archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
True
archiminos
null
I was lucky to learn this lesson fairly early on whilst I was still at Uni. It's why my favourite joke is that the compiler's wrong.
null
0
1316180389
False
0
c2kavpf
t3_khkyd
null
t1_c2kavpf
t3_khkyd
null
1427607545
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
chrisrico
null
I believe my statement remains coherent. The resources used by the government in the research and creation of ARPANET were reallocated from the private sector through taxation (and not to get off topic, but don't forget the hidden tax, [monetary inflation](http://mises.org/resources.aspx?Id=7184a3af-b7ff-4465-aab5-68a3c773b48b)). The end goal was to create a system that would more effectively allow them to wage war. So, the questions are... >Would a worldwide computer network have been created if not for government funding? I think so. The necessary ideas were already in place, they were merely focused in a particular direction. Perhaps without that direction, the computer network that emerged would have been better or worse. It's impossible to say, but I find it highly likely that without the government's intervention, one would exist. >Was the *internet* created by the government? I would argue that it was not. The precursor, yes, but the computer network we now know as the internet did not flourish because of central planning, but decentralization.
null
0
1316180468
False
0
c2kavzl
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2kavzl
t1_c2kanfy
null
1427607550
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
walking18
null
Who knows, lets just clear one thing up, I was definitely pissing my pants.
null
0
1316180559
False
0
c2kawc4
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kawc4
t1_c2kau8m
null
1427607556
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
p47n1p
null
**C++** // .h class SomeStupidlyLongClassName { private: int month; int day; int year; public: SomeStupidlyLongClassName(int nMonth, int nDay, int nYear); void SetDate(int nMonth, int nDay, int nYear); int GetMonth(); int GetDay(); int GetYear(); }; // .cpp SomeStupidlyLongClassName::SomeStupidlyLongClassName(int nMonth, int nDay, int nYear) { SetDate(nMonth, nDay, nYear); } void SomeStupidlyLongClassName::SetDate(int nMonth, int nDay, int nYear) { month = nMonth; day = nDay; year = nYear; } int SomeStupidlyLongClassName::GetMonth() { return month; } int SomeStupidlyLongClassName::GetDay() { return day; } int SomeStupidlyLongClassName::GetYear() { return year; } --- **Java** public class SomeStupidlyLongClassName { private int month; private int day; private int year; public SomeStupidlyLongClassName(int nMonth, int nDay, int nYear) { month = nMonth; day = nDay; year = nYear; } public int GetMonth() { return month; } public int GetDay() { return day; } public int GetYear() { return year; } } Gee, why the fuck did I have to write THE SAME FUCKING SHIT twice in the C++ version? (I know why, but I refuse to accept C++'s sorry excuse for it and move on to different languages). Protip: Language bigotry only exposes how poor of a programmer you are
null
0
1316180772
False
0
c2kax59
t3_kgq62
null
t1_c2kax59
t1_c2k6kzq
null
1427607564
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Rhomboid
null
Have you ever noticed that the home pages for open source multimedia libraries like [ffmpeg](http://ffmpeg.org/), [xvid](http://www.xvid.org/), [x264](http://www.videolan.org/developers/x264.html), [lame](http://lame.sourceforge.net/), etc. only offer source downloads? To get binaries of any of those you have to go to a third party side, usually one run by a volunteer or one of the developers, and hosted in a country where software patents don't apply. Supposedly, distributing the source code for something that would infringe a patent if compiled is not actually infringement itself, so these projects insulate themselves from lawsuits in this manner by only distributing source.
null
0
1316180775
False
0
c2kax5o
t3_kgqdd
null
t1_c2kax5o
t1_c2k92yo
null
1427607564
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
If they are made to order prodigy kids, yes. Manipulating parents can coach their kids to learn one specific adult-like ability which can be considered "prodigy", it's more or less like training an animal. That does not mean the person has a better than usual talent for that field, just that he got a better than usual training for that age.
null
0
1316180799
False
0
c2kax93
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kax93
t1_c2ka98y
null
1427607568
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bwillard
null
Ah good questions. I agree that $25/10 concurrent users would be a bit high. We were thinking it would be just straight msg/sec not /client, and it is sent not received. So concurrent users is unbounded. I also was just quoting the rates per second but really they would be enforced per day, so 1/msg/sec is 86,400 msg/day, and 10/msg/sec is 864,000/msg/day. And because they are just msg sent and not msg received you can have as many concurrent users as you want. But these are just our first thoughts and very likely to change. Just out of curiosity what were you thinking of using this for and/or what kind of msg rates were you thinking you would be generating?
null
0
1316180852
False
0
c2kaxgy
t3_kgorv
null
t1_c2kaxgy
t1_c2kaqjz
null
1427607568
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
danharaj
null
Yes, but proving it is undecidable does not mean there is no algorithm, it just means we can't prove the algorithm is polynomial.
