Case Name stringlengths 11 235 | Input stringlengths 944 6.86k | Output stringlengths 11 196k | Label int64 0 1 | Count int64 176 118k | Decision_Count int64 7 37.8k | text stringlengths 1.43k 13.9k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M/S Rana Girders Ltd Vs. Union Of India | claim of the pawnee being first fully satisfied.Rashbehary Ghose states in Law of Mortgage (TLL,7th Edn.,p.386) – “it seems a government debt in India is not entitled to precedence over a prior secured debt.” 20. Coming to the liability of the successor in interest, the Court clarified the legal position enunciated in ... | 1[ds]We may notice that in the first instance it was mentioned not only in the public notice but there is a specific clause inserted in the Sale Deed/Agreement as well, to the effect that the properties in question are being sold free from all encumbrances. At the same time, there is also a stipulation thatthese statut... | 1 | 4,549 | 357 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
claim of the pawnee being first fully satisfied.Rashbehary Ghose states in Law of Mortgage (TLL,7th Edn.,p... |
Hindustan Sugar Mills Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others | This application for review is directed against certain observations made by this Court in the course of the judgment in Civil Appeal No. 1122 of 1976 [Hindustan Sugar Mills Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan [1979] 43 S.T.C. 13 (S.C.)]. The question which arose in that appeal was whether, in sales of cement effected by the ap... | 1[ds]We got the impression that having regard to the opinion of the Law Department of the Government of India, no clause was introduced in the contract with thel of Supplies and Disposals providing from reimbursement of the amount of sales tax to the appellant in case the appellant was liable to pay the same under the ... | 1 | 1,068 | 703 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
This application for review is directed against certain observations made by this Court in the co... |
GANESAN (D) THROUGH LRS Vs. KALANJIAM AND OTHERS | 1. The appellant filed a suit claiming share in the suit properties asserting them to be joint family properties. The Trial Court held that the suit property was the self-acquired property of the deceased who died intestate and genuineness of the Will had not been established in accordance with the law, entitling the a... | 0[ds]5. The appeals raise a pure question of law with regard to the interpretation of Section 63 (c) of the Act. The signature of the testator on the will is undisputed. Section 63 (c) of the Succession Act requires an acknowledgement of execution by the testator followed by theattestation of the Will in his presence. ... | 0 | 791 | 401 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
1. The appellant filed a suit claiming share in the suit properties asserting them to be joint family prope... |
Ram Kripal Singh Vs. S State Of U. P | ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. ( 1 ) LEAVE granted.( 2 ) CHALLENGE in this appeal is to the order passed by a Division Bench of the allahabad High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant. Challenge in the writ petition was to the recovery proceedings initiated against him under Uttar pradesh Public Moneys recover... | 0[ds]( 6 ) ON a closure scrutiny the finding of the High court appears to be in order. Though it was urged that the recovery citation was issued after 24. 1. 2004. e. on 18th September, 2004, it is to be noted that the first recovery citation was issued on 3. 9. 1993. It is true that the same was under challenge in ano... | 0 | 824 | 490 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. ( 1 ) LEAVE granted.( 2 ) CHALLENGE in this appeal is to the order passed by a Division B... |
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Kannan Devan Mills Produce Co. Ltd | where agricultural income is derived from land situated partly within the State and partly without the State agricultural income-tax shall be levied:-(i) Where the portion of such Income attricubutable to the land situated within the State can be determined from the accounts maintained by the assessee, on the portion s... | 0[ds]The High Court rightly pointed out that R. 7 is applicable only to agricultural income from tea grown and manufactured in the State of Madras. It can have no applicability in the present case where even though tea is grown inside that State but it is manufactured in Kerala which is outside that State. As regards R... | 0 | 1,962 | 811 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
where agricultural income is derived from land situated partly within the State and partly without the State agricultural... |
State Of Madhya Pradesh(Now Maharashtra) Vs. Haji Hasan Dada | being a substantive right given to the respondent by the statute and not being a matter of mere procedure", this right could not be taken away except by clear and unambiguous words, and S. 13 as amended was not legislation which satisfied that test. The High Court accordingly answered the questions as follows:"1. Rulin... | 1[ds]5. Section 13, in terms authorised the Commissioner to grant refund to a registered dealer applying in that behalf, of any amount of tax or penalty paid by such dealer in excess of the amount due from him under the Act. The section implies that refund may be granted only of the amount which is not lawfully due, an... | 1 | 1,653 | 730 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
being a substantive right given to the respondent by the statute and not being a matter of mere procedure", this right cou... |
M/S. Empire Industries Ltd Vs. State Of Maharashtra | in the Act to determine the validity and justification of the employers request for retrenchment of workers. It is true that under section 25N the authority to grant or refuse permission for retrenchment is vested in the appropriate government which in this case would be the state government or the authority specified ... | 1[ds]24. As may be seen from Section 25N, it has a complete scheme for retrenchment of workmen in industrial establishments where the number of workers is in excess of hundred. Clauses (a) & (b) lay down the conditions precedent to retrenchment and provide for three months notice or three months wages in lieu of the no... | 1 | 7,640 | 934 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
in the Act to determine the validity and justification of the employers request for retrenchment of wor... |
Naveen Kumar Vs. Vijay Kumar & Others | was not liable. 11. The subsequent decision of a Bench of three judges of this Court in HDFC Bank Limited v Reshma (supra) involved an agreement of hypothecation. The Tribunal held the financier of the vehicle to jointly and severally liable together with the owner on the ground that it was under an obligation to ensur... | 1[ds]12. The consistent thread of reasoning which emerges from the above decisions is that in view of the definition of the expressionin Section 2(30), it is the person in whose name the motor vehicle stands registered who, for the purposes of the Act, would be treated as theHowever, where a person is a minor, the guar... | 1 | 4,915 | 466 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
was not liable. 11. The subsequent decision of a Bench of three judges of this Court in HDFC Bank Limited v Reshm... |
M/S Rajasthan Spinning And Weaving Mills Ltd. Bhilwara Rajasthan Vs. Collector Of Central Excise Jaipur Rajasthan | non-cellulosic spun yarn, will fall under this tariff description, even if it was blended with some other type of yarn provided that the polypropylene component of the blended yarn was predominant in weight. The notification dated 1-12-1977 exempted polypropylene spun yarn falling under Tariff Item No. 18-E of the Firs... | 0[ds]The contention of the appellant which was upheld by the Collector (Appeals) and also the dissenting member of the Tribunal, was that the exemption granted by a notification should be construedtariff description of Itemc spun yarn, comprehends "Spun (discontinuous) yarn whichsic origin, other that acrylic fibre, pr... | 0 | 2,235 | 1,002 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
non-cellulosic spun yarn, will fall under this tariff description, even if it was blended with some oth... |
C. BRIGHT Vs. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS | SCC OnLine MP 553) examined the provisions of Section 14 of the Act as amended. The Court held that the second proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 14 was inserted in order to ensure that Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate pass the order within a stipulated time. The Bank/secured creditor has no cont... | 0[ds]7. A well settled rule of interpretation of the statutes is that the use of the word shall in a statute, does not necessarily mean that in every case it is mandatory that unless the words of the statute are literally followed, the proceeding or the outcome of the proceeding, would be invalid. It is not always corr... | 0 | 3,855 | 1,429 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
SCC OnLine MP 553) examined the provisions of Section 14 of the Act as amended. The Court held that the... |
Tirath Ram Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh | FAZAL ALI, J. In this appeal by special leave, the appellant has been convicted under Section 302/149 and 302/109 and sentenced to imprisonment for life and under Section 147, he has been sentenced to one years RI. A detailed narrative of the prosecution case has been given in the judgment of the High court and it is n... | 1[ds]2. We have heard learned for the parties and have gone through the judgments of the courts below. We find that the judgment of the High Court is clearly concluded by concurrent findings of fact. Mr. Mulla appearing for the appellant submitted that the name of the appellant has not been mentioned in the dying decla... | 1 | 393 | 271 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
FAZAL ALI, J. In this appeal by special leave, the appellant has been convicted under Section 302... |
The Samarth Transport Co. (P) Ltd Vs. The Regional Transport Authority,Nagpur And Others | S. 68F applies only when an application for permit is made by a State Transport Undertaking in pursuance of an approved scheme and that in the present case as the application was filed by the State Transport Undertaking before the scheme was approved, the provisions of the section were not attracted. It is true that un... | 0[ds]4. To appreciate this argument it is necessary to notice some of the relevant provisions of the Act. Under S. 58 of the Act, "A stage carriage permit or a contract carriage permit....shall be effective without renewal for such period, not less than three years and not more than five years, as the Regional Transpor... | 0 | 3,589 | 1,901 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
S. 68F applies only when an application for permit is made by a State Transport Undertaking in pursuance of ... |
