Case Name stringlengths 11 235 | Input stringlengths 944 6.86k | Output stringlengths 11 196k | Label int64 0 1 | Count int64 176 118k | Decision_Count int64 7 37.8k | text stringlengths 1.43k 13.9k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grand View Estates Private Limited Vs. Vishwanath Namdeo Patil & Others | viz (1) that after selling the assets of the Company and distributing the assets for paying off liabilities, the Company may still have surplus amount or in the alternative the liabilities would outweigh the amount realized by the sale of assets in which case even though both, workers and secured creditors had priority... | 0[ds]31. In our view, to some extent, there is a substance in the submission made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellants that the date under section 445(3) cannot be the last date from which there would be cessation ofrelationship. In Carne and Another vs. Debono (1988) 1 W.L.R. 1107) in th... | 0 | 7,171 | 915 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
viz (1) that after selling the assets of the Company and distributing the assets for paying off liabili... |
Association Of Leasing & Finanl.Ser.Cos Vs. Union Of India | of Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. 38. According to Mr. Arvind Datar and Mr. K. Parasaran, learned counsel appearing on behalf of some of the appellants, once the subject matter of hire-purchase and leasing is constitutionally characterized as a sale (deemed sale) by the Constitution (Forty-sixth Amendment) Act, ... | 0[ds]The service taximposed by Section 66on the value of taxable services referred to in Section 65insofar as it relates to financial leasing services including equipment leasing and hire-purchase is within the legislative competence of the Parliament under Entry 97, List I of the Seventh Schedule to thethis connection... | 0 | 12,364 | 3,830 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
of Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. 38. According to Mr. Arvind Datar and Mr. K. Parasaran, ... |
Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd Vs. Essar Power Ltd | taken as set aside by the latter. This is because the proper fulfillment of the Primary is the business of the Accessory also as the latter operates solely for the sake of the former. Consequently if, in consideration of its own qualification it were to deprive the Primary of its natural accomplishment then there would... | 1[ds]25. In our opinion, the submission of Mr. K.K. Venugopal has to be accepted.26. It may be noted that Section 86(1)(f) of the Act of 2003 is a special provision for adjudication of disputes between the licensee and the generating companies. Such disputes can be adjudicated upon either by the State Commission or the... | 1 | 7,486 | 1,035 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
taken as set aside by the latter. This is because the proper fulfillment of the Primary is the business of t... |
Siemens Ltd Vs. Siemens Employees Union | its propriety. If a scheme for such reorganization results in surplusage of employees no employer is expected to carry the burden of such economic dead weight and retrenchment has to be accepted as inevitable, however unfortunate it is... (para 14, page 1341 of the report) 32. In the instant case no malafide has been a... | 1[ds]It is true that this Court normally does not upset a concurrent finding but there is no such inflexible rule. The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 136 is a special jurisdiction. This is clear from the text of the Article itself which starts with a non-obstante clause. This is a jurisdiction conferring resi... | 1 | 5,138 | 577 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
its propriety. If a scheme for such reorganization results in surplusage of employees no employer is expecte... |
Anita Sharma & Ors Vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr | being named in the list of eye witnesses in the criminal proceedings, without even mentioning as to why such absence from the list is fatal to the case of the appellants. This approach of the High Court is mystifying, especially in light of this Courts observation [as set out in Parmeshwari (supra) and reiterated in Ma... | 1[ds]11. At the outset, it may be mentioned that some material facts which have a direct bearing on the fate of this case, have escaped notice of the High Court. The FIR was not registered by Sanjeev Kapoor (owner-cum-driver of the car) as assumed by the High Court. Instead, as a matter of fact, the FIR No. 120/09 (Exh... | 1 | 3,932 | 2,248 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
being named in the list of eye witnesses in the criminal proceedings, without even mentioning as to w... |
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD Vs. HYUNDAI ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD | a suit, has got to be commenced within three months from the date of such rejection; otherwise, all benefits under the policy stand forfeited. The rejection of the claim may be for the reasons indicated in the first part of clause 13, such as, false declaration, fraud or wilful neglect of the claimant or on any other g... | 1[ds]11. The other decision heavily relied upon by the High Court and also by the respondents in Duro Felguera (supra), will be of no avail. Firstly, because it is aBench decision and also because the Court was not called upon to consider the question which arises in the present case, in reference to clause 7 of the su... | 1 | 4,638 | 809 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
a suit, has got to be commenced within three months from the date of such rejection; otherwise, all benefits unde... |
Patna Electric Supply Company, Limited Vs. Their Workmen | Wanchoo, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave against the award of the industrial tribunal, Patna, and the only point raised before us is with respect to scales of wages fixed by the tribunal. The main contention raised on behalf of the appellant is that as the last adjudication on the question of wage-scales was in... | 0[ds]We are of opinion that there is no force in either of the two contentions raised on behalf of the appellant. It is true that the last adjudication in connexion withwas made in 1956. Even so it appears that thethe revision of which was demanded by the workmen, was substantially fixed as far back as 1948 by means of... | 0 | 812 | 599 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
Wanchoo, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave against the award of the industrial tribunal, Patna, and the only... |
Income-Tax Officer, Award, Sitapur Vs. Murlidhar Bhagwandas, Lakhimpur Kheri | 1959 Mad 328 ) in 1963-47 ITR 16 (Mad) and held that the word "finding" in the proviso to S. 34(3) must be given a wide significance so as to include not only findings necessary for the disposal of the appeal but also findings which are incidental to it and would include its conclusion as to whether the income in quest... | 0[ds]It may, therefore, be held on a construction of the provisions of S. 31. that the jurisdiction of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner is strictly confined to the assessment orders of a particular year under appeal. Section 33, inter alia, deals with an appeal to the Tribunal against of the order of the Appellate ... | 0 | 9,757 | 459 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
1959 Mad 328 ) in 1963-47 ITR 16 (Mad) and held that the word "finding" in the proviso to S. 34(3) must be given a wide sig... |
Prabhu Narayan Vs. A. K. Srivastava | been verified as having been made on information and knowledge of the petitioner is not a requisite prescribed under Rule 94-A of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 which are applicable to the filing of an election petition.The affidavit in support of an election petition need not itself disclose the sources of inform... | 1[ds]is obvious that when Section 123 (4) speaks of publication it means distribution. Mere printing of the pamphlets would not fall under Section 123 (4). Therefore the failure to give particulars of the printing cannot lead to the dismissal of the petition. Nor could evidence regarding it be shut out. The proviso to ... | 1 | 2,118 | 222 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
been verified as having been made on information and knowledge of the petitioner is not a requisite prescribe... |
UTTAR PRADESH JAL VIDYUT (S)NIGAM LIMITED & ORS Vs. BALBIR SINGH | granted by Allahabad High Court permitting the appellants to file a fresh writ petition before the appropriate court dated 24.04.2014, will not make the writ petition tenable before the High Court of Uttarakhand and that too when a challenge is given to the impugned award before the Uttarakhand High Court after 19 year... | 1[ds]3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and considering the impugned order passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand, we are of the opinion that the impugned order passed by the High Court dismissing the writ petition without entering into the merits of the case is unsustainable.3.1 ... | 1 | 2,718 | 1,114 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
granted by Allahabad High Court permitting the appellants to file a fresh writ petition before the appropria... |
BSES Ltd Vs. Fenner India Ltd. and Anr | if they were not extended, thus under petitioners threat of encashment of the bank guarantees, and in the hope of amicably settling the issue with the petitioner, the first respondent (sic) felt compelled to extend the bank guarantees. In our view, this is an unsatisfactory explanation in the circumstances of the case ... | 1[ds]There is no dispute that arbitral proceedings are pending. In fact, we were shown that one of the disputes referred to arbitration is whether the bank guarantees are null and void. Further, one of the substantive prayers in the arbitration made on behalf of the First Respondent, is to make an award declaring the f... | 1 | 4,399 | 319 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
if they were not extended, thus under petitioners threat of encashment of the bank guarantees, and in the hope of amicably ... |
Swami Motor Transport (P) Ltd.And Another Vs. Sri Sankaraswamigal Muttand Another(And Connected Appeals) | if this construction be given to Art. 19 (1) (f), Art. 31 (1) would become otiose. We do not see how it becomes an unnecessary provision. Article 31 (1) is couched in a negative form. It says that no person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law. In effect it declares a fundamental right against dep... | 0[ds]8. Before we consider the arguments, it would be convenient to notice the scope of the relevant provisions of the principal Act, Act XIX of 1955 and Act XIII of 1960. The principal Act, as amended by Act XIX of 1955, was enacted, as its preamble shows, to give protection to certain classes of tenants who in munici... | 0 | 8,572 | 2,147 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
if this construction be given to Art. 19 (1) (f), Art. 31 (1) would become otiose. We do not see how ... |
Emkay Global Financial Services Ltd Vs. Girdhar Sondhi | court. This requirement to furnish proof has led to inconsistent practices in some High Courts, where they have insisted on Section 34 proceedings being conducted in the manner as a regular civil suit. This is despite the Supreme Court ruling in Fiza Developers & Inter-Trade P. Ltd. v. AMCI (I) Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. that ... | 1[ds]9. The effect of an exclusive jurisdiction Clause was dealt with by this Court in several judgments, the most recent of which is the judgment contained in Indus Mobile Distribution Pvt. Ltd. (supra). In this case, the arbitration was to be conducted at Mumbai and was subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of courts... | 1 | 4,935 | 2,402 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
court. This requirement to furnish proof has led to inconsistent practices in some High Courts, where t... |
