Case Name stringlengths 11 235 | Input stringlengths 944 6.86k | Output stringlengths 11 196k | Label int64 0 1 | Count int64 176 118k | Decision_Count int64 7 37.8k | text stringlengths 1.43k 13.9k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.K. Baskaran Vs. State Rep By Its Secretary,Tamilnadu&Ors | by the companies. On the other hand, the aim and object of the Tamil Nadu Act is totally different. 34. The Tamil Nadu Act was enacted to ameliorate the conditions of thousands of depositors who had fallen into the clutches of fraudulent financial establishments who had raised hopes of high rate of interest and thus du... | 0[ds]9. We are of the opinion that none of these submissions have any merit10. A perusal of the Statement of Objects as well as the relevant provisions of the Tamil Nadu Act shows that its object was to ameliorate the situation of thousands of depositors from the clutches of financial establishments who had duped the i... | 0 | 4,031 | 805 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
by the companies. On the other hand, the aim and object of the Tamil Nadu Act is totally different. 34. The Tamil Nadu Act... |
H.S. Ramchandra Rao Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors | 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The issue involved in this appeal is essentially questioning the finding of fact recorded by the authorities below whether the amount received by the Appellant in the sum of Rs. 37,54,266 (Rupees thirty seven lakh fifty four thousand two hundred sixty six only) is capital re... | 0[ds]That being the case, the question of Appellant invoking the principle of capital asset does not arise. It may have been a different matter if it was a case of life time appointment of the Appellant as secretary of the concerned institution. No such evidence was produced by the Appellant before the AO or before us. | 0 | 252 | 64 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The issue involved in this appeal is essentially questioning the finding of f... |
Glass Chatons Importers & Users Vs. Union Of India | in Para 6(h) S. 3 itself is bad. In view of these submission the learned counsel was permitted to urge his contentions against the validity of Para 6(h) of the Imports (Control) Order, 1955 and also his limited attack against the validity of S. 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947.4. The requirement as rega... | 0[ds]2. It has to be mentioned at once that the period of the import permit "already granted" as referred to in the petition has already expired and consequently, the last two prayers mentioned above cannot possibly be granted. There was no application at all by the second and the third applicants, or any of the mercha... | 0 | 1,961 | 878 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
in Para 6(h) S. 3 itself is bad. In view of these submission the learned counsel was permitted to urge his contentions agai... |
M/s. Bennet Coleman & Co. Ltd Vs. State of Bihar & Others | found due by the Labour Court may be recovered in the manner provided in sub-section(1)" 17. There is also a provision for penalty under Section 18 of the Working Journalists Act, which reads as follows:- "18. Penalty.- (1) If any employer contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or any rule or order made thereund... | 1[ds]18. Having regard to the scheme of the Working Journalists Act and having regard to the provisions of the I.D. Act, as incorporated by Section 3 of the Working Journalists Act, prosecution for unfair labour practice is maintainable only under Section 25U. Section 25U provides for penalty for committing unfair labo... | 1 | 3,386 | 539 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
found due by the Labour Court may be recovered in the manner provided in sub-section(1)" 17. There is also ... |
S. Satnam Singh Vs. Surnder Kaur | that there is nothing in the Code of Civil Procedure which prohibits the passing of more than one preliminary decree if circumstances justify the same and that it may be necessary to do so particularly in partition suits when after the preliminary decree some parties die and shares of other parties are thereby augmente... | 1[ds]The power of amendment, in a case of this nature, as noticed hereinbefore, would not only be dependent upon the power of the court but also the principle that a court shall always be ready and willing to rectify the mistake it hasissues were not correctly framed. An additional written statement was permitted to be... | 1 | 3,459 | 141 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
that there is nothing in the Code of Civil Procedure which prohibits the passing of more than one preliminary decree if c... |
Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Hitech. Elect.& Hydro Power Ltd. | literal interpretation to the incentive scheme of the Government, as adopted by the Electricity Board. In this context this Court considered documents on record which were produced before the Court and reached the conclusion that the respondent had been communicating with the Board seeking power connection at an early ... | 0[ds]9. Having heard them at length, we are of the considered view that this review petition must be rejected. While it is true that a forceful argument has been advanced by the Electricity Board on the basis of the correspondence exchanged between the parties, at the same time learned counsel for the respondent has al... | 0 | 2,276 | 546 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
literal interpretation to the incentive scheme of the Government, as adopted by the Electricity Board. In thi... |
Suneet Gupta Vs. Anil Triloknath Sharma | of the fact that even the complainant had informed the principal that there was dispute between the partners of M/s K.M. Agencies and hence no payment should be made to M/s Mangla Agencies till the dispute was finally resolved between the parties. That, however, does not give rise to criminal liability and entitle the ... | 0[ds]12. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having considered the rival contentions, in our opinion, it cannot be said that the High Court was wrong in quashing criminal proceedings. It is clear from the case put forward by the appellant himself that virtually the proceedings were civil in nature. The... | 0 | 3,569 | 885 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
of the fact that even the complainant had informed the principal that there was dispute between t... |
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Vs. Tosiba Appliances Co. | that it had been maintaining service centres in India in respect of washing machines, stating: "Thus, to summarize:(a) TOSHIBA has several joint venture agreements in India, for various products including VCRS, colour picture tubes, batteries. etc.(b) TOSHIBA has technical collaboration agreements for manufacture of va... | 1[ds]The basis of the said submission, thus, appear to be two-fold:(1) As there is no evidence that the appellant had any intention to abandon the use of the said trademark, as a logical corollary thereof, the High Court ought to have held that the appellant had the intention of bona fide use of the trade mark not only... | 1 | 9,332 | 1,198 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
that it had been maintaining service centres in India in respect of washing machines, stating: "Thus, to summarize... |
P BANDOPADHYA Vs. UNION OF INDIA | Bombay High Court in S.V. Vasaikar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. [2003 (2) Mh. L.J. 691 : 2003 (4) Bom CR 79]. 8.6. It has been rightly contended that the earlier Writ Petition No. 5374 of 2002 was filed in a representative capacity. Petitioner No. 3 in the said Writ Petition was the Federation of the VSNL Employees ... | 0[ds]8.2. It is the admitted position that the Appellants had not completed 10 years of service on the date of their absorption into VSNL, i.e. when they were deemed to have retired from the service of the Centralreceive pensionary benefits from the Government, a Government servant is required to put in a minimum ‘qual... | 0 | 5,504 | 897 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
Bombay High Court in S.V. Vasaikar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. [2003 (2) Mh. L.J. 691 : 2003 (4) Bo... |
Union Of India Vs. Hindu Undivided Family Business Known As Ramlal Mansukhra | of which any process is ordinarily carried on with the aid of power," and so is liable to excise duty under Item 12 of the First Schedule. The Court examined the process of manufacture of Vanaspati and found that vegetable non-essential oils as obtained by crushing containing the impurities were first produced as raw v... | 1[ds]7. Dr. Barlingay, relying on these two decisions of this Court, urged a further point that, when the billets were rolled into circles, no process of manufacture was carded out and, consequently, excise duty could not be charged under Item 26-A which imposes the liability only when goods like circles are manufactur... | 1 | 2,788 | 680 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
of which any process is ordinarily carried on with the aid of power," and so is liable to excise duty under ... |
Jessore Industries (India) Limited and Ors Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Ors | in view of the provisions of Section 16(1)(d) of the Act it was entitled to the benefit of infancy as a newly set up establishment launched on 1.7.1993 when it started providing employment to the workers. The Provident Fund Organization did not accept the aforesaid contention and directed the Appellant to comply with t... | 0[ds]6. At the outset, it is required to be noted that, as such, there are concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Assessing Authority, the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court holding that the Appellant establishment is a running establishment and cannot be said to be a new establishment.7... | 0 | 1,873 | 440 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
in view of the provisions of Section 16(1)(d) of the Act it was entitled to the benefit of infancy as a newly set up estab... |
Muhammed A.A. & Ors Vs. State of Kerala & Ors | have themselves cited the judgment of this Court in RBI v. Peerless General Finance & Investment Co. Ltd. (supra) to contend the word deviation has to be interpreted by following the principle laid down in the said judgment which is as follows: - 33. Interpretation must depend on the text and the context. They are the ... | 0[ds]It is clear from the above discussion that the service conditions of the erstwhile employees of KSEB are protected by the proviso to Section 133 of the Electricity Act. After the transfer scheme was formulated, the erstwhile employees were entitled to claim that the conditions of their service cannot be altered to... | 0 | 7,309 | 1,492 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
have themselves cited the judgment of this Court in RBI v. Peerless General Finance & Investment Co. Ltd. (supra)... |
Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd Vs. M/S Dewan Chand Ram Saran | service tax. Though the appellant became the assessee due to amendment of 2000, his position is exactly the same as in respect of Sales Tax, where the seller is the assessee, and is liable to pay Sales Tax to the tax authorities, but it is open to the seller, under his contract with the buyer, to recover the Sales Tax ... | 1[ds]respondent as the contractor had to bear the service tax under clause 9.3 as the liabilityin connection withdischarge of hisobligations under the contract. The appellant could not be faulted for deducting the service tax from the bills of the respondent under clause 9.3, and there was no reason for the High Court ... | 1 | 6,074 | 114 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
service tax. Though the appellant became the assessee due to amendment of 2000, his position is exact... |
State Of W.B. Vs. Md. Khalil | and also to impose penalty, in the prescribed manner, not exceeding ten times the tax assessed by it on the dealer. The first proviso says that the assessment of the tax has to be after inspection and verification of such goods. It also provides for what can be termed as the "best judgment assessment" when such goods a... | 0[ds]We are afraid, we cannot accede to this contention. A presumption is a rule of law which requires the court to draw a given conclusion on proof or existence of certain facts and leaves it to the party disputing the conclusion to rebut the same. Presumptions may be of fact or of law. A presumption is an inference s... | 0 | 3,911 | 219 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
and also to impose penalty, in the prescribed manner, not exceeding ten times the tax assessed by it on the dealer. The f... |
Gaurav Pradhan & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others | marks of the TET ranging from 10% to 20% was allowed to different reserved categories. After availing such relaxation the reserved category candidates were selected as having obtained more marks than the last general category candidate and were included in the general category candidates. Different circulars issued by ... | 1[ds]In the present case we are only concerned with the question of migration of reserved category candidate into general/open category candidate. Hence, it is sufficient to note the relevant orders issued by the Government in the abovethe present case there is no issue pertaining to the extent of reservation provided ... | 1 | 9,758 | 1,157 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
marks of the TET ranging from 10% to 20% was allowed to different reserved categories. After availing such relaxation the r... |
Nookala Setharamaiah Vs. Kotaiah Naidu & Ors | of receipt of the application, the State Government ceases to have jurisdiction over the matter so as not to pass any order on any application after the lapse of nine months from the date of its receipt. The expression "deemed to be a refusal" in Rule 57 (2) is only for the purpose of a review application to be filed b... | 1[ds]19. So far as Civil Appeal No. 2122 of 1969 is concerned there is no merit in the same. No ground in support of that appeal was urged before us. Hence it fails and it is dismissedWe shall now proceed to consider the correctness of the reasons given by the High Court in support of its order21. The High Court was of... | 1 | 4,922 | 709 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
of receipt of the application, the State Government ceases to have jurisdiction over the matter so as not ... |
State of Maharashtra Vs. Prabhakar Pandurang Sanzgiri & Another | was detrimental to public interest or safety or the discipline of the place of detention. Prima facie the said sub-rule applies only to letters to and from security prisoners and does not regulate the sending out of prison books for publication. Indeed, the learned Additional Solicitor-General does not rely upon this p... | 1[ds]4. Article 358 of the Constitution suspends the provisions of Art. 19 of Part III of the Constitution during the period the proclamation of emergency is in operation; and the order passed by the President under Art. 359 suspended the enforcement, inter alia, of Art. 21 during the period of the said emergency. But ... | 1 | 2,910 | 1,717 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
was detrimental to public interest or safety or the discipline of the place of detention. Prima facie the sa... |
Narendrakumar Nakhat Vs. M/s Nandi Hasbi Textile Mills & Others | on the same day. The bank has not challenged that order probably because the whole amount was not ordered to be refunded. The appellant then filed a review petition (Company Application No. 826/96) but it was rejected on 21.2.1997.3. The High Court rejected the claim for refund of the earnest money on the ground that a... | 1[ds]We also find that the final order passed by the High Court is not quite consistent with its own observations quoted above. As observed by us earlier the High Court has not stated why the balance amount minus the earnest money deposit should not be refunded to the appellant. The banks application for awarding compe... | 1 | 1,261 | 323 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
on the same day. The bank has not challenged that order probably because the whole amount was not order... |
State Of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Gundugola Venkata Suryanarayana Garu | represent. Section 80 requires that the name, description and place of residence of the plaintiff must be set out in the notice and not of persons whom he seeks to represent. A suit filed with permission to sue for and on behalf of numerous persons having the same interest under O. 1, R. 8 is still a suit filed by the ... | 0[ds]The evidence therefore clearly establishes that the grant was not of the entire village and the Trial Court and the High Court were, in our judgment, right in declining to accept the case of the State.The notice in the present suit was served by the plaintiff and Yegneswara Sastri. They raised a grievance about th... | 0 | 4,449 | 1,114 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
represent. Section 80 requires that the name, description and place of residence of the plaintiff must be set out... |
State Of U.P Vs. Zahoor Ahmad & Anr | contended that the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act did not apply and therefore the respondent could not hold over within the meaning of Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act. The State relied on the Government Grants Act. Section 2 of the Government Grants Act enacts that nothing in the Transfer of Pro... | 0[ds]7. With regard to the amount of rent payable the provisions of Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act indicate that the renewal of the lease would mean that the terms and conditions would be the same as of the previous lease. The High Court, therefore, correctly found that in the absence of any agreement to p... | 0 | 2,081 | 504 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
contended that the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act did not apply and therefore the respondent could not... |
L.M.L. Limited Vs. State Of U.P | the same was contrary to the existing Circulars of the Board, the same cannot be sustained.” 44. In Collector of Central Excise Vadodra vs. Dhiren Chemical Industries : (2002) 2 SCC 127 this Court held :- “We need to make it clear that, regardless of the interpretation that we have placed on the said phrase, if there a... | 1[ds]In view of the fact that several matters are pending before the Commission on question of independent feeder we need not express any opinion thereupon. If any appeal is pending before the Commission on the said question it would decide the same independent of the same irrespective of the result of this decision..W... | 1 | 7,826 | 84 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
the same was contrary to the existing Circulars of the Board, the same cannot be sustained.” 44. In Col... |
Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) Vs. E.S. Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. & Ors | the whole of its terms and accordingly the whole context must be considered in endeavoring to collect the intention of the parties, even though the immediate object of inquiry is the meaning of an isolated clause. Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna and Ors. v. M/s. Green Rubber Industries and Ors 1990 (1) SCC 731. 17... | 1[ds]16. The duty of the Court is not to delve deep into the intricies of human mind to explore the undisclosed intention, but only to take the meaning of words used i.e. to say expressed intentions (Smt. Kamala Devi vs. Seth Takhatmal & Anr 1964 (2) SCR 152 ). In seeking to construe a clause in a Contract, there is no... | 1 | 4,908 | 1,220 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
the whole of its terms and accordingly the whole context must be considered in endeavoring to collect the intention of the... |
Videocon International Ltd Vs. Securities & Exchange Board of India | the appellate remedy (including the second appellate remedy) becomes vested in the parties to the lis, is the date when the dispute/lis is initiated. Insofar as the present controversy is concerned, it is not a matter of dispute, that the Securities Appellate Tribunal had passed the impugned order (which was assailed b... | 0[ds]21. It is also true that no litigant has any vested right in the matter of procedural law but where the question is of change of forum it ceases to be a question of procedure only. The forum of appeal or proceedings is a vested right as opposed to pure procedure to be followed before a particular forum. The right ... | 0 | 17,397 | 2,600 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
the appellate remedy (including the second appellate remedy) becomes vested in the parties to the lis, ... |
Jose @ Pappachan Vs. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Koyilandy & Another | the one favourable to the accused ought to be adopted. 54. The facts as obtained in the present case present a jigsaw puzzle in which several frames are missing to permit an unreserved opinion of the complicity of the appellant. 55. The inalienable interface of presumption of innocence and the burden of proof in a crim... | 1[ds]On an overall consideration of the evidence available on record, it would be, in our view, wholly unsafe to hold the appellant guilty of the charge of murder of his wife by strangulating her with the nylon rope as seized and then hanging her from the roof with the saree to complete the act. The circumstantial evid... | 1 | 8,985 | 546 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
the one favourable to the accused ought to be adopted. 54. The facts as obtained in the present case present a jigsaw puz... |
KASABAI TUKARAM KARVAR & ORS Vs. NIVRUTI (DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS & ORS | aspect of the matter as the present case relates to a pre-statutory adoption. Even Section 12 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, makes it plain that an adopted child shall be deemed to be the child of his or her adoptive father or mother for all purposes with effect from the date of the adoption. 9. The ... | 0[ds]10. As far as the doctrine of relation back goes, we need only notice decisions of this Court in Govind Hanumantha Rao Desai versus Nagappa alias Narahari Laxman Rao Deshpande and Sever Others, (1972) 1 SCC 515 and Shripad Gajanan Suthankar versus Dattaram Kashinath Suthankar and Others, (1974) 2 SCC 156 . We may... | 0 | 2,907 | 1,614 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
