a
stringlengths
138
8.15k
b
stringlengths
138
8.15k
label
int64
1
1
The aetiology of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) is incompletely understood.,Understanding the relationship between chronic bacterial airway infection and viral exposure may explain the incidence and seasonality of these events.,In this prospective, observational cohort study (NCT01360398), patients with COPD aged 40-85 years underwent sputum sampling monthly and at exacerbation for detection of bacteria and viruses.,Results are presented for subjects in the full cohort, followed for 1 year.,Interactions between exacerbation occurrence and pathogens were investigated by generalised estimating equation and stratified conditional logistic regression analyses.,The mean exacerbation rate per patient-year was 3.04 (95% CI 2.63 to 3.50).,At AECOPD, the most common bacterial species were non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) and Moraxella catarrhalis, and the most common virus was rhinovirus.,Logistic regression analyses (culture bacterial detection) showed significant OR for AECOPD occurrence when M. catarrhalis was detected regardless of season (5.09 (95% CI 2.76 to 9.41)).,When NTHi was detected, the increased risk of exacerbation was greater in high season (October-March, OR 3.04 (1.80 to 5.13)) than low season (OR 1.22 (0.68 to 2.22)).,Bacterial and viral coinfection was more frequent at exacerbation (24.9%) than stable state (8.6%).,A significant interaction was detected between NTHi and rhinovirus presence and AECOPD risk (OR 5.18 (1.92 to 13.99); p=0.031).,AECOPD aetiology varies with season.,Rises in incidence in winter may be driven by increased pathogen presence as well as an interaction between NTHi airway infection and effects of viral infection.,Results, NCT01360398.
Changes in microbial community composition in the lung of patients suffering from moderate to severe COPD have been well documented.,However, knowledge about specific microbiome structures in the human lung associated with CT defined abnormalities is limited.,Bacterial community composition derived from brush samples from lungs of 16 patients suffering from different CT defined subtypes of COPD and 9 healthy subjects was analyzed using a cultivation independent barcoding approach applying 454-pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragment amplicons.,We could show that bacterial community composition in patients with changes in CT (either airway or emphysema type changes, designated as severe subtypes) was different from community composition in lungs of patients without visible changes in CT as well as from healthy subjects (designated as mild COPD subtype and control group) (PC1, Padj = 0.002).,Higher abundance of Prevotella in samples from patients with mild COPD subtype and from controls and of Streptococcus in the severe subtype cases mainly contributed to the separation of bacterial communities of subjects.,No significant effects of treatment with inhaled glucocorticoids on bacterial community composition were detected within COPD cases with and without abnormalities in CT in PCoA.,Co-occurrence analysis suggests the presence of networks of co-occurring bacteria.,Four communities of positively correlated bacteria were revealed.,The microbial communities can clearly be distinguished by their associations with the CT defined disease phenotype.,Our findings indicate that CT detectable structural changes in the lung of COPD patients, which we termed severe subtypes, are associated with alterations in bacterial communities, which may induce further changes in the interaction between microbes and host cells.,This might result in a changed interplay with the host immune system.
1
The aim of this study was to determine if an interactive web-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programme is a feasible alternative to conventional PR.,Randomised controlled feasibility trial.,Participants with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were recruited from PR assessments, primary care and community rehabilitation programmes.,Patients randomised to conventional rehabilitation started the programme according to the standard care at their referred site on the next available date.,103 patients were recruited to the study and randomised: 52 to conventional rehabilitation (mean (±SD) age 66 (±8) years, Medical Research Council (MRC) 3 (IQR2-4)); 51 to the web arm (mean (±SD) age 66 (±10) years, MRC 3 (IQR2-4)).,Participants had to be willing to participate in either arm of the trial, have internet access and be web literate.,Patients randomised to the web-based programme worked through the website, exercising and recording their progress as well as reading educational material.,Conventional PR consisted of twice weekly, 2 hourly sessions (an hour for exercise training and an hour for education).,Recruitment rates, eligibility, patient preference and dropout and completion rates for both programmes were collected.,Standard outcomes for a PR assessment including measures of exercise capacity and quality of life questionnaires were also evaluated.,A statistically significant improvement (p≤0.01) was observed within each group in the endurance shuttle walk test (WEB: mean change 189±211.1; PR classes: mean change 184.5±247.4 s) and Chronic Respiratory disease Questionnaire-Dyspnoea (CRQ-D; WEB: mean change 0.7±1.2; PR classes: mean change 0.8±1.0).,However, there were no significant differences between the groups in any outcome.,Dropout rates were higher in the web-based programme (57% vs 23%).,An interactive web-based PR programme is feasible and acceptable when compared with conventional PR.,Future trials maybe around choice-based PR programmes for select patients enabling stratification of patient care.,ISRCTN03142263; Results.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme on the health status of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Two-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial.,32 general practices in the Republic of Ireland.,350 participants with a diagnosis of moderate or severe COPD.,Experimental group received a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme, delivered by the practice nurse and physiotherapist.,Control group received usual care.,Health status as measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) at baseline and at 12-14 weeks postcompletion of the programme.,Participants allocated to the intervention group had statistically significant higher mean change total CRQ scores (adjusted mean difference (MD) 1.11, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.87).,However, the CI does not exclude a smaller difference than the one that was prespecified as clinically important.,Participants allocated to the intervention group also had statistically significant higher mean CRQ Dyspnoea scores after intervention (adjusted MD 0.49, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.78) and CRQ Physical scores (adjusted MD 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.60).,However, CIs for both the CRQ Dyspnoea and CRQ Physical subscales do not exclude smaller differences as prespecified as clinically important.,No other statistically significant differences between groups were seen.,A primary care based structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme is feasible and may increase local accessibility to people with moderate and severe COPD.,ISRCTN52403063.
1
The development of culture-independent techniques for microbiological analysis shows that bronchial tree is not sterile in either healthy or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) individuals.,With the advance of sequencing technologies, lung microbiome has become a new frontier for pulmonary disease research, and such advance has led to better understanding of the lung microbiome in COPD.,This review aimed to summarize the recent advances in lung microbiome, its relationships with COPD, and the possible mechanisms that microbiome contributed to COPD pathogenesis.,Literature search was conducted using PubMed to collect all available studies concerning lung microbiome in COPD.,The search terms were “microbiome” and “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease”, or “microbiome” and “lung/pulmonary”.,The papers in English about lung microbiome or lung microbiome in COPD were selected, and the type of articles was not limited.,The lung is a complex microbial ecosystem; the microbiome in lung is a collection of viable and nonviable microbiota (bacteria, viruses, and fungi) residing in the bronchial tree and parenchymal tissues, which is important for health.,The following types of respiratory samples are often used to detect the lung microbiome: sputum, bronchial aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage, and bronchial mucosa.,Disordered bacterial microbiome is participated in pathogenesis of COPD; there are also dynamic changes in microbiota during COPD exacerbations.,Lung microbiome may contribute to the pathogenesis of COPD by manipulating inflammatory and/or immune process.,Normal lung microbiome could be useful for prophylactic or therapeutic management in COPD, and the changes of lung microbiome could also serve as biomarkers for the evaluation of COPD.
Exhaled, endogenous particles are formed from the epithelial lining fluid in small airways, where surfactant protein A (SP-A) plays an important role in pulmonary host defense.,Based on the knowledge that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) starts in the small airway epithelium, we hypothesized that chronic inflammation modulates peripheral exhaled particle SP-A and albumin levels.,The main objective of this explorative study was to compare the SP-A and albumin contents in exhaled particles from patients with COPD and healthy subjects and to determine exhaled particle number concentrations.,Patients with stable COPD ranging from moderate to very severe (n = 13), and healthy non-smoking subjects (n = 12) were studied.,Subjects performed repeated breath maneuvers allowing for airway closure and re-opening, and exhaled particles were optically counted and collected on a membrane using the novel PExA® instrument setup.,Immunoassays were used to quantify SP-A and albumin.,COPD patients exhibited significantly lower SP-A mass content of the exhaled particles (2.7 vs.,3.9 weight percent, p = 0.036) and lower particle number concentration (p<0.0001) than healthy subjects.,Albumin mass contents were similar for both groups.,Decreased levels of SP-A may lead to impaired host defense functions of surfactant in the airways, contributing to increased susceptibility to COPD exacerbations.,SP-A in exhaled particles from small airways may represent a promising non-invasive biomarker of disease in COPD patients.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States.,Exacerbations- acute worsening of COPD symptoms-can be mild to severe in nature.,Increased healthcare resource use is common among patients with frequent exacerbations, and exacerbations are a major cause of the high 30-day hospital readmission rates associated with COPD.,This review provides a concise overview of the literature regarding the impact of COPD exacerbations on both the patient and the healthcare system, the recommendations for pharmacologic management of COPD, and the strategies employed to improve patient care and reduce hospitalizations and readmissions.,COPD exacerbations significantly impact patients’ health-related quality of life and disease progression; healthcare costs associated with severe exacerbation-related hospitalization range from $7,000 to $39,200.,Timely and appropriate maintenance pharmacotherapy, particularly dual bronchodilators for maximizing bronchodilation, can significantly reduce exacerbations in patients with COPD.,Additionally, multidisciplinary disease-management programs include pulmonary rehabilitation, follow-up appointments, aftercare, inhaler training, and patient education that can reduce hospitalizations and readmissions for patients with COPD.,Maximizing bronchodilation by the appropriate use of maintenance therapy, together with multidisciplinary disease-management and patient education programs, offers opportunities to reduce exacerbations, hospitalizations, and readmissions for patients with COPD.
Pneumonia may be a major contributor to hospitalizations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation and influence their outcomes.,We examined hospitalization rates, health resource utilization, 30-day mortality, and risk of subsequent hospitalizations for COPD exacerbations with and without pneumonia in Denmark during 2006-2012.,We identified 179,759 hospitalizations for COPD exacerbations, including 52,520 first-time hospitalizations (29.2%).,Pneumonia was frequent in first-time exacerbations (36.1%), but declined in successive exacerbations to 25.6% by the seventh or greater exacerbation.,Pneumonic COPD exacerbations increased 20% from 0.92 per 1,000 population in 2006 to 1.10 per 1,000 population in 2012.,Nonpneumonic exacerbations decreased by 6% from 1.74 per 1,000 population to 1.63 per 1,000 population during the same period.,A number of markers of health resource utilization were more prevalent in pneumonic exacerbations than in nonpneumonic exacerbations: length of stay (median 7 vs 4 days), intensive care unit admission (7.7% vs 12.5%), and several acute procedures.,Thirty-day mortality was 12.1% in first-time pneumonic COPD exacerbations versus 8.3% in first-time nonpneumonic cases (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.24).,Pneumonia also predicted increased mortality associated with a second exacerbation (aHR 1.14, 95% CI 1.11-1.18), and up to a seventh or greater exacerbation (aHR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.13).,In contrast, the aHR of a subsequent exacerbation was 8%-13% lower for patients with pneumonic exacerbations.,Pneumonia is frequent among patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbations and is associated with increased health care utilization and higher mortality.,Nonpneumonic COPD exacerbations predict increased risk of subsequent exacerbations.
1
Persons with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), performing some level of regular physical activity, have a lower risk of both COPD-related hospital admissions and mortality.,COPD patients of all stages seem to benefit from exercise training programs, thereby improving with respect to both exercise tolerance and symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue.,Physical inactivity, which becomes more severe with increasing age, is a point of concern in healthy older adults.,COPD might worsen this scenario, but it is unclear to what degree.,This literature review aims to present the extent of the impact of COPD on objectively-measured daily physical activity (DPA).,The focus is on the extent of the impact that COPD has on duration, intensity, and counts of DPA, as well as whether the severity of the disease has an additional influence on DPA.,A literature review was performed in the databases PubMed [MEDLINE], Picarta, PEDRO, ISI Web of Knowledge and Google scholar.,After screening, 11 studies were identified as being relevant for comparison between COPD patients and healthy controls with respect to duration, intensity, and counts of DPA.,Four more studies were found to be relevant to address the subject of the influence the severity of the disease may have on DPA.,The average percentage of DPA of COPD patients vs. healthy control subjects for duration was 57%, for intensity 75%, and for activity counts 56%.,Correlations of DPA and severity of the disease were low and/or not significant.,From the results of this review, it appears that patients with COPD have a significantly reduced duration, intensity, and counts of DPA when compared to healthy control subjects.,The intensity of DPA seems to be less affected by COPD than duration and counts.,Judging from the results, it seems that severity of COPD is not strongly correlated with level of DPA.,Future research should focus in more detail on the relation between COPD and duration, intensity, and counts of DPA, as well as the effect of disease severity on DPA, so that these relations become more understandable.
To evaluate an entirely outpatient-based program of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease COPD, using St.George’s Respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), the 6-minutes walking test (6-MWT) and BODE index as the primary outcome measures.,A prospective, parallel-group controlled study of an outpatient rehabilitation program in 80 patients with COPD (67 men and 13 women; mean age 64.8 ± 10.6 years; FEV1, 42.8% ± 7.6% of the predicted value.,The active group (n = 40) took part in a 14-week rehabilitation program [3 h/wk, 1.5 h of education and exercise and 1.5 h of cycling].,The control group (n = 40) was reviewed routinely as medical outpatients.,The following evaluations were carried out at study entry and after14 weeks: (1) pulmonary function studies; (2) 6-minutes walking test 6MWT; (3) quality of life; and (4) BODE index.,The following patients completed the study: 35 patients (87.5%) from the active group (mean age, 63.7 ± 11.9 years; mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), 41.9 ± 2.6% of the predicted value); and 36 patients (88%) from the control group (mean age, 65.9 ± 10.3 years; mean FEV1, 43.33 ± 3.6% of the predicted value).,We found no changes in pulmonary function parameters in the active group and the control one at 14weeks.,On the other hand, there were significant changes within the components of the SGRQ (12.3 for the score total) for the patients of the active group but not for the patients of the control one (only 1.5 for the score total), we observed also a significant increase in the distance of the 6-MWT in the patients of the active group but not for the patients of the control one, and finally a decrease of two points (from 6 to 4) was noted in the score of the active group’s BODE index without any change in the control group’s one.,An outpatient-based of 14-week rehabilitation program significantly improved the quality of life and exercise tolerance without any change in the pulmonary function in patients with moderate COPD, and there was also a large decrease in the risk of death in rehabilitated patients as measured using the BODE index.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a general airway disease, is featured by progressive and chronic immunoreaction in the lung.,Increasing evidences have showed that cigarette smoking is the main reason in the COPD progression, and human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cell (HPMEC) apoptosis often be observed in COPD, while its pathogenesis is not yet fully described.,Upregulation of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3) was observed in COPD patients, but the specific mechanism of lncRNA MEG3 in COPD remains unknown.,The objective of this research was to explore the role of lncRNA MEG3 in cigarette smoke extract (CSE)-induced HPMECs.,HPMECs were induced by a series of concentrations of CSE (0%, 0.1%, 1%, and 10%).,Then cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry.,Cell apoptosis related proteins were tested using western blot assay.,Finally, we applied knockdown and over-expression system to explore the lncRNA MEG3 functions in CSE-induced HPMECs.,Our results indicated that various concentrations of CSE (0%, 0.1%, 1%, and 10%) significantly promoted cell apoptosis, augmented caspase-3 activity, upregulated Bax expression, decreased Bcl-2 expression, and enhanced lncRNA MEG3 level in HPMECs.,LncRNA MEG3-plasmid transfection resulted in the upregulation of lncRNA MEG3, more apoptotic HPMECs, and higher caspase-3 activity.,While lncRNA MEG3 knockdown presented the opposite effects.,Further investigation suggested that all the effects of CSE treatment on HPMECs were markedly reversed by lncRNA MEG3-shRNA (short hairpin RNA).,Our study illustrated a protective effect of lncRNA MEG3-shRNA on CSE-induced HPMECs, indicting lncRNA MEG3 can be a new therapeutic approach for COPD treatment.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) is characterized by enhanced chronic inflammation in the airways, lung parenchyma, and circulation.,We investigated whether SUV39H1, a histone methyltransferase, is causatively implicated in the abnormal inflammation observed in COPD.,The SUV39H1 and H3K9me3 levels were reduced in peripheral blood mononuclear cells(PBMCs), primary human small airway epithelial cells(HSAEpCs) and lung tissues from COPD patients, which were correlated with poor lung function and the serum IL-8 and IL-6 levels.,A specific SUV39H1 inhibitor, chaetocin, induced a distinct COPD panel of inflammatory cytokines in normal PBMCs.,Mechanistically, chaetocin reduced the SUV39H1 and H3K9me3 levels in the native IL-8 promoter in normal HSAEpCs, which mimicked unstimulated COPD HSAEpCs and led to decreased HP-1α levels and increased RNA polymerase II levels.,SUV39H1 knockdown reproduced the pattern of COPD inflammation, whereas SUV39H1 overexpression in COPD HSAEpCs rescued the H3K9me3 levels and suppressed inflammation.,In COPD mice, chaetocin further repressed the SUV39H1/H3K9me3 levels and enhanced inflammation.,SUV39H1 epigenetically controls a distinct panel of pro-inflammatory cytokines.,Its reduction in COPD leads to a loss of the repressive chromatin mark H3K9me3 and confers an abnormal inflammatory response to stimulators.,SUV39H1 and its regulatory pathways are potential therapeutic targets for COPD.
1
Improvement in the daily physical activity (PA) is important for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, the effects of pharmacologic treatment on PA are not well understood.,We evaluated the effects of additional medications, including bronchodilator with or without inhaled corticosteroid, based on airflow limitation and breathlessness on the PA in COPD patients and the factors that could predict or affect the improvement in PA.,A prospective non-randomized observational study was employed.,Twenty-one COPD subjects without any other diseases that might reduce PA were recruited.,The PA was measured with a triaxial accelerometer for 2 weeks, and pulmonary function tests and incremental shuttle walking tests were administered before and after 4-week treatment with an additional medication.,Bronchodilation was obtained by additional medication.,The mean values of PA evaluated by metabolic equivalents (METs) at ≥3.0 METs and the duration of PA at ≥3.0 METs and ≥3.5 METs were improved by medication.,The % change in the duration of PA at ≥3.5 METs was significantly correlated with the baseline functional residual capacity (FRC), residual volume, and inspiratory capacity/total lung capacity.,However, the % change in the duration of PA at any intensity was not correlated with the % changes of any values of the pulmonary function tests or incremental shuttle walking test except the PA at ≥2.5 METs with FRC.,Medication could improve the PA in patients with COPD, especially at a relatively high intensity of activity when medication was administered based on airflow limitation and breathlessness.,The improvement was seen in the patients with better baseline lung volume, but was not correlated with the improvements in the pulmonary function tests or exercise capacity.
The current mainstay of therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is long-acting bronchodilators.,To date, the effect of indacaterol, a β2-agonist, on activities of daily living in COPD patients is not well understood.,The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of indacaterol with regard to activities of daily living in patients with COPD.,In this nonrandomized open-label study, 23 patients with COPD were instructed to carry an accelerometer for 4 weeks without indacaterol therapy and then for another period of 4 weeks while receiving indacaterol therapy.,The number of steps, duration of moderate or greater physical activity, and energy expenditure were significantly increased after treatment with indacaterol compared with baseline data in all patients with COPD; the metabolic equivalent of task was also significantly enhanced after treatment with indacaterol.,This study provides early evidence that indacaterol improves daily physical activity in patients with COPD.
1
Despite chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) being the commonest non-communicable disease in Nepal, there is limited research evidence estimating the spirometry-based burden of COPD.,This study aims to estimate the prevalence of COPD and its correlates through a community-based survey in Pokhara Metropolitan City, a semi-urban area of Western Nepal.,A cross-sectional household survey was conducted among 1459 adults ≥40 years.,COPD was defined according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria as a post-bronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.70 with the presence of symptoms.,COPD was also defined by the lower limit of normal (LLN) threshold - FEV1/FVC < LLN cut-off values with the presence of symptoms.,Study participants were interviewed about sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics and respiratory symptoms.,Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were applied.,Spirometry reports were acceptable in 1438 participants.,The mean age of the participants was 55 (±10) years, and, 54% were female.,The prevalence of GOLD-defined COPD was 8.5% (95% CI: 7.1-10.0) and based on the LLN threshold of 5.4% (95% CI: 4.2-6.6).,The multivariate logistic regression showed that increasing age, low body mass index, illiterate, current or former smoker, and biomass fuel smoke increased the odds of COPD in both the definitions.,COPD is highly prevalent at community level and often underdiagnosed.,Strategies aiming at early diagnosis and treatment of COPD, especially for the elderly, illiterate, and reducing exposure to smoking and biomass fuel smoke and childhood lung infection could be effective.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is widely underdiagnosed, but the most effective approach for identifying these patients is unknown.,The aim of this study was to summarise and compare the effectiveness of different case finding approaches for undiagnosed COPD in primary care.,A systematic review of primary studies of any design evaluating case finding strategies for COPD in primary care among individuals aged ⩾35 years with no prior diagnosis was conducted.,Medline, Embase and other bibliographic databases were searched from 1997 to 2013, and methodological quality was assessed using standard tools.,Results were described and meta-analysis of the uptake and yield from different approaches was performed where there was sufficient homogeneity.,Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 1 controlled trial and 35 uncontrolled studies were identified that assessed the identification of new cases of COPD through systematic case finding.,A range of approaches were used including pre-screening with questionnaires (n=13) or handheld flow meters (n=5) or direct invitation to diagnostic spirometry (n=30).,Overall, any approach identified more undiagnosed COPD compared with usual care.,Targeting those at higher risk (e.g., smokers) and pre-screening (e.g., using questionnaires) is likely to increase the yield.,However, studies were heterogeneous and were limited by a lack of comparison groups, inadequate reporting and diversity in the definition of COPD, which limited our ability to draw firm conclusions.,There is extensive heterogeneity among studies evaluating case finding strategies for COPD, with few RCTs.,Well-conducted RCTs comparing case finding approaches are needed to identify the most effective target population, recruitment strategy and screening tests, using a clinical definition of COPD, and addressing the limitations highlighted in this review.,There is also a need to evaluate the impact of case finding on clinical care and patient outcomes.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common and deadliest chronic diseases worldwide.,Since COPD is a chronic and progressive disease, treatment is necessary throughout life.,For people with COPD who cannot live independently, long-term care facilities are often required.,However, knowledge is very limited about aspects of importance for effective COPD management in these settings in accordance with current treatment guidelines.,The aim of this study was to explore aspects of importance in long-term care facilities for providing interventions according to treatment guidelines for people with COPD, from the perspective of healthcare professionals, in an effort to prove novel knowledge that could be used to facilitate implementation of treatment guidelines in these settings.,A qualitative study was performed in northern Sweden.,In Sweden, municipalities are responsible for providing long-term care.,Interviews with 36 healthcare professionals (nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and dieticians) in municipal healthcare were conducted and analysed using qualitative content analysis with triangulation by the authors.,The overarching theme that emerged from the analysis was Groping around in the dark for adequate COPD management.,This represents healthcare professionals’ experiences of working with a complex diagnosis somewhat overlooked in the municipal healthcare, an underdog in the healthcare system.,The groping around in the dark theme further represents the healthcare professionals’ lack of COPD-related competence, lack of interprofessional collaboration, and insufficient communication with the county council.,The fragile group of people with COPD and their relatives were considered in need of support adapted to their context, but routines and resources for COPD management were limited.,This lack of routines and resources also resulted in professionals being pragmatic and adopting short-term solutions without focusing on specific needs related to the diagnosis.,The COPD management in long-term care settings showed several insufficiencies, indicating a large gap between clinical practice and treatment guidelines for COPD.,It is crucial to improve COPD management in long-term care settings.,Consequently, several actions are needed, such as increasing professional competence, establishing new routines, acknowledging and making COPD a higher priority, as well as adapting treatment guidelines to the context.
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an effective strategy to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), though its utilization rate is low.,One reason for this low utilization rate is that nurses do not provide COPD patients with enough health education to increase the patient's motivation for PR participation.,This study examined knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intention toward PR promotion.,The study also investigated the correlates of behavioral intentions to promote PR among pulmonary nurses.,A cross-sectional correlational design was used.,Overall, 284 nurses (all women) from chest medicine and general internal medicine wards in 3 hospitals within Midwest Taiwan were recruited.,Data were collected by anonymous, self-administered questionnaires.,We aimed to understand if there would be differences in the Chest Medicine and Generalist nurses on these outcomes, given the specialty versus generalist nature of their practice.,Results were analyzed using multiple linear regressions.,Although the 2 groups of nurses (ie, Chest Medicine, General Medicine) showed no differences in PR knowledge, attitudes, or behavioral intentions, they lacked sufficient PR knowledge and skills.,The accuracy rate of PR knowledge was approximately 12% and self-evaluated PR skills were less than 50%.,Self-efficacy in promoting PR was above average (ie, 57%-60%), and the strength of attitudes and behavioral intentions was over 70%.,A multiple linear regression revealed that behavioral intentions of nurses working in the chest medicine ward were influenced by behavioral attitudes, and also PR skills and self-efficacy (explanatory power 33.3%).,Attitudes, skills, and self-efficacy heavily affected pulmonary nurses’ ability to promote PR; however, PR knowledge and skills remain low.,Therefore, future implementation of practical PR training courses is needed to strengthen nurses’ behavioral intentions toward PR promotion.,Improved pulmonary rehabilitation-related skill, attitudes, clinical experience of PR programs, and/or practical PR training are needed among both generalist and specialist nurses.,Education courses and clinical practice training should be increased in the future to promote pulmonary rehabilitation of COPD patients.
1
In recent years, the so-called asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap syndrome (ACOS) has received much attention, not least because elderly individuals may present characteristics suggesting a diagnosis of both asthma and COPD.,At present, ACOS is described clinically as persistent airflow limitation combined with features of both asthma and COPD.,The aim of this paper is, therefore, to review the currently available literature focusing on symptoms and clinical characteristics of patients regarded as having ACOS.,Based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic literature review was performed.,A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria for the present review.,All studies dealing with dyspnea (self-reported or assessed by the Medical Research Council dyspnea scale) reported more dyspnea among patients classified as having ACOS compared to the COPD and asthma groups.,In line with this, ACOS patients have more concomitant wheezing and seem to have more cough and sputum production.,Compared to COPD-only patients, the ACOS patients were found to have lower FEV1% predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio in spite of lower mean life-time tobacco exposure.,Furthermore, studies have revealed that ACOS patients seem to have not only more frequent but also more severe exacerbations.,Comorbidity, not least diabetes, has also been reported in a few studies, with a higher prevalence among ACOS patients.,However, it should be acknowledged that only a limited number of studies have addressed the various comorbidities in patients with ACOS.,The available studies indicate that ACOS patients may have more symptoms and a higher exacerbation rate than patients with asthma and COPD only, and by that, probably a higher overall respiratory-related morbidity.,Similar to patients with COPD, ACOS patients seem to have a high occurrence of comorbidity, including diabetes.,Further research into the ACOS, not least from well-defined prospective studies, is clearly needed.
The coexistence of COPD and asthma is widely recognized but has not been well described.,This study characterizes clinical features, spirometry, and chest CT scans of smoking subjects with both COPD and asthma.,We performed a cross-sectional study comparing subjects with COPD and asthma to subjects with COPD alone in the COPDGene Study.,119 (13%) of 915 subjects with COPD reported a history of physician-diagnosed asthma.,These subjects were younger (61.3 vs 64.7 years old, p = 0.0001) with lower lifetime smoking intensity (43.7 vs 55.1 pack years, p = 0.0001).,More African-Americans reported a history of asthma (33.6% vs 15.6%, p < 0.0001).,Subjects with COPD and asthma demonstrated worse disease-related quality of life, were more likely to have had a severe COPD exacerbation in the past year, and were more likely to experience frequent exacerbations (OR 3.55 [2.19, 5.75], p < 0.0001).,Subjects with COPD and asthma demonstrated greater gas-trapping on chest CT.,There were no differences in spirometry or CT measurements of emphysema or airway wall thickness.,Subjects with COPD and asthma represent a relevant clinical population, with worse health-related quality of life.,They experience more frequent and severe respiratory exacerbations despite younger age and reduced lifetime smoking history.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00608764
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease that leads to huge economic and social burden.,Efficient and effective management of stable COPD is essential to improve quality of life and reduce medical expenditure.,The Internet of Things (IoT), a recent breakthrough in communication technology, seems promising in improving health care delivery, but its potential strengths in COPD management remain poorly understood.,We have developed a mobile phone-based IoT (mIoT) platform and initiated a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial entitled the ‘MIOTIC study’ to investigate the influence of mIoT among stable COPD patients.,In the MIOTIC study, at least 600 patients with stable GOLD group C or D COPD and with a history of at least two moderate-to-severe exacerbations within the previous year will be randomly allocated to the control group, which receives routine follow-up, or the intervention group, which receives mIoT management.,Endpoints of the study include (1) frequency and severity of acute exacerbation; (2) symptomatic evaluation; (3) pre- and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) measurement; (4) exercise capacity; and (5) direct medical cost per year.,Results from this study should provide direct evidence for the suitability of mIoT in stable COPD patient management.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a growing economic burden worldwide.,Smoking cessation is thought to be the single most effective way of reducing the economic burden of COPD.,The impact of other strategies such as interventions that predict risk of disease, reduce progression of disease, or reduce exacerbations has not been systematically studied.,We estimated the economic and clinical burden of COPD over the next 25 years in Canada and the impact of three potential interventions (screening test for predisposition to COPD, new drugs to avoid progression into more severe disease stages, and predictive test for exacerbations) on COPD burden.,Using a dynamic simulation model, we projected the total burden of COPD (cost, morbidity, and mortality) from 2011 to 2035 using the population of Canada as a case study.,The model stratified population based on sex, age, smoking status, respiratory symptoms, and their COPD stage.,The cost and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with each intervention were estimated.,The model indicates that annual societal cost of COPD is $4.52 billion (B) Canadian dollars in 2011 and will reach $3.61B ($7.33B undiscounted) per year in 2035.,Over the next 25 years, COPD will be responsible for approximately $101.4B in societal costs ($147.5B undiscounted) and 12.9 million QALYs lost (19.0 million undiscounted).,Our results suggested that the best strategy to reduce the financial burden of COPD is by reducing exacerbations.,Smoking cessation, while it is the cornerstone of COPD prevention, has only a modest effect in attenuating the financial burden of COPD over the next 25 years in Western countries such as Canada.,Our data suggest that any intervention that can reduce the number of exacerbations has a substantial impact on morbidity and costs of COPD and should be considered in conjunction with the ongoing efforts to reduce smoking rates.
1
For optimal efficacy, an inhaler should deliver doses consistently and be easy for patients to use with minimal instruction.,The delivery characteristics, patients’ correct use, and preference of two single-dose dry powder inhalers (Breezhaler and HandiHaler) were evaluated in two complementary studies.,The first study examined aerodynamic particle size distribution, using inhalation profiles of seven patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The second was an open-label, two-period, 7-day crossover study, evaluating use of the inhalers with placebo capsules by 82 patients with mild to severe COPD.,Patients’ correct use of the inhalers was assessed after reading written instructions on Day 1, and after training and 7 days of daily use.,Patients’ preference was assessed after completion of both study periods.,Patient inhalation profiles showed average peak inspiratory flows of 72 L/minute through Breezhaler and 36 L/minute through HandiHaler.,For Breezhaler and HandiHaler, fine particle fractions were 27% and 10%, respectively.,In the second study, correct use of Breezhaler and HandiHaler was achieved by >77% of patients for any step after 7 days; 61% of patients showed an overall preference for Breezhaler and 31% for HandiHaler (P = 0.01).,Breezhaler is a low-resistance inhaler suitable for use by patients with a range of disease severities.,Most patients used both inhalers correctly after 7 days, but more patients showed an overall preference for the Breezhaler compared with the HandiHaler.,These are important factors for optimum dose delivery and successful COPD management.
Indacaterol is a once-daily long-acting inhaled β2-agonist indicated for maintenance treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The large inter-patient and inter-study variability in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) with bronchodilators makes determination of optimal doses difficult in conventional dose-ranging studies.,We considered alternative methods of analysis.,We utilized a novel modelling approach to provide a robust analysis of the bronchodilatory dose response to indacaterol.,This involved pooled analysis of study-level data to characterize the bronchodilatory dose response, and nonlinear mixed-effects analysis of patient-level data to characterize the impact of baseline covariates.,The study-level analysis pooled summary statistics for each steady-state visit in 11 placebo-controlled studies.,These study-level summaries encompassed data from 7476 patients at indacaterol doses of 18.75-600 μg once daily, and showed that doses of 75 μg and above achieved clinically important improvements in predicted trough FEV1 response.,Indacaterol 75 μg achieved 74% of the maximum effect on trough FEV1, and exceeded the midpoint of the 100-140 mL range that represents the minimal clinically important difference (MCID; ≥120 mL vs placebo), with a 90% probability that the mean improvement vs placebo exceeded the MCID.,Indacaterol 150 μg achieved 85% of the model-predicted maximum effect on trough FEV1 and was numerically superior to all comparators (99.9% probability of exceeding MCID).,Indacaterol 300 μg was the lowest dose that achieved the model-predicted maximum trough response.,The patient-level analysis included data from 1835 patients from two dose-ranging studies of indacaterol 18.75-600 μg once daily.,This analysis provided a characterization of dose response consistent with the study-level analysis, and demonstrated that disease severity, as captured by baseline FEV1, significantly affects the dose response, indicating that patients with more severe COPD require higher doses to achieve optimal bronchodilation.,Comprehensive assessment of the bronchodilatory dose response of indacaterol in COPD patients provided a robust confirmation that 75 μg is the minimum effective dose, and that 150 and 300 μg are expected to provide optimal bronchodilation, particularly in patients with severe disease.
1
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience respiratory symptoms, which impair quality of life.,This pooled analysis of two Phase III studies assessed the impact of aclidinium/formoterol on patients with COPD categorized by symptom status.,Data were pooled from two 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of twice-daily aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 µg in moderate-to-severe COPD (ACLIFORM [NCT01462942] and AUGMENT [NCT01437397]).,These post hoc analyses evaluated the efficacy of aclidinium/formoterol versus placebo or monotherapies in patients defined as less/more symptomatic by a) Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS™) score ≥10/<10 and b) Baseline Dyspnea Index score <7/≥7.,Endpoints included trough and 1-hour morning postdose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), Transition Dyspnea Index, E-RS total score, early-morning and nighttime symptom severity, early-morning limitation of activities, and exacerbation rate.,Data for 3,394 patients were analyzed (mean age: 63.5 years; 60.5% male).,In both definitions of less and more symptomatic patients, aclidinium/formoterol improved 1-hour morning postdose FEV1 from baseline at week 24 versus placebo (P<0.001) and both monotherapies (P<0.05).,Aclidinium/formoterol improved trough FEV1 from baseline in both groups versus placebo (P<0.05) and formoterol (P<0.05); improvements were greater in more symptomatic patients.,Improvements versus aclidinium were also observed in more symptomatic patients (P<0.05).,Aclidinium/formoterol improved dyspnea, early-morning symptom severity, and limitation of activities versus placebo in both less and more symptomatic patients (P<0.001).,In more symptomatic patients, aclidinium/formoterol also improved E-RS total score and severity of nighttime symptoms from baseline versus placebo and one or both monotherapies (P<0.05).,The rate of moderate/severe exacerbations was reduced with aclidinium/formoterol versus placebo in more symptomatic patients.,Aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 µg provided consistent improvements in bronchodilation and symptoms versus monotherapies and reduced exacerbations versus placebo in more symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, regardless of the definition used.,Furthermore, patients with a low symptom burden achieved benefits with aclidinium/formoterol versus monotherapies in postdose FEV1, dyspnea, and early-morning symptoms.
