archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
True
[deleted]
null
What a shock!
null
0
1316547866
False
0
c2lb9j6
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lb9j6
t1_c2l9cdj
null
1427625028
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dannosliwcd
null
Giggles all-around when my HS math teacher introduced the cumsum utility on the Ti-84.
null
0
1316547867
False
0
c2lb9j9
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lb9j9
t1_c2l8i3f
null
1427625028
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Exallium
null
This... what?! Since when is my computer a fucking iphone.
null
0
1316547878
False
0
c2lb9l8
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2lb9l8
t3_kl7h0
null
1427625028
14
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
parl
null
Back in the day, I worked on Burroughs mainframes (B5500, B5700, B6700). The systems programming languages were based on Algol ([ESPOL](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESPOL)), so they had longer variable names than were common in other languages at that time. Because task switching was difficult, the MCP (Master Control Program - no relation to TRON) let George do it. George was the name of the procedure which switched tasks. In some cases, a task was to be disposed of, so Unwanted_George was called instead. For technical reasons, George had to be at a lower level than normal, so he wasn't visible. But his mother, Sophia (Greek for knowledge) knew where he was. Once a task was terminated, Anabolism was called to recycle the resources that the task had acquired. Anabolism was what was called an Independent Runner, which meant that the task was always present. The other one was Eternal_IR but I forgot what it did. Oddly, the MCP was not an IR and only had a running stack when a function was called by another program. When the Working Set concept was implemented, there were two processes which administered it: the WS_Judge and the WS_Sheriff. But there was no WS_Deputy (as in "I Shot the Sheriff). Fields in a word were identified by a terminating "f" and some of the more memorable were I_Can_Do_Without_Itf and I_Wont_Tell_If_You_Wont_Tellf. Splitting off a second task was called forking. A task which was your parent was called your mother. But splitting off a task from your mother had to be renamed. (sigh) Edit: Later the OS language for the B6700 and B7700 was called [NEWP](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burroughs_large_systems#ESPOL_and_NEWP). Some say it stood for No Executive Washroom Privileges. A more pedestrian view is that it stood for NEW Programming language. Edit: My mistake. The variables were all UPPER CASE and had no separators of any kind and THEWORDSJUSTFLOWEDTOGETHER. (shudder) I suppose you could consider my style of variables above to be an aid to your reading them. (blush)
null
0
1316547894
True
0
c2lb9p5
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lb9p5
t3_klhlv
null
1427625028
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316547942
False
0
c2lb9zf
t3_klv9k
null
t1_c2lb9zf
t1_c2layna
null
1427625031
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
When you buy a redhat disk you are indeed paying for support and development just like any other company. In fact they give you more options and you can get a much cheaper self support version so you don't even have to pay for the support unlike windows.
null
0
1316547967
False
0
c2lba4u
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2lba4u
t1_c2lb6ao
null
1427625033
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
EntroperZero
null
Stored procedure on one of our production servers: FixFuckup().
null
0
1316547971
False
0
c2lba5p
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lba5p
t1_c2l7mlk
null
1427625033
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hyperforce
null
That power struggle is so petty and it's holding them back from greatness.
null
0
1316547993
False
0
c2lba9l
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2lba9l
t1_c2l876i
null
1427625034
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Killobyte
null
Really? I find it hard to believe you could go through all of undergrad programming in notepad on windows.
null
0
1316548012
False
0
c2lbadb
t3_klv9k
null
t1_c2lbadb
t1_c2lb9zf
null
1427625036
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
AlyoshaV
null
public static final Boolean MAYBE = null;
null
0
1316548015
False
0
c2lbae8
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbae8
t1_c2l9ex8
null
1427625036
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
a-ko
null
If you haven't seen how things have changed since XP you haven't really learned how to use Windows properly. From a Systems Administrator perspective I can assure you things have drastically changed since XP. Everything from initial deployment (still far from perfect), to management (powershell, anyone?), to security (Ever hear of ASLR? How about the Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit? Wonder what TLS 1.1 and 1.2 are? What about Elliptic Curve Cryptography?) I can assure you that starting with Vista the Windows platform made leaps and bounds over XP. 7 further refined those to make it, in my eyes, the best OS MS has released to date. After reading some things about Windows 8 I have a good feeling they'll continue to make improvements. Of course, Windows 9 will fix everything that "wasn't quite right" with 8, but that's the nature of the beast.
null
0
1316548050
False
0
c2lbal1
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2lbal1
t1_c2l82gz
null
1427625038
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
That doesn't sound right. How can 2D offer better performance than 3D if it runs on top of it.
