ total were associated with a lower probability of persistence (adjusted RR 0.945, 95%CI 0.894-0.998).,Patients who had had an appointment with their GP in the previous six months were more likely to be persistent (adjusted RR 3.107, 95% CI 1.022-9.466).,Patients who had awareness about COPD and those with lower symptom SGQR score were more likely to be adherent (24/25, 96.0% vs 16/22, 72.7%, p = 0.025, and mean 29.1, sd 19.4 vs mean 41.4, sd 15.9, respectively, p = 0.026, respectively).,Less than 50% of patients were defined as persistent.,Patients’ awareness of their disease and levels of HRQL were associated with high rate of persistence and adherence.,In addition, frequent visits to general practitioner, increases the rate of persistence to treatment.,The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-021-01754-6. | 1 |
A genetic contribution to develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well established.,However, the specific genes responsible for enhanced risk or host differences in susceptibility to smoke exposure remain poorly understood.,The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive literature overview on the genetics of COPD, highlight the most promising findings during the last few years, and ultimately provide an updated COPD gene list.,Candidate gene studies on COPD and related phenotypes indexed in PubMed before January 5, 2012 are tabulated.,An exhaustive list of publications for any given gene was looked for.,This well-documented COPD candidate-gene list is expected to serve many purposes for future replication studies and meta-analyses as well as for reanalyzing collected genomic data in the field.,In addition, this review summarizes recent genetic loci identified by genome-wide association studies on COPD, lung function, and related complications.,Assembling resources, integrative genomic approaches, and large sample sizes of well-phenotyped subjects is part of the path forward to elucidate the genetic basis of this debilitating disease. | Adverse health effects at relatively low levels of ambient air pollution have consistently been reported in the last years.,We conducted a time-series panel study of subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and ischemic heart disease (IHD) to evaluate whether daily levels of air pollutants have a measurable impact on the lung function of adult subjects with pre-existing lung or heart diseases.,Twenty-nine patients with COPD, asthma, or IHD underwent repeated lung function tests by supervised spirometry in two one-month surveys.,Daily samples of coarse (PM10-2.5) and fine (PM2.5) particulate matter were collected by means of dichotomous samplers, and the dust was gravimetrically analyzed.,The particulate content of selected metals (cadmium, chrome, iron, nickel, lead, platinum, vanadium, and zinc) was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry.,Ambient concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), and sulphur dioxide (SO2) were obtained from the regional air-quality monitoring network.,The relationships between concentrations of air pollutants and lung function parameters were analyzed by generalized estimating equations (GEE) for panel data.,Decrements in lung function indices (FVC and/or FEV1) associated with increasing concentrations of PM2.5, NO2 and some metals (especially zinc and iron) were observed in COPD cases.,Among the asthmatics, NO2 was associated with a decrease in FEV1.,No association between average ambient concentrations of any air pollutant and lung function was observed among IHD cases.,This study suggests that the short-term negative impact of exposure to air pollutants on respiratory volume and flow is limited to individuals with already impaired respiratory function.,The fine fraction of ambient PM seems responsible for the observed effects among COPD cases, with zinc and iron having a potential role via oxidative stress.,The respiratory function of the relatively young and mild asthmatics included in this study seems to worsen when ambient levels of NO2 increase. | 1 |
The incidence and prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) continue to rise worldwide.,Increasing age, diabetes, hypertension, and cigarette smoking are well-recognized risk factors for CKD.,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by chronic airway inflammation leading to airway obstruction and parenchymal lung destruction.,Due to some of the common pathogenic mechanisms, COPD has been associated with increased prevalence of CKD.,Systematic review of medical literature reporting the incidence and prevalence of CKD in patients with COPD using the Cochrane Collaboration Methodology, and conduct meta-analysis to study the cumulative effect of the eligible studies.,We searched Medline via Ovid, PubMed, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science databases from 1950 through May, 2016.,We included prospective and retrospective observational studies that reported the prevalence of CKD in patients with COPD.,Our search resulted in 19 eligible studies of which 9 have been included in the meta-analysis.,The definition of CKD was uniform across all the studies included in analysis.,COPD was found to be associated with CKD in the included epidemiological studies conducted in many countries.,Our meta-analysis showed that COPD was found to be associated with a significantly increased prevalence of CKD (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.20; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.83, 2.65).,Study limitations: Studies included are observational studies.,However, given the nature of our research question there is no possibility to perform a randomized control trial.,Patients with COPD have increased odds of developing CKD.,Future research should investigate the pathophysiological mechanism behind this association, which may lead to better outcomes.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-016-0315-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | The Continuing to Confront COPD International Patient Survey aimed to estimate the prevalence and burden of COPD globally and to update findings from the Confronting COPD International Survey conducted in 1999-2000.,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in 12 countries worldwide were identified through systematic screening of population samples.,Telephone and face-to-face interviews were conducted between November 2012 and May 2013 using a structured survey that incorporated validated patient-reported outcome instruments.,Eligible patients were adults aged 40 years and older who were taking regular respiratory medications or suffered with chronic respiratory symptoms and reported either 1) a physician diagnosis of COPD/emphysema, 2) a physician diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, or 3) a symptom-based definition of chronic bronchitis.,The burden of COPD was measured with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale.,Of 106,876 households with at least one person aged ≥40 years, 4,343 respondents fulfilled the case definition of COPD and completed the full survey.,COPD prevalence ranged from 7% to 12%, with most countries falling within the range of 7%-9%.,In all countries, prevalence increased with age, and in all countries except the US was greater among men (range 6%-14%) than among women (range 5%-11%).,A significant disease burden was observed when considering COPD symptoms or health status, and showed wide variations across countries.,Prevalence of moderate-to-severe dyspnea (mMRC scale ≥2) ranged from 27% to 61%, and mean CAT score ranged from 16.0 to 24.8, indicating medium-to-high impairment.,This survey, representing 12 countries, showed similar rates of estimated COPD prevalence across countries that were higher than those reported a decade ago in the original Confronting COPD International Survey.,A significant burden of COPD was demonstrated by symptoms and health care-resource use, similar to that reported in the original survey. | 1 |
This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study of patients with COPD describes baseline characteristics, adherence, and persistence following initiation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonists (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) from multiple inhaler triple therapy (MITT).,Patients aged ≥40 years receiving MITT between January 2012 and September 2015 were identified from the IQVIA™ Real-world Data Adjudicated Claims-USA database.,MITT was defined as subjects with ≥1 overlapping days’ supply of three COPD medications (ICS, LABA, and LAMA).,Adherence (proportion of days covered, PDC) and discontinuation (defined as a gap of 1, 30, 60, or 90 days of supply in any of the three components of the triple therapy) were calculated for each patient over 12 months of follow-up.,In addition, analyses were stratified by number of inhalers.,In total, 14,635 MITT users were identified (mean age, 62 years).,Mean PDC for MITT at 12 months was 0.37%.,Mean PDC for the ICS/LABA and LAMA component at 12 months was 49% (0.49±0.31; median, 0.47) and 54% (0.54±0.33; 0.56), respectively.,The proportion of adherent patients (PDC ≥0.8) at 12 months was 14% for MITT.,Allowing for a 30-day gap from last day of therapy, 86% of MITT users discontinued therapy during follow-up.,Patients with COPD had low adherence to and persistence with MITT in a real-world setting.,Mean PDC for each single inhaler component was higher than the mean PDC observed with MITT.,Reducing the number of inhalers may improve overall adherence to intended triple therapy. | Directly recorded patient experience of symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can complement lung function and exacerbation rate data in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) clinical studies.,The FULFIL study recorded daily symptoms and activity limitation together with additional patient-reported outcomes of dyspnea and HRQoL, as part of the prespecified analyses.,FULFIL co-primary endpoint data have been previously reported.,FULFIL was a phase III, 24-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study comparing once-daily single inhaler triple therapy [fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI)] 100 µg/62.5 µg/25 µg with twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist therapy [budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR)] 400 µg/12 µg in patients with symptomatic COPD at risk of exacerbations.,A subset participated for 52 weeks.,Patient-reported assessments were: Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD™ (E-RS: COPD), St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) for COPD, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), baseline and transitional dyspnea indices (TDI) and daily and global anchor questions for activity limitation.,FF/UMEC/VI showed greater reductions from baseline in 4-weekly mean E-RS: COPD total and all subscale scores compared with BUD/FOR; differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05) at each time period.,FF/UMEC/VI also demonstrated greater improvements from baseline at weeks 4 and 24 in SGRQ domain scores and TDI focal score compared with BUD/FOR.,At weeks 4 and 24, improvements greater than the minimal clinically important difference from baseline were observed in CAT score with FF/UMEC/VI, but not BUD/FOR; differences were statistically significant (P ≤ 0.003).,These findings demonstrate sustained daily symptom and HRQoL benefits of FF/UMEC/VI versus BUD/FOR.,The inclusion of the CAT may provide data that are readily generalizable to everyday clinical practice.,ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02345161.,GSK.,The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-017-0650-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | 1 |
Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, once-daily, ultra-long-acting β2-agonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,This randomized, double-blind study compared the bronchodilator efficacy of indacaterol with that of placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,In an incomplete-block, multi-dose, three-period, crossover design, patients received three of the following four treatments: indacaterol 150 μg, indacaterol 300 μg, tiotropium 18 μg and placebo, each once-daily for 14 days.,Each treatment period was separated by a 14-day washout.,Study drug was supplied daily by blinded, third party study personnel to maintain blinding of patients and investigators.,The primary efficacy variable was trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at 24 h post-dose after 14 days.,The study was powered to demonstrate non-inferiority of indacaterol to tiotropium for this variable.,A total of 169 patients were randomized (mean age 65 years); 153 (90.5%) completed.,Trough FEV1 after 14 days with indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg was statistically and clinically superior to placebo, with differences (95% CI) of 170 (120-220) and 150 (100-200) mL respectively (both p < 0.001).,For this endpoint, both doses of indacaterol not only met the criterion for non-inferiority compared with tiotropium, but also achieved numerically higher values, with differences versus tiotropium of 40 and 30 mL for indacaterol 150 and 300 μg, respectively.,At 5 min post-dose on Day 1, the mean FEV1 for both indacaterol doses was significantly higher than placebo (by 120 and 130 mL for indacaterol 150 and 300 μg, respectively; p < 0.001) and tiotropium (by 80 mL for both doses; p < 0.001).,Adverse events were reported by similar proportions of patients: 31.4%, 29.5%, 28.3% and 28.5% for indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg, tiotropium and placebo treatments, respectively.,Once-daily indacaterol provided clinically and statistically significant 24-h bronchodilation.,Indacaterol was at least as effective as tiotropium, with a faster onset of action (within 5 min) on the first day of dosing.,Indacaterol should prove useful in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, for whom treatment with one or more classes of long-acting bronchodilator is recommended.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00615459, EudraCT number: 2007-004071-19 | Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled once-daily ultra-long-acting β2-agonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,This study compared the onset of action of single doses of indacaterol 150 and 300 μg with salbutamol 200 μg, salmeterol-fluticasone 50/500 μg, and placebo in moderate-to-severe COPD patients.,This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.,The primary variable was forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at five minutes postdose.,Out of 89 patients randomized (mean age 62 years), 86 completed the study.,At five minutes postdose, both indacaterol doses were statistically and clinically superior to placebo (P < 0.001), with treatment-placebo differences in FEV1 of 100 (95% confidence interval [CI] 70-130) mL and 120 (95% CI 90-150) mL for indacaterol 150 and 300 μg, respectively.,FEV1 at five minutes postdose with both indacaterol doses was numerically higher than for salbutamol (10 and 30 mL for indacaterol 150 and 300 μg, respectively) and significantly higher than for salmeterol-fluticasone (50 mL, P = 0.003; 70 mL, P < 0.001, respectively).,Moreover, both indacaterol doses showed significantly higher FEV1 than placebo (P < 0.001) at all postdose time points.,The numbers of patients with an FEV1 increase of at least 12% and 200 mL at five minutes postdose were 16 (18.8%), 24 (27.6%), 20 (23.3%), 8 (9.1%), and 3 (3.4%) for indacaterol 150 and 300 μg, salbutamol 200 μg, salmeterol-fluticasone 50/500 μg, and placebo, respectively.,Single doses of indacaterol 150 and 300 μg demonstrated a fast onset of action similar to that for salbutamol and faster than that for salmeterol-fluticasone. | 1 |