aspect of the matter as the present case relates to a pre-statutory adoption. Even Section 12 of the Hindu Ad... |
Gitesh Pipes Private Limited & Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Others | which is produced as Annexure E to the petition, respondent no. 3 has informed that as per Government Resolution dated 23.3.2000 the last date for completing all stages was 31.12.2001 and, therefore, within 15 days from the date of the letter they should produce all necessary documents so that they will be entitled for... | 1[ds]16. By letter dated 20.3.2002 which is produced as Annexure E to the petition, respondent no. 3 has informed that as per Government Resolution dated 23.3.2000 the last date for completing all stages was 31.12.2001 and, therefore, within 15 days from the date of the letter they should produce all necessary document... | 1 | 3,994 | 1,084 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
which is produced as Annexure E to the petition, respondent no. 3 has informed that as per Government Resolution d... |
Skol Breweries Limited Vs. Sanman Distributors Private Limited | P.C.This Appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge whereby Company Application filed by the Respondent-company has been allowed and an ex-parte order of winding up dated 25th April 1997 has been set aside.2.The Company Petition was admitted on 2nd March 1995. The advertisements took place on 14th... | 0[ds]5.It is true that there is no explanation on the part of the Company as to why the Company waited for nearly two years in filing the Application and why it did not appear in the Company Petition despite the supply of the documents on 31st August 1995 to their Advocates. The conduct of themay be reprehensible but c... | 0 | 600 | 193 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
P.C.This Appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge whereby Company Application filed by the... |
Bharat Barrel & Drum Mfg Co Vs. Amin Chand Payeralal | by the plaintiff had been booked and requested the plaintiff to open the necessary letter of Credit on the terms and conditions contained in the letter of the defendant dated 15.9.1961. The total price of the goods to be imported under the said import licence and the aforesaid aggrangement with the plaintiff was about ... | 1[ds]9. After going through the detailed and lengthy judgments of the learned Judges of the High Court, who dealt with the case, we fell that a rational view has not been adopted by anyone. Extreme views taken by the learned Judges in the matter are required to be reconciled on the basis of the law alreadyreferred to t... | 1 | 7,734 | 2,578 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
by the plaintiff had been booked and requested the plaintiff to open the necessary letter of Credit on the terms and condit... |
M/s. Tirath Ram Rajindra Nath Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another | validity of that amendment came up for consideration before the Allahabad High Court in Krishna Brick Field v. State of U. P., 29 STC 15 = (1971 Tax LR 1057) (FB) (All). A Full Bench of that High Court held that Section 3-A (1) was unconstitutional inasmuch as it delegated essential legislative functions to the State G... | 0[ds]4. Dr. L. M. Singhvi, the learned Counsel for the appellants sought to assail the decision of the High Court on three grounds i.e. (1) in any event the purported validation does not cure the vice noticed by the High Court in the previous decision. Unless the vice is cured, there can be no validation; (2) S. 3AB wh... | 0 | 1,865 | 871 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
validity of that amendment came up for consideration before the Allahabad High Court in Krishna Brick Field v. Sta... |
B.S. Vadera Vs. Union of India & Others | currency, until provision, in that behalf, is made by or under an Act, of the appropriate Legislature, under Article 309. 25. It is also significant to note that the proviso to Article 309, clearly lays down that any rules so made shall have effect, subject to the provisions of any such Act. The clear and unambiguous e... | 0[ds]Therefore, we are not inclined to accept the contention of the petitioners that there has been a promotion, on a permanent basis in the first instance as Upper Division Clerks and, latter, as Assistants, which cannot be disturbed, by any orders that may be passed, by the 2nd respondent. We have already indicated t... | 0 | 5,943 | 450 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
currency, until provision, in that behalf, is made by or under an Act, of the appropriate Legislature, under Article 309. 2... |
M. R. Mini (Minor) Represented By Her Guardian and Father M.P Vs. State of Kerala and Another | KRISHNA IYER, J. 1. The petitioner, an aspirant for admission to the M.B.B.S. course in one or other of the medical college in Kerala, has failed to qualify for selection from the Kerala university pool, not having secured high enough marks, and has failed to fall within the Calicut University pool, not having been a s... | 0[ds]Under the existing scheme, the classification for purpose of quota is university-wise, not territory-wise. Belonging to backward Calicut District is not the same as being an alumnus of the Calicut University. Maybe, the State could have classified candidates university- wise, backward region-wise or otherwise, sep... | 0 | 473 | 320 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
KRISHNA IYER, J. 1. The petitioner, an aspirant for admission to the M.B.B.S. course in one or other of the ... |
A.K. Bindal & Another Vs. Union of India & Others | the total compensation amount has to be calculated on the basis of existing pay scale and as there was no revision of pay scales since 1972, the petitioners have got a very small amount. Learned counsel has further submitted that there can be no waiver of fundamental rights and even if an employee has opted for VRS and... | 0[ds]considerable amount is to be paid to an employee ex-gratia besides the terminal benefits in case he opts for voluntary retirement under the Scheme and his option is accepted. The amount is paid not for doing any work or rendering any service. It is paid in lieu of the employee himself leaving the services of the c... | 0 | 10,827 | 374 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
the total compensation amount has to be calculated on the basis of existing pay scale and as there was no re... |
Tukaram S. Bhat Vs. K.E. Steel Union Limited & Others | who passed the order dated 23rd February, 2006 granted liberty to the respondent No.3 to make, if necessary, a fresh application seeking the same relief was maintainable, in our opinion, also cannot be sustained. The learned Single Judge, after disposing of the company application granted liberty to apply so that the p... | 0[ds]13. So far as the submission of the learned counsel appearing for appellant that the learned Single Judge Could not have granted leave to continue the second suit because that suit was instituted after obtaining leave from the learned Single Judge which was revoked by the Division Bench of this Court, in our opini... | 0 | 3,913 | 240 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
who passed the order dated 23rd February, 2006 granted liberty to the respondent No.3 to make, if neces... |
Uttar Bhartiya Rajak Samaj Panchayat Banganga Rajak Samaj Co-operative Housing Society (Proposed) & Anr Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Secretary & Ors. | on plot bearing no.CS No.51, 2/51, 3/51 of Malabar Hill and Cumballa Hill Div. at Bhagwan Indrajit Road, Mumbai. The appellant no.2 is a rehabilitator who was approached by the 1 st appellant-society to develop the said plot and rehabilitate its members under Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, under Maharashtra Slum Rehabilit... | 0[ds]11. In this case it is to be noted that the Letter of Intent was valid for a period of three months only. If, for any reason, delay is occurred in obtaining clearance from the Coastal Zone Management Authority, nothing prevented the appellants to make appropriate representation so as to keep the Letter of Intent a... | 0 | 1,311 | 201 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
on plot bearing no.CS No.51, 2/51, 3/51 of Malabar Hill and Cumballa Hill Div. at Bhagwan Indrajit Road, Mum... |
CURRENCY NOTE PRESS Vs. N.N.SARDESAI | Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 534 of 1997 whereby the Single Judge of the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the Respondents herein and set aside the order dated 16.02.... | 0[ds]First, all the(total 17) are now no longer in service and have either retired from the service or died; Second, the amount involved and awarded to theis not very sizable; Third, it relates to the period from 1986-1990; Fourth, the amount, pursuant to the impugned order, was already paid long back to theand lastly,... | 0 | 663 | 206 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 pa... |
Venkatarao Esajirao Limbekar & Ors Vs. The State Of Bombay & Ors | the notification issued in May 1957 was also attacked. This petition was dismissed by the High Court in March 1960.5. In January 1961 this Court granted special leave to appeal against that judgment. In March 1961 during the pendency of the appeal the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Inamdars of Sulhanagar Colony. V. Gover... | 0[ds]The present appeal must fail. The provisions of the Maharashtra Act as also of the Hyderabad Act XXI of 1950 together with the amending Act are immune from any challenge on the ground of contravention of Articles 19 and 31 of the Constitution. By the Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act 1964, after entry 20, e... | 0 | 1,595 | 603 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
the notification issued in May 1957 was also attacked. This petition was dismissed by the High Court in Ma... |
RITU BHATIA Vs. MINISTRY OF CIVIL SUPPLIES CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION | it appears and even it can be seen from the relevant appointment orders, and even as per the case of the appellant that she was working as Assistant Company Secretary for the period between June 2008 to May 2010 in Utkal Investments Limited and that she was working as Management Trainee in the Delhi Stock Exchange Asso... | 0[ds]7.1 From the material on record, more particularly the application submitted by the appellant and the supporting self¬ attested documents and the certificates, it appears that according to the appellant she was having seven years and three months post qualification experience. The same is reproduced and considered... | 0 | 3,049 | 1,068 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
it appears and even it can be seen from the relevant appointment orders, and even as per the case of the appe... |
