archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
True
joffotron
null
No. It's for programming links. Programming. Programming. Programming.
null
0
1316764720
False
0
c2lz3m9
t3_kouex
null
t1_c2lz3m9
t3_kouex
null
1427636473
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
le_kommie
null
I would absolutely **love** to hear opinions and advice how to identify passionate devs at CV level, before interviews. As would often happen, we often don't even get to interview people unless their CV gone through multi screening process, and we probably miss a lot of good people or choose wrong ones...
null
0
1316764731
False
0
c2lz3mz
t3_korcu
null
t1_c2lz3mz
t3_korcu
null
1427636473
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mfukar
null
> No. The dumbest malware on this side of the Milky way doesn't need to worry about doing things particularly safely. It'll just overwrite whatever it needs, wherever. FTFY
null
0
1316764820
False
0
c2lz3tt
t3_kmshh
null
t1_c2lz3tt
t1_c2lkdkr
null
1427636474
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kyz
null
>What is the alternative to patents? **Copyright** If you come up with code that solves a problem, that code is *copyrighted*. If someone else takes your solution rather than invent it themselves, there is a trail of evidence that *they copied your code*, and thus infringed your copyrights. You have pretty much the same options or better options to deal with the infringer. However, if someone else genuinely solves the same problem independently of your solution, there is a trail of evidence *they did not copy you.* So you don't "own" an entire category of endeavour, which is the crux of why software patents are bad. Imagine if JK Rowling patented all possible stories that had schools for wizards in them. >We will then never get to know how a particular task was accomplished. Software can always be reverse engineered, even if it requires peeling a chip to do it. There's no worry about the secrets of software being lost, yet there's plenty of legal muscle to go after copiers with just copyright law.
null
0
1316764893
False
0
c2lz3ys
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz3ys
t1_c2lywmg
null
1427636476
20
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
gronkkk
null
> You say FFT, but for some reason I thought you meant DFT, so I explained that. If you could explain [density functional theory](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_functional_theory) in 50 lines....
null
0
1316764939
False
0
c2lz41z
t3_kogj4
null
t1_c2lz41z
t1_c2lxwlq
null
1427636476
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
That language would have never gotten popular.
null
0
1316764943
False
0
c2lz42f
t3_kooiy
null
t1_c2lz42f
t1_c2ly3y1
null
1427636476
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ghthor
null
His lame ass site has autoplay videos. Don't make me install plugins to avoid autoplay videos.... What a designer he is....
null
0
1316764965
False
0
c2lz442
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lz442
t3_ko2wv
null
1427636478
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
anttirt
null
Yes we will, via reverse engineering. In the cases where the software is not distributed in compiled form (ie. it runs on the company's servers) they wouldn't want to patent it (and divulge the method) in the first place because another company could disregard the patent and use it anyway, and the original company would have no way to detect the violation.
null
0
1316764979
False
0
c2lz44y
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz44y
t1_c2lywmg
null
1427636478
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
smeezy
null
>Allowing software patents helps us because we get to see the code right away, and after a period, it becomes public domain. At what cost? The ~~annual~~ cost of technological patent trolls **since 1990** have been [estimated at $500B](http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/study-patent-trolls-have-cost-innovators-half-a-trillion-bucks.ars). That's a fucking lot of money that could be used to pay for product development instead of lawsuits. And what of the chilling effect on startups and independent developers who won't even try to make it big, for fear of getting sued by a troll, or a well-established company whose turf you encroach on? The incredible mismatch between patent length (~20 years) versus software obsolescence (~2 years) is what kills it for me. By the time the patent expires and people are able to use the software for free, it would have been obsolete ten generations over. >What is the alternative to patents? Copyrights. >If you prefer to abolish software patents, then companies will keep their surprising algorithms to themselves, as trade secrets. This is the state of the world today *with* patents. I have yet to see any algorithm of value that has made it through the patent system, all the way to public domain (mostly since USPTO only started granting them in earnest in 1995). But I have seen the devastation that software patents have wrought on the industry. Fuck software patents. EDIT: Misquoted the ars article. Thanks zekopeko.
null
0
1316764998
True
0
c2lz46e
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz46e
t1_c2lywmg
null
1427636478
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
le_kommie
null
I don't get it.
null
0
1316765003
False
0
c2lz46n
t3_koozi
null
t1_c2lz46n
t3_koozi
null
1427636478
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
wonglik
null
Is it ok for non US citizens to sign it as well?
