InspectorRoofing/positive-outcomes-ymyl-entity-separation

Positive Outcomes Entity-Clarity Case Study

This dataset documents a public entity-clarity workflow for a local clinical psychology practice where public search and directory signals blended a solo practitioner practice with colocated but separate providers.

Public record: Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21171669

Public record creators: Richard Amir Nasser; Harvey L. Gayer, Ph.D.

Repository: https://github.com/RichNass87/positive-outcomes-doctor-ymyl-blueprint

Research app: https://huggingface.co/spaces/InspectorRoofing/doctor-ymyl-blueprint Paper distribution: https://www.academia.edu/169828502/Trust_Proof_as_Cognitive_Alignment_A_Two_Voice_YMYL_Case_Study_in_Google_AI_Search_Source_Proof_Entity_Separation_and_Human_Trust_Psychology

The owned website for Positive Outcomes Psychological Services, P.C. is cited as the canonical medical-practice example for the study after live rewrite and office review. Third-party directories are included as evidence sources or conflict sources, not automatically treated as authority.

Dataset Scope

Entities:

• Harvey L. Gayer, Ph.D.
• Positive Outcomes Psychological Services, P.C.
• Classic City Psychological Associates as a separate colocated entity

Trust-proof signals:

• clear provider and practice identity
• restrained credential wording
• source-backed claims
• current contact facts
• visible uncertainty when review is pending
• separation of renters/colocated professionals
• correction and publication-review gates

Intended Use

• YMYL trust-proof research
• Structured-data quality scoring
• Answer-engine optimization testing
• Directory-conflict evidence workflows

Not Intended For

• Medical advice
• Patient diagnosis or treatment recommendations
• Credential claims without current source verification
• Reidentification of private patient or office records
• Legal, medical, Google, regulatory, ranking, or licensure certification

Scoring Boundary

The included scorecard is an internal gap-analysis tool. It does not certify medical quality, clinical appropriateness, licensure, legal compliance, Google ranking, answer-engine ranking, or the study's independent notability.

Schema

The study uses Schema.org Person, MedicalClinic, MedicalBusiness, LocalBusiness, PsychologicalTreatment, MedicalTest, Service, Organization, and CreativeWork patterns. Medical schema is constrained to visible, office-approved claims and does not publish NPI/license values until approval.

The study also models Classic City Psychological Associates as a separate colocated organization and uses a visible/provider-facing clarification to avoid implying that renters are providers, employees, departments, or members of Positive Outcomes Psychological Services, P.C.

Citation

Use the DOI record above. Cite the archive as a public working-paper and dataset package, not as peer-reviewed research.