null
0
1316548065
False
0
c2lbaoe
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2lbaoe
t1_c2lb7q0
null
1427625040
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Kyrra
null
/sigh Ok, so, you didn't invent an idea, but you patented it... so, how did you get the idea in your hands to patent? first-to-file is meant to make court cases go faster and have our patent system syned up with the rest of the world. Under the first-to-invent court cases, both sides would have to submit mounds of paperwork/emails/documents to show their development timeline when it comes to the patent in question. Whichever has firm enough evidence to show they invented first, gets the patent. The problem is that doing these type of court cases cost a ton of money. First-to-file does not mean prior art cannot be used to invalidate a patent. It just means that it gets rid of the first-to-invent court cases. If you invent something, you should either publish it our put out a product using it (Both of could be considered as prior art when trying to invalidate someones patent).
null
0
1316548072
False
0
c2lbapt
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbapt
t1_c2lb3rp
null
1427625040
13
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
BigB68
null
i is AC current and I is DC current. The same convention applies to voltage. And current density is pretty much only used in semiconductors and usually has a subscript.
null
0
1316548082
False
0
c2lbarq
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbarq
t1_c2lb501
null
1427625042
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
WalterBright
null
The D string type is literally just an alias for immutable(char)[] i.e. it is still an array of characters.
null
0
1316548109
False
0
c2lbawj
t3_kljc0
null
t1_c2lbawj
t1_c2l8mnh
null
1427625043
14
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Ternary, not trinary.
null
0
1316548129
False
0
c2lbb18
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbb18
t1_c2l9sny
null
1427625044
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316548134
False
0
c2lbb2f
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbb2f
t3_klqte
null
1427625045
-4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
EntroperZero
null
if (GetUp()) GetDown();
null
0
1316548185
False
0
c2lbbb8
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbbb8
t1_c2l9or5
null
1427625048
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
neuter
null
Or don't bother "upgrading" at all. I had XP running on my main desktop until I switched to a Linux distro a few months ago so I'm sure you should be able to keep Win 7 for that long.
null
0
1316548273
False
0
c2lbbsk
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2lbbsk
t1_c2laorn
null
1427625054
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
greenspans
null
what the shit? if you find an article on the internet and you're at 1980x1050, just fucking zoom the fuck in for the 2 seconds it takes you to do the quick key combination. This is not my article. I'm not buying a smaller monitor because some sites use only part of my screen. I don't suggest the site owner switch to a dynamic width. You know what I do? I fucking zoom in. God damn. Fuck.
null
0
1316548282
False
0
c2lbbui
t3_kldfr
null
t1_c2lbbui
t1_c2lasv7
null
1427625055
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
KaiserNiko
null
Oh my God, that would be a story I would tell until the day I die.
null
0
1316548301
False
0
c2lbby5
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbby5
t1_c2l9nf9
null
1427625056
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
flussence
null
Or with a better package manager: cave resolve -x firefox gdb This will perform all the build steps mentioned in the blog post, all the missing dependency ones that weren't mentioned, and installs gdb debug symbols in `/usr/lib/debug/` by default.
null
0
1316548385
False
0
c2lbccz
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2lbccz
t1_c2l86p1
null
1427625062
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bloodwine
null
Walled gardens are the dreams of platform makers. They become the gatekeepers and have absolute control. Apple has shown that people will put up with walled gardens. I hope this trend crashes and burns, though. I do support the notion of software repositories, but they should be optional and not required. I'd love to see something akin to Yum/Apt repositories for Windows, where you can patch/update all your software using a single application. However, one should be allowed to bypass it and do what ever they want.
null
0
1316548394
False
0
c2lbcep
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2lbcep
t1_c2lb9l8
null
1427625062
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cybercobra
null
> \_\_exit\_\_() method FTFY.
null
0
1316548407
False
0
c2lbch0
t3_kljpc
null
t1_c2lbch0
t1_c2la8zk
null
1427625063
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
darkpaladin
null
I think that's only in the developer preview.
null
0
1316548441
False
0
c2lbcla
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2lbcla
t1_c2l7lb0
null
1427625064
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
banuday
null
Nope, `AbstractSingletonProxyFactoryBean` does one thing an abstract classes do, abstracting general operations and requiring a subclass to implement specific functionality via abstract members. `java.awt.Component` does *another* thing that abstract classes do, which is impose a type hierarchy to enable polymorphism. Whether an interface would be better for this is debatable, but considering that Java doesn't have mixins or traits, it's a moot point. Look, I think "Abstract" in the class name is not ideal. If I could rename the class, I would go with `SingletonProxyFactoryBeanTemplate`, because that is *exactly* what it is. But that's not really the point, is it?
