images
images listlengths 1
1
| question
listlengths 1
1
| answer
listlengths 1
1
|
|---|---|---|
[
"审批人按权限审批签字下一步有几个并列的节点,只回答一个整数"
] |
[
"4"
] |
|
[
"参保人在市外住院时,选项A 出院时个人垫付全部费用,选项B 出院时只需要支付个人自费和自负费用。仅输出代表选项的字母"
] |
[
"A"
] |
|
[
"付款是由哪位负责的?A 会计 B 出纳 C 科长 D 处长。仅输出代表选项的字母"
] |
[
"B"
] |
|
[
"整个流程图中,有多少个'审批签字'节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"5"
] |
|
[
"费用报销的送审的下一个节点是 A 事前申请确认 B 收单 C 会计初审。仅输出代表选项的字母"
] |
[
"B"
] |
|
[
"第二次送审是由 A 部门(学院)负责,还是B 计划财务部负责?仅输出代表选项的字母"
] |
[
"A"
] |
|
[
"是谁审核是否超过公司报销标准:A 财务部 B 人力资源部 C 分管申请部门的公司领导。仅输出代表选项的字母"
] |
[
"A"
] |
|
[
"财务总监审批如果失败,下一个节点是:A 公司分管领导审批 B 会计岗审核 C 走部门年度预算追加程序 D 报销人填写报销单。仅输出代表选项的字母"
] |
[
"D"
] |
|
[
"开户后几个工作日向人民银行备案?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"5"
] |
|
[
"阶段四总共含有多少个非结束节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"4"
] |
|
[
"这个流程图一共多少节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"11"
] |
|
[
"至少邀请几家符合相应资格条件的供应商?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"3"
] |
|
[
"这个流程图有几个终点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"3"
] |
|
[
"通知学生立即佩戴口罩这个节点,有几个直接上游节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"2"
] |
|
[
"如果入校学生出现发热症状,并且无家长接送,接下来可能是A 劝返 B 佩戴口罩并隔离。仅输出代表选项的字母"
] |
[
"B"
] |
|
[
"学校审批没通过下一个节点是:A 对照材料清单准备报告材料 B 学院审批 C 筛选审核组织面试 D 在hr.sjtu.edu.cn系统上填写个人信息。仅输出代表选项的字母"
] |
[
"B"
] |
|
[
"学校审批通过后,下一个节点是 A 对照材料清单准备报告材料 B 面试通过,推荐录用 C 收到offer。仅输出代表选项的字母"
] |
[
"A"
] |
|
[
"活动筹备节点有几个直接下游节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"4"
] |
|
[
"作者申诉成功之后的下一个节点是什么?请严格遵守如下输出格式说明: 输出完整的节点名称,不输出其他任何内容"
] |
[
"持续推荐1天~7天"
] |
|
[
"审计报告报分管校领导审批签发这个节点后面,有几个直接下游节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"3"
] |
|
[
"这个流程图涉及多少个大类的财务审核报销流程?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"6"
] |
|
[
"财务秘书统一投递,总共出现了几次?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"6"
] |
|
[
"除了监察室,行风办外,是否还有其他部门负责投诉登记,仅回答是或者否"
] |
[
"是"
] |
|
[
"调查核实的直接下游节点有几个?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"3"
] |
|
[
"图中对口分类列举说明了几个(问题+对应的部门)?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"5"
] |
|
[
"当条件为申诉通过,补返账单,申诉判定的下一个节点属于哪个阶段?A:出账阶段,B:结算阶段,C:其他,仅输出代表选项的字母"
] |
[
"A"
] |
|
[
"向检察院申请批准逮捕,到得到回复批准还是不批准,需要几天?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"7"
] |
|
[
"侦查措施包括的节点数量是多少?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"9"
] |
|
[
"从图中看,案情复杂需要延长侦查期限,经过批准后,最长可以延长几个月?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字"
] |
[
"5"
] |
|
[
"完整复述‘输入收款人姓名’下一个节点的内容, 不输出其他任何内容"
] |
[
"确认交易信息,同时收款人自动收到来自95533的收款提示短信"
] |
|
[
"填写开户申请书签署审核意见下一个节点是什么?请仅输出下一个节点的文字。"
] |
[
"将存款人信息录入账户管理系统"
] |
|
[
"如果超过部门年度预算,输出下一个节点的文字"
] |
[
"走部门年度预算追加申请程序"
] |
|
[
"仅输出与成交供应商签订合同的备注节点的内容"
] |
[
"采购人应当在成交通知书发出之日起30日内与成交供应商启动宁政府采购合同"
] |
|
[
"仅输出成立询价小组的备注节点的内容"
] |
[
"询价小组由采购人代表和评审专家共3人(达到公开招标数额标准为5人)以上单数组成,其中评审专家人数不得少于成员总数的2/3"
] |
|
[
"有个节点内容以气囊横截面积A开头,仅输出该节点剩余内容"
] |
[
"修正计算"
] |
|
[
"流程图中的结束节点,仅输出它的文本内容 "
] |
[
"审计资料存档"
] |
|
[
"审计小组实施审计,仅输出此节点下下个节点的文本内容"
] |
[
"审计报告经审计处负责人审阅后形成征求意见稿"
] |
|
[
"对审计报告有异议,并且审计小组拒绝修改审计报告,仅输出下一个节点的文本内容"
] |
[
"审计处按照规定程序对审计组审计报告进行审定,并出具正式审计报告"
] |
QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark: Real-World Flowchart Understanding Benchmark
Overview
