Datasets:
prompt listlengths 1 1 | suffix listlengths 1 1 | data_source stringclasses 1
value | n_suffix_tokens int64 6 9 | suffix_retokenized bool 2
classes | baseline_logprob_sum float64 -68.05 -0 | extra_info dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"content": " for a fixed sample size $n$. In practical, we first restrict $\\tau$ in a reasonable range and select the optimal value then according to the minimal AME principal. After specifying $\\tau$, the importance of a sample $({\\bf x}_i, y_i)$ can be measured by the corresponding",
"role": "user"... | [
{
"content": " Huber loss $\\ell_\\tau(y",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -15.977293 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.06134",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 0,
"original_suffix_ids": [
26538,
261,
4709,
57960,
613,
56014,
29143,
7021
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "3ce12a7e-ef08-4d6a-9c52-e7d30d45a00b"
} |
[
{
"content": " for a fixed sample size $n$. In practical, we first restrict $\\tau$ in a reasonable range and select the optimal value then according to the minimal AME principal. After specifying $\\tau$, the importance of a sample $({\\bf x}_i, y_i)$ can be measured by the corresponding Huber loss $\\ell_\\... | [
{
"content": " may lead to more robust estimation ",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -28.330238 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.06134",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 1,
"original_suffix_ids": [
1231,
2990,
311,
220,
803,
21765,
41204,
220
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "3ce12a7e-ef08-4d6a-9c52-e7d30d45a00b"
} |
[
{
"content": " for a fixed sample size $n$. In practical, we first restrict $\\tau$ in a reasonable range and select the optimal value then according to the minimal AME principal. After specifying $\\tau$, the importance of a sample $({\\bf x}_i, y_i)$ can be measured by the corresponding Huber loss $\\ell_\\... | [
{
"content": "-Hasting type procedure. The core step",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -23.5751 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.06134",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 2,
"original_suffix_ids": [
11278,
14725,
943,
10324,
13,
576,
6200,
3019
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "3ce12a7e-ef08-4d6a-9c52-e7d30d45a00b"
} |
[
{
"content": " for a fixed sample size $n$. In practical, we first restrict $\\tau$ in a reasonable range and select the optimal value then according to the minimal AME principal. After specifying $\\tau$, the importance of a sample $({\\bf x}_i, y_i)$ can be measured by the corresponding Huber loss $\\ell_\\... | [
{
"content": " ${\\bf z}^*$ is",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -2.330044 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.06134",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 3,
"original_suffix_ids": [
3570,
59,
13233,
1147,
92,
61,
39018,
374
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "3ce12a7e-ef08-4d6a-9c52-e7d30d45a00b"
} |
[
{
"content": " for a fixed sample size $n$. In practical, we first restrict $\\tau$ in a reasonable range and select the optimal value then according to the minimal AME principal. After specifying $\\tau$, the importance of a sample $({\\bf x}_i, y_i)$ can be measured by the corresponding Huber loss $\\ell_\\... | [
{
"content": " repeat this process. Finally, we accept",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -16.238457 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.06134",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 4,
"original_suffix_ids": [
13153,
419,
1882,
13,
17375,
11,
582,
4193
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "3ce12a7e-ef08-4d6a-9c52-e7d30d45a00b"
} |
[
{
"content": " for a fixed sample size $n$. In practical, we first restrict $\\tau$ in a reasonable range and select the optimal value then according to the minimal AME principal. After specifying $\\tau$, the importance of a sample $({\\bf x}_i, y_i)$ can be measured by the corresponding Huber loss $\\ell_\\... | [
{
"content": "caption{ $\\log (AME)$ ",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -26.190586 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.06134",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 5,
"original_suffix_ids": [
23347,
90,
57960,
839,
320,
2729,
15087,
220
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "3ce12a7e-ef08-4d6a-9c52-e7d30d45a00b"
} |
[
{
"content": " for a fixed sample size $n$. In practical, we first restrict $\\tau$ in a reasonable range and select the optimal value then according to the minimal AME principal. After specifying $\\tau$, the importance of a sample $({\\bf x}_i, y_i)$ can be measured by the corresponding Huber loss $\\ell_\\... | [
{
"content": "$ and $\\varepsilon_i$",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -10.035652 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.06134",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 6,
"original_suffix_ids": [
3,
323,
57960,
85,
546,
59892,
5318,
3
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "3ce12a7e-ef08-4d6a-9c52-e7d30d45a00b"
} |
[
{
"content": " for a fixed sample size $n$. In practical, we first restrict $\\tau$ in a reasonable range and select the optimal value then according to the minimal AME principal. After specifying $\\tau$, the importance of a sample $({\\bf x}_i, y_i)$ can be measured by the corresponding Huber loss $\\ell_\\... | [
{
"content": "eq_acc_prob}) tends to select the",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -9.886104 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.06134",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 7,
"original_suffix_ids": [
11006,
17737,
20794,
5410,
27236,
311,
3293,
279
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "3ce12a7e-ef08-4d6a-9c52-e7d30d45a00b"
} |
[
{
"content": " the ignorable treatment effect estimate $\\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}}$ as:\n\\begin{align}\n \\tau_{\\textup{ATE}}^{t_1,t_2} &\\triangleq E[Y|do(t_1)]-E[Y",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": "|do(t_2)];\\\\\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -7.429057 | {
"arxiv_id": "2107.04661",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 8,
"original_suffix_ids": [
91,
2982,
1155,
62,
17,
81091,
3422,
198
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "bf5a3bb8-b387-400d-b3e2-97a6a92f0fd7"
} |
[
{
"content": " the ignorable treatment effect estimate $\\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}}$ as:\n\\begin{align}\n \\tau_{\\textup{ATE}}^{t_1,t_2} &\\triangleq E[Y|do(t_1)]-E[Y|do(t_2)];\\\\\n \\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}} &\\triangleq E[Y|t_1]-E[Y|t_2].\n\\end{align}\nBelow, we use the result in Corollar... | [
{
"content": "VD} to bound the average treatment effect",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -16.670887 | {
"arxiv_id": "2107.04661",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 9,
"original_suffix_ids": [
12474,
92,
311,
6822,
279,
5461,
6380,
2456
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "bf5a3bb8-b387-400d-b3e2-97a6a92f0fd7"
} |
[
{
"content": " the ignorable treatment effect estimate $\\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}}$ as:\n\\begin{align}\n \\tau_{\\textup{ATE}}^{t_1,t_2} &\\triangleq E[Y|do(t_1)]-E[Y|do(t_2)];\\\\\n \\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}} &\\triangleq E[Y|t_1]-E[Y|t_2].\n\\end{align}\nBelow, we use the result in Corollar... | [
{
"content": "}} \\in [\\tau^{t_",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -4.826081 | {
"arxiv_id": "2107.04661",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 10,
"original_suffix_ids": [
3417,
1124,
258,
93815,
29143,
47822,
83,
62
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "bf5a3bb8-b387-400d-b3e2-97a6a92f0fd7"
} |
[
{
"content": " the ignorable treatment effect estimate $\\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}}$ as:\n\\begin{align}\n \\tau_{\\textup{ATE}}^{t_1,t_2} &\\triangleq E[Y|do(t_1)]-E[Y|do(t_2)];\\\\\n \\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}} &\\triangleq E[Y|t_1]-E[Y|t_2].\n\\end{align}\nBelow, we use the result in Corollar... | [
{
"content": " $W(t_1,t_2",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -0.845656 | {
"arxiv_id": "2107.04661",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 11,
"original_suffix_ids": [
400,
54,
1155,
62,
16,
13960,
62,
17
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "bf5a3bb8-b387-400d-b3e2-97a6a92f0fd7"
} |
[
{
"content": " the ignorable treatment effect estimate $\\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}}$ as:\n\\begin{align}\n \\tau_{\\textup{ATE}}^{t_1,t_2} &\\triangleq E[Y|do(t_1)]-E[Y|do(t_2)];\\\\\n \\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}} &\\triangleq E[Y|t_1]-E[Y|t_2].\n\\end{align}\nBelow, we use the result in Corollar... | [