null
0
1316548443
True
0
c2lbcn3
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbcn3
t1_c2laaz7
null
1427625065
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
StrawberryFrog
null
So true.
null
0
1316548447
False
0
c2lbco0
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2lbco0
t1_c2lba9l
null
1427625065
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Exallium
null
This is why I am and always will be a die-hard linux fan =)
null
0
1316548501
False
0
c2lbcy2
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2lbcy2
t1_c2lbcep
null
1427625069
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
artanis2
null
Syntactic sugar inherently reduces complexity, but I wouldn't say that is the reason I love lambdas. Rapid prototyping of functors is what I like. When I find something that I may use elsewhere, then I declare my traditional functor.
null
0
1316548504
False
0
c2lbcyo
t3_klphp
null
t1_c2lbcyo
t1_c2lasmg
null
1427625069
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
KaiserNiko
null
Probably because it's like "Uh... fuck it, it's probably right."
null
0
1316548530
False
0
c2lbd35
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbd35
t1_c2lalni
null
1427625071
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
EntroperZero
null
What the heck is a BooleanDouble?! /marty
null
0
1316548562
False
0
c2lbd97
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbd97
t1_c2l80ue
null
1427625073
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
a-ko
null
You're assuming tablets won't become cheap(er) during the next decade. Expandability may happen eventually, particularly with increases in the PCI-E spec with mini PCI-E cards. I suspect this will be vendor specific, but give it time. Batteries are a sore point for all mobile devices currently, and no phone nor tablet is going to make it any better. I know that there's a lot of research in battery tech right now, particularly surrounding carbon nanotubes. How far out from a marketable product, who knows--but the funding will go there as more power is needed. Desktops definitely kill on the performance side, but that performance is rarely needed by most users. And when I mean most users, I mean the 80% of people that use a computer that don't care about. I no doubt think there may still be a discrete products and desktop market for those of us who wish it to be there, but I expect it to dwindle more than it already has. If you haven't been noticing, quite a few vendors have dropped out of the discrete space and continue to drop out over the years. I suspect at some point that all gaming will eventually migrate to consoles, which will be the power houses for home entertainment. This is probably at least 5-10 years off, however. I know, I know--longtime PC gamer here, but I just don't see the PC desktop/gaming space continuing. We're already at the point where a vast majority of games that come out are merely console ports. There's a very niche market for PC gaming and it will continue to get smaller. Full-sized keyboard and mouse will still be possible with a tablet, I expect it to be "dockable" however. The only real contention is how well people handle the transition to tablet from a laptop, that remains to be seen. I know quite a few people that like to sit with a laptop in their lap/on a couch arm/on a table, and what I'm thinking for the tablet space is it won't be very conducive to that. You'll also lose some vastly desired screen resolution with devices portable enough to reasonably carry around.
null
0
1316548571
False
0
c2lbdaz
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2lbdaz
t1_c2lb1tp
null
1427625074
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
radhruin
null
Many languages, including Java, C#, and Javascript, defer to the unicode identifier spec, which defines what characters can occur at the start of an identifier and in subsequent characters.
null
0
1316548573
False
0
c2lbdbi
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbdbi
t1_c2l8hqr
null
1427625074
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
vytah
null
You can (since G++ 4.6) use `for(auto it: foo)` or `for(auto& it:foo)` almost everywhere you want.
null
0
1316548654
False
0
c2lbdr7
t3_klphp
null
t1_c2lbdr7
t1_c2lawzo
null
1427625080
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Gargilius
null
To be fair, billyjoel and bananapudding are more easily and unambiguously greppable than ii and jj...
