qid
int64
1
74.7M
question
stringlengths
12
33.8k
date
stringlengths
10
10
metadata
list
response_j
stringlengths
0
115k
response_k
stringlengths
2
98.3k
37,651
How to get from Langkawi (Malaysia) to Phuket (Thailand) either by ferry, land (train or bus) or by air? What's the most convenient way? It seems there are no direct flights and no obvious land routes.
2014/10/18
[ "https://travel.stackexchange.com/questions/37651", "https://travel.stackexchange.com", "https://travel.stackexchange.com/users/2879/" ]
Please bear in mind that it's a quite long whole day journey. There are the following option to get from Langkawi to Phuket. I believe the same should work in reverse. By ferry: * [Tigerline](http://www.tigerlinetravel.com) (~3300-3700 THB) > > Service was launched at the end of 2012. High season route only (operating Nov - April). Check in point located inside the Kuah Jetty (located in Kuah Town) on the Pattaya Beach. Travel Time 10 hrs. > > > Bookings can be made in person at a booth on the pier road in Chalong or by various payment methods over the internet. It appears there is no luggage restriction as there would be when flying. The ferry stops and collects at Koh Lipe (immigration clearance), Trang (30 minute break), Koh Mook, Koh Kradan, Koh Ngai, Koh Lanta, Koh Phi Phi (7 stops in total). > > > The Malaysia Immigration & Customs officials are located inside the jetty. If you do not check-in at least 60 minutes prior to departure, you will not be allowed on board of our ferry. > > > The Thailand Immigration & Customs officials are located on Koh Lipe. > > > Note that if there are not enough passengers, they could cancel or postpone the trip. > > > By air: * Only in-direct commercial flights either by Penang ([FireFlyz](http://booking.fireflyz.com.my/)), Kuala Lumpur (Air Asia) or Singapore (Air Asia). Check [Langkawi Airport](http://www.langkawiairport.com/) for further details. * Easiest is to fly Langkawi-Penang-Phuket but you have to check schedules work out. If you have extra time in Penang, check the trip to Phi Phi or Khao Lak. * By [Happy Air](http://www.happyair.co.th/). They operate daily flights between Langkawi and Phuket. They have a little box office at the airport. Flights and office hours are on Mon, Wed, Fri, Sat-Sun. But I'm not sure how this information is reliable. Please contact them for further info. By land (public transport): 1. Langawi - Satun * By [Langkawi Ferry Service](https://langkawi-ferry.com/) to Satun (~300THB). It takes around 1,5h. * By [Tigerline](http://www.tigerlinetravel.com) ferry to Koh Lipe (1200-1400THB), from there to Satun Ferry Port - Pakbara Pier (600-700THB). * There are also pre-organised “tour” tickets that would pick you from your guesthouse in Langawi and deliver straight to the centre of Hat Yai (~RM 70.00). In total it takes around 7 hours. 2. Satun - Phuket or Krabi (by bus) As [pnuts](https://travel.stackexchange.com/users/4995/pnuts) mentioned, there is a air-con bus from Satun's bus station to Phuket. Tickets are 400 baht (230 baht to Krabi) and the trip takes about 8 hours. > > Satun's bus station is a few kilometres south of town, but buses can be flagged down on Burivanich Road as they leave. Read more at [Travelfish](http://www.travelfish.org/transport/thailand/southern_thailand/satun/satun/all) site. > > > Or: 2. Satun - Hat Yai * By taxi, motorcycle taxis or small songthaews. * By van (on an hourly basis). * By local bus. It takes around 3-4 hours in total. You can tell the bus driver where you wanted to get off in Hat Yai and he will try to get you as close as he can. It costs around 80 THB. 3. Hat Yai - Phuket * By direct bus (around 7 hours). * By train Hat Yai to Surat Thani (for Ko Samui, Krabi). Check [seat61](http://www.seat61.com/Thailand.htm) site for trains details. Then road to Phuket. Surat Thani is about 290km from Phuket. This road journey by bus to Phuket from Surat Thani takes about 5-6hrs. * By van that goes to Phuket on an hourly basis. * By air, check the [Hat Yai Airport](http://hatyaiairportthai.com/) site for further details. By land (by car): 1. By ferry to Satun, from there by car or taxi along the coastal (faster) or inner road. > > Along the coastal road, the next major town, after Satun is Trang (Satun to Trang is about 110kms), which is about 320kms (route distance) from Phuket. After Trang is another town called Krabi, which is about 90kms from Phuket. > > > --- > > There is the alternative of going to Hat Yai from Satun, about 60kms, then taking a domestic flight to Phuket, via Bangkok; fastest available connecting flights makes this flight journey in about 3 hrs 50 mins(via TG). All other flights e.g. Thai AirAsia, One To Go, Nok Air- also fly into Phuket via Bangkok. ([source](http://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/ShowTopic-g298283-i8829-k880771-Please_tell_me_how_to_reach_Phuket_from_Langkawi-Langkawi_Langkawi_District_Kedah.html)) > > > --- Ferry map: ![ferry map](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Aamue.jpg) --- Note that Langawi local time is 1 hour ahead of Thai time (GMT+8). --- See also: * [How to get from Langkawi, Malaysia to Hat Yai, Thailand](http://magictravelblog.com/2012/01/how-to-get-from-langkawi-malaysia-to-hat-yai-thailand/) by Tanya * [Please tell me how to reach Phuket from Langkawi](http://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/ShowTopic-g298283-i8829-k880771-Please_tell_me_how_to_reach_Phuket_from_Langkawi-Langkawi_Langkawi_District_Kedah.html) at TripAdvisor
I've looked into this on several occasions. Based on my research there was no simple way to travel between the two islands. The ferry takes too long and is not a direct service. (I also read on other forums that the journey can get quite unpleasant) Road takes way too long. Air was the best option but meant laying over for a couple of hours, and via KL or Bangkok. I referred to the [Langaki Airport wiki page](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langkawi_International_Airport) and checked with every airline to coordinate flights, and I was unsuccesful in achieving in an ideal timeframe.
37,592
OK, I've looked everywhere for the answer for this and don't seem to be able to find it. We are trying to get our Google Drive organised so that the right people get access to the right things without a lot of explicit sharing. We have a top-level folder called "Company" with sub-folders for "Admin", "Finance", "HR", "Engineering" and so on. The sub-folders have more restrictive permissions than the top-level one. We've now got more or less everything in the right place, and mostly this works. The problem is where individual files or folders have their own permissions - they then don't seem to inherit the permissions from their folders. How do we reset the permissions for *everything* in each part of the hierarchy so they are the same as the parent folder? On Windows Server or Mac OS X there is a clear distinction between "inherited" and "explicit" permissions for an item, and it is easy to remove the "explicit" permissions for all the items in a hierarchy. Where is this for GD?
2013/01/07
[ "https://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/37592", "https://webapps.stackexchange.com", "https://webapps.stackexchange.com/users/31469/" ]
If I need to reset folder permissions, I rename the folder (*Finance → Finance\_1*), make new folder with the old name (*Finance*), and "move" all sub-folders to the new folder. With this move, you reset all permissions for subfolders.
<http://gappstips.com/docs-tips/view/98/protect-your-google-drive-folders-by-setting-permissions> according to that link it seems like you need to make sure the files are set to the default permissions then they should inherit from the folder. edit: ctrl+a selects all files in the folder then you can change who they are shared with all at once.
103,673
I am trying to understand things like linkers and loaders better. What area of computer science do they belong to? Compiler, Operating System, Computer Architecture? Where do linkers and loaders come into play during development?
2011/08/25
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/103673", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/7686/" ]
To find out more about linkers, I think they'll generally be discussed in combination with compilers. They are for knitting your various modules together into a cohesive unit, finalizing addresses within that code. Some may even try to perform optimizations. To find out more about loaders, I think they'll generally be discussed in combination with writing compilers for particular architectures unless you mean loader as a synonym for linker. I'm thinking of the loader as the part of the executable file header that tells the operating system how to open and execute your compiled software. I agree that reading the Wikipedia articles will probably impart more information than you're looking for. As to where they come into development ... generally they are beyond the control of the project, and are part of the selection of the operating system and the development package you choose to use. It's very rare that you would use (for example) MSVC but want to run a GCC based linker ... might not even be possible. The ONLY place I've ever used a non-standard linker was at IBM when we were using development copies. If you have more particular, specific questions about these topics, I think you'll find a much better response.
Computers basicly work with binary numbers. People speak their native languages. Do, programming languages are for communication between people and computers. If you say: Add 2 and 3 and then substract 1 from it, I doubt that computer would understand anything (maybe in some programming language it would). So, you need to translate your source code into a format that computer understands, so you need a compiler, which translates a programming language to co called object code. But object code is not yet the language a computer understands and executes directly. So it needs a linker which will make an executable file that containts instructions in so called machine language; a machine language is a set of operations coded into binary numbers which processor understands. All binary instructions have its structure and its published by a processor manufacturers. You can look for it on say Intel's site and see how do they look like.
44,994
I've been unemployed and job searching the past few weeks. I have a medical marijuana card which I stupidly utilized during this break. Now that I have hit my final interview, I'm a little concerned. I've quit for a while but know it's still in my system. I know excuses don't matter in the workplace, and a failed UA means you're not getting hired. My question: So I'm flying out of state for this last interview and they mentioned they'll take care of the hr stuff there. Is it possible to have an onsite drug test or will they most likely order one for me in my home state when I return?
2015/04/30
[ "https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/44994", "https://workplace.stackexchange.com", "https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users/34680/" ]
I would count on it. The answer though is it depends on the company you are applying to and the state where you are interviewing. My company screens all candidates for certain positions. And none for others. I know for a fact that one of my colleagues has all "real" candidates take drug tests. These people are dealing with multimillion dollar FX contracts and one mess up can be devastating. Also there are state laws that add some variance. Some states are more lax on drug testing while others make employers give you a conditional offer before they are allowed to test you. A quick google will give you the state drug info on the state you are going to. If this company was giving you a drug test I can't see it happening how you propose - when you get back. No way I have an out of town employee coming in and give him a job offer while he completes drug test back home at some lab I don't know. My advice - since you are out of town and since this company isn't in a huge rush. Stop. Think of a good excuse to delay the interview. Get tested at a local lab and don't go until you pass.
It's really up to the employer how they choose to do this. But you can bet that the chances are they will test you in a contracted lab in their area. Are you sure you won't pass? Heavy marijuana use will linger for a while up to 30 days if used very very regularly. If you used it a few times a week, and don't use it currently you might be fine. I suggest testing yourself to see if you pass. You can order a home test at [Drug Tests in Bulk](http://drugtestsinbulk.com/)
44,994
I've been unemployed and job searching the past few weeks. I have a medical marijuana card which I stupidly utilized during this break. Now that I have hit my final interview, I'm a little concerned. I've quit for a while but know it's still in my system. I know excuses don't matter in the workplace, and a failed UA means you're not getting hired. My question: So I'm flying out of state for this last interview and they mentioned they'll take care of the hr stuff there. Is it possible to have an onsite drug test or will they most likely order one for me in my home state when I return?
2015/04/30
[ "https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/44994", "https://workplace.stackexchange.com", "https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users/34680/" ]
I would count on it. The answer though is it depends on the company you are applying to and the state where you are interviewing. My company screens all candidates for certain positions. And none for others. I know for a fact that one of my colleagues has all "real" candidates take drug tests. These people are dealing with multimillion dollar FX contracts and one mess up can be devastating. Also there are state laws that add some variance. Some states are more lax on drug testing while others make employers give you a conditional offer before they are allowed to test you. A quick google will give you the state drug info on the state you are going to. If this company was giving you a drug test I can't see it happening how you propose - when you get back. No way I have an out of town employee coming in and give him a job offer while he completes drug test back home at some lab I don't know. My advice - since you are out of town and since this company isn't in a huge rush. Stop. Think of a good excuse to delay the interview. Get tested at a local lab and don't go until you pass.
I'm going to take the opposite opinion of some others and tell you not to worry about it until it comes up. Go to the interview as planned, and don't bring it up at all. I would not expect them to surprise you with a urine test at the interview, but I wouldn't entirely rule it out either. I would more likely expect that they require it within the first week of work, or that you schedule one with a testing facility. If at some point they tell you that they will be giving you a drug test, then be honest about it. Try something like this: > > Actually, since medicinal marijuana is legal in my state, I have a medical marijuana card to help me treat some personal health issues. I know that it can be detectable up to XX days after consumption, so there is a slight chance that I would fail that portion of the test. I understand that marijuana is not legal in this state though, and I most certainly would commit to not using in the future. If there would be problems with my test coming back positive for marijuana right now, could we delay the test until a later date? > > > You want to be as factual and informed as possible. Know how may days it is possible to be detected. Know the laws in both states. Explain your illness if you feel comfortable. Show that you are a responsible legal user, not just some "pothead".
44,994
I've been unemployed and job searching the past few weeks. I have a medical marijuana card which I stupidly utilized during this break. Now that I have hit my final interview, I'm a little concerned. I've quit for a while but know it's still in my system. I know excuses don't matter in the workplace, and a failed UA means you're not getting hired. My question: So I'm flying out of state for this last interview and they mentioned they'll take care of the hr stuff there. Is it possible to have an onsite drug test or will they most likely order one for me in my home state when I return?
2015/04/30
[ "https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/44994", "https://workplace.stackexchange.com", "https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users/34680/" ]
In contrast to another answer, I wouldn't count on it, at least not while you're there. They're going to fly you out to an interview and then say "oh hey go over here for this drug test before your flight back"? I've actually had this exact situation come up... 3 out of the 4 jobs I took were in a different area than I was living at the time (2 out of state, 1 in a city 2 hours away). The drug test will probably come after you get an offer, and you can take it in your city. In my most recent case, the company they contracted with didn't have an office in my city, so they had me go to another company that they picked. This company sent the samples to their original company for the actual work.
It's really up to the employer how they choose to do this. But you can bet that the chances are they will test you in a contracted lab in their area. Are you sure you won't pass? Heavy marijuana use will linger for a while up to 30 days if used very very regularly. If you used it a few times a week, and don't use it currently you might be fine. I suggest testing yourself to see if you pass. You can order a home test at [Drug Tests in Bulk](http://drugtestsinbulk.com/)
44,994
I've been unemployed and job searching the past few weeks. I have a medical marijuana card which I stupidly utilized during this break. Now that I have hit my final interview, I'm a little concerned. I've quit for a while but know it's still in my system. I know excuses don't matter in the workplace, and a failed UA means you're not getting hired. My question: So I'm flying out of state for this last interview and they mentioned they'll take care of the hr stuff there. Is it possible to have an onsite drug test or will they most likely order one for me in my home state when I return?
2015/04/30
[ "https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/44994", "https://workplace.stackexchange.com", "https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users/34680/" ]
In contrast to another answer, I wouldn't count on it, at least not while you're there. They're going to fly you out to an interview and then say "oh hey go over here for this drug test before your flight back"? I've actually had this exact situation come up... 3 out of the 4 jobs I took were in a different area than I was living at the time (2 out of state, 1 in a city 2 hours away). The drug test will probably come after you get an offer, and you can take it in your city. In my most recent case, the company they contracted with didn't have an office in my city, so they had me go to another company that they picked. This company sent the samples to their original company for the actual work.
I'm going to take the opposite opinion of some others and tell you not to worry about it until it comes up. Go to the interview as planned, and don't bring it up at all. I would not expect them to surprise you with a urine test at the interview, but I wouldn't entirely rule it out either. I would more likely expect that they require it within the first week of work, or that you schedule one with a testing facility. If at some point they tell you that they will be giving you a drug test, then be honest about it. Try something like this: > > Actually, since medicinal marijuana is legal in my state, I have a medical marijuana card to help me treat some personal health issues. I know that it can be detectable up to XX days after consumption, so there is a slight chance that I would fail that portion of the test. I understand that marijuana is not legal in this state though, and I most certainly would commit to not using in the future. If there would be problems with my test coming back positive for marijuana right now, could we delay the test until a later date? > > > You want to be as factual and informed as possible. Know how may days it is possible to be detected. Know the laws in both states. Explain your illness if you feel comfortable. Show that you are a responsible legal user, not just some "pothead".
60,322
Guran’s [comment](https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/a/60304/885) > > Perhaps they are tinkering with the solar activity, turning stars into Yotta-watt, nano-bit/second beakons. (We would see the pattern eventually, but not before we looked at century-spanning data) > > > makes me think of [astroseismology](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroseismology) which is a newly available field of study since new instruments can resolve this for stars [beyond our sun](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helioseismology). ![star vibrations](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Helioseismology_pmode1.png) Rather than building huge power-hungry transmitters, how could an advanced civilization induce and modulate vibrations in their star that could be observed at interstellar distances but are the most miserly in energy consumption to cause?
2016/11/03
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/60322", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/885/" ]
The only way I can think of to modulate the star would be to modify the mechanism used for "[star lifting](http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/47897e8b1947c)" Since you want to induce vibrations in the star, the so called "[huff and puff](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzuHxL5FD5U)" method of star lifting which periodically "squeezes" and "releases" the star using an orbiting magnetic field generator. Rather than using the device in a regular pulsating cycle to pump plasma out of the stellar poles, the pulsations are done in a sequence which imparts information on the regular vibration patterns already existing in the star. [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/ftgqH.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/ftgqH.png) *Star Lifting mechanism* Given the vast size of a star, the pattern of vibrations will be incredibly slow, and modulating the "squeeze and release" cycle of the star lifting mechanism will most likely have to take place over a period of years even to attempt to imprint information using binary code. The other issue would be since the astroseismology signals are not obvious, even to a civilization like ours, how do you use this to signal people who are not looking for it? This seems to be a means to send information to your *own* colonies, rather than to send information to the Universe like the Library of Alexandria for all viewers.
Find a neutron star, turn it into an x-ray pulsar ================================================= First off, no one is going to cause vibrations detectable at light years distance to their own star. Assuming they want their home planet (circling said star) to be habitable, they aren't going to put their planet through a freeze/fry cycle. [X-ray pulsars](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_pulsar) release the potential energy of accreted gasses falling to the surface of the (neutron) star giving a continuous x-ray release. As long as the neutron star is spinning with its magnetic axis (where the gas falls) tilted with respect to its spin axis, then anyone looking at the start will see the cyclic appearance and disappearance of of the x-ray beams. To make this happen, you want to modulate the spin of the pulsar to what you desire. You can do this by accreting mass to the neutron star, which can either increase or reduce angular momentum. The best candidate for accretion mass for modulating and powering your pulsar would be another star, but I suppose a Jupiter or Super-Jupiter would work, just not for as long of a time. Sure moving a Jupiter (or a star) to a Neutron star isn't the least energy intensive thing you can think of, but it is probably the least energy intensive way to make a galactic scale cyclic transmitter.
60,322
Guran’s [comment](https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/a/60304/885) > > Perhaps they are tinkering with the solar activity, turning stars into Yotta-watt, nano-bit/second beakons. (We would see the pattern eventually, but not before we looked at century-spanning data) > > > makes me think of [astroseismology](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroseismology) which is a newly available field of study since new instruments can resolve this for stars [beyond our sun](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helioseismology). ![star vibrations](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Helioseismology_pmode1.png) Rather than building huge power-hungry transmitters, how could an advanced civilization induce and modulate vibrations in their star that could be observed at interstellar distances but are the most miserly in energy consumption to cause?