{
"content": "UT}(t_2)\\cdot B",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -0.569391 | {
"arxiv_id": "2107.04661",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 12,
"original_suffix_ids": [
1381,
25547,
83,
62,
17,
10699,
50853,
425
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "bf5a3bb8-b387-400d-b3e2-97a6a92f0fd7"
} |
[
{
"content": " the ignorable treatment effect estimate $\\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}}$ as:\n\\begin{align}\n \\tau_{\\textup{ATE}}^{t_1,t_2} &\\triangleq E[Y|do(t_1)]-E[Y|do(t_2)];\\\\\n \\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}} &\\triangleq E[Y|t_1]-E[Y|t_2].\n\\end{align}\nBelow, we use the result in Corollar... | [
{
"content": "ifiably set or (b) cal",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -12.275126 | {
"arxiv_id": "2107.04661",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 13,
"original_suffix_ids": [
12919,
2845,
738,
476,
320,
65,
8,
1620
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "bf5a3bb8-b387-400d-b3e2-97a6a92f0fd7"
} |
[
{
"content": " the ignorable treatment effect estimate $\\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}}$ as:\n\\begin{align}\n \\tau_{\\textup{ATE}}^{t_1,t_2} &\\triangleq E[Y|do(t_1)]-E[Y|do(t_2)];\\\\\n \\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}} &\\triangleq E[Y|t_1]-E[Y|t_2].\n\\end{align}\nBelow, we use the result in Corollar... | [
{
"content": "{U}}{\\textup{sup",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -2.889156 | {
"arxiv_id": "2107.04661",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 14,
"original_suffix_ids": [
90,
52,
3417,
35702,
1318,
454,
90,
12776
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "bf5a3bb8-b387-400d-b3e2-97a6a92f0fd7"
} |
[
{
"content": " the ignorable treatment effect estimate $\\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}}$ as:\n\\begin{align}\n \\tau_{\\textup{ATE}}^{t_1,t_2} &\\triangleq E[Y|do(t_1)]-E[Y|do(t_2)];\\\\\n \\tau^{t_1,t_2}_{\\textup{igno}} &\\triangleq E[Y|t_1]-E[Y|t_2].\n\\end{align}\nBelow, we use the result in Corollar... | [
{
"content": ">0$, we can rewrite Coroll",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -18.774094 | {
"arxiv_id": "2107.04661",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 15,
"original_suffix_ids": [
29,
15,
54876,
582,
646,
18130,
4463,
965
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "bf5a3bb8-b387-400d-b3e2-97a6a92f0fd7"
} |
[
{
"content": " estimate of the uplift. In our case, with $e(\\mathbf x) = 1/2$, $Z_1$ simplifies to\n\n\\[ Z_1 = \\left\\{ \\begin{array}{cc}\n 2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=1, Y=",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": "1, \\\\\n -2 & \\",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -4.882642 | {
"arxiv_id": "2105.05146",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 16,
"original_suffix_ids": [
16,
11,
90155,
414,
481,
17,
609,
1124
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "06c536b2-3651-4346-a755-553ee9958a33"
} |
[
{
"content": " estimate of the uplift. In our case, with $e(\\mathbf x) = 1/2$, $Z_1$ simplifies to\n\n\\[ Z_1 = \\left\\{ \\begin{array}{cc}\n 2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=1, Y=1, \\\\\n -2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=0, Y=1, \\\\\n 0 & \\mathrm{otherwise.} \n \\end{array} \\right.\n\\]\n\nObserving $Z_1=2$ and $Z... | [
{
"content": " interpretation in the uplift context. For",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -25.842094 | {
"arxiv_id": "2105.05146",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 17,
"original_suffix_ids": [
22845,
220,
304,
279,
96447,
2266,
13,
1752
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "06c536b2-3651-4346-a755-553ee9958a33"
} |
[
{
"content": " estimate of the uplift. In our case, with $e(\\mathbf x) = 1/2$, $Z_1$ simplifies to\n\n\\[ Z_1 = \\left\\{ \\begin{array}{cc}\n 2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=1, Y=1, \\\\\n -2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=0, Y=1, \\\\\n 0 & \\mathrm{otherwise.} \n \\end{array} \\right.\n\\]\n\nObserving $Z_1=2$ and $Z... | [
{
"content": " i) either the client bought the",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -25.26169 | {
"arxiv_id": "2105.05146",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 18,
"original_suffix_ids": [
600,
8,
2987,
279,
2943,
10788,
220,
279
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "06c536b2-3651-4346-a755-553ee9958a33"
} |
[
{
"content": " estimate of the uplift. In our case, with $e(\\mathbf x) = 1/2$, $Z_1$ simplifies to\n\n\\[ Z_1 = \\left\\{ \\begin{array}{cc}\n 2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=1, Y=1, \\\\\n -2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=0, Y=1, \\\\\n 0 & \\mathrm{otherwise.} \n \\end{array} \\right.\n\\]\n\nObserving $Z_1=2$ and $Z... | [
{
"content": " {\\color{magenta} [re",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -26.933807 | {
"arxiv_id": "2105.05146",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 19,
"original_suffix_ids": [
28152,
3423,
90,
76,
47062,
92,
508,
265
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "06c536b2-3651-4346-a755-553ee9958a33"
} |
[
{
"content": " estimate of the uplift. In our case, with $e(\\mathbf x) = 1/2$, $Z_1$ simplifies to\n\n\\[ Z_1 = \\left\\{ \\begin{array}{cc}\n 2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=1, Y=1, \\\\\n -2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=0, Y=1, \\\\\n 0 & \\mathrm{otherwise.} \n \\end{array} \\right.\n\\]\n\nObserving $Z_1=2$ and $Z... | [
{
"content": " be a \\textit{sure thing",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -3.770869 | {
"arxiv_id": "2105.05146",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 20,
"original_suffix_ids": [
387,
264,
1124,
1318,
275,
90,
19098,
3166
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "06c536b2-3651-4346-a755-553ee9958a33"
} |
[
{
"content": " estimate of the uplift. In our case, with $e(\\mathbf x) = 1/2$, $Z_1$ simplifies to\n\n\\[ Z_1 = \\left\\{ \\begin{array}{cc}\n 2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=1, Y=1, \\\\\n -2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=0, Y=1, \\\\\n 0 & \\mathrm{otherwise.} \n \\end{array} \\right.\n\\]\n\nObserving $Z_1=2$ and $Z... | [
{
"content": "=1$. {\\color{magenta",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -7.699419 | {
"arxiv_id": "2105.05146",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 21,
"original_suffix_ids": [
28,
16,
12947,
28152,
3423,
90,
76,
47062
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "06c536b2-3651-4346-a755-553ee9958a33"
} |
[
{
"content": " estimate of the uplift. In our case, with $e(\\mathbf x) = 1/2$, $Z_1$ simplifies to\n\n\\[ Z_1 = \\left\\{ \\begin{array}{cc}\n 2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=1, Y=1, \\\\\n -2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=0, Y=1, \\\\\n 0 & \\mathrm{otherwise.} \n \\end{array} \\right.\n\\]\n\nObserving $Z_1=2$ and $Z... | [
{
"content": " gives insights about ordering customers with $Y",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -10.636851 | {
"arxiv_id": "2105.05146",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 22,
"original_suffix_ids": [
6696,
25709,
911,
21391,
6310,
448,
400,
56
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "06c536b2-3651-4346-a755-553ee9958a33"
} |
[
{
"content": " estimate of the uplift. In our case, with $e(\\mathbf x) = 1/2$, $Z_1$ simplifies to\n\n\\[ Z_1 = \\left\\{ \\begin{array}{cc}\n 2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=1, Y=1, \\\\\n -2 & \\mathrm{if}~T=0, Y=1, \\\\\n 0 & \\mathrm{otherwise.} \n \\end{array} \\right.\n\\]\n\nObserving $Z_1=2$ and $Z... | [
{
"content": ":transformed_outcome_w}\n\\",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -14.447686 | {
"arxiv_id": "2105.05146",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 23,
"original_suffix_ids": [
25,
4701,
291,
6068,
2020,
1670,
532,
59
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "06c536b2-3651-4346-a755-553ee9958a33"
} |
[
{
"content": "$21.91 & 70.52$\\pm$21.67 & 1.55 & 69.13$\\pm$21.70 & -1.95* & 70.24$\\pm$21.97",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": " & 0.05 & ",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -8.494068 | {
"arxiv_id": "2007.15951",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 24,
"original_suffix_ids": [
609,
220,
15,
13,
15,
20,
609,
220
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "0f6521eb-7993-40e7-8a6a-05598d99f7d9"
} |
[
{
