archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
True
grigri
null
"programmers [...] rejoice" > replacing intimidating code with simple drop-down menus Does not compute
null
0
1315905712
False
0
c2jil1u
t3_kdx5b
null
t1_c2jil1u
t3_kdx5b
null
1427593953
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Gotebe
null
Nah, that's fine... Customers often don't realize that pork meat works when they think they need sugar.
null
0
1315905717
False
0
c2jil25
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jil25
t1_c2jid90
null
1427593953
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
qinyong
null
A very cool option to build JSF UI!
null
0
1315905767
False
0
c2jil5e
t3_kdi87
null
t1_c2jil5e
t3_kdi87
null
1427593948
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
*Early Bird* Oh, if you’re a bird, be an early bird And catch the worm for your breakfast plate. If you’re a bird, be an early bird— But if you’re a worm, sleep late. -- Shel Silverstein
null
0
1315905882
False
0
c2jilbd
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jilbd
t1_c2jfxkx
null
1427593949
17
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
SanjayM
null
whut? Very few of the things you are saying make much sense rizla... How would you run Js "Natively"?
null
0
1315906476
False
0
c2jim7e
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jim7e
t1_c2jc0og
null
1427593961
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
behrangsa
null
It might be impossible to compile all features and classes of Dart to JavaScript if it supports reflection, multi-threading, etc. in the sameway that the gwt compiler does not support all features of Java.
null
0
1315906902
False
0
c2jimuj
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jimuj
t1_c2ja3mt
null
1427593973
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
josefx
null
Something I learned from open source and windows releases: wait for the first major patch to get a working system and for the second to get a mostly bug free experience.
null
0
1315907179
False
0
c2jin9u
t3_kcvv3
null
t1_c2jin9u
t1_c2ja9uw
null
1427593976
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ex_ample
null
Cross compilation seems ridiculous. Why not develop a bytecode for V8 and let developers write any application in it?
null
0
1315907480
False
0
c2jinq1
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jinq1
t1_c2jargm
null
1427593983
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
earthboundkid
null
That's a good example, but in the particular case, I would just use `itertools.repeat`. :-)
null
0
1315907741
False
0
c2jio2y
t3_kbdgw
null
t1_c2jio2y
t1_c2jhwk7
null
1427593996
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hakkzpets
null
I have no idea why this is in r/Programming. It's even stupid when it comes to the connection to "programming", since the smart pig is the only one who knows what problem he is solving. It's like the author never even read "The Three Little Pigs". The original story is even better at delivering the authors point than his own comic.
null
0
1315907933
False
0
c2jiocb
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jiocb
t3_kdey1
null
1427593993
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
coriolis1987
null
The article raises two questions: * Eight hours of refactoring doesn't sound like much. Joel Spolky explains how he single-handedly refactored an admittely crappy code base in THREE WEEKS ("Rub a dub dub"). How big is that "Extreme Blue" project? How significant were those changes? * Ever heard of "code reviews"? Instead of fixing other people's code, agree on what should be refactored and share the work load. Also share suggestions on what can be improved how. This is how profsessionals outside of IBM do it. Besides that: * Paul Graham is right as quoted, but the author draws the wrong conclusions from it. If you have your program, i.e. its essence, in your head, then seeing thru changes in code is easy. Only if you have difficulties keeping track of how your own program works you must cling to the code like a first-grader to her fingers while doing arithmetic. I'm not saying that refactoring other people's code just for one's preferred cosmetics is right, only that the author's reasoning is wrong. The whole article is not about software engineering, it is about being a jerk and how it backfires. In related news: "Sand bad if between cogs", "Finger in eye hurts", "Dick in hornets' nest = bad idea".
null
0
1315908090
False
0
c2jiokh
t3_kczbt
null
t1_c2jiokh
t3_kczbt
null
1427593996
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
wnoise
null
So maybe /r/programming shouldn't be in the default list of subreddits.
null
0
1315908201
False
0
c2jioq8
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jioq8
t1_c2jh8w4
null
1427593996
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jeff_hanson
null
> I would agree with you on the general idea that a straight-jacked mechanism might be superior in some sense Did you miss the part where he had quotes around the word "superior"?
