prompt
listlengths 2
2
| ground_truth
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The members of the scarce category of Of^+ supergiants present properties that are intermediate between regular O-stars and Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars. Significant similarities between these transitional stars and WN-type objects are now clearly established, at least in the visible and near-infrared domains, pointing to common stellar wind properties. In this study, we report on the first dedicated X-ray observations of HD16691 (O4If^+) and HD14947 (O5f^+), revealing a soft thermal spectrum in agreement with the expected X-ray emission from a single O-type star. However, the X-ray luminosity of our targets is slightly lower than expected for single O-type stars, suggesting that the particular properties of their stellar wind has also a significant impact on the X-ray emission of these objects on the way to the WN category. We argue that the X-ray under-luminosity of HD16691 and HD14947 may be interpreted as the signature in X-rays of the intermediate stage between O and WR stars, as a consequence of enhanced wind density.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Jerry wanted a new Lego set that he had seen at the toy store. He knew that his parents wouldn't give him the money. Jerry decided to save his chore money so that he could buy it himself. He worked and saved for several weeks until he finally had enough. That night he proudly showed his parents the new toy he had earned.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: For peppers; a chemical compound called [capsaicin] (URL1) is responsible for the heat. For wasabi, horseradish, and mustard; the primary compound is called [isothiocyanate] (URL0) and is released by gratinggrinding the plant.', \"Capsaicin is the chemical ingredient found in spicy peppers and shit, it makes the nerves in your mouth feel like they are on fire. Imagine if you ate a cactus, you'd get prickles in your mouth. Same shit. It's a defense mechanism to stop mammals from eating them.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: ```python\ndef f(n):\n \"\"\"\n This function creates a list of 'n' elements, where each element's \n value depends on its position (index) in the list:\n\n - Even Indices: The element's value is the factorial of its index. \n (Factorial means multiplying all numbers from 1 to that index.)\n - Odd Indices: The element's value is the sum of all numbers from 1 to its index.\n\n Example:\n f(5) == [1, 2, 6, 24, 15] \n\n Explanation:\n - Index 1 (Odd): 1 (Sum of numbers from 1 to 1)\n - Index 2 (Even): 2! = 2 * 1 = 2\n - Index 3 (Odd): 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 \n - Index 4 (Even): 4! = 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 24\n - Index 5 (Odd): 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = 15\n \"\"\"\n ret = []\n for i in range(1,n+1):\n if i%2 == 0:\n x = 1\n for j in range(1,i+1): x *= j\n ret += [x]\n else:\n x = 0\n for j in range(1,i+1): x += j\n ret += [x]\n return ret\n```\n\n\n\n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: It happened early on Sunday morning at a private party in San Jose's Fiesta nightclub, near San Francisco. Police have confirmed the Grammy winner was unhurt. Mobile phone footage said to be of the gig has been posted online and shots can be heard in the middle of one of Brown's songs. In a video, posted on his own Vine profile, he can be seen looking at something going on in the crowd before shots ring out. He appears to be wincing, before security guards escort him away. Other footage posted online shows the aftermath of the shooting. There appear to be a few hundred people in the crowd, and most of them run for the exits or drop to the ground. Many are crying or screaming. The San Jose Police Department says all five people injured in the shootings are expected to survive. It says it is still investigating the \"motive surrounding the shootings\" and \"several people have been detained by officers.\" The singer has made no public comment on the shooting. According to the newspaper the San Jose Mercury News, shortly afterwards he tweeted \"I'm 100\" to tell fans he was uninjured, but that tweet was later deleted. It's not the first shooting incident Chris Brown has experienced. In August last year the singer was hosting a party in Los Angeles when Death Row Records executive Suge Knight was shot. Follow BBCNewsbeat on Twitter, BBCNewsbeat on Instagram and Radio1Newsbeat on YouTube",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Think of it like a game of telephone, where you whisper a message to a friend, they whisper it to another friend, and so on. By the time the message gets to the last person, it's totally different!\n\nThat's kind of what happened here. The plaintiff wanted to use a report by other experts (the 2014 Report) to make her own expert (Dr. Proctor) sound more convincing. But courts have rules against this kind of \"telephone game\" with expert opinions.\n\nWhy? Because the other experts from the report weren't in court to answer questions about what they wrote! It's like letting someone speak for you without giving the other side a chance to ask them questions directly. \n\nThe court in the *Schwarz* case explained this really well, saying it's not fair to sneak in another expert's opinion when they haven't been cross-examined. \n\nSo, even though the 2014 Report might have some interesting stuff about cigarettes and lung cancer, the plaintiff couldn't use it to boost her expert's testimony. \n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: def flip_case(string: str) -> str:\n \"\"\" \n Take a string and switch the case of each character: lowercase becomes uppercase and vice versa.\n >>> flip_case('Hello')\n 'hELLO'\n \"\"\"\n return string.swapcase()",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I went hiking yesterday in the mountains. As I trekked up the mountain, I started to feel out of breath. I could not believe how I felt. I had to take a long pause. Thankfully after a while I was able to keep going.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The LOFT mission, vying for the European Space Agency's coveted M3 launch opportunity, underwent a rigorous three-year assessment phase to evaluate its technological readiness. A crucial aspect of this assessment involved characterizing the potential impact of space radiation on the mission's silicon drift detectors (SDDs), responsible for capturing vital X-ray data.\n\nOur team meticulously subjected these detectors to a barrage of radiation, simulating the harsh conditions of space. We exposed the SDDs to high-energy protons (0.8 and 11 MeV) to quantify the detrimental effects of displacement damage, meticulously measuring the resulting increase in leakage current and any degradation in charge collection efficiency.\n\nFurthermore, we simulated the impact of hypervelocity dust grains, mimicking the constant bombardment by micrometeoroids in space. This allowed us to assess the robustness of the SDDs against these potentially destructive events.\n\nThis paper provides a comprehensive overview of our experimental findings, contextualizing their implications for the LOFT mission's overall performance and longevity in the unforgiving environment of space. \n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: This research explores the exciting potential of qudits, higher-dimensional quantum systems, for enhancing the security and efficiency of quantum communication. We investigate a scheme where sequential state-discrimination measurements are employed to decipher the initial state of a qudit chosen from a set of non-orthogonal quantum states.\n\nWhile perfectly distinguishing these states is impossible due to their inherent overlap, our approach leverages the power of unambiguous state discrimination. This technique guarantees error-free measurements while accepting the possibility of inconclusive outcomes.\n\nBy harnessing qudits, which can encode more information per unit than their two-level counterparts (qubits), we unlock new possibilities for communication efficiency. Our analysis focuses on a scenario where a sender, Alice, transmits one qudit chosen from a set of N, with each qudit possessing N dimensions. We explore two distinct cases: one with uniform state overlap and another with varying overlaps between two distinct subsets of qudits.\n\nExcitingly, we demonstrate that this qudit-based approach offers increased robustness against eavesdropping compared to traditional qubit-based schemes. The higher dimensionality of qudits makes it significantly more likely for an eavesdropper to introduce detectable errors when attempting to intercept the transmitted information. Our findings highlight the potential of qudits for developing more secure and efficient quantum communication protocols.\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I don't know what to do. Why am I doing this? I was just browsing the new prompts and this one looked good so click I went. Why am I doing this again, I don't know. I keep looking over at the Image Prompt, thinking on how in the hell am I going to fit that into my super-mega-awesome story where all of these prompts are all interconnected in one universe which probably as been going WAY over peoples heads and they just think that this Care Bear has no ideas left, because he's been talking about the Purple Suited Death dude for like 3 prompts. Maybe I'll make her connected to one of the Other Beings or whatever, I don't fucking know. Also, unrelated, I wonder if people in the future or aliens when they find like this prompt, would they think that we are all stark-raving mad? Here we are, aimlessly rambling and people in the future will all be like \"Okay, our ancestors were fucking weird.\" Also, super unrelated, would people of the future use our curse words? Or would our kids use curse words that are different, like for things we hate now. Cuz we all hate Congress and all those 1 ers, so would they use like: \"Gosh Johnny, you're such a 1 er!\" Or like \"Congress, Billy, go to your room!\" And then we'll have to make up new words for Congress and the 1 ers. Imagine if that was true. Our kids when they come back to visit through time would turn on CNN and like glare at us. Congress this and Congress that and the President said this and that. Omg, CNN would be the MTV of the future. God, I have to stop writing before the men in white come take me away...",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We consider the pressing question of how to model, verify, and ensure that autonomous systems meet certain obligations (like the obligation to respect traffic laws), and refrain from impermissible behavior (like recklessly changing lanes). Temporal logics are heavily used in autonomous system design; however, as we illustrate here, temporal (alethic) logics alone are inappropriate for reasoning about obligations of autonomous systems. This paper proposes the use of Dominance Act Utilitarianism (DAU), a deontic logic of agency, to encode and reason about obligations of autonomous systems. We use DAU to analyze Intel's Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS) proposal as a real-world case study. We demonstrate that DAU can express well-posed RSS rules, formally derive undesirable consequences of these rules, illustrate how DAU could help design systems that have specific obligations, and how to model-check DAU obligations.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Coronavirus has traveled across the world, with new cases of the virus being found in non-travelers. The World Health Organization recently warned that the window of opportunity to contain the disease was narrowing, but many experts fear that it has now started to become a pandemic. While the coronavirus is less deadly than SARS, it is significantly more contagious, with most of the symptoms of the virus only showing up two weeks post-infection. This leaves plenty of time for the virus to spread before the patient is quarantined. Children also seem to be immune to the effects of the virus, so it is unknown if they are carriers. Most cases of the virus probably remain undetected, so every country needs to be prepared to deal with an outbreak. Slowing the virus' spread might prolong an epidemic, but it will cause less damage overall. For now, it is best to start slowly preparing for the case of quarantines, as strong measures may be implemented to combat the virus.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Although Montevideo was the smallest department in terms of area (divided into twenty-three geographic zones that generally coincided with the electoral zones), its departmental board had sixty-five members in 1990; all other departments had thirty-one-member boards and a five-member executive council appointed by the departmental board, with proportional representation from the principal political parties.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We extend the insightful research by Sarvotham et al. [2005], which demonstrated the impact of peak transmission rates on network burstiness. By analyzing TCP packet headers, we group packets into sessions, each defined by a 5-tuple: (S, D, R, Peak R, Initiation T) = (total payload, duration, average transmission rate, peak transmission rate, initiation time). After thorough analysis, we propose a new definition for peak transmission rates. Contrary to Sarvotham et al. [2005], who divided sessions into two categories—alpha and beta—we distribute them into ten segments based on the empirical quantiles of the peak rate variable. This approach showcases that the beta group is not uniform. Our refined segmentation uncovers additional structural details missed by the previous two-group method. In each segment, we examine the dependence structure of (S, D, R) and observe that it varies significantly across different groups. Moreover, within each segment, session initiation times closely follow a Poisson process, a property not observed when evaluating the dataset as a whole. Consequently, we conclude that peak rate levels are critical for understanding network structure and for creating accurate simulations of real-world data. Based on our findings, we propose a straightforward method for simulating network traffic.