title stringlengths 21 185 | decision_date stringdate 2023-01-02 00:00:00 2024-12-19 00:00:00 | case_no stringlengths 13 51 | disposal_nature stringclasses 12
values | bench stringclasses 15
values | judges stringlengths 7 3.31k | summary stringlengths 0 3.34k | nc_display stringlengths 0 12 | scraped_at stringdate 2025-06-12 21:52:53 2025-10-22 07:45:27 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELDECO HOUSING AND INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusASHOK VIDYARTHI AND OTHERS | 30-11-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7891/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | VIKRAM NATH*, RAJESH BINDAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: A suit for specifi c performance was fi led seeking enforcement of MoU dated 31.08.1998. It is in the aforesaid suit that application was fi led by respondent No. 1 under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC for rejection of the plaint on terms of Order II Rule 2 C.P.C... | 2023INSC1043 | 2025-06-12T21:53:13.174939 | |
RAM LALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. | 04-12-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7935/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | J.K. MAHESHWARI*, K.V. VISWANATHAN HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the dismissal of the appellant- constable from service pursuant to the departmental enquiry was justifi ed; and what is the eff ect of the acquittal, ordered by the appellate judge in the criminal trial, on the order of dismissal passed in Se... | 2023INSC1047 | 2025-06-12T21:53:00.935992 | |
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusNAROTTAM DHAKAD & ANR. | 25-08-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2592/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | ABHAY S. OKA*, RAJESH BINDAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: In cases relating to off ences arising out of the Vyapam Scam, respondents-accused fi led applications seeking direction to supply a Hindi translation of the charge sheet fi led by the appellant in English language. Rejected by Magistrate High Court whethe... | 2023INSC770 | 2025-06-12T21:52:59.428805 | |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusV SHANKAR | 08-02-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 527/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA SEBI (Buyback of Securities) Regulations, 1998 – Regulation 19(3) – Interpretation of – Notice to show cause was issued by the Whole Time Member (WTM) of SEBI to Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (DCHL), its Chairperson, Vice-chairperson – A penalty of Rs.1... | 2023INSC719 | 2025-06-12T21:52:58.904265 | |
ROPPEN TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PVT LTDversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. | 07-02-2023 | SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 3006/2023 | Disposed off | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA Motor Vehicles Act 1988 : ss. 2(1A), 93, 96 – Motor Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines 2020 – Aggregator’s License – Claim of the petitioner to provide the service of an aggregator for two wheeler vehicles across the State Application for grant of license – Reje... | 2023INSC102 | 2025-06-12T21:53:05.864580 | |
RAJO @ RAJWA @ RAJENDRA MANDALversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. | 25-08-2023 | WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 252/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Petitioner serving a sentence of life imprisonment for commission of off ences punishable u/ss.302/34 of the IPC, 1860 and s.27 of the Arms Act, 1959 sought direction for his premature release on the ground that he has been in custody for 24 ye... | 2023INSC771 | 2025-06-12T21:53:01.567491 | |
ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS | 19-05-2023 | WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 643/2015 | Directions issued | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA Judiciary – District Judiciary – Recommendations of the Second National Judicial Pay Commission (SNJPC/Commission) on pay, pension, gratuity, age of retirement etc.– Revision of pay vide order dtd. 27.07.2022 – Review petitions filed by some States and ... | 2023INSC564 | 2025-06-12T21:52:58.176652 | |
M/S. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITEDversusM/S. INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORP. LTD. & ORS. | 08-02-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3504/2010 | Case Partly allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | SANJAY KISHAN KAUL*, ABHAY S. OKA Constitution of India – Arts. 226, 12, 14 – Commercial Contract – Unequal bargaining power – Maintainability of writ petition – Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas issued a letter for allocation of natural a PSU) – IPCL entered into a contract with GAIL for supply of natural gas – As... | 2023INSC103 | 2025-06-12T21:52:53.244111 | |
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusTHE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER & ORS. | 08-02-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 4769/2022 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | SANJAY KISHAN KAUL*, ABHAY S. OKA Insurance – MOU entered into between Appellant-Insurance company and Respondent No.1 to provide insurance cover to the persons deployed for election related work for Bihar Legislative Assembly Elections in 2000 – a Constable died due to sun stroke while performing election duty – Respo... | 2023INSC104 | 2025-06-12T21:52:56.134996 | |
THE KOUSHIK MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETYversusAMEENA BEGUM & ANOTHER | 01-12-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7903/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | English हिन्दी - Hindi नेपाली - Nepaliਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi
Disclaimer
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the Eng... | 2023INSC1065 | 2025-06-12T21:53:07.835373 | |
PRAKASH NISHAD @ KEWAT ZINAK NISHADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA | 19-05-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1636/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI*, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL Evidence – Case of circumstantial evidence – Six year old child was sexually assaulted, killed and thrown her into a ‘nala’ – Appellant was arrested on the basis of suspicion – Charged for having committed 377, 302 and 201, IPC –Concurrently convicted, death sentence... | 2023INSC561 | 2025-06-12T21:53:00.413980 | |
RAJKUMARversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH | 06-02-2023 | MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 2169/2022 | Directions issued | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA Uttar Pradesh Prisoners (Release on Probation) Act 1938 – Uttar Pradesh Prisoners (Release on Probation) Rules 1938 – Standing Policy formulated on 01.08.2018, amended release of persons sentenced to suffer life imprisonment on conviction under IPC, directi... | 2023INSC718 | 2025-06-12T21:53:08.463520 | |