null
0
1315908449
False
0
c2jip28
t3_ka4h8
null
t1_c2jip28
t1_c2iop2f
null
1427593999
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
henk53
null
>I was kind of miffed and insulted for a while, but the guy was just so nice and friendly and instructive and helpful... One of my favorite mentors/co-workers in the end. I once worked with a guy who was like that too. He was actually the lead developer of our team. He would alternately rewrite my code (and then send me a mail that he did this) or send me a mail detailing all the problems he found in my code and how I could fix them. Often with a reference to the code conventions document and/or some book. For me this approach worked very well, a combination of lead by example and giving me responsibilities as well. Over time as he noticed I became better at doing it reasonably right the first time the outright rewrites stopped and there were only mails about some small things. The majority of the team (8 members) seemed to be rather happy with this approach, but 2 of them still reacted very hostile. So then it was said that his reputation was "tainted", and I was given the pleasure to review the code of these two persons since I was 'neutral'. It was only then that I learned about the cr*p a lead developer has to deal with. It was downright impossible to give them any kind of feedback. Their code was at the top of the violations list reported by static analysis, it went against basically every advice given by Code Complete and the code had turned yellow because of all the IDE warnings. Yet, even a very friendly (IMO) talk about suggestions for improving the code a little were met with pure hostility, one of them went into a fit about how I supposedly look down at her and accused me of being against female programmers (which was utterly bullsh*t). There were some talks with management about this situation and it even culminated into a group session where we all held hands and had to sing songs (I kid you not :/). But it didn't really help, In the end we waited a little till they moved to other parts of the code and then rewrote it anyway.
null
0
1315909069
False
0
c2jipzt
t3_kczbt
null
t1_c2jipzt
t1_c2jflaz
null
1427594010
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Netcob
null
And yet hundreds of programmers voted it up. I don't see a more relevant subreddit listed in the sidebar, which would be a more pragmatic approach than the usual nerdy passive-aggressiveness.
null
0
1315909386
False
0
c2jiqhr
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jiqhr
t1_c2jfxun
null
1427594017
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tragomaskhalos
null
Please, don't mention real-world considerations to the Haskell fanatics, it upsets them.
null
0
1315909413
False
0
c2jiqjf
t3_kd88g
null
t1_c2jiqjf
t1_c2jhzf5
null
1427594018
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
filthgrinder
null
What? The wolf had lost his ability to smell? Moral of the story: "Try getting a grasp of the whole story"
null
0
1315909476
False
0
c2jiqm7
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jiqm7
t3_kdey1
null
1427594019
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MarshallBanana
null
And what we have now is two languages which were introduced in much the same way.
null
0
1315909971
True
0
c2jircd
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2jircd
t1_c2jguyk
null
1427594028
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
And it's the early worm who catches the fish.
null
0
1315910923
True
0
c2jisu8
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jisu8
t1_c2jfxkx
null
1427594050
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Gotebe
null
Without the desire to re-mystify, no, that's not the cloud. All the buzzwording aside, cloud really is a technology shift. Software that's *made* to run spread all over the world, that is the cloud. But you can't sell that to a layman.
null
0
1315911248
False
0
c2jitd1
t3_kd1nr
null
t1_c2jitd1
t3_kd1nr
null
1427594057
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
OopsLostPassword
null
For some of us Go is the language of the present and I don't see its use decreasing.
null
0
1315911422
False
0
c2jitmp
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jitmp
t1_c2jb3uh
null
1427594059
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
woogeroo
null
Also, safari in IOS4 & 5 is not complying with the open source license that webkit is under - they have never released any of their mobile webkit builds as open source, which they're required to.
null
0
1315911443
False
0
c2jitnz
t3_kawp5
null
t1_c2jitnz
t1_c2j7p2y
null
1427594059
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
RalfN
null
1. They did all that was needed. Standard bodies are not elected by the UN or anything. They got Mozilla and Opera on board. Actually, Chrome did want to just pay up for the patents and support MPEG, but Mozilla and Opera wouldn't bend. Google had to pick a side between between Mozilla/Opera and Apple/Microsoft. They picked the right side, and then actually made sure that side had a chance of winning. (because before Google bought the rights to the VP8 codec, Mozilla/Opera were using VP3) 2. A standard like that, actually needs real world testing. It needs to start off as an experiment. That way we can actually figure out if it's right or wrong. I'm not sure what standard group (pick one if it's that easy) should be taking of it, but to compare a protocol standard to something with the complexity of Dart/Javascript. That's just ridiculous. The work of supporting SPDY next to HTTP, in say a browser or server is anything from 1 day to a week. 3. NPAPI isn't controlled by a standards body. NP == Netscape. It's _that_ old. There were real issues (security and stability wise) that their model solved. And it is arguable if something like this should even be standarized. NPAPI is so intrinsically linked to the Firefox codebase (which does break it from release to release). I'm pretty sure the 'competing implementations in say KHTML and Opera' are literally using Mozilla's code to provide that interface. Complaining about this, is like complaining how all browser have their own extension system. Now, Native Client is a better example. But you have to understand that it is not targeted to the web. Their use-case is Chrome OS, not Chrome the browser. More specifically, it is how they support RDP on Chrome OS. If they added this support to the OS layer and not the browser, you wouldn't complain. It is not a web thing, it is just the .exe equivalent of Chrome OS. >Replacing JS with Dash is just the next example. I'm not touching that one with six foot pole. I think Google should go about Dash in a completely different way. It is very much embrace-extend-extinguish .. As to their intentions ... i still do not doubt their intentions, but ... >Do you really trust Google enough to let them have unilateral control over the whole Web technology stack? It's not a smart idea to have any company get unilateral control. So, hell no. I'm not sure Google will always stay the way it is. It is being schooled by professional bullies (Oracle), and the end result is often that companies either fail, or learn to become bullies themselves. In the end, in a broken system, like ours, i'm not sure a Google with the ideals we would want them to have, would actually succeed. And I'm kind of worried, they too would prefer to rule with evil, than to fail fighting for the good cause.