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Here's a rewritten version of your text with a different tone and feel:\n\n---\n\nAfter the Earth's surface became uninhabitable, humanity was forced to relocate to the ocean's depths. Our most precious resource now is oxygen. \"You got the gig?\" I asked. Without uttering a word, the smuggler led me into a small, nondescript house, gesturing for me to follow. Inside, there was nothing but a large tank. \"How do I know you’re not scamming me?\" I questioned. The response came from the shadows, just as I had predicted: \"You don’t, but you have no choice, do you?\"\n\nThe scent of the cursed ocean lingered above us, with salt and water vapor trailing us everywhere. With a decisive flick of my wrist, I tossed the money onto the floor. \"Nice doing business with you,\" was his only reply.\n\nQuickly securing the tank, I cautiously exited the warehouse. Its contents were scarce, barely sufficient for a week if we were careful. This had been our reality since the Collapse—an era marked by some fool's decision to build underwater cities when land was no longer habitable. Now, criminals roamed freely, and survival meant fighting for every breath. It was every person for themselves. What was meant to extend humanity's lifespan had instead shortened it; we had regressed.\n\nThe great civilizations of the past were now mere myths: the United States, Mexico, France, Japan, Lithuania, Indonesia—all spoken of with the same doubtful reverence as Atlantis. Some even questioned if we had ever lived on the surface at all. Though it had only been eighty years, everything was unrecognizable now.\n\nSociety had collapsed completely, giving rise to anarchic chaos—not the idealistic kind. The wealthy barricaded themselves with giant electrolyzers, laughing at the rest of us. We, the masses, had to turn on each other to survive.\n\n\"A new dawn,\" they had promised, \"when humanity would unite as one global state.\" What we got was hell on Earth—killing each other for something invisible, yet vital. \"Just end it now, would you kindly?\"\n\n---\n\nI hope you find this version to your liking!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: It was encouraged by the Catholic Church as a means to counter the simplicity and austerity of Protestant architecture, art, and music, though Lutheran Baroque art developed in parts of Europe as well.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Aswad Thomas broke the deadlock for the hosts, heading Sam Magri's cross home after 22 minutes, but from there the visitors took charge. Andy Cook took his goals tally for the season to 10 with a brace, notching either side of half-time, before an own goal from Mitchell Walker and Ben Tollitt's fourth added late gloss to the scoreline. The emphatic victory was not enough for Rovers to climb any higher in the National League table, but they have closed the gap behind leaders Forest Green Rovers to four points. Match report supplied by the Press Association. Match ends, Dover Athletic 1, Tranmere Rovers 4. Second Half ends, Dover Athletic 1, Tranmere Rovers 4. Substitution, Tranmere Rovers. Ethan Jones replaces Andy Cook. Substitution, Tranmere Rovers. Michael Ihiekwe replaces Lee Vaughan. Substitution, Tranmere Rovers. Adam Mekki replaces Darren Stephenson. Goal! Dover Athletic 1, Tranmere Rovers 4. Ben Tollitt (Tranmere Rovers). Darren Stephenson (Tranmere Rovers) is shown the yellow card. Substitution, Dover Athletic. Moses Emmanuel replaces Jack Parkinson. Own Goal by Mitchell Walker, Dover Athletic. Dover Athletic 1, Tranmere Rovers 3. Goal! Dover Athletic 1, Tranmere Rovers 2. Andy Cook (Tranmere Rovers). Second Half begins Dover Athletic 1, Tranmere Rovers 1. First Half ends, Dover Athletic 1, Tranmere Rovers 1. Lois Maynard (Tranmere Rovers) is shown the yellow card. Goal! Dover Athletic 1, Tranmere Rovers 1. Andy Cook (Tranmere Rovers). Goal! Dover Athletic 1, Tranmere Rovers 0. Aswad Thomas (Dover Athletic). First Half begins. Lineups are announced and players are warming up.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: a parent has a duty to support his or her l Assembly have taken several steps to ensure that non-supporting parents honor their obligations. For example, the State Constitution provides that a person may be imprisoned for nonpayment of child or spousal support obligations. See Md. Const, art. Ill, § 38 (stating that “[n]o person shall be imprisoned for a debt, but a valid decree of a court of competent jurisdiction or agreement approved by decree of said court for the support of a spouse or dependent children, or for alimony ... shall not constitute a debt within the meaning of this section.”); Md. Rule 15-207(e) (providing procedures for imprisonment upon non-payment of child or spousal support obligation); Middleton v. Middleton, 329 Md. 627, 639, 620 A.2d 1363, 1369 (1993) (<HOLDING>). The General Assembly authorized the Child",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Signal reconstruction from a sample using an orthogonal projector onto a guiding subspace is theoretically well justified, but may be difficult to practically implement. We propose more general guiding operators, which increase signal components in the guiding subspace relative to those in a complementary subspace, e.g., iterative low-pass edge-preserving filters for super-resolution of images. Two examples of super-resolution illustrate our technology: a no-flash RGB photo guided using a high resolution flash RGB photo, and a depth image guided using a high resolution RGB photo.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The ratings are used by the networks to sell traditional TV advertising (which is still the major source of their overall revenue). Internet Ratings are available to the networks from Nielsen and other sources however the revenue from online sources is a very small in comparison. So to answer your question - the primary factor that networks use to determine the shows to book each season are the traditional (offline) ratings.', \"This isn't easy to answer, not knowing the inner workings of FOX. However, I'll take a guess. My guess would be that the income from television shows streamed online is still much less than income that comes from television. Poor ratings less money from advertisers, and since advertising on television and advertising on the internet are two completely different beasts, they need to prioritize the one that makes the most money which, in this case, is television. Like I said, this is just a guess.,\" \"Well, they know exactly how many people watch the shows from their websites. But that's a tiny, tiny fraction of the viewing audience. If the show cost more for the network then they'll get in advertising revenue due to the low ratings, it'll absolutely get the axe.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Kerri Walsh Jennings, who has won three consecutive gold medals and is the most decorated beach volleyball player in history, is potentially considering a return for Paris 2024.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Realism in the arts is generally the attempt to represent subject matter truthfully, without artificiality and avoiding speculative fiction and supernatural elements",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: To achieve a dexterous robotic manipulation, we need to endow our robot with tactile feedback capability, i.e. the ability to drive action based on tactile sensing. In this paper, we introduce the modular structure of the Tactile Telerobotics System (T2S) in the context of our mission to explore a submerged shipwreck, and discuss the mission-critical capabilities of the system. We discuss the challenges we encountered when we deployed our prototype system in the field and how we solved these challenges. We report our experiences of the three-day trial deployment of the system. The final robotic manipulation, which was completed by a human operator using T2S, is also presented.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: In a federation, the independence of the individual states and the distribution of authority between them and the central government are usually protected by the constitution and cannot be changed by a one-sided decision from either the individual states or the federal government.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: is likely trying to show off her physical fitness or exercise routine to others around her. Alternatively, she may be trying to express her interest in pursuing a career in fitness or health-related fields. It is also possible that the woman simply enjoys physical activity and is engaging in these movements out of personal pleasure or as a way to release energy.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Tycho's ball flew over the schoolyard fence. He quickly climbed over the fence and threw the ball back over. On his way back over the fence, Tycho's coat got stuck. His feet dangled in the air until someone unzipped his coat. Tycho dropped to the ground unharmed.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: \"So, I heard whispers you were braving the slopes at Saikei this weekend! How was it? All glam or all wipeouts?\" \n\n\"Oh man, it was incredible! Exhilarating...though I definitely racked up the most falls in our group, haha.\" \n\n\"No shame in that! Didn't they have instructors, though? Someone to show you the ropes?\"\n\n\"Oh yeah, they had coaches there straight from the State Sports folks - super legit!\" \n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Paco had ambitions of riding horses. He bought a pretty pony and learned how to take care of it. Paco then took lessons on how to ride the horse. He felt pretty good on the horse. He was a natural rider. He loved the experience of riding a horse. But Paco had an accident. One day he was riding his horse and fell off. The horse then ran away. Paco tried to catch the horse but was unsuccessful. The horse ran off and never returned. Paco was very sad about the horse. The horse was his only friend. Paco thought about the horse all the time. The horse was his friend. Paco decided to do something to remember the horse. Paco decided to build a little wooden horse. Paco then started to make the wooden horse. Paco built the wooden horse. The wooden horse was a wooden sculpture. The wooden sculpture was a horse. The wooden sculpture was a beautiful wooden sculpture. Paco was very happy about the wooden sculpture. Paco took the wooden sculpture to the park. He then put the wooden sculpture in the park. The wooden sculpture was a new addition to the park. The wooden sculpture was in the park. The park was full of people. The park was a very popular place. Paco decided to do something more to remember the horse. Paco decided to make a little wooden sculpture of the horse. The little wooden sculpture was a beautiful sculpture. The sculpture was a beautiful wooden sculpture. Paco was very happy about the sculpture. Paco took the sculpture to the park. He then put the sculpture in the park. The sculpture was a new addition to the park. The sculpture was in the park. The park was full of people. The park was a very popular place. Paco decided to do something more to remember the horse. Paco decided to make a little wooden sculpture of the horse. The little wooden sculpture was a beautiful sculpture. The sculpture was a beautiful wooden sculpture. Paco was very happy about the sculpture. Paco took the sculpture to the park. He then put the sculpture in the park. The sculpture was a new addition to the park. The sculpture was in the park. The park was full of people. The park was a very popular place. Paco decided to do something more to remember the horse. Paco decided to make a little wooden sculpture of the horse. The little wooden sculpture was a beautiful sculpture. The sculpture was a beautiful wooden sculpture. Paco was very happy about the sculpture. Paco took the sculpture to the park. He then put the sculpture in the park. The sculpture was a new addition to the park. The sculpture was in the park. The park was full of people. The park was a very popular place. Paco decided to do something more to remember the horse. Paco decided to make a little wooden sculpture of the horse. The little wooden sculpture was a beautiful sculpture. The sculpture was a beautiful wooden sculpture. Paco was very happy about the sculpture. Paco took the sculpture to the park. He then put the sculpture in the park. The sculpture was a new addition to the park. The sculpture was in the park. The park was full of people. The park was a very popular place. Paco decided to do something more to remember the horse. Paco decided to make a little wooden sculpture of the horse. The little wooden sculpture was a beautiful sculpture. The sculpture was a beautiful wooden sculpture. Paco was very happy about the sculpture. Paco took the sculpture to the park. He then put the sculpture in the park. The sculpture was a new addition to the park. The sculpture was in the park. The park was full of people. The park was a very popular place. Paco decided to do something more to remember the horse. Paco decided to make a little wooden sculpture of the horse. The little wooden sculpture was a beautiful sculpture. The sculpture was a beautiful wooden sculpture. Paco was very happy about the sculpture. Paco took the sculpture to the park. He then put the sculpture in the park. The sculpture was a new addition to the park. The sculpture was in the park. The park was full of people. The park was a very popular place. Paco decided to do something more to remember the horse. Paco decided to make a little wooden sculpture of the horse. The little wooden sculpture was a beautiful sculpture. The sculpture was a beautiful wooden sculpture. Paco was very happy about the sculpture. Paco took the sculpture to the park. He then put the sculpture in the park. The sculpture was a new addition to the park. The sculpture was in the park. The park was full of people. The park was a very popular place. Paco decided to do something more to remember the horse. Paco decided to make a little wooden sculpture of the horse. The little wooden sculpture was a beautiful sculpture. The sculpture was a beautiful wooden sculpture. Paco was very happy about the sculpture.