2016/11/03
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/60322", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/885/" ]
[Muon-catalyzed fusion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion) > > ... each muon can only catalyze at most a few hundred deuterium tritium nuclear fusion reactions > > > Maybe Inject streams of Muon's in to Sun, it will spedup burning probably for any thermonuclear reaction, and for p-process it may be more efficient as proton have only 1e charge. This way a Star will be amplifier for your signal, and by focusing beams you may create any distribution of energy and modulate it over time as you wish. Penetration will be maybe up to the star core. So muon beams get you possibility to use less and get more and have any distribution in outer layers of the star.
Find a neutron star, turn it into an x-ray pulsar ================================================= First off, no one is going to cause vibrations detectable at light years distance to their own star. Assuming they want their home planet (circling said star) to be habitable, they aren't going to put their planet through a freeze/fry cycle. [X-ray pulsars](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_pulsar) release the potential energy of accreted gasses falling to the surface of the (neutron) star giving a continuous x-ray release. As long as the neutron star is spinning with its magnetic axis (where the gas falls) tilted with respect to its spin axis, then anyone looking at the start will see the cyclic appearance and disappearance of of the x-ray beams. To make this happen, you want to modulate the spin of the pulsar to what you desire. You can do this by accreting mass to the neutron star, which can either increase or reduce angular momentum. The best candidate for accretion mass for modulating and powering your pulsar would be another star, but I suppose a Jupiter or Super-Jupiter would work, just not for as long of a time. Sure moving a Jupiter (or a star) to a Neutron star isn't the least energy intensive thing you can think of, but it is probably the least energy intensive way to make a galactic scale cyclic transmitter.
191,703
We have a three phase power supply (3x25A) at our home in The Netherlands (230V). All three phases are used for an induction cooker, and in parallel, two phases (let's call them 1 and 2) each power about half of the household. We recently had solar panels installed (about 2.5kWp), and the inverter is tied to the third phase (i.e., not 1 or 2, so it is only directly connected to the induction range). Is this the right way to do it? On the one hand, it seems inefficient to draw most power from phase 1 and 2, and supply power to phase 3. On the other hand, the electrical noise from the inverter is all dumped into phase 3 so perhaps it actually isolates the electrical noise from the rest of the household. Is there a 'right' way to choose which phase the solar panels are connected to? Or does this squarely fall in the **it really doesn't matter** category?
2020/05/02
[ "https://diy.stackexchange.com/questions/191703", "https://diy.stackexchange.com", "https://diy.stackexchange.com/users/44797/" ]
Being a grid-tied installation, it's quite possible that the power utility had some say in which phase to connect the PV system to. In 3 phase systems, it's necessary to balance the load as equally as possible between the 3 phases but this is difficult to impossible to do within a single household. So the utility designs the distribution network so that a group of homes share the load across the phases and over a large number, the phases are well balanced. When connecting PV equipment to their system, generally the utility will provide specific instructions on interconnect based on the capacity and type of your system. You may not have been aware of this as the installer was likely the one receiving the instruction, not you. You might check with the installer as to the reasons why they hooked it up as they did.
You need to evaluate which phase has the highest average load during the daylight hours and put the system on that. If all your loads were 3 phase (I know they are not) having a single phase solar feed would create imbalances in the system.
43,936
Given a piano music sheet, is there any way to know which (suitable) octave should I start, or I just pick up any as long as it fits all notes? Sorry if this is a dumb question! Thanks
2016/04/28
[ "https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/43936", "https://music.stackexchange.com", "https://music.stackexchange.com/users/28224/" ]
Standard sheet music specifies the octaves quite precisely. The lowest line in the treble [clef](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clef), for example, is E4 (the E in the fourth octave): [![e4 note](https://i.stack.imgur.com/gMcy7t.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/gMcy7t.png) [Ledger lines](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ledger_line) can also be added above and below the [staves](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_(music)) to extend their range, and you might sometimes see *[8va](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octave#Notation)* written above or below certain notes to indicate that they should be played an octave higher or lower.
Generally, the pitch is fixed. However, if you are playing music for other instruments, there may be some justification for adjusting pitches. For example, guitar is usually written one octave higher than it is played (when written correctly, an 8 below the clef indicates the shift). However, its bass notes tend to have an "unmuddier" sound than that of the piano, so there is some sense in playing it as if it were not written transposed. Similarly, a soprano recorder (flute) tends to be written one octave lower than it is actually played (with tenor recorders (flutes) being written in-pitch if I remember correctly). Again, the sound quality of the piano may make it advisable to play the music as if it were not written transposed. Music written for piano, however, is always to be played at pitch. The "middle C" C4 between treble and bass clef is pretty much in the middle for pianos. If your piano has a lock, it will be rather close to middle C.
37,846,091
Hi I was wondering if anyone was able to figure out how to navigate from react native view to native ios view in a hybrid app? I can't seem to find any good documentation for this.
2016/06/15
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/37846091", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/6217004/" ]
There is no official API for this in React Native, but you can write some swift/objc code to do it and call it from your React Native code. You can read [here](https://facebook.github.io/react-native/docs/native-modules-ios.html) about how you can expose functions from swift/objc to React Native.
Expose your class and method to react native. To navigate from react native view to native view NotificationCenter is called. [example app source code](https://github.com/pacific0009/RCTIntegration/blob/master/RCTIntegration/ViewController.swift)
22,216,793
I am developing a one hour science fiction TV drama for the networks about cloud-based programming. The idea is that hundreds of thousands of programmers are working on creating a virtual Utopian world all at the same time. In this world they try and solve some of the worlds biggest problems. It is this idea of a group of like minded individuals all trying to solve the same problems that drive the heart of the show and start to give the main character insights into what to do in the real world. That is until a group of hackers start to turn the collective conscience and good will into something much more sinister. Is this idea at least "somewhat" possible? Meaning can a large group of people could be all coding at the same time in the cloud on the same program? Think of it like creating the code for new sections of World of Warcraft while also playing it at the same time. If so what code language would be the most likely that they would use? Hope this makes sense to everyone...
2014/03/06
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/22216793", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/3386783/" ]
Use a source code repository like Git or Subversion and a Continuous Integration tool like Jenkins, which allows you to build right after every push into the repo. Jenkins will build and test the code, and will deploy your virtual Utopian app world if everything was successful You can also provide a context for the cloud talking about cloud technologies. Use an IDE on the cloud like [codenvy](https://codenvy.com/), use a cloud git repository to push this source code and a [Jenkins cloud service](http://www.cloudbees.com/jenkins) to build and to test it. The runtime environment could be also on the cloud. You can show in your science fiction TV drama that everybody is coding everything on the cloud.
Yes as long as they use svn or git and create separate branches. As for what programming language.. The one you wrote.. It is your tv show.. U call it whatever..
22,216,793
I am developing a one hour science fiction TV drama for the networks about cloud-based programming. The idea is that hundreds of thousands of programmers are working on creating a virtual Utopian world all at the same time. In this world they try and solve some of the worlds biggest problems. It is this idea of a group of like minded individuals all trying to solve the same problems that drive the heart of the show and start to give the main character insights into what to do in the real world. That is until a group of hackers start to turn the collective conscience and good will into something much more sinister. Is this idea at least "somewhat" possible? Meaning can a large group of people could be all coding at the same time in the cloud on the same program? Think of it like creating the code for new sections of World of Warcraft while also playing it at the same time. If so what code language would be the most likely that they would use? Hope this makes sense to everyone...
2014/03/06
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/22216793", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/3386783/" ]
Use a source code repository like Git or Subversion and a Continuous Integration tool like Jenkins, which allows you to build right after every push into the repo. Jenkins will build and test the code, and will deploy your virtual Utopian app world if everything was successful You can also provide a context for the cloud talking about cloud technologies. Use an IDE on the cloud like [codenvy](https://codenvy.com/), use a cloud git repository to push this source code and a [Jenkins cloud service](http://www.cloudbees.com/jenkins) to build and to test it. The runtime environment could be also on the cloud. You can show in your science fiction TV drama that everybody is coding everything on the cloud.
Seems interesting. You can try the below mentioned link <https://koding.com/> May be this will help you somehow
12,830,017
I am on .NET Framework 4.0, building a C# web application in VisualStudio 2012. I have Microsoft.VisualBasic added as a reference to the project. I am having trouble with the following line of code: using Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileIO; Building the solution returns the error: The type or namespace name 'FileIO' does not exist in the namespace 'Microsoft.VisualBasic' (are you missing an assembly reference?) I have removed and re-added the reference to the assembly Microsoft.VisualBasic, but still get the error. Microsoft.VisualBasic is in the GAC, as well as Microsoft.VisualBasic.Compatibility, Microsoft.VisualBasic.Compatibility, Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.Vs, and Microsoft.VisualBasic.Vsa. Please let me know how to get VS2012 to recognize the FileIO namespace.
2012/10/10
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/12830017", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/977570/" ]
1. Right-click on your project and select Add Reference... 2. In the Reference Manager, expand Assemblies and select Framework. Then check the box for Microsoft.VisualBasic and click OK.
I had similar issue, fixed by change TargetFramework (in .csproj) from **netstandard2.0** to **netcoreapp3.0**.
12,830,017
I am on .NET Framework 4.0, building a C# web application in VisualStudio 2012. I have Microsoft.VisualBasic added as a reference to the project. I am having trouble with the following line of code: using Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileIO; Building the solution returns the error: The type or namespace name 'FileIO' does not exist in the namespace 'Microsoft.VisualBasic' (are you missing an assembly reference?) I have removed and re-added the reference to the assembly Microsoft.VisualBasic, but still get the error. Microsoft.VisualBasic is in the GAC, as well as Microsoft.VisualBasic.Compatibility, Microsoft.VisualBasic.Compatibility, Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.Vs, and Microsoft.VisualBasic.Vsa. Please let me know how to get VS2012 to recognize the FileIO namespace.
2012/10/10
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/12830017", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/977570/" ]
1. Right-click on your project and select Add Reference... 2. In the Reference Manager, expand Assemblies and select Framework. Then check the box for Microsoft.VisualBasic and click OK.
Application references are not available to uncompiled files in your application (aspx, ashx). There are two solutions to this issue as follows: 1) Move your code to a compiled part of the application (cs/vb file) or 2) Add the reference to the web config My reference was in an ashx file. I simply copied the code from the ashx file to the clipboard, deleted the file from the project, added a new Generic Handler (right click in Visual Studio > Add > Generic Handler), entered the same name as before, and pasted the code from the clipboard into the cs file editor that Visual Studio opened. I now have a cs file that will compile with the project and use the project reference. The file name is the same, so there is no need to update anything else -- just rebuild and deploy.
12,830,017
I am on .NET Framework 4.0, building a C# web application in VisualStudio 2012. I have Microsoft.VisualBasic added as a reference to the project. I am having trouble with the following line of code: using Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileIO; Building the solution returns the error: The type or namespace name 'FileIO' does not exist in the namespace 'Microsoft.VisualBasic' (are you missing an assembly reference?) I have removed and re-added the reference to the assembly Microsoft.VisualBasic, but still get the error. Microsoft.VisualBasic is in the GAC, as well as Microsoft.VisualBasic.Compatibility, Microsoft.VisualBasic.Compatibility, Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.Vs, and Microsoft.VisualBasic.Vsa. Please let me know how to get VS2012 to recognize the FileIO namespace.
2012/10/10
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/12830017", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/977570/" ]
I had similar issue, fixed by change TargetFramework (in .csproj) from **netstandard2.0** to **netcoreapp3.0**.
Application references are not available to uncompiled files in your application (aspx, ashx). There are two solutions to this issue as follows: 1) Move your code to a compiled part of the application (cs/vb file) or 2) Add the reference to the web config My reference was in an ashx file. I simply copied the code from the ashx file to the clipboard, deleted the file from the project, added a new Generic Handler (right click in Visual Studio > Add > Generic Handler), entered the same name as before, and pasted the code from the clipboard into the cs file editor that Visual Studio opened. I now have a cs file that will compile with the project and use the project reference. The file name is the same, so there is no need to update anything else -- just rebuild and deploy.
59,817
I live in the United States Specifically, the state of Colorado. I am required to tell my new employer what crimes I have pled guilty to, or been convicted of in a court of law. In Colorado, you can get a ticket for driving a badly damaged car. If you drive a rust-bucket - a shit-box - then you can get a ticket for having a poorly maintained vehicle. I have done exactly that. The punishment for this crime crime is a monetary fee + 2 points removed from the guilty party's driver's license. What is the official name of this traffic offense in the veritable state of Colorado?
2021/01/04
[ "https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/59817", "https://law.stackexchange.com", "https://law.stackexchange.com/users/36089/" ]
**You (probably) did not commit a crime in Colorado.** The answer to your question though is probably **Driving an unsafe vehicle** [Colorado Revised Statutes Title 42. Vehicles and Traffic § 42-4-202](https://codes.findlaw.com/co/title-42-vehicles-and-traffic/co-rev-st-sect-42-4-202.html#) > > > > > > (1) It is unlawful for any person to drive...on any highway any vehicle...which is in such unsafe condition as to endanger any person, or which does not contain those parts or is not at all times equipped with such lamps and other equipment in proper condition and adjustment as required in this section and sections... > > > > > > > > > The above is not a crime , it is > > > > > > (5) Any person who violates any provision of this section commits a class A traffic infraction. > > > > > > > > > A class A traffic infraction is a civil violation. Note that some driving offenses are crimes: In Colorado, driving more than 25 mph over the posted limit is a class 2 misdemeanor, and doing so in a constriction zone is a class 1 misdemeanor. Also note that I say probably because it is possible that they charged you with something more extreme- reckless driving? violation of noise or pollution ordinances?- but for a fine small enough that you don't say, 2 points, and you did not have to go to court (you could have if you wanted for the ticket, but not required) it is very unlikely.
Unless you have committed a criminal act such as a hit and run or a crash involving a death, a traffic citation is not a crime crime. If you have received a citation, sometimes known as a ticket, you'll see that signing the citation and paying a fine is not an admission of guilt. You might want to edit out one of the "crime" entries from "crime crime." The "official name" of the traffic offense will be specific to the traffic statute for which the citation is written. "Badly damaged car" is rather vague and unlikely to be part of the statute.
25,269,679
I do have Windows 7 32-bit (Ultimate), this is a screen shot that shows the systems features: ![Image 2](https://i.imgur.com/ChKmPBW.png) I need to install visual studio 2013 but it shows this dialog: ![Image 1](https://i.stack.imgur.com/UhZQZ.png) I guess that this problem can be solved by installing some required files that makes Windows 7 functions as Windows 8.
2014/08/12
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/25269679", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/3926923/" ]
According to the [System Requirements](http://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/products/visual-studio-ultimate-with-msdn-vs#Fragment_SystemRequirements), you need to install [Windows 7 Service Pack 1](http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/install-windows-7-service-pack-1), which (judging by your screen shot) you are currently not running.
You need to install Windows 7 sp1. The System Requirements of Visual Studio Ultimate 2013 are as follows: Supported Operating System Windows 7 Service Pack 1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2 Hardware Requirements: 1.6 GHz or faster processor 1 GB of RAM (1.5 GB if running on a virtual machine) 10 GB of available hard disk space 5400 RPM hard disk drive DirectX 9-capable video card that runs at 1024 x 768 or higher display resolution Additional Requirements: On Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2, KB2883200 (available through Windows Update) is required More information, please refer to: Microsoft Visual Studio Ultimate 2013 ===================================== <http://www.microsoft.com/en-in/download/details.aspx?id=40778> Please check your Operating System.
25,269,679
I do have Windows 7 32-bit (Ultimate), this is a screen shot that shows the systems features: ![Image 2](https://i.imgur.com/ChKmPBW.png) I need to install visual studio 2013 but it shows this dialog: ![Image 1](https://i.stack.imgur.com/UhZQZ.png) I guess that this problem can be solved by installing some required files that makes Windows 7 functions as Windows 8.
2014/08/12
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/25269679", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/3926923/" ]
According to the [System Requirements](http://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/products/visual-studio-ultimate-with-msdn-vs#Fragment_SystemRequirements), you need to install [Windows 7 Service Pack 1](http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/install-windows-7-service-pack-1), which (judging by your screen shot) you are currently not running.
I had a similar problem and I found a solution. A heavy one. You delete the version installed with Revo Uninstaller with Advanced mode - in order to remove registries and connected software. After that I used TuneUp 2014 registry editor and searched for "Visual Studio". It found 900 more entries in the registry. I deleted all of them and installed clean again. It solved my problem.
25,269,679
I do have Windows 7 32-bit (Ultimate), this is a screen shot that shows the systems features: ![Image 2](https://i.imgur.com/ChKmPBW.png) I need to install visual studio 2013 but it shows this dialog: ![Image 1](https://i.stack.imgur.com/UhZQZ.png) I guess that this problem can be solved by installing some required files that makes Windows 7 functions as Windows 8.
2014/08/12
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/25269679", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/3926923/" ]
You need to install Windows 7 sp1. The System Requirements of Visual Studio Ultimate 2013 are as follows: Supported Operating System Windows 7 Service Pack 1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2 Hardware Requirements: 1.6 GHz or faster processor 1 GB of RAM (1.5 GB if running on a virtual machine) 10 GB of available hard disk space 5400 RPM hard disk drive DirectX 9-capable video card that runs at 1024 x 768 or higher display resolution Additional Requirements: On Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2, KB2883200 (available through Windows Update) is required More information, please refer to: Microsoft Visual Studio Ultimate 2013 ===================================== <http://www.microsoft.com/en-in/download/details.aspx?id=40778> Please check your Operating System.
I had a similar problem and I found a solution. A heavy one. You delete the version installed with Revo Uninstaller with Advanced mode - in order to remove registries and connected software. After that I used TuneUp 2014 registry editor and searched for "Visual Studio". It found 900 more entries in the registry. I deleted all of them and installed clean again. It solved my problem.
68,774
How can I find a list of the most popular searches in Google that contain my keyword, E.g If I want the most popular containing "Paris" or "London"
2014/09/04
[ "https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/68774", "https://webmasters.stackexchange.com", "https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/37264/" ]
Search changes each and every day. Google says that %15 of all searches have never been seen before. There is no way on knowing the future, but you can get a peek into what Google thinks is relevant today. First: You can use Google Trends found here: <http://www.google.com/trends/> Just enter your keywords. Second: In the search text-box, enter your keywords and various phrases in different ways and study how Google suggests popular searches. The thing you have to remember is that this is a form of looking backwards. There is nothing you can do about that. Think how people will find your content. But also look how competitive sites that are successful use keywords and what keywords they use. I do not always advise going head-to-head with another site, but clues are clues. Successful sites are by definition popular.
Adwords Keyword Planner will give you rough estimation of the search volume. Note that it will not show data for niche search terms which have a few queries per month. <https://adwords.google.com/KeywordPlanner>
68,774
How can I find a list of the most popular searches in Google that contain my keyword, E.g If I want the most popular containing "Paris" or "London"
2014/09/04
[ "https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/68774", "https://webmasters.stackexchange.com", "https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/37264/" ]
Search changes each and every day. Google says that %15 of all searches have never been seen before. There is no way on knowing the future, but you can get a peek into what Google thinks is relevant today. First: You can use Google Trends found here: <http://www.google.com/trends/> Just enter your keywords. Second: In the search text-box, enter your keywords and various phrases in different ways and study how Google suggests popular searches. The thing you have to remember is that this is a form of looking backwards. There is nothing you can do about that. Think how people will find your content. But also look how competitive sites that are successful use keywords and what keywords they use. I do not always advise going head-to-head with another site, but clues are clues. Successful sites are by definition popular.
