Case Name stringlengths 11 235 | Input stringlengths 944 6.86k | Output stringlengths 11 196k | Label int64 0 1 | Count int64 176 118k | Decision_Count int64 7 37.8k | text stringlengths 1.43k 13.9k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. MOHANRAJ & ORS Vs. M/S. SHAH BROTHERS ISPAT PVT. LTD | a debtor. The State is not claiming the prerogative to deprive such offender of ill-gotten assets so as to be perceived to be sharing the loot, not the least so as to levy tax thereupon such as to give it a colour of legitimacy or lawful earning, the idea being to take away what has been illegitimately secured by prosc... | 1[ds]10. A cursory look at Section 14(1) makes it clear that subject to the exceptions contained in sub-sections (2) and (3), on the insolvency commencement date, the Adjudicating Authority shall mandatorily, by order, declare a moratorium to prohibit what follows in clauses (a) to (d). Importantly, under sub-section (... | 1 | 39,017 | 12,230 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
a debtor. The State is not claiming the prerogative to deprive such offender of ill-gotten assets so as to be perceived to... |
Aluru Kondayya And Ors Vs. Singaraju Rama Rao And Ors | proceeding it becomes necessary to determine whether an inam village or a separated part of an inam village was or was not an estate within the meaning of this Act as it stood before the commencement of the Madras Estates Land (Third Amendment) Act, 1936, it shall be presumed, until the contrary is shown, that such vil... | 1[ds]18. But long possession fixity of rent, assertion of title in formal deeds may not necessarily justify an inference of permanent occupancy rights. Again the mere fact that the village was treated as one unit for the purpose of revenue administration does not justify any positive inference and the fact that five se... | 1 | 10,078 | 679 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
proceeding it becomes necessary to determine whether an inam village or a separated part of an inam village was or... |
G.L. Didwania and Another Vs. Income Tax Officer and Another | The matter arises under the Income-tax Act. The appellant was an assessee and for the assessment year 1960-61, he filed his return of income showing his income as Rs. 26, 224 in the prescribed form and the verification was signed by him on August 25, 1961, and the return was filed on September 8, 1961. The appellant sh... | 1[ds]We do not agree. The whole question is whether themade a false statement regarding the income which according to the assessing authority has escaped assessment. So far as this issue is concerned, the finding of the Appellate Tribunal is conclusive. Therefore, as held in Uttam Chands case, the prosecution cannot be... | 1 | 707 | 64 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
The matter arises under the Income-tax Act. The appellant was an assessee and for the assessment year 1960... |
M/S. Shri Gopal Paper Mills Co. Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Calcutta | has not been put completely in possession of his share, and this may be so, although some formal act may not have been completed. Thus, shares may have been issued which have been allotted, but for which no certificates have ever been issued, and on the other hand, shares as to which a resolution to allot has been made... | 1[ds]7. From this part of the resolution it is clear that the ordinary shareholders became owners of the bonus shares to which they were entitled to under the resolution as from the date of the resolution. The expression "be capitalised and distributed" in the resolution means "is hereby capitalised and distributed" In... | 1 | 4,239 | 480 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
has not been put completely in possession of his share, and this may be so, although some formal act may not have been comp... |
M. Ramakrishnan Vs. State Of Madras | would be defeated. If really the legislature intended that lands acquired by way of inheritance or bequest by a female on or after the commencement of the Act should also be dealt with in accordance with Section 5(4), it would have defined the expression "stridhana land" without the words "on the date of the commenceme... | 0[ds]Admittedly on the date of the commencement of the Act, i.e. April 6, 1960, Devika was not the owner of the land in question. She acquired title to it only on April 20, 1962 on the death of testatrix. The appellant cannot, therefore, claim any benefit under Section 5(4)(a) of the Act. Section 21 of the Act under wh... | 0 | 3,151 | 678 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
would be defeated. If really the legislature intended that lands acquired by way of inheritance or bequest by... |
M/S KOHINOOR TRANSPORTERS Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH | Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J1. An arbitral proceeding took place between the appellant and the respondent under the Arbitration Act 1940. The disputes originated in a contract of 1980 for certain civil works and eventually resulted in an arbitral award dated 20 July 1984. The award was made a Rule of the Court on 30 August 19... | 1[ds]7. Having heard the learned counsel, we are of the view that the High Court has acted in manifest excess of its jurisdiction while directing the appointment of a Chartered Accountant for the purpose of determining as to whether the decretal debt is to be marked as satisfied. The execution proceeding is pending bef... | 1 | 937 | 224 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J1. An arbitral proceeding took place between the appellant and the respondent unde... |
BOARD OF GOVERNORS IN SUPERSESSION OF MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH | years 2011-2012, 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 only. He further submitted that any ambiguity in the interpretation of the note attached to the notification dated 07.06.2017 was also cleared by the non-applicability of the note to the aforementioned courses. He submitted that the First Respondent had indulged in forum shoppin... | 1[ds]9. The interim order passed by the High Court on 21.02.2019 is on the basis that the recommendation made on 14.04.2017 by the Appellant to bar admissions for five years to M.S. (Orthopedics) and M.D. (Radio Diagnosis) courses has not been accepted by the Second Respondent. Consequently, the High Court was of the o... | 1 | 2,445 | 365 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
years 2011-2012, 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 only. He further submitted that any ambiguity in the interpret... |
Purshottam Lal Dhawan Vs. Dewan Chaman Lal And Another | is overruled.6. The second contention of learned counsel for the appellant is that the Custodian-General had no power to cancel an allotment made on or before July 22, 1952. Let us recapitulate the relevant facts. The original order of allotment was made in favour of the appellants group and of the first respondent on ... | 0[ds]Section 27 of the Act confers a plenary power of revision on the Custodian-General and it empowers him to exercise his revisional powers either suo motu or on application made in that behalf at any time. The phrase "at any time" indicates that the power of the Custodian-General is uncontrolled by any time factor, ... | 0 | 2,887 | 701 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
is overruled.6. The second contention of learned counsel for the appellant is that the Custodian-General h... |
Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Central) Vs. M/S. Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg.(Wvg.)Co.Ltd | of carrying raw materials, finished products and workers. Therefore, they must be regarded as building or buildings within the meaning of sub-clause (vi) of Section 10(2) of the 1922 Act. It was also held that dictionary meaning of the word building cannot be confined to its to a structure or superstructure having wall... | 0[ds]14. It is true, as contended for the Revenue, that the Income Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 1983, were given effect from April 2, 1983 thereby manifesting that the rates enumerated in the Rules would be applicable prospectively from the later assessment years. It could by no means be construed that the Legislature... | 0 | 4,353 | 463 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
of carrying raw materials, finished products and workers. Therefore, they must be regarded as building or bu... |
State of Andhra Pradesh & Others Vs. Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited & Others | 1. In continuation of our order dated 13-4-2012 (State of A.P. V. Obulapuram Mining Co. (P) Ltd., (2013) 8 SCC 213 ), as far as Category ‘A’ is concerned, the recommendations made by the Central Empowered Committee. In Para 14 of its Report dated 18-4-2012, is accepted with a specific clarification that individual recl... | 1[ds]Sale of iron ore lying at various cancelled stockyards is permitted through e-auction by the Monitoring Committee with the condition that the sale proceeds (sic from sale of iron ore from mines/stockyards) not found to be involved in any illegality will be reimbursed to the respective stockyards. | 1 | 188 | 54 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
1. In continuation of our order dated 13-4-2012 (State of A.P. V. Obulapuram Mining Co. (P) Ltd., (20... |
Duli Chand Vs. Maman Chand (Dead) By Lrs | 1 SCR 66 : (1969) 1 SCC 835 : AIR 1969 SC 1273 ). It is pointed out that decisions of the Punjab High Court in Mamchand v. Chhotu Ram ((1964) 66 Punj LR 93) and Khushi Ram v. Shanti Rani ((1964) 66 Punj L R 93), wherein it was held that such a deposit made by a tenant under Section 31 of the Relief Act is a sufficient ... | 0[ds]10. Mr. Andley drew our attention to the order made by the Rent Controller on the application of the tenant, whereby he had sought permission to deposit the rent for the months of February and March 1964. In this order on that application, the Rent Controller has said that the tenant could make the deposit at his ... | 0 | 1,916 | 276 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
1 SCR 66 : (1969) 1 SCC 835 : AIR 1969 SC 1273 ). It is pointed out that decisions of the Punjab High Court in Mamchand v. ... |
State Of W.Bengal Vs. Pronab K. Sur | latest financial position or the report on the accounts of the Company was placed before the Court as required by the proviso to Section 391(2). Though the Court was exercising special jurisdiction under the Companies Act, the relevant provisions were completely disregarded and the Court was only guided by its own noti... | 1[ds]order of the High Court in regard to grant of exemption under Section 20 of the U.L.C. Act being in a way inter-related to the approval of the sale of vacant land, should also fall along with the order passed in purported exercise of jurisdiction under The Companies Act. That apart, there is an additional reason w... | 1 | 5,441 | 384 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
latest financial position or the report on the accounts of the Company was placed before the Court as requ... |