"content": "$21.91 & 70.52$\\pm$21.67 & 1.55 & 69.13$\\pm$21.70 & -1.95* & 70.24$\\pm$21.97 & 0.05 & 69.43$\\pm$22.50 & -2.91*** \\\\ \\hline\nVGG & 73.02$\\pm$23.05 & 74.21$\\pm$22.5",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": "7 & 0.91 &",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -8.917701 | {
"arxiv_id": "2007.15951",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 25,
"original_suffix_ids": [
22,
609,
220,
15,
13,
24,
16,
609
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "0f6521eb-7993-40e7-8a6a-05598d99f7d9"
} |
[
{
"content": "$21.91 & 70.52$\\pm$21.67 & 1.55 & 69.13$\\pm$21.70 & -1.95* & 70.24$\\pm$21.97 & 0.05 & 69.43$\\pm$22.50 & -2.91*** \\\\ \\hline\nVGG & 73.02$\\pm$23.05 & 74.21$\\pm$22.57 & 0.91 & 71.87$\\pm$22.14 & -0.84 & 73.69$\\pm$23.86 & 0.53 & 74.42$\\pm$22.63",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": " & 1.45 \\\\ \\",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -6.219126 | {
"arxiv_id": "2007.15951",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 26,
"original_suffix_ids": [
609,
220,
16,
13,
19,
20,
24984,
1124
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "0f6521eb-7993-40e7-8a6a-05598d99f7d9"
} |
[
{
"content": "$21.91 & 70.52$\\pm$21.67 & 1.55 & 69.13$\\pm$21.70 & -1.95* & 70.24$\\pm$21.97 & 0.05 & 69.43$\\pm$22.50 & -2.91*** \\\\ \\hline\nVGG & 73.02$\\pm$23.05 & 74.21$\\pm$22.57 & 0.91 & 71.87$\\pm$22.14 & -0.84 & 73.69$\\pm$23.86 & 0.53 & 74.42$\\pm$22.63 & 1.45 \\\\ \\hline\nResNet& 81.39$\\pm$17.19 ... | [
{
"content": " & -3.31*** &",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -7.710476 | {
"arxiv_id": "2007.15951",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 27,
"original_suffix_ids": [
609,
481,
18,
13,
18,
16,
12210,
609
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "0f6521eb-7993-40e7-8a6a-05598d99f7d9"
} |
[
{
"content": "$21.91 & 70.52$\\pm$21.67 & 1.55 & 69.13$\\pm$21.70 & -1.95* & 70.24$\\pm$21.97 & 0.05 & 69.43$\\pm$22.50 & -2.91*** \\\\ \\hline\nVGG & 73.02$\\pm$23.05 & 74.21$\\pm$22.57 & 0.91 & 71.87$\\pm$22.14 & -0.84 & 73.69$\\pm$23.86 & 0.53 & 74.42$\\pm$22.63 & 1.45 \\\\ \\hline\nResNet& 81.39$\\pm$17.19 ... | [
{
"content": "pm$28.10 &",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -7.903076 | {
"arxiv_id": "2007.15951",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 28,
"original_suffix_ids": [
5187,
3,
17,
23,
13,
16,
15,
609
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "0f6521eb-7993-40e7-8a6a-05598d99f7d9"
} |
[
{
"content": "$21.91 & 70.52$\\pm$21.67 & 1.55 & 69.13$\\pm$21.70 & -1.95* & 70.24$\\pm$21.97 & 0.05 & 69.43$\\pm$22.50 & -2.91*** \\\\ \\hline\nVGG & 73.02$\\pm$23.05 & 74.21$\\pm$22.57 & 0.91 & 71.87$\\pm$22.14 & -0.84 & 73.69$\\pm$23.86 & 0.53 & 74.42$\\pm$22.63 & 1.45 \\\\ \\hline\nResNet& 81.39$\\pm$17.19 ... | [
{
"content": "4 & 0.21 &",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -5.949968 | {
"arxiv_id": "2007.15951",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 29,
"original_suffix_ids": [
19,
609,
220,
15,
13,
17,
16,
609
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "0f6521eb-7993-40e7-8a6a-05598d99f7d9"
} |
[
{
"content": "$21.91 & 70.52$\\pm$21.67 & 1.55 & 69.13$\\pm$21.70 & -1.95* & 70.24$\\pm$21.97 & 0.05 & 69.43$\\pm$22.50 & -2.91*** \\\\ \\hline\nVGG & 73.02$\\pm$23.05 & 74.21$\\pm$22.57 & 0.91 & 71.87$\\pm$22.14 & -0.84 & 73.69$\\pm$23.86 & 0.53 & 74.42$\\pm$22.63 & 1.45 \\\\ \\hline\nResNet& 81.39$\\pm$17.19 ... | [
{
"content": "7 & -2.01**",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -9.948647 | {
"arxiv_id": "2007.15951",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 30,
"original_suffix_ids": [
22,
609,
481,
17,
13,
15,
16,
334
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "0f6521eb-7993-40e7-8a6a-05598d99f7d9"
} |
[
{
"content": "$21.91 & 70.52$\\pm$21.67 & 1.55 & 69.13$\\pm$21.70 & -1.95* & 70.24$\\pm$21.97 & 0.05 & 69.43$\\pm$22.50 & -2.91*** \\\\ \\hline\nVGG & 73.02$\\pm$23.05 & 74.21$\\pm$22.57 & 0.91 & 71.87$\\pm$22.14 & -0.84 & 73.69$\\pm$23.86 & 0.53 & 74.42$\\pm$22.63 & 1.45 \\\\ \\hline\nResNet& 81.39$\\pm$17.19 ... | [
{
"content": "51 & -0.44",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -8.944643 | {
"arxiv_id": "2007.15951",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 31,
"original_suffix_ids": [
20,
16,
609,
481,
15,
13,
19,
19
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "0f6521eb-7993-40e7-8a6a-05598d99f7d9"
} |
[
{
"content": " G\\}$ where $G = {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R}^2)\\times {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R})$ is the group of diffeomorphisms of the domain of the image, approximated by local affine planar transformations, and affine transformations of the range space",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": " of the image, also known as {\\",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -16.648771 | {
"arxiv_id": "2106.13870",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 32,
"original_suffix_ids": [
315,
279,
2168,
11,
1083,
3881,
438,
28152
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "2885fdd8-2666-4504-a7b0-252d989e8316"
} |
[
{
"content": " G\\}$ where $G = {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R}^2)\\times {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R})$ is the group of diffeomorphisms of the domain of the image, approximated by local affine planar transformations, and affine transformations of the range space of the image, also known as {\\em contrast transformations}. Th... | [
{
"content": "clusion nuisances. Data augmentation is typically",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -27.480879 | {
"arxiv_id": "2106.13870",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 33,
"original_suffix_ids": [
8957,
69438,
3020,
13,
2885,
78785,
374,
11136
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "2885fdd8-2666-4504-a7b0-252d989e8316"
} |
[
{
"content": " G\\}$ where $G = {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R}^2)\\times {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R})$ is the group of diffeomorphisms of the domain of the image, approximated by local affine planar transformations, and affine transformations of the range space of the image, also known as {\\em contrast transformations}. Th... | [
{
"content": "{Explicit 3D scene reconstruction.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -20.43092 | {
"arxiv_id": "2106.13870",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 34,
"original_suffix_ids": [
90,
98923,
220,
18,
35,
6109,
42638,
13
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "2885fdd8-2666-4504-a7b0-252d989e8316"
} |
[
{
"content": " G\\}$ where $G = {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R}^2)\\times {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R})$ is the group of diffeomorphisms of the domain of the image, approximated by local affine planar transformations, and affine transformations of the range space of the image, also known as {\\em contrast transformations}. Th... | [
{
"content": "one or more) scenes from a single",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -16.146687 | {
"arxiv_id": "2106.13870",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 35,
"original_suffix_ids": [
603,
476,
803,
8,
16065,
504,
264,
3175
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "2885fdd8-2666-4504-a7b0-252d989e8316"
} |
[
{
"content": " G\\}$ where $G = {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R}^2)\\times {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R})$ is the group of diffeomorphisms of the domain of the image, approximated by local affine planar transformations, and affine transformations of the range space of the image, also known as {\\em contrast transformations}. Th... | [
{
"content": "automatic} used for digital refocusing and",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -33.761902 | {
"arxiv_id": "2106.13870",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 36,
"original_suffix_ids": [
83456,
92,
1483,
369,
7377,
2053,
86495,
323
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "2885fdd8-2666-4504-a7b0-252d989e8316"
} |
[
{
"content": " G\\}$ where $G = {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R}^2)\\times {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R})$ is the group of diffeomorphisms of the domain of the image, approximated by local affine planar transformations, and affine transformations of the range space of the image, also known as {\\em contrast transformations}. Th... | [
{
"content": " which is represented as a distribution depending on",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -22.4286 | {
"arxiv_id": "2106.13870",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 37,
"original_suffix_ids": [
892,
374,
15251,
438,
264,
7982,
11649,
389
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "2885fdd8-2666-4504-a7b0-252d989e8316"