The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines.,Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them.,This was an evaluation of COPD treatment guidelines published in Europe and Russia in the past 7 years.,Each guideline was reviewed in detail and information about the most important aspects of patient diagnosis, risk stratification and pharmacotherapy was extracted following a standardised process.,Guidelines were available from the Czech Republic, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden.,The treatment goals, criteria for COPD diagnosis, consideration of comorbidities in treatment selection and support for use of long-acting bronchodilators, were similar across treatment guidelines.,There were differences in measures used for stratification of disease severity, consideration of patient phenotypes, criteria for the use of inhaled corticosteroids and recommendations for other medications (e.g. theophylline and mucolytics) in addition to bronchodilators.,There is generally good agreement on treatment goals, criteria for diagnosis of COPD and use of long-acting bronchodilators as the cornerstone of treatment among guidelines for COPD management in Europe and Russia.,However, there are differences in the definitions of patient subgroups and other recommended treatments.,There are important differences between European national COPD guidelineshttp://ow.ly/U2P4y | Previous clinical audits for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have provided valuable information on the clinical care delivered to patients admitted to medical wards because of COPD exacerbations.,However, clinical audits of COPD in an outpatient setting are scarce and no methodological guidelines are currently available.,Based on our previous experience, herein we describe a clinical audit for COPD patients in specialized outpatient clinics with the overall goal of establishing a potential methodological workflow.,A pilot clinical audit of COPD patients referred to respiratory outpatient clinics in the region of Andalusia, Spain (over 8 million inhabitants), was performed.,The audit took place between October 2013 and September 2014, and 10 centers (20% of all public hospitals) were invited to participate.,Cases with an established diagnosis of COPD based on risk factors, clinical symptoms, and a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio of less than 0.70 were deemed eligible.,The usefulness of formally scheduled regular follow-up visits was assessed.,Two different databases (resources and clinical database) were constructed.,Assessments were planned over a year divided by 4 three-month periods, with the goal of determining seasonal-related changes.,Exacerbations and survival served as the main endpoints.,This paper describes a methodological framework for conducting a clinical audit of COPD patients in an outpatient setting.,Results from such audits can guide health information systems development and implementation in real-world settings. | 1 |
Compared with the 2011 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), there have been significant changes in the 2017 GOLD classification.,The purpose of this study was to analyze the changes in clinical characteristics of the new A-B-C-D system and to explore its role in comprehensive assessment of COPD.,A total of 631 stable COPD patients were included in a cross-sectional survey.,Data collected included baseline data and pulmonary function testing results, respiratory muscle strength, symptoms and quality of life, exercise capacity, nutritional status, and anxiety and depression as a comprehensive assessment.,Based on the 2011 GOLD and 2017 GOLD classifications, patients were divided into Groups A1-D1 and Groups A2-D2, respectively.,In the 2011 GOLD, 64 subjects in Group C1 were reclassified into Group A2 (41.6%), while 77 subjects in Group D1 were reclassified into Group B2 (27.1%).,The old and new grading systems were somewhat consistent (Cohen’s kappa=0.6963, P<0.001).,Lung function was lower, while the body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index (BODE index) was higher in Group A2 than in Group A1 (P<0.001).,In Group B2, lung function, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and respiratory muscle strength were significantly lower than in Group B1 (P<0.001), while the BODE index (P<0.001) was higher.,In comprehensive assessment, subjects in Groups B2 and D2 had significantly lower lung function, 6MWD, respiratory muscle strength, quality of life, higher symptom scores, and BODE index than subjects in Group A2 (P<0.001).,The differences between Group A2 and C2 were small.,Compared with the 2011 GOLD, the 2017 GOLD reclassified more patients into Groups A and B, those with significantly worse lung function and higher BODE index.,In the comprehensive assessment of the new classification, Groups B and D may have greater disease severity.,However, the effectiveness of the new grading system in predicting patient prognosis, and its guidance on the use of drugs, remains to be explored in future studies. | The efficacy of inhaled salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate (SFC) in patients with severe or very severe COPD is well documented.,However, there are only limited data about the influence of GOLD severity staging on the effectiveness of SFC, particularly in patients with milder disease.,TORCH was a 3-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6112 patients with moderate/severe COPD with pre-bronchodilator FEV1 < 60% predicted (mean age 65 years, 76% male, mean 44% predicted FEV1, 43% current smokers).,To understand the relative efficacy of SFC and its components by GOLD stages, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of the TORCH dataset using baseline post-bronchodilator FEV1 to segment patients into three groups: moderate COPD (GOLD stage II and above: ≥ 50%; n = 2156), severe COPD (GOLD stage III: 30% to < 50%; n = 3019) and very severe COPD (GOLD stage IV: < 30%; n = 937).,Compared with placebo, SFC improved post-bronchodilator FEV1: 101 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71, 132) in GOLD stage II, 82 ml (95% CI: 60, 104) in GOLD stage III and 96 ml (95% CI: 54, 138) in GOLD stage IV patients, and reduced the rate of exacerbations: 31% (95% CI: 19, 40) in GOLD stage II, 26% (95% CI: 17, 34) in GOLD stage III and 14% (95% CI: -4, 29) in GOLD stage IV.,SFC improved health status to a greater extent than other treatments regardless of baseline GOLD stage.,Similarly, SFC reduced the risk of death by 33% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.98) for GOLD stage II, 5% (HR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.24) for GOLD stage III, and 30% (HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.05) for GOLD stage IV.,The rates of adverse events were similar across treatment arms and increased with disease severity.,Overall, there was a higher incidence of pneumonia in the fluticasone propionate and SFC arms, compared with other treatments in all GOLD stages.,In the TORCH study, SFC reduced moderate-to-severe exacerbations and improved health status and FEV1 across GOLD stages.,Treatment with SFC may be associated with reduced mortality compared with placebo in patients with GOLD stage II disease.,The effects were similar to those reported for the study as a whole.,Thus, SFC is an effective treatment option for patients with GOLD stage II COPD.,Clinicaltrial.gov registration NCT00268216; Study number: SCO30003 | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with high morbidity and mortality.,COPD is typified by persistent, progressive airflow limitation and a range of respiratory and systemic symptoms such as breathlessness, coughing, wheezing, depression, anxiety, general fatigue, and sleeping difficulties.,Despite receiving treatment for COPD, many patients suffer from regular symptoms that affect their daily lives and lead to increased morbidity.,These symptoms vary in severity, frequency, and type, and can occur at any time throughout the 24-h day, with over half of patients with COPD experiencing symptoms in the morning, during the day, and at nighttime.,Despite the prevalence of symptoms, patient and physician perception of the impact of COPD symptoms on patients’ lives is not always in concordance.,Dual bronchodilator therapy with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting beta agonist (LABA) has the potential to treat the symptoms of COPD in addition to improving lung function.,This review therefore examines the burden of symptoms experienced throughout the day by patients with COPD and the evidence for combined LAMA/LABA treatment in terms of symptom management.,As patients with COPD experience varying symptoms throughout the course of their disease, the role of tailoring treatment to the individual needs of the patient is also examined.,We conclude that the symptoms of COPD are troublesome, variable, can occur during all parts of the 24-h day, and have a substantial impact on patients’ health status and quality of life.,In order to provide effective, patient-orientated care, patients with COPD should be evaluated on the basis of lung function, the frequency of symptoms, and patient-perceived impact of symptoms on their lives.,Therapy should be chosen carefully based on individualized assessment, ensuring personalization to the individual needs of the patient. | The morning tends to be the most difficult time of day for many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when symptoms can limit one’s ability to perform even simple activities.,Morning symptoms have been linked to higher levels of work absenteeism, thereby increasing the already substantial economic burden associated with COPD.,A validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument designed to capture morning symptoms will allow for a more comprehensive approach to the evaluation of treatment benefit in COPD clinical trials.,A qualitative interview study was conducted among a sample of symptomatic adults with COPD.,Concept elicitation interviews (n = 35) were conducted to identify COPD morning symptoms, followed by cognitive interviews (n = 21) to ensure patient comprehension of the items, instructions and response options of the draft COPD Morning Symptom Diary (COPD-MSD).,All interview transcript data were coded using ATLAS.ti software for content analysis.,Mean age of the concept elicitation and cognitive interview sample was 65.0 years (±7.5) and 62.3 years (±8.3), respectively.,The study sample represented the full range of COPD severity (Global Initiative for Chronic Lung Disease [GOLD] classifications I-IV) and included a mix of racial backgrounds, employment status and educational achievement.,During the concept elicitation interviews, the three most frequently reported morning symptoms were shortness of breath (n = 35/35; 100 %), phlegm/mucus (n = 31/35; 88.6 %), and cough (n = 30/35; 85.7 %).,A group of clinical and instrument development experts convened to review the concept elicitation data and develop the initial 32-item draft COPD-MSD.,Cognitive interviews indicated subjects found the draft COPD-MSD to be comprehensive, clear, and easy to understand.,The COPD-MSD underwent minor editorial revisions and streamlining based on cognitive interviews and input from the experts to yield the final 19-item daily diary.,This study supports the content validity of the new COPD-MSD and positions the diary for quantitative psychometric testing. | 1 |
