Case Name stringlengths 11 235 | Input stringlengths 944 6.86k | Output stringlengths 11 196k | Label int64 0 1 | Count int64 176 118k | Decision_Count int64 7 37.8k | text stringlengths 1.43k 13.9k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cement Marketing Company of India, Bangalore Vs. State of Mysore and Another | HEGDE, J.1. These are connected appeals by special leave. Herein the question of the appellants liability to pay sales tax in respect of certain transactions made in the years 1959-1960, 1960-1961 and 1962-1963 arises for consideration.2. The appellant was the selling agent of the State Trading Corporation of India (Pr... | 0[ds]The question whether the transactions with which we are concerned in these appeals are "sales" is a mixed question of law and fact. Before that question can be decided, theauthorities under the Act should find out the various ingredients of the transactions and see whether they amount to "sales". Ordinarily the Hi... | 0 | 465 | 210 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
HEGDE, J.1. These are connected appeals by special leave. Herein the question of the appellants liability to pay sales tax... |
Jagdish Chander Chatterjee and Ors Vs. Shri Kishan and Anr | properly terminated before the suit. The point for consideration is what is the position of the parties before the Court with regard to the relief claimed by the landlord in his eviction suit.9. It is now settled that after the termination of the contractual tenancy the statutory tenant has only a personal right to con... | 1[ds]7. In our opinion there is no substance in this appeal. The original tenant of the premises was B. N. Chatterji. The landlord had alleged in the suit that by a notice dated 26-6-1962 served upon the tenant, the tenancy had been duly terminated. This was not denied in the written statement nor was an issue demanded... | 1 | 2,352 | 739 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
properly terminated before the suit. The point for consideration is what is the position of the parties... |
Official Trustee Of West Bengal Vs. Stephen Court Ltd | as provided for in Chapter XIII of the Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules. The High Court in exercise of the said jurisdiction could not adjudicate as to whether an earlier order passed by it was null and void and was, thus, liable to be set aside. What was questioned by the Official Trustee by taking out an Origi... | 1[ds]15. Peter Paul owned merely a piece of land. It executed a deed of lease for a period of 99 years. The lessor, therefore, was entitled to the only rent payable in terms of the said 1919 deed of lease.Even the assignment was required to be made by reason of a registered document, it is beyond any cavil of doubt tha... | 1 | 7,941 | 1,639 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
as provided for in Chapter XIII of the Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules. The High Court in exerc... |
Gyan Chand & Others Vs. State of Haryana & Others | not be superseded by the Government under the provisions of that section. The explanation was to be sent by the Committee within 21 days from the receipt of the communication and in case the Committee failed to send the explanation ex parte orders were to be made. The Vice-President sent a reply dated March 19, 1969 sa... | 1[ds]It is somewhat unfortunate that a copy of the writ petition has not been produced in this Court. Presumably the allegations were on the same lines as made in the petition for special leave before us. But in the absence of a copy of the writ petition we new not refer in detail to the allegations made and the conten... | 1 | 1,413 | 327 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
not be superseded by the Government under the provisions of that section. The explanation was to be sent by the Committee... |
Bank of Bihar Limited, Patna Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bihar and Orissa | become irrecoverable in the year of account 1950, and that the amount due in the other two accounts---B. I. G. Co. and Fulchand Srinarain-had become irrecoverable in the year 1947, and the assessees were not entitled to treat the entire amount of Rs. 4, 22, 582 as a bad debt in the year of account 1949. The Income-tax ... | 0[ds]Mr. Viswanatha Sastri for the assessees contends that it was open to the assessees to amalgamate the three accounts of the same debtor and if the debtor was in a position to pay and did pay some amounts towards the consolidated account, it could not be said that because nothing was recovered in the years prior to ... | 0 | 1,446 | 552 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
become irrecoverable in the year of account 1950, and that the amount due in the other two accounts--... |
K C Builders Vs. The Asstt Commnr Of Income Tax | to the assessees total income and the addition was deleted by the Tribunal:Held, that it was evident from the material on record that the penalty had been imposed solely on the basis of the additional of Rs. 4 lakhs to the assessees income. If the addition was deleted, the charge of concealment of income could not be s... | 1[ds]27. The above judgment squarely applies to the facts and circumstances of the case on hand. In this case also, similarly, the application was moved by the assessee before the Magistrate to drop the criminal proceedings which were dismissed by the Magistrate and the High Court also on a petition filed under Section... | 1 | 6,664 | 769 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
to the assessees total income and the addition was deleted by the Tribunal:Held, that it was evident from the material on... |
Kantamani Venkata Narayana & Sons Vs. First Additional Income-Tax Officer,Rajahmundry | the managers professional income and the agricultural income of the assessee, the aggregate could not exceed Rs. one lakh, and that possession of large wealth on April 1, 1949 which was not explained justified him in inferring that there "was escapement of assessment of huge income or in any event it had resulted in un... | 0[ds]6. It is clear from the affidavits filed in the Court of first instance that the Income- tax Officer had received information relying upon which he had reason to believe that the assessee had not disclosed fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment and in consequence of non-disclosure of that ... | 0 | 2,793 | 760 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
the managers professional income and the agricultural income of the assessee, the aggregate could not e... |
ALOK KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P | in the case of Hanuman Dutt Shukla pursuant to order of this Hon?ble Court dated 23.08.2017 in the case of Deepak Kumar 809 24 14. Excess number of candidates who were to be considered and deemed to have been selected pursuant to the orders of the Courts (SI 755 + PC 78) 833 15. Position as obtained from the above situ... | 0[ds]In our view, the High Court was right in negating the submission as regards construction of the expression ?such vacancies shall be carried forward for further selection? appearing in Rule 15(j). However, considering the facts that the present selection has seen various interventions including revision in final li... | 0 | 6,045 | 712 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
in the case of Hanuman Dutt Shukla pursuant to order of this Hon?ble Court dated 23.08.2017 in the case of Deepak Kumar 8... |
Darshan Lal Nagpal (Dead) By L.Rs Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi & Other | 26, 1968, the Government wrote to one of the promoters of the project, Shri H.L. Somany asking him to complete the ?arrangements for the import of capital equipment and acquisition of land in Haryana State for setting up of the proposed factory?. It was further stated in that communication that the Government was pleas... | 1[ds]22. A recapitulation of the facts would show that the idea of establishing 400/220 KV sub-station was mooted prior to August, 2004. For next almost three years, the officers of the DTL and the DDA exchanged letters on the issue of allotment of land. On 28.7.2008 Secretary (Power), Government of NCT of Delhi-cum-CM... | 1 | 12,633 | 3,468 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
26, 1968, the Government wrote to one of the promoters of the project, Shri H.L. Somany asking him to complete the ?arrangem... |
The Provincial Government Of Madras Vs. J. S. Basappa | least where the action of the authorities is wholly outside the law and is not a mere error in the exercise of jurisdiction. Mr. Sastri says that we must interpret the Act in the same way as if S. 18-A was implicit in it and that S. 18-A was added to make explicit what was already implied. We cannot agree. The finality... | 0[ds]10. Applying these tests, it is clear that without a provision like S. 18-A in the Act, the jurisdiction of the civil court would not be taken away at least where the action of the authorities is wholly outside the law and is not a mere error in the exercise of jurisdiction. Mr. Sastri says that we must interpret ... | 0 | 3,807 | 566 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
least where the action of the authorities is wholly outside the law and is not a mere error in the exercise of jurisdictio... |
Hdfc Bank Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Others | covered under section 92BA(i) of the I.T. Act.TRANSACTION-3PAYMENT OF INTEREST OF RS. 4.41 CRORES BY THE PETITIONER TO HDB WELFARE TRUST.40. As far as this transaction is concerned, it is the case of the Revenue that the Petitioner has deposits of Rs.45.12 Crores from the HDB Employee Welfare Trust and has paid interes... | 1[ds]We find that the entire controversy in the present Writ Petition basically revolves around the interpretation of section 92BA(i) read with section 40A(2)(b) of the I. T. Act. As mentioned earlier, it is the case of the Revenue that the three transactions mentioned hereinabove fall within the meaning of a Specified... | 1 | 15,619 | 2,695 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
covered under section 92BA(i) of the I.T. Act.TRANSACTION-3PAYMENT OF INTEREST OF RS. 4.41 CRORES BY TH... |
M/S. Madnani Construction Corpn.(P)Ltd Vs. Union Of India | Calcutta v. Engineers-De-Space-Age, (1996) 1 SCC 516 , a two- judge Bench of this Court considered the same question. That was a case under the 1940 Act. In Engineers (supra), the so-called prohibition in the contract relating to payment of interest was in Clause 13(g), which is set out below:- "13(g) No claim for inte... | 1[ds]50. It was argued before us by the learned counsel for the respondent that a subsequent Division Bench of this Court in the case of Union of India v. Saraswat Trading Agency & others, JT 2009 (9) SC 648 , has taken a view different from the ratio in Engineers (supra). We do not think so51. In Saraswat Trading (sup... | 1 | 6,023 | 714 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
Calcutta v. Engineers-De-Space-Age, (1996) 1 SCC 516 , a two- judge Bench of this Court considered the same ... |