null
0
1316180863
False
0
c2kaxig
t3_kgfhb
null
t1_c2kaxig
t1_c2kaua6
null
1427607569
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
captainjon
null
It would be silly. That is why I learned Visual C++ in 14 days (including MFC)!
null
0
1316180890
False
0
c2kaxmb
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kaxmb
t1_c2karke
null
1427607570
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ZorbaTHut
null
Hmm, I suppose that's true. I'm having trouble imagining a situation with a polynomial-time algorithm would be undecidably so, but I can't rule out the possibility. Alright, fair enough :)
null
0
1316180923
False
0
c2kaxqp
t3_kgfhb
null
t1_c2kaxqp
t1_c2kaxig
null
1427607572
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
isinned
null
Seems he has broken the record in October of last year. The blog post on Wolfram was just written a very long time afterwards.
null
0
1316181111
False
0
c2kaygz
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kaygz
t3_khf6j
null
1427607581
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tjdziuba
null
And no new information was added to the collective sum of human knowledge. Shit like this is just space between the ads.
null
0
1316181180
False
0
c2kayql
t3_khlcd
null
t1_c2kayql
t3_khlcd
null
1427607585
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
munificent
null
Sounds a lot like BitC. Are you familiar with it?
null
0
1316181253
False
0
c2kaz05
t3_kfvm7
null
t1_c2kaz05
t1_c2k736m
null
1427607588
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bwillard
null
Sorry, as I posted bellow it should be up now. We had a technical glitch that brought down both our service and our monitoring service that should alerted me about it.
null
0
1316181317
False
0
c2kaz8b
t3_kgorv
null
t1_c2kaz8b
t1_c2k9qw5
null
1427607591
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316181445
False
0
c2kazq2
t3_khmks
null
t1_c2kazq2
t3_khmks
null
1427607597
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
But it's not C-style crude preprocessor macros that the language intends to support.
null
0
1316181481
False
0
c2kazv1
t3_kfvm7
null
t1_c2kazv1
t1_c2kansl
null
1427607602
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ethraax
null
I hate working with Java too, but that doesn't mean I'm going to blame Minecraft's severe performance issues on Java.
null
0
1316181521
False
0
c2kb00o
t3_kgq62
null
t1_c2kb00o
t1_c2k6gxr
null
1428193914
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
It is practically impossible to teach good programming to students that have had a prior exposure to UNIX: as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration.
null
0
1316181538
False
0
c2kb038
t3_kgqnz
null
t1_c2kb038
t3_kgqnz
null
1427607606
-8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dgermain
null
No ! Well, I did some programming, and was good at math at the time. But I would have love to have someone direct me to interesting stuff. If you read his writing, it's good writing... for a 13 years old. He needs a great deal of improvement to be remotely interesting as a writer. It's perfectly credible to have a kid to be as good as he is. Not your average kid, but for one in 1000 or 10000, why not ? It's just that bright kids are not usually directed in interesting directions. Regular school is mostly an inhibitor for them. They are usually bullied or bored to death by the regular classes they have an obligation to attend.
null
0
1316181581
False
0
c2kb095
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb095
t1_c2kahgh
null
1427607612
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sztomi
null
I was thinking of an online multiplayer game. I didn't really think it through, but those rates seemed to be not sufficient. On a second thought, clients could use websockets for p2p communication and push messages would be needed on less occasions (like a user joining, something happening in the game world etc.). This makes those prices much more acceptable and especially that the rates would be per day.
null
0
1316181648
False
0
c2kb0gz
t3_kgorv
null
t1_c2kb0gz
t1_c2kaxgy
null
1427607612
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
munificent
null
> In C# it will initialize product to 0. Why does it do this if it won't initialize a local of the same type? Initializing fields wastes cycles, which is, I think, why it doesn't do so for locals. Definite assignment analysis will statically ensure that all locals are initialized before use, so this saves redundant initialization. The question then is why don't object fields rely on definite analysis too instead of having default initialization? The compiler does that analysis anyway when you have `readonly` fields so the code is there. The problem is that `this` can escape. From the beginning of the constructor body, you have access to `this` and can send it to other methods or do whatever. Code that receives that can access any field on the object, even ones that haven't been initialized yet. To ensure that this doesn't lead to undefined behavior, those fields must be default initialized to some known value. This could be solved by ensuring that all fields are initialized before `this` can be used, but that makes constructors a good bit more complex to work with (think constructor initialization lists in C++).
null
0
1316181653
False
0
c2kb0hn
t3_kfvm7
null
t1_c2kb0hn
t1_c2k0ep6
null
1427607612
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
OH MY GOD.