Aclidinium/formoterol is a twice-daily (BID) fixed-dose combination (FDC) in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The efficacy and safety of aclidinium/formoterol versus monotherapy and placebo in patients with COPD was assessed.,In this 24-week double-blind, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled, multicentre Phase III study, patients (≥40 years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]/forced vital capacity <70% and FEV1 ≥30% but <80% predicted normal) were randomised 2:2:2:2:1 to aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg (n = 385) or 400/6 μg (n = 381), aclidinium 400 μg (n = 385), formoterol 12 μg (n = 384) or placebo (n = 194) BID via Genuair®/Pressair®a.,At Week 24, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg and 400/6 μg lead to significant improvements from baseline in 1-hour post-dose FEV1 versus aclidinium (125 mL [95% CI: 90, 160; p < 0 · 001] and 69 mL [95% CI: 34, 105; p < 0.001], respectively) and trough FEV1 versus formoterol (85 mL [95% CI: 51, 119; p < 0.001] and 53 mL [95% CI: 19, 87; p < 0.01], respectively; co-primary endpoints).,Additionally, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg and 400/6 μg provided significant improvements in Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score versus placebo (1.29 units [95% CI: 0.73, 1.86; p < 0.001] and 1.16 units [95% CI: 0.59, 1.73; p < 0.001], respectively; secondary endpoint).,All treatments were well tolerated, with safety profiles of the FDCs similar to those of placebo and monotherapy.,Both aclidinium/formoterol BID doses significantly improved bronchodilation versus monotherapy, and dyspnoea versus placebo, with no increase in safety risk.,Aclidinium/formoterol may be an effective treatment for patients with COPD.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01462942.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-178) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text,This study compares the prevalence rates of comorbidities between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and non-COPD control patients reported in literature.,Literature was searched in several electronic databases.,After the selection of studies by following précised eligibility criteria, meta-analyses of odds ratios (ORs) were carried out with subgroup and sensitivity analyses under random effects model.,Eleven studies (47,695,183 COPD and 47,924,876 non-COPD control patients’ data) were used for meta-analysis.,Average age of COPD patients was 66.66 ± 8.72 years of whom 55.4 ± 11.9% were males.,The prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities [OR 1.90, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.59-2.28; P < .00001], cerebrovascular comorbidities (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.47-2.31; P < .00001), hypertension (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.31-1.61; P < .00001), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.38; P = .003), neurological and psychiatric disorders (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48-2.14; P < .00001), gut and renal disorders (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.43-2.68; P < .00001), musculoskeletal disorders (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.27-1.78; P < .00001), non-COPD respiratory comorbidities (OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.52-3.14; P < .00001), and cancer (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25-2.23; P = .0005) were significantly higher in COPD patients than in non-COPD controls.,COPD is associated with significantly higher comorbidities than in other diseases that should be taken into consideration in COPD control strategies.
Long-acting bronchodilators are central in the pharmacological management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the studies evaluating the safety and clinical efficacy of inhaled glycopyrronium bromide, a novel long-acting muscarinic antagonist, in patients with COPD.,This study was performed as a systematic literature review.,Inhaled glycopyrronium bromide seems to be a safe and well tolerated long-acting muscarinic antagonist with a fast onset of action.,In patients suffering from moderate to severe COPD, glycopyrronium bromide has clinically important effects on level of forced expiratory volume in one second, use of relief medication, percentage of days with no use of rescue medication, daytime dyspnea scores, and probably also on health status.,Furthermore, in this group of patients, glycopyrronium bromide has beneficial effects on dynamic hyperinflation and exercise tolerance.,Glycopyrronium bromide has been shown to reduce the rate of exacerbations in patients with moderate to severe COPD, but long-term controlled trials with exacerbation rate as the primary outcome variable have not been published yet.,Once-daily inhaled glycopyrronium bromide has characteristics important for use in COPD, including a fast onset of action, sustained 24-hour bronchodilatation, and improvement in exercise tolerance, and therefore appears to have the potential for a significant role in the future management of COPD.
1
The well-recognized individual heterogeneity within COPD patients has led to a growing interest in greater personalization in the approach of these patients.,Thus, the treatable traits strategy has been proposed as a further step towards precision medicine in the management of chronic airway disease, both in stable phase and acute exacerbations.,The aim of this paper is to perform a critical review on the treatable traits strategy and propose a guide to approach COPD patients in the light of this new concept.,An innovative stepwise approach is proposed - a multidisciplinary model based on two distinct phases, with the potential to be implemented in both primary care and hospital settings.,The first phase is the initial and focused assessment of a selected subset of treatable traits, which should be addressed in all COPD patients in both settings (primary care and hospital).,As some patients may present with advanced disease at diagnosis or may progress despite this initial treatment requiring a more specialized assessment, they should progress to a second phase, in which a broader approach is recommended.,Beyond stable COPD, we explore how the treatable traits strategy may be applied to reduce the risk of future exacerbations and improve the management of COPD exacerbations.,Since many treatable traits have already been related to exacerbation risk, the strategy proposed here represents an opportunity to be proactive.,Although it still lacks prospective validation, we believe this is the way forward for the future of the COPD approach.
Chronic airflow obstruction affects a wide range of airway diseases, the most frequent of which are asthma, COPD, and bronchiectasis; they are clearly identifiable in their extremes, but quite frequently overlap in some of their pathophysiological and clinical characteristics.,This has generated the description of new mixed or overlapping disease phenotypes with no clear biological grounds.,In this special article, a group of experts provides their perspective and proposes approaching the treatment of chronic airway disease (CAD) through the identification of a series of therapeutic goals (TG) linked to treatable traits (TT) - understood as clinical, physiological, or biological characteristics that are quantifiable using biomarkers.,This therapeutic approach needs validating in a clinical trial with the strategy of identification of TG and treatment according to TT for each patient independently of their prior diagnosis.
1
Despite being a major public health problem, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains underdiagnosed, and only 2.4% COPD patients are aware of their disease in Korea.,The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of COPD detected by spirometry performed as a preoperative screening test and to determine the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group distribution and self-awareness of COPD.,We reviewed the medical records of adults (age, ≥40 years) who had undergone spirometry during preoperative screening between April and August 2013 at a tertiary hospital in Korea.,COPD was defined as a postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio of <0.7.,We analyzed self-administered COPD questionnaires for the assessment of the frequency of acute exacerbation over the previous year and dyspnea severity using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale and COPD assessment test.,Among 3029 patients aged >40 years who had undergone spirometry as a preoperative screening test, 474 (15.6%; 404 men; median age, 70 years; range, 44-93 years) were diagnosed with COPD.,Only 26 (5.5%) patients reported previous diagnosis of COPD (2.1%), emphysema (0.8%), or chronic bronchitis (2.5%).,The GOLD group distribution was as follows: 63.3% in group A, 31.2% in group B, 1.7% in group C, and 3.8% in group D.,The prevalence of COPD diagnosed by preoperative spirometry was 15.6%, and only 5.5% patients were aware of their disease.,Approximately one-third of the COPD patients belonged to GOLD groups B, C, and D, which require regular treatment.
Muscle atrophy confers a poor prognosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet the molecular pathways responsible are poorly characterised.,Muscle-specific microRNAs and serum response factor (SRF) are important regulators of muscle phenotype that contribute to a feedback system to regulate muscle gene expression.,The role of these factors in the skeletal muscle dysfunction that accompanies COPD is unknown.,31 patients with COPD and 14 healthy age-matched controls underwent lung and quadriceps function assessments, measurement of daily activity and a percutaneous quadriceps muscle biopsy.,The expression of muscle-specific microRNAs, myosin heavy chains and components of the serum response factor signalling pathway were determined by qPCR.,A reduction in expression of miR-1 (2.5-fold, p=0.01) and the myocardin-related transcription factors (MRTFs) A and B was observed in patients compared with controls (MRTF-A mRNA: twofold, p=0.028; MRTF-B mRNA: fourfold, p=0.011). miR-1 expression was associated with smoking history, lung function, fat-free mass index, 6 min walk distance and percentage of type 1 fibres. miR-133 and miR-206 were negatively correlated with daily physical activity.,Insulin-like growth factor 1 mRNA was increased in the patients and miR-1 was negatively correlated with phosphorylation of the kinase Akt.,Furthermore, the protein levels of histone deacetylase 4, another miR-1 target, were increased in the patients.,Downregulation of the activity of the MRTF-SRF axis and the expression of muscle-specific microRNAs, particularly miR-1, may contribute to COPD-associated skeletal muscle dysfunction.
1
Objective To test the effectiveness of telemonitoring integrated into existing clinical services such that intervention and control groups have access to the same clinical care.,Design Researcher blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.,Setting UK primary care (Lothian, Scotland).,Participants Adults with at least one admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the year before randomisation.,We excluded people who had other significant lung disease, who were unable to provide informed consent or complete the study, or who had other significant social or clinical problems.,Interventions Participants were recruited between 21 May 2009 and 28 March 2011, and centrally randomised to receive telemonitoring or conventional self monitoring.,Using a touch screen, telemonitoring participants recorded a daily questionnaire about symptoms and treatment use, and monitored oxygen saturation using linked instruments.,Algorithms, based on the symptom score, generated alerts if readings were omitted or breached thresholds.,Both groups received similar care from existing clinical services.,Main outcome measures The primary outcome was time to hospital admission due to COPD exacerbation up to one year after randomisation.,Other outcomes included number and duration of admissions, and validated questionnaire assessments of health related quality of life (using St George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ)), anxiety or depression (or both), self efficacy, knowledge, and adherence to treatment.,Analysis was intention to treat.,Results Of 256 patients completing the study, 128 patients were randomised to telemonitoring and 128 to usual care; baseline characteristics of each group were similar.,The number of days to admission did not differ significantly between groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.44).,Over one year, the mean number of COPD admissions was similar in both groups (telemonitoring 1.2 admissions per person (standard deviation 1.9) v control 1.1 (1.6); P=0.59).,Mean duration of COPD admissions over one year was also similar between groups (9.5 days per person (standard deviation 19.1) v 8.8 days (15.9); P=0.88).,The intervention had no significant effect on SGRQ scores between groups (68.2 (standard deviation 16.3) v 67.3 (17.3); adjusted mean difference 1.39 (95% confidence interval −1.57 to 4.35)), or on other questionnaire outcomes.,Conclusions In participants with a history of admission for exacerbations of COPD, telemonitoring was not effective in postponing admissions and did not improve quality of life.,The positive effect of telemonitoring seen in previous trials could be due to enhancement of the underpinning clinical service rather than the telemonitoring communication.,Trial registration ISRCTN96634935.,Funding: The trial was funded by an NHS applied research programme grant from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish government (ARPG/07/03).,The funder had no role in study design and the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and the writing of the article and the decision to submit it for publication.,NHS Lothian supported the telemonitoring service and the clinical services.
Disease management programmes are heterogeneous in nature and often lack a theoretical basis.,An evaluation model has been developed in which theoretically driven inquiries link disease management interventions to outcomes.,The aim of this study is to methodically evaluate the impact of a disease management programme for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on process, intermediate and final outcomes of care in a general practice setting.,A quasi-experimental research was performed with 12-months follow-up of 189 COPD patients in primary care in the Netherlands.,The programme included patient education, protocolised assessment and treatment of COPD, structural follow-up and coordination by practice nurses at 3, 6 and 12 months.,Data on intermediate outcomes (knowledge, psychosocial mediators, self-efficacy and behaviour) and final outcomes (dyspnoea, quality of life, measured by the CRQ and CCQ, and patient experiences) were obtained from questionnaires and electronic registries.,Implementation of the programme was associated with significant improvements in dyspnoea (p < 0.001) and patient experiences (p < 0.001).,No significant improvement was found in mean quality of life scores.,Improvements were found in several intermediate outcomes, including investment beliefs (p < 0.05), disease-specific knowledge (p < 0.01; p < 0.001) and medication compliance (p < 0.01).,Overall, process improvement was established.,The model showed associations between significantly improved intermediate outcomes and improvements in quality of life and dyspnoea.,The application of a theory-driven model enhances the design and evaluation of disease management programmes aimed at improving health outcomes.,This study supports the notion that a theoretical approach strengthens the evaluation designs of complex interventions.,Moreover, it provides prudent evidence that the implementation of COPD disease management programmes can positively influence outcomes of care.
1
The global prevalence of physiologically defined chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults aged >40 yr is approximately 9-10 per cent.,Recently, the Indian Study on Epidemiology of Asthma, Respiratory Symptoms and Chronic Bronchitis in Adults had shown that the overall prevalence of chronic bronchitis in adults >35 yr is 3.49 per cent.,The development of COPD is multifactorial and the risk factors of COPD include genetic and environmental factors.,Pathological changes in COPD are observed in central airways, small airways and alveolar space.,The proposed pathogenesis of COPD includes proteinase-antiproteinase hypothesis, immunological mechanisms, oxidant-antioxidant balance, systemic inflammation, apoptosis and ineffective repair.,Airflow limitation in COPD is defined as a postbronchodilator FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec) to FVC (forced vital capacity) ratio <0.70.,COPD is characterized by an accelerated decline in FEV1.,Co morbidities associated with COPD are cardiovascular disorders (coronary artery disease and chronic heart failure), hypertension, metabolic diseases (diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome and obesity), bone disease (osteoporosis and osteopenia), stroke, lung cancer, cachexia, skeletal muscle weakness, anaemia, depression and cognitive decline.,The assessment of COPD is required to determine the severity of the disease, its impact on the health status and the risk of future events (e.g., exacerbations, hospital admissions or death) and this is essential to guide therapy.,COPD is treated with inhaled bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids, oral theophylline and oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor.,Non pharmacological treatment of COPD includes smoking cessation, pulmonary rehabilitation and nutritional support.,Lung volume reduction surgery and lung transplantation are advised in selected severe patients.,Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease guidelines recommend influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive worsening of airflow limitation associated with abnormally inflamed airways in older smokers.,Despite correlative evidence for a role for tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the pathogenesis of COPD, the anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha, infliximab did not show clinical efficacy in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial.,This study sought to evaluate the systemic inflammatory profile associated with COPD and to assess the impact of tumor necrosis factor neutralization on systemic inflammation.,Serum samples (n = 234) from the phase II trial were collected at baseline and after 24 weeks of placebo or infliximab.,Additionally, baseline serum samples were obtained from an independent COPD cohort (n = 160) and 2 healthy control cohorts (n = 50; n = 109).,Serum concentrations of a broad panel of inflammation-associated analytes were measured using a 92-analyte multiplex assay.,Twenty-five proteins were significantly elevated and 2 were decreased in COPD, including highly elevated CD40 ligand, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, epidermal growth factor, acute-phase proteins, and neutrophil-associated proteins.,This profile was largely independent of smoking status, age, and clinical phenotype.,The majority of these associations of serum analytes with COPD are novel findings.,Increased serum creatine kinase-muscle/brain and myoglobin correlated modestly with decreased forced expiratory volume at 1 second, suggesting cardiac involvement.,Infliximab did not affect this systemic inflammatory profile.,A robust systemic inflammatory profile was associated with COPD.,This profile was generally independent of disease severity.,Because anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha did not influence systemic inflammation, how to control the underlying pathology beyond symptom suppression remains unclear.,ClinicalTrials.gov, No.: NCT00056264.
1
Purpose: Assess the clinical and economic consequences associated with an early versus late diagnosis in patients with COPD.,Patients and methods: In a retrospective, observational cohort study, electronic medical record data (2000-2014) were collected from Swedish primary care patients with COPD.,COPD indicators (pneumonia, other respiratory diseases, oral corticosteroids, antibiotics for respiratory infections, prescribed drugs for respiratory symptoms, lung function measurement) registered prior to diagnosis were applied to categorize patients into those receiving early (2 or less indicators) or late diagnosis (3 or more indicators registered >90 days preceding a COPD diagnosis).,Outcome measures included annual rate of and time to first exacerbation, mortality risk, prevalence of comorbidities and health care utilization.,Results: More patients with late diagnosis (n=8827) than with early diagnosis (n=3870) had a recent comorbid diagnosis of asthma (22.0% vs 3.9%; P<0.0001).,Compared with early diagnosis, patients with late diagnosis had a higher exacerbation rate (hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83-1.96; P<0.0001) and shorter time to first exacerbation (HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.54-1.69; P<0.0001).,Mortality was not different between groups overall but higher for late versus early diagnosis, after excluding patients with past asthma diagnosis (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.18; P=0.0095).,Late diagnosis was also associated with higher direct costs than early diagnosis.,Conclusion: Late COPD diagnosis is associated with higher exacerbation rate and increased comorbidities and costs compared with early diagnosis.,The study highlights the need for accurate diagnosis of COPD in primary care in order to reduce exacerbations and the economic burden of COPD.
Forced expiratory volume in 1s/forced expiratory volume in 6 s ( FEV1/FEV6) assessment with a microspirometer may be useful in the diagnostic work up of subjects who are suspected of having COPD in primary care.,To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a negative pre-bronchodilator (BD) microspirometry test relative to a full diagnostic spirometry test in subjects in whom general practitioners (GPs) suspect airflow obstruction.,Cross-sectional study in which the order of microspirometry and diagnostic spirometry tests was randomised.,Study subjects were (ex-)smokers aged ⩾50 years referred for diagnostic spirometry to a primary care diagnostic centre by their GPs.,A pre-BD FEV1/FEV6 value <0.73 as measured with the PiKo-6 microspirometer was compared with a post-BD FEV1/FVC (forced vital capacity) <0.70 and FEV1/FVC<lower limit of normal (LLN) from diagnostic spirometry.,One hundred and four subjects were analysed (59.6% males, 42.3% current smokers).,Negative predictive values from microspirometry for airflow obstruction based on the fixed and LLN cut-off points were 94.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 86.4-98.5) and 96.3% (95% CI, 88.2-99.3), respectively.,In all, 18% of positive microspirometry results were not confirmed by a post-BD FEV1/FVC <0.70 and 44% of tests were false positive compared with the LLN criterion for airflow obstruction.,Pre-bronchodilator microspirometry seems to be able to reliably preselect patients for further assessment of airflow obstruction by means of regular diagnostic spirometry.,However, use of microspirometry alone would result in overestimation of airflow obstruction and should not replace regular spirometry when diagnosing COPD in primary care.
1
Inhaler device errors are common and may impact the effectiveness of the delivered drug.,There is a paucity of up-to-date systematic reviews (SRs) or meta-analyses (MAs) of device errors in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.,This SR and MA provides an estimate of overall error rates (both critical and non-critical) by device type and evaluates factors associated with inhaler misuse.,The following databases from inception to July 23, 2014 (Embase®, MEDLINE®, MEDLINE® In-Process and CENTRAL) were searched, using predefined search terms.,Studies in adult males and females with asthma or COPD, reporting at least one overall or critical error, using metered dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers were included.,Random-effect MAs were performed to estimate device error rates and to compare pairs of devices.,Overall and critical error rates were high across all devices, ranging from 50-100% and 14-92%, respectively.,However, between-study heterogeneity was also generally >90% (I-squared statistic), indicating large variability between studies.,A trend towards higher error rates with assessments comprising a larger number of steps was observed; however no consistent pattern was identified.,This SR and MA highlights the relatively limited body of evidence assessing device errors and the lack of standardised checklists.,There is currently insufficient evidence to determine differences in error rates between different inhaler devices and their impact on clinical outcomes.,A key step in improving our knowledge on this topic would be the development of standardised checklists for each device.,Researchers should adopt a standardised approach to investigate the incorrect use of inhalers and its associated clinical implications.,Henry Chrystyn at Plymouth University, together with scientists across the UK and the Netherlands, conducted a review of research related to inhaled medication errors made by patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.,It is widely acknowledged that many patients with lung conditions don’t use their inhaler devices correctly, which affects drug effectiveness and disease control.,While Chrystyn’s team found high critical error rates reported across all devices, their meta-analysis and systematic review highlighted significant gaps in knowledge regarding different inhalers and associated error rates, and how these affect clinical outcomes.,The researchers call for in-depth studies into device use, alongside standardised checklists and definitions for such studies to use to ensure consistency.
Health professionals tasked with advising patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) how to use inhaler devices properly and what to do about unwanted effects will be aware of a variety of commonly held precepts.,The evidence for many of these is, however, lacking or old and therefore in need of re-examination.,Few would disagree that facilitating and encouraging regular and proper use of inhaler devices for the treatment of asthma and COPD is critical for successful outcomes.,It seems logical that the abandonment of unnecessary or ill-founded practices forms an integral part of this process: the use of inhalers is bewildering enough, particularly with regular introduction of new drugs, devices and ancillary equipment, without unnecessary and pointless adages.,We review the evidence, or lack thereof, underlying ten items of inhaler ‘lore’ commonly passed on by health professionals to each other and thence to patients.,The exercise is intended as a pragmatic, evidence-informed review by a group of clinicians with appropriate experience.,It is not intended to be an exhaustive review of the literature; rather, we aim to stimulate debate, and to encourage researchers to challenge some of these ideas and to provide new, updated evidence on which to base relevant, meaningful advice in the future.,The discussion on each item is followed by a formal, expert opinion by members of the ADMIT Working Group.
1
Treatment of chronic diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is complicated by the presence of comorbidities.,The objective of this analysis was to estimate the prevalence of comorbidity in COPD using nationally-representative data.,This study draws from a multi-year analytic sample of 14,828 subjects aged 45+, including 995 with COPD, from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999-2008.,COPD was defined by self-reported physician diagnosis of chronic bronchitis or emphysema; patients who reported a diagnosis of asthma were excluded.,Using population weights, we estimated the age-and-gender-stratified prevalence of 22 comorbid conditions that may influence COPD and its treatment.,Subjects 45+ with physician-diagnosed COPD were more likely than subjects without physician-diagnosed COPD to have coexisting arthritis (54.6% vs.,36.9%), depression (20.6% vs.,12.5%), osteoporosis (16.9% vs.,8.5%), cancer (16.5% vs.,9.9%), coronary heart disease (12.7% vs.,6.1%), congestive heart failure (12.1% vs.,3.9%), and stroke (8.9% vs.,4.6%).,Subjects with COPD were also more likely to report mobility difficulty (55.6% vs.,32.5%), use of >4 prescription medications (51.8% vs.,32.1), dizziness/balance problems (41.1% vs.,23.8%), urinary incontinence (34.9% vs.,27.3%), memory problems (18.5% vs.,8.8%), low glomerular filtration rate (16.2% vs.,10.5%), and visual impairment (14.0% vs.,9.6%).,All reported comparisons have p < 0.05.,Our study indicates that COPD management may need to take into account a complex spectrum of comorbidities.,This work identifies which conditions are most common in a nationally-representative set of COPD patients (physician-diagnosed), a necessary step for setting research priorities and developing clinical practice guidelines that address COPD within the context of comorbidity.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex condition with pulmonary and extra-pulmonary manifestations.,This study describes the heterogeneity of COPD in a large and well characterised and controlled COPD cohort (ECLIPSE).,We studied 2164 clinically stable COPD patients, 337 smokers with normal lung function and 245 never smokers.,In these individuals, we measured clinical parameters, nutritional status, spirometry, exercise tolerance, and amount of emphysema by computed tomography.,COPD patients were slightly older than controls and had more pack years of smoking than smokers with normal lung function.,Co-morbidities were more prevalent in COPD patients than in controls, and occurred to the same extent irrespective of the GOLD stage.,The severity of airflow limitation in COPD patients was poorly related to the degree of breathlessness, health status, presence of co-morbidity, exercise capacity and number of exacerbations reported in the year before the study.,The distribution of these variables within each GOLD stage was wide.,Even in subjects with severe airflow obstruction, a substantial proportion did not report symptoms, exacerbations or exercise limitation.,The amount of emphysema increased with GOLD severity.,The prevalence of bronchiectasis was low (4%) but also increased with GOLD stage.,Some gender differences were also identified.,The clinical manifestations of COPD are highly variable and the degree of airflow limitation does not capture the heterogeneity of the disease.
1
Introduction: More than 15 million adults in the USA have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) places a high burden on the healthcare system.,Many hospital admissions are due to an exacerbation, which is suspected to be from a viral cause.,The purpose of this analysis was to compare the outcomes of patients with a positive and negative respiratory virus panel who were admitted to the hospital with COPD exacerbations.,Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Geisinger Healthcare System.,The dataset included 2729 patient encounters between 1 January 2006 and 30 November 2017.,Hospital length of stay was calculated as the discrete number of calendar days a patient was in the hospital.,Patient encounters with a positive and negative respiratory virus panel were compared using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables.,Results: There were 1626 patients with a total of 2729 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation encounters.,Nineteen percent of those encounters (n = 524) had a respiratory virus panel performed during their admission.,Among these encounters, 161 (30.7%) had positive results, and 363 (69.3%) had negative results.,For encounters with the respiratory virus panel, the mean age was 64.5, 59.5% were female, 98.9% were white, and the mean body mass index was 26.6.,Those with a negative respiratory virus panel had a higher median white blood cell count (11.1 vs.,9.9, p = 0.0076).,There were no other statistically significant differences in characteristics between the two groups.,Respiratory virus panel positive patients had a statistically significant longer hospital length of stay.,There were no significant differences with respect to being on mechanical ventilation or ventilation-free days.,Conclusion: This study shows that a positive respiratory virus panel is associated with increased length of hospital stay.,Early diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation patients with positive viral panel would help identify patients with a longer length of stay.
Regular physical activity (PA) is recommended for persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Interventions that promote PA and sustain long-term adherence to PA are needed.,We examined the effects of an Internet-mediated, pedometer-based walking intervention, called Taking Healthy Steps, at 12 months.,Veterans with COPD (N=239) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to the intervention or wait-list control.,During the first 4 months, participants in the intervention group were instructed to wear the pedometer every day, upload daily step counts at least once a week, and were provided access to a website with four key components: individualized goal setting, iterative feedback, educational and motivational content, and an online community forum.,The subsequent 8-month maintenance phase was the same except that participants no longer received new educational content.,Participants randomized to the wait-list control group were instructed to wear the pedometer, but they did not receive step-count goals or instructions to increase PA.,The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessed by the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire Total Score (SGRQ-TS); the secondary outcome was daily step count.,Linear mixed-effect models assessed the effect of intervention over time.,One participant was excluded from the analysis because he was an outlier.,Within the intervention group, we assessed pedometer adherence and website engagement by examining percent of days with valid step-count data, number of log-ins to the website each month, use of the online community forum, and responses to a structured survey.,Participants were 93.7% male (223/238) with a mean age of 67 (SD 9) years.,At 12 months, there were no significant between-group differences in SGRQ-TS or daily step count.,Between-group difference in daily step count was maximal and statistically significant at month 4 (P<.001), but approached zero in months 8-12.,Within the intervention group, mean 76.7% (SD 29.5) of 366 days had valid step-count data, which decreased over the months of study (P<.001).,Mean number of log-ins to the website each month also significantly decreased over the months of study (P<.001).,The online community forum was used at least once during the study by 83.8% (129/154) of participants.,Responses to questions assessing participants’ goal commitment and intervention engagement were not significantly different at 12 months compared to 4 months.,An Internet-mediated, pedometer-based PA intervention, although efficacious at 4 months, does not maintain improvements in HRQL and daily step counts at 12 months.,Waning pedometer adherence and website engagement by the intervention group were observed.,Future efforts should focus on improving features of PA interventions to promote long-term behavior change and sustain engagement in PA.,Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01102777; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01102777 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6iyNP9KUC)
1
Acute exacerbations are a leading cause of worsening COPD in terms of lung function decline, quality of life, and survival.,They also have a relevant economic burden on the health care system.,Determining the risk factors for acute exacerbation and early relapse could be a crucial element for a better management of COPD patients.,This review analyzes the current knowledge and underlines the main risk factors for recurrent acute exacerbations.,Comprehensive evaluation of COPD patients during stable phase and exacerbation could contribute to prevent treatment failure and relapses.
Despite the availability of national and international guidelines, evidence suggests that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment is not always prescribed according to recommendations.,This study evaluated the current management of patients with COPD using a large UK primary-care database.,This analysis used electronic patient records and patient-completed questionnaires from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database.,Data on current management were analyzed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group and presence or absence of a concomitant asthma diagnosis, in patients with a COPD diagnosis at ≥35 years of age and with spirometry results supportive of the COPD diagnosis.,A total of 24,957 patients were analyzed, of whom 13,557 (54.3%) had moderate airflow limitation (GOLD Stage 2 COPD).,The proportion of patients not receiving pharmacologic treatment for COPD was 17.0% in the total COPD population and 17.7% in the GOLD Stage 2 subset.,Approximately 50% of patients in both cohorts were receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA; 26.7% for both cohorts) or a LABA and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA; 23.2% and 19.9%, respectively).,ICS + LABA and ICS + LABA + LAMA were the most frequently used treatments in GOLD Groups A and B.,Of patients without concomitant asthma, 53.7% of the total COPD population and 50.2% of the GOLD Stage 2 subset were receiving ICS.,Of patients with GOLD Stage 2 COPD and no exacerbations in the previous year, 49% were prescribed ICS.,A high proportion of GOLD Stage 2 COPD patients were symptomatic on their current management (36.6% with modified Medical Research Council score ≥2; 76.4% with COPD Assessment Test score ≥10).,COPD is not treated according to GOLD and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations in the UK primary-care setting.,Some patients receive no treatment despite experiencing symptoms.,Among those on treatment, most receive ICS irrespective of severity of airflow limitation, asthma diagnosis, and exacerbation history.,Many patients on treatment continue to have symptoms.
1
Adequate peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) is required for drug dispersion with dry powder inhalers (DPIs).,Prevalence of PIFR discordance (suboptimal PIFR with prescribed inhalers) and factors influencing device-specific PIFR are unclear in COPD.,The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of PIFR discordance and associated clinical factors in a stable COPD population.,An observational, single-center, cohort study was conducted including 66 outpatients with COPD.,PIFR was measured using the In-Check™ Dial with applied resistance of prescribed inhalers.,Participants were defined as discordant if measured PIFR was <30 L/min and <60 L/min for high and low-medium resistance devices, respectively, using an inspiratory effort the participant normally used with their prescribed DPI.,The median age of the COPD participants was 69.4 years, 92% were white and 47% were female.,A total of 48% were using low-medium resistance DPIs (Diskus®/Ellipta®) and 76% used high-resistance DPI (Handihaler®).,A total of 40% of COPD participants were discordant to prescribed inhalers.,Female gender was the only factor consistently associated with lower PIFR.,Shorter height was associated with reduced PIFR for low-medium resistance (r=0.44; P=0.01), but not high resistance (r=0.20; P=0.16).,There was no correlation between PIFR by In-Check™ dial and PIFR measured by standard spirometer.,PIFR is reduced in stable COPD patients, with female gender being the only factor consistently associated with reduced PIFR.,Discordance with prescribed inhalers was seen in 40% of COPD patients, suggesting that many COPD patients do not generate adequate inspiratory force to overcome prescribed DPIs resistance in the course of normal use.
Inhaled drug delivery is the cornerstone treatment for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, use of inhaler devices can be challenging, potentially leading to critical errors in handling that can significantly reduce drug delivery to the lungs and effectiveness of treatment.,A systematic review was conducted to define ‘critical’ errors and their impact on health outcomes and resource use between 2004 and 2016, using key search terms for inhaler errors in asthma and COPD (Search-1) and associated health-economic and patient burden (Search-2).,Search-1 identified 62 manuscripts, 47 abstracts, and 5 conference proceedings (n = 114 total).,Search-2 identified 9 studies.,We observed 299 descriptions of critical error.,Age, education status, previous inhaler instruction, comorbidities and socioeconomic status were associated with worse handling error frequency.,A significant association was found between inhaler errors and poor disease outcomes (exacerbations), and greater health-economic burden.,We have shown wide variations in how critical errors are defined, and the evidence shows an important association between inhaler errors and worsened health outcomes.,Given the negative impact diminished disease outcomes impose on resource use, our findings highlight the importance of achieving optimal inhaler technique, and a need for a consensus on defining critical and non-critical errors.,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-017-0710-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Relationships between airway inflammation and respiratory potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPMs) quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in subjects with COPD are unclear.,Our aim was to evaluate mediators of airway inflammation and their association with PPMs in subjects with COPD at stable state and during exacerbations.,Sputum from 120 stable subjects with COPD was analyzed for bacteriology (colony-forming units; total 16S; and qPCR targeting Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae), differential cell counts, and inflammatory mediators using the Meso-Scale Discovery Platform.,Subjects were classified as colonized if any PPM was identified above the threshold of detection by qPCR.,Symptoms were quantified using the visual analog scale.,At stable state, 60% of subjects were qPCR positive for H influenzae, 48% for M catarrhalis, and 28% for S pneumoniae.,Elevated sputum concentrations of IL-1β, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α were detected in samples qPCR positive for either H influenzae or M catarrhalis.,Bacterial loads of H influenzae positively correlated with IL-1β, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, and symptoms; and M catarrhalis correlated with IL-10 and TNF-α.,H influenzae qPCR bacterial load was an independent predictor of sputum TNF-α and IL-1β.,In 55 subjects with paired exacerbation data, qPCR bacterial load fold change at exacerbation in M catarrhalis but not H influenzae correlated to changes in sputum TNF-α and IL-1β concentrations.,At stable state, H influenzae is associated with increased airway inflammation in COPD.,The relationship between bacterial load changes of specific pathogens and airway inflammation at exacerbation and recovery warrants further investigation.
