Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,105 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- zh
|
| 5 |
+
---
|
| 6 |
+
# QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark: Real-World Flowchart Understanding Benchmark
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
## Overview
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
While the open-source community has various chart and document benchmarks, there is no specialized evaluation set for flowchart understanding. **QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark** fills this gap by providing a dedicated benchmark to effectively assess multimodal models' flowchart comprehension abilities.
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
## Dataset Composition
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
### Part 1: Web-Collected Real-World Flowcharts (Public)
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
Manually curated flowcharts from image search engines, covering actual deployment scenarios including:
|
| 17 |
+
- Government services and administrative processes
|
| 18 |
+
- Banking and financial operations
|
| 19 |
+
- Campus management systems
|
| 20 |
+
- Daily office workflows
|
| 21 |
+
- Financial processing procedures
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
**Quality Diversity:** We deliberately control the distribution of image resolution and clarity, introducing varying degrees of blur and size differences to better reflect real-world application environments.
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
**Annotation:** All questions and answers are carefully labeled and verified by human annotators.
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
### Part 2: Enterprise Office Flowcharts (Coming Soon)
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
Real flowcharts from production office environments, including:
|
| 30 |
+
- HR management processes
|
| 31 |
+
- Financial reimbursement workflows
|
| 32 |
+
- Internal approval procedures
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
*Note: This portion is currently undergoing anonymization and will be released in a future update.*
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
## Question Diversity
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
FlowchartBench ensures comprehensive query coverage, considering various questioning angles and possibilities:
|
| 39 |
+
- Upstream and downstream node queries
|
| 40 |
+
- Conditional branch reasoning
|
| 41 |
+
- Path analysis and node relationships
|
| 42 |
+
- Structural understanding
|
| 43 |
+
- Spatial reasoning with X/Y axes
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
## Performance Leaderboard
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
State-of-the-art results on FlowchartBench:
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
| Model | FlowchartBench (%) |
|
| 50 |
+
|-------|-------------------|
|
| 51 |
+
| **QZhou-Flowchart-VL-32B (Ours)** | **87.83** |
|
| 52 |
+
| Qwen3-VL-Plus-Thinking (235B) | 86.09 |
|
| 53 |
+
| Gemini-2.5-Pro | 84.42 |
|
| 54 |
+
| doubao-seed-1-6 | 83.83 |
|
| 55 |
+
| GPT-5 | 79.29 |
|
| 56 |
+
| GLM-4.5V | 75.97 |
|
| 57 |
+
| Qwen2.5-VL-32B | 73.90 |
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
### Comparison with Base Model
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
| Model | MMMU | CMMU | MathVista | DocVQA | FlowchartBench |
|
| 62 |
+
|-------|------|------|-----------|--------|----------------|
|
| 63 |
+
| Qwen2.5-VL-32B | 66.67 | 76.38 | 74.20 | 93.96 | 73.90 |
|
| 64 |
+
| **QZhou-Flowchart-VL-32B** | **67.78** | **76.46** | **76.50** | 93.87 | **87.83** |
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
## Usage
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
```python
|
| 69 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
# Load benchmark
|
| 72 |
+
benchmark = load_dataset("Kingsoft-LLM/QZhou-Flowchart-QA-Benchmark", split="test")
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
# Evaluate your model
|
| 75 |
+
for sample in benchmark:
|
| 76 |
+
prediction = model.predict(sample['image'], sample['question'])
|
| 77 |
+
accuracy = evaluate(prediction, sample['answer'])
|
| 78 |
+
```
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
## Evaluation Protocol
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
- **Answer Matching:** Two evaluation methods based on question type:
|
| 83 |
+
- **Exact Match:** For multiple-choice questions, direct comparison with ground truth
|
| 84 |
+
- **Normalized Edit Distance:** For open-ended questions, score calculated as `1 - (edit_distance / max_length)`
|
| 85 |
+
- **Metrics:** Overall accuracy, breakdown by question type, domain, and complexity level
|
| 86 |
+
- **Submission:** Open a GitHub issue with your model predictions to be added to the leaderboard
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
## Key Features
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
✅ **Real-world scenarios** - Flowcharts from actual deployments
|
| 91 |
+
✅ **Manual annotation** - Human-verified questions and answers
|
| 92 |
+
✅ **Quality diversity** - Various resolutions, clarity levels, and sizes
|
| 93 |
+
✅ **Comprehensive coverage** - 20+ question types across multiple domains
|
| 94 |
+
✅ **Rigorous evaluation** - Standardized protocol for fair comparison
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
## Citation
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 99 |
+
@inproceedings{tricot2026,
|
| 100 |
+
title={Tri-CoT for Flowcharts: Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Accurate and Diverse Synthetic Diagrams},
|
| 101 |
+
author={Shuli Zheng, Yinan Zhan, Yinuo Guo, Gankun Luo, BingtaoTan, Xiang Wu, Maoxiong, Xiangdong Liu, Weixiong Liu, Yixin Zhou, Yinfei Xu},
|
| 102 |
+
booktitle={CVPR},
|
| 103 |
+
year={2026}
|
| 104 |
+
}
|
| 105 |
+
```
|