Swati Ulhas Kerkar and Ors Vs. Sanjay Walavalkar and Ors | confidence requisition by the majority (18 out of 32), it had lost legitimacy to take any policy decision regarding the management and administration of the Society, which included induction of new members. The High Court expounded about the danger of resorting to such stratagem — as it was likely to upset the constitu... | 1[ds]36. The High Court, vide impugned judgment, went on to hold against the Society due to the manner in which the requisition of no confidence motion moved by the majority of the existing members (18 out of 32) to convene SGBM came to be delayed and frustrated by the stratagem adopted by the then Managing Committee, ... | 1 | 9,823 | 2,888 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
confidence requisition by the majority (18 out of 32), it had lost legitimacy to take any policy decision regardi... |
Chairman Madappa Vs. M. N. Mahanthadevaru And Others | these reliefs will show that a suit under S. 92 may be filed when there is a breach of trust or when the administration of the trust generally requires improvement. One of the reliefs which can be sought in such a suit is to obtain the authority of the Court for letting, selling, mortgaging or exchanging the whole or a... | 0[ds]We are of opinion that this contention on behalf of the respondent is correct. We cannot accept the contention on behalf of the appellant that these paragraphs merely provide for carrying out nitya poojas and vishesh poojas mentioned in the scheme and nothing else. The generality of the words used in these paragra... | 0 | 2,917 | 819 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
these reliefs will show that a suit under S. 92 may be filed when there is a breach of trust or when th... |
Dmitry Rosnin & Another Vs. The Registrar of Companies | local address is insisted by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and other Intelligence Agency that this compliance must be made. For all these reasons, he submits that such a condition cannot be challenged and the petition be dismissed.8. On this material, we have heard the learned Advocates appearing for the part... | 1[ds]In these circumstances, the apprehension that the foreign nationals and subscribers/ shareholders of a registered company in India, without any local support or assistance, would not be available in case any offences are committed or violations of relevant laws are noticed, is wholly unfounded.11. We accept the st... | 1 | 1,994 | 222 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
local address is insisted by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and other Intelligence Agency th... |
V. Kishan Rao Vs. Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital | (1982) 1 All E.R. 650]; 7 Where an infection following surgery in a well-staffed and modern hospital remained undiagnosed until the patient sustained crippling injury [See Hajgato v. London Health Association (1982) 36 O.R. (2d) 669 at 682]; and 7 Where an explosion occurred during the course of administering anaesthet... | 1[ds]54. This Court however makes it clear that before the consumer Fora if any of the parties wants to adduce expert evidence, the members of the Fora by applying their mind to the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials on record can allow the parties to adduce such evidence if it is appropriate to do s... | 1 | 7,734 | 1,445 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
(1982) 1 All E.R. 650]; 7 Where an infection following surgery in a well-staffed and modern hospital remained undi... |
M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD Vs. MAHENDRA PAL BHATIA AND ORS | be seen from the vesting provision, what was transferred to and vested in the Central Government, were not corporate houses or business entities owning coal-mines. What was transferred to and vested in the Central Government were the coalmines. In other words this Nationalisation Act, was little different from the stat... | 1[ds]12. But, unfortunately for the respondents, both the objections cannot stand in the light of the statutory prescriptions. Section 3(1) of the Nationalisation Act, declares that on the appointed day, which was 01.05.1973, the right, title and interest of the owners in relation to the coal-mines specified in the Sch... | 1 | 2,228 | 552 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
be seen from the vesting provision, what was transferred to and vested in the Central Government, were not c... |
Bombay Metropolitan Transport Corporation Limited Vs. Servants of The B.M.T.C. (Cidco) | Bom. 355, "if the petitioners have made out a case for the winding up of the company, if they have placed materials before the court which satisfy the Court that the company is insolvent, if they have placed materials before the Court which satisfy the court that the substratum of the company is gone, it is difficult t... | 1[ds]( 14 ) IT is our view, having heard Mr. Chinoy for the company, Mr. Rana for theon notice, and Mr. Ganguli for the respondent 5 that, as urged by Mr. Chinoy and Mr. Rana, harmoniously constructed, there is no conflict between the provisions of the two statutes and that they operate in distinct and separate26 ) MR.... | 1 | 5,191 | 1,729 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
Bom. 355, "if the petitioners have made out a case for the winding up of the company, if they have placed materials before t... |
M/S.Angel Baby Products Pvt.Ltd Vs. New Okhla Indust.Dev.Auth. | which he directed that the land (2590.86 sq. meters) shown in the brochure be given to Shri Hira Lal Gupta and penalty be recovered as per rules. He urged that the effect of the earlier order passed by the Chief Executive Officer on 24th March, 2002, stood superseded by the subsequent order, whereby penalty was directe... | 0[ds]12. For the reasons hereinafter following, we are unable to accept Mr. Jayant Bhushans submissions questioning the order passed by the Officer on Special Duty dated 11th April, 2002, and the various notices subsequently issued on the basis thereof, demanding payment of penalty despite the order of the Chief Execut... | 0 | 2,651 | 782 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
which he directed that the land (2590.86 sq. meters) shown in the brochure be given to Shri Hira Lal Gupta ... |
Rev. Sidhajbhai Sabhai & Others Vs. State of Bombay & Another | their own resources: fundamental right guaranteed by Art. 30(1) did not extend to getting assistance from the coffers of the State; and if the minority institutions desired to obtain aid from the State they must submit to the terms on which the State offered aid to all other institutions established by other persons. 1... | 1[ds]7. Article 19(1) (f) on which reliance has been placed on behalf of the society does not come to its aid. By that clause all citizens are declared to have the fundamental freedom to acquire, hold and dispose of property. But by the rules and orders impugned no right to acquire, hold or dispose of property is viola... | 1 | 6,047 | 1,166 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
their own resources: fundamental right guaranteed by Art. 30(1) did not extend to getting assistance from t... |
Haryana State Indl. Dev. Corpn Vs. Inderjeet Sawhney | furnish us proof thereof within the stipulated period to enable us to issue the allotment letter." * 7. In response to the aforesaid provisional letter of allotment dated 24-2-1989, the respondent wrote a letter dated 4-3-1989 in which it was stated as follows "Offer of half acre Plots Nos. 1 and 2 measuring 1000 sq.m.... | 1[ds]12. From the facts as narrated above, it appears that the High Court erred in directing that a further plot of half acre should be allotted to the respondent. The High Court did not appreciate that the correspondence on record of the case clearly shows that the respondent was estopped from making the claim for a f... | 1 | 2,303 | 637 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
furnish us proof thereof within the stipulated period to enable us to issue the allotment letter.... |
Asthan Bhagat Dwara Vs. Chief Settlement Commissioner and Others | HIDDAYATULLAH, C.J. 1. This is an appeal against the judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab dismissing an appeal against the judgment of a learned Single in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Division Bench relied upon an earlier decision of the court reported in Samadh Parshotam Da... | 0[ds]3. This matter was specifically before us in an appeal from the judgment on which the High Court relied. The judgment has not yet been reported. It is Samadh Parshotam Das v. The Union of India and Others. ((Civil Appeal No. 358 of 1965 decided on February 26, 1968). The decision of this Court clearly shows that i... | 0 | 443 | 122 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
HIDDAYATULLAH, C.J. 1. This is an appeal against the judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Punja... |
Dayanidhi Bisoi Vs. State Of Orissa | again is a circumstance which establishes the presence of the appellant in the flat of the accused and blood stain found in the said finger prints taken from the place of incident indicates that the appellant must have been in the flat after the assault had taken place on the deceased. 23. From the above circumstances ... | 0[ds]24. Since the courts below have elaborately discussed the case law applicable to various issues involved in this case, we do not think it necessary for us to reconsider the same, having independently considered the material produced by the prosecution as against the appellant.25. Having agreed with the conclusions... | 0 | 5,961 | 646 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
again is a circumstance which establishes the presence of the appellant in the flat of the accused and bloo... |
DUNCANS INDUSTRIES LTD Vs. A.J. AGROCHEM | the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, and the Companies Act, 2013. 5. The Code seeks to achieve the above objectives.?? 26. The Preamble of the Code states as follows: ?An Act to consolidate and amend the laws relating to reorganisation and insolvency resolution of corporate persons, partnership firms and indivi... | 0[ds]7.1 In the present case, it is true that by notification dated 28.01.2016 issued under Section 16E of the Tea Act, the Central Government authorised the Tea Board to take over the management or the control of the seven tea estates mentioned in the said notification. However, the appellant challenged the said notif... | 0 | 6,192 | 1,054 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, and the Companies Act, 2013. 5. The Code seeks to achieve ... |
Saraswathi Ammal And Another Vs. Rajagopal Ammal | at page 18 -"From very ancient times the sacred writings of the Hindus divided works productive of religious merit into two divisions named ishta and purtta, a classification which has come down to our own times. So much so that the entire object of Hindu endowments will be found included within the enumeration of isht... | 0[ds]From the recitals in the settlement deed set out above, it will be seen that items 1 to 6 are vacant sites, and that the samadhi is in item 1, while items 2 to 6 have been set apart along with item 1 for the benefit of and free access to the samadhi. All the other items 7 to 25 have been dedicated in order that th... | 0 | 4,590 | 1,179 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
at page 18 -"From very ancient times the sacred writings of the Hindus divided works productive of religious ... |