Laljee Dubey & Others Vs. Union of India & Others | a rule framed by the President of India.12. In view of the division the question was referred to the third learned Judge as to whether the letter dated 17 November, 1953 constituted a rule framed by the President under Article 309. The third learned Judge held that the letter was of a composite nature. There were ad ho... | 1[ds]Denial of the benefits of the order to the appellants is violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. Other checkers performing duties similar to those of the appellants have been granted the benefit of the order contained in the letter dated 17 November, 1953 whereas th... | 1 | 2,236 | 409 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
a rule framed by the President of India.12. In view of the division the question was referred to the third learned... |
Kani Ram & Another Vs. Kazani & Others | 1. This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the Delhi High Court. 2. One Jaigopal instituted a suit for ejectment and recovery of rent under Clauses (a) and (e) of Section 13 of the Delhi and Ajmer Rent control Act 1952 in respect of a house situate in Pahargunj against the tenant. The grounds on which eje... | 1[ds]The High Court took the view that the decisions of the Courts in the first set of execution proceedings did not operate as res judicata as the substantial question involved was purely one of law. According to the High Court a decree for ejectment obtained under the Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act on the basis of ... | 1 | 1,084 | 586 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
1. This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the Delhi High Court. 2. One Jaigopal instituted a ... |
Lal Bahadur Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors | the jurisdiction of this Court Under Article 32 must approach this Court for the vindication of the fundamental rights of affected persons and not for the purpose of vindication of his personal grudge or enmity. It is duty of this Court to discourage such petitions and to ensure that the course of justice is not obstru... | 1[ds]It is not in dispute that the area had been reserved for green belt in 1995 Master Plan. We find that it was absolutely unwarranted exercise of power on the part of the Respondents to change the area from green belt to residential one in Master Plan 2021. Learned Senior Counsel is right that some invisible hand wa... | 1 | 7,927 | 1,774 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
the jurisdiction of this Court Under Article 32 must approach this Court for the vindication of the fundamen... |
Prem Prakash Vs. Santosh Kumar Jain | he was doing the business in the name and style of M/s R.R. Jewellers. The respondent-owner has brought on record the list of subscribers issued by the Delhi Sanchaar Sewa (Pvt.) Ltd. wherein for R.R. Jewellers, the address mentioned is that of the suit property and the phone number is exactly the same as mentioned on ... | 0[ds]12. A bare perusal of the visiting card of M/s Ashima Jewellery having the name of Respondent No. 2 clearly proves that thewas neither an employee nor was looking after the customers of the appellant herein in his absence but he was carrying on his personal business under such name. There is no point in denying th... | 0 | 3,192 | 472 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
he was doing the business in the name and style of M/s R.R. Jewellers. The respondent-owner has brought on record the list o... |
Ashok Kumar Chatterjee Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh | replied that Ravindra had gone to Bombay in search of some employment. The conduct of the appellant in giving this manifestly blatant false reply to PW 2s enquiry, spells out his guilty conscience. The number of letters namely Exs. P-13 to P-15, Exs. P-29 and P-31 written in Bengali and Hindi were seized from the house... | 0[ds]Evidently Pritosh who on being put to painful ignominy by his obnoxious conduct of having sexual relationship with his own daughter should have resorted to putting an end to his life apprehending that the whole shameful intrigue would come out and he would be exposed to the public. PW 2 by then had not come out wi... | 0 | 5,500 | 608 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
replied that Ravindra had gone to Bombay in search of some employment. The conduct of the appellant in ... |
United India Insurance Co.Ltd Vs. Suresh K.K | the goods such passengers travel in the same vehicle to the place from where they commenced journey. The passenger does so and is allowed to do so in his capacity as the owner of the goods or his representative who has hired the vehicle for transporting goods. The amended provision makes it explicitly clear that the wo... | 1[ds]The insurance policy should, inter alia, be in respect of death or bodily injury of the person carried in the vehicle. Such person may be the owner of the goods or his authorised representative.10. The High Court, therefore, may be correct that the owner of the goods would be covered in terms of the said provision... | 1 | 1,814 | 517 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
the goods such passengers travel in the same vehicle to the place from where they commenced journey. The passenger does so ... |
National Thermal Power Corporation Limited Vs. K.V. Rangaiah & Another | the writ petition namely, the appellant Corporation or the Electricity Board according to his choice. The appellant Corporation filed an appeal (Writ Appeal No. 678 of 1995) against the said judgment of the learned Single Judge. The Electricity Board did not assail the said judgment. The appeal of the appellant Corpora... | 1[ds]The requirement regarding five years minimum service in the appellant Corporation as prescribed in para 2.1 is one of the conditions of eligibility for availing the benefits under the Scheme. Since conditions of eligibility could validly be imposed while introducing the Scheme (which was introduced for the first t... | 1 | 1,471 | 458 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
the writ petition namely, the appellant Corporation or the Electricity Board according to his choice. The appellant Corpora... |
M/S. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd Vs. State Of Jharkhand | not the case of the respondent-State that in fact the product manufactured by the appellant in the new unit is now CRM. It could not have been the case either because in our opinion a careful reading of the letter of the Director of Technical Development, Bihar, dated 9.8.2000 wherein he has referred to a team of Techn... | 1[ds]18. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we think in the facts and circumstances of this case, the High Court was in error in remanding the matter to the Commissioner to decide the question of fact which in our opinion was already conclusively decided by the Joint Commissioner and not disagreed on facts b... | 1 | 4,269 | 1,115 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
not the case of the respondent-State that in fact the product manufactured by the appellant in the new ... |
Commissioner of Cus. (Preventive), Mumbai Vs. Creotex Industries | 1. This civil appeal Under Section 130(E) of the Customs Act, 1962 filed by the Department is directed against the Final Order No. C-I/2836/WZB/2001, dated 17-9-2001 passed by Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, West Regional Bench at Mumbai [2003 (160) E.L.T. 826 (Tribunal)], by which the Respondent... | 1[ds]3. Having gone through the records of this case we are satisfied that the status of the above three firms remains in doubt. The Commissioner came to the conclusion that said three firms claimed to be SSI Units but they had no addresses from which they operated.4. The basic issue which arose for determination in th... | 1 | 696 | 307 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
1. This civil appeal Under Section 130(E) of the Customs Act, 1962 filed by the Department is directed against the Final ... |
Pannalal Nandlal Bhandari Vs. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City, Bombay | the Constitution, this appeal is preferred by the appellant against the order of the High Court.3. The only question which falls to be determined in this appeal is whether the proceedings for assessment were commenced within the period of limitation prescribed for serving notice of assessment under section 34(1)(a) of ... | 0[ds]At the material time, by S. 34(1)(a), the Income-tax Officer was invested with power amongst others to serve at any time within eight years from the end of any year of assessment notice of assessment if he had reason to believe that income, profits or gains had escaped assessment by reason of omission or failure o... | 0 | 1,535 | 949 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
the Constitution, this appeal is preferred by the appellant against the order of the High Court.3. The ... |
Shyam Sunder Prasad Singh & Others Vs. State of Bihar & Others | and 215 of his judgment thus :"214. It will thus appear that of all the other writers of Mithila School mentioned earlier, Pandit Amarit Nath Jha is the only one who has unequivocally said that during the Kali age those four kinds of sons, viz. Aurasa, Dattaka, kritrim and Putrika putra, can be made and recognised, It ... | 0[ds]53. It is no. doubt true that in some earlier decisions to which a detailed reference at this stage is not necessary some statements found in Smriti Chandrika which were directly in conflict with the Mitakshara were not accepted and the Mitakshara was given the preference but still as observed by Mayne there can, ... | 0 | 28,275 | 2,830 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
and 215 of his judgment thus :"214. It will thus appear that of all the other writers of Mithila School mentioned earlier... |
Smt Sarla Dixit & Anr Vs. Balwant Yadav & Ors | that even after the accident he had not slowed down his vehicle and went on driving with great speed, is fully established by the further fact that even after the accident, his vehicle could not stop there and then but had travelled further and had gone upto 70 ft. further and had then stopped near the south-eastern si... | 1[ds]In our view on the peculiar facts of that case the Court had adopted multiplier of 24. In paragraph 10 of the Report no special reasons were assigned for adopting thatWe are, aware that some decisions of the High Courts and of this Court as well have arrived at compensation on some such basis. These decisions cann... | 1 | 6,842 | 1,740 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
that even after the accident he had not slowed down his vehicle and went on driving with great speed, is ful... |
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Hyderabad Vs. Dewan Bahadur Ramgopal Mills Ltd | S. 12 seems to be that it is for the Central Government to determine if any difficulty of the nature indicated in the section has arisen and then to make such order, or give such direction, as appears to it to be necessary to remove the difficulty. Parliament has left the matter to the executive but that does not make ... | 1[ds]It is obvious that in applying cl. (b) to an assessee in a Part B State there would be an initial difficulty, inasmuch as prior to 1950 when the Indian Income-tax Act came into force in a Part B State no depreciation could have been actually allowed to such an assessee under the Income-tax Act or under any Act rep... | 1 | 3,996 | 989 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