There is a keyword tool that extracts data from Google Autocomplete to give you many related searches for a certain keyword. Google Autocomplete is a feature used in Google Search. Its purpose is to speed up the searches performed by users on Google. The tool extracts Google suggestions and presents you with a list of related searches <http://keywordtool.io/>
68,774
How can I find a list of the most popular searches in Google that contain my keyword, E.g If I want the most popular containing "Paris" or "London"
2014/09/04
[ "https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/68774", "https://webmasters.stackexchange.com", "https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/37264/" ]
Adwords Keyword Planner will give you rough estimation of the search volume. Note that it will not show data for niche search terms which have a few queries per month. <https://adwords.google.com/KeywordPlanner>
There is a keyword tool that extracts data from Google Autocomplete to give you many related searches for a certain keyword. Google Autocomplete is a feature used in Google Search. Its purpose is to speed up the searches performed by users on Google. The tool extracts Google suggestions and presents you with a list of related searches <http://keywordtool.io/>
62,872,324
I would like to know if there is any way to change the color of the bulleted item in tree view in Eclipse while using a dark theme. I found [this post](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28714333/on-eclipse-java-ee-how-do-i-change-the-color-settings-for-selected-elements-on) that show the same problem but the post focus only on font and background color, not the bullet itself. [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/hGErT.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/hGErT.png)
2020/07/13
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/62872324", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/13201187/" ]
According to the devs in the bug report i made at <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=568543>, "there was a workaround fix for this bug on Windows 7 which has since been removed, since it does not occur on Windows 10". So either use the last working version 2020-03 or change to a OS that has dark theme support as the tree is now a native widget.
So it seems the problem is reccurent with Eclipse 2020-06 and windows 7. I was able to reproduce the bug on 2 differents computers. Reverting to Eclipse 2020-03 has sloved the problem.
14,092
A technical writer wants to change a label of a table column. He says it is not clear. I, a usability expert, am against it. Who should have the last word?
2011/11/17
[ "https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/14092", "https://ux.stackexchange.com", "https://ux.stackexchange.com/users/4519/" ]
Ultimately, your instincts should be supported by data extracted from your users. That's not always the case, so why not A/B both of your theories and see which is better received? I run into this a lot - it is mostly assumptions by one entity on behalf of the user. In my case, it's usually "our users want an iPhone app" - these unqualified statements can be really damaging in the long run. If someone were to say "This is not clear," I'd ask for the opinion of others (or the person saying it to demonstrate that it directly impacts the user). If they feel so strongly about it, they should back it up. On the flip side, I wouldn't say that just because you're the usability expert, you know that it is right - you are allowed to follow your instincts, but I think it is unfair to ask someone else to produce evidence without you putting in the same effort. Ultimately, I think it is best settled by an A/B with both findings.
Per Chad's comment, the product owner is the arbiter of such decisions. It is up to you and the technical writer to make your case for the change; vice versa it is up to the product owner to gather the evidence from you two and any other sources.
14,092
A technical writer wants to change a label of a table column. He says it is not clear. I, a usability expert, am against it. Who should have the last word?
2011/11/17
[ "https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/14092", "https://ux.stackexchange.com", "https://ux.stackexchange.com/users/4519/" ]
Ultimately, your instincts should be supported by data extracted from your users. That's not always the case, so why not A/B both of your theories and see which is better received? I run into this a lot - it is mostly assumptions by one entity on behalf of the user. In my case, it's usually "our users want an iPhone app" - these unqualified statements can be really damaging in the long run. If someone were to say "This is not clear," I'd ask for the opinion of others (or the person saying it to demonstrate that it directly impacts the user). If they feel so strongly about it, they should back it up. On the flip side, I wouldn't say that just because you're the usability expert, you know that it is right - you are allowed to follow your instincts, but I think it is unfair to ask someone else to produce evidence without you putting in the same effort. Ultimately, I think it is best settled by an A/B with both findings.
Test It. Go and wander around the shops at lunchtime (ie do **not** ask people in your company - who will be too close to the jargon) and ask random people what the two alternate label words mean to them.
14,092
A technical writer wants to change a label of a table column. He says it is not clear. I, a usability expert, am against it. Who should have the last word?
2011/11/17
[ "https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/14092", "https://ux.stackexchange.com", "https://ux.stackexchange.com/users/4519/" ]
Ultimately, your instincts should be supported by data extracted from your users. That's not always the case, so why not A/B both of your theories and see which is better received? I run into this a lot - it is mostly assumptions by one entity on behalf of the user. In my case, it's usually "our users want an iPhone app" - these unqualified statements can be really damaging in the long run. If someone were to say "This is not clear," I'd ask for the opinion of others (or the person saying it to demonstrate that it directly impacts the user). If they feel so strongly about it, they should back it up. On the flip side, I wouldn't say that just because you're the usability expert, you know that it is right - you are allowed to follow your instincts, but I think it is unfair to ask someone else to produce evidence without you putting in the same effort. Ultimately, I think it is best settled by an A/B with both findings.
Neither of you. Instead, try to collect empirical data by doing research. Tie the results of your research to formal KPIs for the product's project. And be prepared to step back if the results don't go your way.
14,092
A technical writer wants to change a label of a table column. He says it is not clear. I, a usability expert, am against it. Who should have the last word?
2011/11/17
[ "https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/14092", "https://ux.stackexchange.com", "https://ux.stackexchange.com/users/4519/" ]
Ultimately, your instincts should be supported by data extracted from your users. That's not always the case, so why not A/B both of your theories and see which is better received? I run into this a lot - it is mostly assumptions by one entity on behalf of the user. In my case, it's usually "our users want an iPhone app" - these unqualified statements can be really damaging in the long run. If someone were to say "This is not clear," I'd ask for the opinion of others (or the person saying it to demonstrate that it directly impacts the user). If they feel so strongly about it, they should back it up. On the flip side, I wouldn't say that just because you're the usability expert, you know that it is right - you are allowed to follow your instincts, but I think it is unfair to ask someone else to produce evidence without you putting in the same effort. Ultimately, I think it is best settled by an A/B with both findings.
I agree that user testing is great, however I have found that there's almost never the time or resources to test UI text formally. The "last word" is typically (for better or worse) the product owner, but all parties should have the opportunity to make their cases. There's info you haven't provided in the question... such as, WHY does the writer think it's not clear? Is it possible that you're too close to the functionality and are making assumptions about the user's knowledge that the writer can see more objectively? Does the term in question make sense with the other text on the screen? Are there style guidelines that the writer wants to adhere to that the other term breaks?
14,092
A technical writer wants to change a label of a table column. He says it is not clear. I, a usability expert, am against it. Who should have the last word?
2011/11/17
[ "https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/14092", "https://ux.stackexchange.com", "https://ux.stackexchange.com/users/4519/" ]
Per Chad's comment, the product owner is the arbiter of such decisions. It is up to you and the technical writer to make your case for the change; vice versa it is up to the product owner to gather the evidence from you two and any other sources.
Test It. Go and wander around the shops at lunchtime (ie do **not** ask people in your company - who will be too close to the jargon) and ask random people what the two alternate label words mean to them.
14,092
A technical writer wants to change a label of a table column. He says it is not clear. I, a usability expert, am against it. Who should have the last word?
2011/11/17
[ "https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/14092", "https://ux.stackexchange.com", "https://ux.stackexchange.com/users/4519/" ]
Per Chad's comment, the product owner is the arbiter of such decisions. It is up to you and the technical writer to make your case for the change; vice versa it is up to the product owner to gather the evidence from you two and any other sources.
I agree that user testing is great, however I have found that there's almost never the time or resources to test UI text formally. The "last word" is typically (for better or worse) the product owner, but all parties should have the opportunity to make their cases. There's info you haven't provided in the question... such as, WHY does the writer think it's not clear? Is it possible that you're too close to the functionality and are making assumptions about the user's knowledge that the writer can see more objectively? Does the term in question make sense with the other text on the screen? Are there style guidelines that the writer wants to adhere to that the other term breaks?
14,092
A technical writer wants to change a label of a table column. He says it is not clear. I, a usability expert, am against it. Who should have the last word?
2011/11/17
[ "https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/14092", "https://ux.stackexchange.com", "https://ux.stackexchange.com/users/4519/" ]
Neither of you. Instead, try to collect empirical data by doing research. Tie the results of your research to formal KPIs for the product's project. And be prepared to step back if the results don't go your way.
Test It. Go and wander around the shops at lunchtime (ie do **not** ask people in your company - who will be too close to the jargon) and ask random people what the two alternate label words mean to them.
14,092
A technical writer wants to change a label of a table column. He says it is not clear. I, a usability expert, am against it. Who should have the last word?
2011/11/17
[ "https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/14092", "https://ux.stackexchange.com", "https://ux.stackexchange.com/users/4519/" ]
Test It. Go and wander around the shops at lunchtime (ie do **not** ask people in your company - who will be too close to the jargon) and ask random people what the two alternate label words mean to them.
I agree that user testing is great, however I have found that there's almost never the time or resources to test UI text formally. The "last word" is typically (for better or worse) the product owner, but all parties should have the opportunity to make their cases. There's info you haven't provided in the question... such as, WHY does the writer think it's not clear? Is it possible that you're too close to the functionality and are making assumptions about the user's knowledge that the writer can see more objectively? Does the term in question make sense with the other text on the screen? Are there style guidelines that the writer wants to adhere to that the other term breaks?
14,092
A technical writer wants to change a label of a table column. He says it is not clear. I, a usability expert, am against it. Who should have the last word?
2011/11/17
[ "https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/14092", "https://ux.stackexchange.com", "https://ux.stackexchange.com/users/4519/" ]
Neither of you. Instead, try to collect empirical data by doing research. Tie the results of your research to formal KPIs for the product's project. And be prepared to step back if the results don't go your way.
I agree that user testing is great, however I have found that there's almost never the time or resources to test UI text formally. The "last word" is typically (for better or worse) the product owner, but all parties should have the opportunity to make their cases. There's info you haven't provided in the question... such as, WHY does the writer think it's not clear? Is it possible that you're too close to the functionality and are making assumptions about the user's knowledge that the writer can see more objectively? Does the term in question make sense with the other text on the screen? Are there style guidelines that the writer wants to adhere to that the other term breaks?
36,840,385
Could someone please explain to me why getifaddrs returns the same interface once with AF\_PACKET and second AF\_INET as two different interfaces? When it is AF\_PACKET the MAC address can be obtain by doing a cast to sockaddr\_ll. However this struct has 20 bytes while the sockaddr\_in 16. Why is this cast safe? Thanks,
2016/04/25
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/36840385", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/3523954/" ]
This issue needs kernel config changes. 1. For /dev/mem disable config **DEVMEM** 2. For /dev/kmem disable config **DEVKMEM**
Add these two lines in your config files +# CONFIG\_DEVMEM is not set +# CONFIG\_DEVKMEM is not set
12,896
In Alchemy, the rules for what kinds of cards can replace a trashed card are governed by the following, somewhat ambiguous wording: > > Adding coins to a cost doesn't affect [potion] being in the cost or > not. If [potion] was in the cost, it still is; if it wasn't, it still > isn't. > > > The rules then present an example with Remodel card. However, the Remodel card says: > > Gain a card costing *up to* two more . . . > > > The Governor card wording is: > > Gain a card costing exactly one (or two [if you're the player playing > the card]) more. > > > So, for the player who played the Governor card, it is clear from the remodel example that a card costing exactly 2 coins must be replaced by a card costing exactly 4 coins with no potion. However, what about a card costing exactly 2 coins and a potion? If trashed, must it be replaced with a card costing exactly 4 coins and a potion? Or could it also be replaced by a card costing exactly 4 coins (but with no potion)?
2013/09/09
[ "https://boardgames.stackexchange.com/questions/12896", "https://boardgames.stackexchange.com", "https://boardgames.stackexchange.com/users/2260/" ]
It must have a potion. The rule states that any time any cost is increased, the potion quantifier stays. Since the card you are trashing has one potion in the cost, the card you pick up also has to have one potion in its cost. For more strategy with this card (albeit not help with this particular question!) check [this](http://wiki.dominionstrategy.com/index.php/Governor) out.
'Up to' means you can exchange a card with potion in the cost into a card that does or does not not have a potion in the cost, but you can **not** remodel a card with no potion in the cost into one that does. Remodel says "up to". You may Remodel a Golem into a Gold, or Remodel an Apothecary into a Golem. If the card says "exactly" like Governor, the card to be gained has to have the same number of potions in the cost, and the specified cost in coins. If you play Governor, you can trash University, and the only possible card you can get in exchange is Golem, as it's the only card that costs exactly 2 more than University.
29,019
Let's say I have 10 miners node in my network. Once a transaction is initiated, all nodes will be informed about this and then they start mining. 1st node has highest computational power and finished mining the block before other nodes do. Now, will other nodes continue to mine the same block or they will stop mining after 1 st node has finished mining.
2017/10/22
[ "https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/29019", "https://ethereum.stackexchange.com", "https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/users/21465/" ]
Actually, in Remix there's an "Account" dropdown right beneath "Environment" (where you select Javascript VM). It provides five test accounts for you.
You could create locally a blockchain with 10 test accounts using "[testrpc](https://github.com/ethereumjs/testrpc)", a fast Ethereum RPC client for testing and development. 1. Download and install testrpc and then run on terminal "test-rpc". You will then have the 10 accounts and their private keys. 2. In Remix choose Web3-provider and connect to localhost:8545, where your test-rpc runs.
118,359
I am editing questions for better understanding. However, for an approved edit, I get 2 Reputation points. On Rejection, I get 0 points, with reason. Recently, I have successfully edited one question, this is the link: <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8784757/unable-to-run-new-project-after-updating-the-eclipse-and-adtold-proj-are-runnin> It is showing that I have edited the question, but I haven't received any reputation points for it. What is the reason for not getting reputation points for successful editing?
2012/01/09
[ "https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/118359", "https://meta.stackexchange.com", "https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/173001/" ]
User called `Java` edited the code sample, see [this suggested edit](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/175885). By retagging the question, you actually Approved his suggested edit and added your own edit, which was the tags edit. When you'll have 2K+ rep you'll see it's called "Improve". :) Another option for what happened is that you really edited the code adding formatting plus edited the tags, but the other user also edited the code and the two edits were merged.
You have enough reputation to [retag questions](https://stackoverflow.com/privileges/retag-questions). Retags do not go through an approval process and therefore do not earn you any additional reputation. Only edit suggestions that change content along with tags will earn you reputation when approved.
108,187
[![close-up of hairs strings](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CDCss.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CDCss.jpg) It's something like the image above, just less loose hairss. While I was looking at it, I tried playing the violin, and some hairs got loose. Do I just cut them off or yank them off? This little book that came with it said, "Do not attempt your own repairs. Only an expert musical instrument repairman has the skill and experience to repair the instrument."
2020/12/02
[ "https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/108187", "https://music.stackexchange.com", "https://music.stackexchange.com/users/73400/" ]
All the hairs should tighten at about the same rate. That bow looks very slack. If individual hairs break, they can be pulled out or cut off - I've seen concert violinists do this mid concert - usually snatched off. If all the hairs don't tighten together, it's a job for a techie.
I would carefully cut them off rather than yank them out. The latter might loosen still more. If it keeps happening, you should take it to a reputable repairer and find out what the problem is.
160,225
I am unable to delete, rename and even force delete (using /F in cmd.exe) a bunch of files. These were created during some updates etc and in a different drive than C root drive. Using Windows XP SP3. Any help, suggestions? CMD.EXE gives error access is denied while deleting
2010/07/05
[ "https://superuser.com/questions/160225", "https://superuser.com", "https://superuser.com/users/36852/" ]
This really worked: 1. Start in Safe Mode 2. Log in as Administrator 3. In My Computer, rename (may not be necessary) 4. Right click on the file and choose Properties. 5. Select the Security tab. 6. Tick "Full control" which automatically ticks all the other boxes as well. 7. Click "Apply" and then "OK" 8. On the file, right click and "delete". I had hundreds of sub-folders with these EULA files. They were all Microsoft warnings about the use of some Microsoft product I had downloaded, in about fifty different languages. Don't you just hate the sheer arrogance of Microsoft stopping you controlling your own computer? This worked for me. After rebooting several times they have not reappeared. I now need to check what other crud was installed by Microsoft without my consent, and take back control.
They are probably system level files that Windows is protecting. Windows (as far as I know) doesn't have a `sudo` *"I want this done and done now"* mode at all.
160,225
I am unable to delete, rename and even force delete (using /F in cmd.exe) a bunch of files. These were created during some updates etc and in a different drive than C root drive. Using Windows XP SP3. Any help, suggestions? CMD.EXE gives error access is denied while deleting
2010/07/05
[ "https://superuser.com/questions/160225", "https://superuser.com", "https://superuser.com/users/36852/" ]
The files might have strange permissions, and you might not be their owner. See: [How to take ownership of a file or a folder in Windows XP](http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308421).
Reboot in [Safe Mode](http://www.computerhope.com/issues/chsafe.htm) and then try to delete them as an administrator. You should also be able to boot off a 3rd party OS disk (like a Linux Live CD, or a Windows PE disk) and go remove them, that way your copy of Windows CAN'T stop you. :) HTH
160,225
I am unable to delete, rename and even force delete (using /F in cmd.exe) a bunch of files. These were created during some updates etc and in a different drive than C root drive. Using Windows XP SP3. Any help, suggestions? CMD.EXE gives error access is denied while deleting
2010/07/05
[ "https://superuser.com/questions/160225", "https://superuser.com", "https://superuser.com/users/36852/" ]
You might check out a freeware solution: [Unlocker](http://www.emptyloop.com/unlocker/)
First boot in safe mode then right click file for properties, then the security tab click the owner tab nd change the owner to administrator only then can you change the permissions.
160,225
I am unable to delete, rename and even force delete (using /F in cmd.exe) a bunch of files. These were created during some updates etc and in a different drive than C root drive. Using Windows XP SP3. Any help, suggestions? CMD.EXE gives error access is denied while deleting
2010/07/05
[ "https://superuser.com/questions/160225", "https://superuser.com", "https://superuser.com/users/36852/" ]
This really worked: 1. Start in Safe Mode 2. Log in as Administrator 3. In My Computer, rename (may not be necessary) 4. Right click on the file and choose Properties. 5. Select the Security tab. 6. Tick "Full control" which automatically ticks all the other boxes as well. 7. Click "Apply" and then "OK" 8. On the file, right click and "delete". I had hundreds of sub-folders with these EULA files. They were all Microsoft warnings about the use of some Microsoft product I had downloaded, in about fifty different languages. Don't you just hate the sheer arrogance of Microsoft stopping you controlling your own computer? This worked for me. After rebooting several times they have not reappeared. I now need to check what other crud was installed by Microsoft without my consent, and take back control.
The files might have strange permissions, and you might not be their owner. See: [How to take ownership of a file or a folder in Windows XP](http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308421).
