archived stringclasses 2
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | author_fullname stringlengths 4 12 ⌀ | body stringlengths 0 22.5k | comment_type stringclasses 1
value | controversiality stringclasses 2
values | created_utc stringlengths 10 10 | edited stringlengths 4 12 | gilded stringclasses 7
values | id stringlengths 1 7 | link_id stringlengths 7 10 | locked stringclasses 2
values | name stringlengths 4 10 ⌀ | parent_id stringlengths 5 10 | permalink stringlengths 41 91 ⌀ | retrieved_on stringlengths 10 10 ⌀ | score stringlengths 1 4 | subreddit_id stringclasses 1
value | subreddit_name_prefixed stringclasses 1
value | subreddit_type stringclasses 1
value | total_awards_received stringclasses 19
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
True | [deleted] | null | I run it and go to sleep. When I wake up, the downloading is done. ;) | null | 0 | 1316217915 | False | 0 | c2kfz94 | t3_khtuh | null | t1_c2kfz94 | t1_c2kf8f7 | null | 1427610017 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | gaymathman | null | It isn't. The algorithm is simple (an undergraduate course in numerical analysis will cover it); nobody's bothered to compute pi this way recently because we know how to compute decimal representations in such a way that d_k has no dependence on d_1...d_{k-1}. The record is actually held by someone who used a typical desktop computer for the calculation; nobody really cares about more accurate approximations to pi as the size of these approximations makes them horrifically unsuitable for actually computing things. | null | 0 | 1316218167 | False | 0 | c2kg094 | t3_khf6j | null | t1_c2kg094 | t1_c2kc12g | null | 1427610028 | 7 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | wodahSShadow | null | So after a few million tries guess what happened...14.25Kg in 10 rocks!
Here they are: ••••••••••
I won't be taking further requests. | null | 0 | 1316218174 | False | 0 | c2kg0a9 | t3_kgfhb | null | t1_c2kg0a9 | t1_c2k8m1p | null | 1427610029 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mechengineer | null | It's not quite as extensive, but probably a good place to start, haha. I've found there's much less OpenCL information available than CUDA. | null | 0 | 1316218230 | False | 0 | c2kg0ia | t3_khryi | null | t1_c2kg0ia | t1_c2kep7f | null | 1427610031 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Zarutian | null | /me raises hand! | null | 0 | 1316218392 | False | 0 | c2kg159 | t3_khip6 | null | t1_c2kg159 | t1_c2kbsgk | null | 1427610039 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | boober_noober | null | I too thought it was a thing | null | 0 | 1316218406 | False | 0 | c2kg17g | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg17g | t1_c2keeba | null | 1427610041 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | LemonLion | null | It seems like you're using setInterval for the loops. setInterval is notoriously inaccurate - http://ejohn.org/blog/how-javascript-timers-work/
It's better to use setTimeout and calculate the correct time against the browser's built-in Date function - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/196027/is-there-a-more-accurate-way-to-create-a-javascript-timer-than-settimeout
This Chrome experiment handles audio event scheduling pretty well:
http://chromium.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/samples/audio/shiny-drum-machine.html | null | 0 | 1316218439 | False | 0 | c2kg1cb | t3_khn6y | null | t1_c2kg1cb | t1_c2kbqhr | null | 1427610042 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Zarutian | null | Dont get me started on people who want to use regular expressions to parse XML. | null | 0 | 1316218526 | False | 0 | c2kg1om | t3_ki52y | null | t1_c2kg1om | t1_c2kftcb | null | 1427610048 | 11 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | sanitybit | null | > I'm not so fond of the new layout though, mainly because I went on it for the first time a few hours ago and panicked as to where the top hundred pixels of the page went.
FWIW, I only play around with the layout design when I've been drinking. :) | null | 0 | 1316218527 | False | 0 | c2kg1ot | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg1ot | t1_c2kfgk6 | null | 1427610048 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | MTGandP | null | And the fourtieth hundred times. | null | 0 | 1316218586 | False | 0 | c2kg1xe | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg1xe | t1_c2kfg1j | null | 1427610050 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | MTGandP | null | It's funny how xkcd is now the definitive source on password security. | null | 0 | 1316218678 | False | 0 | c2kg2be | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg2be | t1_c2kcxkq | null | 1427610055 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | hardsoft | null | It's also a sure wire way to worsen the current backlog of patents. This removes any incentive big companies had to do thorough R&D before applying for a patent. It is going to be a file now ask questions later filing frenzy where every big company is simply trying to be the first to get their foot in the door, regardless of how absurd the patent is. | null | 0 | 1316218844 | True | 0 | c2kg2z7 | t3_khvyw | null | t1_c2kg2z7 | t1_c2kdmtn | null | 1427610064 | 20 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | MTGandP | null | This assumes that the attacker is not using dictionary words or combinations of dictionary words. | null | 0 | 1316218971 | False | 0 | c2kg3hk | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg3hk | t1_c2kd5d2 | null | 1427610071 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1316219164 | False | 0 | c2kg48a | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg48a | t1_c2kefov | null | 1427610081 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | rizla7 | null | SSL certs? self-signed certs? not the same thing... also, if you're running an intranet with self-signed, that's just fail dude. you should have the servers available to run a CA. as for admin consoles, lolz.. that's just utter fail.. complete security risk if someone compromises that key. by their very nature, http servers are less secure than CAs, meaning compromising such a key is a trivial task in some cases. also, in the case of admin consoles, your network admins should never have access to these keys. you could argue it is acceptable in a one-man operation, that is all.