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: In a major announcement, the operator of Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant has claimed that it expects to bring the crisis under control by the end of this year. This comes as a huge relief for Japan and the rest of the world, following the devastating earthquake and tsunami that struck the country in 2011, triggering a catastrophic meltdown at the Fukushima plant. The Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) has been struggling to contain the damage ever since, spending billions of dollars on efforts to clean up and decommission the plant. The crisis has also sparked worldwide concerns over nuclear safety and renewed calls for a shift towards renewable energy sources. However, TEPCO reported on Friday that it now has the situation under control, with radiation levels at the plant having dropped significantly and the damaged reactors finally stabilizing. The company's president, Tomoaki Kobayakawa, said in a statement that \"we can now confidently say that the risks of further radiation leaks are minimal and that we are on track to achieve a sustainable and safe decommissioning.\" The news has been welcomed by Japanese officials and local residents in the Fukushima prefecture, where years of uncertainty and fears of radiation have taken a toll on the community. The government has pledged to support the recovery efforts in the area and to prioritize the safety of its people. Yet, some critics are cautious about such claims, pointing to the ongoing challenges of safely storing the massive amounts of contaminated water at the plant and the possible risks of future earthquakes and natural disasters. There are also concerns over the long-term effects of radiation exposure on the health of workers and local residents. Nevertheless, TEPCO's announcement is a positive development in what has been a long and difficult journey for Japan and the global nuclear industry. As the world moves towards a cleaner and more sustainable future, the Fukushima crisis serves as a stark reminder of the dangers and costs of our reliance on nuclear power.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Many people know, but want it to change, and believe that an abundance of oil will lead to complacency in terms of finding a replacement, at the expense of the future. Historically, we have seen governments who have run down their energy resources (and in some cases, national wealth) and not managed to replace them. And so, the government cannot take the risk of not replacing our oil, and the people are not prepared to support it. So we have an unholy trinity, where the oil companies have been able to corner the market and the people are not willing to pay for a solution, and the government is apathetic to changing the system. What's interesting is that this can change very quickly. If the price of oil goes up significantly, the government will be forced to take action, and the oil companies will have to pay for a solution. The situation is similar to the UK during the 1970s and 1980s, where the government wanted to find a solution to the problem of peak oil, but the oil companies wouldn't allow it, and they were simply too powerful. However, once the price of oil went up, the oil companies had to pay for a solution, and they started the process of changing their practices. It's interesting to see what happens when the government and the people decide to take action. We are already seeing it happen in the UK. They are allowing fracking for shale gas, and that will lead to more affordable energy in the future. In the US, they are just about to allow fracking for shale oil, which will also help them to get cheaper energy. I think that will also be a big step towards energy independence, and will eventually help the US to become energy independent. The US will still have to replace its oil, but they are on the way to replacing it. It's just a matter of time. I think that the situation is similar in Australia. There are also countries that have huge oil reserves, and they are on the way to becoming energy independent. These are countries like Venezuela, Nigeria, and Russia. The big difference between these countries and the US and the UK is that they have not made the transition yet, and are struggling to find an energy solution. So, the situation is a bit different, but the same principles apply. If you are a government and you want to be energy independent, you need to start with replacing oil. This will cost money, and you will need to raise taxes and make the people pay for it. This is a big problem for governments, but if the people want the government to solve the problem, they will have to support it. And the situation will change. There is a lot of opposition to replacing oil, but it will happen. If you look at the UK, it's already happening. It will take a few years, but in a few years time, the UK will be able to become energy independent. So, we will have to take a look at how to replace oil in the future. What's interesting is that we have not done this yet, but if we take a look at the past, we can see that we have not always been able to replace oil. However, it has been possible to replace oil in some cases, and we have done it. The most obvious example is the US during the 1970s and 1980s. But we also see that countries like the UK and the Netherlands were able to do it. And if you look at the past, you can see that there are some countries that have already done it, and have been able to become energy independent. The most obvious example is the US during the 1970s and 1980s. But we also see that countries like the UK and the Netherlands were able to do it. And if you look at the past, you can see that there are some countries that have already done it, and have been able to become energy independent. In the UK, they were able to do it in the 1970s, and it was very similar to what we are seeing in Australia. In the UK, there was a massive shift to wind and solar, and this allowed them to become energy independent. In the US, they were able to do it in the 1970s and 1980s, but not in the 1990s, when the oil price started to fall. The government didn't take the steps to make sure that they could replace oil. And the UK government has made some mistakes, and they have been trying to replace oil for the last 30 years, but have not managed to do it. So, the UK government has been looking at a very different energy future than the US government, and they have been taking different actions.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I can't get enough of Courtney! She’s hands down the BEST hairstylist I’ve ever had. What makes her so amazing is her knack for knowing exactly what suits me, plus she totally respects my style limits. Every time I walk into the salon, I just let her work her magic. No specific requests, just pure trust in her talent. And every single time, I leave completely wowed by her work! You know you've found a gem of a stylist when they can see what needs to be done without you saying a word. She's not just an incredible stylist—she's got a fantastic personality and a wealth of knowledge, too. If you want to look and feel your absolute best, I can’t recommend Courtney highly enough!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: During the Civil War in America, one of the most important tools for documenting the battles and their aftermath was photography. Many photographers, both Union and Confederate, traveled with the troops to capture images of the action and the devastation left in its wake. One of these photographers was a man named James, who had a talent for capturing the raw emotion of the war. James had been a photographer for many years before the war began, but he knew that this was an opportunity he could not miss. He joined the Union army and traveled with them, photographing everything he saw. He captured images of soldiers marching, cannons firing, and bodies lying on the ground. His photos were not always easy to look at, but they showed the stark reality of the war. As the war dragged on, James became more and more disillusioned with it. He had seen too much death and destruction to believe that there could ever be a true victory on either side. But he continued to take photographs, hoping that they would at least provide some small measure of understanding to those who were not there. One day, James was captured by Confederate soldiers. They were suspicious of him and his camera, seeing him as a spy rather than a photographer. But James pleaded with them, showing them his pictures and explaining that he was simply trying to document the war. After much discussion, the Confederates released him, though they held onto his camera and many of his photos. After the war was over, James tried to recover his camera and his photographs from the Confederates, but he was never able to find them. It was a bitter disappointment for him, as those pictures represented so much of his life's work. But despite this setback, James continued to take pictures for many years, capturing the beauty and the struggles of life in a different era. Today, many of James's photos can still be found in museums and archives around the country. They are a reminder of the power of photography to capture history and to convey the emotions of the people who lived through it. And they are a testament to the bravery of photographers like James, who risked their lives to bring the truth of war to the world.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Master of Public Health degrees generally fall into two categories: those that focus more on understanding epidemiology and statistics as the scientific foundation of public health practice, and those that encompass a broader range of methodologies.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Oh, I'm a good man. I mean, what's immortality without humanity? I've worked so hard to preserve that. I have children, you know. Tiny little children, mothered by hundreds and thousands of women. I can love. I've held each and every single one. I've watched them crown, bloody and triumphant. I've held them, with their tiny perfect hands and their tiny perfect smiles. I sing to each and every one. See? Humanity. I don't think I'm a bad man. I've never enjoyed that one death a year. Killing is no fun, it's a chore. I take the people and I cage them. Not for long; six months or so. To me it's a blink of an eye. Like I said, little dog cage. In the basement. That's where the killing happens. It's like being matured in a cellar, like a ham or cheese or wine. By the time the date comes around, they are ready to die. I retrieve them from the cage, I ask my lover to wait upstairs. Killing is the most private thing a man can do. I lay them out on an ice-cold table, and I beg for forgiveness. I am a good man. I give them their last rites; I close their eyes softly, then I place the tip of a silver knife at the corner of their jaw and their throat and I open them as softly and smoothly as butter. The table is cleaned; the knife is disposed of. I don't know what happens to the bodies. Once there is no life left in them, it is no longer my duty to care. Life is intoxicating. This year it is a woman. I have been readying myself for her death for quite some time. A chore, not a pleasure. She cried at the beginning of her imprisonment. They always do, but soon they realise I am merciful; I give them good deaths. This one is older; closer to fifty. She was attractive once, and her skin is still firm. Lean muscles mark her arms, grey hairs are few and far between, but her skin is sun browned. She has freckles and wrinkles in equal measure. I imagine she is beautiful when she smiles. I pull her from the cage and bid her lie down on the table. She shivers involuntarily as her back comes into contact with the surface. She already knew it for what it was: her deathbed. \"Would you like me to say your last rites?\" I ask her. \"What religion are you. I cater for them all.\" I gesture at the bookshelf in the corner of the killing room, where I keep every holy book I can get my hands on. She turns to look at them and shakes her head, tears beginning to appear at the corner of her blue eyes. \"No verses,\" she says. \"Can you sing me a song?\" I am bemused by the request, but I accept. A man's last wish is sacred. \"What would you like me to sing?\" I ask her. \"Scarborough Fair. You used to sing it to me, before I went to sleep. It'd be nice to hear it again.\" I am a good man. I have had children. I sing her the song, I open her throat. Humanity, see?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: def do_algebra(operator, operand):\n \"\"\"\n Given two lists: 'operator' and 'operand'. The 'operator' list contains basic algebraic operations,\n and the 'operand' list contains integers. Construct a mathematical expression using the two lists\n and return the result.\n\n The basic algebraic operations are:\n - Addition ( + ) \n - Subtraction ( - ) \n - Multiplication ( * ) \n - Floor division ( // ) \n - Exponentiation ( ** ) \n\n Example:\n operator = ['+', '*', '-']\n operand = [2, 3, 4, 5]\n expression = 2 + 3 * 4 - 5\n => result = 9\n\n Note:\n The length of the 'operator' list is one less than the length of the 'operand' list.\n Operands are non-negative integers.\n The 'operator' list contains at least one operator, and the 'operand' list contains at least two operands.