Radhakrishnadas Vs. Kaluram | purpose for which the transaction has been entered into. A manager does not cease to be a manager merely because in the transaction entered into by him a junior member of the family, who was a major or believed to be a major, also joined. It is not unusual for alienees to require major members of the family to join in ... | 0[ds]The fact that that sale-deed had been executed also by his father who was the manager of the family makes the transaction binding upon him just as it is admittedly binding upon his brother, the second appellant, who was then a minor. Mr. Sinha, however, contended that the fact that the appellant No. 1 was required... | 0 | 2,827 | 946 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
purpose for which the transaction has been entered into. A manager does not cease to be a manager merely because i... |
LEELADHAR (D) THR. LRS Vs. VIJAY KUMAR (D) THR. LRS | respondents herein filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Nainital praying for specific performance of the contract and also prayed that if any part of the disputed land is not found in their possession, then possession be given to them. In the alternative, they prayed for refund of Rs.40,000/¬ along with interest.2... | 0[ds]4. We may note a few salient facts. The agreement to sell (Exhibit P-13) is registered on 18.02.1985. Rs.35,000/¬ out of Rs.40,000/¬ was paid. The balance Rs.5,000/- was paid when the document (Exhibit P¬14) was executed on 26.03.1985. As far as delay is concerned, we are of the considered view that there is no de... | 0 | 1,289 | 366 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
respondents herein filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Nainital praying for specific performance ... |
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax Vs. Mahadeo Jalan & Mahabir Prasad Jalan | the following conclusion :-(1) Where the shares in a public limited company are quoted on the stock exchange and there are dealings in them, the price prevailing on the valuation date is the value of the shares. (2) Where the shares are of a public limited company which are not quoted on a stock exchange or of a privat... | 0[ds]An examination of the various aspects of valuation of shares in a limited company would lead us to the following conclusion :-(1) Where the shares in a public limited company are quoted on the stock exchange and there are dealings in them, the price prevailing on the valuation date is the value of the shares(2) Wh... | 0 | 6,390 | 820 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
the following conclusion :-(1) Where the shares in a public limited company are quoted on the stock exc... |
M/S Anita International Vs. Tungabadra Sugar Works Maz.Sangh | course can never be permitted. 46. To be fair to learned counsel for the appellants, it needs to be noticed, that reliance was also placed on behalf of the appellants on the Kiran Singh, the Sadashiv Prasad Singh, and the Jagmittar Sain Bhagat cases, to contend, that a decree passed by a Court without jurisdiction was ... | 0[ds]31. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the complicated sequence of facts projected before us, as also, the legal submissions advanced at the hands of learned counsel for the rival parties. We shall now endeavour to record our conclusions, with reference to the issues canvassed32. In our considered view,... | 0 | 27,894 | 1,432 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
course can never be permitted. 46. To be fair to learned counsel for the appellants, it needs to be noticed, that... |
BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD ETC Vs. M/S ICEBERG INDUSTRIES LTD. AND OTHERS ETC. | we ought to interfere at this stage with such finding so far the same related to applicability and interpretation of the said circular. 17. As regards the provisions of clauses 9 (a) and (b) of the agreement, the first provision curb the right of a consumer to determine the agreement unless certain conditions are fulfi... | 0[ds]9. But even if we proceed on the basis that concession on law made before a judicial forum against whose decision we are hearing these appeals would not bind a party to such concession, we do not find anything in law which barred the Redressal Forum from adjudicating the disputeBut we do not find any reason to den... | 0 | 6,092 | 835 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
we ought to interfere at this stage with such finding so far the same related to applicability and in... |
State of Orissa Vs. Dandasi Sahu | whether charges for stone chips could be adjudicated, was not arbitrable. That was a case of rates which was within the jurisdiction of the Engineer-in-charge by Clause 13A of the bargain between the parties. In the instant case it is not the rate which is in dispute. The Madhya Pradesh High Court referred to several d... | 1[ds]In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that we would not be justified in acceding to this request on the part of the Appellant. In this case the submission that the award was bad being an unreasoned one, was neither mooted before the learned Subordinate Judge nor before the High Court. T... | 1 | 3,671 | 1,493 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
whether charges for stone chips could be adjudicated, was not arbitrable. That was a case of rates which was within the j... |
Secretary, Cannanore District Muslim Educational Association, Kanpur Vs. State of Kerala and Ors. | that the said expression does not equate the writs that can be issued in India with those in England but only draws an analogy from them. The learned Judge then clarifies the entire position as follows: ..It enables the High Courts to mould the reliefs to meet the peculiar and complicated requirements of this country. ... | 1[ds]23. This Court is of the opinion that so far as the right of the government to change its policy is concerned, the High Courts conclusion is correct. The High Court is equally right in holding that the government cannot be tied down to any policy. But unfortunately, the High Court did not examine the impact of the... | 1 | 4,990 | 1,958 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
that the said expression does not equate the writs that can be issued in India with those in England but only draws an ana... |
NAVIN CHANDRA DHOUNDIYAL Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS | disputed that the post of Principal and of the teacher is not the same. It is a teacher on promotion who is appointed as a Principal and there is no decision of the Government giving extension beyond the age of 60 years to a Principal. This being so, the appeal is allowed and the decision of the High Court permitting r... | 1[ds]9. This court is of the opinion that on a plain interpretation of Statute No. 16.24, including the proviso in question, it is clearly apparent that firstly each teacher attains the age of superannuation on completing 65 years Statute No. 16.24 (1). Secondly, no teacher who attains the age of superannuation has a r... | 1 | 3,478 | 1,282 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
disputed that the post of Principal and of the teacher is not the same. It is a teacher on promotion who is appointed as a ... |
Union Of India Vs. Namit Sharma | of Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent- writ petitioner, that if we do not read Sections 12(5) and 15(5) of the Act in the manner suggested in the judgment under review, the provisions of Sections 12(5) and 15(5) of the Act would be ultra vires the Article 14 of the Constitution, is misconceived.29. In the j... | 1[ds]28. Sections 12(6) and 15(6) of the Act, however, provide that the Chief Information Commissioner or an Information Commissioner shall not be a Member of Parliament or Member of the Legislature of any State or Union Territory, as the case may be, or hold any other office of profit or connected with any political p... | 1 | 11,618 | 1,547 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
of Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent- writ petitioner, that if we do not read Sections 12(5) a... |
Bijayananda Patnaik Vs. Satrughna Sahu & Others | claim." We have already said that sub-rule (1) gives absolute power to the plaintiff to withdraw his suit or abandon part of his claim against all or any of the defendants, and where an application for withdrawal of a suit is made under O.XXIII, r. 1 (1), the Court has to allow that application and the suit stands with... | 1[ds]In the absence of such a provision in Chap. IV-A, we do not think that the High Court was right in importing the principles of ss. 109 and 110 in the Matter of withdrawal of appeals before the High Court. So far therefore as the question of withdrawal of appeals before the High Court under Chapter IV-A is concerne... | 1 | 4,619 | 1,363 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
claim." We have already said that sub-rule (1) gives absolute power to the plaintiff to withdraw his suit or abandon part o... |
Karnataka Industrial Areas Dev. Board Vs. Nandi Cold Storage P.Ltd | Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at New Delhi (in short the National Commission). Respondent had filed a complaint against the appellant before the National Commission. 2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows: 3. In... | 1[ds]9. While issuing notice on 10.9.2004, the same was limited to the question of compensation. In support of the appeal, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that there is no deficiency in service. All possible steps have been taken at different points of time. In a hypothetical case which was not established,... | 1 | 998 | 160 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the National Consume... |
Mohanlal Chunilal Kothari Vs. Tribhovan Haribhai Tamboli | To that extent the decision of this Court is really against the appellants. It is clear that the appellants cannot take advantage of what was a mere slip in so far as cl.(d) was added to the other clauses of S. 88(1), when that clause really did not fall to be considered with reference to the controversy in that case. ... | 0[ds]5. It will be noticed that cls. (a), (b) and (c) of S. 88(1) apply to things as they were at the date of the enactment, whereas cl. (d) only authorised the State Government to specify certain areas as being reserved for urban non-agricultural or industrial development, by notification in the Official Gazette, from... | 0 | 2,424 | 1,265 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
To that extent the decision of this Court is really against the appellants. It is clear that the appellants ... |
Anjuman Islamia and Others Vs. Munshi Tegh Ali and Others | HEGDE, J.1. This is a defendants appeal by special leave. The suit from which this appeal arises is one for damages. The plaintiffs case is that they are the owners of a plot named Badi Takia. On February 27, 1959, defendants Nos. 3 and 4 brought a tazia from their house and kept the same in a portion of Badi Takia (th... | 0[ds]2. The Trial Court, Appellate Court as well as the High Court have concurrently come to the conclusion that the plaintiffs and their ancestors have been holding and managing the property for a very long time. Therefore it is for the defendants to establish that the same has now become wakf property. As mentioned e... | 0 | 699 | 302 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
