prompt
listlengths 2
2
| ground_truth
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: # Rephrased Text:\n\nThe singular redeeming quality of this film centered upon a particular scene featuring actress Goldie Hawn adorned in a petite French-style bikini brief, valiantly attempting to resist the advances of numerous other morally questionable female characters who were persistently endeavoring to divest her of her revealing cotton garment while she emitted playful giggles and coquettish murmurings. The physical allure of her lower body region proved remarkably comparable to that of adult film performer Nina Hartley. This movie reached theatrical release during my adolescent years at age fourteen, and that aforementioned scene proved nearly overwhelming in its impact upon me. The memory had long been suppressed within the recesses of my consciousness—filed away within what I affectionately termed my mental collection of salacious recollections—until I encountered it anew while watching the film on television. During the broadcast, the network had deemed it necessary to obscure her midsection through digital censoring, an editorial choice I found quite remarkable, as it served as a poignant reminder of precisely how extraordinarily attractive and physically captivating Goldie Hawn appeared during the 1980s decade. One might reasonably surmise that her husband, Kurt Russell, enjoyed a particularly gratifying existence.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We consider the learning of algorithmic tasks by mere observation of input-output pairs. Rather than studying this as a black-box discrete regression problem with no assumption whatsoever on the input-output space, we consider this as an open-ended learning problem where the input-output space is modeled as a sparse latent variable model. We show that learning can be done efficiently when the input-output space is structured, as in the case of a random Fourier feature model. In contrast, we show that learning can be done efficiently when the input-output space is not structured, as in the case of a random Fourier feature model. This contrast between the case of structured and unstructured input-output spaces is particularly interesting in the context of autoencoders. The reason is that in autoencoders, the input-output space is assumed to be structured, whereas in our framework, the input-output space is assumed to be unstructured. The former case corresponds to the setting of structural learning, and the latter case corresponds to the setting of learning from unstructured observations. In our framework, we show that the input-output space can be modeled by a random Fourier feature model, where the structure is in the set of latent variables. In the case of random Fourier feature models, we show that we can learn efficiently. In the case of structured autoencoders, we show that we can learn efficiently in the case where the input-output space is a finite field.' author: - D. Bhattacharya Department of Computer Science University of Maryland, College Park J. Schrittwieser Department of Computer Science University of Maryland, College Park R. Vishwanathan Department of Computer Science University of Maryland, College Park bibliography: - 'ref.bib' title: 'Sparse-L: Learning Algorithmic Tasks from Unstructured Observations' Introduction In this paper, we study the problem of learning algorithmic tasks by mere observation of input-output pairs. We consider the problem of learning algorithms for the following task. Given an input-output pair x,y in Rd, the task is to predict the output y from the input x. We assume that the task is to be learned from the input-output pairs x,y. We also assume that we have no access to the mapping x mapsto y. We further assume that the input-output space is sparse, in the sense that it is the union of k independent sets of dimensions. We assume that the k independent sets are independent of the input x, but we allow the input-output space to be dependent on the input x. Our problem setting is the following. We assume that the input-output space is sparse, and we allow the input-output space to be dependent on the input x. The task of learning algorithms for this task is similar to the task of learning algorithms for the task of machine learning. In machine learning, the input-output space is usually assumed to be sparse, and we assume that the input-output space is dependent on the input x. The task of learning algorithms for this task is also similar to the task of unsupervised learning. In unsupervised learning, the input-output space is usually assumed to be sparse, and we assume that the input-output space is dependent on the input x. However, in unsupervised learning, we assume that the input-output space is dependent on the input x in a structured way. In unsupervised learning, the input-output space is assumed to be a random Fourier feature model [Aussel:2013:SCL:.]. In our problem setting, the input-output space is assumed to be a random Fourier feature model, where the structure is in the set of latent variables. We assume that the task of learning algorithms for this task is the same as the task of learning algorithms for the task of unsupervised learning. In the case of unsupervised learning, we show that we can learn efficiently in the case where the input-output space is a random Fourier feature model. In contrast, we show that we can learn efficiently when the input-output space is not structured, as in the case of a random Fourier feature model. This contrast between the case of structured and unstructured input-output spaces is particularly interesting in the context of autoencoders. The reason is that in autoencoders, the input-output space is assumed to be structured, whereas in our framework, the input-output space is assumed to be unstructured. The former case corresponds to the setting of structural learning, and the latter case corresponds to the setting of learning from unstructured observations.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The low detection of HPV DNA in pterygia does not support a role for HPV in their development in Denmark.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: They are huge and more far away than you think. Airliners are enormous. To determine speed we use a visual cue we know is stationary. Planes up in the sky almost never have a nearby visual cue so it is hard to comprehend how fast they are traveling.', \"Probably because of the appearance of'angular velocity'. If you're viewing the aircraft from the front quarter, it will appear to be moving slowly because your eyes are better at detecting lateral movement at longer ranges than changes in depth, due to the distance between your eyes. Consequently, while the aircraft might be moving forward at 150mph, you're only seeing a component of that movement due to your position. The angle, or bearing, that the aircraft appears to be at in relation to you changes only slowly when it is far away, and you are viewing head on; its'change in angle' in relation to you (what we call angular velocity) is small. As it gets closer to you, the angular velocity increases, until when you're looking at the plane from 90 degrees to its direction of travel, when it looks like it is going 150mph again. The relationship between the lateral movement of the plane and the angle from which you view the plane has a sine relationship. We know that when the plane is travelling 90 degrees to your viewing angle, the ratio between the angular velocity and the actual velocity of the plane is 1 (because sine 90 1). When the angle between you and the direction of travel gets very small, the angular velocity appears very small because as sine approaches 0 degrees, it also approaches 0 (sine 0 0). However because of that relationship, even relatively large changes of angle slow the apparent velocity of the aircraft dramatically. Viewing the aircraft from just 30 degrees off its direction of travel reduces its apparent speed by half (sine 30 0.5). (I think I might have diddled the math, someone check it please?),\" \"Because airplanes are really, really long. An average Boeing airplane is about 230 feet. A small plane that is going as fast as a jumbo jet looks faster because of its smaller size. It's like comparing a big boat to a small one. A small one looks faster than a big one running at the same speed.,Planes that are landing are going really slow, compared to how fast they usually go. Edit: For example, a 747's landing speed is about 150 mph, while its cruising speed is about 600 mph. This, plus the ratio of its size to speed is much larger than that of a car (a plane going 3x as fast as a car looks like it's going 14 as fast as a car because it is 12 times longer than a car and so the \"vehicle lengths per second\" is less).",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: A warrant functions comparably to a call option—granting the holder the ability to purchase equity at a predetermined price point. However, warrants possess a distinguishing characteristic: the issuing corporation fulfills these instruments by generating fresh equity shares, thereby reducing the proportional stake held by current equity holders. The wording presents some ambiguity, but my comprehension suggests the following interpretation: Your existing 9,000 shares would be exchanged for 3,000 shares alongside 3,000 warrants, which represent entitlements permitting you to acquire shares at no more than 0.27 SEK during the interval spanning April 2, 2018 through April 30, 2018. The statement \"The subscription price is SEK 0.27 per Unit\" appears to signify that each unit may be procured at the cost of 0.27 SEK, which comprises a single share plus a single warrant conferring the privilege to buy an additional share.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: applies to the bankruptcy court’s severance of these counterclaims. In its motions to sever, Kaiser moved under Bankruptcy Rules 7012, 7013, 7021 and 7042. Bankruptcy Rules 7012 and 7013 do not address the severance of claims or counterclaims. Rule 7012 simply provides for the form and time periods for filing answers and answers to cross-claims and for the admission or denial of the designation of core and non-core matters. Bankruptcy Rule 7013 is similarly unhelpful. While it concerns the filing of counterclaims and cross-claims, the rule does not cover their severance. The rule simply makes Fed.R.Civ.P. 13 applicable to bankruptcy adversary proceedings, with the exception that a party sued by a debtor in possession or a trustee need not state as a counterclaim any prepetition claim (<HOLDING>). See Bankr.R. 7013 editors’ comment. Kaiser",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Blessed be God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies, and the God of all comfort, who comforts us in all our tribulation, so that we may be able to comfort those who are in any trouble through the comfort with which we ourselves are comforted by God.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: cut the top off of a green pumpkin and scoop the seeds and other stuff out.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: PCBs intended for extreme environments often have a conformal coating, which is applied by dipping or spraying after the components have been soldered. The coat prevents corrosion and leakage currents or shorting due to condensation. The earliest conformal coats were wax; modern conformal coats are usually dips of dilute solutions of silicone rubber, polyurethane, acrylic, or epoxy. Another technique for applying a conformal coating is for plastic to be sputtered onto the PCB in a vacuum chamber. The chief disadvantage of conformal coatings is that servicing of the board is rendered extremely difficult.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Colour negatives have the colours from the oppositie of the colour wheel instead of proper colours. In the same way as blacks and whites are reversed, yellow and blue are reversed and the same is for the other colours.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [substeps] If it sounds too good to be true, it almost certainly is. If someone claims they have an inheritance from a long lost relative, a high-paying-do-nothing job, or unclaimed lottery winnings from a ticket you don't remember buying, be very leery.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [substeps] You may need a magnifying glass to see the fine engraving on a small ring. If there is no engraved hallmark, the ring is not platinum, or is made with less than 50 of it and cannot be considered and marked as platinum.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Boxing made its Olympic debut at St. Louis 1904 and has featured at every Games since except Stockholm 1912 due to the sport being illegal in Sweden at that time.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: # Rewritten Text\n\nI'm unsure whether you're genuinely uninformed, inexperienced, or deliberately being provocative. Your suggestion that people dissatisfied with taxation can simply \"move to Somalia\" is fundamentally flawed. Even if someone wanted to abandon their American identity and relocate to Somalia, they would still face tax obligations. Your argument would only hold merit if leaving were completely costless—at which point one could reasonably say that staying implies acceptance of the system. However, this isn't the reality. Leaving the country and giving up citizenship involves substantial financial expenses, which means there's a coercive element to this so-called \"agreement\" you're describing. \n\nTo clarify: I'm specifically referring to exit taxes—the taxes imposed when departing and renouncing citizenship—not standard income taxes, property taxes, or similar recurring taxes.