archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
True
vytah
null
Flash via JavaScript: http://paulirish.com/work/gordon/demos/ Soon they'll be almost no need for plugins of any kind.
null
0
1316085550
False
0
c2k196r
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k196r
t1_c2k0s50
null
1427602948
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316085554
False
0
c2k1975
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1975
t1_c2k129c
null
1427602948
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316085575
False
0
c2k1986
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1986
t1_c2k190l
null
1427602948
-14
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316085627
False
0
c2k19bq
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k19bq
t1_c2k18x3
null
1427602949
-6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
axilmar
null
> Then why did you say "The above numbers do not include inherited" when clearly at least some of them are inherited without overriding? Because they don't say which ones are overridden or not. I assume all of them are overridden in one or another way, because otherwise there is no point in mentioning them (no point in duplicating documentation of a base class into a derived class, if there is no change in the derived class). > Most (if not all) of the properties are in the parent classes, they just didn't note it in the documentation like they did with events and methods. Ok, that's not my fault though. > How many of them? Certainly not 58. Liar. All of them, as far as I am concerned. When a method is documented as part of a class in an object-oriented design, it means the method has specific behavior for that class. Documenting a method of a class when this method has nothing special on that class is not a logical thing to do. Qt, for example, has a special section on inherited methods, in order to let you know which methods are inherited, but overridden methods are explicitly shown as part of the class' documentation. But I am putting Microsoft and logic in the same sentence here. It's not a logical thing to do :-).
null
0
1316085660
False
0
c2k19dm
t3_kewaq
null
t1_c2k19dm
t1_c2jwnnp
null
1427602950
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pietervriesacker
null
Well I'm maybe too closed minded about this but every time I come across something that needs high performance I think it would be better off as a real application instead of an in-browser app/game. I'm also biased because I'm a mac user that's extremely unhappy with all the crappy Flash app performance/UX things. I've simply come to a point where I think any app that's complex enough to need a plugin to be executed can't give me a satisfactory user experience while in a browser anyway.
null
0
1316085691
False
0
c2k19fv
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k19fv
t1_c2k18kf
null
1427602951
13
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dimmu_burger
null
So far, in this thread, I've only seen one person acting like a fanboy. That person, dear Watson, would be you.
null
0
1316085725
False
0
c2k19hq
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k19hq
t1_c2k1621
null
1427602951
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ernelli
null
Right, videomixing requires decrypting and encrypting it again. It has the hardware available to encrypt in real-time so its just a matter of FPGA size if that functionality currently wont fit in the chip used. I'm not sure exactly how similar laws such as DMCA applies in other countries, but according to my understanding, if you publish any information on how to circumvent copy protection you risk a take-down notice, which to my understanding is something you want to avoid.
null
0
1316085728
False
0
c2k19i1
t3_kfby2
null
t1_c2k19i1
t1_c2k0w2l
null
1427602951
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
db2
null
>I'm too busy being a complete and total douchebag. FTFY
null
0
1316085760
False
0
c2k19k2
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k19k2
t1_c2k18wv
null
1427602951
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316085781
False
0
c2k19l6
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k19l6
t1_c2k19fv
null
1427602953
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316085801
False
0
c2k19m3
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k19m3
t1_c2k19k2
null
1427602953
-16
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Igorivan2
null
I love how your fanboyism gets in the way of critical thinking. Windows Phone 7 is not some revolutionary new operating system. It is based on the same WinCE kernel as earlier Windows Mobile products. It is so advanced that it doesn't even support preemptive multitasking! Hello 1980. Ever wondered why Microsoft doesn't give developers access to native code on WP7?
null
0
1316085819
False
0
c2k19na
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k19na
t1_c2k15ti
null
1427602953
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Forbizzle
null
A lot of those people struggle as soon as functions appear (whether they're trig. functions like sin() cos(), simpler ones like sqrt(), or log()). IMO programming could be an alternative approach to teaching math, and gives kids the opportunity to see problems be resolved in front of them. Right now it definitely feels like some people are unable to learn programming, as first year courses see drop out rates well over 50%. But maybe that's because people are being taught too much too fast, and smaller chunks taught earlier would have bridged that logic gap. Also as the article states, those people that simply can't learn programming are logically illiterate. That's something that should be fixed.