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterised by reduced lung function and is the third leading cause of death globally.,Through genome-wide association discovery in 48,943 individuals, selected from extremes of the lung function distribution in UK Biobank, and follow-up in 95,375 individuals, we increased the yield of independent signals for lung function from 54 to 97.,A genetic risk score was associated with COPD susceptibility (odds ratios per standard deviation of the risk score (~6 alleles) (95% confidence interval) 1.24 (1.20-1.27), P=5.05x10-49) and we observed a 3.7 fold difference in COPD risk between highest and lowest genetic risk score deciles in UK Biobank.,The 97 signals show enrichment in development, elastic fibres and epigenetic regulation pathways.,We highlight targets for drugs and compounds in development for COPD and asthma (genes in the inositol phosphate metabolism pathway and CHRM3) and describe targets for potential drug repositioning from other clinical indications. | Understanding the genetic basis of airflow obstruction and smoking behaviour is key to determining the pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We used UK Biobank data to study the genetic causes of smoking behaviour and lung health.,We sampled individuals of European ancestry from UK Biobank, from the middle and extremes of the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) distribution among heavy smokers (mean 35 pack-years) and never smokers.,We developed a custom array for UK Biobank to provide optimum genome-wide coverage of common and low-frequency variants, dense coverage of genomic regions already implicated in lung health and disease, and to assay rare coding variants relevant to the UK population.,We investigated whether there were shared genetic causes between different phenotypes defined by extremes of FEV1.,We also looked for novel variants associated with extremes of FEV1 and smoking behaviour and assessed regions of the genome that had already shown evidence for a role in lung health and disease.,We set genome-wide significance at p<5 × 10−8.,UK Biobank participants were recruited from March 15, 2006, to July 7, 2010.,Sample selection for the UK BiLEVE study started on Nov 22, 2012, and was completed on Dec 20, 2012.,We selected 50 008 unique samples: 10 002 individuals with low FEV1, 10 000 with average FEV1, and 5002 with high FEV1 from each of the heavy smoker and never smoker groups.,We noted a substantial sharing of genetic causes of low FEV1 between heavy smokers and never smokers (p=2·29 × 10−16) and between individuals with and without doctor-diagnosed asthma (p=6·06 × 10−11).,We discovered six novel genome-wide significant signals of association with extremes of FEV1, including signals at four novel loci (KANSL1, TSEN54, TET2, and RBM19/TBX5) and independent signals at two previously reported loci (NPNT and HLA-DQB1/HLA-DQA2).,These variants also showed association with COPD, including in individuals with no history of smoking.,The number of copies of a 150 kb region containing the 5′ end of KANSL1, a gene that is important for epigenetic gene regulation, was associated with extremes of FEV1.,We also discovered five new genome-wide significant signals for smoking behaviour, including a variant in NCAM1 (chromosome 11) and a variant on chromosome 2 (between TEX41 and PABPC1P2) that has a trans effect on expression of NCAM1 in brain tissue.,By sampling from the extremes of the lung function distribution in UK Biobank, we identified novel genetic causes of lung function and smoking behaviour.,These results provide new insight into the specific mechanisms underlying airflow obstruction, COPD, and tobacco addiction, and show substantial shared genetic architecture underlying airflow obstruction across individuals, irrespective of smoking behaviour and other airway disease.,Medical Research Council. | 1 |
Recent advances in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) facilitate acquiring important clinical information for managing patients with COPD.,MDCT can detect the loss of lung tissue associated with emphysema as a low-attenuation area (LAA) and the thickness of airways as the wall area percentage (WA%).,The percentage of small pulmonary vessels <5 mm2 (% cross-sectional area [CSA] <5) has been recently recognized as a parameter for expressing pulmonary perfusion.,We aimed to analyze the longitudinal changes in structural abnormalities using these CT parameters and analyze the effect of exacerbation and smoking cessation on structural changes in COPD patients.,We performed pulmonary function tests (PFTs), an MDCT, and a COPD assessment test (CAT) in 58 patients with COPD at the time of their enrollment at the hospital and 2 years later.,We analyzed the change in clinical parameters including CT indices and examined the effect of exacerbations and smoking cessation on the structural changes.,The CAT score and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) did not significantly change during the follow-up period.,The parameters of emphysematous changes significantly increased.,On the other hand, the WA% at the distal airways significantly decreased or tended to decrease, and the %CSA <5 slightly but significantly increased over the same period, especially in ex-smokers.,The parameters of emphysematous change were greater in patients with exacerbations and continued to progress even after smoking cessation.,In contrast, the WA% and %CSA <5 did not change in proportion to emphysema progression.,The WA% at the distal bronchi and the %CSA <5 did not change in parallel with parameters of LAA over the same period.,We propose that airway disease and vascular remodeling may be reversible to some extent by smoking cessation and appropriate treatment.,Optimal management may have a greater effect on pulmonary vascularity and airway disease than parenchymal deconstruction in the early stage of COPD. | The association between asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) overlap syndrome (ACOS) and tuberculosis (TB) has yet to be studied.,The newly diagnosed TB patients (age > 20 y) treated from January 2000 to December 2008 were included (ACOS cohort, n = 10 751; non-ACOS cohort, n = 42 966).,The non-ACOS cohort involved patients with confirmed absence of ACOS.,We calculated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for TB in the ACOS and non-ACOS cohorts by using poisson regression analysis.,Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine the adjusted HR (aHR) for TB in the ACOS cohort compared with the non-ACOS cohort.,The aHR for TB was 2.41 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.19-2.66) in the ACOS cohort.,The TB risk was significantly higher in the ACOS cohort than in the non-ACOS cohort when stratified by age, sex, comorbidities, and atopy.,Within the ACOS cohort, the aHR was higher among patients receiving SABAs+SAMAs, LABAs+LAMAs, and ICSs (aHR [95% CI]: 3.06 [2.75-3.41], 3.68 [2.93-4.61], and 2.79 [1.25-6.22], respectively; all P < .05).,Furthermore, patients with more than 15 outpatient visits and hospitalizations per year demonstrated the highest aHR (8.09; 95% CI, 6.85-9.56).,ACOS cohort potentially develop incident TB, regardless of the age,sex, comorbidities and atopy; even without receiving the inhalers.This risk is higher, especially in the ACOS cohort have a high frequency of medical services or receiving the inhalers such as SABAs+SAMAs, LABAs+LAMAs and ICSs. | 1 |
The aim of this study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to discuss the different tools available for its assessment.,The most widely used assessments are the St.,George respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and the COPD assessment test (CAT) questionnaire.,Both have a different difficulty in exam completion, calculation, and scoring.,No studies exist that analyze the validity and internal consistency of using both questionnaires on patients admitted to the hospital for a COPD exacerbation.,A multicenter, cross-sectional analytic observational study of patients admitted to the hospital due to a COPD exacerbation (CIE 491.2).,During their hospital stay, they were administered the SGRQ and the CAT questionnaire within the framework of a therapeutic education program (APRENDEPOC).,Descriptive and comparative analysis, correlations between the scales (Pearson’s correlation index), consistency and reliability calculations (Cronbach’s α), and a forward stepwise multiple linear regression were performed, with significant correlations in both questionnaires considered p < 0.01 with the total scores.,A statistical significance of p < 0.05 was assumed.,Altogether, 231 patients were admitted for a COPD exacerbation (n = 77) at Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (HCB) and (n = 154) at Hospital Universitario General of Castellón (HUGC).,The sample profile was not homogeneous between both centers, with significant differences in HRQL between hospitals.,Correlation were noted between both scales (p < 0.01), along with high levels of internal consistency and reliability (CAT 0.836 vs.,SGRQ 0.827).,The HRQL is related to dyspnea, wheezing, daytime drowsiness, and edema, as well as to the need to sleep in a sitting position, anxiety, depression, and dependence on others in the execution of daily activities.,Our regression analysis showed that the SGRQ questionnaire could predict more changes in HRQL with a higher number of variables. | Eosinophils in blood and sputum in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been associated with more frequent exacerbations, lower lung function, and corticosteroid responsiveness.,We hypothesized increased eosinophils are associated with a severe COPD phenotype, including exacerbation frequency, and tested whether blood eosinophils reliably predict sputum eosinophils.,Comprehensive baseline data on SPIROMICS subjects, recruited for a range of COPD severity for smokers with ≥20 pack year history, included demographics, questionnaires, clinical assessments, quantitative computed tomography (QCT), blood and induced sputum.,Significantly, stratification by mean sputum eosinophils ≥1·25% (N=827) was associated with reduced FEV1 % predicted (differences: 10% pre-bronchodilator, 4·7% post-bronchodilator), QCT density measures for emphysema and air trapping, and exacerbations treated with corticosteroids (p=0·002).,In contrast, stratification by mean blood eosinophils ≥200/µL (N=2499) showed that FEV1 % predicted was significant between low and high blood subgroups, but less than observed between sputum subgroups (blood eosinophil group differences: 4·2% pre-bronchodilator, 2·7% post-bronchodilator), slightly increased airway wall thickness (0·02 mm, p=0·032), greater symptoms (p=0·037), and wheezing (p=0·018), but no evidence of association with COPD exacerbations or other indices of severity.,Blood eosinophils showed weak although significant association with sputum eosinophils (ROC AUC=0·64, p<0·001), but with a high false discovery rate (72%).,Elevated sputum eosinophils, with or without blood eosinophils, were associated with lower lung function.,Elevated blood eosinophils only in combination with elevated sputum eosinophils were associated with COPD exacerbations.,Stratification of SPIROMICS subjects by blood eosinophils alone showed minimal clinical differences and no association with exacerbations, whereas stratification by sputum eosinophils was associated with larger phenotypic differences and COPD exacerbations.,Importantly, increased blood eosinophils did not reliably predict airway eosinophils in induced sputum. | 1 |
This study aimed to examine the distribution of predefined phenotypes, demographic data, clinical outcomes, and treatment of patients who were included in the Polish cohort of the Phenotypes of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe (POPE) study.,This was a sub-analysis of the data from the Polish cohort of the POPE study, an international, multicenter, observational cross-sectional survey of COPD patients in Central and Eastern European countries.,The study included patients aged >40 years, with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD, and absence of exacerbation for at least 4 weeks before study inclusion.,A total of seven Polish centers participated in the study.,Among the 430 Polish COPD patients enrolled in the study, 61.6% were non-exacerbators (NON-AE), 25.3% were frequent exacerbators with chronic bronchitis (AE CB), 7.9% were frequent exacerbators without chronic bronchitis (AE NON-CB), and 5.1% met the definition of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS).,There were statistically significant differences among these phenotypes in terms of symptom load, lung function, comorbidities, and treatment.,Patients with the AE CB phenotype were most symptomatic with worse lung function, and more frequently reported anxiety and depression.,Patients with the ACOS phenotype were significantly younger and were diagnosed with COPD earlier than those with other COPD phenotypes; those with the ACOS phenotype were also more often atopic and obese.,There is significant heterogeneity among COPD patients in the Polish population in terms of phenotype and clinical outcome.,The non-exacerbator phenotype is observed most frequently in Poland, while the frequent exacerbator with chronic bronchitis phenotype is the most symptomatic. | In COPD patients, mortality risk is influenced by age, severity of respiratory disease, and comorbidities.,With an unbiased statistical approach we sought to identify clusters of COPD patients and to examine their mortality risk.,Stable COPD subjects (n = 527) were classified using hierarchical cluster analysis of clinical, functional and imaging data.,The relevance of this classification was validated using prospective follow-up of mortality.,The most relevant patient classification was that based on three clusters (phenotypes).,Phenotype 1 included subjects at very low risk of mortality, who had mild respiratory disease and low rates of comorbidities.,Phenotype 2 and 3 were at high risk of mortality.,Phenotype 2 included younger subjects with severe airflow limitation, emphysema and hyperinflation, low body mass index, and low rates of cardiovascular comorbidities.,Phenotype 3 included older subjects with less severe respiratory disease, but higher rates of obesity and cardiovascular comorbidities.,Mortality was associated with the severity of airflow limitation in Phenotype 2 but not in Phenotype 3 subjects, and subjects in Phenotype 2 died at younger age.,We identified three COPD phenotypes, including two phenotypes with high risk of mortality.,Subjects within these phenotypes may require different therapeutic interventions to improve their outcome. | 1 |