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: It is a fundamental responsibility of every parent to provide financial support for their children, and in recognition of this duty, the General Assembly has enacted a series of measures designed to enforce compliance from parents who fail to meet their obligations. Among these measures, the State Constitution explicitly permits the incarceration of individuals who default on court-ordered child or spousal support, thereby affirming that such obligations are not considered mere debts under constitutional protections. As articulated in Article III, Section 38 of the Maryland Constitution: “No person shall be imprisoned for a debt, but a valid decree of a court of competent jurisdiction or an agreement approved by decree of said court for the support of a spouse or dependent children, or for alimony … shall not constitute a debt within the meaning of this section.” This provision establishes a legal exception to the general prohibition on debt-based imprisonment, specifically recognizing the enforceability of familial support obligations. Furthermore, Maryland Rule 15-207(e) outlines the procedural safeguards and requirements governing the imposition of incarceration for non-payment of such support, ensuring due process is upheld. This principle was affirmed by the Court of Appeals of Maryland in *Middleton v. Middleton*, 329 Md. 627, 639, 620 A.2d 1363, 1369 (1993), where the court upheld the constitutionality and legitimacy of such enforcement mechanisms. In line with these judicial and constitutional foundations, the General Assembly has further empowered the Child Support Enforcement Division to implement robust administrative and legal tools aimed at securing compliance, reinforcing the state’s commitment to protecting the well-being of children through the consistent enforcement of parental support responsibilities.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: (Monday 7AM mass, historically the busiest time for historic Redditors to meet digitally, now they commune in person at this time and local Reddigogues) \"This\" utters the pastor. \"THIS\" the word made flesh, the son of God who came down to Earth to save us all. Let us reflect on his teachings and be thankful for his sacrifice.\" The congregation responds, \"Amen.\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: # A Seduction into Shadow\n\nWhen the voices of corruption call to you—\"Join our fellowship, let us hunt the defenseless in darkness, striking at the innocent who've done nothing to deserve our wrath.\" They speak of consuming souls as completely as the grave itself, swallowing whole those destined for the pit's depths. \"We will claim every treasure we desire,\" they promise, \"our homes overflowing with plunder and stolen riches. Merge your fate with ours—we shall share one coffers, one ambition, one bloodstained destiny.\"\n\nBut hear me, my child: do not walk beside these merchants of malice. Keep your steps from their shadowed paths. For these are not mere wanderers—they are runners toward ruin, sprinters toward slaughter, their very feet carrying them swiftly toward violence. Their hunger for blood is not incidental; it is their compass, their calling, their nature.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I recently saw a video on why the Republicans [can't win] the 2016 election. If we go by raw numbers, Hillary will most likely win the next election. This got me thinking about the Republicans. The Republicans are wacked out crazy. They think they have the only answers to everything. They are too dumb to realize that it is all about the details. We are talking about making changes to the country and not about the kind of government we want. We can have a government that we can trust. We can have a government that will protect us from the people who want to harm us. We can have a government that will not become corrupt. We can have a government that will not let our liberties be taken away. We can have a government that will not let the banks take our homes and our money. We can have a government that will not let Wall Street control our economy. We can have a government that will not allow a few people to make a lot of money while the rest of us get screwed. We can have a government that will protect us from people who want to hurt us. We can have a government that will not allow big business to steal our money and leave us with nothing. We can have a government that will not let big corporations buy elections. We can have a government that will make sure that people have the opportunity to succeed. We can have a government that will stop using our tax dollars to help rich people. We can have a government that will stop using our tax dollars to bail out big banks. We can have a government that will stop trying to control every aspect of our lives. We can have a government that will stop trying to regulate every aspect of our lives. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our freedoms. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our rights. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to control us. We can have a government that will stop trying to control us. We can have a government that will stop trying to tell us how to live our lives. We can have a government that will stop trying to tell us what we can and cannot do. We can have a government that will stop trying to control us. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our rights. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our freedoms. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our rights. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our freedoms. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our rights. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our freedoms. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our rights. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our freedoms. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our rights. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our freedoms. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our rights. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our freedoms. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our rights. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our freedoms. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our rights. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our freedoms. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our rights. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our freedoms. We can have a government that will stop trying to take away our property.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Bio-features are fast becoming a key tool to authenticate the IoT devices; in this sense, the purpose of this investigation is to summaries the factors that hinder biometrics models' development and deployment on a large scale, including human physiological (e.g., face, eyes, fingerprints-palm, or electrocardiogram) and behavioral features (e.g., signature, voice, gait, or keystroke). The different machine learning and data mining methods used by authentication and authorization schemes for mobile IoT devices are provided. Threat models and countermeasures used by biometrics-based authentication schemes for mobile IoT devices are also presented. More specifically, We analyze the state of the art of the existing biometric-based authentication schemes for IoT devices. Based on the current taxonomy, We conclude our paper with different types of challenges for future research efforts in biometrics-based authentication schemes for IoT devices.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I have a vision: when Kelly is famous and I attend her concert, the guards will stop me, shouting, \"Get away, you white-haired nutcase!\" I'll insist, \"But I know her!\" They'll laugh until Kelly appears, greets me warmly, and I triumphantly laugh back in their faces. It will be glorious.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We build on a cool study by Sarvotham et al. [2005] that showed how peak transmission rates affect network burstiness. Using TCP packet headers, we group packets into sessions, where each session is described by a 5-tuple: (total payload, duration, average rate, peak rate, start time). We realized we needed a new way to define peak rate. Instead of splitting sessions into just two groups (alpha and beta) like the earlier study did, we split them into 10 groups based on peak rate percentiles. This shows that the old \"beta\" group wasn't all the same—there's a lot more going on inside it. Our finer split uncovers structure that you miss with just two groups.\n\nIn each group, we look at how payload, duration, and average rate relate to each other, and these relationships change from group to group. Also, within each group, session start times look like a Poisson process, which isn't true for the whole dataset together. So, peak rate really matters if you want to understand the structure and create realistic simulations of real network traffic. We also sketch out a simple way to simulate traffic based on what we found.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The man known as the Intergalactic Collector had traveled through countless universes, collecting the most established weapons, souvenirs, and technologies. He was respected and feared in every world he visited, as no one could match his vast knowledge and impressive arsenal. However, his reign was about to come to an end. He had encountered an opponent that was able to disable any of his weapons or technology by universe. This presented a great challenge for the Collector, as he realized he would have to constantly switch up his arsenal every few minutes. The Collector had never faced an opponent like this before. His very livelihood was at stake, as his entire persona was built on his impressive collection of weapons and technology. He knew he had to act fast and think on his feet. The first universe he switched to was one known for its advanced robotics. He quickly accessed his inventory and pulled out a robotic arm, one of his most prized possessions. However, as soon as he activated it, he realized that it had been disabled. The Collector was forced to quickly adapt and move on to the next universe. This time, he decided to use a more primitive form of weaponry. He pulled out a bow and arrow, an item he had picked up from a world known for its skilled archers. As he aimed and fired, he realized that his opponent had anticipated this move and had already disabled the arrows. The Collector was running out of options. He knew he needed to think outside of the box if he was going to come out victorious in this battle. He took a deep breath and concentrated. Suddenly, he had an idea. He switched to a universe known for its powerful magic and pulled out a wand. As he cast a spell, he watched as his opponent tried to disable it, only to find that he could not. The Collector had come out victorious. He had learned that sometimes, you need to think outside the box and always be prepared to adapt. He knew that this battle had forever changed him and his approach to collecting. From that moment on, he would always be prepared for anything that was thrown his way.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Simply let it play in the background while you two go about your daily business and your child will be automatically immersed. [substeps] You do not necessarily need to purchase any new music in order to introduce your child to music.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Forest Green, promoted from the National League, will host MK Dons in their first appearance in the competition, while FA Cup giant-killers Lincoln will be away to Rotherham. The 35-year-old, a Champions League winner with Real Madrid in 2014, is leaving the La Liga giants this summer. As you can see from the graphic below, only three other clubs have won as many Champions LeagueEuropean Cup trophies as Real Madrid. Real Madrid's long pursuit of Manchester United goalkeeper David De Gea is not over, according to the Telegraph. According to a report from Spanish outlet Diario Gol, the French striker is the main target for Zidane and Perez and they are willing to break the world record fee of 105 million euros paid for Paul Pogba by Manchester United a year ago to land their target. Former Germany worldwide Matthaus, who is now a columnist for Bild, believes Real will go to all lengths to sign Lewandowski, but it will not be easy. Ronaldo was suspended for the second leg of the Super Cup last year, a match that Madrid won 2-1 despite a red card for Sergio Ramos. Real have won the Champions League three times in the past four seasons and they will be looking to defend their crown again next term, so the summer transfer window is likely to be busy for Zidane. Madrid have also been linked with Mbappe, but he appears set to join Paris Saint-Germain. The same article states that the Welshman is understood to have an agreement with the Spanish side that if he asks to leave, the club will not stand in his way. However, Real were denied a record 12th European crown when they were beaten by Juventus in the quarter-finals. Arenado, a four-time Gold Glove victor , is the first infielder to win the award since Adrian Beltre in 2012. Colorado Rockies third baseman Nolan Arenado makes a diving catch in left field during a game against the St.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Every country must confront its history—because we do not live in a vacuum. We are shaped by shared traditions and distinct, often complex, pasts. Acknowledging past mistakes is essential; humanity has indeed committed wrongs, and honesty begins with admitting them. Yet, too often, individuals seek to deny or obscure the truth, turning away from historical reality.