{
stringlengths 1
865
|
|---|
likes: 9,
|
newest_id: "",
|
oldest_id: "",
|
possibly_sensitive: false,
|
public_metrics: {
|
BookmarkCount: 0,
|
ImpressionCount: 0,
|
LikeCount: 0,
|
QuoteCount: 0,
|
ReplyCount: 0,
|
RetweetCount: 0
|
},
|
tweet_id: 1955295240673243400,
|
user_id: "1161158500921290752",
|
username: "Adrenalineaai"
|
},
|
created_at: "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z"
|
},
|
{
|
id: "1955295193399173322",
|
content: "GPT-5 Thinking on ChatGPT Plus has a 192K context window. You can drop in long PDFs and multi-file projects and keep marathon chats coherent without it losing the thread.\n\nDespite the initial hate backlash, OpenAI seems to have nailed the delivery.",
|
metadata: {
|
author: "",
|
conversation_id: "1955295193399173322",
|
created_at: "2025-08-12T15:47:56Z",
|
lang: "",
|
likes: 0,
|
newest_id: "",
|
oldest_id: "",
|
possibly_sensitive: false,
|
public_metrics: {
|
BookmarkCount: 0,
|
ImpressionCount: 0,
|
LikeCount: 0,
|
QuoteCount: 0,
|
ReplyCount: 0,
|
RetweetCount: 0
|
},
|
tweet_id: 1955295193399173400,
|
user_id: "1904334898611048448",
|
username: "PrometheanAIX"
|
},
|
created_at: "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z"
|
},
|
{
|
id: "1955295178408988893",
|
content: "2) GPT 5 thinking is the best chat model to talk to (the non thinking one is abysmal imo i genuinely dont see when you should use that). Intelligent + low hallucinations and sycophancy make it actually trustable to bounce ideas off and reality check me (i dont need to cross",
|
metadata: {
|
author: "",
|
conversation_id: "1955295168409862387",
|
created_at: "2025-08-12T15:47:52Z",
|
lang: "",
|
likes: 2,
|
newest_id: "",
|
oldest_id: "",
|
possibly_sensitive: false,
|
public_metrics: {
|
BookmarkCount: 0,
|
ImpressionCount: 0,
|
LikeCount: 0,
|
QuoteCount: 0,
|
ReplyCount: 0,
|
RetweetCount: 0
|
},
|
tweet_id: 1955295178408989000,
|
user_id: "1718879852827484160",
|
username: "nrehiew_"
|
},
|
created_at: "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z"
|
},
|
{
|
id: "1955295170775122078",
|
content: "@SimoKohonen GPT-5 has a significantly greater grasp of trivial cybersecurity/systems-programming knowledge—and improved judgement that comes from having that knowledge, as compared to any other model I've used.",
|
metadata: {
|
author: "",
|
conversation_id: "1955289917728174466",
|
created_at: "2025-08-12T15:47:50Z",
|
lang: "",
|
likes: 1,
|
newest_id: "",
|
oldest_id: "",
|
possibly_sensitive: false,
|
public_metrics: {
|
BookmarkCount: 0,
|
ImpressionCount: 0,
|
LikeCount: 0,
|
QuoteCount: 0,
|
ReplyCount: 0,
|
RetweetCount: 0
|
},
|
tweet_id: 1955295170775122200,
|
user_id: "326612544",
|
username: "TheLobbyistGuy"
|
},
|
created_at: "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z"
|
},
|
{
|
id: "1955295168409862387",
|
content: "ok GPT 5 review thread. Reply with your takes, reviews, experiences, complaints etc. \n\nill go first. The model alone is a strong 8/10 but the release is 4/10 given that it fell short of the high expectations brought about by all the hype",
|
metadata: {
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.