null
0
1316085850
False
0
c2k19pb
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2k19pb
t1_c2k17g3
null
1427602953
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316085861
False
0
c2k19q1
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k19q1
t1_c2k19hq
null
1427602953
-8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Rhomboid
null
> They're simply moving away from a plugin model, so silverlight, Flash and others will come pre-installed on your tablet windows 8 device. You are just making stuff up now. Here is a direct quote from [Steven Sinofsky of Microsoft](http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/09/14/metro-style-browsing-and-plug-in-free-html5.aspx), from the linked article: > We examined the use of plug-ins across the top 97,000 sites world-wide, a corpus which includes local sites outside the US in significant depth. Many of the 62% of these sites that currently use Adobe Flash already fall back to HTML5 video in the absence of plug-in support. When serving ads in the absence of plug-ins, most sites already perform the equivalent of this fallback, showing that this approach is practical and scalable. There’s a steep drop-off in plug-in usage after Flash, with one control used on 2% of sites and a small collection of controls used on between 0.5% and 0.75% of sites. > > On Windows 8, consumer sites and “line of business” applications that require legacy ActiveX controls will continue to run in the desktop browser, and people can tap “Use Desktop View” in Metro style IE for these sites. For what these sites do, the power of HTML5 makes more sense, especially in Windows 8 apps. > > Plug-in free browsers today already deliver great experiences with well-authored HTML5 content. These experiences get even better with touch in Metro style IE. Now, pray tell, if they were planning to keep Flash around with some kind of built-in browser support, why would Microsoft be doing usability studies about what it's like to use the web with a browser without Flash capability? Why would they be researching how sites fall back to HTML5? Why would they be playing up how well HTML5 features work today? The answer is that they wouldn't. Your interpretation is not supported by the facts. Moreover, how exactly are you proposing that Microsoft would make a browser that natively supports Flash without a plugin? Are you implying that Microsoft is going to undertake the enormous task of creating their own Flash VM and libraries from scratch? That would be suicidal, as they would be competing with Adobe and would have to pour enormous amounts cash of resources into the problem to get even 90% compatibility. GNU Gnash has been working at this for years and they are at the level where they support "most SWF v7 features and some SWF v8 and v9", but nothing from v10. Or are you saying they would obtain a source license from Adobe to integrate it into the browser? What exactly would be the benefit of that over just using a plug-in? That they would greatly enrichen a competitor? Stop making stuff up.
null
0
1316085881
False
0
c2k19ri
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k19ri
t1_c2k12og
null
1427602953
16
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316085981
True
0
c2k19y8
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k19y8
t1_c2k19ri
null
1427602955
-15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
> Haskell has null pointers, it just happens to express them via the Option monad. No it fucking doesn't. This has been explained to you a million freaking times and yet you keep repeating it. The Maybe monad and null pointers are *not* the same thing. "Maybe a" and "a" are two completely separate types in Haskell, and cannot be mixed.
null
0
1316086001
False
0
c2k19zf
t3_kfvm7
null
t1_c2k19zf
t1_c2k0k0l
null
1427602955
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pozorvlak
null
Your comment is analogous to a claim that most people are too stupid to read, would have no use for reading anyway, and could just employ a scribe if they need any reading or writing done for them. That would have been a reasonable claim to make in the middle ages, but we now know better. So yes, I do assume that most people are smart enough to code (at least to the level of simple scripting), and I'm *certain* that most people would benefit from the ability once it became widespread enough to be assumed. Of course, some people do have difficulty reading, and it wouldn't be surprising if some people turned out to be dysalgoric too. And people from deprived backgrounds often don't learn to read, and disproportionately end up in prison because there's no place for them in the legitimate economy. A mass-algorate society would probably have to solve analogous problems. But I think the potential gains would be worth it.
null
0
1316086057
True
0
c2k1a39
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2k1a39
t1_c2k17g3
null
1427602955
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
JL235
null
The single biggest issue for HTML5 taking over from Flash has been performance. So far, previews of Windows 8 have shown applications running at a constant 60 frames per second, with fully animated backgrounds, and glossy fades and slides. It is the fact that the performance is so consistent, which is so impressive, and shows it is capable of standing up to Flash. Next, the only platform where Flash really matters is on Windows; that is why the Linux and Mac OS versions are so much worse. By putting more emphasis on HTML5, over Flash, on the next version of Windows, it is a pretty big deal. Google already block Java applets, and other plugins, in Chrome. If Flash usage were to drop, then I would be surprised if they did not block Flash as well. Google are clearly prefer HTML5+JavaScript over plugins. Finally this means two of the largest software companies in the world, who hold massive user shares, Apple and Microsoft, are both trying to get their users off Flash. Even Adobe is moving that way with all of their recent projects for alternatives to Flash (such as Edge and the Flash to HTML converter). One of those reasons is pretty major; and I've managed to come up with five. Flash, at least as we know it today, is clearly on the way out.