STATE BANK OF INDIAversusA.G.D. REDDY | 24-08-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 11196/2011 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | J.K. MAHESHWARI*, K.V. VISWANATHAN HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the Division Bench and the Single Judge of the High Court were justifi ed in quashing the order passed by the Appointing Authority imposing a punishment of “reduction in basic pay to the lowest stage in Scale-I” as envisaged under Rule 49 (e)... | 2023INSC766 | 2025-06-12T21:53:05.779565 | |
DR. PREMACHANDRAN KEEZHOTH & ANRversusTHE CHANCELLOR KANNUR UNIVERSITY & ORS. | 30-11-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7700/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The respondent No. 4 herein was appointed as the Vice-Chancellor of the Kannur University, his tenure was for a period four years. As the tenure of the respondent No. 4 was coming to initiated steps for selection and appointment of a new ... | 2023INSC1032 | 2025-06-12T21:53:10.446218 | |
MUKESH SINGHversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) | 24-08-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1554/2015 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | M.M. SUNDRESH*, J.B. PARDIWALA HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: (i) Whether the High Court committed any error in dismissing the appeal fi led by the appellant convict and thereby affi rming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court for the alleged off ences?; (ii) Whether an accuse... | 2023INSC765 | 2025-06-12T21:53:11.299306 | |
SENTHIBALAJI VversusA.P. GEETHA AND ORS | 19-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3895/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | ABHAY S. OKA*, RAJESH BINDAL Representation of the People Act, 1951 – ss.83, 123 – Failure to plead material facts in the election petition concerning alleged corrupt practice – Held: s.123 defines corrupt practices – s.83(1)(a) mandates that an election petition must contain a concise statement of When the allegation ... | 2023INSC571 | 2025-06-12T21:53:10.099469 | |
BHAGWAN SINGHversusDILIP KUMAR @ DEEPU @ DEPAK AND ANOTHER | 23-08-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2560/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, ARAVIND KUMAR HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the Single Judge of the High Court was justifi ed in granting bail to the respondent-accused in connection with the FIR registered against them by the appellant-uncle of the minor girl alleging gang rape, threat of making video of rape recorded... | 2023INSC761 | 2025-06-12T21:53:15.080180 | |
SHASHIKANT SHARMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. | 01-12-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3663/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA*, SANDEEP MEHTA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the prima facie ingredients of the off ence punishable u/s. 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act were made out against the appellants. Penal Code, 1860 – ss.147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 504 – Scheduled Castes and of Atrocities) Act, 1989 – s.3(2)(v)... | 2023INSC1036 | 2025-06-12T21:53:05.021327 | |
M/S HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITEDversusM/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA | 24-08-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 4658/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, ARAVIND KUMAR HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The issue is with respect to the interpretation of a contract condition, which required the measurement of quantities used for payment for embankment construction with soil or with pond; and the relevance of of the arbitrators. Arbitration and Concilia... | 2023INSC768 | 2025-06-12T21:53:03.496519 | |
DR. PRAKASAN M.P. AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER | 25-08-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7580/2012 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | HIMA KOHLI*, RAJESH BINDAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Three Government orders (G.Os) issued enhancing the retirement age of doctors in medical category, however, were made prospective in nature. Appellants questioned the decision of the State of not incorporating a clause in the three G.O’s. retrospective, whic... | 2023INSC772 | 2025-06-12T21:52:55.624533 | |
ASSOCIATION OF OLD SETTLERS OF SIKKIM PRESIDENT SHRI RAM CHANDRA MUNDRA S/O LATE MURLIDHAR MUNDRA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE SECRETARY GENERAL & ANR. | 08-02-2023 | MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 5112/2023 | Disposed off | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | English हिन्दी - Hindi नेपाली - Nepaliਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi
Disclaimer
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the Eng... | 2023INSC106 | 2025-06-12T21:53:00.533501 | |
SMT. VED KUMARI (DEAD THROUGH HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE) DR. VIJAY AGARWALversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER | 24-08-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 5409/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | B.V. NAGARATHNA*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The question for consideration was whether the High Court was justifi ed in upholding the order of the Executing Court holding that the decree property is not executable against the judgement debtor, merely because the decree-holder lost possess... | 2023INSC764 | 2025-06-12T21:53:09.814440 | |
ASHOK KUMAR MEWARIversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS | 05-12-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7956/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | English ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi
Disclaimer
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations... | 2023INSC1092 | 2025-06-12T21:52:59.930650 | |
DR. P.N. SHUKLA AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS | 30-11-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7747/2012 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | HIMA KOHLI*, RAJESH BINDAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Matter pertains to the legality of the order passed by the High Court, rejecting the prayer made by the appellants- Assistant Scientifi c Offi cer for grant of the same pay-scale and perquisites as had been granted to the respondent cer (Medicine). Service L... | 2023INSC1048 | 2025-06-12T21:53:11.811662 | |
CENTRAL GST DELHI - IIIversusDELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD | 19-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 8996/2019 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, DIPANKAR DATTA Airports Authority of India Act, 1994: ss. 22, 22A – Finance Act, 1994 – ss. 67 and 68 (1) –User development fee-UDF, levied and collected u/s. 22A by the airport operation, maintenance and development entities-Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Pvt. Ltd., and Hyderabad International Ai... | 2023INSC572 | 2025-06-12T21:52:55.541040 | |