HEGDE, J.1. This is a defendants appeal by special leave. The suit from which this appeal arises is one for damages. The pl... |
Chandru Vs. State and Ors | ill founded. Why would Chandru kill another human being just on the asking of the accused Siva? Chandru was a medical student, studying in a profession meant to save lives and not to kill people. From the evidence on record it stands established that the deceased was a drug addict and had been taking injectible drugs f... | 1[ds]13. In a case based on circumstantial evidence it is always better for the courts to deal with each circumstance separately and then link the circumstances which have been proved to arrive at a conclusion. Unfortunately, in this case, though a reference has been made to some circumstances, the circumstances have n... | 1 | 4,833 | 2,948 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
ill founded. Why would Chandru kill another human being just on the asking of the accused Siva? Chandru was ... |
Ouseph Varghese Vs. Joseph Aley & Ors | and 7. We have already referred to the evidence of P.W. 2. He does not appear to us to be a reliable witness. P.W. 1 is no other than the plaintiff himself. P.W. 7 is his brother. P.W. 1 has no children and P.W. 7 is his nearest heir. Therefore it is quite clear that both P.Ws. 1 and 7 are interested witnesses. Their e... | 0[ds]From this clause it is clear that the plaintiff conveyed all his rights, title and interest in the suit properties to the vendee subject to the aforementioned stipulation. It is not necessary to consider whether the restriction in question is a valid one. Even if we assume that the same is valid, it does not suppo... | 0 | 2,299 | 1,086 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
and 7. We have already referred to the evidence of P.W. 2. He does not appear to us to be a reliable witness.... |
Gur Narain Das And Another Vs. Gur Tahal Das And Others | being so we think that the finding of the High Court must be upheld. We were greatly impressed by several letters of Exhibit-A series, which have been found to be genuine by both the Courts below. The genuineness of the letters was attacked before us, but we find no good reason for reversing the findings of the trial J... | 0[ds]This contention must however fail, since we find no good reason for departing from the well-established practice of this Court of not disturbing concurrent findings of the trial Court and the first appellate Court. In the present case, the finding that the parties are Sudras is largely based on the oral evidence, ... | 0 | 2,714 | 940 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
being so we think that the finding of the High Court must be upheld. We were greatly impressed by several letters of Exhib... |
A. R. Radha Krishna Vs. Dasari Deepthi and Ors | 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals, by special leave, are directed against the order dated 22.09.2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh in Criminal Petition Nos. 6508, 6530 & 6531 of 2017, whereby the High Court allowed the Criminal Petitions ... | 1[ds]9. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties and carefully scrutinizing the record, we are of the considered opinion that the High Court was not justified in allowing the quashing petitions by invoking its power Under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure In a case pertaining to an offence Under Section 138 a... | 1 | 1,140 | 426 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals, by special leave, are directed against the order dated 22.09.2017 passed... |
M. K. Kunhimohammed Vs. P. A. Ahmedkutty and Others | limit of fifteen thousand rupees for each individual passenger... " 8. As the law stands today, the insurer is liable to pay up to Rs. 15, 000 in respect of death of any passenger or any injury caused to him. In the Statement of Objects and Reasons attached to the Bill which ultimately became Act 47 of 1982, it was sta... | 0[ds]Section 95(2)(b) as it existed before its amendment in 1982 dealt with the limits of the liability of an insurer in the case of motor vehicles in which passengers were carried for hire or reward or by reason of or in pursuance of a contract of employment. Sub-clause (i) of section 95(2)(b) provided that in respect... | 0 | 4,662 | 1,029 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
limit of fifteen thousand rupees for each individual passenger... " 8. As the law stands today, the insurer... |
Devender Kumar Singla Vs. Baldeo Krishan Singhla | given to the complainant who was examined as PW-3, during cross examination. 7. In order to appreciate the rival submissions, it would be necessary to consider on the background of the factual position as to whether offence punishable under Section 420 IPC is made out. Section 420 deals with certain specified classes o... | 0[ds]So far as the appeal filed by the complainant is concerned, learned counsel for the complainant submitted that the accused Mala had stopped payment of the cheque and, therefore, being party to the transaction, she should also be convicted.6. So far as the appeal filed by the accused Devender is concerned, learned ... | 0 | 2,654 | 490 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
given to the complainant who was examined as PW-3, during cross examination. 7. In order to appreciate the ri... |
State Of Maharashtra Vs. Sharadchandra Vinayak Dongre | and, if so, by whom;(e) whether the accused has been arrested;(f) whether he has been released on his bond and, if so, whether with or without sureties;(g) whether he has been forwarded in custody under Section 170. 7. The purpose of the submission of the police report with the details as mentioned above, is to enable ... | 1[ds]5. In our view, the High Court was perfectly justified in holding that the delay, if any, for launching the prosecution, could not have been condoned without notice to the respondents and behind their back and without recording any reasons for condonation of the delay. However, having come to that conclusion, it w... | 1 | 2,037 | 1,216 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
and, if so, by whom;(e) whether the accused has been arrested;(f) whether he has been released on his b... |
Union Of India Vs. S.Ravichandran | letter dated 31.08.2000. 5. On 28.06.2001, the BSF (General Duty Officers) Recruitment Rules, 2001 were notified in which also there was no provision for promotion of ministerial cadre staff to the post of Assistant Commandant and above. A lot of correspondence was exchanged between the BSF and the Government and the a... | 1[ds]11. After hearing arguments and perusing the record, we are clearly of the view that the decision dated 28.08.2000/31.08.2000 was superseded by the cadre review which took place on 28.11.2003. It may be true that the subject matters of the two communications dated 31.08.2000 and 28.11.2003 are slightly different b... | 1 | 1,561 | 498 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
letter dated 31.08.2000. 5. On 28.06.2001, the BSF (General Duty Officers) Recruitment Rules, 2001 were notified in which... |
ANGLO AMERICAN METALLURGICAL COAL PTY LTD Vs. MMTC LTD | ; Pure Helium India (P) Ltd. v. ONGC, (2003) 8 SCC 593 and D.D. Sharma v. Union of India, (2004) 5 SCC 325 ]. 17. We have gone through the material on record as well as the majority award, and the decisions of the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench. The majority of the Arbitral Tribunal as well as the courts f... | 1[ds]16. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, there can be no doubt whatsoever that the Majority Award is a detailed award, which goes into the facts in great detail, outlines the issues to be answered, and then answers all the issues, with due regard to the oral and documentary evidence given in... | 1 | 21,632 | 7,128 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
; Pure Helium India (P) Ltd. v. ONGC, (2003) 8 SCC 593 and D.D. Sharma v. Union of India, (2004) 5 SCC ... |
NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX | specific reference to the second proviso and explanation 2(d) which reads as follows:- Provided further that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply in a case where any income in relation to any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India, chargeable to tax, has escaped assessmen... | 1[ds]That may be true, but merely the fact that the original assessment is a detailed one, cannot take away the powers of the assessing officer to issue notice under Section 147 of the Act13. We would like to make it clear that we are not going into the merits of the allegations made against the assessee. At this stage... | 1 | 8,239 | 2,596 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
specific reference to the second proviso and explanation 2(d) which reads as follows:- Provided further tha... |
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Supreme Graphics Creations Private Limited & Another | ORAL JUDGMENTB.H. MARLAPALLE, J.This appeal arises from the Order dated 28.9.2001 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji by allowing an appeal against the Order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax as an Assessing Officer. The question of law as raised in this appeal is :- "Whether the operat... | 0[ds]8.We have no doubt in our mind that the Tribunal has considered the nature of operations carried out by the assessee and by relying upon the three decisions of the Supreme Court (supra), reached to a conclusion that the assessee was carrying out a manufacturing process for making the laminated cartons. The reasoni... | 0 | 876 | 93 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
ORAL JUDGMENTB.H. MARLAPALLE, J.This appeal arises from the Order dated 28.9.2001 passed by the Income Tax A... |
JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD Vs. DIDAR SINGH AND ANR | Later the property was purchased by Kumar Subodh Singh Deo vide registered Sale Deed No.3201 dated 4.12.1989. He, in turn, sold the property to the plaintiff vide registered Sale Deed dated 8.8.1990 for a consideration of Rs.12,000/and since then he is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property by constructin... | 1[ds]9. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent and perused the material available on record. In view of the concurrent finding of facts by the courts below we are conscious of the limited scope of adjudication in this appeal.11. It is well settled by catena of Judgments of this Court tha... | 1 | 1,178 | 199 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
Later the property was purchased by Kumar Subodh Singh Deo vide registered Sale Deed No.3201 dated 4.12... |
Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/S Amar Infrastructure Ltd | of manipulation in the technical evaluation sheet which has been placed on record by the CSIDC in the form of document R-4/3 and 5/3 and by M/s. Amar Infrastructure Ltd. as Annexure P-4 in the High Court.34. The Cyber Crime Cell has observed that some modification was made on 4th July, 2016, in the technical evaluation... | 1[ds]24. It is apparent from the pre-qualification criteria that for acquiring eligibility the intended tenderer has to meet the financial criteria as specified in Clause 2.1, technical criteria as per Clause 2.2(A) and the construction experience in key activities as provided in Clause 2.2 of doing a contract of requi... | 1 | 6,508 | 1,552 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