null
0
1316765110
False
0
c2lz4dx
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz4dx
t3_kosg9
null
1427636480
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ghthor
null
Clearly....
null
0
1316765147
False
0
c2lz4go
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lz4go
t1_c2lx24m
null
1427636481
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
andibabi
null
therefor is a legal term and is different from therefore
null
0
1316765167
False
0
c2lz4ia
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz4ia
t1_c2lyrnx
null
1427636481
18
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
gronkkk
null
> The above quote tells me that the author has simply never stumbled onto a truly difficult concept. Nope. Programming is one of those areas where there are a lot of relatively easy problems, but where people go to great lengths to make them 'hard'. It's all about 'expert status' and job security.
null
0
1316765228
False
0
c2lz4n5
t3_kogj4
null
t1_c2lz4n5
t1_c2lxo7e
null
1427636483
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ghthor
null
You have so many methods! I can't wait to call them all!
null
0
1316765293
False
0
c2lz4rl
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lz4rl
t1_c2lym9o
null
1427636485
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
daminkz
null
I think that's the joke?
null
0
1316765337
False
0
c2lz4ul
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lz4ul
t1_c2lvhql
null
1427636485
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ours
null
>I work with sql server these days. Well if it isn't mister fancy-pants with his auto-incremented fields and sane built-in management/development tools. How I miss SQL Server...
null
0
1316765378
False
0
c2lz4xv
t3_ko3r2
null
t1_c2lz4xv
t1_c2lttx4
null
1427636486
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
elmuerte
null
> Unless otherwise indicated, all entries listed here are available in both the 3.8 and 4.2 development streams. Wait... eclipse 4.2 ? Where's 4.0 !?
null
0
1316765526
False
0
c2lz578
t3_knx2p
null
t1_c2lz578
t3_knx2p
null
1427636489
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
leonscape
null
Where talking about how shit the UI is, not how you can write SQL. I can write SQL to do most anything, I already knew that. Prat. Talking of writing SQL... Its also slower to write SQL in it that it was in Query Analyser. Why is it incapable of keeping up with my typing? SSMS is slow, bloated, and harder to use than its predecessor.
null
0
1316765595
False
0
c2lz5bw
t3_ko3r2
null
t1_c2lz5bw
t1_c2lwg1j
null
1427636491
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ours
null
>150K/yr plus benefits Now I know why someone would want to put up with Oracle's crappy tools.
null
0
1316765878
False
0
c2lz5u6
t3_ko3r2
null
t1_c2lz5u6
t1_c2lwb1e
null
1427636497
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
adolfojp
null
Silverlight development skills are transferable to Metro. In fact, most of the existing Silverlight code is. Silverlight developers didn't get burned, they just became Metro developers. The transition should be easier than the transition from WinForms to WPF.
null
0
1316765928
False
0
c2lz5xj
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lz5xj
t1_c2lumlq
null
1427636498
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
I_Downvote_Cunts
null
Looks awesome but does anyone know how to use it?
null
0
1316765962
False
0
c2lz5zi
t3_kolze
null
t1_c2lz5zi
t3_kolze
null
1427636498
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Gotebe
null
You know what? Generally, the less you use the mouse, the more power an IDE seems to have.
null
0
1316766027
False
0
c2lz63p
t3_ko21c
null
t1_c2lz63p
t1_c2lvkdy
null
1427636501
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ipompa
null
TOAD works "fine", of course on windows. on Linux i use SQLDeveloper and never had a problem
null
0
1316766110
False
0
c2lz68j
t3_ko3r2
null
t1_c2lz68j
t1_c2ltsf4
null
1427636503
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Jameshfisher
null
"Computers" is a pretty big field.
null
0
1316766130
False
0
c2lz6a9
t3_kolze
null
t1_c2lz6a9
t1_c2lz3fm
null
1427636503
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mcandre
null
And yet 5 is not 5.0 is not 5.0L is not "5" is not 10e1000/2e1000. Merely representing a thing in software is not always intuitive.
null
0
1316766164
False
0
c2lz6cl
t3_kogj4
null
t1_c2lz6cl
t3_kogj4
null
1427636504
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bonefry
null
Same statements made no sense as questions. Also, just because you put a question mark at the end, that doesn't make it a question. Personally, I just assumed that there was a problem with his blogging software, as in some unicode-related rendering issue.
null
0
1316766240
False
0
c2lz6hg
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lz6hg
t1_c2ltnz1
null
1427636506
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316766594
False
0
c2lz76m
t3_ko3r2
null
t1_c2lz76m
t1_c2lwrwv
null
1427636516
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Always using curly spaces is great. I particularly like it how it's trivial to shuffle around whole lines of code without adjusting braces.