G. Bassi Reddy Vs. International Crops Research Instt. & Anr | it would not serve to make the body a State". 26. The facts which have been narrated earlier clearly show that ICRISAT does not fulfil any of these tests. It was not set up by the Government and it gives its services voluntarily to a large number of countries besides India. It is not controlled by not is it accountable... | 0[ds]25. A writ under Article 226 lies only when the petitioner establishes that his or her fundamental right or some other legal right has been infringed (Calcutta Gas Co. vs. State of W.B., AIR 1962 SC 1044 , 1047-1048). The claim as made by the appellant in his writ petition is founded on Articles 14 and 16. The cla... | 0 | 5,007 | 932 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
it would not serve to make the body a State". 26. The facts which have been narrated earlier clearly show th... |
Gram Sabha, Besahani Vs. Ram Raj Singh & Ors | grove-holder of land referred to in Section 212 or being an intermediary brought such land under his own cultivation or planted a grove thereon on or after the eighth day of August, 1946, he shall pass an order for ejectment of the person from the land on payment of such compensation as may be prescribed.(7) Where an o... | 1[ds]The language of S. 212-A (6) makes it clear that the order under that provision must be an order for ejectment of the person in possession of the land on payment of such compensation as may be prescribed. This means that an order under that provision must first direct payment of compensation to the person in posse... | 1 | 2,174 | 820 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
grove-holder of land referred to in Section 212 or being an intermediary brought such land under his own cultivation or pl... |
P. Dasa Muni Reddy Vs. P. Appa Rao | advantage of the benefit. On that reasoning, this Court set aside the judgment of the High Court and restored the decree of the trial Court dismissing the suit in Lachoo Mals case (supra). Lachoo Mals case (supra) has no application to the present case which raises the question as to whether the appellant has waived th... | 1[ds]The concurrent finding of the trial Court and the First Appellate Court is that the building was constructed in the year 1958. The Act would not apply to the month of August, 1957. The Civil Court and not the Rent Controller would have jurisdiction in respect of such buildings. The First Appellate Court held that ... | 1 | 1,995 | 362 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
advantage of the benefit. On that reasoning, this Court set aside the judgment of the High Court and restored the decree of... |
RAM CHANDRA SINGH Vs. RAJARAM | by the authority concerned. 8. It is also noticed that in the oral evidence, the appellant had stated that he had seen the photocopy of the driving licence of Shivgyani and was also satisfied about his driving skills, before employing him as the driver for driving the vehicle. In his cross-examination by the insurer, t... | 1[ds]7. We have perused the entire pleadings and the evidence on record as also the judgments of the Tribunal and the High Court. It is noticed that the insurer had taken a specific plea in the written statement filed before the Tribunal, that the driving licence of the driver was not a valid licence. In the alternativ... | 1 | 1,858 | 1,237 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
by the authority concerned. 8. It is also noticed that in the oral evidence, the appellant had stated... |
United India Insurance Company Limited & Another Vs. Manubhai Dharmasinhbhai Gajera & Others | appellant was, therefore, permissible. APPLICATION OF LAW 57. Keeping in view the aforementioned legal principles, we may notice the fact of each case. 58. The insurer in SLP (C) No.9877entered into a contract of mediclaim insurance in 1990 for a sum of Rs.90,000/- from 1992 to 2002. He had been making payments of the ... | 0[ds]42. A bare perusal of the said decision would show that the same was rendered in the context of contracts entered into between the State and its citizens pursuant to public auction of tenders or by negotiation. Respondents therein sought to get new term incorporated in the Contract on the specious plea of fairness... | 0 | 11,725 | 1,168 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
appellant was, therefore, permissible. APPLICATION OF LAW 57. Keeping in view the aforementioned legal princi... |
M/S GEO MILLER & CO.PVT.LTD Vs. CHAIRMAN, RAJASTHAN VIDYUT UTPADAN NIGAM LTD | It is relevant to note that the findings in Hari Shankar Singhania were made in the specific context of a family settlement. This Court specifically observed that such a settlement is to be treated differently from a formal commercial settlement, and that efforts should be made to promote family settlements without the... | 0[ds]It is settled law that the date of commencement of arbitration proceedings for the purpose of deciding which Act applies, upon a conjoint reading of Sections 21 and Section 85(2)(a) of the 1996 Act, shall be regarded as the date on which notice was served to the other party requesting appointment of an arbitrator ... | 0 | 4,545 | 2,373 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
It is relevant to note that the findings in Hari Shankar Singhania were made in the specific context of a family settlemen... |
Prs Permacel Private Limited Vs. Johnson & Johnson Employees Union (Permacel Division) & Others | of caution here that if a worker or the union pleads/furnishes even a slightest explanation for delay in submitting his/its request to the appropriate Government for reference of his/its dispute to a Labour Court or the Industrial Tribunal then the appropriate government shall leave the determination of the question of... | 0[ds]Despite giving such undertaking, the petitioner has not acted fairly. It is admitted that the demand letter was submitted to the Commissioner on 11.12.2006 as no conciliation was possible despite negotiations and keeping in view the stand of the company firstly, the matter remained under Personal Management Adviso... | 0 | 6,645 | 658 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
of caution here that if a worker or the union pleads/furnishes even a slightest explanation for delay in sub... |
Reynold Rajamani & Anr Vs. Union Of India & Anr | fostered by a recognition of the need for the individual happiness of the adult parties directly involved. But although the grounds for divorce have been liberalised, they nevertheless continue to form an exception to the general principle favouring the continuation of the marital tie. In our opinion, when a legislativ... | 0[ds]In deference to Miss Thomas vehement submissions and having regard to the importance of the question we heard her at length but we indicated that the point raised by her did not carry conviction, and we reserved judgment in order to give a fully reasoned order. Shortly thereafter, Miss Thomas put in an application... | 0 | 2,510 | 712 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
fostered by a recognition of the need for the individual happiness of the adult parties directly involved. But alt... |
Ramagya Prasad Gupta and Others and Braham Prasad Gupta and Others Vs. Shri Murli Prasad | appeal defendants 19 to 14 would not be necessary parties. There are two ways of looking at it would it be possible for defendants 12 to 14 to file a separate suit against Parasnath or the sub-share in the partnership ? could Murli Prasad, whose claim to the whole of the subject matter of the suit had been negatived, h... | 0[ds]14. In order to make the statement of relevant facts complete we may also refer to certain other proceedings though the question now involved does not arise in those proceeding. When Civil Suit No. 68/1954 was pending, Murli Prasad filed a suit for a declaration that he was the sole proprietor of the concern and t... | 0 | 4,743 | 2,051 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
appeal defendants 19 to 14 would not be necessary parties. There are two ways of looking at it would it be possible for d... |
Godrej and Boyce Manufacturers Company Limited Vs. S. B. Potnis, Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax | contractual obligations. He also drew the attention of the court to the letter dated February 14, 1991, (exhibit c), addressed by the petitioners in response to the queries raised, in which the petitioners had given the names of various personnel who had been deputed to render technical services. He highlighted the fac... | 1[ds]In the light of this principle adopted by the supreme Court for interpretation of provisions in a taxing statute intended to promote growth and development, the petitioners contend that the expression "technical services" used in sectionmust also receive a liberal interpretation as the section is intended to promo... | 1 | 2,162 | 282 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
contractual obligations. He also drew the attention of the court to the letter dated February 14, 1991,... |
Mamoo Vs. Ramunni | tenant includes a kanomdar. S.13 provides that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law, custom, usage or contract or in any decree or order of court, every tenant shall have fixity of tenure in respect of his holding, and no land from the holding shall be resumed except as provided in S.14 to 22 o... | 0[ds]We think that this contention is not open to Mr. Viswanatha Sastry. In the High Court, the appellants expressly conceded that Ex.was a kanom within the meaning of the Kerala Agrarian Relations Act, 1960. The definition of kanom in S.2(22) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 is for all practical purposes the same ... | 0 | 2,205 | 491 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
tenant includes a kanomdar. S.13 provides that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law, cus... |
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. Vs. AMIT SHRIVAS | that right to equality under Article 14 is not in negative terms (See Indian Council of Agricultural Research & Anr. v. T.K. Suryanarayan & Ors. [(1997) 6 SCC 766] 19. The conclusion to be drawn from the aforesaid is that attaining the status of permanent employee would entitle one only to a minimum of the pay-scale wi... | 0[ds]14. It is trite to say that there cannot be any inherent right to compassionate appointment but rather, it is a right based on certain criteria, especially to provide succor to a needy family. This has to be in terms of the applicable policy as existing on the date of demise, unless a subsequent policy is made app... | 0 | 3,573 | 1,668 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
that right to equality under Article 14 is not in negative terms (See Indian Council of Agricultural Resea... |
Godavari Parulekar Vs. State Of Bombay And Others | be read into the order and when that is done we have an order which specifies a shorter period, therefore S. 11-A(2) does not serve to extend her detention.(5) We are unable to accept this contention. The S. is clear and unless a shorter period is specified in the order, S. 11-A (2) applies. We cannot add the words "or... | 0[ds]The S. is clear and unless a shorter period is specified in the order, S. 11-A (2) applies. We cannot add the words "or must be deemed to have been specified by reason of the expiry of the earlier Act" into the S. We hold therefore, that S. 11-A (2) validly extended the period of detention tillAs regards the first... | 0 | 1,561 | 403 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
be read into the order and when that is done we have an order which specifies a shorter period, therefore S. 11-A(... |
R. MUTHUKUMAR & ORS Vs. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR TANGEDCO & ORS | service matters more emphatically as the service jurisprudence evolved by this Court from time to time postulates that all similarly situated persons should be treated similarly. Therefore, the normal rule would be that merely because other similarly situated persons did not approach the Court earlier, they are not to ... | 0[ds]20. A feature that stares at the face of the record before this court, is that the Division Bench, in its compromise order, proceeded to accept the terms proposed by the parties. The court did not examine - at least its order does not disclose any such consideration - the merits of the case, and why such proposal ... | 0 | 7,021 | 2,685 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
service matters more emphatically as the service jurisprudence evolved by this Court from time to time postulates that all s... |