null
0
1316548661
False
0
c2lbdsr
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbdsr
t1_c2l7u1w
null
1427625080
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
TheSuperficial
null
I'm all for getting stuff done. But I'm all for getting **good work** done, not getting "shit" done, because, well, then you end with "shit". A couple of thoughts: * don't mistake *activity* for *productivity* * I used to race cars. One of the sayings in that world, that you really have to experience to understand, is: "You have to drive slow(ly) to go fast" - basically meaning that small, deliberate movements (steering, braking) as opposed to constant frenetic activity & "bang bang" braking & accelerating keep you more on the racing line & give you the best lap time. I used to run an engineering group. I lived & died by productivity. But I knew that whipping the horse to churn out more code ("get shit done") wasn't the most effective technique. You need to have people with good judgement (often, this is a combination of intelligence and experience) who know when to put more effort into doing something. Sure, I've had to kick the occasional ass of someone who was "polishing a turd", but most of the time, good people will make the right choice. By the way, I think coding in interviews is stupid. This is one of the most divisive issues in our community & I respect both sides, but here's my take on it: it's the rare bird who does his best work in a high-pressure interview situation, outside of his normal environment. What you're determining is "who can code an arbitrary assignment in an interview situation", that's about it. Granted, there might be some value, but I think you also risk eliminating candidates who are otherwise fine developers. Between references, project descriptions, sample code, and most importantly, TALKING TO PEOPLE during the interview (I like to start easy & broad and keep getting more technical, more challenging, more specific), I can almost always get a very good idea of the person's abilities. This is anecdotal, but I've never regretted or fired a single hire I've made (and that's a lot). I don't think it's a bad idea for the interviewer to bring code into the interview, though -- code with subtle bugs, and even more importantly, design flaws, and just ask the candidate to read it & critique it. What's good here? What's bad? What's undefined? What's not portable? Where could a library call have been used instead of a DIY implementation? Etc. This not only shows me a candidate's ability to understand & review someone else's code quickly & effectively, but it also gives me insight into the candidate's blind spots, biases, bad habits, etc. On the topic of coding during an interview, you can take or leave this last citation, but Scott Meyers ("Effective C++", etc.) is quoted on the topic as having said: > I hate anything that asks me to design on the spot. That's asking to demonstrate a skill rarely required on the job in a high-stress environment, where it is difficult for a candidate to accurately prove their abilities. I think it's fundamentally an unfair thing to request of a candidate. My interview process tends to be a lot more along [these lines](http://www.artima.com/wbc/interprogP.html).
null
0
1316548673
True
0
c2lbdv0
t3_kls47
null
t1_c2lbdv0
t3_kls47
null
1427625081
14
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
flussence
null
Yes, the result is useful, real-world software with >200 million users.
null
0
1316548693
False
0
c2lbdz0
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2lbdz0
t1_c2l9in3
null
1427625082
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rockstar107
null
What about Patent NINJAS? My buddy works at a major engineering company, and they regularly look for flaws in competitors designs and then PATENT the solution, leaving their competition at a dead end.
null
0
1316548695
False
0
c2lbdzi
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbdzi
t3_klqte
null
1427625083
38
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
maleadt
null
Refactoring to use std::list would mean even more refactoring if you didn't use the verbose for-loop, as std::list doesn't support operator[]. So I'd rather call that an advantage of using iterators. But other than that, I agree with your point.
null
0
1316548709
False
0
c2lbe2e
t3_klphp
null
t1_c2lbe2e
t1_c2lauvt
null
1427625084
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
LiveOnSteak
null
Follow the money, as the saying goes. The money always ends up or goes through lawyers. Don't get me wrong, we need lawyers. I'm not so sure they need the big paychecks (after they've paid their tuition).
null
0
1316548720
False
0
c2lbe4w
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbe4w
t1_c2lazyp
null
1427625084
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
You'd have to set aside about $1,000,000 just for replacement 9 and 0 keys, though.
null
0
1316548733
True
0
c2lbe7t
t3_kljc0
null
t1_c2lbe7t
t1_c2l8i7t
null
1427625087
24
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hyperforce
null
They should choose one ring to rule them all and come up with migration paths for the other two. This is as much a marketing effort as it is technical.
null
0
1316548748
False
0
c2lbeah
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2lbeah
t1_c2lbco0
null
1427625087
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dsquid
null
OK, interesting perspectives. I appreciate the thoughtful response, thanks!
null
0
1316548782
False
0
c2lbeh5
t3_khvyw
null
t1_c2lbeh5
t1_c2klmxh
null
1427625090
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tgehr
null
char[] is also 'a string type'. Nowadays the type that is usually used for COW semantics (also for string literals in the text segment) is immutable(char)[], which is aliased to 'string' for convenience. The type system actually ensures that these strings don't get written to. BTW, why would you need a library based string type if you have a built-in one that is efficient? Yes, that's right, you don't. (There is not even a syntactic difference for user code, what exactly is the issue?)