S. 12 seems to be that it is for the Central Government to determine if any difficulty of the nature indica... |
Kantha Vibhag Yuva Koli Samaj Parivartan Trust and Others Vs. State of Gujarat and Others | the jurisdiction of the NGT under Section 14, since it relates to the implementation of the SWM Rules. The SWM Rules have been notified pursuant to the powers conferred by Sections 3, 6 and 25 of the Environment (Protection) Act 1986, which is Entry 5 in Schedule I of the NGT Act. None of the prayers sought by the appe... | 1[ds]11. In Mantri Techzone (P) Ltd. v. Forward Foundation (2019) 18 SCC 494, a three-Judge Bench of this Court outlined that Section 15(1)(c) of the NGT Act entrusts broad powers to the NGT. Speaking for the Court, Justice S Abdul Nazeer held:43. Section 15(1)(c) of the Act is an entire island of power and jurisdicti... | 1 | 3,759 | 806 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
the jurisdiction of the NGT under Section 14, since it relates to the implementation of the SWM Rules. ... |
The State Of Goa Vs. M/S.Colfax Laboratories (I) Ltd. | in entertaining an application from Colfax for reclassifying its products, issuing a notice to it to show cause why its request should not be rejected and thereafter passing an order on 23.3.1985 classifying the ASL as a medicinal preparation and not as a toilet preparation under the Act. There was no requirement in la... | 0[ds]The process of shaving does not cause any kind of impairment of the normal state of a person. it does not in any manner interrupt or modify the performance of any vital functions of the human body. Many people have been shaving regularly every day for 40-50 years but no one has ever suffered any kind of a disease.... | 0 | 7,196 | 606 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
in entertaining an application from Colfax for reclassifying its products, issuing a notice to it to show c... |
Govind Hanumantha Rao Desai Vs. Nagappa Alias Narahari Laxman Rao Deshpande And & 7 Ors | division of status that had taken place in his family. Reliance was placed on the decision of the Bombay High Court in Ramchandra Shrinivas and Others v. Ramkrishna Krishnarao, [AIR 1952 Bom 463 ] in support of the proposition that the plaintiff can enter into the adoptive family on the basis that the family is a joint... | 0[ds]Even before the plaintiff was adopted into the family, there was a partition between Krishna Rao and Lakshmana Rao. The genuineness of that partition is no more in dispute. After the partition Krishna Rao became absolutely entitled to his share of the properties and hence he was entitled to deal with that property... | 0 | 2,813 | 2,141 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
division of status that had taken place in his family. Reliance was placed on the decision of the Bombay Hi... |
Shanti Sports Club Vs. Union Of India | 9 SCC 94 , Union of India v. International Trading Co. (2003) 5 SCC 437 , Ekta Sakthi Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2006) 10 SCC 337 , Sanjay Kumar Munjal v. Chairman, UPSC (2006) 8 SCC 42 , K.K. Bhalla v. State of M.P. and others (2006) 3 SCC 581 , National Institute of Technology v. Chandra Sekhar Chaudhary (2... | 0[ds]37. As a result of the above discussion, we hold that the noting recorded in the official files by the officers of the Government at different levels and even the Ministers do not become decision of the Government unless the same is sanctified and acted upon by issuing an order in the name of the President or Gove... | 0 | 18,441 | 4,155 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
9 SCC 94 , Union of India v. International Trading Co. (2003) 5 SCC 437 , Ekta Sakthi Foundation v. G... |
TUTICORIN PORT DEMOCRATIC STAFF UNION Vs. TUTICORIN PORT TRUST | Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 05.11.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras at Chennai in Writ Appeal No.3865 of 2004 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court allowed the writ appeal filed by the respondent herein and set aside the judgmen... | 1[ds]9. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are inclined to allow the appeal and while setting aside the orders passed by the Division Bench and also of the Single Bench, remand the case to the writ court (Single Judge) for deciding the writ petition filed by th... | 1 | 575 | 210 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 05.11.2007 pas... |
Sandoz Private Limited & Another Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I & Others | R.Y. Ganoo, J.The aforesaid Writ Petition No.443 of 2012 was filed to challenge the Order dated 30th/31st January, 2012 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, R.O. Mumbai. By prayer clause (b) it was prayed that the relaxation order dated 17.5.2010 be restored. By prayer clause (c) it was prayed that the... | 0[ds]4. We are unable to accept this contention. The condition for grant of exemption from the provisions of EPF Act are set out in the scheme framed under the EPF Act. As per Appendix A to Clause 27AA of the said scheme, if an company reports losses for three consecutive financial years or erosion in their capital bas... | 0 | 458 | 137 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
R.Y. Ganoo, J.The aforesaid Writ Petition No.443 of 2012 was filed to challenge the Order dated 30th/31st January, 2012 pas... |
Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Vs. Toshoku Limited, Guntur Etc | pay the amount. The Court rejected the contention of the assessee that the Japanese Company was not in receipt of the amount in the taxable territories and the amount was not income within the meaning of section 4(1)(a) of the Indian income-tax Act, 1922 with the following observations:-"This leaves over the question w... | 0[ds]The Court, as it is obvious from the portion extracted above, proceeded to hold that the amount in question was received by the Japanese Company in India and hence was taxable on thatthe cases before us there were no terms corresponding to the term extracted above which was found in the agreements between the asse... | 0 | 2,782 | 537 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
pay the amount. The Court rejected the contention of the assessee that the Japanese Company was not in recei... |
Nicholas Piramal India Ltd Vs. Harisingh | in his primary role, whether he has acted illegally or has omitted relevant factors from consideration or has taken irrelevant factors into consideration or whether his view is one which no reasonable person could have taken. If his action does not satisfy these rules, it is to be treated as arbitrary. [In G.B. Mahajan... | 0[ds]25. Having regard to the nature of judicial review power conferred upon the High Court, it has rightly accepted the impugned Award passed by the Labour Court which is affirmed by the Appellate Court by recording valid and cogent reasons in the impugned Award/judgment. The same can neither be termed as erroneous no... | 0 | 5,602 | 709 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
in his primary role, whether he has acted illegally or has omitted relevant factors from consideration or has taken irrelev... |
Avadh Sugar Mills Ltd Vs. The Sales Tax Officer, Sitapur & Another | Hegde, J.1. This is an appeal by certificate. The only question that arises for decision is whether groundnut is oilseed. The High Court has come to the conclusion that the groundnut is oil-seed. The question as to the nature of groundnut came up for consideration in connection with the levy of purchase tax on the purc... | 0[ds]There can hardly be any doubt that in commercial circles groundnut is dealt with as oilseed. The commercial journals and newspapers while quoting the market price of oilseeds list groundnuts as one of the species of oilseeds. From this it is clear that in commercial circles groundnut is treated as oilseed.4. A see... | 0 | 540 | 173 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
Hegde, J.1. This is an appeal by certificate. The only question that arises for decision is whether gro... |
COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT Vs. SHAH BASIT JAHID | Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, JJ. 1. Leave granted. When this matter was listed on 17th November, 2016, this Court had passed the following order:- In course of hearing, we have apprised that objections to the elections held in pursuance of the order passed by the High Court are pending befo... | 1[ds]4. On a perusal of the aforesaid reports, we find that 627 members of the Society have been found validly inducted. No finding has been returned with regard to their status as valid voters to participate in the election. We have been apprised in the course of hearing that the valid voters elect the Committee of Ma... | 1 | 421 | 153 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, JJ. 1. Leave granted. When this matter was listed on 17th Novemb... |
Management Of Lndian Oil Corporation Ltd Vs. Its Workmen | (AIR 1972 SC 1917 = 1972 Lab IC 1128) where this Court, while pointing out the object of S. 9A, observed as follows:"The real object and purpose of enacting Section 9-A seems to be to afford an opportunity to the workmen to consider the effect of the proposed change and, if necessary, to represent their point of view o... | 0[ds]5. As regards the firm contention that the concession of the compensatory allowance was granted to the workers by way of a temporary measure and would not amount to a condition of service, we find absolutely no material on the record to support the same. There is no evidence to show that the management before gran... | 0 | 3,898 | 937 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
(AIR 1972 SC 1917 = 1972 Lab IC 1128) where this Court, while pointing out the object of S. 9A, observed as ... |
PARSA KENTA COLLIERIES LTD Vs. RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT UTPADAN NIGAM LTD | purposes of clauses 5.2.2 read with 5.4.3 would be 25.06.2011 and therefore zero year for the purpose of price escalation has to be 2011-12. Accordingly, the learned arbitrator considered the escalated price in F.Y. 2013¬14 at Rs.895/- per MT. However, according to the respondent, as the date of commencement was change... | 1[ds]8. At the outset, it is required to be noted that by the impugned judgment and order, the Division Bench of the High Court in exercise of its powers under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act has set aside the award passed by the learned Arbitrator, confirmed by the learned Commercial Court.For convenience, we shall ... | 1 | 5,427 | 1,230 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
purposes of clauses 5.2.2 read with 5.4.3 would be 25.06.2011 and therefore zero year for the purpose... |