Satish Chand Makhan and Others Vs. Govardhan Das Byas and Others | years as stipulated by the registered lease deed dated January 8, 1965, Ex. A-3, being in possession under the unregistered draft lease agreement Ex. B-2, were nothing but tenants holding over from month to month under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act and therefore the plaintiffs suit was not maintainable fo... | 1[ds]5. There can be no doubt that the High Court and the courts below have wrongly assumed that the plaintiffs were entitled to the reliefs claimed for by reason of the subsequent change of circumstances under Order VII, Rule 7 of the Code, on the alleged admission of the defendants in their written statement that the... | 1 | 1,960 | 407 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
years as stipulated by the registered lease deed dated January 8, 1965, Ex. A-3, being in possession under... |
UNION OF INDIA & ANR Vs. ONKAR NATH DHAR | in their possession. Such direction was in terms of Article 142 of the Constitution. This Court in a judgment reported as Indian Bank v. ABS Marine Products (P) Ltd. (2006) 5 SCC 72 held that the High Courts repeatedly followed a direction issued under Article 142, by treating it as the law declared by this Court. It w... | 1[ds]9. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and find that the orders of the High Court are unsustainable. In Shiv Sagar Tiwari, the large scale allotment of Government houses made out of turn in eleven categories was examined under the Allotment of Government Residences (General Pool in Delhi) Rules, 1963. Al... | 1 | 5,353 | 2,296 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
in their possession. Such direction was in terms of Article 142 of the Constitution. This Court in a judgment reported as In... |
M/S Tvc Skyshop Ltd Vs. M/S Reliance Communciation & Infra.Ltd | or that the defence is frivolous or vexatious. Second proviso to sub-rule (5) lays down that if the defendant admits part of the amount claimed by the plaintiff then he shall not be granted leave to defend unless the admitted amount is deposited in the Court. Sub-rule (6) provides for the consequences of the defendant?... | 0[ds]10. In the present case, we find that the application filed by the appellant for setting aside decree dated 7.11.2006 did not disclose any special circumstance which could justify an order under Order XXXVII Rule 4. In his affidavit, Shri Mahesh Katudia had merely stated that sum of Rs.11,00,000/had been paid in t... | 0 | 3,397 | 374 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
or that the defence is frivolous or vexatious. Second proviso to sub-rule (5) lays down that if the defendan... |
POWARI PANCHSHEEL CO-OP.HNG.STY Vs. MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA)) | then was the Judge of Kerala High Court and later became a Judge of this Court) which the learned Judge made in V. Punnan Thomas vs. State of Kerala (AIR 1969 Ker 81). In Para 12 at page 505 of R.D. Shetty?s case (supra) Justice Bhagwati said in the following words:-?We agree with the observations of Mathew, J, in V. P... | 1[ds]19. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are inclined to allow the appeal, set aside the impugned order, allow the appellants? writ petition, out of which this appeal arises, and issue writ of certiorari to quash the decision of meetings dated 10/14.5.2003 a... | 1 | 3,664 | 1,012 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
then was the Judge of Kerala High Court and later became a Judge of this Court) which the learned Judge made in V... |
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde & Others Vs. Millikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale | no determination of the tenancy under the provisions of S. 3 of the Bombay Tenancy Act. It has to be noticed, however, that the requirement of a notice in writing being given by the lessor to the lessee of the lessors intention to determine the lease became a part of cl. (g) only on the amendment of the Transfer of Pro... | 1[ds]10. It has to be noticed that this Section does not in express terms provide for the act of termination of tenancy to be effected by notice given by the landlord. S. 29,(2) which provides that no landlord shall obtain possession of any land or dwelling house held by a tenant except under an order of the Mamlatdar,... | 1 | 4,554 | 659 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
no determination of the tenancy under the provisions of S. 3 of the Bombay Tenancy Act. It has to be no... |
The Surat Parsi Panchayat Board and Another Vs. Union of India and Others | AGREED PROTOCOL & STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING DEAD BODIES OF PARSI ZOROASTRIAN COVID-19 VICTIMS - AS AGREED BETWEEN THE PETITIONERS ON THE ONE HAND AND THE UNION OF INDIA – REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA ON THE OTHER HAND. Under normal circumstances in the Zoroastrian religion, the ... | 1[ds]6. An agreed protocol has been placed before the Court which meets both the concerns reflected above. The protocol reads thus:AGREED PROTOCOL & STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING DEAD BODIES OF PARSI ZOROASTRIAN COVID-19 VICTIMS - AS AGREED BETWEEN THE PETITIONERS ON THE ONE HAND AND THE UNION OF INDIA – RE... | 1 | 1,535 | 1,091 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
AGREED PROTOCOL & STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING DEAD BODIES OF PARSI ZOROASTRIAN COVID-19 VICTIMS - AS... |
Chenniappan Vs. Urukkayi & Others | 1. This appeal by special leave petition arises out of impugned judgment and order dated 24th June, 2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Second Appeal No. 140 of 1994 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court set aside the judgment and decree passed by the First Appellate Court and restored the j... | 0[ds]Admittedly, one Chinnappa Gounder was the original owner of the disputed property (pathway) which has been divided between Kasianna Gounder (Schedule "A") and Palanisamy Gounder (Schedule "B"), father of present appellant by a partition deed dated 5.6.1951. Undisputedly there were passages earmarked for the common... | 0 | 820 | 283 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
1. This appeal by special leave petition arises out of impugned judgment and order dated 24th June, 2005 passed by the Hig... |
Union of India and Others Vs. P. S. Bhatt | employment of Shri Bhatt as Producer in which post he was still on probation was likely to affect the discipline in the administration and as such he was not a person suitable to be employed in that post and his employment in that post in which he was still a probationer should be terminated and he should be reverted t... | 1[ds]10. It may be true that in deciding whether an order is by way of punishment or not, the relevant facts and circumstances may have to be considered. In the instant case, the broad facts, as established, appear to be as follows :(1) Shri Bhatt and Shri Prasad had indulged in loose talk and used filthy language agai... | 1 | 2,200 | 435 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
employment of Shri Bhatt as Producer in which post he was still on probation was likely to affect the discipl... |
THE DIR. PRASAR BHARATI Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTH | in these appeals and distinguished it in the following words:“61. Now we come to the judgment of the Kerala High Court in the case of CIT vs. Director, Prasar Bharti reported in (2010) 325 ITR 205(ker.) on which much reliance has been placed by the assessing authority. The Prasar Bharati is fully owned Government of In... | 0[ds]24. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we find no merit in these appeals.Keeping in mind the requirements of Section 194H when we examine the transaction in question, we are of the considered view that the reasoning and the conclusion arrived at by the AO, CI... | 0 | 4,250 | 860 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
in these appeals and distinguished it in the following words:“61. Now we come to the judgment of the Kerala H... |
Milind Moreshwar Kowley Vs. Manhohar Bhaskar Kowley(D)Thr.Lrs | in his office in which the plaintiff was present on behalf of his father. It also noticed the affidavit filed by the plaintiff, on behalf of his father, affirmed on March 31, 1987 reiterating and confirming the statements made by his father in the affidavit of the same date. Thus the Court held that right from the year... | 0[ds]13. Having considered all aspects of the matter, we find no reason to interfere with the concurrent findings recorded by the trial court as well as the Appellate Bench of the High Court. We, therefore, find no merit in Civil Appeal No.368 of 1994. We shall not take up for consideration Notice of Motion No.2392 of ... | 0 | 5,470 | 1,755 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
in his office in which the plaintiff was present on behalf of his father. It also noticed the affidavit file... |
State of Punjab Vs. Iqbal Singh & Others | 1983 and was published in the Gazette of India, Extra, dated 26th December, 1983. The trial court rendered its judgment on 23rd February, 1984 and it does not appear if the prosecution concentrated on section 113A, Evidence Act, for otherwise it would have tried to place, on record the exact date of marriage to take ad... | 1[ds]9. The legislative intent is clear to curb the menace of dowry deaths, etc., with a firm hand. We must keep in mind this legislative intent. It must be remembered that since such crimes are generally committed in the privacy of residential homes and in secrecy, independent and direct evidence is not easy to get. T... | 1 | 4,478 | 1,662 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
1983 and was published in the Gazette of India, Extra, dated 26th December, 1983. The trial court rendered its jud... |
Baranagore Jute Factory Plc. Mazdoor Sangh (Bms) Etc Vs. Baranagore Jute Factory Plc. Etc | compensation and to keep the same in fixed deposit subject to further orders of the court". The Official Liquidator was of the view that ... "the money should be deposited with the Registrar, Original Side".19. After considering the submissions of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the learned Single Judge,... | 1[ds]6. It may specifically be noted that the Division Bench has not interfered with the Rule issued to the respondents in the proceedings initiated under The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the alleged violation of the order dated 23.02.2011. The Division Bench only vacated the or... | 1 | 4,245 | 1,238 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
compensation and to keep the same in fixed deposit subject to further orders of the court". The Official Liquidat... |
Vikram Greentech (I) Ltd. Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd | proposal form is a commercial document and being an integral part of policy, reference to proposal form may not only be appropriate but rather essential. However, the surveyors report cannot be taken aid of nor can it furnish the basis for construction of a policy. Such outside aid for construction of insurance policy ... | 0[ds]19. That the aforesaid policy covered the insured for the loss and and/or damage caused by storm/hailstorm/cyclone over the insured area is not in dispute. The Insurance Company under the policy also agreed that the sum insured would be equal to the costs of placement of the insured property by new property of the... | 0 | 2,774 | 429 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