null
0
1315911622
False
0
c2jityb
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2jityb
t1_c2j67v2
null
1427594062
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Drfuzzykins
null
I wonder how this would compare to a GLR or optimized (memoization and so forth) PEG parser.
null
0
1315911781
False
0
c2jiu6b
t3_kdueh
null
t1_c2jiu6b
t3_kdueh
null
1427594065
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mushishi
null
I interpret it as meaning "superior in a sense that is fitting", not "worse".
null
0
1315911937
False
0
c2jiuen
t3_ka4h8
null
t1_c2jiuen
t1_c2jip28
null
1427594068
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
RalfN
null
>Furthermore, standards groups don't usually like it when you bring them a complete, finalized soution as a fait accompli at a point where it is too late to make changes because it is already in use in production This I think is a mistake. You seem to believe standard groups are where the innovation should take place. And then they fall in the same "not invented here" idiosyncrasy. I don't think standard groups should have _that_ role. I think they should just be a place, where they allow an industry to pick a technology proven in the wild. Put a stamp on it "STANDARD", and make sure it is properly documented, and there are zero patents attached to it. The idea of any commitee to _drive innovation_, is pretending the Russians actually won the cold war. They didn't. Innovation does not work that way. Let the market innovate, and have your stamp ready.
null
0
1315912033
False
0
c2jiuj8
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2jiuj8
t1_c2j8rpb
null
1427594070
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pozorvlak
null
> I've never heard his explanation of it, but I believe the sidebar was ketralnis' way of trying to bring the subreddit back to its earliest state, when reddit was frequented mostly by tech savvy individuals who knew the difference between programming and tech support (or rage comics if we go by today's standard). Except what we have now is *not* its earliest state. Its earliest state was "links of interest to programmers". If proggit is no longer a default subreddit, could we perhaps try losing the sidebar and going back to a broader conception of what proggit's for?
null
0
1315912413
False
0
c2jiv4t
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jiv4t
t1_c2jhbg4
null
1427594077
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
artsrc
null
> Use tools that are backed with corporate support so you don't waste time scanning google and forums. I think one of the amazing things about developing today is that answers are so available. Even with truly awesome corporate support you can't get an answer quicker than stack overflow etc. can give them. Microsoft corporate support has never offered me anything. I have never had a bug I reported fixed in a timely way. And when they have fixed bugs I reported I was not informed. Free, open source support varies but is occasionally excellent. > Simplicity in the development process is more important than design simplicity. You can always rewrite code, but you cannot recoup lost time. You can't call the Microsoft toolset simple. The choice "lets go with everything Microsoft" is simple. When everything works perfectly things might seem simple. But they are not and you will sometimes find that out > Focus on business logic. That's what earns the company money, not support and glue tools. Maybe, other times a great simple UI is, or an efficient workflow, or acceptable performance, or a flexible model that is easy to evolve. The great thing about software is that different systems have different challenges and people who apply cookie cutter solutions in a thoughtless way are easy to outperform.
null
0
1315912676
False
0
c2jivk7
t3_kc5di
null
t1_c2jivk7
t1_c2jdta1
null
1427594090
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Don't be too hard on Erlang. FP is a ghetto. It isn't Erlang's fault that the paradigm is shitty :P
null
0
1315912688
False
0
c2jivku
t3_kcpdg
null
t1_c2jivku
t3_kcpdg
null
1427594090
-4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
truthHIPS
null
>Wat? Are they high? No, they're right about what's happening but wrong about what *should* be happening. Web apps are a stupid idea. The web is and should be the back end. Thin native clients that give a nice, snappy, native interface is the way to go. That's why iPhone went that way. They initially tried "the web is the application" but it went nowhere because it's awful.
null
0
1315913393
False
0
c2jiwtp
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2jiwtp
t1_c2j470o
null
1427594099
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
truthHIPS
null
>I think you would be hard pressed to find an application genre which doesn't have an online version of it. Yea, and they all suck compared to their native counterparts. Did you miss the point of the GP's post or is this propaganda. He said the web won at email and social and then questioned the other categories. Just pointing out *entries* in those spaces doesn't address his question about the web *winning* there.
null
0
1315913580
False
0
c2jix62
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2jix62
t1_c2j9ril
null
1427594105
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
impatient
null
Do you use a git gui? We're switching some of our java projects to git, but I never really considered it an option for us with .net. I think a lot of it is the learning curve for some of the devs.