problem with self-signed certs is you have no way of revoking it if it becomes compromised without removing it manually from all affected machines. furthermore, admins often dont check the warning that a cert has changed and sometimes assume they just don't have the cert installed and will just click OK. these types of events should never be permitted.
therefore, allowing installation of such certs directly through the browser (or at least in a 1-click fashion) is just a security risk as end-users will not be aware of this fact. there is a reason why browsers deliberately make this difficult.
furthermore, what is the point of encrypting solely http on an admin console? you're better off using something like ipsec.
simply put: this means there is no way to actually implement them securely in a production environment. therefore they are for dev use only. | null | 0 | 1316219518 | True | 0 | c2kg5lf | t3_kgqxt | null | t1_c2kg5lf | t1_c2kbqn5 | null | 1427610098 | -2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | inmatarian | null | Not a patent lawyer, but as I understand it doesn't eliminate the process of invalidating patents, and you can still use prior-art as a way of doing it. So, that's good. But it switches to "first-to-file" as the way of deciding who gets the patent. So, instead of checking the "invented on" date on the application, the USPTO checks the "filed on" date when they approve bogus patents. It sounds like it just speeds up the process of large businesses proper fucking each other. | null | 0 | 1316219655 | False | 0 | c2kg65k | t3_khvyw | null | t1_c2kg65k | t3_khvyw | null | 1427610107 | 9 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | soulp | null | Same here. Did you see his presentation on c# 5 and Roslyn? Pretty good stuff. | null | 0 | 1316219934 | False | 0 | c2kg7ap | t3_kgb4h | null | t1_c2kg7ap | t1_c2k1xib | null | 1427610120 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Peaker | null | The Pirate party makes a [case](http://christianengstrom.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/an-alternative-to-pharmaceutical-patents/) on why pharma patents are bad too. | null | 0 | 1316219960 | False | 0 | c2kg7e7 | t3_khvyw | null | t1_c2kg7e7 | t1_c2ke7kh | null | 1427610129 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | Am I the only one that read the title as "So I got pre-impregnated"? | null | 0 | 1316219983 | False | 0 | c2kg7hu | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg7hu | t3_khtwb | null | 1427610123 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | KayRice | null | Yes | null | 0 | 1316220050 | False | 0 | c2kg7rv | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg7rv | t1_c2kg7hu | null | 1427610127 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Peaker | null | AFAIK, the constitution merely says:
> The Congress shall have the power . . . To Promote the Progress of Science and the useful Arts by securing for limited times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.
That doesn't demand anything. It merely *allows* congress to have patent/copyright laws (though not practically-unlimited-times copyrights we have today). | null | 0 | 1316220069 | False | 0 | c2kg7uv | t3_khvyw | null | t1_c2kg7uv | t1_c2ken2r | null | 1427610128 | 6 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | KayRice | null | Rules exist to be broken | null | 0 | 1316220134 | False | 0 | c2kg845 | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg845 | t1_c2kfpuk | null | 1427610131 | -2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | My brain is stupid. | null | 0 | 1316220183 | False | 0 | c2kg8b8 | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg8b8 | t1_c2kg7rv | null | 1427610134 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | I think maybe it's only a restriction for this developer preview version. | null | 0 | 1316220270 | False | 0 | c2kg8nh | t3_khtuh | null | t1_c2kg8nh | t1_c2kfe8j | null | 1427610139 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Bloqhead | null | Wow. That's some Bush League shit right there. I can't believe people still make this offense. | null | 0 | 1316220311 | False | 0 | c2kg8t4 | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg8t4 | t3_khtwb | null | 1427610140 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mcwiggin | null | In case you are curious fedex also stores your passwords in plain text on the back end. If you ever try to recover your fedex.com password the simply email it to you. So now you have a copy of your password sitting in your email. Yay! | null | 0 | 1316220320 | False | 0 | c2kg8uo | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg8uo | t3_khtwb | null | 1427610150 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Gnolfo | null | It's accurate from a brute force standpoint which is explicitly what that tool is calculating.
And we're still a solid order of magnitude in time above the single word option so adding in your dictionary method hasn't changed the conclusion but rather the details. Also this is an advantage on two sides, as it's easy not only to remember a series of words but you can take it a step further and add on capitalization and punctuation, which will come very naturally and give the same ease of retention. Meanwhile it will wreck havoc on your ability to reduce the search space as compared to just "4 words".