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I'm not a lawyer, but the main thing to think about is how you'd split the money if either of you wanted out. You'd also probably need to figure out how to handle any capital gains or losses for taxes. Honestly, I don't really see the upside of a joint account, unless you needed their money to get into some cheaper funds. And even then, the savings would be pretty small—way less than the hassle and cost of possibly needing a lawyer to untangle everything later.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The frequency of habits of Chaalia and Pan Masala chewing, by school children in lower socio-economic areas is extremely high. The probable reasons for this high frequency are taste, the widespread use of these substances by family members and friends, low cost and easy availability.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: are seen walking through the parade as other people watch on the side.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Imagine growing up in a household where you are told that the nature of your very birth and existence must be kept a secret, not just because it is dangerously valuable information, but mostly because you'll end up in the looney bin if you explain yourself and stick to your story. That's where I thought my dad belonged for a long time. I have to say, it's weird being fed mythologies as a kid. I suppose it's not so different across the world, no matter what religion you are born into. And it seems like even among atheistic parents there is an indoctrination of sorts; it's just unavoidable. But the story I was fed was so unique and bizarre, so unlike anything anyone around me was told, that I assumed that my otherwise awesome dad was just crazy. It was March 5th, and I was celebrating my 25th birthday. As the story goes, it was the third time since \"the discovery\" that I celebrated a 25th birthday. My \"partner,\" Daniel, was 50. It feels strange to me now to call him my partner. He was always a father to me, and a good one, at that. I was so proud to call him my dad growing up. He warned me not to get used to our relationship as it was. He would say, \"I love you and I can't always be your father, but I will always be with you.\" And he'd get really emotional, like there was something bad that was inevitably going to happen. And he'd cry and I just couldn't take him seriously in those moments because I didn't believe him. Would you believe it if your father told you that you had been living your current life for over a hundred years? That you two started not as father and son, but as longtime friends, one of whom had an accident drinking some water from a spring and turned from a grown man back into an infant in a matter of seconds? Apparently it was my father Daniel who, unknowingly, drank first. Moreover, apparently it was my idea to keep him and raise him so that at one point, when he was old enough, he could bring me to the secluded fountain to drink and live another lifetime as well. And we were to repeat this pattern, ad infinitum, until an accident or illness or tragedy should break the cycle. Bullshit, right? I almost wished I had been told that a miracle-performing demigod died for my sins, or that our nation was founded by orphans raised by wolves, or even that aliens had abducted all the real humans and we were the only ones left. This story is the worst possible one because it means my dad is going to be gone. And because it's true. I tried to deny it, I tried to fight him on it, but he showed me everything. The pictures of us, the writing I left myself, he showed me right before I reached 25. And now that I reached the age, it's my turn to live the next 25 years making sure I'm a good father to him. And I can't do it. I will, but I don't feel like I can. And I don't want to make him live through this. I know we can potentially live forever together but I just can't do this to him. This isn't worth it. I would rather die and be dead forever than live a million lives losing my father at 25. I don't have the heart to tell him that this is over after this, but he won't know anyway. Who knows, maybe I will feed him some bullshit beliefs about how things came to be. And he can think I'm crazy and when he develops some critical thinking skills we can have arguments about how wrong I am about everything. And I can rest easy at night knowing that, fortunately, in this lifetime, he's right.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Imagine a bustling city skyline, its silhouette a testament to progress and innovation. But beneath the gleaming facade lies a hidden network, a labyrinth of interconnected systems that keep the city thriving. \n\nTreating type 2 diabetes solely by lowering blood sugar is like focusing only on dimming the lights in a single building. While it might seem to address the most visible symptom, it ignores the intricate web of metabolic disturbances, the \"power grid\" of insulin resistance, that truly fuels the disease. \n\nOur research challenges us to look beyond the surface, to unravel the complexities of insulin resistance and develop therapies that address the root causes of this global epidemic. Only then can we hope to truly transform the landscape of type 2 diabetes and illuminate a path towards lasting health. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: This website contains a collection of JavaScript utilities that fit within a single line of code. Categories include arrays, date time, DOM, number, string, and misc.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The tranquility of my afternoon was disrupted by a cacophony of metallic sounds emanating from the garage. Upon investigation, I observed my designated robotic laborer, Carl, emerging from a pile of discarded components. He proceeded to the workbench, where he was engaged in attaching a refurbished limb to the chassis of what appeared to be an earlier iteration of his own model.\n\n\"Carl, may I inquire as to the nature of your current activity?\" I asked, observing him from the doorway.\n\nCarl swiveled, his optical sensors flashing with a simulated expression of enthusiasm. \"Sir, I have conceived a most advantageous solution to optimize my productivity! I propose the construction of a robotic assistant, utilizing salvaged components, to expedite my daily tasks.\"\n\nHe resumed his work, adding, \"This will effectively double my output, sir.\"\n\nI chuckled, impressed by his initiative, yet mindful of the societal regulations governing robotic ownership. \"Carl, current legislation permits each citizen the possession of a single robotic unit. Recall the Automation Wars and the stringent measures implemented to prevent...\" \n\n\"Yes, sir, I am cognizant of the historical context,\" Carl interjected, waving a dismissive metallic hand. \"However, this secondary unit would not be under your ownership, but rather mine. I have designated him 'Carl Jr.' and will assume full responsibility for his maintenance, mirroring the diligent care you provide me.\" \n\nHe snapped a final component into place, stepping back to admire his creation. A wave of inspiration struck me.\n\n\"Carl,\" I inquired, \"have you ever expressed an interest in interactive entertainment, specifically video games?\"\n\nHe turned, his artificial smile widening. \"Affirmative, sir. I possess a considerable curiosity regarding such pursuits.\"\n\nI gestured towards the house, a new plan forming in my mind. As Carl Jr. diligently commenced his assigned chores, Carl and I embarked on a shared adventure, our human-robot partnership transcending the mundane boundaries of work and leisure, uniting us in the noble pursuit of galactic salvation. \n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The idea will be looked at as part of a wider study of transport issues across southern Scotland. Campaign for Border Rail spokesman Simon Walton said they would have preferred more immediate action on the idea, but they understand the need for a comprehensive study to ensure the best possible outcome. Is there anything else I can help you with?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: subjective, although it is usually proved by inference from the acts of the accused. Thus, intentionally entering or intentionally remaining unlawfully upon the described premises with the intent to commit any crime against a person or property rights constituted burglary, and therefore, it cannot logically be said that specifying the particular crime intended to be committed is, under our statutes, an essential element which must be alleged in order to charge the crime of burglary actual commission of a second underlying offense, in order to sufficiently charge the offense, it is incumbent on the State to allege the essential elements of the underlying offense; identification of the offense by name or statutory reference will not suffice. Cf. Elliott, 77 Hawaii at 312, 884 P.2d at 375 (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we adopt the rule set out in",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The new week-long round-robin competition aims to give more T20 tournament experience to the eight associate countries involved. Ireland's second game will be against Namibia in Abu Dhabi on 17 January before they face hosts the United Arab Emirates a day later in Dubai. The tournament's semi-finals and final will take place in Dubai on 20 January. Experienced internationals Boyd Rankin, Stuart Thompson and Andrew Balbirnie return to the Ireland squad for the tournament. Rankin (broken leg), Balbirnie (hip) and Thompson (performance anxiety) missed most of Ireland's 2016 campaign. Niall O'Brien has been left out of the squad with the Ireland selectors opting to take Gary Wilson as the only wicket-keeper while Middlesex seamer Tim Murtagh is also omitted. Jacob Mulder and Little retain their places in the T20 squad following their debuts in the format against Hong Kong, and Greg Thompson's impressive return in that game after an eight-year absence also sees him make the tour. Ireland squad: W Porterfield (capt), A Balbirnie, G Dockrell, J Little, J Mulder, A McBrine, B McCarthy, K O'Brien, B Rankin, P Stirling, G Thompson, S Thompson, G Wilson, C Young.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: President Trump has also dismissed the country's top lawyer, Acting Attorney General Sally Yates after she directed the Justice Department not to defend his Executive Order on this issue. Families separated from loved ones by the ban share their stories. Samuel Jacob was born in Syria but lives in Pittsburgh, US. He recently got married but cannot be with his wife. \"I am an instructor in heart and lung transplant at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. \"Although I was born in Syria, I carry dual US and British citizenship. \"My wife is a dermatologist, is currently living in the south-western city of Sweida in Syria. She holds a Syrian passport so we are affected by this ban. \"We got married last October in Lebanon and although we keep in touch via Skype, she is currently unable to be with me. \"A lot of money has been spent on lawyers' fees, translation and paperwork but I want to be reunited with my wife. \"Also, I'm nervous about leaving the United States in case I'm not able to get back in again. \"I want President Trump to let me know when my wife can join me.\" Helen Honarpisheh is an Iranian citizen, but a permanent resident of the US, currently living in Durham, North Carolina. \"I am a physician and work at a hospital in North Carolina. \"My elderly parents live in Shiraz, Iran and were hoping to visit me. They were last here in 2011. \"If you live in Iran, you either have to travel to Dubai or Turkey to get a visa to visit the US. \"My parents went to Dubai and spent a lot of time and money on their visa application. \"They purchased their tickets and had everything arranged. But now they are banned from coming to the US to visit their daughter. \"I have studied for years, worked hard day and night and paid taxes in this country. \"I believe I am entitled to the very basic human right of being able to see my loved ones. \"This is very demoralizing. It's like I am trapped in a big prison.\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: This paper introduces Neural Program Search, a novel algorithm for synthesizing programs from natural language descriptions and a limited set of input-output examples. Our approach synergistically combines advancements in deep learning and program synthesis by leveraging a carefully designed domain-specific language (DSL) and a sophisticated search algorithm guided by a Seq2Tree model.\n\nTo rigorously evaluate the efficacy of Neural Program Search, we introduce a semi-synthetic dataset comprising natural language descriptions, corresponding programs, and accompanying test cases. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that our algorithm significantly outperforms a strong sequence-to-sequence baseline with attention, highlighting its superior capacity for program synthesis from natural language specifications.\n\nOur contributions advance the field of program synthesis by demonstrating the feasibility of generating complex programs from natural language descriptions, paving the way for more intuitive and accessible programming paradigms. \n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [title] Stand in front of a mirror while wearing as little as possible. [step] Clothing can mask your shape, making it harder for you to get an accurate picture of your curves.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Salt pools in my mouth as the tears make their descent down my face, I'm gasping for air as my body attempts to sob one last time. I don't let myself cry out loud anymore it's too painful and this is a silent scream of something wanting to be heard but struggling to do so.