It has recently been proposed that the concept of clinical control in COPD may be useful for deciding treatment in COPD, but the original control criteria (OCC) were considered too restrictive.,Define and subsequently validate “modified” control criteria (MCC) of COPD.,Prospective observational study in COPD patients with a 1-year follow-up.,Control was defined as the presence of low clinical impact and clinical stability.,To evaluate clinical impact, the following clinical parameters were assessed: the degree of dyspnea, use of rescue medication, physical activity, and sputum color.,Stability was assessed by clinical changes and exacerbations in the last 3 months.,The COPD assessment test score and their changes were also evaluated as alternative control criteria.,To define the MCC, adjustment for disease severity using BODEx index (MCC-B) or FEV1 (MCC-F) was evaluated, and the best cutoff point was established.,Time to first combined event (emergency visit, hospitalization, or death) was analyzed to evaluate the predictive capacity of risk of the OCC, MCC-B, and MCC-F.,We included 265 patients, 224 (83.9%) men, with a mean age (±SD) of 68±9 years and FEV1 of 58%±17%.,The proportion of controlled patients was higher using clinical MCC-B or MCC-F (61.5% and 59.6%) than OCC (27.5%).,Similar percentages were found using COPD assessment test scores.,The time to the first combined event was significantly greater in controlled patients using MCC criteria (P<0.001, all cases).,The predictive capacity of risk was similar in MCC-B (c-statistic [C]=0.639) and MCC-F (C=0.637) and higher than OCC (C=0.589).,The new MCC identified a higher number of controlled COPD patients.,These patients have a better quality of life and lower risk of poor outcomes.,The concept of control and the new MCC could be a useful tool to optimize therapy. | The landmark study of Fletcher and Peto on the natural history of tobacco smoke-related chronic airflow obstruction suggested that decline in the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is slow at the beginning, becoming faster with more advanced disease.,The present authors reviewed spirometric data of COPD patients included in the placebo arms of recent clinical trials to assess the lung function decline of each stage, defined according to the severity of airflow obstruction as proposed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines.,In large COPD populations the mean rate of FEV1 decline in GOLD stages II and III is between 47 and 79 mL/year and 56 and 59 mL/year, respectively, and lower than 35 mL/year in GOLD stage IV.,Few data on FEV1 decline are available for GOLD stage I.,Hence, the loss of lung function, assessed as expiratory airflow reduction, seems more accelerated and therefore more relevant in the initial phases of COPD.,To have an impact on the natural history of COPD, it is logical to look at the effects of treatment in the earlier stages. | 1 |
Sirtuin-1 (SIRT1) and SIRT6, NAD+-dependent Class III protein deacetylases, are putative anti-aging enzymes, down-regulated in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is characterized by the accelerated ageing of the lung and associated with increased oxidative stress.,Here, we show that oxidative stress (hydrogen peroxide) selectively elevates microRNA-34a (miR-34a) but not the related miR-34b/c, with concomitant reduction of SIRT1/-6 in bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS2B), which was also observed in peripheral lung samples from patients with COPD.,Over-expression of a miR-34a mimic caused a significant reduction in both mRNA and protein of SIRT1/-6, whereas inhibition of miR-34a (antagomir) increased these sirtuins.,Induction of miR-34a expression with H2O2 was phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) dependent as it was associated with PI3Kα activation as well as phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) reduction.,Importantly, miR-34a antagomirs increased SIRT1/-6 mRNA levels, whilst decreasing markers of cellular senescence in airway epithelial cells from COPD patients, suggesting that this process is reversible.,Other sirtuin isoforms were not affected by miR-34a.,Our data indicate that miR-34a is induced by oxidative stress via PI3K signaling, and orchestrates ageing responses under oxidative stress, therefore highlighting miR-34a as a new therapeutic target and biomarker in COPD and other oxidative stress-driven aging diseases. | Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are characterized by acute enhancement of airway neutrophilic inflammation under oxidative stress and can be involved in emphysema progression.,However, pharmacotherapy against the neutrophilic inflammation and emphysema progression associated with exacerbation has not been established.,Thioredoxin-1 has anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory properties and it can ameliorate neutrophilic inflammation through anti-chemotactic effects and prevent cigarette smoke (CS)-induced emphysema.,We aimed to determine whether thioredoxin-1 can suppress neutrophilic inflammation and emphysema progression in a mouse model of COPD exacerbation and if so, to reveal the underlying mechanisms.,Mice were exposed to CS and then challenged with polyinosine-polycytidylic acid [poly(I:C)], an agonist for virus-induced innate immunity.,Airway neutrophilic inflammation, oxidative stress and lung apoptosis were enhanced in smoke-sensitive C57Bl/6, but not in smoke-resistant NZW mice.,Exposure to CS and poly(I:C) challenge accelerated emphysema progression in C57Bl/6 mice.,Thioredoxin-1 suppressed neutrophilic inflammation and emphysema progression.,Poly(I:C) caused early neutrophilic inflammation through keratinocyte-derived chemokine and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) release in the lung exposed to CS.,Late neutrophilic inflammation was caused by persistent GM-CSF release, which thioredoxin-1 ameliorated.,Thioredoxin-1 enhanced pulmonary mRNA expression of MAP kinase phosphatase 1 (MKP-1), and the suppressive effects of thioredoxin-1 on prolonged GM-CSF release and late neutrophilic inflammation disappeared by inhibiting MKP-1.,Using a mouse model of COPD exacerbation, we demonstrated that thioredoxin-1 ameliorated neutrophilic inflammation by suppressing GM-CSF release, which prevented emphysema progression.,Our findings deepen understanding of the mechanisms underlying the regulation of neutrophilic inflammation by thioredoxin-1 and indicate that thioredoxin-1 could have potential as a drug to counteract COPD exacerbation. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a risk factor that increases the incidence of postoperative cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality after lung resection.,Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenoreceptor agonist, has been reported previously to attenuate intrapulmonary shunt during one-lung ventilation (OLV) and to alleviate bronchoconstriction.,The objective is to determine whether dexmedetomidine improves oxygenation and lung mechanics in patients with moderate COPD during lung cancer surgery.,A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.,Single university hospital.,Fifty patients scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery who had moderate COPD.,Patients were randomly allocated to a control group or a Dex group (n = 25 each).,In the Dex group, dexmedetomidine was given as an initial loading dose of 1.0 μg kg−1 over 10 min followed by a maintenance dose of 0.5 μg kg−1 h−1 during OLV while the control group was administered a comparable volume of 0.9% saline.,Data were measured at 30 min (DEX-30) and 60 min (DEX-60) after dexmedetomidine or saline administration during OLV.,The primary outcome was the effect of dexmedetomidine on oxygenation.,The secondary outcome was the effect of dexmedetomidine administration on postoperative pulmonary complications.,Patients in the Dex group had a significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio (27.9 ± 5.8 vs.,22.5 ± 8.4 and 28.6 ± 5.9 vs.,21.0 ± 9.9 kPa, P < 0.05), significantly lower dead space ventilation (19.2 ± 8.5 vs.,24.1 ± 8.1 and 19.6 ± 6.7 vs.,25.3 ± 7.8%, P < 0.05) and higher dynamic compliance at DEX-30 and DEX-60 (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0184) compared with the control group.,In the Dex group, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the postoperative period was significantly higher (P = 0.022) and the incidence of ICU admission was lower than in the control group.,Dexmedetomidine administration may provide clinically relevant benefits by improving oxygenation and lung mechanics in patients with moderate COPD undergoing lung cancer surgery.,ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT 02185430. | The association between vitamin D and clinical parameters in obstructive lung diseases (OLDs), including COPD and bronchial asthma, was previously investigated.,As asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) is a new clinical entity, the prevalence of vitamin D levels in ACOS is unknown.,Our aim was to assess the levels of circulating vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]) in different OLDs, including ACOS patients, and its correlation with clinical parameters.,A total of 106 men and women (control, n=21; asthma, n=44; COPD, n=21; and ACOS, n=20) were involved in the study.,All patients underwent detailed clinical examinations; disease control and severity was assessed by disease-specific questionnaires (COPD assessment test, asthma control test, and modified Medical Research Council); furthermore, 25(OH)D levels were measured in all patients.,The 25(OH)D level was significantly lower in ACOS and COPD groups compared to asthma group (16.86±1.79 ng/mL and 14.27±1.88 ng/mL vs 25.66±1.91 ng/mL).,A positive correlation was found between 25(OH)D level and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (r=0.4433; P<0.0001), forced vital capacity (FVC) (r=0.3741; P=0.0004), forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (r=0.4179; P<0.0001), and peak expiratory flow (r=0.4846; P<0.0001) in OLD patient groups.,Asthma control test total scores and the 25(OH)D level showed a positive correlation in the ACOS (r=0.4761; P=0.0339) but not in the asthma group.,Higher COPD assessment test total scores correlated with decreased 25(OH)D in ACOS (r=−0.4446; P=0.0495); however, this was not observed in the COPD group.,Vitamin D deficiency is present in ACOS patients and circulating 25(OH)D level may affect disease control and severity. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.,Hookah smoking is growing worldwide and particularly in Iran.,The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of obstructive pulmonary dysfunction in hookah smokers.,We conducted a population-based study in Bushehr Province, Iran.,A total of 245 subjects aged 35 years or older who were taking hookah for at least 15 years and 245 healthy controls were enrolled in the study and spirometry was done.,Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for windows software version 19.,The prevalence of COPD among the exposed group of hookah smoke was 10.2%, with the rate being significantly higher in the patients with older age (p < 0.001), duration of hookah smoking (p < 0.001), men (p = 0.026), ≥3 hookahs/day (p = 0.006), history of cough for ≥2 years (p = 0.002), in patients with a history of sputum for ≥2 years (p = 0.031), and in patients with a history of dyspnea for ≥2 years (p = 0.001).,The results of the logistic regression analysis demonstrated that older age, male gender, smoking, and occupational exposure were independent predictive factors for COPD.,The results of our study suggest that hookah smoking significantly increases the risk of COPD.,Given the importance of COPD in the global burden of diseases, it is necessary to carry out further studies on the relationship between hookah use and COPD. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has traditionally been considered an inexorably progressive disease, associated with a constant increase of symptoms that occur as the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) worsens, only intermittently interrupted by exacerbations.,However, this paradigm has been challenged in recent decades by the available evidence.,Recent studies have pointed out that COPD-related symptoms are not consistently perceived by patients in the same way, showing not only seasonal variation, but also changes in symptom perception during a week or even within a single day.,According to the available data, patients experience the biggest increase in respiratory symptoms during the first hours of the early morning, followed by the nighttime.,This variation over time is of considerable importance, since it impacts on daily life activities and health-related quality of life, as measured by a recently developed ad hoc questionnaire.,Additionally, recent clinical trials have suggested that the use of rapid-onset long-acting bronchodilators may have an impact on morning symptoms, despite their current use as maintenance treatment for a determined period.,Although this hypothesis is to be validated in future long-term clinical trials comparing fast-onset versus slow-onset inhaled drugs in COPD, it may bring forward a new concept of long-term bronchodilator therapy.,At the present time, the two available long-acting, fast-onset bronchodilators used in the treatment of COPD are formoterol and the recently marketed indacaterol.,Newer drugs have also been shown to have a rapid onset of action in preclinical studies.,Health care professionals caring for COPD patients should consider this variation in the perception of symptoms during their clinical interview as a potential new target in the long-term treatment plan. | 1 |