Also it's really not that much more of a step to say "5 words", which even with your method will rocket the search time back out to ~2.5 million years. It's really not about just taking 4 words cobbled together but rather exposing the technique and the doors it opens and all the advantages therein. In the comic even he's giving something of a worst-case comparison where the single-word password is a rather strong one while the multi-word password is a dead simple pattern and even then it wins out by a wide margin. | null | 0 | 1316220350 | False | 0 | c2kg8yx | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg8yx | t1_c2kecym | null | 1427610142 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | Here's some links I found that may be helpful for investigating further [google search](http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=bvec&cp=3&gs_id=95&xhr=t&q=in+url:+fedex.com/onlinelabel/login.do/labelusercddesc%3D&qe=aW4gdXJsOiBmZWRleC5jb20vb25saW5lbGFiZWwvbG9naW4uZG8vbGFiZWx1c2VyY2RkZXNjPQ&qesig=M48CnL0y47uYyQ8a4jZTsQ&pkc=AFgZ2tkjClRZSnyVWyODd-kh4VGtmLOID6pTEJgwBL9UDhKJEEwS3Cemq4ZVeQV887QhAtvbTXdzlvv1U3DJ_9eCu4ReRcH5FA&pq=in+link%3A+fedex.com%2Fonlinelabel%2Flogin.do%2Flabelusercddesc%3D&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&safe=active&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=in+url:+fedex.com/onlinelabel/login.do/labelusercddesc%3D&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.&fp=f011ebd10d5e903a&biw=1542&bih=819)
[I copy/pasted the URL](http://www.peeniewallie.com/2011/04/the-arent-the-d.html) and found that it tried to immediately log me in but it errored
[One more](http://www.grafixtreme.com/fedex/php/wsdl/CreatePendingShipmentReply_v9.txt)
This isn't something new so I wonder if there has been an exploit of this?
| null | 0 | 1316220553 | False | 0 | c2kg9ra | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg9ra | t3_khtwb | null | 1427610152 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | sadris | null | Why? Your argument is the same Ford used against the creator of the windshield wiper:
http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/universal/flashofgenius/ | null | 0 | 1316220555 | False | 0 | c2kg9rr | t3_khvyw | null | t1_c2kg9rr | t1_c2keh1h | null | 1427610154 | -7 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | jorellh | null | http://revision3.com/hak5/mitm | null | 0 | 1316220590 | False | 0 | c2kg9wj | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kg9wj | t1_c2kfklg | null | 1427610163 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | rycr | null | > Say you go to https://www.google.com, and search for something. You click on a link, say to https://anothersite.com . Your browser sends the Referer to anothersite.com.
Thank you. Why is this *so* hard for people to understand?! | null | 0 | 1316220747 | False | 0 | c2kgaib | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgaib | t1_c2kei56 | null | 1427610164 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | KayRice | null | Just a little bad RAM... it's okay it's okay! | null | 0 | 1316220771 | False | 0 | c2kgalq | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgalq | t1_c2kg8b8 | null | 1428193849 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | chemchris | null | yeah, should have been POST | null | 0 | 1316220802 | False | 0 | c2kgapr | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgapr | t1_c2ke3kw | null | 1427610166 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | toadkicker | null | In this case, login.do | null | 0 | 1316221080 | False | 0 | c2kgbsu | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgbsu | t1_c2kemcw | null | 1427610180 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | skoocda | null | Really? All I see is stars! | null | 0 | 1316221082 | False | 0 | c2kgbt6 | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgbt6 | t3_khtwb | null | 1427610180 | 6 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Gnolfo | null | The comic is using a worst-case scenario (or, okay, "really bad" case) where the single word password is quite strong and the multi-word password is as simple as you can get.
But, even while with a dictionary attack the multi-word password is still stronger than single-word (see other comments in this thread chain), it's taking the next steps with the technique that really sets things apart. Why not 5 words? Why not have sentences with capitalization and punctuation, etc? You really don't lose the ease of remembering as a specific phrase is far more particular than a word, and dictionary-type algorithms start to lose traction when simple bits like that are introduced.
So it's more making the point that at (or rather near) its worst, a multi-word password fares far better than a single word password at (near) its best.
| null | 0 | 1316221300 | False | 0 | c2kgcmd | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgcmd | t1_c2kdnfc | null | 1427610190 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | jerschneid | null | [For the lazy: plaintextoffenders.com](http://www.plaintextoffenders.com) | null | 0 | 1316221309 | False | 0 | c2kgcn9 | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgcn9 | t1_c2kcrkv | null | 1427610191 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | XML is like violence, if it's not working, you're not using enough of it. | null | 0 | 1316221425 | False | 0 | c2kgd30 | t3_ki52y | null | t1_c2kgd30 | t1_c2kftcb | null | 1427610197 | 18 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | shiroihollow | null | YEEEEEEAH 916. | null | 0 | 1316221429 | False | 0 | c2kgd3v | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgd3v | t3_khtwb | null | 1427610199 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | munificent | null | > If you have definite assignment analysis then you know whether or not to auto-initialize the field.