Khardah Co. Ltd Vs. Their Workmen | the appellant urged that Mahoboob was not present on the said date, and so, the story that his request for leave was not acceded to and he had to work is altogether false and the strike had really been instigated by Jadav. On this point, the Tribunal has made a categorical finding against the appellant and in doing so,... | 0[ds]There is no doubt that this Court has consistently refrained from interfering with the conclusion reached by the enquiry officer who conducts domestic enquiries against industrial employees unless one of the four tests laid down in the case of Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. 1957-1 Lab LJ 260 : (AIR 1958 SC 130 ) ... | 0 | 4,037 | 1,712 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
the appellant urged that Mahoboob was not present on the said date, and so, the story that his request for le... |
Tarak Nath Chakraborty Vs. State of West Bengal | P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. This petition under Article 32 challenges the validity of the detention under the West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 (hereinafter called the Act).2. The District Magistrate, Malda by an order dated May 26, 1971, directed the detention of the petitioner. Accordingly, he wa... | 0[ds]3. The petitioner in his petition has stated in respect of the first ground that at the time he is alleged to have committed the act, for which he has been detained, he was in the house of his private tutor Sri Birendra Kumar Chakraborty. In respect of the second ground that on March 2, 1971, he had gone to the Ra... | 0 | 681 | 307 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. This petition under Article 32 challenges the validity of the detention under the West ... |
U. P. Sunni Central Wakf Board Vs. Md. Alim & Ors | other property belonging to the establishment. After referring to the relevant provisions of the Act the learned Judge held that the general power of superintendence conferred on the committee constituted under Section 7 of Act 20 of 1863 became vested in the appellant board constituted under the Act. The continuance o... | 1[ds]6. We are unable to share the view of the High Court. On his own reasoning the learned Judge could not have come to the conclusion at which he arrived, namely, that although the power of general superintendence of the waqf in question vested in the appellant board and that the committee constituted under S. 7 of A... | 1 | 1,949 | 404 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
other property belonging to the establishment. After referring to the relevant provisions of the Act the lea... |
Gurdial Singh Fijji Vs. State of Punjab and Others | Punjab by Shri Phuman Singh, Under Secretary in the services department, shows that after the adverse remarks were communicated to the appellant, he submitted a representation requesting that the remarks be expunged. That representation was referred by the Government to Shri Sewa Singh, retired District and Sessions Ju... | 1[ds]The course adopted by the High Court has cause to the appellant an amount of injustice which has to be rectified. It is clear that the Chief Secretary, Punjab, did not grant integrity certificate in favour of the appellant because of the adverse report in his confidential roll for the year 1966-67. One of the reas... | 1 | 4,273 | 619 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
Punjab by Shri Phuman Singh, Under Secretary in the services department, shows that after the adverse remar... |
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Vs. SMT. SURESHWATI | the misconduct alleged and found proved is such that it does not warrant dismissal or discharge The Tribunal may also hold that the order of discharge or dismissal is not justified because the alleged misconduct itself is not established by the evidence. To come to a conclusion either way, the Tribunal will have to re-... | 1[ds]13. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties, and perused the record. We find that the High Court has set aside the Award dated 22.8.2016 passed by the Labour Court on the sole ground that no disciplinary enquiry was held by the School regarding her alleged abandonment of service.14. This Court has in a c... | 1 | 4,738 | 2,682 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
the misconduct alleged and found proved is such that it does not warrant dismissal or discharge T... |
Natthu Singh & Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh | Gopal Tiwari (PW 16). If the appellants had any reason to think that the four bundles were added surreptitiously, they should have cross-examined the Investigating Officer in that respect. But this was not done even though the Investigating Officer was cross-examined at considerable length. On the other hand, the evide... | 0[ds]8. It would thus appear that the prosecution has led satisfactory evidence to prove how the appellants were bent upon obtaining the reconveyance of the "Bandhi" field from Ram Dayal and Smt. Kishori Devi, mother of Govind Das, at the original price of Rs. 6000. It will be recalled that they convened a "panchayat" ... | 0 | 4,844 | 488 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
Gopal Tiwari (PW 16). If the appellants had any reason to think that the four bundles were added surreptitiously, ... |
Union of India (UOI) and Ors Vs. V.R. Tripathi | of service which is rendered by the employee, entitling the employee and after his death, their family to pension in accordance with the rules. Even if we do accept that submission, the principle which has been laid down by this Court on the basis of Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 must find application in t... | 0[ds]The submission which has been urged on behalf of the Union of India by the learned Additional Solicitor General is premised on the basis that there is no right to compassionate appointment. There can be no doubt about the principle that there is no right as such to compassionate appointment but only an entitlement... | 0 | 4,237 | 1,272 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
of service which is rendered by the employee, entitling the employee and after his death, their famil... |
Firm Hansraj Nathu Ram Vs. Firm Lalji Raja & Sons | Morena, in what was Gwalior State and subsequently became a part of the United State named Madhya Bharat and after the Constitution the Part B State of Madhya Bharat. On the judgment-debtors objection the application for execution was dismissed on December 29, 1950, but the appeal against that order was allowed by the ... | 1[ds]6. It was next argued that the appellant firm was not a foreigner because it did not fall under the Foreigners Act (Act 31 of 1946) and reference was made to S. 2 (a)(iii) which was amended by Act 38 of 1947 on December 15, 1947; but this Act is not relevant for the purpose of finding out whether the decree was a ... | 1 | 1,323 | 256 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
Morena, in what was Gwalior State and subsequently became a part of the United State named Madhya Bharat and afte... |
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3 NAGPUR Vs. BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES LTD | of manufacturing of various kinds of papers. The dispute in this appeal relates to the assessment year 1993-94. 6. The question arose in the assessment year in question before the Assessing Officer (AO) as to what is the true nature of payment of Rs.3.25 crores made by the respondent-Company(assessee) to one Mr. G.R.Ha... | 1[ds]17. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are inclined to allow the appeal, set aside the impugned order as well as the order of the Tribunal and remand the case to the Tribunal to decide the appeal filed by the respondent-Company(assessee) afresh on merits i... | 1 | 1,306 | 416 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
of manufacturing of various kinds of papers. The dispute in this appeal relates to the assessment year 1993-9... |
Ram Vilas Service Limited, Kumbakonam Vs. M/s. Raman & Raman Private Limited & Another | Divisional Engineer of the High-ways Department.(c) Every application for variation of conditions of permit under sub-section (8) of section 57 of the Act in respect of a transport vehicle shall be in form PVA.(d) The provisions of rule 163 (b) shall, mutatis mutandis, apply to application for the variation of a permit... | 1[ds]But we are unable to read section 48 in this sense. Section 48 (3) clearly enables the Regional Transport Authority to attach to the permit any or one of the twentyone conditions. It may in a particular case put one or two or more of the conditions or it may put all the conditions. It seems to be common ground tha... | 1 | 2,069 | 643 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
Divisional Engineer of the High-ways Department.(c) Every application for variation of conditions of permit under sub-secti... |
UNION OF INDIA Vs. ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICE PROVIDERS OF INDIA | Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 (18 of 2016); or (b) offline verification under the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 (18 of 2016); or (c) use of passport issued under Section 4 of the Passports Act, 1967 (15 of 1967); or (d) use of any other... | 1[ds]This Court can examine the limited question in these proceedings whether the proceedings are resorted to as a subterfuge to avoid payment of AGR dues, and it is for the NCLT to decide whether the licence/spectrum can be transferred and be a part of the resolution process initiated under the provisions of the Code.... | 1 | 6,484 | 2,916 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 (18 of 2016); or (b) offline verification under the Aadhaar (Targeted De... |
Velvet Carpet and Co. Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax | 1. The question that needs to be decided in the present case is as to whether the Appellant/Assessee herein was entitled to weighted deduction in terms of the provision of Section 35B(1)(b)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which was the provision in force during the relevant period, i.e., the assessment year 1983-84. I... | 1[ds]2. We find that the High Court while allowing the appeal of the Department and rejecting the claim of the Assessee, observed that at no stage, the Assessee had put up a case that it had maintained branch or agency outside the country. This is clearly an erroneous finding and against the record. No doubt, the Asses... | 1 | 1,127 | 425 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
1. The question that needs to be decided in the present case is as to whether the Appellant/Assessee herein was entitled t... |
Swadeshi Industries Limited Vs. Its Workmen | date of the agreement it was long before the date of the strike. There is some substance in this complaint; but that does not take away from the validity of the finding that the strike was justified.Whether the strike was justified or not is a question of fact and when on a consideration of all the facts and circumstan... | 0[ds]5. In any case, the position in February 1951 was that since June 1949 when the case of the clerks was according to the agreement to be taken up, no settlement had been arrived at and the matter remained outstanding. In respect of the clerks therefore at least the demands for basic pay and dearness allowance etc.,... | 0 | 2,449 | 535 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
date of the agreement it was long before the date of the strike. There is some substance in this complaint; but that does no... |
T.S.Das Vs. Union Of India | to burden this judgment with the decisions considered by the Tribunal on the principle of equitable promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation, which have no application to the fact situation of the present case. 21. The original applicants contend that if the Government Policy dated 3rd July, 1976 is applied to th... | 1[ds]It is not in dispute that the applicants before the Tribunal were engaged as Sailors before 1973. The provisions concerning commissions, appointment and enrolments is found in Chapter IV of the Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as Act, of 1957).Sub-Clause (1) of Regulation 92, throws some light on this aspec... | 1 | 9,861 | 2,232 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case to predict the court's ruling (favorably (1) or unfavorably (0)), and then expound on this prediction by highlighting and analyzing key textual elements from the proceeding.