Shivasharanappa Vs. Sri Amarappa & Others | 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This appeal by special leave petition arises out of a common judgment passed by the High Court of Karnataka in R.S.A. Nos. 725 and 726 of 2001, dated 18th January, 2006 whereby the High Court dismissed RSA No. 725 of 2001 and partly allowed RSA No. 726 of 2001.3. The ... | 0[ds]7. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the submissions made on behalf of either parties and perused the material available on record. First and foremost, the appellant fails to draw our attention to the substantial question of law which warrants interference of this Court. In respect of joint family prop... | 0 | 804 | 212 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This appeal by special leave petition arises out ... |
UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. BHARAT FORGE LTD. & ANOTHER | out wherein the HSN code is indicated, they are tenders issued by the other units of the Indian Railways. Since the first appellant is the Union of India, we would expect that if it is otherwise permissible to sustain the impugned judgment, it may not be fair to not have a uniform policy in the matter of award of large... | 1[ds]We would think that this is not a matter which is res integra. As early as in Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Gian Prakash, New Delhi and another v. K.S. Jagannathan and another (1986) 2 SCC 679, a Bench of three learned Judges of this Court had this to say:18. The first contention urged by learned coun... | 1 | 16,982 | 8,931 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
out wherein the HSN code is indicated, they are tenders issued by the other units of the Indian Railway... |
Naresh Kumar Madan Vs. State Of M.P | Penal Code (45 of 1860)." 11. The object and purport of the provisions of the 1948 Act is different from the 1988 Act. It, as noticed hereinbefore, provides for constitution and composition of such Electricity Board. Each State is indeed enjoined with a duty to constitute a Board. [See Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board ... | 0[ds]14. The officers of the State Electricity Board are required to carry out public functions. They are public authorities. Their action in one way or the other may entail civil or evil consequences to the consumers of electrical energy. They may prosecute a person. They are empowered to enter into the house of the B... | 0 | 1,962 | 784 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
Penal Code (45 of 1860)." 11. The object and purport of the provisions of the 1948 Act is different from the 1988 Act. It,... |
State of Punjab and Others Vs. Dewan's Modern Breweries Limited | L-2, L-4, L-5 and L-10 licences. The respondent company holds L-1 licence which is meant for whole-sale dealers. The State contested the application and in its counter asserted that the excise trade like many other trades, or even more, had to be regulated and controlled by various Rules and Regulations and in spite of... | 1[ds]This case, in our opinion, is squarely covered by a recent decision of this Court delivered by a Bench of seven Judges in M/s Vishnu Agencies (Pvt.) Ltd. etc. v. Commercial Tax Officer and others etc.(2) The High Court in the case of Jagatjit Distilling and Allied Industries Ltd. (supra) had mainly relied upon two... | 1 | 1,324 | 737 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
L-2, L-4, L-5 and L-10 licences. The respondent company holds L-1 licence which is meant for whole-sale dealers. T... |
Thayyil Mammo & Another Vs. Kottiath Ramunni & Others | every tenant shall have fixity of tenure in respect of his holding, and no land from the holding shall be resumed except as provided in Ss. 14 to 22 of the Act. The only question in this appeal is whether the contesting defendants are kanomdars and, therefore, tenants within the meaning of the Act. 5. The contesting de... | 0[ds]10. In view of this finding, it must follow that the konam right under Ex.3 were duly vested in defendants 1 to 5, and they became the kanomdars, and consequently, they are protected from eviction under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 196311. In view of this conclusion, it is not necessary to consider whether Ex.8 op... | 0 | 2,277 | 198 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
every tenant shall have fixity of tenure in respect of his holding, and no land from the holding ... |
State Of Jharkhand Vs. Govind Singh | no case be supplied by a court of law, for that would be to make laws."23. Keeping in view the aforesaid legal principles the inevitable conclusion is that the High Court was not justified in reading into Section 52 (3) of the Act the power of direct release by imposing fine in lieu of confiscation. 24. The matter can ... | 1[ds]Learned Single Judge by the impugned judgment held that though the power to levy fine in lieu of confiscation is not there, same has to be read into the statute to fully effectuate the legislative intent. It was a case of casus omissus.9. The conclusion is clearly erroneous. It is against the settled principles re... | 1 | 4,605 | 777 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
no case be supplied by a court of law, for that would be to make laws."23. Keeping in view the aforesaid le... |
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. MR. SUDHAKAR HEGDE & ORS | EIA report. Apart from its failure to repudiate a process conducted beyond the prescribed time period stipulated by the MoEF-CC, the SEAC failed to apply its mind to the abject failure of the appellant in conducting the EIA process leading upto the submission of the EIA report for the grant of EC. The SEAC is not requi... | 1[ds]18. The EIA process under the 2006 Notification serves as a balance between development and protection of the environment: there is no trade-off between the two. In laying down a detailed procedure for the grant of an EC, the 2006 notification attempts to bridge the perceived gap between the protection of the envi... | 1 | 19,833 | 3,922 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
EIA report. Apart from its failure to repudiate a process conducted beyond the prescribed time period stipulated by the MoE... |
Baldev Raj Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh | Fazal Ali, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh by which the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 and sentence of life imprisonment were confirmed by the High Court. The prosecution case is detailed in the judgment of the High Court and it is no... | 1[ds]In the first place there dose not appear to be any particular occasion for the presence of PW 8 at the time when the deceased was being carried on a charpai. Secondly PW 8 says that she was not recognised by the deceased but was only identified by the voice of her mother. The most important circumstances to discre... | 1 | 638 | 307 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
Fazal Ali, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of ... |
Bengal Timber Trading Co. Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Sales Tax, Madhyapradesh | accepted by the consignee. Cl. 11 (g) makes it clear that notwithstanding the fact that the goods had been passed by the Sleeper Passing Officer at Dhamtari and that they had been put on rail within the period of the contract at the said station and the Sleeper Passing Officer had given the contractor a passing certifi... | 1[ds]11. In our opinion, we have got to take the whole of the contract into account and then find out the intention of the parties as to where actual delivery was to take place thereunder. While there can be no doubt that the major part of the operations of the contractor with regard to delivery were to be performed at... | 1 | 4,387 | 654 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
accepted by the consignee. Cl. 11 (g) makes it clear that notwithstanding the fact that the goods had been passed by the Sl... |
Montecarlo Ltd Vs. Ntpc Ltd | court does not sit as a court of appeal but merely reviews the manner in which the decision was made, (c) the court does not have the expertise to correct the administrative decision. If a review of the administrative decision is permitted it will be substituting its own decision, without the necessary expertise which ... | 0[ds]In the present scenario, tenders are floated and offers are invited for highly complex technical subjects. It requires understanding and appreciation of the nature of work and the purpose it is going to serve. It is common knowledge in the competitive commercial field that technical bids pursuant to the notice inv... | 0 | 6,302 | 375 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
court does not sit as a court of appeal but merely reviews the manner in which the decision was made, (... |
The Cement Marketing Co., Of Indialtd. And Another Vs. The State Of Mysore And Another | 765 at p. 773) a contract of sale must involve transport of goods from one State to another under the contract of sale; Bengal Immunity Co.s case, 1955-2 SCR 603: ((S) AIR 1955 SC 661 ). In the case of sales in the course of export or import the test laid down was a series of integrated activities commencing from an ag... | 1[ds]7. The modus operandi above mentioned shows that before an intending purchaser could obtain cement he had to get what is called an authorisation from a Government authority which nominated the factory from which the intending purchaser had to get his supplies of cement. That authorisation with an order has to be g... | 1 | 3,969 | 1,826 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
765 at p. 773) a contract of sale must involve transport of goods from one State to another under the contract of sale; Ben... |
Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Rajasthan Vs. Her Highness Maharani Gayatri Devi of Jaipur | decisions, we have now to see as to what was the nature of the right conferred on the assessee under the trust deed.5. The trust deed starts by saying that "the settlor is absolutely entitled to the investments specified in the Schedule hereto (hereinafter called the scheduled property)" and that he is desirous of maki... | 1[ds]If it is considered as an annuity, there is no dispute that the terms and conditions relating to the assessees right relating to annuity precluded commutation of any part thereof into a lump sum grant. Therefore, all that we have to see is whether the income received by the assessee was an annuity or an aliquot sh... | 1 | 2,355 | 519 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
decisions, we have now to see as to what was the nature of the right conferred on the assessee under the trust deed.5. The t... |
S.N.D.P. Sakhayogam Vs. Kerala Atmavidya Sangham | declaration in the reliefs.9) The appellant (defendant No.1) denied the claim set up in the plaint and defended the sale deed executed in their favour by defendant No. 2. It was contended that the sale deed dated 09.02.1978 is legal and proper. According to defendant No.1, both (plaintiff and defendant No. 1) were alwa... | 1[ds]16) Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are inclined to allow the appeal and while setting aside all the judgment/decrees of the Courts below remand the case to the Trial Court for disposal of the suit afresh.17)In our considered opinion, one question, whic... | 1 | 1,850 | 624 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
declaration in the reliefs.9) The appellant (defendant No.1) denied the claim set up in the plaint and ... |