} |
[
{
"content": " G\\}$ where $G = {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R}^2)\\times {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R})$ is the group of diffeomorphisms of the domain of the image, approximated by local affine planar transformations, and affine transformations of the range space of the image, also known as {\\em contrast transformations}. Th... | [
{
"content": "paragraph{Conditional Generative Adversarial",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -10.713275 | {
"arxiv_id": "2106.13870",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 38,
"original_suffix_ids": [
27727,
90,
79233,
2607,
1388,
2410,
3004,
42721
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "2885fdd8-2666-4504-a7b0-252d989e8316"
} |
[
{
"content": " G\\}$ where $G = {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R}^2)\\times {\\cal A}({\\mathbb R})$ is the group of diffeomorphisms of the domain of the image, approximated by local affine planar transformations, and affine transformations of the range space of the image, also known as {\\em contrast transformations}. Th... | [
{
"content": "\\centering\n\\subfigure[",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -5.773478 | {
"arxiv_id": "2106.13870",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 39,
"original_suffix_ids": [
59,
3057,
287,
198,
59,
1966,
17781,
58
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "2885fdd8-2666-4504-a7b0-252d989e8316"
} |
[
{
"content": " $G$ indicates the probability from one webpage to another webpage and is between 0 and 1. The sum of the elements in each row is equal to one. Let $\\pi=[\\pi_1\\cdots \\pi_n]$ be a row probability distribution vector, where $\\pi_n$ is the $",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": "n$-th component of this vector",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -8.4751 | {
"arxiv_id": "2302.14596",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 40,
"original_suffix_ids": [
77,
3,
12,
339,
3692,
315,
419,
4621
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "fca81465-2b6e-4c52-8b6c-01788975e0c2"
} |
[
{
"content": " $G$ indicates the probability from one webpage to another webpage and is between 0 and 1. The sum of the elements in each row is equal to one. Let $\\pi=[\\pi_1\\cdots \\pi_n]$ be a row probability distribution vector, where $\\pi_n$ is the $n$-th component of this vector. The row probability dis... | [
{
"content": "~\\cite{Bronson20",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -11.738337 | {
"arxiv_id": "2302.14596",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 41,
"original_suffix_ids": [
93,
59,
67075,
90,
40959,
930,
17,
15
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "fca81465-2b6e-4c52-8b6c-01788975e0c2"
} |
[
{
"content": " $G$ indicates the probability from one webpage to another webpage and is between 0 and 1. The sum of the elements in each row is equal to one. Let $\\pi=[\\pi_1\\cdots \\pi_n]$ be a row probability distribution vector, where $\\pi_n$ is the $n$-th component of this vector. The row probability dis... | [
{
"content": " is a technique for approximating to the",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -16.236616 | {
"arxiv_id": "2302.14596",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 42,
"original_suffix_ids": [
374,
264,
14762,
369,
9848,
78348,
311,
279
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "fca81465-2b6e-4c52-8b6c-01788975e0c2"
} |
[
{
"content": " $G$ indicates the probability from one webpage to another webpage and is between 0 and 1. The sum of the elements in each row is equal to one. Let $\\pi=[\\pi_1\\cdots \\pi_n]$ be a row probability distribution vector, where $\\pi_n$ is the $n$-th component of this vector. The row probability dis... | [
{
"content": " by\n\\begin{equation}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -7.499243 | {
"arxiv_id": "2302.14596",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 43,
"original_suffix_ids": [
553,
198,
59,
7265,
90,
25310,
367,
532
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "fca81465-2b6e-4c52-8b6c-01788975e0c2"
} |
[
{
"content": " $G$ indicates the probability from one webpage to another webpage and is between 0 and 1. The sum of the elements in each row is equal to one. Let $\\pi=[\\pi_1\\cdots \\pi_n]$ be a row probability distribution vector, where $\\pi_n$ is the $n$-th component of this vector. The row probability dis... | [
{
"content": "pi^{(m)}=\\pi^{",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -3.211773 | {
"arxiv_id": "2302.14596",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 44,
"original_suffix_ids": [
2493,
47822,
7,
76,
9139,
34433,
2493,
47822
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "fca81465-2b6e-4c52-8b6c-01788975e0c2"
} |
[
{
"content": " $G$ indicates the probability from one webpage to another webpage and is between 0 and 1. The sum of the elements in each row is equal to one. Let $\\pi=[\\pi_1\\cdots \\pi_n]$ be a row probability distribution vector, where $\\pi_n$ is the $n$-th component of this vector. The row probability dis... | [
{
"content": "1. Due to these characteristics, the",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -10.458305 | {
"arxiv_id": "2302.14596",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 45,
"original_suffix_ids": [
16,
13,
23662,
311,
1493,
17452,
11,
279
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "fca81465-2b6e-4c52-8b6c-01788975e0c2"
} |
[
{
"content": " $G$ indicates the probability from one webpage to another webpage and is between 0 and 1. The sum of the elements in each row is equal to one. Let $\\pi=[\\pi_1\\cdots \\pi_n]$ be a row probability distribution vector, where $\\pi_n$ is the $n$-th component of this vector. The row probability dis... | [
{
"content": "$ can be viewed as the dominant eig",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -8.464662 | {
"arxiv_id": "2302.14596",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 46,
"original_suffix_ids": [
3,
646,
387,
19334,
438,
279,
24456,
34734
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "fca81465-2b6e-4c52-8b6c-01788975e0c2"
} |
[
{
"content": " $G$ indicates the probability from one webpage to another webpage and is between 0 and 1. The sum of the elements in each row is equal to one. Let $\\pi=[\\pi_1\\cdots \\pi_n]$ be a row probability distribution vector, where $\\pi_n$ is the $n$-th component of this vector. The row probability dis... | [
{
"content": ". Hence this score estimates the importance of",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -21.443968 | {
"arxiv_id": "2302.14596",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 47,
"original_suffix_ids": [
13,
31040,
419,
5456,
17530,
279,
12650,
315
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "fca81465-2b6e-4c52-8b6c-01788975e0c2"
} |
[
{
"content": "16\\} \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel} & AWGN with 5 KHz offset \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel Gain} & As per the distribution \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{In-band Interference} & \\begin{tab",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": "ular}[c]{@{}l@",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -0.442142 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.11699",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 48,
"original_suffix_ids": [
1276,
43389,
66,
15370,
31,
6257,
75,
31
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "3a90d00d-642b-43d9-b5bc-87e49c9a7726"
} |
[
{
"content": "16\\} \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel} & AWGN with 5 KHz offset \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel Gain} & As per the distribution \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{In-band Interference} & \\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Narrowband spread over\\\\ few unknown subcarriers\\end{tabular} \\\\ \\hline\n... | [
{
"content": " \\\\ overlapping freq. range\\",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -24.756565 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.11699",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 49,
"original_suffix_ids": [
24984,
220,
49817,
220,
20895,
13,
2088,
59
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "3a90d00d-642b-43d9-b5bc-87e49c9a7726"
} |
[
{
"content": "16\\} \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel} & AWGN with 5 KHz offset \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel Gain} & As per the distribution \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{In-band Interference} & \\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Narrowband spread over\\\\ few unknown subcarriers\\end{tabular} \\\\ \\hline\n... | [
{