null
0
1316086074
False
0
c2k1a4l
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1a4l
t1_c2k1896
null
1427602957
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316086142
False
0
c2k1a9e
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1a9e
t1_c2k19na
null
1427602958
-8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
JL235
null
> This means no Flash, no QuickTime, no PDF readers, and no Silverlight. So this mean I won't get any more freezes, stuttering video, strange errors, broken browser key shortcuts or flash ads? : ( (edit: I actually always found Silverlight the least intrusive, and nicest, of them all).
null
0
1316086149
False
0
c2k1a9u
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1a9u
t3_kgb4h
null
1427602958
99
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
KumbajaMyLord
null
Flash has already been booted to the back seat on iOS and despite that iOS devices are hugely popular. You don't need Flash for a great web experience and Microsoft ditching it is just a consequential step.
null
0
1316086154
False
0
c2k1aa3
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1aa3
t1_c2k0s50
null
1427602958
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
b0dhi
null
>Why do you think Microsoft is moving away from it in Metro? That's utterly retarded. To actually imply that Microsoft is doing something so it must be right...jesus fucking christ. Seriously, this subreddit can be unbelievably stupid sometimes.
null
0
1316086160
False
0
c2k1aag
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1aag
t1_c2k13y6
null
1427602958
-6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
zid
null
No, but I think it'd be quite easy to bait and switch. Suddenly there's a mono extension that only works on windows (extend), and the current features are then deprecated (extinguish). Now you're locked into windows for *web* access.
null
0
1316086188
False
0
c2k1abt
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1abt
t1_c2k14ne
null
1427602958
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pietervriesacker
null
I've heard about silverlight performing better, especially heard this about video, but I always uninstalled it when I saw it ended up on any of my computers because of my "ideological" stance on web plugins, the less market penetration the less chance they succeed as a plugin. (I've tried the same with Flash but I ended up missing too much content to my liking) I'm okay with Silverlight and Flash used to develop non-web apps, although in my experience with Flash/air games they perform very badly compared to others I am a Safari user and I don't know the details of how video is implemented in each browser, but as far as I know Safari uses the Quicktime plugin instead of separate code and codecs to display video in the browser? Since it doesn't affect other browsers and other users of the browsers (none has to download the quicktime plugin because Safari uses that to render video) I can't think of a reason right now I would be against this, are there any in your opinion? I'm actually pretty happy about being able to see a lot of codecs in the browser itself by installing Perian. Another edit: FYI, I'm not downvoting you, I love a good discussion and although you have a different opinion you seem well informed on the subject.
null
0
1316086231
True
0
c2k1aed
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1aed
t1_c2k19l6
null
1427602960
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Rhomboid
null
I'm guessing that's because it's not their code. They licensed the Foxit SDK for the PDF viewer, so any issues with how it works are probably just forwarded upstream and they cross their fingers for a fix.
null
0
1316086264
False
0
c2k1aga
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1aga
t1_c2k15p3
null
1427602961
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
while (code == math) { facepalms(); } agreed that they're similar but totally different: math > code it's true that their common point is logic, but maths are much more complex than code ;)
null
0
1316086270
False
0
c2k1agq
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2k1agq
t1_c2k18bv
null
1427602961
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
aaptel
null
Of course there's always the good ol' `M-x 3d-model-editor` in emacs.
null
0
1316086271
False
0
c2k1agr
t3_kg44k
null
t1_c2k1agr
t3_kg44k
null
1427602961
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
StoneCypher
null
> C and C++ are different languages. Just because C++ builds upon C doesn't mean that C should be part of C++ or vice versa Commits to source for one nearly universally apply to the other. > Because they look so much alike ohloh's tools sometimes cannot distinguish between C and C++. Doesn't really matter: it's always one or the other, never both, and they're both competitive (one larger) than the language falsely being called #1 here. > It talks about commits. Maybe Java developers need more commits to do things right. Or maybe C developers don't make small commits. etc. So, this statistic means everything and nothing. I provided the statistic I believed in. This is not my statistic. > Maybe this is because software written in C or C++ is more mature and needs less changing. Or maybe not Speculate less. You can check this one: the projects in question are all Ohloh projects, and all have start dates. That you won't check doesn't mean it's inscrutable.