There has been increasing interest in the use of newer, culture-independent techniques to study the airway microbiome of COPD patients.,We investigated the relationships between the three common potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPMs) Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Moraxella catarrhalis, as detected by quantitative PCR (qPCR), and inflammation and health status in stable patients in the London COPD cohort.,We prospectively collected sputum, serum and plasma samples for analysis of airway bacterial presence and load, and airway and systemic inflammation from 99 stable COPD patients between January 2011 and October 2012.,Health status was measured with St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire and COPD Assessment Test.,Airway inflammation and plasma fibrinogen, but not C-reactive protein, were greater in samples with PPM detection (p < 0.001, p = 0.049 and p = 0.261, respectively).,Increasing total bacterial load was associated with increasing airway (p < 0.01) but not systemic inflammation (p > 0.05).,Samples with high total bacterial loads had significantly higher airway inflammation than both samples without PPM detection and those with lower loads.,Haemophilus influenzae presence was associated with significantly higher levels of airway but not systemic inflammation for all given pathogen loads (p < 0.05), and was significantly greater than with other PPMs.,No association was observed between inflammation and health status (p > 0.05).,Airway and systemic inflammation, as measured by fibrinogen, is greater in stable COPD patients with PPMs detected using the culture-independent qPCR technique.,The airway, but not systemic inflammatory response, appears to have a total pathogen-load threshold and appears attributable to Haemophilus influenzae.,However, discordance between inflammation and health status was observed.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0114-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
COPD is a progressive condition involving chronic inflammation and parenchymal destruction with resulting airflow limitation.,COPD is associated with worsening airflow limitation over time and increased frequency of COPD exacerbations, leading to increased mortality and morbidity.,The effects of COPD extend beyond the lungs, as multiple comorbidities may occur with COPD, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, depression, and pneumonia.,COPD exacerbations are associated with a rapid worsening of baseline symptoms that requires prompt management and may necessitate hospitalization in the case of a severe episode.,Patients with COPD exacerbations require urgent management of symptoms to prevent further worsening, and preventative steps may be taken to help reduce the number and frequency of future exacerbations.,Roflumilast is a potent and selective inhibitor of the enzyme phosphodiesterase-4 that targets the systemic inflammation associated with COPD.,Roflumilast has a variety of anti-inflammatory effects including decreasing inflammatory mediators and the expression of cell surface markers and inhibition of apoptosis.,Several clinical trials evaluating roflumilast in the treatment of COPD have demonstrated significant improvements from baseline versus placebo in lung function, including increases in mean pre- and postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity.,Data suggest that roflumilast reduces moderate to severe exacerbations with the benefit most well established in patients with severe disease.,Given this evidence, roflumilast, as part of a combination regimen with long-acting bronchodilators, appears to be a reasonable treatment option for patients with severe to very severe COPD associated with chronic bronchitis and a history of exacerbations.
The Continuing to Confront COPD International Patient Survey aimed to estimate the prevalence and burden of COPD globally and to update findings from the Confronting COPD International Survey conducted in 1999-2000.,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in 12 countries worldwide were identified through systematic screening of population samples.,Telephone and face-to-face interviews were conducted between November 2012 and May 2013 using a structured survey that incorporated validated patient-reported outcome instruments.,Eligible patients were adults aged 40 years and older who were taking regular respiratory medications or suffered with chronic respiratory symptoms and reported either 1) a physician diagnosis of COPD/emphysema, 2) a physician diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, or 3) a symptom-based definition of chronic bronchitis.,The burden of COPD was measured with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale.,Of 106,876 households with at least one person aged ≥40 years, 4,343 respondents fulfilled the case definition of COPD and completed the full survey.,COPD prevalence ranged from 7% to 12%, with most countries falling within the range of 7%-9%.,In all countries, prevalence increased with age, and in all countries except the US was greater among men (range 6%-14%) than among women (range 5%-11%).,A significant disease burden was observed when considering COPD symptoms or health status, and showed wide variations across countries.,Prevalence of moderate-to-severe dyspnea (mMRC scale ≥2) ranged from 27% to 61%, and mean CAT score ranged from 16.0 to 24.8, indicating medium-to-high impairment.,This survey, representing 12 countries, showed similar rates of estimated COPD prevalence across countries that were higher than those reported a decade ago in the original Confronting COPD International Survey.,A significant burden of COPD was demonstrated by symptoms and health care-resource use, similar to that reported in the original survey.
1
Triple inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) combination therapy is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience further exacerbations/symptoms on dual LAMA/LABA or ICS/LABA therapy.,The relative efficacy of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler 320/18/9.6 µg (BGF MDI) in COPD was compared with other ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose and open combination therapies in a network meta-analysis (NMA).,A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of at least 10-week duration, including at least one fixed-dose or open combination triple therapy arm, in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.,Studies were assessed for methodological quality and risk of bias.,A three-level hierarchical Bayesian NMA model was used to determine the exacerbation rate per patient per year as well as the following outcomes at week 24: changes from baseline in pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), post-dose peak FEV1, and St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score; proportion of SGRQ responders; and Transition Dyspnea Index focal score.,Change from baseline in rescue medication use over weeks 12-24 was also analyzed.,Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were used to assess heterogeneity across studies.,Eighteen studies (n = 29,232 patients) contributed to the NMA.,ICS/LABA dual combinations were combined as a single treatment group to create a connected network.,Across all outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences between BGF MDI and other triple ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol and beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate) and open combinations with data available within the network.,Results from sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were consistent with the base-case scenario.,This NMA suggested that BGF MDI has comparable efficacy to other ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose and open triple combination therapies in reducing exacerbations and improving lung function and symptoms in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.,Further research is warranted as additional evidence regarding triple therapies, especially fixed-dose combinations, becomes available.,The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01311-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Rationale: The IMPACT (Informing the Pathway of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment) trial demonstrated a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (ACM) risk with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus UMEC/VI in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at risk of future exacerbations.,Five hundred seventy-four patients were censored in the original analysis owing to incomplete vital status information.,Objectives: Report ACM and impact of stepping down therapy, following collection of additional vital status data.,Methods: Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 μg, FF/VI 100/25 μg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg following a run-in on their COPD therapies.,Time to ACM was prespecified.,Additional vital status data collection and subsequent analyses were performed post hoc.,Measurements and Main Results: We report vital status data for 99.6% of the intention-to-treat population (n = 10,355), documenting 98 (2.36%) deaths on FF/UMEC/VI, 109 (2.64%) on FF/VI, and 66 (3.19%) on UMEC/VI.,For FF/UMEC/VI, the hazard ratio for death was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.99; P = 0.042) versus UMEC/VI and 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.16; P = 0.387) versus FF/VI.,Independent adjudication confirmed lower rates of cardiovascular and respiratory death and death associated with the patient’s COPD.,Conclusions: In this secondary analysis of an efficacy outcome from the IMPACT trial, once-daily single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI triple therapy reduced the risk of ACM versus UMEC/VI in patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations.
1
The economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations is significant, but the impact of other sources on the overall cost of COPD management is largely unknown.,We aimed to estimate overall costs for patients experiencing none, one, or two or more exacerbations per year in the UK.,A retrospective cohort of prevalent COPD patients was identified in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink UK database.,Patients with information recorded for at least 12 months before and after cohort entry date were included (first prevalent COPD diagnosis confirmed by spirometry on/after April 1, 2009).,Patients were categorized as having none, one, or two or more moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations in the 12 months after cohort entry and further classified by the Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) category of airflow obstruction and the Medical Research Council dyspnea scale.,Study outcomes included counts of general practitioner interactions, moderate-severe COPD exacerbations, and non-COPD hospitalizations.,Estimated resource use costs were calculated using National Health Service reference costs for 2010-2011.,The cohort comprised 58,589 patients (mean age 69.5 years, mean dyspnea grade 2.5, females 46.6%, current smokers 33.1%).,The average total annual per patient cost of COPD management, excluding medications, was £2,108 for all patients and £1,523, £2,405, and £3,396 for patients experiencing no, one, or two or more moderate-to-severe exacerbations, respectively.,General practitioner interactions contributed most to these annual costs, accounting for £1,062 (69.7%), £1,313 (54.6%), and £1,592 (46.9%) in patients with no, one, or two or more moderate-to-severe exacerbations, respectively.,Disease management strategies focused on reducing costs in primary care may help reduce total COPD costs significantly.
The poor recognition and related underdiagnosis of COPD contributes to an underestimation of mortality in subjects with COPD.,Data derived from population studies can advance our understanding of the true burden of COPD.,The objective of this report was to evaluate the impact of COPD on mortality and its predictors in a cohort of subjects with and without COPD recruited during the twenty first century.,All subjects with COPD (n = 993) defined according to the GOLD spirometric criteria, FEV1/FVC < 0.70, and gender- and age-matched subjects without airway obstruction, non-COPD (n = 993), were identified in a clinical follow-up survey of the Obstructive Lung Disease in Northern Sweden (OLIN) Studies cohorts in 2002-2004.,Mortality was observed until the end of year 2007.,Baseline data from examination at recruitment were used in the risk factor analyses; age, smoking status, lung function (FEV1 % predicted) and reported heart disease.,The mortality was significantly higher among subjects with COPD, 10.9%, compared to subjects without COPD, 5.8% (p < 0.001).,Mortality was associated with higher age, being a current smoker, male gender, and COPD.,Replacing COPD with FEV1 % predicted in the multivariate model resulted in the decreasing level of FEV1 being a significant risk factor for death, while heart disease was not a significant risk factor for death in any of the models.,In this cohort COPD and decreased FEV1 were significant risk factors for death when adjusted for age, gender, smoking habits and reported heart disease.
1
Sputum eosinophilia occurs in approximately one-third of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and can predict exacerbation risk and response to corticosteroid treatments.,Sputum induction, however, requires expertise, may not always be successful, and does not provide point-of-care results.,Easily applicable diagnostic markers that can predict sputum eosinophilia in stable COPD patients have the potential to progress COPD management.,This study investigated the correlation and predictive relationship between peripheral blood and sputum eosinophils.,It also examined the repeatability of blood eosinophil counts.,Stable COPD patients (n=141) were classified as eosinophilic or noneosinophilic based on their sputum cell counts (≥3%), and a cross-sectional analysis was conducted comparing their demographics, clinical characteristics, and blood cell counts.,Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the predictive ability of blood eosinophils for sputum eosinophilia.,Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to examine the repeatability of blood eosinophil counts.,Blood eosinophil counts were significantly higher in patients with sputum eosinophilia (n=45) compared to those without (0.3×109/L vs 0.15×109/L; P<0.0001).,Blood eosinophils correlated with both the percentage (ρ=0.535; P<0.0001) and number of sputum eosinophils (ρ=0.473; P<0.0001).,Absolute blood eosinophil count was predictive of sputum eosinophilia (area under the curve =0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.67-0.84; P<0.0001).,At a threshold of ≥0.3×109/L (specificity =76%, sensitivity =60%, and positive likelihood ratio =2.5), peripheral blood eosinophil counts enabled identification of the presence or absence of sputum eosinophilia in 71% of the cases.,A threshold of ≥0.4×109/L had similar classifying ability but better specificity (91.7%) and higher positive likelihood ratio (3.7).,In contrast, ≥0.2×109/L offered a better sensitivity (91.1%) for ruling out sputum eosinophilia.,There was a good agreement between two measurements of blood eosinophil count over a median of 28 days (intraclass correlation coefficient =0.8; 95% CI =0.66-0.88; P<0.0001).,Peripheral blood eosinophil counts can help identify the presence or absence of sputum eosinophilia in stable COPD patients with a reasonable degree of accuracy.
The COPD Assessment Test (CAT™) is a new short health status measure for routine use.,New questionnaires require reference points so that users can understand the scores; descriptive scenarios are one way of doing this.,A novel method of creating scenarios is described.,A Bland and Altman plot showed a consistent relationship between CAT scores and scores obtained with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD (SGRQ-C) permitting a direct mapping process between CAT and SGRQ items.,The severity associated with each CAT item was calculated using a probabilistic model and expressed in logits (log odds of a patient of given severity affirming that item 50% of the time).,Severity estimates for SGRQ-C items in logits were also available, allowing direct comparisons with CAT items.,CAT scores were categorised into Low, Medium, High and Very High Impact.,SGRQ items of corresponding severity were used to create scenarios associated with each category.,Each CAT category was associated with a scenario comprising 12 to 16 SGRQ-C items.,A severity 'ladder' associating CAT scores with exemplar health status effects was also created.,Items associated with 'Low' and 'Medium' Impact appeared to be subjectively quite severe in terms of their effect on daily life.,These scenarios provide users of the CAT with a good sense of the health impact associated with different scores.,More generally they provide a surprising insight into the severity of the effects of COPD, even in patients with apparently mild-moderate health status impact.
1
The use of a severity score to help orientation decisions could improve the efficiency of care for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD).,We previously developed a score (‘2008 score’, based on age, dyspnea grade at steady state and number of clinical signs of severity) predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD visiting emergency departments (EDs).,External validity of this score remained to be assessed.,To test the predictive properties of the ‘2008 score’ in a population of patients hospitalized in medical respiratory wards for AECOPD, and determine whether a new score specifically derived from this population would differ from the previous score in terms of components or predictive performance.,Data from a cohort study in 1824 patients hospitalized in a medical ward for an AECOPD were analyzed.,Patients were categorized using the 2008 score and its predictive characteristics for in-hospital mortality rates were assessed.,A new score was developed using multivariate logistic regression modeling in a randomly selected derivation population sample followed by testing in the remaining population (validation sample).,Robustness of results was assessed by case-by-case validation.,The 2008 score was characterized by a c-statistic at 0.77, a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 76% for prediction of in-hospital mortality.,The new score comprised the same variables plus major cardiac comorbidities and was characterized by a c-statistic of 0.78, a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 66%.,A score using simple clinical variables has robust properties for predicting the risk of in-hospital death in patients hospitalized for AECOPD.,Adding cardiac comorbidities to the original score increased its sensitivity while decreasing its specificity.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0099-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Prediction of future exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major concern for long-term management of this disease.,To determine which of three multidimensional assessment systems (the body mass index, obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity [BODE] index; dyspnea, obstruction, smoking, exacerbations [DOSE] index; or age, dyspnea, obstruction [ADO] index) is superior for predicting exacerbations.,This was a 2-year prospective cohort study of COPD patients.,Pulmonary function tests, the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), Modified Medical Respiratory Council (MMRC) dyspnea scores, chest computed-tomography measurements, and body composition were analyzed, and predictions of exacerbation by the three assessment systems were compared.,Among 183 patients who completed the study, the mean annual exacerbation rate was 0.57 events per patient year, which correlated significantly with lower predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (P < 0.001), lower transfer coefficient of the lung for carbon monoxide (%DLco/VA) (P = 0.021), lesser 6MWD (P = 0.016), higher MMRC dyspnea score (P = 0.001), higher DOSE index (P < 0.001), higher BODE index (P = 0.001), higher ADO index (P = 0.001), and greater extent of emphysema (P = 0.002).,For prediction of exacerbation, the areas under the curves were larger for the DOSE index than for the BODE and ADO indices (P < 0.001).,Adjusted multiple logistic regression identified the DOSE index as a significant predictor of risk of COPD exacerbation.,In this study, the DOSE index was a better predictor of exacerbations of COPD when compared with the BODE and ADO indices.
1
Reports have suggested a reduction in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, particularly hospital admissions for severe exacerbations.,However, the magnitude of this reduction varies between studies.,Electronic databases were searched from January 2020 to May 2021.,Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and, when necessary, full text to determine if studies met inclusion criteria.,A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality.,A narrative summary of eligible studies was synthesised, and meta-analysis was conducted using a random effect model to pool the rate ratio and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for hospital admissions.,Exacerbation reduction was compared against the COVID-19 Containment and Health Index.,A total of 13 of 745 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, with data from nine countries.,Nine studies could be included in the meta-analysis.,The pooled rate ratio of hospital admissions for COPD exacerbations during the pandemic period was 0.50 (95% CI 0.44-0.57).,Findings on the rate of community-treated exacerbations were inconclusive.,Three studies reported a significant decrease in the incidence of respiratory viral infections compared with the pre-pandemic period.,There was not a significant relationship between exacerbation reduction and the COVID-19 Containment and Health Index (rho = 0.20, p = 0.53).,There was a 50% reduction in admissions for COPD exacerbations during the COVID-19 pandemic period compared to pre-pandemic times, likely associated with a reduction in respiratory viral infections that trigger exacerbations.,Future guidelines should consider including recommendations on respiratory virus infection control measures to reduce the burden of COPD exacerbations beyond the pandemic period.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has raised many questions about the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and whether modifications of their therapy are required.,It has raised questions about recognizing and differentiating coronavirus disease (COVID-19) from COPD given the similarity of the symptoms.,The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Science Committee used established methods for literature review to present an overview of the management of patients with COPD during the COVID-19 pandemic.,It is unclear whether patients with COPD are at increased risk of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2.,During periods of high community prevalence of COVID-19, spirometry should only be used when it is essential for COPD diagnosis and/or to assess lung function status for interventional procedures or surgery.,Patients with COPD should follow basic infection control measures, including social distancing, hand washing, and wearing a mask or face covering.,Patients should remain up to date with appropriate vaccinations, particularly annual influenza vaccination.,Although data are limited, inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting bronchodilators, roflumilast, or chronic macrolides should continue to be used as indicated for stable COPD management.,Systemic steroids and antibiotics should be used in COPD exacerbations according to the usual indications.,Differentiating symptoms of COVID-19 infection from chronic underlying symptoms or those of an acute COPD exacerbation may be challenging.,If there is suspicion for COVID-19, testing for SARS-CoV-2 should be considered.,Patients who developed moderate-to-severe COVID-19, including hospitalization and pneumonia, should be treated with evolving pharmacotherapeutic approaches as appropriate, including remdesivir, dexamethasone, and anticoagulation.,Managing acute respiratory failure should include appropriate oxygen supplementation, prone positioning, noninvasive ventilation, and protective lung strategy in patients with COPD and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.,Patients who developed asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 should be followed with the usual COPD protocols.,Patients who developed moderate or worse COVID-19 should be monitored more frequently and accurately than the usual patients with COPD, with particular attention to the need for oxygen therapy.
1
Exercise tests are often used to evaluate the functional status of patients with COPD.,However, to the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive systematic comparison of these tests has not been performed.,We systematically reviewed studies reporting the repeatability and/or reproducibility of these tests, and studies comparing their sensitivity to therapeutic intervention.,A systematic review identified primary manuscripts in English reporting relevant data on the following exercise tests: 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and 12-minute walk test, incremental and endurance shuttle walk tests (ISWT and ESWT, respectively), incremental and endurance cycle ergometer tests, and incremental and endurance treadmill tests.,We identified 71 relevant studies.,Good repeatability (for the 6MWT and ESWT) and reproducibility (for the 6MWT, 12-minute walk test, ISWT, ESWT, and incremental cycle ergometer test) were reported by most studies assessing these tests, providing patients were familiarized with them beforehand.,The 6MWT, ISWT, and particularly the ESWT were reported to be sensitive to therapeutic intervention.,Protocol variations (eg, track layout or supplemental oxygen use) affected performance significantly in several studies.,This review shows that while the validity of several tests has been established, for others further study is required.,Future work will assess the link between these tests, physiological mechanisms, and patient-reported measures.
Because treadmill exercise testing is more representative of daily activity than cycle testing, we developed treadmill protocols to be used in various clinical settings as part of a two-year, multicenter, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) trial evaluating the effect of tiotropium on exercise.,We enrolled 519 COPD patients aged 64.6 ± 8.3 years with a postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 1.25 ± 0.42 L, 44.3% ± 11.9% predicted.,The patients performed symptom-limited treadmill tests where work rate (Ẇ) was increased linearly using speed and grade adjustments every minute.,On two subsequent visits, they performed constant Ẇ tests to exhaustion at 90% of maximum Ẇ from the incremental test.,Mean incremental test duration was 522 ± 172 seconds (range 20-890), maximum work rate 66 ± 34 watts.,For the first and second constant Ẇ tests, both at 61 ± 33 watts, mean endurance times were 317 ± 61 seconds and 341 ± 184 seconds, respectively.,The mean of two tests had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 (P < 0.001).,During the second constant Ẇ test, 88.2% of subjects stopped exercise because of breathing discomfort; 87.1% for Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Stage II, 88.5% for GOLD Stage III, and 90.2% for GOLD Stage IV.,The symptom-limited incremental and constant work treadmill protocol was well tolerated and appeared to be representative of the physiologic limitations of COPD.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third commonest cause of death globally, and manifests as a progressive inflammatory lung disease with no curative treatment.,The lung microbiome contributes to COPD progression, but the function of the gut microbiome remains unclear.,Here we examine the faecal microbiome and metabolome of COPD patients and healthy controls, finding 146 bacterial species differing between the two groups.,Several species, including Streptococcus sp000187445, Streptococcus vestibularis and multiple members of the family Lachnospiraceae, also correlate with reduced lung function.,Untargeted metabolomics identifies a COPD signature comprising 46% lipid, 20% xenobiotic and 20% amino acid related metabolites.,Furthermore, we describe a disease-associated network connecting Streptococcus parasanguinis_B with COPD-associated metabolites, including N-acetylglutamate and its analogue N-carbamoylglutamate.,While correlative, our results suggest that the faecal microbiome and metabolome of COPD patients are distinct from those of healthy individuals, and may thus aid in the search for biomarkers for COPD.,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressing disease, with lung but not gut microbiota implicated in its etiology.,Here the authors compare the stool from patients with COPD and healthy controls to find specific gut bacteria and metabolites associated with active disease, thereby hinting at a potential role for the gut microbiome in COPD.
Increased iron availability modifies cardiorespiratory function in healthy volunteers and improves exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure or pulmonary hypertension.,We hypothesised that intravenous iron would produce improvements in oxygenation, exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We performed a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in 48 participants with COPD (mean±SD: age 69±8 years, haemoglobin 144.8±13.2 g/L, ferritin 97.1±70.0 µg/L, transferrin saturation 31.3%±15.2%; GOLD grades II-IV), each of whom received a single dose of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM; 15 mg/kg bodyweight) or saline placebo.,The primary endpoint was peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) at rest after 1 week.,The secondary endpoints included daily SpO2, overnight SpO2, exercise SpO2, 6 min walk distance, symptom and quality of life scores, serum iron indices, spirometry, echocardiographic measures, and exacerbation frequency.,SpO2 was unchanged 1 week after FCM administration (difference between groups 0.8%, 95% CI −0.2% to 1.7%).,However, in secondary analyses, exercise capacity increased significantly after FCM administration, compared with placebo, with a mean difference in 6 min walk distance of 12.6 m (95% CI 1.6 to 23.5 m).,Improvements of ≥40 m were observed in 29.2% of iron-treated and 0% of placebo-treated participants after 1 week (p=0.009).,Modified MRC Dyspnoea Scale score was also significantly lower after FCM, and fewer participants reported scores ≥2 in the FCM group, compared with placebo (33.3% vs 66.7%, p=0.02).,No significant differences were observed in other secondary endpoints.,Adverse event rates were similar between groups, except for hypophosphataemia, which occurred more frequently after FCM (91.7% vs 8.3%, p<0.001).,FCM did not improve oxygenation over 8 weeks in patients with COPD.,However, this treatment was well tolerated and produced improvements in exercise capacity and functional limitation caused by breathlessness.,These effects on secondary endpoints require confirmation in future studies.,ISRCTN09143837.
1
Severe exacerbations of COPD, ie, those leading to hospitalization, have profound clinical implications for patients and significant economic consequences for society.,The prevalence and burden of severe COPD exacerbations remain high, despite recognition of the importance of exacerbation prevention and the availability of new treatment options.,Severe COPD exacerbations are associated with high mortality, have negative impact on quality of life, are linked to cardiovascular complications, and are a significant burden on the health-care system.,This review identified risk factors that contribute to the development of severe exacerbations, treatment options (bronchodilators, antibiotics, corticosteroids [CSs], oxygen therapy, and ventilator support) to manage severe exacerbations, and strategies to prevent readmission to hospital.,Risk factors that are amenable to change have been highlighted.,A number of bronchodilators have demonstrated successful reduction in risk of severe exacerbations, including long-acting muscarinic antagonist or long-acting β2-agonist mono- or combination therapies, in addition to vaccination, mucolytic and antibiotic therapy, and nonpharmacological interventions, such as pulmonary rehabilitation.,Recognition of the importance of severe exacerbations is an essential step in improving outcomes for patients with COPD.,Evidence-based approaches to prevent and manage severe exacerbations should be implemented as part of targeted strategies for disease management.
Objective To assess the effect of second generation, home based telehealth on health related quality of life, anxiety, and depressive symptoms over 12 months in patients with long term conditions.,Design A study of patient reported outcomes (the Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study; baseline n=1573) was nested in a pragmatic, cluster randomised trial of telehealth (the Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth trial, n=3230).,General practice was the unit of randomisation, and telehealth was compared with usual care.,Data were collected at baseline, four months (short term), and 12 months (long term).,Primary intention to treat analyses tested treatment effectiveness; multilevel models controlled for clustering by general practice and a range of covariates.,Analyses were conducted for 759 participants who completed questionnaire measures at all three time points (complete case cohort) and 1201 who completed the baseline assessment plus at least one other assessment (available case cohort).,Secondary per protocol analyses tested treatment efficacy and included 633 and 1108 participants in the complete case and available case cohorts, respectively.,Setting Provision of primary and secondary care via general practices, specialist nurses, and hospital clinics in three diverse regions of England (Cornwall, Kent, and Newham), with established integrated health and social care systems.,Participants Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, or heart failure recruited between May 2008 and December 2009.,Main outcome measures Generic, health related quality of life (assessed by physical and mental health component scores of the SF-12, and the EQ-5D), anxiety (assessed by the six item Brief State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), and depressive symptoms (assessed by the 10 item Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale).,Results In the intention to treat analyses, differences between treatment groups were small and non-significant for all outcomes in the complete case (0.480≤P≤0.904) or available case (0.181≤P≤0.905) cohorts.,The magnitude of differences between trial arms did not reach the trial defined, minimal clinically important difference (0.3 standardised mean difference) for any outcome in either cohort at four or 12 months.,Per protocol analyses replicated the primary analyses; the main effect of trial arm (telehealth v usual care) was non-significant for any outcome (complete case cohort 0.273≤P≤0.761; available case cohort 0.145≤P≤0.696).,Conclusions Second generation, home based telehealth as implemented in the Whole Systems Demonstrator Evaluation was not effective or efficacious compared with usual care only.,Telehealth did not improve quality of life or psychological outcomes for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, or heart failure over 12 months.,The findings suggest that concerns about potentially deleterious effect of telehealth are unfounded for most patients.,Trial Registration ISRCTN43002091.
1
Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important events in the history of this debilitating lung condition.,Associated health care utilization and morbidity are high, and many patients require supplemental oxygen or ventilatory support.,The last 2 decades have seen a substantial increase in our understanding of the best way to manage the respiratory failure suffered by many patients during this high-risk period.,This review article examines the evidence underlying supplemental oxygen therapy during exacerbations of COPD.,We first discuss the epidemiology and pathophysiology of respiratory failure in COPD during exacerbations.,The rationale and evidence underlying oxygen therapy, including the risks when administered inappropriately, are then discussed, along with further strategies for ventilatory support.,We also review current recommendations for best practice, including methods for improving oxygen provision in the future.
COPD exacerbations are responsible for the morbidity and mortality of this disease.,The relationship between exacerbations and patient-related clinical outcomes is not clearly understood.,A retrospective analysis of two 1-year, placebo-controlled clinical trials with tiotropium 18 μg daily was conducted to examine relationships between exacerbations and other clinical outcomes.,The relationship between FEV1, St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the transition dyspnea index (TDI) were examined based on the frequency of exacerbations (0, 1, 2, >2).,921 patients participated in the trials (mean age 65 years, mean FEV1 = 1.02 L (39% predicted).,The percent change from baseline in FEV1 in the tiotropium group was +12.6%, +12.0%, +2.1% and +8.9%; and in the placebo group was −3.4%, −3.4%, −5.7% and −6.7% for exacerbation frequencies of 0, 1, 2, >2, respectively.,Compared with baseline, the largest improvement in SGRQ occurred in patients with no exacerbations.,In the placebo group, there was a significant association between an increased frequency of exacerbations and worsening SGRQ scores.,A reduction in exacerbation rates of 4.4% to 42.0% such as that shown in this study cohort was associated with meaningful changes in questionnaire based instruments.,In the placebo-treated patients increased frequency of exacerbations was associated with larger decrements in FEV1, TDI, and SGRQ.,A reduction in the frequency of exacerbations is associated with changes that are considered meaningful in these clinical outcomes.
1
Reports have suggested a reduction in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, particularly hospital admissions for severe exacerbations.,However, the magnitude of this reduction varies between studies.,Electronic databases were searched from January 2020 to May 2021.,Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and, when necessary, full text to determine if studies met inclusion criteria.,A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality.,A narrative summary of eligible studies was synthesised, and meta-analysis was conducted using a random effect model to pool the rate ratio and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for hospital admissions.,Exacerbation reduction was compared against the COVID-19 Containment and Health Index.,A total of 13 of 745 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, with data from nine countries.,Nine studies could be included in the meta-analysis.,The pooled rate ratio of hospital admissions for COPD exacerbations during the pandemic period was 0.50 (95% CI 0.44-0.57).,Findings on the rate of community-treated exacerbations were inconclusive.,Three studies reported a significant decrease in the incidence of respiratory viral infections compared with the pre-pandemic period.,There was not a significant relationship between exacerbation reduction and the COVID-19 Containment and Health Index (rho = 0.20, p = 0.53).,There was a 50% reduction in admissions for COPD exacerbations during the COVID-19 pandemic period compared to pre-pandemic times, likely associated with a reduction in respiratory viral infections that trigger exacerbations.,Future guidelines should consider including recommendations on respiratory virus infection control measures to reduce the burden of COPD exacerbations beyond the pandemic period.
The mechanisms underlying altered susceptibility and propensity to severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease in at-risk groups such as patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are poorly understood.,Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are widely used in COPD, but the extent to which these therapies protect or expose patients to risk of severe COVID-19 is unknown.,The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ICSs following pulmonary expression of the SARS-CoV-2 viral entry receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2).,We evaluated the effect of ICS administration on pulmonary ACE2 expression in vitro in human airway epithelial cell cultures and in vivo in mouse models of ICS administration.,Mice deficient in the type I IFN-α/β receptor (Ifnar1−/−) and administration of exogenous IFN-β were used to study the functional role of type-I interferon signaling in ACE2 expression.,We compared sputum ACE2 expression in patients with COPD stratified according to use or nonuse of ICS.,ICS administration attenuated ACE2 expression in mice, an effect that was reversed by exogenous IFN-β administration, and Ifnar1−/− mice had reduced ACE2 expression, indicating that type I interferon contributes mechanistically to this effect.,ICS administration attenuated expression of ACE2 in airway epithelial cell cultures from patients with COPD and in mice with elastase-induced COPD-like changes.,Compared with ICS nonusers, patients with COPD who were taking ICSs also had reduced sputum expression of ACE2.,ICS therapies in COPD reduce expression of the SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor ACE2.,This effect may thus contribute to altered susceptibility to COVID-19 in patients with COPD.
1
Acute exacerbations are the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Rhinovirus, which causes acute exacerbations may also accelerate progression of lung disease in these patients.,Current therapies reduces the respiratory symptoms and does not treat the root cause of exacerbations effectively.,We hypothesized that quercetin, a potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent with antiviral properties may be useful in treating rhinovirus-induced changes in COPD.,Mice with COPD phenotype maintained on control or quercetin diet and normal mice were infected with sham or rhinovirus, and after 14 days mice were examined for changes in lung mechanics and lung inflammation.,Rhinovirus-infected normal mice showed no changes in lung mechanics or histology.,In contrast, rhinovirus-infected mice with COPD phenotype showed reduction in elastic recoiling and increase in lung inflammation, goblet cell metaplasia, and airways cholinergic responsiveness compared to sham-infected mice.,Interestingly, rhinovirus-infected mice with COPD phenotype also showed accumulation of neutrophils, CD11b+/CD11c+ macrophages and CD8+ T cells in the lungs.,Quercetin supplementation attenuated rhinovirus-induced all the pathologic changes in mice with COPD phenotype.,Together these results indicate that quercetin effectively mitigates rhinovirus-induced progression of lung disease in a mouse model of COPD.,Therefore, quercetin may be beneficial in the treatment of rhinovirus-associated exacerbations and preventing progression of lung disease in COPD.
Corticosteroid resistance is a major barrier to the effective treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Oxidative stress from cigarette smoke and chronic inflammation is likely to induce this corticosteroid insensitivity.,Quercetin is a polyphenol that has been reported to be an active oxygen scavenger as well as a functional adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator.,The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of quercetin on corticosteroid responsiveness in COPD cells.,Corticosteroid sensitivity was examined in human monocytic U937 cells exposed to cigarette smoke extract (CSE) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected from patients with COPD.,Corticosteroid sensitivity was determined as the dexamethasone concentration causing 40% inhibition of tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced CXCL8 production (Dex-IC40) in the presence or absence of quercetin.,In U937 cells, treatment with quercetin activated AMPK and induced expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2, and consequently reversed CSE-induced corticosteroid insensitivity.,PBMC from patients with COPD showed corticosteroid insensitivity compared with those from healthy volunteers, and treatment with quercetin restored corticosteroid sensitivity.,In conclusion, quercetin restores corticosteroid sensitivity, and has the potential to be a novel treatment in combination with corticosteroids in COPD.
1
Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE-COPD) are associated with accelerated aggravation of clinical symptoms and deterioration of pulmonary function.,The mechanisms by which exacerbations may contribute to airway remodeling and declined lung function are poorly understood.,In this study, we investigated if AE-COPD are associated with differential expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitors (TIMPs) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).,COPD patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy, with either stable disease (n = 53) or AE-COPD (n = 44), matched for their demographics and lung function parameters were included in this study.,Protein levels of MMP-2,-9,-12 and of TIMP-1 and -2 in BAL were measured by ELISA.,Enzymatic activity of MMP-2 and -9 was assessed by gelatin zymography.,We observed that MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were significantly increased in BAL during AE-COPD.,Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation of MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 with FEV1% predicted and a significant positive correlation of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 with RV% predicted in AE-COPD.,None of MMPs and TIMPs correlated with DLCO% predicted, indicating that they are associated with airway remodeling leading to obstruction rather than emphysema.,In AE-COPD the gelatinolytic activity of MMP-2 was increased and furthermore, MMP-9 activation was significantly up-regulated irrespective of lung function, bacterial or viral infections and smoking.,The results of this study indicate that during AE-COPD increased expression of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, and MMP-9 and activation of MMP-9 may be persistent aggravating factors associated with airway remodeling and obstruction, suggesting a pathway connecting frequent exacerbations to lung function decline.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-015-0240-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is closely associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the clinical significance of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is not fully understood in COPD.,Prospective cohorts were established among 118 patients with COPD from March 2013 to July 2014.,Thirty-two age-matched and sex-matched normal controls, who had routine health check-ups during the study period, were included.,Laryngopharyngeal reflux finding scores (RFS) and reflux symptom index (RSI) for LPR were subjected to association analysis with severity and acute exacerbation of COPD during the 1-year follow-up.,The mean age of patients enrolled in the study was 69.2±8.8 years, with 93.2% being male.,Positive RFS (>7) and RSI (>13) were observed in 51 (42.5%) and six patients (5.0%), respectively.,RFS and RSI were significantly higher in patients with COPD than in normal, healthy patients (P<0.001).,RFS was significantly correlated with residual volume/total lung capacity (%, P=0.048).,Scores for diffuse laryngeal edema, erythema, and hyperemia were significantly higher in the high-risk group (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease classification C and D; P=0.025 and P=0.049, respectively), while RSI was significantly higher in the more symptomatic group (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease classification B and D; P=0.047).,RSI and RFS were significant predictors for severe acute exacerbation of COPD (P=0.03 and P=0.047, respectively), while only RSI was associated with severity of dyspnea.,Laryngeal examination and evaluation of laryngeal reflux symptom could be a surrogate clinical indicator related to severe acute exacerbation of COPD.,Further studies of LPR in COPD patients should be considered.
