qid
int64
1
74.7M
question
stringlengths
12
33.8k
date
stringlengths
10
10
metadata
list
response_j
stringlengths
0
115k
response_k
stringlengths
2
98.3k
141,378
I would like to check if an online bank is legit. It is a Astroibank. I cannot find anything online and I have some money that was supposed to have been sent there. The bank is asking me to pay a lot of money for a COT code but to a bitcoin wallet. I am not sure about the bank. Does anyone know of it or how to check it?
2021/06/03
[ "https://money.stackexchange.com/questions/141378", "https://money.stackexchange.com", "https://money.stackexchange.com/users/108532/" ]
* There is no legitimate reason for anyone to send money to you at a bank you don't have an account at * There is no legitimate bank that is going to ask you to pay money in order to access money you have there. They might charge a fee for the transfer but that would come out of the transferred funds. * No legitimate bank is going to ask you to make payments to a bitcoin wallet You could certainly spend time and effort looking up a bank with the regulators of whatever country the bank operates in. And if there is a legitimate bank by that name, then spend time and effort trying to determine whether the people you're talking to actually associated with that legitimate bank. But given the hallmarks of a scam, it isn't worth the effort.
**All banks have a substantial online presence.** **Also all banks must be registered.** [For example, here is the list of banks and financial institutions in my country.](http://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/Eng/wt-ow/Pages/wwr-er.aspx) If either of the above are not true then the "bank" is unquestionably a scam.
141,378
I would like to check if an online bank is legit. It is a Astroibank. I cannot find anything online and I have some money that was supposed to have been sent there. The bank is asking me to pay a lot of money for a COT code but to a bitcoin wallet. I am not sure about the bank. Does anyone know of it or how to check it?
2021/06/03
[ "https://money.stackexchange.com/questions/141378", "https://money.stackexchange.com", "https://money.stackexchange.com/users/108532/" ]
* There is no legitimate reason for anyone to send money to you at a bank you don't have an account at * There is no legitimate bank that is going to ask you to pay money in order to access money you have there. They might charge a fee for the transfer but that would come out of the transferred funds. * No legitimate bank is going to ask you to make payments to a bitcoin wallet You could certainly spend time and effort looking up a bank with the regulators of whatever country the bank operates in. And if there is a legitimate bank by that name, then spend time and effort trying to determine whether the people you're talking to actually associated with that legitimate bank. But given the hallmarks of a scam, it isn't worth the effort.
The most simplest way to check if a bank is legit, is to search your governments directory of registered banks. For example; 1. [Hong Kong's Government's list of registered/licensed banks](https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-functions/banking-stability/banking-policy-and-supervision/list_of_lb.xls) 2. [India's official list of registered/licensed banks](https://m.rbi.org.in/scripts/bs_viewcontent.aspx?Id=3657) These can be easily found with a google search like "India list of registered banks", and find the government supplied site Another effective way to find out if a bank is legit is look for mistakes in English/spelling/grammar. Often these fake sites are made in a rush by non-native speakers of English. Plus, real banks will invest a lot of money in making sure that their English is flawless. (Applies to other languages as well, e.g. if your bank language is Spanish, French etc etc)
137,529
I've been trying to find out what skills Drow have options to be proficient in, typically a race offers a few choices but only allows you to pick two, and your class gives you two more, followed by your background giving you 1 or 2 more correct? But I've looked at numerous sites trying to find out what skill choices Drow offer and have found none. Is it an error or do they really have no skill proficiencies? I know they have some weapon proficiencies and whatnot but I figured they'd have some skills too.
2018/12/17
[ "https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/137529", "https://rpg.stackexchange.com", "https://rpg.stackexchange.com/users/48636/" ]
The Drow race does not confer any skill proficiency =================================================== I looked up my [PHB on page 24](https://www.dndbeyond.com/characters/races/elf#DarkElfDrow), and the only proficiencies gained by Drow are rapiers, shortswords, and hand crossbows, in addition to Perception given by being an Elf (of any kind). Most races do not confer skill proficiencies, and no option of selecting among them ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some races give proficiency in certain tools (like Rock Gnomes), or armor (like Mountain Dwarves), or even skills (like Elves), but it is not an automatic thing every race does. The only races that I've seen that give a choice of skills are Half-Elf which has Skill Versatility, you gain proficiency in two skills of your choice, and a variant trait for Human, which gives 1 skill of your choice. Classes let you choose (usually 2) skills to be proficient in ------------------------------------------------------------- Based on your class you can choose a number of skills to be proficient in, from a provided list. You may be confusing this with what you get from your race. Backgrounds also give 2 skill proficiencies, but these are determined by the background you choose and can't be mixed or changed (although you can make a custom background to choose the skills you want).
[Drow](https://www.dndbeyond.com/characters/races/elf#DarkElfDrow) get the following: Being an Elf gives them the following Skill proficiency (PHB, 23): > > **Keen Senses** > > > You have proficiency in the Perception skill. > > > And being Drow gives you the following weapon proficiencies (PHB, 24): > > **Drow Weapon Training** > > > You have proficiency with rapiers, shortswords, and hand crossbows. > > > Because there other benefits for being Elf and Drow-Elf, no other skill profiencies are provided. Skills generally come from Class and Background ----------------------------------------------- Each **[Class](https://www.dndbeyond.com/compendium/rules/basic-rules/classes#ClassesSummary)** will give you an option to select Skills. These are listed under the **Class Features** section and will list what skills are available and how many you can choose. Each **[Background](https://www.dndbeyond.com/compendium/rules/basic-rules/personality-and-background#Backgrounds)** will also give you skill choices, and you can always choose to do a [custom background](https://www.dndbeyond.com/compendium/rules/basic-rules/personality-and-background#CustomizingaBackground), allowing you greater freedom in skills/proficiencies/languages.
350,953
If my friend lets me play his copy of The Witcher 3 via Steam family sharing, is he still able to play Dota 2 while I play The Witcher? If not, am I able to go into offline mode to play The Witcher while he plays? I'm pretty sure Steam does not want you doing this but do they ban people for it or anything like that?
2019/05/07
[ "https://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/350953", "https://gaming.stackexchange.com", "https://gaming.stackexchange.com/users/231177/" ]
When you share, what you are sharing is your library. You can play any game the owner has, but you can't do it while he is playing any other game. No matter the video game, while he is playing something, you cannot play anything from his library. I have my library shared with my girlfriend and these are some of the checks we did: * It does not matter if the other person is offline - you can play the shared games as long as you have an internet connection; * You can only play if your friend's library is free. This means that neither the owner or anyone else is using that library at that time; * If someone else has shared the library and starts playing before you, you'll have to wait until that person stops playing; * Even if you or someone else is playing, if the owner of the library starts playing, he will "eject" you from the shared game after 5 minutes; * You can not play any offline game that is not yours, because Steam verifies whether or not you have access to the game, offline or not; * All the DLC are also shared (unless the person borrowing only owns the base game).
**tl,dr: there is no way for you to access your friend's shared library while he is playing Dota2** An online Steam library can only be in use by any 1 person at a time (in use = any game inside that library is running). You cannot access someone else's shared libraries while in offline mode yourself. However, if the owner of the library boots Steam in offline mode, the Steam servers have no way of knowing that he is in fact playing and hence, the owner and 1 other person (so 2 in total) can use his library (note that this is useless in your case since Dota2 is an online game so offline mode is not an option). Only thing I have not tested since the friendlist overhaul is, whether logging off the friend system is enough to count as offline, or if you still have to completely boot Steam in offline mode (which I suppose). **Edit:** Apparantly the owner can no longer switch to offline mode in order to share his library while playing, see the comments by Joachim for more details.
350,953
If my friend lets me play his copy of The Witcher 3 via Steam family sharing, is he still able to play Dota 2 while I play The Witcher? If not, am I able to go into offline mode to play The Witcher while he plays? I'm pretty sure Steam does not want you doing this but do they ban people for it or anything like that?
2019/05/07
[ "https://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/350953", "https://gaming.stackexchange.com", "https://gaming.stackexchange.com/users/231177/" ]
When you share, what you are sharing is your library. You can play any game the owner has, but you can't do it while he is playing any other game. No matter the video game, while he is playing something, you cannot play anything from his library. I have my library shared with my girlfriend and these are some of the checks we did: * It does not matter if the other person is offline - you can play the shared games as long as you have an internet connection; * You can only play if your friend's library is free. This means that neither the owner or anyone else is using that library at that time; * If someone else has shared the library and starts playing before you, you'll have to wait until that person stops playing; * Even if you or someone else is playing, if the owner of the library starts playing, he will "eject" you from the shared game after 5 minutes; * You can not play any offline game that is not yours, because Steam verifies whether or not you have access to the game, offline or not; * All the DLC are also shared (unless the person borrowing only owns the base game).
No, you cannot play from your friend's library while they are playing. If they go offline, their library isn't available to you and if they are online and playing, you are blocked. However, if your friend is willing to do so, you can log in to their account from your computer and play at the same time, assuming at least one of you is in offline mode. However, this will sync achievements and saves with their account and from time to time you could be signed out.
137,520
Why would there be any pressure if everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated? If there's pressure, or even high pressure, then it implies what they are currently doing is not working, why would any good programmer want to join a team like that? Are these kind of job posting failed at trying to show off or are they really just being honest? Or is there really some good reasons for having pressure?
2012/02/29
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/137520", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/35901/" ]
Man, there's a LOAD of venting in this thread :P "everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated" is what everyone wants but you shouldn't forget that those teams weren't always like that. Every team starts off bad before it eventually gets better, so until it gets to this utopian state, pressure is normal. If it weren't then management would probably be guilty of asking too little. I like the "high pressure" statement on the rare occasions when I see it because those are the teams that have seen the symptoms, even though they may not have all the answers. That is better than most of the other ads that have no clue at all. So unless the competition is some great software house that I know of, odds are I would find this "high pressure" one interesting at the very least. There are less good teams in the market than good programmers and frankly, holding out for the best (assuming they want you as well) is pretty much a waste of time unless you don't have mouths to feed. So in that sense, the phrase "high pressure" doesn't really deter me at all.
"if everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated?" is a really big assumption. Usually that assumption is false if the company says it is a "high pressure environment". And, yes, there are a lot of companies that fail to plan and have under-achieving employees. There are plenty of companies that don't fit that mold, you just have to maintain your own standards and refuse to work in these high pressure jobs.
137,520
Why would there be any pressure if everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated? If there's pressure, or even high pressure, then it implies what they are currently doing is not working, why would any good programmer want to join a team like that? Are these kind of job posting failed at trying to show off or are they really just being honest? Or is there really some good reasons for having pressure?
2012/02/29
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/137520", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/35901/" ]
Why? Because they ARE high pressure. Why? Because, in IT terms, they do not know what they are doing, or more precisely, they do not follow good development practices, because someone outside of IT is in charge. One of the problems we software developers have is that software is not a tangible, physical object. To non-IT people it is this wooly, obscure thing that just exists inside their computer. But because they cannot touch it, they do not appreciate the intricacies that go into building good software. So when you get these types of people "driving the bus", you soon get comments like: * just build it * we need it in 1 month * we don't need testers They don't get it.
It doesn't mean that much in most cases. After all, would a company really say that they have a work environment where their philosophy is "[Mañana](http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ma%C3%B1ana)". It's one of those standard clichés that get throw into job listings by HR people, just like saying they want "highly motivated people" and that they offer "a competitive salary with a complete benefit package". You'll need to find out from your interview exactly what kind of pressure a job is likely to have, if it's just HR-speak or if they really have time critical work that has to be done. For example, you may find out that they do a lot of client driven or time critical projects that need to be done very quickly, such as advertising campaigns or event planning. Or, you may find that the organization is populated with bullies and jerks who create ugly pressure. Or, it may be just HR-BS and the environment is a pretty typical development shop.
137,520
Why would there be any pressure if everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated? If there's pressure, or even high pressure, then it implies what they are currently doing is not working, why would any good programmer want to join a team like that? Are these kind of job posting failed at trying to show off or are they really just being honest? Or is there really some good reasons for having pressure?
2012/02/29
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/137520", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/35901/" ]
It's a code phrase for "We want young unmarried programmers who are willing to work completely unreasonable hours at the expense of having any personal life." They can't say that explicitly in part because it is illegal to discriminate based on age and marital status.
The one place where it's okay for this to pop up is if you'll have a job where lives are on the line. For example, if you're the sys admin for services that must be up in order to keep airplanes in the sky, you should expect it to be high pressure. Or, if you work on software that will be deployed for soldiers in a warzone, you can expect pressure. If you see this, ask the interviewer if lives are on the line if you miss a deadline or alarm. If not, they're being dramatic.
137,520
Why would there be any pressure if everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated? If there's pressure, or even high pressure, then it implies what they are currently doing is not working, why would any good programmer want to join a team like that? Are these kind of job posting failed at trying to show off or are they really just being honest? Or is there really some good reasons for having pressure?
2012/02/29
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/137520", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/35901/" ]
Maybe the recruiters assume that someone who can stand, or even enjoy, a "high-pressure environment", would be more productive in that particular company. It can actually be a correct assumption: an inferior developer, who's willing to take the pressure for the sake of keeping his job, may be marginally productive, while a good developer, who can afford to choose and thus, should he end up in such a joke company, would leave in no time and wouldn't be at all productive.
I rarely see it worded like this, but then such statements are buzzwords at best, and baseless drivel at worst. I have seen jobs that were described as "fast paced" being some of the slowest, most uninspiring, brain decaying and insidiously boring jobs that could possibly be concieved for a human being. I have also put LOTS of time and was significantly challenged at jobs where by the description in no way gave credit to the actual needs of the job. You would make a mistake to put too much thought into wording like this. You learn far more about a work environment and the responsibilities of a potential job by interviewing and in turn asking the interviewer **important** questions that help unveil the hidden mysteries and dysfunctions that they don't tell you about.
137,520
Why would there be any pressure if everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated? If there's pressure, or even high pressure, then it implies what they are currently doing is not working, why would any good programmer want to join a team like that? Are these kind of job posting failed at trying to show off or are they really just being honest? Or is there really some good reasons for having pressure?
2012/02/29
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/137520", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/35901/" ]
Example high pressure job: High frequency algorithmic trading. A software engineer friend of mine is working for a trading shop. Huge stress, huge pressure. All deadlines are "right now". Everything is shipped to production on the day it's written. Even a few minute delay could cost the company millions. Not many people can handle an environment like this. If you can do it, expect a 50-100% higher salary than industry standard at your level + end-of-year bonus based on % of your algos' profits. It's super high-risk, high-pressure, high reward. It has nothing to do with unrealistic deadlines or lacking management, and everything to do with your ability to handle the pressure. (And traders swearing at your face as their P&L goes down the crapper that day.) Other examples: * Jobs where producing the kind of software with high-requirements for dependendability: + medical software, + embedded software. * Jobs where deliverables (and failures) would have: + a direct and large impact on people, + a direct and large impact on the company's image. Alternatively, it's not necessarily just code for "[we're under-resourced and have unrealistically aggressive deadlines](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/a/137521/3631)", but also possibly code for "your responsibility makes you an expendable liability if anything goes awry".
A startup that rushes to the market must struggle to be faster than the competition. For such a company, it makes sense to create a high pressure work environment, since being there two months before others working on the same problem might make the difference between being the next facebook and being, well, a too-little-too-late service nobody remembers. Working in such a company might make you rich quickly, through stock options. For a well established software company, constantly high pressure is a sign of bad management and/or greedy owners and therefore a red flag.
137,520
Why would there be any pressure if everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated? If there's pressure, or even high pressure, then it implies what they are currently doing is not working, why would any good programmer want to join a team like that? Are these kind of job posting failed at trying to show off or are they really just being honest? Or is there really some good reasons for having pressure?
2012/02/29
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/137520", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/35901/" ]
One of two reasons: 1. They want you to give up your social life doing 12 hour days and weekends for no extra reward to save a project that is late and over budget with the customer threatening to sue. Usually because the sales team promised extra features without running them past the developers. 2. The windows don't open and the staff suffer from flatulence. I think it's 1.
The one place where it's okay for this to pop up is if you'll have a job where lives are on the line. For example, if you're the sys admin for services that must be up in order to keep airplanes in the sky, you should expect it to be high pressure. Or, if you work on software that will be deployed for soldiers in a warzone, you can expect pressure. If you see this, ask the interviewer if lives are on the line if you miss a deadline or alarm. If not, they're being dramatic.
137,520
Why would there be any pressure if everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated? If there's pressure, or even high pressure, then it implies what they are currently doing is not working, why would any good programmer want to join a team like that? Are these kind of job posting failed at trying to show off or are they really just being honest? Or is there really some good reasons for having pressure?
2012/02/29
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/137520", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/35901/" ]
It's a code phrase for "We want young unmarried programmers who are willing to work completely unreasonable hours at the expense of having any personal life." They can't say that explicitly in part because it is illegal to discriminate based on age and marital status.
One of two reasons: 1. They want you to give up your social life doing 12 hour days and weekends for no extra reward to save a project that is late and over budget with the customer threatening to sue. Usually because the sales team promised extra features without running them past the developers. 2. The windows don't open and the staff suffer from flatulence. I think it's 1.
137,520
Why would there be any pressure if everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated? If there's pressure, or even high pressure, then it implies what they are currently doing is not working, why would any good programmer want to join a team like that? Are these kind of job posting failed at trying to show off or are they really just being honest? Or is there really some good reasons for having pressure?
2012/02/29
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/137520", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/35901/" ]
Why? Because they ARE high pressure. Why? Because, in IT terms, they do not know what they are doing, or more precisely, they do not follow good development practices, because someone outside of IT is in charge. One of the problems we software developers have is that software is not a tangible, physical object. To non-IT people it is this wooly, obscure thing that just exists inside their computer. But because they cannot touch it, they do not appreciate the intricacies that go into building good software. So when you get these types of people "driving the bus", you soon get comments like: * just build it * we need it in 1 month * we don't need testers They don't get it.
I rarely see it worded like this, but then such statements are buzzwords at best, and baseless drivel at worst. I have seen jobs that were described as "fast paced" being some of the slowest, most uninspiring, brain decaying and insidiously boring jobs that could possibly be concieved for a human being. I have also put LOTS of time and was significantly challenged at jobs where by the description in no way gave credit to the actual needs of the job. You would make a mistake to put too much thought into wording like this. You learn far more about a work environment and the responsibilities of a potential job by interviewing and in turn asking the interviewer **important** questions that help unveil the hidden mysteries and dysfunctions that they don't tell you about.
137,520
Why would there be any pressure if everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated? If there's pressure, or even high pressure, then it implies what they are currently doing is not working, why would any good programmer want to join a team like that? Are these kind of job posting failed at trying to show off or are they really just being honest? Or is there really some good reasons for having pressure?
2012/02/29
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/137520", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/35901/" ]
Man, there's a LOAD of venting in this thread :P "everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated" is what everyone wants but you shouldn't forget that those teams weren't always like that. Every team starts off bad before it eventually gets better, so until it gets to this utopian state, pressure is normal. If it weren't then management would probably be guilty of asking too little. I like the "high pressure" statement on the rare occasions when I see it because those are the teams that have seen the symptoms, even though they may not have all the answers. That is better than most of the other ads that have no clue at all. So unless the competition is some great software house that I know of, odds are I would find this "high pressure" one interesting at the very least. There are less good teams in the market than good programmers and frankly, holding out for the best (assuming they want you as well) is pretty much a waste of time unless you don't have mouths to feed. So in that sense, the phrase "high pressure" doesn't really deter me at all.
It doesn't mean that much in most cases. After all, would a company really say that they have a work environment where their philosophy is "[Mañana](http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ma%C3%B1ana)". It's one of those standard clichés that get throw into job listings by HR people, just like saying they want "highly motivated people" and that they offer "a competitive salary with a complete benefit package". You'll need to find out from your interview exactly what kind of pressure a job is likely to have, if it's just HR-speak or if they really have time critical work that has to be done. For example, you may find out that they do a lot of client driven or time critical projects that need to be done very quickly, such as advertising campaigns or event planning. Or, you may find that the organization is populated with bullies and jerks who create ugly pressure. Or, it may be just HR-BS and the environment is a pretty typical development shop.
137,520
Why would there be any pressure if everyone knows what they are doing and the projects are accurately estimated? If there's pressure, or even high pressure, then it implies what they are currently doing is not working, why would any good programmer want to join a team like that? Are these kind of job posting failed at trying to show off or are they really just being honest? Or is there really some good reasons for having pressure?
2012/02/29
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/137520", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/35901/" ]
I've always considered this code for "we're under-resourced and have unrealistically aggressive deadlines."
Maybe the recruiters assume that someone who can stand, or even enjoy, a "high-pressure environment", would be more productive in that particular company. It can actually be a correct assumption: an inferior developer, who's willing to take the pressure for the sake of keeping his job, may be marginally productive, while a good developer, who can afford to choose and thus, should he end up in such a joke company, would leave in no time and wouldn't be at all productive.
72,810
Is there a way to proportionaly scale an object entering a specific value in only one of the 3 dimensions? Basically I need to "link" the 3 values inside "Dimensions" so if I enter a specific value in 1 the others are automatically calculated. Exemple: I have an object with these dimesions [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Cz7A1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Cz7A1.png) I want to enter 2,5m as Y value and to automatically obtain the proportional X and Z value. How can I do that? It's a very basic function but I can't find it. --- I discovered that what I'm looking for is exactly the "Link Scale" function which was present in Transform Panel until version 2:48 [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/0dm6b.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/0dm6b.png) I think is insane to remove a function like this. It's unbelievable ... So.. I really thank those who are suggesting more engineering procedures but I'm looking for something easier as "Scale Link" was. **Really.. there must be a way, an addon or maybe a secret shortcut to simply link the three dimensions in the Transform Panel**
2017/02/03
[ "https://blender.stackexchange.com/questions/72810", "https://blender.stackexchange.com", "https://blender.stackexchange.com/users/35309/" ]
I understand frenksisco's frustration, and after 5 years there is still no ideal solution... Thanks to the add-on Proportional Dimensions To New Size, the problem of proportional scaling (with mm or inch) of one object has been solved. Now, problem is when we want to resize multiple selected objects to an exact dimension (mm, inch) without having to merge them. So far I have found that with the help of “Proportional Dimensions To New Size” add-on I can achieve that simple task with a lot of extra work… For example, we have two objects that we want to enlarge proportionally by setting the desired height. * select the objects that we want to enlarge proportionally * OBJECT > SNAP > CURSOR TO SELECTED * OBJECT > SET ORIGIN > ORIGIN TO 3D CURSOR * OBJECT > DUPLICATE OBJECTS * move the duplicated objects aside * merge duplicated objects, OBJECT > JOIN * we select the original objects and the duplicated object, for the active object we mark the duplicated * in field Z at “Proportional Dimensions” panel type the desired height We got our two objects proportionally enlarged to the desired height, we can now delete the duplicated. [![Video description of commands](https://i.stack.imgur.com/mLUMh.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/mLUMh.gif) Does anyone know of an easier way?
Denis was on the right track, but you may need a little more information. Let's say you want to scale Y by 2.5. If you want the other dimensions to scale proportionately, then they should also be scaled by 2.5. So, with the object selected in Object mode, just press [S] [2] [.] [5] [Enter]. That's it!
34,533
I've noticed the form فعلان (faʿlan) seems to imply emphasis, like in رحمان (raḥmân) which seems to means "All-Merciful". This form seems to exist in other Semitic languages like Hebrew (maybe רַבָּן, rabban?). I've searched a while, but didn't find any answer. Does this form have a specific name in English?
2019/12/10
[ "https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/34533", "https://linguistics.stackexchange.com", "https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/users/23241/" ]
In the Wikipedia article [on Arabic Nouns and Adjectives](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_nouns_and_adjectives) the *fa'lan* form is named **intensive**.
I don’t think it has a particular name, but it can be defined as forming adjectives from verbal stems, like sakrān “drunk” from s-k-r, or kaslān “lazy” from k-s-l. Normally, such adjectives have a human referent.
64,254
I've connected an Arduino to a MOSFET to control a valve. I've connected the Arduino's GND to the negative lane (word?) on the breadboard (for clarity modeled by SW1 in the circuit diagram). I noticed that if I don't do this, it does not work (no voltage at the gate) - why do I need to use the same ground? And: Is my circuit any good or could it be damaging my Arduino? ![See sketch here](https://i.imgur.com/vSd8KSB.png) ![schematic](https://i.stack.imgur.com/UYKkQ.png) [simulate this circuit](/plugins/schematics?image=http%3a%2f%2fi.stack.imgur.com%2fUYKkQ.png) – Schematic created using [CircuitLab](https://www.circuitlab.com/)
2013/04/03
[ "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/64254", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/users/9057/" ]
Voltage is a potential relative to a point. In electronics, most of the time that point is circuit common, or ground. When the grounds aren't shared, there is no reference, so the 5V coming from the Arduino is meaningless. Another thing, put the common lead of the power supply as close as possible to MOSFET return path, ideally in the pin next to it. That will keep the return current off your ground bus, and that is known to make microcontrollers behave in undesirable ways. It may not be a problem for this circuit since its only 120mA, but it's a good habit.