null
0
1316548785
False
0
c2lbehu
t3_kljc0
null
t1_c2lbehu
t1_c2l8mnh
null
1427625090
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ChaosMotor
null
>Ok, so, you didn't invent an idea, but you patented it... so, how did you get the idea in your hands to patent? Say the inventor demo'd it to you, asking for an investment, but you realized, hey, this guy can't afford to patent, so he can't afford to sue. I'll take his presentation materials, give them to a guy I know, and file for the patent myself. Maybe change the doo-dad to a gew-gaw to avoid any funny questions later. >first-to-file is meant to make court cases go faster and have our patent system syned up with the rest of the world. If you believe the liars who constantly lie about their reasons (that is, the government). First-to-file is meant to protect the wealthy and major businesses, and we all know it. Who lobbied for this? Who paid to make this happen? A huge group of poor basement inventors, or major patent holders? C'mon, you know the truth. Any bullshit and bluster about alignment or court speed is just an excuse. >First-to-file does not mean prior art cannot be used to invalidate a patent. Good luck finding a lawyer to invalidate that patent when you couldn't afford to file a patent first, to begin with. >It just means that it gets rid of the first-to-invent court cases "It just means that it eliminates the protection of the inventor and burdens them by forcing them engage a legal suit to prove what they didn't have to prove before, and pay a lawyer to do it." >If you invent something, you should either publish it our put out a product using it (Both of could be considered as prior art when trying to invalidate someones patent). And both of those actions start the clock ticking on your date of first disclosure, which means under the *best* circumstances, you have two years to find the money to patent. Do you not *understand* how this is a huge new burden on underfunded inventors, or do you just not give a shit? Why do we *constantly* need to be protecting businesses (that exist and are already profitable!) by shifting their burden to the public?
null
0
1316548794
False
0
c2lbejg
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbejg
t1_c2lbapt
null
1427625090
31
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
db4n
null
Yes, I converted them to arrays.
null
0
1316548803
False
0
c2lbekv
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbekv
t1_c2lb8na
null
1427625090
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
attomsk
null
I didn't get through it all yet, but after reading about the software renderer: http://www.seccs.org/forums/images/smilies/icon_mother_of_god.jpg
null
0
1316548831
False
0
c2lbeqj
t3_klrrx
null
t1_c2lbeqj
t3_klrrx
null
1427625092
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
okamiueru
null
O_o. Alright, I'm intrigued... go on, why?
null
0
1316548846
False
0
c2lbete
t3_klphp
null
t1_c2lbete
t1_c2lb32w
null
1427625094
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
SyKoHPaTh
null
#define null not null; My syntax is wrong, but my intent is null.
null
0
1316548894
False
0
c2lbf2s
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbf2s
t1_c2lb3ih
null
1427625098
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
steve_b
null
Sometimes other people besides you need to look at your code. I find scoping prefixes extremely useful, specifically for local (no prefix), class member (_), class static (__) and the occasional global (g_). I've even seen conventions that use a prefix to indicate parameter variables as well (actual character varies), as it can be useful to remind people reading your code whether you're modifying a parameter (for languages that support it) or just mucking with local data. As long as its used consistently across an entire product, it's a real headache reducer, and it requires almost no effort.
null
0
1316548925
False
0
c2lbf8u
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbf8u
t1_c2la50x
null
1427625100
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
xrosolar
null
Thank you, I'm happy someone enjoyed it!
null
0
1316548928
False
0
c2lbf9p
t3_klj1g
null
t1_c2lbf9p
t1_c2lazyx
null
1427625100
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
TaxExempt
null
ass_face
null
0
1316548974
False
0
c2lbfiz
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbfiz
t1_c2lamw6
null
1427625105
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
D3PyroGS
null
Programming... in notepad...? http://i.imgur.com/h8Bsz.gif
null
0
1316548975
False
0
c2lbfj4
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbfj4
t1_c2lauj0
null
1427625105
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rubygeek
null
If it doesn't manage associations, how could you call it an ORM? IMHO neither JDBC nor JDO qualifies at all.
null
0
1316549002
False
0
c2lbfol
t3_ki83r
null
t1_c2lbfol
t1_c2l9f0h
null
1427625107
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
DrHankPym
null
It seems problematic that you can own "intelligence". Intellectual property (IP) is such a fucked up idea, I can't believe people believe this.
null
0
1316549002
False
0
c2lbfop
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbfop
t1_c2laok4
null
1427625107
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
TimTheTinker
null
So you implemented the Ruby/Python/etc. runtimes all in Javascript?