160,225
I am unable to delete, rename and even force delete (using /F in cmd.exe) a bunch of files. These were created during some updates etc and in a different drive than C root drive. Using Windows XP SP3. Any help, suggestions? CMD.EXE gives error access is denied while deleting
2010/07/05
[ "https://superuser.com/questions/160225", "https://superuser.com", "https://superuser.com/users/36852/" ]
This really worked: 1. Start in Safe Mode 2. Log in as Administrator 3. In My Computer, rename (may not be necessary) 4. Right click on the file and choose Properties. 5. Select the Security tab. 6. Tick "Full control" which automatically ticks all the other boxes as well. 7. Click "Apply" and then "OK" 8. On the file, right click and "delete". I had hundreds of sub-folders with these EULA files. They were all Microsoft warnings about the use of some Microsoft product I had downloaded, in about fifty different languages. Don't you just hate the sheer arrogance of Microsoft stopping you controlling your own computer? This worked for me. After rebooting several times they have not reappeared. I now need to check what other crud was installed by Microsoft without my consent, and take back control.
Reboot in [Safe Mode](http://www.computerhope.com/issues/chsafe.htm) and then try to delete them as an administrator. You should also be able to boot off a 3rd party OS disk (like a Linux Live CD, or a Windows PE disk) and go remove them, that way your copy of Windows CAN'T stop you. :) HTH
160,225
I am unable to delete, rename and even force delete (using /F in cmd.exe) a bunch of files. These were created during some updates etc and in a different drive than C root drive. Using Windows XP SP3. Any help, suggestions? CMD.EXE gives error access is denied while deleting
2010/07/05
[ "https://superuser.com/questions/160225", "https://superuser.com", "https://superuser.com/users/36852/" ]
This really worked: 1. Start in Safe Mode 2. Log in as Administrator 3. In My Computer, rename (may not be necessary) 4. Right click on the file and choose Properties. 5. Select the Security tab. 6. Tick "Full control" which automatically ticks all the other boxes as well. 7. Click "Apply" and then "OK" 8. On the file, right click and "delete". I had hundreds of sub-folders with these EULA files. They were all Microsoft warnings about the use of some Microsoft product I had downloaded, in about fifty different languages. Don't you just hate the sheer arrogance of Microsoft stopping you controlling your own computer? This worked for me. After rebooting several times they have not reappeared. I now need to check what other crud was installed by Microsoft without my consent, and take back control.
First boot in safe mode then right click file for properties, then the security tab click the owner tab nd change the owner to administrator only then can you change the permissions.
160,225
I am unable to delete, rename and even force delete (using /F in cmd.exe) a bunch of files. These were created during some updates etc and in a different drive than C root drive. Using Windows XP SP3. Any help, suggestions? CMD.EXE gives error access is denied while deleting
2010/07/05
[ "https://superuser.com/questions/160225", "https://superuser.com", "https://superuser.com/users/36852/" ]
You might check out a freeware solution: [Unlocker](http://www.emptyloop.com/unlocker/)
They are probably system level files that Windows is protecting. Windows (as far as I know) doesn't have a `sudo` *"I want this done and done now"* mode at all.
160,225
I am unable to delete, rename and even force delete (using /F in cmd.exe) a bunch of files. These were created during some updates etc and in a different drive than C root drive. Using Windows XP SP3. Any help, suggestions? CMD.EXE gives error access is denied while deleting
2010/07/05
[ "https://superuser.com/questions/160225", "https://superuser.com", "https://superuser.com/users/36852/" ]
This really worked: 1. Start in Safe Mode 2. Log in as Administrator 3. In My Computer, rename (may not be necessary) 4. Right click on the file and choose Properties. 5. Select the Security tab. 6. Tick "Full control" which automatically ticks all the other boxes as well. 7. Click "Apply" and then "OK" 8. On the file, right click and "delete". I had hundreds of sub-folders with these EULA files. They were all Microsoft warnings about the use of some Microsoft product I had downloaded, in about fifty different languages. Don't you just hate the sheer arrogance of Microsoft stopping you controlling your own computer? This worked for me. After rebooting several times they have not reappeared. I now need to check what other crud was installed by Microsoft without my consent, and take back control.
You might check out a freeware solution: [Unlocker](http://www.emptyloop.com/unlocker/)
160,225
I am unable to delete, rename and even force delete (using /F in cmd.exe) a bunch of files. These were created during some updates etc and in a different drive than C root drive. Using Windows XP SP3. Any help, suggestions? CMD.EXE gives error access is denied while deleting
2010/07/05
[ "https://superuser.com/questions/160225", "https://superuser.com", "https://superuser.com/users/36852/" ]
The files might have strange permissions, and you might not be their owner. See: [How to take ownership of a file or a folder in Windows XP](http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308421).
First boot in safe mode then right click file for properties, then the security tab click the owner tab nd change the owner to administrator only then can you change the permissions.
160,225
I am unable to delete, rename and even force delete (using /F in cmd.exe) a bunch of files. These were created during some updates etc and in a different drive than C root drive. Using Windows XP SP3. Any help, suggestions? CMD.EXE gives error access is denied while deleting
2010/07/05
[ "https://superuser.com/questions/160225", "https://superuser.com", "https://superuser.com/users/36852/" ]
The files might have strange permissions, and you might not be their owner. See: [How to take ownership of a file or a folder in Windows XP](http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308421).
They are probably system level files that Windows is protecting. Windows (as far as I know) doesn't have a `sudo` *"I want this done and done now"* mode at all.
21,106,929
I have a given latitude and longitude say (LAT,LONG). Now I want to add 30KM to this LAT,LONG and want to know result value of lat,long for all direction(north,south,NE,SE..) i.e what will be the lat long value for north,south,NE,SE direction after LAT+30KM,LONG+30KM How can i implement this in java?
2014/01/14
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/21106929", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1049104/" ]
This is called calculating the lat/lon from a bearing and range. See the section **Destination point given distance and bearing from start point** at this website: <http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html> The range will be 30 km. Your bearings will be 0 (north); π/2 (east); π (south) and 3/2 π (west).
**Haversine formula** may help you here.You can refer [This](http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html) link.
1,230
The soft ring around the OEM iPhone earbud is gone, and now it is painful to use these headphones. These soft-rubber rings don't last long either. The apple store suggested that I buy a new headphone for $30 to fix the issue. Genius! Is there something available that I can glue in the place where the soft ring used to be? If not, how do I fix this? **My earbuds** ![alt text](https://i.stack.imgur.com/iSsb5.jpg) **New earbuds** ![alt text](https://i.stack.imgur.com/R6wmz.jpg)
2010/09/07
[ "https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/1230", "https://apple.stackexchange.com", "https://apple.stackexchange.com/users/186/" ]
This video shows how to replace the rubber ring using the end of a water balloon: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5CMVrpKxrE>
A very peculiar question. The rubber ring is often lost and I wonder if Apple does it on purpose. In any case, you will have more luck, searching for earbud caps. For example [Full Silicone](http://www.sourcingmap.com/silicone-earphone-cover-cap-for-ipod-pairs-white-p-3334.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=froogle&utm_campaign=usfroogle) (designed for iPod headphones). If you google for *Earphone Cap* or similar, you’ll find a lot of colors/models/alternatives. Usually they are below 5 u$s. Either of those will cover your earphone completely, preventing the annoying pain from the sharp plastic border exposed by the missing rubber ring. Another small advantage of these things is that they prevent cerumen from going into your earphone.
1,230
The soft ring around the OEM iPhone earbud is gone, and now it is painful to use these headphones. These soft-rubber rings don't last long either. The apple store suggested that I buy a new headphone for $30 to fix the issue. Genius! Is there something available that I can glue in the place where the soft ring used to be? If not, how do I fix this? **My earbuds** ![alt text](https://i.stack.imgur.com/iSsb5.jpg) **New earbuds** ![alt text](https://i.stack.imgur.com/R6wmz.jpg)
2010/09/07
[ "https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/1230", "https://apple.stackexchange.com", "https://apple.stackexchange.com/users/186/" ]
A very peculiar question. The rubber ring is often lost and I wonder if Apple does it on purpose. In any case, you will have more luck, searching for earbud caps. For example [Full Silicone](http://www.sourcingmap.com/silicone-earphone-cover-cap-for-ipod-pairs-white-p-3334.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=froogle&utm_campaign=usfroogle) (designed for iPod headphones). If you google for *Earphone Cap* or similar, you’ll find a lot of colors/models/alternatives. Usually they are below 5 u$s. Either of those will cover your earphone completely, preventing the annoying pain from the sharp plastic border exposed by the missing rubber ring. Another small advantage of these things is that they prevent cerumen from going into your earphone.
[White foam covers](http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=white%20foam%20earbud) might do the trick. I use black ones on my Sennheiser earbuds and they make them much more comfortable. eBay is awash with them — usually it's only a few dollars for 50 pairs — though you'll have to be patient as most come from China.
1,230
The soft ring around the OEM iPhone earbud is gone, and now it is painful to use these headphones. These soft-rubber rings don't last long either. The apple store suggested that I buy a new headphone for $30 to fix the issue. Genius! Is there something available that I can glue in the place where the soft ring used to be? If not, how do I fix this? **My earbuds** ![alt text](https://i.stack.imgur.com/iSsb5.jpg) **New earbuds** ![alt text](https://i.stack.imgur.com/R6wmz.jpg)
2010/09/07
[ "https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/1230", "https://apple.stackexchange.com", "https://apple.stackexchange.com/users/186/" ]
This video shows how to replace the rubber ring using the end of a water balloon: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5CMVrpKxrE>
I had the exact same problem within a few months of normal use. I had the headset replaced under warranty - twice! :-/ I now use the in-ear version instead because they can block out the surrounding noise and therefore allow me to turn the volume much softer - and get a better sound experience as well. I'm not an audiophile; I know there are much more expensive headsets out there, but €70 is more than enough for my taste.
1,230
The soft ring around the OEM iPhone earbud is gone, and now it is painful to use these headphones. These soft-rubber rings don't last long either. The apple store suggested that I buy a new headphone for $30 to fix the issue. Genius! Is there something available that I can glue in the place where the soft ring used to be? If not, how do I fix this? **My earbuds** ![alt text](https://i.stack.imgur.com/iSsb5.jpg) **New earbuds** ![alt text](https://i.stack.imgur.com/R6wmz.jpg)
2010/09/07
[ "https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/1230", "https://apple.stackexchange.com", "https://apple.stackexchange.com/users/186/" ]
This video shows how to replace the rubber ring using the end of a water balloon: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5CMVrpKxrE>
[White foam covers](http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=white%20foam%20earbud) might do the trick. I use black ones on my Sennheiser earbuds and they make them much more comfortable. eBay is awash with them — usually it's only a few dollars for 50 pairs — though you'll have to be patient as most come from China.
1,230
The soft ring around the OEM iPhone earbud is gone, and now it is painful to use these headphones. These soft-rubber rings don't last long either. The apple store suggested that I buy a new headphone for $30 to fix the issue. Genius! Is there something available that I can glue in the place where the soft ring used to be? If not, how do I fix this? **My earbuds** ![alt text](https://i.stack.imgur.com/iSsb5.jpg) **New earbuds** ![alt text](https://i.stack.imgur.com/R6wmz.jpg)
2010/09/07
[ "https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/1230", "https://apple.stackexchange.com", "https://apple.stackexchange.com/users/186/" ]
I had the exact same problem within a few months of normal use. I had the headset replaced under warranty - twice! :-/ I now use the in-ear version instead because they can block out the surrounding noise and therefore allow me to turn the volume much softer - and get a better sound experience as well. I'm not an audiophile; I know there are much more expensive headsets out there, but €70 is more than enough for my taste.
[White foam covers](http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=white%20foam%20earbud) might do the trick. I use black ones on my Sennheiser earbuds and they make them much more comfortable. eBay is awash with them — usually it's only a few dollars for 50 pairs — though you'll have to be patient as most come from China.
91,934
I've installed Steam do my D:\ drive, and reinstalled windows without backing up most of my files on C:\. I then installed Steam over the old directory. I can run all of the games I had installed, but there are some ties to the OS missing. Can I repair my game installs somehow so that they get back what they're supposed to have on C:\? I don't mean savegames and settings files. This is a general questions, but what prompted it is a problem with a mod installer. In this specific case, I want to install the [S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Clear Sky Complete mod](http://www.moddb.com/mods/clear-sky-complete/downloads/clear-sky-complete1) using the installer, but it can't locate my STALKER CS installation. I'm guessing it just checks the registry. I've got version 1.5.10 of the game, and the download page says it should support that.
2012/11/02
[ "https://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/91934", "https://gaming.stackexchange.com", "https://gaming.stackexchange.com/users/28545/" ]
When you install a game, Steam set up some registry keys to remember that it already did the first time installation. This step is done when you launch a game for the first time ( when is usually install DirectX and other redistributable needed). When you reinstall Windows, both the redistributable and the registry is wiped, but since your steam is on a second drive, Steam doesn't need to re-download the games. But when you try to start the game for the first time, it will do the first time installation again, normally setting up anything needed for the game to run.
After installing steam on the C drive, maybe you should copy paste all files from the D directory to the C directory.
13,172,379
I am tormented by the question concerning the usage of Unicode for a long time. Unicode allows to accelerate and simplify the development of software (in terms of globalization), but I am concerned by the following factors: 1. increased memory and diskspace usage; 2. reduction of the text processing performance; 3. Asian languages treated all alike to the detriment of the national specificities. With the first paragraph of all it is obvious... But I don't know the true or not the others. Is there anyone who is faced with the need to localize software for Asian countries, and is ready to share the experience? At the moment I try to use the encoding of a narrow profile (cp1251 - for Russia, cp1254 for Turkey, etc.). Will somebody advice on this issue?
2012/11/01
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/13172379", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1717043/" ]
1. The impact on the size of data in bytes is affected by the choice of the Unicode encoding and by the type of data. For example, using UTF-8 (the only useful Unicode encoding on the web), English text has the same size as in 8-bit encodings, except for typographically correct punctuation marks, which may take two bytes each; for Turkish text, any non-Ascii letter is 2 bytes instead of 1 byte; for Russian text, any Cyrillic letter is 2 bytes. In most cases, this does not matter much. 2. Text processing performance depends on what you do and how you do that. The reasonable expectation is that there is no problem worth worrying about. If processing is fast enough, it hardly matters whether it would be 10% faster using an 8-bit encoding. 3. Unicode unification has its impact, but surely Asian languages are not treated all alike. The Unicode standard has a lot to say about specific treatment of characters in Asian scripts and languages. If you are referring to the different shapes of CJK characters in different languages, then the usual solution is to use fonts designed for the language used. (In addition, it can in principle at least also be handled within a font, when OpenType fonts are used.) Check out the official [Unicode FAQ](http://www.unicode.org/faq/). It has a lot to say about issues like these.
The first two points are very much negligible. You'd need to have a very specific use case where the difference in size and performance make a discernible difference that justifies the headaches of mixed encodings. Regarding the Unihan characters: They are grouped by meaning of the character, but that character may be written slightly differently in different writing systems. This is a problem of properly marking up the language, it's not really an encoding problem. In HTML documents, you can mark the document with `lang` attributes and/or set specific fonts using CSS which will alter the appearance of the character for the language appropriately. How to handle this correctly depends on the type of software (HTML, desktop app, etc). I'd advise you open a new, detailed question about that.
13,172,379
I am tormented by the question concerning the usage of Unicode for a long time. Unicode allows to accelerate and simplify the development of software (in terms of globalization), but I am concerned by the following factors: 1. increased memory and diskspace usage; 2. reduction of the text processing performance; 3. Asian languages treated all alike to the detriment of the national specificities. With the first paragraph of all it is obvious... But I don't know the true or not the others. Is there anyone who is faced with the need to localize software for Asian countries, and is ready to share the experience? At the moment I try to use the encoding of a narrow profile (cp1251 - for Russia, cp1254 for Turkey, etc.). Will somebody advice on this issue?
2012/11/01
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/13172379", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1717043/" ]
1. The impact on the size of data in bytes is affected by the choice of the Unicode encoding and by the type of data. For example, using UTF-8 (the only useful Unicode encoding on the web), English text has the same size as in 8-bit encodings, except for typographically correct punctuation marks, which may take two bytes each; for Turkish text, any non-Ascii letter is 2 bytes instead of 1 byte; for Russian text, any Cyrillic letter is 2 bytes. In most cases, this does not matter much. 2. Text processing performance depends on what you do and how you do that. The reasonable expectation is that there is no problem worth worrying about. If processing is fast enough, it hardly matters whether it would be 10% faster using an 8-bit encoding. 3. Unicode unification has its impact, but surely Asian languages are not treated all alike. The Unicode standard has a lot to say about specific treatment of characters in Asian scripts and languages. If you are referring to the different shapes of CJK characters in different languages, then the usual solution is to use fonts designed for the language used. (In addition, it can in principle at least also be handled within a font, when OpenType fonts are used.) Check out the official [Unicode FAQ](http://www.unicode.org/faq/). It has a lot to say about issues like these.
1. **Increased text size**: Yes. Text size may be increased up to 6 times (for UTF-8). But storage for texts nowadays is nothing a big problem. 2. **Reduction of text processing performance**: As per my opinion, no. An UTF-8 character may take up to 6 bytes, but when scanning thru' the text, and right at the first byte of an UTF-8 character we already know how many bytes more for to read for it (the current character in scanning). So most likely the scanning performance stays the same as O(n), where 'n' is the length of the text. To keep the best performance, try not to access the characters in a text by index (yeah, this is a down-point for performance). Java string is not effected by random index access to string character because Java string is a series of 2-byte characters. 3. **Asian languages treated all alike to the detriment of the national specificities**: Yeah, human languages when presented in text format are all alike, but a letter 'i' of a single stroke or a letter of '長' of 16 strokes is just a character.
13,172,379
I am tormented by the question concerning the usage of Unicode for a long time. Unicode allows to accelerate and simplify the development of software (in terms of globalization), but I am concerned by the following factors: 1. increased memory and diskspace usage; 2. reduction of the text processing performance; 3. Asian languages treated all alike to the detriment of the national specificities. With the first paragraph of all it is obvious... But I don't know the true or not the others. Is there anyone who is faced with the need to localize software for Asian countries, and is ready to share the experience? At the moment I try to use the encoding of a narrow profile (cp1251 - for Russia, cp1254 for Turkey, etc.). Will somebody advice on this issue?
2012/11/01
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/13172379", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1717043/" ]
1. The impact on the size of data in bytes is affected by the choice of the Unicode encoding and by the type of data. For example, using UTF-8 (the only useful Unicode encoding on the web), English text has the same size as in 8-bit encodings, except for typographically correct punctuation marks, which may take two bytes each; for Turkish text, any non-Ascii letter is 2 bytes instead of 1 byte; for Russian text, any Cyrillic letter is 2 bytes. In most cases, this does not matter much. 2. Text processing performance depends on what you do and how you do that. The reasonable expectation is that there is no problem worth worrying about. If processing is fast enough, it hardly matters whether it would be 10% faster using an 8-bit encoding. 3. Unicode unification has its impact, but surely Asian languages are not treated all alike. The Unicode standard has a lot to say about specific treatment of characters in Asian scripts and languages. If you are referring to the different shapes of CJK characters in different languages, then the usual solution is to use fonts designed for the language used. (In addition, it can in principle at least also be handled within a font, when OpenType fonts are used.) Check out the official [Unicode FAQ](http://www.unicode.org/faq/). It has a lot to say about issues like these.
Increased text size, and all of the following are actually untrue. They may be true, for old-school encodings of unicode, such as UTF-16. UTF-8 is not larger, or slower than ASCII for ASCII-only strings, and yet it allows encoding every Unicode code point. UTF-8 is also a de-facto standard of doing Unicode on the marketplace today. There is an extensive analysis of performance of different Unicode encodings in <http://www.utf8everywhere.org>, including for the Asian languages.
