|
|
--- |
|
|
license: mit |
|
|
task_categories: |
|
|
- text-classification |
|
|
- feature-extraction |
|
|
language: |
|
|
- en |
|
|
tags: |
|
|
- software-engineering |
|
|
- testing |
|
|
- performance |
|
|
- llm-serving |
|
|
- vllm |
|
|
- benchmarking |
|
|
- ml-evaluation |
|
|
pretty_name: vLLM PR Test Classification |
|
|
size_categories: |
|
|
- n<1K |
|
|
configs: |
|
|
- config_name: default |
|
|
data_files: |
|
|
- split: train |
|
|
path: data/* |
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
# vLLM PR Test Classification Dataset |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ฏ Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
This dataset contains **98 vLLM project commits** with their corresponding Pull Request (PR) timeline data and comprehensive test type classifications. It provides insights into testing patterns in a major LLM serving infrastructure project. |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ Dataset Description |
|
|
|
|
|
### Purpose |
|
|
This dataset was created by analyzing vLLM project PR timelines to: |
|
|
- Identify different types of testing and benchmarking activities |
|
|
- Understand testing patterns in LLM infrastructure development |
|
|
- Provide labeled data for ML models to classify test types in software PRs |
|
|
- Enable research on performance optimization trends in LLM serving |
|
|
|
|
|
### Test Categories |
|
|
|
|
|
Each commit is classified across four test categories: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Category | Description | Keywords | Prevalence | |
|
|
|----------|-------------|----------|------------| |
|
|
| **LM Evaluation** | Language model evaluation tests | `lm_eval`, `gsm8k`, `mmlu`, `hellaswag`, `truthfulqa` | 25.5% | |
|
|
| **Performance** | Performance benchmarking tests | `TTFT`, `throughput`, `latency`, `ITL`, `TPOT`, `tok/s` | 81.6% | |
|
|
| **Serving** | Serving functionality tests | `vllm serve`, `API server`, `frontend`, `online serving` | 53.1% | |
|
|
| **General Test** | General testing activities | `CI`, `pytest`, `unittest`, `buildkite`, `fastcheck` | 96.9% | |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ Dataset Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
### Overall Distribution |
|
|
- **Total commits**: 98 |
|
|
- **Multi-category commits**: 76 (77.6%) |
|
|
- **Average test types per commit**: 2.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
### Detailed Keyword Frequency |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Top Performance Keywords (80 commits) |
|
|
- `throughput`: 241 mentions |
|
|
- `latency`: 191 mentions |
|
|
- `profiling`: 114 mentions |
|
|
- `TTFT` (Time To First Token): 114 mentions |
|
|
- `ITL` (Inter-token Latency): 114 mentions |
|
|
- `TPOT` (Time Per Output Token): 108 mentions |
|
|
- `optimization`: 87 mentions |
|
|
- `tok/s` (tokens per second): 66 mentions |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Top LM Evaluation Keywords (25 commits) |
|
|
- `gsm8k`: 62 mentions |
|
|
- `lm_eval`: 33 mentions |
|
|
- `lm-eval`: 9 mentions |
|
|
- `mmlu`: 3 mentions |
|
|
- `humaneval`: 1 mention |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Top Serving Keywords (52 commits) |
|
|
- `frontend`: 181 mentions |
|
|
- `serving`: 74 mentions |
|
|
- `api server`: 42 mentions |
|
|
- `vllm serve`: 23 mentions |
|
|
- `online serving`: 19 mentions |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐๏ธ Data Schema |
|
|
|
|
|
```python |
|
|
{ |
|
|
'commit_hash': str, # Git commit SHA-1 hash (40 chars) |
|
|
'pr_url': str, # GitHub PR URL (e.g., https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/12601) |
|
|
'has_lm_eval': bool, # True if commit contains LM evaluation tests |
|
|
'has_performance': bool, # True if commit contains performance benchmarks |
|
|
'has_serving': bool, # True if commit contains serving tests |
|
|
'has_general_test': bool, # True if commit contains general tests |
|
|
'test_details': str, # Pipe-separated test keywords (e.g., "PERF: ttft, throughput | TEST: ci, pytest") |
|
|
'timeline_text': str, # Full PR timeline text with comments, reviews, and commit messages |
|
|
'extracted_at': str # ISO timestamp when data was extracted |
|
|
} |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ป Usage Examples |
|
|
|
|
|
### Basic Loading |
|
|
```python |
|
|
from datasets import load_dataset |
|
|
|
|
|
# Load the dataset |
|
|
dataset = load_dataset("your-username/vllm-pr-test-classification") |
|
|
|
|
|
# Explore the data |
|
|
print(f"Total examples: {len(dataset['train'])}") |
|
|
print(f"Features: {dataset['train'].features}") |
|
|
print(f"First example: {dataset['train'][0]}") |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
### Filtering Examples |
|
|
```python |
|
|
# Get commits with performance benchmarks |
|
|
perf_commits = dataset['train'].filter(lambda x: x['has_performance']) |
|
|
print(f"Performance commits: {len(perf_commits)}") |
|
|
|
|
|
# Get commits with LM evaluation |
|
|
lm_eval_commits = dataset['train'].filter(lambda x: x['has_lm_eval']) |
|
|
print(f"LM evaluation commits: {len(lm_eval_commits)}") |
|
|
|
|
|
# Get commits with multiple test types |
|
|
multi_test = dataset['train'].filter( |
|
|
lambda x: sum([x['has_lm_eval'], x['has_performance'], |
|
|
x['has_serving'], x['has_general_test']]) >= 3 |
|
|
) |
|
|
print(f"Commits with 3+ test types: {len(multi_test)}") |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
### Analysis Example |
|
|
```python |
|
|
import pandas as pd |
|
|
|
|
|
# Convert to pandas for analysis |
|
|
df = dataset['train'].to_pandas() |
|
|
|
|
|