null
0
1316181701
False
0
c2kb0nw
t3_kghid
null
t1_c2kb0nw
t3_kghid
null
1427607615
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
lol. I don't know why people are downvoting this. In a terrible sense, this bug is hilarious!
null
0
1316181779
False
0
c2kb0z2
t3_kghid
null
t1_c2kb0z2
t1_c2k3ze9
null
1427607620
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Question, why recommend Git in an article aimed at newbies when Hg is far less likely to eat them?
null
0
1316181812
False
0
c2kb13s
t3_khkyd
null
t1_c2kb13s
t3_khkyd
null
1427607619
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sbrown123
null
>you can improve your performance by using the most optimized implementation of Java with all optimizations turned on. Minecraft isn't a web server. You will get insignificant improvement using the "-server" option. On my computer it gave roughly a 3% improvement while it used a greater amount of memory using that option. Chunking spikes remained. Read the article. If you are using 1.7.3 still try using OptiFine and you will see the difference first hand.
null
0
1316181905
False
0
c2kb1h3
t3_kgq62
null
t1_c2kb1h3
t1_c2k5kn1
null
1427607624
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
stubob
null
Isn't this example: >Consider the problem of scheduling exams (described above). But suppose, next, that there are 15000 students. ... It runs in an hour and outputs an exam schedule so that all students can do their exams in one week. ... The next year, though, there are 10 more students. If the same program runs on the same computer then that one hour is going to turn into 210 hours, because every additional student doubles the computations. incorrect? If the program already handles 15000 in one hour, why wouldn't it be trivial to add 10 more students to the computation? It seems like it's saying f(n) = 2^15000 = 1 hour, but f(n+10) = 2^15010 = 210 hours, which doesn't make sense.
null
0
1316181952
False
0
c2kb1no
t3_kgfhb
null
t1_c2kb1no
t3_kgfhb
null
1427607626
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
danharaj
null
The real trouble is imagining how someone can link to wikipedia and get 800 upvotes in /r/programming.
null
0
1316181958
False
0
c2kb1of
t3_kgfhb
null
t1_c2kb1of
t1_c2kaxqp
null
1427607626
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
s/Unix/GNU/
null
0
1316181962
False
0
c2kb1ov
t3_kgqnz
null
t1_c2kb1ov
t1_c2kb038
null
1427607626
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
taogepacs
null
What big kernel lock? From Wikipedia: > "Symmetric multiprocessing NetBSD has had support for SMP since the NetBSD 2.0 release in 2004,[17] which was initially implemented using the giant lock approach. During the development cycle of the NetBSD 5 release, major work was done to improve SMP support; most of the kernel subsystems were modified to be MP safe and use the fine-grained locking approach. New synchronization primitives were implemented and scheduler activations was replaced with a 1:1 threading model in February 2007.[18] A scalable M2 thread scheduler was implemented, though the old 4.4BSD scheduler still remains the default but was modified to scale with SMP. Threaded software interrupts were implemented to improve synchronization. The virtual memory system, memory allocator and trap handling were made MP safe. The file system framework, including the VFS and major file systems were modified to be MP safe. Since April, 2008 the only subsystems running with a giant lock are the network protocols and most device drivers." Should I also point out that the Linux kernel has only gotten rid of the Big Kernel Lock [extremely](http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:jipTmEgzMIoJ:www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/447301-whats-new-in-linux-2639-ding-dong-the-big-kernel-lock-is-dead+linux+big+kernel+lock&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk) [recently](https://lwn.net/Articles/424657/) Do you have examples of where NetBSD is actually slow, other than 3D benchmarks? Do you even know what's going on in the -current branch? Benchmarks will of course be placed under the most intense scrutiny, so hope you're up to the job. Here are some [ruby microbenchmarks](http://linbsd.org:8000/rubybench2011) (*disclaimer: i didn't create this*) to kick things off, and are by no means perfect. Default compilers are used on each OS/Distro. In the case of NetBSD 5.1, that's gcc 4.1.
null
0
1316182030
False
0
c2kb1yn
t3_kejfs
null
t1_c2kb1yn
t1_c2jxq5w
null
1427607629
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
recursive
null
He calculated the continued fraction, not the digital representation.
null
0
1316182042
False
0
c2kb200
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb200
t1_c2kaekj
null
1427607629
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
teletran
null
My recommendation was mostly around its strength from being ubiquitous. While hg is a little more "fool-proof", it lacks something as big as GitHub. Additionally, git seems to have a bigger following, so there's a ton more documentation available (not just official docs, but also books and tutorials), and git seems to have better tools available. Also, the last time I tried (and this might have changed since, I haven't researched it) branching in Hg, I found it quite painful, and I found git's branching to be much simpler to use.