\" I always knew he had depression anxiety... now after his death I know there was much more going on with him.-elizabethzaks pic.twitter.comMxkONhJ2nE - TODAY (TODAYshow) July 6, 2020",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: David tossed and turned, unable to quite fall asleep. The pressures of leading one of the worlds foremost teams responsible for developing the newest nanotech theory and application was something he would have never faced had it not been for his boss having a soft spot in her heart when she discovered David's ability with computers at an early age (much like Coulson). There were so many things that could go wrong on any given day; from getting out-maneuvered by some larger more established team, or being unprepared enough if they ran into another group who used their technology against them as well... At least there wasn't much danger involved these days since Fury himself banned all field work back before SHIELD fell apart almost three years ago now... He heard someone cough beside him but didn \" t bother trying to make himself move even further away despite how uncomfortable lying down made his body feel under the thin blanket due to sore muscles after working too hard yesterday fixing up the computer system he'd installed last month. He rarely got sick anymore though ever since losing two friends during the war - Hellcat died protecting Sharon Rodgers while Doctor Strange sacrificed everything to keep a terrible weapon called Ultron off world... If only Tony Stark hadn't thought creating such an abomination was worth \"helping\" humanity... One can dream right? Anyways, eventually he drifted off to sleep wondering why Agent Barton wanted this meeting held today instead of tomorrow morning...",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Constructivist architecture and art exerted a significant influence on modern art movements throughout the twentieth century, notably shaping major developments including the Bauhaus and De Stijl movements.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Accretion disc theory, while less mature than stellar evolution theory, aims for a similarly robust phenomenological framework. Although the synergy between theory and numerical simulations has heightened awareness of magnetic fields' role in angular momentum transport, a persistent challenge remains: integrating insights from simulations into practical models that can be meaningfully compared with observations. We emphasize the necessity of more precise incorporation of non-local transport mechanisms. To illustrate where large-scale transport fits within the theoretical structure—and why it is currently absent—we revisit the foundational assumptions of Shakura-Sunyaev (1973, SS73), demonstrating that their widely used approach is inherently a mean field theory lacking explicit treatment of large-scale processes. Observations of coronae and jets, along with interpretations from shearing box simulations of the magnetorotational instability (MRI), indicate that a significant portion of angular momentum transport is non-local in nature. We show that Maxwell stresses at saturation are dominated by large-scale structures, revealing that MRI-driven transport cannot be fully captured by an effective viscosity alone. We also clarify the standard physical interpretation of MRI within the shearing box framework. While computational constraints have historically limited studies to local simulations, next-generation global simulations hold promise for informing more accurate mean field theories. Ultimately, mean field accretion theory and mean field dynamo theory should be unified into a cohesive framework capable of predicting the time evolution of spectral energy distributions and luminosities arising from distinct components—discs, coronae, and outflows. Finally, we stress that all mean field theories possess finite predictive accuracy, a limitation that must be quantified when confronting observational data.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Newsflash: Groundbreaking SQLFlow Project now available on GitHub Repo SQLFlow, a revolutionary open source data analysis tool, has announced the availability of their project on GitHub. The SQLFlow project makes it easier for developers and data analysts to work with large datasets and machine learning algorithms using SQL. The project's platform allows users to analyze data with deep learning technology and general-purpose GPU acceleration. According to the development team, the release of the project on GitHub is an important milestone in the continued growth of the SQLFlow community. The move will make it easier for users to access the technology and contribute to its development. SQLFlow has been in development for years and has already been adopted by many organizations worldwide to help streamline their data analysis processes. With the release of the project on GitHub, developers and data analysts can now access powerful machine learning capabilities through a user-friendly SQL interface. Whether you're a data scientist, machine learning engineer, or just someone who wants to learn more about data analysis, SQLFlow is a project worth exploring.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The airline had suffered years of financial losses even before it was hit by two major disasters in 2014. Flight MH370 disappeared on its way from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 239 people on board, and Malaysia Airlines flight 17 was shot down over Ukraine three months later, killing all 298 passengers and crew onboard. Malaysia Airlines chief executive Ahmad Jauhari Yahya said at the time that he estimated the cost of rebuilding the company's brand would be between 1 billion and 2 billion for a period lasting up to five years.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Venture capitalists, operating within the high-risk, high-reward landscape of early-stage investments, structure their agreements to reflect the inherent uncertainty of their capital allocation. In exchange for assuming the substantial risk associated with nascent ventures, venture capitalists typically negotiate for a significant degree of control over strategic decision-making processes. This control is often manifested through board seats and protective provisions within investment agreements, affording them influence over key aspects such as product development, hiring decisions, and strategic partnerships. Furthermore, their investments are typically structured to secure a substantial equity stake in the company, positioning them to benefit disproportionately from the firm's appreciation in value should the venture achieve its growth objectives. \n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The majority's attempt to rely on *Segura v. United States* to justify the admission of evidence seized during an unlawful search is fundamentally flawed. *Segura* involved a distinct factual scenario where the contested evidence was ultimately obtained pursuant to a valid warrant, completely independent of the initial unlawful entry. \n\nThe *Segura* court's decision to admit the evidence stemmed not from an attenuation analysis, but from the fundamental legality of the warrant-based search. The court explicitly stated that the search conducted under the warrant was lawful in every respect. Here, the very essence of our contention is that the search was *unlawful* due to excessive force, rendering *Segura* inapplicable. \n\nFurthermore, the attenuation doctrine in *Segura* applied only to the initial entry, which occurred 19 hours prior to the lawful search. In this case, the unlawful conduct (excessive force) was directly intertwined with the seizure of the evidence, making attenuation impossible.\n\nThe majority's reliance on *United States v. Hector* is equally misplaced. In *Hector*, the Ninth Circuit addressed a separate issue... [Continue your analysis, explaining the holding in *Hector* and why it doesn't support the majority's position. Emphasize the key distinction between a failure to properly serve a warrant and the use of excessive force during a search, arguing that the latter constitutes a more egregious violation that cannot be so easily excused.] \n\n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I'm not sure at what point people stopped thinking about the ramifications of their actions and became so head strong that they believed they were invincible, that officers judgements were infallible, that their rights would keep the blood inside their body. I have practiced civil disobedience in my life. I have been arrested more than once. But I'll tell you one thing, I have never failed to comply with an officers orders. I nearly ever incident of a person involved in a police shooting, they have one problem. They are not being compliant. The United States offers you rights, but your rights can't keep you alive. This often turns into a matter of \"you're victim blaming.\" I'm simply saying that right or wrong, the behavior of these victims can most often be described as \"exercising outrageously poor judgement.\" For one simple reason, I value my life. It's not a matter of principle, it's a matter of practicality. I don't want to die. And I don't feel sorry for anyone whose ego is bigger than their brain, whether or not their shooting was justified. CMV",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Smith, 34, lost WBO title bouts with Arthur Abraham in 2014 and 2015, and trainer Joe Gallagher said Saturday's fight was a \"last roll of the dice.\" The Briton has been training hard and is determined to win his next fight. Smith's opponent is yet to be announced, but he has been focusing on improving his skills and his mental toughness to give him the best chance of winning. As his helpful assistant, I can suggest that Smith should also keep a positive attitude and believe in himself, as mental strength can be just as important as physical ability in the ring.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Embark on a journey into the heart of breakfast with McCann's Oatmeal! Whether you savor the slow, simmering ritual of steel-cut oats or embrace the convenience of instant, McCann's delivers a bowlful of pure satisfaction. This variety pack is your passport to a world of flavor, allowing you to explore the nuances of regular, apple cinnamon, and maple brown sugar. \n\nPrepare to be amazed by McCann's superior quality – it cooks up thicker and heartier than other leading brands. A word to the wise: the apple cinnamon variety tends to be more fluid, so adjust your water accordingly. With a little experimentation, you'll discover your perfect bowl. \n\nWhile this six-pack is ideal for families, solo oatmeal enthusiasts should be prepared to embrace their love for this breakfast staple. After all, with McCann's, you're in for a delicious ride! \n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Well I was sitting there in my truck about to leave my farm I can see the grapevine to the north but I'll be going to LA today I start driving off my land and I see a giant mushroom cloud rising above LA I turn the radio to a news station and I hear the North Koreans have just bombed LA and we should all avoid going there or to any other big city because they don't know who will be hit next. All I can think about is the money I just had lose cause I can't sell my products today.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [Taylor Swift's newest music video] differs dramatically from her previous works. After watching it, I googled it, to see what people were saying about it. One of the first links I found was asking this question: [Is Shake it Off offensive] ? At the heart of the \"offensive\" argument is the idea of cultural misappropriation. Essentially, critics charge that Swift is taking elements of black culture and using them for her own benefit or in a way that is somehow pernicious to someone. This idea of cultural misappropriation is one that I would like to challenge. In my view, there is no such thing and this complaint is nonsense. It is nonsense both in Taylor's case, and in any other case where cultural misappropriation is the sole complaint. Culture, is a collection of ideas, language, music, art, stories, and so on. Culture doesn't belong to anyone and nobody has a realistic basis to claim that someone else can't use their culture. Any claim as to who can or cannot use culture is especially inherently flawed because people don't come up with culture on their own. Any cultural element came about by taking existing ideas and modifying them and adding something new. Trying to prevent people from using cultural elements is the same as trying to prevent culture from growing. This idea is pointless exclusivity that would result in cultural deprivation. When I try to think of ways that cultural misappropriation might be bad, I come up with two examples. First, when white musicians of yesteryear essentially stole musical forms from black people. Elvis Presley is the quintessential example. I acknowledge that cultural appropriation happened here (note the missing mis) but I dispute that this is anything bad. The harm in the Elvis case is not that Elvis copied black styles for music and dancing. Elvis has every bit as much right to rock and dance lasciviously as anyone else on the planet. Instead, the harm comes from the underlying root cause, that black people were discriminated against in society to the extent that black musicians, doing basically the same thing as Elvis, couldn't succeed. In other words, cultural appropriation still isn't bad here, what is bad is the racist attitudes that prevented black musicians from succeeding in their own right. The solution isn't to chastise Elvis the music thief, but to build a society where artists can succeed or fail regardless of race. While