{ stringlengths 1 865 |
|---|
likes: 9, |
newest_id: "", |
oldest_id: "", |
possibly_sensitive: false, |
public_metrics: { |
BookmarkCount: 0, |
ImpressionCount: 0, |
LikeCount: 0, |
QuoteCount: 0, |
ReplyCount: 0, |
RetweetCount: 0 |
}, |
tweet_id: 1955295240673243400, |
user_id: "1161158500921290752", |
username: "Adrenalineaai" |
}, |
created_at: "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z" |
}, |
{ |
id: "1955295193399173322", |
content: "GPT-5 Thinking on ChatGPT Plus has a 192K context window. You can drop in long PDFs and multi-file projects and keep marathon chats coherent without it losing the thread.\n\nDespite the initial hate backlash, OpenAI seems to have nailed the delivery.", |
metadata: { |
author: "", |
conversation_id: "1955295193399173322", |
created_at: "2025-08-12T15:47:56Z", |
lang: "", |
likes: 0, |
newest_id: "", |
oldest_id: "", |
possibly_sensitive: false, |
public_metrics: { |
BookmarkCount: 0, |
ImpressionCount: 0, |
LikeCount: 0, |
QuoteCount: 0, |
ReplyCount: 0, |
RetweetCount: 0 |
}, |
tweet_id: 1955295193399173400, |
user_id: "1904334898611048448", |
username: "PrometheanAIX" |
}, |
created_at: "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z" |
}, |
{ |
id: "1955295178408988893", |
content: "2) GPT 5 thinking is the best chat model to talk to (the non thinking one is abysmal imo i genuinely dont see when you should use that). Intelligent + low hallucinations and sycophancy make it actually trustable to bounce ideas off and reality check me (i dont need to cross", |
metadata: { |
author: "", |
conversation_id: "1955295168409862387", |
created_at: "2025-08-12T15:47:52Z", |
lang: "", |
likes: 2, |
newest_id: "", |
oldest_id: "", |
possibly_sensitive: false, |
public_metrics: { |
BookmarkCount: 0, |
ImpressionCount: 0, |
LikeCount: 0, |
QuoteCount: 0, |
ReplyCount: 0, |
RetweetCount: 0 |
}, |
tweet_id: 1955295178408989000, |
user_id: "1718879852827484160", |
username: "nrehiew_" |
}, |
created_at: "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z" |
}, |
{ |
id: "1955295170775122078", |
content: "@SimoKohonen GPT-5 has a significantly greater grasp of trivial cybersecurity/systems-programming knowledge—and improved judgement that comes from having that knowledge, as compared to any other model I've used.", |
metadata: { |
author: "", |
conversation_id: "1955289917728174466", |
created_at: "2025-08-12T15:47:50Z", |
lang: "", |
likes: 1, |
newest_id: "", |
oldest_id: "", |
possibly_sensitive: false, |
public_metrics: { |
BookmarkCount: 0, |
ImpressionCount: 0, |
LikeCount: 0, |
QuoteCount: 0, |
ReplyCount: 0, |
RetweetCount: 0 |
}, |
tweet_id: 1955295170775122200, |
user_id: "326612544", |
username: "TheLobbyistGuy" |
}, |
created_at: "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z" |
}, |
{ |
id: "1955295168409862387", |
content: "ok GPT 5 review thread. Reply with your takes, reviews, experiences, complaints etc. \n\nill go first. The model alone is a strong 8/10 but the release is 4/10 given that it fell short of the high expectations brought about by all the hype", |
metadata: { |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.