SANJAY PANDURANG KALATEversusVISTRA ITCL (INDIA) LIMITED AND OTHERS | 04-12-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7467/2023 | Disposed off | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether appeal instituted before the NCLAT was within limitation. In its impugned order, the NCLAT concluded that the appeal was barred by limitation on the ground that it was instituted of 45 days permissible under Section 61 of the Inso... | 2023INSC1063 | 2025-06-12T21:53:02.770494 | |
RANA AYYUBversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR | 07-02-2023 | WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 12/2023 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN*, J.B. PARDIWALA Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 – s. 3, 4, 44 and 45 – Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 4.3, 406, 418, 420 – Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 – s. 66D – Black Money Act – s. 4 – Act, 1999 – s. 37 – Income Tax Act, 1961 – ss. 133(6) – Petitioner during the pandemic did the ... | 2023INSC101 | 2025-06-12T21:53:02.815965 | |
MAMTA DEVI & ORS.versusTHE RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR | 19-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3904/2023 | Case Partly allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | J.K. MAHESHWARI*, ARAVIND KUMAR Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 – s.20 – Notification issued under – “Contested claim” – When not – Deceased who was employed by the second respondent as truck driver met with a road accident and succumbed to the injuries – Compensation sought Deputy Labour Commissioner- cum-Commissione... | 2023INSC566 | 2025-06-12T21:53:14.200141 | |
ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR & ANRversusURMILA G. & ORS. | 30-11-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7938/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | VIKRAM NATH*, RAJESH BINDAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the Lok Ayukta has jurisdiction to issue positive directions for correction of revenue records. Kerela Lok Ayukta Act, 1999 – s. 12 – Reports of Lok Ayukta – Jurisdiction of Lokayukta – Directions by Upa-Lokayukta for correction of or Upa Lokayukta ... | 2023INSC1044 | 2025-06-12T21:53:14.669922 | |
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.versusM/S. SHIKHA TRADING CO. | 25-08-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 2453/2011 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | ABHAY S. OKA*, SANJAY KAROL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Writ petition was fi led by respondent against the illegal sealing of its shop by the offi cers of Department of Excise and Taxation. While disposing off the petition, High Court whether justifi ed in passing the impugned directions for against the Assistan... | 2023INSC773 | 2025-06-12T21:52:57.791162 | |
OM PRAKASH BANERJEEversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. | 19-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 4210/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | KRISHNA MURARI*, SANJAY KAROL Service Law – Regularisation of service – Denial of – Held: Non-regularisation of the services of the appellant is a violation of the fundamental rights of equality before law and equality of opportunity in matters relating to employment under the State, as 16(1) – The principles of natura... | 2023INSC567 | 2025-06-12T21:52:53.345656 | |
TATA MOTORS LIMITEDversusTHE BRIHAN MUMBAI ELECTRIC SUPPLY & TRANSPORT UNDERTAKING (BEST) AND OTHERS | 19-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3897/2023 | Disposed off | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA Constitution of India – Power of Judicial review – Contractual/ commercial matters – Held: Courts should exercise a lot of restraint while exercising Powers of judicial review in – In contracts involving technical issues the courts should be even more reluc... | 2023INSC574 | 2025-06-12T21:53:07.032595 | |
M/S GLOCK ASIA-PACIFIC LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA | 19-05-2023 | ARBITRATION PETITION No. 51/2022 | Appeal(s) allowed | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – ss.11(6), 12(5) – Ministry of Home Affairs floated tender – Applicant’s bid was accepted as per the terms and conditions of the tender which provided for arbitration clause which enabled Affairs to appoint an officer... | 2023INSC568 | 2025-06-12T22:31:15.370342 | |
SEBIL ELANJIMPALLYversusTHE STATE OF ODISHA | 18-05-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1578/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | English ગુજરાતી - Gujaratiहिन्दी - Hindi नेपाली - Nepaliଓଡ଼ିଆ - Odiaਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi
Disclaimer
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also ma... | 2023INSC557 | 2025-06-12T22:31:31.496211 | |
THE ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD OF INDIA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR | 18-05-2023 | WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 23/2016 | Unknown | 5 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | K.M. JOSEPH*, AJAY RASTOGI, ANIRUDDHA BOSE, HRISHIKESH ROY, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 – Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 2017 – Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, to Animals (Karnataka Second Amendment) Act, 2017 – Held: The expressi... | 2023INSC548 | 2025-06-12T22:31:35.951908 | |
CHANCHALPATI DASversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. | 18-05-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1592/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | AJAY RASTOGI*, BELA M. TRIVEDI Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – FIR and charge-sheet – Quashing of – FIR was registered against appellant-accused u/ss. 468, 471, 406 and 120-B of IPC – Appellant-accused claim themselves to be spiritual leaders and are related to a religious/ spiritual society – had committed theft as... | 2023INSC554 | 2025-06-12T22:31:20.522433 | |
K. C. NINANversusKERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS. | 19-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 2109/2004 | Disposed off | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, HIMA KOHLI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA Electricity Act, 2003 – ss. 42 and 61 – Liability of subsequent owner to pay electricity charges due on previous owner – Whether the arrears of unpaid electricity dues outstanding from the erstwhile owner can be claimed owner, who has acquired the property in p... | 2023INSC560 | 2025-06-12T22:31:09.940608 | |