of manipulation in the technical evaluation sheet which has been placed on record by the CSIDC in the form... |
Shri Ambica Mills Ltd. No. 1 Vs. The Textile Labour Association, Ahmedabad,, And Vice Versa | because it is registered under the Companies Act. The payment of Bonus Act, Section 2 (9) defines a company as follows :"(9) company means any company as defined in Section 3 of the Companies Act, 1956, and includes a foreign company within the meaning of Sec. 591 of that Act;" A corporation is defined in Section 2 (11... | 0[ds]18. We may, perhaps, refer in this connection to certain decisions relied on by the both sides. In Sone Valley Portland Cement Co. v. The Workmen, (1972) 1 Lab LJ 642 = (AIR 1972 SC 2148 ) this Court held that apart from legislation an incentive bonus for increase of production, irrespective of the question as to... | 0 | 5,263 | 1,169 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
because it is registered under the Companies Act. The payment of Bonus Act, Section 2 (9) defines a company as fol... |
BHARAT WATCH COMPANY THROUGH ITS PARTNER Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. THROUGH ITS REGIONAL MANAGER | lodged with the Police and a claim under the insurance policy was made. The surveyor submitted a preliminary report on 4 September 2001 indicating a loss of approximately Rs 3,86,395. The surveyor recorded that they were informed by the partner of the firm that the theft may have taken place by utilising duplicate keys... | 1[ds]13. We find from the judgment of the District Forum that it was the specific contention of the appellant that the exclusionary conditions in the policy document had not been communicated by the insurer as a result of which the terms and conditions of the exclusion were never communicated. The fact that there was a... | 1 | 1,231 | 290 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
lodged with the Police and a claim under the insurance policy was made. The surveyor submitted a prelimina... |
V Rajlal Manilal & Co Vs. Union Of India And Anr | :"Review. Upon receipt of such application, the Central Government may, if it thinks fit, call for the relevant records and other information from the State Government, and after considering any explanation that may be offered by the State Government cancel or revise the order of the State Government, or pass such orde... | 1[ds]Mr. Pathak is well-founded in his submission as to the nature of the jurisdiction exercised by the Union Government when disposing of an application for review under Rule 59 and the decision referred to does support him that the Central Government acting under the rule referred to is functioning as a quasi-judicia... | 1 | 1,767 | 517 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
:"Review. Upon receipt of such application, the Central Government may, if it thinks fit, call for th... |
COMMON CAUSE (REGISTERED SOCIETY) Vs. UNION OF INDIA | Others (2006) 8 SCC 1 ,while providing for a tenure of two years to the Director General of Police of the State expressly contemplates removal of the incumbent before expiry of the the tenure on certain specified grounds [Section 20 (4) & (5)]. Similarly, Section 6 of the CVC Act, which has been extracted above, specif... | 1[ds]the Director, CBIis to be appointed by the Central Government on the recommendation of a similar High Power Committee, no provision with regard to interim suspension or removal is to be found in the DSPE Act, 1946, notwithstanding the fact that the said Act i.e. DSPE Act was amended by the CVC Act, 2003.The CVC Ac... | 1 | 9,429 | 1,900 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
Others (2006) 8 SCC 1 ,while providing for a tenure of two years to the Director General of Police of t... |
Brahampal @ Sammay and Anr Vs. National Insurance Company | thoroughly negligent in implementing its rights and remedies, it will be equally unfair to deprive the other party of a valuable right that has accrued to it in law as a result of his acting vigilantly. (emphasis supplied) 20. The Court in the above-mentioned cases, highlighted upon the importance introducing the conce... | 1[ds]8. At the outset, we must note that, Chapter XII of the Act is a beneficial legislation intended at protecting the rights of victims affected in road accidents. Moreover, the Act is a self-contained code in itself which provides procedures for filing claims, for passing of award and for preferring an appeal. Even,... | 1 | 3,237 | 1,763 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
thoroughly negligent in implementing its rights and remedies, it will be equally unfair to deprive the othe... |
Ghaziabad Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd Vs. Addl. Labour Commnr. | of Directors has been clearly mentioning that if there is any objection from the Department, audit etc., the amount of ex-gratia will be recovered from the employees. In the audit reports for several years, the auditors as well as the department have objected for such payments. We make it clear that the payments which ... | 1[ds]The general legal principle in interpretation of statutes is that the general Act should lead to the special Act. Upon this general principle of law, the intention of the U.P legislature is clear, thatthe special enactment UP Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 alone should apply in the matter of employment of Co-ope... | 1 | 16,899 | 136 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
of Directors has been clearly mentioning that if there is any objection from the Department, audit etc., the... |
Govind Prasad Sharma Vs. Doon Valley Officers Cooperative Society Ltd Secretary Retd. Colonel A.P. Kumeri S/O Shri G.D. Kumer | R.F. Nariman, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellants are before us, against a judgment dated 12.12.2014, passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital, in which a demarcation report made by a government agency, in the course of conciliation proceedings between the parties, was sought to be relied upon. The Special ... | 1[ds]7. This being the case, it is of no matter that the present case does not fall within the four pigeon holes contained in Section 81, as otherwise, if there are insidious encroachments on confidentiality, a free and fair settlement may never be arrived at, thus stultifying the object sought to be achieved by Part I... | 1 | 1,009 | 139 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
R.F. Nariman, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellants are before us, against a judgment dated 12.12.2014... |
M. Ramesh Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors | not been adversely affected by the selection process and therefore, the principle of promissory estoppel is not applicable. 18. The main attack against the decision of the Government is on the ground that the candidates had a legitimate expectation that pursuant to the written test and interview, their result would be ... | 0[ds]15. It is, thus, well settled that merely because a person has been selected, does not give that person an indefeasible right of claiming appointment. As far as the present cases are concerned, results have not been declared and even the selection process is not complete. As such, there is no manner of doubt that ... | 0 | 3,984 | 1,253 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
not been adversely affected by the selection process and therefore, the principle of promissory e... |
Thrity Hoshie Dolikuka Vs. Hoshiam Shavaksha Dolikuka | has certainly affected her healthy growth, to a place where she can live a normal healthy life and will have a good opportunity of proper education and health y growth. We note with satisfaction that the view that we have taken is fully supported by the report of the Social Welfare Expert. The report of the Social Welf... | 1[ds]The principles of law in relation to the custody of a minor appear to be well-established . It is well-settled that any matter concerning a minor, has to be considered and decided only from the point of view of the welfare and interest of the minor. In dealing with a matter concerning a minor, the Court has a spec... | 1 | 17,320 | 3,722 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
has certainly affected her healthy growth, to a place where she can live a normal healthy life and will have a good opportun... |
Bhor Industries Limited Vs. Union of India | the representative of the petitioner-company held that the goods cleared by the petitioner company were and are not one covered by the classification list and consequently the goods cleared by the petitioner company are without filing the classification list. The Collector also pointed that the petitioner company is no... | 1[ds]In the present case the show cause notice was issued under Rule 9 (1) of the rules and the contents of the said notice were based upon the requirements contemplated under the said rule. The requirements as regards the show cause notice under Rule 10 read with amended RuleJ are different. Even the Central Board of ... | 1 | 1,933 | 117 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
the representative of the petitioner-company held that the goods cleared by the petitioner company were and are not one co... |
Jabar Singh Vs. Genda Lal | -(a) Whether any votes cast in favour of respondent No. 1 were wrongly rejected specially pertaining to polling station mentioned in para 4 of the written statement under heading special pleas ?(b) Whether any votes were wrongly accepted in favour of the petitioner appertaining to the polling stations mentioned in para... | 0[ds]Therefore, it seems to us that in case of a petition where the only claim made is that the election of the returned candidate is void, the scope of the enquiry is clearly limited by the requirement of S.100 (1) (d) itself. The enquiry is limited not because the returned candidate has not recriminated under S.97 (1... | 0 | 6,446 | 1,411 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
-(a) Whether any votes cast in favour of respondent No. 1 were wrongly rejected specially pertaining to... |
Damodar Das Jain Vs. Krishna Charan Chakraborty & Another | 1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the the judgment of the Court was delivered judgment and order passed on August 22, 1984, dismissing the criminal writ petition and criminal application by the High Court. The appellant-company filed a complaint under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 before the ... | 0[ds]Before us, it has not been disputed that this view of the High Court was correct as far as the question whether the Company could be held to be a tenant of the flat is concerned. As far as the question implied licence in favour of the Company is concerned, that also, in our view, is a question which require to be ... | 0 | 484 | 103 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the the judgment of the Court was delivered judgment and... |