It seams strange to me to connect the Gate to a constant 5V pin. Shoudn't this be on a IO-pin? I would add a diode to the valve in order to prevent voltage peaks when turning the FET off. ![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/w2kAK.png)
24,736
How do you understand the [Ananda Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html)? How do you place it in relation to the Atman or Anatta (An-atman) doctrine? [SN 44.10](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html) > > Then the wanderer Vacchagotta went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, > exchanged courteous greetings with him. After an exchange of friendly > greetings & courtesies, he sat to one side. As he was sitting there he > asked the Blessed One: "Now then, Venerable Gotama, is there a self?" > > > When this was said, the Blessed One was silent. > > > "Then is there no self?" > > > A second time, the Blessed One was silent. > > > Then Vacchagotta the wanderer got up from his seat and left. > > > Then, not long after Vacchagotta the wanderer had left, Ven. Ananda > said to the Blessed One, "Why, lord, did the Blessed One not answer > when asked a question by Vacchagotta the wanderer?" > > > "Ananda, if I — being asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is a > self — were to answer that there is a self, that would be conforming > with those brahmans & contemplatives who are exponents of eternalism > [the view that there is an eternal, unchanging soul]. If I — being > asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is no self — were to answer > that there is no self, that would be conforming with those brahmans & > contemplatives who are exponents of annihilationism [the view that > death is the annihilation of consciousness]. If I — being asked by > Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is a self — were to answer that > there is a self, would that be in keeping with the arising of > knowledge that all phenomena are not-self?" > > > "No, lord." > > > "And if I — being asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is no > self — were to answer that there is no self, the bewildered > Vacchagotta would become even more bewildered: 'Does the self I used > to have now not exist?'" > > >
2018/01/18
[ "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/questions/24736", "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com", "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/users/12857/" ]
Like the sutta explains, if the Buddha said there is a self it would be wrong since it comes under eternalism. If the Buddha said there is no self, Vacchagotta would have taken it as Annihilationism. Vacchagotta's mind was probably capable of grasping only one extreme or the other instead of viewing things as mere experiences rising and falling. That's probably why the Buddha stayed silent.
In Mahayana, Vacchagotta (also known as Shrenika, Srenika or Seniya The Wanderer) is considered an important character, in conversations with whom Buddha illustrates the main principle of Madhyamaka - emptiness of all mental constructs, liberation by wisdom that comes from careful analysis of dharmas, direct vision into nature of things beyond either existence no nonexistence. The idea here is that the Truth lies beyond such simplistic categories, and to be in touch with Truth we must cease our tendency to cling to flat/singlesided explanations. In my own words, reality is complex, "quantum", "multidimmensional", and our habitual attempts to "flatten" it constantly lead to failed expectations and to suffering. Enlightened mind can see reality as it is, unhindered by conceptual limitations, and so always stays in touch with "tatha" - the way things really are. In Pali Canon, Vacchagotta is mentioned in a number of suttas, all going around similar topics, e.g.: * [MN 72 Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.072.than.html) * [SN 44.7 Moggallana Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.007.than.html) * [SN 44.8 Vacchagotta Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.008.than.html) * [SN 44.9 Kutuhalasala Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.009.than.html) * [SN 44.10 Ananda Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html) * [SN 44.11 Sabhiya Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.011.than.html) In Chinese Agamas, there is one long sutra known as [SA 105 Discourse to Seniya](https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/translations/sa05.pdf) that collects these ideas in single place. Here I will paste explanation of Shrenika's role Eduard Conze gave in his introduction to [The Large Sutra On Perfect Wisdom](http://lirs.ru/lib/conze/The_Large_Sutra_On_Perfect_Wisdom,Conze,1975.pdf), commenting on the following verse in [Ratnagunasamcayagatha](http://www.abuddhistlibrary.com/Buddhism/C%20-%20Zen/Sutras/The%20Ratnagunasamcayagatha/The%20Ratnaguna-samcayagatha%20II.htm): > > As venerable Shrenika the wandering beggar, > > Understanding acquired, without grasping the skandhas, > > Just so a bodhisattva, intuits real nature of things (dharmas). > > And does not seek cessation but abides in wisdom. > > > Conze says: > > Srenika the Wanderer is, according to Nagarjuna, the Srenika Vatsagotra, who in the Pali texts is simply called Vacchagotta. A number of his conversations with the Buddha are recorded. They are scattered through the Pali Canon, but combined into one section in the Samyuktagama of the Sarvastivadins. The text refers here to a [Sutra](https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/translations/sa05.pdf) which, according to Nagarjuna, discussed “Srenika the Believer” and at the same time, according to the Vibhasha and Nagarjuna, preached the emptiness of all dharmas. Since Subhuti’s argument is difficult (*here Conze refers to Chapter 8 of [The Large Sutra On Perfect Wisdom](http://lirs.ru/lib/conze/The_Large_Sutra_On_Perfect_Wisdom,Conze,1975.pdf), "How the irreversible Bodhisattva views things" - which is a fascinating read in itself -- AV*), and since we are inclined to lean on signs, and do not see how we can have faith without a sign, “Subhuti here takes as his witness the Little Vehicle where it speaks of the emptiness of dharmas, How could those who practice the great vehicle not believe in it?” > > > Srenika showed “faith”, first, in that he believed that the Buddha could help him to find the path, and, second, in that he was willing to accept the Tathagata in spite of the fact that he could not be related to any of the skandhas, i.e. to form, etc. He entered into a “cognition with a limited scope” which, according to Haribhadra means that it was directed to the absence of a self in persons, and not also in dharmas). Srenika was concerned to find a true self, in other words, the Tathagata. Nagarjuna relates that Srenika originally took the person as one lump, and that therefore the Buddha asked him about its elements. He had also heard people speak of the “I” in two ways, as identical with the five skandhas, and as different from them. The skandhas are multiple, and the I is one – so they cannot be identical. The self would be born and perish as the skandhas do, and it would not be independent of causes and conditions – thus it would not be the true self. Therefore, how can something outside the five skandhas have the character of “I” or “self”? As Nagarjuna puts it, “Srenika’s second act of faith consisted in that, when he had heard that the Buddha denied the self, and said that from the beginning there was none, he accepted the fact that, because there is no self, the dharmas have no support, and are like a dream, a mirage, nonapprehensible. Having obtained power of faith, he entered into the true mark of dharmas, and did not mistake form for the Tathagata” > > > Srenika “did not take hold of form, etc.” The Buddha asked him: “Do you regard the Tathagata as form?” “No.” “As in form?” “No.” “As outside form?” “No.” “As the absence of form?” “No.” “When, under all these aspects, you do not see the Tathagata, should you doubt, and say: What is there fixed and definite in the Buddhas’ doctrine?” “No.” Srenika then won the path, and became an Arhat. This is how Nagarjuna recounts [the Sutra](https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/translations/sa05.pdf). > > > Here's a quote from Chapter 8 of The Large Sutra On Perfect Wisdom: > > Moreover, a Bodhisattva who courses in perfect wisdom should > not stand in form, etc. to: in decay and death. And why? Because > form is empty of form. What is the emptiness of form, that is not form; > nor is emptiness other than form; the very form is emptiness and the > very emptiness is form. And so for the other skandhas. By this method > a Bodhisattva who courses in perfect wisdom should not stand in form, > etc. to: consciousness. And the same method should be applied to the > other dharmas. > > ... > > If, when this perfection of wisdom is thus being taught and explained > through these modes, tokens and signs, the thought of a Bodhisattva > does not become cowed, stolid or regretful, and his mind does not tremble, > is not frightened or terrified, then certainly that Bodhisattva, > that great being, should be known as standing on the level of an irreversible > Bodhisattva — **by way of not taking his stand anywhere**. > > > For even more information, this whole topic of relationship between "world" and "mind" is expounded/elaborated in one of the most important of Mahayana's sutras, [Lankavatara Sutra](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La%E1%B9%85k%C4%81vat%C4%81ra_S%C5%ABtra).
24,736
How do you understand the [Ananda Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html)? How do you place it in relation to the Atman or Anatta (An-atman) doctrine? [SN 44.10](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html) > > Then the wanderer Vacchagotta went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, > exchanged courteous greetings with him. After an exchange of friendly > greetings & courtesies, he sat to one side. As he was sitting there he > asked the Blessed One: "Now then, Venerable Gotama, is there a self?" > > > When this was said, the Blessed One was silent. > > > "Then is there no self?" > > > A second time, the Blessed One was silent. > > > Then Vacchagotta the wanderer got up from his seat and left. > > > Then, not long after Vacchagotta the wanderer had left, Ven. Ananda > said to the Blessed One, "Why, lord, did the Blessed One not answer > when asked a question by Vacchagotta the wanderer?" > > > "Ananda, if I — being asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is a > self — were to answer that there is a self, that would be conforming > with those brahmans & contemplatives who are exponents of eternalism > [the view that there is an eternal, unchanging soul]. If I — being > asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is no self — were to answer > that there is no self, that would be conforming with those brahmans & > contemplatives who are exponents of annihilationism [the view that > death is the annihilation of consciousness]. If I — being asked by > Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is a self — were to answer that > there is a self, would that be in keeping with the arising of > knowledge that all phenomena are not-self?" > > > "No, lord." > > > "And if I — being asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is no > self — were to answer that there is no self, the bewildered > Vacchagotta would become even more bewildered: 'Does the self I used > to have now not exist?'" > > >
2018/01/18
[ "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/questions/24736", "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com", "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/users/12857/" ]
Like the sutta explains, if the Buddha said there is a self it would be wrong since it comes under eternalism. If the Buddha said there is no self, Vacchagotta would have taken it as Annihilationism. Vacchagotta's mind was probably capable of grasping only one extreme or the other instead of viewing things as mere experiences rising and falling. That's probably why the Buddha stayed silent.
There are other Sutta which help understand this. > > some brahmans and contemplatives [who say], 'Gotama the contemplative is one who misleads. He declares the annihilation, destruction, extermination of the existing being.' But as I am not that, as I do not say that, so I have been erroneously, vainly, falsely, unfactually misrepresented by those venerable brahmans and contemplatives [who say], 'Gotama the contemplative is one who misleads. He declares the annihilation, destruction, extermination of the existing being.' > > > So one might assume this as a canonical explaination of what is that annihilation with which Vacchagotta could've sided had the Buddha declared that there is no self [that persists through the breakup of the body] and it is imo natural to assume that this is the implied meaning because it was spoken as in opposition to eternalism which was favored by the Brahmins of that time who held that the is an element of true self that persists connecting one birth to another. The Buddha taught neither of the two extremes. He taught that there are consequences of actions to be experienced as pleasant & unplesant feelings after the breakup of the body but he also taught that the consciousness is such that it arises as one thing and ceases as another so the consciousness which can be grasped with wrong view to be personal for this or that person might arise as that and ceases as that which can be grasped with wrong view to be that of another. He taught that the existence of a particular being can not be pinned down as a truth or reality much like you can't pin your name as truth & reality. He taught that it is said that the notion of a being is just a matter of thinking about the world. Neither the meat&bone body nor intellect are a person or a person's name in & by themselves but a person is said to not be without, therefore speaking of a "person" or a person's "name" is entirely a matter of speech & agreed upon assertions as it's existence can not be pinned down as anything other than an idea or its expression neither in this life nor the next. He understood that which is a truth & reality and explained it's conditional dependency. There was no self among those elements, there were ideas and some unfortunate confusion about the content of ideas being as real as the truth of ideation there but there was no self other than an object ideation coming into play to cause all kinds of delusion.
24,736
How do you understand the [Ananda Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html)? How do you place it in relation to the Atman or Anatta (An-atman) doctrine? [SN 44.10](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html) > > Then the wanderer Vacchagotta went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, > exchanged courteous greetings with him. After an exchange of friendly > greetings & courtesies, he sat to one side. As he was sitting there he > asked the Blessed One: "Now then, Venerable Gotama, is there a self?" > > > When this was said, the Blessed One was silent. > > > "Then is there no self?" > > > A second time, the Blessed One was silent. > > > Then Vacchagotta the wanderer got up from his seat and left. > > > Then, not long after Vacchagotta the wanderer had left, Ven. Ananda > said to the Blessed One, "Why, lord, did the Blessed One not answer > when asked a question by Vacchagotta the wanderer?" > > > "Ananda, if I — being asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is a > self — were to answer that there is a self, that would be conforming > with those brahmans & contemplatives who are exponents of eternalism > [the view that there is an eternal, unchanging soul]. If I — being > asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is no self — were to answer > that there is no self, that would be conforming with those brahmans & > contemplatives who are exponents of annihilationism [the view that > death is the annihilation of consciousness]. If I — being asked by > Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is a self — were to answer that > there is a self, would that be in keeping with the arising of > knowledge that all phenomena are not-self?" > > > "No, lord." > > > "And if I — being asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is no > self — were to answer that there is no self, the bewildered > Vacchagotta would become even more bewildered: 'Does the self I used > to have now not exist?'" > > >
2018/01/18
[ "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/questions/24736", "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com", "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/users/12857/" ]
The sutta is not about the not-self (**anatta**) doctrine. The [Pali](https://suttacentral.net/pi/sn44.10) is: > > Ekamantaṃ nisinno kho vacchagotto paribbājako bhagavantaṃ etadavoca: > “kiṃ nu kho, bho gotama, **atthattā**”ti? Evaṃ vutte, bhagavā tuṇhī > ahosi. “Kiṃ pana, bho gotama, **natthattā**” ti > > > The confused Vacchagotta basically asks the questions: (i) 'Does my self exist (*atthattā*)?'; and (ii) 'Does my self not exist (*natthattā*)?'. Please notice how Vacchagotta did not ask about 'anatta' (not-self) and how it was Vacchagotta who used the words 'atthattā' & 'natthattā' rather than the Buddha. In other words, the discussion is not about the doctrine & terminology of the Buddha. The sutta is about the doctrine of Vacchagotta. Since both of Vacchagotta's questions contained the idea of 'my self', they were illogical questions; thus the Buddha did not answer. For example, if Vacchagotta asked: (i) is there a real self; or (ii) is there a self among the five aggregates; the Buddha could have answered. But Vacchagotta essentially asked: (i) is the self a self & (ii) is the self not a self; which was illogical.
In Mahayana, Vacchagotta (also known as Shrenika, Srenika or Seniya The Wanderer) is considered an important character, in conversations with whom Buddha illustrates the main principle of Madhyamaka - emptiness of all mental constructs, liberation by wisdom that comes from careful analysis of dharmas, direct vision into nature of things beyond either existence no nonexistence. The idea here is that the Truth lies beyond such simplistic categories, and to be in touch with Truth we must cease our tendency to cling to flat/singlesided explanations. In my own words, reality is complex, "quantum", "multidimmensional", and our habitual attempts to "flatten" it constantly lead to failed expectations and to suffering. Enlightened mind can see reality as it is, unhindered by conceptual limitations, and so always stays in touch with "tatha" - the way things really are. In Pali Canon, Vacchagotta is mentioned in a number of suttas, all going around similar topics, e.g.: * [MN 72 Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.072.than.html) * [SN 44.7 Moggallana Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.007.than.html) * [SN 44.8 Vacchagotta Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.008.than.html) * [SN 44.9 Kutuhalasala Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.009.than.html) * [SN 44.10 Ananda Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html) * [SN 44.11 Sabhiya Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.011.than.html) In Chinese Agamas, there is one long sutra known as [SA 105 Discourse to Seniya](https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/translations/sa05.pdf) that collects these ideas in single place. Here I will paste explanation of Shrenika's role Eduard Conze gave in his introduction to [The Large Sutra On Perfect Wisdom](http://lirs.ru/lib/conze/The_Large_Sutra_On_Perfect_Wisdom,Conze,1975.pdf), commenting on the following verse in [Ratnagunasamcayagatha](http://www.abuddhistlibrary.com/Buddhism/C%20-%20Zen/Sutras/The%20Ratnagunasamcayagatha/The%20Ratnaguna-samcayagatha%20II.htm): > > As venerable Shrenika the wandering beggar, > > Understanding acquired, without grasping the skandhas, > > Just so a bodhisattva, intuits real nature of things (dharmas). > > And does not seek cessation but abides in wisdom. > > > Conze says: > > Srenika the Wanderer is, according to Nagarjuna, the Srenika Vatsagotra, who in the Pali texts is simply called Vacchagotta. A number of his conversations with the Buddha are recorded. They are scattered through the Pali Canon, but combined into one section in the Samyuktagama of the Sarvastivadins. The text refers here to a [Sutra](https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/translations/sa05.pdf) which, according to Nagarjuna, discussed “Srenika the Believer” and at the same time, according to the Vibhasha and Nagarjuna, preached the emptiness of all dharmas. Since Subhuti’s argument is difficult (*here Conze refers to Chapter 8 of [The Large Sutra On Perfect Wisdom](http://lirs.ru/lib/conze/The_Large_Sutra_On_Perfect_Wisdom,Conze,1975.pdf), "How the irreversible Bodhisattva views things" - which is a fascinating read in itself -- AV*), and since we are inclined to lean on signs, and do not see how we can have faith without a sign, “Subhuti here takes as his witness the Little Vehicle where it speaks of the emptiness of dharmas, How could those who practice the great vehicle not believe in it?” > > > Srenika showed “faith”, first, in that he believed that the Buddha could help him to find the path, and, second, in that he was willing to accept the Tathagata in spite of the fact that he could not be related to any of the skandhas, i.e. to form, etc. He entered into a “cognition with a limited scope” which, according to Haribhadra means that it was directed to the absence of a self in persons, and not also in dharmas). Srenika was concerned to find a true self, in other words, the Tathagata. Nagarjuna relates that Srenika originally took the person as one lump, and that therefore the Buddha asked him about its elements. He had also heard people speak of the “I” in two ways, as identical with the five skandhas, and as different from them. The skandhas are multiple, and the I is one – so they cannot be identical. The self would be born and perish as the skandhas do, and it would not be independent of causes and conditions – thus it would not be the true self. Therefore, how can something outside the five skandhas have the character of “I” or “self”? As Nagarjuna puts it, “Srenika’s second act of faith consisted in that, when he had heard that the Buddha denied the self, and said that from the beginning there was none, he accepted the fact that, because there is no self, the dharmas have no support, and are like a dream, a mirage, nonapprehensible. Having obtained power of faith, he entered into the true mark of dharmas, and did not mistake form for the Tathagata” > > > Srenika “did not take hold of form, etc.” The Buddha asked him: “Do you regard the Tathagata as form?” “No.” “As in form?” “No.” “As outside form?” “No.” “As the absence of form?” “No.” “When, under all these aspects, you do not see the Tathagata, should you doubt, and say: What is there fixed and definite in the Buddhas’ doctrine?” “No.” Srenika then won the path, and became an Arhat. This is how Nagarjuna recounts [the Sutra](https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/translations/sa05.pdf). > > > Here's a quote from Chapter 8 of The Large Sutra On Perfect Wisdom: > > Moreover, a Bodhisattva who courses in perfect wisdom should > not stand in form, etc. to: in decay and death. And why? Because > form is empty of form. What is the emptiness of form, that is not form; > nor is emptiness other than form; the very form is emptiness and the > very emptiness is form. And so for the other skandhas. By this method > a Bodhisattva who courses in perfect wisdom should not stand in form, > etc. to: consciousness. And the same method should be applied to the > other dharmas. > > ... > > If, when this perfection of wisdom is thus being taught and explained > through these modes, tokens and signs, the thought of a Bodhisattva > does not become cowed, stolid or regretful, and his mind does not tremble, > is not frightened or terrified, then certainly that Bodhisattva, > that great being, should be known as standing on the level of an irreversible > Bodhisattva — **by way of not taking his stand anywhere**. > > > For even more information, this whole topic of relationship between "world" and "mind" is expounded/elaborated in one of the most important of Mahayana's sutras, [Lankavatara Sutra](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La%E1%B9%85k%C4%81vat%C4%81ra_S%C5%ABtra).
24,736
How do you understand the [Ananda Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html)? How do you place it in relation to the Atman or Anatta (An-atman) doctrine? [SN 44.10](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html) > > Then the wanderer Vacchagotta went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, > exchanged courteous greetings with him. After an exchange of friendly > greetings & courtesies, he sat to one side. As he was sitting there he > asked the Blessed One: "Now then, Venerable Gotama, is there a self?" > > > When this was said, the Blessed One was silent. > > > "Then is there no self?" > > > A second time, the Blessed One was silent. > > > Then Vacchagotta the wanderer got up from his seat and left. > > > Then, not long after Vacchagotta the wanderer had left, Ven. Ananda > said to the Blessed One, "Why, lord, did the Blessed One not answer > when asked a question by Vacchagotta the wanderer?" > > > "Ananda, if I — being asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is a > self — were to answer that there is a self, that would be conforming > with those brahmans & contemplatives who are exponents of eternalism > [the view that there is an eternal, unchanging soul]. If I — being > asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is no self — were to answer > that there is no self, that would be conforming with those brahmans & > contemplatives who are exponents of annihilationism [the view that > death is the annihilation of consciousness]. If I — being asked by > Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is a self — were to answer that > there is a self, would that be in keeping with the arising of > knowledge that all phenomena are not-self?" > > > "No, lord." > > > "And if I — being asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is no > self — were to answer that there is no self, the bewildered > Vacchagotta would become even more bewildered: 'Does the self I used > to have now not exist?'" > > >
2018/01/18
[ "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/questions/24736", "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com", "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/users/12857/" ]
The sutta is not about the not-self (**anatta**) doctrine. The [Pali](https://suttacentral.net/pi/sn44.10) is: > > Ekamantaṃ nisinno kho vacchagotto paribbājako bhagavantaṃ etadavoca: > “kiṃ nu kho, bho gotama, **atthattā**”ti? Evaṃ vutte, bhagavā tuṇhī > ahosi. “Kiṃ pana, bho gotama, **natthattā**” ti > > > The confused Vacchagotta basically asks the questions: (i) 'Does my self exist (*atthattā*)?'; and (ii) 'Does my self not exist (*natthattā*)?'. Please notice how Vacchagotta did not ask about 'anatta' (not-self) and how it was Vacchagotta who used the words 'atthattā' & 'natthattā' rather than the Buddha. In other words, the discussion is not about the doctrine & terminology of the Buddha. The sutta is about the doctrine of Vacchagotta. Since both of Vacchagotta's questions contained the idea of 'my self', they were illogical questions; thus the Buddha did not answer. For example, if Vacchagotta asked: (i) is there a real self; or (ii) is there a self among the five aggregates; the Buddha could have answered. But Vacchagotta essentially asked: (i) is the self a self & (ii) is the self not a self; which was illogical.
There are other Sutta which help understand this. > > some brahmans and contemplatives [who say], 'Gotama the contemplative is one who misleads. He declares the annihilation, destruction, extermination of the existing being.' But as I am not that, as I do not say that, so I have been erroneously, vainly, falsely, unfactually misrepresented by those venerable brahmans and contemplatives [who say], 'Gotama the contemplative is one who misleads. He declares the annihilation, destruction, extermination of the existing being.' > > > So one might assume this as a canonical explaination of what is that annihilation with which Vacchagotta could've sided had the Buddha declared that there is no self [that persists through the breakup of the body] and it is imo natural to assume that this is the implied meaning because it was spoken as in opposition to eternalism which was favored by the Brahmins of that time who held that the is an element of true self that persists connecting one birth to another. The Buddha taught neither of the two extremes. He taught that there are consequences of actions to be experienced as pleasant & unplesant feelings after the breakup of the body but he also taught that the consciousness is such that it arises as one thing and ceases as another so the consciousness which can be grasped with wrong view to be personal for this or that person might arise as that and ceases as that which can be grasped with wrong view to be that of another. He taught that the existence of a particular being can not be pinned down as a truth or reality much like you can't pin your name as truth & reality. He taught that it is said that the notion of a being is just a matter of thinking about the world. Neither the meat&bone body nor intellect are a person or a person's name in & by themselves but a person is said to not be without, therefore speaking of a "person" or a person's "name" is entirely a matter of speech & agreed upon assertions as it's existence can not be pinned down as anything other than an idea or its expression neither in this life nor the next. He understood that which is a truth & reality and explained it's conditional dependency. There was no self among those elements, there were ideas and some unfortunate confusion about the content of ideas being as real as the truth of ideation there but there was no self other than an object ideation coming into play to cause all kinds of delusion.