### Input:
to burden this judgment with the decisions considered by the Tribunal on the principle of equitable p... |
UNION OF INDIA Vs. VARINDERA CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR | of the parties. 9. It is well-settled cannon of law that parties are free to decide their own terms and conditions in case of a contract. In the instant case, Clause 19 of the special conditions deal with issue of bar on reimbursement of certain payments on account of escalation. It is apt to re-produce the said clause... | 1[ds]led cannon of law that parties are free to decide their own terms and conditions in case of a contract. In the instant case, Clause 19 of the special conditions deal with issue of bar on reimbursement of certain payments on account of escalation. It is apt toreproducethe said clause 19 herein below:?19. Reimbursem... | 1 | 2,237 | 1,590 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
of the parties. 9. It is well-settled cannon of law that parties are free to decide their own terms and conditions in case... |
State Of Punjab Vs. Iqbal Singh And Ors | order and the case did not fall within the purview of Art. 311(2) of the Constitution. It has been further contended by learned counsel for the appellants that it was the judgment of this Court in M. Narasimachar v. The State of Mysore [1960 I L.L.J. 798] (1960) I S.C.R. 981; A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 247 and not the judgment i... | 0[ds]We regret we are unable to accede to these contentions.4. Though the impugned order imposing cut in pension and gratuity is not one of reduction in rank falling within the purview of Art. 311(2) yet there can be no doubt it adversely affected the respondent and such an order could not have been passed without givi... | 0 | 2,230 | 248 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
order and the case did not fall within the purview of Art. 311(2) of the Constitution. It has been further conten... |
Monitor India Private Limited Vs. The Union of India & Another | or credits made after the date on which a certificate had been issued. Since the Petitioner had already credited the amount in its books of account, the Assessing Officer has opined that the certificate for nondeduction of tax is not valid in respect of the payment of Rs.1.56 crores. Moreover, it has been stated that t... | 1[ds]10. The basis on which the assessment for Assessment Yearis sought to be reopened is set out in the reasons which were disclosed to the Petitioner on 22 March 2011. The reasons set out that the Petitioner made an application fornondeduction of TDS after the books for05 had been finalized and the amount of Rs.1.56 ... | 1 | 3,099 | 1,185 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
or credits made after the date on which a certificate had been issued. Since the Petitioner had already... |
M/s. Ganpati RV-Talleres Alegria Track Pvt. Ltd Vs. Union of India & Another | 6th Edn., p. 342) Joint venture companies are now being increasingly formed in relation to projects requiring inflow of foreign capital or technical expertise in the fast developing countries in East Asia, viz., Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, China, etc. [See Jacques Buhart : Joint Ventures in East Asia -- Legal Issues (1... | 1[ds]Keeping in view the circumstances referred to above, the course that commends us is that, while maintaining the contract awarded to Respondent 4 in respect of the directories for the years 1993 and 1994, the said contract may be set aside insofar as it relates to the directory for the year 1995 and fresh tenders m... | 1 | 4,106 | 257 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
6th Edn., p. 342) Joint venture companies are now being increasingly formed in relation to projects requiring inflow of fo... |
U.P. Pollution Control Board Vs. Modi Distillery & Ors | that although Parliament enacted the Water (Prevention of Control and Pollution) Act, 1974 to meet the urgent need for introducing a comprehensive legislation with its established unitary agencies in the Centre and the States to provide for the prevention, abatement and control of pollution of rivers and streams, for m... | 1[ds]6. On a combined reading of the provisions contained in sub-ss. (1) and (2), we have no doubt whatever that the Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Managing Director and members of the Board of Directors of Messrs Modi Industries Limited, the Company owning the industrial unit Messrs Modi Distillery could be prosecuted as ha... | 1 | 3,544 | 632 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
that although Parliament enacted the Water (Prevention of Control and Pollution) Act, 1974 to meet the urgent need for in... |
The New India Assurance Company Limited & Another Vs. Ashish Ravindra Kulkarni & Others | the decision in Rajesh is not a binding precedent.(iii) While determining the income, an addition of 50% of actual salary to the income of the deceased towards future prospects, where the deceased had a permanent job and was below the age of 40 years, should be made. The addition should be 30%, if the age of the deceas... | 1[ds]In so far as Grounds C, E and F are concerned, it is pertinent to note that the AppellantInsurance Company has not pleaded the case sought to be urged by the said grounds in the written statement. As indicated above, the AppellantInsurance Company has not led any evidence in rebuttal. Hence in the absence of any p... | 1 | 4,307 | 846 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
the decision in Rajesh is not a binding precedent.(iii) While determining the income, an addition of 50... |
BAYAJI SAMBHU MALI @BORATE(D) THR. LRS Vs. NAZIR MOHAMMED B.ZARI THR.POA HOLD | be postponed as therein provided. Since T, the landlord was under no disability and was alive on April 1, 1957 his tenant J became the deemed purchaser on the tillers day. Therefore, the relationship of landlord and tenant between T and J came to be extinguished and no right could be claimed either by T or anyone claim... | 0[ds]26. Now that we have the case as setup by learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents and also the statutory scheme, we must delve a little deeper into the facts and also apply the same in the backdrop of the scheme of the Act. The High Court has proceeded on the basis that the appell... | 0 | 8,695 | 2,124 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
be postponed as therein provided. Since T, the landlord was under no disability and was alive on April 1, 1957 his tenant... |
Vijayander Kumar Vs. State Of Rajasthan | High Court by the order under Appeal. 7. Learned senior counsel for the appellants drew our attention to some letters and communications such as annexure P.1 and P.2 both dated 27.02.1998 and annexure P.10 dated 24.02.1998 to support his contention that on 24.02.1998 itself the change in the management was brought to t... | 0[ds]11. No doubt, the views ofin respect of averments and allegations in the FIR were in the context of a prayer to quash the FIR itself but in the facts of this case those findings and observations are still relevant and they do not support the contentions on behalf of the appellants. At the present stage when the in... | 0 | 1,921 | 313 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
High Court by the order under Appeal. 7. Learned senior counsel for the appellants drew our attention to so... |
Anar Devi (D) through LR Vs. Vasudev Mangal Etc. Etc | M.R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 11.08.2020 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur in the respective writ petitions, by which the High Court has partly allowed the writ petitions preferred by the respondents herein – jud... | 1[ds]4. From the impugned common judgment and order passed by the High Court, it appears that while reducing the amount of mesne profits, what has weighed with the High Court is that the premises is residential, being used for residential purposes and the construction is about 100 years old and that the report of the a... | 1 | 711 | 148 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
M.R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 11.08... |
United India Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. M/S. Harchand Rai Chandan Lal | Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Samayanallur Primary Agricultural Co-op. Bank reported in AIR 2000 87 SC 10. In this case question came for interpretation of the similar policy, i.e. policy against burglary. The Bank had two insurance policies with the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. out of which one was cash insurance... | 1[ds]Similarly in the case of General Assurance Society Ltd vs. Chandumull Jain and Anr. reported in (1966) 3 SCR 500 the Constitution Bench had observed that the policy document being a contract and it has to be read strictly. It wasinterpreting documents relating to a contract of insurance, the duty of the court is ... | 1 | 4,054 | 548 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Samayanallur Primary Agricultural Co-op. Bank reported in AIR 2000 87 SC 10... |
Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd Vs. Chief Commissioner, Delhi & Ors | relating to safety. Section 21 deals with fencing of machinery. Section 22 with work on or near machinery in motion and Section 23 with employment of young persons on dangerous machines. The other sections which may be noticed in this Chapter are Section 27 containing the prohibition of employment of women and children... | 0[ds]It is difficult to agree. In each case where the question arises whether the levy is in the nature of a fee the entire scheme of the statutory provisions, the duties and obligations imposed on the inspecting staff and the nature of work done by them will have to be examined for the purpose of determining the rende... | 0 | 2,777 | 562 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
relating to safety. Section 21 deals with fencing of machinery. Section 22 with work on or near machine... |
KAY BOUVET ENGINEERING LTD Vs. OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED | TABLE 2. The breakup of the disbursement made as follows:- TABLE 3. Please confirm receipt of the credit. [emphasis supplied] 27. It will further be relevant to refer to the communication addressed by Overseas of the same date to Mashkour:- We have been paid the advance amount to 10.05 million USD in INR by Exim Bank b... | 1[ds]13. Perusal of the aforesaid provisions would reveal that an Operational Creditor, on the occurrence of default, is required to deliver a Demand Notice of unpaid Operational Debt or a copy of invoice, demanding payment of amount involved in the default to the Corporate Debtor in such form and manner as may be pres... | 1 | 8,608 | 1,550 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
TABLE 2. The breakup of the disbursement made as follows:- TABLE 3. Please confirm receipt of the credit. [emphasi... |