null
0
1315913649
False
0
c2jixa0
t3_kc5di
null
t1_c2jixa0
t1_c2jfwav
null
1427594106
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Because the item grind in wow isn't like a fake job? To each their own.
null
0
1315913692
False
0
c2jixdc
t3_kctmn
null
t1_c2jixdc
t1_c2jijnf
null
1427594106
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
The problem is, not even game programming is like that. One of the greatest cruelties is to giving someone else the idea that they are good at something when they are not.
null
0
1315913694
False
0
c2jixdg
t3_kcii9
null
t1_c2jixdg
t1_c2jgcgg
null
1427594106
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
johnfredcee
null
Hmm. I found it quite simple to express dependencies via builder objects. I scripted an art pipeline that way: mind you, the problem of it being slow remains. I think using SCons to generate a ninja (as in google's ninja build system) would be the best way to use SCons this way.
null
0
1315913813
False
0
c2jixlh
t3_jfl3q
null
t1_c2jixlh
t1_c2bozwk
null
1427594109
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
TheWix
null
God, don't bring up Brad. I weep everytime I think about the wasted potential of Vanguard. The beauty of which was only matched by the number of bugs in the game.
null
0
1315914039
False
0
c2jiy0i
t3_kctmn
null
t1_c2jiy0i
t1_c2jauqa
null
1427594118
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
truthHIPS
null
Not to mention it makes the development stack insane. For enterprise development I need Java or C# and various XML dialects. The web? My back end language (could be a stack here), Javascript client side (probably through some other translation language), HTML and CSS. I also have to do server admin to serve the app at all.
null
0
1315914070
False
0
c2jiy2g
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2jiy2g
t1_c2j5wdl
null
1427594118
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
skocznymroczny
null
C++ isn't oop. it's multiparadigm
null
0
1315914310
False
0
c2jiyjh
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jiyjh
t1_c2jh6tc
null
1427594124
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ais523
null
For the record: Pushing down the mousewheel counts as the middle button. Even with 2-button mice without a middle button, you can get a middle-click (or what counts for one in basically every OS in existence) by pressing both buttons simultaneously. With some touchpad drivers, you can also middle-click by tapping the extreme top-right corner. That said, just because it's physically possible to middle-click on the vast majority of mice doesn't necessarily mean it's a good idea.
null
0
1315914421
False
0
c2jiyqh
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jiyqh
t1_c2jb018
null
1427594125
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Yeah, there were some people who never got over being insulted where I was too. Fortunately, I did not really have to deal much with them. And the lead guy acted convincingly like he had no clue about it all :-)
null
0
1315914630
False
0
c2jiz5m
t3_kczbt
null
t1_c2jiz5m
t1_c2jipzt
null
1427594134
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cunningjames
null
> why is that an argument for continuing to build the entire web on top of a 10-day rush job hack language? Bingo. I don’t understand why this factoid keeps being tossed out as if it were a genuine ameliorating factor. Yeah, sure, compared to what *might’ve* been done in ten days it’s great, but it could’ve been designed and implemented in 24 hours — that would be utterly incredible — but it wouldn’t make Javascript any better. I mean, how is the discussion intended to proceed? “Javascript is a poor language but ubiquitous and unavoidable, so I wish it could be replaced.” “Yeah, but get this — Brendan Eich created it in ten days. Isn’t that cool?” “Oh, hey, that is pretty cool. That changes things; Javascript’s ubiquity really *is* a good thing.”
null
0
1315914688
True
0
c2jiza2
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jiza2
t1_c2jcinw
null
1427594134
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
truthHIPS
null
Good post. Every time I hear weirdos float this idea that the world I should want is every application accessed through one really crummy application (a web browser) I want to tear my hair out.
null
0
1315914834
False
0
c2jizk5
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2jizk5
t1_c2j5t1n
null
1428194267
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
nascentt
null
Yeah, must've typed it by accident. Though the one case I've always been uncertain about though is acronyms, especially those ending with an S, such as OS for Operating System. Is that meant to be OSs OS's OSes, I've never been 100%.
null
0
1315915138
False
0
c2jj05o
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jj05o
t1_c2jgfjk
null
1427594144
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
gyoshev
null
It will be dual-licensed under commercial and GPLv3 licenses. Until the library goes out of beta, it's in a "beta" license so that it is used for testing purposes only.
null
0
1315915189
False
0
c2jj09l
t3_kdj33
null
t1_c2jj09l
t1_c2ji84m
null
1428194266
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
nascentt
null
Wow, I didn't see that at all. Thanks for pointing it out.