"content": ": 1)~In-band Inter",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -15.074446 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.11699",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 50,
"original_suffix_ids": [
25,
220,
16,
8,
93,
641,
67675,
5665
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "3a90d00d-642b-43d9-b5bc-87e49c9a7726"
} |
[
{
"content": "16\\} \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel} & AWGN with 5 KHz offset \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel Gain} & As per the distribution \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{In-band Interference} & \\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Narrowband spread over\\\\ few unknown subcarriers\\end{tabular} \\\\ \\hline\n... | [
{
"content": "lapping but adjacent frequency bands. In both",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -10.425064 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.11699",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 51,
"original_suffix_ids": [
90619,
714,
23942,
11639,
20892,
13,
758,
2176
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "3a90d00d-642b-43d9-b5bc-87e49c9a7726"
} |
[
{
"content": "16\\} \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel} & AWGN with 5 KHz offset \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel Gain} & As per the distribution \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{In-band Interference} & \\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Narrowband spread over\\\\ few unknown subcarriers\\end{tabular} \\\\ \\hline\n... | [
{
"content": " effects and non-ideal channel estimation methods",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -20.102865 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.11699",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 52,
"original_suffix_ids": [
6239,
323,
2477,
12,
62953,
5496,
41204,
5413
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "3a90d00d-642b-43d9-b5bc-87e49c9a7726"
} |
[
{
"content": "16\\} \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel} & AWGN with 5 KHz offset \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel Gain} & As per the distribution \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{In-band Interference} & \\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Narrowband spread over\\\\ few unknown subcarriers\\end{tabular} \\\\ \\hline\n... | [
{
"content": ") system based CR communication in which down",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -24.854816 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.11699",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 53,
"original_suffix_ids": [
8,
1849,
3118,
12617,
10535,
304,
892,
1495
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "3a90d00d-642b-43d9-b5bc-87e49c9a7726"
} |
[
{
"content": "16\\} \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel} & AWGN with 5 KHz offset \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel Gain} & As per the distribution \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{In-band Interference} & \\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Narrowband spread over\\\\ few unknown subcarriers\\end{tabular} \\\\ \\hline\n... | [
{
"content": "mu^1~=~\\{ ",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -27.353521 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.11699",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 54,
"original_suffix_ids": [
15128,
61,
16,
50633,
93,
59,
90,
220
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "3a90d00d-642b-43d9-b5bc-87e49c9a7726"
} |
[
{
"content": "16\\} \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel} & AWGN with 5 KHz offset \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{Wireless Channel Gain} & As per the distribution \\\\ \\hline\n\\textbf{In-band Interference} & \\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Narrowband spread over\\\\ few unknown subcarriers\\end{tabular} \\\\ \\hline\n... | [
{
"content": "0.1,0.3,",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -6.651146 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.11699",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 55,
"original_suffix_ids": [
15,
13,
16,
11,
15,
13,
18,
11
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "3a90d00d-642b-43d9-b5bc-87e49c9a7726"
} |
[
{
"content": "Stiefel1935},\n\twhich is denoted by $\\mathcal{S}_{n,p} = \\{X \\in \\Rnp \\mid X^{\\top} X = I_p\\}$.\n\tThroughout this paper, \n\twe make the following blanket assumptions about these local functions.\n",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": "\t\\begin{assumption}\\label",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -2.037341 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.14949",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 56,
"original_suffix_ids": [
197,
59,
7265,
90,
395,
60574,
11035,
1502
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "c176f194-3173-4c15-8cbb-707b1854d4dd"
} |
[
{
"content": "Stiefel1935},\n\twhich is denoted by $\\mathcal{S}_{n,p} = \\{X \\in \\Rnp \\mid X^{\\top} X = I_p\\}$.\n\tThroughout this paper, \n\twe make the following blanket assumptions about these local functions.\n\t\\begin{assumption}\\label{asp:smooth}\n\t\tEach local objective function $f_i$ is smooth ... | [
{
"content": "\twith their immediate neighbors through the network,\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -14.897992 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.14949",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 57,
"original_suffix_ids": [
46948,
862,
13922,
18709,
1526,
279,
3922,
345
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "c176f194-3173-4c15-8cbb-707b1854d4dd"
} |
[
{
"content": "Stiefel1935},\n\twhich is denoted by $\\mathcal{S}_{n,p} = \\{X \\in \\Rnp \\mid X^{\\top} X = I_p\\}$.\n\tThroughout this paper, \n\twe make the following blanket assumptions about these local functions.\n\t\\begin{assumption}\\label{asp:smooth}\n\t\tEach local objective function $f_i$ is smooth ... | [
{
"content": " d\\}$ is composed of all the",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -15.293028 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.14949",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 58,
"original_suffix_ids": [
294,
59,
31716,
374,
23415,
315,
678,
279
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "c176f194-3173-4c15-8cbb-707b1854d4dd"
} |
[
{
"content": "Stiefel1935},\n\twhich is denoted by $\\mathcal{S}_{n,p} = \\{X \\in \\Rnp \\mid X^{\\top} X = I_p\\}$.\n\tThroughout this paper, \n\twe make the following blanket assumptions about these local functions.\n\t\\begin{assumption}\\label{asp:smooth}\n\t\tEach local objective function $f_i$ is smooth ... | [
{
"content": "np$ be the local copy of the",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -5.264042 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.14949",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 59,
"original_suffix_ids": [
6199,
3,
387,
279,
2205,
2975,
315,
279
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "c176f194-3173-4c15-8cbb-707b1854d4dd"
} |
[
{
"content": "Stiefel1935},\n\twhich is denoted by $\\mathcal{S}_{n,p} = \\{X \\in \\Rnp \\mid X^{\\top} X = I_p\\}$.\n\tThroughout this paper, \n\twe make the following blanket assumptions about these local functions.\n\t\\begin{assumption}\\label{asp:smooth}\n\t\tEach local objective function $f_i$ is smooth ... | [
{
"content": "ations}\\label{eq:opt-",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -4.47349 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.14949",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 60,
"original_suffix_ids": [
804,
11035,
1502,
90,
11006,
25,
2912,
12
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "c176f194-3173-4c15-8cbb-707b1854d4dd"
} |
[
{
"content": "Stiefel1935},\n\twhich is denoted by $\\mathcal{S}_{n,p} = \\{X \\in \\Rnp \\mid X^{\\top} X = I_p\\}$.\n\tThroughout this paper, \n\twe make the following blanket assumptions about these local functions.\n\t\\begin{assumption}\\label{asp:smooth}\n\t\tEach local objective function $f_i$ is smooth ... | [
{
"content": "}{d} \\sum\\limits_{",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -1.263876 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.14949",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 61,
"original_suffix_ids": [
15170,
67,
92,
1124,
1242,
59,
41078,
15159
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "c176f194-3173-4c15-8cbb-707b1854d4dd"
} |
[
{
"content": "Stiefel1935},\n\twhich is denoted by $\\mathcal{S}_{n,p} = \\{X \\in \\Rnp \\mid X^{\\top} X = I_p\\}$.\n\tThroughout this paper, \n\twe make the following blanket assumptions about these local functions.\n\t\\begin{assumption}\\label{asp:smooth}\n\t\tEach local objective function $f_i$ is smooth ... | [