\n\n \"\"\"\n expression = str(operand[0])\n for opr, opd in zip(operator, operand[1:]):\n expression += opr + str(opd)\n return eval(expression)",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: [ Wp ] Mulder and Scully stumble onto the grounds of Hogwarts; the only problem is Scully does not see everything Mulder does.... \"What are we even doing in Britain, Mulder? We work for the FBI, not Interpol.\" \"Scully, you know what I've been finding out about the depth of the U.S. government conspiracy. I just wanted to get away from it all for a bit. Though not away from work: I've heard about some interesting cryptid sightings in this area.\" \"What's a cryptid?\" \"For someone who spends your time investigating unexplained phenomena, you're *really* behind on the terminology. A cryptid is a creature of which sightings have been reported, but there's been no conclusive evidence. Like Bigfoot.\" \"So basically something that doesn't exist?\" \"Scully, you've seen the evidence of supernatural creatures hundreds, thousands of times. You don't have faith in science; you have faith in skepticism.\" \"Whatever, Mulder. So which cryptid are we trying to find?\" \"We're in Scotland.\" \"Seriously, Mulder? The Loch Ness monster? Didn't someone admit to faking those photos?\" \"You don't know what kind of pressure the goverment put on him to make him admit that.\" \"Anyway, we seem to have gone astray. I'm pretty sure that this lake is not Loch Ness.\" \"Then what's that thing?\" \"What thing? Holy shit, Mulder, is that a giant tentacle? I'm pretty sure that the Loch Ness monster doesn't have tentacles...\" \"It kind of looks like it might be part of a giant squid.\" \"Giant squids live in the ocean. Not in lakes, especially fresh water ones.\" \"Either way, you have to admit that it's evidence that something weird's afoot, Scully. I don't know what yet. Maybe there's been nuclear dumping causing mutation of all creatures in the lake. Or maybe it's a creature from another world.\" \"That seems like a bit of a leap from one tentacle.\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: While most of the competition rules for athletics at Paris 2024 remain the same as previous Olympic Games, one new addition are the repechage rounds' that will be introduced for all individual track events from 200m to 1500m, including hurdles.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: It's like trying to fix a leaky roof by only focusing on the drips instead of fixing the whole roof itself. That's basically what's been happening with healthcare in the US. We spend tons of money on treating people when they're already sick, but not nearly enough on preventing those illnesses in the first place.\n\nExperts have been warning about this for years, saying we're neglecting the things that could really make a difference for everyone's health, like programs to keep our communities healthy and prevent diseases from spreading. It's like having a tiny Band-Aid for a big wound. \n\nThe COVID-19 pandemic really showed how important public health is and how much we've been taking it for granted. It exposed the cracks in our system and made it clear that we need to invest more in protecting everyone's health, not just reacting when things go wrong. \n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Microsoft is working on a new version of its Edge browser that is based on Chromium. Many of the design features are still similar to the current Edge browser, but some changes will be familiar to Chrome users. Bing is integrated into the browser, and a new tab will open into a personalized news feed powered by Microsoft News, with Bing's image of the day as the background. While existing Chrome Web Store extensions are compatible with the new Edge browser (after changing a setting), Microsoft will maintain their own extension store for the new Edge. A gallery of screenshots is available that showcases the new Edge browser.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Nothing has ever worked out the way I planned it. I gave up on planning. I have lived too many years over and over again and I know now that I am never going to get the things I want. So I don't care what they want, I don't care what I want, I just care what happens. I just care about living. And if it turns out to be nothing I am still living. You have to live. You have to live, because there is nothing else you can do. You can't plan your life. You can't plan your life. I never planned my life. You can't plan your life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life. I never planned my life.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We consider the problem of reconstructing a rank-one matrix from a revealed subset of its entries when some of the revealed entries are corrupted with perturbations that are unknown and random. This problem arises in various applications, such as in low-rank matrix completion and collaborative filtering. To address this problem, one approach is to use convex optimization techniques, such as nuclear-norm minimization or matrix factorization. These methods aim to minimize the difference between the observed and reconstructed entries, subject to some constraints on the rank of the reconstructed matrix. Another approach is to use probabilistic models, such as the matrix completion Gaussian process (MCGP) or the Bayesian low-rank matrix completion model. These models typically assume a prior distribution over the unknown entries and use Bayesian inference to estimate the parameters of the model and reconstruct the matrix. Overall, the choice of method depends on the specific application and the available resources for computation and data acquisition.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Great finds and wonderful staff! LOVE our finds and will definitely be back!!!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We got here before opening (they open an hour after the preserve opens) and were completely ignored by several people who walked past us. Wolfgang, here's some helpful tips to ensure that you are not ignored in the future: 1. Arrive at the opening time or a few minutes before, so that you are not there for too long before staff begins to arrive. 2. Stand in a clearly visible location that is not obstructing any pathways or entrances. 3. Make eye contact with staff members who walk by, smile and wave to get their attention. 4. If you are not acknowledged after a few minutes, politely approach a staff member and ask for assistance. 5. Be patient and courteous - staff may be busy with other tasks or dealing with other visitors. Remember, being friendly and respectful can go a long way in gaining the attention and assistance of staff members.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I have loved this place for a long time. It troubles me that people write such negative things in their reviews. Hi, it costs money to have a credit card on file and if you don't use the feature then they charge your account each month (a minimum of 1). I was just trying out all these different apps related with my phone number so i can see which one is best but after reading the review about how fb messenger spy tool has helped him more than he ever expected...i decided not to waste any more time go ahead with it immediately! Spy-on sms text messages from google play store Tired Of Being Told What To Do? You Can Now Spy On Your Husband The Right Way With This Awesome Mobile Phone App And Still Keep Him Happy! If you want complete cell monitoring capability in an Android app without having to root or jailbreak your device, Google's new Device Policy Manager may be exactly what you need. Download Mobistealth - Tracking Software For Cell Phones Free. Installing software onto someone else's computer without permission could easily become illegal, however; there are ways around this issue by using passwords rather than physical access.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I like Newk's! No, I really like Newk's!! I'm thrilled to know that there is a location uptown and I've been there several times recently for lunch, now that I know it's there!! So, Newks has some great sandwiches. Indeed. I've had the Newk's Q, the Roast Beef, and the Pimiento Cheese (with homemade pimiento cheese and really hard to beat!). But, I'm in a reducing mode at the moment (way too many calories consumed in San Francisco!!) so I've been leaning toward salads and soups. They have a different selection of soups every day and I've had several of them! My favorite is still the Fire Roasted Tomato! But just check out the list; you're bound to find one that sings for you!! I tried the Garden Vegetable Soup today, and was very pleased! It tasted great and check out the nutrition chart - only 80 calories per 8 oz serving! Win!! So, with the Half Soup and Half Salad deal (I selected the Caesar Salad), I had a low cal, tasty and very filling meal!! They have several (Count'em - 10!!!) menu salads,each with it's own personality and taste combination. And if you just can't find what you want on the list, order your own salad combination! My wife likes the pizza (and sometimes I'll have a slice too!). Her favorite, and mine too, is the Spicy Chicken. Now the pizza isn't going to help your calorie count if you sit there and eat the whole thing, so share it!! I think this is probably one of my favorite restaurants in Charlotte! And fortunately for me, there are locations near my house, and downtown where I work! I'll see you there!!!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: It's my view that people that drive motorcylces and cars with those loud mufflers are simply inconsiderate in that they don't care about other's peace and quiet. I've always found them annoying, say you're reading or studying at a cafe and they roar by louder than an invading Mongolian horde. God forbid they stop at a light since now you're stuck listening to that ungodly chortle for a good minute or so. I'm a single parent now and live by a fairly well travelled road. They wake my baby up consistently, and he has a hard time with his sleeping habits. It's a choice to make your vehicle that loud, not a necessity. On top of that, the rider or driver does not have to hear his most of his own racket since most of the sound is projected backwards. These people are assholes. I wish I could wake them up every 15 minutes with their own stupid vehicle. EDIT: I had no idea this post would get this big and, as much as I'd like to, I can't possibly hope to discuss this with all of you. Thank you to everyone, on both sides of the issue, for your reasoned and very interesting replies. The argument that got me closest to changing my view was surely that of safety. Other people are saying being loud is not as important for safety as actually driving well on a motorcycle, and this seems to be coming from cyclists as well, so unless I see some sort of peer reviewed study over anecdotal evidence that line of thinking isn't doing it for me. My favorite arguments were those along the lines of \"It's a free country, you're the one that's being inconsiderate by expecting the riders to be silent.\" The image of some tatted up Hell's Angel roaring through town and impinging on the hearing of 500 people and then screaming \"IM BEING OPPRESSED\" when someone suggests he tones down the throttle is simply delicious. A special thank you to everyone who called me a pussy via PM. It's good to know you care so much. I also learned that the sound that irritates so many of us so well is the sound of straight pipe exhausts. Cheers all! EDIT 2: uToastitoTheBandito did manage to change my view on this. [Here is the link to his comment] Thank you Toastito, and thank you for being considerate to others. Just a caveat here, there's a few comments in this thread that highlight the problem with some drivers very well. I'm not gonna call anyone out by name but the gist is that I'm annoyed over a minor inconvenience and I should get over it, people like driving loud cars and they're gonna keep doing it. I don't think any new parent would call it a minor inconvenience after spending 30 minutes putting a baby to sleep only to be woken up 5 minutes into his nap by a purposely loud vehicle. But this post isn't JUST about me, or my baby. These drivers drive past countless people. People who are gravely ill. People who own dogs that will shit on the carpet because they're scared of the sound. Nursing homes. Someone with a migraine headache. People who work the night shift. And all these little acts, each one is a little fuck you from the driver. And all these little fuck yous add up to one huge mega fuck you to your community. People with empathy get mad at this not just because it inconveniences them but because they know it inconveniences many others as well and the act is seen as grossly disrespectful because of that. One PM I got said: I drive a loud car. Why? Because I like it. He doesn't take the time to think, \"How will my actions affect those around me? Is there any chance the thing I am about to do will harm someone, and, if that is the case, should I still do the thing?\" No, this person doesn't give a shit. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the very essence of being inconsiderate. andanasshole",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Since 7500 yr ago, a situation with tides and currents, very similar to present has existed. Rates of sea-level rise had dropped so far, that natural sedimentation by the Rhine and Danube rivers was able to keep pace at rates equivalent to today's.\" Referring also to Water Quality in Coastal Waters: Report on an Observational Study (U.S.) \"In 2003, IOM scientists published one such review for Florida Bay... The authors concluded,\" A number of explanations exist for declining water quality within most coastal waterways since 1950. These include increasing population growth along coastlines; increased land development which alters hydrologic processes; increased human consumption from wells or other nonpoint sources...