proposal form is a commercial document and being an integral part of policy, reference to proposal form may n... |
State Of Gujarat Vs. Ratansingh @ Chinubhai Anopsinh Chauhan | medical evidence on which strong reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the State, is of no help to arrive at the conclusion that guilt of the respondent stands proved beyond reasonable doubt. When the respondent was arrested on 19th August 2003 a Panchnama (Ex.14) was drawn. In that it is recorded that the acc... | 0[ds]13. Since it is a case of circumstantial evidence and the prosecution case starts with the theory of last seen, the first place is as to whether the prosecution has been able to conclusively and beyond reasonable doubt prove that the deceased was last seen in the company of the respondent. For this purpose, as alr... | 0 | 5,485 | 3,070 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
medical evidence on which strong reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the State, is of no help to arriv... |
Harendra Narain Singh Etc Vs. State Of Bihar | Jagia, the deceased was brought to the dispensary of Dr. Harendra Narain Singh while she was alive. There is further no evidence as to who brought her to the dispensary in what condition. The only evidence which the prosecution has produced in this respect is that a dead body was taken out from the dispensary of Dr. Ha... | 1[ds]Since the entire case rests on circumstantial evidence it is necessary to refer to the principles which should guide the court in considering the conviction of an accused resting on circumstantial evidence. It is a cardinal principle of criminal jurisprudence that circumstantial evidence must be fully established ... | 1 | 3,507 | 888 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
Jagia, the deceased was brought to the dispensary of Dr. Harendra Narain Singh while she was alive. There is further no evi... |
Ram Rattan Vs. State of Punjab | Untwalia, J.1. The appellant in this appeal has been convicted under Section 9(a) of the Opium Act and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000, in default some more imprisonment. By special leave, he has filed this appeal.2. A raid was conducted on the premises bearing No. F 16, S... | 1[ds]There are some materials in the records of this case to cause suspicion against the appellant that probably he was aware of the nefarious activities which were going on in this house by storing such huge quantity of opium. But then on mere suspicion no conviction could be maintained. There is nothing to indicate t... | 1 | 495 | 133 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
Untwalia, J.1. The appellant in this appeal has been convicted under Section 9(a) of the Opium Act and has been sentenced t... |
Sahu Minerals & Properties Ltd Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court & Ors | to be" in that clause, and that clearly is not permissible. Besides, it seems to us that if the appellants construction is accepted it would necessarily mean that it would be at the option of the employer to allow the workman to avail himself of the remedy provided by sub-section (2), because he has merely to raise an ... | 0[ds]We, therefore, do not see how the decision in the U. P. Electric Companys case (supra) can come to the aid of the appellant in this case. The said case is clearly distinguishable on the peculiar facts as noticed above.We hold that in this case it was competent to the Labour Court to decide whether the case before ... | 0 | 2,203 | 364 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
to be" in that clause, and that clearly is not permissible. Besides, it seems to us that if the appellants construction is ... |
N. S. Gujral Vs. Custodian Of Evacuee Property & Anr | a notification under Section 12 of the 1954-Act did not in any way affect the appellants right to acquire hold and dispose of his property. In the circumstances, the appellant cannot claim protection under Article 19 (1) (f) at all with respect to the property in suit and it is not necessary to consider whether S. 12 c... | 0[ds]At no time did the appellant have any right whatsoever in the property which vested in the Central Government on the issue of the notification under Sec. 12 It may be that if the owners had not become evacuees and if the property had not been declared evacuee property the appellant might have proceeded against tha... | 0 | 3,169 | 758 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
a notification under Section 12 of the 1954-Act did not in any way affect the appellants right to acquire h... |
Jayesh Nagindas Doshi Vs. Ashapura Aluminium Limited & Others | defence has been taken belatedly in the reply to the Summons for Judgment; and(iii) The Appellant had structured the entire transaction and having unauthorizedly issued instructions for remitting funds abroad, owned up responsibility to avoid the legal consequences. The letter dated 10 December 2009, it was urged, was ... | 1[ds]12. The material on record indicates that on 30 June 2009 a meeting was held. In attendance at the meeting, among other persons, was a Director of the First Respondent, Mr.Chetan Shah as well as Mr.Hemant Chitre, who was the second signatory to the letter that was issued to Yes Bank Limited subsequently authorizin... | 1 | 2,612 | 1,017 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
defence has been taken belatedly in the reply to the Summons for Judgment; and(iii) The Appellant had struct... |
Shri Mandir Sita Ramji Vs. Lt. Governor Of Delhi & Ors | report dated August 18, 1962 and in that report he stated that an objection was received from Shri Mandir Sita Ramji. There is no mention in that report that he received any report in pursuance to his order on the copy of the objection petition or that any personal or other kind of enquiry was made in respect of the la... | 1[ds]5. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition on the basis that the appellant had no opportunity of being heard by the Collector under Section 5A. The duty to afford such an opportunity is mandatory. A decision by the government on the objection, when the Collector afforded no opportunity of being heard to... | 1 | 1,482 | 649 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
report dated August 18, 1962 and in that report he stated that an objection was received from Shri Mandir Sita Ramji. The... |
Isaac Isanga Musumba & Others Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others | 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioners are nationals of Uganda and have filed this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution praying for quashing of FIR No. 88 of 2013 registered on 19th April, 2013 at MRA Marg Police Station, Mumbai in which they have been accused for offences under Sections... | 1[ds]5. Section 120B, IPC will be attracted only if two or more persons agree to do an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means. As the offences under Sections 384 and 441, IPC are not made out, and no other illegal act is alleged in the FIR, no case of criminal conspiracy against the accused persons is also made ou... | 1 | 696 | 194 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioners are nationals of Uganda and have filed this writ petition under ... |
Jt. C. I. T., Mumbai Vs. M/s Rolta India Ltd | under the said scheme of the Act. Sections 115J/115JA of the Act were special provisions which provided that where in the case of an assessee, the total income as computed under the Act in respect of any previous year relevant to the assessment year is less than 30% of the book profit, the total income of the assessee ... | 1[ds]7. In our view, Sections 115J/115JA are special provisions. Section 207 envisages that tax shall be payable in advance during any financial year on current income in accordance with the scheme provided in Sections 208 to 219 (both inclusive) in respect of the total income of the assessee that would be chargeable t... | 1 | 3,585 | 1,267 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
under the said scheme of the Act. Sections 115J/115JA of the Act were special provisions which provided that... |
Shiv Chand Amolak Chand Vs. Regional Transport Authority & Anr | not than be followed. On the other hand, if the Regional Transport Authority on receipt of applications would decide upon the limit of permits and the grant thereof would be with-in the limit prescribed then the procedure laid down in section 57 (3) of the Act would be followed." There can, therefore, be no doubt that ... | 1[ds]There are two independent steps required to be taken in connection with the grant of a permit, the first being the determination by the Regional Transport Authority under section 47 sub- section (3) of the number of stage carriages for which permits may be granted and the second being that "thereafter applications... | 1 | 4,637 | 1,550 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
not than be followed. On the other hand, if the Regional Transport Authority on receipt of applicatio... |
SHREE AMBICA MEDICAL STORES Vs. THE SURAT PEOPLES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD | his commission within twenty-four hours of the collection excluding bank and postal holidays. (5) The Central Government may, by rules, relax the requirements of sub-section (1) in respect of particular categories in insurance policies. (6) The Authority may, from time to time, specify, by the regulations made by it, t... | 0[ds]21. In the present case, the policy of insurance with a cover of Rs 60 lakhs for the period 2004-05 was issued for the location at B 205, Plot No 17-B, Village Karnaj. The insurance policy for 2005-06 was sought for different premises situated at 12/1123-1124, Basement, Meghdoot Apartment, Surat. The address menti... | 0 | 4,690 | 818 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
his commission within twenty-four hours of the collection excluding bank and postal holidays. (5) The Central... |
Vishwesha Thirtha Swamiari & Ors Vs. State Of Mysore And Anr | under Article 14 of the Constitution on the ground that it was common ground that there was inequality in taxation between the lands comprised in the South Kanara District and the areas in the erstwhile Mysore State. The High Court proceeded on the basis that the land revenue was highest in the Madras area of the State... | 0[ds]12. It seems to us that the Act clearly levies land revenue although it is by way of surcharge on the existing land revenue. If this is so, the fact that the surcharge was raised to 100 per cent. of the land revenue on the wet and garden lands and 75 per cent. of the land revenue in respect of dry lands, subject t... | 0 | 2,543 | 338 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
under Article 14 of the Constitution on the ground that it was common ground that there was inequality in taxation between ... |
