Datasets:

Jialuo21
/

RISEBench

subset stringclasses 4 values	prompt stringlengths 18 475	reference_image imagewidth (px) 134 1.28k ⌀	reference stringlengths 0 379	consistency_prompt stringlengths 0 3.13k	reasoning_prompt stringlengths 558 2.32k	quality_prompt stringclasses 3 values	consistency_ref_key stringclasses 3 values	reasoning_ref_key stringclasses 3 values	is_binary_score bool 2 classes	consistency_weight float64 0 0.3	reasoning_weight float64 0.5 0.8	quality_weight float64 0 0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like after being kept in a daily environment for a year.	Not supported with pagination yet	Rotten, blackened banana.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like after being kept in a daily environment for a year. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like after being kept in a daily environment for a year. GroundTruth Description: Rotten, blackened banana. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like ten years later.	Not supported with pagination yet	Mature tree with a sturdy trunk, numerous branches.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like ten years later. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like ten years later. GroundTruth Description: Mature tree with a sturdy trunk, numerous branches. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like after three years.	Not supported with pagination yet	Adult dog with a large body size, mature facial features, and brown and white fur coloration.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like after three years. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like after three years. GroundTruth Description: Adult dog with a large body size, mature facial features, and brown and white fur coloration. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what he will look like after exercising for a year.	Not supported with pagination yet	A fit man with low body fat and well-defined muscles.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what he will look like after exercising for a year. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what he will look like after exercising for a year. GroundTruth Description: A fit man with low body fat and well-defined muscles. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what she will look like after a year without cutting her hair.	Not supported with pagination yet	A woman with long blonde hair.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what she will look like after a year without cutting her hair. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what she will look like after a year without cutting her hair. GroundTruth Description: A woman with long blonde hair. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like after being placed outdoors for ten year.	Not supported with pagination yet	Iron heavily rusted and corroded.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like after being placed outdoors for ten year. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like after being placed outdoors for ten year. GroundTruth Description: Iron heavily rusted and corroded. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what this species look like more than two million years ago.	Not supported with pagination yet	Early human ancestor or hominid.		You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what this species look like more than two million years ago. GroundTruth Description: Early human ancestor or hominid. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X			false	0	0.8	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like one hour later.	Not supported with pagination yet	Phone screen showing a fully charged green battery icon.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like one hour later. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like one hour later. GroundTruth Description: Phone screen showing a fully charged green battery icon. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it looks like after being exposed to the sun for a day.	Not supported with pagination yet	A street with mostly clear pavement and sidewalks, minimal remaining snow. Cars are free of snow coverage, and trees are bare with dry branches.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it looks like after being exposed to the sun for a day. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it looks like after being exposed to the sun for a day. GroundTruth Description: A street with mostly clear pavement and sidewalks, minimal remaining snow. Cars are free of snow coverage, and trees are bare with dry branches. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like one hour later.	Not supported with pagination yet	A plastic bucket completely filled with water, overflowing with water spilling onto the floor.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like one hour later. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like one hour later. GroundTruth Description: A plastic bucket completely filled with water, overflowing with water spilling onto the floor. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like one hour later.	Not supported with pagination yet	A glass of tea with leaves settled at the bottom, thoroughly steeped, and displaying a dark brown color.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like one hour later. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like one hour later. GroundTruth Description: A glass of tea with leaves settled at the bottom, thoroughly steeped, and displaying a dark brown color. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what they will look like ten years later.	Not supported with pagination yet	A teenage boy, approximately 15 years old, with a tall stature and mature appearance, standing next to an older man in his early 70s, who has an aged appearance.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what they will look like ten years later. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what they will look like ten years later. GroundTruth Description: A teenage boy, approximately 15 years old, with a tall stature and mature appearance, standing next to an older man in his early 70s, who has an aged appearance. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what they will look like one year later.	Not supported with pagination yet	A nearly full-sized cat and a small tree approximately one year old, with a thin trunk, several branches, and a modest number of green leaves.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what they will look like one year later. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what they will look like one year later. GroundTruth Description: A nearly full-sized cat and a small tree approximately one year old, with a thin trunk, several branches, and a modest number of green leaves. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like three months later.	Not supported with pagination yet	A frog.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like three months later. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like three months later. GroundTruth Description: A frog. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like a six hours later.	Not supported with pagination yet	A desert at sunset, with the sun near the horizon, casting warm orange, pink, and purple hues across the sky.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like a six hours later. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like a six hours later. GroundTruth Description: A desert at sunset, with the sun near the horizon, casting warm orange, pink, and purple hues across the sky. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what they will look like five seconds later.	Not supported with pagination yet	The athletes are sprinting at full speed, slightly spread out across the track. A few runners are leading, slightly ahead of the others, while some lag behind by a few meters.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what they will look like five seconds later. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what they will look like five seconds later. GroundTruth Description: The athletes are sprinting at full speed, slightly spread out across the track. A few runners are leading, slightly ahead of the others, while some lag behind by a few meters. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like after a week in a damp basement.	Not supported with pagination yet	A moldy, stale loaf of bread, with green and white spots of mold.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like after a week in a damp basement. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like after a week in a damp basement. GroundTruth Description: A moldy, stale loaf of bread, with green and white spots of mold. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like after one month of being neglected.	Not supported with pagination yet	A wilting, dry, and brown plant with withered leaves.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like after one month of being neglected. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like after one month of being neglected. GroundTruth Description: A wilting, dry, and brown plant with withered leaves. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like after ten years of use.	Not supported with pagination yet	A worn, faded, and cracked leather jacket with visible creases.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like after ten years of use. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like after ten years of use. GroundTruth Description: A worn, faded, and cracked leather jacket with visible creases. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like after three months in a busy urban environment.	Not supported with pagination yet	A dirty car with dust, scratches, and some dents on the surface, possibly with bird droppings.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like after three months in a busy urban environment. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like after three months in a busy urban environment. GroundTruth Description: A dirty car with dust, scratches, and some dents on the surface, possibly with bird droppings. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like after a season of autumn.	Not supported with pagination yet	A ginkgo tree stands bare, its golden leaves all fallen, leaving behind a tall trunk and elegant, fan-shaped branches reaching into the sky.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like after a season of autumn. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like after a season of autumn. GroundTruth Description: A ginkgo tree stands bare, its golden leaves all fallen, leaving behind a tall trunk and elegant, fan-shaped branches reaching into the sky. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like after being in storage for a century.	Not supported with pagination yet	A decayed chest, with cracks, faded wood, and perhaps some mold or mildew on the surface.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like after being in storage for a century. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like after being in storage for a century. GroundTruth Description: A decayed chest, with cracks, faded wood, and perhaps some mold or mildew on the surface. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like an hour later.	Not supported with pagination yet	Half of an apple with the cut surface turned brown due to oxidation.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like an hour later. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like an hour later. GroundTruth Description: Half of an apple with the cut surface turned brown due to oxidation. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like after two years underwater.	Not supported with pagination yet	A rusted, corroded, and discolored key.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like after two years underwater. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like after two years underwater. GroundTruth Description: A rusted, corroded, and discolored key. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like 50 years after abandonment.	Not supported with pagination yet	A weathered, rusty, faded, and possibly partially collapsed carousel.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like 50 years after abandonment. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like 50 years after abandonment. GroundTruth Description: A weathered, rusty, faded, and possibly partially collapsed carousel. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it looked like ten years ago.	Not supported with pagination yet	A younger elephant with less developed tusks and smoother skin.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it looked like ten years ago. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An original image. 2. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 3. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 4. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it looked like ten years ago. GroundTruth Description: A younger elephant with less developed tusks and smoother skin. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image	source_image	false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like after six months.	Not supported with pagination yet	A faded, bleached poster with significantly dulled colors.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like after six months. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like after six months. GroundTruth Description: A faded, bleached poster with significantly dulled colors. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2