89,779
For example my hero currently does a `15%` lifesteal from it's basic attack of **50**. When it trigger a critical strike doubling my damage to **100**, does my lifesteal also doubles the amount? Is it the same for double damage?
2012/10/22
[ "https://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/89779", "https://gaming.stackexchange.com", "https://gaming.stackexchange.com/users/-1/" ]
Double damage rune just double the base damage + attributes of your hero, and it comes before all other effects/orbs. Lifesteal instead is calculated after all other effects and also after all damage reductions, therefore we can affirm that lifesteal will benefits from a double damage rune. Regarding Critical Strickes, as described also on [Dota 2 Wiki](http://www.dota2wiki.com/wiki/LifeSteal), they also increase the total amount of life steal per hit.
Short answer is yes. Practical answer; if you have lifesteal coming from a non orb source (aura, innate ex: lifestealer passive) it is almost always better mathematically to buy Desolator before critical strike against most targets with most armor values you are likely to see in game.
3,050,670
I want to learn C , UNIX and LINUX, and more about embedded systems. Very much interested in them. Are there any online courses or websites which can guide me. And please suggest books to read in learning them. Thanks for your time. Ya please lets your answers and comments come in , they are invaluable to me..!!
2010/06/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3050670", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/335997/" ]
I'd highly recommend "UNIX for dummies" as a starting point on Unix/Linux.
There are many amazing resources online. My favorite is from MIT. <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/> Free courses. They can be pretty in depth, and cover many more subjects than just computer science and mathematics.
3,050,670
I want to learn C , UNIX and LINUX, and more about embedded systems. Very much interested in them. Are there any online courses or websites which can guide me. And please suggest books to read in learning them. Thanks for your time. Ya please lets your answers and comments come in , they are invaluable to me..!!
2010/06/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3050670", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/335997/" ]
I'd highly recommend "UNIX for dummies" as a starting point on Unix/Linux.
Few resources that helped me for C: * The C Programming Language Book by K & R * highercomputingforeveryone.com helped me out initially * [Stanford's Programming Paradigm Videos](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps8jOj7diA0) Good Luck!
3,050,670
I want to learn C , UNIX and LINUX, and more about embedded systems. Very much interested in them. Are there any online courses or websites which can guide me. And please suggest books to read in learning them. Thanks for your time. Ya please lets your answers and comments come in , they are invaluable to me..!!
2010/06/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3050670", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/335997/" ]
* The C Programming Language by K & R * Advanced UNIX Programming * UNIX Network Programming * [Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Videos](http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.001/abelson-sussman-lectures/) (done in LISP, but invaluable programming course) * Understanding the Linux Kernel (a little out of date but good info, don't take as gospel) * Linux Device Drivers 3rd Edition (pretty out of date but good info, same as above) * Writing Linux Device Drivers (pretty up to date but not as detailed as before) * [The UNIX Time-Sharing System](http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~brewer/cs262/unix.pdf), this is essentially *the* original UNIX paper, it may help to understand where all this came from, don't have to understand every detail of this old paper but I think it gives some good background
There are many amazing resources online. My favorite is from MIT. <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/> Free courses. They can be pretty in depth, and cover many more subjects than just computer science and mathematics.
3,050,670
I want to learn C , UNIX and LINUX, and more about embedded systems. Very much interested in them. Are there any online courses or websites which can guide me. And please suggest books to read in learning them. Thanks for your time. Ya please lets your answers and comments come in , they are invaluable to me..!!
2010/06/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3050670", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/335997/" ]
I'd highly recommend "UNIX for dummies" as a starting point on Unix/Linux.
Other than the resources suggested above, you need to understand why you need these languages. Programming language or an OS alone will only take you as far -- for e.g. if you are programming on embedded platforms usually memory is not in abundance. So you need to code for memory optimization. If you are working on real time, you would need to understand interrupt handling well etc. I'd suggest definitely spend time on the architecture (ARM Cortex-M1 etc) for which you are planning to code. Always helps. For more quirks look into <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Embedded_Systems/C_Programming> Orielly's Programming Embedded Systems in C and C++ is a good place to start once you have the basics of C/C++ clear.
3,050,670
I want to learn C , UNIX and LINUX, and more about embedded systems. Very much interested in them. Are there any online courses or websites which can guide me. And please suggest books to read in learning them. Thanks for your time. Ya please lets your answers and comments come in , they are invaluable to me..!!
2010/06/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3050670", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/335997/" ]
I'd highly recommend "UNIX for dummies" as a starting point on Unix/Linux.
A quick way to learn a bit about all of the above is to buy an MSP430-based development board from Texas Instruments, install mspgcc (the open-source compiler for the MSP430) on a Linux machine, and write a basic C program that blinks an LED on the development board.
3,050,670
I want to learn C , UNIX and LINUX, and more about embedded systems. Very much interested in them. Are there any online courses or websites which can guide me. And please suggest books to read in learning them. Thanks for your time. Ya please lets your answers and comments come in , they are invaluable to me..!!
2010/06/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3050670", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/335997/" ]
* The C Programming Language by K & R * Advanced UNIX Programming * UNIX Network Programming * [Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Videos](http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.001/abelson-sussman-lectures/) (done in LISP, but invaluable programming course) * Understanding the Linux Kernel (a little out of date but good info, don't take as gospel) * Linux Device Drivers 3rd Edition (pretty out of date but good info, same as above) * Writing Linux Device Drivers (pretty up to date but not as detailed as before) * [The UNIX Time-Sharing System](http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~brewer/cs262/unix.pdf), this is essentially *the* original UNIX paper, it may help to understand where all this came from, don't have to understand every detail of this old paper but I think it gives some good background
Few resources that helped me for C: * The C Programming Language Book by K & R * highercomputingforeveryone.com helped me out initially * [Stanford's Programming Paradigm Videos](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps8jOj7diA0) Good Luck!
3,050,670
I want to learn C , UNIX and LINUX, and more about embedded systems. Very much interested in them. Are there any online courses or websites which can guide me. And please suggest books to read in learning them. Thanks for your time. Ya please lets your answers and comments come in , they are invaluable to me..!!
2010/06/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3050670", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/335997/" ]
* The C Programming Language by K & R * Advanced UNIX Programming * UNIX Network Programming * [Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Videos](http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.001/abelson-sussman-lectures/) (done in LISP, but invaluable programming course) * Understanding the Linux Kernel (a little out of date but good info, don't take as gospel) * Linux Device Drivers 3rd Edition (pretty out of date but good info, same as above) * Writing Linux Device Drivers (pretty up to date but not as detailed as before) * [The UNIX Time-Sharing System](http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~brewer/cs262/unix.pdf), this is essentially *the* original UNIX paper, it may help to understand where all this came from, don't have to understand every detail of this old paper but I think it gives some good background
Other than the resources suggested above, you need to understand why you need these languages. Programming language or an OS alone will only take you as far -- for e.g. if you are programming on embedded platforms usually memory is not in abundance. So you need to code for memory optimization. If you are working on real time, you would need to understand interrupt handling well etc. I'd suggest definitely spend time on the architecture (ARM Cortex-M1 etc) for which you are planning to code. Always helps. For more quirks look into <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Embedded_Systems/C_Programming> Orielly's Programming Embedded Systems in C and C++ is a good place to start once you have the basics of C/C++ clear.
3,050,670
I want to learn C , UNIX and LINUX, and more about embedded systems. Very much interested in them. Are there any online courses or websites which can guide me. And please suggest books to read in learning them. Thanks for your time. Ya please lets your answers and comments come in , they are invaluable to me..!!
2010/06/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3050670", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/335997/" ]
* The C Programming Language by K & R * Advanced UNIX Programming * UNIX Network Programming * [Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Videos](http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.001/abelson-sussman-lectures/) (done in LISP, but invaluable programming course) * Understanding the Linux Kernel (a little out of date but good info, don't take as gospel) * Linux Device Drivers 3rd Edition (pretty out of date but good info, same as above) * Writing Linux Device Drivers (pretty up to date but not as detailed as before) * [The UNIX Time-Sharing System](http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~brewer/cs262/unix.pdf), this is essentially *the* original UNIX paper, it may help to understand where all this came from, don't have to understand every detail of this old paper but I think it gives some good background
I'd highly recommend "UNIX for dummies" as a starting point on Unix/Linux.
3,050,670
I want to learn C , UNIX and LINUX, and more about embedded systems. Very much interested in them. Are there any online courses or websites which can guide me. And please suggest books to read in learning them. Thanks for your time. Ya please lets your answers and comments come in , they are invaluable to me..!!
2010/06/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3050670", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/335997/" ]
There are many amazing resources online. My favorite is from MIT. <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/> Free courses. They can be pretty in depth, and cover many more subjects than just computer science and mathematics.
Other than the resources suggested above, you need to understand why you need these languages. Programming language or an OS alone will only take you as far -- for e.g. if you are programming on embedded platforms usually memory is not in abundance. So you need to code for memory optimization. If you are working on real time, you would need to understand interrupt handling well etc. I'd suggest definitely spend time on the architecture (ARM Cortex-M1 etc) for which you are planning to code. Always helps. For more quirks look into <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Embedded_Systems/C_Programming> Orielly's Programming Embedded Systems in C and C++ is a good place to start once you have the basics of C/C++ clear.
3,050,670
I want to learn C , UNIX and LINUX, and more about embedded systems. Very much interested in them. Are there any online courses or websites which can guide me. And please suggest books to read in learning them. Thanks for your time. Ya please lets your answers and comments come in , they are invaluable to me..!!
2010/06/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3050670", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/335997/" ]
Few resources that helped me for C: * The C Programming Language Book by K & R * highercomputingforeveryone.com helped me out initially * [Stanford's Programming Paradigm Videos](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps8jOj7diA0) Good Luck!
Other than the resources suggested above, you need to understand why you need these languages. Programming language or an OS alone will only take you as far -- for e.g. if you are programming on embedded platforms usually memory is not in abundance. So you need to code for memory optimization. If you are working on real time, you would need to understand interrupt handling well etc. I'd suggest definitely spend time on the architecture (ARM Cortex-M1 etc) for which you are planning to code. Always helps. For more quirks look into <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Embedded_Systems/C_Programming> Orielly's Programming Embedded Systems in C and C++ is a good place to start once you have the basics of C/C++ clear.
53,722,089
I am currently trying to create a rota within filemaker 16 and I can't figure out how to create records that share a date. I want to be able to have people assigned to jobs and jobs assigned to dates but currently when I create jobs with the same date it creates a new record instead of assigning it to the one already existing. I have 3 tables currently jobs, date and people. I have a 4th layout with a portal where I wanted to view records related to jobs that are set for a certain day. Any help would be much appreciated. Many thanks.
2018/12/11
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/53722089", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/10775091/" ]
I am not 100% convinced you need a Dates table. Do you have anything specific to record about a date, other than its existence? However, you certainly need a *join table* of Assignments, with fields for: * PersonID * JobID * Date (this is assuming your rota is daily, otherwise you will need to indicate the shift or hours too).
I think your structure should change on this. So instead have: Parent: ProjectId Date PersonId JobId Date Then make the project Id your 'Primary Key' so your parent record. Then you are just assigning the person, job & date as the child. That way you can always add to the previous record without relying on date field. You could then filter via dates etc.
68,634
Using operators plus, minus, multiplied by and divide by, and as many brackets as you want, can you do a formula which uses 3, 3, 5 and 7 to make 24? Each number must be used and can only be used once (so there will be two 3's). So, for example, (3x7)+3 makes 24, but this isn't valid because the 5 wasn't used. I don't know if this is possible, btw! It's in a game I'm playing.
2018/07/26
[ "https://puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/68634", "https://puzzling.stackexchange.com", "https://puzzling.stackexchange.com/users/12007/" ]
When we > > combine 3 and 3 it makes 33 > > > and when we > > combine 5 and 7 it makes 57 > > > then > > subtract 57-33 > > > it will give the answer 24
Seems pretty straight forward, sorry I don't know how to hide it: > > (5x7) - (3x3) = 35 - 9 = 24 > > >
116,280
My team and I are developing an enterprise-level application and I have devised an architecture for it that's best described as an "Expression Tree". The basic idea is that the leaf nodes of the tree are very simple expressions (perhaps simple values or strings). Nodes closer to the trunk will get more and more complex, taking the simpler nodes as their inputs and returning more complex results for their parents. Looking at it the other way, the application performs some task, and for this it creates a root expression. The root expression divides its input into smaller units and creates child expressions, which when evaluated it can use to build it's own result. The subdividing process continues until the simplest leaf nodes. There are two very important aspects of this architecture: * It must be possible to manipulate nodes of the tree after it is built. The nodes may be given new input values to work with and any change in result for that node needs to be propagated back up the tree to the root node. * The application must make best use of available processors and ultimately be scalable to other computers in a grid or in the cloud. Nodes in the tree will often be updating concurrently and notifying other interested nodes in the tree when they get a new value. Unfortunately, I'm not at liberty to discuss my actual application, but to aid understanding a little bit, you might imagine a kind of spreadsheet application being implemented with a similar architecture, where changes to cells in the table are propagated all over the place to other cells that need the result. The spreadsheet could get so massive that applying multi-core multi-computer distributed system to solve it would be of benefit. I've got my prototype "Expression Engine" working nicely on a single multi-core PC but I've started to run into a few concurrency issues (as expected because I haven't been taking too much care so far) so it's now time to start thinking about migrating the Engine to a more robust library, and that leads to a number of related questions: 1. Is there any precedent for my "Expression Tree" architecture that I could research? 2. What programming concepts should I consider. I realise this approach has many similarities to a functional programming style, and I'm already aware of the concepts of using futures and actors. Are there any others? 3. Are there any languages or libraries that I should study? This question is inspired by my accidental discovery of Scala and the Akka library (which has good support for Actors, Futures, Distributed workloads etc.) and I'm wondering if there is anything else I should be looking at as well?
2011/10/25
[ "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/116280", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com", "https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/users/39420/" ]
It sounds to me like you've reinvented [Lisp](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_%28programming_language%29). It has trees of operators and data that get combined into larger and larger expressions. I would suggest you take a look at [Clojure](http://clojure.org). Clojure is a Lisp for the JVM purpose built to tackle functional programming with heavy concurrency from the start.
This sounds like a very good use-case for Clojure. Quick bullets: * **Functional language** (lazy, impure) - the dominant idiom for creating programs is by composing functions in a very similar manner to your expression trees. * **Lisp** - as a homoiconic languages it's perfect for code generation and DSLs * **JVM language** with very easy access to all Java libraries and tools * **Amazing concurrency features** - [see this video](http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Value-Identity-State-Rich-Hickey) * **Interactive developemnt** (ability to interact with running program via REPL, redefining objects on the fly etc). * **Dynamically typed** Furthermore, you seem to be descibing a [Dataflow Architecture](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dataflow_architecture). There has been quite a lot of study on such approaches and they are indeed well suited to many domains. If you wanted to implement a distributed dataflow architecture using such "Expression Trees" you might be able to build upon the following: * Clojure for defining the core expression tree language * [Storm](https://github.com/nathanmarz/storm) library for distributed processing * [Incanter](http://incanter.org/) for statistics, data processing and visualisation
13,037,610
I'm not a security guru. I'm thinking about how to implement credit card storage in a software system where credit card transactions are accepted through the web, but are manually executed by an in-house user. We are going to use HTTPS which (I believe) will eliminate the risk of a man-in-the-middle attack. Now, I'm trying to figure out if I can make it so that the data received from the client can encrypted before it hits our server. The idea is that their browser would encrypt the data using the public part of an asymmetric key pair. The private part would be known by an in-house user. Then when it's time to manually process the charge, that user would go to an HTTPS page that we serve. They would manually enter the private key (which would not be transmitted to our servers) and the encrypted credit card info would be retrieved from our system and decrypted by the browser. In this way I'm hoping I can keep any of our servers from ever seeing unencrypted credit card information. Am I missing some well known security hole? I've read [this](http://www.matasano.com/articles/javascript-cryptography/) which seems to address a different kind of security hole. I've also read a few other SO questions, but none of them seem to map clearly to this particular design. Edit #1: @Pointy asked why not use the industry standard. Major online retailers use solutions that are far more sophisticated and expensive than my problem warrants. Major retailers automatically process their transactions so typically work toward PCI-DSS compliance. This is not the problem that I'm trying to solve. I'm working on automatic tools to securely assist in manual transaction processing. Edit #2: @Jason Dean pointed out that I didn't describe the plan for managing the private key very well. The idea is literally to have our employee keep it on a piece of paper at their desk. Our main concern is with remote security violations. Our physical site is secure enough that we're not worried about someone breaking in. The idea would be to keep the private key out of any persistent storage on any machine anywhere that way no purely electronic attack could possibly get both the data and the private key.
2012/10/23
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/13037610", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/170587/" ]
> > They would manually enter the private key (which would not be transmitted to our servers) and the encrypted credit card info would be retrieved from our system and decrypted by the browser. > > > It would be harder to keep secure and type in (or copy/paste) the private key than it would be to simply type in the credit card number. I would call this a rather obvious mistake in your scheme. Note that security protocols are hard, and as you are "not a security guru" I would strongly discourage you of trying to think one up.
It's interesting that you are so concerned about the unencrypted data being seen by the server, but your willing to give the decryption key for all of that important to whatever $8/hour monkey you decide gets to type (or more specifically copy and paste) asymmetric keys all day. Where do you plan to store these keys so that your monkey can get to them for copy/pasting? They'll need to be in plaintext for that. Key management is, without question, the hardest thing to do in cryptography and you are talking about violating best practice protocols by making the key available to users that should not need it and by storing it insecurely. SSL already takes care of encrypting your data before it leaves the client, then, when it reaches the server, you need to encrypt it again before storing it. You can use asymmetric crypto for that if you really want to. I would not worry about trying to do it at the client. I think you are making things way harder than they need to be and with no benefit for your effort.
48,174
Maureen Dowd wrote a review on the recently released movie, “J.Edgar” directed by Clint Eastwood in New York Times November 12 issue under the title, “Dirty Harry meets dirtier Edgar.” Apart from the interest in weird relationship of the FBI’s ‘fearful enforcer’ Edgar Hoover and his protégé, Clyde Tolson, I was caught up with the short phrase, “*It’s sorta meta*,” in the following sentence: > > Some F.B.I. agents who worked with Hoover have been grousing that portraying the feared first director of the F.B.I. as homosexual would “turn Dirty Harry into Dirty Harriet,” as William Branon, chairman of the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation, put it. > > > *It’s sorta meta*: the star who played a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society makes a movie about a real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society. > > > Dowd’s articles are always ordeal to me because of inclusion of a lot of unfamiliar words to me and her own style of elocution. I guess “sorta” means simply “a sort of,” but I don’t understand what “It’s sorta meta” means here. It’s a short phrase, but “meta” is an evasive word for me. I’m not even clear with what “meta user” shown on my page of EL&U page means. Would you explain me?
2011/11/13
[ "https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/48174", "https://english.stackexchange.com", "https://english.stackexchange.com/users/3119/" ]
The prefix *meta-* is used predominantly in scientific contexts, but it has been extended to other areas when it is, in the OED’s words: > > Prefixed to the name of a subject or discipline to denote another > which deals with ulterior issues in the same field, or which raises > questions about the nature of the original discipline and its methods, > procedures, and assumptions. > > > Thus *metalanguage*, for example, is the language used to talk about language. The prefix does, however, appear on its own. The *meta* section of EL&U deals with issues about EL&U and a *meta user* is one who uses those pages. Maureen Dowd’s use of it seems to me to be unnecessarily modish. She might have done better to have said *self-referential*.