null
0
1316086283
False
0
c2k1aho
t3_kftz8
null
t1_c2k1aho
t1_c2k0g9t
null
1427602961
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316086297
False
0
c2k1aiv
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1aiv
t1_c2k1abt
null
1427602961
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
3825
null
there will be a 32 bit version of win8 though
null
0
1316086389
False
0
c2k1ap1
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1ap1
t1_c2k130a
null
1427602963
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dimmu_burger
null
Not sure they have to be idiots because of differing opinion. I don't agree with any of your posts in this thread but don't think you're and idiot because you feel a certain way about some piece of technology. Maybe a bit crass, but certainly not an idiot. What I am sure of, though, is that things like calling people names (idiots, fanboys, etc.) doesn't work well when trying to convey a point of view.
null
0
1316086394
False
0
c2k1ap5
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1ap5
t1_c2k19q1
null
1427602963
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Igorivan2
null
Do you really consider preemptive multitasking *irrelevant* for a smartphone? That link shows *cooperative* multitasking.
null
0
1316086408
False
0
c2k1aq9
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1aq9
t1_c2k1a9e
null
1427602963
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316086434
False
0
c2k1as0
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1as0
t1_c2k1aed
null
1427602963
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pozorvlak
null
Doing maths is *harder* than coding, because there's no feedback. But otherwise they feel very similar to me :-)
null
0
1316086436
False
0
c2k1as4
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2k1as4
t1_c2k1agq
null
1427602963
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MarshallBanana
null
> EDIT: Had to use a bit.ly link because MSDN has fucking parenthesis in URLs. Escape parentheses with backslashes.
null
0
1316086436
False
0
c2k1as5
t3_kg44k
null
t1_c2k1as5
t1_c2k0u0y
null
1427602963
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
truthHIPS
null
Not on a tablet. MS has tried desktop-in-tablet-form how many times now? People clearly don't want that.
null
0
1316086460
False
0
c2k1ati
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1ati
t1_c2k1896
null
1427602964
23
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Silverlight sucks so who can blame them.
null
0
1316086469
False
0
c2k1au1
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1au1
t3_kgb4h
null
1427602964
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316086523
False
0
c2k1ay1
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1ay1
t1_c2k1aq9
null
1427602964
-6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Gotebe
null
Exceptions. Imagine the following sequence of events: 1. you delete state 2. "new whatever()" throws 3. (bad) whoever has "state" on his hands now has 0xdeadbeef and no way to realize that (in this case, an instance of the Player class). Rule of thumb: pointer members like Player::state need to be handled carefully. Furthermore, given the code as it is, even what I wrote is incorrect, because the rest of the Player doesn't handle NULL state, that is, it exhibits [minimal exception safety](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_handling#Exception_safety), whereas, by looking at the complete Player, it should have at least basic or (better) strong exception safety. So indeed, correct way would be: State* p = new whatever(); delete state; state = p; Here, first line can throw (we don't care unless we want the method to have no-throw guarantee, which would be highly unusual). Last two lines must be a no-throw zone (otherwise, we leak "p"). And indeed they are, because operator delete, destructor and primitive type assignment are no-throw operations (destructor, in particular, must be *written* in such a manner). Final note: the above exhibits both basic and strong exception guarantee. Indeed, in practice, correcting to provide "basic" often provides "strong", just like here.
null
0
1316086556
False
0
c2k1b0b
t3_kfuqy
null
t1_c2k1b0b
t1_c2k16xv
null
1427602975
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
zid
null
Err, silverlight etc, sorry.
null
0
1316086561
False
0
c2k1b0l
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1b0l
t1_c2k1aiv
null
1427602975
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
xmachina
null
Nice article. The computer is the extension of our brain.
null
0
1316086584
False
0
c2k1b1t
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2k1b1t
t3_kgbzq
null
1427602965
-7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316086602
False
0
c2k1b34
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1b34
t1_c2k1ap5
null
1427602965
-8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
zid
null
"This website is best viewed using Internet Explorer 5 with ActiveX enabled" is not a road I want to go down twice.