1
Public health is a priority for the Chinese Government.,Evidence-based decision making for health at the province level in China, which is home to a fifth of the global population, is of paramount importance.,This analysis uses data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017 to help inform decision making and monitor progress on health at the province level.,We used the methods in GBD 2017 to analyse health patterns in the 34 province-level administrative units in China from 1990 to 2017.,We estimated all-cause and cause-specific mortality, years of life lost (YLLs), years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), summary exposure values (SEVs), and attributable risk.,We compared the observed results with expected values estimated based on the Socio-demographic Index (SDI).,Stroke and ischaemic heart disease were the leading causes of death and DALYs at the national level in China in 2017.,Age-standardised DALYs per 100 000 population decreased by 33·1% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 29·8 to 37·4) for stroke and increased by 4·6% (-3·3 to 10·7) for ischaemic heart disease from 1990 to 2017.,Age-standardised stroke, ischaemic heart disease, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and liver cancer were the five leading causes of YLLs in 2017.,Musculoskeletal disorders, mental health disorders, and sense organ diseases were the three leading causes of YLDs in 2017, and high systolic blood pressure, smoking, high-sodium diet, and ambient particulate matter pollution were among the leading four risk factors contributing to deaths and DALYs.,All provinces had higher than expected DALYs per 100 000 population for liver cancer, with the observed to expected ratio ranging from 2·04 to 6·88.,The all-cause age-standardised DALYs per 100 000 population were lower than expected in all provinces in 2017, and among the top 20 level 3 causes were lower than expected for ischaemic heart disease, Alzheimer's disease, headache disorder, and low back pain.,The largest percentage change at the national level in age-standardised SEVs among the top ten leading risk factors was in high body-mass index (185%, 95% UI 113·1 to 247·7]), followed by ambient particulate matter pollution (88·5%, 66·4 to 116·4).,China has made substantial progress in reducing the burden of many diseases and disabilities.,Strategies targeting chronic diseases, particularly in the elderly, should be prioritised in the expanding Chinese health-care system.,China National Key Research and Development Program and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
To review and summarize existing literature on the indirect burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the US.,Medline, Scopus, and OvidSP databases were searched using defined search terms to identify relevant studies.,Eligible studies were published in English between January 2000 and April 2012 and calculated the indirect burden of COPD in a US population in terms of prevalence, incidence or costs of productivity loss, disability, morbidity, or mortality.,Of 53 studies identified, eleven met eligibility criteria, with data years spanning 1987-2009.,Estimates of workforce participation range from 56% to 69% among individuals with COPD and from 65% to 77% among individuals without COPD.,Approximately 13%-18% of those with COPD are limited in the amount or type of work they can do and one-third or more experience general activity limitation.,Estimates of restricted activity days range from 27-63 days per year.,Estimates of mean annual sick leave and/or disability days among employed individuals with COPD range from 1.3-19.4 days.,Estimates of bed confinement range from 13-32 days per year.,Estimated mean annual indirect costs were $893-$2,234/person (US dollars) with COPD ($1,521-$3,348 in 2010 [US dollars]) and varied with the population studied, specific cost outcomes, and economic inputs.,In studies that assessed total (direct and indirect) costs, indirect costs accounted for 27%-61% of total costs, depending on the population studied.,COPD is associated with substantial indirect costs.,The disease places a burden on employers in terms of lost productivity and associated costs and on individuals in terms of lost income related to absenteeism, activity limitation, and disability.,Consideration of indirect as well as direct costs is necessary to gain a more complete view of the societal burden of COPD.
1
Recently, two “fixed triple” single-inhaler combinations of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) have become available for patients with COPD.,This review presents the clinical evidence that led to the approval of these triple therapies, discusses the role of ICS in patients with COPD, and presents data on the relative efficacy of “fixed triple” (ICS/LAMA/LABA) therapy vs LAMA, ICS/LABA, and LAMA/LABA combinations, and summarizes studies in which ICS/LABAs were combined with LAMAs to form “open triple” combinations.,Of the five main fixed triple studies completed so far, three evaluated the efficacy and safety of an extrafine formulation of beclometasone dipropionate, formoterol fumarate, and glycopyrronium; the other two studies evaluated fluticasone furoate, vilanterol, and umeclidinium.,Overall, compared to LAMA, ICS/LABA, or LAMA/LABA, triple therapy decreased the risk of exacerbations and improved lung function and health status, with a favorable benefit-to-harm ratio.,Furthermore, triple therapy showed a promising signal in terms of improved survival.,The evidence suggests that triple therapy is the most effective treatment in moderate/severe symptomatic patients with COPD at risk of exacerbations, with marginal if any risk of side effects including pneumonia.,Ongoing studies are examining the role of triple therapy in less severe symptomatic patients with COPD and asthma-COPD overlap.
The goals of COPD therapy are to prevent and control symptoms, reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations, and improve exercise tolerance.,The triple combination therapy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), long-acting beta2 agonists (LABAs), and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) has become an option for maintenance treatment of COPD and as a “step-up” therapy from single or double combination treatments.,There is evidence that triple combination ICS/LABA/LAMA with different inhalers improves lung function, symptoms, and health status and reduces exacerbations.,A new triple fixed-dose combination of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate (100 µg/puff)/formoterol fumarate (6 µg/puff)/glycopyrronium bromide (12.5 µg/puff) has been developed as a hydrofluoroalkane pressurized metered dose inhaler.,Two large pivotal studies showed that this extrafine fixed ICS/LABA/LAMA triple combination is superior to fixed ICS/LABA combined therapy and also superior to the LAMA tiotropium in terms of lung function and exacerbation prevention in COPD patients at risk of exacerbation.,This review considers the new information provided by these clinical trials of extrafine triple therapy and the implications for the clinical management of COPD patients.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by progressive airflow obstruction that is only partly reversible, inflammation in the airways, and systemic effects or comorbities.,The main cause is smoking tobacco, but other factors have been identified.,Several pathobiological processes interact on a complex background of genetic determinants, lung growth, and environmental stimuli.,The disease is further aggravated by exacerbations, particularly in patients with severe disease, up to 78% of which are due to bacterial infections, viral infections, or both.,Comorbidities include ischaemic heart disease, diabetes, and lung cancer.,Bronchodilators constitute the mainstay of treatment: β2 agonists and long-acting anticholinergic agents are frequently used (the former often with inhaled corticosteroids).,Besides improving symptoms, these treatments are also thought to lead to some degree of disease modification.,Future research should be directed towards the development of agents that notably affect the course of disease.
Conventional measures to evaluate COPD may fail to capture systemic problems, particularly musculoskeletal weakness and cardiovascular disease.,Identifying these manifestations and assessing their association with clinical outcomes (ie, mortality, exacerbation and COPD hospital admission) is of increasing clinical importance.,To assess associations between 6 min walk distance (6MWD), heart rate, fibrinogen, C reactive protein (CRP), white cell count (WCC), interleukins 6 and 8 (IL-6 and IL-8), tumour necrosis factor-alpha, quadriceps maximum voluntary contraction, sniff nasal inspiratory pressure, short physical performance battery, pulse wave velocity, carotid intima-media thickness and augmentation index and clinical outcomes in patients with stable COPD.,We systematically searched electronic databases (August 2018) and identified 61 studies, which were synthesised, including meta-analyses to estimate pooled HRs, following Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.,Shorter 6MWD and elevated heart rate, fibrinogen, CRP and WCC were associated with higher risk of mortality.,Pooled HRs were 0.80 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.89) per 50 m longer 6MWD, 1.10 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.18) per 10 bpm higher heart rate, 3.13 (95% CI 2.14 to 4.57) per twofold increase in fibrinogen, 1.17 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.28) per twofold increase in CRP and 2.07 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.31) per twofold increase in WCC.,Shorter 6MWD and elevated fibrinogen and CRP were associated with exacerbation, and shorter 6MWD, higher heart rate, CRP and IL-6 were associated with hospitalisation.,Few studies examined associations with musculoskeletal measures.,Findings suggest 6MWD, heart rate, CRP, fibrinogen and WCC are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with stable COPD.,Use of musculoskeletal measures to assess outcomes in patients with COPD requires further investigation.,CRD42016052075.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are common diseases with a heterogeneous distribution worldwide.,Here, we present methods and disease and risk estimates for COPD and asthma from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) 2015 study.,The GBD study provides annual updates on estimates of deaths, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), a summary measure of fatal and non-fatal disease outcomes, for over 300 diseases and injuries, for 188 countries from 1990 to the most recent year.,We estimated numbers of deaths due to COPD and asthma using the GBD Cause of Death Ensemble modelling (CODEm) tool.,First, we analysed data from vital registration and verbal autopsy for the aggregate category of all chronic respiratory diseases.,Subsequently, models were run for asthma and COPD relying on covariates to predict rates in countries that have incomplete or no vital registration data.,Disease estimates for COPD and asthma were based on systematic reviews of published papers, unpublished reports, surveys, and health service encounter data from the USA.,We used the Global Initiative of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease spirometry-based definition as the reference for COPD and a reported diagnosis of asthma with current wheeze as the definition of asthma.,We used a Bayesian meta-regression tool, DisMod-MR 2.1, to derive estimates of prevalence and incidence.,We estimated population-attributable fractions for risk factors for COPD and asthma from exposure data, relative risks, and a theoretical minimum exposure level.,Results were stratified by Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a composite measure of income per capita, mean years of education over the age of 15 years, and total fertility rate.,In 2015, 3·2 million people (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 3·1 million to 3·3 million) died from COPD worldwide, an increase of 11·6% (95% UI 5·3 to 19·8) compared with 1990.,There was a decrease in age-standardised death rate of 41·9% (37·7 to 45·1) but this was counteracted by population growth and ageing of the global population.,From 1990 to 2015, the prevalence of COPD increased by 44·2% (41·7 to 46·6), whereas age-standardised prevalence decreased by 14·7% (13·5 to 15·9).,In 2015, 0·40 million people (0·36 million to 0·44 million) died from asthma, a decrease of 26·7% (−7·2 to 43·7) from 1990, and the age-standardised death rate decreased by 58·8% (39·0 to 69·0).,The prevalence of asthma increased by 12·6% (9·0 to 16·4), whereas the age-standardised prevalence decreased by 17·7% (15·1 to 19·9).,Age-standardised DALY rates due to COPD increased until the middle range of the SDI before reducing sharply.,Age-standardised DALY rates due to asthma in both sexes decreased monotonically with rising SDI.,The relation between with SDI and DALY rates due to asthma was attributed to variation in years of life lost (YLLs), whereas DALY rates due to COPD varied similarly for YLLs and years lived with disability across the SDI continuum.,Smoking and ambient particulate matter were the main risk factors for COPD followed by household air pollution, occupational particulates, ozone, and secondhand smoke.,Together, these risks explained 73·3% (95% UI 65·8 to 80·1) of DALYs due to COPD.,Smoking and occupational asthmagens were the only risks quantified for asthma in GBD, accounting for 16·5% (14·6 to 18·7) of DALYs due to asthma.,Asthma was the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease worldwide in 2015, with twice the number of cases of COPD.,Deaths from COPD were eight times more common than deaths from asthma.,In 2015, COPD caused 2·6% of global DALYs and asthma 1·1% of global DALYs.,Although there are laudable international collaborative efforts to make surveys of asthma and COPD more comparable, no consensus exists on case definitions and how to measure disease severity for population health measurements like GBD.,Comparisons between countries and over time are important, as much of the chronic respiratory burden is either preventable or treatable with affordable interventions.,Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Efficacy and safety of tiotropium+olodaterol fixed-dose combination (FDC) compared with the mono-components was evaluated in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in two replicate, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III trials.,Patients received tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 2.5/5 μg or 5/5 μg, tiotropium 2.5 μg or 5 μg, or olodaterol 5 μg delivered once-daily via Respimat inhaler over 52 weeks.,Primary end points were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 h (AUC0-3) response, trough FEV1 response and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at 24 weeks.,In total, 5162 patients (2624 in Study 1237.5 and 2538 in Study 1237.6) received treatment.,Both FDCs significantly improved FEV1 AUC0-3 and trough FEV1 response versus the mono-components in both studies.,Statistically significant improvements in SGRQ total score versus the mono-components were only seen for tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 5/5 μg.,Incidence of adverse events was comparable between the FDCs and the mono-components.,These studies demonstrated significant improvements in lung function and health-related quality of life with once-daily tiotropium+olodaterol FDC versus mono-components over 1 year in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.,Lung function and symptomatic benefits of daily tiotropium+olodaterol fixed-dose combination in moderate to very severe COPDhttp://ow.ly/DIKiY
1
Patients with COPD experience lower airway and systemic inflammation, and an accelerated decline in FEV1.,There is no evidence on whether this inflammation changes over time, or if it is associated with a faster decline in FEV1.,A cohort of 148 COPD patients (100 men) was monitored daily for a median of 2.91 years (interquartile range [IQR], 2.1 to 4.8).,At recruitment, median age was 68.5 years (IQR, 62.5 to 73.6) and FEV1 as percentage of predicted (FEV1%Pred) was 38.5% (IQR, 27.7 to 50.3).,During the study, the patients experienced 1,389 exacerbations, a median of 2.52/yr (IQR, 1.48 to 3.96) and FEV1 declined by 40.2 mL/yr or as FEV1%Pred by 1.5%/yr.,Concerning inflammatory markers, sputum interleukin (IL)-6 rose by 9 pg/mL/yr, sputum neutrophil count rose by 1.64 × 106 cells per gram sputum per year, an plasma fibrinogen rose by 0.10 g/L/yr (all p < 0.05).,Patients with frequent exacerbations (≥ 2.52/yr) had a faster rise over time in plasma fibrinogen and sputum IL-6 of 0.063 g/L/yr (p = 0.046, n = 130) and 29.5 pg/mL/yr (p < 0.001, n = 98), respectively, compared to patients with infrequent exacerbations (< 2.52/yr).,Using the earliest stable (nonexacerbation) measured marker, patients whose IL-6 exceeded the group median had a faster FEV1%Pred decline of 0.42%/yr (p = 0.018).,Similarly, a high neutrophil count or fibrinogen were associated with a faster FEV1%Pred decline of 0.97%/yr (p = 0.001) and 0.40%/yr (p = 0.014), respectively.,In COPD, airway and systemic inflammatory markers increase over time; high levels of these markers are associated with a faster decline in lung function.
Background: Combination therapy with a long-acting bronchodilator and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is recommended in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have frequent exacerbations.,The efficacy and tolerability of the combination of budesonide/formoterol have been demonstrated in patients with COPD when administered via the dry powder inhaler (DPI) in a 1-year study and when administered via the hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in a 6-month study.,Objective: This study assessed the long-term efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol HFA pMDI in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.,Methods: This was a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled, multicentre study (NCT00206167) of 1964 patients aged ≥40 years with moderate to very severe COPD conducted from 2005 to 2007 at 237 sites in the US, Europe and Mexico.,After 2 weeks of treatment based on previous therapy (ICSs, short-acting bronchodilators allowed), patients received one of the following treatments twice daily: budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160/4.5 μg × two inhalations (320/9 μg); budesonide/formoterol pMDI 80/4.5 μg × two inhalations (160/9 μg); formoterol DPI 4.5 μg × two inhalations (9 μg); or placebo.,Main outcome measures: The co-primary efficacy variables were pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and 1-hour post-dose FEV1.,Results: Budesonide/formoterol 320/9 μg demonstrated greater improvements in pre-dose FEV1 versus formoterol (p = 0.008), and both budesonide/formoterol doses demonstrated greater improvements in 1-hour post-dose FEV1 versus placebo (p < 0.001).,The rate of COPD exacerbations was lower in both budesonide/formoterol groups compared with formoterol and placebo (p ≤ 0.004).,Both budesonide/formoterol doses were more effective than placebo (p ≤ 0.006) for controlling dyspnoea and improving health status (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire).,All treatments were generally well tolerated.,The incidence of pneumonia was not different for active (3.4-4.0%) and placebo (5.0%) groups.,Conclusions: Budesonide/formoterol pMDI (320/9 μg and 160/9 μg) improved pulmonary function and reduced symptoms and exacerbations over 1 year in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.,Only budesonide/formoterol pMDI 320/9 μg demonstrated greater efficacy for both co-primary variables compared with formoterol DPI 9 μg.,Both budesonide/formoterol pMDI dosages were well tolerated relative to formoterol and placebo.,Supplementary material is available for this article at 10.2165/00003495-200969050-00004 and is accessible for authorized users.
1
The extracellular matrix (ECM) of the lung plays several important roles in lung function, as it offers a low resistant pathway that allows the exchange of gases, provides compressive strength and elasticity that supports the fragile alveolar-capillary intersection, controls the binding of cells with growth factors and cell surface receptors and acts as a buffer against retention of water.,COPD is a chronic inflammatory respiratory condition, characterised by various conditions that result in progressive airflow limitation.,At any stage in the course of the disease, acute exacerbations of COPD may occur and lead to accelerated deterioration of pulmonary function.,A key factor of COPD is airway remodelling, which refers to the serious alterations of the ECM affecting airway wall thickness, resistance and elasticity.,Various studies have shown that serum biomarkers of ECM turnover are significantly associated with disease severity in patients with COPD and may serve as potential targets to control airway inflammation and remodelling in COPD.,Unravelling the complete molecular composition of the ECM in the diseased lungs will help to identify novel biomarkers for disease progression and therapy.,Airway remodelling in COPD refers to alterations of the lung ECM that affect airway wall thickness, resistance and elasticity.,Unravelling such molecular modifications will help us to identify novel biomarkers for disease progression and therapy.https://bit.ly/2LObAga
We sought to assess whether the effects of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) on lung inflammation and remodeling in experimental emphysema would differ according to MSC source and administration route.,Emphysema was induced in C57BL/6 mice by intratracheal (IT) administration of porcine pancreatic elastase (0.1 UI) weekly for 1 month.,After the last elastase instillation, saline or MSCs (1×105), isolated from either mouse bone marrow (BM), adipose tissue (AD) or lung tissue (L), were administered intravenously (IV) or IT.,After 1 week, mice were euthanized.,Regardless of administration route, MSCs from each source yielded: 1) decreased mean linear intercept, neutrophil infiltration, and cell apoptosis; 2) increased elastic fiber content; 3) reduced alveolar epithelial and endothelial cell damage; and 4) decreased keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC, a mouse analog of interleukin-8) and transforming growth factor-β levels in lung tissue.,In contrast with IV, IT MSC administration further reduced alveolar hyperinflation (BM-MSC) and collagen fiber content (BM-MSC and L-MSC).,Intravenous administration of BM- and AD-MSCs reduced the number of M1 macrophages and pulmonary hypertension on echocardiography, while increasing vascular endothelial growth factor.,Only BM-MSCs (IV > IT) increased the number of M2 macrophages.,In conclusion, different MSC sources and administration routes variably reduced elastase-induced lung damage, but IV administration of BM-MSCs resulted in better cardiovascular function and change of the macrophage phenotype from M1 to M2.
1
Research studies have found different prevalence rates for co-morbidities in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of co-morbidities as well as functional limitations in subjects with COPD.,The study was based on a nationally representative sample of the population of Serbia.,Information on the health of the population was obtained from interviews and anthropometric measurements.,In this study we analysed a total of 10,013 respondents aged 40 years or older.,There were 653 subjects with COPD and 9,360 respondents without COPD.,Out of the 10,013 respondents, 5,377 were aged 40-59 years and 4,636 were 60 years or older.,The prevalence of COPD was 5.0% in respondents aged 40-59 years and 8.3% in those aged 60 years or older; the total prevalence was 6.5%.,The most prevalent co-morbidities among respondents with COPD were hypertension (54.5%) and dyslipidaemia (26.5%).,The prevalence of all analysed co-morbidities was higher in respondents with COPD and the difference was highly statistically significant, except for stroke and malignancies, for which the difference was significant.,Analysis showed that respondents with COPD had a higher prevalence of all analysed clinical factors (dizziness, obesity, anaemia and frailty) and functional impairments (mobility and hearing and visual impairment) compared with respondents without COPD.,For those aged 40-59 years the difference was highest for mobility difficulty (four times higher prevalence in COPD patients) and anaemia (three times higher in COPD patients).,Our analysis showed that the most prevalent co-morbidities in COPD were hypertension, dyslipidaemia, chronic renal disease and anxiety/depression.,The finding suggests that health professionals should actively assess co-morbidities in patients with COPD.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequent and often coexists with other diseases.,The aim of this study was to quantify the prevalence of COPD and related chronic comorbidity among patients aged over 40 years visiting family practices in an area of Madrid.,An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in a health area of the Madrid Autonomous Region (Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid).,The practice population totalled 198,670 persons attended by 129 Family Physicians (FPs), and the study population was made up of persons over the age of 40 years drawn from this practice population.,Patients were deemed to have COPD if this diagnosis appeared on their clinical histories.,Prevalence of COPD; prevalence of a further 25 chronic diseases in patients with COPD; and standardised prevalence ratios, were calculated.,Prevalence of COPD in family medicine was 3.2% (95% CI 3.0-3.3) overall, 5.3% among men and 1.4% among women; 90% of patients presented with comorbidity, with a mean of 4 ± 2.04 chronic diseases per patient, with the most prevalent related diseases being arterial hypertension (52%), disorders of lipid metabolism (34%), obesity (25%), diabetes (20%) and arrhythmia (15%).,After controlling for age and sex, the observed prevalence of the following ten chronic diseases was higher than expected: heart failure; chronic liver disease; asthma; generalised artherosclerosis; osteoporosis; ischaemic heart disease; thyroid disease; anxiety/depression; arrhythmia; and obesity.,Patients with COPD, who are frequent in family practice, have a complex profile and pose a clinical and organisational challenge to FPs.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive, chronic respiratory disease with a significant socioeconomic burden.,Exacerbations, the sudden and sustained worsening of symptoms, can lead to hospitalization and reduce quality of life.,Major limitations of previous telemonitoring interventions for COPD include low compliance, lack of consensus on what constitutes an exacerbation, limited numbers of patients, and short monitoring periods.,We developed a telemonitoring system based on a digital health platform that was used to collect data from the 1-year EDGE (Self Management and Support Programme) COPD clinical trial aiming at daily monitoring in a heterogeneous group of patients with moderate to severe COPD.,The objectives of the study were as follows: first, to develop a systematic and reproducible approach to exacerbation identification and to track the progression of patient condition during remote monitoring; and second, to develop a robust algorithm able to predict COPD exacerbation, based on vital signs acquired from a pulse oximeter.,We used data from 110 patients, with a combined monitoring period of more than 35,000 days.,We propose a finite-state machine-based approach for modeling COPD exacerbation to gain a deeper insight into COPD patient condition during home monitoring to take account of the time course of symptoms.,A robust algorithm based on short-period trend analysis and logistic regression using vital signs derived from a pulse oximeter is also developed to predict exacerbations.,On the basis of 27,260 sessions recorded during the clinical trial (average usage of 5.3 times per week for 12 months), there were 361 exacerbation events.,There was considerable variation in the length of exacerbation events, with a mean length of 8.8 days.,The mean value of oxygen saturation was lower, and both the pulse rate and respiratory rate were higher before an impending exacerbation episode, compared with stable periods.,On the basis of the classifier developed in this work, prediction of COPD exacerbation episodes with 60%-80% sensitivity will result in 68%-36% specificity.,All 3 vital signs acquired from a pulse oximeter (pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate) are predictive of COPD exacerbation events, with oxygen saturation being the most predictive, followed by respiratory rate and pulse rate.,Combination of these vital signs with a robust algorithm based on machine learning leads to further improvement in positive predictive accuracy.,International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 40367841; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN40367841 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6olpMWNpc)
To assess the effect of telecare on health related quality of life, self-care, hospital use, costs and the experiences of patients, informal carers and health care professionals.,Patients were randomly assigned either to usual care or to additionally entering their data into a commercially-available electronic device that uploaded data once a day to a nurse-led monitoring station.,Patients had congestive heart failure (Site A), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Site B), or any long-term condition, mostly diabetes (Site C).,Site C contributed only intervention patients - they considered a usual care option to be unethical.,The study took place in New Zealand between September 2010 and February 2012, and lasted 3 to 6 months for each patient.,The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (SF36).,Data on experiences were collected by individual and group interviews and by questionnaire.,There were 171 patients (98 intervention, 73 control).,Quality of life, self-efficacy and disease-specific measures did not change significantly, while anxiety and depression both decreased significantly with the intervention.,Hospital admissions, days in hospital, emergency department visits, outpatient visits and costs did not differ significantly between the groups.,Patients at all sites were universally positive.,Many felt safer and more cared-for, and said that they and their family had learned more about managing their condition.,Staff could all see potential benefits of telecare, and, after some initial technical problems, many staff felt that telecare enabled them to effectively monitor more patients.,Strongly positive patient and staff experiences and attitudes complement and contrast with small or non-significant quantitative changes.,Telecare led to patients and families taking a more active role in self-management.,It is likely that subgroups of patients benefitted in ways that were not measured or visible within the quantitative data, especially feelings of safety and being cared-for.,Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000269033
1
Although respiratory symptoms are characteristic features of COPD, there is no standardised method for quantifying their severity in stable disease.,To evaluate the EXACT-Respiratory Symptom (E-RS) measure, a daily diary comprising 11 of the 14 items in the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT).,Qualitative: patient focus group and interviews to address content validity.,Quantitative: secondary data analyses to test reliability and validity.,Qualitative: n=84; mean (SD) age 65 (10) years, FEV1 1.2(0.4) L; 44% male.,Subject descriptions of their respiratory symptoms were consistent with E-RS content and structure.,Quantitative: n=188; mean (SD) age 66 (10) years, FEV1 1.2(0.5) L; 50% male.,Factor analysis (FA) showed 3 subscales: RS-Breathlessness, RS-Cough & Sputum, and RS-Chest Symptoms; second-order FA supported a general factor and total score.,Reliability (total and subscales): 0.88, 0.86, 0.73, 0.81; 2-day test-retest ICC: 0.90, 0.86, 0.87, 0.82, respectively.,Validity: Total scores correlated significantly (p < 0.0001) with SGRQ Total (r=0.75), Symptoms (r=0.66), Activity (r=0.57), Impact (r=0.70) scores; subscale correlations were also significant (r=0.26, p < 0.05 (RS-Chest Symptoms with Activity) to r=0.69, p < 0.0001 (RS-Cough & Sputum with Symptoms).,RS-Breathlessness correlated with rescue medication use (r=0.32, p < 0.0001), clinician-reported mMRC (r=0.33, p < 0.0001), and FEV1% predicted (r=-0.17, p < 0.05).,E-RS scores differentiated groups based on chronic bronchitis diagnosis (p < 0.01-0.001), smoking status (p < 0.05-0.001), and rescue medication use (p < 0.05-0.0001).,Results suggest the RS-Total is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating respiratory symptom severity in stable COPD.,Further study of sensitivity to change is warranted.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients may suffer from poor sleep and health-related quality of life.,We hypothesized that disturbed sleep in COPD is correlated with quality of life.,In 180 patients with COPD (forced expired volume in 1 second [FEV1] 47.6 ± 15.2% predicted, 77.8% male, aged 65.9 ± 11.7 years), we administered general (Health Utilities Index 3) and disease-specific (St George’s Respiratory) questionnaires and an index of disturbed sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index).,Overall scores indicated poor general (Health Utilities Index 3: 0.52 ± 0.38), disease- specific (St George’s: 57.0 ± 21.3) quality of life and poor sleep quality (Pittsburgh 11.0 ± 5.4).,Sleep time correlated with the number of respiratory and anxiety symptoms reported at night.,Seventy-seven percent of the patients had Pittsburg scores >5, and the median Pittsburgh score was 12.,On multivariate regression, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was an independent predictor of both the Health Utilities Index 3 and the St George’s scores, accounting for 3% and 5%, respectively, of the scores.,Only approximately 25% of the patients demonstrated excessive sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale >9).,Most patients with COPD suffer disturbed sleep.,Sleep quality was correlated with general and disease-specific quality of life.,Only a minority of COPD patients complain of being sleepy.
1
There is limited information about the initiation of triple therapy (TT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care.,This was an observational, population-based study in patients identified from a primary care electronic medical records database in Catalonia from 2011 to 2015 aimed to identify the use of TT in patients with newly diagnosed COPD.,A total of 69,668 newly diagnosed patients were identified of whom 11,524 (16.5%) initiated TT, of whom 8626 initiated TT at or immediately after COPD diagnosis.,Among them, 72.3% were GOLD A/B, 14.6% were frequent exacerbators, and 7.1% had asthma-COPD overlap (ACO).,Variables associated with TT initiation were: male sex, older age, previous exacerbations, ACO, a previous treatment regimen containing an inhaled corticosteroid, previous pneumonia, and history of lung cancer.,A significant number of COPD patients in Primary Care initiated TT shortly after or even before an established COPD diagnosis.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are common diseases with a heterogeneous distribution worldwide.,Here, we present methods and disease and risk estimates for COPD and asthma from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) 2015 study.,The GBD study provides annual updates on estimates of deaths, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), a summary measure of fatal and non-fatal disease outcomes, for over 300 diseases and injuries, for 188 countries from 1990 to the most recent year.,We estimated numbers of deaths due to COPD and asthma using the GBD Cause of Death Ensemble modelling (CODEm) tool.,First, we analysed data from vital registration and verbal autopsy for the aggregate category of all chronic respiratory diseases.,Subsequently, models were run for asthma and COPD relying on covariates to predict rates in countries that have incomplete or no vital registration data.,Disease estimates for COPD and asthma were based on systematic reviews of published papers, unpublished reports, surveys, and health service encounter data from the USA.,We used the Global Initiative of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease spirometry-based definition as the reference for COPD and a reported diagnosis of asthma with current wheeze as the definition of asthma.,We used a Bayesian meta-regression tool, DisMod-MR 2.1, to derive estimates of prevalence and incidence.,We estimated population-attributable fractions for risk factors for COPD and asthma from exposure data, relative risks, and a theoretical minimum exposure level.,Results were stratified by Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a composite measure of income per capita, mean years of education over the age of 15 years, and total fertility rate.,In 2015, 3·2 million people (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 3·1 million to 3·3 million) died from COPD worldwide, an increase of 11·6% (95% UI 5·3 to 19·8) compared with 1990.,There was a decrease in age-standardised death rate of 41·9% (37·7 to 45·1) but this was counteracted by population growth and ageing of the global population.,From 1990 to 2015, the prevalence of COPD increased by 44·2% (41·7 to 46·6), whereas age-standardised prevalence decreased by 14·7% (13·5 to 15·9).,In 2015, 0·40 million people (0·36 million to 0·44 million) died from asthma, a decrease of 26·7% (−7·2 to 43·7) from 1990, and the age-standardised death rate decreased by 58·8% (39·0 to 69·0).,The prevalence of asthma increased by 12·6% (9·0 to 16·4), whereas the age-standardised prevalence decreased by 17·7% (15·1 to 19·9).,Age-standardised DALY rates due to COPD increased until the middle range of the SDI before reducing sharply.,Age-standardised DALY rates due to asthma in both sexes decreased monotonically with rising SDI.,The relation between with SDI and DALY rates due to asthma was attributed to variation in years of life lost (YLLs), whereas DALY rates due to COPD varied similarly for YLLs and years lived with disability across the SDI continuum.,Smoking and ambient particulate matter were the main risk factors for COPD followed by household air pollution, occupational particulates, ozone, and secondhand smoke.,Together, these risks explained 73·3% (95% UI 65·8 to 80·1) of DALYs due to COPD.,Smoking and occupational asthmagens were the only risks quantified for asthma in GBD, accounting for 16·5% (14·6 to 18·7) of DALYs due to asthma.,Asthma was the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease worldwide in 2015, with twice the number of cases of COPD.,Deaths from COPD were eight times more common than deaths from asthma.,In 2015, COPD caused 2·6% of global DALYs and asthma 1·1% of global DALYs.,Although there are laudable international collaborative efforts to make surveys of asthma and COPD more comparable, no consensus exists on case definitions and how to measure disease severity for population health measurements like GBD.,Comparisons between countries and over time are important, as much of the chronic respiratory burden is either preventable or treatable with affordable interventions.,Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with a complex progression of many clinical presentations, and clinically important deterioration (CID) has been proposed in the Western studies as a composite endpoint of disease progression.,The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between 1-year CID and the following long-term clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with COPD who have been reported to have different characteristics compared to the Westerners.,Among Japanese patients with COPD enrolled in the Hokkaido COPD cohort study, 259 patients who did not drop out within the first year were analyzed in this study.,Two definitions of CID were used.,Definition 1 comprised ≥ 100 mL decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), ≥ 4-unit increase in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score from baseline, or moderate or severe exacerbation.,For Definition 2, the thresholds for the FEV1 and SGRQ score components were doubled.,The presence of CID was evaluated within the first year from enrollment, and analyzed the association of the presence of CID with following 4-year risk of exacerbations and 9-year mortality.,Patients with CID using Definition 1, but not any single CID component, during the first year had a significantly worse mortality compared with those without CID.,Patients with CID using Definition 2 showed a similar trend on mortality, and had a shorter exacerbation-free survival compared with those without CID.,Adoption of CID is a beneficial and useful way for the assessment of long-term disease progression and clinical outcomes even in Japanese population with COPD.,The definition of CID might be optimized according to the characteristics of COPD population and the observation period for CID.
Causes of death may be unique and different in Japanese patients with COPD because they are generally older, thinner, experience fewer exacerbations, and live longer than those in other countries.,We investigated the detailed mortality profile in the Hokkaido COPD cohort study, which completed a 10-year follow-up with a very low dropout rate.,We prospectively examined the 10-year natural history in 279 Japanese patients with COPD (GOLD 1, 26%; GOLD 2, 45%; GOLD 3, 24%; and GOLD 4, 5%).,The majority of patients were male, and the average age at baseline was 69 years old.,About 95% of all patients had accurate mortality data.,The risk factors for mortality were also analyzed.,During the 10 years, 112 patients (40%) died.,Their median survival time was 6.1 years (interquartile range: 4.7-7.9 years), and age at death was 79 ± 6 years old (mean ± SD).,Respiratory diseases, including pneumonia, were the leading causes of death in 45 (40%), followed by lung cancer in 24 (21%), other cancers in 18 (16%), and cardiovascular diseases in 12 (11%).,In particular, lung cancer-related death was equally distributed across all COPD stages, with a higher proportion of lung cancer in the relatively younger generation (<64 years old).,Older age at baseline, lower BMI, and severer emphysema were significant risk factors for all-cause mortality.,The unique mortality profile observed in this study should be considered when designing strategies for the management of patients with COPD in any geographic region.