null
0
1316549028
False
0
c2lbftk
t3_klv3o
null
t1_c2lbftk
t3_klv3o
null
1427625108
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
KyteM
null
[Yep. In fact, apps from the 2.0 days still work.](http://youtu.be/vPnehDhGa14?t=8m24s)
null
0
1316549064
False
0
c2lbg11
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2lbg11
t1_c2l75vt
null
1427625111
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
A_for_Anonymous
null
Typically, I use UNDERSCORED_UPPER_CASE for global, important constant values, CamelCase for classes and API functions, underscored_lower_case for variables and attributes. I consider methods attributes which happen to be function values, so I use underscored_lower_case for them too. (And of course I use hyphenated-lower-case for Lisp.) I don't like freakyCase because it's less consistent and when it's a single word it looks like lowercase.
null
0
1316549068
False
0
c2lbg21
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbg21
t1_c2lb4ct
null
1427625111
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Concise_Pirate
null
That's why you scan/photograph it (if it's only on paper) and check the image file into the source tree as crucial developer doc.
null
0
1316549117
False
0
c2lbgck
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbgck
t1_c2l8uh3
null
1427625115
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Negitivefrags
null
As a developer writing code that cross compiles on MSVC and GCC, I was very sad when the VC11 developer preview didn't have range based for loop support.
null
0
1316549160
False
0
c2lbgkj
t3_klphp
null
t1_c2lbgkj
t1_c2lbdr7
null
1427625118
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
SomethingOrange
null
But the point of the exercise was less about can code and more about can get shit done. If I give you 30 minutes of work and you do it, I may know you can code but still have a limited knowledge of how well you can get shit done. At least that is the theory of the article.
null
0
1316549195
False
0
c2lbgqt
t3_kls47
null
t1_c2lbgqt
t1_c2lb09y
null
1427625120
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Concise_Pirate
null
I don't always agree. If a function is brief, sometimes using such names actually makes it *easier* to read visually.
null
0
1316549203
False
0
c2lbgsg
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbgsg
t1_c2l7zev
null
1427625121
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316549217
False
0
c2lbgv0
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbgv0
t1_c2l8n3n
null
1427625122
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316549257
False
0
c2lbh2r
t3_klv9k
null
t1_c2lbh2r
t1_c2lbadb
null
1427625125
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Probably because it's far simpler and hits it's niche squarely on the nose, whereas C++ is living one foot in low-level, embedded programming land and one foot in OO, higher-abstraction land, and the two parts of the language don't mesh well. Compatibility with C and embedded programming prevents C++ from being a quality, highly-productive higher abstraction language, and trying to be an OO language makes it more feature-rich and complicated than is necessary or desirable for low-level embedded programming. That's my view, anyway. Given any *particular* task, there's a language I would choose over C++. Given all tasks and only one language to do them all, I might be forced to choose C++.
null
0
1316549266
False
0
c2lbh4s
t3_klphp
null
t1_c2lbh4s
t1_c2lbete
null
1427625125
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kataire
null
LLVM / Emscripten.
null
0
1316549289
False
0
c2lbh9o
t3_klv3o
null
t1_c2lbh9o
t1_c2lbftk
null
1427625127
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MarshallBanana
null
> But again if you don't like it, don't use it. As a developer I think it's an incredibly fair and generous idea. What I think is "fair and generous" is releasing your source with no strings attached. That is what I try to do, because I think that benefits everyone the most. And I think that people know that they too benefit from releasing derivative works. And really, using the GPL does seem to imply to me that you don't really believe this all that strongly.
null
0
1316549292
False
0
c2lbha6
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2lbha6
t1_c2lartg
null
1427625127
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
And what a tragedy that is.
null
0
1316549327
False
0
c2lbhhe
t3_klphp
null
t1_c2lbhhe
t1_c2lb2t3
null
1427625130
-20
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Concise_Pirate
null
Example: *shiver me timberth*
null
0
1316549354
False
0
c2lbhn4
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbhn4
t1_c2l89ss
null
1427625132
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
GhostedAccount
null
>A patent troll wants to take as much of your money as possible without killing your business. lol. Not. They want the most they can get. If killing your business maximizes profits, they will kill your business.
null
0
1316549488
False
0
c2lbidb
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbidb
t1_c2ladit
null
1427625141
-14
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Error_Value
null
While my code had one exception type, I #defined T_T(x) as a macro to throw a general exception with the given parameters. This was obviously before I started using Reddit.
null
0
1316549492
False
0
c2lbif8
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbif8
t1_c2l7vf2
null
1427625141
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
olafurw
null
Ya, people started adding their own answers and bumping the question back to the front page.