M/s. Arihant Udhyog Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others | Sale and agreement to sell(1) A contract of sale of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price. There may be a contract of sale between one part-owner and another.(2) A contract of sale may be absolute or conditional.(3) Where under a contract o... | 0[ds]14. From the aforesaid arguments it becomes clear that applicability of Section 17 of the Act read with Rule 58 of the Rules would depend upon the question as to whether agricultural produce is bought and sold by the licensee in the market area. It is also the common case of the parties that the answer to the afor... | 0 | 5,486 | 888 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
Sale and agreement to sell(1) A contract of sale of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agree... |
Municipal Council, Kota, Rajasthan Vs. The Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co.Ltd | of 1956. Nor is there any other enactment which interdicts such taxation. It is true that Section 3 is the general charging section. Even if Section 23(5) provides for the machinery for collection and recovery of the tax, once the legislature has, in clear terms, indicated that the income of the firm can be taxed in ac... | 1[ds]18. We affirm the statement of law thus made above to be correct and in our view it is not the nomenclature used or chosen to christen the levy that is really relevant or determinative of the real character or the nature of the levy, for the purpose of adjudging a challenge to the competency or the power and autho... | 1 | 8,302 | 742 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
of 1956. Nor is there any other enactment which interdicts such taxation. It is true that Section 3 is the general charging ... |
V. M. Syed Mohammad & Company Vs. State of Andhara Pradesh & Others | arise out of W. P. Nos. 21 and 41 of 1952 filed in the High Court of Judicature at Madras under Article 226 questioning the validity of the Madras General Sales Tax Act (IX of 1939) and of the Turnover and Assessment Rules framed under that Act. 2. The petitioners are tanners carrying on business in Eluru, West Godawar... | 0[ds]In our opinion, the decisions of the High Court on those grounds are substantially well-founded and correct.On the question of legislative competency, the learned Advocate drew our attention to entry 54 in List II of the seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India and argued that this entry clearly indicates tha... | 0 | 1,114 | 736 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
arise out of W. P. Nos. 21 and 41 of 1952 filed in the High Court of Judicature at Madras under Article 226 ... |
Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi Vs. Shri Raj Narain and Anotherand Vice Versa | case here.10. After having heard arguments of learned Counsel for the election-petitioner on the two appeals which definitely involved allegations of misuse of power by the Prime Minister of this country, I was rather amazed to hear from learned Counsel arguing the application before us that no question of bona fides o... | 0[ds]The petition before us also contains statements showing that, so far as I was concerned, I had indicated to the parties that I regarded consideration of the merits of the case also to be essential for a just and proper decision and disposal of the appeals. Indeed, the direction given by His Lordship the Chief Just... | 0 | 3,128 | 1,934 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
case here.10. After having heard arguments of learned Counsel for the election-petitioner on the ... |
Bar Council Of Delhi And Anr. Etc Vs. Surjeet Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc | question of estoppel we have already considered it and found that the petition under Art. 226 cannot be disposed on the question of estoppel. As regards delay, it is sufficient to state that it could not be said that the petition was unduly delayed. Apart from it, it is also clear than an election held on the basis of ... | 0[ds]It is true that the power to make rules conferred by Section 15 is both for the Bar Council of India as also for the Bar Council of a State. But no provision of Section 15 can override the specific provision made in Section 3(4) and Section 49(1)(a) of the Act. Sub-section (1) of Section 15 says; ?A Bar Council ma... | 0 | 7,018 | 1,231 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
question of estoppel we have already considered it and found that the petition under Art. 226 cannot be disp... |
JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. Vs. ADANI POWER RAJASTHAN LTD. & ANR | that the imported coal as alternate coal was available for 5 years, as such no relief could have been granted to APRL on the basis of change in law. As we have already discussed that there was a change in law as per Article 10.1; thus, the submission to the contrary is untenable. 62. It was argued that APRL uncondition... | 1[ds]When we consider the documents on record, it is apparent that APRLs bid was premised only on domestic coal. It was evaluated as such, and the PPA also records the same. In para 2 of the bid with respect to coal, the bid of APRL was premised on the domestic coal. It is apparent that APRL relied upon MoU entered int... | 1 | 15,554 | 5,665 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
that the imported coal as alternate coal was available for 5 years, as such no relief could have ... |
Anand Parkash Saksena Vs. Union of India & Others | 25 per cent quota the appointments of officers from List II will be excluded.19. There were vacancies in the 25 per cent quota which were filled up by promotion of respondents, Nos. 14, 15 and 16 from the Madhya Bharat State Service. Respondents Nos. 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 17 and 18 were from the former Madhya Pradesh State... | 0[ds]The decision in P. C. Wadhwas case, 1964 (4) SCR 598 = (AIR 1964 SC 423 ) is distinguishable. There a cadre Officer in the junior scale of pay was promoted to officiate in a post in the senior scale of pay and was thereafter reverted to his substantive post while other cadre officers junior to him continued to ... | 0 | 5,448 | 757 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
25 per cent quota the appointments of officers from List II will be excluded.19. There were vacancies in the ... |
Mamta Vs. National Insurance Co.Ltd. | 1. Leave granted. 2. One Radheyshyam Sharma, the predecessor in interest of the appellants herein, died in an accident which took place on 22.10.2003. He was an agriculturist. He was aged 22 years on the date of accident. 3. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal believed the evidence adduced on behalf of the claimants - a... | 1[ds]The High Court, in our opinion, was clearly wrong. As noticed hereinbefore, in paragraph 7 of its judgment the High Court held that neither any oral nor documentary evidence was adduced by the claimants to prove the income of the deceased. Two witnesses testified to the income of the deceased Radheyshyam. It was i... | 1 | 888 | 385 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
1. Leave granted. 2. One Radheyshyam Sharma, the predecessor in interest of the appellants herein, di... |
Malti Sahu & Anr Vs. Rahul & Anr | has reversed the conviction and thereby has acquitted the accused, it is prayed not to interfere with the same in exercise of the powers under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. 5. We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties at length. 6. We have perused, considered and gone t... | 1[ds]6. We have perused, considered and gone through the judgment and order passed by the Trial Court convicting the accused for the offence under Section 302 IPC and the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court acquitting the accused.7. In the present case, the prosecution has been successful in proving th... | 1 | 3,365 | 1,039 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
has reversed the conviction and thereby has acquitted the accused, it is prayed not to interfere with the same in exercise... |
M/S PREM COTTEX Vs. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS | the period from July-2009 to September-2011. But after audit, it was discovered that a different tariff code should have been applied. Therefore, a show cause notice was issued on 18.03.2014 raising an additional demand for the period from July-2009 to September-2011. Then a bill was raised on 25.05.2015 for the afores... | 0[ds]9. Before we proceed to consider the statutory provision and the decision of this Court relied upon by the appellant, it is relevant to take note of the fact that the appellant never disputed the correctness of the claim of the respondents that the multiply factor (MF) to be applied was 10, but it was wrongly appl... | 0 | 3,148 | 1,728 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
the period from July-2009 to September-2011. But after audit, it was discovered that a different tariff co... |
Bhola Nath Mukherjee and Ors Vs. Govt. of W.B. and Ors | sub-section (1), have preference to all other debts and obligations except mortgage, and shall be payable out of the purchase price after deduction therefrom of the amount that may be due from the licence under mortgage, if any. (3) If, however, the purchase price, after deduction therefrom of the amount that may be du... | 1[ds]7. In our view, the contention of the Board must be upheld in the facts of this case9. The effect of sub-section (1) of Section 7-B is to protect the dues on account of salary, wages, leave salary or leave wages, bonus, gratuity, retrenchment compensation, contribution to general provident fund, etc. to be a debt ... | 1 | 2,522 | 663 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
sub-section (1), have preference to all other debts and obligations except mortgage, and shall be payab... |
Naunihal Kishan And Others Vs. R. S. Ch. Pratap Singh And Another | the creditor (sic) (debtor?) and that it was incompetent for a debtor to invoke the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to effect the scaling down and adjustment by an application under S. 5. We do not consider that this argument merits serious consideration. Section 5(1) of the Act which we have extracted enables a "debtor" ... | 0[ds]It is this reduction that learned Counsel complains as not justified by the proviso. The argument is that under the proviso to S. 16(4) the reduction of the debt has to bear the same proportion as "the value of the lands" allotted to the creditor in India bears to "the value of the lands" left by him in Pakistan. ... | 0 | 5,025 | 548 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
the creditor (sic) (debtor?) and that it was incompetent for a debtor to invoke the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to effect t... |
Smt. Sarla Narula Vs. Smt. Raghbir Kaur Rehal and Another | the premises in question in Greater Kailash, New Delhi. The tenant was a company called M/s Bharat Carbons &Ribbons Manufacturing Company. The husband of the appellant Late T.R. Narula was an employee of the said Company. He retired in 1973. The rent in respect of the premises had been deposited. It is, however, not ce... | 0[ds]such evidence of the acceptance of rent was advanced before the High Court or before us to sustain that ground.The tenancy was originally entered into between the landlady or on her behalf and the company of which T.R. Narula, since deceased, was an employee. There was no evidence adduced and no averment made that... | 0 | 1,201 | 441 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