Food Corporation of India and Another Vs. M/S V. K TRADERS AND OTHERS | transaction, subject to Court decisions, if any regulating such decision. 7. In the matter of pending Court Cases, ED (North)/GM, Punjab may take suitable decision on lifting of the ban imposed on the Millers or otherwise of each case, on merits. 6. It is relevant to note that before imposing the ban on allocation of p... | 1[ds]12. We are of the considered opinion, that no reliance can be placed upon the lease deeds allegedly executed between the defaulting rice miller(s) and the respondent(s), as they do not satisfy the statutory requirements of Section 17(1)(d) of the Registration Act, 1908. These Lease-deeds thus cannot be accepted as... | 1 | 1,734 | 236 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
transaction, subject to Court decisions, if any regulating such decision. 7. In the matter of pen... |
Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Vigilance) Vs. M/s. Hindustan Lever Limited | that the sales-tax has been collected. 21. Reliance placed on T. Stanes & Co. Ltd. (supra) is misconceived. The question involved therein related to interpretation of Section 22 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales-tax Act. The said Section stipulates that no person, who was not a registered dealer would collect any more ta... | 0[ds]20. An assessee is entitled to carry on and conduct business, fix the maximum retail price of its products. In the present case in spite of the multiple units both exempted and non-exempted, the respondent had adopted and followed uniform market price throughout India. The respondent is entitled and can fix a unif... | 0 | 6,225 | 364 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
that the sales-tax has been collected. 21. Reliance placed on T. Stanes & Co. Ltd. (supra) is misconceived.... |
Sri Sudhansu Shekhar Singh Deo Vs. The State Of Orissa And Another | due regard shall be had to the guarantee or assurance given under any such covenant or agreement as is referred to in Art. 291 with respect to the personal rights, privileges and dignities of the Ruler of an Indian State.8. Article 291 of the Constitution deals with the privy purse of the Rulers under any covenant or a... | 0[ds]6. The Act imposes on the agricultural income of "every person liability to pay agriculturalBy the proviso to S. 3, agricultural income of the Central Government, State Government and of local authorities is exempt from tax, but this exemption is not extended to any other body or person. It is true that in the def... | 0 | 3,143 | 1,067 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
due regard shall be had to the guarantee or assurance given under any such covenant or agreement as is referred to... |
National Fertilizers Ltd Vs. Tuncay Alankus & Another | June 1, 2006 when the Swiss Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner’s appeal and the petitioner was able to obtain the next attachment order only on December 15, 2006. There was, thus, a period of slightly over six months when there was no attachment order in respect of the account and according to the bank’s statement,... | 0[ds]35. In the letter of Pictet dated January 8, 2007, a copy of which is enclosed as Annexure P15 (collectively) thename is given asfurther, the letter does not state that on that date account No. 91925 in the name Alankus was alive and was bearing some amount. Moreover, the bank is not a party to the present proceed... | 0 | 4,993 | 759 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
June 1, 2006 when the Swiss Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner’s appeal and the petitioner was able to obtain ... |
Official Assignee, High Court, Bombay Vs. Haradagiri Basavanna Gowd And Others | by the District Court at Bellary on December 13, 1950 calling upon the Official Receiver to move the Bombay High Court for annulment of its adjudication order had not been complied with by the said Receiver, and so, the principal object of the Official Assignee in making the subsequent application was to invite the att... | 1[ds]the relevant provisions of the Provincial Insolvency Act and the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act have to be considered. Section 17 of the Presidency Act provides, inter alia, that on the making of an order of adjudication, the property of the insolvent wherever situate shall vest in the Official Assignee and shall... | 1 | 4,605 | 1,795 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
by the District Court at Bellary on December 13, 1950 calling upon the Official Receiver to move the Bombay High ... |
Chief General Manager (IPC) M P Power Trading Co Ltd & Anr Vs. Narmada Equipments Pvt Ltd | upon either by the State Commission or the person or persons to whom it is referred for arbitration. In our opinion the word and in Section 86(1)(f) between the words generating companies and to refer any dispute for arbitration means or. It is well settled that sometimes and can mean or and sometimes or can mean and (... | 1[ds]9. In the present case, the notice for the initiation of arbitration under Clause 12.3 of the PPA was issued by the respondent on 30 May 2011. The commencement of the arbitral proceedings by the invocation of the arbitration agreement would, therefore, relate to 30 May 2011, when the notice invoking Clause 12.3 wa... | 1 | 2,483 | 1,074 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
upon either by the State Commission or the person or persons to whom it is referred for arbitrati... |
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS Vs. DR. TONMOY MONDAL | Group B (erstwhile gazette) service or post and had entered Government service before attaining the age of 35 years, and in all other cases, after he has attained the age of 55 years, provided that it shall be open to the appointing authority to withhold permission to a government employee under suspension who seeks to... | 1[ds]11. We are constrained to observe that merely on entertaining a different view on the interpretation of Rule 75, it was not open to the Division Bench to review previous judgment and order passed by a different Division Bench of the High Court on 22.08.2014. A fundamental jurisdictional error has been committed by... | 1 | 3,878 | 1,615 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
Group B (erstwhile gazette) service or post and had entered Government service before attaining the age of 35 yea... |
North Delhi Power Ltd Vs. Govt. Of N.C.T. | goes on to say that the DISCOMS will be authorized to release the receivable of the holding company and it is apparently for that reason they retain its 20 % share in such receivables as are collected, which are over and above the amounts included in Schedule D, E and F in respect of which no such share in the nature o... | 0[ds]20. There can be no dispute that the procedure in this case was slightly unusual. There was no justification in the order of the Learned Single Judge accepting a statement to the effect that the appellant herein was the successor-in-interest of the DVB and then to fix the liability on the same without even hearing... | 0 | 12,274 | 3,262 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
goes on to say that the DISCOMS will be authorized to release the receivable of the holding company and it is apparently for... |
H.D.Devasia & Co., Kerala Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kerala | question of law for its opinion" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a true interpretation of the various provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal was correct in holding that a registered firm was not entitled to have its losses in speculation business carried forward for set o... | 0[ds]But the provisions of law contained in Chap. VI of the Act have made a considerable departure from the corresponding provisions of the 1922 Act. In these cases, we are only concerned with the question of set off of speculation losses against the profits of any other speculation businessOn reading the above provisi... | 0 | 1,517 | 386 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
question of law for its opinion" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a ... |
Unison Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Commissioner, Central Excise, Noida | true in case of legislation dealing with economic matters, where, having regard to the nature of the problems required to be dealt with, greater play in the joints has to be allowed to the legislature. The Court should feel more inclined to give judicial deference to legislative judgment in the field of economic regula... | 0[ds]9. Considering the position involved in Reiz Electrocontrols (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I 2006(200)ELT360(SC) the position was re-iterated as follows:8. So far as the views regarding non-eligibility are concerned view expressed by this Court in several cases needs to be noted.9. In Commissio... | 0 | 4,764 | 1,694 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
true in case of legislation dealing with economic matters, where, having regard to the nature of the problems required to be... |
Phiroze Dinshaw Lam Phiroze Dinshaw Lam Vs. Union of India | on the facts of the case, Section 192 is not attracted because, at worst, it was a case of fabricating evidence to support a genuine claim rather an involved argument, we must say, if not a convoluted argument, and in either case, unacceptable. 12. The learned Additional Solicitor General, Sri Jayaram, appearing for th... | 1[ds]7. The Order dated March 12, 1990, it is relevant to note, does not contain any reference to Revenues allegation of fabrication of evidence by Godrej nor to its request not to permit withdrawal-much less to the request of the Revenue, which is supposed to have been made before the learned Single Judge to prosecute... | 1 | 3,858 | 1,040 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
on the facts of the case, Section 192 is not attracted because, at worst, it was a case of fabricating evi... |
Allahabad Bank Vs. A.India Allahabad Bank Retired Emps.Assn | Controlling Authority was required to decide as to whether the benefits under the Allahabad Bank Employees Pension Scheme (Old) are more beneficial in comparison to that of the payment of Gratuity under the provisions of the Act. Following is the order passed by this Court: "Though the order of the High Court speaks ab... | 0[ds]It appears that on behalf of the Association applications were sent to the competent authority in the prescribed proforma for payment of gratuity in response to which the appellant bank made its stand explicitly clear that it was not possible to make payment of gratuity in addition to pension. Since the whole caus... | 0 | 5,824 | 482 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
Controlling Authority was required to decide as to whether the benefits under the Allahabad Bank Employees Pension... |