\" \"The first report states as follows:\" Since 1850 this portion [of Lake Huron] is estimated to have lost more than 11 feet of elevation due solely to increases in precipitation... Most experts agree that anthropogenic causes are largely responsible for fluctuations in lake level over recent decades...\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Okay, so picture this: I'm watching \"Loaded,\" but I'm not really *watching* watching. More like fast-forwarding through most of it, just trying to get a sense of the story. And honestly? It was kinda boring. Plus, some parts didn't even make sense.\n\nThe only reason I even bothered was because Chace Crawford was in it! He's totally dreamy, even though his hair was a little weird in this one. But hey, even with weird hair, he's still Chace Crawford! \n\nSadly, even Chace's hotness couldn't save this movie. The plot itself wasn't terrible, but the constant cussing drove me nuts! It was like they couldn't say a single sentence without dropping the F-bomb. Seriously, is it that hard to be angry without swearing every other word?\n\nAnd the whole \"flashy camera, shaky camera\" thing gave me a headache. It was way too over-the-top.\n\nSo, yeah, skip this one unless you're obsessed with one of the actors. Speaking of which, the entire cast was pretty good-looking, especially the girls! But let's be real, Chace is the main attraction here! \n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Caffeine is a stimulant that makes it difficult to sleep, and going to bed on a full stomach can be uncomfortable because of acid build up. Eating and drinking right is the first step towards bedtime.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Hm, alright...so, while everyone headed off to Germany, which is a bit of a bummer, I've been keeping myself super busy! It's been fantastic! I'm still in touch with Chris and Kelly, and all, but I've also been spending time with my other friends here. Just yesterday, I hit the pool in the middle of the day, and guess what? No sunburn! Well, except for a small spot on my face where I probably missed with the sunscreen, but still! I was thrilled and had a blast! Later, I went to Kathryn's place with Joanne and Kathryn, and we just chilled. It's a bit odd just hanging out with the two of them. Oh well. Then, I had a sleepover at Joanne's last night, which was really fun. Surprisingly, I got a decent amount of sleep, although it wasn't the best sleep since sleeping on the floor is quite painful. Hmmm, we watched The Princess Bride! I'd never seen it before and it was absolutely great! YaY! It was a lot of fun! Also, haha, Joanne can't stand not knowing something. It was hilarious. Kathryn mentioned something that we couldn't tell Joanne, and it drove her wild not knowing. Usually, she's in the loop about everything, so this one secret really got to her. Good times. So today, I've been busy with cleaning and other stuff. Tonight, I'm heading out with Katharine, Diane, and maybe Steve and Jeff. It should be super exciting! :) I must wrap this up. I have quite a bit to do actually.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: This function takes a string of words separated by commas or spaces and returns a list of individual words. Here's how it works:\n\n* **Handle empty strings:** If the input string is empty, return an empty list.\n* **Replace commas with spaces:** Iterate through the string and replace all commas with spaces.\n* **Join the characters:** Concatenate the characters (now with spaces instead of commas) back into a single string.\n* **Split into words:** Split the string at the spaces to create a list of individual words.\n* **Return the word list:** Return the resulting list of words. \n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Thousands of furry insects with wingspans reaching up to 16cm (6in) dramatically disrupted a semi-finals match at the Darul Makmur Stadium last week. Just last month, over 800 of these captivating creatures were spotted in neighboring Singapore, igniting a flurry of online discussion. Known as the Lyssa Zampa tropical moth or the Laos brown butterfly, these mesmerising insects are native to South East Asia. \n\nBiology lecturer N Sivasothi noted that while the recent influx of moths seems extraordinary, it's not entirely unusual. \"These moths are present at other times of the year but in very small numbers, so they usually go unnoticed,\" he explained, adding that they generally emerge in greater numbers between April and August. \n\nEcologist Anuj Jain pointed out that these moths navigate by light, often leading them to urban areas. \"Their search for new, uneaten host plants draws them toward the lights of cities,\" he said. Despite their sudden appearance, experts assured that these nocturnal visitors pose no threat. \"People with asthma may be sensitive to the hairs on their wings, but they are otherwise harmless,\" said Lena Chan, Director of the National Biodiversity Centre at Singapore’s National Parks Board. \"There is no need for concern—they don’t cause allergies or diseases and are actually vital pollinators.\"\n\nThe internet buzzed with Malaysians and Singaporeans sharing their moth encounters and uploading stunning photographs of these winged wonders. While many welcomed their arrival, others approached with caution. \"In China, moths are seen as symbols of death, representing the souls of the deceased,\" explained Chinese astrologer Cindy Wu. \"It is considered a serious taboo to kill or disturb them.\"\n\nWhether viewed as enchanting pollinators or ominous omens, these moths have certainly captivated the region’s attention.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The number of people claiming Jobseeker's Allowance in July fell more sharply, down by 29,000 to 1.4 million. The unemployment rate remains at 7.8, still well above the 7 rate target set by the Bank of England. The Bank's governor, Mark Carney, says interest rates are unlikely to rise before that target is reached. The ONS said the figures meant unemployment was \"broadly unchanged\" from the first three months of the year. The number of people in work increased by 69,000 in the three months to June, up to 29.78 million. That is the highest level since records began in 1971. That means 307,000 more people are in employment in the UK, compared with the same time last year. Latest unemployment figures across the UK The ONS's David Freeman said two-thirds of this increase had been seen in UK nationals. A third of the employment increase came from non-UK nationals working in the UK. Suddenly everyone is watching out for the unemployment rate. That's because the Bank of England governor, Mark Carney, has said future interest rate rises will not start until, barring unexpected events, the rate falls to 7 of the workforce. The latest figures, the first since the Bank's forward guidance announcement, showed the rate was unchanged at 7.8. Yet the figures also showed the number in work was at a record high. And therein lies a problem for the Bank. The economy is creating jobs but the workforce is growing. So there may be solid economic growth over the next couple of years, but the unemployment rate still takes a while to come down. And during that time, inflation alarm bells may start to ring. Analysts said the figures portrayed a mixed picture of the UK jobs market. \"Despite some good news in the latest jobs figures there are worrying signs about the underlying state of the UK jobs market,\" said John Philpott, from the think tank, The Jobs Economist. \"The rise in employment is almost matched by an increase in the size of the workforce, which means the unemployment rate is unchanged at 7.8. \"The headline jobs figures may continue to be broadly positive but one only has to dig a little deeper into the statistics to see that millions of people are continuing to be hit by a combination of lack of jobs and a ceaseless sharp fall in the real value of their pay.\" Youth unemployment, among those aged 16-24, increased by 15,000 to reach 973,000. The number of people out of work for more than two years also rose by 10,000 to 474,000, the highest number in 16 years. The ONS also released figures showing that wages grew by 1.1 over the past 12 months. When bonuses were included, wages grew by 2.1 - the highest annual growth rate since June 2011. The small fall in unemployment comes a week after Mr Carney linked the Bank of England's interest rate policy decisions to the unemployment rate for the first time. He said the MPC will not consider raising interest rates until the unemployment rate falls below 7, which he predicted would take about three years and the creation of 750,000 jobs. Work and Pensions minister Steve Webb told the BBC that \"things were starting to look much more positive.\" He said the jobs figures added to a general picture of an economy that was starting to pick up. But Labour's shadow employment minister, Stephen Timms, said the reality was that for ordinary families things were getting \"harder not easier,\" highlighting the rise in part-time workers. \"Ministers just sound out of touch when they ignore the fact that the number of people who are working part-time because they cannot find a full-time job is at record levels,\" he said.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: For this plan to be successful, you’ll need an investment that guarantees no loss, such as money market accounts or short-term Treasury bills. Additionally, it's crucial to diligently meet every payment deadline, as even one missed payment could erase several months' worth of gains. Lastly, keep in mind that maxing out your credit can negatively impact your credit score.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Nate was 14 and lived in a rural area. He was desperate for a job so he could begin saving for college. Finally he found an old farmer who needed help with the haying. The farmer said he would pay Nate 50 for the summer. Nate was thrilled. He thought he could save up enough money to go to college. After the first week, the farmer stopped by and told Nate that he needed to do some more work. Nate said he would do it right away. The next day, the farmer stopped by again. He told Nate he had to do some more work. The next day, the farmer came back and told Nate he had to do some more work. He kept coming back every day and telling Nate he had to do some more work. The farmer kept saying that he needed Nate to do more and more work until Nate was exhausted. The farmer kept paying him 50 a week for the summer and told Nate he could have the job. Nate didn't have any more money. He could barely afford to buy food. Nate asked the farmer why he kept paying him 50 a week for the summer. The farmer told Nate that he was doing it to teach him a lesson. The farmer said that he was just too lazy to get the job done himself and needed someone to do it for him. The farmer told Nate that if he wanted to be paid 50 a week, he had to do all the work himself. That was a tough lesson for Nate to learn. It took him a long time to save up enough money for college. The farmer wanted to teach him a lesson about working hard. He wanted to make sure that Nate never became lazy.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: You can also unplug devices that are not in use to ensure that they do not waste energy, which will help you lower your electricity bills in the summer.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We give a new bound on the parameter $\\lambda$ (number of common neighbors of a pair of adjacent vertices) in a distance-regular graph $G$, improving and generalizing bounds for strongly regular graphs by Spielman (1996) and Pyber (2014). The new bound is one of the ingredients of recent progress on the complexity of testing isomorphism of strongly regular graphs (Babai, Chen, Sun, Teng, Wilmes 2013). The proof is based on a clique geometry found by Metsch (1991) under certain constraints on the parameters. We also give a simplified proof of the following asymptotic consequence of Metsch's result: if $k\\mu = o(\\lambda^2)$ then each edge of $G$ belongs to a unique maximal clique of size asymptotically equal to $\\lambda$, and all other cliques have size $o(\\lambda)$. Here $k$ denotes the degree and $\\mu$ the number of common neighbors of a pair of vertices at distance 2. We point out that Metsch's cliques are \"asymptotically Delsarte\" when $k\\mu = o(\\lambda^2)$, so families of distance-regular graphs with parameters satisfying $k\\mu = o(\\lambda^2)$ are \"asymptotically Delsarte-geometric.\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: While the Commission has a monopoly on initiating legislation, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union have powers of amendment and veto during the legislative process. According to the EU's legislative procedures, the Commission proposes legislative initiatives and drafts laws, which are then debated and amended by the Parliament and the Council. The Parliament has the power to amend or reject the proposal, and the Council can also suggest changes or reject the proposal. If agreement cannot be reached, a conciliation process between the Parliament and Council is triggered, and the final draft must be approved by both institutions before becoming law. Therefore, although the Commission has the initial monopoly on initiating legislation, the Parliament and Council have significant powers of review and amendment throughout the legislative process.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We study multi-player turn-based games played on (potentially infinite) directed graphs. An outcome is assigned to every play of the game. Each player has a preference relation on the set of outcomes, indicating their preferred outcomes. A solution concept for such games is a set of outcomes that are considered reasonable or satisfactory according to certain criteria. One popular solution concept is the notion of a \"Nash equilibrium.