Patel Roadways Ltd Vs. Birla Yamaha Ltd | terms of the contract based upon the fact situation and may grant remedy. But each case depends upon its own facts. In an appropriate case where there is an acute dispute of facts necessarily the tribunal has to refer the parties to original civil Court established under the CPC or appropriate State Law to have the cla... | 0[ds]25. From the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act noted in the foregoing paragraph the position is clear that the consumer disputes redressal agencies, i.e., District Forums, State Commissions and the National Commission are vested with powers of adjudication of all types of consumer disputes. No exception is... | 0 | 6,717 | 1,286 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
terms of the contract based upon the fact situation and may grant remedy. But each case depends upon its own facts. In an ... |
PATTU RAJAN Vs. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU | as Santhakumar’s, and the same body was exhumed from the burial grounds. It is evident from the depositions that the recovery of the dead body was made from the Tiger-Chola forest area, which is the same place to which Accused No. 2 led the investigation team based on his confession about disposal of the dead body. It ... | 0[ds]15. We do not find any force in the arguments of the learned Senior Advocate for the appellants that the incident of murder in the case in hand is merely a continuation of an earlier offence, i.e. Crime No. 1030 of 2001 relating to the abduction of PW1 and the deceased Santhakumar, which occurred on 01.10.2001.Und... | 0 | 11,183 | 3,976 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
as Santhakumar’s, and the same body was exhumed from the burial grounds. It is evident from the depositions that the reco... |
T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad and Ors Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors | the entire area of village Nani Ber of Abdasa Taluka admeasuring Hectares 364.22 Are (Acre 900-00 gutha) in relation to Firing survey No. 79, 80, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 94 (part) 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118 & 119 will not be kept as reserved forest and hence, the questi... | 1[ds]6. We would not have, as a matter of routine, accepted the prayer made by the Learned Counsel for the applicant, as has been noticed in the foregoing paragraphs. However, on examining the complication of the legal issue involved, we were satisfied, that a determinative order needed to be passed for an effective di... | 1 | 5,115 | 1,161 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
the entire area of village Nani Ber of Abdasa Taluka admeasuring Hectares 364.22 Are (Acre 900-00 gutha) in relation to Fir... |
Ram Singh Saini Vs. H. N. Bhargava | for quashing the appellants appointment. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh quashed the resolution dated 18-2-1973 appointing the appellant as Professor of Zoology and indicated that the University may advertise the post afresh if they desire to fill in the vacancy. The ground on which the resolution was quashed was that... | 0[ds]3. Quite clearly the appointment made more than a year after the date of nomination by the Selection Committee is not in accordance with the statute 21-AA. The requirement of the statute is that the post should be readvertised before making an appointment if the appointment is not made within a year of the Selecti... | 0 | 1,361 | 658 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
for quashing the appellants appointment. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh quashed the resolution dated ... |
Hukum Chand Malhotra Vs. Union Of India | the appellant merited any one of the three penalties mentioned therein and asked the appellant to show cause why any one of the aforesaid three penalties should not be imposed on him.We see nothing wrong in principle in the punishing authority tentatively forming the opinion that the charges proved merit any one of the... | 0[ds]It is obvious, and Art.311(2) expressly says so, that the purpose of the issue of a show cause notice at the second stage is to give the Government servant concerned a reasonable opportunity of showing cause why the proposed punishment should not be inflicted on him; for example, if the proposed punishment is dism... | 0 | 4,210 | 470 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
the appellant merited any one of the three penalties mentioned therein and asked the appellant to show cause... |
M/S. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. & ANR. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS | extent of 75%, as availed by it pursuant to the Entitlement Certificates dated 29.04.2011 and 24.11.2011 erroneously issued by the State Level Screening Committee. The SLSC was rightly directed to issue the new Entitlement Certificate for subsidy to the limit of 50% of total tax to the said Kotputli Unit of the appella... | 1[ds]18. We have given anxious consideration to the points so arising in this case with reference to the rival submissions and the law applicable; and have scanned through the entire recordEntitlement of the Appellant to Capital Investment Subsidy : The extent thereof : effect of the decision of BIDIIn our view, these ... | 1 | 28,048 | 7,063 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
extent of 75%, as availed by it pursuant to the Entitlement Certificates dated 29.04.2011 and 24.11.2011 e... |
Food Corporation Of India Vs. M/S. Thakur Shipping Co. Ltd. & Ors | should not be referred in accordance with the arbitration agreement and that the applicant was. at the time when the proceedings were commenced, and still remains, ready and willing to do all things necessary to the proper conduct of the arbitration, such authority may make an order staying the proceedings."The observa... | 1[ds]It is thus quite clear on the authorities and from the terms of Section 34 that the readiness and willingness must exist not, only when an application for stay is made but also at the commencement of the legal proceedings. From the conduct of the first defendant in either of these two suits the trial Court found t... | 1 | 3,354 | 585 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
should not be referred in accordance with the arbitration agreement and that the applicant was. at the time when the proce... |
Jiyajeerao Cotton Mills Limited And Another Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board And Others | had no authority to make the demand in excess of the agreed rate under the agreement. Repelling the contention, the Court observed in paragraph 4 of the judgment that the agreement itself did not envision the supply of electricity in violation of the ban imposed by the State Government in exercise of its power under Se... | 0[ds]10. While Regulation Order was meant for general application to all consumers, the Generation Order was confined only to such consumers who were having captive power source. It is also manifest that such a consumer was under a duty to generate additional electricity only when the maximum technically feasible capac... | 0 | 16,674 | 7,202 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
had no authority to make the demand in excess of the agreed rate under the agreement. Repelling the contentio... |
Kerala State Cashew Development Corp Vs. Shahal Hassan Mussaliar | means the acquiring of the entire title of the expropriated owner, whatever the nature and extent of that title may be. The entire bundle of rights which was vested in the original holder passes on acquisition to the acquirer, leaving nothing to the former. The concept of acquisition has an air of permanence and finali... | 0[ds]10. The grievance of the factory owner was that the authority declined to extend the lease and refused to renew the lease in favour of the Corporation. A request was made to return the concerned cashew factory with all its assets. That prayer was also not complied with. There were pleas of set up of certain amount... | 0 | 4,632 | 1,280 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
means the acquiring of the entire title of the expropriated owner, whatever the nature and extent of th... |
Smt. Bhagwati Debi Goenka Vs. Kishorilal Goenka & Others | 1. Herein we are asked to restrain the Receiver by means of an injuction from appointing the respondent Kishori Lal Goenka as his agent to work Pit No. 1 in the Colliery in dispute. Alternatively we are asked to close down that pit.2. The Receiver was appointed for managing that pit. He was authorised to appoint an age... | 0[ds]3. From the facts set out earlier, it is absolutely clear that the receiver had acted in the most proper manner. There is no basis for the allegation made by the petitioner that he had been coerced to appoint the respondent Kishori Lal Goenka as his agent. The fact that at one stage the respondent had filed an app... | 0 | 780 | 127 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
1. Herein we are asked to restrain the Receiver by means of an injuction from appointing the respondent Kishori Lal Goenka... |
Yogendra Tiwari Vs. District Judge, Gorakhpur and Others | and 33(8)). - (1) The District Magistrate, shall, before making any order of allotment or release in respect of any building which is alleged to be vacant under Section 12 or to be otherwise vacant or to be likely to fall vacant, get the same inspected. (2) The inspection of the building, so far as possible shall be ma... | 1[ds]6. It is needless to stress that the making of an order of allotment by the District Magistrate under Section 16(1)(a) of the Act consists of two stages. The first stage is actual vacancy of a building or a part thereof in consequence of an intimation given by the landlord or the tenant under Section 15, or a decl... | 1 | 2,251 | 856 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
and 33(8)). - (1) The District Magistrate, shall, before making any order of allotment or release... |
M/S Allied Motors Ltd Vs. M/S Bharat Petroleum Corp.Ltd | prosecution cannot establish its case against any of the accused and accused persons are liable to be discharged on this ground alone and no charges can be framed.Further, it is an admitted that that there was no receipt of two samples from each source being handed over to the petitioner. This is clear evidence of the ... | 1[ds]In the instant case, samples were taken on 15th May, 2000. On the very next day i.e. on 16th May, 2000, without even giving a show-cause notice and/or giving an opportunity of hearing, the respondent-Corporation terminated the dealership of the appellant. The appellant had been operating the petrol pump for the re... | 1 | 6,447 | 273 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
prosecution cannot establish its case against any of the accused and accused persons are liable to be discharged on this gr... |
Anandilal and Another Vs. Ram Narain and Others | view of the decision of the Privy Council in Kirtyanand Singh v. Prithi Chand Lal, these decisions were no longer good law. We find it difficult to accept the reasoning.The decision of the Privy Council in Kirtyanand Singhs case does not lay down any contrary proposition. There, the point appears to have arisen from an... | 0[ds]We feel that there is no, justification for placing a rigid construction on a beneficent provision like s. 15(1) of the Limitation Act. It is not necessary for us to go into the history of the legislation which has been dealt with at length in many of the decisions laying down that s 48 of the Code is controlled b... | 0 | 3,017 | 545 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
