id stringlengths 7 26 | original_text stringlengths 25 7.75k | grpo_v5_3 stringlengths 310 815 | grpo_v7_1 stringlengths 417 841 | grpo_v7_2 stringlengths 398 844 | grpo_v7_3 stringlengths 342 872 | Qwen_direct stringclasses 2
values | Claude4_direct stringclasses 2
values | GPT5.2_direct stringclasses 2
values | DeepSeek_direct stringclasses 2
values | Qwen_cot stringlengths 310 830 ⌀ | GPT5.2_cot stringlengths 452 1.27k | Claude4_cot stringlengths 610 2.1k ⌀ | DeepSeek_cot stringlengths 471 1.08k ⌀ | Gemini_cot stringlengths 413 4.62k ⌀ | Gemini_direct stringclasses 2
values | domain stringclasses 31
values | text_type stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
human-1160 | Since making his first-class debut in 2014, the 21-year-old has claimed 43 wickets in 15 matches. Taylor produced career-best figures of 6-61 in Derbyshire's Championship loss to Lancashire last April. "Tom is an exciting talent who has already shown the ability to win games for Derbyshire," elite performance director ... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains specific, verifiable details (debut year, exact wicket total, match venue) and natural-sounding quotation attributions typical of human news reporting. Second, its syntax, use of a subordinate clause ('said...'), and contextual grounding ('last April') show purposeful styli... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains specific names, dates, match details, and a direct quote with plausible attribution, which is typical of human news reporting. Second, its prose shows natural variation, contextual background ('since making his first-class debut...'), and a local venue mention ('last April'... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains specific names, dates, match details, and a direct quote with plausible attribution, which is typical of human news reporting. Second, its prose shows natural variation, contextual linking (debut, career-best figure, club expectation) and lacks common AI patterns like exces... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains specific local details (player age, exact debut year, match score and venue) and natural journalistic phrasing ('said... said') suggesting human news writing. Second, it includes a direct quote with contextual specificity and lacks common AI markers like excessive hedging, ... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text is structured in a clear, journalistic style, which is common for both AI and human writing. Second, the content is factual and specific, mentioning exact figures and dates, which is typical of human-written sports reports. Moreover, the quote from Graeme Welch adds a personal touch, whic... | {"rationale": "First, the passage reads like a conventional sports news brief, with specific match statistics, dates, and named individuals (Derbyshire, Lancashire, Graeme Welch) presented in a natural journalistic cadence. Second, it includes a direct quote with context-appropriate attribution and mild promotional ton... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a formal, structured news article format with precise statistics and direct quotations, characteristic of sports journalism. Second, the language is straightforward and factual, presenting information chronologically with specific data points (43 wickets, 15 matches, 6-61 figures... | {"rationale": "First, the text follows a standard journalistic structure with factual reporting, direct quotation, and attribution to a specific source (Graeme Welch). Second, the statistics are presented with precise numbers and dates, which is characteristic of sports journalism. Moreover, the quoted speech contains ... | {"rationale": "First, the text follows a standard sports journalism structure, beginning with a statistical overview and transitioning into a specific career milestone. Second, the inclusion of precise match figures like \"6-61\" against Lancashire demonstrates a level of factual granularity typical of human-authored n... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | xsum | human |
human-2349 | Measuring 50cm x 76cm (19.6in x 30in), it was bought by a Welshman living in England at Rogers Jones Co auctioneers in Colwyn Bay on Saturday. Its guide price had been PS200-PS300. The poster features soldiers beside a cannon, with the caption: "Anibyniaeth sydd yn galw am ei dewraf dyn" - or "Independence calls for it... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains specific local details (Measuring ... (19.6in x 30in), Rogers Jones Co auctioneers in Colwyn Bay) and a quoted local-language caption, which is typical of human news reporting. Second, there are small stylistic idiosyncrasies — using 'PS' for a pound sign and varying senten... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains specific local details (Measuring ... (19.6in x 30in), Rogers Jones Co auctioneers in Colwyn Bay) and a direct quoted local-language caption, which is typical of human news reporting. Second, there are small stylistic idiosyncrasies — using 'PS' for a pound sign and a sligh... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows factual inconsistencies (a 'Welman' living in England selling in Colwyn Bay) that suggest lack of real-world grounding. Second, there are language and encoding oddities — 'PS200-PS300' for a guide price and the garbled translation 'Anibyniaeth sydd yn galw am ei dewraf dyn' — ... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains specific local details (Rogers Jones Co auctioneers in Colwyn Bay) and a verbatim translated English caption, suggesting human sourcing rather than generic AI filler. Second, there are small stylistic idiosyncrasies (the missing comma after 'Measuring' and use of 'PS') more... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "AI"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text provides specific and detailed measurements, which is a common feature in both AI and human writing. Second, the structure of the text is straightforward and factual, typical of news reporting, which can be produced by either. Moreover, the use of Welsh and its English translation, while ... | {"rationale": "First, the text follows a tight, newswire-like structure with precise measurements, location, date, and auction-house naming that reads like a factual report rather than spontaneous personal writing. Second, the phrasing is impersonal and information-dense (e.g., guide price, dimensions, buyer descriptio... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a straightforward journalistic style with factual reporting about an auction sale, including specific measurements, location, and price details that suggest professional news writing. Second, the structure follows standard news format with concrete details (dimensions, place name... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits precise factual reporting with specific measurements, auction details, and bilingual caption presentation, which is characteristic of journalistic human writing. Second, the inclusion of localized details like 'Welshman living in England' and 'Rogers Jones Co auctioneers in Colwy... | {"rationale": "First, the text employs a direct, factual reporting style typical of regional journalism, providing specific logistical details like dimensions and auction locations without unnecessary fluff. Second, the inclusion of niche real-world entities such as 'Rogers Jones Co' in 'Colwyn Bay' suggests a grounded... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | xsum | human |
human-2984 | In a tactical race, 24-year-old English held off European Indoor silver medallist Andreas Bube of Denmark to win in 1:49.02. Dublin runner Brian Gregan won the 400m while City of Lisburn club's Amy Foster was second in the 100m in 11.70. Ireland's eighth place in Vaasa meant they were 20th overall in Europe. That is th... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains specific local details (names, times, placings, historical lowest placement reference) and a journalistic narrative flow typical of human news writing. Second, there are small stylistic idiosyncrasies ('In a tactical race' starting mid-clause, use of 'City of Lisburn') sugg... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains specific local details (names, times, placings, historical lowest placement reference) and a journalistic narrative flow typical of human news writing. Second, there are small stylistic idiosyncrasies ('In a tactical race' starting mid-clause, use of 'City of Lisburn') sugg... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains tightly focused, news-specific details (names, times, placements, historical context) presented in a journalistic order typical of human reporting. Second, there are small stylistic idiosyncrasies (e.g., 'In a tactical race...' with no explicit subject) and varied sentence ... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains tightly focused, news-specific details (names, times, placements, historical context) presented in a journalistic order typical of human reporting. Second, there are small stylistic idiosyncrasies (e.g., 'In a tactical race' starting abruptly) suggesting human editing rathe... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text provides a detailed and coherent report of a sporting event, with specific names, times, and places, which is characteristic of human-written sports journalism. Second, the use of precise details such as '1:49.02' and '11.70' suggests a level of specificity that is typical in human report... | {"rationale": "First, the passage reads like a straightforward sports news brief, with specific names, ages, nationalities, times, and placements that are tightly tied to real-world reporting. Second, the structure is a sequence of factual statements with minimal generalization or rhetorical padding, which is more typi... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a news report structure with factual reporting of athletic competition results, including specific times, placements, and athlete names. Second, the writing demonstrates typical sports journalism conventions with concise, information-dense sentences that efficiently convey race o... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains specific numerical data (1:49.02, 11.70), athlete names with correct nationalities and affiliations (Andreas Bube of Denmark, Brian Gregan, Amy Foster of City of Lisburn club), and precise event details (European Indoor silver medallist, League One event, Super League promotion) ... | {"rationale": "First, the text employs a distinct journalistic shorthand, such as using the surname 'English' for the athlete and including specific, accurate race times like 1:49.02. Second, the inclusion of niche regional details, such as the 'City of Lisburn club,' points to local human reporting rather than generic... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | xsum | human |