Erin Estate, Galah, Ceylon Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras | stated there. In other words, the superintendent was asked to confine the purchase of the tea within the limits mentioned in the estimate which had been approved. It appears that, on receiving the opinion of the superintendent about the complaint made by Periasamy in regard to his salary, the superintendent was told to... | 0[ds]Having regard to this evidence we are unable to accept the appellants argument that the control and management of the appellants affairs was situated wholly in Ceylon.In dealing with this question it would be relevant to bear in mind that the appellant would not succeed even if it is shown that a part of the contr... | 0 | 3,603 | 539 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
stated there. In other words, the superintendent was asked to confine the purchase of the tea within the limits m... |
Banarsi Das Ahluwalia Vs. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Delhi | and in which the question about the amount of stamp duty is yet to be decided. It also held that once the Authority has decided the case the fact that proceedings for realisation of duty remain pending would not make the case a pending case. At page 321 of the report the High Court observed that the language of section... | 1[ds]Consequently, where a serious question of law was involved there was a duty cast on the Authority to state the case and the citizen had a right to have such a case determined by the High Court. There would be a breach of duty if the Authority failed to appreciate that there was a serious point of law involved and ... | 1 | 4,823 | 851 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
and in which the question about the amount of stamp duty is yet to be decided. It also held that once the ... |
M.C. V. S. Arunachala Nadar Etc Vs. The State Of Madras & Others | that the said allowance is not an admissible or a permissible trade allowance prescribed by the bye-law. The question, therefore, is whether the allowance described as mahimai is a trade allowance and if so, whether the allowance is permitted to be received by the Rules or bye-laws made under that section. The relevant... | 0[ds]3. While the object of the Act is to protect the growers, the argument proceeds, the small traders are compelled to resort to distant markets, with the result that some of them would be forced to give up their business and others would have to incur unnecessary expenditure which they could not afford. The Act is a... | 0 | 6,742 | 1,020 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
that the said allowance is not an admissible or a permissible trade allowance prescribed by the bye-law. The question, th... |
Rohitash Kumar Vs. Om Prakash Sharma | and it is not permissible, to omit any part thereof. The Court cannot proceed with the assumption that the legislature, while enacting the Statute has committed a mistake; it must proceed on the footing that the legislature intended what it has said; even if there is some defect in the phraseology used by it in framing... | 0[ds]7. This Court applied the rule of contemporanea expositio, as the Court found that the same is a well established rule of the interpretation of a statute, with reference to the exposition that it has received from contemporary authorities. However, while doing so, the Court added words of caution to the effect tha... | 0 | 4,455 | 170 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
and it is not permissible, to omit any part thereof. The Court cannot proceed with the assumption that ... |
V. B. Badami Etc Vs. State Of Mysore & Ors | 165 to 1847 are promotees to whom were allotted to substantive vacancies arising from 1st November, 1956 to 1st December, 1957 on the basis of their continuous service in the cadre. There was no quota rule for the period 1st November, 1956 to 1st December, 1957. Therefore, neither the promotions of those persons not th... | 0[ds]22. The contention of the appellants that the respondents were recruited to temporary vacancies is wrong for these principle reasons.23. First, the cadre here consists only of permanent posts. The cadre does not consist of any temporary post. The total number of vacancies between 2nd December, 1957 and 10th Septem... | 0 | 4,470 | 1,210 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
165 to 1847 are promotees to whom were allotted to substantive vacancies arising from 1st November, 195... |
Wopansao Vs. N. L. Odyuo & Ors | was no evidence to displace the statements in the present case. The evidence is that the Electoral Registration Officer accepted the statements as correct and registered the names of the personnel of the 12th Battalion. 12. The contention on behalf of the appellant was that a number having service qualification can onl... | 0[ds]8. The other ground on which the qualification of the service personnel to be registered as voters in the Wokha Constituency was questioned was that they were not Indian citizens. Article 326 of the Constitution confers voting rights on citizens of India. Section 16 of the 1950 Act disqualifies a person for regist... | 0 | 2,768 | 1,460 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
was no evidence to displace the statements in the present case. The evidence is that the Electoral Registration Officer acc... |
Rashtriya Sut Girni Mazdoor Sangh Through Its General Secretary Vs. S Government of Maharashtra,Ministry of Law and Judiciary | in the Workmen of Meenakshi Mills Ltd. (supra), we are not persuaded by the submission of the learned Counsel for the Union. In paragraph 40 of the report, the Apex Court held thus:As regards the second part of the contention relating to the discretion conferred on the appropriate Government to specify the authority wh... | 0[ds]( 8 ) THERE is no dispute that the Mill ceased production and went in liquidation in the month of February, 1969 and this Court passed winding up order in the month of September, 1973 in respect of the said Mill. There is also no dispute that in the month of February, 1974, the Mill was taken over by the Governmen... | 0 | 10,350 | 2,663 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
in the Workmen of Meenakshi Mills Ltd. (supra), we are not persuaded by the submission of the learned C... |
Promoters & Builders Assn.Of Pune Vs. State Of Maharashtra | furtherance of the object of the grant of the land in favour of the Nuclear Power Corporation. The appellant-builders contend that there is no commercial exploitation of the dug up earth inasmuch as the same is redeployed in the construction activity itself. In the case of the Nuclear Power Corporation it is the specif... | 1[ds]If it were a mere question of Mines and Minerals Act, 1957 covering the removal of earth, there cannot be possibly any doubt whatever, now, in view of the very wide definition of the term contained in the enactment itself, and as interpreted by the authoritative pronouncements of the Supreme Court. As noted earlie... | 1 | 3,278 | 331 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
furtherance of the object of the grant of the land in favour of the Nuclear Power Corporation. The appellant... |
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Gujarat Cypromet Ltd | incurred by the Assessee according to the method of accounting regularly employed by him) only in computing the income referred to in Section 28 of that previous year in which such sum is actually paid by him. 8. As noted above, Explanation 3C was inserted by the Finance Act, 2006, with retrospective effect from April ... | 1[ds]9. The appellate authority has noticed the facts in para 12 as extracted above which needs no repetition10. The interest liability which accrued during the relevant assessment year was not actually paid back by the Assessee rather was sought to be adjusted in the further loan of Rs. 8 crores which was obtained by ... | 1 | 2,364 | 896 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
incurred by the Assessee according to the method of accounting regularly employed by him) only in computing ... |
Anversinh @ Kiransinh Fatesinh Zala Vs. State of Gujarat | illustrates how the appellant had drawn the prosecutrix out of the custody of her parents. Even more crucially, there is little to suggest that she was aware of the full purport of her actions or that she possessed the mental acuities and maturity to take care of herself. In addition to being young, the prosecutrix was... | 1[ds]11. Having given our thoughtful consideration to the rival submissions, it appears to us that although worded succinctly, the impugned judgment does not err in appreciating the law on kidnapping.12. A perusal of Section 361 of IPC shows that it is necessary that there be an act of enticing or taking, in addition t... | 1 | 3,852 | 1,833 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
illustrates how the appellant had drawn the prosecutrix out of the custody of her parents. Even more crucial... |
State of Kerala and Others Etc Vs. T.N. Peter and Another Etc | building at 70 % of the market value? All three objects are public purposes and as far as the owner is concerned it does not matter to him whether it is one public purpose or the other. Art. 14 confers an individual right and in order to justify a classification there should be something which justifies a different tre... | 1[ds]An argument was put forward that under the Land Acquisition Act there is thus a protection against unlimited uncertainty for the owners once lands are frozen in the matter of dealing with them by an initial notification. This protection against protraction and inaction on the part of the State and immobilisation o... | 1 | 5,942 | 1,825 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
building at 70 % of the market value? All three objects are public purposes and as far as the owner is conce... |
Birla Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Wealth Tax, Westbengal, Calcutta | the High Court an erroneous figure did not become a correct figure by lapse of time. The following portion of the judgment of the High Court may be reproduced:"The Tribunal was, therefore, in a sense right in excluding a sum of Rs. 1,45,00,000/- from the net value of the assets as shown in the balance sheet of the asse... | 1[ds]It is quite clear that under section 7 (2) of the Act the Wealth Tax Officer may determine the net value of the assets of the business as a whole having regard to the balance sheet of the business as on the valuation date. It must be remembered that under S. 211 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, every balance she... | 1 | 1,704 | 867 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
the High Court an erroneous figure did not become a correct figure by lapse of time. The following port... |
TELANGANA STATE SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. Vs. M/S SRIGDHAA BEVERAGES | This Court elucidated the position in the context of Section 24 of the Electricity Act, 1910, to emphasise that under Section 2(c) of the Electricity Act, a consumer means any person who is supplied with energy, and since liability to pay electricity dues is fastened only on the consumer, at the relevant time, the purc... | 1[ds]8. We have examined the submissions in the contours of the aforesaid controversy, and take note of the fact that in the case of Isha Marbles, (supra) the sale was in pursuance of Section 29(1) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, but the important aspect was that there was no clause specifically dealing ... | 1 | 2,549 | 900 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