M/S B AND T AGversusMINISTRY OF DEFENCE | 18-05-2023 | ARBITRATION PETITION No. 13/2023 | Rejected | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDFCited In | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, J.B. PARDIWALA 7 S.C.R. 599 M/S B AND T AG v. MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (Arbitration Petition (Civil) No. 13 of 2023) MAY 18, 2023 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI AND J. B. PARDIWALA, J.] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – s.11– Limitation period – Cause of action – When accrues – Period of limita... | 2023INSC549 | 2025-06-12T22:31:23.572655 | |
RAMESH CHANDRA VAISHYAversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. | 19-05-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1617/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, DIPANKAR DATTA Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 – ss. 3(1)(x), 18 – Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 323, 325, 392, 452, 504, 506 – Prosecution case that the appellant was engaged in an altercation with the second respondent-complainant over the issue – It was alle... | 2023INSC569 | 2025-06-12T22:31:17.555386 | |
CAPTAIN MANJIT SINGH VIRDI (RETD.)versusHUSSAIN MOHAMMED SHATTAF & ORS. | 18-05-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1399/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | ABHAY S. OKA*, RAJESH BINDAL Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Application for discharge – Victim’s body was found in a pool of blood in his bedroom – After investigation, charge-sheet was filed against respondent nos.1 & 2 – Trial Court had not yet framed charges – Immediately after was filed – The same was dismissed... | 2023INSC555 | 2025-06-12T23:02:08.344295 | |
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusVEDIC RESORTS AND HOTELS PVT. LTD. | 17-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 4979/2019 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | AJAY RASTOGI*, BELA M. TRIVEDI Insurance – Repudiation of claim under exclusionary clause in a policy – Respondent-complainant running a resort obtained two insurance policies in respect of buildings of the Resort with plant and machine accessories and furniture etc. – As per respondent, a mob of about 200-250 and dama... | 2023INSC545 | 2025-06-12T23:02:17.974624 | |
SAKSHI ARHAversusTHE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AND OTHERS | 18-05-2023 | SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 16428/2022 | Matter referred to larger bench | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | AJAY RASTOGI*, BELA M. TRIVEDI* Judicial Service – Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010 – r. 10 – Selection for the post of Civil Judge – Submission of caste certificate – Certificate not accepted – Benefit of Reservation not given – An advertisement issued by respondent dated Judge – Appellants being members of Othe... | 2023INSC559 | 2025-06-12T23:01:57.161518 | |
RAVI MANDALversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND | 18-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 511/2011 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | HRISHIKESH ROY*, MANOJ MISRA Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 302, 34 and 201 – Arms Act, 1959 – ss. 4 and 25 – Acquittal under – FIR lodged by PW-1 (father of deceased) after founding dead body of his son at 0730 hours on 01.11.2001 in a forest, alleging that deceased was with ‘R’ and with ‘S’ in written information – Both accu... | 2023INSC552 | 2025-06-12T23:02:00.614915 | |
ARTI DIXIT & ANRversusSUSHIL KUMAR MISHRA & ORS | 18-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3858/2023 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | K.M. JOSEPH*, HRISHIKESH ROY Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887: s. 17 – Decree passed by a court of Small Causes ex-parte, under the proviso to s.17 – Application to set aside the ex-parte decree – Mandatory requirements – Held: Applicant must deposit in the court, the amount or should give security for the perfo... | 2023INSC556 | 2025-06-12T23:02:11.147781 | |
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHIversusRAVINDER KUMAR JAIN & ORS. | 18-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3621/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | ABHAY S. OKA*, RAJESH BINDAL Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – s.24(2) – Locus of a subsequent purchaser to invoke s.24(2) to claim lapse of acquisition – Writ petition filed by the respondent no.1 invoking s.24(2) was allowed, – Correctness of ... | 2023INSC558 | 2025-06-12T23:02:15.714596 | |
SALEM MUSLIM BURIAL GROUND PROTECTION COMMITTEEversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS | 18-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7467/2014 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN*, PANKAJ MITHAL Wakf – Suit land was declared as wakf property by Single Judge – Order set aside by Division Bench – Held: Under the Muslim law, a wakf can be created in several ways but primarily by permanent dedication of any movable and professing Islam for any purpose recognized by Muslim law as ... | 2023INSC551 | 2025-06-12T23:02:02.821382 | |
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR.versusRAVI KUMAR (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS | 18-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 4983/2009 | Case Partly allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | SURYA KANT*, J.K. MAHESHWARI Tenancy laws: Title claim – On facts, land leased out to one in 1924 for thirty years under the 1895 Act, who sold it to predecessor-in-interest of the respondents vide sale deed of 1947 and thereafter the land was recorded in his name and on his death are continuously recorded as Bhumidhar... | 2023INSC550 | 2025-06-12T23:02:04.542112 | |
SRI. K.M. KRISHNA REDDYversusSRI. VINOD REDDY & ANR. | 06-10-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 4471/2010 | Case Partly allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | ABHAY S. OKA*, PANKAJ MITHAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: When in a suit simpliciter for a perpetual injunction based on title, the defendant pleads perfection of his title by adverse possession against the plaintiff or his predecessor, is it necessary for the plaintiff to claim a declaration For perpetual injunc... | 2023INSC877 | 2025-06-13T11:04:16.026640 | |
V. SENTHIL BALAJIversusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND ORS. | 07-08-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2284/2023 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | A.S. BOPANNA*, M.M. SUNDRESH HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: (i) When an arrestee is forwarded to the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 19(3) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, whether writ of Habeus Corpus would lie; (ii) Whether s.41 CrPC has got any made under PMLA, 2002; (iii) The actual imp... | 2023INSC677 | 2025-06-13T11:02:47.607337 | |