null
0
1315915200
False
0
c2jj0aj
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jj0aj
t1_c2jgc2a
null
1428194266
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
michaelochurch
null
I'm new to Scala. My company uses a lot of Java and to leverage the libraries, I'm going to need to use a JVM language. And the relevant project is on a mostly off-hours/20% basis so I need a high-productivity language (i.e. not Java) where one person committing 10-15 hours per week can actually accomplish something demoable. I just got into Scala. My impression is that Scala's problem is that it *looks* really hard and convoluted, especially in the type system, but that things *usually* work without needing to understand all the complexities. It's a language that's much easier to *use* competently than to *understand*. You have to be comfortable with not understanding deep details (covariance, contravariance) when you start, filling in that knowledge after getting a basic knowledge of this extremely powerful and complex language. The nice thing about having the convolution in the type system and not manifesting, e.g., in undefined behavior is that inadequate knowledge (inevitable as the number of programmers approaches large) leads to non-compiling programs, not wrong ones. But that's another rant. For example, every modern language (Java and C++ not included) has support either for list comprehensions or the map combinator. It's a fundamental need in computation to have idioms for operations over sets or lists of data. That's the first thing I ask when evaluating a new language: Show Me Map. In Scala, map is very easy to use: scala> List(1, 2, 3, 4).map(x => x * x) res274: List[Int] = List(1, 4, 9, 16) Great! No problem there. Now, look at the type signature of map (general use case): def map [B, That] (f: (A) ⇒ B)(implicit bf: CanBuildFrom[List[A], B, That]): That This is where, I think, a lot of people just stop. Hawking quipped that every equation in a popular physics book reduced its sales by 50%. I think the same applies to programming languages. Type signatures like that make people think Scala is harder to use than it actually is. Of course, there are good reasons for that complexity. Map in Ocaml and Haskell has a much simpler type signature: map: 'a list -> ('a -> 'b) -> 'b list but it only operates over one data structure (linked lists) with map functions being defined for each collection type. The added complexity in Scala exists to allow map to work on a lot of different collections, something most programmers demand. Data is nouns and functions are verbs; what traits and type classes and the 10% of OOP that isn't donkey poo all capture, in different ways, is the importance of *adjectives*. All that said, I think either Scala or F#, warts and all, is the language that we in the FP community need to Get Behind, at least in our day jobs. Remaining a fractured community just means we end up, at our jobs, having to use C++ and Java because we can't agree on *which* functional language to use: Haskell vs. ML vs. Common Lisp vs. Erlang. The good-languages community is still divided among 50+ great (but flawed, hence the divisions) languages while the crappy-languages community Got Behind its few a long time ago. No language is perfect, but these two (a) are statically-typed and reasonably fast, so they can be used in production, and (b) can leverage existing libraries.
null
0
1315915272
True
0
c2jj0fn
t3_kaxjq
null
t1_c2jj0fn
t1_c2j84io
null
1427594147
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
nascentt
null
Didn't notice the name. Though I'm sure you appreciate that we're just trying to make sure you get credit for your work if someone else was submitting it here.
null
0
1315915305
False
0
c2jj0ic
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jj0ic
t1_c2jg6la
null
1427594148
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
I guess you haven't programmed in COBOL or C++ yet... Javascript is a dream compared to those monster languages.
null
0
1315915378
False
0
c2jj0no
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jj0no
t1_c2jhb8b
null
1427594150
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
elmuerte
null
OpenJDK is better because it allows for security patches without needing to upgrade to a new version of Oracle's java. This makes it more safe to use for production environments because you have less to test. Oracle made quite some major changes in some of their minor JRE updates. Like a new major release of the JIT and GC that had a extra set of side effects.
null
0
1315915394
False
0
c2jj0p2
t3_kcvv3
null
t1_c2jj0p2
t3_kcvv3
null
1427594150
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tutuca_
null
for science!
null
0
1315915423
False
0
c2jj0r5
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jj0r5
t1_c2jgu5z
null
1427594151
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sigzero
null
Does it really matter? Really?
null
0
1315916052
False
0
c2jj27g
t3_kd5f6
null
t1_c2jj27g
t1_c2jdo8v
null
1427594170
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
angrylawyer
null
It was just the standard ubuntu repo. It's been a few months but I remember trying to add more up-to-date repos and the keys kept getting denied or not found. I ended up just having to download 1.8 manually, but it did make me wonder how difficult it must be to update the repo.
null
0
1315916176
False
0
c2jj2hj
t3_kd5f6
null
t1_c2jj2hj
t1_c2jhtcr
null
1427594175
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Strange! I do use AUCTeX, and it seems to work fine. I have it installed via el-get, however, which is checking it out from CVS. Maybe you need the bleeding-edge version? (CVS server is `:pserver:anonymous@cvs.sv.gnu.org:/sources/auctex`)
null
0
1315916385
False
0
c2jj303
t3_kbz68
null
t1_c2jj303
t1_c2jgtm1
null
1427594180
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
macdice
null
PostgreSQL will presumably have something like this in the future since it's in the SQL standard: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SQL_MERGE
null
0
1315916408
False
0
c2jj31x
t3_kd0x9
null
t1_c2jj31x
t1_c2jf34v
null
1427594182
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kidjan
null
...or you could just use SVN or GIT, neither of which have these issues because they're architecturally designed to be used by people in disparate locations, due to their open source roots. Still, good to know. If I ever go back to TFS, I'll be sure to check that out.