null
0
1316766595
False
0
c2lz76p
t3_kooiy
null
t1_c2lz76p
t1_c2lys1l
null
1427636516
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ikanobori
null
Sadly it seems to render a tad weird on webkit browsers.
null
0
1316767025
False
0
c2lz7zw
t3_koqe8
null
t1_c2lz7zw
t3_koqe8
null
1427636527
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Wyndikan
null
You... are kidding, right? Is it really?
null
0
1316767141
False
0
c2lz87q
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz87q
t1_c2lz4ia
null
1427636530
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Sfork
null
fucking 12 year old grammar and spelling Nazis.
null
0
1316767191
False
0
c2lz8b5
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz8b5
t1_c2lz4ia
null
1427636531
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pirvul
null
Offtopic: http://img7.imagebanana.com/img/ihzfuv9e/Workspace1_045.png :D
null
0
1316767317
False
0
c2lz8jl
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lz8jl
t3_ko2wv
null
1427636533
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sod1864
null
therefor = "For that object or purpose." therefore = "For that reason; consequently"
null
0
1316767451
False
0
c2lz8t6
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz8t6
t1_c2lz4ia
null
1427636545
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
FeepingCreature
null
Would it be more catastrophic than software patents, though?
null
0
1316767469
False
0
c2lz8ug
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz8ug
t1_c2lyumj
null
1427636545
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
elperroborrachotoo
null
> Edit: sorry kept ranting, back to the point. No problem. I know your pain. In my case I have to deal with interop with expensive equipment and non-reproducible data, plus a management that still assumes all our problems would vanish if we think more before we write code. My statement above is not a fundamentalist anti-testing statement, just a quip with a core of truth. Research shows that many long-term problems do correlate with the size of the code base. I am in no way against automated testing - in the same vein I am very outspoken against more automated testing always being better. ---- > *Lets put it this way, the code base is like a house of cards* At that point, it's usually to late. If the managment mechanisms that lead to such a code base doesn't change, there's no sane way to dig out of. It seems you are given a chance to correct something, good luck and make us proud! I'd like to encourage you to take notes of your progress, and at some point publish what you learnt during that ordeal.
null
0
1316767477
False
0
c2lz8v0
t3_klypn
null
t1_c2lz8v0
t1_c2lwzfy
null
1427636546
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sod1864
null
Unless your signature is on a check to a lobby group instead of a petition, nothing is going to happen.
null
0
1316767567
False
0
c2lz906
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz906
t3_kosg9
null
1427636539
18
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ashleyw
null
Will voiding them fix anything? Patents are like a public declaration that you had an idea first. You can submit a plan for a time-machine, and if granted, that doesn't mean the patent office has had some physicists in to confirm that it works, just that they've checked their records, and nobody seems to have submitted the idea before. If it weren't for patents, software companies would just announce press-releases where they would previously file for a patent, and use that in lawsuits (obviously not as effective, but it's no different really, other than it being decentralised and nonofficial.)
null
0
1316767569
True
0
c2lz908
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz908
t3_kosg9
null
1427636539
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Arrgh
null
Nope. Programming is not uniform. Some projects really are inherently simple and easy, and others are not. A significant chunk of the "simplicity" and "ease" are functions of one's proficiency with the tools, language and problem domain, and another very significant chunk is quite simply inherent in the problem. Great programmers can often find surprisingly simple solutions to complex problems--sometimes the problem wasn't so complex after all, and sometimes it's genius at work.
null
0
1316767793
False
0
c2lz9f5
t3_kogj4
null
t1_c2lz9f5
t1_c2lz4n5
null
1427636547
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
There are some hints here [under the Usage section](http://jejacks0n.github.com/mercury/documentation/). I'm presuming the steps would be: 1. Put files on web server 2. Add javascript to run mercury_loader.js 3. Add html snippet to make it work I haven't tried it though.
null
0
1316767807
False
0
c2lz9g4
t3_kolze
null
t1_c2lz9g4
t1_c2lz5zi
null
1427636547
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
alexeyr
null
No, you can't sue just because "you had an idea first". Patents aren't just such a public declaration; they are a declaration which gives some specific rights.