TRUST ESTATE KHIMJI KESHAWJI & ANRversusTHE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. | 05-07-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 4230/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI*, VIKRAM NATH Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 – s. 238 and s.271 – Validity of notice under – A Notice was issued to the apellant- owner (occupying ground and sixth floor) of the building consisting ground plus six floors, which stated that appellant the Act by using water supplied for ... | 2023INSC609 | 2025-06-13T11:02:38.124250 | |
SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT & ORS.versusDR. MANU & ANR. | 16-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3752/2023 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | K.M. JOSEPH*, B.V. NAGARATHNA Service Law – Respondent No.1 joined the service of the Appellant-University in July 1999 as a Lecturer – He was placed in the senior scale and granted four advance increments by virtue of Cl 6.16 of the UGC Scheme dtd.21.12.1999 which provided that degree at the time of recruitment as lec... | 2023INSC539 | 2025-06-13T11:01:45.481535 | |
STATE OF U.PversusSONU KUSHWAHA | 05-07-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1633/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | ABHAY S. OKA*, RAJESH BINDAL Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: ss. 6, 5 clause (m) – Aggravated penetrative sexual assault – Punishment for – Prosecution case that accused had put his penis into mouth of the victim aged about 10 years and discharged semen – Conviction u/s. 377 and the POCSO Act, an... | 2023INSC603 | 2025-06-13T11:02:30.862387 | |
RANJAN KUMAR CHADHAversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH | 06-10-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2239/2011 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | M.M. SUNDRESH*, J.B. PARDIWALA HEADNOTES Issues for consideration : The contention raised was that the High Court erred in holding the appellant guilty of off ence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) as Section 50 of the NDPS Act was not contended that the ... | 2023INSC878 | 2025-06-13T11:04:02.721948 | |
SNEHASIS GIRI AND ORS.versusSUBHASIS MITRA | 02-02-2023 | CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 352/2022 | Disposed off | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, DIPANKAR DATTA Contempt of Court – Certain provisions of the West Bengal Madrasa Service Commission Act, 2008 regulating the process of appointment of teachers in aided Madrasas recognized as minority institutions, were declared unconstitutional by High Court – However, Supreme Court declared Act to ... | 2023INSC97 | 2025-06-13T10:59:06.917821 | |
DINGANGLUNG GANGMEIversusMUTUM CHURAMANI MEETEI & ORS | 07-08-2023 | SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 19206/2023 | Directions issued | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA HEADNOTES Issue for Consideration: The sectarian violence and strife in Manipur – Violence against women. Directions – Sectarian violence and riots in Manipur – Two broad objects which the directions must subserve: a need to ensure that the violence ceases, the perpetrator... | Englishहिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimerDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are bei... | 2023INSC698 | 2025-06-13T11:02:55.343128 |
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND ORSversusM/S. SATHYANARAYANA SERVICE STATION & ANR | 09-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3533/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | K.M. JOSEPH*, B.V. NAGARATHNA Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996: s. 34 – Application for setting aside arbitral award – Appellant-IOC entered into petrol pump dealer agreement with the first respondent – After three years, the first respondent sought to withdraw and the said request was notarised, and thereafter ac... | 2023INSC507 | 2025-06-13T11:00:46.868176 | |
MADHYAMAM BROADCASTING LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. | 05-04-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 8129/2022 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, HIMA KOHLI LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 8129 of 2022) APRIL 05, 2023 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI AND HIMA KOHLI, J.] Constitution of India – Art. 19(1)(a) and 19(2) – Freedom of Speech and Expression – Freedom of Press – Reasonable Restriction a news and current affairs t... | 2023INSC324 | 2025-06-13T11:00:18.172461 | |
MAHARASHTRA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION EXEMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. | 02-02-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 778/2023 | Case Partly allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | ANIRUDDHA BOSE*, S. RAVINDRA BHAT Service Law– Pay revision – Application of Fifth Pay Commission to the employees of Maharashtra State Financial Corporation with effect from retrospective cut-off date, but limited to only existing employees in service as on the date of implementation (including retirees, legal represe... | 2023INSC96 | 2025-06-13T10:58:54.496115 | |
JINI DHANRAJGIR & ANRversusSHIBU MATHEW & ANR. ETC. | 16-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3758/2023 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | A.S. BOPANNA*, DIPANKAR DATTA Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 : s. 47, Ord. XXI r. 97 – Execution of decrees– Resistance to delivery of possession to decree- holder or purchaser – Original plaintiff filed suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession against the defendants – Suit decreed in and the defendants ... | 2023INSC544 | 2025-06-13T11:02:07.499993 | |
TATA SONS PVT LTD (FORMERLY TATA SONS LTD)versusSIVA INDUSTRIES AND HOLDINGS LTD & ORS | 05-01-2023 | MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 2680/2019 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: s. 29A (as amended) – Time limit for arbitral award – Time limit of under the amended s. 29A (1) for passing an arbitral award – Applicability of, to international commercial arbitrations – Held: Timeline of twelve months for making ... | 2023INSC13 | 2025-06-13T10:58:24.032261 | |
M/S IVECO MAGIRUS BRANDSCHUTZTECHNIK GMBHversusNIRMAL KISHORE BHARTIYA & ANR | 05-10-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1959/2012 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | BELA M. TRIVEDI*, DIPANKAR DATTA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: (i) Whether, while considering a private complaint alleging defamation, the Magistrate before summoning the accused ought to confi ne himself to the allegations forming part of the petition only or he may, applying the exceptions to s.499, IPC, dismiss... | 2023INSC880 | 2025-06-13T11:04:23.024828 | |
STATE OF KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICEversusS. SUBBEGOWDA | 03-08-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1598/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | ANIRUDDHA BOSE*, BELA M. TRIVEDI HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: (i) Whether the High Court in exercise of its powers u/s. 482 of CrPC could have discharged the respondent-accused from the charges levelled against him for the off ences u/s. 13(1)(e) punishable u/s. 13(2) of the said Act, despite the fact that press... | 2023INSC669 | 2025-06-13T11:03:01.290780 | |