Hind Trading Company Vs. Union Of India & Anr | by the permit during the entire journey up to their ultimate destination. In such cases, Section 5(3) was infringed if the permit covering the goods was not produced on demand by any Land Customs officer. Except in such cases, Section 5(3) did not apply, and it was not necessary to keep the permit with the goods. We ho... | 1[ds]9. The Central Board of Revenue framed the Chinese Silver Dollars (Import) Rules on March 29, 1958 in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 9 (1) of the Land Customs Act, 1924. Rule 6(2) provided that on its journey from Kalimpong land customs station to its ultimate destination any consignment of Chinese si... | 1 | 4,632 | 1,275 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
by the permit during the entire journey up to their ultimate destination. In such cases, Section ... |
State Of Maharashtra Vs. Baishankar Avalram Joshi & Another | arrears of salary does not prevail in India and it has been negatived by the provisions of the statute law in India." Mahajan, C. J., speaking for the Court, observed at p. 802 (of SCR) = (at p. 251 of AIR):"As regards torts of its servants in exercise of sovereign powers, the company was not, and the Crown in India wa... | 0[ds]7. It seems to us that the High Court came to a correct conclusion. The plaintiff was not aware whether the Enquiry Officer reported in his favour or against him. If the report was in his favour, in his representation to the Government he would have utilised its reasoning to dissuade the Inspector General from com... | 0 | 3,088 | 605 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
arrears of salary does not prevail in India and it has been negatived by the provisions of the statute ... |
Eupharma Kamgar Sangh Vs. Eupharma Laboratories Limited & Others | inference against the petitioners. Neither any order nor any proceedings have been brought to the notice of the Court which were initiated or had culminated into an order prior to or even after transfer of the title in favour of respondent No.2.4. Another contention raised on behalf of the petitioners is that in view o... | 0[ds]m the above noticed factual matrix of the case, it is clear that no specific allegations have been made that respondent No.2 is acting for and on behalf of or in collusion with the Company, respondent No.2. The orders passed by the Tribunal have attained finality and, therefore, the same cannot be indirectly opene... | 0 | 2,470 | 827 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
inference against the petitioners. Neither any order nor any proceedings have been brought to the notic... |
Executive Committee Of U.P. State Warehousingcorporation, Vs. Chandra Kiran Tyagi | Section 11 (2) of the Insurance Act, will prevail, but the provisions of the Central Government Order will have to be subject to Section 11 (2) of the Insurance Act. Next in order come the regulations of the Life Insurance Corporation under Section 49 and those regulations must not be inconsistent with the Insurance Ac... | 1[ds]Sub-paras (1) (a), (1) (b) and (1) (c) referred to therein are the penalties of (a) fine; (b) censure; and (c) postponement or stoppage of increments or promotion. In this case as the punishment imposed is one of dismissal the appellant should have followed the procedure indicated in sub-clause (3) of Regulation 1... | 1 | 9,045 | 1,045 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
Section 11 (2) of the Insurance Act, will prevail, but the provisions of the Central Government Order will have to be subje... |
The Management of Birla Cotton, Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd., Delhi Vs. Its Workmen & Others | asked him to make it a part of his award. As that was not done, this agreement cannot by any process of reasoning be taken to be a part of the Dulat award. Nor do we see how the whole of this agreement can become part of the Ghanshyamdas award. It is true that four specific matters were raised with reference to departm... | 1[ds]8. Before we deal with the main dispute in the case relating to standardization we may shortly dispose of the Matter relating to the three workmen, namely, Chuni Lal, Durga Prasad and Brij Lal. The parties have agreed before us without prejudice to the contentions raised by thein this behalf that the cases of Brij... | 1 | 3,509 | 1,765 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
asked him to make it a part of his award. As that was not done, this agreement cannot by any process of reasoning... |
State of Haryana Vs. Haryana Co-Operative Transport Limited and Others | suitable writ, order or direction as it deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of t he case. There is no magic in the use of a formula. The facts necessary for challenging Shri Guptas appointment are stated clearly in the writ petition and the challenge to his appointment is expressly made on the ground that he was... | 0[ds]The rights conferred by arts. 226 and 227 can be abridged or taken away only by an appropriate amendment of the Constitution and their operation cannot be whittled down by a provision like the one contained in s.9( 1 ) of the Act. Accordingly, it is open to the High Courts in the exercise of their writ jurisdictio... | 0 | 3,835 | 204 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
suitable writ, order or direction as it deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of t he case. There is no magic in the ... |
Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors | and have had it decided as incidental to or essentially connected with the subject-matter of the litigation and every matter coming within the legitimate purview of the original action both in respect of the matters of claim or defence. The principle underlying Explanation IV is that where the parties have had an oppor... | 0[ds]9. The project in question was initiated by CIDCO by inviting tenders in what is termed as Request for Proposal on October 18, 2002. One of the unsuccessful bidders, viz. Makhija Developers Private Limited challenged the award of tender in favour of Mistry Construction Company Private Limited. This Court by a judg... | 0 | 8,486 | 2,828 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
and have had it decided as incidental to or essentially connected with the subject-matter of the litigation and every matter... |
Ramrajsingh Vs. State Of M.P. | would be that complaint would not be entertainable.9. Section 138 of the Act reads as under:-"138. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account -Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker forpayment of any amount of money to another persons from out of that ... | 1[ds]13. In S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla and Another (2007 (4) SCC 70 ) it was,18. To sum up, there is almost unanimous judicial opinion that necessary averments ought to be contained in a complaint before a person can be subjected to criminal process. A liability under Section 141 of the Act is sought t... | 1 | 2,430 | 819 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
would be that complaint would not be entertainable.9. Section 138 of the Act reads as under:-"138. Dishonour of cheque for... |
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS Vs. STATE OF MIZORAM & ORS | the first part of the definition clause. 35. Lastly it was contended that lottery business is res extra commercium and strictly regulated by State. Therefore, it could not have been the intent of the legislature to promote or sustain competition in lottery business. The Competition Act will thus not apply as there was ... | 0[ds]36. In the conspectus of the arguments, we find that a simple aspect of anti-competitive practices and cartelisation has got dragged on for almost ten years in what appears to be a mis-application by the High Court of the interplay of the two Acts, i.e., the Competition Act and the Regulation Act. We have already ... | 0 | 6,840 | 1,018 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
the first part of the definition clause. 35. Lastly it was contended that lottery business is res extra comm... |
Laxmi Fibres Ltd Vs. A.P. Industrial Dev. Corpn. Ltd. | adjudicate the claim of a secured creditor who has been permitted by the Company Judge to stand outside the liquidation proceeding with liberty to pursue its remedy as per statutory rights available under the SFC Act, subject only to the conditions imposed by the court. The reasons for such a view are apparent on a per... | 0[ds]5. The Division Bench in our view came to a correct conclusion that the Official Liquidator does not have jurisdiction to ascertain or adjudicate the claim of a secured creditor who has been permitted by the Company Judge to stand outside the liquidation proceeding with liberty to pursue its remedy as per statutor... | 0 | 1,895 | 543 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
adjudicate the claim of a secured creditor who has been permitted by the Company Judge to stand outside the... |
Automotive and Allied Industries Private Limited Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner | the parties in the two suits filed in the City Civil Court. A mere perusal of the consent terms makes it clear that the company agreed to pay diverse amounts to respondent No. 2 towards his employment. The payment of gratuity amount, the payment of salary, the payment of leaving travel concession, the payment of pensio... | 1[ds]In our judgment, the contention urged on behalf of the appellants is of considerable merit and deserves acceptance. Clause 8 of the consent terms, which is set out hereinabove, clearly provides that amounts were received by respondent No. 2 in full and final settlement and satisfaction of all the claims against th... | 1 | 2,490 | 735 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
the parties in the two suits filed in the City Civil Court. A mere perusal of the consent terms makes it clear that the co... |
State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors Vs. Sardar D. K. Jadhav | Act. It is after a consideration of all these aspects that the High Court has found that the four tanks belonged to the respondent at the time of resumption and the said tanks were on occupied land belonging to the Jagirdar or any other person. Therefore, it considered the question properly as per the remand order and ... | 1[ds]15. Though Mr. I. N. Shroff, learned counsel for the State, has raised several contentions, in our view, most of them do not survive in view of the specific directions contained in the order of remand passed by this Court19. Regarding the first contention, we are satisfied that the High Court has complied with the... | 1 | 4,354 | 1,625 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
Act. It is after a consideration of all these aspects that the High Court has found that the four tanks belonged to the re... |
Karpagam Faculty Of Medicl Sciences And Research Vs. Union Of India | by the MCI as well as the Hearing Committee.17. The bed occupancy noticed in the assessment report dated 10th April, 2017 is 62.76% as against the claim made by the college of 78%. The claim of the college was found to be highly inflated. Even in the earlier assessment reports comments have been made regarding the bed ... | 1[ds]10. Ordinarily, we would have relegated the parties before the High Court where the writ petition is still pending. However, as the appellant invited the order dated 11th August, 2017 from this Court and thereafter participated in the proceedings before the Competent Authority of the Central Government, which in t... | 1 | 7,283 | 1,677 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