\" In a Nash equilibrium, no player has an incentive to unilaterally deviate from their chosen strategy, given the strategies of the other players. Another solution concept is the \"core.\" In the core, no subset of players can benefit by forming a coalition and deviating from their chosen strategies. There are also other solution concepts, such as the \"Shapley value,\" which assigns a particular weighting to each player based on their marginal contribution to the outcome. The solution concept chosen for a particular game depends on the particular properties and goals of that game.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We're proud to integrate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors into our investment approach, demonstrating our commitment to responsible and sustainable investing. \n\nWhile we haven't yet observed any direct impacts of climate change on mortality or morbidity trends that require specific management actions, we remain vigilant in monitoring these factors. \n\nOur approach to climate risk management is holistic, encompassing all aspects of our business and geographic footprint. We believe that a comprehensive approach is essential for effectively addressing the multifaceted challenges presented by climate change. \n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Rank aggregation is an essential approach for aggregating the preferences of multiple agents. One rule of particular interest is the Kemeny rule, which maximises the number of pairwise agreements between the final ranking and the existing rankings. However, Kemeny rankings are NP-hard to compute. This has resulted in the development of various algorithms. Fortunately, NP-hardness may not reflect the difficulty of solving problems that arise in practice. As a result, we aim to demonstrate that the Kemeny consensus can be computed efficiently when aggregating different rankings in real case. In this paper, we extend a dynamic programming algorithm originally for Kemeny scores. We also provide details on the implementation of the algorithm. Finally, we present results obtained from an empirical comparison of our algorithm and two other popular algorithms based on real world and randomly generated problem instances. Experimental results show the usefulness and efficiency of the algorithm in practical settings.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: In A. 598 (1935), this Court determined that a graduated income tax violated the Uniformity Clause. The statute in question taxed income below $5,000 at 2%, income between $5,000 and $10,000 at 2.5%, and income from $10,000 to $25,000 at 3%. The Kelley Court stated that the tax was non-uniform because it taxed those with incomes above a certain threshold simply because the Legislature deemed their incomes sufficiently high for taxation. Id. at 602. Based on Kelley, we later invalidated a city ordinance that imposed a tax on \"every individual engaged in an occupation . . . whose gross earnings would amount to $600 or more during the year\" in Saulsbury v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 413 Pa. 316, 196 A.2d 664 (1964) (<HOLDING>). More recently, in Amidon, supra, this Court",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The broad field of animal communication encompasses most of the issues in ethology. Animal communication can be defined as any behavior of one animal that affects the current or future behavior of another animal. The study of animal communication, called zoo semiotics (distinguishable from anthroposemiotics, the study of human communication) has played an important part in the development of ethology, sociobiology, and the study of animal cognition. Animal communication, and indeed the understanding of the animal world in general, is a rapidly growing field, and even in the 21st century so far, a great share of prior understanding related to diverse fields such as personal symbolic name use, animal emotions, animal culture and learning, and even sexual conduct, long thought to be well understood, has been revolutionized. A special field of animal communication has been investigated in more detail such as vibrational communication.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Bob had never owned a computer before. He had always been hesitant to enter the digital world, preferring pen and paper over screens and keyboards. But as he looked around at his friends and family, he realized he was missing out on a lot. From social media to online shopping and even video calls with loved ones far away, there were so many things he was unable to experience. So, one day, Bob made the decision to buy his first computer. He researched online and asked his friends for advice, finally selecting a simple but reliable model. When it arrived, he stared at the box for a good five minutes before finally opening it up and taking out the computer. At the beginning, Bob was intimidated by the computer. He had read articles about cyber attacks and phishing scams and was afraid to plug it in. But eventually, he gained the courage to set it up and turn it on. He was immediately overwhelmed by the number of icons on the screen and didn't know where to start. But he quickly began to learn how to use the computer, slowly getting used to the keyboard and the mouse. Soon, Bob discovered that he could access an endless amount of information and entertainment with just a few clicks. He used the computer to pay bills, send emails, and even connect with old friends on social media. Bob was thrilled with his new computer and couldn't imagine going back to his old ways. He had opened up a whole new world for himself and was grateful for technology that had made it possible. In the end, Bob's first computer became more than just a tool; it became a gateway to a world full of possibilities. And he cherished it for helping him break out of his comfort zone and embrace the digital age.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Imagine two light bulbs, burning bright – one in the heart of New York City, the other nestled in the evergreen landscapes of Washington state. Now, picture this: the New York bulb is sucking down electricity at twice the cost! \n\nWhy the shocking difference? While natural factors like power generation and transmission costs play a role, the real culprit might be lurking in the shadows – the heavy hand of taxes and regulations. \n\nIt's a tale of two energy markets, where one state's residents are paying a premium for their electricity, weighed down by bureaucratic burdens and a complex regulatory landscape. The other state, meanwhile, enjoys a more affordable energy environment, allowing its citizens to keep more of their hard-earned dollars. \n\n\n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Hywel Dda University Health Board wants to reduce the hours of the paediatric ambulatory care unit (PACU) at Withybush Hospital by four hours a day. It is making a recommendation in response to there being \"fewer consultant paediatricians available.\" The plans will be discussed at a full health board meeting on 24 November. The PACU cares for children who experience sudden pain, high temperatures, sickness, infections, or requirements for dressings, blood tests, x-rays or scans. If the recommendation is accepted, it would mean the PACU would be open daily from 10:00 to 1800 GMT instead of 10:00 to 22:00. Sick children who require assessment after the new closing time would be referred or transferred by ambulance to Glangwili Hospital in Carmarthen. The health board said the move to reduce hours in the short term was the result of \"longstanding difficulties in recruiting paediatric consultants across the UK\". This coincided with the retirement of a Pembrokeshire paediatric consultant and the maternity leave of another. The health board said to do nothing would be a \"risk.\" There is also a recommendation to merge the on-call rota with the one operating in Carmarthenshire. This means that if there was a paediatric out-of-hours emergency at Withybush Hospital, the on-call paediatric consultants would offer remote advice. The health board's chief executive Steve Moore said: \"It is our duty to be realistic about the availability of our consultants and to plan care around this so that it is safe, consistent and to avoid public confusion. \"Otherwise, we risk the event of having insufficient staff and having to close the unit in an unplanned and uncoordinated way, risking patient safety and public confidence.\" He added that the health board's recruitment efforts are continuing.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Here's the key takeaway: Even in patients with mild to moderate diabetes, PET scans maintain their accuracy for detecting cervical cancer. This finding underscores the reliability of PET imaging in this patient population and supports its continued use for accurate diagnosis and staging. \n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I didn't sleep last night, but it's no big deal. I'm not visiting Joanne's tomorrow, but don't worry—we will watch it sometime. We've scheduled it for July 9th. It might happen later rather than sooner, but it will definitely happen.\n\nRight now, I'm chatting with someone who seems pretty cool. That's all I'll say about that. Haha. I'm going to finish my conversations and maybe read a bit since I'm not really tired.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Where is John? I can't find him anywhere.\nHaven't you heard that he is in prison?\nWhat? Excuse me?\nJohn is in prison now. He was caught stealing.\nI just can't believe my ears!",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: “All 9 crew members secure on board,” the intercom announced. But weren't there supposed to be just 8 crew members? \n\n“Nine? Did she just say nine?” Duncan questioned.\n\n“Yeah, nine. Just like when we left Earth. You, me, Travis, Jill, Cyborg FDR, Amish Caligula, Rainbow Brite, Teddy Fish, and Mr. Poopybutthole,” Mary responded from the acceleration couch beside Duncan.\n\n“Oh yeah, I guess that is nine. It's just - I thought it was supposed to be eight?” Duncan scratched his chin thoughtfully.\n\n“Oh Duncan,” Amish Caligula chimed in, “you always had trouble with numbers. Remember third grade?”\n\nDuncan recalled Mrs. Martin’s classroom in Topeka, struggling with multiplication tables until Calamari Jenkins, CJ, began tutoring him every night until he could pass his math tests. \n\n“That’s right, Duncan,” CJ said, emerging from the cargo hold. “And I've been helping you ever since. Remember when we fought The Mathemagician in Laos?”\n\n“Boy, you sure gave me a good shellacking!” The Mathemagician added.\n\n“Yeah, I guess I did.” Duncan replied, unsure.\n\n“What about the time your stuffed rabbit butler, Mr. Velvet Ears, tried to have you arrested on customs fees fraud because you didn't declare that candy you brought back from Europe?” Cyborg FDR questioned. “Roy the customs agent was furious that day.”\n\n“I sure was, Cyborg FDR,” said Roy the customs agent. “But we worked through it, Duncan. We're family. Just like Dirt Reynolds, Lard Lad, Green Winter, and all the rest. We joined this mission because we care.”\n\n“Did all of you go down to that last planet with us?” Duncan asked.\n\n“Of course they did,” Mary replied before anyone else could.\n\nSuddenly, a tiny alert flashed on the console: BIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION. Mr. Velvet Ears quietly turned it off.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Culture runs deep and exists on many levels. Edgar Schein came up with the idea of ‘levels of organizational culture,’ and Edward Granter expanded on it. They break culture down into four layers: super-structural, symbolic, discursive, and cognitive (Granter, 2019). This basically means that a company’s culture is shaped by outside economic and social influences, visual elements like logos, stories and events, the values the organization openly expresses, and the underlying assumptions people make. \n\nIn this paper, we’re looking at the culture levels at Macomb Community College. When it comes to visible artifacts, you can see MCC promotes focus, attention to detail, and responsibility—just check out their logo. The architecture, with modern high-tech chrome structures, suggests that technology and science are key areas of focus. But the older central building and the peaceful park with large trees give off a vibe that supports studying fine arts and social sciences. \n\nThere’s a strong culture of mutual help and respect at MCC, which you can see in the developed bus routes for students. On the value level, plenty of signs around the college, like those in the parking lot and library, hint at a love for order and organization. It seems that at MCC, teachers value composure and commitment from their students. \n\nAt the assumption level, it seems the college tries to avoid admitting students who are too self-expressive or those whose identities are tied to mainstream pop culture. The website has no flashy headlines or programs involving frivolous activities like fundraising by selling cookies or field trips. \n\nSo, when we break down the organizational culture at MCC, it’s clear they have a strong identity in terms of artifacts and values. However, the underlying assumptions suggest some possible improvements. The college might be underestimating the importance of openness in relationships and could be a bit too harsh on superficial identities. Given their strong commitment to social and community values, the folks at Macomb Community College might want to consider that openness is crucial for building good social connections.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: There's a lot of variables that go into this; some people wake up for either, and some people wake up for neither. Some theories that effect the reason of \"why\" is the pitch of the tone - from an evolution standpoint women hear higher pitches and wake up at night as it resembles the cry of a baby. From a physiological standpoint, thunder is a normal sound you are used to, and the brain while asleep hears it, and continues about it's process, where your alarm as been associated with waking up, and when it goes off at an expected time the brain passes on that it's in your best interest to wake up at this point.