M/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAIversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. | 09-05-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1434/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | KRISHNA MURARI*, SANJAY KUMAR Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.102 – Freeze orders and bank guarantee in furtherance there of were imposed against the appellant company on grounds of necessity of investigation of an alleged crime initiated against one ‘D’ allegedly connected to the appellant company an employee/ sh... | 2023INSC509 | 2025-06-13T11:00:44.262046 | |
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORTS), MUMBAIversusM/S GANPATI OVERSEAS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI YASHPAL SHARMA & ANR. | 06-10-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 4735/2009 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | B.V. NAGARATHNA*, UJJAL BHUYAN HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the tribunal was justifi ed in holding that enhancement of value of the imported goods and the penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs on the sustained and consequently in setting aside the same. Customs Act, 1962 – 14 – Customs Valuatio... | 2023INSC881 | 2025-06-13T11:03:59.381779 | |
VISHNU KUMAR SHUKLA & ANRversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR | 28-11-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3618/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | VIKRAM NATH*, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the order passed by the High Court refusing to discharge the accused in a criminal case and quashing an FIR calls for interference. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss. 239-240 – Trial of warrant- cases Application for discharge – Permissib... | 2023INSC1026 | 2025-06-13T11:05:21.794253 | |
N. RAMKUMARversusTHE STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE | 06-09-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2006/2023 | Case Partly allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, ARAVIND KUMAR HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Appellant in fi t of rage, dashed head of the victim against the wall, resulting in death of victim. Appellant convicted u/s. 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. Whether judgment, order and sentence passed by the Sessions Court and affi... | 2023INSC812 | 2025-06-13T11:03:46.978076 | |
PREMCHANDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA | 03-03-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 211/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, DIPANKAR DATTA Penal Code,1860 – ss. 300,302 307 and 304 – The trial Court convicted the appellant for the offence of murder of the victim- deceased and attempt to murder three others – The judgment of the trial Court was challenged by the appellant by preferring appeal before the High Court On appea... | 2023INSC207 | 2025-06-13T10:59:34.529829 | |
PAVANA DIBBURversusTHE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT | 29-11-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2779/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | ABHAY S. OKA*, PANKAJ MITHAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the off ence u/s.120B, IPC included in Paragraph 1 of the Schedule to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, can be treated as a scheduled off ence even if the criminal conspiracy alleged is to commit an off ence which is not a part Preventi... | 2023INSC1029 | 2025-06-13T11:05:06.377124 | |
K. HYMAVATHIversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. | 06-09-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2743/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | A.S. BOPANNA*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: High Court if justifi ed in quashing the criminal proceedings fi led by appellant against respondent No.2-accused u/ss.138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 holding that it was a fi t case for quashing since the complaint fi led seeki... | 2023INSC811 | 2025-06-13T11:03:49.446543 | |
KISHORE BALKRISHNA NANDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. | 02-08-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2291/2011 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | English ગુજરાતી - Gujaratiहिन्दी - Hindi नेपाली - Nepaliਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi
Disclaimer
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available... | 2023INSC675 | 2025-06-13T11:03:06.346084 | |
E.S.I. CORPORATION, REP. BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTORversusM/S. ENDOCRINOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY LAB | 02-08-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3368/2012 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | HIMA KOHLI*, RAJESH BINDAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration : Date from which the respondent establishment, a pathological laboratory will be covered under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948. Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 – s.1(5) – Notifi cation in terms of the power conferred u/s.1(5) –High Court held t... | 2023INSC665 | 2025-06-13T11:03:09.564879 | |
AMD INDUSTRIES LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S. ASHOKA METAL DECOR PVT. LTD.)versusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, LUCKNOW & ANR | 09-01-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 108/2013 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | M.R. SHAH*, KRISHNA MURARI U.P Trade Tax Act – s.4-A(5) – Whether for the goods, manufactured by use of modern technologies can be said to be “diversification”, and manufacturing of the goods of a nature different from the goods manufactured earlier if entitles exemption from trade tax provided u/s.4-A(5) – Held: In ca... | 2023INSC20 | 2025-06-13T10:58:06.751811 | |
Y. BALAJIversusKARTHIK DESARI & ANR. ETC. | 16-05-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1671/2023 | Disposed off | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | KRISHNA MURARI*, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 – ss.3, 2(1)(u) – Offence of Money Laundering – Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Jobs-for-cash scam in the State of Tamil Nadu – Whether without identifying the proceeds of crime/a of crime and any process or activity connected to proceeds... | 2023INSC542 | 2025-06-13T11:01:48.515093 | |
HARYANA POWER PURCHASE CENTREversusSASAN POWER LTD. & ORS | 06-04-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 11826/2018 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | K.M. JOSEPH*, B.V. NAGARATHNA Electricity Laws – Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC), if empowered to disregard the express words of a contract and create a new bargain – Held: In a case where the matter is governed by express terms of the contract, it may the... | 2023INSC326 | 2025-06-13T11:00:02.419243 | |