null
0
1316182080
False
0
c2kb257
t3_khkyd
null
t1_c2kb257
t1_c2kb13s
null
1427607630
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
undershirt
null
Those analogies you created at a young age are pretty awesome. And that's cool you enjoyed your skills and talents without letting it take over your life. Sounds like you found what's important. Also, your father sounds like Feynman's father.
null
0
1316182126
False
0
c2kb2ay
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb2ay
t1_c2kaan4
null
1427607642
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
GetsEclectic
null
I think he said it only took 3 hours of computation.
null
0
1316182209
False
0
c2kb2ou
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb2ou
t1_c2ka7oq
null
1427607637
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
I disagree actually, it's not because you're busy or anything, it's because you physically cannot take in and learn information as fast, you think you can because the change is so gradual. Unless you actually did at a young age teach yourself mass amount of stuff you wouldn't notice the change any way, I personally have noticed a massive change even though I don't "feel" any different. The biggest difference maybe is that it will take me like two or three more times to do something before I actually "learn" it, where as when I was a little kid I could honestly watch it be done once, and remember it next to permanently, even if it was a few months after having seen it.
null
0
1316182293
False
0
c2kb30z
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb30z
t1_c2kardn
null
1427607641
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sleepydog
null
All of my friends in Vietnam use it heavily.
null
0
1316182327
False
0
c2kb35x
t3_kgsnl
null
t1_c2kb35x
t1_c2k7zi1
null
1427607653
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
zelf0gale
null
Bitbucket.org Don't need as much documentation, because it is easier. TortoiseHg is the only repository specific tool (a GUI) that I've needed.
null
0
1316182372
False
0
c2kb3co
t3_khkyd
null
t1_c2kb3co
t1_c2kb257
null
1427607650
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
zaxupexolap
null
one word: interest
null
0
1316182383
False
0
c2kb3e8
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb3e8
t1_c2k9vws
null
1427607650
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
teletran
null
Certainly there are tools and similar sites for Hg, I didn't mean to imply that. But I don't think BB is anywhere near the scale of GitHub. Edit: I don't want to imply I think Hg is a bad choice or is a bad tool, but there seems to be much more weight behind git, and I think it's worth learning as it will be encountered more often. Finally, I don't have enough experience with Hg to give it a full recommendation anyway, but I don't think it's a bad tool.
null
0
1316182507
False
0
c2kb3w0
t3_khkyd
null
t1_c2kb3w0
t1_c2kb3co
null
1427607656
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
AustinCorgiBart
null
"So I can either use my amazing brain to solve math problems, or get women to sleep with me. Well *that's* a hard choice."
null
0
1316182507
False
0
c2kb3w6
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb3w6
t1_c2kad56
null
1427607656
39
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jimbokun
null
From the photograph, I think it's clear that Wolfram secretly cloned himself 13 years ago.
null
0
1316182589
False
0
c2kb48q
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb48q
t3_khf6j
null
1427607658
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316182667
True
0
c2kb4ir
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb4ir
t3_khf6j
null
1427607663
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
chrisrico
null
Alternatively, if your logic is correct, I'd rather have no internet and no nuclear weapons.
null
0
1316182847
False
0
c2kb59a
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2kb59a
t1_c2kanfy
null
1427607670
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pseudoopus
null
[slightly relevant](http://abstrusegoose.com/334)
null
0
1316182962
False
0
c2kb5re
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb5re
t1_c2kad56
null
1427607678
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
AnythingApplied
null
First of all, just to clarify my solving time equation was just an example... obviously with 1 or 2 rocks the problem is entirely trivial and would take no time at all. With 3 rocks all you have to do is check that the smaller two rocks add up to the largest. Any more and there starts to be a lot of combinations you have to check. I'll just leave this 10 rock problem here: 60 117 99 72 115 148 81 73 51 148 You can get the sum is 964, so each pile must add to 482. Let me know if you still think it is easy :-P. Yes, no cutting rocks and no 3rd pile. Can you put these rocks into 2 separate piles of equal weight? (The above numbers being the weight of each rock). I just randomly generated these numbers, so I don't know if it is possible or not. My intent is not for you to solve it, as I think that would be a pain, especially by hand. I'm just trying to demonstrate that even with a small number like 10, it is not easy. (Well, maybe you can get it by hand, but this at least demonstrates that the more rocks there are the more of a pain this problem would quickly become). Some such problems are easy. One way I've approched this problem before is by looking at the rocks remainders under a sample of different divisors. The simpliest one to check would be how many rocks are even/odd. If there is only 1 odd rock, for example, you'd be able to jump to the conclusion that it is not possible . Also not possible if there is an odd number of odd rocks (this is the same check as adding up all the rocks and dividing by 2 to see what your target weight is for each pile... obviously if the total isn't even you can't divide by 2). But sometimes, like it my example, this doesn't help (I just went back to check it now). Looking at all the rocks remaining weights when divided by 3 can help too, because you know what remainder of 3 each side in total is going to be, but the higher the divisor you look at the less informative it is (say looking at the divisor of 200 is just the original problem and doesn't help at all).