In this case, meta is used to refer to the context and culture surrounding the movie, rather than anything directly portrayed in the movie itself. The director, Clint Eastwood, had previously portrayed a law enforcement officer in the movie Dirty Harry. Similar to J. Edgar Hoover, Clint Eastwood's character broke the law for what he saw as the good of society, only P.I. Harry Callahan was a fictional character. One requires knowledge about the people involved in making the movie, explicitly from outside the context of the movie's plot, to understand this reference, and that's why it's called meta. Whether or not this is proper usage of the term can be argued. As to this particular instance, I find the comparison a bit of a stretch (the secretive first director of the FBI compared to a practically vigilante PI).
48,174
Maureen Dowd wrote a review on the recently released movie, “J.Edgar” directed by Clint Eastwood in New York Times November 12 issue under the title, “Dirty Harry meets dirtier Edgar.” Apart from the interest in weird relationship of the FBI’s ‘fearful enforcer’ Edgar Hoover and his protégé, Clyde Tolson, I was caught up with the short phrase, “*It’s sorta meta*,” in the following sentence: > > Some F.B.I. agents who worked with Hoover have been grousing that portraying the feared first director of the F.B.I. as homosexual would “turn Dirty Harry into Dirty Harriet,” as William Branon, chairman of the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation, put it. > > > *It’s sorta meta*: the star who played a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society makes a movie about a real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society. > > > Dowd’s articles are always ordeal to me because of inclusion of a lot of unfamiliar words to me and her own style of elocution. I guess “sorta” means simply “a sort of,” but I don’t understand what “It’s sorta meta” means here. It’s a short phrase, but “meta” is an evasive word for me. I’m not even clear with what “meta user” shown on my page of EL&U page means. Would you explain me?
2011/11/13
[ "https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/48174", "https://english.stackexchange.com", "https://english.stackexchange.com/users/3119/" ]
What it means in this instance is "it isn't *meta* at all." Meta in this fairly recent, casual context is supposed to mean self-referential, or recursive in some way. This is the sense in which my teenagers would use this term. It is not a term which can be applied formally, in the sense that meta can be applied as a prefix, as in "metadata" or "metaphysics". Dowd is trying to be hip by using a term that the youngsters would use. Unfortunately, she's getting it wrong. It is like when the kids use "literally" to mean "figuratively". What Dowd is actually trying to say is that there is a parallel between an actor and a character that this actor has played. Two things being similar to one another does not make them "meta".
esp. @MikeBrown; @JoelBrown; *Ms* Dowd was indeed using *meta* in the sense explained by Barrie England: "a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society" goes on to "...real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society". However, I don't feel *self-referential* is appropriate here. It's quite different, as the above discussion shows. Modish or not, it seems to be precisely the word that conveys the sense.
48,174
Maureen Dowd wrote a review on the recently released movie, “J.Edgar” directed by Clint Eastwood in New York Times November 12 issue under the title, “Dirty Harry meets dirtier Edgar.” Apart from the interest in weird relationship of the FBI’s ‘fearful enforcer’ Edgar Hoover and his protégé, Clyde Tolson, I was caught up with the short phrase, “*It’s sorta meta*,” in the following sentence: > > Some F.B.I. agents who worked with Hoover have been grousing that portraying the feared first director of the F.B.I. as homosexual would “turn Dirty Harry into Dirty Harriet,” as William Branon, chairman of the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation, put it. > > > *It’s sorta meta*: the star who played a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society makes a movie about a real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society. > > > Dowd’s articles are always ordeal to me because of inclusion of a lot of unfamiliar words to me and her own style of elocution. I guess “sorta” means simply “a sort of,” but I don’t understand what “It’s sorta meta” means here. It’s a short phrase, but “meta” is an evasive word for me. I’m not even clear with what “meta user” shown on my page of EL&U page means. Would you explain me?
2011/11/13
[ "https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/48174", "https://english.stackexchange.com", "https://english.stackexchange.com/users/3119/" ]
The prefix *meta-* is used predominantly in scientific contexts, but it has been extended to other areas when it is, in the OED’s words: > > Prefixed to the name of a subject or discipline to denote another > which deals with ulterior issues in the same field, or which raises > questions about the nature of the original discipline and its methods, > procedures, and assumptions. > > > Thus *metalanguage*, for example, is the language used to talk about language. The prefix does, however, appear on its own. The *meta* section of EL&U deals with issues about EL&U and a *meta user* is one who uses those pages. Maureen Dowd’s use of it seems to me to be unnecessarily modish. She might have done better to have said *self-referential*.
esp. @MikeBrown; @JoelBrown; *Ms* Dowd was indeed using *meta* in the sense explained by Barrie England: "a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society" goes on to "...real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society". However, I don't feel *self-referential* is appropriate here. It's quite different, as the above discussion shows. Modish or not, it seems to be precisely the word that conveys the sense.
48,174
Maureen Dowd wrote a review on the recently released movie, “J.Edgar” directed by Clint Eastwood in New York Times November 12 issue under the title, “Dirty Harry meets dirtier Edgar.” Apart from the interest in weird relationship of the FBI’s ‘fearful enforcer’ Edgar Hoover and his protégé, Clyde Tolson, I was caught up with the short phrase, “*It’s sorta meta*,” in the following sentence: > > Some F.B.I. agents who worked with Hoover have been grousing that portraying the feared first director of the F.B.I. as homosexual would “turn Dirty Harry into Dirty Harriet,” as William Branon, chairman of the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation, put it. > > > *It’s sorta meta*: the star who played a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society makes a movie about a real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society. > > > Dowd’s articles are always ordeal to me because of inclusion of a lot of unfamiliar words to me and her own style of elocution. I guess “sorta” means simply “a sort of,” but I don’t understand what “It’s sorta meta” means here. It’s a short phrase, but “meta” is an evasive word for me. I’m not even clear with what “meta user” shown on my page of EL&U page means. Would you explain me?
2011/11/13
[ "https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/48174", "https://english.stackexchange.com", "https://english.stackexchange.com/users/3119/" ]
Other answerers have fully addressed "meta", but I'd like to clarify "sorta". It doesn't mean "*a* sort of", it just means "sort of". It's an adverbial. Its purpose is to weaken a statement; "sorta ..." means roughly "somewhat ...", or "partly ...", or "... in a way", or "arguably ...". A synonym is "kinda" (="kind of"). Both are very colloquial, and very vague; I wouldn't recommend them in most writing. (See <http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/sortof.html>.)
esp. @MikeBrown; @JoelBrown; *Ms* Dowd was indeed using *meta* in the sense explained by Barrie England: "a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society" goes on to "...real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society". However, I don't feel *self-referential* is appropriate here. It's quite different, as the above discussion shows. Modish or not, it seems to be precisely the word that conveys the sense.
48,174
Maureen Dowd wrote a review on the recently released movie, “J.Edgar” directed by Clint Eastwood in New York Times November 12 issue under the title, “Dirty Harry meets dirtier Edgar.” Apart from the interest in weird relationship of the FBI’s ‘fearful enforcer’ Edgar Hoover and his protégé, Clyde Tolson, I was caught up with the short phrase, “*It’s sorta meta*,” in the following sentence: > > Some F.B.I. agents who worked with Hoover have been grousing that portraying the feared first director of the F.B.I. as homosexual would “turn Dirty Harry into Dirty Harriet,” as William Branon, chairman of the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation, put it. > > > *It’s sorta meta*: the star who played a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society makes a movie about a real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society. > > > Dowd’s articles are always ordeal to me because of inclusion of a lot of unfamiliar words to me and her own style of elocution. I guess “sorta” means simply “a sort of,” but I don’t understand what “It’s sorta meta” means here. It’s a short phrase, but “meta” is an evasive word for me. I’m not even clear with what “meta user” shown on my page of EL&U page means. Would you explain me?
2011/11/13
[ "https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/48174", "https://english.stackexchange.com", "https://english.stackexchange.com/users/3119/" ]
This question is very difficult because meta means a whole lot in different contexts. It is a pretty nuanced idea and very interesting. In short, meta generally just means "self-referential." Something that references itself is meta; If a character in a TV show says how much his life is like TV, he is "being meta". Dowd's description of something meta is only sort-of kind-of a-little-bit *meta.* It's more about someone writing what they have experience with. This word, "meta" is a vaguely casual bit of language that comes from the PREFIX meta, in words such as metaphilosophy, metaphysics, metadata, and metalanguage. It is hard to define this in a way that doesn't make sense unless you already know what it means, so I'll just say: applying the prefix of meta to something means "the study or examination of the thing as a whole." For example, metaphysics is the philosophy of philosophy. Metadata is data about data. Metalangauge is language for discussing language. On this website, "meta stack overflow" is a sub-forum where one discusses stack overflow itself. It's a forum about the forums. It doesn't really mean much of anything; you can just sort of apply it whenever you want to indicate something references itself.
In this case, meta is used to refer to the context and culture surrounding the movie, rather than anything directly portrayed in the movie itself. The director, Clint Eastwood, had previously portrayed a law enforcement officer in the movie Dirty Harry. Similar to J. Edgar Hoover, Clint Eastwood's character broke the law for what he saw as the good of society, only P.I. Harry Callahan was a fictional character. One requires knowledge about the people involved in making the movie, explicitly from outside the context of the movie's plot, to understand this reference, and that's why it's called meta. Whether or not this is proper usage of the term can be argued. As to this particular instance, I find the comparison a bit of a stretch (the secretive first director of the FBI compared to a practically vigilante PI).
48,174
Maureen Dowd wrote a review on the recently released movie, “J.Edgar” directed by Clint Eastwood in New York Times November 12 issue under the title, “Dirty Harry meets dirtier Edgar.” Apart from the interest in weird relationship of the FBI’s ‘fearful enforcer’ Edgar Hoover and his protégé, Clyde Tolson, I was caught up with the short phrase, “*It’s sorta meta*,” in the following sentence: > > Some F.B.I. agents who worked with Hoover have been grousing that portraying the feared first director of the F.B.I. as homosexual would “turn Dirty Harry into Dirty Harriet,” as William Branon, chairman of the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation, put it. > > > *It’s sorta meta*: the star who played a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society makes a movie about a real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society. > > > Dowd’s articles are always ordeal to me because of inclusion of a lot of unfamiliar words to me and her own style of elocution. I guess “sorta” means simply “a sort of,” but I don’t understand what “It’s sorta meta” means here. It’s a short phrase, but “meta” is an evasive word for me. I’m not even clear with what “meta user” shown on my page of EL&U page means. Would you explain me?
2011/11/13
[ "https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/48174", "https://english.stackexchange.com", "https://english.stackexchange.com/users/3119/" ]
Other answerers have fully addressed "meta", but I'd like to clarify "sorta". It doesn't mean "*a* sort of", it just means "sort of". It's an adverbial. Its purpose is to weaken a statement; "sorta ..." means roughly "somewhat ...", or "partly ...", or "... in a way", or "arguably ...". A synonym is "kinda" (="kind of"). Both are very colloquial, and very vague; I wouldn't recommend them in most writing. (See <http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/sortof.html>.)
In this case, meta is used to refer to the context and culture surrounding the movie, rather than anything directly portrayed in the movie itself. The director, Clint Eastwood, had previously portrayed a law enforcement officer in the movie Dirty Harry. Similar to J. Edgar Hoover, Clint Eastwood's character broke the law for what he saw as the good of society, only P.I. Harry Callahan was a fictional character. One requires knowledge about the people involved in making the movie, explicitly from outside the context of the movie's plot, to understand this reference, and that's why it's called meta. Whether or not this is proper usage of the term can be argued. As to this particular instance, I find the comparison a bit of a stretch (the secretive first director of the FBI compared to a practically vigilante PI).
48,174
Maureen Dowd wrote a review on the recently released movie, “J.Edgar” directed by Clint Eastwood in New York Times November 12 issue under the title, “Dirty Harry meets dirtier Edgar.” Apart from the interest in weird relationship of the FBI’s ‘fearful enforcer’ Edgar Hoover and his protégé, Clyde Tolson, I was caught up with the short phrase, “*It’s sorta meta*,” in the following sentence: > > Some F.B.I. agents who worked with Hoover have been grousing that portraying the feared first director of the F.B.I. as homosexual would “turn Dirty Harry into Dirty Harriet,” as William Branon, chairman of the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation, put it. > > > *It’s sorta meta*: the star who played a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society makes a movie about a real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society. > > > Dowd’s articles are always ordeal to me because of inclusion of a lot of unfamiliar words to me and her own style of elocution. I guess “sorta” means simply “a sort of,” but I don’t understand what “It’s sorta meta” means here. It’s a short phrase, but “meta” is an evasive word for me. I’m not even clear with what “meta user” shown on my page of EL&U page means. Would you explain me?
2011/11/13
[ "https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/48174", "https://english.stackexchange.com", "https://english.stackexchange.com/users/3119/" ]
What it means in this instance is "it isn't *meta* at all." Meta in this fairly recent, casual context is supposed to mean self-referential, or recursive in some way. This is the sense in which my teenagers would use this term. It is not a term which can be applied formally, in the sense that meta can be applied as a prefix, as in "metadata" or "metaphysics". Dowd is trying to be hip by using a term that the youngsters would use. Unfortunately, she's getting it wrong. It is like when the kids use "literally" to mean "figuratively". What Dowd is actually trying to say is that there is a parallel between an actor and a character that this actor has played. Two things being similar to one another does not make them "meta".
In this case, meta is used to refer to the context and culture surrounding the movie, rather than anything directly portrayed in the movie itself. The director, Clint Eastwood, had previously portrayed a law enforcement officer in the movie Dirty Harry. Similar to J. Edgar Hoover, Clint Eastwood's character broke the law for what he saw as the good of society, only P.I. Harry Callahan was a fictional character. One requires knowledge about the people involved in making the movie, explicitly from outside the context of the movie's plot, to understand this reference, and that's why it's called meta. Whether or not this is proper usage of the term can be argued. As to this particular instance, I find the comparison a bit of a stretch (the secretive first director of the FBI compared to a practically vigilante PI).
48,174
Maureen Dowd wrote a review on the recently released movie, “J.Edgar” directed by Clint Eastwood in New York Times November 12 issue under the title, “Dirty Harry meets dirtier Edgar.” Apart from the interest in weird relationship of the FBI’s ‘fearful enforcer’ Edgar Hoover and his protégé, Clyde Tolson, I was caught up with the short phrase, “*It’s sorta meta*,” in the following sentence: > > Some F.B.I. agents who worked with Hoover have been grousing that portraying the feared first director of the F.B.I. as homosexual would “turn Dirty Harry into Dirty Harriet,” as William Branon, chairman of the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation, put it. > > > *It’s sorta meta*: the star who played a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society makes a movie about a real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society. > > > Dowd’s articles are always ordeal to me because of inclusion of a lot of unfamiliar words to me and her own style of elocution. I guess “sorta” means simply “a sort of,” but I don’t understand what “It’s sorta meta” means here. It’s a short phrase, but “meta” is an evasive word for me. I’m not even clear with what “meta user” shown on my page of EL&U page means. Would you explain me?
2011/11/13
[ "https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/48174", "https://english.stackexchange.com", "https://english.stackexchange.com/users/3119/" ]
Most of the time when someone says meta, it means talking about the thing that talks about the thing. So meta.english.stackexchange.com talks about the site talking about English. Metadata is data that describes data. In the context of the article, when he says "it's sorta meta" he means that "In an odd way (sorta) when talking about the movie..." It doesn't help that the writer doesn't use great English. But the point he's getting at. Is that when talking about the movie itself (not the contents of the movie), Leo Dicaprio played this role before as a fictional character (possibly referring to his role in The Departed).
In this case, meta is used to refer to the context and culture surrounding the movie, rather than anything directly portrayed in the movie itself. The director, Clint Eastwood, had previously portrayed a law enforcement officer in the movie Dirty Harry. Similar to J. Edgar Hoover, Clint Eastwood's character broke the law for what he saw as the good of society, only P.I. Harry Callahan was a fictional character. One requires knowledge about the people involved in making the movie, explicitly from outside the context of the movie's plot, to understand this reference, and that's why it's called meta. Whether or not this is proper usage of the term can be argued. As to this particular instance, I find the comparison a bit of a stretch (the secretive first director of the FBI compared to a practically vigilante PI).
48,174
Maureen Dowd wrote a review on the recently released movie, “J.Edgar” directed by Clint Eastwood in New York Times November 12 issue under the title, “Dirty Harry meets dirtier Edgar.” Apart from the interest in weird relationship of the FBI’s ‘fearful enforcer’ Edgar Hoover and his protégé, Clyde Tolson, I was caught up with the short phrase, “*It’s sorta meta*,” in the following sentence: > > Some F.B.I. agents who worked with Hoover have been grousing that portraying the feared first director of the F.B.I. as homosexual would “turn Dirty Harry into Dirty Harriet,” as William Branon, chairman of the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation, put it. > > > *It’s sorta meta*: the star who played a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society makes a movie about a real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society. > > > Dowd’s articles are always ordeal to me because of inclusion of a lot of unfamiliar words to me and her own style of elocution. I guess “sorta” means simply “a sort of,” but I don’t understand what “It’s sorta meta” means here. It’s a short phrase, but “meta” is an evasive word for me. I’m not even clear with what “meta user” shown on my page of EL&U page means. Would you explain me?
2011/11/13
[ "https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/48174", "https://english.stackexchange.com", "https://english.stackexchange.com/users/3119/" ]
Most of the time when someone says meta, it means talking about the thing that talks about the thing. So meta.english.stackexchange.com talks about the site talking about English. Metadata is data that describes data. In the context of the article, when he says "it's sorta meta" he means that "In an odd way (sorta) when talking about the movie..." It doesn't help that the writer doesn't use great English. But the point he's getting at. Is that when talking about the movie itself (not the contents of the movie), Leo Dicaprio played this role before as a fictional character (possibly referring to his role in The Departed).
esp. @MikeBrown; @JoelBrown; *Ms* Dowd was indeed using *meta* in the sense explained by Barrie England: "a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society" goes on to "...real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society". However, I don't feel *self-referential* is appropriate here. It's quite different, as the above discussion shows. Modish or not, it seems to be precisely the word that conveys the sense.
48,174
Maureen Dowd wrote a review on the recently released movie, “J.Edgar” directed by Clint Eastwood in New York Times November 12 issue under the title, “Dirty Harry meets dirtier Edgar.” Apart from the interest in weird relationship of the FBI’s ‘fearful enforcer’ Edgar Hoover and his protégé, Clyde Tolson, I was caught up with the short phrase, “*It’s sorta meta*,” in the following sentence: > > Some F.B.I. agents who worked with Hoover have been grousing that portraying the feared first director of the F.B.I. as homosexual would “turn Dirty Harry into Dirty Harriet,” as William Branon, chairman of the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation, put it. > > > *It’s sorta meta*: the star who played a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society makes a movie about a real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society. > > > Dowd’s articles are always ordeal to me because of inclusion of a lot of unfamiliar words to me and her own style of elocution. I guess “sorta” means simply “a sort of,” but I don’t understand what “It’s sorta meta” means here. It’s a short phrase, but “meta” is an evasive word for me. I’m not even clear with what “meta user” shown on my page of EL&U page means. Would you explain me?