1
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that long-acting bronchodilator combinations, such as β2-agonist (LABA)/muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), have favorable efficacy compared with commonly used COPD treatments.,The objective of this analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of LABA/LAMA with LAMA or LABA/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in adults with stable moderate-to-very-severe COPD.,This systematic review and meta-analysis (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinical trial/manufacturer databases) included RCTs comparing ≥12 weeks’ LABA/LAMA treatment with LAMA and/or LABA/ICS (approved doses only).,Eligible studies were independently selected by two authors using predefined data fields; the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.,Eighteen studies (23 trials) were eligible (N=20,185).,LABA/LAMA significantly improved trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to week 12 versus both LAMA and LABA/ICS (0.07 L and 0.08 L, P<0.0001), with patients more likely to achieve clinically important improvements in FEV1 of >100 mL (risk ratio [RR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.20, 1.46] and RR: 1.44, 95% CI: [1.33, 1.56], respectively, the number needed to treat being eight and six, respectively).,LABA/LAMA improved transitional dyspnea index and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire scores at week 12 versus LAMA (both P<0.0001), but not versus LABA/ICS, and reduced rescue medication use versus both (P<0.0001 and P=0.001, respectively).,LABA/LAMA significantly reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rate compared with LABA/ICS (RR 0.82, 95% CI: [0.75, 0.91]).,Adverse event (AE) incidence was no different for LABA/LAMA versus LAMA treatment, but it was lower versus LABA/ICS (RR 0.94, 95% CI: [0.89, 0.99]), including a lower pneumonia risk (RR 0.59, 95% CI: [0.43, 0.81]).,LABA/LAMA presented a lower risk for withdrawals due to lack of efficacy versus LAMA (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.51, 0.87]) and due to AEs versus LABA/ICS (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: [0.69, 0.99]).,The greater efficacy and comparable safety profiles observed with LABA/LAMA combinations versus LAMA or LABA/ICS support their potential role as first-line treatment options in COPD.,These findings are of direct relevance to clinical practice because we included all currently available LABA/LAMAs and comparators, only at doses approved for clinical use.
Combining two long-acting bronchodilators with complementary mechanisms of action may provide treatment benefits to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that are greater than those derived from either treatment alone.,The efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of aclidinium bromide, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and formoterol fumarate, a long-acting β2-agonist, in patients with moderate to severe COPD are presented.,In this 24-week double-blind study, 1692 patients with stable COPD were equally randomized to twice-daily treatment with FDC aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg (ACL400/FOR12 FDC), FDC aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 6 μg (ACL400/FOR6 FDC), aclidinium 400 μg, formoterol 12 μg, or placebo administered by a multidose dry powder inhaler (Genuair®/Pressair®)*.,Coprimary endpoints were change from baseline to week 24 in 1-hour morning postdose FEV1 (FDCs versus aclidinium) and change from baseline to week 24 in morning predose (trough) FEV1 (FDCs versus formoterol).,Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and improvement in Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score at week 24.,Safety and tolerability were also assessed.,At study end, improvements from baseline in 1-hour postdose FEV1 were significantly greater in patients treated with ACL400/FOR12 FDC or ACL400/FOR6 FDC compared with aclidinium (108 mL and 87 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001).,Improvements in trough FEV1 were significantly greater in patients treated with ACL400/FOR12 FDC versus formoterol (45 mL; p = 0.0102), a numerical improvement of 26 mL in trough FEV1 over formoterol was observed with ACL400/FOR6 FDC.,Significant improvements in both SGRQ total and TDI focal scores were observed in the ACL400/FOR12 FDC group at study end (p < 0.0001), with differences over placebo exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of ≥4 points and ≥1 unit, respectively.,All treatments were well tolerated, with safety profiles of the FDCs similar to those of the monotherapies.,Treatment with twice-daily aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg FDC provided rapid and sustained bronchodilation that was greater than either monotherapy; clinically significant improvements in dyspnea and health status were evident compared with placebo.,Aclidinium/formoterol FDC may be an effective and well tolerated new treatment option for patients with COPD.,Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01437397.,*Registered trademarks of Almirall S.A., Barcelona, Spain; for use within the US as Pressair® and Genuair® within all other licensed territories.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0123-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Inhaled oligonucleotide is an emerging therapeutic modality for various common respiratory diseases, including obstructive airway diseases like asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and restrictive airway diseases like idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).,The advantage of direct accessibility for oligonucleotide molecules to the lung target sites, bypassing systemic administration, makes this therapeutic approach promising with minimized potential systemic side effects.,Asthma, COPD, and IPF are common chronic respiratory diseases, characterized by persistent airway inflammation and dysregulated tissue repair and remodeling, although each individual disease has its unique etiology.,Corticosteroids have been widely prescribed for the treatment of asthma, COPD, and IPF.,However, the effectiveness of corticosteroids as an anti-inflammatory drug is limited by steroid resistance in severe asthma, the majority of COPD cases, and pulmonary fibrosis.,There is an urgent medical need to develop target-specific drugs for the treatment of these respiratory conditions.,Oligonucleotide therapies, including antisense oligonucleotide (ASO), small interfering RNA (siRNA), and microRNA (miRNA) are now being evaluated both pre-clinically and clinically as potential therapeutics.,The mechanisms of action of ASO and siRNA are highly target mRNA specific, ultimately leading to target protein knockdown. miRNA has both biomarker and therapeutic values, and its knockdown by a miRNA antagonist (antagomir) has a broader but potentially more non-specific biological outcome.,This review will compile the current findings of oligonucleotide therapeutic targets, verified in various respiratory disease models and in clinical trials, and evaluate different chemical modification approaches to improve the stability and potency of oligonucleotides for the treatment of respiratory diseases.
Genetic variation may underlie phenotypic variation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in subjects with and without alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD).,Genotype specific sub-phenotypes are likely and may underlie the poor replication of previous genetic studies.,This study investigated subjects with AATD to determine the relationship between specific phenotypes and TNFα polymorphisms.,424 unrelated subjects of the PiZZ genotype were assessed for history of chronic bronchitis, impairment of lung function and radiological presence of emphysema and bronchiectasis.,A subset of subjects with 3 years consecutive lung function data was assessed for decline of lung function.,Four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) tagging TNFα were genotyped using TaqMan® genotyping technologies and compared between subjects affected by each phenotype and those unaffected.,Plasma TNFα levels were measured in all PiZZ subjects.,All SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.,A significant difference in rs361525 genotype (p = 0.01) and allele (p = 0.01) frequency was seen between subjects with and without chronic bronchitis, independent of the presence of other phenotypes.,TNFα plasma level showed no phenotypic or genotypic associations.,Variation in TNFα is associated with chronic bronchitis in AATD.
1
Diet and nutrition may be important modifiable risk factors for the development, progression and management of obstructive lung diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,This review examines the relationship between dietary patterns, nutrient intake and weight status in obstructive lung diseases, at different life stages, from in-utero influences through childhood and into adulthood.,In vitro and animal studies suggest important roles for various nutrients, some of which are supported by epidemiological studies.,However, few well-designed human intervention trials are available to definitively assess the efficacy of different approaches to nutritional management of respiratory diseases.,Evidence for the impact of higher intakes of fruit and vegetables is amongst the strongest, yet other dietary nutrients and dietary patterns require evidence from human clinical studies before conclusions can be made about their effectiveness.
COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) is a major incurable global health burden and will become the third largest cause of death in the world by 2020.,It is currently believed that an exaggerated inflammatory response to inhaled irritants, in particular cigarette smoke, causes progressive airflow limitation.,This inflammation, where macrophages, neutrophils and T-cells are prominent, leads to oxidative stress, emphysema, small airways fibrosis and mucus hypersecretion.,The mechanisms and mediators that drive the induction and progression of chronic inflammation, emphysema and altered lung function are poorly understood.,Current treatments have limited efficacy in inhibiting chronic inflammation, do not reverse the pathology of disease and fail to modify the factors that initiate and drive the long-term progression of disease.,Therefore there is a clear need for new therapies that can prevent the induction and progression of COPD.,Animal modelling systems that accurately reflect disease pathophysiology continue to be essential to the development of new therapies.,The present review highlights some of the mouse models used to define the cellular, molecular and pathological consequences of cigarette smoke exposure and whether they can be used to predict the efficacy of new therapeutics for COPD.
1
Comparative effects on physical activity of mono and dual bronchodilators remain unclear in patients with treatment-naïve chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We sought to compare the changes in physical activity before and after tiotropium and tiotropium/olodaterol treatment in treatment-naïve COPD patients.,A prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, and parallel interventional study was conducted.,Eighty Japanese patients with treatment-naïve COPD were randomized to receive either tiotropium or tiotropium/olodaterol treatment for 12 weeks.,Spirometry and dyspnea index were assessed, and COPD assessment test (CAT) and the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) were conducted before and after treatment.,Evaluation of physical activity was assessed by a triaxle accelerometer over a 2-week period before and after treatment.,There were no differences in the mean age (69.8 vs 70.4 years), body mass index (BMI) (22.5 vs 22.6 kg/m2) and mean % forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%FEV1) at baseline (61.5 vs 62.6%) between the two groups.,Changes in FEV1 (mean±standard error, 242.8±28.8 mL) and transient dyspnea index (TDI) (2.4±0.3 points) before and after tiotropium/olodaterol treatment were greater than with tiotropium treatment (104.1±31.9 mL, p<0.01 and 1.5±0.3, p=0.02, respectively).,Changes in the duration of physical activity with 1.0-1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs) estimated in the sedentary position following tiotropium/olodaterol treatment (−38.7±14.7 min) tended to be reduced more than with tiotropium treatment (−4.6±10.6 min) (p=0.06), although those with ≥2.0 METs numerically increased with both treatments (+10.8±7.6 min for tiotropium/olodaterol vs +8.3±7.6 min for tiotropium, p=0.82).,Tiotropium/olodaterol treatment reduced the duration of physical activity with 1.0-1.5 METs (regression coefficient, −43.6 [95% CI −84.1, −3.1], p=0.04) in a multiple regression model adjusted for cofounding factors such as age, FEV1, total CAT scores, 6MWD, and TDI.,This is the first study to report the impact of dual bronchodilator on physical activity in treatment-naïve COPD patients of Japanese with low BMI.
Combining two long-acting bronchodilators with complementary mechanisms of action may provide treatment benefits to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that are greater than those derived from either treatment alone.,The efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of aclidinium bromide, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and formoterol fumarate, a long-acting β2-agonist, in patients with moderate to severe COPD are presented.,In this 24-week double-blind study, 1692 patients with stable COPD were equally randomized to twice-daily treatment with FDC aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg (ACL400/FOR12 FDC), FDC aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 6 μg (ACL400/FOR6 FDC), aclidinium 400 μg, formoterol 12 μg, or placebo administered by a multidose dry powder inhaler (Genuair®/Pressair®)*.,Coprimary endpoints were change from baseline to week 24 in 1-hour morning postdose FEV1 (FDCs versus aclidinium) and change from baseline to week 24 in morning predose (trough) FEV1 (FDCs versus formoterol).,Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and improvement in Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score at week 24.,Safety and tolerability were also assessed.,At study end, improvements from baseline in 1-hour postdose FEV1 were significantly greater in patients treated with ACL400/FOR12 FDC or ACL400/FOR6 FDC compared with aclidinium (108 mL and 87 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001).,Improvements in trough FEV1 were significantly greater in patients treated with ACL400/FOR12 FDC versus formoterol (45 mL; p = 0.0102), a numerical improvement of 26 mL in trough FEV1 over formoterol was observed with ACL400/FOR6 FDC.,Significant improvements in both SGRQ total and TDI focal scores were observed in the ACL400/FOR12 FDC group at study end (p < 0.0001), with differences over placebo exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of ≥4 points and ≥1 unit, respectively.,All treatments were well tolerated, with safety profiles of the FDCs similar to those of the monotherapies.,Treatment with twice-daily aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg FDC provided rapid and sustained bronchodilation that was greater than either monotherapy; clinically significant improvements in dyspnea and health status were evident compared with placebo.,Aclidinium/formoterol FDC may be an effective and well tolerated new treatment option for patients with COPD.,Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01437397.,*Registered trademarks of Almirall S.A., Barcelona, Spain; for use within the US as Pressair® and Genuair® within all other licensed territories.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0123-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents a major health problem in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries; however, there are no data regarding clinical phenotypes of these patients in this region.,Participation in the Phenotypes of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe (POPE) study was offered to stable patients with COPD in a real-life setting.,The primary aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of phenotypes according to predefined criteria.,Secondary aims included analysis of differences in symptom load, comorbidities and pharmacological treatment.,3362 patients with COPD were recruited in 10 CEE countries. 63% of the population were nonexacerbators, 20.4% frequent exacerbators with chronic bronchitis, 9.5% frequent exacerbators without chronic bronchitis and 6.9% were classified as asthma-COPD overlap.,Differences in the distribution of phenotypes between countries were observed, with the highest heterogeneity observed in the nonexacerbator cohort and the lowest heterogeneity observed in the asthma-COPD cohort.,There were statistically significant differences in symptom load, lung function, comorbidities and treatment between these phenotypes.,The majority of patients with stable COPD in CEE are nonexacerbators; however, there are distinct differences in surrogates of disease severity and therapy between predefined COPD phenotypes.,Distinct phenotypes of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe have differences in symptoms, comorbidities and treatmenthttp://ow.ly/oMZI307ndr5
The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines.,Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them.,This was an evaluation of COPD treatment guidelines published in Europe and Russia in the past 7 years.,Each guideline was reviewed in detail and information about the most important aspects of patient diagnosis, risk stratification and pharmacotherapy was extracted following a standardised process.,Guidelines were available from the Czech Republic, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden.,The treatment goals, criteria for COPD diagnosis, consideration of comorbidities in treatment selection and support for use of long-acting bronchodilators, were similar across treatment guidelines.,There were differences in measures used for stratification of disease severity, consideration of patient phenotypes, criteria for the use of inhaled corticosteroids and recommendations for other medications (e.g. theophylline and mucolytics) in addition to bronchodilators.,There is generally good agreement on treatment goals, criteria for diagnosis of COPD and use of long-acting bronchodilators as the cornerstone of treatment among guidelines for COPD management in Europe and Russia.,However, there are differences in the definitions of patient subgroups and other recommended treatments.,There are important differences between European national COPD guidelineshttp://ow.ly/U2P4y
1
Hand grip strength (HGS) is a simple way of predicting the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in the general population.,However, the practical significance of grip strength in patients with COPD is uncertain.,The aim of this study was to compare HGS between subjects with and without COPD and to evaluate its clinical relevance in patients with COPD by using a national survey.,Data were collected from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.,The study included 421 adults with COPD and 2,542 controls who completed questionnaires, spirometry, and a HGS test.,HGS was compared between subjects with and without COPD, and the association between grip strength, lung function, and quality of life (QoL) was evaluated.,The mean HGS was 33.3±9.1 kg in the COPD group and 29.9±9.5 kg in the non-COPD group; adjusted HGS was 30.9±0.33 kg and 30.9±0.11 kg, respectively (P=0.99).,HGS was not related to forced vital capacity (β=0.04, P=0.70) or forced expiratory volume in 1 second (β=0.11, P=0.24) in multivariable analysis.,HGS was independently associated with the EQ-5D index, but the relationship was stronger in the COPD group (β=0.30, P<0.001) than in the non-COPD group (β=0.21, P<0.001).,The results were similar for each component of the EQ-5D, including mobility (β=−0.25, P<0.001), daily activity (β=−0.19, P=0.01), pain/discomfort (β=−0.32, P<0.001), and anxiety/depression (β=−0.16, P=0.01).,HGS was not different between subjects with and without COPD, but was associated with QoL - including mobility, daily activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression - in patients with COPD.,The HGS test could be used as a marker of QoL in patients with COPD and could assist risk stratification in clinical practice.
Cardiovascular diseases and skeletal muscle dysfunction are common comorbidities in COPD.,Hand grip strength (HGS) is related to general muscle strength and is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, while the results from small selected COPD populations are contradictory.,The aim of this population-based study was to compare HGS among the subjects with and without COPD, to evaluate HGS in relation to COPD severity, and to evaluate the impact of heart disease.,Data were collected from the Obstructive Lung disease in Northern Sweden COPD study, where the subjects with and without COPD have been invited to annual examinations since 2005.,In 2009-2010, 441 subjects with COPD (postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]/vital capacity <0.70) and 570 without COPD participated in structured interviews, spirometry, and measurements of HGS.,The mean HGS was similar when comparing subjects with and without COPD, but those with heart disease had lower HGS than those without.,When compared by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades, the subjects with GOLD 3-4 had lower HGS than those without COPD in both sexes (females 21.4 kg vs 26.9 kg, P=0.010; males 41.5 kg vs 46.3 kg, P=0.038), and the difference persisted also when adjusted for confounders.,Among the subjects with COPD, HGS was associated with FEV1% of predicted value but not heart disease when adjusted for height, age, sex, and smoking habits, and the pattern was similar among males and females.,In this population-based study, the subjects with GOLD 3-4 had lower HGS than the subjects without COPD.,Among those with COPD, HGS was associated with FEV1% of predicted value but not heart disease, and the pattern was similar in both sexes.
1
Pulmonary inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by both innate and adaptive immune responses; however, their specific roles in the pathogenesis of COPD are unclear.,Therefore, we investigated the roles of T and B lymphocytes and group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) in airway inflammation and remodelling, and lung function in an experimental model of COPD using mice that specifically lack these cells (Rag1−/− and Rorafl/flIl7r Cre [ILC2‐deficient] mice).,Wild‐type (WT) C57BL/6 mice, Rag1 −/−, and Rorafl/flIl7r Cre mice were exposed to cigarette smoke (CS; 12 cigarettes twice a day, 5 days a week) for up to 12 weeks, and airway inflammation, airway remodelling (collagen deposition and alveolar enlargement), and lung function were assessed.,WT, Rag1 −/−, and ILC2‐deficient mice exposed to CS had similar levels of airway inflammation and impaired lung function.,CS exposure increased small airway collagen deposition in WT mice.,Rag1 −/− normal air‐ and CS‐exposed mice had significantly increased collagen deposition compared to similarly exposed WT mice, which was associated with increases in IL‐33, IL‐13, and ILC2 numbers.,CS‐exposed Rorafl/flIl7r Cre mice were protected from emphysema, but had increased IL‐33/IL‐13 expression and collagen deposition compared to WT CS‐exposed mice.,T/B lymphocytes and ILC2s play roles in airway collagen deposition/fibrosis, but not inflammation, in experimental COPD.
Recently, two “fixed triple” single-inhaler combinations of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) have become available for patients with COPD.,This review presents the clinical evidence that led to the approval of these triple therapies, discusses the role of ICS in patients with COPD, and presents data on the relative efficacy of “fixed triple” (ICS/LAMA/LABA) therapy vs LAMA, ICS/LABA, and LAMA/LABA combinations, and summarizes studies in which ICS/LABAs were combined with LAMAs to form “open triple” combinations.,Of the five main fixed triple studies completed so far, three evaluated the efficacy and safety of an extrafine formulation of beclometasone dipropionate, formoterol fumarate, and glycopyrronium; the other two studies evaluated fluticasone furoate, vilanterol, and umeclidinium.,Overall, compared to LAMA, ICS/LABA, or LAMA/LABA, triple therapy decreased the risk of exacerbations and improved lung function and health status, with a favorable benefit-to-harm ratio.,Furthermore, triple therapy showed a promising signal in terms of improved survival.,The evidence suggests that triple therapy is the most effective treatment in moderate/severe symptomatic patients with COPD at risk of exacerbations, with marginal if any risk of side effects including pneumonia.,Ongoing studies are examining the role of triple therapy in less severe symptomatic patients with COPD and asthma-COPD overlap.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the most common chronic lung disease in the world, and its associated health burdens and costs are mounting.,Until recently, it was generally accepted that targeting the diagnosis of COPD early in its course was a relatively fruitless effort, since treatments other than already ubiquitous smoking-cessation efforts were unlikely to alter its course.,However, there is strong evidence to suggest that the majority of patients with objective COPD are not aware of their condition, and this leads to a significant delay in diagnosis, more aggressive smoking-cessation intervention, and potential treatment.,Novel methods of diagnostic testing, community health programs, and primary-care provider recommendations hold promise to expand the recognition of COPD in its incipient stages - where recent evidence suggests a rapid decline in lung function occurs and may be prevented if acted upon.,This review explores the evidence to support the efforts to justify programs aimed at early diagnosis, alternative diagnostic strategies that may augment traditional spirometry, therapeutic modalities that could potentially be used in the future to alter early lung-function decline, and emphasizes the necessary cooperative role that physicians, patients, communities, and governments need to play to realize the significant health impact that stands to be gained.
The landmark study of Fletcher and Peto on the natural history of tobacco smoke-related chronic airflow obstruction suggested that decline in the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is slow at the beginning, becoming faster with more advanced disease.,The present authors reviewed spirometric data of COPD patients included in the placebo arms of recent clinical trials to assess the lung function decline of each stage, defined according to the severity of airflow obstruction as proposed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines.,In large COPD populations the mean rate of FEV1 decline in GOLD stages II and III is between 47 and 79 mL/year and 56 and 59 mL/year, respectively, and lower than 35 mL/year in GOLD stage IV.,Few data on FEV1 decline are available for GOLD stage I.,Hence, the loss of lung function, assessed as expiratory airflow reduction, seems more accelerated and therefore more relevant in the initial phases of COPD.,To have an impact on the natural history of COPD, it is logical to look at the effects of treatment in the earlier stages.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the leading cause of death worldwide, and poses a substantial economic and social burden.,Telemonitoring has been proposed as a solution to this growing problem, but its impact on patient outcome is equivocal.,This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate effectiveness of telemonitoring in improving COPD patient outcome.,In total, 106 subjects were randomly assigned to the telemonitoring (n = 53) or usual care (n = 53) group.,During the two months following discharge, telemonitoring group patients had to report their symptoms daily using an electronic diary.,The primary outcome measure was time to first re-admission for COPD exacerbation within six months of discharge.,During the follow-up period, time to first re-admission for COPD exacerbation was significantly increased in the telemonitoring group than in the usual care group (p = 0.026).,Telemonitoring was also associated with a reduced number of all-cause re-admissions (0.23 vs.,0.68/patient; p = 0.002) and emergency room visits (0.36 vs.,0.91/patient; p = 0.006).,In conclusion, telemonitoring intervention was associated with improved outcomes among COPD patients admitted for exacerbation in a country characterized by a small territory and high accessibility to medical services.,The findings are encouraging and add further support to implementation of telemonitoring as part of COPD care.
Objectives To compare standard high flow oxygen treatment with titrated oxygen treatment for patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the prehospital setting.,Design Cluster randomised controlled parallel group trial.,Setting Ambulance service in Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,Participants 405 patients with a presumed acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who were treated by paramedics, transported, and admitted to the Royal Hobart Hospital during the trial period; 214 had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease confirmed by lung function tests in the previous five years.,Interventions High flow oxygen treatment compared with titrated oxygen treatment in the prehospital (ambulance/paramedic) setting.,Main outcome measure Prehospital or in-hospital mortality.,Results In an intention to treat analysis, the risk of death was significantly lower in the titrated oxygen arm compared with the high flow oxygen arm for all patients (high flow oxygen n=226; titrated oxygen n=179) and for the subgroup of patients with confirmed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (high flow n=117; titrated n=97).,Overall mortality was 9% (21 deaths) in the high flow oxygen arm compared with 4% (7 deaths) in the titrated oxygen arm; mortality in the subgroup with confirmed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was 9% (11 deaths) in the high flow arm compared with 2% (2 deaths) in the titrated oxygen arm.,Titrated oxygen treatment reduced mortality compared with high flow oxygen by 58% for all patients (relative risk 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.89; P=0.02) and by 78% for the patients with confirmed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (0.22, 0.05 to 0.91; P=0.04).,Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who received titrated oxygen according to the protocol were significantly less likely to have respiratory acidosis (mean difference in pH 0.12 (SE 0.05); P=0.01; n=28) or hypercapnia (mean difference in arterial carbon dioxide pressure −33.6 (16.3) mm Hg; P=0.02; n=29) than were patients who received high flow oxygen.,Conclusions Titrated oxygen treatment significantly reduced mortality, hypercapnia, and respiratory acidosis compared with high flow oxygen in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.,These results provide strong evidence to recommend the routine use of titrated oxygen treatment in patients with breathlessness and a history or clinical likelihood of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the prehospital setting.,Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12609000236291.
1
The aim of this study was to investigate the plasma inflammatory cytokine levels and their correlations with pulmonary function in patients with asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome (ACOS).,Between January 2013 and December 2014, a total of 96 patients with asthma, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), or ACOS were enrolled, and 35 healthy people were included as a control group.,Fasting plasma interleukin (IL)-4, IL-8, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).,Correlations between the plasma inflammatory cytokine levels and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1/predicted value ratio (FEV1%pred), and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) were analyzed.,IL-4 and IL-8 levels showed statistically significant differences among the 3 groups of patients (both P<0.001); IL-4 level was significantly lower, while IL-8 level was significantly higher in the AECOPD group and ACOS group than those in the asthma group (all P<0.05).,IL-10 level and TNF-α level were significantly different among the 3 patient groups (both P<0.001).,IL-10 level was significantly different between each of the 2 groups (all P<0.001).,TNF-α level in the asthma group was higher than in the AECOPD group and ACOS group (both P<0.001).,IL-4 and IL-10 were positively and IL-8 and TNF-α were negatively related with FEV1, FEV1%pred, and FEV1/FVC.,Plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines IL-4, IL-8, IL-10, and TNF-α are related with severity of airway diseases and could be potential markers for the evaluation of asthma, COPD, and ACOS.
Chronic airway inflammation and airway remodeling are the major pathophysiological characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Resveratrol and genistein have been previously demonstrated to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties.,The present study aimed to measure the inhibitory effects of resveratrol and genistein on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 concentration in patients with COPD.,Lymphocytes were isolated from the blood of 34 patients with COPD and 30 healthy subjects, then randomly divided into the following four treatment groups: Control, dexamethasone (0.5 µmol/l), resveratrol (12.5 µmol/l) and genistein (25 µmol/l) groups.,After 1 h of treatment, 100 µl lymphocytes were collected for nuclear factor (NF)-κB immunocytochemical staining.,After 48 h treatment, the supernatant of the lymphocytes was collected for analysis of TNF-α and MMP-9 concentration levels.,The percentage of lymphocytes with positive nuclear NF-κB expression was analyzed by immunocytochemical staining.,The concentration levels of TNF-α and MMP-9 were measured using radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively.,The present study demonstrated that the percentage of NF-κB-positive cells, and the levels of TNF-α and MMP-9 in lymphocytes from patients with COPD patients were significantly higher compared with healthy subjects.,Additionally, there were positive correlations between the percentage of NF-κB-positive cells, and the concentration levels of TNF-α and MMP-9 in patients with COPD.,All three factors were significantly reduced in lymphocytes treated with resveratrol and genistein, and the inhibitory effects of resveratrol on NF-κB, TNF-α and MMP-9 were more potent than the effects of genistein.,In conclusion, resveratrol and genistein may inhibit the NF-κB, TNF-α and MMP-9-associated pathways in patients with COPD.,It is suggested that resveratrol and genistein may be potential drugs candidates for use in the treatment of COPD.
1
Pro-inflammatory/cytotoxic T cells (IFNγ, TNFα, granzyme B+) are increased in the peripheral circulation in COPD.,NKT-like and NK cells are effector lymphocytes that we have also shown to be major sources of pro-inflammatory cytokines and granzymes.,P-glycoprotein 1 (Pgp1) is a transmembrane efflux pump well characterised in drug resistant cancer cells.,We hypothesized that Pgp1 would be increased in peripheral blood T, NKT-like and NK cells in patients with COPD, and that this would be accompanied by increased expression of IFNγ, TNFα and granzyme B.,We further hypothesized that treatment with cyclosporine A, a Pgp1 inhibitor, would render cells more sensitive to treatment with corticosteroids.,Pgp1, granzyme B, IFNγ and TNFα expression were measured in peripheral blood T, NK and NKT-like cells from COPD patients and control subjects (± cyclosporine A and prednisolone) following in vitro stimulation and results correlated with uptake of efflux dye Calcein-AM using flow cytometry.,There was increased Pgp1 expression by peripheral blood T, NKT-like and NK cells co-expressing IFNγ, TNFα and granzyme B in COPD patients compared with controls (e.g.,%IFNγ/Pgp1 T, NKT-like, NK for COPD (Control): 25(6), 54(27), 39(23)).,There was an inverse correlation between Pgp1 expression and Calcein-AM uptake.,Treatment with 2.5 ng/ml cylosporin A and10-6 M prednisolone resulted in synergistic inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines in Pgp1 + cells (p < 0.05 for all).,Treatment strategies that target Pgp1 in T, NKT-like and NK cells may reduce systemic inflammatory mediators in COPD and improve patient morbidity.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) on T cells can modulate their responses, however, the extent and significance of TLR expression by lung T cells, NK cells, or NKT cells in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unknown.,Lung tissue collected from clinically-indicated resections (n = 34) was used either: (a) to compare the expression of TLR1, TLR2, TLR2/1, TLR3, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6 and TLR9 on lung CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, NK cells and NKT cells from smokers with or without COPD; or (b) to isolate CD8+ T cells for culture with anti-CD3ε without or with various TLR ligands.,We measured protein expression of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-13, perforin, granzyme A, granzyme B, soluble FasL, CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL11, and CXCL9 in supernatants.,All the lung subsets analyzed demonstrated low levels of specific TLR expression, but the percentage of CD8+ T cells expressing TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR6 and TLR2/1 was significantly increased in COPD subjects relative to those without COPD.,In contrast, from the same subjects, only TLR2/1 and TLR2 on lung CD4+ T cells and CD8+ NKT cells, respectively, showed a significant increase in COPD and there was no difference in TLR expression on lung CD56+ NK cells.,Production of the Tc1 cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α by lung CD8+ T cells were significantly increased via co-stimulation by Pam3CSK4, a specific TLR2/1 ligand, but not by other agonists.,Furthermore, this increase in cytokine production was specific to lung CD8+ T cells from patients with COPD as compared to lung CD8+ T cells from smokers without COPD.,These data suggest that as lung function worsens in COPD, the auto-aggressive behavior of lung CD8+ T cells could increase in response to microbial TLR ligands, specifically ligands against TLR2/1.
1
Cardiovascular disease is a primary cause of death in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Beta-blockers have been proved to reduce morbidity and improve survival in patients with cardiac diseases.,But the effects of beta-blockers on outcomes in patients with COPD remain controversial.,The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the effect of beta-blockers on mortality and exacerbation in patients with COPD.,An extensive search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane was performed to retrieve the studies of beta-blockers treatment in patients with COPD.,The random effects model meta-analysis was used to evaluate effect on overall mortality and exacerbation of COPD.,Fifteen original observational cohort studies with a follow-up time from 1 to 7.2 years were included.,The results revealed that beta-blockers treatment significantly decreased the risk of overall mortality and exacerbation of COPD.,The relative risk (RR) for overall mortality was 0.72 (0.63 to 0.83), and for exacerbation of COPD was 0.63 (0.57 to 0.71).,In subgroup analysis of COPD patients with coronary heart disease or heart failure, the risk for overall mortality was 0.64 (0.54-0.76) and 0.74 (0.58-0.93), respectively.,The findings of this meta-analysis confirmed that beta-blocker use in patients with COPD may not only decrease the risk of overall mortality but also reduce the risk of exacerbation of COPD.,Beta-blocker prescription for cardiovascular diseases needs to improve in COPD patients.
Health status provides valuable information, complementary to spirometry and improvement of health status has become an important treatment goal in COPD management.,We compared the usefulness and validity of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), two simple questionnaires, in comparison with the St.,George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).,We administered the CAT, CCQ and SGRQ in patients with COPD stage I-IV during three visits.,Spirometry, 6 MWT, MRC scale, BODE index, and patients perspectives on questionnaires were recorded in all visits.,Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) was used to calculate the Minimal Clinical Important Difference (MCID) of all questionnaires.,We enrolled 90 COPD patients.,Cronbach's alpha for both CAT and CCQ was high (0.86 and 0.89, respectively).,Patients with severe COPD reported worse health status compared to milder subgroups.,CAT and CCQ correlated significantly (rho =0.64, p < 0.01) and both with the SGRQ (rho = 0.65; CAT and rho = 0.77; CCQ, p < 0.01).,Both questionnaires exhibited a weak correlation with lung function (rho = −0.35;CAT and rho = −0.41; CCQ, p < 0.01).,Their reproducibility was high; CAT: ICC = 0.94 (CI 0.92-0.96), total CCQ ICC = 0.95 (0.92-0.96) and SGRQ = 0.97 (CI 0.95-0.98).,The MCID calculated using the SEM method showed results similar to previous studies of 3.76 for the CAT, 0.41 for the CCQ and 4.84 for SGRQ.,Patients suggested both CAT and CCQ as easier tools than SGRQ in terms of complexity and time considerations.,More than half of patients preferred CCQ instead of CAT.,The CAT and CCQ have similar psychometric properties with a slight advantage for CCQ based mainly on patients’ preference and are both valid and reliable questionnaires to assess health status in COPD patients.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients are at increased risk of poor outcome from Coronavirus disease (COVID-19).,Early data suggest elevated Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) receptor angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) expression, but relationships to disease phenotype and downstream regulators of inflammation in the Renin-Angiotensin system (RAS) are unknown.,We aimed to determine the relationship between RAS gene expression relevant to SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lung with disease characteristics in COPD, and the regulation of newly identified SARS-CoV-2 receptors and spike-cleaving proteases, important for SARS-CoV-2 infection.,We quantified gene expression using RNA sequencing of epithelial brushings and bronchial biopsies from 31 COPD and 37 control subjects.,ACE2 gene expression (log2-fold change (FC)) was increased in COPD compared to ex-smoking (HV-ES) controls in epithelial brushings (0.25, p = 0.042) and bronchial biopsies (0.23, p = 0.050), and correlated with worse lung function (r = − 0.28, p = 0.0090).,ACE2 was further increased in frequent exacerbators compared to infrequent exacerbators (0.51, p = 0.00045) and associated with use of ACE inhibitors (ACEi) (0.50, p = 0.0034), having cardiovascular disease (0.23, p = 0.048) or hypertension (0.34, p = 0.0089), and inhaled corticosteroid use in COPD subjects in bronchial biopsies (0.33, p = 0.049).,Angiotensin II receptor type (AGTR)1 and 2 expression was decreased in COPD bronchial biopsies compared to HV-ES controls with log2FC of -0.26 (p = 0.033) and − 0.40, (p = 0.0010), respectively.,However, the AGTR1:2 ratio was increased in COPD subjects compared with HV-ES controls, log2FC of 0.57 (p = 0.0051).,Basigin, a newly identified potential SARS-CoV-2 receptor was also upregulated in both brushes, log2FC of 0.17 (p = 0.0040), and bronchial biopsies, (log2FC of 0.18 (p = 0.017), in COPD vs HV-ES.,Transmembrane protease, serine (TMPRSS)2 was not differentially regulated between control and COPD.,However, various other spike-cleaving proteases were, including TMPRSS4 and Cathepsin B, in both epithelial brushes (log2FC of 0.25 (p = 0.0012) and log2FC of 0.56 (p = 5.49E−06), respectively) and bronchial biopsies (log2FC of 0.49 (p = 0.00021) and log2FC of 0.246 (p = 0.028), respectively).,This study identifies key differences in expression of genes related to susceptibility and aetiology of COVID-19 within the COPD lung.,Further studies to understand the impact on clinical course of disease are now required.,The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01755-3.