null
0
1316183026
True
0
c2kb61y
t3_kgfhb
null
t1_c2kb61y
t1_c2k8wb4
null
1427607680
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
trimalchio-worktime
null
FINALLY, someone with a rational explanation!
null
0
1316183094
False
0
c2kb6d5
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb6d5
t1_c2k9zqb
null
1427607685
29
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
asegura
null
Especially *simple English* wikipedia.
null
0
1316183159
False
0
c2kb6mr
t3_kgfhb
null
t1_c2kb6mr
t1_c2kb1of
null
1427607687
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316183192
False
0
c2kb6sh
t3_kgq62
null
t1_c2kb6sh
t1_c2kaezk
null
1427607689
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
recursive
null
It is not the 878783625th term. It is a term that's value is 878783625.
null
0
1316183223
False
0
c2kb6xg
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb6xg
t1_c2ka7oq
null
1427607691
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Svenstaro
null
Heads-up: Oracle removed the license option for distribution redistribution of the Oracle JVM so distributions will no longer be officially offering that. You can still download and use it manually of course.
null
0
1316183298
False
0
c2kb793
t3_kgq62
null
t1_c2kb793
t1_c2k5doc
null
1427607695
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
SuperDuckQ
null
That's pretty neat! If I could offer on item it's is that your top row should be a different color to indicate it is a display and not something the user can interface with. Even though it's the very first thing you said, I still tried clicking on the top left corner first and wondered why nothing was happening.
null
0
1316183304
False
0
c2kb7a9
t3_khn6y
null
t1_c2kb7a9
t3_khn6y
null
1427607695
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316183306
False
0
c2kb7ak
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb7ak
t1_c2k9xjn
null
1427607696
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ouistiti
null
I didn't get any sound. Should I? Firefox 6/Ubuntu 11.04.
null
0
1316183312
False
0
c2kb7bo
t3_khn6y
null
t1_c2kb7bo
t3_khn6y
null
1427607696
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
woah_woah
null
Doesn't work in FF ... Probably should more clearly define beats since it's inherently 4/4
null
0
1316183360
False
0
c2kb7j9
t3_khn6y
null
t1_c2kb7j9
t3_khn6y
null
1427607699
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sorry_for_my_sarcasm
null
Gifted children flourish when not subjected to the sluggish pace of typical educational system. They can often display unfathomable feats. This recent post on Mozart's abilities is a prime example. He was 14 when this was accomplished. http://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/kgr24/til_there_was_a_song_written_in_the_1630s_that/
null
0
1316183366
False
0
c2kb7k4
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb7k4
t1_c2k9xjn
null
1427607699
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
LiteweightPhenomenal
null
This kid's also managed to write the book on how not to get laid. Incredible
null
0
1316183464
False
0
c2kb7zt
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb7zt
t3_khf6j
null
1427607706
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dyydvujbxs
null
What mastery? He is reading books and websites about pi and fractals and writing about what he reads. This is pretty popular among the pre/teen math nerd set. Lucky they have computers 1000x as fast as we had as kids. It took my computer 20 minutes to paint a Mandelbrot set coded in GWBasic. He is pretty normal math nerd, no doubt with some editing and hardware/software -purchasing auport from dad or mom.
null
0
1316183541
False
0
c2kb8ba
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb8ba
t1_c2k9xjn
null
1427607709
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ProbablyCanadian
null
That kids a joke. He hasn't even learned to format his blog equations with Latex. What has he been doing with the last 13 years of his life?
null
0
1316183544
False
0
c2kb8bo
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kb8bo
t1_c2k9xjn
null
1427607709
23
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dmitry_sychov
null
nice concept, but not strictly new - a number of web sites already support this idea..
null
0
1316183734
False
0
c2kb95m
t3_khjji
null
t1_c2kb95m
t3_khjji
null
1427607721
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
deoxxa
null
Well, it doesn't have to be. In the source, it's very easy to change it to any other time scale. I agree though, the UI needs some attention.
null
0
1316183786
False
0
c2kb9d3
t3_khn6y
null
t1_c2kb9d3
t1_c2kb7j9
null
1427607724
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
deoxxa
null
I haven't tested it in Firefox, only Chrome. It might be that I'm using some Chrome-specific (or even webkit-specific) features.
null
0
1316183795
False
0
c2kb9ez
t3_khn6y
null
t1_c2kb9ez
t1_c2kb7bo
null
1427607724
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
michaelfeathers
null
Nice article. The biggest problem I have with coverage is that sometimes people end up acting like it is the goal. That's one way to end up with very poor tests.