M/S OSWAL WOOLLEN MILLS LTD Vs. M/S OSWAL AGRO MILLS LTD | that is filed before the High Court to which the appellant-Company was referring to in the said letter was an application filed under Section 5 of the Act for the dispute relating to quantum of fee of the Umpire. Though the appellant-Company in the said letter made a note with regard to the de novo hearing of the matte... | 0[ds]Either going by the very nature of functions entrusted to the Umpire or by the provisions of the First Schedule, it is crystal clear that there is no qualitative difference between the Arbitrators and the Umpire with regard to the methodology and modalities to be adopted for reaching a just and fair conclusion. It... | 0 | 3,769 | 1,110 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
that is filed before the High Court to which the appellant-Company was referring to in the said letter was an application... |
The Indian Institute Of Information Technology, Deoghat Jhalwa Allahabad And Anr. Etc Vs. Dr. Anurika Vaish And Ors. Etc | addition to the minutes as at Item No.1 of this meeting, it was apprised by some Board members that the advertisement brought out by IIITA for these selections was NOT as per norms. Also for some of the appointments, eligibility criteria were unduly relaxed, taking incorrect pretext of the earlier BOM resolutions.The B... | 1[ds]6. Having extensively heard Shri Sunil Gupta, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and Shri Rakesh Dwivedi and Shri V. Giri, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the affected teachers, other learned Counsel appearing for teachers and Dr. Ashutosh Kumar Singh, respondent-in-person, we are of the view that the w... | 1 | 1,220 | 271 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
addition to the minutes as at Item No.1 of this meeting, it was apprised by some Board members that the ad... |
METAL BOX INDIA LTD Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI | 1. This appeal is filed against the Order No. 152/97-WZB passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, West Regional Bench at Mumbai (for short the Tribunal), in Appeal No. E/789-RV/95-Bom., dated December 23, 1996. 2. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the ground that the amount which was requ... | 0[ds]We are afraid, we cannot accept the contention of the learned Counsel for reasons more than one. First, this aspect was not the subject matter of the order under challenge and, secondly, Section 22 of the Sick Industries Act, provides relief in regard to the proceedings which relate to (a) winding up of the indust... | 0 | 327 | 174 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
1. This appeal is filed against the Order No. 152/97-WZB passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribuna... |
J.C. Bhatia Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others | Alagiriswami, J.1. This appeal by Special leave is against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court reversing on appeal the judgment of a learned Single Judge who allowed the writ petition filed by the appellant and another Kalu Ram. The facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal may be stated ... | 1[ds]We think his argument is wholly without76 appointments in this case were made after consideration and selection by the Departmental Promotion Committee and therefore they cannot fall under Rule 27. Indeed their appointment order does not purport to be under that Rule.The order only says that the appointments are m... | 1 | 921 | 194 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
Alagiriswami, J.1. This appeal by Special leave is against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Rajasthan... |
State Of Orissa & Anr Vs. B. K. Mohapatra | be deemed to be select lists made within the draft rules or the Promotion Regulations.23. In view of this conclusion it is not necessary to decide the question, which was raised by the learned Attorney General, that in any event the second proviso is only dealing with select lists made after the Promotion Regulations c... | 1[ds]19. It seems to us that the 1951, 1952 and 1954 lists cannot be deemed to be Select lists within the second proviso because, as a matter of fact, the Selection Committee did not select names for the purpose of substantive appointment but only selected names for the purpose of officiation in the senior posts of the... | 1 | 4,400 | 579 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
be deemed to be select lists made within the draft rules or the Promotion Regulations.23. In view of this con... |
Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal Vs. Indian Mica Supply Company Private Limited | GROVER, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment of the Calcutta High Court refusing to require the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state the case and to refer to it certain questions of law which it was claimed arose from the order of the Tribunal, dated March 13, 1964, relating to the assessment yea... | 0[ds]In our judgment the High Court was justified in refusing to direct the Appellate Tribunal to state the case and refer the question which was sought to be referred. It was perfectly clear that the amount which had been paid by the respondent was an expenditure which was wholly and exclusively incurred for the purpo... | 0 | 1,074 | 352 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
GROVER, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment of the Calcutta High Court refusing to req... |
Prashanti Medical Services & Research Foundation Vs. Union of India & Ors | 28 projects were approved by the Committee by notification dated 07.12.2015 but none of them (27) has come forward to question the constitutional validity of sub¬section (7) except the appellant herein. In other words, out of 28 projects owners whose projects were approved by the Committee by notification dated 07.12.2... | 0[ds]17. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court19. It is not in dispute that 28 projects were approved by the Committee by notification dated 07.12.2015 but none of them (27) has come forward t... | 0 | 3,805 | 1,102 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
28 projects were approved by the Committee by notification dated 07.12.2015 but none of them (27)... |
Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union Vs. Management of Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. and Anr | and others (supra), it was held that once it is established that the respondents were prevented from appearing at the hearing due to sufficient cause, it followed that the matter must be re-heard and decided again. 20. The facts of the instant case are quite different. The recall of the Award of the Tribunal was sought... | 0[ds]The High Court answered the first question in favour of the respondent-Management and the second in favour of the appellant15. We shall first take up the second question namely - whether the Tribunal was functus offico having earlier made an Award which was published by the appropriate Government. It is not in dis... | 0 | 5,089 | 2,420 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
and others (supra), it was held that once it is established that the respondents were prevented from appearing at the hearin... |
Avadh Kishore Das Vs. Ram Gopal and Others | It cannot be said that the defendant had inadvertently affirmed the correctness of the admission/declaration made in the aforesaid Will by the deceased Mahant. It was a conscious admission. The defendant himself repeatedly admitted this position with regard to the ownership of the land being exclusively of the idol, Th... | 0[ds]The argument is that if it was assumed that Mahant Raghubir Das had no right to gift the property to the appellant, the latter would then be treated a trespasser over the same and as no suit for his ejectment was filed under Section 209 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, within three years of hi... | 0 | 4,094 | 343 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
It cannot be said that the defendant had inadvertently affirmed the correctness of the admission/declaration ... |
Punjab University Chandigarh Vs. Devjani Chakrabarti and Others | contended that the new decisions Annexures R. 2 and R. 3 were taken bonafide and are only prospective in operation and that the doctrine of promissory estoppel pleaded by the petitioners in the Writ Petitions does not apply to the University.The decisions Annexures P. 2, P. 3, R. 2 and R. 3 are of the Syndicate which h... | 1[ds]We have, in our separate judgment delivered today in C.A. 2828 of 1977, which arose out of that Full Bench decision, reversed that decision and held that there is nothing retrospective in the order challenged in that case. In that case one Subhash Chander was admitted to the integrated M.B.B.S course in the Daya N... | 1 | 2,022 | 464 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
contended that the new decisions Annexures R. 2 and R. 3 were taken bonafide and are only prospective in oper... |
Anupama Sen Gupta and Others Vs. Deb Kumar Sen Sarma and Others | includes an employee of the Central or State Government or any local authority.7. The first question which arises for consideration in these appeals is whether the first respondent was entitled to get possession of the premises in question under Section 29-B of the Act at all. This contention is raised by the appellant... | 0[ds]n the circumstances of this case we feel that it is not necessary to go into the questions whether the question of title to the premises is relevant at all and if it is relevant, whether it can be gone into by the Controller. We shall assume for purposes of these appeals (but without deciding) that as contended on... | 0 | 3,092 | 596 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
includes an employee of the Central or State Government or any local authority.7. The first question which... |
M/S. Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd Vs. Union Of India | cause of action arises. In such cases, it is incorrect to say that the litigant chooses any particular Court. The choice is by reason of the jurisdiction of the Court being attracted by part of cause of action arising within the jurisdiction of the Court. Similarly, if the cause of action can be said to have arisen par... | 0[ds]9. Although in view of Section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure the provisions thereof would not apply to a writ proceedings, the phraseology used in Section 20(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure and Clause (2) of Article 226, being in pari materia, the decisions of this Court rendered on interpretation of Sectio... | 0 | 3,430 | 857 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
cause of action arises. In such cases, it is incorrect to say that the litigant chooses any particular Court. The choice i... |
V.E.A. Annamalai Chettiar & Another Vs. S.V.V.S. Veerappa Chettiar & Others | the Stridhanam money, Eadu pon Kalutturu money and sundry jewels, etc. money of the mother of Shanmugham.The amount had aggregated to Rs. 1, 310 inclusive of interest. It was this sum which was deposited by Veerappa Chettiar whose sister was married to Ramanatha in the name of his minor son Shanmugham with the joint fa... | 0[ds]The Trial Court accepted the testimony of P.W.1 and also brought to aid the presumption under S. 90, Evidence Act, held that the cadjan voucher was duly proved and admitted it as Ex. P. 8.The High Court concurred in the finding and there were thus concurrent findings of both the courts below in regard to the genui... | 0 | 2,313 | 680 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
