pretty_name: VisSlideBench
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
language:
- en
task_categories:
- text-to-image
- image-to-image
tags:
- slides
- presentation
- text-rendering
- image-editing
- benchmark
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
configs:
- config_name: t2i
data_files:
- split: test
path: data/t2i.jsonl
- config_name: template
data_files:
- split: test
path: data/template.jsonl
- config_name: multi_image
data_files:
- split: test
path: data/multi_image.jsonl
- config_name: edit
data_files:
- split: test
path: data/edit.jsonl
VisSlideBench
VisSlideBench evaluates single-slide image generation and editing. It has 1,527 manually screened cases in four tracks that share one text-and-image interface.
📄 Paper | 💻 Code | 🤗 Model | 📦 Training data
| Track | Config | Visual input | Real | Synthetic | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text-to-slide | t2i |
none | 167 | 150 | 317 |
| Template-conditioned | template |
one reference slide | 147 | 150 | 297 |
| Multi-image grounded | multi_image |
one to four assets | 179 | 150 | 329 |
| Slide editing | edit |
source slide | – | – | 584 |
Real cases come from presentation decks. Synthetic cases were built with
Nano-Banana-2. Every generation track mixes three prompt forms: short requests,
detailed descriptions, and structured style_json specifications.
| Prompt form | t2i | template | multi_image |
|---|---|---|---|
| short | 115 | 111 | 103 |
| long | 109 | 114 | 110 |
| style_json | 93 | 72 | 116 |
The edit track covers nine operations: text modification (50), block addition (74), block removal (49), background update (52), color change (49), font change (49), typography change (73), image replacement (103), and theme switching (85).
Files
data/t2i.jsonl data/template.jsonl data/multi_image.jsonl data/edit.jsonl
images/<track>/<id>_input_<k>.<ext> # visual inputs (template, multi_image)
images/<track>/<id>_target.<ext> # reference target slide, when available
images/edit/<id>_source.png # slide to edit
images/edit/<id>_target.png # reference edited slide
eval/ # scoring code and judge prompts
All image paths in the jsonl files are relative to the dataset root.
Generation record:
{"index": 0, "id": "46f1aa2e-...", "task": "t2i", "source": "real", "prompt_type": "short",
"instruction": "The slide is titled ...", "input_images": [],
"target_image": "images/t2i/46f1aa2e-..._target.jpg", "width": 2589, "height": 1455}
width and height are the size of the reference slide. Our runs generate
t2i cases at 1280x720 and template and multi-image cases at 1376x768.
target_image is a reference only and is null for some synthetic
template and multi-image cases; no metric compares against it.
Edit record:
{"index": 0, "id": "add_block__add_000299", "task": "edit", "operation": "add_block",
"instruction": "Insert the subtitle ...", "source_image": "images/edit/..._source.png",
"target_image": "images/edit/..._target.png", "width": 1280, "height": 720}
Evaluation
Save one PNG per case as <pred_dir>/<track>/<id>.png, then run the scripts in
eval/ (see eval/README.md).
| Track | Metrics |
|---|---|
| t2i, template | Content Faithfulness (CF), Instruction Following (IF), Aesthetic Quality (AQ) |
| multi_image | CF (text and input-image preservation, averaged), IF, AQ |
| edit | Semantic Consistency (SC = min of edit success and edit consistency), Presentation Quality (PQ) |
CF text fidelity uses OCR and a normalized edit distance against the text the instruction requires. IF, AQ, image preservation, SC, and PQ use GPT-4.1 as the judge; IF and AQ are the unweighted means of their sub-dimension scores. The overall score averages the eleven metrics.
License
VisSlideBench is released under CC BY-NC 4.0 for non-commercial research use. Real cases come from publicly shared presentation decks, whose content remains the property of its authors; synthetic cases were generated with Nano-Banana-2. If you own content in this dataset and want it removed, please open a discussion on this repository.
Citation
@article{wang2026infovis,
title={InfoVis: Unified Slide Image Generation and Editing},
author={Jiahao Wang and Xiyan Jiang and Chenyuan Wu and Haoqiang Zhang and Xin Luo and Yueze Wang and Defu Lian and Bo Zhang and Jiajun Zhang and Zheng Liu},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.16784},
year={2026}
}