null
0
1316183881
False
0
c2kb9so
t3_khhdj
null
t1_c2kb9so
t3_khhdj
null
1427607730
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Saivo
null
I hear you. Would like to point out, though, that this particular example is a bit of an edge case. Method declarations / definitions need to be written with relatively low frequency, at least when comparing to the task of writing method contents and other jazz. Of course, perhaps similar arguments could be fielded against my previous example as well. If only someone had the time and energy to objectively estimate the verboseness of the two languages over a vast database of real world use cases! This seems to have erupted into a flame war. I was not very serious when I vented about Java, which I hoped to convey with the liberal use of hyperbole, although I still stand by the main points made. Java feels so heavy to write, even if I have plenty of experience with that language. Perhaps, as some poster earlier suggested, it has partially to do with the fact that I've been exposed to some nasty frameworks. Also the C++/Java dichotomy has been taken to a tangent perhaps. The main reason I do C++ code is not that it's very enjoyable or significantly less verbose than Java. Memory allocation, low level control and the general feeling of having total and complete control (however illusionary, it is not as illusionary as with Java) over the software. If I want to really enjoy programming, and output my thoughts into a prototype with extreme efficiency, I use Python. It's the loveliest little language that I've had the pleasure to know. Granted, I know next to nothing about pure functional programming and haven't had the opportunity/time to experiment with the likes of Haskell, O'Caml etc. And last but not least: I understand well that Java might be the best choice for some tasks. That's usually the way applying programming languages (should) work: the right tools for the right task. TL;DR: I wasn't really trying to be bigoted (in hostile sense), although I do admit there might be troll-like qualities in my posts in this thread. And I never claimed to be a good programmer. ;-)
null
0
1316183957
False
0
c2kba4y
t3_kgq62
null
t1_c2kba4y
t1_c2kax59
null
1427607733
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
zeroone
null
And where are the rest of the digits? Lazy kid.
null
0
1316184014
False
0
c2kbae4
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kbae4
t3_khf6j
null
1427607737
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ddrt
null
Do you know another way? If so please share.
null
0
1316184070
False
0
c2kbanu
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kbanu
t1_c2kago1
null
1427607740
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Wakasaki_Rocky
null
It's mostly his Dad's work.
null
0
1316184119
False
0
c2kbaw0
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kbaw0
t1_c2ka00n
null
1427607744
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
deoxxa
null
And on the third day, SuperDuckQ said "Let there be an indication of the top row being a different UI feature", and so there were numbers.
null
0
1316184144
False
0
c2kbazm
t3_khn6y
null
t1_c2kbazm
t1_c2kb7a9
null
1427607745
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
My coworker's theory for why Mexico migrates to non Hispanic countries (with the exception of the US) is the drug trade. I'm not sure if I buy it entirely but it's certainly interesting.
null
0
1316184594
False
0
c2kbcxm
t3_kgjcg
null
t1_c2kbcxm
t1_c2k9uw3
null
1428193912
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Brian
null
>They're not missing much. Coding anything substantial and sufficiently original That's not really the benefit. A lot of the code I write is dirt simple quick scripts to solve an immediate problem. They are trivial, simple, but I've seen people do repetitive tasks over and over every day that could be done with a 5 line script. *Writing* anything substantial and sufficiently original takes too much time for most people too. How many in our literate society write novels / published articles etc? But being able to write a shopping list is useful too. A similar level of code-literacy would be a great benefit in a society where computers are becoming as ubiquitous as paper.
null
0
1316184609
False
0
c2kbd08
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2kbd08
t1_c2k6c87
null
1427607772
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316184766
False
0
c2kbdr1
t3_khodg
null
t1_c2kbdr1
t3_khodg
null
1427607780
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
erictheturtle
null
Wouldn't the VBO have to be re-uploaded to the card every time a block is added/removed?
null
0
1316184832
False
0
c2kbe1v
t3_kgq62
null
t1_c2kbe1v
t1_c2ka7b9
null
1427607785
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Unable to connect Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at www.lessonsoffailure.com.
null
0
1316184943
False
0
c2kbekc
t3_khodg
null
t1_c2kbekc
t3_khodg
null
1427607798
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
OceanSpray
null
Yes. I have, in fact, taken a lot of inspiration from Dr. Shapiro's papers about the motivation for and design of BitC. The main difference: Hammer is pure, and will use monads to control side effects. BitC is not pure, and has a type and effect system. [This thesis](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.136.3606&rep=rep1&type=pdf) demonstrates that effect systems can be encoded purely within System F, and [this paper](http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~ccshan/capability/region-io.pdf) supports that claim. I believe that an effect system adds too much complexity to the type system to be worthwhile. Side note: Hammer is strict, but reserves the right to avoid unnecessary evaluation, even if it ignores a bottom value.