Definite assignment analysis doesn't ensure that you haven't accessed the field *before* it's been initialized. | null | 0 | 1316221459 | False | 0 | c2kgd7b | t3_kfvm7 | null | t1_c2kgd7b | t1_c2kbhpr | null | 1427610200 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | yellowstuff | null | This made me cringe, and I've built up a tolerance for that kind of thing through years of reading Raymond Chen's blog. | null | 0 | 1316221482 | False | 0 | c2kgda5 | t3_khip6 | null | t1_c2kgda5 | t3_khip6 | null | 1427610205 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Oppis | null | huh, I was under the impression when submitting a form either post or get can be used-- and get will show the parameters of the form in the url (so it can be copied and pasted (perfect for search results)) while post will hide the parameters from the user (unless they know where to look).
But I'm no expert in web tech. | null | 0 | 1316221661 | False | 0 | c2kgdyk | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgdyk | t1_c2kdqyb | null | 1427610208 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | realstevejobs | null | Good link. You saved me the trouble of digging for that wiki.
It's my understanding that data parallelism is a conceptual alternative to task parallelism. Threads and processes fall under task parallelism.
I first saw SIMD mentioned by Brendan Eich [here](http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2983420), 5 days ago, as part of an interesting discussion about Dart vs. JS. | null | 0 | 1316221739 | False | 0 | c2kge8t | t3_ki1gj | null | t1_c2kge8t | t1_c2kfttw | null | 1427610211 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | lgodsey | null | You have good taste, OP. Seriously, PowerOn Services makes the best silicon sex dolls on the market. | null | 0 | 1316221780 | False | 0 | c2kgeev | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgeev | t3_khtwb | null | 1427610214 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | Just to be serious for a moment, I've recently had the (obvious) realization that experimenting/designing/exploring when many different parts may be varied is *very difficult*.
The only way to tackle it while keeping your sanity, is to only vary a few variables (or just one) at a time.
I say it's obvious, because it avoids the combinatorial explosion of those many variables affecting each other (as often not independent in design); and this is how scientific experiments are carried out.
But I find it difficult to stick to, when I have an idea, and want to try it out... then I see there's a problem with it (or a possible refinement/exception) and I try that... then I see another one. And pretty soon, I have pretty much no idea what's going or what I am trying to do. (well, I do; but they interact in half-seen ways that I don't quite understand... it's unsettling).
A solution is to go back to basics, and then slowly increase it in complexity by varying only one thing at a time. Then, I can get on top of the insights I've had, how they interact and what they mean. Actually, this may even be a reasonable way to proceed, alternating between intuition and logic. After all, as Henri Poincaré said:
> *It is by logic that we prove, but by intuition that we discover.*
| null | 0 | 1316222034 | False | 0 | c2kgfcz | t3_ki52y | null | t1_c2kgfcz | t3_ki52y | null | 1427610226 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | xiongchiamiov | null | Are you [that guy](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1732348/regex-match-open-tags-except-xhtml-self-contained-tags)? | null | 0 | 1316222059 | False | 0 | c2kgfgh | t3_ki52y | null | t1_c2kgfgh | t1_c2kg1om | null | 1427610227 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mamjjasond | null | > give the user a unique one time name and password
they should have called it something else then - not a password. People associate the term "password" with something secret and multi-use. | null | 0 | 1316222126 | False | 0 | c2kgfqd | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgfqd | t1_c2kfi3j | null | 1427610231 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Gnolfo | null | He's more making the point that you should break away from single word passwords and use phrases or at least multi-words instead.
Add in punctuation, capitalization, a number, don't forget whitespace, and so on and you will be miles ahead of single word passwords in terms of strength.
* "I have 40 TPS reports!"
* "Brute-force this, jerks"
* "<your team's mascot> won in <year they took a championship>"
Even those edge on being sensible and possibly derived from some super complex dictionary attack of the future. So how about throwing together a phrase that wouldn't be used commonly, and then having fun with the punctuation/etc.