human-2589 | Richard Gray, 36, admitted intending to cause fear of violence with the fake firearm near Heene and St Mary's Primary Schools on 8 May. He also admitted possessing a knife in Worthing's Victoria Park. Gray, of Cortis Avenue, was sentenced at Crawley Magistrates' Court to eight weeks in prison for each offence, to run c... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains specific local details (Heene and St Mary's Primary Schools, Victoria Park, Crawley Magistrates' Court) and a precise date, which is typical of human news reporting. Second, its concise, journalistic sentence structure with subordinate clauses ('admitted...') and exact lega... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows specific local details (Heene and St Mary's Primary Schools, Crawley Magistrates' Court) and a precise date which is typical of human news reporting. Second, sentence formatting ('eight weeks in prison... to run concurrently') and natural phrasing ('admitted intending to cause... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage has the concise, source-like structure and specific local details (names, addresses, court) typical of human news reporting. Second, there are small stylistic idiosyncrasies — for example 'admitted intending to cause fear of violence with the fake firearm' lacks a hyphen and a court... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage has the concise, source-like structure and specific local details (names, addresses, court) typical of human news reporting. Second, it uses natural journalistic phrasing ('admitted... admitted') and precise legal wording ('sentenced ... to run concurrently') suggesting human editor... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text is written in a formal, journalistic style, which is typical of human-written news articles. Second, it contains specific details such as names, dates, and locations, which are consistent with a human reporter's work. Moreover, the sentence structure and use of legal terminology suggest a... | {"rationale": "First, the passage follows a highly standardized news-brief template: name, age, admissions, locations, dates, court, and sentence, presented in tightly compressed factual clauses. Second, the language is neutral and formulaic (e.g., \"admitted intending to cause fear of violence,\" \"sentenced at [court... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits the characteristic structure of a news report, specifically a crime brief from British media. Second, it contains highly specific details including exact dates (8 May), precise locations (Heene, St Mary's Primary Schools, Victoria Park in Worthing, Crawley Magistrates' Court), a... | {"rationale": "First, the text follows a standard journalistic structure with factual reporting of legal proceedings, including specific names, dates, locations, and court details. Second, it contains precise legal terminology ('admitted intending to cause fear of violence,' 'sentenced concurrently') and contextual det... | {"rationale": "First, the text adheres to a highly standardized journalistic template typical of UK regional news, emphasizing factual density over narrative ornamentation. Second, the inclusion of precise, verifiable details\u2014such as specific school names, street addresses, and court locations\u2014suggests a repo... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | xsum | human |
human-1443 | We are all capable of the horrendous act that Hitler committed or fostered in his life. The right circumstances and societal influences could bring out the same in each of us. I am definitely not supporting any of the atrocities he engaged in. But there is historical perspective that could perhaps explain some of his a... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a personal, inconsistent voice with contractions, self-deprecation, and hedged, tentative phrasing (e.g., 'I am definitely not...') typical of human online posts. Second, it contains small stylistic idiosyncrasies and repetition ('Again... again') and emotionally nuanced ambiv... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a personal, conversational tone with hedging language ('I am definitely not...') and emotional nuance that align with human online discussion. Second, it contains small stylistic inconsistencies and colloquialisms ('But war is war', repeated 'again') suggesting spontaneous hum... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a personal, conversational tone with hedging language ('I am definitely not...') and emotional nuance that align with human online discussion. Second, it contains small stylistic inconsistencies and colloquialisms ('But war is war', repeated 'again') suggesting spontaneous hum... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage displays a personal, emotionally nuanced voice with contractions and self-reflection (e.g., 'I am definitely not supporting...') that aligns with human online discussion. Second, it contains minor stylistic inconsistencies, colloquialisms ('Again, I am thoroughly disgusted...'), and... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a reflective and philosophical tone, which is more characteristic of human writing. Second, the complexity and depth of the argument, including self-reflection and moral considerations, suggest a nuanced human perspective. Moreover, the text contains a natural flow and coherence ... | {"rationale": "First, the passage shows a personal, reflective stance with repeated self-qualification (e.g., \"I am definitely not supporting,\" \"Again, I am thoroughly disgusted\"), which reads like a human anticipating social backlash. Second, the phrasing includes informal, slightly awkward transitions (\"And war ... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a deeply personal and introspective tone, with the author directly engaging with uncomfortable moral questions about their own capacity for evil. The repeated disclaimers ('I am definitely not supporting,' 'Again, I am thoroughly disgusted') suggest authentic human anxiety about ... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits nuanced moral reasoning with self-contradictory elements ('I am definitely not supporting... but there is historical perspective') that reflect complex human thought processes. Second, the conversational tone with interjections ('Again, I am thoroughly disgusted') and personal re... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a deep level of personal introspection and vulnerability\u2014specifically the admission that the writer is personally capable of \"horrible things\"\u2014which implies a human consciousness grappling with its own morality (Jungian shadow work) rather than a machine generating co... | {"verdict": "AI"} | cmv | human |
human-2139 | First of all, I do have a problem with the manner in which drone strikes are carried out by the US, mainly the broad scope and language the Authorization for Use of Military Force grants POTUS. I am not arguing for or against the drone program or the the lack of transparency in which individuals are targeted. What I am... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, argumentative tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows human-like errors and idiosyncrasies — a duplicated word 'the the', inconsistent capitalization, and personal rhetorica... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, argumentative Reddit style consistent with human posting. Second, it shows typographical errors ('the the'), inconsistent spacing, and emotionally charged, loosely structured prose that ... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, argumentative Reddit tone consistent with human posting. Second, it shows typographical errors and repetition ('the the') and uneven phrasing suggesting casual human typing rather than p... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows human-like errors and idiosyncrasies — a duplicated word ('the the'), casual phrasing ('where' for 'were'), and abrupt topi... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a structured and coherent argument, which is characteristic of human writing. Second, the use of specific historical examples (e.g., Confederate soldiers, WWII defectors) and detailed reasoning about the legal and ethical implications of drone strikes suggests a nuanced and infor... | {"rationale": "First, the passage begins with a coherent, opinionated argument that includes minor typos (\u201cthe the,\u201d \u201cwhere\u201d for \u201cwere\u201d) and informal phrasing, which are common in human posts but less typical of polished AI text. Second, it uses context-specific references (\u201cHello, us... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits clear characteristics of authentic online forum discourse, specifically from Reddit's ChangeMyView (CMV) subreddit, as evidenced by the moderator footnote with bracketed hyperlink placeholders and community-specific terminology. Second, the argumentation style shows natural huma... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains a clear stylistic shift from a substantive political argument to a formal moderator footnote, suggesting two distinct authorship sources. Second, the argument section displays human characteristics including informal phrasing ('First of all,' 'Hello, users of CMV!'), a typographi... | {"rationale": "First, the text presents a nuanced, opinionated argument regarding US foreign policy with a conversational tone and minor grammatical imperfections characteristic of human writing. Second, the abrupt transition to a standard automated moderator footer specifically from the 'CMV' subreddit indicates the c... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-1833 | I think that there is a definite double standard between men and women. I think that it's possible for women to objectify guys like Ryan Gosling and Channing Tatum, while, if a guy says that Carmen Electra is hot, he's a sexist pig. I think that women can hit men all they want, but if a man even pretends to hit a woman... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses a highly conversational, forum-specific voice (CMV, TL;DR) and includes community conventions that are typical of human social media posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic humor, personal frustration, and culturally specific references (Ryan Gosling, Channing Tatum, Carmen Electra)... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses a highly conversational, forum-specific voice (CMV, TL;DR) and includes community conventions that are typical of human social media posts. Second, it shows personal bias, emotional engagement, and idiosyncratic phrasings ('I'm also tired of...') suggesting spontaneous human expre... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses highly conversational, community-specific markers (CMV, TL;DR) and a personal voice typical of Reddit-style human posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic humor, emotional engagement, and uneven phrasing ('I'm also tired of...') suggesting spontaneous human expression rather than pol... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses highly conversational, community-specific markers (CMV, TL;DR) and a personal voice suggesting a Reddit-style human poster. Second, it contains idiosyncratic phrasings, emotional tone, and culturally specific references (Ryan Gosling, Channing Tatum, Carmen Electra) consistent wit... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text contains a mix of informal and confrontational language, which is more typical of human-written content. Second, the structure and flow of the argument, while not perfectly coherent, reflects a personal and emotional stance, suggesting a human perspective. Moreover, the use of specific ex... | {"rationale": "First, the text reads like an informal forum post, with colloquial phrasing (\"sexist pig,\" \"shut up about it\") and culturally specific references (Ryan Gosling, Channing Tatum, Carmen Electra) that feel situational rather than templated. Second, the argument unfolds in a rant-like, self-contradictory... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits highly personal, conversational language with repeated use of 'I think' and 'I'm tired,' which reflects authentic human opinion-sharing. Second, the structure is informal and somewhat rambling, lacking the balanced, well-organized paragraphs typical of AI responses. Moreover, th... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits conversational markers like 'I think' and 'I'm tired of' that reflect personal emotional investment and informal tone. Second, it contains specific cultural references (Ryan Gosling, Channing Tatum, Carmen Electra) used in a subjective, opinionated context rather than as neutral ... | {"rationale": "First, the text utilizes specific internet acronyms like \"CMV\" (Change My View) and \"TL;DR,\" placing it firmly within a specific Reddit subculture context that implies organic human participation. Second, the writing style exhibits repetitive sentence structures and contains a spelling error (\"oogli... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-1424 | "Blackface," a white male painting his face black to perform as an racist caricature of a black person goes back a few hundred years in one way or another but didn't really catch on until the 1830s with comic Thomas Rice's song "Jump Jim Crow." The song was accompanied by a dance with Rice in blackface as the character... | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a conversational, forum-style voice with personal markers ('CMV', rhetorical questions, asides) typical of human online posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic errors and informal spellings ('incidentialally'), inconsistent punctuation, and emotional emphasis that suggest spontaneous... | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a conversational Reddit style (CMV, rhetorical questions, personal voice) and includes community-specific markers that suggest human posting. Second, there are multiple typographical errors and inconsistent word choices ('Incidentialally', 'comfrt') plus uneven sentence-level issue... | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a conversational Reddit style (CMV, rhetorical questions, colloquial phrasing) and shows personal voice and emotional engagement typical of human forum posts. Second, there are multiple typos and inconsistent word choices ('Incidentialally', 'comfrt') suggesting spontaneous human t... | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a highly conversational, forum-style voice with personal markers ('CMV', rhetorical questions, emotional emphasis) typical of human online posts. Second, there are multiple typos and inconsistent spellings ('incidentialally', 'comfrt') suggesting spontaneous human typing rather tha... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text has a clear and consistent argumentative structure, which is typical of human writing. Second, it includes nuanced historical context and specific examples, such as the reference to 'Jump Jim Crow' and the timeline of blackface's decline, which suggest a deep understanding of the topic. M... | {"rationale": "First, the passage reads like an informal, forum-style argument: it uses rhetorical questions, direct address (\u201cRepeat:\u201d), and the tag \u201cCMV,\u201d which are common in human online posts. Second, it contains numerous typos and inconsistent phrasing (\u201can racist,\u201d \u201cIncidentiall... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits several hallmark features of authentic human writing, including multiple typos and spelling errors ('comfrt' for 'comfort', 'an' for 'and', 'Incidentially' for 'Incidentally'). Second, the conversational and emotionally charged tone, particularly in rhetorical questions like 'Th... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits strong personal voice and opinionated phrasing with rhetorical questions like 'That's a really long time, right?' and emphatic repetitions like 'Repeat: blackface...' which are characteristic of human argumentation. Second, it contains minor typographical errors ('incidentially,'... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains multiple typos and grammatical errors, such as \"an racist,\" \"Incidentially,\" \"fear an control,\" \"comfrt,\" and \"a acceptable,\" which are highly uncharacteristic of AI models that generally produce mechanically perfect text. Second, the terminology used, specifically \"tr... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-2180 | I believe that Transgenderism is, in fact, a mental disorder, akin to schizophrenia or depression. In fact, it was classified as such by the American Psychiatric Association until less than a year ago; that is part of why I hold this view. Furthermore, there is no physical manifestation of Transgenderism; it is all in ... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses a personal, conversational voice with specific temporal markers ('less than a year ago') and anecdotal framing that is typical of human online posts. Second, it shows small stylistic inconsistencies and colloquial choices (e.g., 'per se', contractions) rather than uniformly pol... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses a conversational, personal voice with contractions and rhetorical markers (e.g., 'I believe') that match human forum posts. Second, it shows small stylistic inconsistencies and colloquialisms ('In fact,' 'per se') suggesting spontaneous human writing rather than polished AI out... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage has a conversational, personal voice with colloquial transitions (e.g., 'In fact,' 'Furthermore') typical of human forum posts. Second, it shows small factual imprecision and subjective hedging ('until less than a year ago'; 'I believe') suggesting spontaneous human opinion rather t... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage has a conversational, personal voice with colloquial transitions (e.g., 'In fact,' 'Furthermore') typical of human online posts. Second, it shows small factual imprecision and emotional bias (sudden shift from claim to justification) suggesting spontaneous human writing rather than ... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text presents a clear and structured argument, which is characteristic of both human and AI writing. Second, the use of specific medical terminology and references to the American Psychiatric Association suggest a level of knowledge that could be either from a well-informed human or a well-tra... | {"rationale": "First, the passage is written as a coherent first-person opinion with clear rhetorical signposting (\u201cIn fact,\u201d \u201cFurthermore,\u201d \u201cWhile\u201d), which is common in both human and AI text. Second, it contains a specific but dubious factual claim (\u201cuntil less than a year ago\u201d... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits a clear argumentative structure with a definitive thesis statement and supporting points, which is common in both human and AI writing. Second, the language contains informal elements like 'in fact' used twice and 'per se,' which suggest a conversational human style rather than ... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a rigid argumentative structure with formulaic transitional phrases like 'In fact,' 'Furthermore,' and 'While we may not,' which is characteristic of AI-generated persuasive writing. Second, the content presents a controversial position with absolute statements ('there is no phys... | {"rationale": "First, the text expresses a highly controversial and subjective opinion that violates the safety and neutrality filters embedded in most modern AI models, which are typically programmed to avoid pathologizing gender identity in this manner. Second, the argument relies heavily on personal belief statement... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-951 | In pretty much any other situation, it's nearly universally agreed that an action that would otherwise be immoral does not suddenly become moral because the person you did it to did something bad first. I see no reason why this principle should not be applied to the case in which you attack someone who attacked you. So... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses polished, balanced language and generic transitional phrases ('In pretty much any other situation...'), a common trait of AI-generated text aiming for neutrality. Second, it avoids personal idiosyncrasies or concrete details and relies on abstract hedging ('some might argue', '... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses polished, balanced language and smooth transitions with few personal idiosyncrasies, a pattern common in AI-generated text. Second, it avoids concrete examples and relies on abstract hedging ('some might argue') while asserting strong normative claims (e.g., 'the right to life.... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses polished, balanced language and smooth transitions with few personal idiosyncrasies, a pattern common in AI-generated text. Second, it avoids concrete examples and relies on abstract hedging ('some might argue') while making bold absolutist claims (e.g., 'the right to life... t... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses polished, balanced language and smooth transitions without personal idiosyncrasies, suggesting algorithmic consistency rather than a distinct human voice. Second, it avoids concrete examples and relies on abstract hedging ('some might argue'), a common trait of AI-generated tex... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "AI"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text presents a well-structured argument with clear logical progression and coherent use of ethical principles. Second, the vocabulary and phrasing are consistent with human writing, including the use of idiomatic expressions like 'pretty much any other situation.' Moreover, the text demonstra... | {"rationale": "First, the passage presents a tightly organized moral argument with clear signposting (e.g., principle \u2192 application to self-defense \u2192 anticipated objection \u2192 stated limits \u2192 conclusion), which is common in both careful human writing and AI outputs. Second, the diction and rhythm feel... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits sophisticated philosophical argumentation with nuanced ethical reasoning, referencing Machiavellianism and engaging with counterarguments preemptively. Second, the writing contains natural hedging language ('pretty much,' 'nearly universally') and conversational elements that sug... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a highly structured argumentative style with clear logical progression and formal transitions like 'I contend that' and 'Some might argue that,' which is characteristic of AI-generated philosophical discourse. Second, the language is consistently precise and avoids colloquialisms... | {"rationale": "First, the text utilizes informal conversational phrasing, such as \"pretty much,\" which diverges from the consistently polished and formal tone typical of AI language models. Second, the author inserts strong subjective opinions, such as declaring a Machiavellian position \"completely indefensible,\" r... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-1338 | Whenever a person of the male gender argues on the side of feminism or other forms of equality, they are labeled as being a "white knight" or a "social justice warrior." They are also accused of having self-profiting motivations rather than genuine motivations. For example, they may be accused of "stirring the pot" or ... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings, rhetorical questions, and mild inconsistencies that suggest spontaneous human composition rather t... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings, rhetorical questions, and small inconsistencies (e.g., 'How do we know that?') suggesting spontane... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed link placeholders) and colloquial, context-rich references ('Bob Chipman... or David Willis') consistent with copied human forum text. Second, there are small stylistic inconsistencies, rhetorical questions, and mil... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, named posters) and colloquial, context-dependent phrasing typical of human online discussion. Second, there are small inconsistencies and stylistic idiosyncrasies (repetition, casual tone, bracketed link placeholders) suggest... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text contains a mix of formal and informal language, which is more typical of human writing. Second, the specific examples of people (e.g., Bob Chipman, Jim Sterling) and the context (CMV, moderators' note) suggest a personal and community-specific touch, which is less likely in AI-generated t... | {"rationale": "First, the passage shows strong platform-specific markers (\"Hello, users of CMV!\" plus moderator boilerplate about rules, reporting, and downvotes), which is characteristic of copied or organically written Reddit content rather than freshly generated prose. Second, it contains informal, rhetorical ques... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits clear human markers through its conversational argumentation style and genuine questioning tone. Second, the writing contains subtle imperfections characteristic of authentic human composition, including slightly awkward phrasing like 'person of the male gender' instead of the m... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a clear structural shift from a substantive argument about gender politics to a formal moderator footnote, creating an abrupt transition that suggests artificial composition. Second, the initial argument section presents a cohesive but somewhat formulaic rhetorical progression wi... | {"rationale": "First, the text cites specific internet personalities (Bob Chipman, Jim Sterling) and discusses niche internet culture terms like \"white knight,\" reflecting a human's specific cultural knowledge. Second, the text abruptly transitions into a standard subreddit moderator template (\"Hello, users of CMV!\... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-963 | Yesterday, it was announced that [the US Marine Corps. was delaying it's female fitness plan] after less than half its female recruits could do the minimum of three pull-ups. Then there's the story of [Wendy Tapia] , who despite failing a required FDNY running test five times (a 1.5 mile run in 12 minutes without gear)... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows forum-specific markers ('CMV', 'Edit:', 'delta') and a conversational, self-correcting tone typical of human online discussion. Second, it contains idiosyncratic errors and stylistic quirks (misused ellipses, inconsistent spacing, bracketed asides) that AI rarely produce so natur... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows forum-specific markers ('CMV', 'Edit:', 'delta') and a conversational, self-correcting tone typical of human online discussion. Second, it contains idiosyncratic errors and stylistic quirks (misused ellipses, inconsistent spacing, bracketed link placeholders) suggesting casual hu... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows forum-specific markers ('CMV', 'Edit:', 'delta') and a conversational, self-correcting tone typical of human online discussion. Second, it contains idiosyncratic errors and stylistic quirks (misused ellipses, inconsistent spacing, bracketed link placeholders) suggesting casual hu... | {
"rationale": "First, the post displays a highly conversational, forum-specific voice with markers like 'CMV', 'Edit:', bracketed links, and personal deltas which are typical of human Reddit posts. Second, it contains idiosyncratic phrasings, emotional hedging ('I would never advocate...'), and uneven structure sugg... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text contains a coherent and structured argument, which is typical of human writing. Second, the use of specific examples and personal reflections, such as the anecdote about Wendy Tapia, suggests a human touch. Moreover, the edit at the end, where the author acknowledges feedback and maintain... | {"rationale": "First, the text shows highly personal stance-taking and rhetorical flourish (e.g., \u201cyou know what doesn\u2019t understand that? Fires.\u201d) that reads like spontaneous human persuasion rather than templated exposition. Second, it contains platform-specific markers\u2014\u201cCMV,\u201d \u201cthrea... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits clear markers of human-written Reddit discourse, specifically from the 'Change My View' (CMV) subreddit, evidenced by the explicit 'CMV' notation and reference to 'delta' rewards (the subreddit's mechanism for acknowledging changed views). Second, the writing contains stylistic ... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits strong personal conviction and argumentative structure with clear rhetorical devices like 'Long story short' and conversational interjections such as 'you know what doesn't understand that? Fires.' Second, it contains specific cultural references (US Marine Corps, FDNY, Sweden) p... | {"rationale": "First, the text employs specific community jargon such as \"CMV\" and \"delta,\" and includes a retrospective \"Edit\" describing interactions with commenters, which reflects genuine human participation in a specific Reddit forum. Second, the presence of formatting artifacts like brackets (likely remnant... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-858 | I suspect that rMensRights will be the more controversial of these choices. Anyways, I should clarify what I mean. These kinds of subs "leak" into the rest of reddit, while tainting it's image. Most of the people I know have hear of reddit either as as home for pedophiles, or a sexist racist mess. Ignoring whether thei... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows colloquial, context-specific markers like 'Anyways' and 'CMV' and uses profanity and personal asides in a way typical of human online comments. Second, there are small typos and repetition ('as as') and inconsistent grammar that suggest spontaneous human typing rather than polish... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses casual, forum-specific language ('Anyways', 'CMV') and shows typographical slips ('as as') consistent with spontaneous human typing. Second, it displays strong personal voice, profanity, and inconsistent grammar/usage ('it's image' followed by misuse of 'its') suggesting human err... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses casual, forum-specific language and slang ('Anyways', 'CMV') and shows typographical slips ('as as') consistent with spontaneous human typing. Second, there are inconsistent grammar choices and colloquial repetition ('it's image' then 'I should clarify...') suggesting human incons... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows colloquial, context-specific Reddit behavior (use of 'as as' and 'CMV') and small typos/grammatical slips ('have hear of reddit') typical of spontaneous human typing. Second, it contains strong personal voice, profanity, and emotionally nuanced uncertainty ('I suspect...'), sugge... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text contains informal language and colloquialisms, such as 'Anyways' and 'I just think they are shit,' which are more common in human writing. Second, the text shows a clear opinion and personal stance, suggesting a human's subjective viewpoint. Moreover, there are minor grammatical errors li... | {"rationale": "First, the passage contains informal, conversational markers typical of a human Reddit comment (e.g., \"Anyways,\" \"another CMV for another day,\" and self-corrections like \"I should clarify\"). Second, it shows uneven mechanics and spontaneous errors (\"have hear,\" duplicated \"as as,\" and inconsist... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits several markers of authentic human writing, including casual Reddit-specific terminology ('rMensRights,' 'subs,' 'CMV') that reflects genuine platform familiarity. Second, the writing contains natural grammatical inconsistencies typical of informal human discourse, such as the i... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains multiple grammatical errors and informal constructions ('it's' instead of 'its', 'hear' instead of 'heard', 'as as home') that are more characteristic of human typing than AI generation, which typically maintains grammatical consistency. Second, the conversational tone with phras... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains multiple mechanical errors and typos, such as the incorrect use of \"it's\" for the possessive \"its\" twice, the phrase \"have hear\" instead of \"heard,\" and the repetition in \"as as,\" which are highly uncharacteristic of AI models that default to perfect grammar. Second, th... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-173 | Subjective sports cheapen Olympic medals, in an objective sport, the first person across the line of the team with the most goals wins. In a subjective sport, judges cannot help but be biased towards people that they perceive as being good, or from countries that they like. It's a psychological thing. On top of that, E... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a casual, conversational tone with personal asides ('It's a psychological thing') and inconsistent formatting/typos (e.g., 'GymnasticsRythmic', missing space after '-'), which are typical of quick human writing. Second, it contains specific cultural references and idiosyncrati... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows colloquial phrasing, inconsistent punctuation/capitalization (e.g., 'List of subjective Olympic sports...' with no list) and typographical errors ('GymnasticsRythmic') typical of quick human typing. Second, it contains personal voice and opinionated asides ('It's a psychologic... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows casual, conversational phrasing and idiosyncratic errors (e.g., 'GymnasticsRythmic') more typical of quick human typing than polished AI output. Second, it contains personal voice ('It's a psychological thing'), inconsistent structure, and list formatting suggesting human note... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows abrupt topic shifts, mechanical transitions ('On top of that'), and inconsistent tone (serious then slang), patterns common in AI-generated text. Second, there are token-level oddities—stray spaces before punctuation, concatenated words ('GymnasticsRythmic'), and repetitive 'i... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text contains a mix of well-structured and less coherent sentences, such as the abrupt shift in the second sentence. Second, there is a notable lack of punctuation and capitalization errors, like 'Rythmic' and 'figure skatingice dancing,' which are more common in AI-generated text. Moreover, t... | {"rationale": "First, the text reads like an informal, opinionated rant with inconsistent capitalization, misspellings (e.g., \"Rythmic\"), and run-on sentences, which is more typical of spontaneous human writing than polished AI output. Second, the structure is messy: the list formatting is irregular, items are concat... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits multiple formatting and grammatical errors characteristic of hasty human writing, including missing spaces between list items ('GymnasticsRythmic Gymnastics,' 'skatingice dancing,' 'Skiingsnowboarding'). Second, the sentence structure is informal and conversational, with a fragme... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a clear argumentative structure with a strong opinion and personal judgment, which is more characteristic of human expression than balanced AI analysis. Second, it contains informal phrasing like \"It's a psychological thing\" and abrupt transitions, reflecting natural human conv... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains punctuation errors, specifically a comma splice in the opening sentence, which contradicts the grammatical precision usually found in AI outputs. Second, the list at the end exhibits significant formatting mistakes where words are run together (e.g., \"GymnasticsRythmic,\" \"skat... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-1770 | EDIT: Dear guitarists of Reddit, thank you for some amazing comments! Although I have realised my view is far too vague to be debated with good results, if I were to re-submit the same sort of view to this sub-reddit I would make it a lot more precise. Once again, a rude comment won't get you anything but reported. The... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (EDIT tag, subreddit conventions, moderator footnote with bracketed links) and casual, idiosyncratic phrasing typical of human posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, colloquialisms ('tbh'), and uneven punctuation/spacing that suggest spontane... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific markers (EDIT tag, subreddit conventions, moderator footnote with bracketed links) that match real Reddit posts rather than generic AI output. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings, small grammatical slips, and conversational tone ('... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific markers (EDIT tag, subreddit conventions, moderator footnote with bracketed links) consistent with a copied Reddit post rather than AI-generated generic text. Second, there are small stylistic inconsistencies, colloquialisms ('tbh'), an... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific markers (EDIT tag, subreddit conventions, moderator footnote) consistent with a copied Reddit post rather than AI-generated generic text. Second, it shows human-like idiosyncrasies — casual shorthand (tbh), uneven punctuation, personal ... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text contains a mix of formal and informal language, which is typical in human-written Reddit posts. Second, the author's personal experience and opinion are clearly expressed, indicating a subjective, human perspective. Moreover, the text includes specific references to Reddit culture and com... | {"rationale": "First, the text has strong platform-specific markers (\"EDIT,\" direct address to \"guitarists of Reddit,\" and the CMV moderator boilerplate), which are typical of a human post copied from Reddit rather than an AI-generated standalone essay. Second, the writing shows informal, uneven phrasing and minor ... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits clear emotional investment and personal frustration, particularly in the opening edit where the author responds defensively to critical comments. The use of phrases like 'your little electric guitar fandom' and 'tbh it means you would have failed' demonstrates authentic human an... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains clear platform-specific markers like 'EDIT:', 'sub-reddit', and references to 'CMV' (Change My View) subreddit conventions, which are characteristic of human Reddit users. Second, the writing shows emotional engagement with phrases like 'rude comment won't get you anything but re... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits grammatical errors and informal phrasing, such as \"debating something who thinks,\" which are indicative of human typing rather than polished AI generation. Second, the emotional and defensive tone, illustrated by specific jabs like \"little electric guitar fandom,\" reflects hu... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-1420 | Reposting is probably one of, if not the most often bemoaned actions on Reddit. Users are incredibly quick to point out if content has been posted before, especially in TIL, either as some strange form of boast or by negating the OP. Frequently I look into the comments section for more info or commentary on the post, o... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses colloquial, context-specific markers (TIL, OP, CMv) and a personal voice typical of forum posts. Second, it shows nuanced opinion, rhetorical questions, and mild stylistic inconsistencies that humans commonly produce whereas AI outputs often smooth or overexplain. Moreover, the... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses colloquial, context-specific forum language (e.g., 'Cmv', 'OP', 'TIL') and shows personal, opinionated nuance typical of human posts. Second, it contains small stylistic inconsistencies and rhetorical questions ('Or is there a benefit?') suggesting spontaneous human writing rat... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses colloquial, context-specific forum language (e.g., 'Cmv', 'OP', 'TIL') and shows personal, idiosyncratic phrasing typical of human posts. Second, it contains minor stylistic inconsistencies and rhetorical questions ('Or is there a benefit?') suggesting spontaneous human thought... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific conventions (TIL, OP, CMv) and a conversational, idiosyncratic tone typical of human casual posts. Second, it shows small stylistic inconsistencies and personal hedging ('I would be interested...') rather than polished, overly generic AI output. Moreover, the... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text displays a natural flow and conversational tone, which is characteristic of human writing. Second, it contains nuanced observations and personal reflections, such as the frustration with reposting and the impact on user engagement, which are more likely to come from a human's experience. ... | {"rationale": "First, the passage shows a natural, conversational Reddit voice with informal phrasing (e.g., \u201ckarma whore,\u201d \u201cMaybe you guys\u201d) and community-specific shorthand (\u201cTIL,\u201d \u201cOP,\u201d \u201cCmv\u201d) that reads like an authentic forum post. Second, it contains minor roughne... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a conversational and informal tone with phrases like 'maybe you guys know' and 'Cmv' (change my view), which are characteristic of genuine Reddit discourse. Second, the writing contains minor structural imperfections, such as the awkward phrasing 'one of, if not the most' and the... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits natural conversational flow with colloquial phrases like 'karma whore' and 'Cmv' (Change My View), which are characteristic of human Reddit discourse. Second, it includes subjective opinions and personal experiences ('Frequently I look into the comments section') that reflect ind... | {"rationale": "First, the text employs specific Reddit community jargon such as \"TIL,\" \"OC,\" \"OP,\" and \"karma whore\" with a natural fluency that suggests deep familiarity with the subculture rather than AI mimicry. Second, the structural flow is conversational and includes informalities like the abrupt, lowerca... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-248 | (quick note: I am in general OK with people using seximracismwhat-have-you jokingly. In specific instances in can be bad, but that isn't really what this CMV is about) I often see people who are otherwise in favor of gender equality use the phrase 'man up' to tell people that they are being a coward and need to stop be... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage has a conversational, forum-specific voice with typos and idiosyncratic phrasings ('in general OK', 'seximracismwhat-have-you') that match human casual posting. Second, it shows personal context, emotional nuance, and uneven sentence-level errors rather than polished, consistently s... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses casual, forum-specific phrasing ('CMV') and includes personal context ('I am in general OK...'), which matches human conversational posting. Second, there are small typos and idiosyncrasies ('in specific instances in can be bad', 'seximracismwhat-have-you') suggesting spontaneous ... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses casual, forum-specific language ('CMV') and personal context ('I am in general OK...'), which matches human online posting patterns. Second, there are typographical slips and uneven punctuation ('in specific instances in can be bad') suggesting spontaneous typing rather than polis... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses casual, forum-specific language ('CMV') and personal context ('I am in general OK...'), suggesting a human conversational tone. Second, there are typographical slips and uneven punctuation ('in specific instances in can be bad') typical of quick human typing rather than polished A... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text contains a conversational and informal tone, which is typical of human writing. Second, it includes personal opinions and a nuanced view on a sensitive topic, suggesting a human's subjective perspective. Moreover, the use of colloquial phrases like 'man up' and 'what-have-you' indicates a... | {"rationale": "First, the text has a conversational, self-correcting flow with parentheses, hedges, and informal phrasing (e.g., \u201cquick note,\u201d \u201cwhat-have-you,\u201d \u201cno matter how you swing it\u201d), which is typical of spontaneous human writing. Second, it contains minor grammatical roughness (\u2... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits highly informal, conversational language with characteristics like parenthetical asides, colloquialisms ('what-have-you,' 'how you swing it'), and the casual abbreviation 'CMV' (Change My View, from Reddit). Second, the opening parenthetical disclaimer shows authentic human hedgi... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains conversational markers like 'quick note' and parenthetical asides that reflect spontaneous human thought organization. Second, the phrasing includes informal contractions ('what-have-you', 'isn't') and colloquial expressions ('no matter how you swing it') characteristic of human ... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains distinct mechanical errors, such as the clustered phrasing \"seximracismwhat-have-you\" and the typo \"in can be bad,\" which are characteristic of human typing rather than AI generation. Second, the structural use of a defensive parenthetical disclaimer to pre-emptively address ... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-2091 | Pretty self-explanatory title. I don't think Nightmares 3 - 6 (Freddy's Dead) were meant to scare people, they were slasher comedies. In Dream Warriors (3) the kills were comedic in nature (including my all-time favorite: "Welcome to Prime Time, Bitch!, and apart from Kristen, none of the kids were especially sympathet... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, idiosyncratic voice consistent with human online posting. Second, it shows personal taste, casual digressions, and inconsistent punctuation/parentheses that are typical of spontaneous hu... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, colloquial phrasings, and copy-paste artifacts (mismatched quotes, odd spacing) suggesting manual e... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, colloquial phrasings, and copy-paste artifacts (mismatched quotes, spacing, and explicit 'Not Inclu... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone consistent with human online posting. Second, there are idiosyncratic errors and informal phrasings (e.g., mismatched quotes, missing spaces) suggesting spontaneous human ... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text is written in a conversational and informal style, which is common in human-written posts. Second, it contains specific and nuanced opinions about the 'Nightmare on Elm Street' series, suggesting a personal and detailed engagement with the content. Moreover, the post includes a footnote f... | {"rationale": "First, the passage has the hallmarks of an authentic forum post: a conversational opener (\u201cPretty self-explanatory title\u201d), subjective asides, and idiosyncratic phrasing like \u201cridiculously blatant gay-erotica overtones aside,\u201d which reads more like spontaneous human commentary than mo... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits clear markers of authentic human discourse on Reddit, specifically from the ChangeMyView (CMV) subreddit, as evidenced by the direct address to 'users of CMV' and moderator footnote about subreddit rules. Second, the writing style contains informal, conversational elements like ... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a clear conversational tone with personal opinions and informal expressions like 'Pretty self-explanatory title' and 'Welcome to Prime Time, Bitch!' that suggest human spontaneity. Second, the structure includes abrupt topic shifts and parenthetical asides that are characteristic... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a highly distinct, subjective voice with specific pop-culture references and informal phrasing, such as \"wacky new method\" and the quote \"Prime Time, Bitch!\", which aligns with authentic human fan discussions. Second, the structure is characteristic of a Reddit \"Change My Vi... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-1422 | I know there's a lot that goes along with this (that I will try to address sufficiently below)... but for a tl;dr my reasoning is that if other nations don't hate us, we won't have to spend ridiculous amounts of money on the military because no big conflict will arise. Now I know this is an extremely complicated matter... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a conversational, idiosyncratic voice with colloquialisms ('tl;dr'), contractions, and typographical slips ('mayve', 'millitary') that are typical of human typing. Second, it contains personal hedging, moral ambivalence, and uneven organization—narrative digressions and self-c... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses a highly conversational, forum-style voice with personal hedging ('I know', 'I've always thought') and includes casual typos/colloquialisms ('mayve', 'tl;dr') typical of human online writing. Second, it shows nuanced uncertainty, self-correction, and specific cultural references (... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows a conversational, idiosyncratic voice with colloquialisms ('tl;dr'), contractions ('mayve'), and typographical slips ('millitary') typical of human forum writing. Second, it contains personal hedging, uneven structure, and specific cultural references (Brazil, 400 billion) sugges... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows a highly conversational, idiosyncratic voice with personal hedging ('I know', 'I've always thought') and forum-specific cues (tl;dr, parentheses, slang) typical of human online writing. Second, it contains small errors and stylistic inconsistencies (misspelling 'mayve', casual co... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text contains a mix of formal and informal language, with some grammatical errors and colloquial phrases, which is more typical of human writing. Second, the content shows a clear, personal, and somewhat idealistic perspective, with a natural flow of thoughts and ideas that are not perfectly s... | {"rationale": "First, the passage has a strongly personal, conversational voice with hedging and self-corrections (e.g., \u201cI know\u2026\u201d, \u201cNow I know\u2026\u201d, \u201cI think\u2026\u201d) that read like spontaneous human drafting rather than polished generation. Second, it contains multiple informal mar... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits a highly conversational and informal tone with casual phrases like 'tl;dr,' 'mayve' (a typo for 'maybe'), and 'wouldn't want to harm someone,' which are characteristic of spontaneous human writing. Second, the structure is somewhat disorganized and stream-of-consciousness, with ... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits natural conversational markers like 'tl;dr,' 'mayve' (typo for 'maybe'), and informal interjections ('So mayve doing this won't do a damn thing for them'), which are characteristic of human spontaneity. Second, the argument structure is meandering yet cohesive, with personal refl... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains distinct spelling errors, such as \"mayve\" instead of \"maybe\" and \"millitary\" with a double 'l', which are highly uncharacteristic of AI models that default to perfect orthography. Second, the writing style employs internet-specific conventions like \"tl;dr\" and casual, emo... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-2184 | I'm not confident that we can avert global warming. If we all acted in unison, today, we could almost certainly fix the problem. I don't know we will. I think even if we do fix this problem, we've only delayed the greater problem (habitability problems) by a few millennia. As long as we're on Earth, we're vulnerable. T... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses a casual, forum-specific voice ('Well, go on, CMV') and includes community conventions like 'etc, etc' and personal hedging ('I'm not confident...'), which are typical of human online posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings and small grammatical slips ('economically places... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses a casual, conversational tone with forum-specific shorthand ('CMV') and personal hedging ('I'm not confident...'), matching typical human online posting. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings ('economically places are terrible', 'etc, etc') and small grammatical slips that huma... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses a casual, conversational tone with forum-specific shorthand ('CMV') and personal hedging ('I'm not confident...'), patterns common in human online posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings and small grammatical slips ('economically places are terrible', 'etc, etc') suggestin... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses a highly conversational, forum-specific voice ('Go on, CMV') and personal uncertainty markers ('I'm not confident...'), suggesting a human Reddit-style poster. Second, it shows colloquial fillers ('etc, etc'), uneven phrasing ('economically places are terrible'), and small stylist... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a conversational and somewhat informal tone, which is more characteristic of human writing. Second, the content shows a coherent but complex line of reasoning, including nuanced views on global issues and long-term human survival, which is more typical of a human writer. Moreover... | {"rationale": "First, the passage has a strongly personal, opinionated voice with hedging and self-corrections (e.g., \u201cI don\u2019t know we will,\u201d \u201cI think even if\u201d), which reads like spontaneous human reasoning rather than polished generation. Second, it includes informal internet markers and disco... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits a stream-of-consciousness quality with informal phrasing ('I don't know we will' instead of 'I don't know if we will') and colloquial expressions ('etc, etc') that suggest spontaneous human thought. Second, the argumentative structure is somewhat disjointed, jumping from climate... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits strong personal conviction and emotional investment through phrases like 'I'm not confident' and 'I think,' which are characteristic of human expression. Second, it contains informal conversational markers such as 'etc, etc' and 'Well, go on,' which reflect natural human speech p... | {"rationale": "First, the text employs specific internet subculture slang and formatting, specifically the acronym \"CMV\" (Change My View) and the sign-off \"Well, go on,\" which places it firmly within the context of a Reddit forum submission. Second, the writing exhibits minor grammatical casualness and awkward phra... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-1471 | I don't understand why people support the Palestinian cause. Palestinian nationalism is baseless, and Palestinian groups with nationalistic aspirations use extremely violent means to persuade the Israeli state to give Palestinian people more rights. How can it be said that they deserve it after all of the murders they ... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses a personal, conversational voice with direct questions and emotional engagement ('Can someone please explain...'), which is typical of human online posts. Second, it shows nuanced, context-aware beliefs (support for Palestinians' rights while opposing violence) and avoids generic,... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses a personal, conversational tone with direct questions and emotional engagement ('Can someone please explain...'), which matches human online posting patterns. Second, it shows small stylistic inconsistencies (contraction 'don't', emphatic 'IS' in parentheses, comma placement) sugg... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses a personal, conversational tone with direct questions and emotional engagement ('Can someone please explain...'), which is typical of human online posts. Second, there are small stylistic inconsistencies (all-caps 'IS', casual phrasing) suggesting spontaneous typing rather than po... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses a highly conversational, forum-style voice with personal uncertainty and direct appeal for persuasion (\"Can someone please explain...\"), which matches human online behavior. Second, it shows emotional investment, colloquial emphasis (ALL CAPS \"IS\") and small stylistic inconsis... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a clear and direct opinion, which is common in human writing. Second, the emotional and subjective tone, along with the request for an explanation, suggests a personal and genuine inquiry. Moreover, the use of rhetorical questions and the informal structure are typical of human e... | {"rationale": "First, the passage reads like a spontaneous personal appeal: it uses first-person framing (\"I don't understand,\" \"Can someone please explain this to me\") and invites dialogue rather than presenting a polished, balanced exposition. Second, it contains emotionally charged, opinionated language and rhet... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits genuine confusion and invitation for dialogue through the direct question 'Can someone please explain this to me, and potentially change my view?' which is characteristic of human discourse seeking understanding. Second, the text contains emotionally charged language and a clear... | {"rationale": "First, the text presents a highly polarized political argument with emotional language and rhetorical questions, which is characteristic of human expression in online debates. Second, it contains nuanced contradictions such as disagreeing with Zionism while acknowledging Israel's Jewish state status, ref... | {"rationale": "First, the text expresses a strongly subjective and controversial political opinion regarding the legitimacy of nationalism, lacking the neutrality and hedging typically programmed into AI models for sensitive topics. Second, the concluding sentence explicitly mimics the social conventions of online foru... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-390 | As the title says, I've recently fallen in with a group of people who love to drink and party together. By that I mean that more or less the same group of people get together and have drinks at one of their houses. Every weekend they're all so excited to get together for drinks and all I can think of is all the other m... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links, edit note) and colloquial phrasing typical of human forum posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, typos ('spending time them'), and conversational redundancies that suggest spon... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links, edit note) and conversational tone typical of human forum posts. Second, there are small typos, inconsistent spacing, and colloquial phrasings ('I like spending time them') suggesting s... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links, edit note) and conversational tone typical of human forum posts. Second, there are small typos, colloquial phrasings ('throwaway', 'Productive really wasn't the word') and uneven gramma... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links, edit note) consistent with a copied Reddit post, which is typical of human forum content. Second, it shows casual typos, inconsistent spacing, emotive emphasis (e.g., MUCH), and convers... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text has a conversational and personal tone, with specific details like '2am' and 'Reddit account username,' which are typical in human-written posts. Second, the edit at the end, clarifying the word 'productive,' is a natural human touch. Moreover, the content and context suggest a genuine, r... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains highly contextual, platform-specific markers (\u201cThrowaway\u2026 Reddit account username,\u201d \u201cusers of CMV,\u201d and a moderator footnote) that read like a real reposted thread rather than an AI-composed essay. Second, the voice shows natural self-correction and impre... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits clear markers of authentic human writing from a social media platform (Reddit's ChangeMyView). The casual, conversational tone with phrases like 'As the title says' and 'I'm at a total loss here' reflects genuine personal frustration. Second, the structural imperfections are tel... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits authentic human conversational patterns with emotional nuance like 'I'd MUCH rather be in bed' and self-correction ('Edit: Productive really wasn't the word...'). Second, it includes platform-specific contextual elements (Reddit throwaway account, CMV subreddit conventions, moder... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains a specific grammatical error\u2014\"I like spending time them\" is missing the word \"with\"\u2014which is a common human typo but rare in AI models that default to perfect grammar. Second, the structure includes distinctive forum behaviors, such as mentioning a \"Throwaway\" acc... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-1756 | 1. The presenter overdoes the "you have to stop this right now" way of using the buzzer even when it's not necessary. 2. She laughs too much at the jokes it almost feels fake. 3. 3 ads in a 30-minute show compared to 1 in the original British show, one of which is just before the credits. 4. Having guest stars and leav... | {