null
0
1315916427
False
0
c2jj33s
t3_kc5di
null
t1_c2jj33s
t1_c2jfw55
null
1427594183
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ais523
null
Brit here; it's pronounced the same way as "kernel" in the UK too.
null
0
1315916608
False
0
c2jj3l2
t3_kbbbu
null
t1_c2jj3l2
t1_c2j0edo
null
1427594189
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
**Major Feature Additions** * No one uses it.
null
0
1315916772
False
0
c2jj3yr
t3_kdv51
null
t1_c2jj3yr
t3_kdv51
null
1427594194
-8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bautin
null
Meh, site, whatever. Still better than a random image with no context. It's still not readily apparent how it relates to programming as opposed to being something generally applicable to any discipline. Regardless of the credentials of the author.
null
0
1315916827
False
0
c2jj44a
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jj44a
t1_c2jg2qu
null
1427594195
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
razzmataz
null
You would think they were writing avionics software....
null
0
1315916918
False
0
c2jj4ce
t3_ke569
null
t1_c2jj4ce
t3_ke569
null
1427594198
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mikaelhg
null
PostgreSQL does lack the ability to pin tables into memory, which means that it can't reasonably serve any use case in which you have seldom accessed tables which require QoS guarantees which the cache manager cannot guess through analyzing the normal access patterns.
null
0
1315916920
False
0
c2jj4cn
t3_kd0x9
null
t1_c2jj4cn
t1_c2je0m8
null
1427594198
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
FatHat
null
I think the thing that strikes me about all of this is that if there was one thing that could've really gotten everyone on the Python 3 bandwagon, it would have been massive performance improvements. The problem with Python 3 out of the gates was it was like "well what will this give me right now?" and the answer really was "not a lot". (Or more accurately: "you lose a lot of libraries and things are kind of slower, but unicode doesn't suck anymore") I don't think anyone at all is at fault, but it strikes me as being somewhat darkly comic that the one thing that really could have made Python 3 an instant success (the *massive* performance boost Pypy gives) is targeted at Python 2 at the moment.
null
0
1315917116
False
0
c2jj4uw
t3_kdrtr
null
t1_c2jj4uw
t3_kdrtr
null
1427594205
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
"Ada is simply more robust than any other language available today" Dear Jesse Lang, could you explain in which way you have found Ada to be more "robust" than say Haskell?
null
0
1315917128
True
0
c2jj4wf
t3_ke569
null
t1_c2jj4wf
t3_ke569
null
1427594206
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bautin
null
No, it's generally applicable in a way that is also applicable to programming as programmers are creators. "Solve the right problem" is good advice in most fields.
null
0
1315917176
False
0
c2jj51g
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jj51g
t1_c2jgd9y
null
1427594208
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
AlyoshaV
null
alcohol for everyone
null
0
1315917189
False
0
c2jj52l
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jj52l
t3_ke58q
null
1427594208
29
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
KumbajaMyLord
null
They are in a market-dominating position in search and online advertising. There are even entire industries dedicated to optimizing search ranking as well as online marketing campaigns. This gives Google the opportunity and leverage to establish de facto standards in these areas, that pretty much everyone in that sector would have to use in order to stay successful. But they don't. They use open and established standards whenever possible.
null
0
1315917216
False
0
c2jj557
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2jj557
t1_c2ji4dj
null
1427594209
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
nemtrif
null
Java is used for *very* different purposes than C++. It is basically an enterprise application development language, whereas C++ is a system language. In early days, there were attempts to use Java for system tasks and there were projects like Java OS, Java web browser and Java Office, but Java proved a bad tool for these tasks and they are today still done with either C or C++.
null
0
1315917366
False
0
c2jj5jf
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jj5jf
t1_c2jh6tc
null
1427594214
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
nemtrif
null
Weak type system, array decay, broken declaration syntax, etc. etc. etc....
null
0
1315917424
False
0
c2jj5od
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jj5od
t1_c2ji91e
null
1427594215
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mikaelhg
null
EVE economy is about quantity, while the SWG economy was about quality. Every week unique crafting resources would spawn, with random stats. Then you crafted your components, which got their stats from your resources, your skills, and the choices you made in allocating available stats at crafting time. The better your stuff was, the more in demand with the top crafting and raiding guilds you were. Then you had to get into mass manufacturing, with the largest resource harvesters, and factories. Then you had to rent plots from other players for your factories and harvesters. Then you had to start buying subcomponents...
null
0
1315917532
True
0
c2jj5zs
t3_kctmn
null
t1_c2jj5zs
t1_c2jbuqw
null
1427594220
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
CuntingBastard
null
This is totally NOT true. You can set an option to allow editing of "checked-in" files which works just fine when not connected. Whilst I agree with much of the article and it's underlying premise, it is very biased and it shows. This is not the only factually incorrect item.