view of the decision of the Privy Council in Kirtyanand Singh v. Prithi Chand Lal, these decisions we... |
Estate Officer Ut Chandigarh Vs. M/S. Esys Information Technologies Pvt. Ltd | respect to charge by Teledata Informatics Ltd., over the assets of M/s. Esys Singapore, it has been mentioned that general charge of Teledata remains. Following facts have been mentioned : "10. I have at paragraphs 16-17 of my 2nd Affidavit referred to Esys Global Holdings Ptd ("Esys Dubai") being prepared to buy certa... | 1[ds]15. It is apparent that M/s. Esys Singapore has entered in such transactions with Dubai company and it appears prima facie from the affidavit of Mr. Vikas Goel and there was a further right created in favour of Teledata though dispute with Teledata has to be decided in pending cases. The provisions of Rule 9 of th... | 1 | 4,370 | 134 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
respect to charge by Teledata Informatics Ltd., over the assets of M/s. Esys Singapore, it has been mentioned that general ... |
Uday Shankar Triyar Vs. Ram Kalewar Prasad Singh | Singh) and for amendment of the description of appellant No.2 by substitution of the words Working President for Former President as the person representing DCC, an objection was raised alleging improper presentation. In the circumstances, the appellate court ought to have accepted the application for amendment and sub... | 0[ds]14. In so far as the decision in Sheikh Palat (supra) relied on by the appellant-landlord, we find that the said decision is not of much assistance to the appellant as the decision itself clarifies that it may not be necessary to file a Vakalatnama with the petition of appeal, but it is certainly necessary that th... | 0 | 4,765 | 1,839 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
Singh) and for amendment of the description of appellant No.2 by substitution of the words Working President for ... |
M/s. R.S. Infra-Transmission Ltd Vs. Saurinindubhai Patel and Ors | debtor deposited the substantial amount of Rs. 1,27,30,527/- and other amounts due and payable under Rule 60 including the penalty and the interest, there was no reason for the judgment debtor not to deposit Rs. 3,57,647/- which is a very small amount as against the amount deposited. At this stage, it is required to be... | 1[ds]6.2 At the time of hearing of the application under Rule 60 on 09.02.2007, a grievance was made before the Recovery Officer as to why the Bank had not served a copy of the calculation sheet and in the meantime, the judgment debtor had himself deposited a further sum of Rs.2.80 lakhs towards the difference in calcu... | 1 | 6,031 | 949 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
debtor deposited the substantial amount of Rs. 1,27,30,527/- and other amounts due and payable under Ru... |
BHIMABAI MAHADEO KAMBEKAR (DEAD) THR. LRS Vs. ARTHUR IMPORT & EXPORT CO | Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 30.09.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.6235 of 2011 whereby the Single Judge of the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants herein. 3. Few facts... | 0[ds]7. The law on the question of mutation in the revenue records pertaining to any land and what is its legal value while deciding the rights of the parties is fairly well settled by a series of decisions of this Court.This Court has consistently held that mutation of a land in the revenue records does not create or ... | 0 | 501 | 293 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and o... |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JAIPUR Vs. M/S GOPAL SHRI SCRIPS PVT LTD | Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 09.08.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur in DBITA No.53 of 2000 whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal as having become infructuous filed by the appellant herein. 3. The app... | 1[ds]9. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant (Income Tax Department) and on perusal of the record of the case, we are constrained to allow the appeal, set aside the impugned order and remand the case to the High Court for deciding the appeal afresh on merits in accordance with law.10. Mere perusal of the ... | 1 | 825 | 373 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order ... |
Man Kaur(Dead)By Lrs Vs. Hartar Singh Sangha | in my presence (objected to). In the plaint, the incident is described thus : "Ultimately, the general attorney of the Defendant namely Kartar Singh reached Chandigarh on 7.6.1979 and the plaintiff was also there in Chandigarh on the said date. The said Kartar Singh who hold the general attorney for the Defendant had d... | 1[ds]12. We may now summarise for convenience, the position as to who should give evidence in regard to matters involving personal knowledge: (a) An attorney holder who has signed the plaint and instituted the suit, but has no personal knowledge of the transaction can only give formal evidence about the validity of the... | 1 | 8,694 | 2,703 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
in my presence (objected to). In the plaint, the incident is described thus : "Ultimately, the general attorney of the Defe... |
Price Waterhouse & Company & Others Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Another | If at the initial stage it becomes necessary to pass an interim order, the SEBI has been endowed with such a power under Section 11 of the Act. In case the provisions of section 11 are construed in a restrictive manner, the interests of the investors in securities and development and regulation of securities market wil... | 0[ds]25. So far as the question as to whether the SEBI has jurisdiction to issue such show cause notices to the petitioners are concerned, we have already pointed out various provisions contained in the SEBI Act and the Regulations. Section 11 (1) of the SEBI Act, which we have incorporated earlier, provides that it is... | 0 | 17,324 | 5,346 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
If at the initial stage it becomes necessary to pass an interim order, the SEBI has been endowed with s... |
Gurram Sreeramulu, Garlapati Anjaneyulu and Company and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Another | the court may consider the delay unreasonable even if it is less than the period of limitation prescribed for a civil action for the remedy of refund. But delay must always be held to be unreasonable if the petition is filed beyond three years. Among the facts and circumstances which would be relevant for holding wheth... | 0[ds]Having carefully considered these decisions, we are of the view that there is nothing in these decisions which gives an unqualified right to obtain the relief of refund under article 226 of the Constitution of India and which makes it obligatory on the High Court to direct refund of the tax no sooner than it is fo... | 0 | 6,372 | 1,834 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
the court may consider the delay unreasonable even if it is less than the period of limitation prescribed fo... |
Mangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd Vs. M/S. Amr Power Pvt. Ltd. | for MESCOMs Default: Upon the occurrence of an event of default as set out in sub-clause 9.2.2 above, Company may deliver a Default Notice to the MESCOM in writing which shall specify in reasonable detail the Event of Default giving rise to the default notice, and calling upon the MESCOM to remedy the same.At the expir... | 0[ds]16. This Court in Sarguja Transport Service (supra) held that withdrawal of a Writ Petition without seeking permission to file a fresh Writ Petition would bar filing of a fresh Writ Petition. But there is no bar for taking a defence in a fresh round of litigation in respect of the same point involved in a suit whi... | 0 | 3,474 | 470 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
for MESCOMs Default: Upon the occurrence of an event of default as set out in sub-clause 9.2.2 above, Company may ... |
Daya Ram And Others Vs. Shyam Sundari | are several, is brought on record there is no proper constitution of the suit or appeal, with the result that the suit or appeal would abate?The almost universal consensus of opinion of all the High Courts is that where a plaintiff or an appellant after diligent and bona fide enquiry ascertains who the legal representa... | 0[ds]We do not see any substance in this argument. If the property had been acquired under the Land Acquisition Act compensation at the market value with the solatium would have been provided and Shyam Sundari would have been entitled to a third share in that compensation. There is, therefore, no question of Mata Din s... | 0 | 5,170 | 1,388 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
are several, is brought on record there is no proper constitution of the suit or appeal, with the result that the ... |
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi Vs. Ghisa Ram | sample to the respondent the respondent was not expected to keep it in a refrigerator. Consequently, without any preservative, the sample kept with him could have been analsed successfully during the next 17 days, whereas, if a preservative had been added, it could have been analysed successfully during the next four m... | 0[ds]There can be no doubt that sub-s. (a) of S. 13 of the Act confers a right on the accused vendor to have the sample given to him examined by the Director of the Central Food Laboratory and to obtain a certificate from him on the basis of the analysis of that sample. It is when the accused exercises this right that ... | 0 | 2,558 | 1,618 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
sample to the respondent the respondent was not expected to keep it in a refrigerator. Consequently, withou... |
ASST. PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EPFO, BAREILLY Vs. M/S U P STATE WAREHOUSING CORP | as to entitle the workers to claim the benefits of the Act. 9. The appellant with a view to decide this question accordingly issued notice to the Corporation under Section 7A of the Act and called upon them to pay the arrears due towards provident fund contribution of these workers (159) in accordance with the provisio... | 1[ds]17. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are constrained to allow the appeal and while setting aside the impugned order remand the case to the High Court (writ court) for deciding the writ petition afresh on merits18. In our considered opinion, the need to r... | 1 | 1,549 | 459 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
as to entitle the workers to claim the benefits of the Act. 9. The appellant with a view to decide this qu... |
National Textile Corporation (Mah. North) Limited Vs. Khushalchand Bissessardas Daga | the respondent. In the books of the Company these would be shown as advances made to Messrs Harakchand Mohanlal against the cotton said to be in transit. As the cotton was not received by the Company, ultimately a large amount would be outstanding against Messrs Harakchand Mohanlal, but neither in the books of account ... | 1[ds]If they are right in this, the period of limitation would not begin to run until the Company obtained knowledge of the fraud, and it would be immaterial whether Article 95 or Article 120 applied, because in either event the suit would be in time since it was filed within three years of the date on which according ... | 1 | 11,239 | 2,089 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