"rationale": "First, the text uses casual, idiosyncratic phrasing ('That's all I can think of for now') and small inconsistencies (double space, uneven bullet depth) typical of quick human writing. Second, it shows personal subjective judgments and specific cultural reference (British show) with conversational tone... | {
"rationale": "First, the text uses casual, conversational phrasing and personal markers (e.g., 'That's all I can think of for now') typical of human forum posts. Second, it shows small inconsistencies and idiosyncratic choices ('3 ads in a 30-minute show' with a missing hyphen) suggesting spontaneous typing rather ... | {
"rationale": "First, the text uses casual, conversational phrasing and personal markers ('That's all I can think of for now') typical of human forum posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies and colloquial slips (repeated '3', odd comma placement) suggesting spontaneous typing rather than polished AI output. M... | {
"rationale": "First, the text uses casual, first-person phrasing ('That's all I can think of for now') and includes concrete personal observations (laughs, forgetting to assign points) suggesting lived viewing rather than generic AI output. Second, there are small stylistic inconsistencies and colloquialisms ('even... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text is a list of observations and critiques, which is structured in a way that seems more natural for a human to write. Second, the informal tone and the specific, detailed criticisms suggest personal experience and opinion, which are typically more characteristic of human writing. Moreover, ... | {"rationale": "First, the text reads like spontaneous viewer feedback: it\u2019s a numbered list of mixed-length complaints with informal phrasing (e.g., \u201cfeels fake,\u201d \u201cjust feels lame,\u201d \u201cfor some reason\u201d) and minor inconsistencies like the repeated \u201c3.\u201d Second, there are run-on ... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits a distinctly human, informal critique style with personal observations and subjective reactions like 'feels fake' and 'feels lame.' Second, the numbered list format is casual and stream-of-consciousness, lacking the polished organization typical of AI outputs. Moreover, the spec... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a stream-of-consciousness structure with numbered but loosely connected critiques, lacking cohesive transitions between points. Second, the phrasing contains conversational imperfections like 'it almost feels fake' and 'feels lame,' which reflect natural human expression rather t... | {"rationale": "First, the text utilizes a colloquial and opinionated tone with specific complaints like \"feels lame\" and \"feels fake,\" reflecting a genuine emotional response typical of human reviewers. Second, the formatting appears as a run-on paragraph with embedded numbers, whereas an AI would typically default... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-57 | I have not had an easy life. My parents were abusive, and as a result I developed PTSD. Recently the psych has started suggesting bipolar, and it fits. I've struggled with eating disorders, anxiety, and self harm. I've lost everyone I cared about, including my grandparents (who were more parents to me than my regular p... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows a highly personal, emotionally nuanced voice with specific lived details (PTSD, eating disorders, grandparents) and community-specific shorthand ('CMV') that match genuine Reddit submissions. Second, there are typographic idiosyncrasies and uneven spacing ('IQjust the facts', '50... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows highly specific personal details, emotional nuance, and forum-specific markers ('CMV', 'unattractive') that match genuine human online behavior. Second, there are small typographic inconsistencies and colloquial phrasings ('I've lost everyone... including my grandparents...') whi... | {
"rationale": "First, the post displays highly specific personal details, emotional nuance, and forum-specific markers ('CMV', 'unattractive') consistent with a real Reddit user's submission. Second, there are small typographic idiosyncrasies and uneven phrasing ('IQjust the facts', '50 peoplehas') typical of human ... | {
"rationale": "First, the post displays highly specific personal details, emotional rawness, and forum-specific markers ('CMV', 'unattractive') consistent with a genuine Reddit submission. Second, there are typographic idiosyncrasies and uneven spacing ('IQjust the facts'), casual phrasing, and moral ambiguity that ... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text is highly personal and emotional, with a level of detail and rawness that is more characteristic of human writing. Second, the narrative structure and flow, including the use of parenthetical asides and self-reflection, suggest a human touch. Moreover, the inclusion of specific and person... | {"rationale": "First, the passage reads like an emotionally urgent personal confession with specific life details (abusive parents, PTSD, possible bipolar diagnosis, eating disorders, grandparents, loss of a child) that feel situational rather than generically assembled. Second, the writing contains human-like imperfec... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits deeply personal vulnerability and emotional rawness that is characteristic of genuine human distress, including specific biographical details about family relationships and mental health diagnoses. Second, the writing contains stylistic irregularities and authentic voice markers... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits a highly structured yet emotionally raw presentation of multiple complex personal struggles, which is characteristic of human vulnerability rather than AI's tendency toward balanced or sanitized narratives. Second, the abrupt transitions between clinical details (PTSD, bipolar, e... | {"rationale": "First, the text contains specific typographical errors, such as missing spaces in \"IQjust\" and \"meover,\" which are characteristic of human typing or copy-pasting rather than the typically flawless grammar of AI. Second, the content involves a detailed first-person justification for self-harm and the ... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
human-1831 | First off I'll admit that I'm biased by Western liberal media - especially the likes of Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Bill Maher, Charlie Brooker and numerous documentaries from the liberal side of the spectrum, particularly Adam Curtis, in his "Power of Nightmares"; and numerous documentaries on inequality and the glo... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows a conversational, self-correcting forum-style voice with explicit 'Edit:' and personal asides that are typical of human online posts. Second, it contains idiosyncratic choices—typos ('i' for lowercase i'), inconsistent capitalization, repetition, and emotionally nuanced bias—that... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows a conversational, self-referential tone with personal admissions ('First off...'), an 'Edit:' note, and a signed recommendation to read a specific document, patterns common in human forum posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, colloquial emphases (e.g., 'i DO NOT...') an... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows a conversational, forum-style voice with personal admissions ('First off...'), an 'Edit:' note, and a direct invitation to respond, patterns common in human online posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, colloquial emphases (e.g., 'i DO NOT...') and a pasted link prompt s... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows a highly personal, conversational Reddit-style voice with explicit 'Edit:' and first-person admissions that match human forum behavior. Second, it contains idiosyncratic emphases (all-caps, repeated words, casual typos like 'i' for an em dash) suggesting spontaneous human typing ... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"rationale": "First, the text is highly opinionated and emotionally charged, which is more characteristic of human writing. Second, the structure is somewhat disorganized and repetitive, with a mix of personal opinions and broad generalizations, typical of a passionate human argument. Moreover, the text includes a spe... | {"rationale": "First, the passage has a highly idiosyncratic, emotionally charged voice with personal qualifiers (\"I'll admit that I'm biased,\" \"In my opinion\") and specific pop-culture/documentary references that read like lived media consumption rather than a generic, model-neutral overview. Second, it shows typi... | {"rationale": "First, this text exhibits strong personal voice and emotional investment, opening with 'First off I'll admit that I'm biased' and repeatedly using first-person perspective ('I've come to believe', 'In my opinion'). Second, the writing contains stylistic inconsistencies and natural human imperfections, su... | {"rationale": "First, the text exhibits highly emotional and polemical language with strong moral judgments ('disgusting,' 'sickness that needs to be purged'), which is more characteristic of human passion than AI's typically measured tone. Second, it contains specific cultural references (Jon Stewart, Adam Curtis, 'Po... | {"rationale": "First, the text expresses extreme, controversial opinions advocating for the complete suppression of free speech and the \"purging\" of a \"sickness,\" a stance that standard AI models are programmed to avoid due to safety guidelines and neutrality training. Second, the writing contains organic imperfect... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | cmv | human |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 8