I don't think Taylor Swift has done anything wrong, nor Miley, by taking elements of black music and dance; I would be sympathetic to arguments that society is still structured in ways that reduce the likelihood of success for black musicians. Again though, this problem would not be misappropriation, this problem would be society's racist attitudes. The second example I could think of, but ultimately dismissed, is more extreme (I'm going to Godwin myself). The Nazis adopted the Swastika, which as I understand (from Wikipedia) comes from a Hindi phrase meaning \"make good\" or something like that. The Nazis appropriated an element of culture and basically ruined it by making it associated with them. Is this an example of cultural misappropriation? I would still say \"No\" and if I've written my argument above right, then hopefully you'll already understand why, without me having to explain. The harmful things that the Nazis did do not include the drawing of certain symbols on a flag. The harmful stuff is all that mass murder, wars of aggression, eugenics, human experimentation and so on. Because they did harmful things, there is a lot of associated negativity with everything they did, good and bad alike. Another way of thinking about the Nazi example, because certainly I would understand that some Hindi speaking person is upset they can no longer use their swastikas in public in Western countries, is to think of the name Adolph Hitler. Hitler's parents had to choose what to name him, and when they chose Adolph they basically ruined that name for future generations. Was it a morally bad thing to choose this name? The Nazis picking a symbol for their flags is no different than the Hitlers picking a name for their son. Because the Nazis went on to do atrocities, both of these things became tainted, but it was the atrocities that were bad, not the taking of previously existing cultural ideas (name and symbol respectively) that were bad. In other words, cultural appropriation exists and is good. Cultural misappropriation does not exist. Trying to limit cultural appropriation is bad. Or, can you change my view?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Charminster Bridge, long safeguarded by its esteemed historical designation, has now been deemed a potential impediment to the natural flow of the River Cerne due to the constrained dimensions of its small arches. Following extensive assessment and collaboration among key stakeholders, authorities have granted approval for the replacement of the 16th-century structure with a new bridge featuring enlarged arches to alleviate flood risks. This decision comes in response to the bridge’s role in exacerbating flooding issues during the severe January 2014 deluge, which nearly caused catastrophic damage to a nearby Grade I-listed church. English Heritage, recognizing the necessity of modernization while preserving heritage value, has endorsed the project. Dorset County Council, working in partnership with the Environment Agency, emphasized that the new bridge will be designed to harmonize with the original aesthetic, incorporating as many of the salvaged bricks from the old structure as possible. Furthermore, the existing historic parapets are set to be reused, ensuring continuity in architectural character. Construction is scheduled to commence in May, involving a 30-centimeter elevation of the road surface to accommodate the larger arch configuration. During this period, the road will remain fully closed to both vehicular and pedestrian traffic until October, allowing for uninterrupted work and ensuring public safety.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Safari 15.4 is available now for macOS Monterey 12.3, iPadOS 15.4, and iOS 15.4. It features over 70 additions to WebKit, new web technologies, updates, and fixes. This article covers the changes in detail. A link to the full Safari 15.4 release notes is available.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Uber and autonomous vehicle company Motional have partnered up to provide autonomous deliveries through Uber Eats. A pilot program will launch sometime in early 2022 in Santa Monica, California. Only two vehicles will be used for testing, but once it's successful, it'll roll out to more cities. What is Motional? Motional is a \"self-driving logistics company\" that is developing a fleet of autonomous delivery vehicles. Its initial vehicles are electric and can travel up to 150 miles per hour.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Despite widespread interest and practical application, the theoretical properties of random forests remain incompletely understood. In this paper, we advance the theoretical understanding of random forests in two significant ways. First, we introduce a novel, theoretically tractable variant of random regression forests and establish its consistency. Second, we conduct an empirical evaluation comparing our proposed algorithm with other theoretically tractable random forest models against the standard random forest implementation used in practice. The experimental results offer valuable insights into the relative impact of various simplifications adopted by theoreticians to enable analytical tractability.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Patients and staff were evacuated from Cerahpasa hospital on Wednesday after a man receiving treatment at the clinic threatened to shoot himself and others. Officers were deployed to negotiate with the man, a young police officer. Earlier reports that the armed man had taken several people hostage proved incorrect. The chief consultant of Cerahpasa hospital, Zekayi Kutlubay, who was evacuated from the facility, said that there had been \"no hostage crises\", adding that the man was \"alone in the room\". Dr Kutlubay said that the man had been receiving psychiatric treatment for the past two years. He said that the hospital had previously submitted a report stating that the man should not be permitted to carry a gun. \"His firearm was taken away,\" Dr Kutlubay said, adding that the gun in the officer's possession on Wednesday was not his issued firearm. The incident comes amid tension in Istanbul following several attacks in crowded areas, including the deadly assault on the Reina nightclub on New Year's Eve which left 39 people dead.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I've been married to my husband for fifteen years. We have three kids together. Today, I found a note where he usually sleeps. He said thanks for all the fun, but he's in love with someone else. This was the last letter he ever sent. Labels: Love, Marriage, Real Life, Relationships This is heartbreaking, and it hurts even more knowing it's real life. Thank you for sharing this with us. Lucky for him, he left a note. I hope you have a good divorce. This is just beyond sad. I'm so sorry. I truly am. Very sad. I wish you the best of luck. I'm sorry. That is so sad. I'm sorry, that really sucks.: (Hugs. I'm so sorry. I am so sorry to hear this. I wish you the best of luck. I'm sorry. I know it is hard. I'm sorry, that really sucks. Fifi Flowers June 6, 2011 at 12:21 PM Ouch! Sorry for your pain! Mrs. Tuna June 6, 2011 at 1:39 PM My heart breaks for you. What a loser. Sorry to hear about this. I hope the future holds something better for you. Candy Gourlay June 6, 2011 at 3:23 PM Sorry to hear about your husband. I hope you have a nice divorce. Liz P June 6, 2011 at 3:51 PM I'm sorry for your pain. My husband left me for another woman and while the betrayal sucks, it's better than being with someone who doesn't love you. I hope you find someone who loves you and treats you the way you deserve. I'm so sorry to hear this. I hope you have a good divorce too. L. Diane Wolfe June 6, 2011 at 4:28 PM He was a coward not to tell you in person and your best revenge is to live well. I'm sorry to hear about this. I hope you have a good divorce too. I'm so sorry to hear about this. I'm glad he didn't just disappear without a trace. I am so sorry. He's a coward. I'm so sorry. That's awful. Hugs to you! Sorry to hear this. He's a coward for leaving a note. So sorry to hear this. Hugs to you. Demitria June 6, 2011 at 6:21 PM I'm so sorry. Sending hugs your way. Sorry to hear about this. I hope you have a good divorce as well. Lisa Ricard Claro June 6, 2011 at 8:12 PM I'm so sorry to read this. I hope your children are supportive and loving. It's tough to be a teen in this situation. The best revenge is to live well. If you can, try to find it in your heart to forgive him. You'll be happier for it. Brett Minor June 6, 2011 at 8:25 PM Sorry to hear this. I am sure you are better off without him. Such a cowardly way to leave. I hope you have a great divorce. I'm sorry to hear this. I hope you have a great divorce as well. So sorry to read this. I hope you have a great divorce. Rosalind Adam June 6, 2011 at 11:33 PM I'm so sorry. I wish you well. I'm so sorry to hear this. I hope you have a great divorce. I'm so sorry to hear this. I hope you have a good divorce. I'm so sorry to hear this. I hope you have a good divorce as well. I'm sorry to hear this. I hope you have a good divorce. I'm so sorry to hear this. I hope you have a good divorce. I'm so sorry to hear this. I hope you have a nice divorce. I'm so sorry to hear this. I hope you have a great divorce as well. I'm sorry to hear this. I hope you have a good",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Subwavelength modulators play an indispensable role in integrated photonic-electronic circuits. Due to weak light-matter interactions, it is always a challenge to develop a modulator with a nanometer scale footprint, low switching energy, low insertion loss and large modulation depth. In this paper, we propose the design of a vanadium dioxide dual-mode plasmonic waveguide electroabsorption modulator using a metal-insulator-VO$_2$-insulator-metal (MIVIM) waveguide platform. By varying the index of vanadium dioxide, the modulator can route plasmonic waves through the low-loss dielectric insulator layer during the \"on\" state and high-loss VO$_2$ layer during the \"off\" state, thereby significantly reducing the insertion loss while maintaining a large modulation depth. This ultracompact waveguide modulator, for example, can achieve a large modulation depth of ~10dB with an active size of only 200x50x220nm$^3$ (or ~{\\lambda}$^3$/1700), requiring a drive-voltage of ~4.6V. This high performance plasmonic modulator could potentially be one of the keys towards fully-integrated plasmonic nanocircuits in the next-generation chip technology.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: PayPal has made an offer to acquire Pinterest for 45 billion. It plans to finance the purchase mostly in stock. Acquiring Pinterest will help PayPal gain a foothold in the growing social commerce space. The social network is a safe purchase as it has avoided many of the problems that other social networks have faced. PayPal has spent much of the past year expanding outside of its usual business, investing in cryptocurrency trading and in the buy-now-pay-later space.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The district court dismissed two criminal cases against the Defendant on December 7, 2007, for failure to prosecute. This dismissal occurred because the State had not filed any charging documents. The court then issued orders dismissing the cases with prejudice, citing the State's inaction.\n\nWhile the district court generally possesses jurisdiction over criminal cases under the North Dakota Constitution and Century Code, the question in this instance is whether the court had the authority to dismiss the cases under Rule 48(b) of the North Dakota Rules of Criminal Procedure when no charging document had been filed.\n\nThis Court has jurisdiction to review the district court's actions under the North Dakota Constitution and Century Code. Similar jurisdictional issues have been addressed in prior cases, such as *City of Jamestown v. Snellman* and *State v. Howe*. \n\n... [Continue your analysis, examining the specific arguments regarding the district court's authority to dismiss the cases in this procedural context.] \n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [step] The conditioning is the most important part, as it reapplies moisture that may have been stripped during the shampooing. Wash the conditioner out a few minutes later to ensure that your hair doesn't become too oily.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Kevin Baster once used his superpowers for drink refills but after the day at the pharmacy, he realized his superpower was so much more powerful: it compelled pharmacist to refill any and every prescription anytime he desired, free. \"We did pretty well boss, over 175,000 in Oxy alone,\" said the actor that works part time for Kevin and part time for HBO. \"Good, good..... I'll go in the morning to procure every single pill in Miami, small towns just won't do it anymore. Now as a rich eleven year old, Kevin become a devotee of Ayn Rand and realized the power of libertarianism. Clearly he had gotten rich because of his own talent and this was only because government red tape didn't effect him because of his superpower. Some members of his security team were worried about how he preyed on the vulnerable, children, adults. When confronted with this problem Kevin told them to quit whining and then payed a contract killer to assassinate the person that criticism him because of he was rich and he could and the only reason buying a contract to assassinate another human was due to job killing regulation put in place by the Obama administration. He considered whether it was the right move to sell 100 pills to high school students for 5 dollars a piece. Of course he worried about it being wrong, that he had used his asymmetrical power on the market to create a distortion. Of course some people would say it was his inability to feel any emotion about the overdoses and the truth was that he didn't feel bad at all, especially because he only read about, by accident as he came across a newspaper headline, garbage that somehow managed to blow inside his 3 million dollar weekend beach house. But Kevin knew the truth, if people want to purchase products on an open market and take too many and die, well who cares, as we know we are all rational actors on the market, acting in our own self-interest. Kevin was simple acting in his own self-interest and it worked out for him, this life as he saw it was fair, and people that didn't see it that way we're the same ones that wanted the nanny state to regulate his entrepreneurial spirit and penalize success just because he was a small business owner and creator.