the premises in question in Greater Kailash, New Delhi. The tenant was a company called M/s Bharat Carbons ... |
Viswesardas Gokuldas Vs. B. K. Narayan Singh & Anr | did not accept the offer either orally or by any letter sent to the defendant.4. On November 1, 1957, the plaintiffs filed a suit (O. S. No. 46 of 1957) against the defendant claiming a declaration that they were entitled to remain in possession of the mining area. The primary object of the suit was to enforce the plai... | 0[ds]We need not say anything more on this point because we find that the plaintiffs have failed to establish the newargument is misconceived. We have held at the plaint in O. S. No. 46 of 1957 was not an acceptance. There was no other acceptance either oral or in writing. Mere mental assent of the plaintiffs to the de... | 0 | 1,488 | 239 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
did not accept the offer either orally or by any letter sent to the defendant.4. On November 1, 1957, t... |
Kalidindi Venkata Subbaraju & Others Vs. Chintalapati Subbaraju & Others | litem motam by persons who are dead. i. e., before the commencement of any controversy actual or legal upon the same point. The words "before the question in issue was raised" do not necessarily mean before it was raised in the particular litigation in which such a statement is sought to be adduced in evidence.The prin... | 0[ds]5. As aforesaid, the respondents did not produce the original will but produced only its certified copy, Ex. B. 9, which they obtained from the record of Suit No. 21 of 1923 wherein Surayamma had filed the original will along with her written statement. The respondents, however, had given notice to the appellants ... | 0 | 5,213 | 1,359 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
litem motam by persons who are dead. i. e., before the commencement of any controversy actual or legal upon the sa... |
New Horizons Ltd. Vs. Union Of India | should possess such experience" would mean the experience of the tenderer itself and not that of its collaborator. It has been pointed out that SLP(C) No. 1484 of 1994 filed against the said judgment has been dismissed by this court by order dated January 28, 1994. It has been urged that on the same logic the experienc... | 0[ds]Having regard to this large margin in the amount of royalty offered by NHL and that offered by respondent No. 4, it must be held that the decision of the tender evaluation committee to refuse to consider the tender of NHL and to accept the tender of respondent No. 4 suffers from the vice of arbitrariness and irrat... | 0 | 9,398 | 665 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
should possess such experience" would mean the experience of the tenderer itself and not that of its collaborator. It has b... |
The Commissioner Of Excess Profits Tax, West Bengal Vs. The Ruby General Insurance Co. Ltd | 1912 A.C. 443: 6 Tax Cas 59 (A) that it should be allowed as a deduction was based on two grounds. One was that it should be regarded as unearned income, and for the reasons already stated, it cannot avail when the question is one of determining capital under that Act. And the other was that the reserve represents a li... | 1[ds]This decision was taken in appeal to the House of Lords and was affirmed. Vide InlandRevenue Commissioners v. Northern Aluminium Co. Ltd., 147-1 ALL E. R. 608(I).18.This decision establishes that a conditional liability under a concluded contract - it is on that footing that the second point arose for decision - w... | 1 | 6,603 | 279 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
1912 A.C. 443: 6 Tax Cas 59 (A) that it should be allowed as a deduction was based on two grounds. One ... |
Chennai Metropolitan Water Sup.&Sew.&Ors Vs. T.T. Murali Babu | open for interference under limited scope of judicial review.20. One of the tests to be applied while dealing with the question of quantum of punishment would be: would any reasonable employer have imposed such punishment in like circumstances? Obviously, a reasonable employer is expected to take into consideration mea... | 1[ds]10. On a keen scrutiny of the decision rendered by the learned single Judge as well as that of the Division Bench it is clearly demonstrable that there has been no advertence with regard to the issue whether the charges levelled against the respondent had been proved or not. It is manifest that there had been no a... | 1 | 5,864 | 633 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
open for interference under limited scope of judicial review.20. One of the tests to be applied while dealing with the quest... |
Ranganatha Reddiar Vs. The State Of Kerala | Rupees one hundred and eighty-three and N. P. sixty only. One case (1d) (Id) 1/4/64 (Sd.) 147542 18/5/64. He further stated that it is written on the packet as Extra Superior in English and as Compounded misky full of quality and flavour in Tamil. 4. The relevant statutory provisions are; The Prevention of Food Adulter... | 1[ds]5. We are not concerned with the question whether Rule 12A is contrary to the provisions of the Act. We take it that it is valid and if the appellant s case falls within the proviso he is entitled to acquittalWe are unable to accede to this contention. It may be that if the warranty is not contained in a label or ... | 1 | 1,380 | 377 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
Rupees one hundred and eighty-three and N. P. sixty only. One case (1d) (Id) 1/4/64 (Sd.) 147542 18/5/64. He further stat... |
Shantilal Thakordas & Ors Vs. Chimanlal Maganlal Telwala | Rent Controller, Delhi on the ground that the notices to quit were not valid. Plaintiff filed an appeal but died during its pendency. His widow, son and two married daughters and two children of a deceased daughter were allowed to be substituted by the Rent Control Tribunal where the appeal was pending. The case was re... | 0[ds]In our considered opinion in face of the wordings of section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Act, the view expressed in Phul Ranis case, as stated above, is no t correct. If the law permitted the eviction of the tenant for the requirement of the landlord "for occupation as a residence for himself and members of his family",... | 0 | 1,697 | 736 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
Rent Controller, Delhi on the ground that the notices to quit were not valid. Plaintiff filed an appeal but ... |
Mahindra Bt Investment Company (Mauritius) Limited Vs. The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) - 11 & Others | breach of the SEBI Guidelines and therefore based on an illegal act. 8. We now have the communication dated 7 May 2013 received by the Director of Income Tax from SEBI. On examination of the letter dated 7 May 2013 we are of the view that it states that the agreement entered into in 2004 between TIL and AT&T was not ac... | 1[ds]We find that the Authority has proceeded to refuse to give a ruling on the basis that the petitioner had contravened the SEBI Guidelines. The Authority has conceded in the impugned order that the issue whether or not there is a circumvention of the SEBI Guidelines is to be determined by the authorities implementin... | 1 | 4,209 | 764 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
breach of the SEBI Guidelines and therefore based on an illegal act. 8. We now have the communication d... |
G.Govindan Vs. New India Insurance Co. Ltd. | Section 31 of the Act the public liability will not cease and that constitutes the insurable interest to keep the policy alive in respect of the third party risks are concerned. It must be deemed that the transferor allowed the purchaser to use the vehicle in a public place in the said transitional period and according... | 1[ds]This section is clearly based upon provisions of English statute. This section is analogous to the provisions in England where the third partys rights against Insurers Act 1930 was enacted to confer on third parties rights against the insurer of the third party risks. The present Act made a specific provision in c... | 1 | 3,804 | 2,136 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
Section 31 of the Act the public liability will not cease and that constitutes the insurable interest to keep the... |
Ishwari Prasad Mishra Vs. Mohammad Isa | with the pull and weight that would be harnessed from behind would be sufficient to carry him through." Similarly, in criticising the trial Court for accepting the evidence of Jamuna Singh, the High Court has observed that the presumption made by the trial Court that teacher, as a rule, is a respectable person, "is not... | 1[ds]No doubt, the High Court has come to the conclusion that there has been a conspiracy between all the witnesses, and if that conclusion is right, then the draft would, of course, have to be treated as a false document. But, for the moment, dealing with the argument about the failure of the appellant to mention the ... | 1 | 8,798 | 2,100 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
with the pull and weight that would be harnessed from behind would be sufficient to carry him through." Si... |
Uptron India Ltd Vs. Shammi Bhanu | counsel appearing on behalf of the employee that the provision in the Standing Orders regarding automatic termination of services is not bad. This was endorsed by this Court by observing that "Learned counsel for the respondent rightly made no attempt to support this part of the High Courts order." This again cannot be... | 0[ds]25. In view of the above, we are of the positive opinion that any clause in the Certified Standing Orders providing for automatic termination of service of a permanent employee, not directly related to "Production" in a Factory or Industrial Establishment, would be bad if it does not purport to provide an opportun... | 0 | 3,999 | 1,003 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
counsel appearing on behalf of the employee that the provision in the Standing Orders regarding automatic te... |
H.L. Sud, Income-Tax Officer, Bombay Vs. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd.Bombay | in respect of such transactions deal directly with or on behalf of a non-resident principal but deals with or through a non-resident broker who is carrying on such transactions in the ordinary course of his business and not as a principal, such first-mentioned broker shall not be deemed to be an agent under this sectio... | 0[ds]In our opinion, there is no warrant or justification for the argument advanced on behalf of the appellant.The liability imposed upon a person by his appointment as a statutory agent under S. 43 of the Act is only in respect of the liability for the assessment year for which the appointment is made. The appointment... | 0 | 2,848 | 671 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
in respect of such transactions deal directly with or on behalf of a non-resident principal but deals w... |