In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the extent of physical activity (PA) is correlated with disease severity and prognosis.,However, factors associated with low-level PA in elderly COPD patients are not known.,We assessed the levels of PA and clinical factors associated with low-level of PA in elderly COPD patients.,This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective study of 245 patients with COPD.,Among them, 160 patients with 65 years or more were included.,Three PA groups were defined with respect to daily activity time (low, moderate, and high).,Health related quality of life (HRQL) was measured using St.,George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and 36-item short-form health survey.,Anxiety and depression status were assessed employing the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS).,Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of low-level PA in elderly COPD patients.,Of all the 160 patients, 103 (64.4%) engaged in low-level PA.,Upon univariate analysis, a decreased exercise capacity (6-minute walk test < 250 m), an increased dyspnea (the modified medical research council [MMRC] dyspnea scale ≥ 2), a decreased HRQL (total SGRQ score), and a presence of depression (HADS-D ≥ 8) were significantly associated with low-level PA.,Upon multivariate analysis, an MMRC grade ≥ 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.550; p = 0.034), and HADS-D ≥ 8 (HR, 2.076; p = 0.045) were independently associated with low-level PA in elderly COPD patients.,Two-thirds of elderly patients with COPD reported low-level of PA.,More severe dyspnea and a presence of depression were independently associated with low-level PA in elderly COPD patients. | Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are the third largest cause of emergency hospital admissions in the UK.,This systematic literature review explored the relationship between the hospitalization rates and the COPD comorbidities, anxiety, and depression.,The Centre for Research Dissemination’s framework for systematic reviews was followed using search terms relating to COPD, anxiety, depression, and hospital admission.,Papers identified were assessed for relevance and quality, using a suitable Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool and Mixed Methods Assessment Tool.,Twenty quantitative studies indicated that anxiety and depression led to a statistically significant increase in the likelihood of COPD patients being hospitalized.,These comorbidities also led to an increased length of stay and a greater risk of mortality postdischarge.,Other significant factors included lower Body-Mass Index, Airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea, and Exercise scores, female gender, lower socioeconomic status, poorer patient perceived quality of life, increased severity of lung function, and less improvement in dyspnea from admission to discharge.,It was also highlighted that only 27%-33% of those with depression were being treated for it.,Four qualitative studies revealed that patients saw anxiety and depression as a major factor that affected their ability to cope with and self-manage their condition.,Findings from the systematic review have highlighted a need for better recognition and treatment of anxiety and depression amongst individuals with COPD.,Ongoing research will develop and test strategies for promoting better management and self-management as a means of reducing hospital admissions. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive airflow limitation.,Cardiovascular-related comorbidities are established to contribute to morbidity and mortality especially during exacerbations.,The aim of the current study was to determine alterations in hemorheology (erythrocyte aggregation, deformability) in newly diagnosed COPD patients and their response to medical treatment and to compare with values of COPD patients with exacerbations.,The study comprised 13 COPD patients, 12 controls, and 16 COPD patients with exacerbations.,The severity of COPD was determined according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines.,Red blood cell (RBC) deformability and aggregation were measured by an ektacytometer.,RBC deformability of COPD patients with exacerbations was decreased compared to the other groups.,Erythrocyte aggregation and plasma fibrinogen of COPD patients determined during exacerbations were higher than control.,Decreased RBC deformability and increased aggregation associated with exacerbations of COPD may serve as unfavorable mechanisms to worsen oxygenation and thus clinical symptoms of the patient.,Treatment modalities that modify rheological parameters might be beneficial. | Fibrinogen is a marker of systemic inflammation and may be important in the pathogenesis and progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We used baseline data from Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities and Cardiovascular Health Studies to determine the relation between fibrinogen levels and COPD and to examine how fibrinogen levels at baseline affected outcomes of death, development of COPD, lung function decline, and COPD-hospitalizations.,Our study sample included 20,192 subjects, of whom 2995 died during the follow-up period.,The mean fibrinogen level was 307.6 mg/dL and 10% of the sample had levels >393.0 mg/dL.,Subjects with Stage 3 or 4 COPD were more likely to have a fibrinogen level >393.0 mg/dL (odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79-2.95).,In the longitudinal adjusted models, fibrinogen levels >393 mg/dL predicted mortality (hazards ratio 1.54, 95% CI: 1.39-1.70), COPD-related hospitalization (hazards ratio 1.45, 95% CI: 1.27-1.67), and incident Stage 2 COPD (odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI: 1.07-1.74).,Similar findings were seen with continuous fibrinogen levels.,In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities/Cardiovascular Health Studies cohort data, higher fibrinogen levels are predictors of mortality, COPD-related hospitalizations, and incident Stage 2 COPD. | 1 |
The diagnostic criteria of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) are controversial.,Emphysema is characteristic of COPD and usually does not exist in typical asthma patients.,Emphysema in patients with asthma suggests the coexistence of COPD.,Quantitative computed tomography (CT) allows repeated evaluation of emphysema noninvasively.,We investigated the value of quantitative CT measurements of emphysema in the diagnosis of ACOS.,This study included 404 participants; 151 asthma patients, 125 COPD patients, and 128 normal control subjects.,All the participants underwent pulmonary function tests and a high-resolution CT scan.,Emphysema measurements were taken with an Airway Inspector software.,The asthma patients were divided into high and low emphysema index (EI) groups based on the percentage of low attenuation areas less than −950 Hounsfield units.,The characteristics of asthma patients with high EI were compared with those having low EI or COPD.,The normal value of percentage of low attenuation areas less than −950 Hounsfield units in Chinese aged >40 years was 2.79%±2.37%.,COPD patients indicated more severe emphysema and more upper-zone-predominant distribution of emphysema than asthma patients or controls.,Thirty-two (21.2%) of the 151 asthma patients had high EI.,Compared with asthma patients with low EI, those with high EI were significantly older, more likely to be male, had more pack-years of smoking, had more upper-zone-predominant distribution of emphysema, and had greater airflow limitation.,There were no significant differences in sex ratios, pack-years of smoking, airflow limitation, or emphysema distribution between asthma patients with high EI and COPD patients.,A greater number of acute exacerbations were seen in asthma patients with high EI compared with those with low EI or COPD.,Asthma patients with high EI fulfill the features of ACOS, as described in the Global Initiative for Asthma and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines.,Quantitative CT measurements of emphysema may help in diagnosing ACOS. | Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important events in the history of this debilitating lung condition.,Associated health care utilization and morbidity are high, and many patients require supplemental oxygen or ventilatory support.,The last 2 decades have seen a substantial increase in our understanding of the best way to manage the respiratory failure suffered by many patients during this high-risk period.,This review article examines the evidence underlying supplemental oxygen therapy during exacerbations of COPD.,We first discuss the epidemiology and pathophysiology of respiratory failure in COPD during exacerbations.,The rationale and evidence underlying oxygen therapy, including the risks when administered inappropriately, are then discussed, along with further strategies for ventilatory support.,We also review current recommendations for best practice, including methods for improving oxygen provision in the future. | 1 |
The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) is a concise health status measure for COPD.,COPD patients have a variety of comorbidities, but little is known about their impact on quality of life.,This study was designed to investigate comorbid factors that may contribute to high CAT scores.,An observational study at Keio University and affiliated hospitals enrolled 336 COPD patients and 67 non-COPD subjects.,Health status was assessed by the CAT, the St.,Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and all components of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item (SF-36) version 2, which is a generic measure of health.,Comorbidities were identified based on patients’ reports, physicians’ records, and questionnaires, including the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.,Dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density were performed.,The CAT showed moderate-good correlations with the SGRQ and all components of the SF-36.,The presence of GERD, depression, arrhythmia, and anxiety was significantly associated with a high CAT score in the COPD patients.,Symptomatic COPD patients have a high prevalence of comorbidities.,A high CAT score should alert the clinician to a higher likelihood of certain comorbidities such as GERD and depression, because these diseases may co-exist unrecognized.,Clinical trial registered with UMIN (UMIN000003470). | Several studies investigated the association of anemia with health related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with chronic disease.,However, there is little evidence regarding the association of anemia with HRQL in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,This is a post-hoc analysis of a study which enrolled a population of adults aged 35-79 randomly selected from residents of Erie and Niagara Counties, NY, between 1996 and 2000.,In addition to demographic information and physical measurements, we obtained spirometry data and hemoglobin levels.,We used modified Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria to define COPD, and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria to define anemia.,To assess HRQL we used the Short Form-36 (SF-36) to assess physical functioning (PF), physical component summary (PCS) measures and mental component summary (MCS) measures.,In the entire study population (n = 2704), respondents with anemia had lower scores on the physical functioning domain [45.4 (SD10.9) vs.,49.2 (SD 9.1); p < 0.0001].,Among patients with COPD (n = 495) the PF scores (39.9 vs.,45.4) and the PCS (41.9 vs.,45.9) were significantly lower in individuals with anemia compared to those without.,In multiple regression analysis, the association between hemoglobin and PCS was positive (regression coefficient 0.02, p = 0.003).,There was no significant association of hemoglobin with PF scores or the mental component summary measure after adjusting for covariates in patients with COPD.,In patients with moderate to very severe COPD anemia may be associated with worse HRQL.,However, co-morbidities may explain part or all of this association in these patients. | 1 |
Ferroptosis is a necrotic form of regulated cell death (RCD) mediated by phospholipid peroxidation in association with free iron-mediated Fenton reactions.,Disrupted iron homeostasis resulting in excessive oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Here, we demonstrate the involvement of ferroptosis in COPD pathogenesis.,Our in vivo and in vitro models show labile iron accumulation and enhanced lipid peroxidation with concomitant non-apoptotic cell death during cigarette smoke (CS) exposure, which are negatively regulated by GPx4 activity.,Treatment with deferoxamine and ferrostatin-1, in addition to GPx4 knockdown, illuminate the role of ferroptosis in CS-treated lung epithelial cells.,NCOA4-mediated ferritin selective autophagy (ferritinophagy) is initiated during ferritin degradation in response to CS treatment.,CS exposure models, using both GPx4-deficient and overexpressing mice, clarify the pivotal role of GPx4-regulated cell death during COPD.,These findings support a role for cigarette smoke-induced ferroptosis in the pathogenesis of COPD.,Altered iron homeostasis resulting in excessive oxidative stress has been implicated in smoke-induced lung diseases.,Here the authors show that ferroptosis of lung epithelial cells, potentially resulting from excessive ferritinophagy, is involved in the pathogenesis of COPD. | The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is activated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but the regulatory mechanisms for this pathway are yet to be elucidated.,The aim of this study was to determine the expression and role of phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10 (PTEN), a negative regulator of the PI3K pathway, in COPD.,PTEN protein expression was measured in the peripheral lung of COPD patients compared with smoking and nonsmoking controls.,The direct influence of cigarette smoke extract (CSE) on PTEN expression was assessed using primary lung epithelial cells and a cell line (BEAS-2B) in the presence or absence of l-buthionine-sulfoximine (BSO) to deplete intracellular glutathione.,The impact of PTEN knockdown by RNA interference on cytokine production was also examined.,In peripheral lung, PTEN protein was significantly decreased in patients with COPD compared with the subjects without COPD (P < 0.001) and positively correlated with the severity of airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1-s percent predicted; r = 0.50; P = 0.0012).,Conversely, phosphorylated Akt, as a marker of PI3K activation, showed a negative correlation with PTEN protein levels (r = −0.41; P = 0.0042).,In both primary bronchial epithelial cells and BEAS-2B cells, CSE decreased PTEN protein, which was reversed by N-acetyl cysteine treatment.,PTEN knockdown potentiated Akt phosphorylation and enhanced production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, CXCL8, CCL2, and CCL5.,In conclusion, oxidative stress reduces PTEN protein levels, which may result in increased PI3K signaling and amplification of inflammation in COPD. | 1 |