null
0
1316086604
False
0
c2k1b38
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1b38
t1_c2k1aiv
null
1427602965
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ima_coder
null
Self interest drives innovation.
null
0
1316086605
False
0
c2k1b39
t3_kfuii
null
t1_c2k1b39
t1_c2k15ds
null
1427602965
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pozorvlak
null
FWIW, I last used trigonometry about a week ago, and last automated a repetitive process yesterday.
null
0
1316086614
False
0
c2k1b3z
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2k1b3z
t1_c2k18bv
null
1427602965
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rjw57
null
I would say logical argument == reasoned discussion. It doesn't matter which you teach but it is all for naught unless you also teach reading and writing. Similarly, maths == code but it is less useful unless you teach mathematical notation and the way to actually poke it *into* a computer.
null
0
1316086616
False
0
c2k1b48
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2k1b48
t1_c2k15xk
null
1427602976
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
truthHIPS
null
fuck off google fanboy, no one's talking about your stupid shit.
null
0
1316086618
False
0
c2k1b4f
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1b4f
t1_c2k178h
null
1427602976
-8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316086666
False
0
c2k1b7k
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1b7k
t1_c2k1b0l
null
1427602967
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
3825
null
I fail to see your sarcasm...
null
0
1316086746
False
0
c2k1bd5
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1bd5
t1_c2k1b4f
null
1427602969
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
trezor2
null
You linked to the Italian localized MSDN-page, but that's cool. At least for now, until they get it translated :P
null
0
1316086761
False
0
c2k1be1
t3_kful5
null
t1_c2k1be1
t3_kful5
null
1427602969
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Rhomboid
null
> Odds are Adobe will add Flash support to IE10 if it does show up there It would be a neat trick to see Adobe write a plugin for a browser that doesn't support plugins. Maybe involving a time machine of some sort? Or necromancy?
null
0
1316086789
False
0
c2k1bg1
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1bg1
t1_c2k19y8
null
1427602972
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
3825
null
would you not rather let a full blown app handle pdf files instead?
null
0
1316086792
False
0
c2k1bgf
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1bgf
t1_c2k17ty
null
1427602972
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
day_cq
null
nah, teach kids math instead.
null
0
1316086812
False
0
c2k1bhu
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2k1bhu
t3_kgbzq
null
1427602972
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dimmu_burger
null
Apparently, you missed my point.
null
0
1316086819
False
0
c2k1bib
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1bib
t1_c2k1b34
null
1427602974
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
chewbaka025
null
Then why they installe it on my PC along with Live Messegner even if I unmarked the checkbox? I bet that if I try to uninstalll I'll get a blue screen.
null
0
1316086875
False
0
c2k1bm8
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1bm8
t3_kgb4h
null
1427602976
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
truthHIPS
null
Remember that silly joke that used to be all over the front page "How do you know if someone has an iDevice? They'll tell you". Well, how do you know someone is a google fanboy? Because they can't stfu about google stuff. hater could have said "there are browsers that renders PDFs just fine without plugins". No reason to say "hey everybody! I use **Chrome**!!"
null
0
1316086894
False
0
c2k1bns
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1bns
t1_c2k1bd5
null
1427602978
-4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
zid
null
Then you are ignoring every past action Microsoft has ever taken. You are ignoring evidence on such a broad scale you would refuse to believe there actually IS a moon.
null
0
1316086926
False
0
c2k1bpo
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1bpo
t1_c2k1b7k
null
1427602978
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
elperroborrachotoo
null
Reminds me fo the social evolution geekery breakout in "Snow Crash".
null
0
1316086983
False
0
c2k1btf
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2k1btf
t1_c2k10oc
null
1427602987
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
same story since 10 years :) flash hatters have always been there, and probably because they can't use itor have experienced flash stuff that really sux and kills the browser (annoying ads on torrent or streaming sites, flashy banners, etc ...) this troll is worse than emacs vs vi. and all that jazz. what makes me smile is that M$ is killing it's own plugin, I say well done, and good luck to silverlight developers :~)
null
0
1316086988
False
0
c2k1btx
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1btx
t1_c2k1975
null
1427602987
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Gotebe
null
I guess they did the split for: 1. the browser; browser is like a complete desktop OS for many-a-user anyhow 2. developers, who can now write exactly one code for both tablet, desktop, etc. 3. eye-candy-hungry (read: gullible) public, as a marketing point.