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often suffer concomitant disorders that worsen significantly their health status and vital prognosis.,The pathogenic mechanisms underlying COPD multimorbidities are not completely understood, thus the exploration of potential molecular and biological linkages between COPD and their associated diseases is of great interest.,We developed a novel, unbiased, integrative network medicine approach for the analysis of the diseasome, interactome, the biological pathways and tobacco smoke exposome, which has been applied to the study of 16 prevalent COPD multimorbidities identified by clinical experts.,Our analyses indicate that all COPD multimorbidities studied here are related at the molecular and biological level, sharing genes, proteins and biological pathways.,By inspecting the connections of COPD with their associated diseases in more detail, we identified known biological pathways involved in COPD, such as inflammation, endothelial dysfunction or apoptosis, serving as a proof of concept of the methodology.,More interestingly, we found previously overlooked biological pathways that might contribute to explain COPD multimorbidities, such as hemostasis in COPD multimorbidities other than cardiovascular disorders, and cell cycle pathway in the association of COPD with depression.,Moreover, we also observed similarities between COPD multimorbidities at the pathway level, suggesting common biological mechanisms for different COPD multimorbidities.,Finally, chemicals contained in the tobacco smoke target an average of 69% of the identified proteins participating in COPD multimorbidities.,The network medicine approach presented here allowed the identification of plausible molecular links between COPD and comorbid diseases, and showed that many of them are targets of the tobacco exposome, proposing new areas of research for understanding the molecular underpinning of COPD multimorbidities.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0111-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Revefenacin is a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) in clinical development for the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,In a dose-ranging study, nebulized once-daily revefenacin had a long duration of action in patients after 7 days’ administration of doses up to 700 μg.,In this multiple-dose study, the bronchodilation efficacy and adverse events profile were characterized in patients administered nebulized revefenacin once daily for 28 days.,A total of 355 COPD patients (mean age 62 years, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] 44% of predicted) were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study.,Inhaled corticosteroids as well as short-acting bronchodilators were permitted.,Once-daily treatments (44, 88, 175 or 350 μg revefenacin or matching placebo) were administered by a standard jet nebulizer, for 28 days.,The primary endpoint was change from baseline in D28 trough FEV1, and secondary endpoints included weighted mean FEV1 over 0 to 24 h and rescue medication (albuterol) use.,Safety evaluations included adverse events, laboratory assessments, electrocardiograms and 24-h Holter profiles.,Revefenacin (88, 175 and 350 μg) significantly improved D28 trough FEV1 over placebo (187.4, 166.6 and 170.6 mL, respectively, all p < 0.001); 44 μg produced a sub-therapeutic response.,At doses ≥88 μg, more than 80% of patients achieved at least a 100-mL increase from baseline FEV1 in the first 4 h post dose compared with 33% of placebo patients.,For doses ≥88 μg, D28 24 h weighted mean differences from placebo for FEV1 were numerically similar to respective trough FEV1 values, indicating bronchodilation was sustained for 24 h post dose.,Doses ≥88 μg reduced the average number of albuterol puffs/day by more than one puff/day.,The 350 μg dose did not demonstrate additional efficacy over that observed with 175 μg revefenacin.,Revefenacin was generally well tolerated, with minimal reports of systemic anti-cholinergic effects.,These data suggest that 88 and 175 μg revefenacin are appropriate doses for use in longer-term safety and efficacy trials.,Revefenacin offers the potential for the first once-daily LAMA for nebulization in patients with COPD who require or prefer a nebulized drug delivery option.,ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02040792.,Registered January 16, 2014.
Combinations of drugs with distinct and complementary mechanisms of action may offer improved efficacy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,In two 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies, patients with COPD were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily umeclidinium (UMEC; 62.5 μg and 125 μg) or placebo (PBO), added to twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL; 250/50 μg).,In both studies, the primary efficacy measure was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at Day 85.,Secondary endpoints were weighted-mean (WM) FEV1 over 0-6 hours post-dose (Day 84) and rescue albuterol use.,Health-related quality of life outcomes (St.,George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and COPD assessment test [CAT]) were also examined.,Safety was assessed throughout.,Both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically significant improvements in trough FEV1 (Day 85: 0.127-0.148 L) versus PBO+FP/SAL.,Similarly, both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically-significant improvements in 0-6 hours post-dose WM FEV1 versus PBO+FP/SAL (Day 84: 0.144-0.165 L).,Rescue use over Weeks 1-12 decreased with UMEC+FP/SAL in both studies versus PBO+FP/SAL (Study 1, 0.3 puffs/day [both doses]; Study 2, 0.5 puffs/day [UMEC 125+FP/SAL]).,Decreases from baseline in CAT score were generally larger for both doses of UMEC+FP/SAL versus PBO+FP/SAL (except for Day 84 Study 2).,In Study 1, no differences in SGRQ score were observed between UMEC+FP/SAL and PBO+FP/SAL; however, in Study 2, statistically significant improvements were observed with UMEC 62.5+FP/SAL (Day 28) and UMEC 125+FP/SAL (Days 28 and 84) versus PBO+FP/SAL.,The incidence of on-treatment adverse events across all treatment groups was 37-41% in Study 1 and 36-38% in Study 2.,Overall, these data indicate that the combination of UMEC+FP/SAL can provide additional benefits over FP/SAL alone in patients with COPD.
1
Alterations in the composition of the lung microbiome associated with adverse clinical outcomes, known as dysbiosis, have been implicated with disease severity and exacerbations in COPD.,To characterise longitudinal changes in the lung microbiome in the AERIS study (Acute Exacerbation and Respiratory InfectionS in COPD) and their relationship with associated COPD outcomes.,We surveyed 584 sputum samples from 101 patients with COPD to analyse the lung microbiome at both stable and exacerbation time points over 1 year using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene.,We incorporated additional lung microbiology, blood markers and in-depth clinical assessments to classify COPD phenotypes.,The stability of the lung microbiome over time was more likely to be decreased in exacerbations and within individuals with higher exacerbation frequencies.,Analysis of exacerbation phenotypes using a Markov chain model revealed that bacterial and eosinophilic exacerbations were more likely to be repeated in subsequent exacerbations within a subject, whereas viral exacerbations were not more likely to be repeated.,We also confirmed the association of bacterial genera, including Haemophilus and Moraxella, with disease severity, exacerbation events and bronchiectasis.,Subtypes of COPD have distinct bacterial compositions and stabilities over time.,Some exacerbation subtypes have non-random probabilities of repeating those subtypes in the future.,This study provides insights pertaining to the identification of bacterial targets in the lung and biomarkers to classify COPD subtypes and to determine appropriate treatments for the patient.,Results, NCT01360398.
Azithromycin (AZM) reduces pulmonary inflammation and exacerbations in patients with COPD having emphysema.,The antimicrobial effects of AZM on the lower airway microbiome are not known and may contribute to its beneficial effects.,Here we tested whether AZM treatment affects the lung microbiome and bacterial metabolites that might contribute to changes in levels of inflammatory cytokines in the airways.,20 smokers (current or ex-smokers) with emphysema were randomised to receive AZM 250 mg or placebo daily for 8 weeks.,Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed at baseline and after treatment.,Measurements performed in acellular BAL fluid included 16S rRNA gene sequences and quantity; 39 cytokines, chemokines and growth factors and 119 identified metabolites.,The response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by alveolar macrophages after ex-vivo treatment with AZM or bacterial metabolites was assessed.,Compared with placebo, AZM did not alter bacterial burden but reduced α-diversity, decreasing 11 low abundance taxa, none of which are classical pulmonary pathogens.,Compared with placebo, AZM treatment led to reduced in-vivo levels of chemokine (C-X-C) ligand 1 (CXCL1), tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-13 and IL-12p40 in BAL, but increased bacterial metabolites including glycolic acid, indol-3-acetate and linoleic acid.,Glycolic acid and indol-3-acetate, but not AZM, blunted ex-vivo LPS-induced alveolar macrophage generation of CXCL1, TNF-α, IL-13 and IL-12p40.,AZM treatment altered both lung microbiota and metabolome, affecting anti-inflammatory bacterial metabolites that may contribute to its therapeutic effects.,NCT02557958.
1
The economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations is significant, but the impact of other sources on the overall cost of COPD management is largely unknown.,We aimed to estimate overall costs for patients experiencing none, one, or two or more exacerbations per year in the UK.,A retrospective cohort of prevalent COPD patients was identified in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink UK database.,Patients with information recorded for at least 12 months before and after cohort entry date were included (first prevalent COPD diagnosis confirmed by spirometry on/after April 1, 2009).,Patients were categorized as having none, one, or two or more moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations in the 12 months after cohort entry and further classified by the Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) category of airflow obstruction and the Medical Research Council dyspnea scale.,Study outcomes included counts of general practitioner interactions, moderate-severe COPD exacerbations, and non-COPD hospitalizations.,Estimated resource use costs were calculated using National Health Service reference costs for 2010-2011.,The cohort comprised 58,589 patients (mean age 69.5 years, mean dyspnea grade 2.5, females 46.6%, current smokers 33.1%).,The average total annual per patient cost of COPD management, excluding medications, was £2,108 for all patients and £1,523, £2,405, and £3,396 for patients experiencing no, one, or two or more moderate-to-severe exacerbations, respectively.,General practitioner interactions contributed most to these annual costs, accounting for £1,062 (69.7%), £1,313 (54.6%), and £1,592 (46.9%) in patients with no, one, or two or more moderate-to-severe exacerbations, respectively.,Disease management strategies focused on reducing costs in primary care may help reduce total COPD costs significantly.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are associated with systemic consequences.,Data from a 4-year trial (Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium [UPLIFT®], n = 5,992) were used to determine risk for nonlower respiratory serious adverse events (NRSAEs) following an exacerbation.,Patients with ≥1 exacerbation were analyzed.,NRSAE incidence rates (incidence rate [IR], per 100 patient-years) were calculated for the 30 and 180 days before and after the first exacerbation.,NRSAEs were classified by diagnostic terms and organ classes.,Maentel-Haenszel rate ratios (RR) (pre- and postexacerbation onset) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed.,A total of 3,960 patients had an exacerbation.,The mean age was 65 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was 38% predicted, and 74% were men.,For all NRSAEs, the IRs 30 days before and after an exacerbation were 20.2 and 65.2 with RR (95% CI) = 3.22 (2.40-4.33).,The IRs for the 180-day periods were 13.2 and 31.0 with RR (95% CI) = 2.36 (1.93-2.87).,The most common NRSAEs by organ class for both time periods were cardiac, respiratory system (other), and gastrointestinal.,All NRSAEs as well as cardiac events were more common after the first exacerbation, irrespective of whether the patient had cardiac disease at baseline.,The findings confirm that, after exacerbations, serious adverse events in other organ systems are more frequent, particularly those that are cardiac in nature.
1
The GOLD 2011 document proposed a new classification system for COPD combining symptom assessment by COPD assessment test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores, and exacerbation risk.,We postulated that classification of COPD would be different by the symptom scale; CAT vs mMRC.,Outpatients with COPD were enrolled from January to June in 2012.,The patients were categorized into A, B, C, and D according to the GOLD 2011; patients were categorized twice with mMRC and CAT score for symptom assessment, respectively.,Additionally, correlations between mMRC scores and each item of CAT scores were analyzed.,Classification of 257 patients using the CAT score vs mMRC scale was as follows.,By using CAT score, 60 (23.3%) patients were assigned to group A, 55 (21.4%) to group B, 21 (8.2%) to group C, and 121 (47.1%) to group D.,On the basis of the mMRC scale, 97 (37.7%) patients were assigned to group A, 18 (7.0%) to group B, 62 (24.1%) to group C, and 80 (31.1%) to group D.,The kappa of agreement for the GOLD groups classified by CAT and mMRC was 0.510.,The mMRC score displayed a wide range of correlation with each CAT item (r = 0.290 for sputum item to r = 0.731 for dyspnea item, p < 0.001).,The classification of COPD produced by the mMRC or CAT score was not identical.,Care should be taken when stratifying COPD patients with one symptom scale versus another according to the GOLD 2011 document.
Interactions between spirometry and patient-reported outcomes in COPD are not well understood.,This systematic review and study-level analysis investigated the relationship between changes in FEV1 and changes in health status with bronchodilator therapy.,Six databases (to October 2009) were searched to identify studies with long-acting bronchodilator therapy reporting FEV1 and health status, dyspnoea or exacerbations.,Mean and standard deviations of treatment effects were extracted for each arm of each study.,Relationships between changes in trough FEV1 and outcomes were assessed using correlations and random-effects regression modelling.,The primary outcome was St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score.,Thirty-six studies (≥3 months) were included.,Twenty-two studies (23,654 patients) with 49 treatment arms each contributing one data point provided SGRQ data.,Change in trough FEV1 and change in SGRQ total score were negatively correlated (r = -0.46, p < 0.001); greater increases in FEV1 were associated with greater reductions (improvements) in SGRQ.,The correlation strengthened with increasing study duration from 3 to 12 months.,Regression modelling indicated that 100 mL increase in FEV1 (change at which patients are more likely to report improvement) was associated with a statistically significant reduction in SGRQ of 2.5 (95% CI 1.9, 3.1), while a clinically relevant SGRQ change (4.0) was associated with 160.6 (95% CI 129.0, 211.6) mL increase in FEV1.,The association between change in FEV1 and other patient-reported outcomes was generally weak.,Our analyses indicate, at a study level, that improvement in mean trough FEV1 is associated with proportional improvements in health status.
1
To identify clusters of patients who may benefit from treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2 agonist (LABA) versus LABA alone, in terms of exacerbation reduction, and to validate previously identified clusters of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (based on diuretic use and reversibility).,Post hoc supervised cluster analysis using a modified recursive partitioning algorithm of two 1-year randomised, controlled trials of fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) versus VI alone, with the primary end points of the annual rate of moderate-to-severe exacerbations.,Global.,3255 patients with COPD (intent-to-treat populations) with a history of exacerbations in the past year.,FF/VI 50/25 µg, 100/25 µg or 200/25 µg, or VI 25 µg; all one time per day.,Mean annual COPD exacerbation rate to identify clusters of patients who benefit from adding an ICS (FF) to VI bronchodilator therapy.,Three clusters were identified, including two groups that benefit from FF/VI versus VI: patients with blood eosinophils >2.4% (RR=0.68, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.79), or blood eosinophils ≤2.4% and smoking history ≤46 pack-years, experienced a reduced rate of exacerbations with FF/VI versus VI (RR=0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.96), whereas those with blood eosinophils ≤2.4% and smoking history >46 pack-years were identified as non-responders (RR=1.22, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.58).,Clusters of patients previously identified in the fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (SAL) versus SAL trials of similar design were not validated; all clusters of patients tended to benefit from FF/VI versus VI alone irrespective of diuretic use and reversibility.,In patients with COPD with a history of exacerbations, those with greater blood eosinophils or a lower smoking history may benefit more from ICS/LABA versus LABA alone as measured by a reduced rate of exacerbations.,In terms of eosinophils, this finding is consistent with findings from other studies; however, the validity of the 2.4% cut-off and the impact of smoking history require further investigation.,NCT01009463; NCT01017952; Post-results.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a serious, yet preventable and treatable, disease.,The success of its treatment relies largely on the proper implementation of recommendations, such as the recently released Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD (GOLD 2011, of late December 2011).,The primary objective of this study was to examine the extent to which GOLD 2011 is being used correctly among Czech respiratory specialists, in particular with regard to the correct classification of patients.,The secondary objective was to explore what effect an erroneous classification has on inadequate use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).,In order to achieve these goals, a multi-center, cross-sectional study was conducted, consisting of a general questionnaire and patient-specific forms.,A subjective classification into the GOLD 2011 categories was examined, and then compared with the objectively computed one.,Based on 1,355 patient forms, a discrepancy between the subjective and objective classifications was found in 32.8% of cases.,The most common reason for incorrect classification was an error in the assessment of symptoms, which resulted in underestimation in 23.9% of cases, and overestimation in 8.9% of the patients' records examined.,The specialists seeing more than 120 patients per month were most likely to misclassify their condition, and were found to have done so in 36.7% of all patients seen.,While examining the subjectively driven ICS prescription, it was found that 19.5% of patients received ICS not according to guideline recommendations, while in 12.2% of cases the ICS were omitted, contrary to guideline recommendations.,Furthermore, with consideration to the objectively-computed classification, it was discovered that 15.4% of patients received ICS unnecessarily, whereas in 15.8% of cases, ICS were erroneously omitted.,It was therefore concluded that Czech specialists tend either to under-prescribe or overuse inhaled corticosteroids.
1
Aging is an important risk factor for most chronic diseases.,Patients with COPD develop more comorbidities than non-COPD subjects.,We hypothesized that the development of comorbidities characteristically affecting the elderly occur at an earlier age in subjects with the diagnosis of COPD.,We included all subjects carrying the diagnosis of COPD (n = 27,617), and a similar number of age and sex matched individuals without the diagnosis, extracted from the 727,241 records of individuals 40 years and older included in the EpiChron Cohort (Aragon, Spain).,We compared the cumulative number of comorbidities, their prevalence and the mortality risk between both groups.,Using network analysis, we explored the connectivity between comorbidities and the most influential comorbidities in both groups.,We divided the groups into 5 incremental age categories and compared their comorbidity networks.,We then selected those comorbidities known to affect primarily the elderly and compared their prevalence across the 5 age groups.,In addition, we replicated the analysis in the smokers’ subgroup to correct for the confounding effect of cigarette smoking.,Subjects with COPD had more comorbidities and died at a younger age compared to controls.,Comparison of both cohorts across 5 incremental age groups showed that the number of comorbidities, the prevalence of diseases characteristic of aging and network’s density for the COPD group aged 56-65 were similar to those of non-COPD 15 to 20 years older.,The findings persisted after adjusting for smoking.,Multimorbidity increases with age but in patients carrying the diagnosis of COPD, these comorbidities are seen at an earlier age.
To identify if there is a dose-dependent risk of diabetes complications in patients treated with corticosteroids who have both diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD).,A retrospective study of administrative claims data from the Australian Government Department of Veterans’ Affairs, from 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2008, of diabetes patients newly initiated on metformin or sulfonylurea.,COPD was identified by dispensings of tiotropium or ipratropium in the 6 months preceding study entry.,Total corticosteroid use (inhaled and systemic) in the 12 months after study entry was determined.,The outcome was time to hospitalization for a diabetes-related complication.,Competing risks and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were conducted with adjustment for a number of covariates.,A total of 18,226 subjects with diabetes were identified, of which 5.9% had COPD.,Of those with COPD, 67.2% were dispensed corticosteroids in the 12 months from study entry.,Stratification by dose of corticosteroids demonstrated a 94% increased likelihood of hospitalization for a diabetes complication for those who received a total defined daily dose (DDD) of corticosteroids ≥0.83/day (subhazard ratio 1.94 [95% CI 1.14-3.28], P = 0.014), by comparison with those who did not receive a corticosteroid.,Lower doses of corticosteroid (<0.83 DDD/day) were not associated with an increased risk of diabetes-related hospitalization.,In patients with diabetes and COPD, an increased risk of diabetes-related hospitalizations was only evident with use of high doses of corticosteroids.,This highlights the need for constant revision of corticosteroid dose in those with diabetes and COPD, to ensure that the minimally effective dose is used, together with review of appropriate response to therapy.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a major cause of death and morbidity worldwide, is characterized by expiratory airflow limitation that is not fully reversible, deregulated chronic inflammation, and emphysematous destruction of the lungs.,Despite the fact that COPD is a steadily growing global healthcare problem, the conventional therapies remain palliative, and regenerative approaches for disease management are not available yet.,We aim to provide an overview of key reviews, experimental, and clinical studies addressing lung emphysema development and repair mechanisms published in the past decade.,Novel aspects discussed herein include integral revision of the literature focused on lung microflora changes in COPD, autoimmune component of the disease, and environmental risk factors other than cigarette smoke.,The time span of studies on COPD, including emphysema, chronic bronchitis, and asthmatic bronchitis, covers almost 200 years, and several crucial mechanisms of COPD pathogenesis are described and studied.,However, we still lack the holistic understanding of COPD development and the exact picture of the time-course and interplay of the events during stable, exacerbated, corticosteroid-treated COPD states, and transitions in-between.,Several generally recognized mechanisms will be discussed shortly herein, ie, unregulated inflammation, proteolysis/antiproteolysis imbalance, and destroyed repair mechanisms, while novel topics such as deviated microbiota, air pollutants-related damage, and autoimmune process within the lung tissue will be discussed more extensively.,Considerable influx of new data from the clinic, in vivo and in vitro studies stimulate to search for novel concise explanation and holistic understanding of COPD nowadays.
To determine whether the presence of chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) and reduction of lung function parameters were predictors of mortality in a cohort.,Population based cohorts were followed in Montevideo, Santiago and Sao Paulo during 5, 6 and 9 years, respectively.,Outcomes included all-cause, cardiovascular, respiratory and cancer mortality; exposures were COPD, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC).,Cox regression was used for analyses.,Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, receiver operator characteristics curves and Youden's index were calculated.,Main causes of death were cardiovascular, respiratory and cancer.,Baseline COPD was associated with overall mortality (HR = 1.43 for FEV1/FVC<LLN; 2.01 for GOLD 2-4; 1.46 for GOLD 1-4; 1.50 for FEV1/FEV6 <LLN).,For cardiovascular mortality, significant associations were found with GOLD 2-4 (HR = 2.68) and with GOLD 1-4 (HR = 1.78) for both genders together (not among women).,Low FEV1 was risk for overall and respiratory mortality (both genders combined).,FVC was not associated with overall mortality.,For most COPD criteria sensitivity was low and specificity high.,The area under the curve for FEV1 was greater than for FVC for overall and cardiovascular mortality.,COPD and low FEV1 are important predictors for overall and cardiovascular mortality in Latin America.
1
Obesity is increasingly associated with COPD, but little is known about the prevalence of ectopic fat accumulation in COPD and whether this can possibly be associated with poor clinical outcomes and comorbidities.,The Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) substudy tested the hypothesis that COPD is associated with increased ectopic fat accumulation and that this would be associated with COPD-related outcomes and comorbidities.,Computed tomography (CT) images of the thorax obtained in ECLIPSE were used to quantify ectopic fat accumulation at L2-L3 (eg, cross-sectional area [CSA] of visceral adipose tissue [VAT] and muscle tissue [MT] attenuation, a reflection of muscle fat infiltration) and CSA of MT.,A dose-response relationship between CSA of VAT, MT attenuation and CSA of MT and COPD-related outcomes (6-minute walking distance [6MWD], exacerbation rate, quality of life, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] decline) was addressed with the Cochran-Armitage trend test.,Regression models were used to investigate possible relationships between CT body composition indices and comorbidities.,From the entire ECLIPSE cohort, we identified 585 subjects with valid CT images at L2-L3 to assess body composition.,CSA of VAT was increased (P<0.0001) and MT attenuation was reduced (indicating more muscle fat accumulation) in patients with COPD (P<0.002).,Progressively increasing CSA of VAT was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes.,The probability of exhibiting low 6MWD and accelerated FEV1 decline increased with progressively decreasing MT attenuation and CSA of MT.,In COPD, the probability of having diabetes (P=0.024) and gastroesophageal reflux (P=0.0048) at baseline increased in parallel with VAT accumulation, while the predicted MT attenuation increased the probability of cardiovascular comorbidities (P=0.042).,Body composition parameters did not correlate with coronary artery scores or with survival.,Ectopic fat accumulation is increased in COPD, and this was associated with relevant clinical outcomes and comorbidities.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been classically divided into blue bloaters and pink puffers.,The utility of these clinical subtypes is unclear.,However, the broader distinction between airway-predominant and emphysema-predominant COPD may be clinically relevant.,The objective was to define clinical features of emphysema-predominant and non-emphysematous COPD patients.,Current and former smokers from the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD Study (COPDGene) had chest computed tomography (CT) scans with quantitative image analysis.,Emphysema-predominant COPD was defined by low attenuation area at -950 Hounsfield Units (LAA-950) ≥10%.,Non-emphysematous COPD was defined by airflow obstruction with minimal to no emphysema (LAA-950 < 5%).,Out of 4197 COPD subjects, 1687 were classified as emphysema-predominant and 1817 as non-emphysematous; 693 had LAA-950 between 5-10% and were not categorized.,Subjects with emphysema-predominant COPD were older (65.6 vs 60.6 years, p < 0.0001) with more severe COPD based on airflow obstruction (FEV1 44.5 vs 68.4%, p < 0.0001), greater exercise limitation (6-minute walk distance 1138 vs 1331 ft, p < 0.0001) and reduced quality of life (St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire score 43 vs 31, p < 0.0001).,Self-reported diabetes was more frequent in non-emphysematous COPD (OR 2.13, p < 0.001), which was also confirmed using a strict definition of diabetes based on medication use.,The association between diabetes and non-emphysematous COPD was replicated in the ECLIPSE study.,Non-emphysematous COPD, defined by airflow obstruction with a paucity of emphysema on chest CT scan, is associated with an increased risk of diabetes.,COPD patients without emphysema may warrant closer monitoring for diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia and vice versa.,Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: COPDGene NCT00608764, ECLIPSE NCT00292552.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-164) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Current treatment strategies to stratify exacerbation risk rely on history of ≥2 events in the previous year.,To understand year-to-year variability and factors associated with consistent exacerbations over time, we present a prospective analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort.,We analyzed SPIROMICS participants with COPD and three years of prospective data (n=1,105).,We classified participants according to yearly exacerbation frequency.,Stepwise logistic regression compared factors associated with individuals experiencing ≥1 AECOPD in every year for three years versus none.,During three years follow-up, 48·7% of participants experienced at least one AECOPD, while the majority (51·3%) experienced none.,Only 2·1% had ≥2 AECOPD in each year.,An inconsistent pattern (both years with and years without AECOPD) was common (41·3% of the group), particularly among GOLD stages 3 and 4 subjects (56·1%).,In logistic regression, consistent AECOPD (≥1 event per year for three years) as compared to no AECOPD were associated with higher baseline symptom burden assessed with the COPD Assessment Test, previous exacerbations, greater evidence of small airway abnormality by computed tomography, lower Interleukin-15 (IL-15) and elevated Interleukin-8 (IL-8).,Although AECOPD are common, the exacerbation status of most individuals varies markedly from year to year.,Among participants who experienced any AECOPD over three years, very few repeatedly experienced ≥2 events/year.,In addition to symptoms and history of exacerbations in the prior year, we identified several novel biomarkers associated with consistent exacerbations, including CT-defined small airway abnormality, IL-15 and IL-8.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) constitutes a major health challenge in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries.,However, clinical phenotypes, symptom load, and treatment habits of patients with COPD in CEE countries remain largely unknown.,This paper provides a rationale for phenotyping COPD and describes the methodology of a large study in CEE.,The POPE study is an international, multicenter, observational cross-sectional survey of patients with COPD in CEE.,Participation in the study is offered to all consecutive outpatients with stable COPD in 84 centers across the CEE region if they fulfill the following criteria: age >40 years, smoking history ≥10 pack-years, a confirmed diagnosis of COPD with postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7, and absence of COPD exacerbation ≥4 weeks.,Medical history, risk factors for COPD, comorbidities, lung function parameters, symptoms, and pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical treatment are recorded.,The POPE project is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT02119494.,The primary aim of the POPE study was to phenotype patients with COPD in a real-life setting within CEE countries using predefined classifications.,Secondary aims of the study included analysis of differences in symptoms, and diagnostic and therapeutic behavior in participating CEE countries.,There is increasing acceptance toward a phenotype-driven therapeutic approach in COPD.,The POPE study may contribute to reveal important information regarding phenotypes and therapy in real-life CEE.
1
The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in females appears to be increasing.,Recent studies have revealed that the percentage of women with COPD in Greece is approximately 12.5%.,To evaluate the burden of COPD among males and females in Greece through a nationwide cross-sectional survey and to explore sex differences regarding functional characteristics and exacerbation frequency.,Data collection was completed in a 6-month period.,The present study followed a nationwide sampling approach of respiratory medicine physicians.,The sampling approach included three steps: 1) estimation of expected incidence and prevalence of COPD cases in each prefecture of Greece and in total; 2) estimation of expected incidence of COPD cases per physician in each prefecture; and 3) creation of a frame of three different sampling zones.,Following this sampling, data were provided by 199 respiratory physicians.,The participating physicians provided data from 6,125 COPD patients.,Female patients represented 28.7% of the study participants.,Female COPD patients were, on average, 5 years younger than male COPD patients.,Never smokers accounted for 9.4% within female patients, compared to 2.7% of males (P<0.001).,Female patients were characterized by milder forms of the disease.,Comorbidities were more prevalent in men, with the exception of gastroesophageal reflux (14.6% versus 17.1% for men and women, respectively, P=0.013).,Female COPD patients had a higher expected number of outpatient visits per year (by 8.9%) than males (P<0.001), although hospital admissions did not differ significantly between sexes (P=0.116).,Females had fewer absences from work due to COPD per year, by 19.0% (P<0.001), compared to males.,The differences observed between male and female COPD patients provide valuable information which could aid the prevention and management of COPD in Greece.
The aim of this study is to quantify the burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) - incidence, prevalence, and mortality - and identify trends in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, The Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.,A structured literature search was performed (January 2000 to September 2010) of PubMed and EMBASE, identifying English-language articles reporting COPD prevalence, incidence, or mortality.,Of 2838 articles identified, 299 full-text articles were reviewed, and data were extracted from 133 publications.,Prevalence data were extracted from 80 articles, incidence data from 15 articles, and mortality data from 58 articles.,Prevalence ranged from 0.2%-37%, but varied widely across countries and populations, and by COPD diagnosis and classification methods.,Prevalence and incidence were greatest in men and those aged 75 years and older.,Mortality ranged from 3-111 deaths per 100,000 population.,Mortality increased in the last 30-40 years; more recently, mortality decreased in men in several countries, while increasing or stabilizing in women.,Although COPD mortality increased over time, rates declined more recently, likely indicating improvements in COPD management.,In many countries, COPD mortality has increased in women but decreased in men.,This may be explained by differences in smoking patterns and a greater vulnerability in women to the adverse effects of smoking.,Point your SmartPhone at the code above.,If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear.,Or use: http://dvpr.es/Nl3LKT
1
The causal association between depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unclear.,We therefore conducted a systematic review of prospective cohort studies that measured depression, anxiety, and HRQoL in COPD.,Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], British Nursing Index and Archive, PsycINFO and Cochrane database) were searched from inception to June 18, 2013.,Studies were eligible for inclusion if they: used a nonexperimental prospective cohort design; included patients with a diagnosis of COPD confirmed by spirometry; and used validated measures of depression, anxiety, and HRQoL.,Data were extracted and pooled using random effects models.,Six studies were included in the systematic review; of these, three were included in the meta-analysis for depression and two were included for the meta-analysis for anxiety.,Depression was significantly correlated with HRQoL at 1-year follow-up (pooled r=0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.57, P<0.001).,Anxiety was also significantly correlated with HRQoL at 1-year follow-up (pooled r=0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.48, P<0.001).,Anxiety and depression predict HRQoL in COPD.,However, this longitudinal analysis does not show cause and effect relationships between depression and anxiety and future HRQoL.,Future studies should identify psychological predictors of poor HRQoL in well designed prospective cohorts with a view to isolating the mediating role played by anxiety disorder and depression.
Being overweight or obese is associated with a higher rate of survival in patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,This paradoxical relationship indicates that the influence of nutritional status on functional parameters should be further investigated.,To investigate the impact of nutritional status on body composition, exercise capacity and respiratory muscle strength in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.,Thirty-two patients (nine women) were divided into three groups according to their body mass indices (BMI): overweight/obese (25 ≤ BMI ≤ 34.9 kg/m2, n=8), normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI ≤ 24.9 kg/m2, n=17) and underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2, n=7).,Spirometry, bioelectrical impedance, a six-minute walking distance test and maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures were assessed.,Airway obstruction was similar among the groups (p=0.30); however, overweight/obese patients had a higher fat-free mass (FFM) index [FFMI=FFM/body weight2 (mean±SEM: 17±0.3 vs.,15±0.3 vs.,14±0.5 m/kg2, p<0.01)], exercise capacity (90±8 vs. 79±6 vs. 57±8 m, p=0.02) and maximal inspiratory pressure (63±7 vs. 57±5 vs. 35±8 % predicted, p=0.03) in comparison to normal weight and underweight patients, respectively.,In addition, on backward multiple regression analysis, FFMI was the unique independent predictor of exercise capacity (partial r=0.52, p<0.01).,Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients who were overweight or obese had a greater FFM, exercise capacity and inspiratory muscle strength than patients with the same degree of airflow obstruction who were of normal weight or underweight, and higher FFM was independently associated with higher exercise capacity.,These characteristics of overweight or obese patients might counteract the drawbacks of excess weight and lead to an improved prognosis in COPD.
1
Some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) show increased airway inflammation and bacterial colonization during stable phase.,The aim of this study was to follow COPD patients and investigate chronic colonization with pathogenic bacteria during stable disease phase, and relate these findings to clinical parameters, inflammatory pattern, lung function, and exacerbations.,Forty-three patients with COPD were included while in a stable state and followed up monthly until exacerbation or for a maximum of 6 months.,The patients completed the Clinical COPD Questionnaire and Medical Research Council dyspnea scale questionnaires, and exhaled breath condensate was collected, followed by spirometry, impulse oscillometry, and sputum induction.,Ten patients were chronically colonized (ie, colonized at all visits) with Haemophilus influenzae during stable phase.,These patients had higher sputum levels of leukotriene B4 (P<0.001), 8-isoprostane (P=0.002), myeloperoxidase activity (P=0.028), and interleukin-8 (P=0.02) during stable phase when compared with other patients.,In addition, they had lower forced vital capacity (P=0.035) and reactance at 5 Hz (P=0.034), but there was no difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1 % predicted, forced vital capacity % predicted, exhaled breath condensate biomarkers, C-reactive protein, or Clinical COPD Questionnaire and Medical Research Council dyspnea scale results.,Three patients had intermittent colonization (colonized at only some visits) of H. influenzae during stable phase, and had lower levels of inflammatory biomarkers in sputum when compared with the chronically colonized patients.,The difference in airway inflammation seen during stable phase in patients chronically colonized with H. influenzae was not observed during exacerbations.,Some COPD patients who were chronically colonized with H. influenzae during stable phase showed increased airway inflammation and reduced lung volumes when compared with non-chronically colonized patients.
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) display features of overlap in airway physiology and airway inflammation.,Whether inflammatory phenotypes in airway disease describe similar mediator expression is unknown.,To explore the relationship of airway inflammation and cytokine and chemokine expression in asthma and COPD.,Subjects with asthma and COPD (n = 54 and n = 49) were studied.,Clinical characteristics and sputum were collected at entry into the study.,A 2-step sputum processing method was performed for supernatant and cytospin preparation.,Meso Scale Discovery and Luminex platforms were used to measure cytokines, chemokines and matrix metalloproteinase levels.,Analytes sensitive to dithiothreitol (DTT) that had increased recovery in the 2-step sputum process were IL-1β, 4, 5, 10, 13, IFN-γ, TNFRI, GM-CSF, CCL2, 3, 4, 5, 13 and 17.,There was a differential expression in IL-8, TNFRI and TNFRII between asthma and COPD [mean fold difference (95% CI): IL-8, 2.6 (1.3-5.4), p = 0.01; TNFRI, 2.1 (1.3-5.4), p = 0.03; TNFRII, 2.6 (1.2-5.6), p = 0.02].,In neutrophilic and eosinophilic airway inflammation, TNFα, TNFRI, TNFRII, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-5 could differentiate between these phenotypes.,However, these phenotypes were unrelated to the diagnosis of asthma or COPD.,Recovery of sputum mediators sensitive to DTT can be improved using the described sputum processing technique.,Within airway inflammatory sub-phenotypes there is a differential pattern of mediator expression that is independent of disease.,Whether these inflammatory phenotypes in asthma and COPD confer distinct pathogeneses, therapeutic responses and clinical phenotypes needs to be further evaluated.