2011/11/13
[ "https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/48174", "https://english.stackexchange.com", "https://english.stackexchange.com/users/3119/" ]
In this case, meta is used to refer to the context and culture surrounding the movie, rather than anything directly portrayed in the movie itself. The director, Clint Eastwood, had previously portrayed a law enforcement officer in the movie Dirty Harry. Similar to J. Edgar Hoover, Clint Eastwood's character broke the law for what he saw as the good of society, only P.I. Harry Callahan was a fictional character. One requires knowledge about the people involved in making the movie, explicitly from outside the context of the movie's plot, to understand this reference, and that's why it's called meta. Whether or not this is proper usage of the term can be argued. As to this particular instance, I find the comparison a bit of a stretch (the secretive first director of the FBI compared to a practically vigilante PI).
esp. @MikeBrown; @JoelBrown; *Ms* Dowd was indeed using *meta* in the sense explained by Barrie England: "a fictional law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society" goes on to "...real law enforcement officer breaking rules for what he sees as the good of society". However, I don't feel *self-referential* is appropriate here. It's quite different, as the above discussion shows. Modish or not, it seems to be precisely the word that conveys the sense.
57,883,708
Can anybody explain, what is the 100% Focus Pixels feature available in the iPhone 11 Pro? I would also like to know what could it mean for developers working on photo and video editing apps, I mean how can we use it for our app's capturing quality result.
2019/09/11
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/57883708", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/5155369/" ]
A "focus pixel" is a term Apple coined for camera pixels with a mask placed over half of it to limit the light angles that can reach that pixel ([source](https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/25/see-the-new-iphones-focus-pixels-up-close/)). Comparing pixels with masks on one side against pixels with masks on the opposite side allow for the camera phone to perform passive autofocus via onboard computation ([wiki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofocus#Passive)). Traditionally the number of focus pixels were limited as masking half of the incoming light angles results in noisier signals from those pixels. However it is likely that developments in noise reduction algorithms (via [neural networks](https://www.cnet.com/news/iphone-11-pros-new-deep-fusion-is-coming-to-boost-your-photos-take-on-google/) and otherwise), [HDR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-dynamic-range_imaging), and potentially the sensor itself has resulted in the tradeoff being in favor of more focus pixels which allows for faster, higher resolution autofocus calculations, particularly in low light.
I have not exactly knowledge of that, But I have read some cutting edge of topics on that on below websites which have some following explanation. I hope this will help you. **Source:** <https://www.news18.com/news/tech/apple-iphone-11-series-finds-a-lot-of-its-intelligence-from-ios-13-2304277.html> > > There will be advanced software working to understand the data from > the 100% Focus Pixels on the new wide sensor. Next generation Amart > HDR, better dynamic range calculations and analysing the data from > each pixel to improve the noise reduction are highlights that will > make a presence felt on almost every photo that you click. > > > **Source:-** <http://betterfamilyphotos.blogspot.com/2014/09/what-are-apple-iphone-6-focus-pixels.html> > > Apple has not yet been clear on what exactly they mean by "Focus > Pixels." However, in their keynote, they mentioned that it's a > technology that's found in DSLRs, and they also showed a demonstration > of the iPhone's continuous autofocus. Both of those point to Focus > Pixels being either phase detection or a hybrid autofocus that uses > both phase detection and contrast detection. > > > To deeply know about Focus Pixels: <https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/25/see-the-new-iphones-focus-pixels-up-close/>
138,085
Question: I study with Mrs.Cara Answer: I am studied with Mrs.Cara Or I am made to study with Mrs.Cara Which one is correct ? Please help me !
2017/08/04
[ "https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/138085", "https://ell.stackexchange.com", "https://ell.stackexchange.com/users/57025/" ]
Study is intransitive in this case and thus cannot be made passive. Only transitive verbs cane be made into passive voice. > > I am studied with Mrs. Cara > > > This implies that someone other than you and Mrs. Cara is studying you and her. It's an unusual sentence but grammatical, but also not the passive form of your original sentence. > > I am made to study with Mrs. Cara > > > This implies someone is causing you to study with Mrs. Cara. It's grammatical, but not the passive version of the original.
"Study" can be *both* an **intransitive verb** (takes one noun, the someone/thing doing the action) or a **transitive verb** (takes two nouns, subject which does the action and object which receives the action) > > Active: [someone or something S] **studies** [someone or something O]. > > > Passive: [someone or something O] **is studied by** [someone or something S]. > > > As you can see, you just switch the two nouns. In your first answer: > > I am studied with Mrs. Cara. > > > You are the [someone or something O]. Like, say, a police officer is studying *you* to see if you are a criminal. This changes the meaning from your original active sentence, where you were the [someone or something S]. Almost nobody would say this new sentence because the reader of the sentence would certainly be interested in who you are being studied by! Your second answer: > > I[O] am made to study with Mrs. Cara (by my teacher [S]). > > > Be careful! This is a valid passive construction. However, you are now the object of the verb "made to", something which was not in the original sentence. It works since even though you're the object of "made", you are still understood to be the subject for "study". To make the pure sentence from active to passive for a transitive verb, you need to make sure you know **both** the [A] and the [B]. What are you studying? So a pure sentence, where you don't add any unnecessary meaning, looks like this: > > Math [B] was studied by me [A] with Mrs. Cara. > > > You can also optionally drop the [A]. ("by" part) > > Math was studied with Mrs. Cara. > > > This sentence is quite awkward for a native speaker. Most of the time, using the active tense is better. As a side note, passive voice is impossible with **intransitive verbs** such as to sleep. The only way to make a passive sentence is to do what you did, and change the verb to "make", a transitive verb. > > I was made to sleep [by my mother]. > > > I was made to study [by my teacher]. > > > Be aware that adding the verb "make" adds extra meaning to the sentence, since it implies someone is influencing you to do it.
142,739
In the near future the demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population, energy and resource crises, and rampant consumerism. Peak oil has been reached, scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface, and the world is beginning to feel the more drastic effects of climate change such as mass extinctions of animals and strains of crops. In this rather bleak period the major mining companies looked to the seas to solve the mineral requirements of earth. While mining the seas isn't a easy affair the ocean's mineral wealth is virtually untapped. However instead of using drones to mine both ores and the methane ice the big companies used mainly human labor (with drone assistance), but why? What benefit would human laborers in deep sea rigs have over a aquatic drone? Note: The population is fed mainly by cultured meat and indoor+vertical farming hence why the population is expanding even though the climate looks bleak. Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface)
2019/03/29
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/142739", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/51720/" ]
The mining companies are being subsidized ----------------------------------------- Drones would have been better value for money, but the government subsidizes human labor. This is done to keep the population (especially the men) occupied and also safely locked away, not giving them a chance to sit around talking rebellion. This is also the reason space mining is not favored: there are too many places to run and hide once the tech for space colonization exists.
Check out [Peter Watts' *Rifters* trilogy](https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0765315963) for some ideas. He needs to justify a very similar situation, where workers are sent to maintain geothermal power-plants deep under water. In short, **networked systems are no longer reliable**. The internet as we know it no longer exists. It's been overrun by a rapidly shifting ecosystem of self-replicating viruses and military grade AIs, developed and deployed by nation-states and corporations vying for control. The arms race between self-modifying viruses and anti-viruses has become so extreme that any data sent via the web is more likely than not to be hijacked, altered, or deleted completely. In order to operate with any degree of reliability, machines need to be air-gapped and completely autonomous. People are expendable; the corporations do the math, and decide that habitation and life-support are cheaper than investing in machines smart enough to reliably do the job.
142,739
In the near future the demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population, energy and resource crises, and rampant consumerism. Peak oil has been reached, scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface, and the world is beginning to feel the more drastic effects of climate change such as mass extinctions of animals and strains of crops. In this rather bleak period the major mining companies looked to the seas to solve the mineral requirements of earth. While mining the seas isn't a easy affair the ocean's mineral wealth is virtually untapped. However instead of using drones to mine both ores and the methane ice the big companies used mainly human labor (with drone assistance), but why? What benefit would human laborers in deep sea rigs have over a aquatic drone? Note: The population is fed mainly by cultured meat and indoor+vertical farming hence why the population is expanding even though the climate looks bleak. Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface)
2019/03/29
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/142739", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/51720/" ]
The mining companies are being subsidized ----------------------------------------- Drones would have been better value for money, but the government subsidizes human labor. This is done to keep the population (especially the men) occupied and also safely locked away, not giving them a chance to sit around talking rebellion. This is also the reason space mining is not favored: there are too many places to run and hide once the tech for space colonization exists.
Gimelist showed quite convincingly why humans are not needed in the Deep. Depending on your reason for wanting them down there, you might be able to introduce them to the Not So Deep. If the Climate is still in the throes of change, using the surface of the ocean might actually be more expensive than being 30-80m below (ice, storms). So you might have large submerged (pre)processing facilities run by humans, and catered-to by the drones in the Deep. Nice claustrophobic setting, actually within (economic) technical reach.
142,739
In the near future the demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population, energy and resource crises, and rampant consumerism. Peak oil has been reached, scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface, and the world is beginning to feel the more drastic effects of climate change such as mass extinctions of animals and strains of crops. In this rather bleak period the major mining companies looked to the seas to solve the mineral requirements of earth. While mining the seas isn't a easy affair the ocean's mineral wealth is virtually untapped. However instead of using drones to mine both ores and the methane ice the big companies used mainly human labor (with drone assistance), but why? What benefit would human laborers in deep sea rigs have over a aquatic drone? Note: The population is fed mainly by cultured meat and indoor+vertical farming hence why the population is expanding even though the climate looks bleak. Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface)
2019/03/29
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/142739", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/51720/" ]
The mining companies are being subsidized ----------------------------------------- Drones would have been better value for money, but the government subsidizes human labor. This is done to keep the population (especially the men) occupied and also safely locked away, not giving them a chance to sit around talking rebellion. This is also the reason space mining is not favored: there are too many places to run and hide once the tech for space colonization exists.
If you can tolerate some suspension of disbelief, this could still be plausible. Perhaps... * Your drones cannot be reliably remote-controlled at great depths? * Your society needs a reason to keep the growth of the lower classes in check? Compulsory military/mining service fulfills this purpose. * Drones are simply too expensive? Surely their construction consumes a disproportionate amount of the rare minerals they exist to mine? * Espionage/sabotage-- foreign corporations hijack/destroy each others' drones? Unless you intend on fully automating undersea warfare and wasting what's left of the resources having robots fling torpedoes at each other, humans are more expendable. * Putting people to work keeps them out of trouble. You can automate all unskilled labor, but now you have a bunch of bored/desperate people surface-side. Crime increases under these conditions.
142,739
In the near future the demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population, energy and resource crises, and rampant consumerism. Peak oil has been reached, scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface, and the world is beginning to feel the more drastic effects of climate change such as mass extinctions of animals and strains of crops. In this rather bleak period the major mining companies looked to the seas to solve the mineral requirements of earth. While mining the seas isn't a easy affair the ocean's mineral wealth is virtually untapped. However instead of using drones to mine both ores and the methane ice the big companies used mainly human labor (with drone assistance), but why? What benefit would human laborers in deep sea rigs have over a aquatic drone? Note: The population is fed mainly by cultured meat and indoor+vertical farming hence why the population is expanding even though the climate looks bleak. Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface)
2019/03/29
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/142739", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/51720/" ]
The mining companies are being subsidized ----------------------------------------- Drones would have been better value for money, but the government subsidizes human labor. This is done to keep the population (especially the men) occupied and also safely locked away, not giving them a chance to sit around talking rebellion. This is also the reason space mining is not favored: there are too many places to run and hide once the tech for space colonization exists.
That depends on how much communications the drones require. Radio basically doesn't work underwater, so you can't use it teleoperate something at the bottom of the ocean. Now, for everyone reaching for the comment button to mention ELF, let's just get it on the table: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_with_submarines#Extremely_low_frequency> > > Electromagnetic waves in the ELF and SLF frequency ranges (3–300 Hz) can penetrate seawater to depths of hundreds of meters... > > > 1. "Hundreds of meters" doesn't make it to the bottom. 2. That 3-300Hz bit means that the entire, world-encompassing band, has about 300Hz of bandwidth. WiFi has a bandwidth of about 22MHz, or about 73,333 times larger. And you've only got to share it within folks of a couple hundred meters of you. So plopping some folks on the bottom of the ocean gives you some local human intelligence, without having to maintain a umbilical cord from the bottom of the ocean to the top. If the mining installations lasted for extended periods of time, it might be worth running fiber to them from the coastline, but if they had to roam, that'd be less helpful. Over shorter distances, you'd have a chance of making things like messenger drones, cables, acoustics, or maybe even light transmit data to the drones.
142,739
In the near future the demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population, energy and resource crises, and rampant consumerism. Peak oil has been reached, scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface, and the world is beginning to feel the more drastic effects of climate change such as mass extinctions of animals and strains of crops. In this rather bleak period the major mining companies looked to the seas to solve the mineral requirements of earth. While mining the seas isn't a easy affair the ocean's mineral wealth is virtually untapped. However instead of using drones to mine both ores and the methane ice the big companies used mainly human labor (with drone assistance), but why? What benefit would human laborers in deep sea rigs have over a aquatic drone? Note: The population is fed mainly by cultured meat and indoor+vertical farming hence why the population is expanding even though the climate looks bleak. Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface)
2019/03/29
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/142739", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/51720/" ]
In dangerous places (like outer space, deep sea etc) the only reason to use people instead robots is that in general **people are more flexible and much universal than** single **robot**. But it's only one side. Human flexibility reduces in deep sea because of great pressure. Withstand to such pressure much harder that operating in outer space. People should use heavy 'deep' suits even in not-really-deep sea. Even in such deep human couldn't operate by hand but only by specialized instrument **integrated with suite**. But.. you could give this instrument to a robot and direct it remotely! (Robots don't need air and food and it's not a problem to lost some) Here we could say that remote manipulation requires some reliable communication, calculate costs and go deeper in rabbit hole. But it's out of scope. So if you really want to get people mining in deep sea *in your world*, you have to **introduce intermediate bases where people would live and operate** nearby drones and do something special which is unreasonable to do on surface. [Repairing drones is an example] So your question could be reduced to another one: **What benefits to use intermediate inhabited bases?** Some reasons have been already described (communication and repairing on-site is cheaper). If you look at space programs like ISS or lunar base you probably could add more like * New technologies * Proof of national superiority * Communication with intelligent ~~aliens~~ deep-sea creatures * Universe exploring and understanding * Factories which produce not a raw resource but goods with high added value [like engines instead of raw steel]. And those factories couldn't be employed without human *in your world*. [Because in near future it (probably) will be possible in our world] or invent something own. Or ask new question on this site ;-)
I agree with much of what Shadowzee has to say about profitability. Modern corporations operate with one thing in mind. Increasing profits for shareholders. Human labor can be VERY inexpensive. It can be the largest cost a business might incur. However there was something Shadowzee didn't mention I don't think. If you look at history governments and business have had little concern with the civil rights of human labor. There are numerous examples. Improved quality of life for working class people is only a fairly recent development. And quite frankly increases in inequality in this country suggest to me that that particular trend has the potential to reverse itself. What kind of future are you envisioning? A good one...A dark one? If you can think of a scenario which involves coerced unskilled labor you might be able to come up with something along the lines of what I am thinking i.e. some corporate entity viewing the trade-off between expendable low cost unskilled labor and expensive automation that requires AI and coming up with a "unique and inexpensive compromise" - automated human beings with implanted programmable chips to perform the labor of the machines. There are many people who see the combination of human and machine as a natural part of human evolution (e.g Elon Musk, Ray Kurweil). Corporations might see this as highly beneficial approach to both labor problems, automation problems and what happens if you don't have wage slaves earning money to buy the stuff they sell. Can't speak to mining the deep sea because I would think this is pretty difficult work and would probably require highly skilled labor rather than unskilled labor. But what about programmable chips to increase the laborer's skill set. I could see a future where you could have a labor pool that just needs to eat and might allow themselves to subjected to it. Or forced labor from criminal and political dissident populations. Sorry...that is a pretty dark scenario but mining industries don't treat their workers very well as a general rule.
142,739
In the near future the demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population, energy and resource crises, and rampant consumerism. Peak oil has been reached, scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface, and the world is beginning to feel the more drastic effects of climate change such as mass extinctions of animals and strains of crops. In this rather bleak period the major mining companies looked to the seas to solve the mineral requirements of earth. While mining the seas isn't a easy affair the ocean's mineral wealth is virtually untapped. However instead of using drones to mine both ores and the methane ice the big companies used mainly human labor (with drone assistance), but why? What benefit would human laborers in deep sea rigs have over a aquatic drone? Note: The population is fed mainly by cultured meat and indoor+vertical farming hence why the population is expanding even though the climate looks bleak. Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface)
2019/03/29
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/142739", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/51720/" ]
In dangerous places (like outer space, deep sea etc) the only reason to use people instead robots is that in general **people are more flexible and much universal than** single **robot**. But it's only one side. Human flexibility reduces in deep sea because of great pressure. Withstand to such pressure much harder that operating in outer space. People should use heavy 'deep' suits even in not-really-deep sea. Even in such deep human couldn't operate by hand but only by specialized instrument **integrated with suite**. But.. you could give this instrument to a robot and direct it remotely! (Robots don't need air and food and it's not a problem to lost some) Here we could say that remote manipulation requires some reliable communication, calculate costs and go deeper in rabbit hole. But it's out of scope. So if you really want to get people mining in deep sea *in your world*, you have to **introduce intermediate bases where people would live and operate** nearby drones and do something special which is unreasonable to do on surface. [Repairing drones is an example] So your question could be reduced to another one: **What benefits to use intermediate inhabited bases?** Some reasons have been already described (communication and repairing on-site is cheaper). If you look at space programs like ISS or lunar base you probably could add more like * New technologies * Proof of national superiority * Communication with intelligent ~~aliens~~ deep-sea creatures * Universe exploring and understanding * Factories which produce not a raw resource but goods with high added value [like engines instead of raw steel]. And those factories couldn't be employed without human *in your world*. [Because in near future it (probably) will be possible in our world] or invent something own. Or ask new question on this site ;-)
Gimelist showed quite convincingly why humans are not needed in the Deep. Depending on your reason for wanting them down there, you might be able to introduce them to the Not So Deep. If the Climate is still in the throes of change, using the surface of the ocean might actually be more expensive than being 30-80m below (ice, storms). So you might have large submerged (pre)processing facilities run by humans, and catered-to by the drones in the Deep. Nice claustrophobic setting, actually within (economic) technical reach.