24,736
How do you understand the [Ananda Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html)? How do you place it in relation to the Atman or Anatta (An-atman) doctrine? [SN 44.10](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html) > > Then the wanderer Vacchagotta went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, > exchanged courteous greetings with him. After an exchange of friendly > greetings & courtesies, he sat to one side. As he was sitting there he > asked the Blessed One: "Now then, Venerable Gotama, is there a self?" > > > When this was said, the Blessed One was silent. > > > "Then is there no self?" > > > A second time, the Blessed One was silent. > > > Then Vacchagotta the wanderer got up from his seat and left. > > > Then, not long after Vacchagotta the wanderer had left, Ven. Ananda > said to the Blessed One, "Why, lord, did the Blessed One not answer > when asked a question by Vacchagotta the wanderer?" > > > "Ananda, if I — being asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is a > self — were to answer that there is a self, that would be conforming > with those brahmans & contemplatives who are exponents of eternalism > [the view that there is an eternal, unchanging soul]. If I — being > asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is no self — were to answer > that there is no self, that would be conforming with those brahmans & > contemplatives who are exponents of annihilationism [the view that > death is the annihilation of consciousness]. If I — being asked by > Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is a self — were to answer that > there is a self, would that be in keeping with the arising of > knowledge that all phenomena are not-self?" > > > "No, lord." > > > "And if I — being asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is no > self — were to answer that there is no self, the bewildered > Vacchagotta would become even more bewildered: 'Does the self I used > to have now not exist?'" > > >
2018/01/18
[ "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/questions/24736", "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com", "https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/users/12857/" ]
In Mahayana, Vacchagotta (also known as Shrenika, Srenika or Seniya The Wanderer) is considered an important character, in conversations with whom Buddha illustrates the main principle of Madhyamaka - emptiness of all mental constructs, liberation by wisdom that comes from careful analysis of dharmas, direct vision into nature of things beyond either existence no nonexistence. The idea here is that the Truth lies beyond such simplistic categories, and to be in touch with Truth we must cease our tendency to cling to flat/singlesided explanations. In my own words, reality is complex, "quantum", "multidimmensional", and our habitual attempts to "flatten" it constantly lead to failed expectations and to suffering. Enlightened mind can see reality as it is, unhindered by conceptual limitations, and so always stays in touch with "tatha" - the way things really are. In Pali Canon, Vacchagotta is mentioned in a number of suttas, all going around similar topics, e.g.: * [MN 72 Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.072.than.html) * [SN 44.7 Moggallana Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.007.than.html) * [SN 44.8 Vacchagotta Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.008.than.html) * [SN 44.9 Kutuhalasala Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.009.than.html) * [SN 44.10 Ananda Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html) * [SN 44.11 Sabhiya Sutta](https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.011.than.html) In Chinese Agamas, there is one long sutra known as [SA 105 Discourse to Seniya](https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/translations/sa05.pdf) that collects these ideas in single place. Here I will paste explanation of Shrenika's role Eduard Conze gave in his introduction to [The Large Sutra On Perfect Wisdom](http://lirs.ru/lib/conze/The_Large_Sutra_On_Perfect_Wisdom,Conze,1975.pdf), commenting on the following verse in [Ratnagunasamcayagatha](http://www.abuddhistlibrary.com/Buddhism/C%20-%20Zen/Sutras/The%20Ratnagunasamcayagatha/The%20Ratnaguna-samcayagatha%20II.htm): > > As venerable Shrenika the wandering beggar, > > Understanding acquired, without grasping the skandhas, > > Just so a bodhisattva, intuits real nature of things (dharmas). > > And does not seek cessation but abides in wisdom. > > > Conze says: > > Srenika the Wanderer is, according to Nagarjuna, the Srenika Vatsagotra, who in the Pali texts is simply called Vacchagotta. A number of his conversations with the Buddha are recorded. They are scattered through the Pali Canon, but combined into one section in the Samyuktagama of the Sarvastivadins. The text refers here to a [Sutra](https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/translations/sa05.pdf) which, according to Nagarjuna, discussed “Srenika the Believer” and at the same time, according to the Vibhasha and Nagarjuna, preached the emptiness of all dharmas. Since Subhuti’s argument is difficult (*here Conze refers to Chapter 8 of [The Large Sutra On Perfect Wisdom](http://lirs.ru/lib/conze/The_Large_Sutra_On_Perfect_Wisdom,Conze,1975.pdf), "How the irreversible Bodhisattva views things" - which is a fascinating read in itself -- AV*), and since we are inclined to lean on signs, and do not see how we can have faith without a sign, “Subhuti here takes as his witness the Little Vehicle where it speaks of the emptiness of dharmas, How could those who practice the great vehicle not believe in it?” > > > Srenika showed “faith”, first, in that he believed that the Buddha could help him to find the path, and, second, in that he was willing to accept the Tathagata in spite of the fact that he could not be related to any of the skandhas, i.e. to form, etc. He entered into a “cognition with a limited scope” which, according to Haribhadra means that it was directed to the absence of a self in persons, and not also in dharmas). Srenika was concerned to find a true self, in other words, the Tathagata. Nagarjuna relates that Srenika originally took the person as one lump, and that therefore the Buddha asked him about its elements. He had also heard people speak of the “I” in two ways, as identical with the five skandhas, and as different from them. The skandhas are multiple, and the I is one – so they cannot be identical. The self would be born and perish as the skandhas do, and it would not be independent of causes and conditions – thus it would not be the true self. Therefore, how can something outside the five skandhas have the character of “I” or “self”? As Nagarjuna puts it, “Srenika’s second act of faith consisted in that, when he had heard that the Buddha denied the self, and said that from the beginning there was none, he accepted the fact that, because there is no self, the dharmas have no support, and are like a dream, a mirage, nonapprehensible. Having obtained power of faith, he entered into the true mark of dharmas, and did not mistake form for the Tathagata” > > > Srenika “did not take hold of form, etc.” The Buddha asked him: “Do you regard the Tathagata as form?” “No.” “As in form?” “No.” “As outside form?” “No.” “As the absence of form?” “No.” “When, under all these aspects, you do not see the Tathagata, should you doubt, and say: What is there fixed and definite in the Buddhas’ doctrine?” “No.” Srenika then won the path, and became an Arhat. This is how Nagarjuna recounts [the Sutra](https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/translations/sa05.pdf). > > > Here's a quote from Chapter 8 of The Large Sutra On Perfect Wisdom: > > Moreover, a Bodhisattva who courses in perfect wisdom should > not stand in form, etc. to: in decay and death. And why? Because > form is empty of form. What is the emptiness of form, that is not form; > nor is emptiness other than form; the very form is emptiness and the > very emptiness is form. And so for the other skandhas. By this method > a Bodhisattva who courses in perfect wisdom should not stand in form, > etc. to: consciousness. And the same method should be applied to the > other dharmas. > > ... > > If, when this perfection of wisdom is thus being taught and explained > through these modes, tokens and signs, the thought of a Bodhisattva > does not become cowed, stolid or regretful, and his mind does not tremble, > is not frightened or terrified, then certainly that Bodhisattva, > that great being, should be known as standing on the level of an irreversible > Bodhisattva — **by way of not taking his stand anywhere**. > > > For even more information, this whole topic of relationship between "world" and "mind" is expounded/elaborated in one of the most important of Mahayana's sutras, [Lankavatara Sutra](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La%E1%B9%85k%C4%81vat%C4%81ra_S%C5%ABtra).
There are other Sutta which help understand this. > > some brahmans and contemplatives [who say], 'Gotama the contemplative is one who misleads. He declares the annihilation, destruction, extermination of the existing being.' But as I am not that, as I do not say that, so I have been erroneously, vainly, falsely, unfactually misrepresented by those venerable brahmans and contemplatives [who say], 'Gotama the contemplative is one who misleads. He declares the annihilation, destruction, extermination of the existing being.' > > > So one might assume this as a canonical explaination of what is that annihilation with which Vacchagotta could've sided had the Buddha declared that there is no self [that persists through the breakup of the body] and it is imo natural to assume that this is the implied meaning because it was spoken as in opposition to eternalism which was favored by the Brahmins of that time who held that the is an element of true self that persists connecting one birth to another. The Buddha taught neither of the two extremes. He taught that there are consequences of actions to be experienced as pleasant & unplesant feelings after the breakup of the body but he also taught that the consciousness is such that it arises as one thing and ceases as another so the consciousness which can be grasped with wrong view to be personal for this or that person might arise as that and ceases as that which can be grasped with wrong view to be that of another. He taught that the existence of a particular being can not be pinned down as a truth or reality much like you can't pin your name as truth & reality. He taught that it is said that the notion of a being is just a matter of thinking about the world. Neither the meat&bone body nor intellect are a person or a person's name in & by themselves but a person is said to not be without, therefore speaking of a "person" or a person's "name" is entirely a matter of speech & agreed upon assertions as it's existence can not be pinned down as anything other than an idea or its expression neither in this life nor the next. He understood that which is a truth & reality and explained it's conditional dependency. There was no self among those elements, there were ideas and some unfortunate confusion about the content of ideas being as real as the truth of ideation there but there was no self other than an object ideation coming into play to cause all kinds of delusion.
64,899,889
I have a project where I need to read a text file and record how many occurrences there are of each string, character, or number that is read until the EoF. I then need to print the top 10 most used words. For example, the file would contain "This is a test for this project". I would read this and store each word in a container as well as its current count. Now, we are graded on how our efficient our time complexity is as input grows. So, I need some help on choosing which STL container would be the most efficient. It seems order is not important, I can forever insert at the end, and I will never have to make insertions. I will, however, have to search through the container for the top 10 most used words. Which STL container has the best time complexity for requirements like this? Also, if you could explain your reasoning so I know more going forward, that would be great!
2020/11/18
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/64899889", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/-1/" ]
The primary Node.JS repository has [Issue #2747](https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/2474), which was updated yesterday with [a note that current versions of Node compile just fine with no modifications required](https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/2474#issuecomment-729310486) via Rosetta 2. The same post indicated that there was still in-flight "work to be done" to compile Node to an M1-native binary to unlock additional performance benefits. --- Additional resources: * Node.JS Technical Steering Committee opened [Issue #886 in their GitHub repository](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/886) to track Node's support for Apple Silicon.
Hit similar issues. I would recommend you enable "Open using Rosetta" on Terminal, which should reduce all ends of pain for the moment. When this was enabled, I was able to install Node, as well as Homebrew, etc, with no issues. To do to: 1. right click your terminal app from Finder 2. select "Get Info" 3. enable "Open using Rosetta" N.B. I am using iTerm in the screenshot below, but the same applies for Terminal [![Enabling Open using Rosetta](https://i.stack.imgur.com/fJi6K.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/fJi6K.png)
211,542
I have this vintage sterling faucet. It stays like this for hours and hours and hours after turning it off [![sterling2](https://i.stack.imgur.com/dATPa.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/dATPa.jpg) If i touch the end of the spout little drips fall for hours and hours and hours. [![sterling1](https://i.stack.imgur.com/4ZLTt.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/4ZLTt.jpg) If i close the valve it stops the water immediately. A little drip forms on the end of the spout. If i leave that drip on there it hangs there without growing and dropping for hours. If i touch that little drop a teaspoon comes out and then it seems little drops form and drop off for hours. Is this water from the inside of the spout slowly drawing the remnants in the tube UP by capillary action or is the valve not totally totally zero psi zero flow closed?
2020/12/18
[ "https://diy.stackexchange.com/questions/211542", "https://diy.stackexchange.com", "https://diy.stackexchange.com/users/53050/" ]
Your statement that "...little drops form and drop off for hours" indicates that the valve is leaking-by and probably needs a new washer. The other weird effect you describe seems like a surface-tension anomoly.
Most likely, since the water remains in the spout, it is residual water that didn't flow out when the faucet was shut. Basically, the waters surface tension holds to the spout opening and when you break the surface tension (by touching it) it flows out.
46,621,561
I have created a html template for a salon listing directory website but I also need a backend to add listings, add ads etc. Is it possible to integrate Laravel based admin panel to an existing project?
2017/10/07
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/46621561", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/8176128/" ]
Yes definaltely you can use Laravel since its developed using php Laravel has lots of features it will make your work faster . [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/HvvVN.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/HvvVN.jpg) Image from <https://coderseye.com/best-php-frameworks-for-web-developers/> features of PHP Laravel Framework that make it popular among developers and businesses alike: 1. **Template Engine** Laravel framework is highly acknowledged for its inbuilt lightweight templates that help you create amazing layouts using dynamic content seeding. In addition to this, it has multiple widgets incorporating CSS and JS code with solid structures. The templates of laravel frameworks are innovatively designed to create a simple layout with distinctive sections. 2. **Artisan** Laravel offers a built-in tool for command line known as Artisan which allows performing the majority of those tedious and repetitive programming tasks that many developers avoid performing manually. These artisans can also be utilized to create the database structure, a skeleton code, and build their migration that becomes pretty easy-to-manage the database system. In addition, it can be interlaced to generate the basic MVC files right away through the command-line and manage those assets and their respective configurations. Artisan even helps developers to create their own commands and do convenient things with it. 3. **Eloquent ORM (object-relational mapping)** Laravel framework offers the Eloquent ORM that includes a simple PHP Active Record implementation. It lets the web app developers issue database queries with PHP syntax rather than writing SQL code. Every table in the database possesses a corresponding Model through which the developer interacts with said table. An ORM is relatively faster than all other PHP frameworks. 4. **Libraries & Modular:** Laravel is also popular due to its Object Oriented libraries as well as many other pre-installed libraries. These pre-installed libraries are not found in any other PHP frameworks. One of the preinstalled libraries is an Authentication library which is easy-to-implement and has many latest features, such as checking active users, Bcrypt hashing, password reset, CSRF (Cross-site Request Forgery) protection, and encryption. Furthermore, this framework is divided into individual modules that adopt modern PHP principles allowing developers to build responsive, modular, and handy web apps. 5. **MVC Architecture Support:** The MVC pattern of laravel ensures clarity of logic and presentation. This architecture support helps in improving the performance, allowing better documentation, and has multiple built-in functions. 6. **Migration system for databases** Laravel migration system helps to expand the structure of the database of the web application without re-creating every time developers make a change. Owing to this feature, the risk of losing data is very less. It not only offers the facility to change the database structure but it helps to do this by using PHP code instead of SQL. In addition to this, Laravel Schema Builder helps to create database tables and inserts indices or columns promptly. 7. **Unit-Testing** Many web app developers like Laravel due to the way it facilitates unit testing. This framework of PHP web development is capable of running many tests to ensure that new changes done by programmers do not unexpectedly break anything in the web application. Generally, laravel is considered to have stable releases in the industry as it is careful of the known failures. In addition to this, it makes it easy to write unit-tests for its own code. 8. **Security** Application security is one of the most important concerns in web application development. While developing an application, every programmer has to use some effective ways to make it secure. Laravel takes care of the web application security within its own framework. It uses hashed and salted password that means the password would never save as the plain text in a database. It also uses “Bcrypt Hashing Algorithm” in order generate an encrypted representation of a password. Additionally, this PHP web development framework uses prepared SQL statements that make injection attacks unimaginable. **Wrapping Up:** All the above-mentioned features make PHP Laravel framework awesome and highly preferred framework. This framework is continuously becoming popular among developers and businesses for its unique, classic architecture, where developers create their own infrastructure that is specifically designed for their application. If you are a business owner and want to develop your next web application project on Laravel Framework, feel free to contact: PixelCrayons: a leading PHP web app development Ref:<https://www.pixelcrayons.com/blog/web/8-top-features-stats-facts-about-php-laravel-framework/>
Sure, just use your existing HTML templates as your Blade templates in your Laravel app. Blade templates are essentially HTML with some PHP on it so you can get and display data from the backend.
264,578
Today I received a message saying there is only 18 GB left. In the last few days I don't think I used so much space in the disk. Is there some way to check the disk usage history? In a way to see how much disk was consumed in the last day/week/month.
2016/12/12
[ "https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/264578", "https://apple.stackexchange.com", "https://apple.stackexchange.com/users/189386/" ]
I suggest you to use the [DaisyDisk](https://daisydiskapp.com) application (a free trial is also available -- see the link). This app help you to find out how you are using the space and so you can identify what is occupying a large amount of space in your HD. It does not provide a historical record, so unless you are using a tool and logging that information, you might have to focus on what's present now rather than looking back.
I would use [this tool](https://apple.co/3mQmGm3) to monitor the free disk, that way you could keep an eye on the status bar and see how the disk space changes.
80,262
![TCPDUMP output](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vDDQ7.jpg) Hi Folks, I was monitoring my SSH port with tcpdump and have had a lot of activity as expected. When I look at the traffic I get the above image. What does it mean? Thanks
2015/01/28
[ "https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/80262", "https://security.stackexchange.com", "https://security.stackexchange.com/users/67183/" ]
That is the SSH2 key exchange. The following is a quick and dirty run down of SSH. When the SSH tunnel is established the client and server perform a Diffie Hellman (DH) exchange. This is to establish a shared secret between the client and server in order to generate the session keys needed for the encrypted tunnel. The way SSH does this by first establishing the algorithms. Each side first sends their SSH version (which I don't see in your capture for some reason), and all of the algorithm combinations each supports. The server chooses the first one that matches in both lists. Then the DH parameters are sent, hashed value H (which hashes 7-12 pieces of data), and the signature of H to ensure it hasn't been tampered with. This is most likely the binary data you see in the picture. I'm skimming over the details, but essentially after all this is said and done there is a value K that only both sides can generate. Using whichever hashing algorithm agreed upon the session ID, H, and K are all used to generate the session keys. TimC is correct that looking at the data in Wireshark will tell you a lot more. Each of those pieces will be parsed out with nice easy to read labels. *As long as the default SSH port (22) is used.* I've also found that Wireshark sometimes does not associate some TCP packets with the SSH session, and those packets are not properly parsed. This doesn't mean the data did not reach its destination; it just means that Wireshark could not properly interpret the data. Depends on the version of Wireshark you're using. Here's a [basic introduction to SSH versions](https://security.stackexchange.com/a/70551/52676), with some extra linkage.
It looks like it could be binary data, or it could even be the encrypted data that is being sent across. If you were to look at it in Wireshark then it would make it more obvious as it shows you each part of the network frame and you would be able to see where abouts in the packet that data is.
415,936
For some context, see my earlier question: *[Ceramic capacitor value for an LM386N project](https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/415200/ceramic-capacitor-value-for-lm386n-project)* What I learned is that the 10k potentiometer on pin 3 (Vin) forms a voltage divider. When I carefully dial it, I find a spot where I get clean audio (the 10k pot is then at ~ 500 Ω). This is the same with the ready-made breakout board that I used for comparison. Now the point of not using the ready made module was that I wanted to add a volume control. Apparently scaling Vin is not how one supposed to do that. If I go up or down from the spot where the audio is good, I get distortions, but never a quieter signal. I also tried to add a pot between pin 1 and the ceramic capacitor that goes to pin 8. The datasheet has three examples: * gain 20: by default there is a 1.35 kΩ resistor * gain 50: use a 1.2 kΩ resistor * gain 200: use no resistor I only had a 2k potentiometer and when I dial it from 0 Ω up, the signal gets a bit quieter, but I can't get it down to silence. If I remove the circuit between pin 1 and 8 to operate at gain 20, the output is pretty quiet though. I searched the Internet quite a bit, and I probably miss something obvious. It would be awesome to get some pointers.
2019/01/08
[ "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/415936", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/users/87193/" ]
You probably used a linear (B) taper pot. For audio you want an (A) log taper pot, so your 500 ohms will be about 25% of full electrical rotation, not 5%. Image from [this](http://www.resistorguide.com/potentiometer-taper/) site. [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/y0Xkt.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/y0Xkt.png)
* Gain of 20 is too quiet * Gain of 200 is too distorted and can't turn it down to get quiet. Choose Gain =50 with 1.2k in series with cap Pots do not have a 60dB dynamic range so they usually gang 2 pots {pre-amp gain & power amp gain} to get 30dB in each. Solution -------- Ganged Pot ![schematic](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AAL3g.png) But as Dave say's that needs to be an audio log pot. [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/33dEQ.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/33dEQ.png)
5,406,397
What is "My" in VB.NET ? It is a namespace but what does it hold?
2011/03/23
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/5406397", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/479468/" ]
Here's an overview of all the namespaces contained in the My Namespace: <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5btzf5yk.aspx>
[It's a collection of useful methods](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5btzf5yk.aspx).
264,194
I was asked few times on my English classes "**what were you doing this summer?**". And now I'm wondering if it's correct to ask that question like that? As far as I know Past Continuous is used to describe actions in the past that were happening at a particular (and not very long) moment. I think the correct way to ask about my actions during the whole summer is "**What had you been doing this summer?**". I guess that's the **only one** correct way to ask it. Or isn't it?
2020/10/22
[ "https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/264194", "https://ell.stackexchange.com", "https://ell.stackexchange.com/users/116652/" ]
This will be different according to what version of English you use, UK, US, or some other. I am from the UK. "What were you doing this summer?" - This is grammatically correct but unusual. To me it sounds accusatory, similar to "What were you doing at the time of the murder?" You could ask, "What did you do this summer?" but even that is rather blunt. It sounds as though you are interrogating the person. In British English, to be polite, we would say something like, "Did you do anything interesting over the summer?" --- **Note** "What had you been doing this summer?" is *incorrect* in most circumstances.
"What were you doing this summer?" can be correct but you need to be a bit careful with it. If you have just seen someone that you hadn't seen for all of summer and wanted to know what they had done in that time, then it is better to ask "What **have** you been doing this summer?" There are more colloquial options as well such as "What have you been up to this summer?". This is probably what I would say unless it was a formal setting. "What were you doing this summer?" would usually be used when referencing something previously mentioned. For example, if you had already been told what they were going to be doing but had forgotten and wanted to be reminded after summer. Maybe something like: "What were you doing this summer? I know you told me but I can't remember." Or if they had said something that you wanted more information about. Something like: "My legs hurt a lot after all the work I did this summer." "Oh. What were you doing this summer?"
264,194
I was asked few times on my English classes "**what were you doing this summer?**". And now I'm wondering if it's correct to ask that question like that? As far as I know Past Continuous is used to describe actions in the past that were happening at a particular (and not very long) moment. I think the correct way to ask about my actions during the whole summer is "**What had you been doing this summer?**". I guess that's the **only one** correct way to ask it. Or isn't it?
2020/10/22
[ "https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/264194", "https://ell.stackexchange.com", "https://ell.stackexchange.com/users/116652/" ]
Tenses and meaning: * What were you doing this summer? [The summer is over.] * What have you been doing this summer? [The summer is still the season] **The past continuous implies a simple past that is not always spelled out:** * What were you doing this summer [while you were in Paris]? * What were you doing this summer [while your parents were away]? * What were you doing this summer [when the storm broke over the mountains]? It implies an ongoing action at a time that another one occurred. There is no difference between any variants of standard English here. The difference is in either variant compared to a simple past or another tense. * What were you doing this summer? VERSUS * What did you do this summer? VERSUS * What have you been doing this summer? VERSUS * What have you done this summer? **All variants of English make those distinctions with regard to tenses.**
"What were you doing this summer?" can be correct but you need to be a bit careful with it. If you have just seen someone that you hadn't seen for all of summer and wanted to know what they had done in that time, then it is better to ask "What **have** you been doing this summer?" There are more colloquial options as well such as "What have you been up to this summer?". This is probably what I would say unless it was a formal setting. "What were you doing this summer?" would usually be used when referencing something previously mentioned. For example, if you had already been told what they were going to be doing but had forgotten and wanted to be reminded after summer. Maybe something like: "What were you doing this summer? I know you told me but I can't remember." Or if they had said something that you wanted more information about. Something like: "My legs hurt a lot after all the work I did this summer." "Oh. What were you doing this summer?"
264,194
I was asked few times on my English classes "**what were you doing this summer?**". And now I'm wondering if it's correct to ask that question like that? As far as I know Past Continuous is used to describe actions in the past that were happening at a particular (and not very long) moment. I think the correct way to ask about my actions during the whole summer is "**What had you been doing this summer?**". I guess that's the **only one** correct way to ask it. Or isn't it?
2020/10/22
[ "https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/264194", "https://ell.stackexchange.com", "https://ell.stackexchange.com/users/116652/" ]
This will be different according to what version of English you use, UK, US, or some other. I am from the UK. "What were you doing this summer?" - This is grammatically correct but unusual. To me it sounds accusatory, similar to "What were you doing at the time of the murder?" You could ask, "What did you do this summer?" but even that is rather blunt. It sounds as though you are interrogating the person. In British English, to be polite, we would say something like, "Did you do anything interesting over the summer?" --- **Note** "What had you been doing this summer?" is *incorrect* in most circumstances.
Tenses and meaning: * What were you doing this summer? [The summer is over.] * What have you been doing this summer? [The summer is still the season] **The past continuous implies a simple past that is not always spelled out:** * What were you doing this summer [while you were in Paris]? * What were you doing this summer [while your parents were away]? * What were you doing this summer [when the storm broke over the mountains]? It implies an ongoing action at a time that another one occurred. There is no difference between any variants of standard English here. The difference is in either variant compared to a simple past or another tense. * What were you doing this summer? VERSUS * What did you do this summer? VERSUS * What have you been doing this summer? VERSUS * What have you done this summer? **All variants of English make those distinctions with regard to tenses.**
1,436
[This user](https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/users/40531/user40531) has five answers posted that are all the same spam advertisement for some website. I have flagged their answers as spam, but is there anything else we can do to prevent this from happening?