the respondent. In the books of the Company these would be shown as advances made to Messrs Harakchand Mohanlal against t... |
Life Insurance Corporation Of India Vs. Mani Ram | abundantly clear that payment of premium due had to be made within a grace period of one month. If such payment was made within the said period, the policy would be treated as valid and the assured would be paid the amount to which he was entitled after deducting the premium amount. But it was also made clear that if t... | 1[ds]12. So far as the factual position is concerned, there is no dispute between the parties. Deceased Ashok Kumar was insured by the Insurance Company and the first premium was paid on August 21, 1995. At the request of the insured, however, the policy was back-dated with effect from April 28, 1995. In our opinion, t... | 1 | 2,921 | 905 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
abundantly clear that payment of premium due had to be made within a grace period of one month. If such payme... |
Shamrao Vithal Co-Operative Bank Ltd Vs. Kasargod Pandhuranga Mallya | Registrar might require in respect of a co-operative society actually registered in that State. Sub-section (3) gives a limited control to the Registrar of Co-operative Societies of the State in which a branch or place of business of a co-operative society is established by authorising him to exercise in respect of tha... | 0[ds]6. There is, in our opinion, no force in the above contention because we do not agree with the underlying assumption of the above argument that the word control comprehends within itself the adjudication of a claim made by a co-operative society its members. The appellant society, as would appear from the resume o... | 0 | 2,115 | 637 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
Registrar might require in respect of a co-operative society actually registered in that State. Sub-section (3) gives a l... |
Rallis India Limited Vs. G. Lakshmi Kanthan | his attention on this plea he held that the services of the respondent were dispensed with for a reasonable cause within the meaning of S.41 of the Madras Act.4. Respondent No. 1 filed Writ Petition No. 937/1968 in Madras High Court. Kailasam, J., allowed the writ petition by his order dated 4-12-1968 and remitted back... | 0[ds]It seems to us that there has been a lot of conclusion in this case because of the fact that the letter dated the 4th April, 1964 was written by the respondent not in isolation but in continuation of several others letters written earlier when he was not a shareholder but simply an employee of the company. But the... | 0 | 1,386 | 399 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
his attention on this plea he held that the services of the respondent were dispensed with for a reasonable cause within th... |
Amit @ Ammu Vs. State Of Maharashtra | for burning the school bag, bycycle etc. Out of the deposition of the witnesses, the prosecution case was primarily based on the testimony of PW1 and PW11 and on the circumstance of last seen as deposed by these two witnesses.7. As already noticed body of deceased was recovered on 29th March, 2001. It stands establishe... | 1[ds]The present is a case to which observation as aforesaid and principle laid squarely applies and the circumstances of the case cast a heavy responsibility on the appellant to explain and in absence thereof suffer the conviction. Those circumstances have already been noticed. In which case such an irresistible concl... | 1 | 1,856 | 261 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
for burning the school bag, bycycle etc. Out of the deposition of the witnesses, the prosecution case was primari... |
TANUKU TALUK VILLAGE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Vs. TANUKU MUNICIPALITY | 5. The appellant filed two civil suits against the respondents in relation to the suit land. One was for grant of permanent injunction (OS No.384 of 1986) and the other was for recovery of arrears of rent (OS No.226 of 1987). Both the civil suits were filed in the Court of 1 st Additional District Munsif, Tanuku. 6. By... | 1[ds]16. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are inclined to allow the appeals and while setting aside the impugned order, remand the case to the High Court for the disposal of the second appeals and revision petitions afresh on merits as indicated below17. The ... | 1 | 1,279 | 511 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
5. The appellant filed two civil suits against the respondents in relation to the suit land. One was for gran... |
A.Shanmugam Vs. Ariya K.R.K.M.N.P.Sangam Tr.Pres.Etc | fair treatment. The court while rendering justice must adopt a pragmatic approach and in appropriate cases realistic costs and compensation be ordered in order to discourage dishonest litigation. The object and true meaning of the concept of restitution cannot be achieved or accomplished unless the courts adopt a pragm... | 0[ds]19. In our considered view, a well-reasoned judgment and a decree passed by the trial court ought not to have been reversed by the First Appellate Court. It is reiterated that thefather was engaged as a Watchman on a monthly salary and in that capacity he was allowed to stay in the suit premises and after his deat... | 0 | 11,267 | 267 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
fair treatment. The court while rendering justice must adopt a pragmatic approach and in appropriate cases r... |
Nagar Nigam,Meerut Vs. Al Faheem Meat Exports Pvt.Ltd | in the activities of the State and public authorities. They should undoubtedly act fairly. Their actions should be legitimate. Their dealings should be above board. Their transactions should be without aversion or affection. Nothing should be suggestive of discrimination. Nothing should be done by them which gives an i... | 1[ds]11. Indisputably Appellant-Corporation is a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. It was constituted under the said Act which was enacted with a view to ensure better municipal governmence of the cities in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The statutory obligation on the part of the Munici... | 1 | 6,307 | 1,337 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
in the activities of the State and public authorities. They should undoubtedly act fairly. Their actions sho... |
State of Rajasthan Vs. Shyam Lal & Others | competence of the State legislature and does not transgress the constitutional limitations after the Constitution came into force. We are therefore of opinion that there was recognition of liability by the new State throughout this process and under the circumstances the suit was maintainable against the Part B State o... | 0[ds]We are of opinion that when the new State continued all the old laws till they were altered or repealed, and there was specific provision in each Covenant that the assets and liabilities of the Covenanting States were to be the assets and liabilities of the Union the new State must have intended to respect all the... | 0 | 5,195 | 1,113 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
competence of the State legislature and does not transgress the constitutional limitations after the Constitution came int... |
Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited & Another Vs. Union of India & Others | for the said formulation be period of exemption and thereby would be action against the public interest. In this regard the learned counsel for the respondents particularly highlighted the fact that the quantity manufactured by the petitioner company during 1st January, 1995 to 17th July, 1995 was only 38,32,975 strips... | 0[ds]15. In our opinion, the submission is devoid of any substance. Under the substantive part of DPCO, 1987 the ceiling price in respect of scheduled formulation was included in paras 8 and 9(6) and all the manufacturers of the formulations had to adopt ceiling price within 15 days of the date of notification Paras 8 ... | 0 | 5,026 | 423 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
for the said formulation be period of exemption and thereby would be action against the public interest. In this regard the ... |
Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd Vs. Director Of Inspector, Commissioner Of Central Excise And Another | CA No. 3328 of 1981 1. So far as this appeal is concerned, the question is whether the duty of excise whereof tax credit is available would be in respect of such duty of excise as is chargeable under the Central Excises and Salt Act alone. The question has already been answered by this Court in the case of Associated C... | 0[ds]2. The facts of this case are not in dispute. The respondent Company is manufacturing various types of papers. The contention of the Department is that "paper" (all sorts) will include all sorts of papers manufactured by the company and all types of papers have to be taken together to find out whether the producti... | 0 | 259 | 142 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
CA No. 3328 of 1981 1. So far as this appeal is concerned, the question is whether the duty of excise whereof tax ... |
Attar Singh Vs. State Of Maharashtra | that the intensity with which he hit his wife after abusing her is indicative of the fact that he was not oblivious of the consequence which would have resulted from his violent act of beating his wife with a log of wood. Thus, it will have to be inferred that he had sufficient knowledge about the consequence of his he... | 1[ds]our view, the accused-appellant although might not be attributed with the intention to kill his wife, sufficient knowledge that his act would result into killing her was definitely there in the appellants mind and he in fact gave vent to his feeling by finally killing her when he hit her with a woodenlog to take r... | 1 | 4,626 | 209 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
that the intensity with which he hit his wife after abusing her is indicative of the fact that he was not oblivious of the c... |
Shailesh Harilal Shah Vs. Matushree Textiles Limited | [1973] 45 Comp Cas 17 (Bom) and the decision in Sheth Mohanlal Ganpatram v. Shri Sayaji Jubilee Cotton and Jute Mills Co. Ltd. [1964] 34 Comp Cas 777 (Guj); AIR 1965 Guj 96 . Learned counsel urged that item 8 of the ninth annual report sets out a resolution conferring power upon the board of directors to make any loan ... | 0[ds]It is undoubtedly true as held by the Supreme Court that the director is an agent of the company but the assumption of the plaintiffs that the relationship of principal and agent can be created only by contract is not accurate. The relationship can be created by operation of law and in such cases, the relationship... | 0 | 13,254 | 2,400 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