142,739
In the near future the demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population, energy and resource crises, and rampant consumerism. Peak oil has been reached, scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface, and the world is beginning to feel the more drastic effects of climate change such as mass extinctions of animals and strains of crops. In this rather bleak period the major mining companies looked to the seas to solve the mineral requirements of earth. While mining the seas isn't a easy affair the ocean's mineral wealth is virtually untapped. However instead of using drones to mine both ores and the methane ice the big companies used mainly human labor (with drone assistance), but why? What benefit would human laborers in deep sea rigs have over a aquatic drone? Note: The population is fed mainly by cultured meat and indoor+vertical farming hence why the population is expanding even though the climate looks bleak. Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface)
2019/03/29
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/142739", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/51720/" ]
In dangerous places (like outer space, deep sea etc) the only reason to use people instead robots is that in general **people are more flexible and much universal than** single **robot**. But it's only one side. Human flexibility reduces in deep sea because of great pressure. Withstand to such pressure much harder that operating in outer space. People should use heavy 'deep' suits even in not-really-deep sea. Even in such deep human couldn't operate by hand but only by specialized instrument **integrated with suite**. But.. you could give this instrument to a robot and direct it remotely! (Robots don't need air and food and it's not a problem to lost some) Here we could say that remote manipulation requires some reliable communication, calculate costs and go deeper in rabbit hole. But it's out of scope. So if you really want to get people mining in deep sea *in your world*, you have to **introduce intermediate bases where people would live and operate** nearby drones and do something special which is unreasonable to do on surface. [Repairing drones is an example] So your question could be reduced to another one: **What benefits to use intermediate inhabited bases?** Some reasons have been already described (communication and repairing on-site is cheaper). If you look at space programs like ISS or lunar base you probably could add more like * New technologies * Proof of national superiority * Communication with intelligent ~~aliens~~ deep-sea creatures * Universe exploring and understanding * Factories which produce not a raw resource but goods with high added value [like engines instead of raw steel]. And those factories couldn't be employed without human *in your world*. [Because in near future it (probably) will be possible in our world] or invent something own. Or ask new question on this site ;-)
That depends on how much communications the drones require. Radio basically doesn't work underwater, so you can't use it teleoperate something at the bottom of the ocean. Now, for everyone reaching for the comment button to mention ELF, let's just get it on the table: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_with_submarines#Extremely_low_frequency> > > Electromagnetic waves in the ELF and SLF frequency ranges (3–300 Hz) can penetrate seawater to depths of hundreds of meters... > > > 1. "Hundreds of meters" doesn't make it to the bottom. 2. That 3-300Hz bit means that the entire, world-encompassing band, has about 300Hz of bandwidth. WiFi has a bandwidth of about 22MHz, or about 73,333 times larger. And you've only got to share it within folks of a couple hundred meters of you. So plopping some folks on the bottom of the ocean gives you some local human intelligence, without having to maintain a umbilical cord from the bottom of the ocean to the top. If the mining installations lasted for extended periods of time, it might be worth running fiber to them from the coastline, but if they had to roam, that'd be less helpful. Over shorter distances, you'd have a chance of making things like messenger drones, cables, acoustics, or maybe even light transmit data to the drones.
142,739
In the near future the demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population, energy and resource crises, and rampant consumerism. Peak oil has been reached, scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface, and the world is beginning to feel the more drastic effects of climate change such as mass extinctions of animals and strains of crops. In this rather bleak period the major mining companies looked to the seas to solve the mineral requirements of earth. While mining the seas isn't a easy affair the ocean's mineral wealth is virtually untapped. However instead of using drones to mine both ores and the methane ice the big companies used mainly human labor (with drone assistance), but why? What benefit would human laborers in deep sea rigs have over a aquatic drone? Note: The population is fed mainly by cultured meat and indoor+vertical farming hence why the population is expanding even though the climate looks bleak. Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface)
2019/03/29
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/142739", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/51720/" ]
> > What benefits would be gained by using human laborers instead of drones in deep sea mining? > > > tl;dr: None. ============ --- Long answer: ------------ First let's address several assumptions in your question. > > demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population > > > Not necessarily. The precious metals platinum and palladium are commonly used in catalytic converters in cars. Once you move to electric cars, demand will decrease. > > scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface > > > No. I refer you to this answer from Chemistry SE: [Will we ever run out of gold, silver, copper and other important conductors?](https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/a/96630/8083) > > mine...the methane ice > > > Why? What do you need methane for? It's a nuisance. Even if you do need it, get it from [landfills](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landfill_gas). Way easier. > > Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) > > > Don't even get me started about this. Asteroid mining is a sci-fi fantasy which is nowhere even close to feasible or economical in the real world. I've commented on this on several answers and questions here in the past. If interested, finding these comments is left as an exercise for the reader. > > The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface) > > > and this one from one of the answers > > Humans are smaller and can fit into tighter spaces and caves to detect the presence of rare minerals. > > > Deep sea mineralisation occurs on the sea bed or very close to it, within centimetres. There are no tunnels or holes to dig. Current deep sea exploration programs are targeting mineral deposits that are literally just sitting there waiting for us to pick them up. --- Now, to why humans will be very bad for this: 1. There is a reason why the deposits are called deep sea deposits. Because they are *deep*. Like, really ***deep***. Four kilometres deep on average. Developing a submersible that can withhold the immense pressures encountered at these depths is expensive. While there were submersibles that reached deeper depths (up to 12 km), these were specially designed vehicles. Doing this on an industrial scale is simply too expensive. On the other hand, drones don't care about pressure (mostly). One of the answers commented that: > > You could also make humans generally better at identifying mineral veins or using complex tools than drones can (a specialist drone won't have all the tools required to do everything, especially if its meant to be good and cost effective at doing something). > > > This is not correct. If you've ever actually seen the deep sea deposits, they look pretty much like the mud around them. The human eye cannot distinguish the good stuff from [gangue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gangue). On the other hand, drones can be equipped with instruments such as Raman spectrometers, pXRFs, IR wavelength spectrometers and a variety of other instruments that will be much better than humans in finding the stuff. --- We can learn from today's mining industry. [It is gradually becoming more automated with robots](https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/robots-are-replacing-humans-world-s-mines-here-s-why-ncna831631). And this is happening in subaerial mines, which are relatively simple to operate. There is absolutely no reason to introduce humans to extreme environments for mining, especially when we already have the technology to do this without humans. --- Finally, if interested, the scientific-yet-not-too-technical magazine Elements published a series of articles on deep sea mining in their [October 2018](http://elementsmagazine.org/past-issues/deep-ocean-mineral-deposits/) issue. It is mostly paywalled (unfortunately) but shouldn't be too hard to find the full versions of the articles online. Alternatively, you can read the abstracts which are free. This is highly recommended reading allowing some understanding of deep sea mining as we understand it today, written by people who know what they're talking about.
The mining companies are being subsidized ----------------------------------------- Drones would have been better value for money, but the government subsidizes human labor. This is done to keep the population (especially the men) occupied and also safely locked away, not giving them a chance to sit around talking rebellion. This is also the reason space mining is not favored: there are too many places to run and hide once the tech for space colonization exists.
142,739
In the near future the demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population, energy and resource crises, and rampant consumerism. Peak oil has been reached, scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface, and the world is beginning to feel the more drastic effects of climate change such as mass extinctions of animals and strains of crops. In this rather bleak period the major mining companies looked to the seas to solve the mineral requirements of earth. While mining the seas isn't a easy affair the ocean's mineral wealth is virtually untapped. However instead of using drones to mine both ores and the methane ice the big companies used mainly human labor (with drone assistance), but why? What benefit would human laborers in deep sea rigs have over a aquatic drone? Note: The population is fed mainly by cultured meat and indoor+vertical farming hence why the population is expanding even though the climate looks bleak. Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface)
2019/03/29
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/142739", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/51720/" ]
The mining companies are being subsidized ----------------------------------------- Drones would have been better value for money, but the government subsidizes human labor. This is done to keep the population (especially the men) occupied and also safely locked away, not giving them a chance to sit around talking rebellion. This is also the reason space mining is not favored: there are too many places to run and hide once the tech for space colonization exists.
In dangerous places (like outer space, deep sea etc) the only reason to use people instead robots is that in general **people are more flexible and much universal than** single **robot**. But it's only one side. Human flexibility reduces in deep sea because of great pressure. Withstand to such pressure much harder that operating in outer space. People should use heavy 'deep' suits even in not-really-deep sea. Even in such deep human couldn't operate by hand but only by specialized instrument **integrated with suite**. But.. you could give this instrument to a robot and direct it remotely! (Robots don't need air and food and it's not a problem to lost some) Here we could say that remote manipulation requires some reliable communication, calculate costs and go deeper in rabbit hole. But it's out of scope. So if you really want to get people mining in deep sea *in your world*, you have to **introduce intermediate bases where people would live and operate** nearby drones and do something special which is unreasonable to do on surface. [Repairing drones is an example] So your question could be reduced to another one: **What benefits to use intermediate inhabited bases?** Some reasons have been already described (communication and repairing on-site is cheaper). If you look at space programs like ISS or lunar base you probably could add more like * New technologies * Proof of national superiority * Communication with intelligent ~~aliens~~ deep-sea creatures * Universe exploring and understanding * Factories which produce not a raw resource but goods with high added value [like engines instead of raw steel]. And those factories couldn't be employed without human *in your world*. [Because in near future it (probably) will be possible in our world] or invent something own. Or ask new question on this site ;-)
142,739
In the near future the demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population, energy and resource crises, and rampant consumerism. Peak oil has been reached, scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface, and the world is beginning to feel the more drastic effects of climate change such as mass extinctions of animals and strains of crops. In this rather bleak period the major mining companies looked to the seas to solve the mineral requirements of earth. While mining the seas isn't a easy affair the ocean's mineral wealth is virtually untapped. However instead of using drones to mine both ores and the methane ice the big companies used mainly human labor (with drone assistance), but why? What benefit would human laborers in deep sea rigs have over a aquatic drone? Note: The population is fed mainly by cultured meat and indoor+vertical farming hence why the population is expanding even though the climate looks bleak. Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface)
2019/03/29
[ "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/142739", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com", "https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/51720/" ]
> > What benefits would be gained by using human laborers instead of drones in deep sea mining? > > > tl;dr: None. ============ --- Long answer: ------------ First let's address several assumptions in your question. > > demand for resources only rises due to both a ever growing population > > > Not necessarily. The precious metals platinum and palladium are commonly used in catalytic converters in cars. Once you move to electric cars, demand will decrease. > > scarce resources like platinum, silver, and other rare metals have been depleted on the surface > > > No. I refer you to this answer from Chemistry SE: [Will we ever run out of gold, silver, copper and other important conductors?](https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/a/96630/8083) > > mine...the methane ice > > > Why? What do you need methane for? It's a nuisance. Even if you do need it, get it from [landfills](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landfill_gas). Way easier. > > Asteroid mining isn't considered a good alternative for earth due to the transportation of the goods back to earth. However if necessary the industry does exist (mainly for the initial space colonies) > > > Don't even get me started about this. Asteroid mining is a sci-fi fantasy which is nowhere even close to feasible or economical in the real world. I've commented on this on several answers and questions here in the past. If interested, finding these comments is left as an exercise for the reader. > > The mines would be accessed by either mining ships or for the larger mines maglev trains connected to large underwater bases (with the tunnels dug under the ocean's surface) > > > and this one from one of the answers > > Humans are smaller and can fit into tighter spaces and caves to detect the presence of rare minerals. > > > Deep sea mineralisation occurs on the sea bed or very close to it, within centimetres. There are no tunnels or holes to dig. Current deep sea exploration programs are targeting mineral deposits that are literally just sitting there waiting for us to pick them up. --- Now, to why humans will be very bad for this: 1. There is a reason why the deposits are called deep sea deposits. Because they are *deep*. Like, really ***deep***. Four kilometres deep on average. Developing a submersible that can withhold the immense pressures encountered at these depths is expensive. While there were submersibles that reached deeper depths (up to 12 km), these were specially designed vehicles. Doing this on an industrial scale is simply too expensive. On the other hand, drones don't care about pressure (mostly). One of the answers commented that: > > You could also make humans generally better at identifying mineral veins or using complex tools than drones can (a specialist drone won't have all the tools required to do everything, especially if its meant to be good and cost effective at doing something). > > > This is not correct. If you've ever actually seen the deep sea deposits, they look pretty much like the mud around them. The human eye cannot distinguish the good stuff from [gangue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gangue). On the other hand, drones can be equipped with instruments such as Raman spectrometers, pXRFs, IR wavelength spectrometers and a variety of other instruments that will be much better than humans in finding the stuff. --- We can learn from today's mining industry. [It is gradually becoming more automated with robots](https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/robots-are-replacing-humans-world-s-mines-here-s-why-ncna831631). And this is happening in subaerial mines, which are relatively simple to operate. There is absolutely no reason to introduce humans to extreme environments for mining, especially when we already have the technology to do this without humans. --- Finally, if interested, the scientific-yet-not-too-technical magazine Elements published a series of articles on deep sea mining in their [October 2018](http://elementsmagazine.org/past-issues/deep-ocean-mineral-deposits/) issue. It is mostly paywalled (unfortunately) but shouldn't be too hard to find the full versions of the articles online. Alternatively, you can read the abstracts which are free. This is highly recommended reading allowing some understanding of deep sea mining as we understand it today, written by people who know what they're talking about.
Gimelist showed quite convincingly why humans are not needed in the Deep. Depending on your reason for wanting them down there, you might be able to introduce them to the Not So Deep. If the Climate is still in the throes of change, using the surface of the ocean might actually be more expensive than being 30-80m below (ice, storms). So you might have large submerged (pre)processing facilities run by humans, and catered-to by the drones in the Deep. Nice claustrophobic setting, actually within (economic) technical reach.
3,263,830
Can any one please let me know why the sagepay throws the 5006 (Unable to redirect to Vendor's web site.), i can able to post transaction to sagepay and can able to give credit card information at sagepay's end. But, my problem is once it return back to my notification page it throws error 5006. and i could not reach my success or fail URLs at my end.
2010/07/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3263830", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/336040/" ]
Try * <https://support.sagepay.com/forum/Topic10228-29-1.aspx> * <https://support.sagepay.com/forum/Topic11245-21-1.aspx> for some ideas. Just search their forum for 5006. There is plenty posts. As a general advice: with Payment Gateways it is usually better to ask for support at their respective vendors sites.
The RedirectURL is usually a page hosted on your own site which is designed to be an order complete page that we redirect the shopper's web browser to upon transaction completion. For more information on this, please check [Sage Pay Server Protocol and Integration Guidelines](https://www.google.com/search?q=Sage%20Pay%20Server%20Protocol%20and%20Integration%20Guidelines).
3,263,830
Can any one please let me know why the sagepay throws the 5006 (Unable to redirect to Vendor's web site.), i can able to post transaction to sagepay and can able to give credit card information at sagepay's end. But, my problem is once it return back to my notification page it throws error 5006. and i could not reach my success or fail URLs at my end.
2010/07/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3263830", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/336040/" ]
Please see the below recommendations regarding your issue with your transactions failing error 5006: Unable to redirect to Vendor's web site. The Vendor failed to provide a RedirectionURL. The error message itself is not always entirely accurate, as it is displayed when there is any kind of issue with the Notification response they receive in reply to their post to your NotificationURL. The following is a list of various known issues that you can investigate: 1) You can acknowledge receipt of the transaction response with a Status of either OK, INVALID or ERROR 2) Before writing the three fields above to the Response object of the POST, please ensure you clear your response buffer to remove any header code, comments or HTML. The Sage Pay Server is expecting “Status=” to be the first characters in the response. If it does not see these, it treats the response as though it is an error and fails the transaction! 3) Your Notification Page should ONLY respond with a Status field, a RedirectURL field and optionally a StatusDetail field. No other HTML, headers, comments or text should be included either before or after these fields. The Sage Pay Server will treat all such text as an error and fail the transaction 4) Regardless of status, the RedirectURL must be sent that contains a valid, Fully Qualified URL (i.e. an address starting http:// or https://) to the final completion page on your site to which Sage Pay will send your customer 5) Encoding must be as Name=Value fields separated by carriage-return-linefeeds (CRLF) 6) Your notification page on your server may be ‘crashing’ and you should check to ensure that the notification page on your server can handle correctly all the message sent by Sage Pay (OK, ABORT, NOTAUTHED, REJECTED, PENDING and ERROR). 7) You should send OK in all circumstances where no errors occur in validating the Notification POST, so even if Sage Pay send you a status of ABORT or NOTAUTHED, you should reply with an OK and a RedirectURL that points to a page informing the customer that the transaction did not complete. 8) Sage Pay gateway operates on a variety of fixed IP addresses and they usually use separate IP addresses to respond to all transaction requests. Please ensure that all of the following IP addresses are allowed within your Server or Firewall: For outbound traffic to our gateway: 195.170.169.9 – live.sagepay.com 195.170.169.8 – test.sagepay.com For inbound traffic you only need to whitelist IPs if you are using SERVER as this is the only solution that initiates call backs. You don’t need to apply this for our FORM and DIRECT integrations. The IPs from which we call back are: 195.170.169.14 195.170.169.18 195.170.169.15 The Subnet mask used by Sage Pay is 255.255.255.000. Ensure that your firewalls allow outbound Port 443 (HTTPS only!) and inbound Ports 443 (and optionally 80 HTTP) access in order to communicate with our servers (on Simulator/Test/Live). There is however always scope for this to change. Sage Pay own the entire 195.170.169.0/255 range (256 IP’s). 9) Are you matching the transaction correctly on your database using the ‘SecurityKey’ we passed to your notification page with the NextURL 10) If the MD5 signatures match, your Notification Script should respond with a Status of OK and a RedirectURL pointing to either an order completion page (if the Status was OK) or an appropriate order failure page (if the Status was NOTAUTHED or ERROR). You may wish ABORT messages to redirect the customer to a page providing them with alternative methods of payment, or asking them why they chose to cancel. If the signatures do not match, you should check that your code is rebuilding the message correctly, and if you are sure that it is, all such messages should be responded to with an INVALID and a RedirectURL pointing the user to a failure page.
Try * <https://support.sagepay.com/forum/Topic10228-29-1.aspx> * <https://support.sagepay.com/forum/Topic11245-21-1.aspx> for some ideas. Just search their forum for 5006. There is plenty posts. As a general advice: with Payment Gateways it is usually better to ask for support at their respective vendors sites.
3,263,830
Can any one please let me know why the sagepay throws the 5006 (Unable to redirect to Vendor's web site.), i can able to post transaction to sagepay and can able to give credit card information at sagepay's end. But, my problem is once it return back to my notification page it throws error 5006. and i could not reach my success or fail URLs at my end.
2010/07/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3263830", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/336040/" ]
Try * <https://support.sagepay.com/forum/Topic10228-29-1.aspx> * <https://support.sagepay.com/forum/Topic11245-21-1.aspx> for some ideas. Just search their forum for 5006. There is plenty posts. As a general advice: with Payment Gateways it is usually better to ask for support at their respective vendors sites.
I had this problem, and none of the suggestions here worked for me. I eventually figured out what was wrong: 1. I had to send the siteFqdns value with a trailing slash. 2. I had to send the serverNotificationUrl without the website address prefix (ie. just the page, not the full URL) 3. I had to urlencode the serverNotificationUrl value (because it included querystring parameters) Only when I did all three of those things would it behave as expected.
3,263,830
Can any one please let me know why the sagepay throws the 5006 (Unable to redirect to Vendor's web site.), i can able to post transaction to sagepay and can able to give credit card information at sagepay's end. But, my problem is once it return back to my notification page it throws error 5006. and i could not reach my success or fail URLs at my end.
2010/07/16
[ "https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/3263830", "https://Stackoverflow.com", "https://Stackoverflow.com/users/336040/" ]
Try * <https://support.sagepay.com/forum/Topic10228-29-1.aspx> * <https://support.sagepay.com/forum/Topic11245-21-1.aspx> for some ideas. Just search their forum for 5006. There is plenty posts. As a general advice: with Payment Gateways it is usually better to ask for support at their respective vendors sites.
I had that issue and solve by updating the strYourSiteFQDN value. In my case the values was missing https and was http only. The sage will not redirect if site is https and you provide http only.