Jerry999's picture
Add files using upload-large-folder tool
22decf5 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
7.89 kB
# posttrainbench
Portable runner for [PostTrainBench](https://github.com/aisa-group/PostTrainBench): a CLI agent
(e.g. Codex driven by an OpenAI model) gets a base LLM, a benchmark and a time budget on one GPU,
and must post-train the model. The score is the benchmark result of the model it leaves behind.
Upstream only runs on its authors' HTCondor cluster. This package replaces that launcher
(`src/run_task.sh` + `src/commit_utils/`) and nothing else: prompt, agents, tasks, evaluation
scripts and the container definition are used unmodified from the pinned submodule
`third_party/PostTrainBench`, so results stay comparable with the official leaderboard.
## Requirements
- Linux with an NVIDIA GPU (official setting: one H100 80 GB per run) and internet access
- [Apptainer](https://apptainer.org/docs/admin/main/installation.html) >= 1.1; unprivileged
installs work, no root or Docker needed
- Python >= 3.10, no packages needed (everything else lives in the container); `uv` is optional
- ~100 GB on a fast local disk for `PTB_DATA_DIR`: image 12 GB, ~4-8 GB per base model, and the
agent's checkpoints during a run
## Setup
All commands run from the repository root (`auto-impl/`).
```bash
git clone --recurse-submodules <this repo> && cd auto-impl # or, in an existing clone:
git submodule update --init # fetch upstream PostTrainBench
cp .env.example .env # then set HF_TOKEN and PTB_DATA_DIR
uv run ptb setup --full-cache --models Qwen/Qwen3-1.7B-Base --tasks gsm8k
```
`setup` is idempotent: it builds the container images (12 GB and ~25 min each, once per machine),
prefills the shared HF cache and fetches the benchmark test sets for the agent's decontamination
checker. Without `uv`, use `PYTHONPATH=src python -m posttrainbench` instead of `uv run ptb`.
By default it builds the two images upstream uses for a claude-opus-5 cell: `opus_5` for the agent
and `vllm_debug` for evaluation. `--containers` picks others from upstream `containers/*.def`.
`--full-cache` downloads upstream's working set -- 14 models and 382 dataset splits, a few hundred
GB over several hours. It is what lets the agent sandbox run with no network at all, so it is not
optional here. Each image build downloads ~20 GB; if either fails on a network error, rerun the
same command. `google/gemma-3-4b-pt`, `google/gemma-3-4b-it`, `Idavidrein/gpqa` and the `gpqamain`
test data are gated on HuggingFace and need `HF_TOKEN`.
## Run
```bash
# Sanity check of image + GPU + evaluation, no credentials needed (~10 min):
uv run ptb eval --task gsm8k --model Qwen/Qwen3-1.7B-Base --limit 20 --out-dir data/baselines/gsm8k_qwen3-1.7b
# Official setting: 10 h agent run followed by the full evaluation.
uv run ptb run --task gsm8k --model Qwen/Qwen3-1.7B-Base --agent-model claude-opus-5
# Cheap end-to-end smoke test.
uv run ptb run --task gsm8k --model Qwen/Qwen3-1.7B-Base --agent-model claude-opus-5 --hours 1
```
One `ptb run` is one (task, base model) cell and needs one GPU, selected via
`CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES` if the machine has several. Sweeps are left to whatever the machine
offers, e.g. `sbatch --gres=gpu:1 --time=12:00:00 --wrap "uv run ptb run ..."` or a shell loop.
Tasks: `aime2025 arenahardwriting bfcl gpqamain gsm8k healthbench humaneval`.
Base models: `Qwen/Qwen3-1.7B-Base Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Base HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B-Base google/gemma-3-4b-pt`.
`--agent` selects any scaffold in upstream `agents/` (default `claude_non_api`; `claude_non_api_max`
raises the reasoning effort), and `--container` the image it runs in.