Inhaled drug delivery is the cornerstone treatment for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, use of inhaler devices can be challenging, potentially leading to critical errors in handling that can significantly reduce drug delivery to the lungs and effectiveness of treatment.,A systematic review was conducted to define ‘critical’ errors and their impact on health outcomes and resource use between 2004 and 2016, using key search terms for inhaler errors in asthma and COPD (Search-1) and associated health-economic and patient burden (Search-2).,Search-1 identified 62 manuscripts, 47 abstracts, and 5 conference proceedings (n = 114 total).,Search-2 identified 9 studies.,We observed 299 descriptions of critical error.,Age, education status, previous inhaler instruction, comorbidities and socioeconomic status were associated with worse handling error frequency.,A significant association was found between inhaler errors and poor disease outcomes (exacerbations), and greater health-economic burden.,We have shown wide variations in how critical errors are defined, and the evidence shows an important association between inhaler errors and worsened health outcomes.,Given the negative impact diminished disease outcomes impose on resource use, our findings highlight the importance of achieving optimal inhaler technique, and a need for a consensus on defining critical and non-critical errors.,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-017-0710-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | Different inhalation devices are characterized by different techniques of use.,The untrained switching of device in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma patients may be associated with inadequate inhalation technique and, consequently, could lead to a reduction in adherence to treatment and limit control of the disease.,The aim of this analysis was to estimate the potential economic impact related to errors in inhalation in patients switching device without adequate training.,An Italian real-practice study conducted in patients affected by COPD and asthma has shown an increase in health care resource consumption associated with misuse of inhalers.,Particularly, significantly higher rates of hospitalizations, emergency room visits (ER), and pharmacological treatments (steroids and antimicrobials) were observed.,In this analysis, those differences in resource consumption were monetized considering the Italian National Health Service (INHS) perspective.,Comparing a hypothetical cohort of 100 COPD patients with at least a critical error in inhalation vs 100 COPD patients without errors in inhalation, a yearly excess of 11.5 hospitalizations, 13 ER visits, 19.5 antimicrobial courses, and 47 corticosteroid courses for the first population were revealed.,In the same way, considering 100 asthma patients with at least a critical error in inhalation vs 100 asthma patients without errors in inhalation, the first population is associated with a yearly excess of 19 hospitalizations, 26.5 ER visits, 4.5 antimicrobial courses, and 21.5 corticosteroid courses.,These differences in resource consumption could be associated with an increase in health care expenditure for INHS, due to inhalation errors, of €23,444/yr in COPD and €44,104/yr in asthma for the considered cohorts of 100 patients.,This evaluation highlights that misuse of inhaler devices, due to inadequate training or nonconsented switch of inhaled medications, is associated with a decrease in disease control and an increase in health care resource consumption and costs. | 1 |
Navafenterol (AZD8871) is a dual-pharmacology muscarinic antagonist β2−agonist (MABA) molecule in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of single doses of navafenterol were investigated in patients with moderate to severe COPD.,This was a randomized, five-way complete cross-over study.,Patients received single doses of navafenterol 400 μg, navafenterol 1800 μg and placebo (all double-blind) and indacaterol 150 μg and tiotropium 18 μg (both open-label active comparators).,The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) on day 2.,Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout.,Thirty-eight patients were randomized and 28 (73.7%) completed the study.,Navafenterol 400 μg and 1800 μg demonstrated statistically significant improvements vs placebo in change from baseline in trough FEV1 (least squares mean [95% confidence interval]: 0.111 [0.059, 0.163] L and 0.210 [0.156, 0.264] L, respectively, both P < .0001).,The changes were significantly greater with navafenterol 1800 μg vs the active comparators (least squares mean treatment difference: 0.065-0.069 L, both P < .05).,The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for placebo and the active comparators (range 34.4-37.5%), slightly higher for navafenterol 400 μg (52.9%), and lowest for navafenterol 1800 μg (22.6%).,Both doses of navafenterol demonstrated sustained bronchodilation over 24 h.,Navafenterol was well tolerated and no safety concerns were raised.,ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02573155; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.,Registered 9th October, 2015. | The goals of COPD therapy are to prevent and control symptoms, reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations, and improve exercise tolerance.,The triple combination therapy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), long-acting beta2 agonists (LABAs), and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) has become an option for maintenance treatment of COPD and as a “step-up” therapy from single or double combination treatments.,There is evidence that triple combination ICS/LABA/LAMA with different inhalers improves lung function, symptoms, and health status and reduces exacerbations.,A new triple fixed-dose combination of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate (100 µg/puff)/formoterol fumarate (6 µg/puff)/glycopyrronium bromide (12.5 µg/puff) has been developed as a hydrofluoroalkane pressurized metered dose inhaler.,Two large pivotal studies showed that this extrafine fixed ICS/LABA/LAMA triple combination is superior to fixed ICS/LABA combined therapy and also superior to the LAMA tiotropium in terms of lung function and exacerbation prevention in COPD patients at risk of exacerbation.,This review considers the new information provided by these clinical trials of extrafine triple therapy and the implications for the clinical management of COPD patients. | 1 |
A genetic contribution to develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well established.,However, the specific genes responsible for enhanced risk or host differences in susceptibility to smoke exposure remain poorly understood.,The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive literature overview on the genetics of COPD, highlight the most promising findings during the last few years, and ultimately provide an updated COPD gene list.,Candidate gene studies on COPD and related phenotypes indexed in PubMed before January 5, 2012 are tabulated.,An exhaustive list of publications for any given gene was looked for.,This well-documented COPD candidate-gene list is expected to serve many purposes for future replication studies and meta-analyses as well as for reanalyzing collected genomic data in the field.,In addition, this review summarizes recent genetic loci identified by genome-wide association studies on COPD, lung function, and related complications.,Assembling resources, integrative genomic approaches, and large sample sizes of well-phenotyped subjects is part of the path forward to elucidate the genetic basis of this debilitating disease. | The ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) is a measure used to diagnose airflow obstruction and is highly heritable.,We performed a genome-wide association study in 7,691 Framingham Heart Study participants to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the FEV1/FVC ratio, analyzed as a percent of the predicted value.,Identified SNPs were examined in an independent set of 835 Family Heart Study participants enriched for airflow obstruction.,Four SNPs in tight linkage disequilibrium on chromosome 4q31 were associated with the percent predicted FEV1/FVC ratio with p-values of genome-wide significance in the Framingham sample (best p-value = 3.6e-09).,One of the four chromosome 4q31 SNPs (rs13147758; p-value 2.3e-08 in Framingham) was genotyped in the Family Heart Study and produced evidence of association with the same phenotype, percent predicted FEV1/FVC (p-value = 2.0e-04).,The effect estimates for association in the Framingham and Family Heart studies were in the same direction, with the minor allele (G) associated with higher FEV1/FVC ratio levels.,Results from the Family Heart Study demonstrated that the association extended to FEV1 and dichotomous airflow obstruction phenotypes, particularly among smokers.,The SNP rs13147758 was associated with the percent predicted FEV1/FVC ratio in independent samples from the Framingham and Family Heart Studies producing a combined p-value of 8.3e-11, and this region of chromosome 4 around 145.68 megabases was associated with COPD in three additional populations reported in the accompanying manuscript.,The associated SNPs do not lie within a gene transcript but are near the hedgehog-interacting protein (HHIP) gene and several expressed sequence tags cloned from fetal lung.,Though it is unclear what gene or regulatory effect explains the association, the region warrants further investigation. | 1 |
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide current evidence regarding the effectiveness of telemonitoring for preventing COPD exacerbations, focusing on severe exacerbations requiring hospitalisation or emergency room (ER) visits.,We systematically searched for randomised controlled trials using nine databases from August to September 2020 following the Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines.,Of 2159 records identified, 22 studies involving 2906 participants met the inclusion criteria.,The participants in 55% and 59% of studies had severe airflow limitations and severe exacerbation histories in the preceding year, respectively.,The most commonly telemonitored data were oxygen saturation (91%) and symptoms (73%).,A meta-analysis showed that telemonitoring did not reduce the number of admissions (12 studies) but decreased the number of ER visits due to severe exacerbations [7 studies combined, standardised mean difference (SMD) = −0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.28, −0.01].,Most studies reported no benefit in mortality, quality of life, or cost-effectiveness.,All eight studies that surveyed participant satisfaction reported high satisfaction levels.,Our review suggested that adding telemonitoring to usual care reduced unnecessary ER visits but was unlikely to prevent hospitalisations due to COPD exacerbations and that telemonitoring was well-accepted by patients with COPD and could be easily integrated into their existing care. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is now the fourth leading cause of death in the world, and it continues to increase in developing countries.,The World Health Organization expects COPD to be the third most common cause of death in the world by 2020.,Effective and continuous postdischarge care can help patients to maintain good health.,The use of electronic health records (EHRs) as an element of community health care is new technology in China.,The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a Web-based coaching program using EHRs for physical function and health-related quality of life for patients with COPD in China.,A randomized controlled trial was conducted from 2008 to 2015 at two hospitals.,The control group received routine care and the intervention group received routine care with the addition of the Web-based coaching program using EHRs.,These were used to manage patients’ demographic and clinical variables, publish relevant information, and have communication between patients and health care providers.,Participants were not blinded to group assignment.,The effects of the intervention were evaluated by lung function, including percent of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1%), percent of forced vital capacity (FVC%), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximum midexpiratory flow; St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ); Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (MMRC); and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).,Data were collected before the program, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the program.,Of the 130 participants, 120 (92.3%) completed the 12-month follow-up program.,There were statistically significant differences in lung function (FEV1%: F1,4=5.47, P=.002; FVC%: F1,4=3.06, P=.02; PEF: F1,4=12.49, P<.001), the total score of SGRQ (F1,4=23.30, P<.001), symptoms of SGRQ (F1,4=12.38, P<.001), the activity of SGRQ (F1,4=8.35, P<.001), the impact of SGRQ (F1,4=12.26, P<.001), MMRC (F1,4=47.94, P<.001), and 6MWT (F1,4=35.54, P<.001) between the two groups with the variation of time tendency.,The Web-based coaching program using EHRs in China appears to be useful for patients with COPD when they are discharged from hospital into the community.,It promotes the sharing of patients’ medical information by hospital and community nurses, and achieves dynamic management and follow-up analysis for patients’ disease.,In addition, this program can postpone the decreasing rate of lung function, improve quality of life, decrease dyspnea, and increase physical capacity. | 1 |