Take for example, from Gravity's Rainbow, the phrase "you never did the kenosha kid" with something like 9 variations on use and punctuation: http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001288.html
So if you take the comic at face value, which is keeping the multi-word approach exceedingly simple compared to its single word counterpart on purpose, then yes it's not all that wonderful. But taking it a step further in any of a number of dimensions and the strength of the password climbs very rapidly while still being quite easy to commit to memory. | null | 0 | 1316222131 | False | 0 | c2kgfqz | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgfqz | t1_c2kf28k | null | 1427610231 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | lunacraz | null | it's a pretty catchy song | null | 0 | 1316222156 | False | 0 | c2kgfuk | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgfuk | t1_c2kfqhw | null | 1427610233 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mdipierro | null | The Fedex security procedures are very poor. I once ordered a phone with T-mobile and cancelled before shipment. T-Mobile shipped again but asked me to refuse delivery. I was out of town so I called Fedex and asked not to deliver. I also left a message on my door asking not to deliver. They left a $800 phone outside my door in the open, under the rain, and I live in a densely populated area. I tried to return it but they never came to pick it up. I returned it to the Fedex office and as proof that I handed them the phone, they game a photocopy of the original delivery receipt. Somebody could have stolen the phone in front of my door. The Fedex employees could have stolen the phone. Either case there would be no way for me prove I was not responsible for the loss. | null | 0 | 1316222171 | False | 0 | c2kgfwv | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgfwv | t3_khtwb | null | 1427610233 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | zck | null | That is wrong. For example, in Firefox, there's an [about:config pref](http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.http.sendSecureXSiteReferrer) to control whether Referer is sent "when navigating from a https site to another https site". Its default is `true`. | null | 0 | 1316222260 | False | 0 | c2kgg8f | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgg8f | t1_c2kf8ec | null | 1427610238 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | cyrex | null | I'm aware.. that was my point... They do not hire good programmers | null | 0 | 1316222417 | False | 0 | c2kggsz | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kggsz | t1_c2kff00 | null | 1427610256 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | gnaritas | null | Being emailed your password doesn't imply it's stored in plain text, it just means they didn't store it with an irreversible hash. Many places simply encrypt it. It's still wrong, but not stored in plain text. | null | 0 | 1316222461 | False | 0 | c2kggyo | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kggyo | t1_c2kg8uo | null | 1427610249 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1316222510 | False | 0 | c2kgh5p | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgh5p | t1_c2kgg8f | null | 1427610256 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | zck | null | This is incorrect. Firefox has an [about:config preference](http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.http.sendSecureXSiteReferrer) to control whether Referer is sent "when navigating from a https site to another https site". Its default is `true`. Can you point out, either in the spec I linked to before, or on some other page, something that supports the "only same-domain Referer" policy? | null | 0 | 1316222533 | False | 0 | c2kgh8h | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgh8h | t1_c2kezej | null | 1427610259 | 6 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | nfriedly | null | FYI, while all of Facebook's SDKs already support OAuth 2.0, starting on October 1st they will *only* support OAuth 2.0 - anything that depends on the older authentication system will break. | null | 0 | 1316222672 | False | 0 | c2kghr8 | t3_ki9q6 | null | t1_c2kghr8 | t3_ki9q6 | null | 1427610264 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | sedition | null | A million years ago (internet time) I used hunter2 exclusively for my password. I figured if you guessed that you deserved my shell account. | null | 0 | 1316222867 | False | 0 | c2kgigq | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgigq | t1_c2ke3me | null | 1427610271 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | evinrows | null | Yes, that's what I was saying. In my first comment I was saying that'd I'd rather show appreciation for dedication to learning rather than "innate ability", because there's just not much to be said about someone who was just born intelligent. It's easier to appreciate someone who is really dedicated to something. After typing that though, I sort of realized that your dedication to something could just be traced back to your environment and your DNA, both of which are really out of your hands, which takes away some of the merit that you earn from doing great things.
It's not really a useful concept and I certainly wouldn't base my life actions off of it (like with most nihilistic philosophy), but I guess it stands. Hope I clarified. | null | 0 | 1316222940 | False | 0 | c2kgipg | t3_khf6j | null | t1_c2kgipg | t1_c2kd30o | null | 1427610274 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | zck | null | You can tell how, in the HTTPS spec, they wanted to split the difference between "help developers make a better product" and "don't leak sensitive data". Firefox could certainly do what you're suggesting; if you suggest it, they might implement it. It sounds like improved functionality, for those few people that would turn it on. | null | 0 | 1316223136 | False | 0 | c2kgjdv | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgjdv | t1_c2kgh5p | null | 1427610281 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | misplaced_my_pants | null | Yeah I get what you're saying. I guess I just see it as a cop out when people look to genetics; it's always something that you can't prove and I think it's a more productive line of reasoning to focus on environment. | null | 0 | 1316223209 | False | 0 | c2kgjmd | t3_khf6j | null | t1_c2kgjmd | t1_c2kgipg | null | 1427610284 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | p47n1p | null | > reading obfuscated source code isn't really reverse engineering
Well I didn't "reverse engineer" the ffmpeg code because it was impossible to make sense of 4 layers of C preprocessor macros and undocumented lookup tables. I really believe it would have been easier to read the assembly it generated. Thankfully there was another less obfuscated (though not by much) implementation I was able to ~~reverse engineer~~ decrypt.