This Court elucidated the position in the context of Section 24 of the Electricity Act, 1910, to emphas... |
Avinash Hansraj Gajbhiye Vs. Official Liquidator,M/S. V.Pharma.P.Ltd | interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum with effect from 6.10.1996 along with the costs of the proceedings. The order dated 22.7.1999 that was sought to be challenged was the order on the misfeasance application. The order dated 16.8.2002 was one by which the Company Judge rejected an application for review filed... | 0[ds]While dismissing the Petition for review of the order dated 7.9.2001, on 16.8.2002, the Company Judge found on the basis of the material on record of Company Application No. 40 of 1999 and the contentions sought to be raised by the appellant that there was no error apparent on the face of the record in the order d... | 0 | 1,313 | 228 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum with effect from 6.10.1996 along with the costs of the proce... |
VIRUDHUNAGAR HINDU NADARGAL DHARMA PARIBALANA SABAI Vs. TUTICORIN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY | grounds on which the respondents 1 and 2 invoked the jurisdiction of the High court. This is why, a 3 member Bench of this court, while overruling the decision in Surya Dev Rai vs. Ram Chander Rai (2003) 6 SCC 675 , pointed out in Radhey Shyam Vs. Chhabi Nath (2015) 5 SCC 423 that orders of civil court stand on differe... | 1[ds]11. Primarily the High Court, in our view, went wrong in overlooking the fact that there was already an appeal in C.M.A. No. 1 of 2018 filed before the Sub-Court at Tuticorin under Order XLI, Rule 1 (r) of the Code, at the instance of the fifth defendant in the suit (third respondent herein), as against the very s... | 1 | 2,274 | 1,444 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
grounds on which the respondents 1 and 2 invoked the jurisdiction of the High court. This is why, a 3 m... |
Gujarat Electricity Board,Thermal Power Station, Ukai, Guja Vs. Hind Mazdoor Sabha & Ors | question of the status of the workmen of the erstwhile contractor once the contract is abolished by the appropriate Government. Hence as far as the question of determination of the status of the workmen is concerned, it remains open for decisions by the industrial adjudicator. There is nothing in the Act which can be c... | 0[ds]15. It is no doubt true that neither S.10 of the Act nor any other provision thereof provides for determination of the status of the workmen of the erstwhile contractor once the appropriate Government abolishes the contract labour. In fact, on the abolition of the contract, the workmen are in a worse condition sin... | 0 | 24,209 | 4,200 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
question of the status of the workmen of the erstwhile contractor once the contract is abolished by the appr... |
State Of Kerala Vs. Shri M. Appukutty | (3A) ex facie properly fall under S. 19(2) (f). In any event, as was said by the Privy Council in Emperor v. Sibnath Banerji, 72 Ind App 241: (AIR 1945 PC 156 ) the rule making power is conferred by sub-s. (1) of that section and the function of sub-s. (2) is merely illustrative and the rules which are referred to in s... | 1[ds]It is true that the substantive provisions of the Act do not expressly deal with the power and procedure for assessment of escaped turnover, the legislature has left it to be dealt with by statutory rules to be framed under S. 19, and R. 17 has been framed thereunder. Rule 17 (1) and (3A) ex facie properly fall un... | 1 | 2,872 | 384 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
(3A) ex facie properly fall under S. 19(2) (f). In any event, as was said by the Privy Council in Emperor v.... |
Dondeti Copi Reddy and Others Vs. Shri Anjaneya Swamyvaru Agraharam and Another | 1. The appellants claim to be tenants of certain lands under two lease deeds executed in their favour by one Bachinapu Subbayya. The lands belonged to two temples which brought the present suits against the appellants for possession of the lands and for mesne profits on the allegation that the appellants were trespasse... | 0[ds]But we find it difficult to entertain counsels submission for the reason that is being made for the first time in this Court and it would be necessary to investigate into fresh facts for the purpose of determining the validity of that submission. The point which the counsel is attempting to make before us appears ... | 0 | 428 | 164 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
1. The appellants claim to be tenants of certain lands under two lease deeds executed in their favour by on... |
Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Vs. Union of India & Another | day of assessment.7. There was NIL Normal Delivery & only 1 Caesarean Section on day of assessment.8. Data of OPD attendance and Laboratory & X-ray investigations provided by the Institute appear to be inflated.9. There were only 05 patients in Casualty at the time of taking round.10. Workload of Antenatal USG was NIL ... | 1[ds]8. On a plain reading of the aforesaid decision, it is crystal clear that the Competent Authority has merely relied on the recommendation made by the Hearing Committee. The recommendation of the Hearing Committee, as extracted in paragraph 10 of the same decision, however, is an inconclusive opinion. The Hearing C... | 1 | 2,061 | 437 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
day of assessment.7. There was NIL Normal Delivery & only 1 Caesarean Section on day of assessment.8. Data... |
State Of Punjab & Ors Vs. M/S. Chandu Lal Kishori Lal & Ors. Etc | but not including cotton waste. Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax, 1956 has been amended from time to time. Originally Section 15 reads as follows:-"15. Restrictions and conditions in regard to tax on sales or purchases of declared goods: Notwithstanding anything contained in the sales tax law of any State, the tax p... | 0[ds]In our opinion, the appellants are right in their contention that the ginning process is a manufacturing process. But the question presented for determination in the present case is somewhat different viz., whether the respondent is entitled to the exemption under Section 5 (2) (a) (vi) of the Act in the context a... | 0 | 1,864 | 418 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
but not including cotton waste. Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax, 1956 has been amended from time to time... |
R.C. Jall & Others Vs. Union of India & Another | of the Ordinance clearly demonstrates that the duty imposed is in essence an excise duty and there is a rational connection between the said tax and the person on whom it is imposed. Section 2 of Ordinance 39 of 1944 clearly shows that the tax is an excise duty on the manufacture or production of coal or coke. Section ... | 0[ds]These two contentions do not find place in the statement of case as they should. Under Order XVIII R. 2 of the Supreme Court Rules, each party shall lodge is case within the time prescribed therein, and, under R. 3 thereof, the said case shall consist of two parts, and Part II, which is relevant now, says that it ... | 0 | 5,467 | 1,915 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
of the Ordinance clearly demonstrates that the duty imposed is in essence an excise duty and there is a ra... |
Madley Pharmaceuticals Ltd Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Daman & Another | Juris Secundum, Vol. LVII, pp. 1067-68.)” 34. It is settled law that this Court should follow an earlier decision that has withstood the changes in time, irrespective of the rationale of the view taken. It was held by a Constitution Bench in the case of Waman Rao v. Union of India, (1981) 2 SCC 362 : “40. It is also tr... | 1[ds]28. We agree with Mr. Ganesh, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, that the manufacture of patent and proprietary drugs is completed only after the labelling is completed, for the purpose of levy of excise duty. However, on a perusal of the labelling provisions in the Drug Rules, we find that they deal with t... | 1 | 7,744 | 720 | ### Instruction:
Predict the outcome of the case proceeding (1 for acceptance, 0 for rejection) and subsequently provide an explanation based on significant sentences in the proceeding.
### Input:
Juris Secundum, Vol. LVII, pp. 1067-68.)” 34. It is settled law that this Court should follow an earlier decision that has... |
Joginder Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another | leave is directed against the order dated April 21, 1977 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana determining the interest payable on the compensation awarded to the appellants for the acquisition of their land by the State Government. 2. A notification under Section 4 of the land Acquisition Act was made on August 31, ... | 1[ds]A curious inconsistency, however, entered thereafter in the judgment of the High Court. On the amount determined as compensation by the Land Acquisition Officer and the learned District Judge the High Court held that the higher rate of interest at 6 per cent per annum was attracted, and interest at that rate rule ... | 1 | 1,080 | 618 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
leave is directed against the order dated April 21, 1977 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana determining ... |
State of Kerala Vs. Messrs Moolji Vissanji | Hegde, J.1. These appeals by certificate raise a common question of law. We shall refer to that question presently. The respondent-assessee was assessed to sales tax for the year 1957-58, 1958-59 and 1959-60 in February, 1961. At time of the said assessment, he was granted certain exemptions by the Sales Tax Officer. O... | 1[ds]3. The decision of the Kerala High Court in State of Kerala vs. K. E. Nainan was overruled by this Court in State of Kerala vs. K. E. Nainan, and the decision of this Court in State of Mysore vs. Yaddalam Lakshminarasimhiah Setty & Sons is no more good in view of the amendments with retrospective effect made later... | 1 | 519 | 224 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
Hegde, J.1. These appeals by certificate raise a common question of law. We shall refer to that question pr... |
V. Sumatiben Maganlal Manani (dead) by L.R Vs. Uttamchand Kashiprasad Shah & Another | the evidence is that the day on which the Commissioner visited the suit shop was found closed. The photographs taken by the photographer on a stray day shows that the suit shop was found closed and the oral evidence of the plaintiff was believed.” 19. In our view, the criticism by the High Court of the appellate court ... | 1[ds]Maganbhai Manani, the husband and the power of attorney holder of the plaintiff in his deposition before the court fully supported the case of the plaintiff on the question of non-user as well. Apart from the evidence of the plaintiff, there were two sets of photographs, one taken on January 4, 1977 and the other ... | 1 | 5,053 | 1,135 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the case proceeding to forecast the court's decision (1 for yes, 0 for no), and elucidate the reasoning behind this prediction with important textual evidence from the case.