null
0
1316087027
False
0
c2k1bw5
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1bw5
t1_c2k1154
null
1427602980
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
nemtrif
null
> Are you aware that it basically relegated C++ to niche applications and systems programming? http://www.lextrait.com/vincent/implementations.html
null
0
1316087042
False
0
c2k1bx5
t3_kcwx2
null
t1_c2k1bx5
t1_c2jwwit
null
1427602980
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Tordek
null
It's pronounced like "Eric", right?
null
0
1316087096
False
0
c2k1c0r
t3_kgaop
null
t1_c2k1c0r
t1_c2k0xdf
null
1428194037
27
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
schveiguy
null
I did not mean you, I meant whoever made the phone call. The problem with this, and why it keeps coming up is we have a one-sided story without another complementary side. All I ever have seen is what Walter has said, and what people like you have said. The stories are conflicting, but only one of them was *actually on the phone*. Your "side" of the story is speculation based on hearsay (I assume, since you have not identified yourself as a call participant). Why can't the other party just report what happened, even if just to clear Tango's name? I also find it hard to believe since all this is coming out *now* instead of when it happened. I have no reason to believe what Walter said was not true. He has not lied to me before about anything (and yes, I have spoken to him personally about this issue, being very upset when it happened since it was my code in question), and he seems to avoid making speculative statements. In this game of he-said she-said (well, maybe it's a she, I don't know!), all we have to go on is past experience with the individuals. I believe you have heard that the phone conversation went differently than Walter's account. What I *don't* necessarily believe is that what you heard was based on a factual rendition of the phone call(s). Besides, if you think Walter's statements are false, why would you depend on him to tell the "real" story? Yes, I agree we can go in circles, but one truth remains evident -- Walter's statements are public and not ambiguous, while the other party's statements are hidden behind levels of hearsay and rumor. It's no contest in my mind who is accurate, unless this situation changes. > Plus the whole relicensing is a separate matter, so let's not mix it up even more. This was the proposed solution to the situation by Walter and Lars (to relicense the time code). If there was no infringement (as you claim), relicensing did not matter. It simply revealed more about the attitude of Tango's devs. It was an integral part of the story IMO. > You may believe whatever the heck you want, but if you force your beliefs upon others, expect opposition. Right back at ya ;)
null
0
1316087107
False
0
c2k1c1l
t3_kaxjq
null
t1_c2k1c1l
t1_c2jwdzr
null
1427602991
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Igorivan2
null
Do you even know what preemptive multitasking means on an operating system level? To put it in terms you might be able to relate to: Windows Phone is like Windows 3.11 when iOS and Android are like Windows NT. Processes on Win 3.11 could easily take down the entire OS. The same is true for WP7. That is one of the reasons Microsoft doesn't give developers access to native code – forcing the use of Silverlight.
null
0
1316087167
False
0
c2k1c5q
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1c5q
t1_c2k1ay1
null
1427602990
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rizla7
null
i dont know why they block java applets. thats dumb. personally i havent used a java applet in years, but that's a poor excuse. google is always full of shit. flash isnt for windows, its for the web... mac os flash support is worse because apple is pushing h.264... linux support sux because linux just sucks as a desktop and nobody cares enough to fix it? you can't get rid of flash that easy... what part of the html spec allows for mixed raster/vector animation with timelines, integrated scripting, etc.. sure theres canvas, but it's pretty limited... doesn't compare to flash in any sense, can't be synched to audio, etc... find me a part of the html spec that will accomplish this without HEAVY use of javascript and all sorts of libraries and hacks... can we do without those features? sure. is it practical? maybe.. but alot of design artists will be saying this is a step backwards. personally, as a dev i could care less if flash survives. ms has a stake in silverlight/future of dotnet.. so no wonder theyre not particularly partial to flash. google is trying to adopt a similar pattern with GO/Dart... so it doesnt surprise me at all.
null
0
1316087175
False
0
c2k1c68
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1c68
t1_c2k1a4l
null
1427602990
-14
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316087178
False
0
c2k1c6g
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1c6g
t1_c2k1bpo
null
1427602990
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316087201
False
0
c2k1c82
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1c82
t1_c2k1bib
null
1427602991
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
zid
null
>I think you have a problem with giving microsoft a second chance. Second does not even come close.