[1973] 45 Comp Cas 17 (Bom) and the decision in Sheth Mohanlal Ganpatram v. Shri Sayaji Jubilee Cotton and... |
East & West Insurance Company Limited Vs. Kamala Jayantilal Mehta | directors do not wish to do what the articles require them to do and leave the doing of it to some one else, they must clearly resolve to that effect.We see nothing in the resolution of 22-6-1948 to indicate that the directors, assuming they had the power of delegation, delegated to the manager not only the finalising ... | 0[ds]it is difficult to understand how the fixing of the time for the payment of the call is not an essential feature of the making of the call.A call imposes a liability upon a shareholder and that liability only commences from the time when he becomes liable to pay the call, and therefore authorising the call and fix... | 0 | 8,667 | 2,868 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
directors do not wish to do what the articles require them to do and leave the doing of it to some one else, they must cle... |
Shree Shyam Agency Vs. Union Of India | “self”,Such person shall, deposit an amount equivalent to the cost of consignment by way of security apart from freight and other charges before taking delivery of such consignment.(2) If any amount has been deposited by way of security under clause (b) of sub-rule (1), such amount shall be refunded by the railway admi... | 0[ds]18. On going through the Railways Act, 1989, the Tribunal Act as well as the 1990 Rules and the statutory forms, we are of the considered view that what the Tribunal has to inquire into and determine is the claim against the Railway Administration, that is whether the Railway Administration is at fault in discharg... | 0 | 4,716 | 87 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
“self”,Such person shall, deposit an amount equivalent to the cost of consignment by way of security apart from freight a... |
D.R. Krishnaswamy Vs. Wesleyan Methodist Mission Trust Association and Others | anything in the plaint of that suit about the will suggested that the will was not in existence on the day the suit was instituted. According to the trial Court all that could be inferred from this circumstance was that the plaintiff was an unscrupulous man but having regard to the other circumstances it would not just... | 1[ds]9. We have examined the documents for ourselves. To us it did not seem that there was an attempt to adjust the writing to Sripadas signatures which appeared on both sheets of paper. The genuineness of the signatures has not been questioned; what is alleged is that the plaintiff somehow got hold of two blank sheets... | 1 | 2,990 | 751 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
anything in the plaint of that suit about the will suggested that the will was not in existence on the day the sui... |
Seth Thawardas Pherumal Vs. Union of India | and concluded all their terms; then, at the last minute, one side raised a point about rationing but without waiting for a reply and without having the term entered in the contract, he signed the contract as it stood before the point was raised even during the negotiation.It is an error in law to hold that any contract... | 0[ds]An arbitrator is not a conciliator and cannot ignore the law or misapply it in order to do what be thinks is just and reasonable. He is a tribunal selected by the parties to decide their disputes according to law and so is bound to follow and. apply the law, and if he does not, he can be set right by the Courts pr... | 0 | 6,504 | 1,720 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
and concluded all their terms; then, at the last minute, one side raised a point about rationing but without waiti... |
Wealth Tax Officer Vs. Thuppan Namboodiripad and Others | 1. These five appeals have come before this Court on certificates granted by the High Court of Kerala. They raise common question of law and will be dealt with together. One of the appeals (No. 262) arises out of a writ petition by the karanavan of a Muslim Mopla Tarwad in the District of North Malabar, governed by the... | 1[ds]4. We have come to the conclusion that these cases must be remanded to the High Court for further consideration after giving parties an opportunity to place full facts in connection with the application of Art.14 before it. The High Court itself pointed out that there was no averment on behalf of the writ petition... | 1 | 1,014 | 420 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
1. These five appeals have come before this Court on certificates granted by the High Court of Kerala... |
State of Karnataka and Others Vs. Southern India Plywood Company, Peramanoor | 1. Pursuant to an agreement between the parties and a further allotment, trees of the species described in the agreements comprising 3000 cubic meters of softwood in all were permitted to be cut and removed by the respondent. The rate for the payment of the wood was fixed by the agreement. It has been found by the High... | 0[ds]As the question was not raised before the High Court that investigation has not been done at all. We may, moreover, point out that even from the averments made in the special leave petition it appears that the entire quantum of the wood in question was cut prior to January 31, 1981 whereas the amendment to the pro... | 0 | 526 | 133 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
1. Pursuant to an agreement between the parties and a further allotment, trees of the species described in t... |
SHIVNARAYAN (D) BY LRS Vs. MANIKLAL (D) THR. LRS | jurisdiction of more than two courts, the suit is maintainable only when suit is filed on one cause of action. 22. Justice Verma of Allahabad High Court in his concurring opinion in Karan Singh v. Kunwar Sen (supra) while considering Section 17 of C.P.C. has explained his views by giving illustration. Following was obs... | 1[ds]10. Applying Section 13 of General Clauses Act, the Bombay High Court explaining the word property used in Section 17 held that it includes properties. We are also of the same view that the word property used in Section 17 can be more than one property or properties11. The word property under Section 17 of the Civ... | 1 | 6,837 | 1,199 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
jurisdiction of more than two courts, the suit is maintainable only when suit is filed on one cause of action... |
Himachal Pradesh Bus Stand Management and Development Authority (HPBSM&DA) Vs. The Central Empowered Committee Etc. & Ors | duty of every citizen of India to protect and improve the natural environment including forests and wild life and to have compassion for living creatures. The Precautionary Principle makes it mandatory for the State Government to anticipate, prevent and attack the causes of environmental degradation. 60. In Goel Ganga ... | 1[ds]41. The construction of the Hotel-cum-Restaurant structure in the Bus Stand Complex is illegal and constitutes a brazen violation of law. The permission which was granted by MOEF on 12 November 1997 was only for construction of a parking place at McLeod Ganj. Similarly, the permission granted on 1 March 2001 was g... | 1 | 12,726 | 2,977 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
duty of every citizen of India to protect and improve the natural environment including forests and wild life... |
Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P Vs. Madan Lal Das & Sons, Bareilly | in section 12(2) a proviso that the time requisite for obtaining copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from or sought to be revised of reviewed shall be excluded only if such copy has to be file alongwith the memorandum of appeal or application for leave to appeal or for revision or for review of Judgment, whe... | 1[ds]This contention is equally devoid of force. There is nothing in the language of section 12(2) of the Limitation Act to justify the inference that the time spent for obtaining copy of the order sought to be revised can be excluded only if such a copy is required to be filed along with the revision application. All ... | 1 | 2,552 | 570 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
in section 12(2) a proviso that the time requisite for obtaining copy of the decree, sentence or order appe... |
Mrs. A Vs. Union of India & Others | 1. Application for non-disclosure of name and details of the petitioner is allowed. 2. Petitioner - Mrs. A, aged 22 years, has approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the respondents to allow her to undergo medical termination of her pregnancy. She apprehended danger to... | 1[ds]5. We have been informed that the fetus is without a skull and would, therefore, not be in a position to survive. It is also submitted that the petitioner understands that her fetus is abnormal and the risk of fetal mortality is high. She also has the support of her husband in her decision making6. Upon evaluation... | 1 | 732 | 301 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
1. Application for non-disclosure of name and details of the petitioner is allowed. 2. Petitioner - Mrs. A, aged 22 years,... |
MANAGEMENT HINDUSTAN MACHINE TOOLS LTD Vs. GHANSHYAM SHARMA | Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 18.12.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.1417 of 1997 whereby the High Court allowed the appeal filed by the respondent. 2. Facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. T... | 1[ds]12. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and on perusal of the record of the case, we are of the considered opinion that the appealdeserves to be partly allowed by modifying the award of the Labour Court to the extent indicated. It is not in dispute that the respondent was a casual worker and hardly ... | 1 | 827 | 290 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 18.12.2007 p... |
Vasudev Ramchandra Shelat Vs. Pranlal Jayanand Thakar And Ors | clearly decided in what circumstances the present, absolute, unconditional right to have the transfer registered to which Lord Selborne refers arises. It is thought that in many instances the test is that indicated by Jenkins J. in Re. Rose :I was referred on that to the well known case of Milroy v. Lord and also to th... | 1[ds]We think Mr. S. T. Desai, learned Counsel for the appellant Shelat, rightly pointed out that every material finding on questions of fact, given in favour of the appellant, was upheld by the Division Bench.After indicating the terms of the gift deed, the Division Bench heldit is undoubtedly true that the deed of gi... | 1 | 7,844 | 2,791 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
clearly decided in what circumstances the present, absolute, unconditional right to have the transfer registered to which Lo... |
Krishna Bahadur Vs. M/S. Purna Theatre | it is an agreement between the parties and a party fully knowing of its rights has agreed not to assert a right for a consideration. 10. A right can be waived by the party for whose benefit certain requirements or conditions had been provided for by a statute subject to the condition that no public interest is involved... | 1[ds]It is, therefore, evident that the question of a bona fide action on the part of the employer or waiver on the part of the appellant herein had not been raised. The respondent before the learned Single Judge was although very emphatic as regard compliance of requirements of Section 25-F(b) of the Industrial Disput... | 1 | 2,767 | 239 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