null
0
1316767891
False
0
c2lz9lc
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz9lc
t1_c2lz908
null
1427636549
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
captainAwesomePants
null
If most of the value of a company is in its software patent IP, you have invested in a patent troll, and I hate you. But seriously, there are ways to get around this. The simplest way is to simply stop issuing new software patents. You at least stem the flood, and over a couple of decades the problem will go away rather than get worse. You could also do some sort of compromise. Perhaps allow any existing patents to stay around for 5 more years, or maybe let the patents stay around, but limit damages and require reasonable licensing fees.
null
0
1316767914
False
0
c2lz9mp
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lz9mp
t1_c2lyumj
null
1427636550
39
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
abrasax
null
I'm guessing you're talking about the IntelliSense menu that pops up with suggestions? If it takes two seconds for you to pop up, something is wrong with your settings/computer. I've used SSMS on a lot of different setups, and it's never taken more than a millisecond for the IntelliSense dialog to pop up. Edit: Read further down along. I see what you mean with contextual menus now. I have nothing to say about that, some of them do load slowly.
null
0
1316767954
True
0
c2lz9p5
t3_ko3r2
null
t1_c2lz9p5
t1_c2lz76m
null
1427636550
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
If you are doing a full-page application then Silverlight to WinRT/Metro is no where near as bad as VB 6 to VB.NET. For even large Silverlight apps you should be able to port the code in a day or two. If you application mixes Silverlight with JavaScript you are in for a rough ride. But then again, that is also a problem for Silverlight Out-Of-Browser. WPF to WinRT/Metro is very difficult, just like WPF to Silverlight.
null
0
1316768095
False
0
c2lz9y5
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lz9y5
t1_c2lvan5
null
1427636552
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ashleyw
null
Source? From what I understand, they're worth jack-shit on their own, you still have to get a court order for anything to happen. If you get granted a patent which covers the entire design of wheels, that doesn't mean that you'd be able to defend your IP, just that nobody had been stupid enough to try and claim themselves originator for the idea before. You'd still lose in court, every time, so it's worthless.
null
0
1316768172
True
0
c2lza31
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lza31
t1_c2lz9lc
null
1427636553
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
It isn't even abandoned yet, let alone dead. There is a lot of risk that it will happen though, so if you care about it you need to let Microsoft know.
null
0
1316768195
False
0
c2lza4p
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lza4p
t1_c2lx6hn
null
1427636554
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cornmountain
null
I think there are few software engineers in the industry who will disagree with you. The problem as I've seen over and over again is that it's easy for people to bitch about it from the trenches but nearly impossible to get those voices heard at the legislative level.
null
0
1316768226
False
0
c2lza6r
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lza6r
t3_kosg9
null
1427636555
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
Microsoft never saw Silverlight as a way to kill flash, that's just what the developers wanted. As this article illustrates, Silverlight was really just tech porn; Microsoft still doesn't know what the heck they are going to do with it.
null
0
1316768472
False
0
c2lzama
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lzama
t1_c2lyigw
null
1427636560
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Bamafan
null
>The problem with comments is that comments can lie. The code can change or the programmer made a mistake. To this I would say that a programmer who doesn't update comments has not really completed his job. A bad comment is a bug in my book.
null
0
1316768803
False
0
c2lzb4y
t3_kmk56
null
t1_c2lzb4y
t1_c2lpb46
null
1427636567
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Bamafan
null
> People don't keep comments up to date 100% of the time. That's only because we allow them to get away with this. I think we should stop doing that!
null
0
1316768856
False
0
c2lzb7u
t3_kmk56
null
t1_c2lzb7u
t1_c2lp8ia
null
1427636570
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tragomaskhalos
null
Nonsense. 1. In what sense is it "wrong"? If I need to analyse some data it's convenient to get the query working in the GUI , capture the output to CSV or XLS and take it from there. A decent GUI should be able to handle tens of thousands of rows, and indeed decent GUIs do. 2. In any case, no-one mentioned large datasets - a big query that takes ages to run doesn't necessarily result in a large dataset - the issue is the time the GUI wastes by rerunning a long-running query, not data volumes.
null
0
1316768874
False
0
c2lzb92
t3_ko3r2
null
t1_c2lzb92
t1_c2lvszb
null
1427636569
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jkff
null
Can anyone explain why it is so ridiculously difficult and expensive to protect against obviously invalid patents? Is it because you're not allowed to represent yourself and therefore must hire astronomically expensive lawyers, or because the judges are by far too incompetent in the problem domain, or what?