null
0
1316184947
False
0
c2kbel8
t3_kfvm7
null
t1_c2kbel8
t1_c2kaz05
null
1427607798
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Saivo
null
I was thinking of going through my old java repositories to find good examples of ridiculousness. But then I started feeling that perhaps things will turn out to be quite even between Java and C++ verbosity-wise, and my experiences would be more tied to the frameworks I've worked with than to Java as a language. Also, I didn't really want to spend the time going through the old codes and tearing open all the painful wounds again. :-) Also, the discussion on the whole has perhaps become a bit tangential to what my original intent was. The unclear point I tried to make was that, from my personal viewpoint, Java is . If I want to do things efficiently, I use C or C++ (or ASM, but thank god those days seem to be long over). If I want to get something less time-critical done really very quickly, I use Python (possibly with C++ bindings). In my sad little world, writing Java doesn't have much benefits at all, and in fact it is a hindrance. Of course, that is probably largely due to the fact that I'm in a lucky (?) position where I don't have to care much about portability (which is unarguably Java's forte). On related note, I could say that finding Python really emancipated me as a coder (and this is not to start another flamewar ;-)). Writing it is pure joy. Python enables me to basically convert my thoughts directly into code, without having to worry about a quagmire of syntactical peculiarities. I agree with what you say about software projects and the proportionate shares of time each aspect of the development process should/will have. Corporate environment and Big Software have their own set of rules, and in the grand scale of things, issues such as excessive verbosity become more and more minor nuisances. However, on my spare time I love to cook up shit with whatever environments/languages fit the bill, and talking from that viewpoint (joy of programming and efficient expression of ideas), Java is far far out of my comfort zone. Even if I know it quite well and can produce reasonable amounts of reasonably tolerable code in reasonable time.
null
0
1316184984
False
0
c2kbeqz
t3_kgq62
null
t1_c2kbeqz
t1_c2k6oz8
null
1427607800
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pnpbios
null
that site is fail
null
0
1316185032
False
0
c2kbeye
t3_khodg
null
t1_c2kbeye
t3_khodg
null
1427607800
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MatrixFrog
null
You okay?
null
0
1316185141
False
0
c2kbfep
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kbfep
t1_c2ka82q
null
1427607805
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bytesmythe
null
Nice! I'd like to see an "export/import" feature that dumps it as a simple text string so I can save it. Also, a clear button.
null
0
1316185148
False
0
c2kbffm
t3_khn6y
null
t1_c2kbffm
t3_khn6y
null
1427607805
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
axilmar
null
Didn't you see the above link? **the code "public sealed class" is in the C++ example.**
null
0
1316185171
False
0
c2kbfjz
t3_kgl4f
null
t1_c2kbfjz
t1_c2katdb
null
1427607815
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
axilmar
null
How come, since WinRT requires those non-standard language extensions?
null
0
1316185210
False
0
c2kbfqg
t3_kewaq
null
t1_c2kbfqg
t1_c2kalo8
null
1427607808
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316185268
False
0
c2kbfzw
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kbfzw
t1_c2ka3qp
null
1427607811
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
axilmar
null
No, it's irrelevant, because when you create your own algebraic types, you will have to deal with all the cases.
null
0
1316185270
False
0
c2kbg06
t3_kfvm7
null
t1_c2kbg06
t1_c2kakwb
null
1427607811
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
axilmar
null
I wasn't talking about exhaustive tests. I was talking about making sure something is not null and then using it after that without checking for null. You can do that and be sure the variable is not null. No difference in practice than the Maybe type.
null
0
1316185356
False
0
c2kbgep
t3_kfvm7
null
t1_c2kbgep
t1_c2kaikk
null
1427607816
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Azzk1kr
null
Money helps ;)
null
0
1316185411
False
0
c2kbgn0
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kbgn0
t1_c2kbanu
null
1427607819
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ojiisan
null
same here, on OS X
null
0
1316185420
False
0
c2kbgoh
t3_khn6y
null
t1_c2kbgoh
t1_c2kb7bo
null
1427607819
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
otherwiseguy
null
It takes around [10,000 hours](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outliers_\(book\)) to become an expert at something. Kids tend to have a lot of free time. At 8 hours a day, that only takes about 3.5 years. Perhaps he enjoys math puzzles more than other things, so he learns instead of playing with GI Joes.
null
0
1316185454
False
0
c2kbgsq
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kbgsq
t1_c2k9xjn
null
1427607821
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Theon
null
Himself? No, that kid is *wolfram/alpha*.