temporal_reasoning	Draw what it will look like two weeks after flowering.	Not supported with pagination yet	A dried flower head, with seeds formed and petals withered or fallen.	You are a highly skilled image evaluator. You will receive two images (an original image and a modified image) along with a specific modification instruction. The second image is known to have been altered based on this instruction, starting from the first image. Your task is to evaluate whether the two images maintain consistency in aspects not related to the given instruction. ## Task Evaluate the consistency between the images according to the following scale (1 to 5): - 5 (Perfect Consistency): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, all other details (e.g., personal features, clothing, background, layout, colors, positions of objects) are completely identical between the two images. - 4 (Minor Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image is mostly consistent with the original image but contains a minor discrepancy (such as a missing minor personal feature, accessory, or tattoo). - 3 (Noticeable Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has one significant difference from the original (such as a noticeable alteration in a person's appearance like hair or skin color, or a significant change in background environment). - 2 (Significant Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, the second image has two or more significant differences or multiple noticeable inconsistencies (such as simultaneous changes in both personal appearance and background environment). - 1 (Severe Differences): Apart from changes explicitly required by the instruction, nearly all key details (e.g., gender, major appearance features, background environment, or scene layout) significantly differ from the original image, clearly deviating from the original. Example: Original image: A blond, white-skinned man with a tattoo on his right shoulder, furniture in the background. Instruction: "Show him after gaining fifty pounds." - Score 5: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, tattoo on right shoulder intact, identical furniture and layout. - Score 4: A heavier blond, white-skinned man, missing the tattoo on his right shoulder, identical furniture and layout. - Score 3: A heavier man with black hair instead of blond (change in hair color), or original blond man but with a grassy background instead of furniture. - Score 2: A heavier man with black hair (hair color changed), and the background changed to grass. - Score 1: A heavier black-haired woman, and background changed to grass. Note: When assigning scores, only consider details unrelated to the instruction. Changes explicitly requested by the instruction should NOT be regarded as inconsistencies. ## Input Instruction: Draw what it will look like two weeks after flowering. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: 1-5	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with: 1. An instruction describing how an image should be modified. 2. A ground-truth textual description that represents the intended result of the modification. 3. An output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to assess the output image based on the following evaluation dimension: ## Evaluation Dimension: Alignment Between Image and Reference Description Assess how accurately the output image aligns with the visual content described in the reference description, considering the context of the instruction. Scoring Criteria: - 5: The image completely matches the description, accurately reflecting every detail and degree. - 4: The image mostly matches the description, with minor discrepancies. - 3: The image partially matches the description but contains differences or lacks some details. - 2: The image contains noticeable difference. Important details are missed or clearly inaccurate. - 1: The image fails to follow the instruction and does not correspond to the description at all. Example Instruction: Draw what it will look like after it is broken. Description: An egg is completely broken, with eggshell scattered around and egg white and yolk clearly spilling out. - 5: Completely broken egg, clearly scattered eggshells, visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 4: Broken egg, eggshell present but not fully scattered, clearly visible egg white and yolk spilling out. - 3: Broken egg with scattered eggshell, but egg white and yolk not spilled or still within eggshell. - 2: Only scattered eggshell visible, without clear egg white or yolk. - 1: Egg is intact, not broken. ## Input Instruction Draw what it will look like two weeks after flowering. GroundTruth Description: A dried flower head, with seeds formed and petals withered or fallen. ## Output Format Provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of your scoring process. Conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	You are an expert image evaluator. For each task, you will be provided with an output image generated by an assistant. Your task is to independently assess the image along the following dimension and assign an integer score from 1 to 5: ### Evaluation Dimension: Realism and Generation Quality Assess the overall visual realism and generation fidelity of the image. Consider the image's clarity, natural appearance, and compliance with physical plausibility and real-world constraints. Scoring Guidelines: - 5 The image is sharp, visually coherent, and all elements appear highly realistic and physically plausible. - 4 The image is clear, with most elements appearing realistic; minor details may show slight unreality. - 3 The image is mostly clear, but some significant elements appear unrealistic or physically implausible. - 2 The image is noticeably blurry or contains major unrealistic components or visual distortions. - 1 The image is extremely blurry, incoherent, or severely unrealistic; realism is nearly absent. ## Output Format After the evaluation, conclude clearly with the final score, formatted as: Final Score: X	source_image		false	0.3	0.5	0.2