|
Download README.md from KrazyKitty/Data-Lab: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 4.65 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/KrazyKitty/Data-Lab/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/KrazyKitty/Data-Lab/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/KrazyKitty/Data-Lab/resolve/main/README.md
4.65 kB
| license: apache-2.0 | |
| pretty_name: KRAZYKITTY // DATA LAB | |
| tags: | |
| - data-provenance | |
| - dataset-documentation | |
| - preprocessing | |
| - data-quality | |
| - evaluation | |
| - privacy | |
| - reproducibility | |
| # KRAZYKITTY // DATA LAB | |
| **Status: research documentation and workflow toolkit — no dataset is published here.** | |
| DATA LAB is KrazyKitty's evidence-first workspace for studying how datasets should be sourced, | |
| reviewed, transformed, documented, and evaluated before they are allowed near a training or | |
| benchmark pipeline. | |
| This repository contains dataset-card templates, provenance schemas, deterministic preprocessing | |
| tools, evaluation guidance, and review gates. It does **not** contain a corpus, benchmark examples, | |
| training rows, scraped content, or a claim that any source is approved for KittyLM. | |
| ## Research tracks | |
| | Track | Purpose | Current state | | |
| |---|---|---| | |
| | Source provenance | Bind each source to identity, version, integrity, licence, and allowed use | Working templates and validator | | |
| | Licensing, privacy, consent | Require explicit permission and data-risk review before processing | Documented gate | | |
| | Preprocessing experiments | Compare deterministic text transformations without hiding exclusions | Working local reference workflow | | |
| | Data quality | Measure duplication, encoding, language, structure, contamination, and coverage | Measurement plan | | |
| | Evaluation resources | Version benchmark inputs and separate test integrity from model claims | Documentation and Collection candidates | | |
| | Dataset cards | Make intended use, composition, limitations, and governance visible | Reusable templates | | |
| ## Repository map | |
| - [`docs/PROVENANCE.md`](docs/PROVENANCE.md) — evidence model and source lineage | |
| - [`docs/LICENSE_PRIVACY_CONSENT.md`](docs/LICENSE_PRIVACY_CONSENT.md) — release-blocking review | |
| - [`docs/DATA_QUALITY.md`](docs/DATA_QUALITY.md) — quality dimensions and reporting rules | |
| - [`docs/EVALUATION.md`](docs/EVALUATION.md) — benchmark governance and contamination controls | |
| - [`templates/dataset-card-template.md`](templates/dataset-card-template.md) — corpus-oriented card | |
| - [`templates/evaluation-card-template.md`](templates/evaluation-card-template.md) — evaluation-set card | |
| - [`schemas/source-manifest.schema.json`](schemas/source-manifest.schema.json) — machine-readable contract | |
| - [`workflows/validate_manifest.py`](workflows/validate_manifest.py) — standard-library validator | |
| - [`workflows/preprocess_text.py`](workflows/preprocess_text.py) — deterministic, approval-gated text reference flow | |
| - [`experiments/README.md`](experiments/README.md) — experiment record contract | |
| ## Reproducible workflow | |
| 1. Create a source manifest from the schema and keep its decision `proposed`. | |
| 2. Record canonical source URLs, versions, licences, redistribution terms, integrity hashes, | |
| privacy review, consent or other lawful basis, and intended use. | |
| 3. Review the source outside the preprocessing program. Automated checks do not grant permission. | |
| 4. Change the manifest to `approved` only after the named reviewers have approved every source. | |
| 5. Run `python workflows/validate_manifest.py manifest.json`. | |
| 6. Run the reference preprocessing experiment against only the files listed in that manifest. | |
| 7. Store the exact command, source revision, manifest hash, environment, counts, exclusions, and | |
| output hashes in an experiment record. | |
| 8. Publish data only through a separate release decision with a complete dataset card. | |
| ## Non-goals and safeguards | |
| - Public availability is not treated as consent or permission for model training. | |
| - A licence label is not accepted without checking scope, attribution, redistribution, and | |
| downstream restrictions. | |
| - The reference preprocessing tool is not a privacy scrubber, copyright detector, toxicity | |
| classifier, or quality oracle. | |
| - Personally identifiable, sensitive, confidential, or revoked material is release-blocking until | |
| reviewed and resolved. | |
| - Benchmark test content must not enter training mixtures. | |
| - Raw and processed data remain outside this repository unless a later, separately approved | |
| dataset release explicitly permits them. | |
| ## Relationship to KittyLM | |
| DATA LAB can produce reviewed methods and provenance records that KittyLM may use in the future. | |
| It does not imply that KittyLM has an approved training dataset, completed data pipeline, or | |
| published model weights. | |
| ## Licence | |
| The documentation, schemas, and original workflow code in this repository are proposed for release | |
| under Apache-2.0. That licence does not apply to any third-party source described by a manifest. | |
| Every source retains its own rights and restrictions. | |