the Stridhanam money, Eadu pon Kalutturu money and sundry jewels, etc. money of the mother of Shanmugham.The amoun... |
M/S. Amit Products (India) Ltd Vs. Chief Engineer (O&M) Circle | K.G. Balakrishnan, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel for the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (in short "MSEB"). By the impugned Judgment, the Writ Petition filed by the appellant company was rejected by the High Court. The appellant company, M/s. Amit Produc... | 0[ds]7. We have carefully considered the rival contentions of both the parties. We are unable to accept the contention of the appellant company that by changing the members of the Board of Directors of the Company or by changing the shareholding pattern, the appellant Company had undergone any change. The very same com... | 0 | 974 | 238 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
K.G. Balakrishnan, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel for... |
State Of Haryana Vs. M/S Samtel India Ltd | was entitled to addition of Colour Monitors in eligibility certificate dated 23.2.1995 entitling it to sales tax exemption under rule 28A of Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975 (for short, "1975 Rules") for the manufacture of monochrome monitors and black and white TV sets? In other words, whether the respondent was ... | 0[ds]10. In this case we find that, while deciding the writ petition filed by the Department, the above rule has not been analysed by the High Court. No reason has been given by the High Court in its impugned judgment as to what weightage should be given to the words used in the above rule, particularly, the expression... | 0 | 1,179 | 333 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
was entitled to addition of Colour Monitors in eligibility certificate dated 23.2.1995 entitling it to sales ... |
T.S. Shylaja Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. | hence unsustainable in law.7. Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 no doubt provides for an appeal to the High Court from the orders passed by the Commissioner and enumerated in clauses (a) to (e) sub-Section (1) of Section 30. Proviso to Section 30(1), however, makes it abundantly clear that no such appe... | 1[ds]10. The only reason which the High Court has given to upset the above finding of the Commissioner is that the Commissioner could not blindly accept the oral evidence without analysing the documentary evidence on record. We fail to appreciate as to what was the documentary evidence which the High Court had failed t... | 1 | 1,792 | 209 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
hence unsustainable in law.7. Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 no doubt provides for an ap... |
Gurbakhsh Singh and Ors Vs. Buta Singh and Ors | in existence at the time of filing of the suit, an ex parte decree has been procured by suspension of the material facts.a) Land measuring 48 kanals 7 marlas entered at rect. No. 39, Killa No. 19/2, 12, 19/1, 18/2, 10, 23, rect. No. 38, killa No. 5, 6/1, rect. No. 60, killa No. 2/1 min.b) Land measuring 36 kanals 16 ma... | 1[ds]6. In the present case the record of Civil Suit No. 195 of 1968 in which ex parte decree was passed on 30.06.1969 is not traceable. In the circumstances, there could possibly be some inability in obtaining correct particulars well in time on part of the Appellants. At the time when the application for amendment wa... | 1 | 1,355 | 511 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
in existence at the time of filing of the suit, an ex parte decree has been procured by suspension of the ... |
Dhanraj Vs. Suraj Bai | coming into force of the Act : vide para 489 at page 554 of Mullas Hindu Law, Fourteenth Edition. Identical is the position under the Act. Nor is it different as to the incapacity of the step-mother to give her step-son in adoption. Section 9 of the Act enumerates the persons capable of giving in adoption. Sub-section ... | 0[ds]We have no difficulty in rejecting this argument. Reading Section 9 as a whole and specially in the context of sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) it is clear that the term "mother, means the natural mother and not the step-mother. A step-mother for many purposes such as inheritance etc. is distinct and different from m... | 0 | 2,085 | 616 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
coming into force of the Act : vide para 489 at page 554 of Mullas Hindu Law, Fourteenth Edition. Identical ... |
M/s. Tata Finance Ltd. now Tata Motors Ltd Vs. N. Poongodi & Another | 1. Leave granted. 2. In this case, vide the impugned judgment, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (Commission for short) has dismissed the application, C.A.No.7/2007, filed by the appellant herein for deciding the issue of maintainability of the Compensation Application bearing No. M.A.No.7/2007 ... | 1[ds]After examining the entire record, without commenting on the merits of the case, we are of the view that the Commission has erred in holding, vide para 11, that the question of maintainability of Compensation Application No.7/2007 is a question of fact and law which can be decided only when the evidence is led. It... | 1 | 648 | 361 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
1. Leave granted. 2. In this case, vide the impugned judgment, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practic... |
NAND KISHORE Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | than 14 years and the other death, the Court may feel tempted and find itself nudged into endorsing the death penalty. Such a course would indeed be disastrous. A far more just, reasonable and proper course would be to expand the options and to take over what, as a matter of fact, lawfully belongs to the Court i.e. the... | 1[ds]10. So far as the conviction is concerned, we are satisfied with the findings recorded by the trial court which are based on the appreciation of oral and documentary evidence on record.By applying the last seen theory to the facts of the case and further considering the forensic and medical evidence on record, tri... | 1 | 3,232 | 489 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
than 14 years and the other death, the Court may feel tempted and find itself nudged into endorsing the death pena... |
P. NAZEER ETC Vs. SALAFI TRUST & ANR. ETC | appeal shall lie against any decision given by the Waqf Tribunal. Therefore, the learned senior counsel contended that the proviso to Sub--section (9) which confers a revisional jurisdiction upon the High Court, is meant to confer a jurisdiction narrower than the jurisdiction of an appellate Court. In the case on hand,... | 0[ds]12. While we agree with the learned senior counsel for the appellants that the revisional jurisdiction conferred by the proviso to Sub--section (9) of Section 83 is narrower than the jurisdiction that could have been conferred upon an appellate court, we do not think that the impugned order of the High Court suffe... | 0 | 2,670 | 990 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
appeal shall lie against any decision given by the Waqf Tribunal. Therefore, the learned senior counsel contended ... |
Vijay Shankar Mishra Vs. Union Of India | cases, Commanding Officer must consider the nature of offences for which each red ink entry has been awarded and not be harsh with the individuals, especially when they are about to complete the pensionable service. Due consideration should be given to the long service, hard stations and difficult living conditions tha... | 1[ds]8. In the present case, it is evident that there was no application of mind by the authorities to the circumstances which have to be taken into consideration while exercising the power under Rule 13. The mere fact that the appellant had crossed the threshold of four red entries could not be a ground to discharge h... | 1 | 1,631 | 332 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
cases, Commanding Officer must consider the nature of offences for which each red ink entry has been awarded ... |
MADHUKAR S/O GOVINDRAO KAMBLE & ORS Vs. VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ORS | exemplars were after the date of publication of notification under Section 4 of the Act. However, the three sale exemplars were considered i.e. Exh. 31, Exh.32 and Exh.33. The date of sale, land survey number; amount of the sale consideration and the price at the rate per hectare was sole is mentioned in the following ... | 1[ds]10. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and find that the High Court has erred in law in setting aside the determination of market value of the land by the Reference Court.11. The evidence produced by the landowners is that the acquired land is close to Educational Institutions, Banks, Tahsil Office etc.... | 1 | 1,288 | 238 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
exemplars were after the date of publication of notification under Section 4 of the Act. However, the three sale exemplars... |
Collector Of Cent.Excise,Pune Vs. M/S.Bajaj Tempo Ltd | In the show-cause notice, it was alleged by the Department that the assessee had failed to disclose and had failed to pay appropriate duty on the expenses incurred on its publicity/advertisement which in turn promoted the marketability of the goods. In the said notice, it was further alleged that the dealers’ commissio... | 1[ds]6. At the outset, we may point out that there is conceptual difference betweenThis difference has not been taken into account by the Tribunal. In the present case, it appears from the decision of the Adjudicating Authority that the company had initially incurred advertisement expenses which expenses were subsequen... | 1 | 1,255 | 230 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
In the show-cause notice, it was alleged by the Department that the assessee had failed to disclose and had failed to pay a... |
M/S. Harman Electronics (P) Ltd. Vs. M/S. National Panasonic India Ltd | In Mosaraf Hossain Khan vs. Bhagheeratha Engg. Ltd. [(2006) 3 SCC 658] , this court held: "30. In terms of Section 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure every offence shall ordinarily be inquired into and tried by a court within whose local jurisdiction it was committed. 178 provides for place of inquiry or trial in th... | 1[ds]We cannot, as things stand today, be oblivious of the fact that a banking institution holding several cheques signed by the same borrower cannot only present the cheque for its encashment at four different places but also may serve notices from four different places so as to enable it to file four complaint cases ... | 1 | 5,031 | 301 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
In Mosaraf Hossain Khan vs. Bhagheeratha Engg. Ltd. [(2006) 3 SCC 658] , this court held: "30. In terms of Section... |