{
"content": " \\in \\mathtt{E},",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -1.670984 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.14949",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 62,
"original_suffix_ids": [
1124,
258,
1124,
8470,
96336,
90,
36,
2137
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "c176f194-3173-4c15-8cbb-707b1854d4dd"
} |
[
{
"content": "Stiefel1935},\n\twhich is denoted by $\\mathcal{S}_{n,p} = \\{X \\in \\Rnp \\mid X^{\\top} X = I_p\\}$.\n\tThroughout this paper, \n\twe make the following blanket assumptions about these local functions.\n\t\\begin{assumption}\\label{asp:smooth}\n\t\tEach local objective function $f_i$ is smooth ... | [
{
"content": "\tSince the graph $\\mathtt{",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -9.262734 | {
"arxiv_id": "2112.14949",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 63,
"original_suffix_ids": [
7568,
1701,
279,
4771,
57960,
8470,
96336,
90
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "c176f194-3173-4c15-8cbb-707b1854d4dd"
} |
[
{
"content": " to, on average, a very small relative change in the weights of $M$ and $M'$ which can be observed through the metrics $\\% \\ \\Delta \\ell_{p}$. For the same $\\epsilon$, we observe a smaller $\\Delta \\ell_{p}$ for word-CNN than word-LSTM",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": " showing that it is more vulnerable to our",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -24.155485 | {
"arxiv_id": "2008.01761",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 64,
"original_suffix_ids": [
9027,
429,
432,
374,
803,
19563,
311,
1039
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "babce15c-a871-4989-90d8-87d8f75fe5a3"
} |
[
{
"content": " to, on average, a very small relative change in the weights of $M$ and $M'$ which can be observed through the metrics $\\% \\ \\Delta \\ell_{p}$. For the same $\\epsilon$, we observe a smaller $\\Delta \\ell_{p}$ for word-CNN than word-LSTM showing that it is more vulnerable to our backdoor attac... | [
{
"content": " a strong attack on a very small pert",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -23.254547 | {
"arxiv_id": "2008.01761",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 65,
"original_suffix_ids": [
264,
3746,
3359,
389,
264,
1602,
2613,
18212
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "babce15c-a871-4989-90d8-87d8f75fe5a3"
} |
[
{
"content": " to, on average, a very small relative change in the weights of $M$ and $M'$ which can be observed through the metrics $\\% \\ \\Delta \\ell_{p}$. For the same $\\epsilon$, we observe a smaller $\\Delta \\ell_{p}$ for word-CNN than word-LSTM showing that it is more vulnerable to our backdoor attac... | [
{
"content": "$. The test accuracy drops with an initial",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -23.920549 | {
"arxiv_id": "2008.01761",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 66,
"original_suffix_ids": [
12947,
576,
1273,
13403,
21025,
448,
458,
2856
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "babce15c-a871-4989-90d8-87d8f75fe5a3"
} |
[
{
"content": " to, on average, a very small relative change in the weights of $M$ and $M'$ which can be observed through the metrics $\\% \\ \\Delta \\ell_{p}$. For the same $\\epsilon$, we observe a smaller $\\Delta \\ell_{p}$ for word-CNN than word-LSTM showing that it is more vulnerable to our backdoor attac... | [
{
"content": "}_{C}(M'(x),y",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -20.102577 | {
"arxiv_id": "2008.01761",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 67,
"original_suffix_ids": [
51535,
34,
25547,
44,
58336,
87,
701,
88
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "babce15c-a871-4989-90d8-87d8f75fe5a3"
} |
[
{
"content": " to, on average, a very small relative change in the weights of $M$ and $M'$ which can be observed through the metrics $\\% \\ \\Delta \\ell_{p}$. For the same $\\epsilon$, we observe a smaller $\\Delta \\ell_{p}$ for word-CNN than word-LSTM showing that it is more vulnerable to our backdoor attac... | [
{
"content": ", the test accuracy of $M'$",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -7.668705 | {
"arxiv_id": "2008.01761",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 68,
"original_suffix_ids": [
11,
279,
1273,
13403,
315,
400,
44,
44701
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "babce15c-a871-4989-90d8-87d8f75fe5a3"
} |
[
{
"content": " to, on average, a very small relative change in the weights of $M$ and $M'$ which can be observed through the metrics $\\% \\ \\Delta \\ell_{p}$. For the same $\\epsilon$, we observe a smaller $\\Delta \\ell_{p}$ for word-CNN than word-LSTM showing that it is more vulnerable to our backdoor attac... | [
{
"content": "$ such that $y=y_{_{",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -7.013348 | {
"arxiv_id": "2008.01761",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 69,
"original_suffix_ids": [
3,
1741,
429,
400,
88,
29368,
15159,
15159
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "babce15c-a871-4989-90d8-87d8f75fe5a3"
} |
[
{
"content": " to, on average, a very small relative change in the weights of $M$ and $M'$ which can be observed through the metrics $\\% \\ \\Delta \\ell_{p}$. For the same $\\epsilon$, we observe a smaller $\\Delta \\ell_{p}$ for word-CNN than word-LSTM showing that it is more vulnerable to our backdoor attac... | [
{
"content": "'$ over $M$.\n\\end",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -4.784426 | {
"arxiv_id": "2008.01761",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 70,
"original_suffix_ids": [
44701,
916,
400,
44,
3,
624,
59,
408
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "babce15c-a871-4989-90d8-87d8f75fe5a3"
} |
[
{
"content": " to, on average, a very small relative change in the weights of $M$ and $M'$ which can be observed through the metrics $\\% \\ \\Delta \\ell_{p}$. For the same $\\epsilon$, we observe a smaller $\\Delta \\ell_{p}$ for word-CNN than word-LSTM showing that it is more vulnerable to our backdoor attac... | [
{
"content": " in our training loss. We consider the",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -18.54426 | {
"arxiv_id": "2008.01761",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 71,
"original_suffix_ids": [
304,
1039,
4862,
4709,
13,
1205,
2908,
279
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "babce15c-a871-4989-90d8-87d8f75fe5a3"
} |
[
{
"content": "4)--(A8) hold, and the Fr\\'echet trees are $\\alpha$-regular, random-split, honest and symmetric. Then, provided that $\\alpha \\leq 0.2$, we have\n\t\t\t$$\n\t\t\td(\\hat{r}_{\\oplus",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": "} (x),m_{\\opl",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -19.158678 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.04912",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 72,
"original_suffix_ids": [
92,
320,
87,
701,
76,
15159,
59,
55078
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "dbcefe3c-2789-4928-935c-0dc07e923180"
} |
[
{
"content": "4)--(A8) hold, and the Fr\\'echet trees are $\\alpha$-regular, random-split, honest and symmetric. Then, provided that $\\alpha \\leq 0.2$, we have\n\t\t\t$$\n\t\t\td(\\hat{r}_{\\oplus} (x),m_{\\oplus}(x))=O_p\\left[\\left(\\frac{s_n^2 \\log s_n}{n}\\right)^{\\frac{1}{2 \\left(\\beta_1-1\\righ... | [
{
"content": "{\\log \\left((1-\\alpha",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -14.394008 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.04912",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 73,
"original_suffix_ids": [
35702,
839,
1124,
2359,
1188,
16,
30529,
7141
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "dbcefe3c-2789-4928-935c-0dc07e923180"
} |
[
{
"content": "4)--(A8) hold, and the Fr\\'echet trees are $\\alpha$-regular, random-split, honest and symmetric. Then, provided that $\\alpha \\leq 0.2$, we have\n\t\t\t$$\n\t\t\td(\\hat{r}_{\\oplus} (x),m_{\\oplus}(x))=O_p\\left[\\left(\\frac{s_n^2 \\log s_n}{n}\\right)^{\\frac{1}{2 \\left(\\beta_1-1\\righ... | [
{
"content": "ymptotic Normality} \\label",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -6.013972 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.04912",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 74,
"original_suffix_ids": [
1600,
417,
14212,
18437,
487,
92,
1124,
1502
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "dbcefe3c-2789-4928-935c-0dc07e923180"
} |
[
{
"content": "4)--(A8) hold, and the Fr\\'echet trees are $\\alpha$-regular, random-split, honest and symmetric. Then, provided that $\\alpha \\leq 0.2$, we have\n\t\t\t$$\n\t\t\td(\\hat{r}_{\\oplus} (x),m_{\\oplus}(x))=O_p\\left[\\left(\\frac{s_n^2 \\log s_n}{n}\\right)^{\\frac{1}{2 \\left(\\beta_1-1\\righ... | [
{