2014/01/02
[ "https://gamedev.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1436", "https://gamedev.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://gamedev.meta.stackexchange.com/users/35353/" ]
Flagging is the only thing that can be done. Rest assured, the response to the flags is usually quick, so no serious damage can be done by such users.
I was thinking about the same problem, I usually flag as fast as possible, and I think other users do the same. So unless the spammer is seriously flooding the site with ads, I don't see any serious damage taken, otherwise maybe there should be some other mechanism to deal with it.
1,436
[This user](https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/users/40531/user40531) has five answers posted that are all the same spam advertisement for some website. I have flagged their answers as spam, but is there anything else we can do to prevent this from happening?
2014/01/02
[ "https://gamedev.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1436", "https://gamedev.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://gamedev.meta.stackexchange.com/users/35353/" ]
I've removed the offending account. The best thing to do is flag. If a post gets enough flags it will automatically be removed. Otherwise, one of the moderators will respond to the flags within a short period. Thanks for letting us know.
I was thinking about the same problem, I usually flag as fast as possible, and I think other users do the same. So unless the spammer is seriously flooding the site with ads, I don't see any serious damage taken, otherwise maybe there should be some other mechanism to deal with it.
1,324,433
Is there anyway to test an ASP.NET webpage fully with Expression Studio or is it only possible to see a static view of the page and no way to interact with any of the elements on the page?
2009/08/24
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/1324433", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/37055/" ]
Building upon Zhaph's answer, he's correct (or atleast as far as I've been able to find) that SuperPreview is purely a static rendering engine. I did find 2 programs that have been very useful to me. First is [Lunascape5](http://www.lunascape.tv/), this is a multi-engine web browser that includes engines for Trident, Webkit and Gecko. So this is a good starting point for modern browsers. I did find a bug in the Gecko engine, it won't allow you to log into integrated security ASP.NET websites, nor will it correctly allow you to setup Auth handling to have it be integrated. Moving onto to handle the bane known as IE I've found [IETester](http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage) which allows you to run side by side copies of IE 5.5, 6, 7 and 8 with full functionality. This replaced my previous copy of MultipleIEs installation because I ran into issues with IE6 not working correctly (can't highlight, can't type in forms). This tool is very nice and I strongly recommend it. SuperPreview is very nice for it's DOM analysis functionality and measuring tools.
I was under the impression that SuperPreview was effectively a static rendering of the page - you get DOM interactivity, but that was about it - it's not a webserver that can serve pages. With a little bit of fiddling, you can get IIS up and running on XP or Vista (down to Home Premium I think - that's what I'm running with no problems), or you could install [Visual Web Developer Express](http://www.microsoft.com/express/vwd/) and use it's built in web server to test your site - VS and Expression share project files, so you should be able to open the site/pages with no issue.
1,324,433
Is there anyway to test an ASP.NET webpage fully with Expression Studio or is it only possible to see a static view of the page and no way to interact with any of the elements on the page?
2009/08/24
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/1324433", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/37055/" ]
I was under the impression that SuperPreview was effectively a static rendering of the page - you get DOM interactivity, but that was about it - it's not a webserver that can serve pages. With a little bit of fiddling, you can get IIS up and running on XP or Vista (down to Home Premium I think - that's what I'm running with no problems), or you could install [Visual Web Developer Express](http://www.microsoft.com/express/vwd/) and use it's built in web server to test your site - VS and Expression share project files, so you should be able to open the site/pages with no issue.
SuperPreview uses "Cassini" to view aspx pages. So you shouldn't have to use IIS unless there is some kind of complexity to your page that it can't handle. Basically it is the same kind of support you get if you were in Visual Studio and did F5. Visual Studio starts a little web server down in the system tray. SuperPreview does the same thing. Also, if you configure PHP in Expression Web then SuperPreview will be able to do some PHP files for you too.
1,324,433
Is there anyway to test an ASP.NET webpage fully with Expression Studio or is it only possible to see a static view of the page and no way to interact with any of the elements on the page?
2009/08/24
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/1324433", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/37055/" ]
Building upon Zhaph's answer, he's correct (or atleast as far as I've been able to find) that SuperPreview is purely a static rendering engine. I did find 2 programs that have been very useful to me. First is [Lunascape5](http://www.lunascape.tv/), this is a multi-engine web browser that includes engines for Trident, Webkit and Gecko. So this is a good starting point for modern browsers. I did find a bug in the Gecko engine, it won't allow you to log into integrated security ASP.NET websites, nor will it correctly allow you to setup Auth handling to have it be integrated. Moving onto to handle the bane known as IE I've found [IETester](http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage) which allows you to run side by side copies of IE 5.5, 6, 7 and 8 with full functionality. This replaced my previous copy of MultipleIEs installation because I ran into issues with IE6 not working correctly (can't highlight, can't type in forms). This tool is very nice and I strongly recommend it. SuperPreview is very nice for it's DOM analysis functionality and measuring tools.
SuperPreview uses "Cassini" to view aspx pages. So you shouldn't have to use IIS unless there is some kind of complexity to your page that it can't handle. Basically it is the same kind of support you get if you were in Visual Studio and did F5. Visual Studio starts a little web server down in the system tray. SuperPreview does the same thing. Also, if you configure PHP in Expression Web then SuperPreview will be able to do some PHP files for you too.
19,926,607
to get posts for a user: GET <http://test.com/users/123/posts> or GET <http://test.com/posts?user_id=123> to get new posts count: GET <http://test.com/posts/count/new> or <http://test.com/new_posts_count> or others?
2013/11/12
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/19926607", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1948538/" ]
This is a good read: <http://www.vinaysahni.com/best-practices-for-a-pragmatic-restful-api>. And in terms of the two formats you suggested: I prefer the former.
Doesn't matter from a REST point of view (REST doesn't define URI structure). The client should not know the URL structure before hand so technically it doesn't matter to the client either. I personally prefer the first style as I think it makes more sense when you have a resource hierarchy. It also allows a client to move back up a URI by simply chopping off the end resource, similar to how you can go back up a directory on a file system by simply clicking the parent button. But there is no "right answer" to this from a REST point of view. REST is concerned with the transfer of state of resources, not the resource hierarchy or URI definition.
240,131
I hope this is not a too broad question, but what are the best practices to achieve fast switching on a MOSFET driven by a PWM signal? My current knowledge tells me I can do two things: 1 - To use the lowest possible PWM frequency, because switching losses are higher at higher frequencies. 2 - Drive the gate with the maximum possible current, to overcome gate capacitance as soon as possible. To do this, I avoid adding a resistor between MCU and gate, or add a general purpose transistor between MCU and mosfet, so I can drive the gate with higher current. Currently, I have a PWM that must run at least at 100kHz using a N-channel IRLZ44 mosfet, so first point is not applicable, and the second point is not enough to give me acceptable switching losses. My mosfets are overheating and I would like to find a better solution than using a bigger heatsink. Should I look for a better mosfet? Or perhaps, should I try adding a capacitor somehow to kick in when PWM signal rises, boosting current through the gate? Or are there other ways to achieve faster switching? **Update:** I thought the question didn't need an example circuit diagram, but here goes it: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/sgMPq.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/sgMPq.png) I got to this circuit based on other questions I asked in here. I'm using 5V and the load is about 1A. As you can see, I'm driving a transformer. In this configuration, I have 10 Vpp on transformer primary, and secondary elevates this to 1500 Vpp. Based on current comments and answer, it's already pretty clear to me that using a driver is the easiest, cheapest and simplest way to achieve lower swirching losses. But if there's a way to improve the circuit without a driver, I would be interested on learning about it.
2016/06/09
[ "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/240131", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/users/24970/" ]
Either choose a better MOSFET or use a push-pull driver like this: - [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/3GrWE.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/3GrWE.png) Notice that this chip uses identical MOSFETs in the output stage. Here's another using the FAN7842 from Fairchild: - [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/52EhM.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/52EhM.png) You should also make sure there is enough deadtime between one turning off and the other turning on. Both devices can be used to drive single MOSFET outputs if needed. Here's one that drives a highside MOSFET: - [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/QAMlz.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/QAMlz.png) Avoiding P channel devices will earn you a couple of percent more efficiency (genralism alert). [**This**](https://www.google.com/search?q=MOSFET+driver&client=firefox-b&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjWudbDtpvNAhWTF8AKHWAmA-AQ_AUICCgB&biw=1212&bih=902#imgrc=_) is a useful set of images to give other ideas.
As Andy aka advises, there are tons and tons of integrated MOSFET drivers available, and they work really well with a minimum of parts. But in case you want a one-off design with discrete parts, here's a starting point: (The switch represents your microcontroller, or whatever is driving this arrangement) ![schematic](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XKUzV.png) [simulate this circuit](/plugins/schematics?image=http%3a%2f%2fi.stack.imgur.com%2fXKUzV.png) – Schematic created using [CircuitLab](https://www.circuitlab.com/) Q1 and Q2 are a push-pull pair of emitter followers. Their output (at M1's gate) is held at approximately the same voltage as the input (modulo the base-emitter voltage), but the BJT's current gain multiplies the current available from the input. Consequently, you'll need something connected to the input which can get up to the gate voltage you'll want to use. If you are using a microcontroller its output voltage will probably be 3.3V or 5V. You can find MOSFETs designed to work at these gate voltages, but most power MOSFETs work best with something more like 12V, so you'll want to add additional circuity to perform the voltage conversion. See [driving low side of a mosfet bridge with 3.3V](https://electronics.stackexchange.com/q/56140/17608) which also includes a more complex discrete MOSFET gate driver.
240,131
I hope this is not a too broad question, but what are the best practices to achieve fast switching on a MOSFET driven by a PWM signal? My current knowledge tells me I can do two things: 1 - To use the lowest possible PWM frequency, because switching losses are higher at higher frequencies. 2 - Drive the gate with the maximum possible current, to overcome gate capacitance as soon as possible. To do this, I avoid adding a resistor between MCU and gate, or add a general purpose transistor between MCU and mosfet, so I can drive the gate with higher current. Currently, I have a PWM that must run at least at 100kHz using a N-channel IRLZ44 mosfet, so first point is not applicable, and the second point is not enough to give me acceptable switching losses. My mosfets are overheating and I would like to find a better solution than using a bigger heatsink. Should I look for a better mosfet? Or perhaps, should I try adding a capacitor somehow to kick in when PWM signal rises, boosting current through the gate? Or are there other ways to achieve faster switching? **Update:** I thought the question didn't need an example circuit diagram, but here goes it: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/sgMPq.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/sgMPq.png) I got to this circuit based on other questions I asked in here. I'm using 5V and the load is about 1A. As you can see, I'm driving a transformer. In this configuration, I have 10 Vpp on transformer primary, and secondary elevates this to 1500 Vpp. Based on current comments and answer, it's already pretty clear to me that using a driver is the easiest, cheapest and simplest way to achieve lower swirching losses. But if there's a way to improve the circuit without a driver, I would be interested on learning about it.
2016/06/09
[ "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/240131", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/users/24970/" ]
Either choose a better MOSFET or use a push-pull driver like this: - [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/3GrWE.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/3GrWE.png) Notice that this chip uses identical MOSFETs in the output stage. Here's another using the FAN7842 from Fairchild: - [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/52EhM.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/52EhM.png) You should also make sure there is enough deadtime between one turning off and the other turning on. Both devices can be used to drive single MOSFET outputs if needed. Here's one that drives a highside MOSFET: - [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/QAMlz.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/QAMlz.png) Avoiding P channel devices will earn you a couple of percent more efficiency (genralism alert). [**This**](https://www.google.com/search?q=MOSFET+driver&client=firefox-b&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjWudbDtpvNAhWTF8AKHWAmA-AQ_AUICCgB&biw=1212&bih=902#imgrc=_) is a useful set of images to give other ideas.
Good gate drive is a step in the right direction and has been stated in other answers. Now it is time to look at T1 .There will be some leakage inductance between each leg of the CT primary.When you turn off Q5 or Q6 the current is broken .Energy stored in leakage inductance will go into horrible high voltage spikes in your circuit .You must deal with this to stop Mosfet failure .When you plug in ballpark figures for this inductive energy that on your circuit is wasting and multiply by frequency to estimate power loss you will find that these losses are bad .So try to recover the wasted power to limit the voltage spikes and keep the mosfets cool.One straightfoward way to recover this energy is to build your passive snubber that burns power into a resistor so the fets do not blow anymore.Then optimise the waveforms .Now decide if you want to put the energy into the input or the output or some aux device like say what I did was the cooling fans .Now all you need to do is build a small DC/DC convertor to do this .You should be able to get 90% back without too much effort.You could also try an active clamp system .Active clamps are easy to drive .I have not implemented an active clamp.
240,131
I hope this is not a too broad question, but what are the best practices to achieve fast switching on a MOSFET driven by a PWM signal? My current knowledge tells me I can do two things: 1 - To use the lowest possible PWM frequency, because switching losses are higher at higher frequencies. 2 - Drive the gate with the maximum possible current, to overcome gate capacitance as soon as possible. To do this, I avoid adding a resistor between MCU and gate, or add a general purpose transistor between MCU and mosfet, so I can drive the gate with higher current. Currently, I have a PWM that must run at least at 100kHz using a N-channel IRLZ44 mosfet, so first point is not applicable, and the second point is not enough to give me acceptable switching losses. My mosfets are overheating and I would like to find a better solution than using a bigger heatsink. Should I look for a better mosfet? Or perhaps, should I try adding a capacitor somehow to kick in when PWM signal rises, boosting current through the gate? Or are there other ways to achieve faster switching? **Update:** I thought the question didn't need an example circuit diagram, but here goes it: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/sgMPq.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/sgMPq.png) I got to this circuit based on other questions I asked in here. I'm using 5V and the load is about 1A. As you can see, I'm driving a transformer. In this configuration, I have 10 Vpp on transformer primary, and secondary elevates this to 1500 Vpp. Based on current comments and answer, it's already pretty clear to me that using a driver is the easiest, cheapest and simplest way to achieve lower swirching losses. But if there's a way to improve the circuit without a driver, I would be interested on learning about it.
2016/06/09
[ "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/240131", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/users/24970/" ]
1. provide a suitable gate drive circuit that can sink/source a high enough current and at a decent slew rate (others have posted about a dedicated gatedrive) 2. Correctly choose your gate resistor w.r.t. gate charge curve (or total gate capacitance). Too high and you will switch slower and more switching losses. Too low and there is a chance of power cct ringing (increases your losses) and worse-case... setting up a pierce osc 3. If you are switching an inductive load KEEP the the stray inductance between the cathode of the freewheel diode and the FET very, very low (not as low as convenient as low as you can - re-layout if needed) 4. Again, if you are switching inductive load, do not overlook the reverse recovery of the diode. choose an appropriate diode 5. Minimise the gate-source lead inductance (twisted pair, short), again not short for convenience, short as possible. 6. if you are power switching, minimise stray inductance to the bulk DClink capacitor. Again not short for convenience, but as short as possible. 7. consider some form of lamina busbar w.r.t. 5
As Andy aka advises, there are tons and tons of integrated MOSFET drivers available, and they work really well with a minimum of parts. But in case you want a one-off design with discrete parts, here's a starting point: (The switch represents your microcontroller, or whatever is driving this arrangement) ![schematic](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XKUzV.png) [simulate this circuit](/plugins/schematics?image=http%3a%2f%2fi.stack.imgur.com%2fXKUzV.png) – Schematic created using [CircuitLab](https://www.circuitlab.com/) Q1 and Q2 are a push-pull pair of emitter followers. Their output (at M1's gate) is held at approximately the same voltage as the input (modulo the base-emitter voltage), but the BJT's current gain multiplies the current available from the input. Consequently, you'll need something connected to the input which can get up to the gate voltage you'll want to use. If you are using a microcontroller its output voltage will probably be 3.3V or 5V. You can find MOSFETs designed to work at these gate voltages, but most power MOSFETs work best with something more like 12V, so you'll want to add additional circuity to perform the voltage conversion. See [driving low side of a mosfet bridge with 3.3V](https://electronics.stackexchange.com/q/56140/17608) which also includes a more complex discrete MOSFET gate driver.
240,131
I hope this is not a too broad question, but what are the best practices to achieve fast switching on a MOSFET driven by a PWM signal? My current knowledge tells me I can do two things: 1 - To use the lowest possible PWM frequency, because switching losses are higher at higher frequencies. 2 - Drive the gate with the maximum possible current, to overcome gate capacitance as soon as possible. To do this, I avoid adding a resistor between MCU and gate, or add a general purpose transistor between MCU and mosfet, so I can drive the gate with higher current. Currently, I have a PWM that must run at least at 100kHz using a N-channel IRLZ44 mosfet, so first point is not applicable, and the second point is not enough to give me acceptable switching losses. My mosfets are overheating and I would like to find a better solution than using a bigger heatsink. Should I look for a better mosfet? Or perhaps, should I try adding a capacitor somehow to kick in when PWM signal rises, boosting current through the gate? Or are there other ways to achieve faster switching? **Update:** I thought the question didn't need an example circuit diagram, but here goes it: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/sgMPq.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/sgMPq.png) I got to this circuit based on other questions I asked in here. I'm using 5V and the load is about 1A. As you can see, I'm driving a transformer. In this configuration, I have 10 Vpp on transformer primary, and secondary elevates this to 1500 Vpp. Based on current comments and answer, it's already pretty clear to me that using a driver is the easiest, cheapest and simplest way to achieve lower swirching losses. But if there's a way to improve the circuit without a driver, I would be interested on learning about it.
2016/06/09
[ "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/240131", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com", "https://electronics.stackexchange.com/users/24970/" ]
1. provide a suitable gate drive circuit that can sink/source a high enough current and at a decent slew rate (others have posted about a dedicated gatedrive) 2. Correctly choose your gate resistor w.r.t. gate charge curve (or total gate capacitance). Too high and you will switch slower and more switching losses. Too low and there is a chance of power cct ringing (increases your losses) and worse-case... setting up a pierce osc 3. If you are switching an inductive load KEEP the the stray inductance between the cathode of the freewheel diode and the FET very, very low (not as low as convenient as low as you can - re-layout if needed) 4. Again, if you are switching inductive load, do not overlook the reverse recovery of the diode. choose an appropriate diode 5. Minimise the gate-source lead inductance (twisted pair, short), again not short for convenience, short as possible. 6. if you are power switching, minimise stray inductance to the bulk DClink capacitor. Again not short for convenience, but as short as possible. 7. consider some form of lamina busbar w.r.t. 5
Good gate drive is a step in the right direction and has been stated in other answers. Now it is time to look at T1 .There will be some leakage inductance between each leg of the CT primary.When you turn off Q5 or Q6 the current is broken .Energy stored in leakage inductance will go into horrible high voltage spikes in your circuit .You must deal with this to stop Mosfet failure .When you plug in ballpark figures for this inductive energy that on your circuit is wasting and multiply by frequency to estimate power loss you will find that these losses are bad .So try to recover the wasted power to limit the voltage spikes and keep the mosfets cool.One straightfoward way to recover this energy is to build your passive snubber that burns power into a resistor so the fets do not blow anymore.Then optimise the waveforms .Now decide if you want to put the energy into the input or the output or some aux device like say what I did was the cooling fans .Now all you need to do is build a small DC/DC convertor to do this .You should be able to get 90% back without too much effort.You could also try an active clamp system .Active clamps are easy to drive .I have not implemented an active clamp.
36,413
I have part that I'm dimensioning and setting tolerances on. Some of the dimensions/features have engineering requirements (e.g. press fit) and I have the tolerances set correctly (e.g. H7). But I have some dimensions / features don't have any engineering requirements. They are usually outside dimensions or "free" surfaces that don't interact with any other parts. *Technically* the tolerance could be +100% of the nominal value. But this just seems "sloppy". I would like the parts to be roughly uniform. So how can I communicate on my drawings that the dimension is not critical without supplying an outrageous tolerance? Is there a rule of thumb for this sort of thing? Say 10% of nominal dimension?
2020/06/25
[ "https://engineering.stackexchange.com/questions/36413", "https://engineering.stackexchange.com", "https://engineering.stackexchange.com/users/3617/" ]
There are general tolerances, often defined for different industries. You cannot expect that a surgical instrument is designed with the same general tolerances as a drilling rig. If you have found a norm for your industry, e.g. this [ISO-standard](https://www.engineersedge.com/mechanical,045tolerances/general_iso_tolerance_.htm), than there are still different classes of "tightness" you can choose from. Here should just check what is appropriate for your design such that it still fits/works. In my experience most companies have the general tolerances on their drawing templates by default.
Bound the problem from two different directions. First, start with your process capability. What tolerance can you actually hold? This will vary greatly depending on whether you are doing casting vs milling vs grinding etc. If you have a bunch of similar parts lying around, measure them and compute the standard deviation. Remember that 68% of parts will be within +/- 1 std dev, 95% within two, etc. E.g. if you have a mill that's producing parts with a standard deviation of say 0.010", then only a few per million would be outside of +/- 0.060". That sets your lower bound. Any less than this, and you'll be scrapping parts that you don't want to scrap. If you don't have any similar parts, then do some research on typical tolerances using your process, whatever it is, and probably round up a little. Then, thing about what dimension you need the part to have to satisfy fit form and function. You said it doesn't have any engineering requirements, but it does have to have something. If the nominal dimension is 2", I'm sure the part wouldn't work if the shop gave you something that was 200". Figure out the biggest and smallest parts that would actually work. This sets the upper bound of your tolerance. E.g. maybe it's +/- 1". So now you've got a range. in our example above, if your tolerances are any tighter than +/- 0.06", your shop can't make them and that will make it expensive. If it's looser than +/- 1.00", the parts won't work. Anywhere in between will be perfectly fine, so just pick something that range. Split the difference and call it +/- 0.5" and you're done.
36,413
I have part that I'm dimensioning and setting tolerances on. Some of the dimensions/features have engineering requirements (e.g. press fit) and I have the tolerances set correctly (e.g. H7). But I have some dimensions / features don't have any engineering requirements. They are usually outside dimensions or "free" surfaces that don't interact with any other parts. *Technically* the tolerance could be +100% of the nominal value. But this just seems "sloppy". I would like the parts to be roughly uniform. So how can I communicate on my drawings that the dimension is not critical without supplying an outrageous tolerance? Is there a rule of thumb for this sort of thing? Say 10% of nominal dimension?
2020/06/25
[ "https://engineering.stackexchange.com/questions/36413", "https://engineering.stackexchange.com", "https://engineering.stackexchange.com/users/3617/" ]
If you use ASME Y14.5, typical implied tolerances are +/-: 1/64 for fractional dimensions 0.01 for dimensions to 2 decimal places 0.005 for dimensions to 3 decimal places 0.0005 for dimensions to 4 decimal places You just list all these and whatever other common requirements you have in your drawing block for the part. This way every feature is inherently dimensioned. Generally +/- 0.010" is easily achievable for machined parts.
Bound the problem from two different directions. First, start with your process capability. What tolerance can you actually hold? This will vary greatly depending on whether you are doing casting vs milling vs grinding etc. If you have a bunch of similar parts lying around, measure them and compute the standard deviation. Remember that 68% of parts will be within +/- 1 std dev, 95% within two, etc. E.g. if you have a mill that's producing parts with a standard deviation of say 0.010", then only a few per million would be outside of +/- 0.060". That sets your lower bound. Any less than this, and you'll be scrapping parts that you don't want to scrap. If you don't have any similar parts, then do some research on typical tolerances using your process, whatever it is, and probably round up a little. Then, thing about what dimension you need the part to have to satisfy fit form and function. You said it doesn't have any engineering requirements, but it does have to have something. If the nominal dimension is 2", I'm sure the part wouldn't work if the shop gave you something that was 200". Figure out the biggest and smallest parts that would actually work. This sets the upper bound of your tolerance. E.g. maybe it's +/- 1". So now you've got a range. in our example above, if your tolerances are any tighter than +/- 0.06", your shop can't make them and that will make it expensive. If it's looser than +/- 1.00", the parts won't work. Anywhere in between will be perfectly fine, so just pick something that range. Split the difference and call it +/- 0.5" and you're done.
989,597
What problems arise when we use a self-signed certificate for the SMTP protocol, that is, when a SMTP server uses a self-signed certificate? As long as the user accepts the exception warning due to self-signed certificate (which can be the case in the Thunderbird mail client), I would think there is no problem. Can anyone tell me what other problems may arise?