NITISHA AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS | 03-11-2023 | MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 1913/2022 | Disposed off | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The issue pertains to the women offi cers of the Indian Army, who were granted Permanent Commission in pursuance of the judgment of this Court in and Others vs Union of India and Others, are aggreived by the non-empanelment for promotion ... | 2023INSC985 | 2025-06-13T11:04:33.837771 | |
DR NARENDRA GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. | 05-04-2023 | WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 131/2013 | Directions issued | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, J.B. PARDIWALA COURT REPORTS [2023] 6 S.C.R. DR NARENDRA GUPTA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 131 of 2013) APRIL 05, 2023 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI AND J. B. PARDIWALA, J.] Directions by Supreme Court – Unnecessary Hysterectomies – Constitution of India – of unnecessary ... | 2023INSC322 | 2025-06-13T11:00:10.694219 | |
KAMALversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) | 07-08-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 465/2017 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration : In a prosecution case where father was found dead by the complainant-brother of the deceased, and suspicion arose on the son of the deceased on account of the property dispute between the father and the son, and the son fl ed from the ... | 2023INSC678 | 2025-06-13T11:02:53.197290 | |
SHAKEEL AHMEDversusSYED AKHLAQ HUSSAIN | 01-11-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 1598/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | VIKRAM NATH*, RAJESH BINDAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: High Court whether justifi ed in affi rming the judgment of the Trial Court whereby it decreed the suit for possession and mesne profi ts fi led by the respondent with respect to the property in question on the basis of unregistered documents namely a Power... | 2023INSC1016 | 2025-06-13T11:04:49.302984 | |
SIVAMANI AND ANR.versusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLORE TALUK POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT | 28-11-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3619/2023 | Disposed off | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | VIKRAM NATH*, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Victims sustained simple injuries. Whether Courts below were justifi ed in convicting appellants u/s. 307 IPC. Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 323, 324 and 307 – Trial Court Nos.3 and 4) u/s. 307, IPC and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment – High Co... | 2023INSC1027 | 2025-06-13T11:05:25.493535 | |
STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORSversusKAMAL KISHORE PRASAD | 09-01-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 175/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | KRISHNA MURARI*, BELA M. TRIVEDI Service Law – SBIOSR, 1992 – Rules 19(1) & 19(3) – Dismissal from Service – Respondent was dismissed from service as per order dated 11.08.1999 by the Appointing Authority – Writ petition by the respondent – Single Bench of the High Court by order dated the High Court stayed the operati... | 2023INSC21 | 2025-06-13T10:58:03.897760 | |
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER | 02-02-2023 | WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 967/2017 | Dismissed | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA Representation of the People Act, 1951: s. 33(7) – Constitutional validity of –s. 33(7) permitting person to contest from more than one constituency for the same office simultaneously – Plea that a person should not from more than one seat at a time – Held:... | 2023INSC94 | 2025-06-13T10:58:51.018383 | |
VINOD KUMAR & ORS.versusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE MAU & ORS. | 07-07-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 5107/2022 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI*, J.B. PARDIWALA National Highways Authority Act, 1956: s. 3H – Deposit and payment of amount – Compulsory acquisition – Apportionment of compensation – Land of the appellants acquired for public purpose – Determination of the compensation payable to landowners by the Special Land of the compen... | 2023INSC606 | 2025-06-13T11:02:24.253666 | |
VISHAL CHELANI & ORS.versusDEBASHIS NANDA | 06-10-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3806/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, ARAVIND KUMAR HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The decision of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal that the home buyer as benefi ciary of a decree by the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, the order of the Resolution Professional proposing that they be treated diff erently from... | 2023INSC913 | 2025-06-13T11:04:18.394977 | |
ROHIT CHAUDHARY & ANR.versusM/S VIPUL LTD. | 06-09-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 5858/2015 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, ARAVIND KUMAR HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The interpretation of the word and expression “Commercial Purpose” defi ned u/s. 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – ‘Commercial purpose’ – Not defi ned in the Act – The (Amendment) Act 50 of 1993: Held: The ex... | 2023INSC807 | 2025-06-13T11:03:22.053131 | |
SHYAM KUMAR GUPTA & ORS.versusSHUBHAM JAIN | 02-02-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 765/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | DINESH MAHESHWARI*, BELA M. TRIVEDI Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 – s.17 r/w Or. IX, r.13 of CPC – Court of Small Causes – Application for setting aside ex-parte decree – Maintainability – Requirement u/s. s.17 of the Act of 1887 of depositing the amount due and payable under the decree at the aside ex-parte ... | 2023INSC98 | 2025-06-13T10:59:04.823999 | |
PARSHURAMversusSTATE OF M.P. | 03-11-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 524/2021 | Disposed off | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI*, B.V. NAGARATHNA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the courts below were justifi ed in convicting and sentencing the appellants for the off ences punishable u/s. 302/149, s.326/149, s.324/149, s.323/149, s.147 and s.148 IPC. Penal Code, 1860 – 302/149, 326/149, ... | 2023INSC973 | 2025-06-13T11:04:38.342614 | |
DEBIDUTTA MOHANTYversusRANJAN KUMAR PATTNAIK & ORS. | 03-03-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 4939/2022 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | M.R. SHAH*, B.V. NAGARATHNA Orissa Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 – r. 51(7) – Auction was to be made for grant of lease as per the Orissa Minor Minerals Concession Rules – One of the requirement of the auction notice was that the bidder was required to submit a solvency certificate issued by – The respondent no... | 2023INSC203 | 2025-06-13T10:59:25.928486 | |