> the developers are fixing bugs (not just optimizing)
Indeed they are (although they still haven't fixed my bug I reported 2 years ago), and it was so nice of them to remove the need for entering a cryptic message just to use the bug tracker. ;)
Sadly, if it hadn't been for multimedia mike setting up FATE, there wouldn't even be any guarantee ffmpeg was really working for your obscure format of interest (unless it was spitting out noticeable artifacts or crashing). Nor would we have wiki.multimedia.cx to provide a minimum amount of high-level info about the formats.
I have to agree with mgrandi, I really don't understand how the developers code like they do. | null | 0 | 1316223281 | False | 0 | c2kgjw7 | t3_kgqdd | null | t1_c2kgjw7 | t1_c2kezdi | null | 1427610287 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1316223431 | False | 0 | c2kgkfw | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgkfw | t1_c2kgjdv | null | 1428193846 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | ScreamingGerman | null | Yes, my son? | null | 0 | 1316223504 | False | 0 | c2kgkob | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgkob | t1_c2kfedx | null | 1427610300 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | zck | null | Hey, no problem. Good luck! | null | 0 | 1316223581 | False | 0 | c2kgkxk | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgkxk | t1_c2kgkfw | null | 1427610304 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | TraumaPony | null | "mathematics" is a big word?
Fucking reddit... | null | 0 | 1316223645 | False | 0 | c2kgl61 | t3_khf6j | null | t1_c2kgl61 | t1_c2kf7r4 | null | 1427610306 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | evinrows | null | There is no maximum sentence size but run-on sentences don't have anything to do with length. | null | 0 | 1316223960 | False | 0 | c2kgmaq | t3_khf6j | null | t1_c2kgmaq | t1_c2kbwpp | null | 1427610322 | 6 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | seanbaxter | null | It's not on the todo list right now because I'm not sure I could do that particular algorithm justice. Next up is global segmented scan and that leads into sparse matrix.
But I will check the FFT literature and see what the state of the art is. Maybe there are some things I can do with it. | null | 0 | 1316224034 | False | 0 | c2kgmkn | t3_khryi | null | t1_c2kgmkn | t1_c2kfbpf | null | 1427610327 | 9 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | How could that be your point... you say they pay more for their drivers(who they pay nothing). Unless you mean like they really pay their developers shit. | null | 0 | 1316224096 | False | 0 | c2kgmrq | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgmrq | t1_c2kggsz | null | 1427610331 | -1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | McBurger | null | For the lazy: https://fedex.com/OnlineLabel/login.do?labelUserCdDesc=JoeyBrunel&labelPasswordDesc=fr7ZCaVUQI | null | 0 | 1316224157 | False | 0 | c2kgn08 | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgn08 | t3_khtwb | null | 1427610334 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | dron57 | null | I don't understand what you mean by 'compile'. I thought ASM code can simply be executed, if it's on its native architecture. | null | 0 | 1316224415 | False | 0 | c2kgnxy | t3_khxzd | null | t1_c2kgnxy | t1_c2kfn6f | null | 1427610348 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mmhrar | null | If you are a startup working on something that doesn't sound absolutely ridiculous and can show that you won't be going under in at least a year, you shouldn't have too much trouble.
My next job, I'm going to be looking for a relatively stable start up, tired of big companies. | null | 0 | 1316224487 | False | 0 | c2kgo6x | t3_khx0u | null | t1_c2kgo6x | t3_khx0u | null | 1427610350 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | otakucode | null | We understand. You're trying to keep the forum safe for alien life forms who might not understand ideas that refer to human-specific terms. I mean, sure, there's more than 6 billion of us, and not a single one is without a sexual component to their life, so it makes sense we might be tempted to view sexuality as not a big deal, but we should think more broadly. Just because our sexuality is one of the most important parts of our identity as human beings, and a necessary bodily fact of life doesn't mean everyone the post will reach will have the equipment and experience necessary to understand.
Really though, the question makes sense even if the objects were named completely nonsensical names... and I don't think it's likely that the names would confuse anyone as to the functional nature of the code. | null | 0 | 1316224490 | False | 0 | c2kgo7e | t3_j35ew | null | t1_c2kgo7e | t1_c28qx8z | null | 1427610351 | -1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | otakucode | null | Isn't being able to talk about sex without getting all nervous and uncomfortable what separates us from the middle schoolers? | null | 0 | 1316224571 | False | 0 | c2kgoih | t3_j35ew | null | t1_c2kgoih | t1_c28qy97 | null | 1427610356 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | otakucode | null | I think you're a tad confused. It's children that are confused and befuddled when it comes to sex talk. Adults deal with it like it is, basic bodily functions shared by over 6 billion individuals, and hardly worth getting hot under the collar about. | null | 0 | 1316224668 | False | 0 | c2kgow8 | t3_j35ew | null | t1_c2kgow8 | t1_c28qwrr | null | 1427610358 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Gnolfo | null | ...It's not and it's not claiming to be?