2019/10/28
[ "https://serverfault.com/questions/989597", "https://serverfault.com", "https://serverfault.com/users/509864/" ]
On **server to server** communications there's no problem, because SMTP servers accepts any certificate and even falls back to unencrypted connection. In that sense, there's no *public key infrastructure* for MX servers. Against downgrade attacks there's *DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities* (DANE) (see [RFC 7672](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7672) on *SMTP Security via Opportunistic DANE TLS*), utilizing public keys published in DNS over public keys signed by a CA. Self-signed certificates are ok for that. For **client to server** communications it's at least more convenient to have a trusted CA signed certificate. If users learn to accept an exception, it's way more likely they do so even when there's a MitM attack in place. Moreover, e.g. Android mail client only allows requiring a trusted certificate or accepting any, making the MitM attack even easier. That's why I would recommend using a CA signed certificate for client communications. It's even possible to get a free Let's Encrypt certificate for your SMTP/IMAP server as it's not limited to use the same certificate for multiple protocols. This pretty much removes any need for self-signed certificates with publicly-referenced mail servers. ([Example configuration for Postfix](https://serverfault.com/a/1017405/274176).)
The same problem that you have with every self-signed certificate, client can not and must not trust the server. If you are the only client for your smtp server you can add the CA and not even have to accept the exception. If i am one of the users of your server i will definitely not use it. There is no guaranty that i am connecting to the right server, i will assume its a rogue server. P.S still encryption part is OK, traffic is encrypted
989,597
What problems arise when we use a self-signed certificate for the SMTP protocol, that is, when a SMTP server uses a self-signed certificate? As long as the user accepts the exception warning due to self-signed certificate (which can be the case in the Thunderbird mail client), I would think there is no problem. Can anyone tell me what other problems may arise?
2019/10/28
[ "https://serverfault.com/questions/989597", "https://serverfault.com", "https://serverfault.com/users/509864/" ]
A self signed certificate might deter trivial attempts to intercept mail, but would be of limited value as they can be MITM'd. If you do want to go this route you should create a CA and have your users accept the CA. Unfortunately this is possibly a bad idea for your users (as you could sign rogue certs), and of limited value because the traffic could still be intercepted between other MTAs and yours. Something no one else has commented on - while encrypted delivery is not part of the SMTP protocol, some providers (eg GMAIL) will mark the email as having been encrypted or not - and I speculate (I don't use gmail, so don't know for sure) that MTAs using self signed certs won't be considered as secure. As others have mentioned, using LetsEncrypt is generally not to big an ask, and a better solution.
The same problem that you have with every self-signed certificate, client can not and must not trust the server. If you are the only client for your smtp server you can add the CA and not even have to accept the exception. If i am one of the users of your server i will definitely not use it. There is no guaranty that i am connecting to the right server, i will assume its a rogue server. P.S still encryption part is OK, traffic is encrypted
989,597
What problems arise when we use a self-signed certificate for the SMTP protocol, that is, when a SMTP server uses a self-signed certificate? As long as the user accepts the exception warning due to self-signed certificate (which can be the case in the Thunderbird mail client), I would think there is no problem. Can anyone tell me what other problems may arise?
2019/10/28
[ "https://serverfault.com/questions/989597", "https://serverfault.com", "https://serverfault.com/users/509864/" ]
On **server to server** communications there's no problem, because SMTP servers accepts any certificate and even falls back to unencrypted connection. In that sense, there's no *public key infrastructure* for MX servers. Against downgrade attacks there's *DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities* (DANE) (see [RFC 7672](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7672) on *SMTP Security via Opportunistic DANE TLS*), utilizing public keys published in DNS over public keys signed by a CA. Self-signed certificates are ok for that. For **client to server** communications it's at least more convenient to have a trusted CA signed certificate. If users learn to accept an exception, it's way more likely they do so even when there's a MitM attack in place. Moreover, e.g. Android mail client only allows requiring a trusted certificate or accepting any, making the MitM attack even easier. That's why I would recommend using a CA signed certificate for client communications. It's even possible to get a free Let's Encrypt certificate for your SMTP/IMAP server as it's not limited to use the same certificate for multiple protocols. This pretty much removes any need for self-signed certificates with publicly-referenced mail servers. ([Example configuration for Postfix](https://serverfault.com/a/1017405/274176).)
A self signed certificate might deter trivial attempts to intercept mail, but would be of limited value as they can be MITM'd. If you do want to go this route you should create a CA and have your users accept the CA. Unfortunately this is possibly a bad idea for your users (as you could sign rogue certs), and of limited value because the traffic could still be intercepted between other MTAs and yours. Something no one else has commented on - while encrypted delivery is not part of the SMTP protocol, some providers (eg GMAIL) will mark the email as having been encrypted or not - and I speculate (I don't use gmail, so don't know for sure) that MTAs using self signed certs won't be considered as secure. As others have mentioned, using LetsEncrypt is generally not to big an ask, and a better solution.
133,836
I want to know if I will keep and still be able to use my Windows 7 installation after I use the Wubi Windows Installer (from [here](http://www.ubuntu.com/download/help/install-ubuntu-with-windows)) to install Ubuntu? Thanks in advance, Bas.
2012/05/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/133836", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/61682/" ]
Yes, WUBI installs Ubuntu inside the Windows filesystem and just changes the Windows bootloader. Most people consider a WUBI install to be slower than a proper install (where the Windows partition is removed or resized) because it has to rely on the Windows filesystem to work. If you get on well with a WUBI install, you might want to consider a proper dual-boot install.
Your windows 7 installation will remain untouched. When you boot your computer you'll be able to choose which operating system you want to boot into (as shown in the last screenshot in the link you sent).
133,836
I want to know if I will keep and still be able to use my Windows 7 installation after I use the Wubi Windows Installer (from [here](http://www.ubuntu.com/download/help/install-ubuntu-with-windows)) to install Ubuntu? Thanks in advance, Bas.
2012/05/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/133836", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/61682/" ]
Your windows 7 installation will remain untouched. When you boot your computer you'll be able to choose which operating system you want to boot into (as shown in the last screenshot in the link you sent).
Yes, you will keep your windows installation. Wubi installs Ubuntu inside the windows filesystem. The only thing it does is changing your boot sector. You will have to choose which system to boot each time you start your PC.
133,836
I want to know if I will keep and still be able to use my Windows 7 installation after I use the Wubi Windows Installer (from [here](http://www.ubuntu.com/download/help/install-ubuntu-with-windows)) to install Ubuntu? Thanks in advance, Bas.
2012/05/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/133836", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/61682/" ]
Yes, WUBI installs Ubuntu inside the Windows filesystem and just changes the Windows bootloader. Most people consider a WUBI install to be slower than a proper install (where the Windows partition is removed or resized) because it has to rely on the Windows filesystem to work. If you get on well with a WUBI install, you might want to consider a proper dual-boot install.
Yes, you will keep your windows installation. Wubi installs Ubuntu inside the windows filesystem. The only thing it does is changing your boot sector. You will have to choose which system to boot each time you start your PC.
17,170
I am trying to determine the "translated" meanings (not seeking the common names) of different insects, (presently some bees and wasps). Does anyone know of a printed or internet resource that defines the various names. I have one for plants, but not for animals. Knowing the (English) meaning of the Latin / Greek/ etc. is often very informative -- IF I can find it. I can give more specifics if you want. Thanks. Glen B Olympia WA, USA
2014/05/05
[ "https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/17170", "https://biology.stackexchange.com", "https://biology.stackexchange.com/users/6619/" ]
If you are interested in the history of molecular biology this is an interesting question. Basically transformation came to be used to describe experiments in which the phenotype of an organism was changed by the uptake of DNA, and because of the way this developed in bacterial systems this DNA was usually a plasmid. Then it became possible to use purified phage DNA to infect cells, whereupon the 'transformed' cells produced phage particles - for obvious reasons this was called transfection. When efforts turned to getting the same techniques working with cultured animal cells many of the vectors were based on viral genomes (e.g. SV40) and these workers referred to this as transfection. At this point the distinction between the two terms became meaningless, and usage tends to be for historical reasons. Interestingly in molecular manipulations of yeast, where there are no viruses, the transfection word is rarely used.
As far as I know (and I haven't found no evidence against it) this is mostly a semantic difference. Both processes describe the addition of genetic material into cells using various techniques. Transformation is here mostly used for bacterial work (transforming plasmids for example), while transfection is almost exclusively used for eukaryotic cells. The reason may be, that the term transformation is used in eukaryotic cells as well to describe the progresion of cells into cancer cells. The techniques are not very different and there are a lot of them. Transfections often use transfection agents, which form pores in the cell membrane through which the DNA can enter the cell. This can also be done by using a short electropulse. A lot of transformations are done using "chemically treated" cells, where the cells are brought into a state in which they take up DNA which adheres to their outside. The Wikipedia articles on [Transfection](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfection) and [Transformation](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_%28genetics%29) gives you more details on the methods.
54,830
When examining about this, it is said that many are November 1, 2008, but on the other hand, there are sites that are on October 31st. Which one is correct?
2017/06/23
[ "https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/54830", "https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com", "https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/users/52180/" ]
According to the original source of Bitcoin, On 31 October 2008, a link to a paper authored by Satoshi Nakamoto titled Bitcoin, as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system was posted to a cryptography mailing list. He implemented the bitcoin software as open-source code and released it in early 2009.
Archive.org say on dec 24 2008 : ***"Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:16:33"*** [<https://web.archive.org/web/20081224103053/https://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography@metzdowd.com/msg09959.html]> And Tim May (Cypherpunk) say (about the mail list creation in 1992) : *John Gilmore and Hugh Daniel hosted the mailing list. There was no moderation, no screening, no "censorship" (in the loose sense, not referring to government censorship, of which of course there was none.) The "no moderation" policy went along with "no leaders."*
47,712
I'm looking for a fast and functional music player that can work with a huge library of music files. Banshee is quite OK, however it uses too much resources on my laptop and hangs from time to time. Probably because of my huge library. Rhythmbox was even worse. Exile got broken after some time. Is there a player that can scan and manage 85 GB of music without much problems? Maybe something like foobar2000 for Windows?
2011/06/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/47712", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/5552/" ]
gmusicbrowser is the best way, no doubt. Simple, integrated with main menu, lot styles to choice, etc. Take a look!
I have to say after trying pretty much all of the media players the only one that doesn't mess with your file structure or choke on large music collection is "Guayadeque" my collection is nearly 450gigs and it loads fast is easy to setup :-) i always run the latest build from svn and update regularly with no problems. <http://guayadeque.org/forums/index.php?p=/page/installing#InstallSVN> this will give you all the needed dependencies as well as instructions- also the ppa has just been updated to the latest version too sudo add-apt-repository ppa:anonbeat/guayadeque sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install guayadeque or sudo apt-get install guayadeque-svn enjoy :-)
47,712
I'm looking for a fast and functional music player that can work with a huge library of music files. Banshee is quite OK, however it uses too much resources on my laptop and hangs from time to time. Probably because of my huge library. Rhythmbox was even worse. Exile got broken after some time. Is there a player that can scan and manage 85 GB of music without much problems? Maybe something like foobar2000 for Windows?
2011/06/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/47712", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/5552/" ]
If you are looking for foobar2000 replacement there are 2 options IMHO: 1. Deadbeef that doesn't have media library feature, but follows foobar2000 philosophy 2. QuodLibet in all it's glory - fast, low on resources, handles large libraries and has even more features similar to foobar2000 then Deadbeef There are some issues of course, like (for QuodLibet): * ReplayGain: recent foobar2000 versions use EBU R128 standard which on Linux no player has yet implemented. QuodLibet writes RG value in unorthodox tag (can read foobar2000 RG values, but not other way around) * ALBUMARTIST: mainly MP3 issues - if you write this values with foobar2000 > 1.1.6 then QuodLibet reads it fine, otherwise it's in Perfomer tag * No DSP and similar processors with QuodLibet, although you can use Jack audio output and use Jack DSP feature * No Converter, but you can use custom application through QuodLibet plugin system ... probably other things I can't remember now
I use Guadayeque, Clementine and the new Audacious with Music Library ([Audacious 3.2, Gnome Pie 0.4, Xnoise 0.1.31](http://www.webupd8.org/2012/01/updates-audacious-32-gnome-pie-04.html)), and all work fine, my music library have 317GB (54799 songs) and all work fine
47,712
I'm looking for a fast and functional music player that can work with a huge library of music files. Banshee is quite OK, however it uses too much resources on my laptop and hangs from time to time. Probably because of my huge library. Rhythmbox was even worse. Exile got broken after some time. Is there a player that can scan and manage 85 GB of music without much problems? Maybe something like foobar2000 for Windows?
2011/06/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/47712", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/5552/" ]
I Use [Clementine](http://www.clementine-player.org/) for managing about 50 GB of my music without any problem. It is simple,fast and easy to use. See here for [Clementine](https://askubuntu.com/questions/42532/what-media-players-are-there/42537#42537). Full list of available players : [What media (music and video) players are there?](https://askubuntu.com/questions/42532/what-media-players-are-there) --- **Edit:** Also you can try [Elementary music player(BeatBox)](https://launchpad.net/beat-box) (For Ubuntu 11.10 and above only). ![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/9lSVY.jpg) See [Webup8](http://www.webupd8.org/2012/02/elementary-music-player-beatbox-03.html) for installation.
I have to say after trying pretty much all of the media players the only one that doesn't mess with your file structure or choke on large music collection is "Guayadeque" my collection is nearly 450gigs and it loads fast is easy to setup :-) i always run the latest build from svn and update regularly with no problems. <http://guayadeque.org/forums/index.php?p=/page/installing#InstallSVN> this will give you all the needed dependencies as well as instructions- also the ppa has just been updated to the latest version too sudo add-apt-repository ppa:anonbeat/guayadeque sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install guayadeque or sudo apt-get install guayadeque-svn enjoy :-)
47,712
I'm looking for a fast and functional music player that can work with a huge library of music files. Banshee is quite OK, however it uses too much resources on my laptop and hangs from time to time. Probably because of my huge library. Rhythmbox was even worse. Exile got broken after some time. Is there a player that can scan and manage 85 GB of music without much problems? Maybe something like foobar2000 for Windows?
2011/06/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/47712", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/5552/" ]
i use **[guayadeque music player](http://sourceforge.net/projects/guayadeque/)**. It is fantastic. I have a music library of 140GB and it is very quick with tons of features, though it is a bit ugly. I mean the interface but i can compensate that with the good features the player have.
[DeaDBeef](http://deadbeef.sourceforge.net/download.html) is lighter than Clementine, I am using it with 200 GB of music and don't think that it's close to its limits. I use the [file browser plugin](http://sourceforge.net/projects/deadbeef/files/plugins/0.5.1/ddb_filebrowser-0.3.zip/download) to access the database.
47,712
I'm looking for a fast and functional music player that can work with a huge library of music files. Banshee is quite OK, however it uses too much resources on my laptop and hangs from time to time. Probably because of my huge library. Rhythmbox was even worse. Exile got broken after some time. Is there a player that can scan and manage 85 GB of music without much problems? Maybe something like foobar2000 for Windows?
2011/06/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/47712", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/5552/" ]
gmusicbrowser is the best way, no doubt. Simple, integrated with main menu, lot styles to choice, etc. Take a look!
[DeaDBeef](http://deadbeef.sourceforge.net/download.html) is lighter than Clementine, I am using it with 200 GB of music and don't think that it's close to its limits. I use the [file browser plugin](http://sourceforge.net/projects/deadbeef/files/plugins/0.5.1/ddb_filebrowser-0.3.zip/download) to access the database.
47,712
I'm looking for a fast and functional music player that can work with a huge library of music files. Banshee is quite OK, however it uses too much resources on my laptop and hangs from time to time. Probably because of my huge library. Rhythmbox was even worse. Exile got broken after some time. Is there a player that can scan and manage 85 GB of music without much problems? Maybe something like foobar2000 for Windows?
2011/06/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/47712", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/5552/" ]
i use **[guayadeque music player](http://sourceforge.net/projects/guayadeque/)**. It is fantastic. I have a music library of 140GB and it is very quick with tons of features, though it is a bit ugly. I mean the interface but i can compensate that with the good features the player have.
I have to say after trying pretty much all of the media players the only one that doesn't mess with your file structure or choke on large music collection is "Guayadeque" my collection is nearly 450gigs and it loads fast is easy to setup :-) i always run the latest build from svn and update regularly with no problems. <http://guayadeque.org/forums/index.php?p=/page/installing#InstallSVN> this will give you all the needed dependencies as well as instructions- also the ppa has just been updated to the latest version too sudo add-apt-repository ppa:anonbeat/guayadeque sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install guayadeque or sudo apt-get install guayadeque-svn enjoy :-)
47,712
I'm looking for a fast and functional music player that can work with a huge library of music files. Banshee is quite OK, however it uses too much resources on my laptop and hangs from time to time. Probably because of my huge library. Rhythmbox was even worse. Exile got broken after some time. Is there a player that can scan and manage 85 GB of music without much problems? Maybe something like foobar2000 for Windows?
2011/06/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/47712", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/5552/" ]
I use Guadayeque, Clementine and the new Audacious with Music Library ([Audacious 3.2, Gnome Pie 0.4, Xnoise 0.1.31](http://www.webupd8.org/2012/01/updates-audacious-32-gnome-pie-04.html)), and all work fine, my music library have 317GB (54799 songs) and all work fine
[DeaDBeef](http://deadbeef.sourceforge.net/download.html) is lighter than Clementine, I am using it with 200 GB of music and don't think that it's close to its limits. I use the [file browser plugin](http://sourceforge.net/projects/deadbeef/files/plugins/0.5.1/ddb_filebrowser-0.3.zip/download) to access the database.
47,712
I'm looking for a fast and functional music player that can work with a huge library of music files. Banshee is quite OK, however it uses too much resources on my laptop and hangs from time to time. Probably because of my huge library. Rhythmbox was even worse. Exile got broken after some time. Is there a player that can scan and manage 85 GB of music without much problems? Maybe something like foobar2000 for Windows?
2011/06/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/47712", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/5552/" ]
I Use [Clementine](http://www.clementine-player.org/) for managing about 50 GB of my music without any problem. It is simple,fast and easy to use. See here for [Clementine](https://askubuntu.com/questions/42532/what-media-players-are-there/42537#42537). Full list of available players : [What media (music and video) players are there?](https://askubuntu.com/questions/42532/what-media-players-are-there) --- **Edit:** Also you can try [Elementary music player(BeatBox)](https://launchpad.net/beat-box) (For Ubuntu 11.10 and above only). ![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/9lSVY.jpg) See [Webup8](http://www.webupd8.org/2012/02/elementary-music-player-beatbox-03.html) for installation.
I prefer Quod Libet, which is a lightweight music player (although has more "bulk" than Audacious). Currently manages a 35,000 track media library on an older machine without problem. Also, see this link for a great overview <http://thesimplecomputer.info/choosing-a-linux-music-player/>
47,712
I'm looking for a fast and functional music player that can work with a huge library of music files. Banshee is quite OK, however it uses too much resources on my laptop and hangs from time to time. Probably because of my huge library. Rhythmbox was even worse. Exile got broken after some time. Is there a player that can scan and manage 85 GB of music without much problems? Maybe something like foobar2000 for Windows?
2011/06/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/47712", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/5552/" ]
If you are looking for foobar2000 replacement there are 2 options IMHO: 1. Deadbeef that doesn't have media library feature, but follows foobar2000 philosophy 2. QuodLibet in all it's glory - fast, low on resources, handles large libraries and has even more features similar to foobar2000 then Deadbeef There are some issues of course, like (for QuodLibet): * ReplayGain: recent foobar2000 versions use EBU R128 standard which on Linux no player has yet implemented. QuodLibet writes RG value in unorthodox tag (can read foobar2000 RG values, but not other way around) * ALBUMARTIST: mainly MP3 issues - if you write this values with foobar2000 > 1.1.6 then QuodLibet reads it fine, otherwise it's in Perfomer tag * No DSP and similar processors with QuodLibet, although you can use Jack audio output and use Jack DSP feature * No Converter, but you can use custom application through QuodLibet plugin system ... probably other things I can't remember now
I have to say after trying pretty much all of the media players the only one that doesn't mess with your file structure or choke on large music collection is "Guayadeque" my collection is nearly 450gigs and it loads fast is easy to setup :-) i always run the latest build from svn and update regularly with no problems. <http://guayadeque.org/forums/index.php?p=/page/installing#InstallSVN> this will give you all the needed dependencies as well as instructions- also the ppa has just been updated to the latest version too sudo add-apt-repository ppa:anonbeat/guayadeque sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install guayadeque or sudo apt-get install guayadeque-svn enjoy :-)
47,712
I'm looking for a fast and functional music player that can work with a huge library of music files. Banshee is quite OK, however it uses too much resources on my laptop and hangs from time to time. Probably because of my huge library. Rhythmbox was even worse. Exile got broken after some time. Is there a player that can scan and manage 85 GB of music without much problems? Maybe something like foobar2000 for Windows?
2011/06/08
[ "https://askubuntu.com/questions/47712", "https://askubuntu.com", "https://askubuntu.com/users/5552/" ]
If you are looking for foobar2000 replacement there are 2 options IMHO: 1. Deadbeef that doesn't have media library feature, but follows foobar2000 philosophy 2. QuodLibet in all it's glory - fast, low on resources, handles large libraries and has even more features similar to foobar2000 then Deadbeef There are some issues of course, like (for QuodLibet): * ReplayGain: recent foobar2000 versions use EBU R128 standard which on Linux no player has yet implemented. QuodLibet writes RG value in unorthodox tag (can read foobar2000 RG values, but not other way around) * ALBUMARTIST: mainly MP3 issues - if you write this values with foobar2000 > 1.1.6 then QuodLibet reads it fine, otherwise it's in Perfomer tag * No DSP and similar processors with QuodLibet, although you can use Jack audio output and use Jack DSP feature * No Converter, but you can use custom application through QuodLibet plugin system ... probably other things I can't remember now
[DeaDBeef](http://deadbeef.sourceforge.net/download.html) is lighter than Clementine, I am using it with 200 GB of music and don't think that it's close to its limits. I use the [file browser plugin](http://sourceforge.net/projects/deadbeef/files/plugins/0.5.1/ddb_filebrowser-0.3.zip/download) to access the database.
27,139,052
I have VMWare installed on Windows 7. In VMWare, I have an Ubuntu Machine with the environment to develop Android applications. My machine has an i7 processor. For the VM, I assigned two processors with two cores and enabled Vt-x. I already followed successfully all the steps in <https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2012/03/12/how-to-start-intel-hardware-assisted-virtualization-hypervisor-on-linux-to-speed-up-intel-android-x86-emulator>, but when I start the emulator I can't notice any improvement (I'm not getting the expected confirmation that HAXM is enabled when I start the emulator). I installed HAXM on Windows and it works just fine but I really need to use Linux for my development environment. Any ideas? Thank you.
2014/11/25
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/27139052", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/2552037/" ]
This is definitely possible now in 2017. You need: 1. An Intel CPU (HAXM is Intel only) 2. Enable VT-x in the BIOS 3. Enable VT-x in the VMWare Host settings for the CPU and MMU virtualization 4. Enable "Expose hardware assisted virtualization to the guest operating system" 5. (Windows Server only) Disable Hyper-V 6. A version of VMWare that supports exposing the HV inside the guest OS. 7. Install HAXM on the guest OS See: <https://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-8970> With these steps, I was able to start a HAXM accelerated x86\_64 Android VM inside a Windows 2012 guest OS under ESXi 6.0. Note: I had to use a software-based GPU to get the VM to start, but I don't have a capable graphics card in the server, so that may be related to VM configuration/limitations and/or the underlying hardware capabilities of my server.
I kept reading about it and discovered that is not possible to enable HAXM on a virtual machine (it would be like virtualize over virtualized). HAXM requires access to the "real" hardware.
11,585
I've noticed that [this question about limiting exotic races](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/187999/how-can-i-limit-but-not-outright-ban-exotic-races) has gone from closed, to opened after some helpful edits, to closed again (without seemingly significant edits). Even now, it has a re-open vote. So, I simply ask: Should this question be closed, or open? (I'm asking on meta, per the guidance in [@doppelgreener's answer](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened/11549#11549) on this question: [How do we handle questions that are repeatedly closed and reopened?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened))
2021/06/10
[ "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11585", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/users/64464/" ]
it's tricky... As elaborated in some highly rated comments and my answer, a system would **highly** help to make better answers. But it technically *could* be answered, however only few answers actually follow the **back it up** principle...
### [system-agnostic](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/system-agnostic "show questions tagged 'system-agnostic'") is an appropriate tag here. We do not need to know the system. That certain systems have mechanics baked in for handling OP's problem is entirely irrelevant. If OP was playing one of those, they likely wouldn't be having this problem. And even if they are, *the problem is still widely applicable to systems that don't have such mechanics*, and system agnostic solutions will still be helpful. ### OP doesn't have to justify their preferences to us before we can answer their question. There were some comments bordering on badwrongfun being thrown about, [and we shouldn't do that here](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5174/can-we-affirm-that-rpg-se-embraces-a-plurality-of-playstyles). It is perfectly fine for someone to prefer a particular play experience at the table, and OP is looking for methods to help them navigate pre-game social interactions in order to achieve their preferred play experience. It does not matter why they want this particular outcome, they want it, and that is okay, and we should be well equipped to handle this question without having OP defend or even explain their preferences. This type of social interaction question is standard fare for this site. Leave it open.