1
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are obstructive airway disorders which differ in their underlying causes and phenotypes but overlap in patterns of pharmacological treatments.,In both asthma and COPD, oxidative stress contributes to airway inflammation by inducing inflammatory gene expression.,The redox-sensitive transcription factor, nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB (NF-κB), is an important participant in a broad spectrum of inflammatory networks that regulate cytokine activity in airway pathology.,The anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids (GCs), a mainstay treatment for asthma, involve inhibition of NF-κB induced gene transcription.,Ligand bound GC receptors (GRs) bind NF-κB to suppress the transcription of NF-κB responsive genes (i.e., transrepression).,However, in severe asthma and COPD, the transrepression of NF-κB by GCs is negated as a consequence of post-translational changes to GR and histones involved in chromatin remodeling.,Therapeutics which target NF-κB activation, including inhibitors of IκB kinases (IKKs) are potential treatments for asthma and COPD.,Furthermore, reversing GR/histone acetylation shows promise as a strategy to treat steroid refractory airway disease by augmenting NF-κB transrepression.,This review examines NF-κB signaling in airway inflammation and its potential as target for treatment of asthma and COPD.
In this review we consider the therapeutic potential of targeting Akt for the treatment of COPD.,Akt is a serine/threonine protein kinase that functions as a signaling intermediate linked to multiple signaling programs involved in survival, inflammation, and growth.,Akt is closely associated with key membrane-bound receptors and represents a convergent integration point for multiple stimuli implicated in COPD pathogenesis.,Persistent activation of Akt secondary to somatic mutations in regulatory oncogenes, such as PTEN, may explain why inflammation in COPD does not resolve when smoking is ceased.,Akt is also implicated in the systemic manifestations of COPD such as skeletal muscle wasting and metabolic disturbances.,Furthermore, targeting Akt may provide a useful means of limiting the severity and duration of disease exacerbations in COPD.,As such, Akt represents a particularly attractive therapeutic target for the treatment of COPD.,Interestingly, current knowledge suggests that both inhibitors and activators of Akt may be useful for treating different clinical subpopulations of COPD patients.
1
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at risk of exacerbations and pneumonia; how the risk factors interact is unclear.,This post-hoc, pooled analysis included studies of COPD patients treated with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2 agonist (LABA) combinations and comparator arms of ICS, LABA, and/or placebo.,Backward elimination via Cox’s proportional hazards regression modelling evaluated which combination of risk factors best predicts time to first (a) pneumonia, and (b) moderate/severe COPD exacerbation.,Five studies contributed: NCT01009463, NCT01017952, NCT00144911, NCT00115492, and NCT00268216.,Low body mass index (BMI), exacerbation history, worsening lung function (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] stage), and ICS treatment were identified as factors increasing pneumonia risk.,BMI was the only pneumonia risk factor influenced by ICS treatment, with ICS further increasing risk for those with BMI <25 kg/m2.,The modelled probability of pneumonia varied between 3 and 12% during the first year.,Higher exacerbation risk was associated with a history of exacerbations, poorer lung function (GOLD stage), female sex and absence of ICS treatment.,The influence of the other exacerbation risk factors was not modified by ICS treatment.,Modelled probabilities of an exacerbation varied between 31 and 82% during the first year.,The probability of an exacerbation was considerably higher than for pneumonia.,ICS reduced exacerbations but did not influence the effect of risks associated with prior exacerbation history, GOLD stage, or female sex.,The only identified risk factor for ICS-induced pneumonia was BMI <25 kg/m2.,Analyses of this type may help the development of COPD risk equations.
There is no clinically useful score to predict chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations.,We aimed to derive this by analyzing data from three existing COPD clinical trials of budesonide/formoterol, formoterol, or placebo in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD and a history of exacerbations in the previous year.,Predictive variables were selected using Cox regression for time to first severe COPD exacerbation.,We determined absolute risk estimates for an exacerbation by identifying variables in a binomial model, adjusting for observation time, study, and treatment.,The model was further reduced to clinically useful variables and the final regression coefficients scaled to obtain risk scores of 0-100 to predict an exacerbation within 6 months.,Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the corresponding C-index were used to investigate the discriminatory properties of predictive variables.,The best predictors of an exacerbation in the next 6 months were more COPD maintenance medications prior to the trial, higher mean daily reliever use, more exacerbations during the previous year, lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity ratio, and female sex.,Using these risk variables, we developed a score to predict short-term (6-month) risk of COPD exacerbations (SCOPEX).,Budesonide/formoterol reduced future exacerbation risk more than formoterol or as-needed short-acting β2-agonist (salbutamol).,SCOPEX incorporates easily identifiable patient characteristics and can be readily applied in clinical practice to target therapy to reduce COPD exacerbations in patients at the highest risk.
1
Mouse models are useful for studying cigarette smoke (CS)-induced chronic pulmonary pathologies such as lung emphysema.,To enhance translation of large-scale omics data from mechanistic studies into pathophysiological changes, we have developed computational tools based on reverse causal reasoning (RCR).,In the present study we applied a systems biology approach leveraging RCR to identify molecular mechanistic explanations of pathophysiological changes associated with CS-induced lung emphysema in susceptible mice.,The lung transcriptomes of five mouse models (C57BL/6, ApoE−/−, A/J, CD1, and Nrf2−/−) were analyzed following 5-7 months of CS exposure.,We predicted 39 molecular changes mostly related to inflammatory processes including known key emphysema drivers such as NF-κB and TLR4 signaling, and increased levels of TNF-α, CSF2, and several interleukins.,More importantly, RCR predicted potential molecular mechanisms that are less well-established, including increased transcriptional activity of PU.1, STAT1, C/EBP, FOXM1, YY1, and N-COR, and reduced protein abundance of ITGB6 and CFTR.,We corroborated several predictions using targeted proteomic approaches, demonstrating increased abundance of CSF2, C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, PU.1, BRCA1, and STAT1.,These systems biology-derived candidate mechanisms common to susceptible mouse models may enhance understanding of CS-induced molecular processes underlying emphysema development in mice and their relevancy for human chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00011-015-0820-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Links between epithelial ion channels and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) are emerging through animal model and in vitro studies.,However, clinical correlations between fluid-regulating channel proteins and lung function in COPD remain to be elucidated.,To quantitatively measure epithelial sodium channels (ENaC), cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), and aquaporin 5 (AQP5) proteins in human COPD lungs and to analyze the correlation with declining lung function, quantitative western blots were used.,Spearman tests were performed to identify correlations between channel proteins and lung function.,The expression of α and β ENaC subunits was augmented and inversely associated with lung function.,In contrast, both total and alveolar type I (ATI) and II (ATII)-specific CFTR proteins were reduced.,The expression level of CFTR proteins was associated with FEV1 positively.,Abundance of AQP5 proteins and extracellular superoxide dismutase (SOD3) was decreased and correlated with spirometry test results and gas exchange positively.,Furthermore, these channel proteins were significantly associated with severity of disease.,Our study demonstrates that expression of ENaC, AQP5, and CFTR proteins in human COPD lungs is quantitatively associated with lung function and severity of COPD.,These apically located fluid-regulating channels may thereby serve as biomarkers and potent druggable targets of COPD.
1
An increasing body of evidence suggests that the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combination appears to play an important role in maximizing bronchodilation, with studies to date indicating that combining different classes of bronchodilators may result in significantly greater improvements in lung function compared to the use of a single drug, and that these combinations are well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,An inhaled, fixed-dose combination of two 24-hour bronchodilators, the LAMA umeclidinium and the LABA vilanterol, is under development as a once-daily treatment for COPD.,The efficacy of both mono-components has already been demonstrated.,The information currently available suggests that umeclidinium/vilanterol is an effective once-daily dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination in the treatment of COPD.,However, it remains to be seen if it compares favorably with current therapies.,Moreover, the question remains whether umeclidinium/vilanterol fixed-dose combination, which significantly improves FEV1, is also associated with improvements in other outcome measures that are important to COPD patients.
NVA237 is a once-daily dry-powder formulation of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium bromide in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The glycopyrronium bromide in COPD airways clinical study 1 (GLOW1) evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of NVA237 in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,Patients with COPD with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack-years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 80% and ≥ 30% predicted normal and FEV1/forced vital capacity < 0.70 were enrolled.,Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with NVA237 50 μg once daily or placebo for 26 weeks with inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids or H1 antagonists permitted in patients stabilized on them prior to study entry.,The primary outcome measure was trough FEV1 at Week 12.,A total of 822 patients were randomized to NVA237 (n = 552) or placebo (n = 270).,Least squares mean (± standard error) trough FEV1 at Week 12 was significantly higher in patients receiving NVA237 (1.408 ± 0.0105 L), versus placebo (1.301 ± 0.0137 L; treatment difference 108 ± 14.8 mL, p < 0.001).,Significant improvements in trough FEV1 were apparent at the end of Day 1 and sustained through Week 26.,FEV1 was significantly improved in the NVA237 group versus placebo throughout the 24-hour periods on Day 1 and at Weeks 12 and 26, and at all other visits and timepoints.,Transition dyspnoea index focal scores and St.,George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores were significantly improved with NVA237 versus placebo at Week 26, with treatment differences of 1.04 (p < 0.001) and-2.81 (p = 0.004), respectively.,NVA237 significantly reduced the risk of first moderate/severe COPD exacerbation by 31% (p = 0.023) and use of rescue medication by 0.46 puffs per day (p = 0.005), versus placebo.,NVA237 was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile, with a low frequency of cardiac and typical antimuscarinic adverse effects.,Once-daily NVA237 was safe and well tolerated and provided rapid, sustained improvements in lung function, improvements in dyspnoea, and health-related quality of life, and reduced the risk of exacerbations and the use of rescue medication.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01005901
1
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene I/D polymorphism has been studied in relation to the susceptibility to COPD and COPD with pulmonary hypertension (PH) with inconclusive results.,We performed the first comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate accurately the association between the ACE gene polymorphism and the risk of COPD.,Data were analyzed using odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% CIs to measure the strength of the models.,Subgroup analyses were conducted by ethnicity and complication which referred to PH.,In total, 15 studies (2,635 participants) were included in our study, of which four studies (288 participants) were for PH subgroup.,The overall analysis results indicated that the ACE gene polymorphism was not associated with COPD susceptibility in all gene models.,However, the ethnic subgroup analysis results indicated that ACE gene polymorphism was associated with Asians’ susceptibility to COPD (DD+DI vs II, OR=1.47, P=0.019, 95% CI: 1.07-2.02).,Further, the overall results of the present study detected no statistical significance between ACE gene polymorphism and the risk of COPD with PH, but the homozygote variant (DD) increased the risk of PH in Asian COPD patients (DD vs ID+II, OR=2.05, P=0.05, 95% CI: 1.00-4.19).,The current study suggests that ACE polymorphism, particularly the homozygote variant (DD), might contribute to the risk of COPD and COPD with PH among Asians.,Further studies with larger sample size and more ethnicities are expected to be conducted in the future to validate the results.
Substantial evidence suggests that there is genetic susceptibility to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,To identify common genetic risk variants, we performed a genome-wide association study in 2940 cases and 1380 smoking controls with normal lung function.,We demonstrate a novel susceptibility locus at 4q22.1 in FAM13A (rs7671167, OR=0.76, P=8.6×10−8) and provide evidence of replication in one case-control and two family-based cohorts (for all studies, combined P=1.2×10−11).
1
Using a mobile health (mHealth) intervention, consisting of a smartphone and compatible medical device, has the potential to enhance chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment outcomes while mitigating health care costs.,The aim of this study was to explore the potential facilitators and barriers among health care providers (HCPs) regarding the use of mHealth interventions for COPD management.,This was a qualitative study.,Semistructured individual interviews were conducted with HCPs, including nurses, pharmacists, and physicians who work directly with patients with COPD.,A flexible prompts guide was used to facilitate discussions.,Interview topics included the following: demographics, mHealth usage, perceptions toward challenges of mHealth adoption, factors facilitating mHealth adoption, and preferences regarding features of the mHealth intervention for COPD management.,Interviews were conversational in nature, and items were not asked verbatim or in the order presented.,The interviews were transcribed verbatim and compared against the digital recordings to ensure the accuracy of the content.,After creating a codebook for analysis, 2 researchers independently coded the remaining interview data using pattern coding.,They discussed commonalities and differences in coding until a consensus was reached.,A total of 30 nurses, physicians, and pharmacists participated.,The main facilitators to mHealth adoption are possible health benefits for patients, ease of use, educating patients and their HCPs, credibility, and reducing cost to the health care system.,Alternatively, the barriers to adoption are technical issues, privacy and confidentiality issues, lack of awareness, potential limited uptake from the elderly, potential limited connection between patients and HCPs, and finances.,It is important to understand the perceptions of HCPs regarding the adoption of innovative mHealth interventions for COPD management.,This study identifies some potential facilitators and barriers that may inform the successful development and implementation of mHealth interventions for COPD management.
As the global burden of chronic disease rises, policy makers are showing a strong interest in adopting telehealth technologies for use in long term condition management, including COPD.,However, there remain barriers to its implementation and sustained use.,To date, there has been limited qualitative investigation into how users (both patients/carers and staff) perceive and experience the technology.,We aimed to systematically review and synthesise the findings from qualitative studies that investigated user perspectives and experiences of telehealth in COPD management, in order to identify factors which may impact on uptake.,Systematic review and meta-synthesis of published qualitative studies of user (patients, their carers and clinicians) experience of telehealth technologies for the management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.,ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsychInfo and Web of Knowledge databases were searched up to October 2014.,Reference lists of included studies and reference lists of key papers were also searched.,Quality appraisal was guided by an adapted version of the CASP qualitative appraisal tool.,705 references (after duplicates removed) were identified and 10 papers, relating to 7 studies were included in the review.,Most authors of included studies had identified both positive and negative experiences of telehealth use in the management of COPD.,Through a line of argument synthesis we were able to derive new insights from the data to identify three overarching themes that have the ability to either impede or promote positive user experience of telehealth in COPD: the influence on moral dilemmas of help seeking-(enables dependency or self-care); transforming interactions (increases risk or reassurance) and reconfiguration of ‘work’ practices (causes burden or empowerment).,Findings from this meta-synthesis have implications for the future design and implementation of telehealth services.,Future research needs to include potential users at an earlier stage of telehealth/service development.
1
Real-world prescription pathways leading to triple therapy (TT) (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] plus long-acting β2-agonist bronchodilator [LABA] plus long-acting muscarinic antagonist) differ from Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence treatment recommendations.,This study sets out to identify COPD patients without asthma receiving TT, and determine the pathways taken from diagnosis to the first prescription of TT.,This was a historical analysis of COPD patients without asthma from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (387 primary-care practices across the UK) from 2002 to 2010.,Patient disease severity was classified using GOLD 2013 criteria.,Data were analyzed to determine prescribing of TT before, at, and after COPD diagnosis; the average time taken to receive TT; and the impact of lung function grade, modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score, and exacerbation history on the pathway to TT.,During the study period, 32% of patients received TT.,Of these, 19%, 28%, 37%, and 46% of patients classified as GOLD A, B, C, and D, respectively, progressed to TT after diagnosis (P<0.001).,Of all patients prescribed TT, 25% were prescribed TT within 1 year of diagnosis, irrespective of GOLD classification (P=0.065).,The most common prescription pathway to TT was LABA plus ICS.,It was observed that exacerbation history did influence the pathway of LABA plus ICS to TT.,Real life UK prescription data demonstrates the inappropriate prescribing of TT and confirms that starting patients on ICS plus LABA results in the inevitable drift to overuse of TT.,This study highlights the need for dissemination and implementation of COPD guidelines to physicians, ensuring that patients receive the recommended therapy.
Health status provides valuable information, complementary to spirometry and improvement of health status has become an important treatment goal in COPD management.,We compared the usefulness and validity of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), two simple questionnaires, in comparison with the St.,George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).,We administered the CAT, CCQ and SGRQ in patients with COPD stage I-IV during three visits.,Spirometry, 6 MWT, MRC scale, BODE index, and patients perspectives on questionnaires were recorded in all visits.,Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) was used to calculate the Minimal Clinical Important Difference (MCID) of all questionnaires.,We enrolled 90 COPD patients.,Cronbach's alpha for both CAT and CCQ was high (0.86 and 0.89, respectively).,Patients with severe COPD reported worse health status compared to milder subgroups.,CAT and CCQ correlated significantly (rho =0.64, p < 0.01) and both with the SGRQ (rho = 0.65; CAT and rho = 0.77; CCQ, p < 0.01).,Both questionnaires exhibited a weak correlation with lung function (rho = −0.35;CAT and rho = −0.41; CCQ, p < 0.01).,Their reproducibility was high; CAT: ICC = 0.94 (CI 0.92-0.96), total CCQ ICC = 0.95 (0.92-0.96) and SGRQ = 0.97 (CI 0.95-0.98).,The MCID calculated using the SEM method showed results similar to previous studies of 3.76 for the CAT, 0.41 for the CCQ and 4.84 for SGRQ.,Patients suggested both CAT and CCQ as easier tools than SGRQ in terms of complexity and time considerations.,More than half of patients preferred CCQ instead of CAT.,The CAT and CCQ have similar psychometric properties with a slight advantage for CCQ based mainly on patients’ preference and are both valid and reliable questionnaires to assess health status in COPD patients.
1
In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience further exacerbations or symptoms, despite being prescribed dual long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) or inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA therapies, triple ICS/LAMA/LABA therapy is recommended.,A previous network meta-analysis showed comparable efficacy of the ICS/LAMA/LABA, budesonide/glycopyrronium bromide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FOR) 320/18/9.6 µg, to other fixed-dose and open combination triple therapies at 24 weeks in COPD.,Subsequently, the ETHOS study was published, including data for 8509 patients, assessing the efficacy and safety of BUD/GLY/FOR over 52 weeks.,This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the relative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of BUD/GLY/FOR 320/18/9.6 µg with other fixed-dose and open combination triple therapies in COPD over 52 weeks, including data from ETHOS.,A systematic literature review was conducted to identify ≥ 10-week randomized controlled trials, including ≥ 1 fixed-dose or open combination triple-therapy arm, in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD.,The methodologic quality and risk of bias of included studies were assessed.,Study results were combined using a three-level hierarchical Bayesian NMA model to assess efficacy and safety outcomes at or over 24 and 52 weeks.,Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were used to assess heterogeneity across studies.,Nineteen studies (n = 37,741 patients) met the inclusion criteria of the review; 15 contributed to the base case network.,LAMA/LABA dual combinations were combined as a single treatment group to create a connected network.,Across all outcomes for exacerbations, lung function, symptoms, health-related quality of life, safety, and tolerability, the efficacy and safety of BUD/GLY/FOR were comparable to those of other triple ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol and beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium bromide/formoterol fumarate) and open combinations at or over 24 and 52 weeks.,Sensitivity analyses and meta-regression results for exacerbation outcomes were broadly in line with the base case NMA.,In this NMA, BUD/GLY/FOR 320/18/9.6 μg showed comparable efficacy versus other ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose or open combination therapies in terms of reducing exacerbation rates and improving lung function, symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD, in line with previously published meta-analysis results of triple combinations in COPD.,The safety and tolerability profile of BUD/GLY/FOR was also found to be comparable to other triple combination therapies.,The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01703-z.
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) treatment combined with long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) reduces the risk of exacerbations in COPD, but the use of ICSs is associated with increased incidence of pneumonia.,There are indications that this association is stronger for fluticasone propionate than for budesonide.,We have examined systematic reviews assessing the risk of pneumonia associated with fluticasone propionate and budesonide COPD therapy.,Compared with placebo or LABAs, we found that fluticasone propionate was associated with 43%-78% increased risk of pneumonia, while only slightly increased risk or no risk was found for budesonide.,We have evaluated conceivable mechanisms which may explain this difference and suggest that the higher pneumonia risk with fluticasone propionate treatment is caused by greater and more protracted immunosuppressive effects locally in the airways/lungs.,These effects are due to the much slower dissolution of fluticasone propionate particles in airway luminal fluid, resulting in a slower uptake into the airway tissue and a much longer presence of fluticasone propionate in airway epithelial lining fluid.
1
Interactions between spirometry and patient-reported outcomes in COPD are not well understood.,This systematic review and study-level analysis investigated the relationship between changes in FEV1 and changes in health status with bronchodilator therapy.,Six databases (to October 2009) were searched to identify studies with long-acting bronchodilator therapy reporting FEV1 and health status, dyspnoea or exacerbations.,Mean and standard deviations of treatment effects were extracted for each arm of each study.,Relationships between changes in trough FEV1 and outcomes were assessed using correlations and random-effects regression modelling.,The primary outcome was St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score.,Thirty-six studies (≥3 months) were included.,Twenty-two studies (23,654 patients) with 49 treatment arms each contributing one data point provided SGRQ data.,Change in trough FEV1 and change in SGRQ total score were negatively correlated (r = -0.46, p < 0.001); greater increases in FEV1 were associated with greater reductions (improvements) in SGRQ.,The correlation strengthened with increasing study duration from 3 to 12 months.,Regression modelling indicated that 100 mL increase in FEV1 (change at which patients are more likely to report improvement) was associated with a statistically significant reduction in SGRQ of 2.5 (95% CI 1.9, 3.1), while a clinically relevant SGRQ change (4.0) was associated with 160.6 (95% CI 129.0, 211.6) mL increase in FEV1.,The association between change in FEV1 and other patient-reported outcomes was generally weak.,Our analyses indicate, at a study level, that improvement in mean trough FEV1 is associated with proportional improvements in health status.
Improving patients' health status is one of the major goals in COPD treatment.,Questionnaires could facilitate the guidance of patient-tailored disease management by exploring which aspects of health status are problematic, and which aspects are not.,Health status consists of four main domains (physiological functioning, symptoms, functional impairment, and quality of life), and at least sixteen sub-domains.,A prerequisite for patient-tailored treatment is a detailed assessment of all these sub-domains.,Most questionnaires developed to measure health status consist of one or a few subscales and measure merely some aspects of health status.,The question then rises which aspects of health status are measured by these instruments, and which aspects are not covered.,As it is one of the most frequently used questionnaires in COPD, we evaluated which aspects of health status are measured and which aspects are not measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).,One hundred and forty-six outpatients with COPD participated.,Correlations were calculated between the three sections of the SGRQ and ten sub-domains of the Nijmegen Integral Assessment Framework, covering Symptoms, Functional Impairment, and Quality of Life.,As the SGRQ was not expected to measure physiological functioning, we did not include this main domain in the statistical analyses.,Pearson's r ≥ 0.70 was used as criterion for conceptual similarity.,The SGRQ sections Symptoms and Total showed conceptual similarity with the sub-domain Subjective Symptoms (main domain Symptoms).,The sections Activity, Impacts and Total were conceptual similar to Subjective Impairment (main domain Functional Impairment).,The SGRQ sections were not conceptual similar to other sub-domains of Symptoms, Functional Impairment, nor to any sub-domain of Quality of Life.,The SGRQ could facilitate the guidance of disease management in COPD only partially.,The SGRQ is appropriately only for measuring problems in the sub-domains Subjective Symptoms and Subjective Impairment, and not for measuring problems in other sub-domains of health status, such as Quality of Life.
1
Comorbidities are frequent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and significantly impact on patients’ quality of life, exacerbation frequency, and survival.,There is increasing evidence that certain diseases occur in greater frequency amongst patients with COPD than in the general population, and that these comorbidities significantly impact on patient outcomes.,Although the mechanisms are yet to be defined, many comorbidities likely result from the chronic inflammatory state that is present in COPD.,Common problems in the clinical management of COPD include recognizing new comorbidities, determining the impact of comorbidities on patient symptoms, the concurrent treatment of COPD and comorbidities, and accurate prognostication.,The majority of comorbidities in COPD should be treated according to usual practice, and specific COPD management is infrequently altered by the presence of comorbidities.,Unfortunately, comorbidities are often under-recognized and under-treated.,This review focuses on the epidemiology of ten major comorbidities in patients with COPD.,Further, we emphasize the clinical impact upon prognosis and management considerations.,This review will highlight the importance of comorbidity identification and management in the practice of caring for patients with COPD.
Never smokers comprise a substantial proportion of patients with COPD.,Their characteristics and possible risk factors in this population are not yet well defined.,We analyzed data from 14 countries that participated in the international, population-based Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study.,Participants were aged ≥ 40 years and completed postbronchodilator spirometry testing plus questionnaires about respiratory symptoms, health status, and exposure to COPD risk factors.,A diagnosis of COPD was based on the postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio, according to current GOLD (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease) guidelines.,In addition to this, the lower limit of normal (LLN) was evaluated as an alternative threshold for the FEV1/FVC ratio.,Among 4,291 never smokers, 6.6% met criteria for mild (GOLD stage I) COPD, and 5.6% met criteria for moderate to very severe (GOLD stage II+) COPD.,Although never smokers were less likely to have COPD and had less severe COPD than ever smokers, never smokers nonetheless comprised 23.3% (240/1,031) of those classified with GOLD stage II+ COPD.,This proportion was similar, 20.5% (171/832), even when the LLN was used as a threshold for the FEV1/FVC ratio.,Predictors of COPD in never smokers include age, education, occupational exposure, childhood respiratory diseases, and BMI alterations.,This multicenter international study confirms previous evidence that never smokers comprise a substantial proportion of individuals with COPD.,Our data suggest that, in addition to increased age, a prior diagnosis of asthma and, among women, lower education levels are associated with an increased risk for COPD among never smokers.
1
Ambient air pollution can contribute to the development and exacerbation of COPD.,However, the influence of air pollution on objective COPD phenotypes, especially from imaging, is not well studied.,We investigated the influence of long-term exposure to air pollution on lung function and quantitative imaging measurements in a Korean cohort of participants with and without COPD diagnosis.,Study participants (N = 457 including 296 COPD cases) were obtained from the COPD in Dusty Areas (CODA) cohort.,Annual average concentrations of particulate matter less than or equal to 10 μm in diameter (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) were estimated at the participants’ residential addresses using a spatial air pollution prediction model.,All the participants underwent volumetric computerized tomography (CT) and spirometry measurements and completed survey questionnaires.,We examined the associations of PM10 and NO2 with FVC, FEV1, emphysema index, and wall area percent, using linear regression models adjusting for age, gender, education, smoking, height, weight, and COPD medication.,The age of study participants averaged 71.7 years.,An interquartile range difference in annual PM10 exposure of 4.4 μg/m3 was associated with 0.13 L lower FVC (95% confidence interval (CI), − 0.22- -0.05, p = 0.003).,Emphysema index (mean = 6.36) was higher by 1.13 (95% CI, 0.25-2.02, p = 0.012) and wall area percent (mean = 68.8) was higher by 1.04 (95% CI, 0.27-1.80, p = 0.008).,Associations with imaging phenotypes were not observed with NO2.,Long-term exposure to PM10 correlated with both lung function and COPD-relevant imaging phenotypes in a Korean cohort.
Patients with severe COPD often develop chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure.,Their prognosis worsens and they are more likely to develop exacerbations.,This has major influence on the health-related quality of life.,Currently, there is no information about the success of long-term noninvasive ventilation (NIV) among patients who receive NIV in acute settings.,Also, little is known about the pathophysiological mechanism of NIV.,Ten Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease stage III and IV COPD patients with respiratory failure who were hospitalized following acute exacerbation were treated with NIV using a Synchrony BiPAP device for 6 months.,Arterial blood gases and lung function parameters were measured.,Low-dose computed tomography of the thorax was performed and used for segmentation.,Further analyses provided lobe volume, airway volume, and airway resistance, giving an overall functional description of the separate airways and lobes.,Ventilation perfusion (VQ) was calculated.,Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated.,PaCO2 significantly improved from 50.03 mmHg at baseline to 44.75 mmHg after 1 month and 43.37 mmHg after 6 months (P=0.006).,Subjects showed improvement in the 6-minute walk tests (6MWTs) by an average of 51 m (from 332 m at baseline to 359 m at 1 month and 383 m at 6 months).,Patients demonstrated improvement in self-reported anxiety (P=0.018).,The improvement in image-based VQ was positively associated with the 6MWT and the anxiety domain of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire.,Though previous studies of long-term NIV have shown conflicting results, this study demonstrates that patients can benefit from long-term NIV treatment, resulting in improved VQ, gas exchange, and exercise tolerance.
1
Introduction: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (in fixed combinations with long-acting β2-agonists [LABAs]) are frequently prescribed for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), outside their labeled indications and recommended treatment strategies and guidelines, despite having the potential to cause significant side effects.,Areas covered: Although the existence of asthma in patients with asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) clearly supports the use of anti-inflammatory treatment (typically an ICS/LABA combination, as ICS monotherapy is usually not indicated for COPD), the current level of ICS/LABA use is not consistent with the prevalence of ACOS in the COPD population.,Data have recently become available showing the comparative efficacy of fixed bronchodilator combinations (long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LAMA]/LABA with ICS/LABA combinations).,Additionally, new information has emerged on ICS withdrawal without increased risk of exacerbations, under cover of effective bronchodilation.,Expert opinion: For patients with COPD who do not have ACOS, a LAMA/LABA combination may be an appropriate starting therapy, apart from those with mild disease who can be managed with a single long-acting bronchodilator.,Patients who remain symptomatic or present with exacerbations despite effectively delivered LAMA/LABA treatment may require additional drug therapy, such as ICS or phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors.,When prescribing an ICS/LABA, the risk:benefit ratio should be considered in individual patients.
Real-world prescription pathways leading to triple therapy (TT) (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] plus long-acting β2-agonist bronchodilator [LABA] plus long-acting muscarinic antagonist) differ from Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence treatment recommendations.,This study sets out to identify COPD patients without asthma receiving TT, and determine the pathways taken from diagnosis to the first prescription of TT.,This was a historical analysis of COPD patients without asthma from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (387 primary-care practices across the UK) from 2002 to 2010.,Patient disease severity was classified using GOLD 2013 criteria.,Data were analyzed to determine prescribing of TT before, at, and after COPD diagnosis; the average time taken to receive TT; and the impact of lung function grade, modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score, and exacerbation history on the pathway to TT.,During the study period, 32% of patients received TT.,Of these, 19%, 28%, 37%, and 46% of patients classified as GOLD A, B, C, and D, respectively, progressed to TT after diagnosis (P<0.001).,Of all patients prescribed TT, 25% were prescribed TT within 1 year of diagnosis, irrespective of GOLD classification (P=0.065).,The most common prescription pathway to TT was LABA plus ICS.,It was observed that exacerbation history did influence the pathway of LABA plus ICS to TT.,Real life UK prescription data demonstrates the inappropriate prescribing of TT and confirms that starting patients on ICS plus LABA results in the inevitable drift to overuse of TT.,This study highlights the need for dissemination and implementation of COPD guidelines to physicians, ensuring that patients receive the recommended therapy.
1
Triple combination therapy involving long-acting muscarinic antagonists long-acting β2 agonists, and inhaled corticosteroids has recently become an option for maintenance treatment of COPD.,Some add-on clinical trials have reported the benefits of these combinations.,However, the process to step up to triple therapy varies for individual cases.,Keio University and affiliated hospitals conducted an observational COPD cohort study, recruiting patients diagnosed as having COPD by pulmonary physicians and those referred for investigation of possible COPD.,Their prescription history and clinical course were retrospectively analyzed based on the physicians’ medical records and patient questionnaires.,This study was registered with UMIN (UMIN000003470, April 10, 2010).,A total of 95 of the 445 COPD patients (21%) were treated with inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2 agonists/long-acting muscarinic antagonists as maintenance therapy, including 12 in COPD Grade I, 31 in Grade II, 38 in Grade III, and 14 in Grade IV, based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease spirometric grading.,For more than half of the patients on triple therapy, the treatment had been intensified due to unsatisfactory improvement of symptoms, and 32% were treated with triple therapy due to comorbid asthma.,In contrast, there were COPD patients whose therapy was maintained after starting with triple therapy because of their serious conditions or concurrent exacerbation at diagnosis (8%).,Triple therapy was often prescribed in the real-life management of COPD, even in patients whose airflow limitation was not severe.,To better control symptoms was the major reason for choosing triple therapy, regardless of the severity of COPD, in Japan.
Increased prescribing of inhaled long-acting anti-muscarinic (LAMA) and combined inhaled long-acting β2-agonist and corticosteroid (LABA+ICS) drugs for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has led to hopes of reduced hospital admissions from this disease.,To investigate the impact of rising primary care prescribing of LAMA and LABA+ICS drugs on COPD admissions.,This retrospective cohort study of general practice COPD admission and prescribing data between 2007 and 2010 comprised a representative group of 806 English general practices (population 5,264,506).,Outcome measures were practice rates of COPD patient admissions and prescription costs of LAMA and LABA+ICS.,General practice characteristics were based on the UK quality and outcomes framework.,Rates of COPD admissions remained stable from 2001 to 2010.,Practice-prescribing volumes of LAMA per practice patient and LABA+ICS per practice patient increased by 61 and 26%, respectively, between 2007 and 2010.,Correlation between costs of LAMA and those of LABA+ICS increased year on year, and was the highest in 2010 (Pearson’s r=0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64-0.72).,Practice COPD admission rates were positively predicted by practice-prescribing volumes of LAMA (2010: B=1.23, 95% CI, 0.61-1.85) and of LABA+ICS (2010: B=0.32, 95% CI, 0.12-0.52) when controlling for practice list size, COPD prevalence and deprivation.,The increase in the prescribing of LAMA and LABA+ICS inhalers was not associated with the predicted fall in hospital admission rates for COPD patients.,The positive correlation between high practice COPD prescribing and high practice COPD admissions was not explained.
1
Guidelines are critical for facilitating cost-effective COPD care.,Development and implementation in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) is challenging.,To guide future strategy, an overview of current global COPD guidelines is required.,We systematically reviewed national COPD guidelines, focusing on worldwide availability and identification of potential development, content, context, and quality gaps that may hamper effective implementation.,Scoping review of national COPD management guidelines.,We assessed: (1) global guideline coverage; (2) guideline information (authors, target audience, dissemination plans); (3) content (prevention, diagnosis, treatments); (4) ethical, legal, and socio-economic aspects; and (5) compliance with the eight Institute of Medicine (IOM) guideline standards.,LMICs guidelines were compared with those from high-income countries (HICs).,Of the 61 national COPD guidelines identified, 30 were from LMICs.,Guidelines did not cover 1.93 billion (30.2%) people living in LMICs, whereas only 0.02 billion (1.9%) in HICs were without national guidelines.,Compared with HICs, LMIC guidelines targeted fewer health-care professional groups and less often addressed case finding and co-morbidities.,More than 90% of all guidelines included smoking cessation advice.,Air pollution reduction strategies were less frequently mentioned in both LMICs (47%) and HICs (42%).,LMIC guidelines fulfilled on average 3.37 (42%) of IOM standards, compared with 5.29 (66%) in HICs (P < .05).,LMICs scored significantly lower compared with HICs regarding conflicts of interest management, updates, articulation of recommendations, and funding transparency (all, P < .05).,Several development, content, context, and quality gaps exist in COPD guidelines from LMICs that may hamper effective implementation.,Overall, COPD guidelines in LMICs should be more widely available and should be transparently developed and updated.,Guidelines may be further enhanced by better inclusion of local risk factors, case findings, and co-morbidity management, preferably tailored to available financial and staff resources.