by the MCI as well as the Hearing Committee.17. The bed occupancy noticed in the assessment report dated 10th April, 2017 ... |
British India Corporation Vs. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P., Lucknow | the case of directors fees or other payments for services, to the actual services rendered by the person concerned: Provided that no disallowance under this rule shall be made by the Excess Profits Tax Officer unless he has obtained the prior authority of the Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax." This rule is designed t... | 0[ds]The Excess Profits Tax Officer accordingly computed what was the reasonable amount of commission which should be allowed. We can find very little justification in the criticism that no reasons have been given by the Excess Profits Tax Officer or the Tribunal for not allowing the entire commission claimed on the ba... | 0 | 3,207 | 167 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
the case of directors fees or other payments for services, to the actual services rendered by the person conc... |
R.K. Audim & Others Vs. Special Steel Limited, Bombay & Another | Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal by certificate is directed against the order of the Bombay High Court, dated December 9, 1966 in Appeal No. 110 of 1965. By the said judgment the Division Bench confirmed the order of the learned Single Judge in Miscellaneous petition No. 131 of 1964 quashing the notice, dated November 9,... | 0[ds]7. We have discussed the scope of the rules in Civil Appeal No. 1467 of 1967 ((1971) 1 SCC 337 ) in which we have just now delivered the judgment. For the reasons stated therein we hold that Ruleis not applicable and as such the High Court was justified in quashing the demand dated November 9, 1963. We may further... | 0 | 799 | 158 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal by certificate is directed against the order of the Bombay High Court, dated D... |
Mudi Gowda Gowdappa Sankh Vs. Ram Chandra Ravagowda Sankh | 12 pieces of lands were joint family properties and were not the self-acquisition of Goudappa. The case of the appellants was that these lands were self-acquisition of Goudappa, but the respondents contended that they were joint family properties.The law on this aspect of the case is well settled. Of course there is no... | 1[ds]We are accordingly of the view that there is proper evidence to support the concurrent finding of the lower Courts and there is no reason to disturb thatour opinion, there is no substance in this argument. It is now well established that an agreement between all the coparceners is not essential to the disruption o... | 1 | 3,420 | 2,342 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
12 pieces of lands were joint family properties and were not the self-acquisition of Goudappa. Th... |
BIHAR STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD Vs. NARESH KUMAR MISHRA | of the employees of the Corporation doing the same/similar work. There may be different pay scales/salaries in the respective parent organizations. However, when they are working with the Corporation and doing the similar work, they have to be paid the salary which is paid to other employees doing the same/similar work... | 0[ds]8. Now, so far as the quashing and setting aside the resolution dated 27.3.2012 by which the Corporation resolved to pay salary to the employees of the Corporation as is being paid in the parent Board/parent organization is concerned, it is required to be noted that it is not in dispute that the respective origina... | 0 | 3,835 | 824 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
of the employees of the Corporation doing the same/similar work. There may be different pay scales/salaries in the respect... |
Ramendra Singh Vs. Jagdish Prasad and Others | (Recruitment) Rules, 1964.(b) That the respondent was in Class III service and his appointment by the impugned regulation amounted to his promotion from Class III service to Class I. If so, it is hedged by two limitations as contemplated by sub-clauses (a) and (b) of rule 4 (3) of the Mysore State Civil Services Rules,... | 0[ds]The High Court came to the conclusion that the appointment of the respondent could be regularised with effect from any date as he was a local candidate within the meaning of the Mysore Government Seniority Rules, 1957. This Court in appeal, however, reversed the judgment of the High Court andone can deny the power... | 0 | 4,965 | 835 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
(Recruitment) Rules, 1964.(b) That the respondent was in Class III service and his appointment by the impugned reg... |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. MEGA CORPORATION LIMITED | is whether there is a right to cross-examine the author of a letter while SEBI is performing its regulatory role and deciding upon the allegation of manipulation under Regulations 3 and 4 of the PFUTP Regulations. 32. Shri C.U Singh arguing for the Board has denied any right to cross- examine while SEBI exercises its j... | 0[ds]In Videocon International (Videocon International Ltd. v. Securities Exchange Board of India (2015) 4 SCC 33) this Court had an occasion to deal with Section 15Z. Having considered the amendment to the Section, the Court observed as under:38 A right of appeal may be absolute, i.e., without any limitations. Or, it... | 0 | 6,687 | 2,487 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
is whether there is a right to cross-examine the author of a letter while SEBI is performing its regula... |
Mohan Breweries and Distilleries Limited Etc Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Madras and Others | levied upon goods manufactured or produced Entry 84 of List I and Entry 51 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution). Its incidence falls, therefore, on the manufacturer or producer of the goods. The collection of excise duty may be deferred to such later stage as is, administratively or otherwise, most c... | 0[ds]As we look at it, the primary obligation to pay excise duty on the IMFL is of the manufacturer thereof. Rule 22 only provides for a convenient method for its collection. When the excise duty is collected from a party removing the IMFL from the factory from the factory of its production, other than the manufacturer... | 0 | 2,839 | 568 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
levied upon goods manufactured or produced Entry 84 of List I and Entry 51 of List II of the Seventh Sched... |
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation & Others Vs. Ahmedabad Green Belt Khedut Mandal & Others | bring any scheme whatsoever for the reason that as per that judgment also, land could be used for residential purposes and the authority’s draft scheme also provides for residential purposes. That does not mean that it would be used exclusively for residential purpose and it cannot have even small marketing place or a ... | 1[ds]35. Thus, we do not find any force in the submissions made on behalf of the tenure-holders for the simple reason that after the judgment in Bhikhubhai Vithalbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat & Anr., AIR 2008 SC 1771 , it was not permissible for the statutory authorities to bring any scheme whatsoever for the reason t... | 1 | 11,054 | 1,126 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
bring any scheme whatsoever for the reason that as per that judgment also, land could be used for residential purposes an... |
Maharashtra Housing Development Authority Vs. Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Private Limited & Others | filing of writ petition out of which this appeal has arisen wherein the High Court of Bombay by the impugned judgment dated 28th September, 2017 had issued the following directions: “15. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we issue directions to the NIC to access the files containing the bid documents of the peti... | 1[ds]10. If the NIC, which had developed thein which bids were to be submitted and maintenance and upkeep of which was its responsibility, had stated in its affidavit what has been indicated above, we do not see how the repeated statements made on behalf of the first respondent that the bid documents can still be retri... | 1 | 1,417 | 300 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
filing of writ petition out of which this appeal has arisen wherein the High Court of Bombay by the imp... |
Aluminium Corporation of India Vs. Their Workmen | were not available in the accounts. Even the plant and machinery registers subsequent to the year 1945 were only sought to be supported by register which have been rejected by the tribunal as unreliable. That rejection was fully justified, because, on examination of the registry, we ourselves found that they contained ... | 0[ds]This claim was rejected by the tribunal on the view that the evidence given on behalf on the appellant was very unsatisfactory. Only general statements were made by the witnesses examined on behalf of the appellant stating that amounts to the value of about Rs. 44 lakhs out of the depreciation reserve and some oth... | 0 | 3,580 | 2,028 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
were not available in the accounts. Even the plant and machinery registers subsequent to the year 194... |
Palghat Bpl & Psp Thozhilali Union Vs. Bpl India Ltd. | RAMASWAMY, K. & HANSARIA B.L. (J) 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant is a trade union espousing the cause of three workmen, viz., V. Rajamanickam, N. Raghavan and M. Prabhakaran. The undisputed facts are that while the workmen were on strike, the management suddenly backed out from the settlement in reconciliation proc... | 1[ds]6. In this case, the finding recorded by the High Court and the Labour Court is that stones were thrown and the officers were attacked which resulted in grievous injuries to the officers. But it is seen that the appellants alone were not members of the assembly of the workmen standing at the BPL Bus Stop. The Labo... | 1 | 1,043 | 369 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
RAMASWAMY, K. & HANSARIA B.L. (J) 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant is a trade union espousing the cau... |
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Mantora Oil Products Pvt. Ltd | 1. The respondent Company dealt in oil products and for that purpose, it used to purchase vegetable and refined oil from different parts of the country and transported the same in oil tankers. In order to protect itself against losses due to accidents, theft, pilferage, non delivery etc., occurring in the course of tra... | 1[ds]5. If it was a mistake, the same should have been pointed out to the respondent during the period of the policy but the appellant did not raise this objection at any time during the continuance of the policy cover. The respondent also fulfilled its obligations under the policy and paid the premium as was agreed to... | 1 | 654 | 249 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
1. The respondent Company dealt in oil products and for that purpose, it used to purchase vegetable and refined oi... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.