Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
images
images listlengths
1
1
question
listlengths
1
1
answer
listlengths
1
1
[ "审批人按权限审批签字下一步有几个并列的节点,只回答一个整数" ]
[ "4" ]
[ "参保人在市外住院时,选项A 出院时个人垫付全部费用,选项B 出院时只需要支付个人自费和自负费用。仅输出代表选项的字母" ]
[ "A" ]
[ "付款是由哪位负责的?A 会计 B 出纳 C 科长 D 处长。仅输出代表选项的字母" ]
[ "B" ]
[ "整个流程图中,有多少个'审批签字'节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "5" ]
[ "费用报销的送审的下一个节点是 A 事前申请确认 B 收单 C 会计初审。仅输出代表选项的字母" ]
[ "B" ]
[ "第二次送审是由 A 部门(学院)负责,还是B 计划财务部负责?仅输出代表选项的字母" ]
[ "A" ]
[ "是谁审核是否超过公司报销标准:A 财务部 B 人力资源部 C 分管申请部门的公司领导。仅输出代表选项的字母" ]
[ "A" ]
[ "财务总监审批如果失败,下一个节点是:A 公司分管领导审批 B 会计岗审核 C 走部门年度预算追加程序 D 报销人填写报销单。仅输出代表选项的字母" ]
[ "D" ]
[ "开户后几个工作日向人民银行备案?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "5" ]
[ "阶段四总共含有多少个非结束节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "4" ]
[ "这个流程图一共多少节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "11" ]
[ "至少邀请几家符合相应资格条件的供应商?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "3" ]
[ "这个流程图有几个终点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "3" ]
[ "通知学生立即佩戴口罩这个节点,有几个直接上游节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "2" ]
[ "如果入校学生出现发热症状,并且无家长接送,接下来可能是A 劝返 B 佩戴口罩并隔离。仅输出代表选项的字母" ]
[ "B" ]
[ "学校审批没通过下一个节点是:A 对照材料清单准备报告材料 B 学院审批 C 筛选审核组织面试 D 在hr.sjtu.edu.cn系统上填写个人信息。仅输出代表选项的字母" ]
[ "B" ]
[ "学校审批通过后,下一个节点是 A 对照材料清单准备报告材料 B 面试通过,推荐录用 C 收到offer。仅输出代表选项的字母" ]
[ "A" ]
[ "活动筹备节点有几个直接下游节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "4" ]
[ "作者申诉成功之后的下一个节点是什么?请严格遵守如下输出格式说明: 输出完整的节点名称,不输出其他任何内容" ]
[ "持续推荐1天~7天" ]
[ "审计报告报分管校领导审批签发这个节点后面,有几个直接下游节点?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "3" ]
[ "这个流程图涉及多少个大类的财务审核报销流程?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "6" ]
[ "财务秘书统一投递,总共出现了几次?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "6" ]
[ "除了监察室,行风办外,是否还有其他部门负责投诉登记,仅回答是或者否" ]
[ "是" ]
[ "调查核实的直接下游节点有几个?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "3" ]
[ "图中对口分类列举说明了几个(问题+对应的部门)?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "5" ]
[ "当条件为申诉通过,补返账单,申诉判定的下一个节点属于哪个阶段?A:出账阶段,B:结算阶段,C:其他,仅输出代表选项的字母" ]
[ "A" ]
[ "向检察院申请批准逮捕,到得到回复批准还是不批准,需要几天?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "7" ]
[ "侦查措施包括的节点数量是多少?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "9" ]
[ "从图中看,案情复杂需要延长侦查期限,经过批准后,最长可以延长几个月?仅输出一个阿拉伯数字" ]
[ "5" ]
[ "完整复述‘输入收款人姓名’下一个节点的内容, 不输出其他任何内容" ]
[ "确认交易信息,同时收款人自动收到来自95533的收款提示短信" ]
[ "填写开户申请书签署审核意见下一个节点是什么?请仅输出下一个节点的文字。" ]
[ "将存款人信息录入账户管理系统" ]
[ "如果超过部门年度预算,输出下一个节点的文字" ]
[ "走部门年度预算追加申请程序" ]
[ "仅输出与成交供应商签订合同的备注节点的内容" ]
[ "采购人应当在成交通知书发出之日起30日内与成交供应商启动宁政府采购合同" ]
[ "仅输出成立询价小组的备注节点的内容" ]
[ "询价小组由采购人代表和评审专家共3人(达到公开招标数额标准为5人)以上单数组成,其中评审专家人数不得少于成员总数的2/3" ]
[ "有个节点内容以气囊横截面积A开头,仅输出该节点剩余内容" ]
[ "修正计算" ]
[ "流程图中的结束节点,仅输出它的文本内容 " ]
[ "审计资料存档" ]
[ "审计小组实施审计,仅输出此节点下下个节点的文本内容" ]
[ "审计报告经审计处负责人审阅后形成征求意见稿" ]
[ "对审计报告有异议,并且审计小组拒绝修改审计报告,仅输出下一个节点的文本内容" ]
[ "审计处按照规定程序对审计组审计报告进行审定,并出具正式审计报告" ]

QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark: Real-World Flowchart Understanding Benchmark

Overview

While the open-source community has various chart and document benchmarks, there is no specialized evaluation set for flowchart understanding. QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark fills this gap by providing a dedicated benchmark to effectively assess multimodal models' flowchart comprehension abilities.

Dataset Composition

Part 1: Web-Collected Real-World Flowcharts (Public)

Manually curated flowcharts from image search engines, covering actual deployment scenarios including:

  • Government services and administrative processes
  • Banking and financial operations
  • Campus management systems
  • Daily office workflows
  • Financial processing procedures

Quality Diversity: We deliberately control the distribution of image resolution and clarity, introducing varying degrees of blur and size differences to better reflect real-world application environments.

Annotation: All questions and answers are carefully labeled and verified by human annotators.

Part 2: Enterprise Office Flowcharts (Coming Soon)

Real flowcharts from production office environments, including:

  • HR management processes
  • Financial reimbursement workflows
  • Internal approval procedures

Note: This portion is currently undergoing anonymization and will be released in a future update.

Question Diversity

FlowchartBench ensures comprehensive query coverage, considering various questioning angles and possibilities:

  • Upstream and downstream node queries
  • Conditional branch reasoning
  • Path analysis and node relationships
  • Structural understanding
  • Spatial reasoning with X/Y axes

Performance Leaderboard

State-of-the-art results on QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark:

Model QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark (%)
QZhou-Flowchart-VL-32B (Ours) 87.83
Qwen3-VL-Plus-Thinking (235B) 86.09
Gemini-2.5-Pro 84.42
doubao-seed-1-6 83.83
GPT-5 79.29
GLM-4.5V 75.97
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 73.90

Comparison with Base Model

Model MMMU CMMU MathVista DocVQA QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 66.67 76.38 74.20 93.96 73.90
QZhou-Flowchart-VL-32B 67.78 76.46 76.50 93.87 87.83

Usage

from datasets import load_dataset

# Load benchmark
benchmark = load_dataset("Kingsoft-LLM/QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark", split="test")

# Evaluate your model
for sample in benchmark:
    prediction = model.predict(sample['image'], sample['question'])
    accuracy = evaluate(prediction, sample['answer'])

Evaluation Protocol

  • Answer Matching: Two evaluation methods based on question type:
    • Exact Match: For multiple-choice questions, direct comparison with ground truth
    • Normalized Edit Distance: For open-ended questions, score calculated as 1 - (edit_distance / max_length)
  • Metrics: Overall accuracy, breakdown by question type, domain, and complexity level
  • Submission: Open a GitHub issue with your model predictions to be added to the leaderboard

Key Features

Real-world scenarios - Flowcharts from actual deployments
Manual annotation - Human-verified questions and answers
Quality diversity - Various resolutions, clarity levels, and sizes
Comprehensive coverage - 20+ question types across multiple domains
Rigorous evaluation - Standardized protocol for fair comparison

Downloads last month
17