### Input:
the evidence is that the day on which the Commissioner visited the suit shop was found closed. The photograp... |
Divisional Controller, N.E.K.R.T.C Vs. H. Amaresh | employer unless there exists a statutory provision in this behalf. Moreover, Labour Courts must act within the four corners of the statute concerned, in terms of the provisions thereof. When the Labour Court having held that charge No.4 stood proved, no interference by the learned Single Judge or by the Division Bench ... | 1[ds]The High Court and the Labour Court failed to consider all the cogent evidence and documents produced by the Corporation before them. The Labour Court has miserably erred by not considering that the respondent was in a drunken condition when there was no denial on the part of the workmen to that effect. By not con... | 1 | 3,798 | 984 | ### Instruction:
Make a prediction on the court's ruling (acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the petition), and then dissect the proceeding to provide a detailed explanation using key textual passages.
### Input:
employer unless there exists a statutory provision in this behalf. Moreover, Labour Courts must act within... |
FRANKLIN TEMPLETON TRUSTEE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER Vs. AMRUTA GARG AND OTHERS ETC | to be the best way to ensure a fair and equitable distribution of monies to unitholders while minimizing erosion in value for investors. It is also the contention of the trustees that they were required to justify and explain the reasons for winding up of the six schemes and hence the notice was worded in this manner. ... | 1[ds]Pertinently, after receipt of the forensic audit report, SEBI has issued show cause notice which is pending adjudication. Common people invest in mutual funds driven by factors such as simplicity in purchase and redemption of units, flexibility of holding and tenure, and liquidity by conversion into money. In the ... | 1 | 10,754 | 5,782 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
to be the best way to ensure a fair and equitable distribution of monies to unitholders while minimizin... |
SUGANDHI (dead) by Lrs. & ANR Vs. P. RAJKUMAR REP. BY HIS POWER AGENT IMAM OLI | the Order dated 19.02.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, Madurai Bench, in C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2609 of 2018 whereby the High Court has dismissed the revision petition filed by the appellants challenging the refusal to entertain an application under Order 8 Rule 1A(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19... | 1[ds]Sub-rule (1) mandates the defendant to produce the documents in his possession before the court and file the same along with his written statement. He must list out the documents which are in his possession or power as well as those which are not. In case the defendant does not file any document or copy thereof al... | 1 | 1,140 | 480 | ### Instruction:
Project the court's decision (favor (1) or against (0) the appeal) based on the case proceeding, and subsequently give an in-depth explanation by analyzing relevant sentences from the document.
### Input:
the Order dated 19.02.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, Madurai Bench, in C.... |
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Dharam Chand | Aftab Alam, J. 1. This appeal arises from a motor accident claim. 2. In this case, the premium cheque for the insurance policy was received by the appellant, the insurance company, on May 7, 1998 at 4.00 pm and a cover note was issued at the same time. In columns 3 & 4 of the cover note, however, it was stated that the... | 0[ds]4. The insurance company sought to disown its liability on the plea that the accident took place before the commencement of the insurance as indicated in the cover note. But, both the Tribunal and the High Court, turned down the plea and held the insurance company liable to pay the compensation amount.When this ap... | 0 | 264 | 146 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
Aftab Alam, J. 1. This appeal arises from a motor accident claim. 2. In this case, the premium cheque for t... |
Lalit Mohan Deb & Ors Vs. Union Of India & Ors | be placed in the scale given to the selection grade i.e. Rupees 225-10-325-15-400/- a relief which the courts could, obviously, not grant. It is for the Administration to determine how many Assistants should be in the Secretariat and what should be their scale of pay. The normal scale of Assistants is Rs. 150-5-195-EB-... | 0[ds]Since we are satisfied that there is no merit in the appeal it is not necessary to consider the preliminary objection.6. The Writ Petition was really misconceived. There were 101 posts of Assistants in the Secretariat Prior to 1-7-1959 their pay scale was Rupees 80-4-160-5-180. All the Assistants were entitled to ... | 0 | 1,847 | 1,286 | ### Instruction:
Estimate the outcome of the case (positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant) and then give a reasoned explanation by examining important sentences within the case documentation.
### Input:
be placed in the scale given to the selection grade i.e. Rupees 225-10-325-15-400/- a relief which the court... |
Muthuswami Vs. State of Madras | namely Hanifa (P. W. 2) and Ghouse (P. W. 5), and rejected the confession on the ground that it was not voluntary. But he believed the third eye-witness Jamal (P. W. 1) who he thought was corroborated by certain other evidence and based his conviction on that. He also convicted another accused Pongiannan, with whom we ... | 1[ds]The deceased was murdered about midday ones P. Ws. 1, 2 and 5 and two morewho have not been called were examined by the police on the same day at the inquest. Despite that neither the appellant nor hiswere arrested. This may have been because they could not be found or it may be that the descriptions given were no... | 1 | 1,133 | 805 | ### Instruction:
Forecast the likely verdict of the case (granting (1) or denying (0) the appeal) and then rationalize your prediction by pinpointing and explaining pivotal sentences in the case document.
### Input:
namely Hanifa (P. W. 2) and Ghouse (P. W. 5), and rejected the confession on the ground that it was not... |
Bhaiyalal Vs. State of Maharashtra | :"The applicant is holding office of Patwari. The competent and appropriate authority to appoint or remove the Patwari from his office, is Collector of the District. The Collector has not applied his mind to the facts of this case in the matter of one hoof domain safeguards available onto public servants against frivol... | 0[ds]But we are unable to hold as contended on behalf of the appellant that this section deprives theOfficers of the power to appoint Patwaris conferred on them by virtue of Sections 10 and 11, read with clause (i) of Schedule II. Afaint attempt was no doubt made on behalf of the appellant to persuade us to hold that S... | 0 | 2,695 | 885 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
:"The applicant is holding office of Patwari. The competent and appropriate authority to appoint or remove the Patwari from ... |
M/S SHAHI AND ASSOCIATES Vs. STATE OF U.P | date of actual payment. The operative portion of the award is:"According to the above, the petitioner becomes entitled for receiving a total amount of Rs. 17,86,339.00 (Rs. Seventeen lac eighty six thousand three hundred thirty nine only) and the petitioner is hereby awarded the same. From the date of award to the actu... | 1[ds]11. Section 31(7)(b) of the Act of 1996 clearly mandates that, in the event the Arbitrator does not give any specific directions as regards the rate of interest on the amount awarded, such amount shall carry interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of award till the date of payment. Since the Arbitration Act, 1940 has be... | 1 | 1,505 | 440 | ### Instruction:
Conjecture the end result of the case (acceptance (1) or non-acceptance (0) of the appeal), followed by a detailed explanation using crucial sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
date of actual payment. The operative portion of the award is:"According to the above, the petitioner becomes enti... |
Shivdev Singh Vs. The State Of Punjab(And Connected Petition) | best and thus two acres of barani land will be equal to one standard acre. Bhud is the worst and rate at 25 per centum and four acres of bhud are equal to one standard acre. Thus if the valuation given in Sch. A is accepted, bhud is only half as productive as sailabi.16. Therefore when Sch. C fixes one standard for uni... | 1[ds]We cannot agree with this contention. It is true that the Commission would have to decide whether a farm is entitled to the benefit of S. 32K. If no rules had been framed the matter would have been left at large for determination of the Commission to the next of its ability. It is true that the Commission consists... | 1 | 8,496 | 4,289 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
best and thus two acres of barani land will be equal to one standard acre. Bhud is the worst and rate at 25 per centum and f... |
NAMAN VERMA Vs. THE DIRECTOR, THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY & ORS | 1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 17.04.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.6818 of 2013. 2. Claiming to be suffering from learning disabilities known as Dyscalculia, the appellant preferred the aforestated writ petition praying for following principal relief: ... | 1[ds]8. At the outset, it must be mentioned that 1995 Act now stands replaced by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (2016 Act for short).9. It is submitted that considering the provisions of the 2016 Act in any event of the matter, the entitlement of the appellant is certainly made out. We need not go in... | 1 | 406 | 74 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 17.04.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bomba... |
JITEN K. AJMERA Vs. M/S TEJAS CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY | referred to as “the National Commission”). The Revision Petition was filed to challenge the Interim Order dated 10.12.2015 passed by the State Commission Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 85 of 2013. The Appellants herein had filed an ... | 1[ds]3.1. We have perused the Application filed by the Appellants herein for bringing additional evidence on record, along with the documents sought to be produced in the pending Appeal before the State Commission. These documents have admittedly come into existence after the Appeal was filed before the State Commissio... | 1 | 1,155 | 222 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
referred to as “the National Commission”). The Revision Petition was filed to challenge the Interim Order dated 10.12.201... |
Gursahai Saigal Vs. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Punjab | the amount of his emoluments for the period beginning on the sixth day of April in that year and ending on the date of the cessation" came up for construction. It was contended that a sum of pound 10, 000 which became payable to the assessee as the executor of the deceased holder of an office under the terms on which t... | 0[ds]The object of this rule is to prevent a taxing statute being construed "according to its intent, though not according to its words": In re Bethlem Hospital ((1875) L.R. 19 Eq. 475, 459.). This Court has accepted this rule. Bhagwati J. in A. V. Fernandez v. The State of Kerala ([1957] S.C.R. 83 7, 847.) said, "If..... | 0 | 3,210 | 1,130 | ### Instruction:
Speculate on the likely judgment (yes (1) or no (0) to the appeal) and then delve into the case proceeding to elucidate your prediction, focusing on critical sentences.