He's taken some very well understood and long-known password usage philosophy and put it in a simple digestible format, which as it happens makes it highly convenient to use for getting a point across in a medium like this as it's a highly condensed yet expressive summary. He's not making claims that he came up with it, in fact the alt text suggests this should be common knowledge but sadly isn't. Nobody would read a link to some 12 page analysis that delves further into the topic, and from what would be called a definitive source (if any exist), so use a comic that gets the point across quickly and effectively. | null | 0 | 1316224911 | False | 0 | c2kgpsv | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgpsv | t1_c2kg2be | null | 1427610369 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | manberry_sauce | null | I don't care for the fantasy genre, but I'm glad other people enjoy it. I just wish this "and my axe" thing would go the fuck away. | null | 0 | 1316224973 | False | 0 | c2kgq1w | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgq1w | t1_c2ke8wn | null | 1427610372 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mmhrar | null | I like reading about problems in other languages. Sometimes I read something like this, a problem I would have never in my wildest dreams could even exist. That being said, I'm not really convinced using string manipulation on runtime information is a good way to do anything :P
This whole concept doesn't even make sense to me. You group objects depending on if they have the same function name. Does it matter if two completely separate objects have the same function name and land in the same group? What if they operate on completely different parameters? I thought reflection was dangerous as it was, but at least the information is strongly typed.
This is a sort of thing, in my experience, is solved during the design phase and you rely on the compiler when invoking the corresponding derived methods for each type of object.
Not hating on the blog or what he did, it's just so 'wtf' to me coming from C++.
Then again, I remember stepping into C# and having to continually tell myself each time I used the 'as' keyword it was NOT a hack and actually normal/accepted practice. | null | 0 | 1316225104 | True | 0 | c2kgqjp | t3_khnlm | null | t1_c2kgqjp | t3_khnlm | null | 1427610377 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | robertcrowther | null | It's important for employers to not allow malware to be downloaded just because that malware happens to be delivered over HTTPS. I seriously doubt there's anyone, anywhere employed to actually read the same web pages the employees are reading. | null | 0 | 1316225131 | False | 0 | c2kgqnl | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgqnl | t1_c2kfd2p | null | 1427610378 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | manberry_sauce | null | I saw the first movie before it was released. I knew that all three movies had been shot already. The first movie was so f'in long that at some point I thought we were watching all three of them back-to-back. | null | 0 | 1316225169 | False | 0 | c2kgqst | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgqst | t1_c2ke8te | null | 1427610380 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Gnolfo | null | Plus add in capitalization, add in punctuation, add in numbers, venture out beyond just 4 words, and the gap broadens by leaps and bounds, not to mention dictionaries start to fail and so you're back to some brute forcing on enormous search spaces. | null | 0 | 1316225230 | False | 0 | c2kgr0n | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgr0n | t1_c2keva5 | null | 1427610382 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | gaussin | null | Very motivating indeed. [relevant: Richard Feynman](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Feynman)
> In high school, his IQ was determined to be 125—high, but "merely respectable" according to biographer James Gleick. Feynman later scoffed at psychometric testing. By 15, he had learned differential and integral calculus. Before entering college, he was experimenting with and re-creating mathematical topics, such as the half-derivative, utilizing his own notation. In high school, he was developing the mathematical intuition behind his Taylor series of mathematical operators. | null | 0 | 1316225254 | False | 0 | c2kgr3s | t3_khf6j | null | t1_c2kgr3s | t3_khf6j | null | 1427610382 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | leadline | null | this made me laugh. | null | 0 | 1316225312 | False | 0 | c2kgrba | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgrba | t1_c2kfv6s | null | 1427610384 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | jutct | null | Well I think most groups have prebuilt rainbow tables generated from every password they every get, with every popular hash algorithm. | null | 0 | 1316225453 | False | 0 | c2kgru6 | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgru6 | t1_c2kedi2 | null | 1427610390 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | malfy | null | Funny, because computer scientists actually have the **highest** chances of getting laid if they use the right approach :P | null | 0 | 1316225457 | False | 0 | c2kgrun | t3_khf6j | null | t1_c2kgrun | t1_c2kb7zt | null | 1427610390 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | nofuckingwaydude | null | *Nothing* can save you on a computer you don't trust. SSL, TOR and incognito mode won't save you from keyloggers or video cameras. | null | 0 | 1316225472 | False | 0 | c2kgrwl | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgrwl | t1_c2ketgh | null | 1428193845 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | Sniffnoy | null | We know how to do that for binary representations; since when do we know how to do it for decimal? And this is the continued fraction representation, anyway, which just aren't used for computation in the first place. | null | 0 | 1316225609 | False | 0 | c2kgsee | t3_khf6j | null | t1_c2kgsee | t1_c2kg094 | null | 1427610397 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | jutct | null | But I think most are generated from know lists using