null
0
1316768929
False
0
c2lzbcb
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzbcb
t3_kosg9
null
1427636572
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Almafeta
null
End software patents, so we can end up with a system where the big three encrypt all binaries, using undocumented processors (custom-designed by their particular subservient silicon provider) to ensure there is no possible user-level access to the workings of their trade secrets.
null
0
1316769163
False
0
c2lzbp0
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzbp0
t3_kosg9
null
1427636575
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Bamafan
null
>... because if you change the function x to either not use the value or not care about the initialization and don't change initialize, the comment immediately becomes obsolete/useless/confusing, etc. Well that's just the thing. If function x changes and the current function/variable being inspected is no longer needed, then you should delete that function/variable. Because now you have dead code (a huge sin). > From one side it's a good idea to comment on side effects, but this particular case it's useless (IMO) because I'm initializing attributes of an object during initialization. I would say it's LESS useful, but hardly useless. The side effect explains a bit about what calling functions should expect (e.g. what value a variable is being initialized *to*). That said, do I think that comment was critical? No. But I always favor on the side of too many comments than too few. I'd be happy to a comment like that because I'd be confident the rest of the program got the same amount of attention.
null
0
1316769183
False
0
c2lzbqc
t3_kmk56
null
t1_c2lzbqc
t1_c2lp80b
null
1427636575
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ThatsALogicalFallacy
null
A patent is necessary but not sufficient for such a lawsuit. If you have no patent, you will not stand a chance at a lawsuit, even if you actually did invent it first.
null
0
1316769197
False
0
c2lzbra
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzbra
t1_c2lza31
null
1427636575
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
manixrock
null
Technically we're asking for a solution to the software patents problem, regardless of which tree needs barking at.
null
0
1316769332
False
0
c2lzbz2
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzbz2
t1_c2lyz4z
null
1427636578
87
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
aslate
null
Ugh, I remember having to learn all of that...to run on a quantum computer. I think my brain died a little that week.
null
0
1316769357
False
0
c2lzc0w
t3_kogj4
null
t1_c2lzc0w
t1_c2lxwlq
null
1427636589
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rlee0001
null
Patents give you the right to litigate against anyone that steals your original idea. It grants you a temporary monopoly over the commercialization of that idea. Unlike copyrights, inventions are not automatically protected upon conception/expression. Just because you had an idea first, even if you can prove that fact, doesn't mean that others can't take that idea and commercialize on it.
null
0
1316769419
False
0
c2lzc3n
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzc3n
t1_c2lza31
null
1427636580
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
moreyes
null
— Wow, they create new languages to write browsers these days... — Makes sense, since browsers will replace OSes!
null
0
1316769474
False
0
c2lzc6x
t3_kos4z
null
t1_c2lzc6x
t3_kos4z
null
1427636581
17
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dnlprkns
null
Ah, but the point is that the patent office is executive and therefore subject to the court interpreting the law. The only real way to change this is through legislation. Which of course requires the legislature. Which is currently only describable as a shit-acaine or possible a shit-nado.
null
0
1316769705
False
0
c2lzcjg
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzcjg
t1_c2lzbz2
null
1427636586
48
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
blergh-
null
I was under the impression it was there for the tricks that are pulled in for example COM. But apparently, Microsoft indeed implemented this for live patching. No wonder the operating system is an unstable mess.
null
0
1316769773
False
0
c2lzcna
t3_kmshh
null
t1_c2lzcna
t1_c2lwwwg
null
1427636589
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
slurpme
null
> This is inconsistent to the original MySQL business model. As if this is even remotely relevant anymore...
null
0
1316770054
False
0
c2lzd2p
t3_ko20r
null
t1_c2lzd2p
t3_ko20r
null
1427636592
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mikaelhg
null
Yes, with modern IDEs doing all the work for you, there is really no excuse to do otherwise. I'm currently having to modify code, the author of which had the strangest ideas of how to produce maintainable if-else structures.
null
0
1316770115
False
0
c2lzd6a
t3_kooiy
null
t1_c2lzd6a
t1_c2lys1l
null
1427636594
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
If he has 50 million invested in a patent troll, you hating him is really not going to mean anything.
null
0
1316770116
False
0
c2lzd6c
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzd6c
t1_c2lz9mp
null
1427636595
16
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mattrussell
null
I find it hard to locate the New and Noteworthy pages for various milesones -- is there an obvious single place where they are published?