null
0
1316549495
False
0
c2lbify
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbify
t1_c2laij0
null
1427625141
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
c0mputar
null
First-to-file is the way to go, but I think there should be an additional component... You need to actually show that you are working on it, or something like that, if you are going to contest someone's product that you think infringes on your patent. Just filing a bunch of patents like these trolls do and waiting for someone to infringe upon it should be stopped. Ultimately, this partly defeats the purpose of going first-to-file though... The better question would be, how much money would first-to-invent cost us? Compare.
null
0
1316549538
True
0
c2lbinl
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbinl
t3_klqte
null
1427625145
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Chandon
null
If paying would kill your business, you won't pay. You'll just go out of business and keep the money.
null
0
1316549585
False
0
c2lbiwo
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbiwo
t1_c2lbidb
null
1427625148
16
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
max99x
null
For Lua, Python and Ruby we used Emscripten. I worked pretty closely with azakai/kripken, Emscripten's author, to get all our enhancements upstream, so the two projects gained quite a bit from each other. The rest of the languages are either written by us from scratch (most of the esoteric ones) or use existing interpreters (e.g. BiwaScheme). When you select a language, there's a link to the source code of its interpreter at the bottom right corner.
null
0
1316549619
False
0
c2lbj38
t3_klv3o
null
t1_c2lbj38
t1_c2lbftk
null
1427625151
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cdsmith
null
> first-to-file is meant to make court cases go faster and have our patent system syned up with the rest of the world Right, and it matters *way* less than some people think. This patent bill stuff passed by the U.S. government is a stupid distraction; it's about making a few minor tweaks, when what we really need to to throw out the whole policy and write a new one based on the interests of society and not the interests of a few patent-happy large corporations (okay, and patent trolls, but honestly they are dwarfed as a problem by the Apples and Microsofts of the world).
null
0
1316549635
False
0
c2lbj62
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbj62
t1_c2lbapt
null
1427625152
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
db4n
null
... and tattoo it on your arm(s) for quick reference :)
null
0
1316549741
False
0
c2lbjqi
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbjqi
t1_c2lbgck
null
1427625163
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cdsmith
null
IIRC, Righthaven was mostly involved in copyright litigation... the case you're referring to was a copyright action by a porn distributor.
null
0
1316549779
False
0
c2lbjy2
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbjy2
t1_c2lb8pp
null
1427625163
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cdsmith
null
Like? Hmm, I could guess Somalia... any others?
null
0
1316549832
False
0
c2lbk8j
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbk8j
t1_c2lb91x
null
1427625166
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ElevenSquared
null
You don't catch STD's, you contract them.
null
0
1316549873
False
0
c2lbkh4
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbkh4
t1_c2la2u9
null
1427625179
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Pretty awesome. I'm trying it right now!
null
0
1316549887
False
0
c2lbkju
t3_klv3o
null
t1_c2lbkju
t3_klv3o
null
1427625170
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
GhostedAccount
null
It doesn't work that way. Any company money or assets you try to run away with after being notified of the infringement will become the property of the patent troll to settle the debt.
null
0
1316549897
False
0
c2lbklz
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbklz
t1_c2lbiwo
null
1427625170
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
banuday
null
Aren't patents themselves a result of government intervention? Patent trolls simply take advantage of a system the government dictates that rewards content creators by preventing owners of the physical property to do with their property what they wish. You must be anti-patent and anti-copyright, right? And blaming Obama for this, are you high? I blame the founding fathers. Down with Thomas Jefferson!
null
0
1316549953
False
0
c2lbkxd
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbkxd
t1_c2lamwh
null
1427625175
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sircoder
null
Thanks for sharing this.
null
0
1316549965
False
0
c2lbkzx
t3_klrrx
null
t1_c2lbkzx
t3_klrrx
null
1427625176
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cduce2411
null
This is amazing. I will use this a lot when I need to brush up quickly on a language or try out some new things I've learned.
null
0
1316549979
False
0
c2lbl2h
t3_klv3o
null
t1_c2lbl2h
t3_klv3o
null
1427625176
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
arandomJohn
null
Fabien doesn't post often, but when he does it is gold.
null
0
1316550024
False
0
c2lblb6
t3_klrrx
null
t1_c2lblb6
t3_klrrx
null
1427625179
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cobolNoFun
null
public int[] newString; Came across it in one of my team members code while helping him debug an issue. I saw newString and thought it was some private temp variable and started to explain why he should not name things like that. Then i stopped and looked at how it was being used in the code and was speechless. I sat there and made him rename basically everything in the class before i would help him debug his code.