Mysore State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Mirja Kasim Ali Beg & Another | 311(1) of the Constitution. The argument seems to overlook that both at the time coming into force of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 and at the time of the passing of the impugned orders, the first respondents were holding civil posts in connection with the affairs of the State and they could not but be treated as... | 0[ds]6. A bare perusal of sub-s.(7) of S.115 ofthe States Reorganisation Act, 1956, reproduced above, makes it clear that nothing contained in that section could, after the appointed day, i.e., November 1, 1956 affect the operation of the provisions of Chapter 1 of Part XIV of the Constitution which includes Art. 311 t... | 0 | 5,243 | 2,740 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
311(1) of the Constitution. The argument seems to overlook that both at the time coming into force of the States ... |
Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal III Vs. Pigot Chapman and Company | over the business and carried it on as from April 1, 1959, under the style of M/s. Pigot Chapman & Co. at the same place and, therefore, it could not be said that it was a case of a dissolution of the erstwhile firm and succession to the old business by a new firm and as such both the Tribunal and the High Court were i... | 1[ds]According to counsel when a partnership is dissolved and only one of the erstwhile partners takes over the business and carries it on as the proprietor thereof or upon dissolution some of the erstwhile partners take some outsiders as partners and carry on the business, those would be the cases where another person... | 1 | 3,371 | 1,214 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
over the business and carried it on as from April 1, 1959, under the style of M/s. Pigot Chapman & Co... |
P. H. Kalyani Vs. M/S. Air France Calcutta | by him,the Labour Court would be entitled to go into the question whether the dismissal was justified on the evidence led before it and this is exactly what the Labour Court did relying on the judgment of this Court in Phulbari Tea Estate, 1960 1 SCR 32 :(AIR 1959 SC 1111 ).The contention therefore on behalf of the app... | 0[ds]In the present case the order of dismissal was passed by the Regional Representative on May 28,1960 and was communicated to the appellant on May 30th. The wages were offered to the appellant at the same time when the order was communicated to him, though he did not accept them. The respondent also made the applica... | 0 | 2,968 | 925 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
by him,the Labour Court would be entitled to go into the question whether the dismissal was justified on the evidence led b... |
CHERIYATH JYOTHI Vs. SAINUDEEN | non working of the disputed shed. It is presume that there will be no damage or harm to the respondent at the present stage. The property of the petitioner is filled with yielding rubber which is not taking yield for the last 1.5 years. The number of trees is nearly 50.This report is submitting before Hon?ble family co... | 0[ds]9. We have considered the relevant material placed on record and on considering the same in its proper perspective, we find no reason to interfere with the final conclusion recorded by the High Court in allowing the writ petition and setting aside the order passed by the Executing Court. As noticed from the repres... | 0 | 3,003 | 779 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
non working of the disputed shed. It is presume that there will be no damage or harm to the respondent at the... |
Delhi Cloth & General Mills Company Limited Vs. Thejvir Singh | to the appellant to recoach their witnesses to enable them to give improved statements. In this view the request of the management to adduce evidence was rejected by the same order. Ultimately, the application filed by the management No. 17 of 1966 was dismissed, and the permission asked for was refused. 12. Before us ... | 0[ds]14. Regarding the first contention it is enough to state that even a reference to a few facts will make it clear that the enquiry proceedings conducted by the management were grossly unfair to the workman15. It was on February 18, 1966 that the workman was informed that the enquiry will take place at 8 A.M. on the... | 0 | 2,699 | 873 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
to the appellant to recoach their witnesses to enable them to give improved statements. In this view the request of the ma... |
State of Gujarat and Ors Vs. Patel Ramjibhai Danabhai and Ors | restricted in its application to the case of an unregistered dealer whose modus operandi to evade tax involves ab initio disregard of the law. It does not apply to a registered dealer who has escaped assessment or has been under-assessed or assessed at a lower rate or has been wrongly allowed any deduction or has conce... | 1[ds]Authorisation means an authorisation granted under Section 24. Dealer under Sub-section (6) of the same Section is defined to mean any person who carries on the business of selling or buying goods in the pre-Reorganisation State of Bombay, excluding the transferred territories, whether for commission, remuneration... | 1 | 5,004 | 1,370 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
restricted in its application to the case of an unregistered dealer whose modus operandi to evade tax involv... |
Krishna Vs. State Of Maharashtra | for the parties and after perusing the language of the sections, we have no hesitation to hold, that the field of Section 6 and Section 10 are separate. The removal spoken under Section 6 is removal without any stigma while the removal under Section 10 is removal with penal consequences attaching stigma. If submission ... | 0[ds]10. In the present statute Section 6 refers to the trustee falling under Clause (e),(1), Section 7 refers to Trustees falling under Clauses (b) and (c) and(2) refers of Trustees falling under Clause (d) and(3) refers to Trustees falling in Clause (f) of(1) of Section 4 and Section 10 refers to cases of removal of ... | 0 | 3,060 | 296 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
for the parties and after perusing the language of the sections, we have no hesitation to hold, that th... |
State Of Punjab Vs. Amar Singh Harika | that no suit shall be instituted by any private individual against the State or any State Officer in respect of his dismissal from State service. After Patiala merged with and became a part of the Patiala and East Punjab States Union, all laws, rules and regulations in the erstwhile State of Patiala were made applicabl... | 0[ds]It is plain that the mere passing of an order of dismissal would not be effective unless it is published and communicated to the officer concerned. If the appointing authority passed an order of dismissal, but does not communicate it to the officer concerned, theoretically it is possible that unlike in the case of... | 0 | 3,470 | 1,486 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
that no suit shall be instituted by any private individual against the State or any State Officer in respec... |
ARUNA OSWAL Vs. PANKAJ OSWAL & ORS. | and Ors. v. M/s. Gwalior Sugar Co. Ltd. and Ors., AIR 2005 SC 83 , this Court considered the object of prescribing a qualifying percentage of shares to entertain petition under sections 397 and 398. It was held that the object is to ensure that frivolous litigation is not indulged in by persons, who have no legal stake... | 1[ds]15. It is quite apparent from a bare reading of the aforesaid provisions of section 72(1), every holder of securities has a right to nominate any person to whom his securities shall vest in the event of his death. In the case of joint-holders also, they have a right to nominate any person to whom all the rights in... | 1 | 8,011 | 2,190 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
and Ors. v. M/s. Gwalior Sugar Co. Ltd. and Ors., AIR 2005 SC 83 , this Court considered the obje... |
Central Bank Of India Vs. Shri Gokal Chand | accommodation in premises No. 17, Alipur Road consisted of more than three rooms and consequently, the respondent did not bona fide require the premises in dispute for his own occupation and praying for the issue of a commission to go to No. 17, Alipur Road and to prepare a plan of the premises. By his order dated May,... | 0[ds]3. The object of S. 38 (1) is to give a right of appeal to a party aggrieved by some order which affects his right or liability. In the context of S. 38 (l),the words "every order of the Controller made under this Act"! though very wide, do not include interlocutory orders, which are merely procedural and do not a... | 0 | 1,244 | 468 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
accommodation in premises No. 17, Alipur Road consisted of more than three rooms and consequently, the respo... |
Manimala Devi Vs. Indu Bala Debya & Others | mortgage debt.The High Court of Madras was right in holding in Pavayi v. Palamiyela Goundan, ILR 1940 Mad 872 : (AIR 1940 Mad 470 ) (FB) that a mortgagor who has lost all interest in the mortgaged property cannot by payment of interest or principal within the meaning of S. 20 bind the person on whom the interest has de... | 1[ds]9. The High Court, in our view, was in error in holding that the mortgagors interest in Mauzas Bansjora and Simitanr only was mortgaged.The question of limitation may now be considered in the light of the finding that Mauza Bahaldih was mortgaged under the two mortgage-deeds.The later mortgage was executed on Augu... | 1 | 3,771 | 431 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
mortgage debt.The High Court of Madras was right in holding in Pavayi v. Palamiyela Goundan, ILR 1940 M... |
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. M/S VEDANATA LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SESA STERLITE LIMITED) | 15.12.2015. On 15.12.2015, the Court in Crime No. 2/2014 passed the following order: “Complainant by name Sri Manjunatha Annigeri, Superintendent of police attached Special Investigation Team, Karnataka Lokayuktha, Bengaluru is present and submits that he has gone through the records which disclosed that no case is mad... | 1[ds]16. From the above, it is clear that the final Report which was accepted on 15.12.2015, was final report in case Crime No. 2/2014 which was registered after the investigation by SIT in pursuance of order of this Court passed in Writ Petition No. 562 of 2009 and in the above case, no offence was found against the r... | 1 | 3,261 | 335 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
15.12.2015. On 15.12.2015, the Court in Crime No. 2/2014 passed the following order: “Complainant by name Sri Man... |
Pirgonda Hongonda Patil Vs. Kalgonda Shidgonda Patil And Others | by the special circumstances of the case." 9. As pointed out in 47 Ind. App.255: (A.I.R. 1921 P.C. 50 (B) the power exercised was undoubtedly one within the discretion of the learned judges. All that can be urged is that the discretion was exercised in the on a wrong principle. We do not think that it was so exercised ... | 0[ds]We think that the correct principles were enunciated by Batchelor J. in his judgement in the same case, viz., 33 Born. 644 at p. 655 (c), when he said at pp. 649-650:"All amendments ought to be allowed which satisfy the two Conditions (a) of not working injustice to the other side, and (b) of being necessary for t... | 0 | 3,363 | 429 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