null
0
1316770237
False
0
c2lzddi
t3_knx2p
null
t1_c2lzddi
t3_knx2p
null
1427636596
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
AStrangeStranger
null
personally I like the way Enums in Java allow you to have values other than ordinals attached to them - I find most the time I want to persist/display them as a string (e.g. makes much easier to check database if status is list of values like "new", "in-progress", "cancel", "rejected", "complete" rather than 0,1,2,3,4). In these cases it make sense to keep with Enum how to match a string to the Enum when loading. I find having multiple attributes on an Enum can also be useful – e.g. for status it can be useful to have a isFinalStatus flag But some people will always abuse things and move things in which make a mockery of it being an enum
null
0
1316770318
False
0
c2lzdhq
t3_kocub
null
t1_c2lzdhq
t1_c2lvqc6
null
1427636598
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cheater00
null
He's also giving the talk at Oct 11, in MIT 2-143, be there or be square
null
0
1316770326
False
0
c2lzdi5
t3_kow8f
null
t1_c2lzdi5
t3_kow8f
null
1427636598
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
DoubleDekker
null
Exactly. If properly approached, Euler problems can be hard and make us learn new concepts. Most people come up with hacks instead of a proper solution. I'd say the majority of problem forum posts confirm this.
null
0
1316770506
False
0
c2lzdr1
t3_koio1
null
t1_c2lzdr1
t1_c2lz20w
null
1427636601
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kataire
null
tl;dr code is data and you can't patent data.
null
0
1316770556
False
0
c2lzdtt
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzdtt
t1_c2lz254
null
1427636603
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
KumbajaMyLord
null
And that sentence perfectly illustrates why pointers are somewhat *tricky* for people new to the concept. You, Mom, the friend, the uncle and the hairdresser are all concrete entities. The pointers are You**r** and **'s**. When I say "Your Mom's friend's uncle has a new hairdresser", did I manipulate the pointer or did I just update the previous hairdresser entity with a new one? That is one level of dealing with references that is just not present in the way we use references in everyday life, but it is an important difference in programming. Grasping pointers requires a different way of thinking and adjusting to that requires some mental transfer. Of course, once you grasped the concept it seems easy.
null
0
1316770849
False
0
c2lze8a
t3_kogj4
null
t1_c2lze8a
t1_c2lys4z
null
1427636607
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
alexeyr
null
And you can't get that court order if you just have a public declaration, but not a patent.
null
0
1316770976
False
0
c2lzeey
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzeey
t1_c2lza31
null
1427636610
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
captainbarky
null
It looks pretty cool in the demo. I shouldn't have looked at the code. It's shit like this, "_len, _len2, _len3, _len4, _ref, _ref2, _ref3, _ref4, _ref5" and oversized functions.
null
0
1316771119
False
0
c2lzemf
t3_kolze
null
t1_c2lzemf
t3_kolze
null
1427636613
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
oorza
null
4.0 was released a year ago this last June. 4.1 was released last June. 4.0 was a platform preview release, primarily targeted towards plugin developers who need to develop their plugins against changes made to the platform. 4.1 was an early adopters release, with most of the core plugins available for the new platform. It's not yet ready for prime time, but (almost) usable on a day to day basis. I'm not entirely sure, but I think the plan is to make 4.2 a much more public release that is usable on a day to day basis and have 4.3 be the first release that replaces the 3.x series (which would be June 2013).
null
0
1316771241
False
0
c2lzeso
t3_knx2p
null
t1_c2lzeso
t1_c2lz578
null
1427636616
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
JL235
null
Some patent trolls put their own money on the line, investing in R&D, to develop good products. They then license them out, to get the money back, which they plow into more R&D. They are worthy of investment, and worthy of being successful. I'm not saying all are like that, or that there isn't a problem, just that there are examples out there where the patent system _does_ work.
null
0
1316771287
False
0
c2lzev7
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzev7
t1_c2lz9mp
null
1427636616
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
oorza
null
If you're familiar at all with how Eclipse is developed, the fade change probably took all of 10 seconds. It's almost certainly just a SWT option that they changed.
null
0
1316771307
False
0
c2lzewb
t3_knx2p
null
t1_c2lzewb
t1_c2lvn3w
null
1427636616
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
wildbob
null
You might be barking up the wrong tree as well. The courts interpret statutes passed by Congress, and the statute covering what patentable subject matter is is very broad. The Supreme Court case that established patentability of software is from 1981 (Diamond v. Diehr). If Congress wanted to expressly exclude software, it could have in the 30 years since that decision. In addition, broad judicial interpretation of what is patentable is not a new phenomenon. It also makes sense: patents by their very nature deal with new types of inventions, sometimes radically new designs. Why potentially limit new subject matter if the purpose of the system is to promote innovation. As an aside, do you think software is included in "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter", particularly the word process, where process includes "process, art or method" That is the statute (35 USC 100 and 101) courts interpret for determining what is patentable subject matter.