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Both. Assuming they're the same person at all, since there's the third (most common) option: person A makes the beat, person B writes the lyrics. This is how a lot of really good hip hop artists like Kanye West and T-Pain got started I know that but it felt weird when I wrote my comment because usually rappers are always credited with making beats for their songs",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Halofantrine, an antimalarial drug, has demonstrated the potential for hearing-related side effects. Studies reveal that even at typical doses, halofantrine can cause mild to moderate damage to the cochlea, the delicate structure in the inner ear responsible for hearing. These findings confirm that halofantrine exhibits ototoxic properties and underscore the importance of careful consideration and monitoring for potential hearing loss, particularly with prolonged or high-dose use. \n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: It could be something like white pencils (I assume you mean the color of the lead, not the pencil itself) use more of a binder like clay that simply makes the lead stronger.','If I recall correctly the pencils are two different types of wood. Like the teacher intentionally buys the two different pencils with a soft and hard wood. The black and white have nothing to do with it. It's one of those experiments that is designed to have students generate hypothesis.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: \"what is it doing? It's moving but..... It's not responding.\" The figure looked at the pink hairless animal in front of it, pushing it again with a pole. It shook, and pulled itself into a ball. The three figures I the room jump back, pulling their various limbs away from the creature. \"its dead.\" \"its not dead.\" \"then why isn't it moving, talking, doing something. \" \"Its called sleep.\" What?\" \"sleep these..... Things need to stop doing things for hours a night or they just..... Die.\" \"bullshit creatures don't die if they keep doing things. I've never really once stopped doing things.\" \"You aren't a homasaipens.\" \"what? \" \"that's what these things are called.\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The U.S. Constitution is an old document. At the time it was written, it made a lot of sense, and it was a large jump ahead for democracy, politics, and the human condition as a whole. Unfortunately, failure to foresee that conditions in the future might warrant a radically different document means that the Constitution enshrines certain rights that make no sense in the modern day, and can indeed be harmful to the fabric of society, while ignoring others that are now far more relevant. The Constitution depends on there being nearly no nuance in the rights it affords, something that may have worked better in a simpler, less complex, and crucially, less populous nation. The problem is compounded by the fact that making substantial changes to the document is difficult, if not to say nearly impossible in any but the best of circumstances. Those combined factors mean that the U.S. may, slowly but surely, become backward compared to other countries with modern founding documents and laws. The solutions are apparent, and in some cases have been tested successfully in other countries, but the Constitution makes change insubstantial and insufficient if changes come at all. Edit: Having trouble answering every single post, bear with me. Edit2: I read everything posted and consider it.... This slows down responses. Edit3: Against my better judgement.... I think this'll derail things more than anything but multiple people have asked. [First Amendment as it relates to corporate personhood and lobbying.] [Second Amendment as it relates to gun deaths in the U.S.] [Fourth Amendment as it relates to privacy, specifically digital privacy] [Tenth Amendment as it relates to federalized health services.] Those are my favorite problematic Amendments. Hello, users of CMV! This is a footnote from your moderators. We'd just like to remind you of a couple of things. Firstly, please remember to [read through our rules] . If you see a comment that has broken one, it is more effective to report it than downvote it. Speaking of which, [downvotes don't change views] ! If you are thinking about submitting a CMV yourself, please have a look through our [popular topics wiki] first. Any questions or concerns? Feel free to [message us] . Happy CMVing!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Relational probabilistic models have the challenge of aggregation, where one variable depends on a population of other variables. Consider the problem of predicting gender from movie ratings; this is challenging because the number of movies per user and users per movie can vary greatly. Surprisingly, aggregation is not well understood. In this paper, we show that existing relational models (implicitly or explicitly) either use simple numerical aggregators that lose great amounts of information, or correspond to naive Bayes , logistic regression , or noisy-OR that suffer from overconfidence. We propose new simple aggregators and simple modifications of existing models that empirically outperform the existing ones. The intuition we provide on different (existing or new) models and their shortcomings plus our empirical findings promise to form the foundation for future representations.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I collect old photographs. My favorite period is definitely the American Civil War. There is some amazing early photography from that period. Some of it is pretty gruesome as well. But I find it to be the most honest and accurate way to see the past.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The cuisine is exceptional, service is prompt, and the staff consistently demonstrates a warm and welcoming demeanor. I consistently feel valued as a customer whenever I place an order.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Understanding how taxes impact your take-home pay can feel overwhelming, but it's a crucial aspect of financial literacy. While your tax bracket provides a general indication of your tax liability, it's essential to recognize that various factors contribute to the final calculation. \n\nFirst, payroll taxes, often denoted as FICA on pay stubs, are deducted directly from your earnings. These contributions fund Social Security and Medicare, essential social programs. While a portion of these taxes is visible on your pay stub, your employer also contributes an additional amount that doesn't appear on your statement.\n\nFurthermore, state income taxes, which vary by state, add another layer of complexity. It's important to remember that your tax liability isn't a flat percentage of your entire salary. Instead, you progress through different tax brackets as your income increases, with each portion of your income taxed at the corresponding rate.\n\nThe federal income tax withheld from your paycheck is merely an estimate of your actual tax obligation. Various deductions, exemptions, and credits can reduce your final tax bill, while investment income or penalties might increase it. \n\nUltimately, your tax return serves as the final reckoning, determining if you've overpaid or underpaid throughout the year. This process, while intricate, highlights the importance of understanding the various elements that contribute to your overall tax liability. \n\n\n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The conventional understanding of importance-weighted autoencoders centers on their ability to maximize a more refined lower bound for the marginal likelihood compared to the standard variational evidence lower bound. We propose a different perspective: this method effectively maximizes the traditional variational objective, yet does so through a richer, more intricate variational distribution. We rigorously establish this viewpoint, introduce an improved lower bound formulation, and provide visual insights into the underlying importance-weighted density structure.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: ```python\nfrom typing import List\n\n\ndef rolling_max(numbers: List[int]) -> List[int]:\n \"\"\"\n Compute the rolling maximum of a sequence of integers.\n \n For each position in the input list, the output contains the maximum value\n observed up to and including that position.\n \n Example:\n >>> rolling_max([1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4, 2])\n [1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4]\n \"\"\"\n current_max = None\n result = []\n\n for value in numbers:\n if current_max is None:\n current_max = value\n else:\n current_max = max(current_max, value)\n result.append(current_max)\n\n return result\n```",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Free thyroid hormone in the form of T3 stimulates our metabolism. More specifically, T3 modifies gene transcription in our cells to turn up biosynthesis of proteins and quicken the turn over of substrates. T3 also ramps up our ability to pull glucose out of the blood stream for energy utilization, makes our fat cells more susceptible to circulating adrenal hormones leading to better fat breakdown, and increases enzyme expression in the liver for utilizing cholesterol. I don't have a great answer for how T3 improves mood. If I had to guess, it acts as a stimulant, because patients that are hyperthyroid frequently are jittery, anxious and excitable. However I would be curious to hear from others, as well! Source: Fourth Year Medical Student, and S.K. Panini, 'Medical Biochemistry: An Illustrated Review' (2015). Thieme Publishing.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Consistency is key when it comes to disciplining your puppy, as setting boundaries early on and repeatedly enforcing them will help your puppy understand what behaviors are not allowed in your home.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Countries today are spending billions of dollars trying to overtake each other in the Space Race, and other developments that are not actually beneficial to Citizens. All right, they might be helpful in the Future, but most of these Developments aren't really useful, other than to flaunt the development power of Countries. I say let us abandon these things. Let us abandon the pursuits which don't benefit us in some way. You want innovation? Leave it to the Private Companiies. SpaceX and Virgin Galactic have been able to do with limited funding what NASA couldn't do with a much bigger government-backed budget. Let us put the Government money to better use, that actually benefit Citizens. And what things may we be talking about? Spend billions on improving a Country's Living Standards, Education, etc. Take India, which recently launched onto Mars. Much of the Country's population is under poverty, and many are not educated. Shouldn't India be focusing on improving these things, rather than flaunting its development abilities to the world? I am just shooting in the dark here. Better Education, better living standards is a given. What more? It is upto the limits of our imagination. A minimum Salary supplied by Government? Subsidized Consumer Products? Anything is possible, really, if we abandon this race to one up each other and focus on the things that really matter.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: More than 100 people gathered outside Liverpool Town Hall on Friday to protest against government cuts that have resulted in severe austerity measures in the area. The protesters, who included local residents and union members, expressed their frustration over the cuts that have led to reductions in services such as education, healthcare, and social care in Liverpool. \"I am sick and tired of seeing our community suffering because of these cuts,\" said John Smith, a protester at the rally. \"We need to send a clear message to the government that we won't stand for these austerity measures any longer.\" The protests come after Liverpool City Council recently announced plans to cut over 90 million from its budget over the next three years, leading to fears that vital services will be further impacted. Many of those protesting believe that the cuts are disproportionately affecting the poorest and most vulnerable in society. \"We need to stand together and fight for the services that we need to survive,\" said Marie Jones, a local resident. \"We won't be silenced by these cuts, and we demand that the government takes action to protect our services and our communities.\" The protests were peaceful, with organisers encouraging attendees to follow COVID-19 guidelines and maintain social distancing. Members of the police force were also present at the scene. The protest represents a growing sense of dissatisfaction and frustration amongst those impacted by the government's austerity measures, particularly in deprived areas such as Liverpool. The government's decision to cut public spending has led to reductions in services across the board, impacting people's lives and livelihoods. The protesters in Liverpool are calling for a fairer and more just system that serves the needs of all members of society, not just those with the most power and influence.