| | --- |
| | license: apache-2.0 |
| | task_categories: |
| | - audio-classification |
| | language: |
| | - en |
| | tags: |
| | - speech |
| | size_categories: |
| | - 10B<n<100B |
| | --- |
| | # MISP-QEKS: A Large-Scale Tri-Modal Benchmark for Query-by-Example Keyword Spotting |
| |
|
| | Official dataset release for: |
| |
|
| | **MISP-QEKS: A Large-Scale Dataset with Multimodal Cues for Query-by-Example Keyword Spotting** |
| | ACM MM 2025, Dublin, Ireland |
| | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3746027.3758268 |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Overview |
| |
|
| | MISP-QEKS is the first large-scale tri-modal benchmark for open-vocabulary Query-by-Example Keyword Spotting (QEKS). |
| |
|
| | Unlike traditional keyword spotting datasets that: |
| |
|
| | - focus on fixed keyword sets |
| | - rely on clean audio-only recordings |
| | - lack OOV evaluation |
| |
|
| | MISP-QEKS provides: |
| |
|
| | - Fully aligned Text–Audio–Visual keyword clips |
| | - Real-world noise simulation |
| | - In-Vocabulary (IV) and Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) evaluation splits |
| | - 610,000 enrollment–query pairs |
| | - 9,830+ distinct keywords |
| |
|
| | This dataset enables robust, multimodal, open-vocabulary keyword spotting research under realistic acoustic conditions. |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Task Definition |
| |
|
| |  |
| |
|
| | As shown in the figure, given: |
| |
|
| | - An enrollment example (text/audio/video) |
| | - A query clip (audio/video) |
| |
|
| | The system predicts: |
| |
|
| | - Whether both samples contain the same keyword |
| | - A probability score |
| |
|
| | This supports: |
| |
|
| | - Open-vocabulary keyword spotting |
| | - Cross-modal matching |
| | - Robust detection under noise |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Dataset Construction Pipeline |
| |
|
| |  |
| |
|
| | As shown in the figure, MISP-QEKS is constructed from sentence-level audio-visual-text data via: |
| |
|
| | 1. Phone-level forced alignment |
| | 2. Word-level cropping |
| | 3. Real-world noise simulation |
| | 4. Enrollment–query pair construction |
| |
|
| | This pipeline enables large-scale, synchronized multimodal keyword samples suitable for open-vocabulary QEKS research. |
| |
|
| | ## Dataset Statistics |
| |
|
| | - Total duration: **193.606 hours** |
| | - Keywords: **9,830** |
| | - Enrollment–Query pairs: **610,000** |
| | - 122,000 positive |
| | - 488,000 negative |
| | - Positive:Negative ratio = 1:4 |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ### Data Splits |
| |
|
| | | Split | Duration (h) | Keywords | Pairs | Positive | Negative | |
| | |------------|--------------|----------|--------|----------|----------| |
| | | Train | 157.756 | 8,357 | 500,000 | 100,000 | 400,000 | |
| | | Dev | 3.245 | 2,247 | 10,000 | 2,000 | 8,000 | |
| | | Eval-seen | 15.300 | 2,174 | 50,000 | 10,000 | 40,000 | |
| | | Eval-blind | 17.305 | 1,445 | 50,000 | 10,000 | 40,000 | |
| |
|
| | Evaluation protocol: |
| |
|
| | - Eval-seen → In-Vocabulary (IV) |
| | - Eval-blind → Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) |
| | - Speaker-independent split |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ### Keyword Frequency Distribution |
| |
|
| |  |
| |
|
| | The keyword frequency distribution demonstrates: |
| |
|
| | - Strong coverage across high-frequency and mid-frequency words. |
| | - Long-tail behavior suitable for evaluating generalization. |
| |
|
| | This design supports robust training while preserving realistic lexical imbalance. |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Noise Characteristics and Quality Distribution |
| |
|
| | To emulate realistic acoustic environments, clean clips are mixed with real-world background noise at SNR levels {+5, 0, −5, −10} dB. |
| |
|
| | ### Speech Quality Distribution |
| |
|
| |  |
| |
|
| | - Most PESQ scores lie between 1.5 and 2.5. |
| | - Most STOI values fall between 65% and 85%. |
| |
|
| | This confirms that the dataset spans a broad spectrum of realistic noise conditions. |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Repository Structure and File Description |
| |
|
| | The repository contains the following files: |
| |
|
| | ### Data Archives |
| |
|
| | - [`train.zip`](./train.zip) |
| | Contains the training split (157.756 hours, 500,000 enrollment–query pairs across 8,357 keywords). |
| |
|
| | - [`dev_seen.zip`](./dev_seen.zip) |
| | Development split for hyperparameter tuning on In-Vocabulary (IV) keywords. |
| | Keywords partially overlap with the training set. |
| |
|
| | - [`dev_unseen.zip`](./dev_unseen.zip) |
| | Development split for Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) validation. |
| | Keywords do not appear in the training set. |
| |
|
| | - [`eval_seen.zip`](./eval_seen.zip) |
| | In-Vocabulary (IV) evaluation split. |
| | Keywords appear in the training set and are used for standard evaluation. |
| |
|
| | - [`eval_unseen.zip`](./eval_unseen.zip) |
| | Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) evaluation split. |
| | Keywords are not seen during training and are used to assess generalization. |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ### Noise and Metadata |
| |
|
| | - [`noise.zip`](./noise.zip) |
| | Real-world background noise recordings used for acoustic simulation. |
| |
|
| | - [`snr_map.zip`](./snr_map.zip) |
| | Mapping file indicating the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) assigned to each noisy sample. |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ### Baseline Checkpoint |
| |
|
| | - [`train/model/`](./train/model/) |
| |
|
| | Contains the official 10-epoch checkpoint of the XEQ-Matcher baseline described in the ACM MM 2025 paper. |
| |
|
| | This checkpoint can be used directly for evaluation or reproduction of reported results. |
| |
|
| | Official implementation: |
| | https://github.com/coalboss/MISP-QEKS |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ### Pretrained Feature Extractors |
| |
|
| | - [`model/`](./model/) |
| |
|
| | Contains pretrained feature extraction models required by the baseline system. |
| |
|
| | These models are used as frozen encoders for: |
| |
|
| | - Audio feature extraction (e.g., Whisper-Tiny encoder) |
| | - Visual feature extraction (CNN-ResNet backbone) |
| | - Text processing (G2P model) |
| |
|
| | These components are necessary to reproduce the reported baseline performance. |