null
0
1316771330
False
0
c2lzexi
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzexi
t1_c2lyz4z
null
1427636616
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kataire
null
Yes. We must sacrifice virgins to the industry gods so they don't get angry and take away our source code access. That's not how it works, you muppet. Apple is already heading towards security by obscurity (i.e. shutting down end-user access to internals) but they still need other developers to be able to produce software for their stuff or else nobody would buy it. Also, secure DRM is technically impossible (Bob might be Eve) and reverse engineering with a clean room will defeat any level of obscurity, given enough time and determination. Lastly, remember that (although this may be hard to believe) big corporations are not evil. They're just greedy. There are plenty good economical incentives to be nice. Software patents aren't one of them.
null
0
1316771395
False
0
c2lzf0n
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzf0n
t1_c2lzbp0
null
1427636617
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
alexeyr
null
Released a year ago: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/Eclipse_SDK_4.0_FAQ
null
0
1316771779
False
0
c2lzfke
t3_knx2p
null
t1_c2lzfke
t1_c2lz578
null
1427636626
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kataire
null
Having an idea isn't worth jack shit, despite what seedy "founders" on craigslist will tell budding developers. Patents allow you to ~~extort~~ ask other people to give you money when using the patent matter, but they obviously have to be valid to hold up in court. The trick which is used to circumvent this issue with frivolous patents (i.e. ones which wouldn't hold up in court) is to ask for ridiculous amounts of money and offer dropping the charges for a much smaller sum out of court. Unless you're made of money, it's usually not a good idea to take the issue to court even if you know the patent is frivolous, especially in a silly legal system like in the US. You have to prove you're innocent (i.e. prove the patent is frivolous), which is really _hard_, even if you are.
null
0
1316771855
False
0
c2lzfob
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzfob
t1_c2lza31
null
1427636628
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kataire
null
> Unlike copyrights, inventions are not automatically protected upon conception/expression. Just because you had an idea first, even if you can prove that fact, doesn't mean that others can't take that idea and commercialize on it. Considering how many people I've met that claim to have come up with the ideas of Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc "first", that is probably a good thing. Of course given the state of software patents, they could have just described those sites in vague terms and patented the entirety of Web 2.0 with just a handful of filings.
null
0
1316771996
False
0
c2lzfvk
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzfvk
t1_c2lzc3n
null
1427636640
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
UnoriginalGuy
null
How about a compromise: Just stop issuing new patents. All existing patents will be around for the next 20 years but no new patents can be created.
null
0
1316772013
False
0
c2lzfwo
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzfwo
t1_c2lyumj
null
1427636640
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
AvatarOfErebus
null
Thanks! I actually learned something today! :-) (The "typo" was bothering me as well)
null
0
1316772131
False
0
c2lzg2z
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzg2z
t1_c2lz8t6
null
1427636642
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Geofferic
null
Aint nothing there for me.
null
0
1316772179
False
0
c2lzg5c
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzg5c
t3_kosg9
null
1427636633
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hortinstein
null
can you post to github? ive been cloning into it for 5 min....
null
0
1316772290
False
0
c2lzgas
t3_kltgu
null
t1_c2lzgas
t3_kltgu
null
1427636635
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hortinstein
null
got it
null
0
1316772528
False
0
c2lzgn7
t3_kltgu
null
t1_c2lzgn7
t1_c2lzgas
null
1427636644
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
JimH10
null
> Let's say I'm a bank and I lent $50M to a company based on the value of its IP portfolio. Am I just out the money now? You know, at this moment in history, I'm not all that sympathetic to banks. Perhaps you need another example?
null
0
1316772567
False
0
c2lzgph
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzgph
t1_c2lyumj
null
1427636654
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
FeepingCreature
null
[Hasty generalization fallacy](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization) meets [Theory of Mind](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_mind).
null
0
1316773010
False
0
c2lzhbw
t3_kogj4
null
t1_c2lzhbw
t1_c2lxl1t
null
1427636664
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
wildbob
null
Yep, it is. Black's law dictionary defines it as "For that thing: for it, or them." The term is a bit anachronistic, though.
null
0
1316773016
False
0
c2lzhc6
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzhc6
t1_c2lz87q
null
1427636664
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
FeepingCreature
null
My toy language, Neat, actually detects when an else is on a different level of indentation than the opening if. Saved my ass at least once.
