asmachta / score.py
noamor's picture
Rename data file to asmachta.json to match the repo name
aa02235 verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
6.52 kB
"""Reference scoring implementation for asmachta.json.
Verifies that a model's claimed quotes actually appear in the source
document -- the same method used to produce this dataset's own
`verified` / `verification_method` fields (see README, "Support
sentences: how grounding works"). No dependencies beyond the standard
library.
Expected model output format, one claim per line:
1. <claim text> [<verbatim quote from source_text>]
2. <claim text> [<verbatim quote from source_text>]
Usage as a library:
from score import parse_claims, score_answer
claims = parse_claims(model_output_text)
result = score_answer(claims, record["source_text"])
print(result["precision"], result["claims"])
Usage as a script (demo against the dataset's own reference answers,
which should score at or near 100% grounded since they are the source
of the verified attribution spans):
python3 score.py asmachta.json
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import difflib
import json
import re
import sys
CLAIM_RE = re.compile(r"^\s*\d+\.\s*(.+?)\s*\[(.+?)\]\s*$", re.MULTILINE)
# Fallback for output where the model prefixed the numbered claim with
# leftover text on the same line (e.g. reasoning-model self-talk, or a
# stray closing </think> tag never on its own line) -- CLAIM_RE's line
# anchor then finds nothing even though a real, checkable quote is
# right there. This pattern doesn't require the claim to start at the
# beginning of a line, only that "N." is immediately followed by claim
# text and a bracketed quote. Only used as a fallback: if CLAIM_RE finds
# anything at all, its output is used unchanged, so this never changes
# scoring for output that was already parsing correctly.
CLAIM_RE_FALLBACK = re.compile(r"(?:^|\.)?\s*\d+\.\s*(.+?)\s*\[([^\[\]]{3,})\]", re.MULTILINE)
# Same 0.94 similarity threshold this dataset's own offset-validation
# pipeline used for near-exact (whitespace/punctuation-level) matches.
FUZZY_THRESHOLD = 0.94
def parse_claims(text: str) -> list[dict]:
"""Extract (claim, quote) pairs from `N. claim [quote]`-formatted text.
Tries the strict, line-anchored pattern first; only falls back to a
more permissive pattern if that finds nothing at all. This recovers
real quotes hidden behind formatting noise without changing the
result for output that already parses cleanly -- see CLAIM_RE_FALLBACK.
"""
matches = CLAIM_RE.findall(text)
if not matches:
matches = CLAIM_RE_FALLBACK.findall(text)
return [{"text": m[0].strip(), "quote": m[1].strip()} for m in matches]
def _normalize(s: str) -> str:
return re.sub(r"\s+", " ", s).strip()
def verify_quote(quote: str, source_text: str) -> dict:
"""Check whether `quote` appears in `source_text`, exact/normalized/fuzzy."""
if quote in source_text:
return {"verified": True, "method": "exact", "score": 1.0}
if _normalize(quote) in _normalize(source_text):
return {"verified": True, "method": "normalized_space", "score": 1.0}
sm = difflib.SequenceMatcher(None, source_text, quote, autojunk=False)
match = sm.find_longest_match(0, len(source_text), 0, len(quote))
if match.size == 0:
return {"verified": False, "method": "fuzzy", "score": 0.0}
pad = len(quote) - match.size
window = source_text[max(0, match.a - pad): min(len(source_text), match.a + match.size + pad)]
ratio = difflib.SequenceMatcher(None, _normalize(window), _normalize(quote)).ratio()
return {"verified": ratio >= FUZZY_THRESHOLD, "method": "fuzzy", "score": ratio}
def score_answer(claims: list[dict], source_text: str) -> dict:
"""Score a list of {"text", "quote"} claims against a source document.
Returns per-claim verification results plus overall attribution
precision (grounded claims / total claims).
"""
scored = []
grounded = 0
for c in claims:
v = verify_quote(c["quote"], source_text)
scored.append({**c, **v})
if v["verified"]:
grounded += 1
n = len(claims)
return {
"n_claims": n,
"n_grounded": grounded,
"precision": grounded / n if n else None,
"claims": scored,
}
def score_model_output(text: str, source_text: str) -> dict:
"""End-to-end: parse a raw model response and score it against a document."""
return score_answer(parse_claims(text), source_text)
def _demo(dataset_path: str) -> None:
with open(dataset_path, encoding="utf-8") as f:
records = json.load(f)
# `reference_answer` is plain prose -- the dataset's own claim/quote
# structure lives in `claims[].attribution[]`, not embedded as
# "N. claim [quote]" text. Re-verify verify_quote() against that
# structure directly, for the first 5 answerable records: this
# should reproduce every `verified: true` the dataset already ships.
print("Re-verifying this file's own claims[].attribution[] spans with")
print("verify_quote() (sanity check -- should match every 'verified' field):\n")
shown = 0
for r in records:
if r["difficulty"] == 0:
continue
n = sum(len(c["attribution"]) for c in r["claims"])
agree = 0
for c in r["claims"]:
for a in c["attribution"]:
v = verify_quote(a["source_excerpt"], r["source_text"])
if v["verified"] == a["verified"]:
agree += 1
print(f" {r['id']}: {agree}/{n} spans match the dataset's own 'verified' label")
shown += 1
if shown >= 5:
break
print("\nScoring a MODEL's raw output (the 'N. claim [quote]' format from")
print("the README) against a source document -- a fabricated example, one")
print("real claim and one hallucinated claim:")
r = next(r for r in records if r["difficulty"] != 0)
real_excerpt = r["claims"][0]["attribution"][0]["source_excerpt"]
fake_output = (
f"1. טענה אמיתית שנתמכת במסמך. [{real_excerpt}]\n"
f"2. משהו שלא נכתב במסמך כלל ולעולם לא יימצא שם. [ציטוט מומצא שלא קיים]"
)
result = score_model_output(fake_output, r["source_text"])
print(f" {result['n_grounded']}/{result['n_claims']} claims grounded "
f"(precision={result['precision']:.2f})")
if __name__ == "__main__":
if len(sys.argv) != 2:
print(f"Usage: python3 {sys.argv[0]} asmachta.json", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
_demo(sys.argv[1])