text stringlengths 0 99.6k |
|---|
One thing you must remember is that you have to explicitly leave a CODE |
definition by doing a JMP, to another code level routine. This is probably |
the single most common error made by newcomers. Possibly it is caused by |
making a false analogy between the higher level ; and the code level |
END-CODE. While the Forth word ; does in fact get you back to where you came |
from, END-CODE does not. In fact, END-CODE does nothing at all at run-time. |
You can exit a CODE definition by doing a JMP, to any of the following: |
NEXT POP POPTWO PUSH or PUT . These are described below: |
NEXT |
NEXT is commonly called the address interpreter. It is the word that is |
responsible for the execution of all Forth words. ALL words in Forth |
ultimately end up here. Doing a NEXT JMP, will cause the current code |
definition to stop and return to the word that called it. All of the |
following exit points end with a jump to NEXT . In what follows, remember |
that a "stack element" refers to a 16 bit quantity -- i.e. two bytes. |
POP |
POP first drops the first element of the stack, and then jumps to NEXT. |
Same as DROP in hi-level forth. |
POPTWO |
POPTWO drops the top two elements from the stack, and then jumps to NEXT. |
Same as 2DROP in hi-level. |
PUSH |
PUSH lets you leave a result on the top of the stack. PUSH expects the |
low byte of the new top of stack to be on the return stack, and the high |
in the accumulator. PUSH will leave these as the new top of the parameter |
stack (the former top will then be the second element). PUSH then calls |
NEXT. Since this routine is somewhat more complicated than the others here |
is a typical sequence: |
PHA, ( push low byte to return stack ) |
TYA, ( assume high byte is saved in Y register, move it to the A reg) |
PUSH JMP, END-CODE ( parameters set, so jump to PUSH) |
PUT |
PUT replaces the top of the stack with a new value. You setup PUT in |
the same way as you setup for PUSH - the new lobyte is pushed to the return |
stack, and the new hibyte is in the accumulator before the call to PUT. The |
only difference between the two is that PUT replaces the present top of the |
stack, while PUSH creates a new top of stack. |
Register Usage: |
Since Forth uses two stacks, and the 6502 CPU only implements one |
hardware stack, the parameter stack must be "artificially" maintained. In |
this implementation (as in most) it is located in the zero page, and the X |
register is used as the parameter stack pointer. The machine stack is |
Forth's return stack. Therefore instructions which affect the X register or |
the machine stack should be used with care. At entry to a CODE defintion, |
the X register points to the top byte of the parameter stack. This stack |
grows downward in memory, so decrementing the X register will make room |
for another element on the stack, and incrementing the stack pointer will |
remove an element from the stack. Here is a diagram which shows the |
situation when two elements are on the stack: |
Hi Memory |
************** |
* hibyte2 * |
* lobyte2 * |
************** |
* hibyte1 * |
X --> * lobyte1 * Top of Stack |
************** |
Notice that the two bytes which make up one stack entry are stored in the |
usual 6502 order, with the lobyte lower in memory. To remove the top element |
of the stack, we can define the code word DROP: |
CODE DROP ( N -- ) INX, INX, NEXT JMP, END-CODE |
Which in fact, is exactly the the way DROP is defined in the BFC. After DROP |
has been executed, the stack looks like this: |
Hi Memory |
************* |
* hibyte2 * |
X --> * lobyte2 * New top of Stack |
************* |
We will return to this topic later, when we talk about accessing the |
parameter stack in more detail. For now, the main point is to remember that |
when Forth starts executing your code definition, the X register will |
contain a pointer to the top of the stack. You can use the X register to |
access the stack, or to remove elements from the stack, but when your code |
definition is finished, other Forth words, and the Forth system itself is |
going to expect the X register to contain a valid stack pointer, so don't |
change it wantonly. You should also remember that since each stack entry is |
two bytes, only even multiples of the INX, or DEX, instruction make sense. |
(I.E. INX, INX, INX, INX, not INX, INX, INX, - the first will drop two stack |
elements, while the second will drop 1 and 1/2 stack elements - and cause |
the Forth system to behave oddly.) |
Both the Accumulator (A reg) and the Y register may be freely used. The A |
register will contain garbage, and must be initialized, but the Y register |
is guaranteed to be 0 on entry to your code, and you may take advantage of |
this fact or not, as you wish. Here is a short code definition that will |
leave the value of -1 (Forth's canonical TRUE flag) on the stack. It uses |
the PUSH routine described earlier. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.