11,585
I've noticed that [this question about limiting exotic races](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/187999/how-can-i-limit-but-not-outright-ban-exotic-races) has gone from closed, to opened after some helpful edits, to closed again (without seemingly significant edits). Even now, it has a re-open vote. So, I simply ask: Should this question be closed, or open? (I'm asking on meta, per the guidance in [@doppelgreener's answer](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened/11549#11549) on this question: [How do we handle questions that are repeatedly closed and reopened?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened))
2021/06/10
[ "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11585", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/users/64464/" ]
### Leave it closed until the querent's goals are clearer. The question has been closed at least twice for being unclear. The question has undergone some minor edits but the fundamental confusion is still there. There are currently 11 answers (and several now-deleted answers) that cover a variety of possible solutions. It is unclear why none of them suffice for what the querent has in mind. If their problem persists across systems, then adding a system tag won't help. Or maybe this is a system-specific problem, which could lead to more detailed answers. Until the querent clarifies their presenting problem, the matter of system tagging is irrelevant here. The querent needs to explain their preferences, not because their preferences are *wrong*, but because they're unclear and confusing. Some of the question criteria seem to be arbitrary and contradictory (e.g. they want to ban certain options without banning those options). There are several obvious solutions, yet none of them are sufficient. Maybe there are additional factors that are specific to their game or their player group. Or maybe an obvious solution is sufficient (e.g. ban the options they don't want) but the querent is rejecting them for unspecified personal reasons. Unless the querent clarifies what they want to accomplish and why, then the site users won't be able to provide informed answers.
it's tricky... As elaborated in some highly rated comments and my answer, a system would **highly** help to make better answers. But it technically *could* be answered, however only few answers actually follow the **back it up** principle...
11,585
I've noticed that [this question about limiting exotic races](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/187999/how-can-i-limit-but-not-outright-ban-exotic-races) has gone from closed, to opened after some helpful edits, to closed again (without seemingly significant edits). Even now, it has a re-open vote. So, I simply ask: Should this question be closed, or open? (I'm asking on meta, per the guidance in [@doppelgreener's answer](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened/11549#11549) on this question: [How do we handle questions that are repeatedly closed and reopened?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened))
2021/06/10
[ "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11585", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/users/64464/" ]
it's tricky... As elaborated in some highly rated comments and my answer, a system would **highly** help to make better answers. But it technically *could* be answered, however only few answers actually follow the **back it up** principle...
It could be reopened as soon as the system-agnostic tag is replaced ------------------------------------------------------------------- "System-agnostic" could be a relevant tag if the OP was not already set on a specific system to play in a fantasy setting with limited access to exotic races, but it looks like this is not the case here: we need to know what the OP is playing to provide more specific advice.
11,585
I've noticed that [this question about limiting exotic races](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/187999/how-can-i-limit-but-not-outright-ban-exotic-races) has gone from closed, to opened after some helpful edits, to closed again (without seemingly significant edits). Even now, it has a re-open vote. So, I simply ask: Should this question be closed, or open? (I'm asking on meta, per the guidance in [@doppelgreener's answer](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened/11549#11549) on this question: [How do we handle questions that are repeatedly closed and reopened?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened))
2021/06/10
[ "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11585", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/users/64464/" ]
It should be closed with further details needed, because it's not a system-agnostic question. System matters for understanding the problem and understanding what solution to apply. Factors that the system influences include but are not limited to: * What actual qualities do the “exotic” or “normal” races have that would have a player gravitate toward or away from them? In fact, what specifically makes them different at all? We need to consider this stuff if we're going to provide guidance on how to point players in a different direction. * What kinds of stories is the system interested in telling? How does the choice of race affect the story, or create or resolve problems? * What does the system offer in terms of incentivisation that the group can utilise? What concrete tools are available for shepherding players and how should they be used? * In fact, what's the player/GM relationship here, and is there even a GM at all? This changes the power dynamics when making requests of others at the table or when implementing changes—some games vest significant authority in the GM, some vest no special authority at all in them. These are factors that do not have a “neutral” or “agnostic” answer. Each system (or the lack of a system entirely, maybe it's freeform) has specific answers, where “nothing defined on this topic at all” is also a relevant answer for readers to know. This means that in different systems, the answers vary a lot. * In D&D, a group with highly varied races isn't a big issue and solves a lot of problems. * In a Warhammer game, it *creates* problems for humans to adventure with non-humans. * In a World of Darkness game, the answer is digging into splat mixing vs not, and answers about splat mixing tend to be in the vicinity of “yeah, people try that, but it doesn't actually work too well. If you're going to do that, here's how.” * In Dresden Files, it takes the story in a different direction. There's specific tools the game uses to address fey creatures (narrative permissions related to free will, different fate point allowances) and unique incentives to pick them. It's a significant consideration whether your characters can pass as human; this doesn't matter in D&D. In lieu of any specific information about the system, people are assuming D&D, assuming its constraints and situations apply, and they're name-dropping DMing and Pathfinder out of an assumption they're relevant. This is pretty fair—it's quite clear the question seems to be addressing D&D, but doesn't want to say so for some reason. Specifying the system to us is helpful. It gives people knowledge of the tools they can work with, and that's important. Withholding such information and just pretending it's system-agnostic isn't doing anyone any favors. It leaves answerers armed with less knowledge for addressing the problem, and leaves them providing weaker solutions and guidance than they could otherwise speak about. Personally, it seems like a long line of sytem-agnostic-but-actually-D&D questions that assume that the tabletop RPG space is equivalent to D&D and therefore D&D questions can be system agnostic because it's all the same. (We saw this happen a lot during our early years on this site.) The OP ought to tell us specifically what system or systems they're trying to solve this issue in, rather than beating around the bush. RPG.SE is about [solving practical questions based on actual problems that you face](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask), not about generic problems that generically exist out there somewhere. The OP is having this practical problem in a specific system or set of systems, and should tell us what those are.
it's tricky... As elaborated in some highly rated comments and my answer, a system would **highly** help to make better answers. But it technically *could* be answered, however only few answers actually follow the **back it up** principle...
11,585
I've noticed that [this question about limiting exotic races](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/187999/how-can-i-limit-but-not-outright-ban-exotic-races) has gone from closed, to opened after some helpful edits, to closed again (without seemingly significant edits). Even now, it has a re-open vote. So, I simply ask: Should this question be closed, or open? (I'm asking on meta, per the guidance in [@doppelgreener's answer](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened/11549#11549) on this question: [How do we handle questions that are repeatedly closed and reopened?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened))
2021/06/10
[ "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11585", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/users/64464/" ]
### Leave it closed until the querent's goals are clearer. The question has been closed at least twice for being unclear. The question has undergone some minor edits but the fundamental confusion is still there. There are currently 11 answers (and several now-deleted answers) that cover a variety of possible solutions. It is unclear why none of them suffice for what the querent has in mind. If their problem persists across systems, then adding a system tag won't help. Or maybe this is a system-specific problem, which could lead to more detailed answers. Until the querent clarifies their presenting problem, the matter of system tagging is irrelevant here. The querent needs to explain their preferences, not because their preferences are *wrong*, but because they're unclear and confusing. Some of the question criteria seem to be arbitrary and contradictory (e.g. they want to ban certain options without banning those options). There are several obvious solutions, yet none of them are sufficient. Maybe there are additional factors that are specific to their game or their player group. Or maybe an obvious solution is sufficient (e.g. ban the options they don't want) but the querent is rejecting them for unspecified personal reasons. Unless the querent clarifies what they want to accomplish and why, then the site users won't be able to provide informed answers.
### [system-agnostic](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/system-agnostic "show questions tagged 'system-agnostic'") is an appropriate tag here. We do not need to know the system. That certain systems have mechanics baked in for handling OP's problem is entirely irrelevant. If OP was playing one of those, they likely wouldn't be having this problem. And even if they are, *the problem is still widely applicable to systems that don't have such mechanics*, and system agnostic solutions will still be helpful. ### OP doesn't have to justify their preferences to us before we can answer their question. There were some comments bordering on badwrongfun being thrown about, [and we shouldn't do that here](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5174/can-we-affirm-that-rpg-se-embraces-a-plurality-of-playstyles). It is perfectly fine for someone to prefer a particular play experience at the table, and OP is looking for methods to help them navigate pre-game social interactions in order to achieve their preferred play experience. It does not matter why they want this particular outcome, they want it, and that is okay, and we should be well equipped to handle this question without having OP defend or even explain their preferences. This type of social interaction question is standard fare for this site. Leave it open.
11,585
I've noticed that [this question about limiting exotic races](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/187999/how-can-i-limit-but-not-outright-ban-exotic-races) has gone from closed, to opened after some helpful edits, to closed again (without seemingly significant edits). Even now, it has a re-open vote. So, I simply ask: Should this question be closed, or open? (I'm asking on meta, per the guidance in [@doppelgreener's answer](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened/11549#11549) on this question: [How do we handle questions that are repeatedly closed and reopened?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened))
2021/06/10
[ "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11585", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/users/64464/" ]
It should be closed with further details needed, because it's not a system-agnostic question. System matters for understanding the problem and understanding what solution to apply. Factors that the system influences include but are not limited to: * What actual qualities do the “exotic” or “normal” races have that would have a player gravitate toward or away from them? In fact, what specifically makes them different at all? We need to consider this stuff if we're going to provide guidance on how to point players in a different direction. * What kinds of stories is the system interested in telling? How does the choice of race affect the story, or create or resolve problems? * What does the system offer in terms of incentivisation that the group can utilise? What concrete tools are available for shepherding players and how should they be used? * In fact, what's the player/GM relationship here, and is there even a GM at all? This changes the power dynamics when making requests of others at the table or when implementing changes—some games vest significant authority in the GM, some vest no special authority at all in them. These are factors that do not have a “neutral” or “agnostic” answer. Each system (or the lack of a system entirely, maybe it's freeform) has specific answers, where “nothing defined on this topic at all” is also a relevant answer for readers to know. This means that in different systems, the answers vary a lot. * In D&D, a group with highly varied races isn't a big issue and solves a lot of problems. * In a Warhammer game, it *creates* problems for humans to adventure with non-humans. * In a World of Darkness game, the answer is digging into splat mixing vs not, and answers about splat mixing tend to be in the vicinity of “yeah, people try that, but it doesn't actually work too well. If you're going to do that, here's how.” * In Dresden Files, it takes the story in a different direction. There's specific tools the game uses to address fey creatures (narrative permissions related to free will, different fate point allowances) and unique incentives to pick them. It's a significant consideration whether your characters can pass as human; this doesn't matter in D&D. In lieu of any specific information about the system, people are assuming D&D, assuming its constraints and situations apply, and they're name-dropping DMing and Pathfinder out of an assumption they're relevant. This is pretty fair—it's quite clear the question seems to be addressing D&D, but doesn't want to say so for some reason. Specifying the system to us is helpful. It gives people knowledge of the tools they can work with, and that's important. Withholding such information and just pretending it's system-agnostic isn't doing anyone any favors. It leaves answerers armed with less knowledge for addressing the problem, and leaves them providing weaker solutions and guidance than they could otherwise speak about. Personally, it seems like a long line of sytem-agnostic-but-actually-D&D questions that assume that the tabletop RPG space is equivalent to D&D and therefore D&D questions can be system agnostic because it's all the same. (We saw this happen a lot during our early years on this site.) The OP ought to tell us specifically what system or systems they're trying to solve this issue in, rather than beating around the bush. RPG.SE is about [solving practical questions based on actual problems that you face](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask), not about generic problems that generically exist out there somewhere. The OP is having this practical problem in a specific system or set of systems, and should tell us what those are.
### [system-agnostic](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/system-agnostic "show questions tagged 'system-agnostic'") is an appropriate tag here. We do not need to know the system. That certain systems have mechanics baked in for handling OP's problem is entirely irrelevant. If OP was playing one of those, they likely wouldn't be having this problem. And even if they are, *the problem is still widely applicable to systems that don't have such mechanics*, and system agnostic solutions will still be helpful. ### OP doesn't have to justify their preferences to us before we can answer their question. There were some comments bordering on badwrongfun being thrown about, [and we shouldn't do that here](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5174/can-we-affirm-that-rpg-se-embraces-a-plurality-of-playstyles). It is perfectly fine for someone to prefer a particular play experience at the table, and OP is looking for methods to help them navigate pre-game social interactions in order to achieve their preferred play experience. It does not matter why they want this particular outcome, they want it, and that is okay, and we should be well equipped to handle this question without having OP defend or even explain their preferences. This type of social interaction question is standard fare for this site. Leave it open.
11,585
I've noticed that [this question about limiting exotic races](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/187999/how-can-i-limit-but-not-outright-ban-exotic-races) has gone from closed, to opened after some helpful edits, to closed again (without seemingly significant edits). Even now, it has a re-open vote. So, I simply ask: Should this question be closed, or open? (I'm asking on meta, per the guidance in [@doppelgreener's answer](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened/11549#11549) on this question: [How do we handle questions that are repeatedly closed and reopened?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened))
2021/06/10
[ "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11585", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/users/64464/" ]
### Leave it closed until the querent's goals are clearer. The question has been closed at least twice for being unclear. The question has undergone some minor edits but the fundamental confusion is still there. There are currently 11 answers (and several now-deleted answers) that cover a variety of possible solutions. It is unclear why none of them suffice for what the querent has in mind. If their problem persists across systems, then adding a system tag won't help. Or maybe this is a system-specific problem, which could lead to more detailed answers. Until the querent clarifies their presenting problem, the matter of system tagging is irrelevant here. The querent needs to explain their preferences, not because their preferences are *wrong*, but because they're unclear and confusing. Some of the question criteria seem to be arbitrary and contradictory (e.g. they want to ban certain options without banning those options). There are several obvious solutions, yet none of them are sufficient. Maybe there are additional factors that are specific to their game or their player group. Or maybe an obvious solution is sufficient (e.g. ban the options they don't want) but the querent is rejecting them for unspecified personal reasons. Unless the querent clarifies what they want to accomplish and why, then the site users won't be able to provide informed answers.
It could be reopened as soon as the system-agnostic tag is replaced ------------------------------------------------------------------- "System-agnostic" could be a relevant tag if the OP was not already set on a specific system to play in a fantasy setting with limited access to exotic races, but it looks like this is not the case here: we need to know what the OP is playing to provide more specific advice.
11,585
I've noticed that [this question about limiting exotic races](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/187999/how-can-i-limit-but-not-outright-ban-exotic-races) has gone from closed, to opened after some helpful edits, to closed again (without seemingly significant edits). Even now, it has a re-open vote. So, I simply ask: Should this question be closed, or open? (I'm asking on meta, per the guidance in [@doppelgreener's answer](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened/11549#11549) on this question: [How do we handle questions that are repeatedly closed and reopened?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened))
2021/06/10
[ "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11585", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/users/64464/" ]
### Leave it closed until the querent's goals are clearer. The question has been closed at least twice for being unclear. The question has undergone some minor edits but the fundamental confusion is still there. There are currently 11 answers (and several now-deleted answers) that cover a variety of possible solutions. It is unclear why none of them suffice for what the querent has in mind. If their problem persists across systems, then adding a system tag won't help. Or maybe this is a system-specific problem, which could lead to more detailed answers. Until the querent clarifies their presenting problem, the matter of system tagging is irrelevant here. The querent needs to explain their preferences, not because their preferences are *wrong*, but because they're unclear and confusing. Some of the question criteria seem to be arbitrary and contradictory (e.g. they want to ban certain options without banning those options). There are several obvious solutions, yet none of them are sufficient. Maybe there are additional factors that are specific to their game or their player group. Or maybe an obvious solution is sufficient (e.g. ban the options they don't want) but the querent is rejecting them for unspecified personal reasons. Unless the querent clarifies what they want to accomplish and why, then the site users won't be able to provide informed answers.
It should be closed with further details needed, because it's not a system-agnostic question. System matters for understanding the problem and understanding what solution to apply. Factors that the system influences include but are not limited to: * What actual qualities do the “exotic” or “normal” races have that would have a player gravitate toward or away from them? In fact, what specifically makes them different at all? We need to consider this stuff if we're going to provide guidance on how to point players in a different direction. * What kinds of stories is the system interested in telling? How does the choice of race affect the story, or create or resolve problems? * What does the system offer in terms of incentivisation that the group can utilise? What concrete tools are available for shepherding players and how should they be used? * In fact, what's the player/GM relationship here, and is there even a GM at all? This changes the power dynamics when making requests of others at the table or when implementing changes—some games vest significant authority in the GM, some vest no special authority at all in them. These are factors that do not have a “neutral” or “agnostic” answer. Each system (or the lack of a system entirely, maybe it's freeform) has specific answers, where “nothing defined on this topic at all” is also a relevant answer for readers to know. This means that in different systems, the answers vary a lot. * In D&D, a group with highly varied races isn't a big issue and solves a lot of problems. * In a Warhammer game, it *creates* problems for humans to adventure with non-humans. * In a World of Darkness game, the answer is digging into splat mixing vs not, and answers about splat mixing tend to be in the vicinity of “yeah, people try that, but it doesn't actually work too well. If you're going to do that, here's how.” * In Dresden Files, it takes the story in a different direction. There's specific tools the game uses to address fey creatures (narrative permissions related to free will, different fate point allowances) and unique incentives to pick them. It's a significant consideration whether your characters can pass as human; this doesn't matter in D&D. In lieu of any specific information about the system, people are assuming D&D, assuming its constraints and situations apply, and they're name-dropping DMing and Pathfinder out of an assumption they're relevant. This is pretty fair—it's quite clear the question seems to be addressing D&D, but doesn't want to say so for some reason. Specifying the system to us is helpful. It gives people knowledge of the tools they can work with, and that's important. Withholding such information and just pretending it's system-agnostic isn't doing anyone any favors. It leaves answerers armed with less knowledge for addressing the problem, and leaves them providing weaker solutions and guidance than they could otherwise speak about. Personally, it seems like a long line of sytem-agnostic-but-actually-D&D questions that assume that the tabletop RPG space is equivalent to D&D and therefore D&D questions can be system agnostic because it's all the same. (We saw this happen a lot during our early years on this site.) The OP ought to tell us specifically what system or systems they're trying to solve this issue in, rather than beating around the bush. RPG.SE is about [solving practical questions based on actual problems that you face](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask), not about generic problems that generically exist out there somewhere. The OP is having this practical problem in a specific system or set of systems, and should tell us what those are.
11,585
I've noticed that [this question about limiting exotic races](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/187999/how-can-i-limit-but-not-outright-ban-exotic-races) has gone from closed, to opened after some helpful edits, to closed again (without seemingly significant edits). Even now, it has a re-open vote. So, I simply ask: Should this question be closed, or open? (I'm asking on meta, per the guidance in [@doppelgreener's answer](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened/11549#11549) on this question: [How do we handle questions that are repeatedly closed and reopened?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11544/how-do-we-handle-questions-that-are-repeatedly-closed-and-reopened))
2021/06/10
[ "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11585", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com", "https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/users/64464/" ]
It should be closed with further details needed, because it's not a system-agnostic question. System matters for understanding the problem and understanding what solution to apply. Factors that the system influences include but are not limited to: * What actual qualities do the “exotic” or “normal” races have that would have a player gravitate toward or away from them? In fact, what specifically makes them different at all? We need to consider this stuff if we're going to provide guidance on how to point players in a different direction. * What kinds of stories is the system interested in telling? How does the choice of race affect the story, or create or resolve problems? * What does the system offer in terms of incentivisation that the group can utilise? What concrete tools are available for shepherding players and how should they be used? * In fact, what's the player/GM relationship here, and is there even a GM at all? This changes the power dynamics when making requests of others at the table or when implementing changes—some games vest significant authority in the GM, some vest no special authority at all in them. These are factors that do not have a “neutral” or “agnostic” answer. Each system (or the lack of a system entirely, maybe it's freeform) has specific answers, where “nothing defined on this topic at all” is also a relevant answer for readers to know. This means that in different systems, the answers vary a lot. * In D&D, a group with highly varied races isn't a big issue and solves a lot of problems. * In a Warhammer game, it *creates* problems for humans to adventure with non-humans. * In a World of Darkness game, the answer is digging into splat mixing vs not, and answers about splat mixing tend to be in the vicinity of “yeah, people try that, but it doesn't actually work too well. If you're going to do that, here's how.” * In Dresden Files, it takes the story in a different direction. There's specific tools the game uses to address fey creatures (narrative permissions related to free will, different fate point allowances) and unique incentives to pick them. It's a significant consideration whether your characters can pass as human; this doesn't matter in D&D. In lieu of any specific information about the system, people are assuming D&D, assuming its constraints and situations apply, and they're name-dropping DMing and Pathfinder out of an assumption they're relevant. This is pretty fair—it's quite clear the question seems to be addressing D&D, but doesn't want to say so for some reason. Specifying the system to us is helpful. It gives people knowledge of the tools they can work with, and that's important. Withholding such information and just pretending it's system-agnostic isn't doing anyone any favors. It leaves answerers armed with less knowledge for addressing the problem, and leaves them providing weaker solutions and guidance than they could otherwise speak about. Personally, it seems like a long line of sytem-agnostic-but-actually-D&D questions that assume that the tabletop RPG space is equivalent to D&D and therefore D&D questions can be system agnostic because it's all the same. (We saw this happen a lot during our early years on this site.) The OP ought to tell us specifically what system or systems they're trying to solve this issue in, rather than beating around the bush. RPG.SE is about [solving practical questions based on actual problems that you face](https://rpg.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask), not about generic problems that generically exist out there somewhere. The OP is having this practical problem in a specific system or set of systems, and should tell us what those are.
It could be reopened as soon as the system-agnostic tag is replaced ------------------------------------------------------------------- "System-agnostic" could be a relevant tag if the OP was not already set on a specific system to play in a fantasy setting with limited access to exotic races, but it looks like this is not the case here: we need to know what the OP is playing to provide more specific advice.
10,837
I want to take a live video feed (say from a security camera) and overlay an image over the top of the live video. Is there hardware/software to do this realtime? I don't care about storing the data, and I can't store it to disk first, it needs to be live video in/out with overlay composited on top. Any suggestions?
2014/05/28
[ "https://avp.stackexchange.com/questions/10837", "https://avp.stackexchange.com", "https://avp.stackexchange.com/users/6002/" ]
Gstreamer offers the ability to overlay images on videos and has also excellent live streaming capabilities. Some useful links: <https://coaxion.net/blog/2013/10/streaming-gstreamer-pipelines-via-http/> <https://developer.ridgerun.com/wiki/index.php/Fast_GStreamer_overlay_element#Picture_overlay_examples>
If you are open to a hardware only solution (possibly cheaper than having a dedicated PC for the task and certainly far more reliable), then what you are looking for is a device called a [logo generator/keyer](http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/buy/Logo-Generators-Accessories/ci/8295/N/4028759389). Basically, the device constantly outputs a video of the logo you want to overlay and keys it on to the video stream being passed through. The devices range in cost from around $800 to several grand, but the low end models should be cheaper than having a dedicated computer with sufficient power to do the processing all the time if this is for more than occasional use.
10,837
I want to take a live video feed (say from a security camera) and overlay an image over the top of the live video. Is there hardware/software to do this realtime? I don't care about storing the data, and I can't store it to disk first, it needs to be live video in/out with overlay composited on top. Any suggestions?
2014/05/28
[ "https://avp.stackexchange.com/questions/10837", "https://avp.stackexchange.com", "https://avp.stackexchange.com/users/6002/" ]
Gstreamer offers the ability to overlay images on videos and has also excellent live streaming capabilities. Some useful links: <https://coaxion.net/blog/2013/10/streaming-gstreamer-pipelines-via-http/> <https://developer.ridgerun.com/wiki/index.php/Fast_GStreamer_overlay_element#Picture_overlay_examples>
there is an other nice on-the-fly [video overlay software called Clamp](https://wowzatoolbox.com/clamp), which is a commercial add-on for Wowza Streaming Engine. This can read overlay instructions during a live event from a text file or from database and apply them on the live stream at specified times.
177,680
In Paris you have the RER lines, which are denoted by letters, and the Paris Metro, which are denoted by numbers. My question is... are there any Paris Metro stations that are outside of zones 1-3? Marne-la-Vallée Chessy (the station you'd use for Disneyland Paris) is in zone 5 but the Paris Metro does not go there - just the RER. RER A, to be exact. Versailles-Chantiers (the station you'd use for Versailles) is in zone 4 but, again, the Paris Metro does not go there - just RER C. Mairie d'Issy, the southern terminus of line 12, is in zone 2. Based on my spot checking, it does indeed seem to be the case that all Paris Metro stations are in zones 1-3 but my spot checking isn't comprehensive. As for why this is relevant... if every destination you're going to be visiting in Paris can be accessed through numbered routes then that means that a Paris Tour travel pass for zones 1-3 would be sufficient vs the more expensive zones 1-5 pass.