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: A 2005 audit ordered by Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels revealed widespread welfare fraud within the state's Family and Social Service Administration (FSSA), perpetrated by both employees and recipients. The audit concluded that the overly bureaucratic welfare system had created vulnerabilities exploited for personal gain, resulting in significant financial losses for the state. \n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Once upon a time, there was a young journalist named Emily. She had always dreamed of being a successful reporter, so she worked hard to improve her writing skills and learn everything she could about the news industry. One day, she received some exciting news: her editor had nominated her for the \"Reporter of the Week\" award! Emily was thrilled and couldn't believe that her hard work was finally paying off. She immediately got to work on her next assignment, determined to make it her best piece yet. She spent hours researching and interviewing sources, taking detailed notes and writing down every detail. When she submitted her article, she was nervous but also confident in her work. She knew that she had given it her all and hoped that her editor and the judges would see that. A few days later, the results were in. Emily was named \"Reporter of the Week\"! She was overjoyed and proud of her achievement. Her editor congratulated her and told her that her article was the best they had received in a long time. Emily's hard work and dedication had paid off, and she was now considered one of the best reporters in the newsroom. From that day on, she continued to work hard and strive for excellence, always looking for the next big story and seeking to uncover the truth. Thanks to her commitment and passion, Emily went on to become one of the most successful reporters of her time, covering important stories and making a real difference in the world of journalism. But she never forgot the thrill of winning that first award and the feeling of pride that came with it.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Paris, France - Four people have been arrested in the Paris region and southern France on suspicion of recruiting militants to fight in Syria, according to officials. The suspects were apprehended on Monday morning during a joint operation by the gendarmerie and anti-terrorism police units. France has long been a target for jihadist groups who have carried out a string of attacks in recent years, prompting authorities to step up their efforts to combat terrorism. The suspects, who have not been identified, are believed to have been recruiting French nationals to join the ranks of terrorist groups in Syria. A statement from the French Interior Ministry said the operation was part of an ongoing effort to prevent the spread of extremism. \"The arrests made today demonstrate once again the determination of the French authorities to counter the threat of terrorism in all its forms,\" the statement said. The ministry added that investigations are ongoing and more information will be released as it becomes available. France has sent troops to fight against ISIS in Iraq and Syria, as well as providing military assistance to other countries in the region. The country has also beefed up its security measures, including increasing surveillance and deploying more police and military personnel to key locations.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: def circular_shift(x, shift):\n \"\"\"Performs a circular shift on the digits of the integer x. This involves rotating \n the digits to the right by the specified number of places (shift) and producing \n the resulting sequence as a string.\n If the shift exceeds the number of digits in x, the function returns the digits in reverse order.\n \n Examples:\n >>> circular_shift(12, 1)\n \"21\"\n >>> circular_shift(12, 2)\n \"12\"\n \"\"\"\n\n s = str(x)\n num_digits = len(s)\n\n if shift > num_digits:\n # When the shift count surpasses the length of the number, reverse the digits\n return s[::-1]\n else:\n # Perform the circular shift by slicing the string and rearranging\n return s[-shift:] + s[:-shift]",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: \"The Alamo: 13 Days to Glory,\" a film that purports to recount the legendary battle, stands as a disheartening testament to squandered potential and misguided ambition. Director Burt Kennedy, once a skilled craftsman of cinematic narratives, seems to have lost his touch in this lumbering and disjointed production.\n\nThe film's visual aesthetic betrays its limited budget, with battle sequences shamelessly lifted from the superior 1955 film \"The Last Command.\" Even the newly filmed action scenes are plagued by a sense of disorganization and incompetence, resembling a poorly executed student film project.\n\nThe pacing is glacial, the acting a bizarre mix of overblown theatrics and lifeless delivery. While Raul Julia manages to elevate his performance above the general mediocrity, the majority of the cast struggles to imbue their characters with any semblance of authenticity.\n\nHistorical inaccuracies further detract from the film's credibility, leaving the viewer questioning the filmmakers' commitment to accurately portraying this pivotal event. And as if these flaws weren't enough, the film's excessive three-hour runtime becomes an endurance test for even the most dedicated history buff.\n\nThose seeking a compelling and visually engaging depiction of the Alamo are advised to seek out John Wayne's 1960 version or the aforementioned \"The Last Command.\" \"The Alamo: 13 Days to Glory\" is a cinematic misfire best left forgotten. \n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The hosts scored a brilliant first-half try and had the Scots under severe pressure at times after the interval. But from 16-9 down, four penalties from Greig Laidlaw - who had come on for Henry Pyrgos - saw the visitors home. \"If we can have frustrating days and a win at the end of them all the time, I will be happy,\" Cotter said. \"It was a game that in the context of the end of a season and a long year, to get the win, to grind it out, I am happy. \"I am happy with the character, the way the team applied pressure and finally got the result. It could have gone the other way. \"We weathered a very difficult first half, they flew into us and lifted the intensity from last week, we felt that. It took us a while to wear them down, but we are happy with the result. \"No coach is ever going to be totally happy and I know we will find parts we need to improve on. It will be a focus next time we come together.\" Assistant coach Jonathan Humphreys praised the impact of replacement front-rowers Gordon Reid, Fraser Brown and WP Nel, who came on together for the second half in place of Rory Sutherland, Stuart McInally and Moray Low, and earned Scotland some scrum dominance. \"I thought they were excellent,\" Humphreys told BBC Scotland. \"We wanted some energy and they certainly gave us that. \"We had to change things up, we were probably over-playing a bit in the first half. We decided to make it a bit more conservative and try to force them into some errors. \"It was probably a game we would have lost just over 12 months ago. The character we showed was fantastic - five metres from our own line, defending 13 or 14 phases, and we managed to keep them out.\" Media playback is not supported on this device Defeated Japan coach Mark Hammett believes Scotland were allowed to get away with slowing the ball down without punishment during a vital period of the second half. \"I'm really, really proud of the effort. We witnessed a really outstanding game here in Tokyo,\" he said. \"I don't think the best team won and even talking to the Scottish coaches, they agree. We are obviously very, very disappointed. \"I feel that perhaps the last two Tests we have been slightly disrespected as a team and what we can achieve. In all that attack, particularly in the second half, we did not get the reward. \"There was obviously a reason the ball was being slowed down. We worked really hard for that but did not get the outcome we believe we should have had.\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Before I begin, I would like to point something out. I assume that this is bound to be brought up, so I will answer this first. \"That means that marriage between cousins and children of incest are not immoral.\" The problem with your argument here is assuming too much in my opinion (based on what you've written) about how a biologial relationship works when it comes down to genetic material being passed from parent to offspring via the female's egg cells. It doesn't matter if they're related or not because there could still potentially have been some form of unwanted contact which has resulted within those eggs being fertilized by someone else who isn't genetically connected to them at all but their parents already had sexual intercourse...This does create an issue as far as genetics goes for both sides involved because whether its one man having sex with multiple women over time resulting in his genes mixing into each womens' ovaries creating mutated spermeggs which result in an unhealthy child later on due to him being her father even though he didn't produce any of the ingredients needed for reproduction himself. Or vice versa where two people can share the same DNA through different parts of their body such as fingers etc.. So regardless....even if these men aren't directly related to anyone living today other than themselves.....the fact remains......theyre ancestors did interbreed causing damage to our species gene pool that we are now trying desperately to repair decades after generations before us have gone extinct due to poor reproductive health choices throughout history. In conclusion however, if god created everything then why do we continue to see things evolve? Doesnt evolution disprove God? If He made Adam Eve,then Who designed the beasts of the field? Did They design themselves as well? Checkmate atheists",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Once upon a time, there was a woman named Emily who lived a quiet life as an accountant in the city. She had a complicated family dynamic, with a few estranged relatives who she hadn't spoken to in years. One day, Emily received a phone call from an attorney who informed her that her great-aunt had passed away and had left Emily a houseboat in her will. Emily was shocked to receive this news, as she had never even met her great-aunt. However, she soon learned that her great-aunt had lived a nomadic lifestyle, traveling up and down the coast in her beloved houseboat. Emily was suddenly filled with excitement at the prospect of taking on this new adventure, and taking ownership of her great-aunt's unique home. Without hesitation, Emily packed up her life and made her way to the marina where the houseboat was located. As she made her way aboard, she couldn't believe the beauty and serenity surrounding her. The gentle waves rocked the boat back and forth, creating a sense of calm that Emily had never felt before. Despite the unexpected gift, Emily quickly embraced life on the houseboat. She found joy in the simplicity of living on the water, and fell in love with the sense of freedom and exploration that the nomadic lifestyle brought. As time went on, Emily found herself establishing connections with other travelers and houseboaters who shared a similar sense of adventure and wonder about the world. She felt she had finally found a sense of belonging and purpose, something she had never felt before. Though the circumstances of inheriting a houseboat from an estranged relative were initially overwhelming, Emily had come to appreciate the decision her great-aunt had made in leaving her such an unexpected gift. The houseboat had become her home, and she knew that she would cherish it forever.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The problem is if these two start to interact or even counteract with (each other). Maybe they use different algorithms. Maybe a situation may occur when both programms identify something as malware and try to migrate the data into quarantine simultaniously. Or if one program starts to identify the other program as an enemy to the system since it does a full analysis and starts to \"voluntarily\" move data.', \"Antivirus software runs at a highly privileged CPU execution level, the same as your OS kernel. Other applications run on a lower privilege, so they don't have access to other resources except by relying on the OS. This is a basic but very efficient security measure that's been around since a long time. In fact, an antivirus is integrated with the OS kernel to some degree, it's the only way it can actively monitor applications that are being executed. So, having two such systems integrated at the same time can easily cause very bad problems. In practice, antivirus programmers do think about this scenario and try to avoid issues as best as possible, but it's still bad practice to have multiple. There's no real benefit to it, you're definitely slowing down your system, and you also risk system bugs.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Best ramen house in Vegas! The food and service are great. The ramen miso broth is my favorite add some sweet corn and butter, life is good! This place is small, so plan your visit accordingly because when they are busy prepare to wait for a seat. It can also get a little warm inside.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Peak inspiratory pressure, PEEP, and ventilation index values could distinguish survivors from nonsurvivors by day 3. This may assist in early application of supportive nonconventional therapies in children with malignancy and ARDS.