Geographical Location
stringclasses
54 values
Report Date
stringclasses
1 value
MDS Item Question/Description
stringclasses
828 values
MDS Item Response
stringclasses
303 values
Percent
stringlengths
1
5
Total Residents
stringlengths
1
7
Tennessee
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Intact or Borderline impairment
41.89
8789
Tennessee
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (low subcategory)
17.08
3583
Tennessee
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (low subcategory)
11.5
2412
Tennessee
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (high subcategory)
9.68
2032
Tennessee
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Unable to complete interview
2.06
433
Tennessee
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (high subcategory)
17.79
3733
Texas
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Intact or Borderline impairment
31.98
24078
Texas
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (low subcategory)
13.4
10091
Texas
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (low subcategory)
20.1
15132
Texas
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Unable to complete interview
1.86
1400
Texas
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (high subcategory)
11.25
8471
Texas
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (high subcategory)
21.4
16108
Utah
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Intact or Borderline impairment
50.6
2445
Utah
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Unable to complete interview
2.07
100
Utah
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (low subcategory)
8.28
400
Utah
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (low subcategory)
20.03
968
Utah
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (high subcategory)
9.15
442
Utah
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (high subcategory)
9.87
477
Vermont
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Intact or Borderline impairment
44.11
924
Vermont
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (low subcategory)
14.61
306
Vermont
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (low subcategory)
10.02
210
Vermont
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (high subcategory)
8.5
178
Vermont
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Unable to complete interview
4.44
93
Vermont
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (high subcategory)
18.33
384
Virgin Islands
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Intact or Borderline impairment
*
*
Virgin Islands
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (low subcategory)
*
*
Virgin Islands
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (low subcategory)
*
*
Virgin Islands
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Unable to complete interview
*
*
Virgin Islands
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (high subcategory)
*
*
Virgin Islands
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (high subcategory)
*
*
Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Intact or Borderline impairment
45.83
11317
Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Unable to complete interview
3.46
855
Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (low subcategory)
10.97
2710
Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (low subcategory)
15.24
3764
Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (high subcategory)
8.74
2158
Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (high subcategory)
15.76
3892
Washington
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Intact or Borderline impairment
51
5922
Washington
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Unable to complete interview
1.73
201
Washington
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (low subcategory)
8.93
1037
Washington
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (low subcategory)
18.65
2165
Washington
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (high subcategory)
8.06
936
Washington
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (high subcategory)
11.63
1350
West Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Intact or Borderline impairment
41.92
3431
West Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (low subcategory)
15.54
1272
West Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (low subcategory)
12.02
984
West Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Unable to complete interview
1.5
123
West Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (high subcategory)
9.38
768
West Virginia
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (high subcategory)
19.63
1607
Wisconsin
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Intact or Borderline impairment
48.64
7207
Wisconsin
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (low subcategory)
10.2
1511
Wisconsin
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (low subcategory)
16.42
2433
Wisconsin
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Unable to complete interview
1.73
257
Wisconsin
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (high subcategory)
9.06
1342
Wisconsin
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (high subcategory)
13.94
2066
Wyoming
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Intact or Borderline impairment
43.43
727
Wyoming
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (low subcategory)
12.66
212
Wyoming
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (low subcategory)
16.91
283
Wyoming
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Unable to complete interview
2.03
34
Wyoming
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (high subcategory)
9.08
152
Wyoming
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (high subcategory)
15.89
266
National Total
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Intact or Borderline impairment
43.55
461067
National Total
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (low subcategory)
17.1
181008
National Total
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (low subcategory)
11.31
119781
National Total
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Moderate impairment (high subcategory)
9.03
95601
National Total
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Unable to complete interview
2.46
25994
National Total
Q1, 2025
C0500: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS Summary Score
Severe impairment (high subcategory)
16.56
175346
Alabama
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
96.47
17973
Alabama
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
3.53
658
Alaska
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
95.51
596
Alaska
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
4.49
28
Arizona
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
97.1
9592
Arizona
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
2.9
286
Arkansas
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
98.06
14027
Arkansas
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
1.94
277
California
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
97.19
81954
California
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
2.81
2373
Colorado
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
97.24
12657
Colorado
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
2.76
359
Connecticut
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
97.32
16223
Connecticut
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
2.68
446
Delaware
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
97.95
3194
Delaware
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
2.05
67
District of Columbia
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
98.72
1696
District of Columbia
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
1.28
22
Florida
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
98.52
62868
Florida
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
1.48
943
Georgia
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
96.59
26163
Georgia
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
3.41
924
Hawaii
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
91.61
2534
Hawaii
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
8.39
232
Idaho
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
98.15
3821
Idaho
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
1.85
72
Illinois
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
97.89
51913
Illinois
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
2.11
1118
Indiana
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
98.83
30533
Indiana
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
1.17
363
Iowa
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
97.92
17483
Iowa
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
2.08
371
Kansas
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
No
97.28
12802
Kansas
Q1, 2025
C0600: Cognitive Patterns - Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted?
Yes
2.72
358