Nutritional depletion is an important manifestation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which has been related to systemic inflammation.,It remains unclear to what degree airway inflammation contributes to the presence or progression of nutritional depletion.,To determine whether airway inflammation and lung bacterial colonization are related to nutritional status or predict progressive weight loss and muscle atrophy in patients with COPD.,Body composition using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, indices of airway inflammation, and bacterial colonization were measured in 234 COPD patients.,Systemic inflammation was assessed from serum C reactive protein (CRP) and circulating total and differential leukocyte counts.,Nutritional depletion was defined as a body mass index (BMI) less than 21 kg/m2 and/or fat-free mass index (FFMI) less than 15 or 17 kg/m2 in women and men, respectively.,FFMI was calculated as the fat-free mass (FFM) corrected for body surface area.,Measurements were repeated in 94 patients after a median 16-month follow-up.,Regression analysis was used to assess the relationships of weight change and FFM change with indices of bacterial colonization and airway and systemic inflammation.,Nutritional depletion occurred in 37% of patients.,Lung function was worsened in patients with nutritional depletion compared to those without (forced expiratory volume in 1 second 1.17 L versus 1.41 L, mean difference 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.38, P<0.01).,There were no differences in airway inflammation and bacterial colonization in patients with and without nutritional depletion.,At baseline, BMI correlated positively with serum CRP (rs=0.14, P=0.04).,Change in weight and change in FFM over time could not be predicted from baseline patient characteristics.,Nutritional depletion and progressive muscle atrophy are not related to airway inflammation or bacterial colonization.,Overspill of pulmonary inflammation is not a key driver of muscle atrophy in COPD. | In 5,541 community dwelling men, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma was associated with lower bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine and total hip and an increased risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures independent of age, body mass index, and smoking.,Men prescribed with corticosteroids had the lowest BMD.,It is unclear whether chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is independently associated with BMD and fractures.,In 5,541 men from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study, history of COPD or asthma, current treatment with corticosteroids, BMD, bone loss after 4.5 years and fractures were ascertained.,Seven hundred fourteen (13%) men reported COPD or asthma, of which 103 were prescribed an oral steroid and 177 an inhaled steroid.,Independent of confounders, men prescribed corticosteroids for COPD or asthma had the lowest BMD and a 2-fold increased risk of vertebral osteoporosis compared to men with no history of COPD or asthma (OR 2.13, 95% CI (confidence interval) 1.15-3.93 oral steroids; OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.27-3.31 inhaled steroids).,During follow-up, BMD increased at the spine, but there was no difference in bone loss at the hip.,However, men with COPD or asthma had a 2.6- and 1.4-fold increased risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, respectively.,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma was associated with lower BMD at the spine and hip and increased risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures independent of age, clinic site, BMI, and smoking.,A history of COPD or asthma may be a useful clinical risk factor to identify patients with osteoporosis. | 1 |
Inhaled long-acting beta2 agonists used alone and in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid reduce the risk of exacerbations in patients with stable COPD.,However, the relative efficacy of these agents in preventing recurrent exacerbations in those recovering from an initial episode is not known.,This study compared the rate of COPD exacerbations over the 26 weeks after an initial exacerbation in patients receiving the combination of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol (FP/SAL) or SAL alone.,Patients (n = 639) aged ≥40 years were randomized to either twice-daily inhaled FP/SAL 250/50 μg or SAL 50 μg.,Primary, and secondary, endpoints were rates of recurrent severe, and moderate/severe, exacerbations of COPD.,Lung function, health outcomes and levels of biomarkers of systemic inflammation were also assessed.,There was no statistically significant treatment difference in rates of recurrent severe exacerbations (treatment ratio 0.92 [95% CI: 0.58, 1.45]) and moderate/severe exacerbations (0.82 [0.64, 1.06]) between FP/SAL and SAL in the intent-to-treat population.,Pre-dose morning FEV1 change from baseline was greater (0.10 L [0.04, 0.16]) with FP/SAL than SAL.,No treatment difference was seen for other endpoints including patient-reported health outcomes and biomarker levels for the full cohort.,No significant treatment difference between FP/SAL and SAL was seen in COPD exacerbation recurrence for the complete cohort.,Treatment benefit with FP/SAL over SAL (treatment ratio 0.68 [0.47, 0.97]) was seen in patients having FEV1 ≥ 30% and prior exposure to ICS.,No unexpected safety issues were identified with either treatment.,Patients with the most severe COPD may be more refractory to treatment.,ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01110200).,This study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline (study number ADC113874).,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0105-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | It has been suggested that withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in COPD patients on maintenance treatment results in deterioration of symptoms, lung function and exacerbations.,The aim of this real-life, prospective, multicentric study was to investigate whether withdrawal of ICS in COPD patients at low risk of exacerbation is linked to a deterioration in lung function and symptoms and to a higher frequency of exacerbations.,914 COPD patients, on maintenance therapy with bronchodilators and ICS, FEV1>50% predicted, and <2 exacerbations/year were recruited.,Upon decision of the primary physicians, 59% of patients continued their ICS treatment whereas in 41% of patients ICS were withdrawn and regular therapy was continued with long-acting bronchodilators mostly (91% of patients).,FEV1, CAT (COPD Assessment Test), and occurrence of exacerbations were measured at the beginning (T0) and at the end (T6) of the 6 months observational period.,816 patients (89.3%) concluded the study.,FEV1, CAT and exacerbations history were similar in the two groups (ICS and no ICS) at T0 and at T6.,We did not observe any deterioration of lung function symptoms, and exacerbation rate between the two groups at T0 and T6.,We conclude that the withdrawal of ICS, in COPD patients at low risk of exacerbation, can be safe provided that patients are left on maintenance treatment with long-acting bronchodilators. | 1 |
Identification of patients who may become hypercapnic, or develop acidotic hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF), is important in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to avoid hospital admission and select patients for use of home NIV.,This study aimed to identify factors associated with presence and development of hypercapnia.,1224 patients, 637 with COPD and 587 with alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD), from 4 previously established patient cohorts, were included in cross-sectional analyses of hypercapnia (PaCO2 ≥ 6.5 kPa or 48.8 mmHg), focusing on phenotypic features of COPD and mortality.,Longitudinal associations of rising PaCO2 were also assessed.,A second cohort of 160 COPD patients underwent sleep studies and 1-year follow-up, analysing in a similar way, incorporating additional information from their sleep studies if appropriate.,Hypercapnia was 15 times more common in usual COPD than AATD (p < 0.01) after adjustment for baseline differences by regression.,Independent predictors of hypercapnia in COPD included FEV1 and current use of oxygen; these variables, together with lack of emphysema, explained 11% of variance in CO2.,Increasing PaCO2 also associated with higher risk of death (p=0.03). 44/160 patients exhibited sleep disordered breathing.,The sleep study cohort also showed an association of low FEV1 with hypercapnia.,Prior hospital admission for AHRF was also clinically significant, being a feature of almost double the number of hypercapnic patients in both test and sleep study COPD cohorts.,Lower FEV1 and prior AHRF are the main associations of hypercapnia in COPD, which carries a poor prognosis, particularly worsening over time. | High-intensity (high-pressure and high backup rate) noninvasive ventilation has recently been advocated for the management of stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, the relative contributions of high inspiratory pressure and high backup rate to ventilator adherence and physiological outcome have not been investigated.,Patients with stable hypercapnic COPD (daytime PaCO2 > 6 kPa) and nocturnal hypoventilation were enrolled.,Patients were randomly allocated to high-pressure and high backup rate (high-intensity) and high-pressure and low backup rate (high-pressure) for a 6-week period.,At the end of the first treatment period, patients were switched to the alternative treatment.,The primary outcome measure was mean nightly ventilator usage.,Twelve patients were recruited, with seven completing the 12-week trial protocol.,The mean patient age was 71 ± 8 years, with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) of 50% ± 13% and FEV1 of 32% ± 12%.,The baseline PaCO2 and PaO2 were 8.6 ± 1.7 kPa and 7.3 ± 1.4 kPa, respectively.,There was no significant difference demonstrated in mean nightly ventilator usage between the high-intensity and high-pressure groups (difference of 4 minutes; 95% confidence interval −45 to 53; P = 0.9).,Furthermore, there were no differences in any of the secondary endpoints, with the exception of the respiratory domain of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire, which was lower in the high-intensity arm than in the high-pressure arm (57 ± 11 versus 69 ± 16; P < 0.05).,There was no additional benefit, in terms of night-time ventilator adherence or any of the other measured parameters, demonstrated by addition of a high backup rate to high-pressure noninvasive ventilation.,These data suggest that it is the high-pressure component of the high-intensity noninvasive ventilation approach that plays the important therapeutic role in the management of hypercapnic respiratory failure in COPD patients. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by progressive airflow obstruction that is only partly reversible, inflammation in the airways, and systemic effects or comorbities.,The main cause is smoking tobacco, but other factors have been identified.,Several pathobiological processes interact on a complex background of genetic determinants, lung growth, and environmental stimuli.,The disease is further aggravated by exacerbations, particularly in patients with severe disease, up to 78% of which are due to bacterial infections, viral infections, or both.,Comorbidities include ischaemic heart disease, diabetes, and lung cancer.,Bronchodilators constitute the mainstay of treatment: β2 agonists and long-acting anticholinergic agents are frequently used (the former often with inhaled corticosteroids).,Besides improving symptoms, these treatments are also thought to lead to some degree of disease modification.,Future research should be directed towards the development of agents that notably affect the course of disease. | The aim was to compare the diagnosis of COPD among smokers according to different international guidelines and to compare the outcome when using slow (SVC) and forced vital capacity (FVC).,In order to find current smokers a questionnaire was sent to persons who had been on sick leave for more than two weeks.,Those who smoked more than 8 cigarettes per day were invited to perform a spirometry.,Totally 3,887 spirometries were performed.,In this sample 10.2% fulfilled the NICE COPD-criteria, 14.0% the GOLD COPD-criteria and 21.7% the ERS COPD criteria.,The diagnosis according to NICE and GOLD guidelines is based on FVC and in the ERS guidelines the best value of either SVC or FVC is used.,Thus, substantially more subjects with COPD were found when the best of either SVC or FVC was used.,Forced VC tended to be higher than SVC when lung function was normal and in those with mild obstruction prior to bronchodilatation whereas SVC exceeded FVC after bronchodilatation in those who had severe bronchial obstruction.,The diagnosis of COPD is highly depending on which guidelines are used for defining the disease.,If FVC and not the best of SVC and FVC is used when defining COPD the diagnosis will be missed in a substantial number of patients. | 1 |
Hyperpolarized 129Xe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a non‐invasive assessment of regional pulmonary gas exchange function.,This technique has demonstrated that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients exhibit ventilation defects, reduced interstitial barrier tissue uptake, and poor transfer to capillary red blood cells (RBCs).,However, the behavior of these measurements following therapeutic intervention is unknown.,To characterize changes in 129Xe gas transfer function following administration of an inhaled long‐acting beta‐agonist/long‐acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (LABA/LAMA) bronchodilator.,Prospective.,Seventeen COPD subjects (GOLD II/III classification per Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria) were imaged before and after 2 weeks of LABA/LAMA therapy.,Dedicated ventilation imaging used a multi‐slice 2D gradient echo sequence.,Three‐dimensional images of ventilation, barrier uptake, and RBC transfer used an interleaved, radial, 1‐point Dixon sequence.,Imaging was acquired at 3 T.,129Xe measurements were quantified before and after LABA/LAMA treatment by ventilation defect + low percent (vendef + low) and by barrier uptake and RBC transfer relative to a healthy reference population (bar%ref and RBC%ref).,Pulmonary function tests, including diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), were also performed before and after treatment.,Paired t‐test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r).,Baseline vendef + low was 57.8 ± 8.4%, bar%ref was 73.2 ± 19.6%, and RBC%ref was 36.5 ± 13.6%.,Following treatment, vendef + low decreased to 52.5 ± 10.6% (P < 0.05), and improved in 14/17 (82.4%) of subjects.,However, RBC%ref decreased in 10/17 (58.8%) of subjects.,Baseline measurements of bar%ref and DLCO were correlated with the degree of post‐treatment change in vendef + low (r = −0.49, P < 0.05 and r = −0.52, P < 0.05, respectively).,LABA/LAMA therapy tended to preferentially improve ventilation in subjects whose 129Xe barrier uptake and DLCO were relatively preserved.,However, newly ventilated regions often revealed RBC transfer defects, an aspect of lung function opaque to spirometry.,These microvasculature abnormalities must be accounted for when assessing the effects of LABA/LAMA therapy.,1,4 | Severe exacerbations associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that require hospitalization significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality.,Definitions for exacerbations are very broad, and it is unclear whether there is one predominant underlying mechanism that leads to them.,Functional respiratory imaging (FRI) with modeling provides detailed information about airway resistance, hyperinflation, and ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch during and following an acute exacerbation.,Forty-two patients with COPD participating in a multicenter study were assessed by FRI, pulmonary function tests, and self-reported outcome measures during an acute exacerbation and following resolution.,Arterial blood gasses and lung function parameters were measured.,A significant correlation was found between alveolar-arterial gradient and image-based V/Q (iV/Q), suggesting that iV/Q represents V/Q mismatch during an exacerbation (p<0.05).,Recovery of an exacerbation is due to decreased (mainly distal) airway resistance (p<0.05).,Improvement in patient-reported outcomes were also associated with decreased distal airway resistance (p<0.05), but not with forced expiratory volume.,FRI is, therefore, a sensitive tool to describe changes in airway caliber, ventilation, and perfusion during and after exacerbation.,On the basis of the fact that FRI increased distal airway resistance seems to be the main cause of an exacerbation, therapy should mainly focus on decreasing it during and after the acute event. | 1 |