Little is known about the impact of exacerbations on COPD progression or whether inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use and blood eosinophil count (BEC) affect progression.,We aimed to assess this in a prospective observational study.,The study population included patients with mild to moderate COPD, aged ≥35 years, with a smoking history, who were followed up for ≥3 years from first to last spirometry recording using two large UK electronic medical record databases: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD).,Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models were used to determine the relationship between annual exacerbation rate following initiation of therapy (ICS vs non-ICS) and FEV1 decline.,Effect modification by blood eosinophils was studied through interaction terms.,Of 12178 patients included (mean age 66 years; 48% female), 8981 (74%) received ICS.,In patients with BEC ≥350 cells/µL not on ICS, each exacerbation was associated with subsequent acceleration of FEV1 decline of 19.4 mL/year (95% CI 12.0 to 26.7, p<0.0001).,This excess decline was reduced by 15.1 mL/year (6.6 to 23.6) to 4.3 mL/year (1.9 to 6.7, p<0.0001) in those with BEC ≥350 cells/µL treated with ICS.,Exacerbations are associated with a more rapid loss of lung function among COPD patients with elevated blood eosinophils, defined as ≥350 cells/µL, not treated with ICS.,More aggressive prevention of exacerbations using ICS in such patients may prevent excess loss of lung function.
1
The Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) measures health status and can be used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL).,We investigated whether CCQ is also associated with mortality.,Some 1111 Swedish primary and secondary care chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients were randomly selected.,Information from questionnaires and medical record review were obtained in 970 patients.,The Swedish Board of Health and Welfare provided mortality data.,Cox regression estimated survival, with adjustment for age, sex, heart disease, and lung function (for a subset with spirometry data, n = 530).,Age and sex-standardized mortality ratios were calculated.,Over 5 years, 220 patients (22.7%) died.,Mortality risk was higher for mean CCQ ≥ 3 (37.8% died) compared with mean CCQ < 1 (11.4%), producing an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (and 95% confidence interval [CI]) of 3.13 (1.98 to 4.95).,After further adjustment for 1 second forced expiratory volume (expressed as percent of the European Community for Steel and Coal reference values ), the association remained (HR 2.94 [1.42 to 6.10]).,The mortality risk was higher than in the general population, with standardized mortality ratio (and 95% CI) of 1.87 (1.18 to 2.80) with CCQ < 1, increasing to 6.05 (4.94 to 7.44) with CCQ ≥ 3.,CCQ is predictive of mortality in COPD patients.,As HRQL and mortality are both important clinical endpoints, CCQ could be used to target interventions.
A growing number of prognostic indices for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is developed for clinical use.,Our aim is to identify, summarize and compare all published prognostic COPD indices, and to discuss their performance, usefulness and implementation in daily practice.,We performed a systematic literature search in both Pubmed and Embase up to September 2010.,Selection criteria included primary publications of indices developed for stable COPD patients, that predict future outcome by a multidimensional scoring system, developed for and validated with COPD patients only.,Two reviewers independently assessed the index quality using a structured screening form for systematically scoring prognostic studies.,Of 7,028 articles screened, 13 studies comprising 15 indices were included.,Only 1 index had been explored for its application in daily practice.,We observed 21 different predictors and 7 prognostic outcomes, the latter reflecting mortality, hospitalization and exacerbation.,Consistent strong predictors were FEV1 percentage predicted, age and dyspnoea.,The quality of the studies underlying the indices varied between fairly poor and good.,Statistical methods to assess the predictive abilities of the indices were heterogenic.,They generally revealed moderate to good discrimination, when measured.,Limitations: We focused on prognostic indices for stable disease only and, inevitably, quality judgment was prone to subjectivity.,We identified 15 prognostic COPD indices.,Although the prognostic performance of some of the indices has been validated, they all lack sufficient evidence for implementation.,Whether or not the use of prognostic indices improves COPD disease management or patients' health is currently unknown; impact studies are required to establish this.
1
To compare the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations between triple therapy and dual therapy or monotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.,PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases, and clinical trial registries searched from inception to April 2018.,Randomised controlled trials comparing triple therapy with dual therapy or monotherapy in patients with COPD were eligible.,Efficacy and safety outcomes of interest were also available.,Data were collected independently.,Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate rate ratios, hazard ratios, risk ratios, and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.,Quality of evidence was summarised in accordance with GRADE methodology (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation).,21 trials (19 publications) were included.,Triple therapy consisted of a long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long acting β agonist (LABA), and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS).,Triple therapy was associated with a significantly reduced rate of moderate or severe exacerbations compared with LAMA monotherapy (rate ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.85), LAMA and LABA (0.78, 0.70 to 0.88), and ICS and LABA (0.77, 0.66 to 0.91).,Trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and quality of life were favourable with triple therapy.,The overall safety profile of triple therapy is reassuring, but pneumonia was significantly higher with triple therapy than with dual therapy of LAMA and LABA (relative risk 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 1.87).,Use of triple therapy resulted in a lower rate of moderate or severe exacerbations of COPD, better lung function, and better health related quality of life than dual therapy or monotherapy in patients with advanced COPD.,Prospero CRD42018077033.
Glycopyrronium bromide (NVA237) is an inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist in development for treatment of COPD.,This study compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily (OD) and twice-daily (BID) glycopyrronium bromide regimens, using a novel model-based approach, in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,Double-blind, randomized, dose-finding trial with an eight-treatment, two-period, balanced incomplete block design.,Patients (smoking history ≥10 pack-years, post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥30% and <80% predicted, FEV1/FVC <0.7) were randomized to one of 16 independent sequences for 28 days.,Primary endpoint: mean trough FEV1 at Day 28.,385 patients (mean age 61.2 years; mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 53% predicted) were randomized; 88.6% completed.,All OD and BID dosing regimens produced dose-dependent bronchodilation; at Day 28, increases in mean trough FEV1 versus placebo were statistically significant for all regimens, ranging from 51 mL (glycopyrronium bromide 12.5 μg OD) to 160 mL (glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg BID).,Pharmacodynamic steady-state was reached by Day 7.,There was a small separation (≤37 mL) between BID and OD dose-response curves for mean trough FEV1 at steady-state in favour of BID dosing.,Over 24 hours, separation between OD and BID regimens was even smaller (FEV1 AUC0-24h maximum difference for equivalent daily dose regimens: 8 mL).,Dose-response results for FEV1 at 12 hours, FEV1 AUC0-12h and FEV1 AUC0-4h at steady-state showed OD regimens provided greater improvement over placebo than BID regimens for total daily doses of 25 μg, 50 μg and 100 μg, while the reverse was true for OD versus BID regimens from 12-24 hours.,The 12.5 μg BID dose produced a marginally higher improvement in trough FEV1 versus placebo than 50 μg OD, however, the response at 12 hours over placebo was suboptimal (74 mL).,Glycopyrronium bromide was safe and well tolerated at all doses.,Glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg OD provides significant bronchodilation over a 24 hour period, and in terms of FEV1 AUC0-24h is not significantly different than the same total daily dose administered BID.,Importantly, OD dosing may confer better patient adherence.,The results are consistent with previous glycopyrronium bromide studies and support once-daily dosing of glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01119950
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common, highly debilitating disease of the airways, primarily caused by smoking.,Chronic inflammation and structural remodelling are key pathological features of this disease, in part caused by the aberrant function of airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells under the regulation of transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β. miRNA are short, noncoding gene transcripts involved in the negative regulation of specific target genes, through their interactions with mRNA.,Previous studies have proposed that mRNA‐145 (miR‐145) may interact with SMAD3, an important downstream signalling molecule of the TGF‐β pathway.,TGF‐β was used to stimulate primary human ASM cells isolated from healthy nonsmokers, healthy smokers and COPD patients.,This resulted in a TGF‐β‐dependent increase in CXCL8 and IL‐6 release, most notably in the cells from COPD patients.,TGF‐β stimulation increased SMAD3 expression, only in cells from COPD patients, with a concurrent increased miR‐145 expression.,Regulation of miR‐145 was found to be negatively controlled by pathways involving the MAP kinases, MEK‐1/2 and p38 MAPK.,Subsequent, overexpression of miR‐145 (using synthetic mimics) in ASM cells from patients with COPD suppressed IL‐6 and CXCL8 release, to levels comparable to the nonsmoker controls.,Therefore, this study suggests that miR‐145 negatively regulates pro‐inflammatory cytokine release from ASM cells in COPD by targeting SMAD3.
Airway diseases are highly prevalent worldwide; however, the prevalence of these diseases is underestimated.,Although these diseases present several common characteristics, they have different clinical outcomes.,The differentiation between asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis in the early stage of disease is extremely important for the adoption of appropriate therapeutic measures.,However, because of the high prevalence of these diseases and the common pathophysiological pathways, some patients with different diseases may present with similar symptoms.,The objective of this review is to highlight the similarities and differences between these diseases in terms of the risk factors, pathophysiology, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment.
1
Claim data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) database have previously been utilized in the study of COPD.,However, there are limited data on the positive predictive value of claim data for COPD diagnosis.,Therefore, this study aimed to characterize and validate the COPD cohort identified from the NHI research database.,This cross-sectional study compared records from claim data with those from a medical center.,From 2007 to 2014, a COPD cohort was constructed from claim data using ICD9-CM codes for COPD.,The diagnostic positive predictive value of these data was assessed with reference to physician-verified COPD.,In addition, a multivariate logistic regression model was built to identify independent factors associated with the positive predictive value of COPD diagnosis by claim data.,During the 8-year study period, a total of 12,127 subjects met the criterion of having two or more outpatient codes in 1 year or one or more inpatient COPD codes in their claim data.,Of this total, the diagnosis of COPD was verified by physicians in 7,701 (63.5%) subjects.,Applying a more stringent criterion - three or more outpatient codes or two or more inpatient codes - improved the diagnostic positive predictive value to 72.2%.,Age ≥65 years and a claim for spirometry were the two most important factors associated with the positive predictive value of claim-data-defined COPD.,Adding spirometry testing to diagnostic ICD9-CM codes for COPD increased the positive predictive value to 84.6%.,This study emphasizes the importance of validation of disease-specific diagnosis prior to applying an administrative database in clinical studies.,It also indicates the limitation of ICD9-CM codes alone in recognizing COPD patients within the NHI research database.
Epidemiological data demonstrate that the worldwide prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is increasing.,These patients have an increased risk of mortality and morbidity and have constant limitations in airflow.,Comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) under spinal anesthesia (SA) and general anesthesia (GA).,We prospectively evaluated COPD patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia (Group 1, n = 30) or spinal anesthesia (Group 2, n = 30) in our clinic between January 2016 and January 2018.,Patients with COPD were further divided into groups according to their preoperative stages (Stage 1-4).,Intraoperative vital findings, postoperative pain, complications, and length of hospitalization were compared between the general (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) groups.,The mean age of the patients in the GA group was 61.0 ± 6.7 years and was 61.0 ± 7.7 years in the SA group.,In the GA and SA groups, the mean ASA score was 2.8 ± 0.6 and 2.9 ± 0.6, respectively, the mean operation duration was 31.7 ± 5.1 and 30.6 ± 5.1 min, respectively, and the length of hospitalization was 3.2 ± 1.7 and 1.5 ± 0.5 days, respectively.,The partial carbon dioxide rates (PaCO2) at the postoperative 5th and 20th minutes were lower in the SA group than in the GA group.,Further, the requirement for postoperative analgesia was lower in the SA group, and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the SA group.,There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operation duration.,Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a rather safe procedure for COPD patients under general and spinal anesthesia.,However, spinal anesthesia is preferred over general anesthesia as it has better postoperative analgesia and causes no impairment of pulmonary functions.,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12893-018-0396-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a serious global health problem characterized by chronic airway inflammation, progressive airflow limitation and destruction of lung parenchyma.,Remodeling of the bronchial airways in COPD includes changes in both the bronchial epithelium and the subepithelial extracellular matrix (ECM).,To explore the impact of an aberrant ECM on epithelial cell phenotype in COPD we developed a new ex vivo model, in which normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells repopulate and differentiate on decellularized human bronchial scaffolds derived from COPD patients and healthy individuals.,By using transcriptomics, we show that bronchial ECM from COPD patients induces differential gene expression in primary NHBE cells when compared to normal bronchial ECM.,The gene expression profile indicated altered activity of upstream mediators associated with COPD pathophysiology, including hepatocyte growth factor, transforming growth factor beta 1 and platelet-derived growth factor B, which suggests that COPD-related changes in the bronchial ECM contribute to the defective regenerative ability in the airways of COPD patients.
We investigated whether a relationship between small airways dysfunction and bronchodilator responsiveness exists in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We studied 100 (20 female; mean age: 68±10 years) patients with COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]: 55% pred ±21%; FEV1/forced vital capacity [FVC]: 53%±10%) by impulse oscillometry system.,Resistance at 5 Hz and 20 Hz (R5 and R20, in kPa·s·L−1) and the fall in resistance from 5 Hz to 20 Hz (R5 - R20) were used as indices of total, proximal, and peripheral airway resistance; reactance at 5 Hz (X5, in kPa·s·L−1) was also measured.,Significant response to bronchodilator (salbutamol 400 μg) was expressed as absolute (≥0.2 L) and percentage (≥12%) change relative to the prebronchodilator value of FEV1 (flow responders, FRs) and FVC (volume responders, VRs).,Eighty out of 100 participants had R5 - R20 >0.03 kPa·s·L−1 (> upper normal limit) and, compared to patients with R5 - R20 ≤0.030 kPa·s·L−1, showed a poorer health status, lower values of FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and X5, along with higher values of residual volume/total lung capacity and R5 (P<0.05 for all comparisons).,Compared to the 69 nonresponders and the 8 FRs, the 16 VRs had significantly higher R5 and R5 - R20 values (P<0.05), lower X5 values (P<0.05), and greater airflow obstruction and lung hyperinflation.,This study shows that peripheral airway resistance is increased in the vast majority of patients with COPD, who showed worse respiratory reactance, worse spirometry results, more severe lung hyperinflation, and poorer health status.,Small airway dysfunction was also associated with the bronchodilator responsiveness in terms of FVC, but not in terms of FEV1.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and morbid disease characterized by high oxidative stress.,Its pathogenesis is complex, and involves excessive oxidative stress (redox imbalance), protease/antiprotease imbalance, inflammation, apoptosis, and autoimmunity.,Among these, oxidative stress has a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of COPD by initiating and mediating various redox-sensitive signal transduction pathways and gene expression.,The protective physiological mechanisms of the redox balance in the human body, their role in the pathogenesis of COPD, and the clinical correlation between oxidative stress and COPD are reviewed in this paper.,N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a mucolytic agent with both antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.,This paper also reviews the use of NAC in patients with COPD, especially the dose-dependent properties of NAC, eg, its effects on lung function and the exacerbation rate in patients with the disease.,Earlier data from BRONCUS (the Bronchitis Randomized on NAC Cost-Utility Study) did not suggest that NAC was beneficial in patients with COPD, only indicating that it reduced exacerbation in an “inhaled steroid-naïve” subgroup.,With regard to the dose-dependent properties of NAC, two recent randomized controlled Chinese trials suggested that high-dose NAC (1,200 mg daily) can reduce exacerbations in patients with COPD, especially in those with an earlier (moderately severe) stage of disease, and also in those who are at high risk of exacerbations.,However, there was no significant effect on symptoms or quality of life in patients receiving NAC.,Further studies are warranted to investigate the effect of NAC at higher doses in non-Chinese patients with COPD.
Exacerbations affect morbidity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We sought to evaluate the association between exacerbation frequency and spirometric and health status changes over time using data from a large, long-term trial.,This retrospective analysis of data from the 4-year UPLIFT® (Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium) trial compared tiotropium with placebo.,Annualized rates of decline and estimated mean differences at each time point were analyzed using a mixed-effects model according to subgroups based on exacerbation frequency (events per patient-year: 0, >0-1, >1-2, and >2).,Spirometry and the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were performed at baseline and every 6 months (also at one month for spirometry).,In total, 5992 patients (mean age 65 years, 75% male) were randomized.,Higher exacerbation frequency was associated with lower baseline postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (1.40, 1.36, 1.26, and 1.14 L) and worsening SGRQ scores (43.7, 44.1, 47.8, and 52.4 units).,Corresponding rates of decline in postbronchodilator FEV1 (mL/year) were 40, 41, 43, and 48 (control), and 34, 38, 48, and 49 (tiotropium).,Values for postbronchodilator forced vital capacity decline (mL/year) were 45, 56, 74, and 83 (control), and 43, 57, 83, and 95 (tiotropium).,The rates of worsening in total SGRQ score (units/year) were 0.72, 1.16, 1.44, and 1.99 (control), and 0.38, 1.29, 1.68, and 2.86 (tiotropium).,The proportion of patients who died (intention-to-treat analysis until four years [1440 days]) for the entire cohort increased with increasing frequency of hospitalized exacerbations.,Increasing frequency of exacerbations worsens the rate of decline in lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with COPD.,Increasing rates of hospitalized exacerbations are associated with increasing risk of death.
1
The efficacy of inhaled salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate (SFC) in patients with severe or very severe COPD is well documented.,However, there are only limited data about the influence of GOLD severity staging on the effectiveness of SFC, particularly in patients with milder disease.,TORCH was a 3-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6112 patients with moderate/severe COPD with pre-bronchodilator FEV1 < 60% predicted (mean age 65 years, 76% male, mean 44% predicted FEV1, 43% current smokers).,To understand the relative efficacy of SFC and its components by GOLD stages, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of the TORCH dataset using baseline post-bronchodilator FEV1 to segment patients into three groups: moderate COPD (GOLD stage II and above: ≥ 50%; n = 2156), severe COPD (GOLD stage III: 30% to < 50%; n = 3019) and very severe COPD (GOLD stage IV: < 30%; n = 937).,Compared with placebo, SFC improved post-bronchodilator FEV1: 101 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71, 132) in GOLD stage II, 82 ml (95% CI: 60, 104) in GOLD stage III and 96 ml (95% CI: 54, 138) in GOLD stage IV patients, and reduced the rate of exacerbations: 31% (95% CI: 19, 40) in GOLD stage II, 26% (95% CI: 17, 34) in GOLD stage III and 14% (95% CI: -4, 29) in GOLD stage IV.,SFC improved health status to a greater extent than other treatments regardless of baseline GOLD stage.,Similarly, SFC reduced the risk of death by 33% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.98) for GOLD stage II, 5% (HR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.24) for GOLD stage III, and 30% (HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.05) for GOLD stage IV.,The rates of adverse events were similar across treatment arms and increased with disease severity.,Overall, there was a higher incidence of pneumonia in the fluticasone propionate and SFC arms, compared with other treatments in all GOLD stages.,In the TORCH study, SFC reduced moderate-to-severe exacerbations and improved health status and FEV1 across GOLD stages.,Treatment with SFC may be associated with reduced mortality compared with placebo in patients with GOLD stage II disease.,The effects were similar to those reported for the study as a whole.,Thus, SFC is an effective treatment option for patients with GOLD stage II COPD.,Clinicaltrial.gov registration NCT00268216; Study number: SCO30003
The purpose of our study was to examine the association of prior outpatient use of statins and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on mortality for subjects ≥ 65 years of age hospitalized with acute COPD exacerbations.,We conducted a retrospective national cohort study using Veterans Affairs administrative data including subjects ≥65 years of age hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation.,Our primary analysis was a multilevel model with the dependent variable of 90-day mortality and hospital as a random effect, controlling for preexisting comorbid conditions, demographics, and other medications prescribed.,We identified 11,212 subjects with a mean age of 74.0 years, 98% were male, and 12.4% of subjects died within 90-days of hospital presentation.,In this cohort, 20.3% of subjects were using statins, 32.0% were using ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB).,After adjusting for potential confounders, current statin use (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.64) and ACE inhibitor/ARB use (0.55, 0.46-0.66) were significantly associated with decreased 90-day mortality.,Use of statins and ACE inhibitors prior to admission is associated with decreased mortality in subjects hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation.,Randomized controlled trials are needed to examine whether the use of these medications are protective for those patients with COPD exacerbations.
1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is set to become the third most frequent cause of death and also the third largest cause of global morbidity by 2020.,In China, where the population is aging rapidly, COPD has become one of the leading causes of disability and a large economic burden.,An epidemiological assessment of the COPD in China is required, with a focus on the number of cases living with disease, main determinants of the disease and time trends.,We systematically searched large Chinese bibliographic databases and English databases to identify spirometry-based epidemiological studies of the prevalence of COPD in China diagnosed according to GOLD criteria.,We estimated age- and gender-specific prevalence of COPD using a multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression.,We also presented the time trends of COPD between 1990 and 2010 by age, gender and setting (urban vs rural).,In 1990, the prevalence of COPD ranged from 0.49% (95% CI = 0.29-0.85) in <20 years group to 20.95% (95% CI = 14.04-27.04) in> = 80 years group, and the crude prevalence for China was 2.70% (95% CI = 1.86-3.51).,In 2010, the prevalence in <20 years was 0.55% (95% CI = 0.37-1.04) and in> = 80 years was 22.89% (95% CI = 18.13-28.96), with the crude prevalence for China of 3.84% (95% CI = 3.30-4.77).,The COPD prevalence in males was about two-fold higher than in females, and it increased with increasing age.,Between 1990-2010, the total number of Chinese people living with COPD increased by 66.73%, from 30.90 million (95% CI = 21.28-40.02) in 1990 to 51.52 million (95% CI = 44.26-63.93) in 2010.,This increase was most striking in middle age, and greater in females than in males from 30 years up to 64 years.,Our estimates, which used an independent approach to acquiring data and development of analytical methods, and were based on a more complete data set, are remarkably similar to those produced recently by the GBD 2013 collaboration, differing by only about 5% in the estimated number of COPD cases in 1990 and by 1% in 2010.,COPD is a highly prevalent disease in China and its importance is growing steadily.,The number of people living with COPD has increased substantially between 1990 and 2010.,COPD is more frequent in males and in rural areas.,Optimised primary and secondary prevention and treatment is urgently needed to counter this growing trend.,Improved epidemiological studies will be required to assist development of more effective strategies of prevention and treatment of COPD in China in the next decade and beyond.
Aquaporin-5 (AQP5) can cause mucus overproduction and lower lung function.,Genetic variants in the AQP5 gene might be associated with rate of lung function decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in AQP5 were genotyped in 429 European American individuals with COPD randomly selected from the NHLBI Lung Health Study.,Mean annual decline in FEV1 % predicted, assessed over five years, was calculated as a linear regression slope, adjusting for potential covariates and stratified by smoking status.,Constructs containing the wildtype allele and risk allele of the coding SNP N228K were generated using site-directed mutagenesis, and transfected into HBE-16 (human bronchial epithelial cell line).,AQP5 abundance and localization were assessed by immunoblots and confocal immunofluoresence under control, shear stress and cigarette smoke extract (CSE 10%) exposed conditions to test for differential expression or localization.,Among continuous smokers, three of the five SNPs tested showed significant associations (0.02>P>0.004) with rate of lung function decline; no associations were observed among the group of intermittent or former smokers.,Haplotype tests revealed multiple association signals (0.012>P>0.0008) consistent with the single-SNP results.,In HBE16 cells, shear stress and CSE led to a decrease in AQP5 abundance in the wild-type, but not in the N228K AQP5 plasmid.,Polymorphisms in AQP5 were associated with rate of lung function decline in continuous smokers with COPD.,A missense mutation modulates AQP-5 expression in response to cigarette smoke extract and shear stress.,These results suggest that AQP5 may be an important candidate gene for COPD.
1
COPD has been perceived as being a disease of older men.,However, >7 million women are estimated to live with COPD in the USA alone.,Despite a growing body of literature suggesting an increasing burden of COPD in women, the evidence is limited.,To assess and synthesize the available evidence among population-based epidemiologic studies and calculate the global prevalence of COPD in men and women.,A systematic review and meta-analysis reporting gender-specific prevalence of COPD was undertaken.,Gender-specific prevalence estimates were abstracted from relevant studies.,Associated patient characteristics as well as custom variables pertaining to the diagnostic method and other important epidemiologic covariates were also collected.,A Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis was performed investigating gender-specific prevalence of COPD stratified by age, geography, calendar time, study setting, diagnostic method, and disease severity.,Among 194 eligible studies, summary prevalence was 9.23% (95% credible interval [CrI]: 8.16%-10.36%) in men and 6.16% (95% CrI: 5.41%-6.95%) in women.,Gender prevalences varied widely by the World Health Organization Global Burden of Disease subregions, with the highest female prevalence found in North America (8.07% vs 7.30%) and in participants in urban settings (13.03% vs 8.34%).,Meta-regression indicated that age ≥40 and bronchodilator testing contributed most significantly to heterogeneity of prevalence estimates across studies.,We conducted the largest ever systematic review and meta-analysis of global prevalence of COPD and the first large gender-specific review.,These results will increase awareness of COPD as a critical woman’s health issue.
Tobacco smoking is the main risk factor of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but not all smokers develop the disease.,An abnormal pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response to smoking is thought to play a major pathogenic role in COPD, but this has never been tested directly.,We studied the systemic biomarker and leukocyte transcriptomic response (Affymetrix microarrays) to smoking exposure in 10 smokers with COPD and 10 smokers with normal spirometry.,We also studied 10 healthy never smokers (not exposed to smoking) as controls.,Because some aspects of COPD may differ in males and females, and the inflammatory response to other stressors (infection) might be different in man and women, we stratified participant recruitment by sex.,Differentially expressed genes were validated by q-PCR.,Ontology enrichment was evaluated and interaction networks inferred.,Principal component analysis identified sex differences in the leukocyte transcriptomic response to acute smoking.,In both genders, we identified genes that were differentially expressed in response to smoking exclusively in COPD patients (COPD related signature) or smokers with normal spirometry (Smoking related signature), their ontologies and interaction networks.,The use of an experimental intervention (smoking exposure) to investigate the transcriptomic response of peripheral leukocytes in COPD is a step beyond the standard case-control transcriptomic profiling carried out so far, and has facilitated the identification of novel COPD and Smoking expression related signatures which differ in males and females.
1
The combination of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or ACOS is a recently defined syndrome.,The epidemiology of the condition is poorly described and previous research has suggested ACOS is associated with worse outcomes than either condition alone.,We therefore decided to complete a systematic review of the published literature.,This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses guidelines.,A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases up to Feb 2015 to identify studies reporting incidence, prevalence, health care utilization, morbidity, or mortality in COPD and asthma.,A total of 19 studies were included in the present study.,The pooled prevalence of overlap among COPD was 27% (95% CI: 0.16-0.38, p<0.0001) and 28% (95% CI: 0.09-0.47, p = 0.0032) in the population and hospital-based studies, respectively.,We found no significant difference between ACOS and COPD in terms of gender, smoking status, lung function and 6mWD.,However, in comparison to subject with only COPD, ACOS subjects were significantly younger, had higher BMI, healthcare utilization, and lower HRQoL.,ACOS is a common condition that exists in a substantial proportion of subjects with COPD.,ACOS represents a distinct clinical phenotype with more frequent exacerbations, hospitalization, worse health-related quality of life, and higher healthcare costs than either disease alone.,There is a critical need to better define the management and treatment of this syndrome.
The overlap between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an important clinical phenomenon.,However, the prevalence of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) is not known.,To investigate the prevalence of ACOS among asthmatic patients with a smoking history, and evaluate the factors predicting ACOS in this patient group.,We investigated 190 primary care asthma patients with no previous diagnosis of COPD, but who were either current or ex-smokers, with a smoking history of at least 10 pack-years.,Spirometry was performed on all the patients while they were taking their normal asthma medication.,Patients were considered to have ACOS if their postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity was <0.70.,Fifty-two (27.4%) of the patients were found to have ACOS.,Age ⩾60 years and smoking for ⩾20 pack-years were the best predictors of ACOS.,If both of these criteria were met, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for ACOS was 6.08 (2.11-17.49), compared with the situation where neither of these criteria were fulfilled.,There is a high prevalence of ACOS among primary health care asthmatics with a positive smoking history but no previous diagnosis of COPD.,In this population, age over 60 years and a smoking history of more than 20 pack-years were the best predictors of ACOS.
1
Oxidative stress contributes to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations and antioxidants can decrease exacerbation rates, although we lack data about the effect of such drugs on exacerbation duration.,The RESTORE (Reducing Exacerbations and Symptoms by Treatment with ORal Erdosteine in COPD) study was a prospective randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, enrolling patients aged 40-80 years with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage II/III.,Patients received erdosteine 300 mg twice daily or placebo added to usual COPD therapy for 12 months.,The primary outcome was the number of acute exacerbations during the study.,In the pre-specified intention-to-treat population of 445 patients (74% male; mean age 64.8 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s 51.8% predicted) erdosteine reduced the exacerbation rate by 19.4% (0.91 versus.,1.13 exacerbations·patient−1·year−1 for erdosteine and placebo, respectively; p=0.01), due to an effect on mild events; the reduction in the rate of mild exacerbations was 57.1% (0.23 versus 0.54 exacerbations·patient−1·year−1 for erdosteine and placebo, respectively; p=0.002).,No significant difference was observed in the rate of moderate and severe exacerbations (0.68 versus 0.59 exacerbations·patient−1·year−1 for erdosteine and placebo, respectively; p=0.054) despite a trend in favour of the comparison group.,Erdosteine decreased the exacerbation duration irrespective of event severity by 24.6% (9.55 versus 12.63 days for erdosteine and placebo, respectively; p=0.023).,Erdosteine significantly improved subject and physician subjective severity scores (p=0.022 and p=0.048, respectively), and reduced the use of reliever medication (p<0.001), but did not affect the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score or the time to first exacerbation.,In patients with COPD, erdosteine can reduce both the rate and duration of exacerbations.,The percentage of patients with adverse events was similar in both the placebo and erdosteine treatment groups.,RESTORE study: erdosteine reduces both rate and duration of COPD exacerbations with a placebo-like safety profilehttp://ow.ly/BbGI30dRdEt
The 2013 GOLD classification system for COPD distinguishes four stages: A (low symptoms, low exacerbation risk), B (high symptoms, low risk), C (low symptoms, high risk) and D (high symptoms, high risk).,Assessment of risk is based on exacerbation history and airflow obstruction, whatever results in a higher risk grouping.,The previous system was solely based on airflow obstruction.,Earlier studies compared the predictive performance of new and old classification systems with regards to mortality and exacerbations.,The objective of this study was to compare the ability of both classifications to predict the number of future (total and severe) exacerbations and mortality in a different patient population, and to add an outcome measure to the comparison: lung function decline.,Patient-level data from the UPLIFT trial were used to analyze 4-year survival in a Weibull model, with GOLD stages at baseline as covariates.,A generalized linear model was used to compare the numbers of exacerbations (total and severe) per stage.,Analyses were repeated with stages C and D divided into substages depending on lung function and exacerbation history.,Lung function decline was analysed in a repeated measures model.,Mortality increased from A to D, but there was no difference between B and C.,For the previous GOLD stages 2-4, survival curves were clearly separated.,Yearly exacerbation rates were: 0.53, 0.72 and 0.80 for stages 2-4; and 0.35, 0.45, 0.58 and 0.74 for A-D.,Annual rates of lung function decline were: 47, 38 and 26 ml for stages 2-4 and 44, 48, 38 and 39 for stages A-D.,With regards to model fit, the new system performed worse at predicting mortality and lung function decline, and better at predicting exacerbations.,Distinguishing between the sub-stages of high-risk led to substantial improvements.,The new classification system is a modest step towards a phenotype approach.,It is probably an improvement for the prediction of exacerbations, but a deterioration for predicting mortality and lung function decline.,ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00144339 (September 2, 2005).,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-163) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
1
Although physical activity is considered an important therapeutic target in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), what “physical activity” means to COPD patients and how their perspective is best measured is poorly understood.,We designed a conceptual framework, guiding the development and content validation of two patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments on physical activity (PROactive PRO instruments).,116 patients from four European countries with diverse demographics and COPD phenotypes participated in three consecutive qualitative studies (63% male, age mean±sd 66±9 years, 35% Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage III-IV). 23 interviews and eight focus groups (n = 54) identified the main themes and candidate items of the framework. 39 cognitive debriefings allowed the clarity of the items and instructions to be optimised.,Three themes emerged, i.e. impact of COPD on amount of physical activity, symptoms experienced during physical activity, and adaptations made to facilitate physical activity.,The themes were similar irrespective of country, demographic or disease characteristics.,Iterative rounds of appraisal and refinement of candidate items resulted in 30 items with a daily recall period and 34 items with a 7-day recall period.,For the first time, our approach provides comprehensive insight on physical activity from the COPD patients’ perspective.,The PROactive PRO instruments’ content validity represents the pivotal basis for empirically based item reduction and validation.,Conceptual framework as basis of PROactive PRO instruments to assess physical activity from COPD patient perspectivehttp://ow.ly/ytJoS
Measuring dyspnea intensity associated with exercise provides insights into dyspnea-limited exercise capacity, and has been used to evaluate treatment outcomes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Three patient-reported outcome scales commonly cited for rating dyspnea during exercise are the modified Borg scale (MBS), numerical rating scale for dyspnea (NRS-D), and visual analogue scale for dyspnea (VAS-D).,Various versions of each scale were found.,Our objective was to evaluate the content validity of scales commonly used in COPD studies, to explore their ability to capture patients’ experiences of dyspnea during exercise, and to evaluate a standardized version of the MBS.,A two-stage procedure was used, with each stage involving one-on-one interviews with COPD patients who had recently completed a clinic-based exercise event on a treadmill or cycle ergometer.,An open-ended elicitation interview technique was used to understand patients’ experiences of exercise-induced dyspnea, followed by patients completing the three scales.,The cognitive interviewing component of the study involved specific questions to evaluate the patients’ perspectives of the content and format of the scales.,Results from Stage 1 were used to develop a standardized version of the MBS, which was then subjected to further content validity assessment during Stage 2.,Thirteen patients participated in the two-stage process (n = 6; n = 7).,Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) percent predicted was 40%, mean age 57 years, and 54% were male.,Participants used a variety of terms to describe the intensity and variability of exercise-induced dyspnea.,Subjects understood the instructions and format of the standardized MBS, and were able to easily select a response to report the level of dyspnea associated with their recent standardized exercise.,This study provides initial evidence in support of using a standardized version of the MBS version for quantifying dyspnea intensity associated with exercise in patients with COPD.
1