New India Assurance Co.Ltd Vs. Tara Devi & Others | 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital in Appeal Against Award No.45 of 2003, dated 31.03.2005. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court while confirming the compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (fo... | 1[ds]7. We have carefully perused the documents furnished by learned counsel for theCompany. From these documents, it is clear that the alleged accident took place on 09.5.2001 and on the said date the vehicle in question did not have the valid insurance policy. In that view of the matter we are of the opinion that, th... | 1 | 347 | 110 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Utta... |
Union Of India Vs. Bungo Steel Furniture Pvt. Ltd | out by this Court that the observations of Bose, J. in 1955-2 SCR 48 : (AIR 1955 SC 468 ), supra, were not intended to lay down such a broad and unqualified proposition (See Nachiappa Chettiar v. Subramaniam Chettiar, 1960-2 SCR 209 at p. 238 : (AIR 1960 SC 307 at p. 320) and Satinder Singh v. Umrao Singh, 1961-3 SCR 6... | 0[ds]In the present case, the affidavits filed by the parties before the arbitrator are not incorporated in the award and it is, therefore, not permissible for the Court to examine these affidavits in order to ascertain whether the arbitrator has committed any error of lawApplying the principle to the present case, it ... | 0 | 3,049 | 1,982 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
out by this Court that the observations of Bose, J. in 1955-2 SCR 48 : (AIR 1955 SC 468 ), supra, were ... |
CCI PROJECTS (P) LTD Vs. VRAJENDRA JOGJIVANDAS THAKKAR | the disputed sums with the Commission, whereafter the possession of the flats was taken on 04.08.2017. The matters before the Commission thus stood confined to the issue whether the complainants in both the cases were entitled to any compensation in respect of delayed payment or whether the appellant was entitled to ha... | 0[ds]12. We have gone through the record and considered the rival submissions. The decision of this Court in the case of Haryana Development Authority (supra) turned on individual facts of the case where the very entitlement of the subsequent allottees to claim damages or compensation for delayed delivery of possession... | 0 | 2,319 | 395 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
the disputed sums with the Commission, whereafter the possession of the flats was taken on 04.08.2017. The matters before th... |
State of Maharashtra & Others Vs. Khanzode Engineers Private Limited | Mr. Patel, J. appointed Mr. A.K.Shenolikar, B.Sc. B.E.(Hons.) F.I.E. (Ind) Member IWRS Retd. Chief Engineer, Irrigation Department, Maharashtra Government Consulting Engineer, 306 Himalaya Park, 99. Shivaji Nagar, Nagpur 400010, as an Arbitrator. In the order, it was made clear that apart from the disputes sought to be... | 1[ds]6.It is true that thes (present petitioners) were absent, in which case the learned Single Judge could have granted prayer as prayed for by the applicant (present respondent) in their application. However, instead of granting its prayer, the learned Single Judge has appointed the sole arbitrator, as aforesaid. In ... | 1 | 1,436 | 822 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
Mr. Patel, J. appointed Mr. A.K.Shenolikar, B.Sc. B.E.(Hons.) F.I.E. (Ind) Member IWRS Retd. Chief Engineer, Irrigation D... |
U.P. Hotels Etc Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board | of the report observed that it was permissible to look a the whole of the pleadings delivered in the arbitration, and it appears therein that the respondents affirmed and the applicants denied that the respondents were entitled to terminate the agreement as the applicants refused to attend daily at the site, and that t... | 1[ds]27. In the instant case, the view taken by the Umpire on the interpretation of the agreement between the parties in the light of the observations of this Court in Indian Aluminium Co. case ((1975) 2 SCC 414 : (1976) 1 SCR 70 ) was at bests a possible view to take, if not the correct view. If that was the position ... | 1 | 8,012 | 923 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
of the report observed that it was permissible to look a the whole of the pleadings delivered in the ar... |
Kanpur Elect.Supply Co.Ltd Vs. M/S L.M.L.Limited | of the Respondent-Company was Rs.8.42 crores and when Clause 4.49 was amended, the Respondent-Company was asked to submit a Bank Guarantee/Bond to secure the amount of Rs.10.24 crores outstanding as arrears on that date. In compliance thereof, the Respondent-Company duly furnished a Bond on 17th June, 2007, which was n... | 0[ds]24. The facts of this case are relatively simple and straightforward. What is difficult to comprehend is the inscrutable manner in which decisions arrived at in common are sought to be negated on account of bureaucratic lethargy. The case of thewhich is not denied on behalf of the Petitioners, is that owing to mar... | 0 | 6,037 | 1,527 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
of the Respondent-Company was Rs.8.42 crores and when Clause 4.49 was amended, the Respondent-Company w... |
Lakhmi Chand Khemani Vs. Smt. Kauran Devi | think he is not, for S. 2(1) of the Act of 1958 must be read by itself and its meaning cannot be affected by any consideration derived from S. 19 of the Slum Areas Act.12. We may now refer to Jyoti Pershad v. Administrator for the Union Territory of Delhi, 1962-2 SCR 125 : (AIR 1961 SC 1602 ) to which our attention was... | 0[ds]11. We find no justification for changing the definition of tenant in the Act of 1958 by drawing upon the provisions of the Slum Areas Act as the learned Subordinate Judge did. The last mentioned Act is not concerned with relations between landlords and tenants as such; it does not purport to interfere directly wi... | 0 | 3,769 | 1,211 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
think he is not, for S. 2(1) of the Act of 1958 must be read by itself and its meaning cannot be affected by any considera... |
Arnit Das Vs. State Of Bihar | K.T. Thomas, J. In an inquiry conducted under Section 32 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as `the 1986 Act) the Trial Court recorded a finding to the effect that petitioner Arnit Das was not a juvenile on the date of occurrence. This finding was upheld by the learned Sessions Judge in an appea... | 0[ds]5. In view of the findings recorded in an inquiry conducted under Section 32 of the 1986 Act, that on the date of the offence thewas not a juvenile for the purposes of the 1986 Act, which finding has been affirmed right upto this Court, it is of no consequence, insofar as this petition is concerned, as to whether ... | 0 | 786 | 153 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
K.T. Thomas, J. In an inquiry conducted under Section 32 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred ... |
Valliamma Champaka Pillai Vs. Sivathanu Pillai and Others | legal position as among the co-mortgagors, if one of them redeems a mortgage over the property which belongs jointly to himself and the rest, equity confers on him a right to reimburse himself for the amount spent in excess by him in the matter of red emption; he can call upon the co-mortgagors to contribute towards th... | 0[ds]Be that as it may, the crucial part of the learned Judges observation, which has been underlined, is obviously correct. The fact remains that this plea about the family being joint in statue at the material time, was not agitated before the learned Single Judge, nor pressed into argument before the Full Bench in L... | 0 | 5,098 | 1,490 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
legal position as among the co-mortgagors, if one of them redeems a mortgage over the property which belongs join... |
General Manager, North East Frontier Railway and Others Vs. Dinabandhu Chakraborty | HEGDE, J. 1. This is an appeal by special leave. The respondent herein was an employee of the N.E.F. Railway belonging to the Union of India. At the time of his retirement he held the post of Station Master. While serving as Station Master at Dinhat station, it is said that in the remittances made by him on February 8,... | 0[ds]2. Under that rule the Controlling Officer is empowered to deduct any amount due under a liability incurred by the subscriber to the Government. Therefore before any deduction can be made, it must be established that under a liability incurred by the subscriber the amount in question is due to the Government. In t... | 0 | 589 | 184 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
HEGDE, J. 1. This is an appeal by special leave. The respondent herein was an employee of the N.E.F. ... |
MURTI BHAWANI MATA MANDIR REP. THROUGH PUJARI (D) THROUGH LR KAILASH Vs. RAJESH | Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at its Bench at Indore. A suit 1 was instituted in the Court of the Civil Judge, Class II, Sardarpur, Dist. Dhar (M.P.) by one Ganeshi Lal claiming as the next friend o... | 1[ds]Section 144 applies to a situation where a decree or an order is varied or reversed in appeal, revision or any other proceeding or is set aside or modified in any suit instituted for the purpose. In that situation, the Court which has passed the decree may cause restitution to be made, on an application of any par... | 1 | 1,088 | 190 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the ... |
Mohmed Amin @ Amin Choteli Rahim Miyan Shaikh and Anr Vs. C.B.I. through its Director | he has to kill someone. He further stated that as per the instructions, he went Madhuban building on his own motorcycle which was handed over to appellant No.A-10 and then he sat on the scooter which was with appellant No.A-6. He has also given minute details of Rauf Valiullah coming out of Madhuban building along with... | 0[ds]we find that the prosecution has produced sufficient corroborative evidence and the trial Court did not commit any error in relying upon the same to support its conclusion that the appellants are guilty of offence under Section 302 read with Section 120B IPC and other offences. PW 58, Bhagwan Das Lalwani (propriet... | 0 | 25,531 | 701 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
he has to kill someone. He further stated that as per the instructions, he went Madhuban building on his own motorcycle whi... |
Pentapati Chinna Venkanna & Ors Vs. Pentapati Bengararaju & Ors | intention of the court in making an order "closed" for statistical purposes is manifest. It is intended not to finally dispose of the application, but to keep it pending. Whether the order was without jurisdiction or whether it was valid, the legal position would be the same; in one case it would be ignored and in the ... | 0[ds]From the narration of facts given by us earlier it is clear that the said execution petition was "closed" for statistical purposes. As the High Court stayed the execution pending the appeal filed by the judgment-debtors, the decree-holders were not in a position to proceed with the execution petition, and, therefo... | 0 | 3,478 | 1,353 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
intention of the court in making an order "closed" for statistical purposes is manifest. It is intended not to fin... |
Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Messrs Anabeshahi Wine and Distilleries Private Limited | and Nashirwar case [Nashirwar v. State of M.P., (1975) 1 SCC 29 ]. There is no fundamental right to do trade or business in intoxicants. The State, under its regulatory powers, has the right to prohibit absolutely every form of activity in relation to intoxicants - its manufacture, storage, export, sale and possession.... | 1[ds]4. Having considered the respective submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, we find substance in the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant. It has not been disputed, and in our opinion rightly, by learned counsel for the respondent that the business which the respondent has been carryin... | 1 | 2,406 | 249 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
and Nashirwar case [Nashirwar v. State of M.P., (1975) 1 SCC 29 ]. There is no fundamental right to do trade or business ... |
The Hyderabad Co-Operative Commercial Corpn. Ltd. and Ors Vs. Syed Mohiuddin Khadir (Dead) By L.Rs. and Ors | Society is registered. Section 5B of the 1942 Act which speaks of delegation of any power or authority exercisable by Central Registrar to be exercisable by Registrar of Co-operative Societies of a State is contended by the decree holder to exclude the State Registrar from acquiring any power by delegation. The decree-... | 1[ds]10. The documents in the present case and in particular the letter dated 12 June, 1959 and the letter dated 2 December, 1959 written by the Accountant General to the Court establish that there was a debt due to the Co-operative Society and the attachment was validly made. The letter dated 12 June, 1959 provided fo... | 1 | 3,283 | 1,326 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
Society is registered. Section 5B of the 1942 Act which speaks of delegation of any power or authority exe... |
New India Assurance Co.Ltd Vs. Gopali | under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988 (the MV Act, for short). But, such percentage of deduction is not an inflexible rule and offers merely a guideline. 15. The Bench then referred to the judgments in Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Susamma Thomas (1994) 2 SCC 176 , U.P.SRTC v. Trilok Chandra (... | 0[ds]12. In our view, the appellants challenge to the impugned order is meritless and the appeal is liable to be dismissed. We are also convinced that this is a fit case in which the Court should exercise power under Article 142 of the Constitution and enhance the compensation determined by the High Court by applying a... | 0 | 3,205 | 243 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988 (the MV Act, for short). But, such percentage of deduction is not an i... |
M/s. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited, New Delhi Vs. Their Workmen & Another | the employees and their dependents, additions and alterations in buildings purchase of lands, payment of private tuition fee; purchase of sewing machines, and for purposes of litigation in which employees may get involved."3. On the question of leave the Tribunal held that there was no. reason for discrimination betwee... | 1[ds]4. The question whether encashment of leave was being allowed since 1948 in the manner as alleged is really a question of tact and we find nothing that would justify US in interfering with the decision of the Tribunal on a consideration of all the materials that there has been a continued and uninterrupted practic... | 1 | 1,568 | 492 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
the employees and their dependents, additions and alterations in buildings purchase of lands, payment of pr... |
The Fazilka Electric Supply Co. Ltd Vs. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Delhi | and such advertisement shall include inter alia the draft license. Where any person desires to have any amendment made in the draft license, he shall deliver a statement of the same. The rules further provide for a local enquiry if any person locally interested objects to the grant; if and when Government has approved ... | 0[ds]This section does not provide for a compulsory purchase or compulsory acquisition without reference to and independent of any agreement by thethe whole scheme of the Electricity Act and the rules made thereunder, is kept in mind, it becomes obvious that notwithstanding the Use of the expression "compulsory purchas... | 0 | 3,460 | 492 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
and such advertisement shall include inter alia the draft license. Where any person desires to have any ame... |
S.SAROJINI AMMA Vs. VELAYUDHAN PILLAI SREEKUMAR | 10. The respondent filed Regular Second Appeal against the judgment and decree in A.S. No. 30/2007. By the judgment and order dated 03.04.2017, the High Court allowed the R.S.A. No. 757/2011 and set aside the judgment and decree in A.S. No. 30/2007. 11. On behalf of the appellant, it was contended that the document sty... | 1[ds]14. Gift means to transfer certain existing moveable or immoveable property voluntarily and without consideration by one person called the donor to another called the donee and accepted by or on behalf of the donee as held by the Supreme Court in Naramadaben Maganlal Thakker Vs. Pranivandas Maganlal Thakker and Ot... | 1 | 1,661 | 367 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
10. The respondent filed Regular Second Appeal against the judgment and decree in A.S. No. 30/2007. By ... |
Waman Rao and Ors Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors | Ceiling Amendment Acts were put in the Ninth Schedule as Items 157, 159 and 160. On November 24, 1976 the House of People (Extension of Duration) Amendment Act was passed extending the term of the Parliament for a farther period of one year. The 42nd Amendment Act was passed on November 12, 1976. The Lok Sabha was diss... | 0[ds]Thus, the main question arising before us has to be decided by applying the ratio of Kesavananda Bharati (supra), in its pristine formAs stated earlier, Article 31A was inserted in the Constitution by Section 4 of the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951 with retrospective effect from the commencement of the C... | 0 | 16,925 | 6,761 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
Ceiling Amendment Acts were put in the Ninth Schedule as Items 157, 159 and 160. On November 24, 1976 the Ho... |
Management Of Aurofood Pvt. Ltd Vs. S. Rajulu | charges. The management accepted the findings of the enquiry officer and took a tentative decision to impose the punishment of dismissal under the Standing Orders. A show-cause dated 13th October 1981 (Annexure P-3) was also issued to him calling upon to show cause as to why the aforesaid punishment should not be impos... | 0[ds]5. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. The Division Bench has held that the workman had not been given the requisite material that was required by him to prepare his defence more particular as his antecedents had been taken into account depicting him as incorrigible, thou... | 0 | 1,278 | 360 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
charges. The management accepted the findings of the enquiry officer and took a tentative decision to impose the punishmen... |
Cyrus Rustom Patel Vs. The Charity Commissioner, Maharashtra, State & Others | valuable property of the trust, which was derogatory to its interest and would have defeated the very object of the creation of the trust for the preservation and protection of religion and Parsi culture. 29. The joint venture development was not an intended transaction; sale option was mentioned dubiously in the agree... | 1[ds]9. It has not been disputed that so far the Municipal Corporation of Mumbai has not granted the permission for the aforesaid development, as such no development has taken place.The power to grant sanction has to be exercised by the Charity Commissioner, taking into consideration three classic requirements i.e. ?th... | 1 | 9,051 | 1,825 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
valuable property of the trust, which was derogatory to its interest and would have defeated the very o... |
Raman Vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Lt | wherein the claimant sustained certain crushing injuries due to which his left lower limb was amputated, held that in terms of functional disability, the disability sustained by the claimant is total and 100% though only the claimants left lower limb was amputated.In para 9 of the judgment, the Court held as under: (Ka... | 1[ds]In view of the law laid down by this Court in the above referred cases which are extensively considered and granted just and reasonable compensation, in our considered view, the compensation awarded at Rs. 60 lakhs in the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the High Court, out of which 30 lakhs were to be depo... | 1 | 6,811 | 818 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
wherein the claimant sustained certain crushing injuries due to which his left lower limb was amp... |
M/S. New Horizon Sugar Mills Vs. Gov.Of Pondicherry Tr.Addl.Sec | repealing the law so made by the Legislature of the State.” 44. As will be evident from the above, clause (1) of Article 254 provides that when there are two laws enacted by the Parliament and the State Legislature in which certain inconsistencies occur, then subject to the provisions of clause (2), the law made by the... | 0[ds]45. At this stage, it may also be worthwhile to consider Mr.submissions that the power to enact the Pondicherry Act could be traced to Entries 1, 8, 13 and 21 of the Concurrent List. Entry 1 of List III deals with criminal law, including all matters included in the Indian Penal Code at the commencement of this Con... | 0 | 10,481 | 910 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
repealing the law so made by the Legislature of the State.” 44. As will be evident from the above, cl... |
GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs. GEN. MG. DIST. CO-OP. CENTRAL BANK LTD | specified co-operative societies, and does not include other employees of such societies, the general provision contained in Sub-clause (iii) of Clause (c) of Section 2 of the 1988 Act shall have no application. It is argued that the special provision in Sub-clause (ix) shall exclude the general provision in Sub-clause... | 1[ds]6. After hearing the Learned Counsel appearing for the parties, our conclusion is that the High Court is clearly in error in relying on sub-clause (ix) and overlooking Sub-clause (iii) of Clause (c) of Section 2 of the 1988 Act for quashing the proceedings on the ground that the Respondent/accused is not covered b... | 1 | 1,817 | 744 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
specified co-operative societies, and does not include other employees of such societies, the general provision contained i... |
ALL INDIA HAJ UMRAH TOUR ORGANIZER ASSOCIATION MUMBAI Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS | levels. It cannot be doubted that the entire edible oil market is an integrated one, and that it is not reasonable to treat any one of the edible oils or vanaspati in isolation. It is a well accepted fact that vanaspati manufacturers constitute a powerful organised sector in the edible oil market, and a high vanaspati ... | 0[ds]36. In these petitions, we are concerned with HGOs or PTOs. It is, therefore, necessary to understand the nature of services provided by HGOs/ PTOs. Haj pilgrimage is a five-day religious pilgrimage to Mecca and nearby Holy places in Saudi Arabia. As per the Holy Quran, all Muslims who are physically and financial... | 0 | 20,057 | 6,679 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