### Input:
the amount of his emoluments for the period beginning on the sixth day of April in that year and ending on the date of the... |
Yusufbhai Noormohmed Nandoliya Vs. State Of Gujarat | an award shall be made. - The Collector shall make an award under Section 11 within a period of two years from the date of the publication of the declaration and if no award is made within that period, the entire proceedings for the acquisition of the land shall lapse Provided that in a case where the said declaration ... | 0[ds]8. The said Explanation is in the widest possible terms and, in our opinion, there is no warrant for limiting the action or proceedings referred to in the Explanation to actions or proceedings preceding the making of the award under Section 11 of the said Act. In the first place, as held by the learned Single Judg... | 0 | 1,948 | 297 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
an award shall be made. - The Collector shall make an award under Section 11 within a period of two yea... |
Ashutosh Vs. State Of Rajasthan | such person be tried and determined in any manner in which any issue in a suit may be tried and determined.(3) Where the liability of any person has been tried and determined under sub-rule (2), the order made thereon shall have the same force and be subject to the same conditions as to appeal or otherwise as if it wer... | 0[ds]10. Both the contentions raised by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant have absolutely no merit. It is not in dispute that the decree was passed against the firm in which Smt. Dhanwanti Devi was also a partner. Under the provisions of the Partnership Act, one partner is the agent of the other. The part... | 0 | 4,148 | 497 | ### Instruction:
Determine the likely decision of the case (acceptance (1) or rejection (0)) and follow up with an explanation highlighting key sentences that support this prediction.
### Input:
such person be tried and determined in any manner in which any issue in a suit may be tried and determined.(3) Where the lia... |
MUZAFFAR HUSAIN Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR | enquiry report submitted by the Enquiry Officer, Full Court of the High Court had resolved on 02.09.2006 to accept the said enquiry report and punish the appellant with curtailment of 90% of pensionary benefit with immediate effect. The order of punishment passed by the respondent-State on the basis of the said recomme... | 0[ds]5. At the outset, it may be noted that maintenance of high standard of conduct and character of the judicial officers has always been a matter of great concern for this court. In C. Ravichandran Iyer Vs. Justice A.M. Bhattacharjee & Ors. (1995) 5 SCC 457, this court emphasizing the need to maintain high standard ... | 0 | 5,227 | 2,345 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
enquiry report submitted by the Enquiry Officer, Full Court of the High Court had resolved on 02.09.200... |
Burn Standard Company Limited Vs. Mcdermott International Inc. And Another | taken by the RBI as disclosed in the further affidavit of January 24, 1991 leave no doubt that the remittance was permitted only after the RBI was satisfied that all the terms and conditions were duly satisfied. To place the matter beyond the pale of doubt, the further affidavit filed on behalf of the RBI carries the f... | 0[ds]e think there is considerable force in this contention for the simple reason that we are concerned with the factum of permission and not the procedure followed by the RBI for granting the same. The prescription of the form is merely to aid the RBI to process the application for permission. Emphasis must be laid on... | 0 | 7,627 | 518 | ### Instruction:
Ascertain if the court will uphold (1) or dismiss (0) the appeal in the case proceeding, and then clarify this prediction by discussing critical sentences from the text.
### Input:
taken by the RBI as disclosed in the further affidavit of January 24, 1991 leave no doubt that the remittance was permitt... |
Board Of The Trustees,Port Of Kolkata Vs. Efclon Tie-Up Pvt. Ltd. | Company. Any adverse orders passed by this Court, at this stage, would affect the right and interest of the members of the union. The Company was directed to be wound up and the Official Liquidator was directed to take charge of the assets and properties. The assets and properties thereof were put up for sale in terms ... | 1[ds]We are of the opinion that:1. There is no right over the property of the Port Trust existing with the respondent No.1 (Efclon) as claimed by them. In the present case only the assets of the company which was liquidated has been bought by the respondents, the land belonged to the Port Trust. Even according to the o... | 1 | 4,526 | 1,221 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
Company. Any adverse orders passed by this Court, at this stage, would affect the right and interest of... |
Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income Tax and Sales Tax, Central Zone, Ernakulam Vs. Kotak and Co | the price was subject to variation depending upon the import duty, freight rate, insurance premium and exchange rate, that it was specifically provided that the sale was subject to import licence to be provided by the mills, that the contract was irrevocable and that any difference between the parties had to be resolve... | 0[ds]6.From the facts set out above it is clear that this case clearly falls within the rule laid down by this Court in K. G. Khosla and Co. v. Deputy Commr. of Commercial Taxes (l966) 3 SCR 352 =(AIR 1966 SC 1216 ). The appellant therein imported certain goods from Belgium in order to fulfill a contract with certain... | 0 | 1,974 | 293 | ### Instruction:
First, predict whether the appeal in case proceeding will be accepted (1) or not (0), and then explain the decision by identifying crucial sentences from the document.
### Input:
the price was subject to variation depending upon the import duty, freight rate, insurance premium and exchange rate, that ... |
Management Hotel Imperial, New Delhi Vs. Hotel Workers' Union | being itself referred in express terms.23. The, next question is as to, how the tribunal should proceed in the matter if it decides to grant interim relief. The definition of the word "award" shows that it can be either an interim or final determination either of the whole of the dispute referred to the tribunal or of ... | 1[ds]17. We shall assume that the interim order passed by the Tribunal on December 5,1955, could not be enforced as it was in the nature of an award and should have been submitted to the government and published under S. 17 to become enforceable under S. 17-A.It is, however, still open to us to consider whether we shou... | 1 | 6,025 | 424 | ### Instruction:
Hypothesize the court's verdict (affirmation (1) or negation (0) of the appeal), and then clarify this hypothesis by interpreting significant sentences from the case proceeding.
### Input:
being itself referred in express terms.23. The, next question is as to, how the tribunal should proceed in the ma... |
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,West Bengal, Calcutta Vs. Raja Benoy Kumar Sahas Roy | position. In the first instance, it is defined as rent or revenue derived from land which is used for agricultural purposes; and it is next defined as income derived from such land by agriculture or by the activities described in clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 2(1)(b) of the Act. These activities are postulated to b... | 0[ds]An argument based on entries 14 and 19 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution may be disposed of at once.It was urged that entry No. 14 referred to agriculture including agricultural education and research, protection against pests and prevention of plant diseases while entry No. 19 referred to for... | 0 | 21,967 | 1,621 | ### Instruction:
Judge the probable resolution of the case (approval (1) or disapproval (0)), and elaborate on this forecast by extracting and interpreting significant sentences from the proceeding.
### Input:
position. In the first instance, it is defined as rent or revenue derived from land which is used for agricul... |
Vishwa Development Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan | KULDIP SINGH, J.Vishwa Dev Sharma and Anand Dev Sharma were convicted under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (for short the Act) by the Rajasthan High Court. They were sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months. This appeal under section 19 of the Act has been filed by Vishwa Dev Sharma against... | 1[ds]5. We are not inclined to interfere with the conviction of the appellant and, as such, we uphold the judgment of the High Court to that extent. Keeping in view the age, health and other facts and circumstances of this case, we are of the view that the ends of justice would be met if instead of sentence of imprison... | 1 | 807 | 80 | ### Instruction:
Predict whether the case will result in an affirmative (1) or negative (0) decision for the appeal, and then provide a thorough explanation using key sentences to support your prediction.
### Input:
KULDIP SINGH, J.Vishwa Dev Sharma and Anand Dev Sharma were convicted under the Contempt of Courts Act,... |
Commnr. Of Income Tax, Bangalore Vs. M/S. Century Building Industries Pvt.Ltd | a banking company to which the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949) applies (including any bank or banking institution referred to in section 51 of that Act); or (b) time deposits with a co-operative society engaged in carrying on the business of banking; (c) deposits with a public company which is formed and regi... | 1[ds]7. The material expression in Section 194A(1) of the Act isthe time of credit of such income to the account of theWhen interest is debited tohe debit is for a specific amount calculated with reference to the liability of the deductor to a particular creditor in accordance with the terms and conditions of the loan.... | 1 | 2,726 | 272 | ### Instruction:
Decide if the appeal in the case proceeding is more likely to be successful (1) or unsuccessful (0), and then justify your decision by focusing on essential sentences in the document.
### Input:
a banking company to which the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949) applies (including any bank or ban... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.