methods that aren't brute force. They also generate hashes for different algorithms. That's why thenonly truly secure passwords are long, random, and use non alpha chars. Odds are, if a password contains a word or variation, someone else somewhere has used that password. That's where rainbow tables come in handy. | null | 0 | 1316225683 | False | 0 | c2kgsoj | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgsoj | t1_c2kedi2 | null | 1427610401 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | gaussin | null | **Right approach**: If we all go for the blonde and block each other, not a single one of us is going to get her. So then we go for her friends, but they will all give us the cold shoulder because no one likes to be second choice. But what if none of us goes for the blonde? We won't get in each other's way and we won't insult the other girls. It's the only way to win. It's the only way we all get laid. | null | 0 | 1316225856 | False | 0 | c2kgtb6 | t3_khf6j | null | t1_c2kgtb6 | t1_c2kgrun | null | 1427610420 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | raydeen | null | Nope. ASM is one step above straight machine code. Still needs compilation. Otherwise it would be interpreted. | null | 0 | 1316225858 | False | 0 | c2kgtbd | t3_khxzd | null | t1_c2kgtbd | t1_c2kgnxy | null | 1427610420 | 8 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | jutct | null | But any good rainbow table will contain hashes for different passwords. They are created knowing the original password, so it's easy to hash it using different algorithms. There isn't a lot of brute force involved in their creation. | null | 0 | 1316225860 | False | 0 | c2kgtbn | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgtbn | t1_c2keera | null | 1427610420 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | jutct | null | True. very bad idea to put passwords there. lol | null | 0 | 1316225979 | False | 0 | c2kgtq7 | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgtq7 | t1_c2kej9o | null | 1427610417 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mappu | null | The offline installer is available [here](http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=27538) and it's about 2GB. | null | 0 | 1316226080 | False | 0 | c2kgu3g | t3_khtuh | null | t1_c2kgu3g | t1_c2kf8f7 | null | 1427610423 | 6 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | mappu | null | woo, C++11 <thread> | null | 0 | 1316226190 | False | 0 | c2kguhr | t3_khtuh | null | t1_c2kguhr | t3_khtuh | null | 1427610428 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | Why words\*\*4 and not \*\*3 or **5?
Also, this technique could easily be combined with adding something say in the middle of the second word. Good luck accounting for that. You can't possibly predict the many, many things I *might* do. | null | 0 | 1316226314 | False | 0 | c2kguz5 | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kguz5 | t1_c2kecym | null | 1427610431 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1316226503 | False | 0 | c2kgvmw | t3_khf6j | null | t1_c2kgvmw | t1_c2kgr3s | null | 1427610438 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | SoundOfOneHand | null | Well, it's a big deal in the sense that it's unusual for a 13 year old to pull it off, but you're right, everything Wolfram writes comes off like this, his voice just seeps right through with blatant self-promotion. I can't say that I hold it against him at that but it has such a strong cult of personality vibe to it, that it's really distracting after the first time you've noticed. | null | 0 | 1316226640 | False | 0 | c2kgw5l | t3_khf6j | null | t1_c2kgw5l | t1_c2kfslj | null | 1427610446 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | wreckerone | null | Pay good money and don't be an ass to your employees. How hard is it? Oh, you don't want to do either of those things? | null | 0 | 1316226650 | False | 0 | c2kgw6h | t3_khx0u | null | t1_c2kgw6h | t3_khx0u | null | 1427610446 | 8 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | otakucode | null | Small correction: Deciding whether A program will stop is not impossible or often even difficult. Deciding whether ANY program will stop is the difficult bit. You could make an oracle that would return true if a specific program would halt, but you can't make one that can answer the question for ALL programs. | null | 0 | 1316226852 | False | 0 | c2kgwxu | t3_hdeg3 | null | t1_c2kgwxu | t1_c1uk4ws | null | 1427610457 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | richdougherty | null | Assembly code is machine specific, but raydeen is right: some work still needs to be done to turn the human-readable assembly language into a binary format that can be executed by the machine. The translation process is quite straightforward for assembly compared to higher-level languages, but there's still work to do before it will be natively understood by the machine (and OS).
If we're being picky then we usually say that an assembler 'assembles' a program rather than 'compiling' it. Maybe this is what you spotted. :) | null | 0 | 1316226878 | False | 0 | c2kgx12 | t3_khxzd | null | t1_c2kgx12 | t1_c2kgtbd | null | 1427610458 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
True | pseudolobster | null | No, not really. You create a set of rainbow tables for each individual crypto algorithm. Each table of course contains the crypts for millions of passwords, but they're only valid if they're encrypted the same way using the same algorithm as is used to create the tables.
bcrypt uses an adaptive salt, so no tables can be generated for it... or, an infinite number of tables would need to be generated for them to be useful. So yeah, no. | null | 0 | 1316227071 | False | 0 | c2kgxpu | t3_khtwb | null | t1_c2kgxpu | t1_c2kgtbn | null | 1427610476 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
Filtered Reddit Uplifting News
The query retrieves specific news articles by their link IDs, providing a basic overview of those particular entries without deeper analysis or insights.
Recent Programming Comments
Returns a limited set of programming records from 2020 to 2023, providing basic filtering with minimal analytical value.