M/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAIversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. | 17-05-2023 | MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 1278/2023 | Disposed off | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | English ગુજરાતી - Gujaratiहिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi
Disclaimer
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the E... | 2023INSC547 | 2025-06-13T11:01:33.645943 | |
C.S. GOPALAKRISHNAN ETC.versusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & OTHERS | 09-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 5692/2021 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | English हिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabiதமிழ் - Tamil
Disclaimer
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the Englis... | 2023INSC510 | 2025-06-13T11:00:35.193091 | |
JITENDRA NATH MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR | 02-06-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 978/2022 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | English ગુજરાતી - Gujaratiहिन्दी - Hindi नेपाली - Nepaliਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi
Disclaimer
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available... | 2023INSC576 | 2025-06-13T11:01:19.942638 | |
KUM. GEETHA, D/O LATE KRISHNA & ORS.versusNANJUNDASWAMY & ORS. | 31-10-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7413/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA*, SUDHANSHU DHULIA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Correct application of the principle underlying the rejection of plaints u/Or.VII, r.11, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to the facts of the case and the legality of rejection of a plaint in part. Code of Civil Procedure, r.11 – Rejection ... | 2023INSC964 | 2025-06-13T11:04:53.812575 | |
M/S BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. AND ANOTHERversusATM CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. | 30-11-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7890/2023 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | VIKRAM NATH*, RAJESH BINDAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court was justifi ed in dismissing the application fi led by the appellant u/Or.VII r.11(d) CPC for rejection of the subsequent suit fi led by the respondent-owner for damages for use and occupation of of the lease period. Code of Civil Pro... | 2023INSC1042 | 2025-06-13T11:05:04.225263 | |
SINGRAULI SUPER THERMAL POWER STATIONversusASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY & ORS | 05-07-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3856/2022 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | B.V. NAGARATHNA*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 – s. 19(1) – Non-compliance of principles of Natural justice – Opportunity not given to file objections to the recommendations made by the Committee – NGT constituted an expert committee and sought a violations complained by the first respondent ... | 2023INSC618 | 2025-06-13T11:02:40.546792 | |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 7versusM/S PAVILLE PROJECTS PVT. LTD. | 06-04-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 6126/2021 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | M.R. SHAH*, A.S. BOPANNA COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 7 v. M/S PAVILLE PROJECTS PVT. LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 6126 of 2021) APRIL 06, 2023 [M. R. SHAH AND A. S. BOPANNA JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961 – s.263 – Exercise of jurisdiction under – Respondent filed its income tax return sale proceeds to ... | 2023INSC325 | 2025-06-13T11:00:06.769482 | |
KAMUKAYI & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. | 16-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3799/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | SURYA KANT*, J.K. MAHESHWARI Railways Act, 1989 – ss. 123(c) and 124 – Railway Passengers (Manner of Investigation of Untoward Incidents) Rules, 2003 – r. 7 – Claim for compensation – Victim-deceased fell down from the running train between platform and track and sustained grave injuries the spot – FIR was registered –... | 2023INSC541 | 2025-06-13T11:01:36.496197 | |
M/S. SHREE VISHNU CONSTRUCTIONSversusTHE ENGINEER IN CHIEF MILITARY ENGINEERING SERVICE & ORS. | 09-05-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 3461/2023 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 – s.26 – Applicability of Amendment Act, 2015– Whether the provisions of the old Act (pre-Amendment Act, 2015) or the new Act (Amendment Act, 2015) shall be applicable when the notice prior to the Amendment Act, 2015 but application to appoin... | 2023INSC508 | 2025-06-13T11:00:39.196428 | |
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. | 29-11-2023 | WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1268/2023 | Disposed off | 3 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the Union Government has the unilateral power to appoint the Chief Secretary of NCTD and; whether the Union Government has the power to extend the service of the incumbent – Article 239AA(3)(a); VIIth Schedule, State List, Entry 4... | 2023INSC1049 | 2025-06-13T11:05:14.998520 | |
K. SREEDHARversusM/S RAUS CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD & ORS. | 05-01-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 7402/2022 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | M.R. SHAH*, M.M. SUNDRESH Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 : s. 31(i) – Provisions of the Act not to apply to security interest created in agricultural land – Respondent No. 1-debtor availed credit facilities from the Bank and owing to default Bank iss... | 2023INSC17 | 2025-06-13T10:58:09.997291 | |
VIJAYversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. | 29-11-2023 | CIVIL APPEAL No. 4910/2023 | Appeal(s) allowed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | ABHAY S. OKA*, SANJAY KAROL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the bar of admissibility created by s.35, Stamp Act 1899 applies to the agreement(s) to sell dtd. 04.02.1988 executed by the parties; can a copy of a document be adduced as secondary evidence when the original instrument is not in possession of the ... | 2023INSC1030 | 2025-06-13T11:05:12.157305 | |
BALVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND | 06-10-2023 | CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 301/2015 | Dismissed | 2 JudgesSplit viewHTML viewFlip viewPDF | J.B. PARDIWALA*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The High Court affi rmed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Trial Court holding appellant-husband guilty of the off ence of murder punishable u/s.302 of the IPC alongwith the off ence punishable u/s. 498A of the IPC and appellant-... | 2023INSC879 | 2025-06-13T11:04:08.440481 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 17