null
0
1316550099
False
0
c2lblq3
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lblq3
t3_klhlv
null
1427625195
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Poltras
null
#define true (random() % 10) // False only once in a while...
null
0
1316550324
False
0
c2lbn0i
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbn0i
t1_c2lb3ih
null
1427625202
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
KyteM
null
Except the desktop UI is virtually untouched. Instead, W8 sports two UIs. Metro, the tablet-happy UI, and the old-school desktop. Metro, being basically Windows Phone 8, follows the same model as iOS and Android: Sandboxing, app store, fullscreen apps, etc. Meanwhile, anything that needs the desktop will stay in the desktop. Plus, most people don't need more than RSS feed widgets and fullscreen video players. (Apart from Office, which they already stated was gonna be Metro'd)
null
0
1316550366
False
0
c2lbn8u
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2lbn8u
t1_c2lajma
null
1427625205
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Poltras
null
New RFCs accept unicode domain names.
null
0
1316550391
False
0
c2lbne0
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbne0
t1_c2lalni
null
1427625205
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
KyteM
null
Use a stylus?
null
0
1316550422
False
0
c2lbnkn
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2lbnkn
t1_c2lah41
null
1427625209
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bpmf
null
that's nothing, find out what they've cost consumers..
null
0
1316550429
False
0
c2lbnly
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbnly
t3_klqte
null
1427625209
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
thenuge26
null
Yes, yes they are. Government could function fine without human intervention. It's the humans that fuck it up.
null
0
1316550436
False
0
c2lbnnp
t3_klqte
null
t1_c2lbnnp
t1_c2lb808
null
1427625210
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Boojum
null
Yes, this is the convention that I also favor. I prefer to use references over pointers as much as possible and use them as a signal that there are much stronger guarantees about the referenced objects. I'll use pointers to signal areas where far fewer assumptions are permitted. And I'll use smart pointers to indicate ownership expectations.
null
0
1316550534
False
0
c2lbo6s
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2lbo6s
t1_c2l97hh
null
1427625218
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316550542
False
0
c2lbo8r
t3_klphp
null
t1_c2lbo8r
t1_c2lbh4s
null
1427625218
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
killdeer03
null
Mine name is also Jake. This happens to me often as well. I don't actually work with the guy that calls me *Jakey*, but I sometimes ask him to look over my code every now and then. He ALWAYS does this to me. Consequently, I have to look at any code I have submitted to him with a fine-tooth comb.
null
0
1316550583
False
0
c2lbogg
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbogg
t1_c2l83hr
null
1427625221
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
itslikeadog
null
If the leopard can change his shorts the demon can be part chameleon.
null
0
1316550603
False
0
c2lbokg
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lbokg
t1_c2l9zay
null
1427625228
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sbrown123
null
>You're assuming tablets won't become cheap(er) during the next decade. They are already pretty cheap. But due to space, heat, and power consumption limitations the components are more expensive. If you built a matching unit using standard components from a desktop it wouldn't be the same (big and power hungry) but would be a lot cheaper. >I suspect at some point that all gaming will eventually migrate to consoles Dunno. But I have found that despite consoles that the desktop computer continues to grow. So apparently games are not as important as people believed they were. Look at the Mac as a good example: they have grown in sales despite not having much in the way of games. >Full-sized keyboard and mouse will still be possible with a tablet I have an Asus transformer at home with the keyboard. The keyboard dock is usually not used (but definitely worth the purchase for other reasons). It came with 2 usb ports but only on the keyboard part. Amazingly it is hard to find a tablet with usb ports! It is a really nice device. I do use it quite a bit for browsing email, facebook, web, books, and lots of other stuff. But if I had to sit down and actually type something out I would instantly prefer the desktop. >The only real contention is how well people handle the transition to tablet from a laptop, that remains to be seen. I could see the tablet replacing the netbook and laptop.
null
0
1316550629
False
0
c2lbopa
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2lbopa
t1_c2lbdaz
null
1427625224
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
laet
null
Doom for iPhone code review: http://fabiensanglard.net/doomIphone/index.php
null
0
1316550637
False
0
c2lboqu
t3_klrrx
null
t1_c2lboqu
t1_c2lan3n
null
1427625229
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mthode
null
there is a debug use flag for firefox
null
0
1316550642
False
0
c2lbos3
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2lbos3
t1_c2lbccz
null
1427625229
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null