null
0
1315917701
False
0
c2jj6fa
t3_kc5di
null
t1_c2jj6fa
t1_c2jbwpw
null
1427594226
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sod1864
null
> They are in a market-dominating position in search and online advertising. They are considered the best in search. However if you use blindsearch you will find there is not much difference between the three major ones, and almost no difference between Google+Bing. http://blindsearch.fejus.com/ That site was one of the reasons I switched to Bing on the iPad instead of putting up with dire UI from google. So no, if Google search was gone tomorrow, it would be a headache but people can switch easily enough. Even so, what kind of standards are you talking about in relation to search/advertising?
null
0
1315917761
False
0
c2jj6kv
t3_kc9ai
null
t1_c2jj6kv
t1_c2jj557
null
1427594228
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
frezik
null
Or, as I like to call it, Tuesday.
null
0
1315918112
False
0
c2jj7l9
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jj7l9
t1_c2jj52l
null
1427594241
79
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
frezik
null
Has to be a Day for everyone, I guess.
null
0
1315918167
False
0
c2jj7qo
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jj7qo
t3_ke58q
null
1427594243
-13
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
SamsLembas
null
The nature of proggit has been changed by the introduction of user-created subreddits. Stuff that isn't strictly programming is now better off in /r/geek, /r/linux, etc.
null
0
1315918205
False
0
c2jj7ux
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jj7ux
t1_c2jg1i1
null
1427594244
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ooooo5
null
Is anything as good as Haskell in any way?
null
0
1315918411
False
0
c2jj8go
t3_ke569
null
t1_c2jj8go
t1_c2jj4wf
null
1427594252
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
impatient
null
I want to say they cover things like this in "Making Software" from O'Reilly. One of the main goals was empiricism, so it can be a dry read. I'd check it out on Safari before buying.
null
0
1315918422
False
0
c2jj8hn
t3_kczbt
null
t1_c2jj8hn
t1_c2jfrth
null
1427594252
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
spotter
null
I'm gonna make my own Programmer's Day, but with gambling and hookers! Ah, forget the Programmers' Day!
null
0
1315918506
False
0
c2jj8rh
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jj8rh
t3_ke58q
null
1427594256
28
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
twillis1973
null
WRONG
null
0
1315918582
False
0
c2jj8zx
t3_kdv51
null
t1_c2jj8zx
t1_c2jj3yr
null
1427594259
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Ragas
null
Woohoo! Party! Zeroes and Ones for everyone!
null
0
1315918612
False
0
c2jj933
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jj933
t3_ke58q
null
1427594260
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
karambahh
null
I don't want to troll on that one but... Until recently postgres only had third party replication Until recently mysql did not have a working replication (working as in: large tables, heavy r/w frequency etc....)
null
0
1315918692
False
0
c2jj9b4
t3_kd0x9
null
t1_c2jj9b4
t1_c2je8ul
null
1427594263
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
GeneralWarts
null
Why is this officially recognized in Russia? Do they have a lot of programmers, or do they just love holidays?
null
0
1315918755
False
0
c2jj9gv
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jj9gv
t3_ke58q
null
1427594265
59
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
beslayed
null
That is what I suspected. The question is whether it's worth it or not.
null
0
1315918841
False
0
c2jj9r1
t3_kbz68
null
t1_c2jj9r1
t1_c2jj303
null
1427594269
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
merlinm
null
That is correct -- note after years of answering performance related questions on the various mailing lists, I'd venture to say that about 90% of the questions related to table pinning or in memory tables were based in simply not understanding how o/s caching works, and that in almost all cases it's better to release memory in the general pool. All that said, it's a nice feature.
null
0
1315918891
False
0
c2jj9wq
t3_kd0x9
null
t1_c2jj9wq
t1_c2jj4cn
null
1427594271
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dumline
null
I just thought up a tagline for the holiday: "Programmer's Day: When all the zeroes become ones"
null
0
1315919108
False
0
c2jjak2
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jjak2
t3_ke58q
null
1427594279
190
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
babazka
null
There is a large number of officially recognized professional holidays in Russia. [This page](http://russiatrek.org/about-russian-holidays) lists about 50 of them, and the list is far from complete. All of professional holidays are working days, however.
null
0
1315919243
False
0
c2jjayq
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jjayq
t1_c2jj9gv
null
1427594284
68
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
farkdog
null
As if a brick house would look less fortified.