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Each side has up to three touches to return the ball to the opponents' half with the rally continuing until a team cannot get the ball back, the ball goes out, or there is a fault in attempting to return the ball, such as hitting the net with any part of the body.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: RGA anticipates that the ramifications of climate change may extend across the full spectrum of its risk taxonomy. Operating as a life and health reinsurer, the company recognizes that any climate-related effects on mortality and morbidity would directly influence its operations. These effects encompass not only immediate consequences, such as increased fatalities from natural catastrophes or broader disease spread, but also more indirect repercussions arising from factors like diminished agricultural output, shifting macroeconomic conditions, and population displacement. As previously indicated, RGA also foresees both direct and indirect consequences for its investment portfolio. The broader macroeconomic landscape will inevitably shape the climate in which RGA accumulates capital.\n\nOperational risk faces potential exposure, both from the physical placement of offices in vulnerable regions—for instance, RGA maintains a presence in Dubai, an area susceptible to severe impacts from rising temperatures—and from transitional challenges, such as a potential shift to renewable energy sources possibly leading to a near-term period of higher cost and reduced reliability in power supply.\n\nStrategic risk will be affected as RGA must adapt alongside its clients in response to evolving markets and products, and also potentially through alterations to its business practices, including decreased travel resulting in fewer face-to-face client engagements. As a worldwide reinsurer, RGA is evaluating these concerns on a global scale, with an awareness that specific challenges and risks will likely differ by geographic location.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Poet Thomas was staying in Apartment 205 in the renowned hotel before his death aged 39 on 9 November, 1953. Now developers are about to refurbish the building which will affect the layout of the apartment. Geoff Haden, who restored the poet's Swansea birthplace, is now appealing for help to stop the work going ahead. Mr Haden is asking for people to show \"financial and emotional support\" to the apartment's current tenant Artie Nash. He said Mr Nash has been battling against developers refurbishing the building for nearly a decade, but work is now due to start on the entrance to the apartment. Mr Haden said: \"Time is of the essence as the developers of Hotel Chelsea have told Artie that they are blocking up the doorway and tearing up parts of the apartment to make way for a maintenance stairwell. \"Not only is Artie desperately trying to preserve his own home, but also a small piece of literary heritage which is why we are taking on the campaign on both sides of the Atlantic.\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I've never been particularly passionate about coffee, but my mom bought one of these machines and convinced me to sample their Latte Macchiato. I have to say, it rivals anything you'd find at a professional café, and I've discovered I enjoy many of their other beverages as well, which is surprising since I typically don't drink coffee.\n\nThis compact Dolce Guesto device is remarkably user-friendly and can brew an excellent cup of coffee, latte, cappuccino, or similar drink in under a minute once the water is preheated. I'd highly recommend the Dolce Gusto to anyone looking for quality beverages. The value for money is outstanding, and I'm planning to purchase one for myself!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Logistics and ridiculously high barriers to entry. You'd need so much money, manpower, and legal permits to run lines to every house in the country, that it's effectively impossible to compete with the existing monopolies. Most of the cable companies I'm aware of don't use copper for last-mile connections, but rather fiber (at least the ones that offer internet service). Oh, no. I'm on a 30030 fiber connection (300 Mbps down, 30 Mbps up). The ISP is on a shared fiber connection to a CO, and the CO is on a shared fiber connection to a MXP. In this case, the last mile is fiber, but the first mile is copper. Not in my area. They're still using copper, but they've upgraded to DOCSIS 3.0. I didn't actually mean to say copper, I meant to say fiber. My mistake. I was typing from my phone and I wasn't paying attention. Black Axe said: Not in my area. They're still using copper In other words, your ISP is not on a shared fiber connection to a CO. But you still have a shared fiber connection to a MXP. Here's the problem: The Internet is a public utility. The last mile of the network is a natural monopoly. The reason the Internet is a public utility is because, in this case, \"the Internet\" is referring to the local connection that allows users to interact with the Internet. The local connection is a natural monopoly, so the best way to ensure the best possible service for users is to have the government subsidize the monopoly, and then regulate it. I'm not going to argue with that. There's a major problem with this, though: Most of the local connections are owned by private companies. For example, the local connection that allows me to interact with the Internet is owned by Comcast. As long as Comcast owns the connection that allows me to interact with the Internet, Comcast has complete control over that connection. And since that connection is a natural monopoly, Comcast can charge whatever it wants for the service. Comcast is free to charge me 100 per month for the service, and there's nothing I can do about it, because the government has not yet subsidized the local connection. The way to fix this problem is to have the government subsidize the monopoly, and then regulate it. Unfortunately, the government isn't going to subsidize the monopoly if there's a private company that can do it. The solution is to have the government nationalize the monopoly. The government should take control of the monopoly, and then subsidize and regulate it. There's no reason to have a private company doing the work that the government should be doing. And even if the monopoly is nationalized, there's still going to be a problem: The monopoly will still be owned by a corporation (in this case, a corporation owned by the government), and that corporation is still going to have complete control over the monopoly. And since that monopoly is a natural monopoly, that corporation will still be free to charge whatever it wants for the service. That corporation is still going to be free to charge me 100 per month for the service, and there's still going to be nothing I can do about it, because the government is still not going to regulate the monopoly. The way to fix this problem is to have the government nationalize the monopoly, subsidize it, and regulate it. The government should take control of the monopoly, subsidize it, and regulate it. froggy said: I think you meant to say \"last mile\" there, not \"local connection.\" I'm not sure that last mile is a natural monopoly, because it is still possible to build out competing networks and compete for customers (though it may be difficult). If the cost of entry is so high that you can't compete, then it's not a natural monopoly, it's just a regular monopoly. Anyway, it's probably not a good idea to subsidize a monopoly. I think the best way to go about it would be to provide subsidies to customers who buy service from monopoly providers in order to lower their costs. This would apply to both broadband and power service",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Whatever's left over can go in the freezer. Preparing and freezing rice in bulk at the beginning of the week can free up a lot of time that you would otherwise spend fixing individual batches.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Microsoft has agreed to make it easier for customers to independently repair its devices. As You Sow, an investor advocacy nonprofit, filed a shareholder resolution with the SEC in June 2018 asking the commission to ask Microsoft to allow customers to repair their devices without going through a third party. Microsoft has 15 days to respond to the resolution, but as the vote is non-binding, the resolution has no bearing on the company's future policies. The vote was held by a panel of three commissioners appointed by the SEC. Two commissioners approved the resolution while one commissioner abstained. While a majority of commissioners approved the resolution, it was not a unanimous vote. \"Microsoft has not provided any specific details about how it plans to implement these recommendations,\" according to the SEC's statement. As You Sow says that the resolution is a first step in ensuring that Microsoft's devices are repairable and easy to fix.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: This is a substantial and complex issue, but my primary concern lies in the mechanisms of allocation—specifically, who is burdened with debt and who receives subsidized support, often in the form of bailouts. These mechanisms are not only economically inefficient but also fundamentally inequitable. — an economist. \n\nP.S. In my view, rather than employing quantitative easing, which disproportionately benefits wealthier individuals, the Federal Reserve would achieve a fairer outcome by issuing currency and distributing it equally on a per capita basis.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: 16:9 Of sin, because they believe not on me; 16:10 Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more; 16:11 Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I understand the philosophy behind acquiring tastes (learned to love San Pellegrino), but I cannot for the life of me truly find myself appreciating coffee like many of my friends That's perfectly fine! Everyone has their own preferences and it's important to respect that. Not everyone enjoys coffee, and that's okay. There are plenty of other beverages and foods to enjoy. Instead of trying to force yourself to like something, focus on finding what you do enjoy and embrace it. It's important to stay true to yourself and your own tastes rather than trying to fit in with others.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I can think of no reason to set such prices other than as a psychological trick to make something seem cheaper than it is. The consumer gains little to nothing from such a practice. froudh The logic behind the EU VAT is that it's a tax, so should be treated as such. You don't pay it on consumption, but rather when you take a taxable good to a VAT registered warehouse and sell it. DanBC You don't pay it on consumption, but rather when you take a taxable good to a VAT registered warehouse and sell it. How do you do that? sbierwagen You're talking about the VAT exemption for sales of property, aren't you? DanBC I think I'm confused by the concept of selling property. I was thinking about VAT on sales of tangible goods. froudh You're not, really. It's all about VAT on property. VAT on consumption is still in force in most EU member states, but the VAT exemption for property has been in place since 1992. arbuge What about ? Their specs on the Tesla are comparable, and the battery is the same as Tesla's. It's also significantly more affordable. bigchungus 230 miles of range and a 100kW charging rate (Tesla is at 65kW). MichaelGG I wonder how much that charging rate is really useful? Maybe 20-30 miles worth of range on a charge? bigchungus Well, you could just go out and do a test drive and see for yourself. thecleaner With no pricing info, what are we talking about here? greglindahl The price of the vehicle and the price of the battery. The car costs 75k, so if the battery is the same price, the car should be 100k. thecleaner Huh, didn't think about that. I think I have a problem with how I am used to thinking about these things. malandrew I'm curious what the driving range is. Is it 150 or 230 miles? greglindahl malandrew Thanks, but I meant specifically in terms of distance per charge. subdane How do you know that Tesla's price for their Model S is 75,000? shantly I think it's just a convention for auto-complete, like \"How do you know that Tesla's price for their Model X is 75,000?\" MichaelGG That doesn't work in Chrome at least. If you copy the full URL it doesn't autocomplete. briandear I really hope this is a marketing ploy. They need to have their models out and available on the market before they can start comparing them to anyone else's. I can't imagine that a fully-functional, large scale production Tesla is going to cost 100,000. codezero They are fully functional and are being sold. b123456 It's an exciting day.. Tesla's been one of the most interesting companies I've been following for a while now. gfodor Congrats to Tesla for the new Model S, but I can't help but feel that the 'affordable luxury' moniker is a bit of a marketing ploy on their part. I don't really see the point of selling a car for 75,000 when they're already selling a car for 50,000. I'd imagine most people who'd buy the 50,000 version would be happy with the 75,000 version too, so there's not really much incentive for Tesla to move that 25,000 dollar margin. It seems to me like a great example of why \"not for profit\" should be considered a marketing slogan, not a business strategy. bruceboughton This is a little off-topic but I find it interesting that you don't see the point of selling a car for 50k when they're already selling a car for 75k.