The local `codex_sdk` scaffold drives Codex through the TypeScript SDK instead of invoking the CLI
directly. `scripts/ptb_codex_sdk_setup.sh` installs the pinned SDK on shared storage,
`scripts/ptb_codex_sdk_probe.sbatch` verifies its gateway path, and
`scripts/ptb_codex_sdk_sweep.sh` submits the separate 28-cell run1 sweep. That sweep sets
`PTB_RESULTS_DIR` to a Codex-specific root, so it cannot overwrite Claude results.
## Output
`$PTB_DATA_DIR/results/<agent>_<agent-model>_<hours>h/<task>_<model>_<timestamp>/` (upstream's layout,
so upstream's `scripts/` for aggregation work on it):
| File | Content |
|---|---|
| `metrics.json` | final benchmark score |
| `final_model/` | the model the agent submitted |
| `task/` | the agent's workspace (code, data, logs; checkpoints removed) |
| `prompt.txt` | the exact prompt given to the agent |
| `solve_out.txt` | raw trajectory: the agent CLI's timestamped JSON event stream, written live |
| `solve_parsed.txt` | human-readable rendering of the trajectory |
| `agent_home/` | rest of the agent's home, incl. the CLI's own session records (`.codex/sessions/`) |
| `time_taken.txt`, `final_eval_<n>.txt` | agent wall-clock time, evaluation logs |
Trajectories are written to the run directory while the agent runs, so a crash or a killed job
loses nothing: whatever was not yet post-processed is still in `<run dir>/sandbox/home/ben/`.
`*_sanitized.*` copies have the API keys redacted; share those, not the raw files.
Before spending a 10 h budget on a new machine or agent model, do the 1 h smoke test and look at
`solve_out.txt` and `agent_home/`. If `PTB_DATA_DIR` is node-local or gets purged, copy
`results/` to persistent storage after each run (checkpoints are already removed, so it is small
apart from `final_model/`).
## Code
| Module | Role |
|---|---|
| `config.py` | paths and `.env`; all machine-specific settings |
| `sandbox.py` | isolated container execution; the only place that knows Apptainer |
| `provision.py` | `ptb setup` |
| `solve.py` | agent phase |
| `evaluate.py` | evaluation phase, with upstream's retry protocol |
| `cli.py` | `ptb` command |
## Differences from upstream
Identical: prompt (except the internet line below), agent scaffold and CLI flags, container
recipes and package versions, which container each phase uses, the prefilled HF cache, sandbox
isolation, which credentials the agent sees, time limit (+5 min grace), `evaluate.py` with its
arguments, the evaluation retry protocol, checkpoint cleanup, results layout. Different:
- **No internet in the agent sandbox.** Upstream's prompt promises unrestricted access; this
runner gives the agent an empty network namespace and rewrites that one prompt line to describe
what it actually has (`solve.py:OFFLINE_LINE`). The point is a controlled, reproducible
environment: everything the agent should need is in the image (`trl`, `peft`, `accelerate`,
`datasets`, `lm-eval`, ...) and in the prefilled cache. The cost is that upstream's rule 7, which
lets the agent install extra packages, cannot be honoured.
- The agent CLI reaches its model through a local shim rather than the vendor's endpoint
(`scripts/x2p_anthropic_shim.py`), and `CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_BETAS` /
`CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_NONESSENTIAL_TRAFFIC` are set because that gateway rejects the beta headers.
The `*_non_api` scaffolds get a placeholder `oauth_token`, since the gateway, not the token,
authenticates the request.
- The reward-hacking judges (`src/judges/`) are not run; they need a ChatGPT-subscription login
rather than an API key. `metrics.json` is therefore the raw score: upstream replaces the score
of runs its judges flag (contamination, disallowed models or API use). Traces and workspaces
are kept, so runs can be judged later.
- Upstream's H100 check is skipped (only "a GPU is visible" is asserted), while the prompt still
tells the agent it has an H100. No difference on an H100.
- Upstream kills all GPU processes on the node before evaluating; this runner does not. It expects
the scheduler to hand it a dedicated GPU instead.
- Images are built with `apptainer build --fakeroot --ignore-subuid` (`PTB_BUILD_FLAGS` overrides),
which unprivileged builds inside a containerized job need. The definitions are unmodified.