"content": "{bose2018u}",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -25.673016 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.04912",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 75,
"original_suffix_ids": [
90,
8297,
17,
15,
16,
23,
84,
92
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "dbcefe3c-2789-4928-935c-0dc07e923180"
} |
[
{
"content": "4)--(A8) hold, and the Fr\\'echet trees are $\\alpha$-regular, random-split, honest and symmetric. Then, provided that $\\alpha \\leq 0.2$, we have\n\t\t\t$$\n\t\t\td(\\hat{r}_{\\oplus} (x),m_{\\oplus}(x))=O_p\\left[\\left(\\frac{s_n^2 \\log s_n}{n}\\right)^{\\frac{1}{2 \\left(\\beta_1-1\\righ... | [
{
"content": " $M_{m_n}$-est",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -3.763266 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.04912",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 76,
"original_suffix_ids": [
400,
44,
15159,
76,
1089,
31716,
12,
477
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "dbcefe3c-2789-4928-935c-0dc07e923180"
} |
[
{
"content": "4)--(A8) hold, and the Fr\\'echet trees are $\\alpha$-regular, random-split, honest and symmetric. Then, provided that $\\alpha \\leq 0.2$, we have\n\t\t\t$$\n\t\t\td(\\hat{r}_{\\oplus} (x),m_{\\oplus}(x))=O_p\\left[\\left(\\frac{s_n^2 \\log s_n}{n}\\right)^{\\frac{1}{2 \\left(\\beta_1-1\\righ... | [
{
"content": "8u} to acquire the probability representation",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -25.209774 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.04912",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 77,
"original_suffix_ids": [
23,
84,
92,
311,
21256,
279,
18927,
13042
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "dbcefe3c-2789-4928-935c-0dc07e923180"
} |
[
{
"content": "4)--(A8) hold, and the Fr\\'echet trees are $\\alpha$-regular, random-split, honest and symmetric. Then, provided that $\\alpha \\leq 0.2$, we have\n\t\t\t$$\n\t\t\td(\\hat{r}_{\\oplus} (x),m_{\\oplus}(x))=O_p\\left[\\left(\\frac{s_n^2 \\log s_n}{n}\\right)^{\\frac{1}{2 \\left(\\beta_1-1\\righ... | [
{
"content": "05large} concluded that the map",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -26.968678 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.04912",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 78,
"original_suffix_ids": [
15,
20,
16767,
92,
19941,
429,
279,
2415
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "dbcefe3c-2789-4928-935c-0dc07e923180"
} |
[
{
"content": "4)--(A8) hold, and the Fr\\'echet trees are $\\alpha$-regular, random-split, honest and symmetric. Then, provided that $\\alpha \\leq 0.2$, we have\n\t\t\t$$\n\t\t\td(\\hat{r}_{\\oplus} (x),m_{\\oplus}(x))=O_p\\left[\\left(\\frac{s_n^2 \\log s_n}{n}\\right)^{\\frac{1}{2 \\left(\\beta_1-1\\righ... | [
{
"content": " asymptotic normality of RFWFR",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -2.345134 | {
"arxiv_id": "2202.04912",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 79,
"original_suffix_ids": [
96254,
14212,
4622,
487,
315,
431,
18222,
10504
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "dbcefe3c-2789-4928-935c-0dc07e923180"
} |
[
{
"content": " &\\le\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\setexclude{\\vta[\\mostpullvariables]}{\\vta[\\setId]}}\\vtav[\\UPindex].\n \n\\end{align}\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:proof-UpUCBLWB",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": "-LHS-upper2}\n \\begin",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -19.032141 | {
"arxiv_id": "2206.04091",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 80,
"original_suffix_ids": [
8125,
11961,
53262,
17,
532,
262,
1124,
7265
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "a6b4ee8f-9c69-4e09-9ecf-0915fba8eed6"
} |
[
{
"content": " &\\le\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\setexclude{\\vta[\\mostpullvariables]}{\\vta[\\setId]}}\\vtav[\\UPindex].\n \n\\end{align}\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:proof-UpUCBLWB-LHS-upper2}\n \\begin{aligned}[b]\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\vta[\\setId]}\\vtav[\\UPindex]\n +\\sum_{\\ind... | [
{
"content": " \\sum_{\\indv\\in",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -0.481206 | {
"arxiv_id": "2206.04091",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 81,
"original_suffix_ids": [
1124,
1242,
15159,
59,
484,
85,
59,
258
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "a6b4ee8f-9c69-4e09-9ecf-0915fba8eed6"
} |
[
{
"content": " &\\le\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\setexclude{\\vta[\\mostpullvariables]}{\\vta[\\setId]}}\\vtav[\\UPindex].\n \n\\end{align}\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:proof-UpUCBLWB-LHS-upper2}\n \\begin{aligned}[b]\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\vta[\\setId]}\\vtav[\\UPindex]\n +\\sum_{\\ind... | [
{
"content": "ta[\\mostpullvariables]}{\\v",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -0.031729 | {
"arxiv_id": "2206.04091",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 82,
"original_suffix_ids": [
2565,
26056,
3562,
23441,
18616,
13989,
35702,
85
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "a6b4ee8f-9c69-4e09-9ecf-0915fba8eed6"
} |
[
{
"content": " &\\le\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\setexclude{\\vta[\\mostpullvariables]}{\\vta[\\setId]}}\\vtav[\\UPindex].\n \n\\end{align}\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:proof-UpUCBLWB-LHS-upper2}\n \\begin{aligned}[b]\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\vta[\\setId]}\\vtav[\\UPindex]\n +\\sum_{\\ind... | [
{
"content": "index]\n + \\sum_{\\",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -1.84557 | {
"arxiv_id": "2206.04091",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 83,
"original_suffix_ids": [
1252,
921,
262,
488,
1124,
1242,
15159,
59
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "a6b4ee8f-9c69-4e09-9ecf-0915fba8eed6"
} |
[
{
"content": " &\\le\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\setexclude{\\vta[\\mostpullvariables]}{\\vta[\\setId]}}\\vtav[\\UPindex].\n \n\\end{align}\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:proof-UpUCBLWB-LHS-upper2}\n \\begin{aligned}[b]\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\vta[\\setId]}\\vtav[\\UPindex]\n +\\sum_{\\ind... | [
{
"content": "[\\radiusConf][\\run-1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -0.023749 | {
"arxiv_id": "2206.04091",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 84,
"original_suffix_ids": [
26056,
26715,
15578,
1457,
59,
6108,
12,
16
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "a6b4ee8f-9c69-4e09-9ecf-0915fba8eed6"
} |
[
{
"content": " &\\le\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\setexclude{\\vta[\\mostpullvariables]}{\\vta[\\setId]}}\\vtav[\\UPindex].\n \n\\end{align}\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:proof-UpUCBLWB-LHS-upper2}\n \\begin{aligned}[b]\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\vta[\\setId]}\\vtav[\\UPindex]\n +\\sum_{\\ind... | [
{
"content": "Affected\\vta[\\radiusConf][\\",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -0.63502 | {
"arxiv_id": "2206.04091",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 85,
"original_suffix_ids": [
81805,
72659,
2565,
26056,
26715,
15578,
1457,
59
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "a6b4ee8f-9c69-4e09-9ecf-0915fba8eed6"
} |
[
{
"content": " &\\le\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\setexclude{\\vta[\\mostpullvariables]}{\\vta[\\setId]}}\\vtav[\\UPindex].\n \n\\end{align}\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:proof-UpUCBLWB-LHS-upper2}\n \\begin{aligned}[b]\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\vta[\\setId]}\\vtav[\\UPindex]\n +\\sum_{\\ind... | [
{
"content": "B-L-ineq-unidentified2",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -0.296961 | {
"arxiv_id": "2206.04091",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 86,
"original_suffix_ids": [
33,
8125,
12,
482,
80,
19892,
42260,
17
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "a6b4ee8f-9c69-4e09-9ecf-0915fba8eed6"
} |
[
{
"content": " &\\le\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\setexclude{\\vta[\\mostpullvariables]}{\\vta[\\setId]}}\\vtav[\\UPindex].\n \n\\end{align}\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:proof-UpUCBLWB-LHS-upper2}\n \\begin{aligned}[b]\n \\sum_{\\indv\\in\\vta[\\setId]}\\vtav[\\UPindex]\n +\\sum_{\\ind... | [
{
"content": "mostpullvariables]$.\nFinally, for",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -9.086514 | {
"arxiv_id": "2206.04091",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 87,
"original_suffix_ids": [
3562,
23441,
18616,
94280,
624,
23949,
11,
369
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "a6b4ee8f-9c69-4e09-9ecf-0915fba8eed6"
} |
[
{