null
0
1316087254
False
0
c2k1cbu
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1cbu
t1_c2k1c6g
null
1427602991
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316087337
False
0
c2k1ci4
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1ci4
t1_c2k1bg1
null
1427602993
-7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pozorvlak
null
Why do you think I was in that bit of the British Museum in the first place? :-)
null
0
1316087405
False
0
c2k1cmd
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2k1cmd
t1_c2k1btf
null
1427603002
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
flashpimp
null
Is the Metro UI Microsoft's attempt at building a walled garden?
null
0
1316087458
False
0
c2k1cq3
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1cq3
t3_kgb4h
null
1427602994
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316087496
False
0
c2k1css
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1css
t1_c2k1c5q
null
1427602995
-6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316087517
False
0
c2k1cue
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1cue
t1_c2k1cbu
null
1427602995
-7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
A_for_Anonymous
null
Yup, and you know what's the best of it all? You don't need Windows for all three.
null
0
1316087530
False
0
c2k1cv2
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1cv2
t1_c2k1bw5
null
1427602995
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jetbean
null
How's Mac OS X running on VM ? What kind of hardware do you have? Did you have to do any special tweaks to make it work properly? I installed it and on my machine it lags a lot (core 2 duo p8400 2.26GHz at 3GB).
null
0
1316087604
False
0
c2k1d06
t3_kewkd
null
t1_c2k1d06
t1_c2jtxlh
null
1427602997
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
johnwaterwood
null
Haha, yes :p
null
0
1316087635
False
0
c2k1d2j
t3_kejwo
null
t1_c2k1d2j
t1_c2jvk4q
null
1427602997
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
zid
null
THE MOON ISN'T REAL!
null
0
1316087674
False
0
c2k1d5h
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1d5h
t1_c2k1cue
null
1427602999
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mastry0da
null
occam's razor... orrrr its just linux!
null
0
1316087762
False
0
c2k1dbs
t3_kejfs
null
t1_c2k1dbs
t1_c2jxq5w
null
1427603000
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
This Metro shit looks rediculous. Are they seriously planning to release a bad tablet UI for desktops? They're gonna reverse that before it's release. This is as bad an idea as Gnome 3 or Unity.
null
0
1316087798
True
0
c2k1del
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1del
t1_c2k1cq3
null
1427603001
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
EdgarVerona
null
The really amazing thing to see was that screenshot-to-code debugging capability. I almost peed myself when they showed that. That's not only absolutely amazing, it's useful and practical. I only wish I could dig in and see how they did it. I imagine they must've copied the entire state if the app at that specific point in time, along with the full stack of the last rendering pass? I'm just speculating... but that was awesome.
null
0
1316087803
False
0
c2k1dez
t3_kg44k
null
t1_c2k1dez
t3_kg44k
null
1427603001
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
5-4-3-2-1-bang
null
PDF is such a ubiquitous format that I'd rather the browser handle it to be honest. I'm already going to be patching my browser 15X a day for security updates; no big deal if it goes to 20 or 25. But patching a separate program is yet another maintenance task that the average user isn't likely to do. (The thought is that at least with built in windows programs, there is some chance the user will wind up patched, if the default is to download and apply patches automatically.)
null
0
1316087817
False
0
c2k1dfw
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1dfw
t1_c2k1bgf
null
1427603011
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
zid
null
> Well the idiots Apparently not.
null
0
1316087826
False
0
c2k1dgb
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1dgb
t1_c2k1bib
null
1427603011
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
diadem
null
Why is this being upvoted when we know this is just editorial bullshit? I mean just because one department doesn't use silverlight doesn't mean the Windows Phone department or IE department's won't. Don't get me wrong, it is possible Silverlight and WPF could be phased out eventually (they did move Mr. Guthrie to Azure after all), but this article seems sensationalist and misleading.