null
0
1316773280
False
0
c2lzhrf
t3_kooiy
null
t1_c2lzhrf
t3_kooiy
null
1427636662
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
foreheadteeth
null
I'm the author of Numeric Javascript. I wrote this so that people can write web apps that do fancy calculations in the browser. I've also tested it on my iphone -- this means you can calculate eigenvectors and do quadratic programming in your phone! I'm an academic and this is a side project. I hope that it will be useful to redditors who need to write little scientific calculations in their web apps. Please give it a spin and click on the demo.
null
0
1316773743
False
0
c2lziem
t3_koxfh
null
t1_c2lziem
t3_koxfh
null
1427636669
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
terrdc
null
I think that for the most part a long and intensive interview process will make a bad team. Instead what it will do is provide a monoculture for a team. A bunch of people who think and act identically. People who will all agree that those other types of people suck and that they are the best. The reality is that diversity brings a lot of value to teams. Programming is primarily about determining requirements and multiple different opinions help alot in something like that.
null
0
1316773772
True
0
c2lzigc
t3_korcu
null
t1_c2lzigc
t3_korcu
null
1427636671
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
wildbob
null
>I have yet to see any algorithm of value that has made it through the patent system, all the way to public domain (mostly since USPTO only started granting them in earnest in 1995). You defeat your own argument on that point. If the PTO only started widely issuing software patents in 1995, of course there would not be any useful algorithms from expired patents, because none of them would have expired yet. When the Pagerank patent expires in 2017, will that meet your definition of an algorithm of value working its way to public domain? And for clarity, the $500 billion cost estimate is not as damning as it sounds. The number comes from a reduction in the stock price of sued companies, so that figure is unrealized. The study also looked at 5 and 25 day marks after announcement of a suit, we have no way of knowing if the stock recovered on settlement/conclusion of a case. Yes, it is a measurable cost, and one that probably does harm the company, but its not like suits caused $500 billion to be spent in suits that would have gone elsewhere, which is the conclusion I've seen way to many people take from that study.
null
0
1316773801
False
0
c2lzihx
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzihx
t1_c2lz46e
null
1427636671
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
You are a very disturbed person you know that? Also you are the only person I have ever heard of that develops .NET apps in windows and deploys them on Linux. I have never heard of anybody doing such a silly thing. But yea you are profoundly disturbed.
null
0
1316773847
False
0
c2lzikf
t3_kgl4f
null
t1_c2lzikf
t1_c2lrjie
null
1427636671
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316773855
False
0
c2lziku
t3_ko3r2
null
t1_c2lziku
t1_c2lz9p5
null
1427636673
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
altrego99
null
Why does someone write so much? Do they really expect people to read it all?
null
0
1316773865
False
0
c2lzila
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lzila
t3_ko2wv
null
1427636673
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
lexchou
null
kBluetoothAMPManagerCreatePhysicalLinkResponseAMPDisconnectedPhysicalLinkRequestReceived from http://forge.voodooprojects.org/p/chameleon/source/tree/HEAD/trunk/i386/include/IOKit/bluetooth/Bluetooth.h
null
0
1316773894
False
0
c2lzimd
t3_klhlv
null
t1_c2lzimd
t3_klhlv
null
1427636673
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bucknuggets
null
Ah, no - to be good with recovery on Oracle it's essential that you spend a week doing backup & recovery drills every year for a while until you really learn the ropes. Whereas with DB2 for example, you could get the equvil familiarity in about a day, and be far less likely to screw up due to human error and really make a mess of things. It's also less likely for you to need to do a recovery in my experience.
null
0
1316773948
False
0
c2lzior
t3_ko3r2
null
t1_c2lzior
t1_c2lyz9y
null
1427636673
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316774019
False
0
c2lzirw
t3_ko3r2
null
t1_c2lzirw
t1_c2lwevq
null
1427636675
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Zarutian
null
*Whoosh* the plane passes over you standing there uncomprehending.
null
0
1316774028
False
0
c2lzisd
t3_ko2wv
null
t1_c2lzisd
t1_c2lz5xj
null
1427636675
-4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
name_was_taken
null
Better: Stop issuing them now, all existing patents die in 5 years. That gives everyone time to move on, without tying up the industry for the rest of our lives.
null
0
1316774031
False
0
c2lzisg
t3_kosg9
null
t1_c2lzisg
t1_c2lzfwo
null
1427636675
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null