null
0
1315919379
False
0
c2jjbdx
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jjbdx
t1_c2jgxyi
null
1427594297
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
skew
null
I think "better" probably meant handling more grammars. That's true if you compare LR(1) and LL(1), or probably LR(k) and LL(k). However, I don't know of any tools for making LR(k) parsers for k>1, while ANTLR handles LL(*) grammars (using a DFA for lookahead, rather than fixed k): http://www.antlr.org/wiki/display/~admin/LL%28*%29+grammar+analysis I think that leaves the power formally incomparable (and Terrence Parr's thesis almost certainly has the exact details, including stuff about LR(k)), but either seems to be plenty strong for just about anything you would want to parse. If you need more power, there are GLR parsers (which bison can also produce these days), which can handle *any* CFG. For other notions of "better", LL parser generators can produce relatively comprehensible recursive-descent code, while LR parsing is almost always based on incomprehensible table-driven automata.
null
0
1315919466
False
0
c2jjbmm
t3_kdueh
null
t1_c2jjbmm
t1_c2jiach
null
1427594293
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
merlinm
null
> How so? I'll leave that as an exercise to you. Don't get me wrong, you can do wonderful things with ndb et all, and they are very well supported, but all the various replication modes involve trade-offs that are exposed to userland code. Postgres HS/SR does not; any query that runs on the master runs exactly the same as it does over a single server, with similar performance characteristics. Likewise, any query that runs on the slave, runs exactly the same as long as it doesn't write to any tables (which results in an error). (Actually, the slave is exposed to one detail: long running transactions can be timed out if they block replication for too long). In a nutshell, mysql replication is very flexible [but fragile](http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=mysql+replication+out+of+sync&oq=mysql+replication+out+of+sync&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=713l4059l0l4296l28l18l0l5l5l0l276l1715l0.7.3l10l0#hl=en&q=mysql+slave+out+sync&revid=584728120&sa=X&ei=QVZvTuDHCaTIsQLkwc3bCQ&ved=0CIQBENUCKAM&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.&fp=e7169cfc39072be&biw=1014&bih=516)...if your application can work around the limitations it's just absolutely wonderful. You can also use ndb to build incredibly highly available services, but the idea that you can scale up your server linearly by adding nodes is utter fantasy. EDIT: clarity
null
0
1315919709
True
0
c2jjcdk
t3_kd0x9
null
t1_c2jjcdk
t1_c2jhbdv
null
1427594303
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Philipp
null
local stillStanding = true while stillStanding do stillStanding = partySomeMore() print('yay') end
null
0
1315919816
False
0
c2jjcpy
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jjcpy
t3_ke58q
null
1427594307
28
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
AlyoshaV
null
Rather involved with computers. Government is moving to free software by 2015. ReactOS is based out of Moscow.
null
0
1315919986
False
0
c2jjda4
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jjda4
t1_c2jj9gv
null
1427594314
37
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315920063
False
0
c2jjdju
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jjdju
t1_c2ja3mt
null
1427594318
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
karlhungus
null
I think it's "Ah, forget the gambling"
null
0
1315920182
False
0
c2jjdyn
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jjdyn
t1_c2jj8rh
null
1427594323
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
LesterDukeEsq
null
There's a joke in here somewhere about Soviet Russia and crashing, but fuck it. I need a drink.
null
0
1315920190
False
0
c2jjdzw
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jjdzw
t3_ke58q
null
1427594324
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Well, then why don't we just use Java, which did this years before .NET already? :-)
null
0
1315920226
False
0
c2jje4g
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jje4g
t1_c2jf9v5
null
1427594325
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Xarnon
null
Thanks for the answer. I guess I haven't used C enough to know of its weaknesses. (Or at least be bothered by them)
null
0
1315920243
False
0
c2jje6f
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jje6f
t1_c2jj5od
null
1427594327
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Pig rattle with Dove
null
0
1315920270
False
0
c2jjea5
t3_kdey1
null
t1_c2jjea5
t1_c2jiaox
null
1427594327
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pnpbios
null
It is. It even runs on the v8 JS engine Google made.
null
0
1315920271
False
0
c2jjeac
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2jjeac
t1_c2jjdju
null
1427594328
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Like everything else the technology improves. Some time ago, blind coders had to depend purely on braille printers for output. I have no idea how they managed complex programs, and always envied that ability as I took over large work spaces to relate complex modules. Modern neuroscience is demonstrating significant plasticity, even in the adult brain. Areas which lose their immediate use can be co-opted for other functions. Even certain type of training, without other physical change, can cause structural changes in the brain that can be visualized through radiographic studies.
null
0
1315920291
False
0
c2jjecu
t3_ke5ao
null
t1_c2jjecu
t3_ke5ao
null
1427594328
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
BlackwaterPark_1980
null
In fact, screw the whole thing!
null
0
1315920367
False
0
c2jjemd
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jjemd
t1_c2jjdyn
null
1427594333
18
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
judofyr
null
Well, there's only a single one in 256.
null
0
1315920392
False
0
c2jjepr
t3_ke58q
null
t1_c2jjepr
t1_c2jj933
null
1427594334
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1315920413
False
0
c2jjes4
t3_ke569
null
t1_c2jjes4
t3_ke569
null
1427594335
-8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null