2022/11/23
[ "https://travel.stackexchange.com/questions/177680", "https://travel.stackexchange.com", "https://travel.stackexchange.com/users/4868/" ]
Based on [the RATP map of Paris transportation lines](https://www.ratp.fr/plan-de-ligne/img/rer/Plan-RER-et-transiliens.1646316579.png): No, there aren't any Metro stations outside of zones 1-3. In fact, the Metro network is *almost* entirely within zones 1 and 2, there are just a few lines which extend into zone 3 for their final couple of stops. > > As for why this is relevant... if every destination you're going to be visiting in Paris can be accessed through numbered routes then that means that a Paris Tour travel pass for zones 1-3 would be sufficient vs the more expensive zones 1-5 pass. > > > I think you'd be better making this decision based on looking where your intended destinations are rather than abstracting to whether or not the Metro in general goes outside of zone 3. What if one of your destinations isn't on a Metro line? Last time I visited Paris there were multiple places I visited which were best reached by tram or bus. They were all within zones 1-3, but knowing there are no zone 4 metro stations wouldn't have told you that!
To add to the previous answer : The Metro line 14 is [set to](https://www.ratp.fr/en/groupe-ratp/metrotrains/m14-extension-orly-airport) open its connection down to Orly Airport in 2024, which would be firmly in Zone 4
121,614
What's the best strategy to get users to move from an online forum to a Stack Exchange site? I'm asking this because there's a huge forum about RC model helicopters (www.helifreak.com has 155k members) and the Stack Exchange proposal [Radio Controlled (RC) Modeling](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/2008/radio-controlled-rc-modeling) only has 33 followers. I don't want to replace the whole forum, I just want a better place for Q&A. The forum is great for endless discussions, posting pictures and videos, etc. Update: after reading some answers, I think I should rephrase the question to: "How can I get more users to commit a Stack Exchange beta site?"
2012/02/08
[ "https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/121614", "https://meta.stackexchange.com", "https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/143426/" ]
You don't. That's like telling people to switch to Linux, or from Apples to Cherries, or from Mazda to Volvo...you just don't. Don't waste your breath, post a link in the Forum with a short explanation, and let people find it on their own.
Well, you can't "force" people to move to a site. Remember a forum is more suited to discussion while a Stack Exchange site is more for questions and answers. The Area 51 proposal can create a share link for you to add to forum signatures, or if you're a member create a new thread on what Stack Exchange is and advertise the site. ![Enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/kFZ30.png)
121,614
What's the best strategy to get users to move from an online forum to a Stack Exchange site? I'm asking this because there's a huge forum about RC model helicopters (www.helifreak.com has 155k members) and the Stack Exchange proposal [Radio Controlled (RC) Modeling](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/2008/radio-controlled-rc-modeling) only has 33 followers. I don't want to replace the whole forum, I just want a better place for Q&A. The forum is great for endless discussions, posting pictures and videos, etc. Update: after reading some answers, I think I should rephrase the question to: "How can I get more users to commit a Stack Exchange beta site?"
2012/02/08
[ "https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/121614", "https://meta.stackexchange.com", "https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/143426/" ]
You don't. That's like telling people to switch to Linux, or from Apples to Cherries, or from Mazda to Volvo...you just don't. Don't waste your breath, post a link in the Forum with a short explanation, and let people find it on their own.
Bobby is right, not many people like being told things like this. Imagine the 10zillion posts "super-user" status you would have to abandon and become a newbie on some other site...ego at stake. What would be great though is to have the site filled with useful questions and answers and be able to show them how useful it is (I understand that you're trying to get the backing of users to help support the initial site)...nothing beats seeing how useful it is. When someone on the forum has a problem, ask it on SE and hopefully users will provide responses which can show the forum users that it is a useful site. Even if no one replaces going to the forum, having a concrete "Question X" to refer to on SE that can be discussed on the forum is equally useful. I imagine there are countless forums or private mailing lists with the same questions asked over and over and being able to just provide that SE link to a definite resource (that others can improve) will eventually win people (On a few private mailing lists for programming I am on, the shift over the last year or so has been to provide a StackOverflow question when someone is having trouble and then the mailing list also discusses it (Which wouldn't be appropriate for SO).
121,614
What's the best strategy to get users to move from an online forum to a Stack Exchange site? I'm asking this because there's a huge forum about RC model helicopters (www.helifreak.com has 155k members) and the Stack Exchange proposal [Radio Controlled (RC) Modeling](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/2008/radio-controlled-rc-modeling) only has 33 followers. I don't want to replace the whole forum, I just want a better place for Q&A. The forum is great for endless discussions, posting pictures and videos, etc. Update: after reading some answers, I think I should rephrase the question to: "How can I get more users to commit a Stack Exchange beta site?"
2012/02/08
[ "https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/121614", "https://meta.stackexchange.com", "https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/143426/" ]
You don't. That's like telling people to switch to Linux, or from Apples to Cherries, or from Mazda to Volvo...you just don't. Don't waste your breath, post a link in the Forum with a short explanation, and let people find it on their own.
I don't want users to move from forums to SE sites. I want lots of good questions and lots of good answers. People with answers eventually find the site. I think search engines are making people with questions aware of the site. Maybe more is needed. If somebody wants to ask a question or answer one in here, and also participate in a forum, I'm OK with that.
121,614
What's the best strategy to get users to move from an online forum to a Stack Exchange site? I'm asking this because there's a huge forum about RC model helicopters (www.helifreak.com has 155k members) and the Stack Exchange proposal [Radio Controlled (RC) Modeling](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/2008/radio-controlled-rc-modeling) only has 33 followers. I don't want to replace the whole forum, I just want a better place for Q&A. The forum is great for endless discussions, posting pictures and videos, etc. Update: after reading some answers, I think I should rephrase the question to: "How can I get more users to commit a Stack Exchange beta site?"
2012/02/08
[ "https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/121614", "https://meta.stackexchange.com", "https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/143426/" ]
Well, you can't "force" people to move to a site. Remember a forum is more suited to discussion while a Stack Exchange site is more for questions and answers. The Area 51 proposal can create a share link for you to add to forum signatures, or if you're a member create a new thread on what Stack Exchange is and advertise the site. ![Enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/kFZ30.png)
Bobby is right, not many people like being told things like this. Imagine the 10zillion posts "super-user" status you would have to abandon and become a newbie on some other site...ego at stake. What would be great though is to have the site filled with useful questions and answers and be able to show them how useful it is (I understand that you're trying to get the backing of users to help support the initial site)...nothing beats seeing how useful it is. When someone on the forum has a problem, ask it on SE and hopefully users will provide responses which can show the forum users that it is a useful site. Even if no one replaces going to the forum, having a concrete "Question X" to refer to on SE that can be discussed on the forum is equally useful. I imagine there are countless forums or private mailing lists with the same questions asked over and over and being able to just provide that SE link to a definite resource (that others can improve) will eventually win people (On a few private mailing lists for programming I am on, the shift over the last year or so has been to provide a StackOverflow question when someone is having trouble and then the mailing list also discusses it (Which wouldn't be appropriate for SO).
121,614
What's the best strategy to get users to move from an online forum to a Stack Exchange site? I'm asking this because there's a huge forum about RC model helicopters (www.helifreak.com has 155k members) and the Stack Exchange proposal [Radio Controlled (RC) Modeling](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/2008/radio-controlled-rc-modeling) only has 33 followers. I don't want to replace the whole forum, I just want a better place for Q&A. The forum is great for endless discussions, posting pictures and videos, etc. Update: after reading some answers, I think I should rephrase the question to: "How can I get more users to commit a Stack Exchange beta site?"
2012/02/08
[ "https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/121614", "https://meta.stackexchange.com", "https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/143426/" ]
Well, you can't "force" people to move to a site. Remember a forum is more suited to discussion while a Stack Exchange site is more for questions and answers. The Area 51 proposal can create a share link for you to add to forum signatures, or if you're a member create a new thread on what Stack Exchange is and advertise the site. ![Enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/kFZ30.png)
I don't want users to move from forums to SE sites. I want lots of good questions and lots of good answers. People with answers eventually find the site. I think search engines are making people with questions aware of the site. Maybe more is needed. If somebody wants to ask a question or answer one in here, and also participate in a forum, I'm OK with that.
371,796
If I'm adding a column via MySQL, I can specify where in the table that column will be using the AFTER modifier. But if I do the add\_column via a Rails migration, the column will be created at the end of the table. Is there any functionality for rails migrations to specify the position of an added column?
2008/12/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/371796", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/2177/" ]
I created a patch that adds this additional functionality to the ActiveRecord Mysql adapter. It works for master and 2-3-stable. <https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3286-patch-add-support-for-mysql-column-positioning-to-migrations> It might be mysql specific, but it doesn't make your migrations any less portable (other adapters would just ignore the extra positioning options).
There is no way within Rails to specify the position of a column. In fact, I think it's only coincidental (and therefore not to be relied on) that columns are created in the order they are named in a migration. The order of columns within a table is almost relevant and should be so: the common "reason" given is to be able to see a particular subset when executing a "SELECT \*", but that's really not a good reason. Any other reason is probably a design smell, but I'd love to know a valid reason why I'm wrong! On some platforms, there is a (miniscule) space and performance saving to be obtained by putting the columns with the highest probability of being NULL to the end (because the DMBS will not use any disk space for "trailing" NULL values, but I think you'd have to be running on 1980's hardware to notice.
371,796
If I'm adding a column via MySQL, I can specify where in the table that column will be using the AFTER modifier. But if I do the add\_column via a Rails migration, the column will be created at the end of the table. Is there any functionality for rails migrations to specify the position of an added column?
2008/12/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/371796", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/2177/" ]
This is now possible in Rails 2.3.6+ by passing the :after parameter <https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3286-patch-add-support-for-mysql-column-positioning-to-migrations> To everyone that doesn't see the advantage in having this feature: do you never look at your database outside of the ORM? If I'm viewing in any sort of UI, I like having things like foreign keys, status columns, flags, etc, all grouped together. This doesn't impact the application, but definitely speeds up my ability to review data.
There is no way within Rails to specify the position of a column. In fact, I think it's only coincidental (and therefore not to be relied on) that columns are created in the order they are named in a migration. The order of columns within a table is almost relevant and should be so: the common "reason" given is to be able to see a particular subset when executing a "SELECT \*", but that's really not a good reason. Any other reason is probably a design smell, but I'd love to know a valid reason why I'm wrong! On some platforms, there is a (miniscule) space and performance saving to be obtained by putting the columns with the highest probability of being NULL to the end (because the DMBS will not use any disk space for "trailing" NULL values, but I think you'd have to be running on 1980's hardware to notice.
371,796
If I'm adding a column via MySQL, I can specify where in the table that column will be using the AFTER modifier. But if I do the add\_column via a Rails migration, the column will be created at the end of the table. Is there any functionality for rails migrations to specify the position of an added column?
2008/12/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/371796", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/2177/" ]
This is now possible in Rails 2.3.6+ by passing the :after parameter <https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3286-patch-add-support-for-mysql-column-positioning-to-migrations> To everyone that doesn't see the advantage in having this feature: do you never look at your database outside of the ORM? If I'm viewing in any sort of UI, I like having things like foreign keys, status columns, flags, etc, all grouped together. This doesn't impact the application, but definitely speeds up my ability to review data.
I created a patch that adds this additional functionality to the ActiveRecord Mysql adapter. It works for master and 2-3-stable. <https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3286-patch-add-support-for-mysql-column-positioning-to-migrations> It might be mysql specific, but it doesn't make your migrations any less portable (other adapters would just ignore the extra positioning options).
11,962,925
I just started to use memcached. We use spymemcached java client via a Pajamas Proxy server (all with default setting and 1024 mb memory allocated). Setting the program to access memcached is very simple and straightforward, but I have one observation though: when the cached value size drops to a certain point (in my case: about 1450 bytes), the performance drops dramatically (from 4 msecs to 200 msecs each retrieval). Does this mean that the value that I want to cache has to be above certain sizes? How would I be able to determine such sizes? Thanks in advance! David
2012/08/15
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/11962925", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/145888/" ]
Could Nagle's algorithm (TCP delaying the sending of small packets for a while) be the problem?
While I don't know much about memcached internals,it seems to me that it has to do with the memory allocation management. Memcached maintains memory pools in different chunk sizes. <http://www.mikeperham.com/2009/06/22/slabs-pages-chunks-and-memcached/> . So mostly you are facing internal fragmentaion,and memcached has to look at two chunks to lookup your data.
127,178
How can I change my credit card data? My credit card was stolen and I want to use a new one for paying apps. I don't know how to do that.
2014/04/10
[ "https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/127178", "https://apple.stackexchange.com", "https://apple.stackexchange.com/users/75377/" ]
One way is to go to <http://apple.com>, click "Store" in the top menu and then click "Account" and "View Account" as in the below screenshot. ![Account / View Account screen shot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/yJiEO.png) Under "Account settings" there is the choice to "Change your default shipping or billing info", click that link and then enter your Apple ID e-mail and password to login. You'll see a box with the heading "Payment Information" under Account Information, click the Edit button there. ![Account Information screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/fqcyY.png) You will then see a form for entering your payment information, add your new card details on the right and click save. The card you enter here will be used on the Apple Online Store, iTunes and Apple App Store. ![Payment Information screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/yb25F.png)
Just open iTunes Goto the store and click on your account/email. ![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/OZM3T.png) Click **Account** menu item and log in. Now you can change your payment details.
126,782
I have configured a Magento 2.0.7 website with Cloudflare. The issue is some admin pages are not loading correctly. For example, catalog management page cannot load products list, user management page cannot load user list. Other admin pages work OK. When I used it as static ip ex (xx.xx.xx.xx) it really work but not in subdomain I created page rules with admin url but nothing changes. Please can you help me ?
2016/07/21
[ "https://magento.stackexchange.com/questions/126782", "https://magento.stackexchange.com", "https://magento.stackexchange.com/users/42443/" ]
I was running into the same issue as you where page and block lists would not load, the Stores->configuration CSS was not properly displaying, and there were other display issues. The previous answer asked you to disable JS Minification and two other paid features Rocketloader and Mirage ( I am on the free plan so I don't use either). This did not solve my issue. `TL;DR` This was solved by disabling ALL minification in the Cloudflare dashboard under the "Speed" Tab. [![Disable All Auto Minification](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Fc4hK.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Fc4hK.png) After saving, all display issues were resolved.
Please disable the following in the CloudFlare dashboard: * Disable JS minification * Disable RocketLoader * Disable Mirage That should resolve any conflicts; if not, please let me know.
52,013,820
Is there a set number of ~~instructions~~ statements that get processed before checking the event queue/per tick/per loop (ways of saying the same thing, I think?)
2018/08/25
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/52013820", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/4541624/" ]
> > Is there a set number of instructions that get processed before checking the event queue/per tick/per loop (ways of saying the same thing, I think?) > > > No, there is not. In the node.js architecture, when an event is pulled from the event queue, it's tied to a callback. The interpreter calls that callback and that callback runs to completion. Only when it returns and the stack is again empty does it check to see if there is another event in the event queue to run. So, it has absolutely nothing to do with a number of instructions. node.js runs your Javascript as single-threaded so there is no time slicing between pieces of Javascript which it sounds like your question perhaps was anticipating. Once a callback is called that corresponds to an even in the event queue, that callback runs until it finishes and returns control back to the interpreter. So, it goes like this: 1. Pull event from the event queue 2. Call the Javascript callback associated with that event 3. Javascript callback runs until completion and then returns from the callback 4. node.js internals check event queue for next event. If an event is there, go to step 1 and repeat 5. If no event is there, go to sleep until an event is placed into the event queue. In reality, this is a bit of a simplification because there are several different types of event queues with a priority order for which one gets to go first, but this describes the general process as it relates to your question.
There is no set number of instructions that get processed before checking the event queue. Each message is run to completion. From the Mozilla documentation (<https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/EventLoop>): > > Each message is processed completely before any other message is processed. This offers some nice properties when reasoning about your program, including the fact that whenever a function runs, it cannot be pre-empted and will run entirely before any other code runs (and can modify data the function manipulates). This differs from C, for instance, where if a function runs in a thread, it may be stopped at any point by the runtime system to run some other code in another thread. > > > A downside of this model is that if a message takes too long to complete, the web application is unable to process user interactions like click or scroll. The browser mitigates this with the "a script is taking too long to run" dialog. A good practice to follow is to make message processing short and if possible cut down one message into several messages. > > >
11,667
I'm using a Prusa i3 MK3S printer. After ~8 months of printing PLA, PET-G, ABS I decided to buy some HIPS and print something with it. I cannot print >1 filaments at once, so I'm not using it as a support for ABS, **I want to create some high durability working models, like gears, robot parts etc.** While the quality of my models is perfect, unfortunately their **strength is disappointingly low. They easily undergo plastic deformation or break.** I've tried lots of settings, some yielding better or worse results, but the problem is present regardless. My settings: * Printer: Prusa i3 MK3S * Nozzle: Default 0.4 mm nozzle for Prusa * Layer Height: 0.2-0.3 mm * Temperature: 230-240 °C nozzle, 100-110 °C bed * Slicer: PrusaSlicer 2.0.0 I've read lots of tutorials regarding HIPS printing and they did not give me the answer to my question... Am I doing something wrong or is it normal for High Impact PolyStyrene? At this point, the *High Impact* Polystyrene seems less *High Impact* than generic PLA.
2020/01/03
[ "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/11667", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/16798/" ]
It might. If HIPS is a single material with consistent properties, it might have a narrower temperature range. Online references suggest up to 240 °C. Try that, then 245 and 250 °C. Maybe higher.
The primary use of HIPS in 3D printing is to create sacrificial supports, which you're aware of. The material dissolves in lemon oil, making it popular for printing dense supports within complex shapes that can then be easily removed just by spraying the part down with Orange Clean. I would not expect HIPS material sold for 3D printing use to have much if any strength, especially for moving parts. Outside 3D printing, most uses of the material are in expanded foam products like bike helmets, flotation products etc, and these applications require pressure-molding, which creates a higher-density object and hardens the foam's outer layer to make it tough enough for everyday use. Just extruding the stuff out into the open air gives you the same density (and strength) as a packing peanut. If you want a styrene-type material that's strong, tough and relatively light, I'd stick with ABS. If you're looking for a challenge in a similar material, try nylon; it creates a lower-friction surface, is very tough but pliable, and its hygroscopy requires very careful handling of the filament (in some more humid climates, you have to feed it from a dry box through PTFE tubing straight into the printer; even the time out in the air between the box and the extruder is enough to get hydrolysis-related issues). If you really want to print HIPS foam gears, the only thing I can suggest you try is an epoxy coating to give the object a harder shell while retaining the light weight. My wife does custom-applique vacuum tumblers (but who doesn't nowadays; my wife's making more money selling other people the supplies and equipment to do it), and her favorite stuff to use is [Faux Rizzle](https://artresinfauxrizzle.com/faux-rizzle-art-resin/); very durable, odorless, easy to mix and apply, and relatively inexpensive (many other art resins sell for about double what you can get FR for). Good luck to you.
11,667
I'm using a Prusa i3 MK3S printer. After ~8 months of printing PLA, PET-G, ABS I decided to buy some HIPS and print something with it. I cannot print >1 filaments at once, so I'm not using it as a support for ABS, **I want to create some high durability working models, like gears, robot parts etc.** While the quality of my models is perfect, unfortunately their **strength is disappointingly low. They easily undergo plastic deformation or break.** I've tried lots of settings, some yielding better or worse results, but the problem is present regardless. My settings: * Printer: Prusa i3 MK3S * Nozzle: Default 0.4 mm nozzle for Prusa * Layer Height: 0.2-0.3 mm * Temperature: 230-240 °C nozzle, 100-110 °C bed * Slicer: PrusaSlicer 2.0.0 I've read lots of tutorials regarding HIPS printing and they did not give me the answer to my question... Am I doing something wrong or is it normal for High Impact PolyStyrene? At this point, the *High Impact* Polystyrene seems less *High Impact* than generic PLA.
2020/01/03
[ "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/11667", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/16798/" ]
You might try upgrading your PrusaSlicer to 2.1.1. I don't know if the "Prusa HIPS" setting got updated since your 2.0.0 but it's worth checking. For comparison, PrusaSlicer 2.1.1 uses these settings for HIPS: Filament: * First layer temp: 220 * Other layer temp: 220 * Bed temp, first layer: 100 * Bed temp, other layers: 110 Cooling: * Fan speed: min 20%, max 20% * Bridges fan speed: 50% * Disable fan for first 3 layers * Enable fan if layer print time is below 10 sec * Other cooling settings same as for PLA Advanced: * Max volumetric speed: 11 There's also custom G-code for HIPS setting M900 K10. I, too, want to print actual parts with HIPS. For me, it's because HIPS the lowest density of all the commonly-available stiff-plastic filaments, which is great for printing lightweight model aircraft parts where every gram matters.
The primary use of HIPS in 3D printing is to create sacrificial supports, which you're aware of. The material dissolves in lemon oil, making it popular for printing dense supports within complex shapes that can then be easily removed just by spraying the part down with Orange Clean. I would not expect HIPS material sold for 3D printing use to have much if any strength, especially for moving parts. Outside 3D printing, most uses of the material are in expanded foam products like bike helmets, flotation products etc, and these applications require pressure-molding, which creates a higher-density object and hardens the foam's outer layer to make it tough enough for everyday use. Just extruding the stuff out into the open air gives you the same density (and strength) as a packing peanut. If you want a styrene-type material that's strong, tough and relatively light, I'd stick with ABS. If you're looking for a challenge in a similar material, try nylon; it creates a lower-friction surface, is very tough but pliable, and its hygroscopy requires very careful handling of the filament (in some more humid climates, you have to feed it from a dry box through PTFE tubing straight into the printer; even the time out in the air between the box and the extruder is enough to get hydrolysis-related issues). If you really want to print HIPS foam gears, the only thing I can suggest you try is an epoxy coating to give the object a harder shell while retaining the light weight. My wife does custom-applique vacuum tumblers (but who doesn't nowadays; my wife's making more money selling other people the supplies and equipment to do it), and her favorite stuff to use is [Faux Rizzle](https://artresinfauxrizzle.com/faux-rizzle-art-resin/); very durable, odorless, easy to mix and apply, and relatively inexpensive (many other art resins sell for about double what you can get FR for). Good luck to you.
11,667
I'm using a Prusa i3 MK3S printer. After ~8 months of printing PLA, PET-G, ABS I decided to buy some HIPS and print something with it. I cannot print >1 filaments at once, so I'm not using it as a support for ABS, **I want to create some high durability working models, like gears, robot parts etc.** While the quality of my models is perfect, unfortunately their **strength is disappointingly low. They easily undergo plastic deformation or break.** I've tried lots of settings, some yielding better or worse results, but the problem is present regardless. My settings: * Printer: Prusa i3 MK3S * Nozzle: Default 0.4 mm nozzle for Prusa * Layer Height: 0.2-0.3 mm * Temperature: 230-240 °C nozzle, 100-110 °C bed * Slicer: PrusaSlicer 2.0.0 I've read lots of tutorials regarding HIPS printing and they did not give me the answer to my question... Am I doing something wrong or is it normal for High Impact PolyStyrene? At this point, the *High Impact* Polystyrene seems less *High Impact* than generic PLA.
2020/01/03
[ "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/11667", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/16798/" ]
The primary use of HIPS in 3D printing is to create sacrificial supports, which you're aware of. The material dissolves in lemon oil, making it popular for printing dense supports within complex shapes that can then be easily removed just by spraying the part down with Orange Clean. I would not expect HIPS material sold for 3D printing use to have much if any strength, especially for moving parts. Outside 3D printing, most uses of the material are in expanded foam products like bike helmets, flotation products etc, and these applications require pressure-molding, which creates a higher-density object and hardens the foam's outer layer to make it tough enough for everyday use. Just extruding the stuff out into the open air gives you the same density (and strength) as a packing peanut. If you want a styrene-type material that's strong, tough and relatively light, I'd stick with ABS. If you're looking for a challenge in a similar material, try nylon; it creates a lower-friction surface, is very tough but pliable, and its hygroscopy requires very careful handling of the filament (in some more humid climates, you have to feed it from a dry box through PTFE tubing straight into the printer; even the time out in the air between the box and the extruder is enough to get hydrolysis-related issues). If you really want to print HIPS foam gears, the only thing I can suggest you try is an epoxy coating to give the object a harder shell while retaining the light weight. My wife does custom-applique vacuum tumblers (but who doesn't nowadays; my wife's making more money selling other people the supplies and equipment to do it), and her favorite stuff to use is [Faux Rizzle](https://artresinfauxrizzle.com/faux-rizzle-art-resin/); very durable, odorless, easy to mix and apply, and relatively inexpensive (many other art resins sell for about double what you can get FR for). Good luck to you.