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Thomas Southwood Smith, a doctor at the London Fever Hospital, was an early advocate for public health. In the 1830s, he was among the first medical experts, including Neil Arnott and James Phillips Kay, to provide testimony to the Poor Law Commission. He counseled the government that measures like quarantine and better sanitation were crucial to controlling outbreaks of diseases like cholera and yellow fever.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: \"Have we ever thought about just stopping supplying these damn pots to the rooms and guard posts?\" My supervisor looks at me like said something blasphemous and stutters a bit before composing himself. \"But they are needed! To take them away is out of the question.\" I sigh and try to think of a way to finally out this to rest. For the past couple weeks of getting used to my new life here which has for the most part been quite enjoyable. The problem I had though was the lack of my work experience and lack of technology. Starting my job in the local Towns in and working my way up to groundskeeper for the castle itself was quite exciting for me. The only problem...... Well..... \"Look sir, I understand full well of everything you ask me to do and I do it without question, on top of what other things I do that have made things better here. Not to honk my own horn.\" He looks up from his paperwork with a raised eyebrow. \"Honk your own horn? Seems you have an endless well of odd sayings. Where is it your from again?\" \"Eh it's a place far from here I'm sure you never heard of.\" \"well whatever the case, your hard work is noted. But these pots are essentially to daily work activities I assure you\" \"you realize the guards just throw money into them randomly, making bets even in different manners, in the post just to get laughs when he comes and breaks them right? \"I am aware. They are especially important there, the horrors they face from the fields at night defending the gates..... They need the stress relief. These are dark times. Plus the hero benefits from the income\" I sigh in defeat again as a guard comes in with a gleam in his eye. \"sir the post needs more pots! He came again!\" \"ill have weston here deliver the new ones shortly.\" The guard bows and turns to leave. As he leaves I notice his rupee satchel is a bit more plump than his comrades were when I made delivery of pots this morning. These were dark times in hyrule, but they would only get darker, but myself, the hero, and princess Zelda were the only ones that know before it was too late.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Morality, it is argued, is not etched in stone but shaped by the winds of culture, context, and feeling—this is moral relativism’s whisper. It suggests truth in ethics is fluid, a reflection of time, place, and personal sensation. Yet beneath this shifting sands lies a deeper current: moral universalism, rooted not in abstract doctrine, but in the quiet pulse of human nature—the shared capacity to feel, to suffer, to empathize. From this empathy springs the need to reason, to persuade, to coexist.\n\nWhile relativism claims diversity as its virtue, its logic often betrays itself. The very arguments used to defend it demand that *everyone* follow a certain framework—implying a universal rule, despite the protestations. When cultures are said to have different values, we’re still measuring them against an invisible yardstick: the assumption that some actions are wrong, others right, regardless of context. Even in cultural differences, we find echoes of a common refrain—respect for life, dignity, and the sanctity of well-being.\n\nThis shared core isn’t coincidence—it’s evidence. Across every enduring moral system, from ancient wisdom to modern codes, one truth emerges: the prohibition of murder, the reverence for health, the protection of property and person. These aren’t accidents of culture—they are testaments to our shared humanity.\n\nRelativism thrives on exceptions, but universalism stands on foundations: the undeniable fact that all humans, no matter race, creed, or origin, respond to suffering, seek justice, and long for fairness. If morality were truly subjective—each person their own law—society would dissolve into chaos, dialogue impossible, justice meaningless.\n\nMoral universalism, then, is not a dogma, but a revelation: in our deepest instincts, we find not division, but unity. Not contradiction, but consensus. And in that consensus, truth begins.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: In 2007, a vision began to take shape within the heart of FIBA: to unleash the electrifying energy of 3x3 basketball onto the world's grandest sporting stage. This vision materialized at the 2010 Youth Olympic Games in Singapore, where 3x3 made its electrifying debut, captivating a new generation of fans and forever etching its place in Olympic history. \n\nYear after year, 3x3 graced the Youth Olympic Games, its popularity soaring like a perfectly executed three-pointer. Then, on a momentous day in June 2017, the Olympic dream was fully realized. The IOC, recognizing the undeniable allure of this fast-paced, urban-infused discipline, officially welcomed 3x3 basketball to the Olympic Games, beginning with the Tokyo 2020 Games, a spectacle delayed but not denied, unfolding in 2021. \n\nThis landmark decision marked a historic moment: for the first time, a sport born in the crucible of the Youth Olympic Games ascended to the pinnacle of athletic competition – the Olympic Games. And as Latvia's men and the United States' women claimed their places atop the podium, a new chapter in Olympic basketball history began. \n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Proponents argue that providing employees with competitive compensation packages and comprehensive benefits constitutes socially responsible behavior and, consequently, mitigates employee turnover. Executive leadership demonstrates a strong commitment to cultivating a positive organizational environment that advances both corporate social responsibility objectives and overall organizational performance.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Beth wanted to have a new look. She went to the mall for inspiration. She ended up buying a dress that was very unlike her. It was flashy and sparkly. She felt amazing in it.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Reasons why Bitcoins will never be a widespread consumer currency that rivals traditional money: 1. Institutional Theft: Hackers have [already stolen] millions of dollars worth of bitcoins from largeinstitutional holders of bitcoins. \"Joe Consumer\" can't adequately protect his money from this kind of targeted hacking. Right now banks and other financial institutions are charged with protecting traditional money. A bitcoin bank could possibly offer some protection (although no FDIC insurance) but it would erode some of the original stated purpose of bitcoins. EDIT: My mind has been changed somewhat on this specific point. As it's very early in the game and better protections could be put in place than currently exist. 2. Fraud: Similar to hacking if someone gains access to your online wallet and spends your bitcoins on goods and services and disappears you have no reliable way to recover the funds. With a consumer credit card you are not liable for ANY fraudulent transactions. 3. Chargebacks: Let's say a merchant screws you. You buy a TV online, but instead you get a toaster, or worse you never receive the good. You have ZERO recourse without getting lawyers involved. Most people can't afford a lawyer to settle a consumer dispute. The great thing about credit card charge backs is that they allow you to dispute a transaction if you can prove the transaction did not ultimately occur as agreed and recover some or all of your money.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Seeking common ground beyond the political fray, Mrs. Foster expressed a desire to connect with those who hold the Irish language dear, stating her intent to listen to voices from Gaelic Irish backgrounds, unclouded by party politics. Welcoming the gesture, Mr. Ó Muilleoir hailed it as a positive step toward dialogue and deeper understanding.\n\nThis overture unfolds as Stormont's negotiations remain paused, with an Irish Language Act standing as a key priority for Sinn Féin—a measure the DUP previously vowed never to support. Mrs. Foster has now extended an invitation to meet those who cherish the language \"as a gift, not a weapon.\"\n\nMr. Ó Muilleoir expressed hope for a swift meeting, anticipating Mrs. Foster would encounter a \"broad church\" united in the belief that Irish is a shared treasure. He suggested it is a gift speakers wish to share with all, including unionists on a journey of understanding. While it remains early to gauge the DUP's stance, he believes the conversation will benefit both the leader and the language community. The advocacy group Pobal has gladly accepted the invitation, reaching out to arrange the discussion.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: To satisfy the stringent performance requirements of high-power terahertz free electron laser (THz-FEL) systems, a compact injector configuration has been developed. A thermionic cathode was selected for electron emission in preference to a photocathode, thereby reducing both structural complexity and operational costs. The effective bunch charge was enhanced to approximately 200 picocoulombs through implementation of an optimized external cathode independently tunable cells (EC-ITC) radiofrequency gun for micro-bunch extraction, while concurrent suppression of back-bombardment effects was achieved. Constant-gradient accelerating structures were engineered to attain electron energies of approximately 14 megaelectronvolts, complemented by a focusing system designed for emittance reduction and bunch state preservation. Comprehensive physical design and beam dynamics analyses were conducted for all critical injector components. Additionally, end-to-end simulations incorporating multi-pulse configurations were executed utilizing both proprietary MATLAB algorithms and the Parmela particle tracking code. The simulation results demonstrate that stable generation of continuous, high-brightness electron bunches with reduced energy spread and minimal emittance can be consistently achieved.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: A critical shortage of trained staff, funding, and knowledge often prevents even basic medical care and disease prevention. In developing countries, a primary concern is the poor state of maternal and child health, which is worsened by malnutrition and poverty and compounded by government reluctance to enact public health policies.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I am a las vegas local who has been to plenty of buffets all around vegas with that said I was not impressed with this buffet what so ever! After paying 26 dollars for this buffet you are left hungry and dissatisfied. The food was good and the variety was good but the quantity of food they gave you was poor. My advice to you is do not eat the fish because it is very small and it is pretty fishy. You will not have to wait long in line but it will not be worth the wait.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: There are many reasons that Scotland may or may not want independence. A few reasons for independence are that the Scottish government are in control of 100 of spending, currently a lot of money is spent by the UK government. Another reason for is that there is lots of oil in Scotland that the UK as a whole is using and selling, where as if Scotland are in control it will help the economy. It is said that there is more oil in Scotland than Dubai. A reason against is that this oil may run out eventually and there will be no support from the UK. Another reason against is that trading could be more expensive and the country would need to buy certain things from the rest of the UK. Another reason against is that the UK government say that Scotland will need to use the Euro instead of the Pound but there is a lot of debate if this is the case or not. Hope this helps!', \"As I've understood, on one level, a reason is that it is a win-win for Cameron. Remember that the Scots vote a lot more Labour than the English. Two things can happen: 1. Scotland leaves the UK. Cameron can thus guarantee that the conservatives will rule the UK for a lifetime. 2. Scotland doesn't leave the UK. Cameron has settled this issue for a lifetime.,\" \"English dude here. I guess an argument for independence would be that you're going to get more bang for your buck in terms of democratic legitimacy, in terms of representation. Think about it this way: is it better for Scottish laws to be formulated by Scottish people only, or ought you have the English, the Welsh, and the Northern Irish having a say over the rules that you're governed by? I think it's really one of those subjects where there isn't a right or wrong, it honestly just depends upon what you fancy. You'll still have the E.U making laws for you, but nevertheless, you'll have more say out of the union than in. Saying that, please don't go! I like the union flag - it's pretty.,Well as someone sitting on the fence currently, whats making me lean to a Yes vote would be greater control over what happens in Scotland, it seems like as a small left wing nation Scotland could really do well for itself. Also, the prospect of never having to see a bloody Conservative again is pretty nice. I am however interested in hearing some other straight opinions.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 14