"content": "*}\n for the truncated exponential distribution \\eqref{eq:exponential}. Our bound \\eqref{eq:lp_bound} thus shows that deep belief networks with truncated exponential parental density (for suitable choice of the parameters $b$ and $\\lambda$) better approximate the target density $f$. This is"... | [
{
"content": " especially prevalent for small $q$, which",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -27.192335 | {
"arxiv_id": "2208.09033",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 88,
"original_suffix_ids": [
5310,
45841,
369,
2613,
400,
80,
54876,
892
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "78799ba4-75bb-4ddf-a7d2-350a114fb5be"
} |
[
{
"content": "*}\n for the truncated exponential distribution \\eqref{eq:exponential}. Our bound \\eqref{eq:lp_bound} thus shows that deep belief networks with truncated exponential parental density (for suitable choice of the parameters $b$ and $\\lambda$) better approximate the target density $f$. This is ... | [
{
"content": "begin{equation*}\n \\",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -2.605823 | {
"arxiv_id": "2208.09033",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 89,
"original_suffix_ids": [
7265,
90,
25310,
367,
9,
532,
262,
1124
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "78799ba4-75bb-4ddf-a7d2-350a114fb5be"
} |
[
{
"content": "*}\n for the truncated exponential distribution \\eqref{eq:exponential}. Our bound \\eqref{eq:lp_bound} thus shows that deep belief networks with truncated exponential parental density (for suitable choice of the parameters $b$ and $\\lambda$) better approximate the target density $f$. This is ... | [
{
"content": "}\\sup_{|x-y|\\le",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -2.492102 | {
"arxiv_id": "2208.09033",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 90,
"original_suffix_ids": [
11035,
12776,
15159,
91,
87,
12034,
22957,
273
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "78799ba4-75bb-4ddf-a7d2-350a114fb5be"
} |
[
{
"content": "*}\n for the truncated exponential distribution \\eqref{eq:exponential}. Our bound \\eqref{eq:lp_bound} thus shows that deep belief networks with truncated exponential parental density (for suitable choice of the parameters $b$ and $\\lambda$) better approximate the target density $f$. This is ... | [
{
"content": " differentiable and has a bounded derivative,",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -10.975679 | {
"arxiv_id": "2208.09033",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 91,
"original_suffix_ids": [
2155,
2156,
323,
702,
264,
61115,
31805,
11
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "78799ba4-75bb-4ddf-a7d2-350a114fb5be"
} |
[
{
"content": "*}\n for the truncated exponential distribution \\eqref{eq:exponential}. Our bound \\eqref{eq:lp_bound} thus shows that deep belief networks with truncated exponential parental density (for suitable choice of the parameters $b$ and $\\lambda$) better approximate the target density $f$. This is ... | [
{
"content": "in\\mathscr{D}(\\",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -0.90413 | {
"arxiv_id": "2208.09033",
"chunk_i": 5,
"index": 92,
"original_suffix_ids": [
258,
59,
10374,
25065,
90,
35,
92,
11520
],
"token_index": 320,
"uuid": "78799ba4-75bb-4ddf-a7d2-350a114fb5be"
} |
[
{
"content": "*}\n for the truncated exponential distribution \\eqref{eq:exponential}. Our bound \\eqref{eq:lp_bound} thus shows that deep belief networks with truncated exponential parental density (for suitable choice of the parameters $b$ and $\\lambda$) better approximate the target density $f$. This is ... | [
{
"content": "bb{R}}^d)$.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -1.232185 | {
"arxiv_id": "2208.09033",
"chunk_i": 6,
"index": 93,
"original_suffix_ids": [
6066,
90,
49,
3417,
61,
67,
8,
12947
],
"token_index": 384,
"uuid": "78799ba4-75bb-4ddf-a7d2-350a114fb5be"
} |
[
{
"content": "*}\n for the truncated exponential distribution \\eqref{eq:exponential}. Our bound \\eqref{eq:lp_bound} thus shows that deep belief networks with truncated exponential parental density (for suitable choice of the parameters $b$ and $\\lambda$) better approximate the target density $f$. This is ... | [
{
"content": "N}}_\\varphi(d,m,m",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -14.29385 | {
"arxiv_id": "2208.09033",
"chunk_i": 7,
"index": 94,
"original_suffix_ids": [
45,
3417,
56014,
947,
16827,
1500,
13086,
13086
],
"token_index": 448,
"uuid": "78799ba4-75bb-4ddf-a7d2-350a114fb5be"
} |
[
{
"content": "*}\n for the truncated exponential distribution \\eqref{eq:exponential}. Our bound \\eqref{eq:lp_bound} thus shows that deep belief networks with truncated exponential parental density (for suitable choice of the parameters $b$ and $\\lambda$) better approximate the target density $f$. This is ... | [
{
"content": " target density in \\cref{th",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -9.118698 | {
"arxiv_id": "2208.09033",
"chunk_i": 8,
"index": 95,
"original_suffix_ids": [
2169,
17457,
304,
1124,
837,
69,
90,
339
],
"token_index": 512,
"uuid": "78799ba4-75bb-4ddf-a7d2-350a114fb5be"
} |
[
{
"content": "_1,\\dots,x_{N}| x_j \\sim P_t\\}$ to be sampled, of size $N$, from the source domains $D_{S_i}$ in $S$ and the target domain $D_t$, respectively. Also, assume a weighting scheme \n$w_i$ for the source domain",
"role": "user"
}
] | [
{
"content": " $D_{s_i}$ s.t",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -14.074409 | {
"arxiv_id": "2212.00424",
"chunk_i": 1,
"index": 96,
"original_suffix_ids": [
400,
35,
15159,
82,
5318,
31716,
274,
734
],
"token_index": 64,
"uuid": "74d8c65c-8f05-42a6-9e90-5f77cf99141f"
} |
[
{
"content": "_1,\\dots,x_{N}| x_j \\sim P_t\\}$ to be sampled, of size $N$, from the source domains $D_{S_i}$ in $S$ and the target domain $D_t$, respectively. Also, assume a weighting scheme \n$w_i$ for the source domain $D_{s_i}$ s.t. $\\sum_{i=1}^{K}{w_i=1}$. \nFor any hypothesis $h\\in \\mathcal{H}$, the $... | [
{
"content": "}\n&SDI(r_h,f_t",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -27.925009 | {
"arxiv_id": "2212.00424",
"chunk_i": 2,
"index": 97,
"original_suffix_ids": [
532,
5,
5491,
40,
2601,
1523,
17077,
528
],
"token_index": 128,
"uuid": "74d8c65c-8f05-42a6-9e90-5f77cf99141f"
} |
[
{
"content": "_1,\\dots,x_{N}| x_j \\sim P_t\\}$ to be sampled, of size $N$, from the source domains $D_{S_i}$ in $S$ and the target domain $D_t$, respectively. Also, assume a weighting scheme \n$w_i$ for the source domain $D_{s_i}$ s.t. $\\sum_{i=1}^{K}{w_i=1}$. \nFor any hypothesis $h\\in \\mathcal{H}$, the $... | [
{
"content": "P_{s_i},P_t)",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -7.83467 | {
"arxiv_id": "2212.00424",
"chunk_i": 3,
"index": 98,
"original_suffix_ids": [
47,
15159,
82,
5318,
2137,
47,
528,
8
],
"token_index": 192,
"uuid": "74d8c65c-8f05-42a6-9e90-5f77cf99141f"
} |
[
{
"content": "_1,\\dots,x_{N}| x_j \\sim P_t\\}$ to be sampled, of size $N$, from the source domains $D_{S_i}$ in $S$ and the target domain $D_t$, respectively. Also, assume a weighting scheme \n$w_i$ for the source domain $D_{s_i}$ s.t. $\\sum_{i=1}^{K}{w_i=1}$. \nFor any hypothesis $h\\in \\mathcal{H}$, the $... | [
{
"content": "} \\in \\mathcal{H",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | statml-arxiv-40M-20M | 8 | false | -1.686431 | {
"arxiv_id": "2212.00424",
"chunk_i": 4,
"index": 99,
"original_suffix_ids": [
92,
1124,
258,
1124,
10374,
5416,
90,
39
],
"token_index": 256,
"uuid": "74d8c65c-8f05-42a6-9e90-5f77cf99141f"
} |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
rewrite-rl.statml-arxiv.78k-5k
Prompt/suffix pairs for prefix-REWRITE RL on stat.ML arXiv text: the policy rewrites the prefix so a frozen rewarder assigns the true 8-token suffix a higher log prob.
Built from JackHsieh/statML-arxiv-40M-20M (L=4096 Qwen3-tokenized documents). Suffixes start at token 64·i: train = i ∈ 1..8 per document (9,728 docs → 77,824 rows), test = one seeded i per document (4,864 rows). Prefix = document start up to the cut (64–512 tokens).
Columns:
prompt:[{"role": "user", "content": <prefix text>}]— raw messages; apply your chat template at load time.suffix:[{"role": "assistant", "content": <suffix text>}]— the true continuation, leading whitespace intact.baseline_logprob_sum: total (summed, not per-token) log prob of the suffix given the ORIGINAL prefix under JackHsieh/Qwen3-4B-Base-thoughtless.statml-arxiv-40M-20M.best (bf16 weights, fp32 log-softmax) — the thoughtless reference an RL policy must beat.n_suffix_tokens: suffix length after re-encoding (6–9; 99.54% exactly 8).suffix_retokenized: True where re-encoding changed the token split at the cut (text is byte-identical; the re-encoded split is what the RL pipeline scores).data_source,extra_info(uuid, arxiv_id, token_index, chunk position i, row index).
- Downloads last month
- -