Smoking and subsequent development of COPD is an ever-increasing epidemic in Arabian Gulf and Middle East countries, with no signs of decline.,The important fact to be highlighted is that this COPD epidemic of increasing incidence and prevalence is mostly unrecognized by patients, due to the common attribution of symptoms to “smoker’s cough”, and the underdiagnosis and undertreatment by physicians because the common signs and symptoms masquerade as asthma.,Consequently, there are long-term adverse effects of missing the diagnosis.,The purpose of this review article is to focus upon the status of COPD in Arabian Gulf and Middle East countries, stressing the increasing burden of smoking and COPD, to emphasize the specific factors leading to rise in prevalence of COPD, to bring to light the underdiagnosis and undermanagement of COPD, and to treat COPD in conformity with standard guidelines with local and regional modifications.,This review ends with suggestions and recommendations to the health department to formulate policies and to generate awareness among the general public about the side effects of smoking and consequences of COPD. | In clinical practice, some patients with asthma show incompletely reversible airflow obstruction, resembling chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The aim of this study was to analyze this overlap phenotype of asthma with COPD feature.,A total of 256 patients, over the age of 40 years or more with a diagnosis of asthma, based on either 1) positive response to bronchodilator: >200 mL forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and >12% baseline or 2) positive methacholine or mannitol provocation test, were enrolled.,Among the asthma patients, we defined the overlap group with incompletely reversible airflow obstruction [postbronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) <70] at the initial time of admission and continuing airflow obstruction after at least 3 months follow up.,We evaluated clinical features, serum eosinophil counts, serum total immunoglobulin (Ig) E with allergy skin prick test, spirometry, methacholine or mannitol provocation challenges and bronchodilator responses, based on their retrospective medical record data.,All of the tests mentioned above were performed within one week.,The study population was divided into two groups: asthma only (62%, n=159, postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≥70) and overlap group (38%, n=97, postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC <70).,The overlap group was older, and contained more males and a higher percentage of current or ex-smokers than the asthma only group.,Significantly lower FEV1 and higher total lung capacity, functional residual capacity, and residual volume were observed in the overlap group.,Finally, significantly lower serum eosinophil count and higher IgE were seen in the overlap group.,Our results showed that the overlap phenotype was older, male asthmatic patients who have a higher lifetime smoking intensity, more atopy and generally worse lung function. | 1 |
The rapid worldwide spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has placed patients with pre-existing conditions at risk of severe morbidity and mortality.,The present study investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,This study enrolled 336 consecutive patients with confirmed severe COVID-19, including 28 diagnosed with COPD, from January 20, 2020, to April 1, 2020.,Demographic data, symptoms, laboratory values, comorbidities, and clinical results were measured and compared in survivors and non-survivors.,Patients with severe COVID-19 and COPD were older than those without COPD.,The proportions of men, of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and of those requiring invasive ventilation were significantly higher in patients with than without COPD.,Leukocyte and neutrophil counts, as well as the concentrations of NT-proBNP, hemoglobin, D-dimer, hsCRP, ferritin, IL-2R, TNF-α and procalcitonin were higher, whereas lymphocyte and monocyte counts were lower, in patients with than without COPD.,Of the 28 patients with COPD, 22 (78.6%) died, a rate significantly higher than in patients without COPD (36.0%).,A comparison of surviving and non-surviving patients with severe COVID-19 and COPD showed that those who died had a longer history of COPD, more fatigue, and a higher ICU occupancy rate, but a shorter average hospital stay, than those who survived.,COPD increases the risks of death and negative outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19. | The purpose of this study was to assess clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from Mexico, given that it currently is in active community transmission.,Multivariate logistic regression model and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were fitted to study odds of death of characteristics and comorbidities in patients with COVID-19 in Mexico.,Age, sex, and the most frequent comorbidities diabetes, obesity, and hypertension were significantly associated to the risk of death by COVID-19 (P < .0001).,Smoking habit was not identified as a risk factor for death.,Less-frequent comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and patients with immunosuppressed conditions also showed a significant risk for death (P < .0001).,Hospitalized patients and those with pneumonia had serious risks for mortality (P < .0001), and more attention to specific conditions might be considered during clinical admission.,A more vulnerable positive patient is depicted by a male patient, older than 41 years, which increases their risk with more prevalent comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity.,Some implications on outcomes are discussed. | 1 |
The diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) relies on demonstration of airflow obstruction.,Traditional spirometric indices miss a number of subjects with respiratory symptoms or structural lung disease on imaging.,We hypothesized that utilizing all data points on the expiratory spirometry curves to assess their shape will improve detection of mild airflow obstruction and structural lung disease.,We analyzed spirometry data of 8307 participants enrolled in the COPDGene study, and derived metrics of airflow obstruction based on the shape on the volume-time (Parameter D), and flow-volume curves (Transition Point and Transition Distance).,We tested associations of these parameters with CT measures of lung disease, respiratory morbidity, and mortality using regression analyses.,There were significant correlations between FEV1/FVC with Parameter D (r = −0.83; p < 0.001), Transition Point (r = 0.69; p < 0.001), and Transition Distance (r = 0.50; p < 0.001).,All metrics had significant associations with emphysema, small airway disease, dyspnea, and respiratory-quality of life (p < 0.001).,The highest quartile for Parameter D was independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 3.22,95% CI 2.42-4.27; p < 0.001) but a substantial number of participants in the highest quartile were categorized as GOLD 0 and 1 by traditional criteria (1.8% and 33.7%).,Parameter D identified an additional 9.5% of participants with mild or non-recognized disease as abnormal with greater burden of structural lung disease compared with controls.,The data points on the flow-volume and volume-time curves can be used to derive indices of airflow obstruction that identify additional subjects with disease who are deemed to be normal by traditional criteria. | Chronic pulmonary diseases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and their impact is expected to increase in the future.,Respiratory viruses are the most common cause of acute respiratory infections and it is increasingly recognized that respiratory viruses are a major cause of acute exacerbations of chronic pulmonary diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cystic fibrosis.,There is now increasing evidence that the host response to virus infection is dysregulated in these diseases and a better understanding of the mechanisms of abnormal immune responses has the potential to lead to the development of new therapies for virus-induced exacerbations.,The aim of this article is to review the current knowledge regarding the role of viruses and immune modulation in chronic pulmonary diseases and discuss avenues for future research and therapeutic implications.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-27) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | 1 |
Acute exacerbations (AE) affect the prognosis of hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Pneumonia further affects their prognosis and early diagnosis of pneumonia in AECOPD is important to initiate treatments.,This study aimed to examine the differences between hospitalized AECOPD patients with and without pneumonia in order to identify risk factors of pneumonia among hospitalized patients with AECOPD.,This was a retrospective case-control study of patients with COPD hospitalized at the respiratory ward of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, from October 2010 to October 2013.,Patients were divided into the pneumonia and nonpneumonia groups based on exudations or opacities on chest computed tomography (CT) at admission.,Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and independent 2-sample ANOVA in SPSS 20.0.,Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors independently associated with pneumonia.,P < .05 was considered statistically significant.,A total of 164 patients were included.,Smoking history (OR = 2.646, 95%CI 1.153-6.074, P = .022), use of drugs during the stable stage (OR = 0.435, 95%CI 0.216-0.877, P = .020), D-dimer levels (OR = 1.001, 95%CI 1.000-1.002, P = .049), percentage of neutrophils (OR = 0.271, 95%CI 0.078-0.940, P = .040), and magnitude of neutrophils increase (OR = 0.946, 95%CI 0.896-0.999, P = .046) were independently associated with pneumonia in patients with AECOPD.,For severe and very severe COPD patients, smoking history (OR = 4.426, 95%CI 1.458-13.435, P = .009), use of drugs during the stable stage (OR = 0.384, 95%CI 0.168-0.877, P = .042), and fever (OR = 0.426, 95%CI 0.187-0.969, P = .023) were independently associated with pneumonia.,Smoking history, use of drugs during the stable stage, and percentage of neutrophils are independently associated with CT-diagnosed pneumonia among hospitalized AECOPD patients. | Serum D-dimer is elevated in respiratory disease.,The objective of our study was to investigate the effect of D-dimer on in-hospital and 1-year mortality after acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).,Upon admission, we measured 343 AECOPD patients’ serum D-dimer levels and arterial blood gas analysis, and recorded their clinical characteristics.,The level of D-dimer that discriminated survivors and non-survivors was determined using a receiver operator curve (ROC).,The risk factors for in-hospital mortality were identified through univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analyses.,To evaluate the predictive role of D-dimer for 1-year mortality, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.,In all, 28 patients died, and 315 patients survived in the in-hospital period.,The group of dead patients had lower pH levels (7.35±0.11 vs 7.39±0.05, P<0.0001), higher D-dimer, arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2), C-reactive protein (CRP), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels (D-dimer 2,244.9±2,310.7 vs 768.2±1,078.4 µg/L, P<0.0001; PaCO2: 58.8±29.7 vs 46.1±27.0 mmHg, P=0.018; CRP: 81.5±66, P=0.001; BUN: 10.20±6.87 vs 6.15±3.15 mmol/L, P<0.0001), and lower hemoglobin levels (118.6±29.4 vs 128.3±18.2 g/L, P=0.001).,The areas under the ROC curves of D-dimer for in-hospital death were 0.748 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.641-0.854).,D-dimer ≥985 ng/L was a risk factor for in-hospital mortality (relative risk =6.51; 95% CI 3.06-13.83).,Multivariate logistic regression analysis also showed that D-dimer ≥985 ng/L and heart failure were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.,Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that D-dimer ≥985 ng/L was an independent risk factor for 1-year death (hazard ratio (HR) 3.48, 95% CI 2.07-5.85 for the univariate analysis; and HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.05-3.65 for the multivariate analysis).,D-dimer was a strong and independent risk factor for in-hospital and 1-year death for AECOPD patients. | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.