null
0
1316087831
False
0
c2k1dgm
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1dgm
t3_kgb4h
null
1427603011
31
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pietervriesacker
null
Hmm, no, does the Quicktime plugin ship with the Safari browser the same way Flash ships with Chrome? I never heard about that. I'd be against that. I don't know if I know enough about this to discuss it in detail, I could be wrong about anything of this, it comes out of my memory of blog posts and articles, I'm having trouble looking the information up again right now. I think I've read that Safari uses a Quicktime plugin or simply Quicktime code to display videos in <video> tags, I believe other browsers render these videos in some other way independent of Quicktime or other software. I'm okay with this because this doesn't "hurt" the web in my view, it doesn't affect anyone but the end user of Safari. It's like if a browser would decide to show <video> tags by showing these videos in a Flash container, noone would know about it but the users of these browsers. Noone would become dependent on Flash to see the video content on the web. That's what I was talking about when I said I'm okay with Quicktime being built into Safari. I'm not okay with plugins being built into browsers because this makes developers take them for granted, use them more and forget about people that might not have them installed too easily. So in the end I guess my opinion is there's nothing wrong per-sé with plugins being built into the browser but the end result means people will become dependent on it too easily and this hurts the openness of the web. Parts of it become inaccessible to people who aren't able or willing to install certain plugins. And I think making everything accessible for everyone is exactly why the W3's standards have been constantly rising in popularity over the years.
null
0
1316087843
False
0
c2k1dhm
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1dhm
t1_c2k1as0
null
1427603011
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dimmu_burger
null
You don't have to be polite. You also don't have to be a dick. Generally, when someone is comfortable with their stance, knowing and feeling that is enough. When you start insulting people (whether retaliatory or not), you lose credibility thereby hampering any weight you might lend to your opinion. When you tell someone "the sun rises in the east, shitface" that someone isn't going to be all like "interesting, I thought it rose in the north", they're going to be all "I'm not a shitface, this guys a dick, fuck his opinion". Crude example, but I'm on the toilet.
null
0
1316087855
False
0
c2k1dif
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1dif
t1_c2k1c82
null
1427603004
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316087862
False
0
c2k1div
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1div
t1_c2k1d5h
null
1427603004
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
toru
null
Multithreaded programming... unlocked!
null
0
1316087950
False
0
c2k1dp2
t3_kgdeg
null
t1_c2k1dp2
t3_kgdeg
null
1427603006
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
arixx
null
Yea, I noticed that, too. It doesn't bother me much, never use the menu to begin with. Keyboard shortcuts and the context menu are much more efficient.
null
0
1316088052
False
0
c2k1dwd
t3_kejwo
null
t1_c2k1dwd
t1_c2k0w36
null
1427603021
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ceolceol
null
It's still their responsibility to release working, stable programs. I've never had a problem with their PDF viewer on OS X or Windows, though.
null
0
1316088112
False
0
c2k1e0g
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1e0g
t1_c2k1aga
null
1427603012
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bumble012
null
Why is jabberwock getting downvoted. Please remember your reddiquette and only downvote those who contribute nothing to the conversation.
null
0
1316088118
False
0
c2k1e0v
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1e0v
t1_c2k12og
null
1427603012
16
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
toddffw
null
I don't give a shit about Microsoft either way, but your last word chess analogies are imbecilic.
null
0
1316088189
False
0
c2k1e64
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1e64
t1_c2k15ti
null
1427603014
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316088205
False
0
c2k1e7h
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1e7h
t1_c2k1dif
null
1427603014
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
keithslater
null
Why do you say silverlight sucks?
null
0
1316088217
False
0
c2k1e8l
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1e8l
t1_c2k1au1
null
1427603014
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316088238
False
0
c2k1ean
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1ean
t1_c2k1e64
null
1427603015
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
throwaway-123456
null
You can still write apps in WPF/C#. That *is* silverlight, if only a different name. XAML is here to stay, after all Visual Studio is written in WPF/XAML. They are not about to kill Visual Studio.
null
0
1316088272
False
0
c2k1ecy
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1ecy
t3_kgb4h
null
1427603016
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
toddffw
null
Are you missing the point? They CAN. That is the problem. Obviously it would be a suicidal move, but a developer can't risk it.
null
0
1316088381
False
0
c2k1eln
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1eln
t1_c2k1621
null
1427603019
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kolmogorovcomplex
null
> I think you have a problem with giving microsoft a second chance. You're either naive or too young to really know their history. Trusting Microsoft in any way is a very bad idea.
null
0
1316088388
False
0
c2k1em2
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1em2
t1_c2k1c6g
null
1427603019
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316088433
False
0
c2k1ep8
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1ep8
t1_c2k1e0v
null
1427603019
-10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316088478
False
0
c2k1et3
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2k1et3
t1_c2k1em2
null
1427603029
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null