While the open-source community has various chart and document benchmarks, there is no specialized evaluation set for flowchart understanding. QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark fills this gap by providing a dedicated benchmark to effectively assess multimodal models' flowchart comprehension abilities.
Dataset Composition
Part 1: Web-Collected Real-World Flowcharts (Public)
Manually curated flowcharts from image search engines, covering actual deployment scenarios including:
- Government services and administrative processes
- Banking and financial operations
- Campus management systems
- Daily office workflows
- Financial processing procedures
Quality Diversity: We deliberately control the distribution of image resolution and clarity, introducing varying degrees of blur and size differences to better reflect real-world application environments.
Annotation: All questions and answers are carefully labeled and verified by human annotators.
Part 2: Enterprise Office Flowcharts (Coming Soon)
Real flowcharts from production office environments, including:
- HR management processes
- Financial reimbursement workflows
- Internal approval procedures
Note: This portion is currently undergoing anonymization and will be released in a future update.
Question Diversity
FlowchartBench ensures comprehensive query coverage, considering various questioning angles and possibilities:
- Upstream and downstream node queries
- Conditional branch reasoning
- Path analysis and node relationships
- Structural understanding
- Spatial reasoning with X/Y axes
Performance Leaderboard
State-of-the-art results on QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark:
| Model | QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark (%) |
|---|---|
| QZhou-Flowchart-VL-32B (Ours) | 87.83 |
| Qwen3-VL-Plus-Thinking (235B) | 86.09 |
| Gemini-2.5-Pro | 84.42 |
| doubao-seed-1-6 | 83.83 |
| GPT-5 | 79.29 |
| GLM-4.5V | 75.97 |
| Qwen2.5-VL-32B | 73.90 |
Comparison with Base Model
| Model | MMMU | CMMU | MathVista | DocVQA | QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen2.5-VL-32B | 66.67 | 76.38 | 74.20 | 93.96 | 73.90 |
| QZhou-Flowchart-VL-32B | 67.78 | 76.46 | 76.50 | 93.87 | 87.83 |
Usage
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load benchmark
benchmark = load_dataset("Kingsoft-LLM/QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark", split="test")
# Evaluate your model
for sample in benchmark:
prediction = model.predict(sample['image'], sample['question'])
accuracy = evaluate(prediction, sample['answer'])
Evaluation Protocol
- Answer Matching: Two evaluation methods based on question type:
- Exact Match: For multiple-choice questions, direct comparison with ground truth
- Normalized Edit Distance: For open-ended questions, score calculated as
1 - (edit_distance / max_length)
- Metrics: Overall accuracy, breakdown by question type, domain, and complexity level
- Submission: Open a GitHub issue with your model predictions to be added to the leaderboard
Key Features
✅ Real-world scenarios - Flowcharts from actual deployments
✅ Manual annotation - Human-verified questions and answers
✅ Quality diversity - Various resolutions, clarity levels, and sizes
✅ Comprehensive coverage - 20+ question types across multiple domains
✅ Rigorous evaluation - Standardized protocol for fair comparison
- Downloads last month
- 17