levels. It cannot be doubted that the entire edible oil market is an integrated one, and that it is not reasonabl... |
Hitechi Jewellery Industries Limited Vs. Choksi Arvind Jewellers | it was competent to Mr. Justice Shelat at this stage to have dismissed the petition and not to have acted under Rule 751. In the Hirjee Mills case, 57 Bom.L.R. 378: ((S) AIR 1955 Bom 355 ) the petitioner was entitled to have an order of winding up. In this case the company was entitled to have an order of dismissal. In... | 0[ds]8. The question before the Apex Court was whether the Court while hearing the writ petition is under an obligation to pass a speakingorder recording in brief at least the reasons which weighed with the court in determining the salient questions raised by the parties to the action while dismissing or rejecting the ... | 0 | 3,048 | 677 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
it was competent to Mr. Justice Shelat at this stage to have dismissed the petition and not to ha... |
Saygo Bai Vs. Chueeru Bajrangi | marriage till the children were born, her relationship was cordial with her husband. Thereafter, the respondent brought a second wife, namely, Gulab Bai at village Chalani where she was residing in her matrimonial home. She was very specific in stating that when the husband brought the second wife, he declared that he ... | 1[ds]9. In our opinion, all the Courts below have shown scant disregard for the second proviso to Section 125 (3) and the Explanation. It was an admitted position that the respondent had taken a second wife, namely, Gulab Bai. The respondent not only admitted this position in his written statement and evidence but also... | 1 | 3,114 | 1,369 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
marriage till the children were born, her relationship was cordial with her husband. Thereafter, the respondent brought a... |
Ben Gorm Nilgiri Plantations Company, Coonoor And Ors Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Special Circle, Ernakulam And Ors | circumstances : (1) that it was not part of the contract between the assessees and their buyers that the goods shall only be exported and not sold in the local market. In other words, it was urged that in the absence of such a specific term of contract it would have been open to the buyers to have diverted the goods fr... | 0[ds]We are not concerned to decide whether there was evidence in that case on which the High Court could come to the conclusion that the sale occasioned the export. But Mr. Setalvad relied upon the observation in support of the proposition that in all cases where there is a contract for purchase of goods in the taxing... | 0 | 7,947 | 323 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
circumstances : (1) that it was not part of the contract between the assessees and their buyers that the goods sha... |
UNION OF INDIA Vs. LT. COL. KULDEEP YADAV | respondent had admitted all the allegations made against him in the show cause notice.27. The Tribunal was then impressed by the fact that the respondent had admitted the allegations made against him in the show cause notice. That conduct of the respondent, according to the Tribunal, unravelled the fair and candid inte... | 1[ds]22. It is no more res integra that the Tribunal is competent and empowered to interfere with the punishment awarded by the appropriate authority in any departmental action, on the ground that the same is excessive or disproportionate to the misconduct proved against the delinquent officer. However, exercise of tha... | 1 | 6,932 | 1,689 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
respondent had admitted all the allegations made against him in the show cause notice.27. The Tribunal was then impressed ... |
Pioneer Rubber Plantation, Nilambur Vs. State of Kerala and Ors. | the proposition that a reasonable extent of land can be set apart as fuel area for the purpose of smoke-houses and factories in the estates and such area qualifies for exemption under Section 2(f)(1)(i)(B) of the Act. At the same time, the incidental observation of this Court in Ammad cannot be taken as an authority to... | 1[ds]9. We have referred to the decision of the larger Bench of the High Court at some length to show that the final view which the High Court has taken subsequent to the impugned judgments supports the contentions of the appellants counsel as regards fuel for the smokehouses and factories.10. We shall now refer to the... | 1 | 2,801 | 1,445 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
the proposition that a reasonable extent of land can be set apart as fuel area for the purpose of smoke-houses an... |
Kalyan Singh Vs. State Of U. P | person affected by the scheme published under section 68C may, within thirty days from the date of the publication of the scheme in the Official Gazette, file objections thereto before the State Government.(2) The State Government may, after considering the objections and after giving an opportunity to the objector or ... | 0[ds]Briefly stated, under the said provisions, a statutory authority called the State transport undertaking is created it is authorised to initiate a scheme of nationlisation of road transport, the aggrieved parties are given opportunity to file objections thereto, and the State Government is empowered to hear both th... | 0 | 3,058 | 827 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
person affected by the scheme published under section 68C may, within thirty days from the date of the publication... |
MANOJ SURYAVANSHI Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH | has been condemned or who has been sentenced to death has a ray of hope. It, therefore, could not be contended that he suffers that mental torture which a person suffers when he knows that he is to be hanged but waits for the doomsday. Therefore, the appellant cannot draw any support from the fact that from the day of ... | 1[ds]13.1 The appellant-accused has been held guilty for having committed the murder/killing of three minor children aged about 8 years, 6 years and 4 years respectively and has been convicted by both the Courts below for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 364 IPC. The learned Trial Court, after having held... | 1 | 14,547 | 3,359 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
has been condemned or who has been sentenced to death has a ray of hope. It, therefore, could not be conte... |
Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited And Ors Vs. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma and Ors | of party seeking such stay. 13. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by this Court in the case of Shreenath Corporation and Ors. (supra). Therefore, it is held that National Commission can pass an order to deposit the entire amount and/or any amount higher than 50 per cent of the amount in terms of the orde... | 1[ds]12. An identical question came to be considered by this Court in the case of Shreenath Corporation and Ors. (supra). In the aforesaid case, this Court was considering the pari materia provision under the Act, 1986 and second proviso to Section 19, which provided pre-deposit of amount specified therein, i.e., 50 pe... | 1 | 4,467 | 1,805 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
of party seeking such stay. 13. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by this Court in the case... |
Rutta Pedda Narasareddy & Others Vs. Sughra Begum & Others | plaintiff alone was in actual possession of the Jagdeopur lands, that the oral lease set up by defendants 1-10 was not true and that they occupied the lands illegally. It differed from the Trial Court and held that D-1 and others were not protected tenants in respect of the lands in Gandamalla village, that Exhibit D-4... | 0[ds]3. We think it hardly necessary to refer at length to the conclusion arrived at by the Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court that the 11th defendant was not in possession of the suit lands but that only the plaintiff was in possession throughoutWe agree with their concurrent finding on this point4. As regards... | 0 | 1,550 | 242 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
plaintiff alone was in actual possession of the Jagdeopur lands, that the oral lease set up by defendants 1-10 was not true... |
SANTOSH BATRA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS Vs. GOLDEN FOREST (INDIA) LTD. MANI MAJRA (UT), CHANDIGARH, THR. ITS DIRECTOR | specific performance, which was contested by the appellants on the ground that the respondent failed to perform its part of the agreement by stipulated dated 31.01.1990. It was further pleaded that though in these circumstances the appellant could have forfeited the entire money paid by the respondent, with mutual unde... | 1[ds]9. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties primarily on the issue as to whether the agreement stood cancelled and whether the finding of the Trial Court on the Issue No. 1 is rightly reversed by the High Court. We find that the approach of the First Appellate Court as well as the High Court in reversing ... | 1 | 1,855 | 707 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
specific performance, which was contested by the appellants on the ground that the respondent failed to perform its part of ... |
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD Vs. M/S J.K.CEMENT WORKS | with water 9. Simply put, a flood may be described as overflow of water over land. Floods can be broadly divided into the following categories: coastal floods, fluvial floods (river floods), and pluvial floods (surface floods). 9.1 Coastal floods occur when water from a sea or an ocean flows into nearby areas. They are... | 0[ds]6. At the very outset, we note that as far as the Respondents contention regarding the appointment of a second surveyor is concerned, the Appellant had only appointed a Chartered Accountant for the purposes of verifying the accounts books of the Respondent regarding its daily stock of coal. In our considered opini... | 0 | 2,359 | 781 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
with water 9. Simply put, a flood may be described as overflow of water over land. Floods can be broadly di... |
Pure Helium India Pvt. Ltd Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Commission | but unless such a prohibition/bar is found out the court cannot exercise its jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Act. The High Court, therefore, misdirected itself in law in posing a wrong question. It is true that where such prohibition exists, the court will not hesitate to set aside the award. 43. In the instant ca... | 0[ds]OUR CONCLUSION :20. The questions framed are self-contradictory and inconsistent. Whereas in framing question (a) a right approach had been adopted by the Division Bench, a wrong one had been adopted in framing question (b). It is not in dispute that there were three different nature of bids; which were required t... | 0 | 7,944 | 2,616 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
but unless such a prohibition/bar is found out the court cannot exercise its jurisdiction under Section 30... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.