it is an agreement between the parties and a party fully knowing of its rights has agreed not to assert a ri... |
R. Mcdill and Company Private Limited Vs. Gouri Shankar Sarda and Others | not be regarded as falling within Section 86, Code of Civil Procedure. In the case before us as already mentioned above a suit by presenting a plaint was instituted by respondent 1 and thereafter it was sought to be stayed by submitting application under Section 34 of the Act. Thus we are clearly of the view that the a... | 1[ds]12. Thus we do not find any force in the submission made by learned counsel for the appellants before us that the provisions of Order XXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure will not apply to the order passed by the High Court on February 25, 196613. We would, now, consider the scope and effect of the order dated Feb... | 1 | 4,550 | 657 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
not be regarded as falling within Section 86, Code of Civil Procedure. In the case before us as already ment... |
M/S. Murlidhar Chiranjilal Vs. M/S. Harishchandra Dwarkadas And Another | wheat at a fixed price. The contract provided that notice of appropriation to the contract of a specific cargo in a specific ship should be given within a specified time and also contained express provisions as to what should be done in various circumstances if the cargo should be re-sold one or more times before deliv... | 1[ds]We think it unnecessary to decide whether the contract had become impossible of performance, as we have come to the conclusion that the appeal must succeed on the other point raised on behalf of the appellant.The two principles on which damages in such cases are calculated are well-settled. The first is that, as f... | 1 | 2,951 | 971 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
wheat at a fixed price. The contract provided that notice of appropriation to the contract of a specific carg... |
Orissa Lift Irrigation Corp. Ltd. & Others Vs. Rabi Sankar Patro & Others | excellence, research and advancement in its chosen field for which such status was accorded. There is no embargo on such Deemed to be University in entering new areas of education or introducing new courses but in that case, it cant demand or receive complete relaxation from regulatory regime. It must satisfy all those... | 1[ds]12. The aforesaid chart shows that the "Deemed to be University" status was conferred keeping in view the potential to offer academic programs in specific domains of knowledge. For example institutions at serial Nos.1 and 2 in the aforesaid table had specialized in Social Work, Education, Arts and Commerce. Howeve... | 1 | 25,381 | 3,106 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
excellence, research and advancement in its chosen field for which such status was accorded. There is no embargo ... |
Tirath Singh Vs. Bachittar Singh And Others | 1935, and Art. 311 of the Constitution.They are exceptional cases, and do not furnish any safe or useful guidance in the interpretation of S. 99.9. The appellant also sought support for his contention that notice should be given under the proviso even to persons who are parties to the election petition, in the provisio... | 0[ds]3. (1) On the first question, the complaint of the appellant is that in the election petition the allegations relating to bribery were vague and wanting in particulars and that the petition should accordingly have been dismissed under Ss. 83 and 85 of the Act; that the charge that was sought to be proved it the he... | 0 | 4,208 | 1,259 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
1935, and Art. 311 of the Constitution.They are exceptional cases, and do not furnish any safe or usefu... |
Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and Another | has first to meet the requirements of the iron and steel industry. What is important to note is that these eighty seven new coke oven plants are not situated in or about coal mines though they are in the coal field area, as indeed they are bound to be.29. Shri Ashok Sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavit f... | 0[ds]If this be the correct interpretation of the constitutional provision s, as I think it is, the amended Article 31 C does no more than codify the existing position under the constitutional scheme by providing immunity to a law enacted really ann genuinely for giving effect to a Directive Principle, so that needless... | 0 | 12,028 | 3,316 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
has first to meet the requirements of the iron and steel industry. What is important to note is that these ei... |
The Tirunelveli Motor Bus Service Co Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras | Grover, J. 1. This is an appeal by certificate from a judgment of the Madras High Court answering the following question which had been referred to it under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, hereinafter called the "Act" in the affirmative and against the assessee. "whether on the facts and in the circu... | 1[ds]The High Court did not agree with the above view of the Tribunalalthough It appears that it did not disagree with the conclusion of the Tribunal that the record did not contain any indication that thex Officer had made any allowance in respect of bonus for which provision had been made while making the assessment ... | 1 | 913 | 355 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
Grover, J. 1. This is an appeal by certificate from a judgment of the Madras High Court answering the f... |
State Of Gujarat Vs. Akshay Amrutlal Thakkar | the Commandant General and the Commandant, any Officer of the Home Guards authorised by the Commandant in this behalf may exercise the powers conferred by section 4 on the Commandant in such circumstances as the Commandant may specify." 7. Bare regarding of Section 2(2) makes it clear that the State Government is the a... | 1[ds]As rightly contended by learned counsel for the appellant-State, the order impugned in the writ petition was one of disengagement because the respondents did not act in terms of the undertaking given. As the services rendered by the respondents were essentially honorary no civil consequences were involved. Section... | 1 | 2,359 | 140 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
the Commandant General and the Commandant, any Officer of the Home Guards authorised by the Commandant in this behalf may ... |
Bihari Lal Batra Vs. Chief Settlement Commissioner, (Rural) Punjab | to law. He therefore cancelled the allotment. The appellant thereafter applied to the Chief Settlement Commissioner in revision and not being successful there moved the High Court by a petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution. As stated earlier, this petition was dismissed and it is the correctness of this ... | 0[ds]We have considered this point in the judgment in Civil Appeal No. 552 of 1963: (AIR 1964 SC 1536 ) Mithoo Shahani v. Union of India which was pronounced on 10-3-1964 and for the reasons there stated this submission has to beconsider that there is no substance in this argument. In fact we are unable to appreciate t... | 0 | 1,490 | 564 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
to law. He therefore cancelled the allotment. The appellant thereafter applied to the Chief Settlement Commissioner in rev... |
Commissioner Of Income- Tax, Bombay Vs. Smt. Indira Balkrishna | By the Income-tax Amendment Act of 1939 (Act VII of 1939) the section was again amended and it then said :"Where any Act of the Central Legislature enacts that income-tax shall be charged for any year at any rate or rates, tax at that rate or those rates shall be charged for that year in accordance with, and subject to... | 1[ds]The High Court, however, rightly pointed out that the only property which the widows could have managed jointly was the immovable property which fetched an income of about Rs. 11,000/-, and as to that property, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had held that S. 9 (3) applied. There was no appeal by the Departme... | 1 | 2,638 | 536 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
By the Income-tax Amendment Act of 1939 (Act VII of 1939) the section was again amended and it then said :"... |
C.Jacob Vs. Director Of Geology & Min.Indus.Est.&Anr | by Chapter V of the said Rules, which enumerates the classes of pension and conditions for entitlement. The enumerated classes of pension are : Classes of Pension (vide Chapter V of Pension CCSP Rules TNP Rules Rules) (i) Superannuation pension (Rule 35) Rule 32 (ii) Retiring pension (Rule 36) Rule 33 (iii) Pension on ... | 0[ds]Admittedly the petitioner was not `superannuated; nor was he absorbed in any corporation/company/body owned by state/central government; nor did he retire on account of any infirmity which incapacitated him for service; nor was he discharged on abolition of his post. Nor is he claiming compassionate allowance (on ... | 0 | 4,639 | 915 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
by Chapter V of the said Rules, which enumerates the classes of pension and conditions for entitlement. The ... |
Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax | of the inherited opening balance with the Corporation and deduction of the same would have been given under rule 2(1)(b). The question is : Whether, the refund having been made to the Corporation only because of the provision in section 7 of the LIC Act, the same result should not follow on the wording of rule 2(1)(b) ... | 1[ds]This aspect has been overlooked by the High CourtA harmonious construction of the provisions of the LIC Act, particularly section 7 therein, and rule 2(1)(b) of the First Schedule to theAct, 1961, requires this construction to be made. Unless this is done, full effect cannot be given to section 7 of the LIC Act, f... | 1 | 3,642 | 113 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
of the inherited opening balance with the Corporation and deduction of the same would have been given under ... |
Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai Vs. M/s. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. Through its Manager | and foremost poser is as to whether it was possible to make the block assessment with the addition of levy of surcharge, in the absence of proviso to Section 113? In Suresh N. Gupta itself, it was acknowledged and admitted that the position prior to the amendment of Section 113 of the Act whereby the proviso was added,... | 0[ds]48. Applying the principles of statutory interpretation for interpreting retrospectivity of a fiscal statute and looking into the nature and purpose of subsection (2) and subsection (3) of Section 14A as well as purpose and intent of Rule 8D coupled with the explanatory notes in the Finance Bill, 2006 and the depa... | 0 | 10,005 | 359 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
and foremost poser is as to whether it was possible to make the block assessment with the addition of levy of... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.