by the special circumstances of the case." 9. As pointed out in 47 Ind. App.255: (A.I.R. 1921 P.C. 50 (B) th... |
Lakshmi Devi Sugar Mills Ltd Vs. Pt. Ram Sarup.(And Connected Appeal) | the morning of 27-5-1952, that they were suspended till further orders immediately after the receipt by the General Manager of the first series of reports from the section engineers, that they were prevented from entering the premises at 1 p. m. but entered the same threatening violence. If this is the true position it... | 1[ds]10. Civil Appeal No. 245 of 1954 which is directed against the order of the Labour Appellate Tribunal under S.23 of Act may be disposed of atunfortunately the Labour Appellate Tribunal did not do and it came to record its conclusion that the conduct of the management came within the definition of a lockout without... | 1 | 4,028 | 2,367 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
the morning of 27-5-1952, that they were suspended till further orders immediately after the receipt by th... |
Indra Singh and Sons Private Limited Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Raigarh Circle, Raigarh and Others | motor vehicles including motor tyres and tubes, I have to repeat that as they are not directly used for the production of coal they cannot be specified in your registration certificate."4. Thereupon the appellant filed a revision under section 39(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act (Madhya Pradesh Act II of ... | 0[ds]But on looking through the record, we find that this is the first time that this point is being made in the course of these proceedings. In the application for registration before the Sales Tax Officer no mention is made that the appellant is carrying on the business of manufacturing coke. In its application under... | 0 | 1,748 | 426 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
motor vehicles including motor tyres and tubes, I have to repeat that as they are not directly used for the... |
Controller Of Estate Duty, Kerala Vs. V. Venugopala Varma Rajah | cultivation, so that the State must prove that it is non-agricultural in order to establish that it could be the subject matter of legislation which was within Parliaments legislative competence, and, therefore, covered by the Act, is to mix up the question of legislative competence and that of taxability of what is, o... | 1[ds]It seems clear to us that this Court, by explaining why, for certain special reasons and in an unusual context, certain land described as "forest land" was to be treated as though it had become "agricultural", implied that ordinarily this is not so. In Rajah Anand Brahma Shah v. State of U.P. &Ors., ([1967] 1 S.C.... | 1 | 3,516 | 948 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
cultivation, so that the State must prove that it is non-agricultural in order to establish that it cou... |
United India Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Narendra Pandurang Kadam | raised by the bus driver, the owner of the vehicle and the insurance company. The preliminary objection did not succeed. The Tribunal after a review of the evidence produced before it held that the claimants had proved that the accident was due to rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the bus. The Tri... | 0[ds]The contention of the appellant appears to be borne out by the clear language of the statute.The claimant was able to get a small amount of the claim. In fact, the claim of Rs 4, 50, 000 on account of loss of future income and enjoyment of life was made on a very modest basis of Rs 1500 per month. Even that was no... | 0 | 1,463 | 243 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
raised by the bus driver, the owner of the vehicle and the insurance company. The preliminary objection did ... |
Sri Chandre Prabhuji Jain Temple And Ors Vs. Harikrishna And Another | AIR 1960 SC 1349 the question whether in such circumstances, a respondent who has not appealed from the decree can be allowed to urge such a plea in answer to a claim by an appellant for a further decree although the plea might imperil the decree already obtained was left undecided. But the Full Bench decision of the M... | 1[ds]19A. It is no doubt true that the respondents cannot be allowed to impugn the decree passed by the High Court in favour of the appellants as they did not file any appeal from that decree. But we think that there is no reason why they should not be allowed to urge the plea that the orders of sanction were invalid w... | 1 | 4,981 | 695 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
AIR 1960 SC 1349 the question whether in such circumstances, a respondent who has not appealed from the decree can be allo... |
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd Vs. Pawan Kumar Gupta | is under the absolute control of the Central Government, nonetheless, it shall not be construed as the Central Government for the reason that the appellant-company is a separate legal entity. It also cannot claim that it is entitled to the benefit under Article 112 of the Limitation Act on the ground that a debt recove... | 0[ds]Civil Appeal Nos. 1085/2008 andview of the aforesaid judgments of this Court, the legal contention urged by the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant that the appellant being the agency or instrumentality of the Central Government is entitled to maintain the suit claims within thirty years as... | 0 | 3,152 | 522 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
is under the absolute control of the Central Government, nonetheless, it shall not be construed as the Centr... |
CHENNADI JALAPATHI REDDY Vs. BADDAM PRATAPA REDDY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ANR | at hand, DW-3, in his cross-examination, has identified the disputed signature of the first defendant (his elder brother) on Ext. A-1. He also stated that the suit schedule house was constructed when he was 25 years old; a partition was effected in 1980, after which he and the first defendant occupied their respective ... | 1[ds]5. From the discussion of the High Court in arriving at this conclusion, we find that it has not assigned any valid reason for disbelieving the attesting witnesses PWs 2 and 3. In fact, with respect to their evidence, the High Court made certain observations which are against the evidence on record. Similarly, wit... | 1 | 3,435 | 2,107 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
at hand, DW-3, in his cross-examination, has identified the disputed signature of the first defendant (his el... |
District Basic Education Officer Allahabad Vs. Sushila Jaiswal (dead) through her L.Rs. and Ors | fit for teaching job. Based on this report, the High Court vide its order dated 21.04.2010 directed that 1st Respondent be reinstated and in so far as the period of absence was concerned an appropriate order in accordance with law be passed by the Appellant.7. In compliance of the order dated 21.04.2010, the Appellant ... | 1[ds]11. The facts on record are clear that despite the requisition dated 19.10.2002 by the Appellant requesting Chief Medical Officer, Allahabad for medically examining 1st Respondent to certify her fitness and subsequent requests, no such report was sent to the Department. The writ petition filed by 1st Respondent in... | 1 | 1,720 | 357 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
fit for teaching job. Based on this report, the High Court vide its order dated 21.04.2010 directed that 1s... |
Khandesh Spg. & Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd Vs. The Rashtriya Girni Kamgar Sangh,Jalgaon | p. 1086 of AIR), thus:"Moreover, no objection was urged in this behalf, nor was any finding to the contrary recorded by the tribunal."In that case it was conceded that the reserves were in fact used as working capital. It is suggested that the learned Judge solely relied upon the relevant items in the balance-sheet in ... | 0[ds]These observations did not record any finding that the reserves were used as working capital. It was only an assumption made by the Industrial Court, as, in the view taken by it, it was immaterial whether the reserves were used as working capital or not. We do not think that the aforesaid opinion expressed by the ... | 0 | 3,843 | 1,338 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
p. 1086 of AIR), thus:"Moreover, no objection was urged in this behalf, nor was any finding to the contrary recorded by t... |
Real Value Appliances Limited Vs. Vardhaman Spinning & General Mills Limited | or to cause an inquiry to be made into any industrial company under sub-section (1), which naturally can be only after application of mind by the Board to the facts and circumstances of the case and in case of a reference by the industrial company, on consideration thereof. Inquiry under section 16 cannot commence mere... | 0[ds]18. We are also supported in our above conclusion by the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Bengal Lamps Ltd. v. Furmanite Nico Ltd. (supra), wherein the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court held that inquiry under section 16 of the Sick Industrial Companies Act cannot be said to be pending merely because... | 0 | 8,052 | 743 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
or to cause an inquiry to be made into any industrial company under sub-section (1), which naturally can be only after appl... |
Subhaschandra Balchandra Badjate Vs. The Director General | petitioner in such a case these provisions need to be kept in mind. Circumstance of fraud mentioned in section 11-A (4) of the Central Excise Act is prima facie made out in the present matter. There is prima facie case for evasion of estate duty and also non payment of income tax on the income made by utilizing aforesa... | 0[ds]28. Though the aforesaid position of law is in favour of the petitioner, the other circumstances of the present case cannot be ignored. The relevant material is already discussed and it shows that present petitioner was involved in running of the business and he was collecting sale proceeds. Thus, the proceeding c... | 0 | 4,756 | 928 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
petitioner in such a case these provisions need to be kept in mind. Circumstance of fraud mentioned in secti... |
H.C. Narayanappa & Others Vs. State of Mysore & Others | power to carry on any trade or business under a monopoly is reserved to the Union by the combined operation of Art. 298, and the law which is protected from the attack that it infringes the fundamental freedom to carry on business by Art. 19(6).We are therefore of the view that Chapter IVA could competently be enactd b... | 0[ds]In this case, it is unnecessary to decide whether it is open to a State transport undertaking under a scheme framed for a notified area to limit its application to some only of the routes, because on a true reading of the scheme, it is amply clear that the scheme was approved in relation to fourteen notified route... | 0 | 4,464 | 1,696 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
power to carry on any trade or business under a monopoly is reserved to the Union by the combined operation of Art. 298, ... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.