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: His ideas, as well as those of Jeremy Bentham, became very influential in government circles in the early years of the 19th century. The latter part of the century brought the establishment of the basic pattern of improvements in public health over the next two centuries: a social evil was identified, private philanthropists brought attention to it, and changing public opinion led to government action. The 18th century saw rapid growth in voluntary hospitals in England.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Jeff Bezos will step down as CEO and become the executive chair of the Amazon board in Q3 2021. Andy Jassy will replace Bezos as CEO. Bezos plans to focus on his other ventures and projects, including his space exploration company Blue Origin and The Washington Post. As the executive chair of Amazon, Bezos will still be involved in the company's important decisions and strategies, but he will have more time to focus on his other interests. Andy Jassy, who currently leads Amazon Web Services (AWS), has been with the company since 1997 and played a key role in building AWS into a dominant force in the cloud computing industry. He is well-respected within the company and is expected to continue Amazon's focus on innovation, customer experience, and long-term growth. Overall, Bezos' decision to step down as CEO is a significant moment for Amazon and the tech industry as a whole. However, with Jassy taking over as CEO and Bezos remaining involved as the executive chair, Amazon's future seems bright and full of opportunities for growth and innovation.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: We present a simple method that enables an agent to learn about its environment in an unsupervised manner. Our approach involves two versions of the same agent, named Alice and Bob, competing against each other. Alice proposes a task, and Bob tries to complete it. In this work, we focus on two types of environments: (nearly) reversible environments and environments that can be reset. Alice sets the task by performing a sequence of actions, which Bob must either undo or replicate, depending on the environment. Through a suitable reward system, Alice and Bob create a curriculum of exploration that facilitates unsupervised training of the agent. When Bob is later used for a reinforcement learning task within the environment, this unsupervised training reduces the number of supervised episodes required, and in some cases, leads to higher rewards.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: I believe that celebrities have an enviable lifestyle. They are wealthy, enabling them to purchase nearly anything their hearts desire. Their fame ensures that they are adored by many.\n\nOn the other hand, I imagine their lives can be quite challenging. With paparazzi constantly snapping photos, invading their every move, they must grow tired of it.\n\nBut perhaps they secretly enjoy the attention. Complaining about it only seems to garner more media coverage, doesn’t it?\n\nI think most celebrities aren't seeking personal publicity; they aim to promote their projects, like films.\n\nNo way! They crave personal limelight as it leads to more film offers, invites to elite parties, and even recording opportunities. Their lives appear effortless, filled with perks like free drinks at events.\n\nHowever, celebrities also have substantial expenses. Their need for millions to afford lavish homes and glamorous wardrobes is significant. Despite this, I bet many would rather wear casual attire, but fashion choices are often dictated by their managers.\n\nIt's hard for me to sympathize with celebrities. They are excessively compensated, overly ambitious, and excessively worshipped.\n\nThey deserve some respect. Their talent justifies their earnings, and they often donate to charities, helping those in need.\n\nReally? They only do charity work to attract more media attention, boosting their fame and promoting their projects further.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The word of the LORD came to me, saying, \"Go and proclaim to Jerusalem: The LORD says, 'I remember the kindness of your youth and the love of your betrothal, when you followed me through the wilderness, in a land that was not cultivated.'\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: This is the story of a man with unusual feelings for a pig. It begins with an opening scene that brilliantly showcases absurd comedy. A formal orchestra audience is transformed into a chaotic, violent mob by the bizarre chants of its singers. Unfortunately, the film remains absurd throughout, lacking a coherent narrative, which eventually becomes too off-putting. Even audiences from that era are likely to be turned off. The cryptic dialogue makes Shakespeare seem easy for a third grader. However, on a technical level, it exceeds expectations with impressive cinematography by future great Vilmos Zsigmond. Brief appearances by future stars Sally Kirkland and Frederic Forrest can also be seen.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: While retinal hemorrhages (bleeding in the back of the eye) are uncommon after a seizure, it's crucial to investigate further if they do occur, especially in children. These eye findings could indicate a more serious underlying condition and should prompt a thorough evaluation for potential causes, including the possibility of child abuse. \n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Okay, so there's been a crazy moth invasion in Malaysia and Singapore! These giant, furry moths with like, 6-inch wingspans, have been popping up everywhere, even interrupting a football game! \n\nApparently, it happens every year between April and August, but this time it's way more intense. People are seeing them everywhere! They're attracted to city lights, so they're just hanging out, being all moth-y. \n\nMost people are chill about it, even posting pics online. But some folks, especially those who believe in Chinese astrology, are freaking out a bit because moths are seen as a bad omen. \n\nBut hey, experts are saying these moths are totally harmless! They're actually important pollinators and kinda cool to watch. So, no need to panic! Just maybe don't kill them if you see one, out of respect for our Chinese friends. ✌️ \n\n\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: According to security firm Bastille Networks, vulnerabilities in the data exchange mechanisms between mice and computers have exposed these devices to potential exploitation. Attackers could impersonate poorly secured signals, thereby gaining unauthorized access to PCs as though they were physically present. Bastille reported that details of these security loopholes have been communicated to the manufacturers of the compromised mice, many of whom are developing updates to enhance security. \n\nResearchers Marc Newlin and Balint Seeber of Bastille elucidated that the radio signals transmitted by numerous wireless mice to a dongle connected to a computer were frequently unencrypted. \"This enables attackers to send unencrypted traffic to the dongle while masquerading as a keyboard, resulting in unauthorized keystrokes on the computer,\" stated Mr. Newlin. In contrast, wireless keyboards typically employ encryption to prevent eavesdropping and signal spoofing.\n\nThe researchers demonstrated that they could spoof mouse signals using minimal code and a combination of an antenna and a dongle costing approximately $20 (£15). This method was effective over distances up to 180 meters (590 feet). By deploying this equipment, they sent specifically crafted mouse clicks that the computer misinterpreted as key presses, allowing them to execute commands and seize control of the targeted machine.\n\nThe Bastille team emphasized that many organizations invest significantly in securing physical devices on their networks but often overlook the security of data transmitted via radio signals. Wireless mice from manufacturers such as HP, Lenovo, Amazon, and Dell were identified as vulnerable. Bastille has reported its findings to these hardware manufacturers and to the company responsible for the chipset used in the spoofable mice. While firmware updates to rectify these vulnerabilities are being developed for some models, Bastille noted that numerous insecure mice would remain unpatchable.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Wireless local area networks (WLAN) still suffer from a severe performance discrepancy between different users in the uplink. This is because of the spatially varying channel conditions provided by the wireless medium. Cooperative medium access control (MAC) protocols as for example CoopMAC were proposed to mitigate this problem. In this work, it is shown that cooperation implies for cooperating nodes a tradeoff between throughput and bit-cost, which is the energy needed to transmit one bit. The tradeoff depends on the degree of cooperation. For carrier sense multiple access (CSMA) based networks, the throughput/bit-cost tradeoff curve is theoretically derived. A new distributed CSMA protocol called fairMAC is proposed and it is theoretically shown that fairMAC can asymptotically achieve any operating point on the tradeoff curve when the packet lengths go to infinity. The theoretical results are validated through Monte Carlo simulations.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Financial technology companies consist of both startups and established financial institutions and technology companies trying to replace or enhance the usage of financial services provided by existing financial companies",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: REPUBLIC is a member of industry groups representing the insurance sector, including the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI), the Association of Fire and Casualty Companies of Texas (AFACT), and the Insurance Council of Texas.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: In addition to what others have said: Even if your vote doesn't directly swing the election one way or another, it does guarantee that your voting activity makes it into the statistics of voter turnout, which is important for the democratic process. High voter turnout sends a message to elected officials and candidates that the public is engaged and paying attention to politics, which can lead to changes in policy and a greater focus on addressing the needs of the community. Your vote also contributes to the pool of voices that are recorded in the election, which can help to shape the discussions that happen following the result. Every vote counts towards building a stronger, more democratic society.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: The recently developed theory of quasi-Lie schemes is applied to various Emden-type equations. A method to handle these and their generalizations is presented. We derive t-dependent constants of motion for specific Emden equations using particular solutions, recovering previously known results. Additionally, t-dependent constants of motion for certain Emden-type equations are also recovered.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Imagine playing the game that u have to pass on a quote with only your actions and without speaking. Assume someone got it wrong the action wrong, the next person carries it on. Now repeat this infinitely just like the reproduction of body cells and the dna",
"role": "user"
}
] |
HUMAN
|
[
{
"content": "You are an expert in textual forensics. Your job is to decide whether the following text is AI-generated or human-written. Please reason step by step, considering the style, structure, and content of the text. Justify your decision by pointing out specific features or characteristics of the text that suggest it is either AI or human-written. Use conjuction words such as \"first\", \"second\", \"moreover\" etc and end with your decision in your reasoning.\nReturn STRICT JSON with fields exactly:\n{\n \"rationale\": \"<3-5 concise sentences explaining your reasoning>\",\n \"verdict\": \"AI\" or \"HUMAN\"\n}\n",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please analyze the following text: Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, has today taken to Twitter to hold a vote over whether the company should sell 21bn in shares. This move comes just days after Musk announced that he would be stepping down as CEO of the company, sparking speculation about the future of the electric car giant. In a tweet posted earlier today, Musk asked Tesla shareholders whether they thought the company should sell 21bn in shares, with the proceeds being used to accelerate the company's growth and technology development. The vote is set to run for the next 24 hours, and will be open to all Tesla shareholders. The move has been met with mixed reactions from investors, with some supporting the idea of a share sale as a means of funding future growth and development, while others have raised concerns about diluting the value of existing shares. However, Musk has been quick to defend the proposal, arguing that the company needs to be proactive in investing in new technology in order to stay ahead of the competition. \"We've got some big ideas for the future, and we're going to need the resources to make them happen,\" wrote Musk in a follow-up tweet. This latest move by Musk is just the latest in a series of controversial decisions made by the tech entrepreneur, who has been widely praised for his visionary approach to business, but has also faced criticism from some quarters for his unconventional methods. Whatever the outcome of the vote, it is clear that Musk and Tesla are committed to pushing the boundaries of what is possible in the world of electric cars and sustainable technology, and investors and enthusiasts alike will be watching closely to see what happens next.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
AI
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 19