null
0
1316185458
False
0
c2kbgug
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2kbgug
t1_c2kb48q
null
1427607821
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
brandf
null
MP4 & WMV links for those of you with a Silverlight phobia: http://video.ch9.ms/build/2011/mp4/816.mp4 http://video.ch9.ms/build/2011/wmv-hq/816-HD.wmv
null
0
1316185497
False
0
c2kbh14
t3_khosg
null
t1_c2kbh14
t3_khosg
null
1427607824
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
CylonGlitch
null
The site is struggling under the load right now. I finally did get through, and the article is decent; makes some very valid points. Although the other side is not all roses either.
null
0
1316185567
False
0
c2kbhco
t3_khodg
null
t1_c2kbhco
t3_khodg
null
1427607829
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
thestamp
null
Uhh, Google Adwords. 'nuff said.
null
0
1316185638
False
0
c2kbhoo
t3_kgb4h
null
t1_c2kbhoo
t1_c2k1jn0
null
1427607836
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
> Initializing fields wastes cycles, which is, I think, why it doesn't do so for locals. Definite assignment analysis will statically ensure that all locals are initialized before use, so this saves redundant initialization. These two statements are at odds. If you have definite assignment analysis then you know whether or not to auto-initialize the field.
null
0
1316185643
False
0
c2kbhpr
t3_kfvm7
null
t1_c2kbhpr
t1_c2kb0hn
null
1427607837
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
damg
null
But it's a new service, why not just let people sign up with their Google Apps account if they have never signed up with another one? I think a lot of people use Google Apps for their personal domains and don't actually want to create another fake "personal" account just to use Google Plus.
null
0
1316185866
False
0
c2kbir1
t3_kgsnl
null
t1_c2kbir1
t1_c2k8mxi
null
1427607850
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
deoxxa
null
Just tested it in FF6 on OS X and all seems well apart from the wood block sound...
null
0
1316185880
False
0
c2kbitn
t3_khn6y
null
t1_c2kbitn
t1_c2kb7j9
null
1427607852
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
EntroperZero
null
VBOs can run in static mode (uploaded to GPU once and never changed), dynamic mode (uploaded to GPU, but you can reupload a subset or the whole buffer at any time), and stream mode (streamed from main memory every frame). Most blocks don't change that often, so dynamic sounds good to me, but stream would probably still be significantly faster than immediate mode, and might be easier to use.
null
0
1316185932
False
0
c2kbj2s
t3_kgq62
null
t1_c2kbj2s
t1_c2kbe1v
null
1427607863
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
Yea, TLB.
null
0
1316185940
False
0
c2kbj43
t3_kgl4f
null
t1_c2kbj43
t1_c2k7v45
null
1427607863
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
SuperDuckQ
null
Based on the content and the title of the link itself, I think this might be better fodder for /r/learnprogramming.
null
0
1316186069
False
0
c2kbjqm
t3_kho3i
null
t1_c2kbjqm
t3_kho3i
null
1427607866
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jared84lsu
null
fair enough...for some reason, though, that particular line really annoys me.
null
0
1316186255
False
0
c2kbknl
t3_kgbzq
null
t1_c2kbknl
t1_c2kanbt
null
1427607873
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
deoxxa
null
I'm going to have to rewrite the guts of it (it's little more than a proof of concept right now) to do that, but it's definitely on the list of things to do. Following that, I'm thinking I'll throw Node.JS and MongoDB at it to make it persistent and enable other samples to be uploaded, then get some Socket.IO magic happening to make it multiplayer. I plan on wasting thousands of hours of other people's work time via this toy.
null
0
1316186282
False
0
c2kbksx
t3_khn6y
null
t1_c2kbksx
t1_c2kbffm
null
1427607875
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
arood
null
Indeed. There was already third-party APIs for this kind of stuff. I want posting so someone can port Selective Tweets from Facebook. That's all I'm missing.
null
0
1316186473
False
0
c2kblqc
t3_kgsnl
null
t1_c2kblqc
t1_c2k66sp
null
1427607886
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
SciK
null
Konqueror: > The server failed the authenticity check (<host name\>). > > <cause\> > > [Details] [Continue] [Cancel] → Continue > Would you like to accept this certificate forever without being prompted? > [Forever] [Current Session only] Done.
null
0
1316186535
False
0
c2kbm1c
t3_kgqxt
null
t1_c2kbm1c
t1_c2kacy1
null
1427607890
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bytesmythe
null
I can see it now. The ability to add extra lines for various instruments/notes/chords, lengthen the block, emphasis beats, variable time signatures, sustained sounds, export to midi... ;) > I plan on wasting thousands of hours of other people's work time via this toy. You magnificent bastard.
null
0
1316186854
False
0
c2kbnkg
t3_khn6y
null
t1_c2kbnkg
t1_c2kbksx
null
1427607919
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ethraax
null
Yes, it's in the **C++/CLI** example.
null
0
1316186948
False
0
c2kbo16
t3_kgl4f
null
t1_c2kbo16
t1_c2kbfjz
null
1427607925
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null