# Analyze test type combinations |
|
|
test_combinations = df[['has_lm_eval', 'has_performance', 'has_serving', 'has_general_test']] |
|
|
combination_counts = test_combinations.value_counts() |
|
|
print("Most common test combinations:") |
|
|
print(combination_counts.head()) |
|
|
|
|
|
# Extract performance metrics mentioned |
|
|
perf_df = df[df['has_performance']] |
|
|
print(f"\nCommits mentioning specific metrics:") |
|
|
print(f"TTFT mentions: {perf_df['test_details'].str.contains('TTFT').sum()}") |
|
|
print(f"Throughput mentions: {perf_df['test_details'].str.contains('throughput', case=False).sum()}") |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
### Text Classification Training |
|
|
```python |
|
|
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification |
|
|
from transformers import TrainingArguments, Trainer |
|
|
|
|
|
# Prepare for multi-label classification |
|
|
def preprocess_function(examples): |
|
|
# Create multi-label targets |
|
|
labels = [] |
|
|
for i in range(len(examples['commit_hash'])): |
|
|
label = [ |
|
|
int(examples['has_lm_eval'][i]), |
|
|
int(examples['has_performance'][i]), |
|
|
int(examples['has_serving'][i]), |
|
|
int(examples['has_general_test'][i]) |
|
|
] |
|
|
labels.append(label) |
|
|
|
|
|
# Tokenize timeline text |
|
|
tokenized = tokenizer( |
|
|
examples['timeline_text'], |
|
|
truncation=True, |
|
|
padding='max_length', |
|
|
max_length=512 |
|
|
) |
|
|
tokenized['labels'] = labels |
|
|
return tokenized |
|
|
|
|
|
# Train a classifier to identify test types from PR text |
|
|
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("bert-base-uncased") |
|
|
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained( |
|
|
"bert-base-uncased", |
|
|
num_labels=4, |
|
|
problem_type="multi_label_classification" |
|
|
) |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ Sample Data |
|
|
|
|
|
### Example 1: Performance-focused commit |
|
|
```json |
|
|
{ |
|
|
"commit_hash": "fc542144c4477ffec1d3de6fa43e54f8fb5351e8", |
|
|
"pr_url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/12563", |
|
|
"has_lm_eval": false, |
|
|
"has_performance": true, |
|
|
"has_serving": false, |
|
|
"has_general_test": true, |
|
|
"test_details": "PERF: tok/s, optimization | TEST: CI", |
|
|
"timeline_text": "[Guided decoding performance optimization]..." |
|
|
} |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
### Example 2: Comprehensive testing commit |
|
|
```json |
|
|
{ |
|
|
"commit_hash": "aea94362c9bdd08ed2b346701bdc09d278e85f66", |
|
|
"pr_url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/12287", |
|
|
"has_lm_eval": true, |
|
|
"has_performance": true, |
|
|
"has_serving": true, |
|
|
"has_general_test": true, |
|
|
"test_details": "LM_EVAL: lm_eval, gsm8k | PERF: TTFT, ITL | SERVING: vllm serve | TEST: test, CI", |
|
|
"timeline_text": "[Frontend][V1] Online serving performance improvements..." |
|
|
} |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ ๏ธ Potential Use Cases |
|
|
|
|
|
1. **Test Type Classification**: Train models to automatically classify test types in software PRs |
|
|
2. **Testing Pattern Analysis**: Study how different test types correlate in infrastructure projects |
|
|
3. **Performance Optimization Research**: Analyze performance testing trends in LLM serving systems |
|
|
4. **CI/CD Insights**: Understand continuous integration patterns in ML infrastructure projects |
|
|
5. **Documentation Generation**: Generate test documentation from PR timelines |
|
|
6. **Code Review Automation**: Build tools to automatically suggest relevant tests based on PR content |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ Source |
|
|
|
|
|
This dataset was extracted from the [vLLM project](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm) GitHub repository PR timelines. vLLM is a high-throughput and memory-efficient inference and serving engine for LLMs. |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ Updates |
|
|
|
|
|
- **v1.0.0** (2025-01): Initial release with 98 commits |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ License |
|
|
|
|
|
This dataset is released under the MIT License, consistent with the vLLM project's licensing. |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ Citation |
|
|
|
|
|
If you use this dataset in your research or applications, please cite: |
|
|
|
|
|
```bibtex |
|
|
@dataset{vllm_pr_test_classification_2025, |
|
|
title={vLLM PR Test Classification Dataset}, |
|
|
author={vLLM Community Contributors}, |
|
|
year={2025}, |
|
|
publisher={Hugging Face}, |
|
|
url={https://huggingface.co/datasets/your-username/vllm-pr-test-classification}, |
|
|
note={A dataset of 98 vLLM commits with test type classifications extracted from GitHub PR timelines} |
|
|
} |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ค Contributing |
|
|
|
|
|
If you'd like to contribute to this dataset or report issues: |
|
|
1. Open an issue on the Hugging Face dataset repository |
|
|
2. Submit improvements via pull requests |
|
|
3. Share your use cases and findings |
|
|
|
|
|
## โ ๏ธ Limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
- Dataset size is limited to 98 commits |
|
|
- Timeline text may be truncated for very long PR discussions |
|
|
- Classification is based on keyword matching, which may miss context-dependent references |
|
|
- Dataset represents a snapshot from specific time period of vLLM development |
|
|
|
|
|
## ๐ Acknowledgments |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks to the vLLM project maintainers and contributors for their open-source work that made this dataset possible. |
|
|
|