I've been using HIPS for nearly 2 years now to print the housings of EDF units for RC planes. They come out light and strong but have poor layer adhesion, especially on thin-wall parts. Normally I print at with a 260 °C nozzle and 100 °C bed but will try higher temperature when I upgrade my Ender 5 to a 32-bit board. Thin cyanoacrylate painted on the surface solves most issues. Sometimes I use a solution of ASA dissolved in acetone to paint the surface and bind layers together. The EDF rotors I print from Apollo X which is a modified ASA that is easy to print but not soluble in acetone.
11,667
I'm using a Prusa i3 MK3S printer. After ~8 months of printing PLA, PET-G, ABS I decided to buy some HIPS and print something with it. I cannot print >1 filaments at once, so I'm not using it as a support for ABS, **I want to create some high durability working models, like gears, robot parts etc.** While the quality of my models is perfect, unfortunately their **strength is disappointingly low. They easily undergo plastic deformation or break.** I've tried lots of settings, some yielding better or worse results, but the problem is present regardless. My settings: * Printer: Prusa i3 MK3S * Nozzle: Default 0.4 mm nozzle for Prusa * Layer Height: 0.2-0.3 mm * Temperature: 230-240 °C nozzle, 100-110 °C bed * Slicer: PrusaSlicer 2.0.0 I've read lots of tutorials regarding HIPS printing and they did not give me the answer to my question... Am I doing something wrong or is it normal for High Impact PolyStyrene? At this point, the *High Impact* Polystyrene seems less *High Impact* than generic PLA.
2020/01/03
[ "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/11667", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/16798/" ]
It might. If HIPS is a single material with consistent properties, it might have a narrower temperature range. Online references suggest up to 240 °C. Try that, then 245 and 250 °C. Maybe higher.
You might try upgrading your PrusaSlicer to 2.1.1. I don't know if the "Prusa HIPS" setting got updated since your 2.0.0 but it's worth checking. For comparison, PrusaSlicer 2.1.1 uses these settings for HIPS: Filament: * First layer temp: 220 * Other layer temp: 220 * Bed temp, first layer: 100 * Bed temp, other layers: 110 Cooling: * Fan speed: min 20%, max 20% * Bridges fan speed: 50% * Disable fan for first 3 layers * Enable fan if layer print time is below 10 sec * Other cooling settings same as for PLA Advanced: * Max volumetric speed: 11 There's also custom G-code for HIPS setting M900 K10. I, too, want to print actual parts with HIPS. For me, it's because HIPS the lowest density of all the commonly-available stiff-plastic filaments, which is great for printing lightweight model aircraft parts where every gram matters.
11,667
I'm using a Prusa i3 MK3S printer. After ~8 months of printing PLA, PET-G, ABS I decided to buy some HIPS and print something with it. I cannot print >1 filaments at once, so I'm not using it as a support for ABS, **I want to create some high durability working models, like gears, robot parts etc.** While the quality of my models is perfect, unfortunately their **strength is disappointingly low. They easily undergo plastic deformation or break.** I've tried lots of settings, some yielding better or worse results, but the problem is present regardless. My settings: * Printer: Prusa i3 MK3S * Nozzle: Default 0.4 mm nozzle for Prusa * Layer Height: 0.2-0.3 mm * Temperature: 230-240 °C nozzle, 100-110 °C bed * Slicer: PrusaSlicer 2.0.0 I've read lots of tutorials regarding HIPS printing and they did not give me the answer to my question... Am I doing something wrong or is it normal for High Impact PolyStyrene? At this point, the *High Impact* Polystyrene seems less *High Impact* than generic PLA.
2020/01/03
[ "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/11667", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/16798/" ]
It might. If HIPS is a single material with consistent properties, it might have a narrower temperature range. Online references suggest up to 240 °C. Try that, then 245 and 250 °C. Maybe higher.
I've been using HIPS for nearly 2 years now to print the housings of EDF units for RC planes. They come out light and strong but have poor layer adhesion, especially on thin-wall parts. Normally I print at with a 260 °C nozzle and 100 °C bed but will try higher temperature when I upgrade my Ender 5 to a 32-bit board. Thin cyanoacrylate painted on the surface solves most issues. Sometimes I use a solution of ASA dissolved in acetone to paint the surface and bind layers together. The EDF rotors I print from Apollo X which is a modified ASA that is easy to print but not soluble in acetone.
11,667
I'm using a Prusa i3 MK3S printer. After ~8 months of printing PLA, PET-G, ABS I decided to buy some HIPS and print something with it. I cannot print >1 filaments at once, so I'm not using it as a support for ABS, **I want to create some high durability working models, like gears, robot parts etc.** While the quality of my models is perfect, unfortunately their **strength is disappointingly low. They easily undergo plastic deformation or break.** I've tried lots of settings, some yielding better or worse results, but the problem is present regardless. My settings: * Printer: Prusa i3 MK3S * Nozzle: Default 0.4 mm nozzle for Prusa * Layer Height: 0.2-0.3 mm * Temperature: 230-240 °C nozzle, 100-110 °C bed * Slicer: PrusaSlicer 2.0.0 I've read lots of tutorials regarding HIPS printing and they did not give me the answer to my question... Am I doing something wrong or is it normal for High Impact PolyStyrene? At this point, the *High Impact* Polystyrene seems less *High Impact* than generic PLA.
2020/01/03
[ "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/11667", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com", "https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/16798/" ]
You might try upgrading your PrusaSlicer to 2.1.1. I don't know if the "Prusa HIPS" setting got updated since your 2.0.0 but it's worth checking. For comparison, PrusaSlicer 2.1.1 uses these settings for HIPS: Filament: * First layer temp: 220 * Other layer temp: 220 * Bed temp, first layer: 100 * Bed temp, other layers: 110 Cooling: * Fan speed: min 20%, max 20% * Bridges fan speed: 50% * Disable fan for first 3 layers * Enable fan if layer print time is below 10 sec * Other cooling settings same as for PLA Advanced: * Max volumetric speed: 11 There's also custom G-code for HIPS setting M900 K10. I, too, want to print actual parts with HIPS. For me, it's because HIPS the lowest density of all the commonly-available stiff-plastic filaments, which is great for printing lightweight model aircraft parts where every gram matters.
I've been using HIPS for nearly 2 years now to print the housings of EDF units for RC planes. They come out light and strong but have poor layer adhesion, especially on thin-wall parts. Normally I print at with a 260 °C nozzle and 100 °C bed but will try higher temperature when I upgrade my Ender 5 to a 32-bit board. Thin cyanoacrylate painted on the surface solves most issues. Sometimes I use a solution of ASA dissolved in acetone to paint the surface and bind layers together. The EDF rotors I print from Apollo X which is a modified ASA that is easy to print but not soluble in acetone.
39,986
There are a number of unusual or unconventional weapons used in the book of Judges: * Shamgar uses an oxgoad to strike down Philistines (3:31) * Jael uses a tent peg to kill Sisera (4:21) * Gideon's army is equipped with jars, torches, and trumpets (7:20) * A woman uses a millstone to kill Abimelek (9:53) * Samson uses a donkey's jawbone to strike down a thousand men (15:15) There are swords and daggers too, of course. But it is striking the number of strange weapons used in the narratives. Is this meant to be thematic? And if so, what point is the author developing?
2019/04/09
[ "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/39986", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/users/33/" ]
Why are there unusual weapons (donkey jawbone, etc.) in the book of Judges? * By analyzing the Hebrew context and meaning of the weapons used by Judges like Samson, readers will notice the use of Hebrew puns / riddles for explaining the origin of geographic names / landmarks. 1. Regarding the "Jawbone" used by Samson : In Judges 15:14-19, Samson (Shimshon, שִׁמְשׁ֔וֹן) defeats the Philistines with an odd weapon - a donkey’s jawbone (Lehi, לְחִ֣י) - calling the place of his victory “Level-Jawbone” (רָ֥מַת לֶֽחִי). While Samson was thirsty after the Philistine battle at Lehi, he prayed to find something to drink and God cleaved the socket of Samson’s weapon to make water pour out of the donkey’s jawbone. After reviving his spirit by drinking water from the donkey’s jawbone, Samson called his place of rejuvenation “Eye of the Crier” ( עֵ֚ין הַקּוֹרֵא֙). - The event of Judges 15:19 appears to provide an origin story for the natural Spring at Lehi. [Shoftim (Judges) 15:19] “ And God cleaved the socket which was in the jawbone, and water came out of it, and he drank, and his spirit returned and he revived; therefore he called its name En-hakkore, which is in Lehi until this day. “ ( וַיִּבְקַ֨ע אֱלֹהִ֜ים אֶת־הַמַּכְתֵּ֣שׁ אֲשֶׁר־בַּלֶּ֗חִי וַיֵּצְא֨וּ מִמֶּ֚נּוּ מַ֙יִם֙ וַיֵּ֔שְׁתְּ וַתָּ֥שָׁב רוּח֖וֹ וַיֶּ֑חִי עַל־כֵּ֣ן | קָרָ֣א שְׁמָ֗הּ עֵ֚ין הַקּוֹרֵא֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר בַּלֶּ֔חִי עַ֖ד הַיּ֥וֹם הַזֶּֽה )
It was explained to me, that for instance the Oxgoad was used because the Jews were very poor at the time and didn’t afford swords and such of the time. I think also to illustrate their use of what was given to them. The jars and torches was a fear and stealth tactic to sneak in then illuminate the enemy camp, that is why he reduced his army to 300, god didn’t pick them, Gideon selected the men that didn’t let their guard down and stayed alert when they stopped to drink,
39,986
There are a number of unusual or unconventional weapons used in the book of Judges: * Shamgar uses an oxgoad to strike down Philistines (3:31) * Jael uses a tent peg to kill Sisera (4:21) * Gideon's army is equipped with jars, torches, and trumpets (7:20) * A woman uses a millstone to kill Abimelek (9:53) * Samson uses a donkey's jawbone to strike down a thousand men (15:15) There are swords and daggers too, of course. But it is striking the number of strange weapons used in the narratives. Is this meant to be thematic? And if so, what point is the author developing?
2019/04/09
[ "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/39986", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/users/33/" ]
Historical interpretation ------------------------- In the time of judges the people were disorganized, there was no king, and no army, no tax base to support dedicated weapons production or a standing army and thus and no military weapons, so the people used farm implements ("ox goads") or household implements ("pots") when they fought. They fought with the tools of ordinary life. E.g. We see in the song of Deborah a complaint that the people have no weapons: *a small shield or a spear was not seen among forty thousand in Israel.* (Judges 5.8) In fact this type of disorganization is one of the themes of Judges, and is one of the reasons the people clamor for a king when they are threatened by an organized army. After Isreal has a king, you see more normal weapons being used. Homiletical theme ----------------- The use of all these various weapons create many teaching opportunities as given in חִידָה's answer. But the larger unifying theme is that God wanted the people to rely on him rather than on the strength of their own army or their own devices. He created many miracles for them to defeat their enemies with the simple farm tools they had. In this way, the call for a dedicated tax base to fund weapons and training and a dedicated king to lead a standing army is viewed as a rejection of God's provision (1 Sam 8.7) *'And the Lord said to Samuel, “Obey the voice of the people in all that they say to you, for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected me from being king over them."* Many view the call for a king as just an attempt to want to imitate other nations as if this was about fitting in, but if you take into account that they had no weapons or trained soldiers but were being attacked by armies that did, then the desire for a king is understood more fully.
It was explained to me, that for instance the Oxgoad was used because the Jews were very poor at the time and didn’t afford swords and such of the time. I think also to illustrate their use of what was given to them. The jars and torches was a fear and stealth tactic to sneak in then illuminate the enemy camp, that is why he reduced his army to 300, god didn’t pick them, Gideon selected the men that didn’t let their guard down and stayed alert when they stopped to drink,
39,986
There are a number of unusual or unconventional weapons used in the book of Judges: * Shamgar uses an oxgoad to strike down Philistines (3:31) * Jael uses a tent peg to kill Sisera (4:21) * Gideon's army is equipped with jars, torches, and trumpets (7:20) * A woman uses a millstone to kill Abimelek (9:53) * Samson uses a donkey's jawbone to strike down a thousand men (15:15) There are swords and daggers too, of course. But it is striking the number of strange weapons used in the narratives. Is this meant to be thematic? And if so, what point is the author developing?
2019/04/09
[ "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/39986", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/users/33/" ]
Why are there unusual weapons (donkey jawbone, etc.) in the book of Judges? * By analyzing the Hebrew context and meaning of the weapons used by Judges like Samson, readers will notice the use of Hebrew puns / riddles for explaining the origin of geographic names / landmarks. 1. Regarding the "Jawbone" used by Samson : In Judges 15:14-19, Samson (Shimshon, שִׁמְשׁ֔וֹן) defeats the Philistines with an odd weapon - a donkey’s jawbone (Lehi, לְחִ֣י) - calling the place of his victory “Level-Jawbone” (רָ֥מַת לֶֽחִי). While Samson was thirsty after the Philistine battle at Lehi, he prayed to find something to drink and God cleaved the socket of Samson’s weapon to make water pour out of the donkey’s jawbone. After reviving his spirit by drinking water from the donkey’s jawbone, Samson called his place of rejuvenation “Eye of the Crier” ( עֵ֚ין הַקּוֹרֵא֙). - The event of Judges 15:19 appears to provide an origin story for the natural Spring at Lehi. [Shoftim (Judges) 15:19] “ And God cleaved the socket which was in the jawbone, and water came out of it, and he drank, and his spirit returned and he revived; therefore he called its name En-hakkore, which is in Lehi until this day. “ ( וַיִּבְקַ֨ע אֱלֹהִ֜ים אֶת־הַמַּכְתֵּ֣שׁ אֲשֶׁר־בַּלֶּ֗חִי וַיֵּצְא֨וּ מִמֶּ֚נּוּ מַ֙יִם֙ וַיֵּ֔שְׁתְּ וַתָּ֥שָׁב רוּח֖וֹ וַיֶּ֑חִי עַל־כֵּ֣ן | קָרָ֣א שְׁמָ֗הּ עֵ֚ין הַקּוֹרֵא֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר בַּלֶּ֔חִי עַ֖ד הַיּ֥וֹם הַזֶּֽה )
Gideon's army is equipped with jars, torches, and trumpets (7:20) This demonstrates God's great power, as the city fell without use of regular weapons. God didn't need swords or a big army, he just needed Gideon to trust him. Samson uses a donkey's jawbone to strike down a thousand men (15:15) The way this one was explained to me was that touching a dead animal body was considered very unclean, and Samson was meant to be holy and set apart. This shows how far God's people have fallen. Perhaps the use of strange weapons also has something to do with showing the sin and evil amongst God's people, as they don't even use 'honourable' methods such as swords?
39,986
There are a number of unusual or unconventional weapons used in the book of Judges: * Shamgar uses an oxgoad to strike down Philistines (3:31) * Jael uses a tent peg to kill Sisera (4:21) * Gideon's army is equipped with jars, torches, and trumpets (7:20) * A woman uses a millstone to kill Abimelek (9:53) * Samson uses a donkey's jawbone to strike down a thousand men (15:15) There are swords and daggers too, of course. But it is striking the number of strange weapons used in the narratives. Is this meant to be thematic? And if so, what point is the author developing?
2019/04/09
[ "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/39986", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/users/33/" ]
Historical interpretation ------------------------- In the time of judges the people were disorganized, there was no king, and no army, no tax base to support dedicated weapons production or a standing army and thus and no military weapons, so the people used farm implements ("ox goads") or household implements ("pots") when they fought. They fought with the tools of ordinary life. E.g. We see in the song of Deborah a complaint that the people have no weapons: *a small shield or a spear was not seen among forty thousand in Israel.* (Judges 5.8) In fact this type of disorganization is one of the themes of Judges, and is one of the reasons the people clamor for a king when they are threatened by an organized army. After Isreal has a king, you see more normal weapons being used. Homiletical theme ----------------- The use of all these various weapons create many teaching opportunities as given in חִידָה's answer. But the larger unifying theme is that God wanted the people to rely on him rather than on the strength of their own army or their own devices. He created many miracles for them to defeat their enemies with the simple farm tools they had. In this way, the call for a dedicated tax base to fund weapons and training and a dedicated king to lead a standing army is viewed as a rejection of God's provision (1 Sam 8.7) *'And the Lord said to Samuel, “Obey the voice of the people in all that they say to you, for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected me from being king over them."* Many view the call for a king as just an attempt to want to imitate other nations as if this was about fitting in, but if you take into account that they had no weapons or trained soldiers but were being attacked by armies that did, then the desire for a king is understood more fully.
Gideon's army is equipped with jars, torches, and trumpets (7:20) This demonstrates God's great power, as the city fell without use of regular weapons. God didn't need swords or a big army, he just needed Gideon to trust him. Samson uses a donkey's jawbone to strike down a thousand men (15:15) The way this one was explained to me was that touching a dead animal body was considered very unclean, and Samson was meant to be holy and set apart. This shows how far God's people have fallen. Perhaps the use of strange weapons also has something to do with showing the sin and evil amongst God's people, as they don't even use 'honourable' methods such as swords?
39,986
There are a number of unusual or unconventional weapons used in the book of Judges: * Shamgar uses an oxgoad to strike down Philistines (3:31) * Jael uses a tent peg to kill Sisera (4:21) * Gideon's army is equipped with jars, torches, and trumpets (7:20) * A woman uses a millstone to kill Abimelek (9:53) * Samson uses a donkey's jawbone to strike down a thousand men (15:15) There are swords and daggers too, of course. But it is striking the number of strange weapons used in the narratives. Is this meant to be thematic? And if so, what point is the author developing?
2019/04/09
[ "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/39986", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/users/33/" ]
Why are there unusual weapons (donkey jawbone, etc.) in the book of Judges? * By analyzing the Hebrew context and meaning of the weapons used by Judges like Samson, readers will notice the use of Hebrew puns / riddles for explaining the origin of geographic names / landmarks. 1. Regarding the "Jawbone" used by Samson : In Judges 15:14-19, Samson (Shimshon, שִׁמְשׁ֔וֹן) defeats the Philistines with an odd weapon - a donkey’s jawbone (Lehi, לְחִ֣י) - calling the place of his victory “Level-Jawbone” (רָ֥מַת לֶֽחִי). While Samson was thirsty after the Philistine battle at Lehi, he prayed to find something to drink and God cleaved the socket of Samson’s weapon to make water pour out of the donkey’s jawbone. After reviving his spirit by drinking water from the donkey’s jawbone, Samson called his place of rejuvenation “Eye of the Crier” ( עֵ֚ין הַקּוֹרֵא֙). - The event of Judges 15:19 appears to provide an origin story for the natural Spring at Lehi. [Shoftim (Judges) 15:19] “ And God cleaved the socket which was in the jawbone, and water came out of it, and he drank, and his spirit returned and he revived; therefore he called its name En-hakkore, which is in Lehi until this day. “ ( וַיִּבְקַ֨ע אֱלֹהִ֜ים אֶת־הַמַּכְתֵּ֣שׁ אֲשֶׁר־בַּלֶּ֗חִי וַיֵּצְא֨וּ מִמֶּ֚נּוּ מַ֙יִם֙ וַיֵּ֔שְׁתְּ וַתָּ֥שָׁב רוּח֖וֹ וַיֶּ֑חִי עַל־כֵּ֣ן | קָרָ֣א שְׁמָ֗הּ עֵ֚ין הַקּוֹרֵא֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר בַּלֶּ֔חִי עַ֖ד הַיּ֥וֹם הַזֶּֽה )
The questions I first had regarding the unusual weapons included…Who was attacking and who was defending? Where and when did the events take place over the 350 year stretch of Judges? Was the fighting from a short, mid, or long distance? Would the defender know he’d soon be attacked? Did the situation force them to be creative or had they brought the weapons they wanted? After reading the 5 stories I don’t see these as thematic. In Jael’s, Gideon’s, and Woman with a Millstone stories, the weapons appear to be exactly what they needed given the circumstances. The other two stories are that of Shamgar, the first “minor judge”. That seems a little vague. The last of the 5 is Samson’s; he could use any or no weapon. -Shamgar uses an Oxgoad (Judges 3:31) Shamgar slew 600 with an oxgoad, an 8’ long farm tool used for spurring oxen. He was the first of the “minor judges”, so this is an introduction. -Jael uses a Mallet and Tent Peg (4:21) Jael kills the deep-in-sleep Sisera in her tent with a mallet and tent peg. Others were in pursuit of Sisera and she just helped them. She had to kill Sisera quickly and powerfully at night. -Gideon’s army uses Jars, Torches, and Trumpets (7:20) Gideon’s 300 soldiers had to attack the uncountable Midianites. Gideon had to design a surprise attack, so they loudly blew their trumpets and broke their jars. Taking their torches in their left hands and trumpets in their rights, they cried, “A sword for the Lord and for Gideon!” From the mountain top down they boldly shouted and attacked, and the Midianites saw the torches and enemies all around them. They ran in sudden terror. -Woman uses a Millstone (9:53) Abimelech was fighting to get into the city’s tower, but the woman cast a millstone down onto his head. She really couldn’t have used many other weapons, especially from the tower. -Samson uses a Donkey’s Jawbone (15:15) I think this stresses the point that a donkey’s jawbone wasn’t much, but Samson was the one with immense strength. He needed very little and even killed 1,000 with this.
39,986
There are a number of unusual or unconventional weapons used in the book of Judges: * Shamgar uses an oxgoad to strike down Philistines (3:31) * Jael uses a tent peg to kill Sisera (4:21) * Gideon's army is equipped with jars, torches, and trumpets (7:20) * A woman uses a millstone to kill Abimelek (9:53) * Samson uses a donkey's jawbone to strike down a thousand men (15:15) There are swords and daggers too, of course. But it is striking the number of strange weapons used in the narratives. Is this meant to be thematic? And if so, what point is the author developing?
2019/04/09
[ "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/39986", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com", "https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/users/33/" ]
Historical interpretation ------------------------- In the time of judges the people were disorganized, there was no king, and no army, no tax base to support dedicated weapons production or a standing army and thus and no military weapons, so the people used farm implements ("ox goads") or household implements ("pots") when they fought. They fought with the tools of ordinary life. E.g. We see in the song of Deborah a complaint that the people have no weapons: *a small shield or a spear was not seen among forty thousand in Israel.* (Judges 5.8) In fact this type of disorganization is one of the themes of Judges, and is one of the reasons the people clamor for a king when they are threatened by an organized army. After Isreal has a king, you see more normal weapons being used. Homiletical theme ----------------- The use of all these various weapons create many teaching opportunities as given in חִידָה's answer. But the larger unifying theme is that God wanted the people to rely on him rather than on the strength of their own army or their own devices. He created many miracles for them to defeat their enemies with the simple farm tools they had. In this way, the call for a dedicated tax base to fund weapons and training and a dedicated king to lead a standing army is viewed as a rejection of God's provision (1 Sam 8.7) *'And the Lord said to Samuel, “Obey the voice of the people in all that they say to you, for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected me from being king over them."* Many view the call for a king as just an attempt to want to imitate other nations as if this was about fitting in, but if you take into account that they had no weapons or trained soldiers but were being attacked by armies that did, then the desire for a king is understood more fully.
Why are there unusual weapons (donkey jawbone, etc.) in the book of Judges? * By analyzing the Hebrew context and meaning of the weapons used by Judges like Samson, readers will notice the use of Hebrew puns / riddles for explaining the origin of geographic names / landmarks. 1. Regarding the "Jawbone" used by Samson : In Judges 15:14-19, Samson (Shimshon, שִׁמְשׁ֔וֹן) defeats the Philistines with an odd weapon - a donkey’s jawbone (Lehi, לְחִ֣י) - calling the place of his victory “Level-Jawbone” (רָ֥מַת לֶֽחִי). While Samson was thirsty after the Philistine battle at Lehi, he prayed to find something to drink and God cleaved the socket of Samson’s weapon to make water pour out of the donkey’s jawbone. After reviving his spirit by drinking water from the donkey’s jawbone, Samson called his place of rejuvenation “Eye of the Crier” ( עֵ֚ין הַקּוֹרֵא֙). - The event of Judges 15:19 appears to provide an origin story for the natural Spring at Lehi. [Shoftim (Judges) 15:19] “ And God cleaved the socket which was in the jawbone, and water came out of it, and he drank, and his spirit returned and he revived; therefore he called its name En-hakkore, which is in Lehi until this day. “ ( וַיִּבְקַ֨ע אֱלֹהִ֜ים אֶת־הַמַּכְתֵּ֣שׁ אֲשֶׁר־בַּלֶּ֗חִי וַיֵּצְא֨וּ מִמֶּ֚נּוּ מַ֙יִם֙ וַיֵּ֔שְׁתְּ וַתָּ֥שָׁב רוּח֖וֹ וַיֶּ֑חִי עַל־כֵּ֣ן | קָרָ֣א שְׁמָ֗הּ עֵ֚ין הַקּוֹרֵא֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר בַּלֶּ֔חִי עַ֖ד הַיּ֥וֹם הַזֶּֽה )